The Glenn Beck Program - Best of the Program | Guest: John-Henry Westen | 3/22/22

Episode Date: March 22, 2022

Pat joins Glenn and Stu to discuss the woke takeover of Disney and Disney’s new CEO being punished for not being woke enough. Glenn and Stu discuss Hunter Biden’s laptop, the corruption behind the cover-up, and Biden’s Supreme Court nominee. John-Henry Westen, the co-founder of LifeSiteNews, joins Glenn to discuss the fatima/pope inviting bishops to join him in the consecration of Russia and Ukraine. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

60% of the vans on Amazon come a vendor independent like Sac Magic. Hello, here Camille of Sac Magic. Our compresses, show of fraud are fabriced to Quebec, and our presence

on Amazon enlarge our clientele to world entire. Trouvee de little enterprises like on our own onaucea. Hey, everybody, it's a Tuesday

and a great Tuesday it is. You know why? Stu's here. Mm-hmm. Yes. Sto's here, and he said like seven words. Only on Tuesdays.

I limit to seven words on Tuesdays. It's a stew seven-word Tuesday on the Glenn Beck podcast. Yeah, it's great. People have been waiting for it. So we talk about war, nuclear war, what's happening in Ukraine and Russia. And why is the Pope doing something that he's doing this coming Friday, what Catholics should be paying attention to? It's kind of a big deal in the Catholic world if the Pope is actually Catholic. You know the old saying, is the Pope Catholic?

I don't know. I don't know. This one? I don't know. I don't know. That's a new saying. Yeah, it's a new saying. By the way, we also talk about Peter Schweizer, and he's in the news today about a possible indictment of Hunter Biden.

We're going to have him on Studeau's America tonight. It's about his father. Yeah. Well, still, though, these things take steps, and it's important to follow this and make sure to progress is. I'm going to talk to him on Studeau's America tonight. I'll probably only say like seven words again. I'll just let him go. It'll be a great show.

He knows this stuff better than anybody. Yeah, that's tonight on Studez America. Tomorrow night on my Wednesday night special, we are going to talk about the future of your money. Digital currency, what the Fed and the Treasury are actually planning right now and what it means to your future. Here's a podcast. You're listening to.

Hell Disney. Oh, boy. There is a new CEO. His name is Bob Chapic. And he is apparently somewhat of a conservative. I don't think that he's conservative conservative. But for Disney and Hollywood, he's like, I don't know, gangis con. Who I don't think was really conservative.

Right. And Bob wanted to take the company after taking it over from Bob Eager. He was like, let's stay out of politics. Enough of this. Enough of this. Well, you can't do that to a company like Disney who has let the left just run roughshod over all of the company. They control the company now. So he wasn't going to take a public stand against the Florida legislation that would stop classroom orientation and gender identity conversations in kindergarten the third grade.

and give parents the right to say, uh-uh, no. But that wasn't, no, that's not Disney enough. And so the employees started to really have a problem. He immediately gave $5 million to, you know, some LGBTQI2 plus. To buy your hall pass. Yeah. He tried. And that's not enough.

Not enough. Not enough. Not enough. Never enough. Nope. He apologized. Now he's going on a listening. tour of gay, transgender, and non-binary employees.

I know, I know. So, I mean, how dumb is this civilization at this point? What do you mean a listening tour? Like, you don't know anything about these topics. No, he's just, he's being punished. Yes, he's being punished. He's being punished publicly being trot out and a square and having him be yelled at. And none of these things mean the things they're publicly designed to mean. Like the $5 million payment isn't even, people would say, oh, you're just trying to pay off this organization to, you know, give you a pass. Yeah. That's not even really what it is.

What it is is is a hope that they will go after somebody else. You are paying them. So they go after the next company instead of you. There's no indication. Nobody believes that they're going to stop doing these irrational things and trying to close down companies because they didn't support some bill that says the opportunity. of what they claim it does. Pat Gray is joining us from Pat Gray Unleashed. Pat, we're talking about Disney having their big meeting and boy, the liberals are very upset and they are absolutely in control now of Disney and everything, the parks and everything else. Conservatives have finally

come out as a coalition and they've said they've had enough. They're saying this is a hostile work environment and they're called names. They're ridiculed by the other staff members and they said enough is enough. Wow. Yeah. So the employees have had enough. No, the conservative employees. Yeah. It's Bob and Steve and I think Kathy. No, Kathy's she's very liberal. She's very liberal. She's very liberal. Yeah. So no, there are that, you know, there are enough conservatives, not enough to balance it. I'm sure, but there are a lot of conservatives that are just keeping their mouth shut. And now the conservatives are not keeping their mouth shut. Did this start with the Buzz Lightyer thing where they re-inserted the same-sex kiss? No. Was it part of that? No, no. That was in response.

That was like, okay, we're sorry. We're sorry. We're sorry. We'll. Yeah. Yeah, because the liberal or the woke employees at Disney were pissed off that they took it out. Yeah. When people heard it was in There was some uproar. And then they took it out. And then there was uproar apparently from employees at Disney. And they put it back in. Yeah. Well, this is interesting because, I mean, is it time ever to just say I'm not going to Disney?

Because I won't. I think it is time. I won't go to Disney anymore. It is time. You know me. I am. I love Disney. I love.

You're a Disney file. Yes, I am. And I love it, love it, love it. I love the history of it. I love the imagination of it. You know, I love everything about it. I will not take my kids there. Now, I'm lucky because my kids are teenagers.

Yeah, nice, convenient boy coward. Your kids turn 20. No, it is. You know me, though. Pat, I go there by myself. Oh, you are. You're that guy. I mean, I go by myself.

I will not do it anymore. Yeah. I think Disney has become, I mean, well, this is what happens when you don't. Don't focus on business. You focus on politics. They have placated and placated and placated. They've lost control of their company. Yeah.

So now the CEO doesn't run the company. The employees run the company. And I don't think that's going to be good for business. So let me ask you this. This is an honest question. Because I think we talk about this stuff and we simplify it, over simplify it. As you just talked about, your solution was they stopped thinking about business, they just started thinking about politics.

There are definitely companies that work that way, right? That just are like legitimately political organizations just making donations and that's what they want to do. They're super woke. There are a lot of companies, however, that are just thinking about business. And when they think about business, this is not defending this, but I'm just giving

you the actual thoughts of these CEOs. They see these things pop up. They realize it's going to be a problem for them. And they just want it to go away. So if you're a company like Disney, which is filled with liberals, filled with them. I mean, this is a creative company. There are tons and tons and tons and tons of liberals working at Disney. Correct.

When they actually decided to put in a CEO who was relatively conservative, who wanted to implement a policy of neutrality. Neutrality. No politics like Coinbase did, right? Yeah. Is that Bob Chepic you're talking about? He wanted to institute a policy of neutrality? Yeah. He did. That's why they didn't. Because he has not done well with that sense. This is why they didn't immediately respond to the don't say gay thing, though. And they didn't come out strongly opposed to it. Like you kind of would expect from Disney. Supposedly, at least the reporting is on this, that they decided not to say anything about it because it's not our business.

We're a freaking, you know, theme park company. Right. We're making a movie. There's no reason for us to do this. That was their internal thought. Their employees revolted, right? Their employees basically said, we're shutting down your. entire company if you if you go this direction so then they started throwing money at everybody

and everything else so how do you manage this as a see you don't there that that's at the death throws you're now you've lost your company you've lost your company so all of these companies that went down this road and are going down this road and you know i don't know is coca cola doing it because they actually believe it i think they do i think they're part well i know they are they're big part of the Great Reset. So they buy into it 110%. You know, so I don't think you're going to, they're not going to worry about it when they lose control of their company.

But Disney has lost control. And if you want a company that just stays out of everything and is not about politics, it may be too late. It may be too late. You know, Joe Rogan is. Joe Rogan. They've held the line, though, on Joe Rogan. But did you hear what Joe Rogan?

Did you hear what Joe Rogan said just last week? Yeah, he's not going to have Donald Trump on. He's not going to talk about politics anymore. I didn't hear that. Yeah. He said he's not going to talk politics anymore? He's not going to talk politics anymore. And, you know, part of it is.

So he's caving. Well, I don't know. He said, I don't want to be that guy. And I don't want to be that guy. I don't want to be that guy where, I just want to be an observer. I don't want to be the guy that's pushing for one thing or another.

Well, that doesn't mean you stop talking about politics. That means you have Joe Biden on and Donald Trump on. That's what that is. You know what I mean? That's the kind of thing he was doing. Exactly right. But he was not going to do that anymore. He's going to stay out.

And again, I think it's always been what's interested him. Right. Like he had, if I remember right, Andrew Yang on. I think maybe Tulsi Gabbard, but he didn't have every Democrat on. He had Bernie Sanders on. In fact, endorsed Bernie Sanders. But he also was incredible. A guy who endorsed Bernie Sanders is in this position now.

I think about what the right wing is right now. The right wing is a guy who endorsed Bernie Sanders and Tulsi Gabbard, a guy who ran the campaign for Bernie Sanders in Hawaii. These are hardcore conservatives now. That's where we are in this world. And Russell Brand. And Russell Brad. One of the most extreme leftists of the 2000s. Bill Maher.

The guy who led liberalism for 20 years is now a conservative too. It's incredible. But you know what? I think I could hang out with both of those guys that we get along right now. I think so too. Yeah. I mean, that shows you. Because they have some common sense.

Right. That's all you need is some common sense. Right. Just a little bit. Not all of it. No. You don't need all of it. No.

No. Just a little bit of it. It is a modicum. It's crazy. It is crazy. How nuts it has truly become to where, what was it I was reading in, oh, the New York Times. Did you see what happened with Candace Owen? I don't know. Oh, this is fantastic.

So Candice gets a note from the New York Times and the New York Times says, hi, I'm writing from the New York. Times, we're working on a story about Russian messaging that includes some of your comments. We note that you advance the idea that Ukraine was a corrupt country, which matched comments we've seen from Russia state media. Oh, wow. That's a real, uh, shot on a limb on that one. I'm wondering if you have any context to further comment to add about your comparison. We're finalizing the story today.

So she wrote back, I'm really confused by this email. I learned about the idea that Ukraine was a corrupt country from the New York Times. You guys have covered the corruption of Ukraine extensively for years. As just one example, here's a piece from the New York Times editorial board entitled Ukraine's unyielding corruption. I educated myself about both the neo-Nazi problem in Ukraine and the unyielding corruption by reading your newspaper, not Russian state media. Is there something specific, I said, that was different than what you guys have written about in the past?

For more good measure, here are some more past articles written from reputable sources over the past few years about the corruption and neo-Nazi problem in Ukraine. For clarity, are you now suggesting that the Western media covered extensively over the last few years is now just Russian propaganda? Are you suggesting all of these articles were sponsored by Russia's state media? Again, I'd love to provide you with a quote for the article. I just want to be clear regarding what you mean when you say I'm advancing ideas that Ukraine was a corrupt country when in fact I got all of my ideas from your publication.

Brilliant. But other than that. So good. But it's as if they all have Alzheimer's. It's as if they all literally don't remember what they were saying just yesterday. Right, because Ukraine can be the good guys in a war that were attacked across their borders and also be a corrupt country. Which they are. Which they are.

They have tons. I mean, it's almost a joke that Ukraine was so corrupt. The whole reason Zelensky got elected was because his entire platform was fighting the unending corruption in the country. Yeah, but look at some of the most. moves he's made recently. Right. And there's, he's not saying he's a saint.

I mean, there's no reason to argue he's a saint either. Again, if you're getting attacked, right, you're going to do all sorts of different things. The only thing we can say about Zelensky in this period, to my mind, and you correct me if I'm wrong, is that he has handled the public facing part of this war well.

Yes. He has done a good job messaging to his people and to the world. Yep. About this particular conflict. That's about what. we can say. No, and we can say that they seem to be fighting well. They seem to be fighting well. And like, look, is he a great military tactician? I doubt it. He might be. But I mean, they are fighting really well and strongly. And if these reports even from Russia are correct. Yeah. That's true.

All right. Back in just a minute. Thank you. Pat Gray from... We should mention, by the way, the brand new feature for Blaze TV subscribers with Pat Gray on leash. Pat, how does this work? This is every day, right? It is every day. Yeah, Pat Gray overtime. Nice. Right after the show? Right after the show. This is big. Well, it's, you know, it's not live, so it's posted separately. So just look for it where you find the podcast. Okay. For Blaze TV subscribers, I might do my overtime.

Just on Facebook, so it's so it's just out there immediately. Really? Yeah, that's what I might. Isn't that cool? Aren't that cool? Aren't you cool? I might just do that. I wonder if you have some say-so. Blacestiv.com slash Glenn to get the Pat Gray Unleashed overtime. Brand new

starting today. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program, and we really want to thank you for listening. This is the Glenn Beck program. Let me give you one more story on Wednesday. That's tomorrow night. 9 p.m. My Wednesday night special is on the U.S. dollar and what you need to know about what is coming.

And honestly, I really don't care what other people think. I don't do this show for people who do not listen to the show. I do this show for people who listen and people who are. smart enough to do their own homework and understand just because I say it doesn't make it so. We don't deal in conspiracy theories on this program. We deal with facts and we will tomorrow give you the facts of the new digital dollar that will be unveiled by our Treasury Department and what it means to you. I don't give a flying crap. What anybody says, you need the information. Everybody else can, you know, make it on their own, I guess, when they get there.

That is tomorrow. But I just want to give you a real quick reason why you should pay attention to this tomorrow. I just told you that it looks like the Fed is going to increase the interest rate, not by another quarter percent. they're now talking about 1.9% over the year. That will almost cripple us. How much is it, Stu, per point? Was it? So every point was the interest rates go up on our national debt. It costs us $30 trillion over 30 years,

which is the same amount we would spend on our entire national defense over that time period. So if you think about essentially, every time you hear that point goes up by just one point, we're adding an entire new U.S. military to our budget. And that's just in debt. We're talking about 1.9. So that's two militaries in 30 years. And again, you are not getting anything for this, right?

This is not like we're actually getting, our defense doesn't get twice as good. You're just paying more money to, service that debt. And by the way, how do you get people to buy that much debt? You have to increase the interest rate to say, this is what we're going to pay you for us borrowing that amount of money. We're kind of at the, we're kind of at the end here of people just being able to look away from what is an absolute mess. Let me give you another story. The U.S. has been extremely trigger happy with stinging economic measures and central banks may decide to diversify their

portfolio of foreign reserves instead of relying heavily on the U.S. dollar, according to the co-director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security. This is from CNBC. Central banks are beginning to ask questions at Gal Luft of the Washington-based think tank, adding that they are wondering if reliance on the dollar and putting all of their eggs in one basket is a smart idea. The United States has extended itself. It has been extremely trigger-happy when it comes to the use of sanctions and other economic punishments. Love said the U.S. took unacceptable and unheard-of steps in recent weeks, such as effectively freezing central bank reserves. The overall picture is really not good. He said, one in ten countries in the world is now under some form of U.S. sanctions.

It's remarkable. One in ten. That has a cumulative effect and as a result, we see the dollar playing less and less of a role and portfolios in central banks. It does seem that like, at the very least, this is going to end in some sort of Axis' allies situation where half the world is avoiding the dollar. Yep. You know, I mean, it doesn't seem like this is going to stick around. round for a long time. And, you know, look, this is arguably why the president is saying there's going to be a new world order, right? This is, those are his words, by the way, not mine.

But he, they are believing that this is lost. It does seem like that is what the concede is here. Well, I think he was making that point, honestly, in his first address. I mean, he, he was just leading people there. Managed decline. Yeah, managed decline. He was just leading people there saying, you know, the real question is whether a free democracy like ours can survive. I mean, I know the answer, but I mean, that's the real question. Can we defeat something like China, these authoritarian countries that can move so quickly? Well, I think he did know the answer. And his answer is different than my answer and probably different than your answer.

But not to the elites. They think the way to go is to be more like China. And that's when he said yesterday, be a new world owner That's what he's talking about That's way more energy than he said it right now Sorry New

He is that That speech was like what would happen If someone told you You had to say like 12 paragraphs But you could not inhale So you have one big breath at the beginning And then you join the speech And he's like

It's so bad He's got nothing left man So bad It's just so bad So bad That is what is, that's what's happening now with the dollar. We'll give you all of the details on the Wednesday night special. Now, can we, can we go back to President Biden and, uh, and Hunter?

The, the thing that is incredible to me is that no one is really talking about the real damage, the real damage. And will it matter if we throw Hunter Biden in jail? Because that's what will happen. The press, they'll indict him, and the press will make it all about him and his scandalous pictures. And they'll make it all about, you know, crack-fueled parties and everything else and make him into a bad guy. And make him into a bad guy. And but make it only about him being a bad guy. They'll make his constant crack use and stealing money from all over the world and impregnating women and leaving them.

They'll make that into a bad thing. Watch the media. They'll do it. And we all know people have been caught in pictures having sex. We all know. Yeah, look, they'll take the crack rocks that he was smoking off the hooker's belly and make it seem bad. And this is the sort of manipulation, the media. You know, get into.

How is this possibly happening? I don't know. And you're right, what they will do. If it gets down this road and they lose control of it, they will make Hunter Biden into the sacrificial lamb. He will play the role of the, you know, the person who goes to a minimum security prison for a year and a half. Yep. And they will say, oh, you know, well, they'll wash their hands of it and it'll be, it'll all be done. There is no clearer impeachment trial than this one.

There's no clearer impeachment trial. This is a high crime here. He was taking money from other countries while in office. Millions and millions and millions of dollars. 30 million dollars. And when we say he, we're not talking about Hunter. That is what this is all in the Peter Schweizer book. It's all in the laptop.

All of all of the emails. You have you have people confirming that work. with Hunter on these programs confirming, yep, that's what it means. And we're selling, we were sending money to Joe Biden. And to the media's unending eternal disgrace. All of this was known before the election. These are people who were coming out to national media sources before the election. And the media made up their mind that in 2016, they were all too tough on Hillary Clinton and her emails.

And they were just, you guys remember. how tough they were on Hillary Clinton, right? That's literally how they saw that situation. We were tough on Hillary and that cost her the election and Donald Trump won. This time we can't make that same mistake. It doesn't matter if it's true or not. We have to stop this from happening again. May I just say we were talking about Disney and its problems with the left right now.

And they held yesterday they had a big meeting and they're going to reimagine their future. You know, that is the first time I've heard those words. in the last few years, and I haven't had a coronary, because that's what Disney should do is reimagine things. They're in the land of imagination. Everybody else is reimagining the police, reimagining. This is my favorite. This is coming from the Los Angeles Times.

Listen to this. The fight, by the way, is anybody really fighting against? this against this judicial nominee. I don't think there's a real effort. Yeah. Because I think they realize they're not going to, they have no chance of stopping her. So don't,

don't overplay your hand. This is their theory, by the way. Don't overplay your hand. Don't give them a moment. They're going to be able to come back and say, look what happened with X, Y, and Z. In some ways, don't give them a Kavanaugh. Because that, that, correct.

Created a lot of energy on the right, the way they acted in that. So what's crazy is, it's like, if they're not, throwing flowers at her it's too much listen this from the Los Angeles Times the fight over the nomination of judge can Katanji a Brown Jackson for the Supreme Court is powerful evidence that our political system is broken like never before there's no plausible basis for opposing Jackson who has impeccable qualifications and about whom nothing controversial has been discovered oh my gosh that

That's pretty all encompassing. Yet her confirmation hearings, which begin on Monday, are likely to be highly. This is written before the hearings, okay, likely to be highly contentious. Likely. It's future news. Likely to be contentious. So here's what they found. She is unlikely to get the votes of more than a.

a Republican senator or two. No, she'll get Mitt Romney. Lacking any credible basis for opposing her, Republicans are turning to unfair smears. Smears in the world of law credentials don't get any better than hers. A graduate of Harvard College, Harvard Law School, she clerked for judges in the federal district court, blah, blah, blah, blah. But lacking any grounds for opposition, Republicans are resorting to slime. Some are criticizing her because she worked as a public defender. I didn't even know she worked as a public defender. Oh my gosh, is she going to be on the Supreme Court? I didn't know that. Did you know that, Stu? That's one of the worst things who could possibly happen to America. A public defender that's now in the Supreme Court,

she represented poor people? I've not heard one person say that they care that she was a public defender in a negative way. Nope. Nope. Why would they, why would, I mean, it's just part of the legal system. We all understand as part of the legal system. According to the Los Angeles time, what's really going on here is that Republicans believe that they can appeal to their political base by opposing any Democratic pick for the Supreme Court that they're willing to resort to whatever it takes. Oh, is that what Republicans do? That's exactly. Did they accuse her of rape yet? Because I missed the bulletin on that one.

Have they accused her of a murder? Have they accused her of a... I mean, you know, I will tell you. I do hear that Lindsay Graham is going to question her about a test she took in the fourth grade. Oh my gosh. Oh my gosh. Yeah. And we can't have somebody.

Did she cheat on that test? She cheated on that test. Oh, my gosh. She cheated on that test. Get her out of there. Yeah. Get her out. It was, you know, her test on what happened on Little House on the Prairie.

And, you know, she was supposed to read the book. Apparently she didn't. And, you know, it's because it's full of white people. people. Oh, okay. Well, that's understandable. Yeah, so that's the fight we're going to have here. Systemic is what that is.

It really is. Unbelievable. Unfeckin' believable. Is it just me that just is like, move on? Because you can't, it's hard to not feel that way. I mean, they have to push back a little bit. But I don't think, it does not feel like a real effort. No.

If you're looking for a full out, you know, not Kavanaugh-like, because no one on the right wants a Kavanaugh-like attack, but at least a serious push. back and an attempt to win over a couple of Democrats to stop this nomination. You're not going to get it here. Yeah, you're not. Absolutely not. And you know what? Unlike the Democrats that think that everyone who opposes them has slime in their closet, not everybody has slime in their closet. If you find slime, you should expose it. New York Times, Hunter Biden, you should expose it. And she's going to be a But don't make it up. Terrible Supreme Court justice and be wrong on every single thing. but she is qualified for the job.

It's similar to Kavanaugh, the way the Kavanaugh thing should have gone, which is like, okay, we disagree with everything you're going to say about the Constitution, but you're obviously qualified. That's Kavanaugh, that's her, but that doesn't mean you don't push back against those things and make sure that people understand where she stands. Because she's going to be, she does not respect the Constitution in the way that a Supreme Court justice should. These nominations have consequences. The best of the Glenn Beck program.

I am surrounded. by a new family of people who have their life back because of relief factor. I'm one of them. I was in pain and got to the point to where I just couldn't do it anymore. Anybody else feel like, you know, I just can't get up another day? We have our life back because of relief factor. It's not a television commercial. It's a group of real people with real results.

that had real pain. Try it yourself. Relief Factor. This guy when he started, completely bald. Look at him now. Doesn't do anything for your hair. But it will help you. Get out of pain. Give it a shot.

Try the three-week quick start. It doesn't work, move on. But we're here to tell you it works. Relieffactor.com. All right, I want to introduce you to somebody. His name is John Henry Weston. He is the co-founder and editor, in chief of LifeSightNews.com and host of the John Henry Weston show.

John Henry, how are you, sir? Glenn, very good to speak with you. In fact, it's an honor for me as one of the original pioneers against cancel culture. You're a real hero. Wow, thank you very much. I wanted to talk to you about something that I don't think a lot of Americans know about. I think Catholics might, but they, I don't know if they know what is happening and how important what is happening with the Pope, I believe this Friday.

Can you take us through slowly and explain as you go along? Absolutely. So, as you've covered actually, very often, we have seen a global revolution for over the last 100 years, but especially in the last 100 years. And very often, heaven is very helpful in warning us of what's going on. Now, one of the things that I want to do is I want to encourage your listeners not to trust what I'm saying, to go and verify for themselves, because they can do that nowadays. So, in 1917, there was the most stupendous public miracle in the history of the world after the resurrection and ascension of our Lord Jesus Christ in heaven. It was in October of 1917, October 13th, in fact.

And you can go and look at the newspaper's reports from all over Portugal, that happened in Kumbra, in the, at the Kovaday area at the time in Portugal, and that you can go and look at all the newspaper reports. Three shepherd children, poor as church mice couldn't read, couldn't write, were receiving visions, actually, from heaven, actually didn't know what they were seeing. They saw an angel in the year before and teaching them to pray in reparation for sins being committed against our Lord, and all of the sins that we deal with normally. But in 1917, starting in May, they saw a woman from heaven.

They later learned that it was the mother of Jesus who appeared to them. She asked the three little kids to show up on the 13th of the month for six consecutive months. So they started this, and the rumors started to spread. No one saw anything except the little kids, but they would hear these messages, and they were secrets to be held, and so on. One of the first messages, one of the first visions that they saw, saw many people falling into hell. And horrible that was. And this is hell where the souls of poor sinners go. So this is what happens.

I mean, this unbelievable stuff seen by little children, seven, eight, and ten years old at the time. And what happens is this gets more and more popular. You know, as things are, people are interested in the extraordinary, they think this is happening. But people are showing up, first by the hundreds, then actually by the thousands, little kids kneeling down in a field praying. But they're saying all sorts of extraordinary things. And rumors start and rumors start.

So they're coming, such, so much so, that the government at the time there, which was leaning communists against religion, hated the Catholic faith, wanted to do away with it, we're like, oh, we're disturbed. This is terrible. There's many people coming out to this nonsense. So the three little kids, August 13th, they forbid them to going to their normal appointment, if you will, at the COVID area with the woman from heaven because they're basically arrested, they're threatened. And then they go back. People could, again, hates the faith and wants to disprove it. Thousands of people, in fact, by September, tens of thousands showing up for this thing. Little kids make a fool of the Catholic Church,

and we'll show everybody, encourage the media, and the media are ready to take it down as yet what happened. So come noontime when it was supposed to happen, it's raining cats and dogs. Already people are calling out what a sham this is. I'm sure the writers and the photographers are going nuts with, what a story this is going to be. It's really juicy.

Here are these idiots standing out here in mud everywhere. Because isn't it in the middle of a field? Kids kneel down in the middle of this mud, discussed. Lucy, one of the three kids, yells, look at the sun. The sun begins to spin, gyrate on its axis, and then throw off various colors in the sky, and then it comes hurtling toward the earth. So much so that people, now there's 70,000 people there, and there's reporters from everywhere, photographing this. And you can see any there in the umbrellas, then you hurdles toward the earth.

They start kneeling down in the mud, screaming out their sins, saying, you know, repent, I repent, I repent, because they honestly think it's the, it only takes less than a minute. Everything goes back to normal. The sun goes back to where it belongs. Everything is back to normal,

except one thing is weird. Everything is dry, like there was no rain. So is a stupendous miracle witnessed by 70,000 people, and photograph. And I encourage your readers to, your listeners to go and check it out. Check out the newspaper articles.

They're all over the net because it was so stupendous. But this was Heaven's Warning in 1917 about what was to come. So I want to read for you the exact words of the woman from heaven, our lady, as Catholics call her, or the mother of Jesus, as she would be known popularly. she said, and this is the account from the three little kids, the oldest of whom was kept alive, actually sister Lucy, joined a convent later and lived in Quamber, Portugal, in the convent.

Her little cousins, Yacintha and Francisco, both died at the time, and they died of plague, and they suffered actually horrible deaths, but they offered up all of their sufferings. in union with Jesus' own suffering on the cross to expiate or to to repair, if you will, to console our Lord for these outrages of the sins of mankind. John Henry, there are three secrets that the kids were given, and the first two, I believe, have been revealed. And then the third one is the prophecy of nuclear war, or is that another? Is that the second one?

Yeah, it's a little bit complicated because of the way it's worded. So the first secret would have been the vision of hell that we already described. Okay. The next or second secret is what I'm about to read to you exactly, what the explanation of that vision was. Vision. And then there's a missing part because notice how with the first secret or first was a vision and then came part two explanation. Part 3 is another vision, except there's no explanation this time.

Okay. And that is the missing component, and we'll get into that. Okay. So these are the words directly from our lady, the mother of Jesus, from heaven to the children. You have seen hell where the souls of four sinners go. To save them, God wishes to establish in the world devotion to my immaculate heart. and that is the devotion to the heart of Mary, which beats for the love of Jesus. So if what I say to you is done, she continued, many souls will be saved and there will be peace.

The war is going to end. Now, this is the first World War, this is in 1917. So the war is going to end. But if people do not cease offending God, a worse one will break out during the reign of Pius the 11th. Now, that's very interesting because, of course, there is no pious the 11th at the time. This is 1917, so they don't even have a piously 11th, and then she's obviously then predicting the Second World War. She says, and she goes on, to prevent this, I shall come to ask for consecration of Russia to my immaculate heart, and the communion of reparation on the first Saturdays, and I'll explain what that is in a minute.

She says, and this is where the prophecies of doom come in. If my requests are heated, Russia will be converted, and there will be peace. If not, she will spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions against the church. The good will be martyred. The Holy Father, that means the Pope, will have much to suffer. various nations will be annihilated. Okay. Then adds at the end, in the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph.

The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me, and she will be converted, and a certain period of peace will be granted to the world. Okay, so who was the Pope during, first question, who was the Pope during World War II? The 12th, I think it was 42. Very interestingly, there have been a number of popes who tried. A lot of them didn't bother. Not a lot. there's only, we're only talking about, I believe, is eight popes. But the 12th, twice. He could see the

build up. And in October 42 already, he does a consecration, but he doesn't do it exactly the way our lady requested. If you notice in the request, when she comes back, it's actually 1929. And I can read for you the request. She says, this is 1929. So now the first two children have died, Sister Lucy is in the convent, and our Lord appears to her and says, The moment has come when God asks the Holy Father to make in union with all the bishops of the world, the consecration of Russia, this is our lady, I'm sorry, the consecration of Russia to my immaculate heart, promising to save it by this means. Now, the key words are, the moment has come when God has asked for the Holy Father that spoke

to make in union with all the bishops of the world the consecration of Russia to my macular heart. So here's the interesting part. So, 1942, you have Pope Pius X. 12th try it in October 1st. So he tries it. He does a consecration, yes, of the world, not of Russia, and he doesn't invite the other bishops. Sister Lucy already starts to write, wait a minute, didn't work because he didn't do it exactly as was asked for. He tries it again in December. Same thing, not involving other bishops, not mentioning Russia. In 52, in July of 52, he actually does mention Russia. but doesn't do it with all the other missions.

And so, you know, there's tries, but, again, it's not done exactly. Now, to give an example of how severe it is to not do it exactly, I point you to recent articles. If you go to LifeSat News.com and check these articles out. Recently, there were a couple priests who were watching videos of their own baptism. And in the baptism, the priest baptizing these little children who are later priests, says, we baptize you in the name of the Father. Right, right, right.

And yet, it's invalid. Why? Because the words that Jesus taught for baptism that are used throughout the scriptures are absolutely to be used. And if they're not used properly, the baptism's invalid. It's supposed to be I baptize you. Okay. So think of how small that is.

So the wording is so super important. So let me take another break, and I'm going to come back. And now I want to ask you, what is the Pope doing? And is it because of, as you wrote in one of your articles, this plays a role somehow or another with Ukraine, Kiev and Russia. Something about that, we think. And the Pope all of a sudden has said, hey, we have to do this. What is he doing? And is he going to do it right?

and we'll continue our conversation here in just a second. You can read all of these stories on LifesightNews.com, LifeSightNews.com. I know we have a lot of Christians that listen to the program, a lot of people that are not Catholic, I'm not Catholic, but I think anytime, I do believe that God knows what's going on. We should put our faith in God and not in man, and any faith that is trying to appeal to heaven,

we should be aware of and pray for ourselves as well. Na, na, na, na.