The Glenn Beck Program - Best of the Program | Guest: John Solomon | 7/14/25

Episode Date: July 14, 2025

Glenn opens up the phones to get his listeners' true feelings regarding the Trump administration and the handling of the Epstein files. Why is demanding truth and transparency such a controversial thing? CEO and editor in chief of Just the News John Solomon joins to discuss the possibility of AG Pam Bondi charging John Brennan for his role in Russiagate. Glenn and Jason break down the recent update from President Trump regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

60% of the vans on Amazon come a vendor independent like SACMagic. Hello, here Camille of Sack Magic. Our compresses, show of fraud are fabriced in Quebec, and our presence on Amazon

enlarge our clientele to the world entire. Trouve of little enterprises like on our own.com. So where are you? Where's the American public on the lack of transparency from the Trump administration

regarding the Epstein files? We hear from you and a very, very clear caller right up towards the top of today's podcast. Also, will the CIA director John Brennan be indicted for pushing the fake Russia collusion story. There is a much bigger story happening here than any place else.

An investigative journalist John Solomon has the latest for us. And a new poll shows 63% of people disagree with the direction of the Democratic Party. So why is the Republican Party eating itself right now? All this and more on today's podcast. Let me tell you about real estate agents I trust. There's really something unreal about the real estate agent process. Pictures can, you know, look too good to be true. Open houses can feel staged.

Sometimes if agents themselves sound more like salespeople and guides, you kind of turn off with that. If you're not careful, it starts to look like a three-ring circus. You want somebody genuine. You want somebody authentic. Somebody who understands you, what you're looking for, you know, understands the market. Because this is your home, your family, your future. It's very possible that buying or selling a home is going to be the largest financial transaction you're ever involved in. This is why I started real estate agents I trust.

We connect you with agents who have earned their way in, not through pay-to-play, but through performance. These are the top sellers, the people we have vetted ourselves intensely to make sure they're the right person for the job for you. We look for experience, expertise, and a track record of helping people just like you. We started with the 500 best real estate agents in the country, according to the Wall Street Journal, and we just found what they do, and we just started looking for others like them. Go to real estate agents.itrust.com. We'd like to recommend one in your area. Real estate agentsitrust.com.

Now back to the podcast. You're listening to the best of the Blenbeck program. Hello, America. You know we've been fighting every single day. We push back against the lies, the censorship, the nonsense of the mainstream media that they're trying to feed you. We work tirelessly to bring you the unfiltered truth because you deserve it. But to keep this fight going, we need you.

Right now, would you take a moment and rate and review the Glenn Beck podcast? Give us five stars and lead a comment because every single review helps us break through Big Tech's algorithm to reach more Americans who need to hear the truth. This isn't a podcast. This is a movement. And you're part of it, a big part of it. So if you believe in what we're doing, you want more people to wake up. Help us push this podcast to the top. Rate, review, share.

Together, we'll make a difference. And thanks for standing with us. Now let's get to work. say how to Jason Buttrill. Jason, how are you, sir? Good morning, Glenn. I think I'm frustrated as most people are this morning. I'm confused.

Yeah, I am. You know, I don't. Do you think you know what happened? No. I mean, I think that you mentioned common sense. I mean, I think common sense is what's breaking a lot of people right now because we all know, you know, generally what happened. It's just now it feels like it'll never be proven.

And that is the heart, I think, of the frustration and kind of the feeling of where do we go from here. And it's it's not just this. It is, this is emblematic of everything we have gone through. And we thought we had finally a way to break all of that. And now it doesn't seem like we do. And I think at least that is my real frustration. The number is 8 at 8-8-7-27-V-E-C-K.

I just want you to vent. I want you to be able to say, because I have, man, I have everybody's, opinion right in front of me. I could go through them. I got Charlie Kirk's opinion on this. I have Donald Trump's opinion on this. I have Megan Kelly. You've heard my opinion, I'm sure, David Axelrod. Everybody has an opinion on this, but can I hear yours? 8-88-27-B-E-C-K. Byron in Colorado. Hello, Byron. Glenn, I just think that we need to, I mean, the only way that we're going to be able to heal

is if all the evidence gets out to the people. They have to be transparent or else they're not going to trust anybody. The people are not going to trust anybody in the administration. They have to release all the evidence. What if they came out and said, we have released all of the evidence? No.

They're still not going to believe them because there's still stuff that they told us they haven't released. So that's the problem. They have to be transparent. If they're not transparent, nobody's going to believe them here on out. I mean, nobody's going to believe them. I happen to agree with you, Byron.

Thank you so much. You know, I have to tell you, I think it would be different for me if Donald Trump came out and said, look, we're releasing everything except we've taken out all of the names, but we're releasing absolutely everything we have. We just want to make sure that we're protecting all of the victims. just release it. And there's nothing to see here, gang. There is nothing.

And I understand your feeling. The attack that is being levied on really the supporters of Donald Trump is confusing to me. It only makes it works because Donald Trump knows his audience. He knows, he knows us. I've never seen anybody intuit a group of people better than Donald Trump. and this is so unlike Donald Trump saying nobody cares about this, nobody's talking about it. President Trump, everybody's talking about this. You were talking about this.

You told us how important it was. And I understand that maybe there might not be any evidence, okay, but the way this is being handled is just making things worse. Just making things worse. and we have to have a resolution of this. You can't just say to your supporters, you people are all out of control. Wait a minute. Wait a minute.

We're just asking you, and you don't see how badly this has been bungled? I mean, let's just say there is nothing. Pam Bondi comes out and says, it's sitting on my desk. Was it or not? Was that a lie or not? It's sitting on my desk.

desk. Okay. Then the next day, well, I can't because they're hiding things, the FBI. Was that a lie? I have everything. We're just going through it. Then there is nothing. Which one is it? Which one is it? I just want somebody to recognize you're not crazy. You know what I mean? And this is the first time I felt like my own side was calling me crazy. I don't know what to believe on any of it. I don't have a horse in this except for the truth and restoring trust. That's all I want.

That's all I want. I just want the truth so I can have trust in members of my government. That's it. Because if we don't restore the trust, we've got nothing. So my only horse in this race is just, look, if you made mistakes, great. If there was never any evidence, great. But please recognize that we're not crazy for reading it the way we've been reading it. You may have all the answers.

That's not good enough for us. It's not good enough. Let me go to Christy in Texas. Hello, Christy. Hi. I think as Christians who believe in a higher power and a higher law, we have to ask ourselves what personally, how we personally come at this. I don't know if you remember all the screaming that was done about moving the embassy to Jerusalem and how none of that panned out. I wonder how much of this is just spiritual warfare.

I did listen to Scott Adams' take on this, which is very persuasive, and I'm just, I'm where you are in what I don't know what to think. What was his take? I miss Scott's. It was that we elected, that we have a Democratic representative government, and that we elected him to make these difficult decisions based on information that we cannot have, so we need to trust him. I agree with that to some degree with that to some degree.

You are our elected representative, and I've given him the benefit of the doubt on so much because of that. We elected him. That is his job. However, that's not what he's saying. That's not what he's saying. If you want the trust because you can't know it because there are certain things in there for national security, that's different than what is being said.

Am I wrong, Jason? I mean, that is, then you come out and say that. Look, there are some things that can't be revealed at this time due to national security. I can't give you any more than that. You're just going to have to trust me on that. okay, that's different than saying, what's wrong with you people? Why aren't you just satisfied by me saying there's nothing there?

Well, because you didn't say it at first. It wasn't you. My problem really isn't with you. My problem is with Pam Bondi. My problem is really with the FBI and Pam Bondi. Which one of, who bungled this? I think it's Pam, but who bungled this? And if you can't at least admit,

the PR rollout of this is leading to all of this stuff. It's leading to that. And I think it just needs to be vetted and solved one way or another. And you're not going to do it by telling people shut up and sit down. Isn't that what the left has done to us forever? Shut up and sit down. Nothing to see here. I don't want to believe this about our government.

I don't want to believe that they're making excuses knowingly for people who are abusing girls. I don't want to believe that. So help me not believe it. Help me. We go to Travis in South Dakota. Hello, Travis. Hi, Glenn. Hi, Jason.

I tell you what, guys, I feel really betrayed and I feel really, really angry. We have a president who tells us to move on from Epstein because it's, It doesn't matter. Are you guys still talking about this? Seriously? And yet he still talks about the 2020 election fraud. He talks about the Hunter Biden laptop. He talks about all this stuff from five, six years ago.

And he tells us to move on from the Epstein trial or the Epstein case. People like me will not stop talking about this. I feel so betrayed and so angry. This is not what I voted for. If we do not stand up for the children of this country, we have nothing. We have absolutely nothing. And I tell you what, I've also lost a lot of respect for a lot of people that are prominent figures in this country because they are saying, you know what, this doesn't matter. Like, Carrie Lake came out on Saturday.

She's like, you know what? What really matters is election fraud and post-election fraud. It's like, you know what? The children of this country really, really matter. How could we just sweep them under the rug and not care? Move on, America. Move on. Travis.

Thank you for calling. Let me ask you, is there anything that could be said that would make you go, okay, that's as good as it's going to get for here? I want transparency and I want justice. All of them, children, all those families, everything they went through, I don't want to know their names. I pray that God would be with them and give them some sort of peace if they could ever, ever get it. I want transparency and I want justice. Is there anything that anyone could produce to show you and have you go, okay, Epstein is dead, Gladwell is in prison, and that's the only justice you're going to be able to get? I want evidence. Quit telling us that, you know, oh, well, he killed himself, and we saw everything. We have the information, by the way, it doesn't exist. Show us the information.

Make me believe. Help me believe that he killed himself. Help me believe that maybe you don't have any evidence against people. Then show us that stuff. I do not trust the government at all. And yet they expect me to take their word for it. I'm sorry, you lost your credibility a long time ago, government. You need to start gaining the trust of these American people back.

And I really hope and pray that they can at least provide some sort of evidence. How do you prove the negative, Travis. See, that's where I'm at. I think I'm right where you are. I don't, I'm beyond, I don't have a horse in this race. What I have is common sense. And what I have is maybe a bunch of people hyping this up for a very long time.

But then I need somebody to say, hey, these people were hyping this for this reason. And here, let me show you how that was done. I need, I need, I want to believe. I want to believe in the good. So help me, but I don't know how you prove a negative. How do you prove there is no evidence? I absolutely agree. If all these people like me are all upset about this Epstein client list and it's all been for not all these years,

then help me believe that, you know what, you've been wrong this entire time. And actually there's some really good things out there. And if it's the opposite, show us that evidence too. All right now, all we have to go on is the word and trust of the United States government. And they don't tell us anything. So this is what we found in the documents we're going to give you are going to be, you know, mostly redacted. But the information is there. We just can't show it to you.

You got to help us out a little bit. There's a lot of good in this country, but you've got to help us out a little bit. Travis, I don't think anyone could have said it better than that. Thank you. You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program. When's the last time you look forward to dinner? I don't mean how to have it. I mean, I actually felt excited like you used to when steak night meant something.

You know, when the smell hit the pan and people drifted in the kitchen without being called. It's amazing what good meat can do. Good fish, good chicken. Good ranchers is not about just buying American. You are supporting U.S. farmers and ranchers. It's about making food mean something again because we've forgotten, you know, what chicken is supposed to taste like or how a burger used to taste when you were sure you were eating American beef and it was all natural. This is a wake-up call. Everything Good Rancher sells is 100% American.

No import, no mystery, just high-quality beef, chicken, and seafood delivered straight to your door. Right now when you subscribe, they're offering free meat for life. Choose from ground beef, wild-caught salmon, bacon, or seed oil fruit. chicken nuggets. You'll get that bonus in every box for as long as you say, stay subscribed. So visit good ranchers.com. Use the promo code back and unlock your free meat for life. Plus get $40 off. It's good ranchers.com. Good ranchers.com. American meat delivered. John Solomon, welcome to the program. Good to be with you. Hey, thank you very much. You know, I just look at the last time you were on with me was 23, and I'm thinking we have got to

have John Solomon on more than that. I would love it. Count me in any. time you want. You're the best. Okay, so I saw this report and give me some hope. I so desperately want to believe, John, give me some hope. Yeah, listen, this is a very real thing. The FBI has opened a predicated investigation. That's the mean that there's enough evidence to support a belief that crimes occurred on what, viewing the last 10 years as an ongoing conspiracy, an ongoing conspiracy by the deep state and Democrats to protect Democrats from possible criminal prosecution, people like Hillary Clinton and Hunter Biden and Joe Biden, and to foist upon Donald Trump and his supporters investigations that weren't warranted by the evidence.

And when you go through that, you can cycle through this and begin to put a very clear pattern in timeline. Hillary Clinton gets let off on the email case, even though the FBI got new intelligence early, just a few weeks before James Comey cleared her that said that maybe she, there was a criminal matter. They ignore it. They clear her on the same day, they start working towards putting Donald Trump under the bogus Russia collusion investigation. Fast forward to 2020, there are three events that protect Democrats, the effort to

call Hunter Biden's laptop disinformation, the impeachment scandal to make it look like Donald Trump had a Ukraine problem when it was Joe Biden. And in August of 2020, the FBI gets an extraordinary. a piece of intelligence that China is trying to hijack the election by creating bogus mail-in ballots for Joe Biden, and they don't investigate it. They pull back and actually turn a blind eye to it. Then you go all the way down to 2022, the Jack Smith theft, Joe Biden, sicking the prosecutors on Donald Trump when he himself has a classified documents bomb,

but instead they're going to project that on Donald Trump. And you can go all the way to 24, where Joe Biden's, mental decline is covered up by the White House to try to influence the election. Cash Patel's document or the FBI's document treats this as an ongoing conspiracy. Now, why is that important? It allows you to go back and charge events that are outside the statute of limitations. And you don't have to do this in D.C. Many of the overt acts occurred in Florida with the raid of President Trump's home.

So you could potentially have a grand jury in a trial in Florida where the jury is probably more likely to consider the evidence fairly. Okay. I don't want to get my hopes up. Yeah. I heard Judge, John, I heard this and the ongoing conspiracy that is remarkable. That will take care of everything

that we have. I mean, because nobody has been prosecuted for anything. And you just, you just list a lot of really important possible crimes. And most of those are past the statute of limitations. But if they, if they

say this is an ongoing conspiracy. They can go all the way back past that statute of limitations and charge everybody. However, and the other good part is you could possibly do it in Florida. So if you're not doing it in Washington, D.C. or in New York, you have a chance of actually a fair trial. But we have been let down over and over and over again. Oh, yeah. Many more times than we've ever been given a moment of relief and hope. I think this is going to turn on two very important events and they'll have to happen soon in the next week or two. The first is will Pam Bondi appoint a special prosecutor and give them the full authority and resources you do? You can't do this at the FBI while you're also trying to stop criminals and the counterintelligence threats. You got to break this off,

give a person who focuses on it full time the ability to do it, and panel that grand jury and then treat this like a real investigation. The second is there are two pieces of evidence. It's remarkable, given all the Russia Gate and other documents that we've gotten, that these two highly classified documents have never been released. But they are the ignition point. They are the events that would help a jury understand the beginning and then the repetition of this pattern. In, there is a set of documents in a classified annex and the inspector, DOJ inspector general report about Hillary Clinton being let off in the email scandal that show that just before, James Comey cleared her, intelligence came in that suggested there was a serious criminal matter

and the FBI chose under James Comey not to investigate that. The Democrat gets off in the face of perhaps really damning evidence. The second piece is a document. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Do we know what that evidence was? Do we? We only have the description of Chuck Grassley in one letter. Chuck Grassley has spent eight years trying to get this information released and I think he is about to succeed with President Trump. But basically it just says foreign intelligence came in that the FBI should have investigated and it didn't. And instead it just waved a magic wand and exonerated Hillary Clinton. We don't know more than that. It's highly classified. I believe it's at the top secret compartmentalized level. So it's sensitive. But I think Chuck Grassi may have the president's

attention and this may happen. Now you know that maybe Hillary Clinton, there's another piece of evidence that we didn't know about that Hillary Clinton perhaps got off on when, in fact, she might have been prosecuted. That establishes Democrats getting off like Hunter Biden afterwards and all the other things that happened. The flip side is a piece of evidence that John Durham, the special prosecutor, who tried to indict some people in D.C. but couldn't get him convicted. He writes in his final report about the Clinton plan intelligence. It's an intercept that the United States intelligence intercepted in July before. before the FBI opened up the clearly corrupt crossfire hurricane investigation,

an unwarranted investigation of Russia collusion. A couple of days before that, the U.S. intelligence community intercepts that Hillary Clinton has personally approved a plan to hang a Russian shingle on Donald Trump's campaign. So basically concoct a scandal to make it look like Russia is trying to help Donald Trump win the election so that they can get by Hillary Clinton's own Russia problems. Remember, Bill Clinton, they're taking the $500,000 speech fee from Russia, and they got all the money for the foundation from Russian interest. So the government knows before it opens up on Donald Trump,

before it opens up on Donald Trump, that Hillary Clinton is concocting the very thing they're about to investigate, and they go ahead and proceed with that. Now, we don't know what the intercept is specifically, but I think if we get that released, and John Durham clearly was begging for it to be released in his, report, those two pieces give us the ignition of this recurring cycle of let Democrats off and pin down Republicans with bogus scandal.

The FBI has both of those? They do. They're both, well, they're both, believe it or not, in classified annexes of reports. So the first one is in the possession of the Justice Department Inspector General. He got access to that intelligence, and that would be the easiest place to declassified it from. Pam Bondi and the president could do that. The second is in the John Durham report. He also created a classified annex to his report that has that explosive Clinton plan intelligence. So Pam Bondi and the president could do that. The FBI is well aware of this. It's part of the reason why

the cash Patel FBI opened up the conspiracy case. But unless you can share it with a grand jury, because it's declassified, you're going to keep the grand jurors in the dark. And what may be two of the most explosive pieces of evidence we haven't had. What makes you believe? I'm really trying, I'm trying to keep hope alive here. What makes you believe that this will actually happen? Oh, listen, I'm a reporter. I start with a cynical look at everything. I don't know if it will happen.

I do know that the events that I identify in the story have happened. Now, the investigation was opened about three months ago by the FBI. I have talked to some people who were consulted by the Justice Department. would you consider being a special counsel or a deputy special counsel? Now, remember, special counsels have to be Senate confirmed, so it would be better to have a U.S. attorney. And if you don't have a U.S. attorney, maybe you go and name someone who's a cabinet secretary, who's a former prosecutor.

Lee Zeldon at EPA was a prosecutor earlier in his life. He sent it confirmed. He was part of the team that broke the Russia collusion delusion out in the public. What if you named him and you just sped things up? those are the things that have happened now the only reason I'm going to believe it is if Donald Trump to classifies and Pam Bondi appoints the special counsel we'll see if they do that it won't take long listen this is not rocket science they could do this tomorrow if they chose to do they have to do it before the statute of limitation runs out on people like

Brennan well a lot of the events on Brandon go back to 16 Comey go back to 16 so but they would be wrapped into a conspiracy you can bring them forward There's plenty of events that have occurred in 2022, 23, and 24 that keep the statute alive for several years. The raid on Mar-a-Lago over the objections of the FBI. That could be an overt act. There's a very small window left on the China intelligence. The China intelligence comes in in August. That's still about six or eight weeks out.

If you open the investigation now, you might be able to toll the statute on that. But there are several events that occur between 2022 and 2024, the cover up of Joe Biden's mental decline that keep a long window for a special prosecutor to bring the whole kitchen in. This is basically a kitchen sink conspiracy case. But that's how you went after the mob back in the 80s and 90s with Rudy Giuliani. You can tie events together. There's several years of statute on some events that are part of the alleged conspiracy. So they'd have time to do this, but time's a ticking. And it's up to President Trump and Pam Bondi. If they want to pursue what Cash Patel started, just announced it this week. Get it going.

Is there any reason you can think of that Donald Trump would not want to do this? I haven't talked to him yet. I'm going to try to interview him the next day or two if they'll allow me to. But I'd like to find out, will you do classify it? What do you think about it? At the end of the day, the president usually will keep a hands-off thing on the Justice Department. So it's going to come down to Pam Bondi, who's had a bumpy start to her tenure for sure. You think? But at the same time, you know, she is smart. He understands things. This could be a gift horse that just showed up at her door. And if she runs with it, I think the American public will get an accounting that they've

never gotten for and potentially accountability to some of these bad actors who had a spin cycle. It just kept going over and over again. Commit a crime, project the crime on the other guys, create a false scandal. They did that several times. Now is it time to unravel that great punishment so it doesn't happen again in the future. This is the best of the best. the Glenn Beck program. Welcome to the Glenn Beck program.

The president is giving a press conference right now. Very severe tariffs coming on Russia, if no Ukraine ceasefire deal is within 50 days. He's also sending weapons to Ukraine via NATO, which I don't know if that makes it better, does it, Jason? No, it's basically the same thing. I mean, I guess it's not, you know, we know they're not going to be sold into corruption. not going to go to some Nazi. Right.

That's an upgrade. It's actually a very good point because there was no, you know, transparency at all. Talk about chain of custody. We have no clue. I saw, was it Lindsey Graham over the weekend talking about, you know, that he was expecting an announcement today. I don't know if this is what it is or not. Yeah, I think it is.

I think that we all know at the core what President Trump's all about, which is stopping war, which is not having it happen. I've seen a lot of negotiating power shifted in his corner, especially after the Iran-Israel thing. Yes. He has definitely got the, I don't know, it's hard to describe his negotiation, or the way he does foreign policy. It's almost like shock, shock foreign policy to where. It's over-tun window. They don't really know what to expect.

Correct. And that's very, very good. I think this is feeding into that. I think it's part of it. We know Trump doesn't want to go to war, but now Vladimir Putin is not so sure. So I think that this is the president testing the waters here, letting that, you know, what he's what he's done, especially with Iran and Israel, let that kind of speak for himself and see if this moves the needle. This is one of the things that kills me about the critics of Donald Trump, the ones who like him. I heard all kinds of people saying, oh, now look, we're going to go to war.

Do you really think that that's what Donald Trump is doing? You really think he spent his whole life talking about two things. His hatred for foreign wars and his love for tariffs. And he's going to get on that that's been a lifetime ruse just so he could get in and then bring us to war. He he is doing everything he can to stop this war. You saw it in the frustration that he had. What was it a week ago where he let the F bomb fly at the reporters as he's going into Marine One? he he just thinks this is just stupid this is just stupid in Israel and Hamas and Iran and also with Ukraine and Russia

but he's got to be you know you he understands peace through strength he's not going to send you know a pallet of cash to our enemy and be like hey Vladimir Putin look what showed up on your tarmac a trillion dollars and expect that to to work. It's not going to work. It's not going to work. No. He knows he has to be tough and that's what's happening. I don't like sending arms to Ukraine. I guess I'm better with him going to NATO, but then NATO is going to give them to Ukraine. So what difference does that make? You know what I mean? I don't understand that one, but I will tell you that he's meeting with the NATO Secretary General at the White House right

now and he's talking about this. And, you know, you got to give the guy some credit on being a negotiator. Oh, absolutely. He's set all this up through how he's dealt with all the rest of the situations that has come before this one. He's in actually a very, very good position. He's shown that he's willing to, not only willing to, but prefers to go to the negotiating table. He tried to forced Vladimir Putin, which he did a little bit, got some concessions, but they did something that they have not done since Russia invaded Ukraine. They sat down and talked. He should just, if anything, he should get credit for that right there. But now, since this is not really working, he's also shown that he's willing to get tough. He's willing to say, okay, fine, that's not working,

then this has to work. So now the Russians are having to weigh these two things. I don't want to see a B2 flying over some area, you know, anytime in the near future. Nobody wants to see that. Maybe we should start looking at this negotiating thing a little bit more. Right now, all the options appear to be on the table, and that's a good thing. The confusion is a good thing on the Russian side. So there's a lot of talk about, you know, from our side on Donald Trump, man, he's really, and I got to tell you, I don't see it this way.

I see Pam Bondi making some bad, and you know, maybe I'm singling her out unfairly. I don't think so, but maybe I am. I see a real problem on that, real problem. And that's not a problem they can't correct. They just have to do it. But I see, you know, now people are saying, oh, see, he's just getting us into a foreign war. You really, maybe it's just me. You don't understand what this guy is doing.

and quite honestly, tell me one thing that is easy for him to solve. How is he going to solve the, how do you solve the immigration thing? How do you solve that? He's already solved, nobody's coming in. He solved that. Now he's got to fight with these kangaroo courts all over the country where the Supreme Court has said, you can't do it. They're still doing it.

You're dealing with actual Marxists and communists, who were funded by our own government in some cases, who are putting radicals on the streets to burn things down and to cause havoc and chaos. You have people now in the press who would rather take down Donald Trump and start some sort of a ground war against ice by using video of children running from ice,

most likely not because of ice, but because they were trying to escape They were there without any parents. They were there as individual children. God only knows what these people have, what these kids have gone through. And they were working illegally in the pot fields. So, I mean, it's bad enough, California.

You got pot fields. On top of that, now you've got children, you know, picking the pot fields for you. And you're still standing with the communist radicals. I mean, you know, what do you do? What do you do? I mean, it's easy for an authoritarian. They say, well, he's an authoritarian.

He's, you know, he's Mussolini. He's Hitler. You know, Hitler would have had all this taken care of a long time ago. Trains would be running on time by this point. He's not. He's doing everything he can constitutionally. And, I mean, tell me the thing that is going his way. We wouldn't have, we wouldn't, he wouldn't have had to waste his time today on Ukraine and Russia.

he wouldn't have had to waste his time on Iran and Israel. Had Biden not screwed both those places up, he'd be working on other things. Look how much time it's taken. And they love it. They love it. And they love it that we are tearing each other apart. It's hard because you've got to question these things,

but you also have to question them in a way where you're not tearing each other apart. And I don't know how to do that. I don't know if I'm doing a good job or a really bad job. I don't know if you perceive me as a giant sellout or, you know, too tough. I have no idea. No idea. I don't really care because I'm just saying what I believe to be the right thing. But the one thing I don't want to do is cause more problems.

Because look at the problems that the left is causing. And nobody, we're not paying attention to it. We're not paying attention to it. We've got Mamdani, who is, he might be the, he's a communist. they're shooting themselves in the foot over and over and over again. I don't know. I don't know. I don't.

I mean, you know, we talked earlier about there are some things that we can do that we should be doing. I think that you always said to me way back when I started doing this job when I just came on with your chief researchers, if when you are finally, if you're stuck, just start falling the money. Yeah. That will tell you so much. I feel like right now we're stuck with this Epstein thing, whether it's because of chain of custody, whether it's because it's been 15 years. Whatever it is. Whatever it is. I think that's something that a special counsel and a grand jury focused on weaponization of government as a whole, so rush agate everything, I think a lot of the Epstein stuff will come out with that.

I think that if you started following the money, just on the Epstein stuff, we can block out a lot of the other things. things that, you know, seem suspicious, let's say the intelligence connections, things like that, that we can't prove, we probably will never prove, but we all kind of think are there. Let's not go there. Right now, let's just concentrate on following the money. That could lead us to the intelligence connections. That could lead us to a lot of other things. Look at Epstein's financial network, for instance.

It is a maze. This is not how things are supposed to go. Offshore shell companies, these are facts. offshore shell companies in places like Bermuda, where we get money coming in by the millions, and then they go black. They're black coming in, they're black going out. Why is that, Glenn? Isn't that something that our financial, you know, experts and nerds can go, wait a minute,

let's focus on that. Maybe that will lead us to what we want to know. The question is, to the Treasury, were there any warnings from banks? Because banks are supposed to warn this is like a black. site. That's what happened with Hunter Biden. Remember, there were like 80 some or 180 some warnings to the Treasury from banks saying this looks like money laundering. I'd like to know from the Treasury, were there any warnings on that? Because with that many offshore accounts, that's what those are for. You know, it's either sheltering money against taxes or something really

nefarious is going on. Money is going in and out that shouldn't be going in and out. And where's this money coming from? And where's this money going to? Yeah, like banks that were supposedly just turning a blind eye to some of these transactions. Maybe we look at some of those. What about the charities? This is another thing. And I want to put maybe some of these things we can show on Wednesday for our TV show. I mean, just the money alone will, is just a total mind screw. It is insane. But like charities, why were major billionaires going to Epstein to then, funnel money, or not, I want to say funnel money, but then to have Epstein do major contributions

to some of these charities. Why? Why would major billionaires after Epstein has already been outed through a case, what was that, 2008, 2009, he's already been outed as this person. Would you then go to this guy and then say, let's funnel money into some of these charities? Why? Unless you're trying to hide money, unless you're trying to direct it in certain ways. Again, these are tangible things that we can follow. This is money. It tells a story. We can follow it. Now, why isn't the mainstream media concentrating on that? Why isn't the New York Times saying, Bermuda?

There's monies and show companies in Bermuda, the U.S. Virgin Islands? This makes no sense. This is like Cyprus and gangsters in Ukraine for crying out loud. Which they also didn't cover. It's right there, which they didn't cover. I mean, come on, guys. I know. I know.