The Glenn Beck Program - Best of the Program | 8/29/18

Episode Date: August 29, 2018

Ep #170 - The Daily Best of GB Podcast: 8/29/18  - The Media vs. Skin Color? - The Schools Shootings That Weren't? - 'Ruthsteria' and Ruth On-A Shelf'? - Louis C.K. is back, but is it too early? -�...�Alex Jones defends his trans-porn searches Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 The Blaze Radio Network On Demand Welcome to the podcast, it's Stu, along with Jackie. He's joining me here. Pat also was on the show today. Yeah, he was all right. He was okay. I mean, you know, yeah, if you like that sort of thing.
Starting point is 00:00:16 I guess he was. We start the show with Jeffrey Tubin, who, I mean, has made a ridiculous points. And a point, you know, you go over, you go over and watch a lot of cable news. You might have just hearing the same points over and over again. I will say this for Jeffrey Toobin. I have never heard the point he made last night.
Starting point is 00:00:31 I've never heard. heard anyone to make it. I've never heard anyone accuse this organization of this. It's a claim about racism that is brand new to me. So we've got a new thing in our, that's kind of interesting in this world. It actually is, yeah. You feel like everything's been said. And Jeffrey Toobin breaks that today. We have the new NPR study about school shootings, which is incredible. Absolutely incredible. And some great reporting by NPR. You will be surprised that they even decided to do this. Boy, that's for sure, because you'd expect NPR to look at the original. original number and go, wow, that's bad. You people are all bad instead of going. Hey, that number
Starting point is 00:01:07 seems high. Yeah. Louis C.K. is back from his Me Too, I guess, trip to Siberia. That's where they wanted him to go. He's made his first comedy appearance in New York, and we'll talk about that. And what are the, what's the appropriate punishments for these actions? We'll get into that today, as well as a brand new story about civil asset forfeiture, another person who did nothing wrong, has no crime against them, and lost a bunch of their money in an inexplicable development across the United States.
Starting point is 00:01:39 I don't know why this is happening, why more people aren't standing up against it, but it is happening. I mean, all these municipalities are using this, and there's a couple other ways now that people are sending us, that these cities are using just to, you know, obviously
Starting point is 00:01:55 it's for our safety and to enhance their payroll. Yeah. It doesn't sound like a good idea. And if you heard the rumor of Alex Jones viewing trans porn on the air by mistake, what? He's got an explanation from that. It's fascinating. We get to all of that today on the podcast.
Starting point is 00:02:19 You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program. It's Wednesday, August 29th. It's Pat Stu and Jeffrey for Glenn this week. We were just talking about Trump derangement syndrome. and there's a couple of terms that circulate through the media all the time. One of them's fake news. The other is Trump derangement syndrome. And they bug me.
Starting point is 00:02:53 And I think they bother you to a certain extent, Stoop, because it makes it, I don't know, it just makes it seem like everybody who says anything about the president has Trump derangements. And that's not the case. I mean, we don't have it. And we complain about some of the things he does. Yeah, I mean, the test usually is whether you can find things that you like, right? Yeah. And we've gone through many, many things that we do like that the president has done.
Starting point is 00:03:19 But I will say... Even his critics, though, I don't think are always affected with Trump derangement system. Like, if you're a liberal, right? And you see things like Neil Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, you may very well not like those on ideological grounds. That doesn't mean you have Trump derangement. arrangement syndrome, that means you just don't like his picks, right? There seems to be a different situation going on for some people, though. Although, yeah, if there's any, and if there's any location that's infected with supposed
Starting point is 00:03:50 Trump derangement syndrome, it's just about everybody at CNN, including Jeffrey Tubin. I mean, he's a guy that once in a while makes sense, but not really when it comes to Trump. Yeah, he just, there's a, there's a sign of the, if you're going to make Trump derangement. arrangement syndrome into something, there's a sign of it of like pulling every issue, no matter how separate from race and those, and hatred, bring all of them to that. No matter what it is, whether it's a Supreme Court pick, whether it's a tax decrease, whether it's talking about, you know, North Korea, whatever you can, bring it back to the idea that the reason he's doing X, Y, and C is because he hates black people.
Starting point is 00:04:33 Like it's just going to that same boring analysis saying every single thing revolves around that one issue. And it shows, of course, it reveals your obsession with that issue. It reveals your obsession, not ours, but your obsession with skin color, with your obsession with, you know, reproductive organs. Your obsession with that. That's not something that we want to care about. But you're constantly bringing it up. And this is a perfect example from yesterday with Jeffrey Tubin when he was talking about. the president saying how if Republicans lose in the midterms and the Democrats take control of the House,
Starting point is 00:05:13 there's going to be violence in the streets. And listen to the way Jeffrey Tubin spins that. The theme here is, I'm Donald Trump and I'll protect you from the scary black people. Antifa is widely perceived as an African American organization. No, it's not. And this is just part of the same story of LeBron. Ron James and Don Lemon and Maxine Waters and the NFL players and the UCLA basketball players. This is about black versus white.
Starting point is 00:05:42 This is about Donald Trump's appeal to racism. And it just happens all the time. And we never say it or we don't say it enough for what it is. Don't say it enough. That's what's going on. That is amazing. Okay. Antifa is widely considered just black people by whom?
Starting point is 00:05:59 By you maybe? Like you said, we're just saying. do, that says more about him than it does Donald Trump, a lot more. I mean, that's racist. Yeah, I mean, because nobody considers Antifa just black people. I consider them anarchists. I consider them hell bent on chaos and communism. I don't consider them black necessarily.
Starting point is 00:06:23 Yeah. Yeah. But even more than that, we've done a lot of coverage on this group. We've, you know, we've done multiple, you know, Glenn's done the week-long chalkboard on them. He's done multiple big monologues about them. Their history, where they came from. First of all, they did not come, certainly from African-American roots in any way.
Starting point is 00:06:42 They came from, you know, it started back in World War II. But beyond that, all the videos we've seen of Antifa, I'm not saying there's no black people in the organization, but I can't think of one picture in my brain of ever seeing a black person in Antifa. Yeah, I can't either. I'm sure they are. I mean, just because odds.
Starting point is 00:07:01 But I've never, I can't remember. remember ever seeing one. They're almost always like the person who you think you're going to bump into Starbucks the next day. Some like, you know, tortured, angsty, you know, 22 year old who, you know, who went to too many communist college courses and now thinks they're going to change the world by throwing things at people. I don't think, I don't know that I've ever heard anyone make the point before. Ever. This is like the first time I've ever heard the point that black people are associated with Antiphon. Me too. They're just, it, I always think of it as like that, like Seattle, Starbucksy, you know, angst.
Starting point is 00:07:36 I don't think at all. It's not a racial organization at all. It started against fascism back in the day, and you can make an argument when it started, it actually did good things, but it's been evolved to, at this point, it's ridiculousness. I mean, it's just anything that they don't love.
Starting point is 00:07:50 They're just anarchists now. Yeah. Yeah, they're just left-wing anarchists. And it's, it's agonizing to continually hear the nonsense that everything's about race. And you know, that just diminishes when things are about race. When you make everything about race, you've just watered down the actual racism that does exist. And we see from time to time, certainly not as much as CNN sees it.
Starting point is 00:08:17 But I don't think I've ever heard Donald Trump even say anything about Antifa being groups of black people. No. I haven't heard anybody saying it, not just us. Nobody claims that it's about blackness. And this is what surprises me all the time. Like when you have these issues that pop up with race, the left has immersed themselves so completely in this issue. And to them, it is like the ultimate equation that solves all math problems.
Starting point is 00:08:52 You know, it's just, I remember when Barack Obama was going and they talked about an apartment and they said that was racist. It's like an apartment. I lived in a lot of apartments. There's a lot of white people that live in apartments. Way more white people live in apartments nationwide than black people do. It's just an absurd thing. Chicago. Yeah, Chicago.
Starting point is 00:09:11 Why is a dog whistle for black people? Right. And like, no. What? There's a lot of violence that goes on there. Yeah. Yeah. Chicago.
Starting point is 00:09:19 That's code for black people. It's an absurd instinct. The word car. That's code for people. Yeah. Car. Really? The word the.
Starting point is 00:09:28 If you use the too much? It's code for black people. You mean the black people. That's what you mean when you say the word the. What explains that motivation though? Racism. I think it's racist. I think that in and of itself is racist.
Starting point is 00:09:43 I think Jeffrey Tubin's a racist. I'm just so tired of beating around the bush with these people on what they are and who they are. I'm really kind of done with it. When you see race everywhere, when that's all you think of, Maybe you should turn that, you know, look in the mirror. Become a little bit introspective. Maybe you're the racist. Yeah, because I think there's an instinct, especially with the older, I mean, we used to say this about Chris Matthews.
Starting point is 00:10:10 Chris Matthews went through a generation in which race was such a big issue for people. And it was something that was constantly talked about. And, you know, really until Obama kind of got in there and, you know, he was, we really came from that perspective of viewing everything. through the prism of race. He constantly saw things in racial terms. To the point where he said this. You know, I forgot he was black tonight for an hour. Right.
Starting point is 00:10:37 Because usually I, that's all I think of. That's all I think so, right? Like, when you think of everything in the term of black and white, uh-huh. Well, shockingly, everything becomes a black and white issue. Yeah. And, you know, it's the same thing that happens with conspiracy theorists, right? Conspiracy theorists, you get in, when you get down the road to 9-11,
Starting point is 00:10:55 and you get down the road of Sandy Hook, and you go down all these things, well of course every shooting seems like a false flag to you. Every time you see something, you think it's a conspiracy theory with the government. And it's the same thing with the left and race. It's not this. There are actual things. Just like with conspiracy theories, governments do actually do bad things. They have done things at times that are really terrible.
Starting point is 00:11:19 But it's the same thing with this, where you have racial issues that are real. There are actual racial issues that come up. But when you see everything, that way. You can't stop yourself from pulling things that are, you know, 15 lanes over from race back into your lane because that's all you think about all the time. But it also like that's up then lessens the real racism. Yeah. I mean, it just weakens that all the heck. And that's what the same with, you know, the full Trump derangement syndrome. You know, there are times when you want to be against Donald Trump, but you listen to the deranged syndrome people and you're like, okay, well,
Starting point is 00:11:52 no, I'm not that bad. Yeah. I'm not going there with you. I mean, in a way that's letting someone else control the way you feel, which I don't like either. You know, just because the media says stupid things shouldn't affect my opinion. I should be able to come up with my opinion on my own. But this is another example of it. They did this thing a while ago where it was like, you know, 13 of the last 15 people that Donald Trump has called dumb were black. And this proves.
Starting point is 00:12:15 And too, it actually kind of references that they were Maxine Waters. Except that seven or eight of them were the same person. Yeah, no, yeah, I think it was something like 10 of 11 or something like that. Yeah. It was Maxine Waters and Don Lemon, the two. Right. And you also, to believe this theory, you have to also believe that he was not racist at all until he was elected. Because he did, before that, he was calling white people dumb all the time.
Starting point is 00:12:38 All the time. And then for the whole first year of his presidency, he only called one person dumb, Mika Brzeinsky, who's white. So you have to believe he developed the racism not in his first 71 years, but in the last year. And in that last year, he developed the racism all completely. solely based on Maxine Waters and Don Lemon. Isn't an easier explanation of that is he doesn't like Maxine Waters and Don Lemon? Maxine Waters and Don Lemon have been recently criticizing him, and what Donald Trump does in those moments is called them dumb.
Starting point is 00:13:10 It's just like he called Jeb Bush dumb and Marco Rubio dumb and Tim Cruz dumb. And Jeff Bush is dumb. He had a really good point there. Jim Bush is dumb. Some people are. So is Maxine Waters. Yes, she is. Now, Don Lemon, I do not think is dumb. Yes, she is.
Starting point is 00:13:24 He is an opponent and he's, you know, he's liberal at times and I don't, but Maxine Waters, I think pretty clearly is dumb. She makes incredibly stupid points all the time. She's made a good case for being dumb the last few years, if not her entire life. Her whole career. I mean, it could be, there could be other examples. Maybe she's, you know, losing her sharpness as she gets later in life. I don't know.
Starting point is 00:13:44 But, I mean, she is tripped up and made really insane comment. Hank Johnson, you know, Hank Johnson comes out and says Guam's going to tip over. Can we not say that he's dumb because he's black? He happens to be a black person. No, that's a dumb comment. White or black, whoever said it, that's a dumb comment. You know, Guam's not going to tip over because you put too many military forces on one side of it. That's not what islands do.
Starting point is 00:14:09 Okay? So, I mean, can we not observe that sometimes people have those moments? Do you have that from a scientist? I had it from a military source. Yeah, okay. Who immediately was like, uh, we don't anticipate that happening. Great. One of the greatest responses of all times.
Starting point is 00:14:26 So good. But, you know, take, you're right, taking these things from issues that are not related to race and trying to move them into that analysis weakens the actual case. And it doesn't make any sense. It's the same thing, you know, like the alt-right, largely speaking, the alt-right is a small group compared to, you know, conservatives and Republicans and everything else. But when you try to call every single Republican alt-right, you fail.
Starting point is 00:14:59 You fail because you then weaken the case against people like Richard Spencer, who is really a problem. Like that theory, his theories, I think, are real negative and certainly have nothing to do with conservatism. But when you bring like Mitt Romney and you call him alt-right, it doesn't, there's no, there's, there's, you lose all value in your criticism. Yeah, and all credibility. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:15:21 The Best of the Glenn Beck program. NPR has a really surprising study that they did. I'm blown away that NPR, first of all, paid attention to it in the first place. Secondly, actually reported their findings because this doesn't seem to fit their narrative. No, and it's one of those stats that when you hear it, it blatantly fails to you as possible. You'll see liberals constantly share these numbers. There's been 7,000 in school shootings. this year and you're just like, is there any
Starting point is 00:15:59 moment where you just sit back and say there's no way that's possible? Like you obviously know it's not true? Is there any part of you that gets to that point in your analysis? Well, there were supposedly in 2015, 240 school shootings. Right. And we know that's preposterous. Of course. That didn't happen.
Starting point is 00:16:17 Now, sometimes they get to those numbers in various ways. For example, a guy who has no association with a school at midnight feels despondent, leaves his home, pulls into the back corner of the school parking lot, and shoots himself. Is that a school shooting? No, but it was an incident with a gun on school grounds.
Starting point is 00:16:36 To any gun hating organization, that's a school shooting. And they'll put that in. You'll have times where police officers will come, and the police officer will mistakenly shoot his gun that hits no one, and they'll call it a school shooting. You know, someone, there have been times where pellet guns, some kid will bring in a pellet gun and shoot one of his friends and they'll call it a school shooting. These are the type of things they go in there to deuce the numbers because we know the problem is there. There is a problem with school shootings.
Starting point is 00:17:04 However, we know now we don't have to juice the numbers because there was 240 shootings in 2015. And this is a U.S. Department of Education report. So, you know, it's some credibility, I guess, behind it. It's not like, you know, it's not Mother Jones or, you know, every town for gun safety. This was a government report, which people generally speaking will take seriously. the year was 2015, 2016, nearly 240 schools reported at least one incident involving a school-related shooting. NPR, God only knows the reason, decided to actually check into this, which is amazing in and of itself. Because usually when there's a stat about guns that make guns look bad, nobody looks into them.
Starting point is 00:17:46 That's kind of the policy. Yeah. But in this case, what they found was amazing. 240 school shootings. they write in 161 cases schools or districts attested that no incident took place or couldn't confirm one. So what they're saying is not the stuff I'm talking about before
Starting point is 00:18:07 where like it's a Pelican or it's a guy committing suicide near school grounds. No, they're saying 161 of the 240 were just nothing. It's even more amazing than that because of the remaining 59 cases they couldn't be, some of those couldn't be confirmed or disconfirmed. So they're unsure on them. They actually found only 11 confirmed by either the schools or through news reports. 11 out of 240. It's amazing.
Starting point is 00:18:38 It's amazing. And, you know, again, if you have a school shooting, it's probably going to be easy to confirm. You know, you call Parkland School District right now. They're going to be able to confirm a school shooting occurred there. Yeah. Some of this is amazing. Civil Rights Data Collection for 2018 required every public school more than 96,000
Starting point is 00:18:53 answer questions on a wide range of issues What it appears is they put the wrong number Like someone put, I think it was Cleveland, put 37 in for school shootings and they meant to answer the question before it. Good gosh. Now if Cleveland had 37 school shootings,
Starting point is 00:19:07 I feel like we might have heard of that. You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program. Like listening to this podcast? If you're not a subscriber, become one now on iTunes. And while you're there, Do us a favor and rate the show.
Starting point is 00:19:34 You know, there's some kind of Ruth Bader Ginsburg hysteria going on right now. And I, you know, not only is there a documentary. There's a major movie release coming out, I think, on Christmas Day. And now there's a CNN special. Are they running the, is it? I think they're running the documentary. But man, are they promoting that thing?
Starting point is 00:19:57 Ruth Sterea. Yeah. Ruth Sterea is good. I like that. I like Ruth Sterea. It is really amazing. You know, again, there was a Ruth Bader Ginsburg documentary made and just like praising her.
Starting point is 00:20:08 There's like a little cult following around her. And it's kind of one of those things that here's this little tiny old lady who's super tough and doesn't give up on her. And of course, she's super liberal, which helps. But I honestly think it's part of it is like sort of a Betty White syndrome where like I, you know, I love Betty White. But like there was a thing she had a few years ago. Oh, yeah. Peter Ginsburg. But after you reach a certain age and, you know, I'm well aware of this, is.
Starting point is 00:20:31 that after you reach a certain age, people are like, oh, he's cute. I haven't reached that yet. Well, you've reached. I'm well aware of it. You haven't reached the age where people think you're cute, but you have past Ruth Bitter-Ginsberg's age. But it also is, I think, I think you're right with the Betty White syndrome. And I think also it's, man, we've got to build her up and make her happy so she doesn't leave. I think there's something to that, too.
Starting point is 00:20:53 Because I will tell you this, if she were to retire tomorrow, they would hate her more than anybody has ever been hated. How dare you? How dare you leave now? Well, they did it to Kennedy. They bludgeoned him for leaving. They loved him for years because he was the quote-unquote conservative that kept siding with him. Yeah. He was the greatest guy in the world until he was gone.
Starting point is 00:21:14 And then he was the worst guy in the world. The Ginsburg thing is so amazing because there seems to be, I mean, other than the speculation, I just can't figure out what the reason for it all of a sudden is. I think she's an interesting character in which. which she's, if you think about it, if you're a liberal, right? Like the same way I love Clarence Thomas, right? Clarence Thomas, because he's generally, he's the most conservative person on the Supreme Court.
Starting point is 00:21:42 And at least, you know, depending on how you measure it. And those things are always tough to measure. But he's certainly one of the top one or two. And he's a, you know, I think he does a great job on the Supreme Court. And he, so he's really, so that part of it, if you're a liberal, you love Ruth Bader Ginsburg. She never disappoints you. She's always, always on the liberal side. She never, oh, wait, wow, this one.
Starting point is 00:22:01 and she went the other way. She's super predictable. A hundred percent like, you know, basically Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez add about 100 points to the IQ and put her in the Supreme Court. Right? Like, it's that sort of arrangement.
Starting point is 00:22:14 Of course the left loves that, right? I mean, you know, she's... And, you know, that's part of it, I think. Another part of it is, you know, just her physical sort of stature, right? Like, she's this kind of tiny, like old lady... And just a powerhouse.
Starting point is 00:22:29 Who's just still a powerhouse? And I think that's one of the things they like about Betty White. That's how Betty White had that research in some ways. In the past, we heard how much what a relationship she had with Scalia and how he loved her. They loved a battle. So she's had that kind of bit of a little bit of love with that. But can you imagine? And she's fought for women's rights.
Starting point is 00:22:48 For women's rights. All the causes that are popular. But I mean, think about this from a news organization standpoint. This is essentially a pro-Ruth-Bader Ginsburg propaganda piece. It's basically trying to turn her into a cult. hero, which has sort of happened, and this is on that, on that level, should CNN be airing that? I mean, to me, the answer is no. Even the same thing with, you know, with Scalia, right?
Starting point is 00:23:15 Like, Scalia passes away. Should you be, should you make a documentary or air a documentary that's a one-sided propaganda piece about Antonin Scalia if you're a news organization? Probably not, right? I mean, if you're going to do the thing about Ruth Bates, Ginsberg, you probably also have to do it for Anton and Scalia if you want to even attempt to look fair. Well, the good thing is, is that she believes in the United States and the Constitution.
Starting point is 00:23:40 And that, you know, there's nothing better. Yeah, absolutely. We saw that in this. The word woman does not appear even once in the U.S. Constitution. Nor does the word freedom. Your honor. Boo-ya! Oh, did she nail him.
Starting point is 00:24:00 Wow. That's supposedly based on a true incident, I guess, from her past, which was in her 30s and or 20s, I don't know. But the Supreme Court Justice leans in and says, The word woman doesn't appear even once in the U.S. Constitution. Nor does the word freedom, Your Honor. Except for, well, it does. But other than that. Don't worry about the facts.
Starting point is 00:24:31 That's great. Is it? I mean, it's not in our Constitution, though, right? I mean, it's like it's in our constitution. But you've got to go all the way to the first amendment before you find the word freedom. So it's pretty tough. I mean, it's tough to find it. And she is the one who famously, as Jeffie was kind of just pointing out there, said that South Africa's constitution was.
Starting point is 00:24:56 Yeah, South Africa's is the one which you should focus on. And Canada. because it was written in 1982. Ours is too old. But for instance, in South Africa... What does that analysis mean for her? You know, it's like, I love this idea that the oldest person on the Supreme Court can tell us it's, you know, the Constitution's too old. Should we start throwing out Supreme Court justices at 65 to?
Starting point is 00:25:20 One of the reasons that she really liked the Constitution from South Africa. Well, they came up with a really incredible concept of an independent judiciary. Yeah, who would have thought of that? Why the hell didn't we think of that? Oh, wait. An independent judiciary. What if we had, wait, what if we had an independent judiciary, an independent legislative branch? And you couple that with an independent executive branch.
Starting point is 00:25:45 And now you're just talking crazy now. They're all separate and co-equal what would happen. I mean, I can't even think what kind of government you'd have then. It's like, what do you mean? They came up with, we did that 240. 40 years ago. What are you talking about? Have you seen our Constitution, Ruth? Have you read it? Certainly by her rulings, I don't think she's read it. And by this little trailer, I don't think she's read it. You're telling us that the word of freedom is not in it. And I love the way she pauses there because it's so powerful.
Starting point is 00:26:16 So she's so power. The first time I heard it, I thought she was saying, no, the word woman isn't in there, but the word freedom is. No. Listen to this carefully. The word woman does not appear even once in the U.S. Constitution. You can tell he's a pastor. Listen to the tone of his voice. Almost like, you know, Christian Bales, Batman. The word woman. It's almost like he's vomiting the word woman.
Starting point is 00:26:41 It's so offensive to him. The word woman. Listen to it is. The word woman does not appear even once in the U.S. Constitution. Nor does the word freedom. Yeah, nor does the word freedom. Your Honor. Oh, my.
Starting point is 00:26:58 Ooh, that's powerful. Oof, that's just a stinging indictment there. I mean, freedom of speech. I think the point is that the U.S. Constitution is flawed. And, you know, the word woman's not in it. Neither is the word freedom. Neither do we have, I guess, an independent judiciary that's set apart. I mean, it's ridiculous.
Starting point is 00:27:20 Was she arguing for a new amendment to the Constitution at this point? In this particular? I don't know. Because the only thing you can maybe think of it, and off the top of my head, I can't, I don't know. But she's just saying that she's not concluding the amendments. Like we had to amend the Constitution to get freedom in it. Is that what she's trying to say?
Starting point is 00:27:38 If you would have said, if you, it doesn't appear until the amendments, that's one thing. Because the Bill of Rights is part of the Constitution. Right, I know. But what I'm saying is if she's arguing for, which I would maybe suspect, the equal rights amendment, Uh-huh. Maybe she's saying we have to add in the word woman.
Starting point is 00:27:56 Maybe. Here with another amendment. I don't know. Again, I'm giving her too much of a break here. Way too much, and we always do that. Yeah, I know. They never do that for us. No, of course, never.
Starting point is 00:28:06 Never, but I'm just trying to understand. I feel like that's valuable to at least attempt. Try to understand it. But I can't wait until Christmas Day when this power of power. I'm taking the family. Oh, yeah. You are. Oh, man.
Starting point is 00:28:17 Before we open presents, we're headed to. Yeah. Oh, man. I've already, I've already got the. the wine ready to go open up take a drink a sip of wine go to the movies and just celebrate roosteria yeah go for it and ruth better gets work is about the size of my elf on a shelf too so it kind of fits with the christmas thing does look like elf on the shelf she's so tiny tiny but powerful tiny but powerful that's tremendous it's kind of like tiny you know like the same way people think about small
Starting point is 00:28:45 dogs where like you know there's really it's really difficult for a small dog to be ugly even though, like, I have pugs and pugs are absolutely ugly, but people think they're cute because they're small. Yeah. Right? They're small. Yeah. And not Jeffie doesn't, but of course, Jeffie, you know, look at Jeffie.
Starting point is 00:29:01 But there's a, there's that thing where I think when you're small and powerful, it gives you that, like, there's some cool part of that people like. Yeah. And I think that's the main part. Because there's no, like, you could easily love Breyer, who's also old and also super liberal. Right. Like there's, you know, you could have, I mean, you could go and praise Sotomayor, who, and some measures is to the left of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and it's younger and Hispanic. You could do that if you wanted to as well.
Starting point is 00:29:32 But they're picking Ruth Bader Ginsburg, I think because of just physical qualities, which again, they say you should never do. But she's tiny and she's old and she's cute and, like, you want to give her a little hug and maybe pet her. Right. You know, and I think that's why. her up and walk with her. Yeah, you want to just give her a big hug. She's, we're Peter Ginsburg. I don't necessarily.
Starting point is 00:29:53 I really don't. I want to, personally, I want to do Ruth on a shelf now. Ruth on a shelf is a solid product. That's a solid, we could easily get some of those. Yes. You feel like your house might be haunted with it, though. I don't think I want to come out in the middle of the night. That thing's just scampering across the ground somehow.
Starting point is 00:30:11 Wait, how did that happen? I think it could happen. A Ruth on a shelf easily comes alive. That would be tremendous. And that I don't want. No, it's scary. That's a frightening thought. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program, and we really want to thank you for listening.
Starting point is 00:30:40 The Me Too movement continues to swim along quite nicely. And, you know, make sure that people don't work. And I mean, and that's fine if people have actually committed egregious crimes. You mean, like one of the founders, Asia Argento, who is apparently now, getting thrown out of her jobs, which is interesting. That's an interesting development. That is interesting.
Starting point is 00:31:08 Yeah. You know, I don't know how to handle this stuff because when you have a legal system, right? What you do is in advance of the trial, you have laws on the books, and then people know what those laws are. And then when you go in and you have a trial and you're found guilty,
Starting point is 00:31:23 they're on the books is a range of punishment, which would be applied to the person who committed the crime. So you're saying, after the after you have say i don't know uh presented evidence and a jury is perhaps said that there's enough evidence to say yes you're guilty and and then after that there's some consequences yes that is what i would before that's what happens because those people you're you're a bad person okay so so just the accusation is enough to say you're a bad person you need to get out of your job and that seems to be where we are now so you get the you feel the
Starting point is 00:32:00 punishment right away. You lose all of your jobs. You lose your company. You lose everything, whether you did it or not. And again, it is certainly just for people like, let's say, Harvey Weinstein, who did a lot of terrible things. However, on that same front, you should actually be convicted of a crime before the punishment gets associated with you. And we've jumped the gun on that one, and we now believe the person should get punished immediately. And with someone in the wine scene, it's easy. We all suspect that he really did all these things, and it seems overwhelmingly,
Starting point is 00:32:33 there's an overwhelming amount of evidence, including his own words on tape that indicate that. So, you know, no one really cares on that one. But when it comes to someone like Louis C.K., is a good example of this. Louis C.K. was part of the Me Too movement. And if you remember the story, basically he did things to himself in front of women.
Starting point is 00:32:55 After he asked them if it was okay. Yeah, awkward. Right? I mean, as you'd expect from Louis CK, very awkward. Hey, can I do this in front of you? Well, one of the stories even was that one girl remembered that he asked and I said, no, and so it didn't happen. So he didn't happen. Right.
Starting point is 00:33:12 Yeah. So she said no. Amazingly, it worked. Yeah. Right. Right. Now the other system worked. Yes.
Starting point is 00:33:18 And now they're still complaining about it. Right. Well, if you didn't want him to do that, then you should have said no. Right. And then if he continued, you'd have a case. if he does Now what we have And from my understanding is
Starting point is 00:33:30 That there's no allegation That he ever did that Against their will Yeah I don't I don't know if some of I don't know if any of them said that I don't remember any of them saying that I mean it's creepy what he was doing
Starting point is 00:33:41 Yes Very creepy But he did ask for permission And seemingly Permission was granted Yeah or there I think one of There's one group of women
Starting point is 00:33:49 They didn't say anything They didn't say anything And they just kind of laugh at him And then he said I'm gonna take my clothes off now okay And they kind of like Uncomfortable and then stayed.
Starting point is 00:33:58 He takes his clothes off and they're so upset they don't leave. Well, now their argument here, he's a comedian and he's a comedian and he's powerful and famous. Now, some of these were before. Comedians have all power over people? Because I wasn't aware of this up until this point.
Starting point is 00:34:12 Well, comedians have this extraordinary power over people. How are you still working? I don't know. Well, I guess you could argue. I mean, again, I think their argument is poor here. But their argument is he does have power in the world of being in comedian and these were people who were trying to rise.
Starting point is 00:34:29 Like, you know, like Jerry Seinfeld certainly has some impact. At the time he was doing a TV show. He was doing other stuff. He had deals with Netflix. Those are all gone. But at the time he did. Right. So he did have some kind of power.
Starting point is 00:34:41 Right. Like, you have power. Like, you know, would you say, you know, Jerry Seinfeld has, could have an influence on a young comedian's career? I mean, the answer to that's, of course, the answer is yes. All young comedians? Did he do this in front of? I know, at least a few of them were.
Starting point is 00:34:54 You know, there was one who said, that, I mean, even talk about a weak allegation. The allegation, again, these are just such a weird topics. The allegation was that Louis C.K. got on the phone with a woman.
Starting point is 00:35:15 And the woman during the call suspected, believed. He never said he was. Oh, that's right. I remember this. But suspected that he was masturbating while on the phone with her. Oh, my gosh. Now, there was no confirmation of that, but that's what she thought was going on.
Starting point is 00:35:31 And that was a Me Too allegation. And he was so powerful that she could not hang up? I guess so. Okay. There you go. I mean, let's let's be honest. He did not ask for permission. Well, he's on the phone.
Starting point is 00:35:43 He didn't say he was doing it either. No, she just believed it. She just believed it. Right. So the idea is, okay, well, Louis C.K. It's unbelievable. It's unbelievable. To say that.
Starting point is 00:35:53 Anybody who's been on the phone with that guy could say, yeah, I believe he was Pleasuring himself when we're on the phone, and I'm really offended by that. And I think, I think for all of my stress, I need like three and a half million dollars in this guy. No, you know what? No, I don't want to seem greedy. Two million. So their argument is, okay, well, he could behind the scenes say, you know what, I just don't like her work. I don't like, I don't think she's a good comedian.
Starting point is 00:36:18 And then she might not advance in her career. And, of course, a lot of times comedians will say, you know, anybody will say that. if they feel, a lot of people feel inaccurately that others have thwarted their careers, right? A lot of people say well, this person's keeping me down. It's a very human instinct to believe that. Unless you have real evidence of someone
Starting point is 00:36:37 doing it, it's hard to take anything from it. So, and there was very little of that with Louis C. Carey. I think one person I think may have said that if I remember correctly. I was headed in the opposite direction. I think a few of them were saying that they it seemed like
Starting point is 00:36:52 he did things to help them. Right. Like it was like awkward and he, because of the awkward situation, he actually tried to assist them in their career. So, so Louis C.K., for the first time now, has come out and done a comedy set at, uh, in New York. How dare he? How did it? The comedy seller?
Starting point is 00:37:10 Was it the comedy seller? It was one of those smaller clubs. 115 people were there not knowing he was coming. So, you know, and comedy seller in Carolines and New York, a few clubs like that are famous for big time comedians, popping out out of nowhere. there for a normal show. Practice their new set.
Starting point is 00:37:27 Yeah, practice their new set, try out some new material, and then leave. So out of nowhere, Louis C.K. comes out for his first public appearance. Does normal comedy, does not mention... Standing ovation. Standing ovation, before he even starts.
Starting point is 00:37:37 Does not mention the scandals at all. Just does his little routine, try some stuff out, and leaves. There was apparently one call from a patron of the appearance said, I wish I would have known in advance, so I could have made the decision whether I wanted to come or not.
Starting point is 00:37:53 You know, which, you know, guess I can understand, though, I bet they would have no trouble filling the room. Yes. And I just think this is the issue when you don't use the justice system. There's no punishment that has been allocated already. Like we saw Glenn Thrush from the, it was in New York Times, and he's been at Politico and a bunch of different things, you know, left-wing sort of White House type reporter who also got a Me Too allegation against him.
Starting point is 00:38:21 The allegation against him was that after late night parties, he would often hit on younger employees of the papers he was working for. And again, he was a, these are people who want to get into journalism. He's an important, powerful journalist. And there was no accusation that he actually forced anyone to do anything.
Starting point is 00:38:43 The accusation was that he should have known better to not fraterize with the younger workers. So, and what happened with him is he's back working. You know, he did not seem to have, he did lose. He was suspended, I think, for a while, but I think he's back now working. But there's no set punishments because there's no legal system here, right? We've decided to go around the legal system. Right.
Starting point is 00:39:07 And we've decided that these things should be educated in our own minds. What do we think Louis C.K. did? What do we think Glenn Thresh did? What do we think, you know, Kevin Spacey did? And we will allocate those as it comes. What was it? Jeffrey Tambor has. a Me Too allegation.
Starting point is 00:39:26 Yes. He seems to have felt no repercussions about it at all. After this, he was in the death of Stalin. He, you know, he was, you know, people, I don't know, do people just believe him? Because he would, you know, because he's on the right side of things. Possible. Yeah. You know, maybe, it doesn't seem to be a real obvious pattern here.
Starting point is 00:39:46 Is it wrong for Louis C.K. to now be able to come back and talk about things that he thinks are funny in front of people? Well, I mean, I think the answer to that is, If people don't show up, he should probably stop doing it. If he, you know, he'll, he'll, if people aren't interested in hearing what he wants to say, then he can't be a stand-up comedian anymore because people don't want to hear him. And that is a, you know, a market-based job. If people like your comedy, they come, and you get to do it for a living.
Starting point is 00:40:14 If they don't, and you suck and they don't come, then you don't. So, the outrage here that we have to allow, you know, we have to, you know, we have to, make sure that he never gets in front of people again and he has to be punished till the end of time is it's kind of a crazy instinct you know I don't know maybe it's almost as if we're addicted to outrage is this your job this week this is Jeffie no I've come up with it with a
Starting point is 00:40:42 useful job for Jeffie you're looking at the stupid poster the whole time right across for me for the addicted to outrage for those of you listening on radio that's all I see yeah I look at Stu I see this glut back well it is coming out soon So you can abide that.
Starting point is 00:40:57 But I guess it's in some ways is tied to that, right? I mean, we have, we all act as if we're perfect and we're all, we all act as if we've never made a mistake. And we all act as if we can just slam everybody who has had their public issues. When in reality, like there has to be. And this is, I think, part of the job of people who really support the Me Too movement and think its work is important. And a lot of it is that you have to, you have to take a stand as someone in the Me Too movement to say, this particular claim is bull crap. This particular claim doesn't rise to the level of what we're talking about.
Starting point is 00:41:32 Right. You know, the fact that there's a, there's a statement made by someone that's a little bit sexualized or, I mean, who's the guy, was it Amazon, I think?
Starting point is 00:41:41 It was the Amazon guy who was at a party. He was one of the heads of Amazon development, I think, or I think it was Amazon, not Netflix, but it was one of the big streaming providers. And he went to a party and he said some offensive things to a woman at a party. He was hitting on her.
Starting point is 00:41:55 And that was, I think, the only allegation that he was inappropriate in conversation at a drunken Christmas party and like that is something you know if you look back at the office the show
Starting point is 00:42:08 things like that happened all the time and it's not appropriate but like that person would just have people would think he's a dirtbag or people would say do you believe he did this once but now he doesn't seem to do that anymore and it would kind of blow over and now we have to make sure they're fired we have to make sure
Starting point is 00:42:24 they pay some public penance And he was. And he was. He did wide up, you know, I think he resigned. Yeah. He resigned under pressure is what actually happened. I mean, who among us haven't been drunk at a Christmas party and started hitting on? I mean, think about.
Starting point is 00:42:37 Quite a few of us. Who among us? Quite a few of us. Certainly, Jeffie would. If these standards were around in, you know, the 1830s with Jeffie was coming of age. I mean, I can't even imagine what would have happened to him. But, you know, look, there is, there should be some level. most, I don't know what the percentage is,
Starting point is 00:42:58 but I bet there's half of people why not meeting their significant other at work? Yeah. I don't know. I mean, I'm guessing at the percentage. Probably a high percentage, right? I mean, you have, or, and then if you want to add in people who are at bars that have been drinking,
Starting point is 00:43:12 you're even higher, right? I mean, like, you, that shouldn't mean if you, if you do something inappropriate, and many women made this argument around the Me Too point when that was really happening, is that, you know, that's part of, what I want. Like I want there to be
Starting point is 00:43:29 some available level of sexuality that is able to be expressed by someone I'm trying to court. If not, I mean, there has to be some sort of realize that no means no, right? 100%. So when
Starting point is 00:43:45 you know, when you start bashing Louis C.K., remember he asked. Right. He asked. And that's the thing. It's gone from no means no to don't ask. Yeah, yeah, it has. And, you know, that is a... Don't flirt. Don't flirt. Don't ask. Don't show interest.
Starting point is 00:44:01 Don't look. Don't certainly don't touch. So how do men and women ever get together again? You know, to ask fundamentally, how does the species continue? Yeah. At some point, in every relationship, you go in for your first kiss. Rarely are you saying... Hey, do you mind you sign this contract that allows me to, where my lips to touch yours, Like that's not how it happens
Starting point is 00:44:26 And there are people who misjudge it Right? Like I mean, I have always been on the case of Of being such a wuss That you wait way too long And eventually it's so obvious That it's time to go for it That's what I waited till
Starting point is 00:44:40 Because you know, I'm a loser But you know, not everybody's that way Sometimes people call it wrong You know, sometimes and that shouldn't be That can be something where we say Hey, you know, that's inappropriate at this place Hey don't do that anymore No, I'm not interested
Starting point is 00:44:55 thank you. Then the person absolutely needs to stop. But you know, there has to be some room for men and women, and maybe men and men and women, to do the little dance. Yeah. That is part of it. That's not Harvey Weinstein, but it is part of it.
Starting point is 00:45:13 This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. Alex Jones was caught in a little bit of a, just a kind of a sticky wicket, if you will. A bit of a moment. Yeah. He was showing how to navigate on his website on Info Wars.
Starting point is 00:45:36 Which does seem to be a high percentage of their programming. A lot of it is just how do you get to the male vitality formula pills? Because that's how he makes all his money. So, yeah, they spend some time with that. So he's showing how to navigate on his smartphone. And then he taps it and it goes back to the original screen that had all of his tabs out there. Yeah, it brings like where you see like nine tabs on the screen at the same time. Mm-hmm. One of the tabs was a transsexual porn site.
Starting point is 00:46:09 And... It could happen to anybody. It could have... Well, anybody who's surfing for trans porn, yes. For those of us who don't necessarily frequent those sites, can't happen to you. Okay? So I thought, okay, well, maybe somebody just went in there, and here's what he's going to say, even if it's not the case.
Starting point is 00:46:28 somebody photoshop that into his phone. Right. And he says that all the time when there's no evidence of it. Why not go with that? Right. Defense. Somebody in the deep state photoshop that. And that's not what he said, which is fascinating to me.
Starting point is 00:46:45 Here's instead how he explained his little trans porn site. And also, what about the trans porn on your phone, Alex? Are you going to talk about that? Say that again. Say that again. trans porn on your phone. That's all they keep talking about. You know, I saw a couple news articles about that.
Starting point is 00:47:04 It's ridiculous. I was like looking up some reporter we're trying to hire today and punched in some number. It popped up porn on my phone. Everybody's had porn popping up on their phones hundreds of times. So I'm sitting there with a phone on air showing it to everybody because I couldn't get a URL up in the studio. And then like something pops up and like, oh my God.
Starting point is 00:47:22 And I looked at it. The news blurted out because there was nothing there. They blurt it to then say something was there. Then you went to it with some porn menu. I probably had porn menus pop up 500 times on my phone. So I appreciate your call. Because you're surfing them. It's insane, ladies and gentlemen.
Starting point is 00:47:36 There's two jobs of people, people that look at porn and people that lie about it. But I wasn't looking at porn on my phone. I don't take phones on air that I look at porn on. And so I saw all that. I didn't even respond to it. I mean, if I respond to half the attacks on me, it'll absolutely ridiculous. But I'll say this. The Amazon ads, the Viagra ads, the weird non-plastic bag ads,
Starting point is 00:47:57 are taking my iPhone over. iPhones didn't used to be that bad like Android. It's a great point there with a plastic bag, ban ads that are taking over his iPhone. He does seem to be admitting that he looks at porn. Absolutely. He's that phone. Like, you know, Alex Jones looking at porn or trans porn
Starting point is 00:48:14 is absolutely not the worst thing about him. Like, it's probably one of his better characteristics. So I don't know what that would be a big deal. It's just, you know. The trans community thought it was unusual because he bashes trans people so much. Yeah. And every time there's a trans story, he's, you know, he's raving about it,
Starting point is 00:48:30 ranting about it. And so it's interesting that he's actually looking at trans porn when he's ranting about trans people. And the trans site was excited. The transite was very happy. Very happy about it. Yeah. Yes.
Starting point is 00:48:43 I mean, that's fascinating. Maybe not as transphobic as you once thought. There you go. And that's probably what he should say. There was a, years ago, there was a, morning show host at Texas city that I once lived in
Starting point is 00:49:02 who got into a traffic accident while leaving a gay bar at two in the morning and then left the scene and went home or whatever and so it was kind of an issue and then so there's a lot of you know he's a conservative talk show host and so people were wondering
Starting point is 00:49:22 what were you doing at a gay bar and he said well it shows you I'm not homophobic like they say I am doesn't it that was his explanation so maybe that's a good one for sure how much shows you I'm not transphobic oh man it's I'm telling you it does bode to you know one of the things that I live by is clear your search menus that's what you one of the things your search good safety tip thank you jeffy so does this happen to you Does porn pop up on your phone? Hundreds of times? 500 times?
Starting point is 00:49:58 There seems to be a real issue with your phone. I will say no. That doesn't happen. Especially on an iPhone. I mean, iPhone is like, it's a closed ecosystem. And when I'm looking for reporters, I will say it has never popped up while looking for reporters to hire. Well, is it possible that this particular trans porn star happens to have some journalism
Starting point is 00:50:21 chops? Is it possible? She's out covering the tough stories in between porn shoes. I think that's not. It is possible. It's possible. Absolutely it is. It's possible.
Starting point is 00:50:32 Okay, let's grant him that. I don't know how much. Maybe. Alex knows how tough it is to run a website and have people subscribe to it. And that's what that porn person was doing. Mm-hmm. Because she, he offered Alex a free pass. Oh, really?
Starting point is 00:50:49 Yeah. Yeah. Come on, Alex. If you like it, I'm here for you. I thought it was nice. What an amazing world we live in. It's just an amazing world. So she did actually respond to this?
Starting point is 00:51:01 Yeah. And she offered a free pass. That's pretty smart, actually. Yeah, no, you might as well jump in there. But I think the days of the porn sites all popping up on your screen, which did happen in the past are long gone. Yeah, I think that doesn't happen as much anymore. I do. It certainly doesn't happen 500 times.
Starting point is 00:51:22 No, it does not. But it does, if you don't delete your search entry, if you type in a word and it pops, then whatever you've been searching for or bringing up, comes up as a reminder, hey, it's still here for you. Is that what happens? I could happen.
Starting point is 00:51:43 That's what I understand. It's possible. Somebody has told you about that. Yeah, they've had it happen to them and they related that story to you. Can you imagine the amount of trans porn being tweeted and sent to Alex Jones right now. Oh, man.
Starting point is 00:51:55 I mean, it's got to be, people are probably trolling him constantly with it now. Hey, check out this new conspiracy theory I found, Link. This guy's going to be opening up so much transport. I guess that's what happens, you know? Yes. You know, whatever. It's not like we had a high opinion of Alex Jones.
Starting point is 00:52:12 Wow. This happened to a pastor while he was on his shirt. Like, that might be notable. Like, the fact that Alex Jones does weird things is the least surprising thing. I mean, it's good for him, right? keeping him in the news other than being blocked from, you know, bringing people to his site. And by the way, let's say once again, we're absolutely opposed to Alex Jones being eliminated from all of these, all of these sites, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube. Real estate. Put his stuff back up and let the people decide. Okay. If they want to, if they want to see it, they see it.
Starting point is 00:52:47 Stop banning people because they have a different point of view. Now, again, Facebook is a private business and so are all the rest. So they can do that if they want. It's just not the right thing to do. Yeah. The interesting part, I think, in this conversation, because I think we all agree that private businesses can do whatever they want. And we all agree that Alex Jones is trash.
Starting point is 00:53:07 And we all agree that even though Alex Jones is trash, he should still be left on the platform. Yes. The interesting addition to this is a lot of these social networks get protections from, you know, legal action. because they claim to be, hey, we're just user-generated content, you know, we're just a platform, right? Right.
Starting point is 00:53:28 And so, like, for example, if someone were to post child porn on Twitter, Twitter doesn't, the employees of Twitter don't go to prison for child porn, right? If someone posts a terroristic threat on Twitter, they then don't, you know. You can't go to Twitter for that and blame them. Twitter's fault, right? Yeah. And they get protections from these situations, as they should, by the way. Or copyright fraud is another one.
Starting point is 00:53:55 If someone posts a copyrighted material, then people, you know, if they do it and don't try to take it down, they can get in trouble for it. But generally speaking, if someone just posts something, they'll have a window there to take it down as soon as possible. And it's not like they're going to put Twitter out of business for it. But for that protection, right. There's a responsibility. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:54:16 And their responsibility is to not control the content. Yeah. So they can't be a partisan entity. So you can't be biased. Right. They can't. And they are. And they kind of are.
Starting point is 00:54:25 And Ted Cruz has brought this argument up before. So it's a good argument. Yeah. I mean, again, I still think they should be able to handle their own content. But that, you know, maybe you don't get the same protections. Right. If you want to go that direction, you want to make it an all liberal social media site, you should, in my view, should be able to create it.
Starting point is 00:54:44 If you want to create, you know, you know, liberal.com and make it all people tweeting to each other about liberal things. Except that's not what you agreed to when you got these protections. So you're going to have to change the rule if you want to do it that way. Or we just remove the protection and you're subject to prosecution when somebody does something on your site. Which is it? What do you want? Yeah.
Starting point is 00:55:10 And the easiest thing is just let people decide. Stop. And I think their supposed good motives and the motives of many people in Congress are like, hey, you've got to take a responsibility for what's on your site. You need to take responsibility. And they all went in front of Congress and said, you know what, we do. This is on us.
Starting point is 00:55:25 We need to do better. Not really. No. You really don't need to do better. You don't need to do it. People will click on the things they want to click on. People will like the things that they want to like. It's not your responsibility.
Starting point is 00:55:36 Not your responsibility to manipulate what people believe. Even if they believe dumb things or inaccurate things, even in that circumstance, when there's other crimes that are committed like threats and child porn and stuff, yeah, that's your responsibility to get it off. soon as possible. Yeah. But that's different than speech.
Starting point is 00:55:52 And you should just leave it up there. So what? Alex Jones wants to say something that's blatantly false over and over and over and over again. So what? We figured it out all these years. Why can't we now? I mean, it's not like I believed in the 9-11 theories to begin with. So what's the big deal now?
Starting point is 00:56:09 It's not like I really thought that the Sandy Hook tragedy was a false flag operation. I never believe that. You know, there might have been some people who did. But I think any normal human being knew that that was an actual event that occurred. And a real tragic one. Yes. And I think we all can agree. One thing that Alex was right out is that everything starts at the Gulf of Tonkin.
Starting point is 00:56:35 There's nothing that doesn't start there. That's right. That's where it all started. It is. That is where it all started. The Gulf of Tonkin. Exactly right. You could go back a little bit further to the,
Starting point is 00:56:47 the Rothschilds. If you wanted to. If you wanted to. Right. You know, we won't go there right now. I don't want to go to high level. That's Alex's job. Right.
Starting point is 00:56:58 The Blaze Radio Network. On demand.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.