The Glenn Beck Program - Best of The Program | 2/8/21

Episode Date: February 8, 2021

The Supreme Court will review the necessity of the Fourth Amendment, along with multiple 2020 election lawsuits. A column in the L.A. Times called “What can you do about the Trumpites next door?” complains after a neighbor shoveled the author’s driveway. The Hyppo Awards are coming, and Glenn goes over the endless list of nominees. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Pat Gray, who was just incredible on and off the field today. Pat, how do you feel? Ooh, I'm spent now because it was... It was quite a show, quite a show, quite a show. It was three hours of solid action. Yeah, and we only got hitting the face mask with the ball a couple of times. Yeah, like three or four. Yeah, but that's it.

But that's it. Yeah. We talk about the Super Bowl a little bit, some of the commercials. Also on today's podcast, we told you about, a woman that has just been arrested and tried as a 95-year-old in a Polish court, but she was tried in juvenile court. You have to hear that story and how it connects to something that I honestly thought for all weekend was a parody, something that was satire,

something that was trying to make an opposite point. But no, it turns out it wasn't the op-ed piece. So what do we do with all that? all the Trumpites that live next door. You don't want to miss the second of the day show. You're listening to. Just a refresher on the Fourth Amendment. Do you remember the third, of course, is not quartering soldiers.

The Fourth Amendment is... Fourth Amendment. Warrantless searches. Warrantless searches? Yes. I was just going to say. Fourth Amendment is the right against warrantless searches. of a person's home.

It is one of, I mean, it's number four. It's one of the things that really set us apart forever. We have been set apart in, in, in many places. Have you seen the movie or the series Criminal? No. It's a, it's a really good show, I think. It's from Great Britain, at least the first one I watch was from Great Britain. Is it Netflix?

Yeah, Netflix. And then there's a version from France. France, Germany, and Spain. And so, and they're different stories and different actors in different countries, obviously. And I was watching the one, I think, from Spain. And I'm like, what? You can't. Oh, crap.

You can do that in Spain. Same in Germany. They do things. The police do things. You're like, uh, they can do war. Excuse me? Searches. Oh, it's crazy.

What's an amazing protection. It really is. So now the Supreme Court. is looking in to see if that really is something we should worry about. So before a police officer or any other governor official can enter your home, they have to show a judge that they have probable cause that they will discover specific evidence of a crime. This was because the king, and this is what the Stasi did, this is what the KGB did, this is what all of the Marxists do.

they just go into a house and they say, we know they're hiding something. I mean, look at them. We know they're hiding something. And they'll tear your house apart. And they'll do it sometimes just to harass other times because they really think that they have something on you. But it doesn't matter in the end.

And they can come into your house at any time. Now, there are some exceptions to this right. I wasn't aware of this. But it makes sense. the exceptions are police officer looks through a window sees a person about to stab another person can the officer go in and stop the attack he doesn't have a warrant yes because there's a probable cause right yeah i would say extreme circumstantable cause or extreme circumstances and it is it falls under emergency aid yep uh and extreme circumstances so if

somebody, if the officer looks through the same window and see somebody collapsing from a heart attack, they can go in and help. They can go in and help. Neither of these, the court have ruled, violate the Fourth Amendment. However, there is something else called the community caretaking exception. Originally, it comes from a case in which police took a gun out of the trunk of an impounded vehicle without obtaining a warrant. The Supreme court held that there was a community caretaking exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant

required because police perform community caretaking functions totally divorced from the detection, investigation, and acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute. Stop it. That's ridiculous. That's insane.

I mean, you're completely negating the Fourth Amendment there. I know. Their case was, this is an abandoned car. Wow. And You can't just leave a gun in the car. Okay. All right. Now, in the first two exceptions, you can understand it.

This last exception is not limited to an immediate emergency. Okay? That's just, I'm just performing a common good. Okay. Here's the new case. Does this apply to a person's home? Remember, they found a gun. Sure shouldn't.

The court has announced that they're going to hear arguments next month on a case that presents this issue. In the case, Mr. Kenelia or whatever was arguing with his wife and melodramatically put an unloaded gun on the kitchen table and said, just shoot me now and get it over with. He didn't threaten her with the gun. It was unloaded. He put it in the center of the table and said, just shoot me now. His wife, in this argument, called a non-emergency number for the police who arrived. The police disagreed whether the husband was acting normal or agitated, but they did convince him to take an ambulance to the local hospital for an evaluation.

Police didn't go with him. while he was on his way to the hospital, the Mrs. told police that her husband kept two handguns in the home. The police decided to search the home for the guns without obtaining a warrant. Now, the Mrs. did consent to have the police search their home, but it was legally negated because the police lied to her and said, oh, your husband said it was okay for us to search and seize all of the guns. That wasn't true.

So they located the two guns, seized them, and he sued for the violation of his Fourth Amendment right to privacy and his Second Amendment right to keep handguns in the home for self-protection. The First Circuit Court of Appeals, which is the federal court just under the Supreme Court, cited with the police. The court wrote, at its core, community caretaking doctrine is designed to give police elbow room. to take appropriate action when unforeseen circumstances present some transient hazard that requires immediate attention. Remember the elbow room clause? Oh, that's just... Right, it's right with a good and bloody cause, isn't it? Understanding the core purpose of the doctrine leads to the conclusion that it should not be limited to just motor vehicle context.

Threats to individual and community safety are not confined to the highways. Wow. You couple that with the civil asset forfeiture situation that's going on that's kind of similar. That no one ever seems to talk about. That nobody talks about. And I think it's one of the most critical problems we face right now, freedom-wise. $29 billion in assets have been stolen from people over the last 14 years. In case you don't know what that is, this comes from a Reagan law, the RICO Act, wasn't it?

I think it was. When they were trying to get mobsters and they couldn't get, they couldn't get, they couldn't get, the mobsters and because they had all this wealth and everything else. So the RICO Act, you could go in and you could take their assets and hold them. And then when they were tried, you'd work it out later. Yeah, you'd work it out later or you'd sell them if they went to jail forever. And it was a cut through the Constitution. It was a reasonable-ish cut. I don't like cutting the Constitution. Ish. Ish. It's a big is. Yeah. And it's a much bigger ish now. Yeah, yeah. Back then, it was like, well, we've got, you know, the Gambino crime family and everything else. It always, trouble always comes when you go, yeah, but, no. No, no butts, no bots. Because down the road, these are the things that happen. So now civil asset forfeiture, if you're just driving in a place and they happen to see cash, you open up your glove box and you have, you know, $10,000 in there. Yeah, or $1,000 of cash. You just. have cash, you know, like it's from a bank.

They take it. They take it. And they can legally take it. And keep it. And keep it. And you're like... And you're not charged with anything. You're not charged with any kind of crime.

You just lost your $10,000 or in some cases much more than that. There was a guy in Utah pulled over by the Utah Highway Patrol who lost $500,000. Took that all the way to all the way to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court eventually told him, you got to give it back. And as of like a year ago, I haven't heard that I haven't followed up on this, but he still hadn't gotten it back. Probably because they spent it. Yeah, probably. These are the towns.

And this is going to get much worse as we go into an economic recession or depression. These towns are using this to survive. They can't write enough tickets or they don't have enough income tax coming in. And it fights the drug lords is what they claim in Texas. Well, that's money that's valuable to fight against the. drug cartels. Well, I'm sorry, that's not your money. That's no excuse. You can't have that. That's not yours. That belongs to an American citizen and there's no crime with carrying cash on your person. There's no crime. You can do it if you want. Yeah, but a reasonable person wouldn't

right. A reasonable person wouldn't have $500,000 in cash. That's true. And that's what they say. That's true. I mean, people are, if you're traveling, with cash now if you're traveling really with anything and it is suspicious but so what well if you if you had the cash and you took it from the from the bank you keep you have to keep the bank oh keep the receipt so you know that it came out of there but even that doesn't doesn't save you yeah even if you have the receipt of where this cash came from it still doesn't save you And they'll do this at airports. They'll do this on highways.

They'll confiscate people in highways in Texas that are stopped all the time like that. All the time. And it's not good. And it's happening all over the country. You know, when people say, what rights have been violent? Well, that would be one. Warrantless searches. That would be another one.

You notice this one is lying to the police. So they were lying to the police. And the court still said, yeah, but they can do that because extenuating circumstances. I mean, they were looking out for the cops. They were lying. They lied about it. It's the same thing with the FISA court. The FBI lied to the FISA court to give, to suspend all of Donald Trump's teams, civil rights.

All of them. You had no privacy. They were listening. It was warrantless. All of it. That was the start of the whole problem, too. Correct. and it was based on a lie.

And if they can do it to him, the president of the United States, what do you think they're going to do to you? And as I saw this case, I thought, boy, this is something the left has got to be funding. The left has got to be pouring money into this court case. Who is even arguing that case? Because think of what can be done to your rights if you lose the Fourth Amendment. It's completely gone. You're not accused of a crime. They didn't have to go to a court and you find police officers in your house.

And you can't say, where's your warrant? You just have to take it. Boy, that is not America. You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program. So here it is. What can you do about the Trumpers next door? I'm quoting now. Oh, heck no.

The Trumpites next door to our pandemic getaway, who seemed as devoted to the ex-president as you can get without being Q fans, just plowed our driveway without being asked. And they did a great job. How am I going to resist demands for unity in the face of this act of aggressive niceness? Now, you're thinking, hmm. Okay, that's a joke. Right. Of course, on some level, I realize I owe them things. Thanks.

And man, it really looks like the guy backdrag the driveway like a pro. I mean, but how much thanks? I'm still quoting. These neighbors are staunch partisans of blue lives. Oh, dear. Oh, my gosh. Police officers? Yeah.

Oh, my. That's what they do. Oh, wow. They support them? Yes, they do. Oh. They do. They do.

They do. And there aren't a lot of anything other than white lives in the neighborhood. Oh. Are you white? Because, I mean, you moved in. So if you moved in and you're not white, well, they didn't seem to have some sort of a process to keep people like you out. Now, did they? If you are white, that's your problem.

Why didn't you buy that and give that to a minority? Or why didn't you not buy that and go find someplace that was more diverse? This is also kind of weird. Back in the city, people don't sweep other people's water. for anything. Hezbollah. The Shiite Islamic political party in Lebanon also gives away things for free.

Okay. Yeah, they're just like Hezbollah. So we've, we've gone from, they plowed my driveway to I think they're members of Hezbollah. The favors Hezbollah does for people in the cities probably don't involve snow plows. But like other mafias,

so now Trumpites are, Hezbollah and a mafia. Hezbollah tends to its own, the Shiite sick, elderly, and hungry. They offer protection and hospitality and win loyalty that way. They also demand devotion to their brutal us versus them anti-Sunni cause. Some of us are family, the favors say. The rest are infidels. I think when the guy was putting on the snow plow to plow to plow out your driveway,

I think that's what he was thinking. Uh-huh. We're family. Yeah. Up here, up here in the mountains and a getaway with family. And I'm going to plow this driveway. And next, I expect you to kneel down to a giant golden statue of Donald Trump as we slit the throat of babies. The same is true to Louis Farrakhan.

Okay. So now it's political Hezbollah, mafia, and Louis. Lewis Farrakhan. Louis Farrakhan, who currently helms the nation of Islam, while the Southern Poverty Law Center classifies him as a dangerous anti-Semite, by the way, the Southern Poverty Law Center is a pile of crap. It is an agenda organization run by the left. But they define him as a dangerous anti-Semite.

Much of his flock says he's just a little screwy and unfailingly generous to them. Okay. when someone again if you just joined us i'm reading from a serious op ed in the los angeles times when someone helps you when you're down or snowed in it's almost impossible to regard them as a plight on the world in fact you're more likely to be overwhelmed with gratitude and convinced of the person's inherent goodness you might end up like the upper middle class family I stayed with in France as a teenager. They didn't attend a citywide celebration for the 100th birthday of Charles de Gaulle, the war hero who orchestrated the liberation of his country

from Nazi Germany in 1944. They did have several portraits of a Nazi collaborator on their wall. When I screwed up and found the courage to ask, how was it during the occupation for you? The lady of the house replied, We were happy because the Nazis were very polite. I was in tears. I bet. I bet. I mean, here you are staying at yet another white family's house.

And they turn out to be Nazi collaborators. But I'm trying to figure out exactly what that story has to do with the guy who just plowed your driveway, as if it wasn't offensive enough. that you that you call him in a public space the guy i mean if he reads the l.A. Times you don't think he's going to know i'm probably the guy who was plowing the driveway this is your thank you you called me a mob member a member of hesbalah or a Nazi collaborator wow all from plowing the Plowing the neighbors driveway. Without being asked. So when I accept generosity from my pandemic neighbors,

acknowledging the legitimate kindness with a wave or a plate of cookies, am I also sealing us in as fellow travelers who are very polite to each other, but not so much to them? Loving your neighbor is evidently much easier when your neighborhood is full of people just like you. You think maybe that's why you get along with. with everybody where you live in Los Angeles. Maybe that's why you can't find a conservative at all in New York City because you all just congregate and you all think that you're right and there's no room for anybody else's

opinion and so you just brutalize them. You know, because in that scenario, we're the them. My neighbors supported a man who showed near murderous contempt for the majority of Americans. My neighbors supported a man who showed near murderous contempt for the majority of Americans. Okay. What are you doing? You're taking half of the country because they supported Trump and you're saying they're Hezbollah terrorists, mafia members, or Nazi collaborators?

Well, gee. I can understand because I wouldn't want to bring a piece of pie to one of those guys. Don't you understand? That's exactly what you're doing. You have almost a murderous contempt for half the country. They kept him in business with their support. But the plowing. On January 6th after the insurrection, Senator Ben Sass issued an awe-shuck's plea for all Americans to love their neighbor.

The United States, he said, isn't the Hatfields and McCoys, this blood feud forever. And he added, you can't hate someone who shovels your driveway. At the time I seethed. Why? I got really great advice from somebody last week. I said, uh, we're going to family therapy, uh, for, oh, I don't know, a thousand reasons. Hmm. Most of them, uh, coincidentally have the name of my children.

attached to it but uh so i go i go to the the therapist and he said listen here's what i want you to do i want you to i want you to ask okay so what how did you get there and i said okay and then they'll say this and then they'll say this and then they'll say this and then i just want to punch him in the face and he said well the punching in the face thing and i said i'm kidding and he said yeah i know i'm writing it down though too soon the government will have access to these. He said, I want you to whenever you find yourself getting really upset, stop. He said, because that's you. That's not them. That's you. And you're upset because of something you believe or something that you think. And it's a challenge to you. And this is the way we all feel.

We feel as though our country is going away and no one's doing anything about it. And our rights are about to be lost. And so, yeah, I get a little tense. But if they're not feeling that and you are, you are not going to be able to even listen to them once you start feeling that way. He's like, you have to get control of what's inside of you and separate. that when you're in these conversations. That's really good advice. Really good advice.

So he says at the time of the Capitol, I seethed. That's in you, man. That's in you. And it was in me too, because I felt these people were taking away our country. Now, what's weird is I felt that way during the riots all summer long. so I'm consistent. You're not. You should ask why you seethe then and didn't seethe a few months ago.

He said, I see the Capitol had just been desecrated, but maybe my neighbor heard sass and was determined to make a bid for reconciliation. Maybe your neighbor didn't like that. Have you thought of that? Your neighbor didn't like that. Because if your neighbor was a Trump supporter, I know a lot of Trump supporters. In fact, I know a majority of Trump supporters were like, that's not cool. Stop that. I know I was really angry.

I seethed. And why was I really angry if I have to examine that? Because I knew dopes like you would classify everybody on the right as somebody who backed that. And gee, guess who's right again? So here's my response to my plowed driveway for now. Politely, but not profusely, I'll acknowledge his kindness with a wave and a thanks, a minimal start on building back trust. Notice that person next door has to build up this guy's trust.

The Trump supporter has all the work to do. you just have to tolerate them. Do you ever think that maybe the trust goes both ways? The lack of trust is going both ways. You ever think? See, this is what kills me. And I am guilty of this myself. I have adopted a new phrase in my life.

And I've got a few of them. Question with boldness, the very existence of God. For if there be a God, he must surely rather honest questioning over blindfolded fear. The other, there are many things I believe. believe that I shall never say, but I shall never say the things I do not believe. And the third one I just forgot. Don't forget, hire the vet. That's it.

Jeez, I just forgot this one. Yeah. It's, uh, oh, well, it's this, it's this. The only thing I'm certain of is that I'm not certain of anything. That's it. If we could just adopt that, the world would be a much different place. because everyone is certain of the truth. Everyone.

Marjorie Taylor Green was certain that Q was real. Well, no. Now does she really change your mind or not? I don't know. AOC is certain. Her point of view is the right way to go. We have to stop being certain of things. because honestly, tell me, you don't trust anything, right?

I don't. So what could you possibly be certain of? Instead of just tolerating, I'm not ready, I'm quoting the article, I'm not ready to knock on the door with a covered dish yet. Maybe you should. Maybe you should. Maybe you should go to them and say, you know what? My turn. My turn.

And it's not just bringing you a covered dish. Could you come over for dinner? because I just I just want to get to know you. How, how you were a supporter. Don't try to be right. Don't try to win. Just try to understand. And I will bet you that you will find a lot of common ground.

And it's going to be hard. Because I know it would be almost impossible for me. I might have to get up from a dinner with you, the author of this article, I would probably, I would probably just say, I've got bad diarrhea. I got to get up from dinner about every five minutes.

I'm sorry. I don't mean to be rude. Just to go out and breathe. But I'd be willing to do it. And I'd be willing to listen and not try to win or not make a list of things. Yeah, but then you. But how many people are willing to do it? do that. Very few. Very few. And that stops us from actually seeing the things that we do agree on.

Oh, wait a minute. You know, you were telling me the other day, you were really upset about this. Did you read this story about this? If you're talking to somebody who's willing to go down that journey with you, I can guarantee you they didn't know that story. Because I've done this with many friends. They don't read that. We read much of their stuff. They read none of ours. Patience, deep breaths, and stop being certain that you are right. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. Did you hear that Iowa lifted all restrictions on COVID? Two days before the Super Bowl, they were like, okay, enough of this. And so they lifted the restrictions, which I think is pretty amazing myself.

There's also another story that I find interesting. If you read the whole story, the headline is Supreme Court lifts California worship bands prompted by coronavirus. And you're like, hey, finally. Hey, finally. So that's over. No, no, read on. Perhaps the most surprising aspect of the Friday night ruling,

the new justice Amy Coney Barrett, whose conservative Catholic views drew suspicion from many liberals in advance of her confirmation last year, declined to grant the churches the most sweeping relief favored by her most conservative colleagues. Have we lost Amy Coney-Barrid already? Jeez, I hope not. Have we lost her already? Justice's Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas would have granted all of the church's request, lifting the singing and chanting bands,

and barred Californians from enforcing a 20,000. 25% capacity limit that applies to many indoor facilities. Okay. So that's what that's what Calais. That's what the churches wanted. Only two of the justices said yes to that. They went for a middle ground, which says you have to treat the churches just like you would treat anybody else.

So when you say this is a business and you can do this with the business, then that applies to the churches. and only that. Well, that doesn't, I mean, businesses, they're not really included in the Bill of Rights. I don't know. I mean, it might be, is that, is that to be? I'm not sure. No.

No, it's not there. Okay. What's a little disturbing for me is Elena Kagan's dissent. Under the court's injunction, the state must instead treat worship. services like secular activities that pose a much lesser danger. The mandate defies our case law, exceeds our judicial role, and risks worsening the pandemic. In the worst public health crisis in a century, this foray into armchair epidemiology cannot

end well. Hang on just a second. Really? What she's saying here is the applicant. bore the burden of establishing their entitlement to relief from the singing band. In my view, they didn't carry out that burden, at least not on this record. Even if a full congregation singing hymns is too risky, California does not explain why a single mask cantor cannot lead worship behind a mask and a plexiglass shield.

That's Gorsuch writing this. Well, Kasich in her, how do you say her name? Kagan. Kagan in her ruling and the dissent said that it is not the role for the Supreme Court to get involved in state issues. That's why she didn't want to rule on it. She thought it was dangerous. And she also thought that it should be the local government. that made the decisions on these things.

Really? Because I agree with you on that one. That's fantastic. Now, this one happens to be a constitutional amendment question. Right. Which you guys are supposed to answer. Yes. So you've got to answer that one.

Right. But why aren't you staying out of everything else? Unbelievable. Unbelievable. Unbelievable. So it's still 25% capacity at California churches. Yes. still can't sing.

We've been singing for I don't know, six months probably. Have to wear the mask though. Yeah, do have to wear the mask, which is hard. Yeah. 45 straight minutes is about my limit. I'm coming out of my skin by then. Well, by the way, I want you to know.

Iran has had some you know, some of the vaccines have gone through. And And the Ayatollah told his social media, don't go near any of those who have had the COVID vaccine. And this is a big deal. Because if you remember, I think it was Mahmoud Ahmadinejad when he came to the UN. He explained that there are no homosexuals in Iran.

Right, right. Right. Well, the Ayatollah now is saying that those who have had the COVID, I'm quoting, don't go near those who have had the COVID vaccine, they've become homosexual. Oh, wow. All of them? Everybody who's had the vaccine. He didn't say, he just said, don't go near anybody who's had the COVID vaccine. They have become homosexuals.

So, uh, that's interesting. Interesting. Is this a plot? by the gay organizations to make us all almost sexual. What does, what does R say about this?

R? Yeah. He's the guy who followed up from Q. I think he's next in line, isn't it? What did R say about this? Or S or T? He said, R said, that they're using the same chemical

that's turning the friggin' frogs gay. I knew it. It's the same chemical. He knew it. Yeah. I knew it. Yeah, they put that right in the vaccine and they're doing it to us as well as the frogs. I'm sorry, I'm drawing the line.

I'm not going to do it. Not that there's anything wrong with that. With gay frogs. No. For gay frogs. Or gay people, whatever. Gay clerics. Right.

Whoever. I've got myself an opposite sex person that I'm sure in my life with right now. So you're not going to get the COVID vaccine. Right. Right. Man, that was a close call. It really was. It really was.

together by the end of the week. Thank you, Ayatollah. Wow. That would have been bad. Leave it to the irony. You know what? We need to start negotiating with these guys. Right?

Seriously. Let's get a treaty going with them. Maybe leave them going some cash on a runway somewhere. Because these guys, they know what they're doing. I mean, we wouldn't have known about how COVID makes you go gay. No, we would not. If not for them. Well, good thing Joe Biden is in, is in charge now.

What are your thoughts on the vaccine? Do you want it? No. I've already. it. Well, it's true. You've had the... Yeah, I've had the vid. You came down. You had the vid. I had the vid. You're a survivor. I'm a survivor. I want a ribbon. What color would my ribbon be? Because green, I think that's something to do with being drunk on St. Patrick's Day.

Brown, but there is no problem with that with COVID. It just has to... Yeah. Yeah. Maybe a milky white because of the stuff you cough up. Maybe that's it. I want a milky white. I didn't realize as a coughed up Milky White stuff. As a survivor, as a survivor. Yeah. So I have that going. So don't please don't even talk to me about COVID because you haven't been there, brother. No, I have not.

You have not carried that. I have not carried it. You were not there. And we were all. This was my generation's Vietnam and World War II combined. Combined. Combined. At the same time, can you imagine fighting World War II and Vietnam?

At the same time? At the same time, like lay one country over the other. You're in Germany and Vietnam at the same time. That seems like a lot. With an old gun and a new gun. Wow. Helicopters were freaking the Germans out. But that's the kind of war it was.

That's kind of where it was. Yeah. But you survived it. Never the less. Yeah, I don't want to talk about it anymore because I'll wake up with night sweats from it. Anyway, we have the, we have the Hippo Awards that are coming this week. Now, these are the first ever Hippo Awards. Can we get a shot of the very lovely, it's actually was expensive.

But it is a, it's a hippo trophy. And by the way, hippo is spelled with a why, not an eye. Because these are the first ever 2021 awards to give recognition to the biggest hypocrites in our society over the last year. And where do we even begin? where do we even begin? The nominees, it's endless. And the Academy has had a very difficult time voting. And quite honestly, I have seen some of the results, and there's not enough minorities on there.

Oh, oh. So we might have to just, you know. Yeah, revisit. You know what I mean? Because the Academy is looking really racist. Right. You couldn't find one? You couldn't find one hypocrite that was black?

Okay. Anyway, so the HIPAA Awards happened this week, and I've got a couple of new people to add to this. Apparently, Nancy Pelosi, you know, should be fine $5,000 because she has broken her own rule and walked around the metal detectors to get into the house. Oh, my gosh. That was such a big deal to her. Well, she was, but it's not her. I mean, yeah, she's in a hurry. Let's see, let me just, may I please?

Because I've watched enough Columbo. I'm not a detective, but I am a doctor. And I'm a doctor that has watched Colombo and other like murder she wrote when I was younger. So I know. Would the killer suggest that you put a metal detector up? No. No. No.

No. That's what a killer wants you to think. They want you to think I'm not the one carrying a gun Because I said I'm gonna put the metal detector in I'm gonna get away with this But she was caught Walking around the metal detector

Now how safe do you feel? Not at all safe I'm just saying The call is coming from within the house So she's got that one Which I think is beautiful I like Chris Murphy he came out this weekend and he said there's no comparison between comments made by Maxine Waters

and other Democrats and the comments made by Donald Trump. And I have to say he's right. I was going to say the same thing. He's exactly right. He is exactly right there. And how do you mean that, Stu? I mean, Pat. I think the comments made by Maxine Waters are much, much worse.

Holy cow. Yeah. Holy cow. Wait a minute. What? Yeah. Yeah. Hmm

Hmm So we have a couple of people We have Akazio Cortez We have Omar Ilan Omar That are That have been promoting a conspiracy About you know

How there were tours given around Nancy Pelosi Floated the theory That Putin played a role In the Capitol riot Oh geez Let's see Congressman Sherrill

claimed some of her Republican congressional colleagues had led people through the United States Capitol last Tuesday on what appeared to be a reconnaissance mission. So we got a lot of them there that, you know, they're all saying, hey, you can't believe Q. You can't believe Q. But maybe R is calling them. Jamie Lee Curtis with the USPS, Taylor Swift, and the conspiracy.

Remember, they're all against conspiracies. So looking at all of these. these are the people that would be for greatest hypocritical action taken on the cause of conspiracy. And boy, this list just goes on and on and on the hypocrites. And for them to say, oh, you'll let me tell you something. There is no way. These things, these don't compare at all. As Pat said, you're exactly right.

Let me just take Chuck Schumer. A year ago, Chuck Schumer stood on the steps of the Supreme Court in front of an angry mob and said, if this court takes this action and they don't rule in the way he wanted, they don't rule, well, there is going to be hell to be paid, and they don't have any idea what's coming their way. Now, you might say that that was a threat, but the Supreme Court would. be more balanced, right? Well, John Roberts, in a very rare exception, came out to issue a public statement that day and said, rhetoric like that puts our security at the Supreme Court in danger.

It has to be condemned and it must stop. Now, Chuck Schumer is leading the band here? Really? Hippocrite or Banana Republic show trial.