The Glenn Beck Program - Best of the Program | 4/16/25

Episode Date: April 16, 2025

Is the U.S. dollar at risk of losing its global reserve status? Glenn and Stu compare Trump's alleged "Mar-a-Lago Accord" to the 1985 Plaza Accord, which decimated Japan’s economy, and question whether Trump is purposely devaluing the dollar to counter China. Pennsylvania Democratic Governor Josh Shapiro’s estate was terrorized, and the mainstream media is burying the story and downplaying the Left's growing assassination culture. The New York Times recently released an article that causes Glenn to ask: Was ADHD a "hoax" that feminized our boys? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hey, welcome to the podcast. There is a report out that President Trump is trying a very risky short-term play that would devalue our dollar and the Chinese currency at the same time. But what would that do in regards of a trade war or even heating up to an actual conflict? I don't know if it's true or not, but it's something we should consider. Also, how close we came to an actual threat to our democracy over the weekend and no one is talking about it. And then Stu just goes on to support, you know, big pharma and all those evil people that, you know, make medicine. Is ADHD, you know, a scam or not? It's a great conversation on today's podcast. So what does it mean to be pro-life?

Because it's easy to say we're pro-life, and that's good. But it's really just a label. It's a particular set of deep values. And it means showing up. When you say your pro-life, it means showing up for it. It means caring about the unborn baby that's growing inside a mom, desperately wanting mom to make the right decision when it comes to life or death and child. But it also means about caring about that mom,

understanding that she is experiencing a terrifying, difficult situation she feels completely alone in. And she just needs help. You would not believe how easy it is to change expectant mom's mind when you actually talk to her and listen to her. first you have to dismiss that it's just a clump of cells and you do that with a free ultrasound from preborn and then just listen to them. What do you need? That's why preborn is there for the first two years of the baby's life

for mom and the baby because nobody else is there for him. Please dial pound 250. Become a part of this movement. Say the keyword baby at pound 250, keyword baby, or you can donate online at preborn.com slash beck. That's preborn.com slash beck. Sponsored by preborn. Hello America. You know we've been fighting every single day. We push back against the lies, the censorship, the nonsense of the mainstream media that they're trying to feed you. We work tirelessly to bring you the unfiltered truth because you deserve it. But to keep this fight going, we need you. Right now, would you take a moment and rate and review the Glenn Beck podcast? Give us five stars and lead a comment because every single review helps us break through Big Tech's algorithm to reach more Americans who need to hear the truth. This isn't a lot. a podcast, this is a movement, and you're part of it, a big part of it. So if you believe in what

we're doing, you want more people to wake up, help us push this podcast to the top. Rate, review, share. Together, we'll make a difference. And thanks for standing with us. Now let's get to work. You're listening to you. Go on. How are you? Yeah, there is a, there's a story in the blaze today. Trump's economic blueprint is hiding in plain sight. Let me give you just a little bit of it. The Trump tariff plan has rocked the stock market and economists around the world with President notoriously labeling the implementation of his tariffs as Liberation Day, while others called his reciprocal moves a huge mistake. Many have argued that Trump did not actually implement reciprocal tariffs at all, though.

Look no further than on X, where even though, even through his platform's owner, Elon Musk, is one of Trump's top advisors, White House post about the tariffs was slapped with community notes label that said the numbers from the administration were not based on actual foreign tariffs at all, blah, blah, blah, blah. So the story goes on to say, so what is he doing? And I would like to, you know, they interviewed an expert that is with the president, Stephen Moran, big time economic advisor. He's worked at the Treasury Department and one of the top advisors now for the president.

And he talks about a couple of things. He talks about the Marlago Accord, which is speculation. Don't know if this is what the president is doing, et cetera, et cetera. But there's also something that Stephen wrote about, and I'll talk about it here in a second, that seems to be laying out the same course that the president may be on. So let me explain this to you because what they're claiming is that the president may be tweaking the value of the U.S. dollar to help America out. And let me go over this,

because there's some serious risks attached to this one. So imagine the U.S. dollar as the coolest toy on the playground. And everybody wants to play with it because it's the best. Nobody thought we could have a better toy than this one. That toy is called the World's Reserve currency, meaning that countries use it as gold. It is their savings account. and they use it for trading, for savings, for buying stuff globally.

Now, the Mar-a-Lago Accord, which the Blaze says might be a Trump administration plan, wants to make that toy a little less shiny on purpose by devaluing the dollar, basically making it worth less compared to other countries' money. In particular, the Chinese won. Why? Well, imagine you have a lemonade stand. And our lemonade is really pricey because it's traded in dollars. And you've got to use dollars and, you know, dollars are just really expensive.

Our lemonade now is much more expensive. But across the street, China is selling theirs way cheaper. So everybody is buying their stuff from China. Well, if we would devalue our dollar, our lemonade would get cheaper and more people would from us than from China. That's a very dangerous game we play. The idea is to make American goods like cars steal cheaper to sell overseas, which would boost our industries and create jobs over here.

Okay. Now, the Blaze story also mentions another goal, helping our massive national debt, which is now 33, 34 trillion. dollars. If the dollar is worth less, then the debt is easier to pay off. It's like owing a hundred, but now a hundred isn't as much as it used to be, so it's less of a burden to repay. But here's the catch, and it's a big one. I think Germany did this. I think that's what Germany did. Devaluing the dollar can cause inflation, which means prices go up for everything.

So your favorite candy bar, you walk into the store, used to be a dollar, it's now $5. And if it's made overseas, it's guaranteed to be $5. Because now the tariffs on it and everything else, and we've devalued our dollar. So all the foreign stuff is far more expensive since our dollar buys less. Okay. It's different if you're buying it with gold. because gold, dollar and gold, it doesn't change with the dollar's value. It seems like it's going up, but it's actually not.

The dollar is going down. So it takes more dollars. You know, when you see the price of gold is up, no, no, no. Usually that means the dollar is down. Okay. So because we're not buying everything in gold or saving gold, nor are other countries, the price hike hits hard. Now imagine that happening to everything.

groceries, gas, clothes. Well, the Blaze and Stephen Miron warned that this kind of inflation could be a disaster for Americans. Gee, you think? It's not good. It's not good. Now, there's another huge risk here. Devaluing our dollar to pay down the debt could be seen as an act of war. If I have a trillion dollars of our debt, and I want you to pay,

a trillion dollars back, if you start devaluing your dollar and now you're only really giving me $500 billion for my $500 billion that I have in my savings account, I'm kind of pissed at you. You're intentionally stealing from my account, right? China has well over a trillion dollars of our bonds, U.S. Treasury bonds, in their piggy bank. We devalue our dollar. We're taking money out of their pigging bank and just setting it on fire. Could make him furious. You know, they might see it as an economic attack.

The Blaze pointed out that this could spark a trade war, but maybe even a war war. We're talking about trillions of dollars. Don't like to poke a beehive. You know, just because some of the honey inside might be really good. No, let's not poke the beehive unless you're prepared for all of the possible consequences. Now, the Blaze mentioned something called the Plaza Accord, which happened back in 1985. And it was a deal that was made in 85.

We got together at the Plaza Hotel in New York with countries like Japan and Germany. And the agreement was to weaken the U.S. to help American industries because back then our dollar was super strong and it was hurting our exports like now. And it worked for a while except Japan got hit hard. Their money got too strong. Their exports tanked and they ended up in decades-long economic slump. Ever wonder what happened?

Remember when Japan was huge? They owned everything and it was like, I think they forced me now to name my next child Sony. And then all of a sudden it stopped and you didn't, you're like, what happened? Well, they just crashed. Yeah, why did they crash? Because of the Plaza Accord. We weakened our dollar, which made everything from Japan more expensive. And that put them out.

Now, the Mar-Lago Accord is like a modern-day version of that, except this time it's aimed at China. And the stakes are much, much bigger. So what's the upside of this? Well, it could make American goods cheaper abroad, so our factories will start, you know, buzzing again, we'll create more jobs. It also might shrink our trade deficit. That's when we buy more from other countries than we sell to them. We need to sell more things to them. If our stuff is cheaper, then we sell more, and the gap closes.

Third, like I say, could make our debt feel lighter to pay off, at least in theory. but the risks of this are massive. Besides inflation and the act of worthing, if we make our dollar less shiny, other countries also might say, you know, I'm not going to play with that toy anymore. I'm not going to hold that toy. Wait a minute, it's the greatest.

Well, no, not anymore. Because now it has cost my treasury all kinds of money. I've lost half my money because it's not gold. and that was kind of the plan here was that you would never devalue your dollar, United States, and that way we would hold your dollar as our reserve currency. That's a very, very big deal. If we lose our reserve currency status in the world, we lose all of our VIP privileges.

We can't borrow money cheap, everything gets pricey, much, much more pricey. Blaise also warned that China might dump our treasury bonds that could crash our financial markets. You know, this is, look, he's playing Jenga, and I hope he's the greatest Jenga player of all time. But he's playing Jenga. I don't know if they're going for this. Blaze thinks that it's likely. You know, Stephen Miram, he wrote or co-wrote something called a user.

guide to restructuring the global trade system. It spells out this whole plan. And people have been saying, no, that's not what Trump is doing. But he wrote this before Trump got into office and he's on the Trump team. And it seems to be, you know, mirroring exactly what is what is happening. He talked about using tariffs, taxes on imports, pressure China into a deal, suggest national security rules to force everything through. This is exactly what the president is doing.

And with an advisor like Mirren in his corner, I mean, there's a chance this is what he's cooking up, especially since Trump loves the idea of boosting American industries and taking China on. But it's a very, very risky game. It's, you know, like we're going, we're at a carnival gang. And I really want that stuff bear. Okay. All right. Well, I'm going to get you that stuff bear.

Instead of using the BB gun. though, you're using a shotgun loaded with slugs. You might win the bear, but you also might kill everybody behind the counter with it and take down the whole stand. So I'm just glad

that I'm the one explaining it and not having to make the decision on it. Because this is a very, we are in a high stakes game. Never seen anything played. Have you, you seen anything played this high stakes? No. And it's,

is a high stakes game. What does this mean for, let's say, the rest of his presidency, like as far as the other things that we are cheering on that he's doing? If this doesn't work, right? Nothing. I mean, he'll not be able to do anything. He won't be able to do anything. No, I don't think so. If this wins, he, we're golden for a long time. If this loses, I don't think we even hold the House or the Senate, and we don't win in 28. That's a big, so risk, big, win big, I suppose. It really is. And I don't know the odds. I mean, I know what everybody says. Never tell me the odds. Never tell me the odds. Never tell me the odds. I like to know the odds. Before I put my money down on the table, I like to know the odds.

That's not what Hans Solo said. So for, you know, you're going to have to adjust your theory there. Yeah, no, I think it's really, it's a, it's a big game. And, you know, it's a different. It's interesting because I always remember Trump talking so confidently and, I mean, you know, at length about wanting a strong dollar. Like, I always thought that was a big part of his theory. I think what he's trying to. So maybe he's, here's how I would interpret. What I read in the blaze, this is how I would interpret what he's doing. He's not actually trying to do that over the long term.

He's not trying to bring the price of the debt down. what he's trying to do is bring our dollar down far enough force China to keep their dollar, their one up and kill him short term and then get out of this and reverse it. You know what I mean?

I think he plays a great game of chicken. Oh yeah. And I think that's true. I think that's what he's doing. I don't think this is his plan on, yeah, it is my long term plan. We're always going to do this. I'm going to bring the dollar down.

out of zero. It wouldn't make sense. Right. And it doesn't go with what he says about a strong dollar. You need to have a strong dollar. If you're going to be the world's reserve currency, this is not a good idea. However, if he's playing it short term and he's playing chicken, it might just work because China is in a very precarious situation. They lose the ability to trade their stuff cheaply. they're in trouble. Overnight they're in trouble. Yeah, that's very true.

There's so much based on exports. And it's funny, they've been manipulating their currency forever. They always do this. And they can, you know, I though don't, I've never looked at that as a good thing for them. No. Right? Like basically what they're doing is they're subsidizing a giant electronic sale for the United States. And it does not seem like a good policy to me.

And one, I've never heard an American politician advocate, including Donald Trump. We can't. We promised the world we wouldn't do this. That's why we were in so much trouble in 2008. We changed our policy. We said, you know what, take care of America first. We would not have bailed all of those banks out had we stuck to the deal we made for the rest of the world. We won't do this so you can trust that the dollar will remain sound. Trust us. Yes, trust us. Always just trust us. Don't worry about it. We'll be fine. Everything will be fine. Well, it worked for a very long time. We did it for a very long time. But in 08, we violated that. And now, you know, I don't know where we are on that. The good thing about us is it's a comparative trust because luckily everyone else sucks. So that's our biggest advantage.

Let me tell you about relief factor. Life wasn't meant to be watched from the sidelines, whether you're itching to hit the hiking trails, conquer a round of golf, chase the grandkids around the yard, or finally tackling that DIY project that's been staring at you for months now. should not hold you back. And if you're sitting there thinking, well, I love to, but, stop. That butt has been holding you back for too long. And it's time to end it. Relief factor could be a game changer for you. It was for me. It was created by doctors specifically to reduce the inflammation that has been causing all that pain you're carrying around. And it's not a drug. It's a daily supplement that could change your life, change mine. And over a million people have kicked pain to the curb with

relief factor. If you're living with pain right now, you'd love to get out of it, wouldn't you? Try it. The three-week quick start, 1995, relief factors, three-week quick start, less than a dollar a day. It's 1-800-4 relief, 1-800, the number four relief, or relief factor.com. Now, back to the podcast. This is the best of the Glenbeck program. Well, we were lucky this time. It is strange that this happened on April 13th. I'll tell you why. in a minute. April 13th, 2025, most of us were asleep when a man named Cody

Balmer scaled the fence at the governor's mansion in Pennsylvania. He smashed a window, he threw a Molotov cocktail inside, and had he found the governor there, Josh Shapiro, he planned to bludgeon him with a

hammer. His reason hatred, political hatred. Now, the governor and his family escaped physically unharmed. The fire left something smoldering in what should be smoldering in all of us. It's a question of what happens to a society when people no longer believe in the rule of law, in debate, into votes, but instead believe in violence when they justify that violence as morally righteous. And that's what's happening. There is a broader assassination

culture that appears to be emerging within segments of our society. And I think the trend line is deeply troubling. Listen to this. There was a survey. They questioned 1,264 residents of the U.S. 31% and 38% stated it would be at least somewhat justified to murder Elon Musk and President Trump. 31% said yes to Elon Musk.

38%, almost 40% of our population said it's okay to murder the president. These percentages, however, go way up when you isolate left of center respondents. So anybody who described themselves as either far left, liberal, or slightly liberal, the numbers went 48% to kill Elon Musk and 55% to kill the president. to kill the president. That's half of people who say they're at least slightly liberal. Wow. 40% said it's at least somewhat justifiable to burn down or destroy a Tesla dealership in protest. Now, this is not new.

This deadly logic we've seen before. And strangely, it was 160 years ago, almost to the day. April 1865, President Abraham Lincoln attends a play at Ford's Theater. He comes in, he's late. Some accounts suggest that Lincoln had left a box open for a last-minute guest, possibly General Grant, who declined, or maybe somebody else. Perhaps even John Wilkes Booth himself. He was a popular actor.

He was known in Washington Society. one of the people at the theater saw Booth send a letter up to Lincoln's box or send a note up to Lincoln's box he might have been asking if he could sit with the president we don't know and the president might have said yeah because John Wilkes Booth he wasn't just a popular actor

so his family was very popular as well and they were known to be Southerners and maybe because Booth was having a play the next week that was at Ford's Theater, maybe the president was trying to bring people together. I don't know. But there he is in the theater. And just a few days before, he was giving his second inaugural address. And he said something that enraged Booth.

He suggested that formerly enslaved people. people. At least the educated and those who had served should be given the right to vote. And Booth at that point turned to his companion and said, that means N-word citizenship. That'll be the last speech he makes. And so he picked up a pistol and you know the rest. But Booth wasn't acting alone that night. Not just in the literal conspiracy, though he there was one, but in spirit, He believed that he was saving democracy from a tyrant. Booth wasn't having, he wasn't some raging lunatic in his own mind. He thought he was a patriot.

He thought he was the liberator. He saw Lincoln as the usurper and Booth as the deliverer. We don't recoil at this. Now we used to. We used to call that treason. But how different is that from the logic than the kind we're hearing today? We're hearing the same kind of logic. Now we don't recoil.

Now we don't call it treason. There is a new report out from the network contagion research institute. They found that half, 55% of self-identified leftists say Donald Trump is justifiable to kill him. This is not the fringe anymore. It is mainstreamed through algorithms, college campuses, op-eds, by any means necessary. that's not just a slogan that was said in the 60s. That is now a permission slip to do whatever it is you think is right. In 1865, the stage was literal.

And Booth used that stage to deliver his final act. He entered Lincoln's box, point blank range, one bullet to the back of the head. Then he jumped to the stage below, and he shouted, Sixth Emperor Tyrannus, thus always to tyrants. As if he was slaying Caesar, he limped off stage, he had a broken leg. Twelve days later, soldiers found him cornered in a barn in Virginia, and they shot him. And as he lay dying, Booth stared at his hands, the hands that had taken the president's life, just a few days before. And he whispered a single word.

Looking at his hands, he said, useless. useless. I think that was the judgment of his own actions. His final clarity. Instead of saving democracy, he assaulted its very soul. And it did nothing. Lincoln died, not just as a martyr for the union,

but of a victim of the same delusion infecting our political climate today. The idea that democracy can be preserved through violence, that saving the republic by killing those that we disagree with somehow works. So here we are again. This time it's fire bombs and hammers. And by the way, just so you know,

that was somebody who wanted to free Palestine by killing the Jewish governor who's a Democrat in Pennsylvania. Okay, so that makes it even all the more heartwarming, doesn't it? if anybody thinks that you are not going to be victimized by these people, you will never, you will never be radical enough for these people. And the fever is rising. It's no longer limited to lone actors.

It's visible on how we excuse riots. We justify doxing. We rationalize political intimidation. All of it, of course, is dressed up in the language of justice. I want to talk about justice this hour. power. Justice without law is not justice. It's vengeance. Vengeance is blind. So now, what do we do? Well, the first thing we have to do is remember the past and not as a moral bedtime story, but as a warning. Why is it that they want us to not know our own history? If you don't know your own history,

You can't defend the things that you think are important. You no longer know what worked, what didn't. You no longer know what shaped us. You no longer have any warnings to go, wait a minute, wait a minute. Didn't this happen before? I don't know. Booth did not end tyranny. He deepened the division.

His bullet didn't preserve liberty. It set the reconstruction of the country that Lincoln fought to heal. it set it back. Second thing, we have to reject every attempt left or right to justify violence in the name of saving democracy. Because democracy doesn't need saviors. It needs citizens. When you think of yourself as a savior, you'll justify anything.

In my book, there's only one savior. There's lots of citizens. I'm a citizen. You're a citizen. Citizens vote. Citizens speak. Citizens challenge. Citizens disagree. But we're not saviors, so we can't take life.

We don't get to choose who lives, who dies. And the last thing, again, we have to learn from history. Maybe we should reflect on the words this April right after the assassination. Have you even, did you know about this assassination attempt? Why isn't that everywhere? somebody who was saying they were trying to free the Palestinians, tried to murder our governor of a very large state in our country who is Jewish, clearly an anti-Semite, somebody from the left,

tried to kill one of our governors. And why isn't that everywhere? Is it just me? Have I just missed this? this seems like a footnote story. This is a very large story. And because it's not a lead story everywhere for days, it tells you something about the media, doesn't it?

It tells you something about the culture of the left. They're excusing it by burying it. So perhaps we should just reflect on the words of a dying assassin. useless. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think he meant as he's looking at his hands, his hands, the hands that killed a president, and he sees nothing changed. Let's not forget the lessons of 1865 because we almost repeated them over the summer and we almost repeated them again just a couple of days ago, again in Pennsylvania. This time, one was a Republican, the next one was a Democrat, more importantly, a Jew. And both times these seem to be just swept under the rug.

Why? Because there are people that are trying to convince you that violence is the answer. It's not. It's not. if we convince ourselves again that violence is ever the answer then all of what we have done will be useless just like Booth's final act and just like the country we will lose if we don't change course you're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program

so even though Stu doesn't want you to hear this news I don't want you to hear this news because he hates children I do. I have two of them. Well, yeah. Well, Mangelite liked them in pairs too. Wow. That would really dark, really fast. I do have a tendency of...

We're like 10 seconds into the hour. Like launching nuclear weapons at the first. I've noticed. Yeah, we should probably build up to that one. Anyway, there's a new article out now that that talks about ADHD and it's coming from... the left and the experts that they're now starting to say, I don't know. Maybe, maybe, maybe not everything we thought was true about ADHD. And I think this story is written by Matt Walsh, who's great.

Whoever wrote this for The Daily Wire was great. More than 21% of 14-year-old boys in this country now supposedly suffer from ADHD. The number goes up to 23% for 17-year-old boys. As a result, prescriptions for drugs like Ritalin and Adderall have skyrocketed. Just want you to know that speed. From 2012 to 2012, the total number of prescriptions for stimulants to treat ADHD increased dramatically by nearly 60%. From 2012, in a 10-year period, we've gone up with 60% prescription. Between the ages of 10 to 14, the demographics saw the highest increase in these prescriptions.

So he writes, and I think this is such a great observation. For decades, you've been instructed to believe there's no significance to this correlation whatsoever. And here it is. As women increasingly enter the workforce and replace men in teaching jobs, we're not supposed to draw any conclusions about how the behavior of male children is now being addressed. The truth is, we've been told, not that a feminist. education system has increasingly punished normal male behavior. It doesn't understand. It's not that schools have lost their capacity to educate male students.

It's not that smartphone use and electronics in general have become distractions. Teachers have been unable to control. Instead, we're led to believe that boys have suddenly become afflicted with a severe psychological disorder. Okay. You know, this is the first time I had ever heard that. about, you know, how we've feminized things. And we have.

We've diminished boys. But I grew up at a school. I don't think I had a male teacher until I was in high school. And I had all female teachers. There weren't a lot of nuns that were, oh, my gosh, I remember that really, I remember that really male like maybe she was a man, but identified as a nun. I'm not sure. And you, of course, to put it gently, are not exactly a recent student.

I know. It's better than where I thought he was going, Sarah. I thought he was going, you're not really a man. But I'll take it. You're right, though. There are surely are more female teachers that would think just because of the workforce changes. Sure. But that was a pretty, I mean, all my teachers that I can always remember were female too.

The one thing that has changed, though, is we just dismiss boys entirely. I mean, it's all focused on girls right now. All of it. It's science. everything is just push the girls, push the girls, push the girls, you can be anything. Shut up, sit down, have some riddling to the boys. And that's a problem.

And I have to tell you, as a parent, you probably have recognized this. Does Lisa understand your daughter better than you do? And you understand your son? I get the point you're going at. I don't know that it would necessarily apply. Some ways she very well understands my daughter. Because I walk in, I'm just clueless. I have no idea.

I, you know, I walk in as my, as a dad, and I'm like, hey, put some pants on, would you? And my daughter's like, uh-huh. And I'm like, what the hell did I just say? And my wife just looks at me like, you don't say that to her. And I'm like, okay. But she'll say that to my son and my son doesn't go, uh-huh, they're different. I know they are. They are.

And I can relate, for instance, my wife, she'll say something. and I know how she means it because I'm an adult, but I can hear what Rath hears. Right. Because I heard it from my mom, and I realize now that's not what my mom meant, but you hear, pick up your room,

you're always a mess, you're always this, and that's not what she said. You know what I mean? Sure. You know, it's true. It's not what. As they get into the teenagers in particular,

it's really difficult. That's what I really mean. That's what I mean is the teenage years. I have no idea. Like, I had no idea how mean girls are. Oh, my gosh. They are vicious. I would much rather be put into a room of rabid boys than normal girls.

They are dangerous. Guys can be jerks, but they're on the surface. They're stupid jerks. Yeah, it's just kind of nonsensical stuff. Girls dig. They dig for the wounds. Gosh, they just, they'll cut you open and then they'll eat your heart while you're still watching. I mean, it's horrible.

Anyway, so the article goes on to say about how some of these studies, and they point one out, the University of Central Florida, conducted a grand experiment where they put a child in front of a computer, and it shows the video in this. The research, by the way, you can get this article at glenbeck.com. You just sign up for my free email newsletter. You get all the stories we talk about every day. Research has showed a child two separate videos.

One video was about mathematics, and it involves a teacher talking about basic addition, subtraction, and multiplication. The other video was the pod racing scene from Star Wars. Now, you'll never guess what they discovered. Oh, what did they discover? They discovered that when the math lecture was going on, the kid started spinning in his chair and he was fidgeting and not paying attention. But when the child was watching the pod. Yes. Something deeply psychologically wrong with that kid. You're telling me when they showed the one good scene from the first prequel they were interested?

Wow. That's shocking. I was fidgeting. The rest of the movie was like math. Yeah, I would say I would like give me the one that is the pod racing scene versus the trade dispute scene from the star. Why go to anything else? Just do the Star Wars thing. Right. So it doesn't prove anything. It proves that there wasn't a lot of good scenes in the first Star Wars. Wait a minute. I just did a. study with my kids. They like sugary cereal over brand flakes. Oh my gosh, ADE. I know. I got to get

them on the brand flakes. No, I got to get them on LSD or something. We are looking for these, these, uh, the, these, uh, diagnosis of these to diagnose kids in this way, I think often. That doesn't mean that there aren't some that are that have these types of issues. I, I, you know, I, I, when you refer to that article, this is, you said Matt Walsh wrote this. Matt, I don't know. It's from Daily Wire. I thought it was Matt. Daily Wire is great. We love the DailyWall. wire guys. Obviously, that's, you know, the one I had read was some scientific, I thought it were referring to a different story where they did not say it was a scam. Obviously, it's an opinion to say it's a scam. Although it might be the right thing. Yeah, it's a pretty

strong opinion. It might be the right one. I don't know. But I mean, I was referring to a different article, which is why I was confused that you're framing of it. So like, these are. Right, right, right, right. I think there are kids that are affected with really different, they have real trouble in school. Oh my gosh. Focusing on things. Of course. That was, that are maybe a little bit more than they can handle. a psychological disorder. It's not. It's not. All kids are wired differently.

Yeah. Boys and girls are wired differently in the first place. Then it's just, you know, that's one of the things that AI can produce that will be good with you as a parent overseeing it every step of the way is it will adapt to the way you learn because everybody learns differently, you know? There are kids that just, they're into math and I don't get it and they can talk about math all day long and they've lost me. But a kid that likes to learn through stories, I'm there all day for him. I'm there all day. And I was the same way. I'm a visual learner.

I'm a story. You know, I learn from stories. And if I have a really boring teacher, some of the kids are really going to love that teacher because he's just all about facts and just gets it all out and can explain it. In fact, that doesn't help me. That doesn't help me. That doesn't mean I have a psychological, well, make it clear. That by itself does not indicate that I have a deep psychological problem. Okay. Other things might, but not that. That's just everybody is different, especially the difference between boys and girls. And here's what they said. The conclusion was that ADHD is triggered.

by cognitively demanding tasks. No, no, it's not. No, it's not. I was painting yesterday, and I can't tell you how many times I just kind of like was holding the brush and I walked around the house and I'm like, oh, wait a minute, I was painting.

I mean, I just get, I just, you know, lose train of thought and I start thinking about something else. And I'm like, wait, oh, wait, I got to go back into the art room and paint, you know. I don't know if anybody else is like that, but, you know, it's honestly, It's kind of like going to the fridge all the time, you know. There's no reason to go to the fridge and just stare at the fridge that you just opened up and stared at, you know.

That's not a deep psychological problem. That's just the way you're wired. Fat? Yes. Yes. Yes. The fat is directly wired right to my brain. Right to the brain.

Right to the brain. So, you know, I personally think a lot of things, uh, are solved, and not for everybody, not universally, but are solved by understanding that we're all different. And then, you know, just not being such a Mambi-pambi, wishi, shi-washy society that's trying to understand everything. Do you ever see the South Park episode on ADHD? Listen to this. Hello, I'm Dr. Richard Shea here to tell you about my exciting new drug-free treatment for children with attention deficit disorder.

This treatment is fast and effective and doesn't use harmful drugs. Watch closely as I apply treatment to the first time. And study! If you would like more information on my bold new treatment, please send away for this free brochure entitled. So part of it is, part of it is, and this is obviously way over. You should hit kids. No, no.

What I'm saying is, and this is, you know, this is a very broad brush. times. One of the things that we have a problem with now is just saying, knock it off, study, knock it off, focus. And I know not everybody can, but if you couple that with actually knowing that kids are different and trying to find the best way for your kids to learn, because it's not, that's the problem, honestly, with big class sizes and a lot of public schools. Public schools are made for everybody to be the same. Okay? Everybody has to be the same. Well, they're not the same.

Some kids, some kids learn really well in that atmosphere. Some kids don't. It's not one size fits all. And they're not teaching you. You know, it's a lot more exciting when you are learning things. I mean, honestly, how many times have you heard your kids say, well, your kids aren't teenagers yet? So you'll start to hear this. One is, yeah.

Really? How old? Zach's 13. 13. About to turn 14. Wow. Yeah, crazy. He's about to be married and have kids.

Or at least just have kids. Anyway, oh, please no. You know, you'll hear from your kids, why do I have to know this? Why am I memorizing this? I'll never use it. I'll never use it. And, you know, as a parent, you want to say, you're right. There's no reason why you need to know, memorize that name and that year.

Tell my kids all the time. AI's coming. You're not going to have to know anything. All you have to do is just type it in and it'll do all the work. It might not be a good. Don't worry about it. Never learn another thing, son. See, I don't tell them it's coming.

I tell them it's already here. Why are you working on that? Why are you questioning? Just take a picture of it. Give it to Grock and it will finish it. But there's, we have to start, we have to start going back to a lot of the common sense, you know, that we used to have. And there's a lot of things that were really bad.

I mean, you know, I was, I was. afraid of our principal. She was, it was Sister Una. Okay? That just says enough right there. Sister Una. And she had a paddle that she hung up in her office that she made herself.

And it was a wood paddle and she had drilled holes in it to pick up speed so there wasn't real resistance. Oh, yeah. Oh my. And she, you know, she was proud of it. She was proud of it. But you know what I was more afraid of? I mean, I would have taken the paddling, give it to me twice as hard, sister.

Just let's keep this between us. Just don't call my parents. Okay. We don't have that anymore. We don't have that anymore. And there are some things that come from discipline, some things that come from kids being different, and some, you know, because they do have an issue.

You know, you can't talk a kid out of, you know, dyslexia. You can't understand your way out of dyslexia. You can't do anything except understand that that makes your child different. And there are ways for them to learn. But the worst thing you can do is to medicate your child so they don't adapt. They have to. You either are wildly successful or you're going to live under a bridge if you have ADD.

You decide. You either adapt to it and use it as a strength or you just, you don't adapt to it and you just are crushed by the rest of your life. Na, no, no.