The Glenn Beck Program - Best of the Program | Guest: Kelsi Sheren | 2/16/26

Episode Date: February 16, 2026

Glenn also gives the only difference between the deportations Obama carried out and the ones President Trump is carrying out. Glenn reacts to Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s speech at the Munich Security Conference over the weekend. Glenn discusses the ongoing effort to reform British politics as a major step forward in rejecting the failed progressive politics that have nearly destroyed the entire U.K. Glenn speaks with former Canadian artillery gunner Kelsi Sheren, who joins to discuss how the Canadian government is profiting off the deaths of its citizens.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This episode is brought to you by Nespresso. Hear that, that's your next obsession. Every coffee, a new world. Every sip, a new taste. This is the new Nespresso. One touch, endless possibilities. Iced, flavored, long, short. Because some days call for that espresso kick.

And sometimes, a smooth, silky latte just wins. It's exceptional but effortless. Like actually effortless. Simply press, brew, and explore. Nispresso, what else? Keep exploring at nespresso.com. If we fix the language, we can lower the temperature and have a conversation on the emission of key facts in the immigration cases.

We've got a few of those I want to share with you. Also, Rubio's speech tying it together with Great Britain and what it means there and here. And Kelsey Sharon, an amazing woman who is trying to stand up and fight made in Canada. But she says, I might be Canadian, but you guys have a real problem. She talks about that all on today's podcast. Preborn is our sponsor. Scripture tells us, you know, we don't wrestle against flesh and blood and bone. We wrestle against powers and principalities.

That matters, especially when we talk about the issue of life and abortion. When you're standing for life, you're not at war with young women who find themselves scared and confused or alone. You're pushing back against an evil idea, the idea that tells them they have no other option, that the life inside of them is a problem to be solved instead of a human being. This is why preborn exists. they provide women a free ultrasound and compassionate care from people who aren't there to condemn them, but to support them and give them information and give them real help, not death. When a mom hears a heartbeat, everything changes.

It stops being abstract and it becomes a reality. I want you to help if you can. Go to preborn.com. Any donation is so well needed and worth your time. It's preborn.com slash beck. Preborn.com slash Beck. You can dial pound 250. and say the keyword baby. Donate today. Preborn.com pound 250 keyword baby.

Hello, America. You know we've been fighting every single day. We push back against the lies, the censorship, the nonsense of the mainstream media that they're trying to feed you. We work tirelessly to bring you the unfiltered truth because you deserve it. But to keep this fight going, we need you. Right now, would you take a moment and rate and review the Glenn Beck podcast? Give us five stars and lead a comment because every single review helps us break. breakthrough big tech's algorithm to reach more Americans who need to hear the truth. This isn't a podcast. This is a movement.

And you're part of it, a big part of it. So if you believe in what we're doing, you want more people to wake up. Help us push this podcast to the top. Rate, review, share. Together, we'll make a difference. And thanks for standing with us. Now let's get to work. You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program.

Just got a couple of comments from insiders. I'm talking about the story about, well, two stories. One in Minnesota, a woman who's, you know, tracking down ice and yelling at them as they're trying to deport somebody who literally had been raping children. And then the second story was about this guy who is an Irish immigrant who came here, to start a new life, yada, yada, yada. But half that story has been left out,

the story that he was wanted in Ireland. he left behind his family and two 18-month-old children and came over here and started and then only, you know, reached out to his children 18 years later because he was in trouble over here in America. Okay. So let me tell you the rest of those stories here in a second and how you can communicate, but somebody wrote in. Who was it that wrote in? Tracy. Okay, Tracy said what? Okay.

Thank you so much for the first immigrant story on the Ireland dad. Poor Seamus. My daughter has been inundating me with this type of story. I try, but I cannot find the facts. I wonder why. And thank you for confirming what I had suspected. There is more to the story. Of course there is.

There always is more to the story. And they are always left out. Okay. So now that you have the facts, how are you going to talk to your daughter about it? Because giving her the facts won't be. enough. You need to know how to talk to people on the other side. And I'm, believe me, I am, a lot of the stuff I say on the air, the person that needs to hear it the most is me.

So let's learn this together, if you will. What is the question that will open the door for anybody to hear you? Okay. It's not, how can you not care about the victim? Because they see a victim and that victim is real or not. They see a victim. You see a victim and they're different. So you can't say, how can you not care about the kid that was raped? Okay. Or in the case with the Irish guy, how can you not care about the two daughters? You need to ask this to open the door. What would you need to see to believe the situation might be different from the abuses that you're worried about? Okay. Ask them questions. Always ask questions. Always ask questions. and separate them from the ideology.

Because if you say you're wrong, they feel attacked. They'll fight. If you say, wow, I can understand how you're suspicious on this. Government has done so many bad things. Government has lied a lot. And a lot of people are worried about this. Can we look into this case, this specific case, a little deeper here? You're lowering their shield.

You're giving them the wind. Do you trust the government? Because I don't. And that's the thing that we all have. in common. They don't trust the government. Neither do we. So let's give on that one. You know what? I understand that. A lot of people are suspicious and I'm very suspicious of our government. But let's look at this particular, this individual case specifically together. You want to protect innocent people. You want to prevent abuse from the government. I want to prevent abuse from the

government. I want fairness, you want fairness. Let's start there, but let's start with the facts here, okay? This is the part that you instinctively might understand. Okay, it's why our, it's why that monologue with the two points of view actually works. If you can honestly hold two truths at once, you can make all kinds of progress. Okay. And, And that is one, yeah, you should fear the government. You should fear the government. You should fear the government overreach. Our founders were against that.

Our founders warned us that government is fire. So yeah. Okay, there's one truth. And I'm with you on that. Are you all so worried about violent crime and children being raped? Because I know you are. You're my daughter. You're my son.

I know you. That is important. Those two things can be true. And it's in that space where we can have a dialogue. Okay. Some people are not going to be reached, you know, in the moment. Some people are just, I mean, if there's a, if there's a camera, it's over. Okay.

When identity and ego and audience, uh, combine the persuasion rate drops almost to zero. So in that case, if there is a camera, the person that you are trying to appeal to is not the person yelling. This is really important. If a camera is rolling, you are no longer, this is Martin Luther King, you are no longer trying to persuade the person who you're, who's yelling at you. You're now arguing for the people who are watching who don't haven't fully made up their minds yet. They don't know. They can be persuaded. That's where minds move.

So once there's a camera, stop performing. for that person and start understanding the audience that you're trying to attract and to appeal to are the reasonable people who still have an open mind and want to see which one is going to act like a normal human being. Okay. You don't break through by shouting louder than the crowd. You break through by speaking to the person who is standing quietly behind the crowd, wondering, is there another way to see the world than these two points of view? Because that's what we're trying to do. So let me tell you the three stories that happened in the parking lot in Minnesota. No battlefield, no courtroom, no history book, just a parking lot. Three different stories happening

at the same time. Layer one, the activist. She sees agents with badges and unmarked cars. She didn't see safety. She sees power. Now maybe she's watched videos for years that convince her that our government is, you know, is just abusing people and killing people. Maybe she believes the weak are always one step away from being crushed by the system, whatever. So she steps forward, Cameron Hand, she thinks she's doing something brave.

She believes she's standing between the vulnerable and the machine. And when the agent says, we're looking for somebody accused of raping children, her mind is not going to process this information. It processes that information as some sort of, sort of justification. Because once trust is gone, every explanation sounds like an excuse. She doesn't trust them. She doesn't trust them. So it doesn't matter what they say. Layer two, the agents. Now step into the agent's shoes for a second. They're not seeing ideology. They're seeing

names on warrants, reports, victims, paperwork that says someone dangerous might be close by. they're thinking about the people who don't get interviews on social media. The child harm, the family that lost somebody, the victim who doesn't get their camera pointed their way. To them, interruption is not a protest. It feels like obstruction, especially when people are chanting death threats to them. So when somebody says, I don't care, that lands on them as a punch. Because from their side of the glass, this isn't about politics. It's about prevention and stopping somebody who has raped a child.

child. Now the third participant in this, the silent majority, and that's everybody else. The people who are watching this clip later that night, the mom doing dishes, the dad, you know, scrolling, you know, in the garage, the teenager trying to figure out what the truth even looks like anymore. And they watch one version of the video and they think, how could somebody defend that? Then they watch another version and they think, how did we get to a country where this feels normal. They're not radicals. The third group is tired.

And all they're trying to do is decide which fear is bigger. The fear of unchecked power or the fear of rising chaos. Okay, that's the real story here. All three perspectives are completely incomplete. All three of those. The activists might be missing the victims. The agents might be missing the distrust that people feel. That's legitimate.

And the audiences at home, they're being asked to choose aside before they've even heard the whole story. It's who makes, who appeals to their emotions. Because modern media rewards emotion first. Context much, much later, if context comes at all. It's all about how does it make you feel? And civilizations collapse when people stop believing. the other side could possibly be acting in good faith, when every disagreement becomes proof of evil, when every fact becomes propaganda, when empathy becomes surrender.

So maybe the question isn't, who won the argument in the parking lot? Maybe the question is, how many people watched it? How many people became a little more certain that their fellow Americans are the enemy? Because if that number keeps rising, the parking lot isn't just the beginning, okay? So how do you talk to these people? You've got to start where they are, not where you want them. You know, most people encounter that story on both sides through empathy. A man detained far from home, harsh conditions, wife speaking publicly, dogs waiting for

him. If you begin with you're being manipulated, you lose people instantly. Instead, start with empathy. I understand why people feel sympathy for this. guy because I mean, nobody likes the idea of somebody sitting in detention for months, you know, not knowing what's going on, his wife, what did she do, the dogs, I get it. You're not surrendering here. You're lowering the temperature so you can add some things to the pot.

Okay. Then you have to introduce the missing frame, not the attack. Don't say, but he's a bad guy. Say, can we widen the frame here? Can we just for a second? Let's step back and look at a bigger picture here. He overstayed a 90-day visa by many, many years. Final order of removal came from a judge.

The opportunity for him to leave was available to him. The reason why he didn't want to go back is because he had drug-related charges in Ireland. Also, he abandoned his daughters saying the daughters are saying they're abandoned and unsupported. I mean, you're a daughter. if dad would have left and left mom alone for 18 years, no child support, no, nothing, nothing. Doesn't that need to be included in this? Widen the frame.

When you say, can we just widen the frame a little bit? I agree with what you're seeing. Let's widen the frame just a little bit. That is showing, I believe in fairness. I'm not going to dismiss everything you say. I see what you're saying. And then shift from the person to the pattern. This is a critical move.

If you focus only on him, people will think you're arguing immigration policy. Instead, you need to say, this is not about one man. This is about how stories get built. The first narrative, wife plus dogs plus detention, compassion. That's what it equals. You add the missing details. The perception changes. People rarely resist when you make it about media,

literacy rather than politics. Nobody trusts the media. Use the terms both things can be true. This is so critical because it breaks the binary thinking, which we're all trained. There's only right or wrong, right or wrong, right or wrong. It can be true that tendension conditions should be humane. But it also is true that full legal and family history matters. And when people realize you don't have to abandon compassion to acknowledge the facts, maybe they'll relax a little bit. And when they relax, then you can point to the real danger, because the real danger is not immigration. The real danger here is emotional framing, replacing facts. A story designed to trigger sympathy before context appears. Selective humanization. Their humanization. Their human

humanizing the guy, but dehumanizing ice. Some victims are centered, others disappear. What about the children? The abandoned children. What about the children on the other guy that was raping children? What about them? People pick aside before hearing the full record. That is a real, real problem.

The danger is not that people feel compassion. The danger is when compassion gets. It's steered by omission. So instead of confrontation, use things like, but can I, can I widen this view for you a little bit? Did you hear that? Can we zoom out for a minute? Because there's this fact. You know, I felt that way too.

I understand how you feel until I heard fill in the blank. Ask the question, what would change if both stories are true? Anything change for you if both stories are true? invite thinking instead of triggering defense. Because what we're doing right now is triggering defense. What never works is you care more about the dogs than you do about kids. You're just so naive. You know all of you people, you just have bad intent.

Lead with accusations, you'll fail every time. Those things only harden the identity. The danger isn't that we feel sympathy. The danger is when sympathy is handed before. the whole story arrives. Tell them the whole story. People don't change when you prove them wrong. They change when they realize, I didn't have all the facts. And your goal is not to win the argument, the argument about the Irishman. Your goal is to teach people how to notice a story when it is trying to think for them. Let me tell you about relief factor. Pain has a way of slowly redrawing

the borders of your life. You don't notice it at first. You know, you just skip a walk. You pass on a project. You sit down a little earlier than you used to. And before long, things, you know, that we're normal now are painful and your new normal is not good. This is what chronic inflammation does. It doesn't always arrive with drama. Sometimes it just stays quietly, turning movement into effort and effort into exhaustion. Relief factor was designed to support your body's natural response to inflammation so you're not just masking, discomfort for a few hours, but you're actually, you know, giving your system a chance to find a better balance over time. And the track record matters. Over a million people have tried it.

75% of them go on to order more month after month. I'm one of them. Get at least a little small piece of your life back and then see if that doesn't grow into a bigger, bigger piece. If you're done dealing with daily pain, go to Relieffactor.com. Get their three-week quick start. It's Relieffactor.com. 800 the number four relief. 800, the number four relief, relief factor.com. Now back to the podcast. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program, and we really want to thank you for listening.

We're talking about Marco Rubio's speech in Berlin this week, and I want to take it over to England. I mean, the main point that we need to get out of Europe right now is they know it's over. They know that what they're doing, doing is not going to work. And as Marco Rubio said, we did it too. We were there. We're just changing because of Donald Trump. We have woken up and we're changing. And we have to do something different. And that begins with remembering who you are. Okay. Let me, I'm going to come back to

that point here and say, just remember, remember who you are. First, let me, let me give you something. This is from an MP in Great Britain. Over the weekend, he posted on X. And he, He launched a new political party. I want you to hear this cut one, Rupert Lowe. I have chosen to speak to you today from the farm because places like this represent what proper Britain is about. Hard work, responsibility, effort, duty, stewardship. This is the England I know, and this is the England that I love.

On a farm, you don't think in election cycles or headlines or postings, or polling. You think in seasons. You think in generations, in what you leave behind to those who come after you. And that's why, here on the farm, I am now launching, Restore Britain as a national political party. I'm now going to dedicate my life to finding, organizing, funding and providing hundreds of qualified candidates to present to the British people at the next general election. This process has already started. with invitations being issued to patriots in aligned political parties, reform, the conservatives, the SDP, advance and more.

The men and women standing for a store in that election will not be politicians. I promise you that. They will not be failed ministers. They will not be tainted by failures of the past. They will be from business, from the military, from science, from medicine, from education, from industry, representing real communities up and down the country. Every single one will be from well outside the existing political establishment and every single one will understand the difficult decisions that need to be taken.

Because there are no easy fixes. I'm not going to tell you comforting lies about the condition of our country. I have only ever been honest with the British people and I will be straight with you now. what is necessary will be incredibly painful. But for the first time in a very long time, voters will have a genuine alternative, which is truthful with them about the scale of what now has to be done. Okay, so this is a guy who he led the inquiry into the Pakistani rape games, which failed spectacularly.

I mean, I don't know how you're a politician and you vote against an inquiry into the rape gangs, but they did it in overwhelming numbers. And so he's had enough. This is coming. I got to tell you, I really think with everything the way it is going now with the Justice Department and if Congress fails on the Save Act, you're going to start to see this kind of thing happening in America. You're going to say, I'm done with the Democrat, Republicans. Done with the Democrats, but done with the Republicans, get the same old crap every

time. And you're going to see people like him saying, I will finance. And it'll probably be Elon Musk. And good luck with that, Republicans. You know, vote against the SAVE Act at your own peril. Okay. I've got a couple of examples of what is happening over in Europe where this kind of thing is taking hold now. Okay. What Rubio was talking about this week. weekend was this system has failed and Donald Trump is going a completely different direction. And we will lead the way, at least for our people, and we would love to have you join us in this, but you have to restore common sense. You cannot keep doing the same thing over and over again.

This system doesn't work. And we all know it. Just we're the first ones to admit it. It doesn't work. So what do you do? I mean, have you ever worked for a failing company? Have you ever worked for, I remember I was 18 years old and I worked for WPGC. And it was one of the first real top 40 radio stations in the country.

It was the one that financed the Beatles to come over for the Ed Sullivan Show. And the deal was come over for the Ed Sullivan Show and then you come down and do a concert in Washington, D.C for us at WPGC. They led the way on rock and roll for forever. I mean, I remember I was going through the archives. I'm 18 years old and they put me in charge of the archives. And I go through the archives and I find this picture of John, Paul, George, and Ringo in WPGC T-shirts. I have never seen a picture of the Beatles in a radio station t-shirt before. and I was brought in as the station was starting to fail.

And so I was part of the team. And we used to talk about it in the hallways. We're going to be remembered as the team that was the demise of this great radio station. And I hated it, hated it. And no one would listen to reason and restore. WPGC is still in Washington, D.C. It's a success again, but it's not a top 40 station. And it's, but, you know, it was a success.

if you've ever worked for a company going down, you know there are many options in front of you. You can give up and give in, and you can say, let it go. Doesn't matter, let it go. I'm not one of those people because I like history.

I know what history means. And when it comes to Western civilization, how could you make the case that it's, it's worth letting go. You could only make a case if you've been carefully taught that Western civilization means nothing except bad things. And you're misinformed on that. And it's going to be a dangerous awakening when you finally get the real news on what the Western civilization is. This is why I keep saying we're already in World War III. We're fighting World War III. You just don't know it yet. Islam is on the move. And what is their target? Western civilization. You take down Western

civilization and they occupy those countries, which they've been trying to do for a thousand plus years. They occupy those countries. They now, A, have nuclear weapons. And if they occupy those countries, you no longer have what built us. You no longer have where we all came from. You no longer have the memory because the memory will be erased. So you can work for a company and you have a choice. You're going to go for the hostile takeover and they'll sell off all the parts. You can come up with this is what WPGC did, a whole new plan.

they were like, okay, we're not that anymore. We don't care about that history. And they worked hard to erase the history of who they were. And they eventually were successful, but they aren't what they were. And maybe that doesn't matter when it comes to a radio station. But it does when it comes to a culture. Or you can see the writing on the wall and you can go, okay, what we are is really, really important. And I see the future.

We're going to keep doing what. we do best, but we will adapt to the new realities. And so you restart the company. You have the same company, same goals, but you're achieving them in different ways. And let me give you a real world example, 1908, a company, Fisher carriage. It makes wooden carriages. It makes the, you know, everything back then, the horse, you know, and buggy and the, and the carriage for the car, you know,

early on the cars. They were all wooden. And then they would slap some metal on top of them, but there was a wooden frame underneath. And that's what Fisher Carriage did. Fisher Carriage made the greatest suspension and carriages in America. They saw what was coming, and that is the automobile, and started making wooden carriages. And they made good wooden carriages. By 19, let me look this, 1910, they were known as the carriage company to make wooden cars. But they saw what was coming and they realized we have to get into steel. By 1919, GM comes in. Fisher carriages, the important part of the car, not the engine, just the rest of the car,

they have a choice. We can either just keep doing what we've been doing, make carriages for, you know, horses and everything else, but we believe the car is the future, and they had slowly retooled what they had been doing, and by 1920, 1919, they're purchased by GM. Now GM, because they had strategically made partnerships. They saw the future.

They saw that it was cards, so they made strategic partnerships. They were going to build the carriages for Cadillac. They were going to be making all of the carriages for all of the different companies under the GM label. Now, that was kind of scary because you're going up against Ford. But Ford wasn't changing. He wasn't willing to change. Fisher carriages willing to change. When I was growing up, you would open the door of a,

Cadillac or anything, any card made by GM, you would open the door and there would be a little plate and it was a little blue plate and it had a horse and carriage logo on it, just had that carriage like, you know, you see the, I don't know, the queen or the princess, you know, going in in a Disney movie, saw that and it said underneath Fisher made, no, a carriage or a body made by Fisher. Okay. May I suggest that we understand that times have changed and we want our country to survive. And we want the Western civilization to survive.

And so we can't sit here and say, we make horse and buggies. We make the buggies for the horse and that's all we're ever going to do. We see the world is changing and has changed. and we adapt so we don't lose who we are. We do it in a different way. We do it in a better way, but we hold our values and what made us a country in the first place. We don't throw everything out, and we don't hold on to the crap that doesn't work. Get rid of that crap.

It's over. Those days are over. Great. What made us a great country in the first place? let's remember those things, let's restore those things, and then let's adapt those to today's issues and problems. I think that's what Rubio was saying. And he was challenging Europe. And at the same time, he was reminding America, this is what Donald Trump is challenging America to do as well.

We're going to do it. Join us. That was the last part. Remember I told you he had this great pattern. start with a unifying memory. Bring people together. Remember what we were? Then state the problem. Here's the problem. It doesn't work anymore. Then state the intent. We want to preserve Western civilization. The next step was invite them to join. And we don't want to do it alone. We want to do it with you because we're family. Invoke the memory again. We came from you. And then the last step was, show the promise that the goal will accomplish. If we do this and do this together, we will be stronger.

We will preserve Western civilization. But it will work so much easier and so much better if we do it together. You're listening to the best of Glenn Beck. Need a little more? Check out the full show podcasts. Anywhere you download podcasts. Man, I'm so excited to have our next guest on. Kelsey Sharon is somebody.

She's a Canadian combat veteran. She was a former artillery gunner, a female searcher. She served right alongside the Americans and the British in Afghanistan in 2009. It took a physical and mental toll on her diagnosed with PTSD and traumatic brain injury. She rebuilt her entire life through therapy and entrepreneurship. And she is on this mission to help bring. to attention, death, and the silent epidemic of our veteran suicide. I wanted to get her on, as I just saw her in an interview. I don't remember who it was, but she was talking about the

maid program up in Canada and going through some of the details. You know, they just did this study on how much will, how much will Canada save if they just kill people instead of giving him palliative care? Oh my gosh, $1.27 trillion. Okay, that's a horrifying stat and horrifying that anybody was like, how much can we save by killing people who are going to die anyway? I mean, I read about that in history books. It didn't end well. Kelsey is here with us now.

Hi, Kelsey. How are you? Hi, Glenn. Nice to meet you. Thanks for having me. You bet. You bet. So can you go through this?

I mean, how did they even get to the point to where they're like, yeah, we can save a whole lot of a lot of money if we start killing people? Well, I mean, that's what happens when you have a liberal government. for over 10 years that has told you for a very long time since the 70s in his father's own documents, the Trudeau Federation, that they wanted to roll out assisted dying in Canada. They wanted to be more like Denmark. They wanted to be more like Europe, a more progressive country that utilizes, you know, choice and compassion and dignity.

And they use all of these really wonderful keywords that, you know, people grab onto and for solace when their loved ones are passing away. And frankly, Canada is like the least of our problems. At this point, America's slow rolling this like I've never seen before. But Canada itself, yeah, Canada itself has been toying with this since, you know, well in the 90s when dying with dignity really started to come to fruition. And then ultimately in 2016, when a pro-death cult called dying with dignity had over $9 million and decided to challenge the Supreme Court and actually won in the Carter v. Canada case. And that's when killing began.

So you're right about the United States. And I'm, I'm so. concerned about what we're teaching our doctors and our nurses and our medical schools and state after state starting to roll this out just like Canada. And what a surprise, it's the most progressive states in America. Not necessarily, though. That's where most people are very wrong. A lot of red states are actually rolling this out. And a lot of Republicans in places like Montana have voted for this. You know, my job isn't to, you know, just teach people about what's going on. it's to raise the alarm so that you guys can stop it dead in its tracks. And right now you guys have 14 states and are rolling at another 18 this year.

And we have the list of those with bills on the table. We know who's doing it. We know who's promoting it in America. And it all starts with compassion and choices. And the Rabin group who ironically work alongside the Bill Gates Foundation and the Obama Foundation. And we actually got their marching orders for this year to 2028. And by 2028, over 50% of the American population will, live in states where Maine is available and you don't have residency requirements in Vermont

or Oregon, which means you have death tourism coming. Well, you're a ray of sunshine. And this is why people love having me, Glenn. No, I know, no, I know. It's, it is, you were, you, you, you state the facts and it was, that's why I asked you to get on. It's just, so sorry. How do you stop this? How do you stop this? It is so well funded, so well planned. and people, they don't, they don't get it. I mean, this is what happens in history over and over again. You don't get it until it's too late. And you're like, what they've been telling you the whole time, if there is, if there is some sort of shortage of medical care, then rationing has to start.

And what do you think that means? It means this. And what do you think a shortage is? Like, we'll never have shortages. We have shortages today. Yes, we do. We have shortages of nurses and doctors because we all fired them. You know, I don't know which words I can say here.

So I'll be careful. But we have, you know, we fired that. FCC rules, but on that, you can say, you can say whatever you want, just FCC rules. So, yeah, so, you know, in Canada, we fired all of the nurses and doctors and firefighters who refused the vaccine who had backbones in America, same sort of thing. And then we cry, oh, my God, we have a shortage and hospitals have to close and we just don't know why. It's like, you know, a lot of this isn't rocket science as to the average human. But I, you know, I really do believe I put my life into this work for a reason.

then I have the largest podcast in the globe that covers made daily. And so I try to bring it up in a way that's understanding to people that are not going to be depressed. So I look at it this way, like we actually have the power. Americans actually have the power. Canadian citizens have the power. We have to be willing to assert said power. And you don't know how to assert power if you don't know what's happening. And so my job is to do the investigative deep diving work with.

I have great people, you know, Alex Shaddenberg, and a lot of different people who have been studying this for 30, 40 years, who have become mentors of mine. And I'm just really a, I'm just really a vessel and a voice for this, for this issue. And it's really because they started offering it to veterans. And those veterans happen to be friends of mine who called in 2019 and 2021. So, you know, in Canada, this spring, we're about to hit our 100,000th death. We are expanding to the mentally ill in March of 2027. And then I put an episode out today on the Kelsey Sharon perspective where I was,

able to show that sick kids hospital, the greatest biggest hospital for children in Canada, actually went into parliament arguing that we should be killing mature minors in 2023. And that means children down to zero to one. And that's what Quebec is arguing right now. Now, I'm careful to state that, of course, there is levels to Canada. And this is what happens when you allow death. And that was the Jillian Michaels interview. She brought me in to have a conversation about.

And the reason it stood out to people was because Western University did. a study. And it was supposed to be, I mean, just make it very clear because people love to correct me. It was supposed to be an if situation, Glenn. This is an if situation. But here's what happens with if really quickly. When you allow death to walk through the door, you don't get to decide how it's amended. Now, Canada funds dying with dignity, dying with dignity challenges the Supreme Court. They have over, we saw their financials from last year, over $9 million. They make over $700,000 in investment in just like the turnaround alone. Now, for America, compassion and choices is your death cult, right?

These are the guys who lobby all of your governments, who are in D.C., who are in Washington, who are in Florida and Arizona, talking to all your senators. And then they've hired quietly the Rabin Group. And the Rabin group people should really be paying attention to because this is your social elite. These are the ones going around slow dripping the mentality

to the elderly and to everyone that, you know, it's a peaceful death. But the longer I do this work, the more evidence I find that it's not peaceful. We actually paralyze you and drown you to death. And that's Dr. Jules of its work I spoke about on Jordan Peterson. So, you know, this isn't small. This is eugenics.

You guys don't even allow the death penalty in certain states, but you'll allow your loved one to drink a cup of poison and have a death potentially up to 137 hours. So we have to stop pretending that this is compassion and dignity and empathy. It never has been. It's called eugenics. It's rolled its way back around because we forgot what history looks. like. And now Canada has killed the most people. I mean, like I said, 100,000 people in a decade.

That's an entire town. That's an entire village. And these aren't elderly. Glenn, these are not elderly people. We have Keanu's case. You have Caleb Pollack, who you spoke to. You have Roger Foley. We have case of coercion after coercion after coercion. And the problem is, in my opinion, Canada's too far gone because they're so infiltrated. But America has a real chance here. You know, been speaking with Alex Jones recently a lot about this trying to get to people like RFK and Donald Trump to understand that I spoke with your United States State Department and they were not even aware there were bills on the table to legalize this. And they're even looking at revamping the Pichetta bill in America because Bill, you know, Bill Clinton said,

we can't be funding, you know, anything assists the death. So then what the death lobby has done is change the language. So it's not assisted death anymore, Glenn. It's end of life care. So if you change the term, they can get the bill passed. And now I found evidence of them targeting Veterans Affairs America

once the Pichetta bill is back in place. Have you ever read War on the Week? The book by Edwin Black. No, I have not. It outlines, oh, you need to talk to Edwin Black. He is the best. But he did extend. extensive research on, you know, eugenics and how it killed all the week and how it was all

perpetrated, how it was done. It is a book of just solid documentation of what happened in the past. And if you know all of that, you see this unfolding and you're like, it's happening again. It's, you know, Hugo Boss designed the black SS officer's outfits. Okay. It doesn't come in looking scary. we think of those black SS uniforms as scary. They didn't at the time.

They were sharp. They were beautiful. It was Hugo Boss. And it comes in and it screams compassion. The black uniforms were not as frightening as the white uniforms of the doctors and the nurses in the 1930s and 40s in Germany. And we're doing the same thing. And they're doing it exactly the same way.

Yeah. Why do we not learn? Well, we don't learn because this is money talks. and power is power, right? And so the thing we figured out is that, you know, the beautiful gold standard health care system in the communist country I live in is actually, you know, 20,000 people die a year

on the health care waiting lists. We have over one point, over a million people walking out of ERs because they can't see a doctor. We have no doctors. We cannot get dental care. We're overrun by immigration. And they don't have to pay for hospitals or anything along those lines.

So people like myself who come from actually a family who escaped the Nazis in Hungary and came to Canada, worked their way up. We can't have that conversation because I look white now, don't I? So we can't have that conversation, but we can for sure allow the Trudeau government from 2015 and 16 upwards to institute this program where ironically, just ironically, though, Glenn, 96% of the people using this program are white. And so if you look at America, 95% of the people that have used that program are also white. And so people can say this is a race thing, but it's a cost-saving thing.

So this study I was bringing up, it was an if situation. And they were just running basic numbers. And they were saying, look, if we kept expanding the law, which, by the way, we already are, so that's not an if anymore to me. If we keep expanding the law, then what we will see eventually is a savings of over a trillion dollars. Just as the law sits today in February 16th, it's already saved $117 billion by not providing palliates of care or hospice. So is it, let me ask you, because this is the question people don't get. Is it really free will or choice if their only choice is death?

No, it's not free will. I mean, you know, and you're the killer, the shooter up in Canada recently. I read his words and he was, you know, a few years ago, he's like, I just, I'd rather die than wait. I can't wait for this health care system anymore. I can't wait. I can't wait. I can't wait. I'd just rather die.

If he had made, he would have, he would have been killed. Now, some people will say, well, that would have been better. That's not the choice. That's not the choice. It's a false choice. Well, and that's where we're at. I mean, I've had 23 operations now. And every, almost the majority of them, I've had to go to a mentor of mine,

Gabby Reese so she could call an athletes team who could call somebody else to get surgery for me because you'll die on a waiting list here. And that's the reality. I'm not being emotive or facetious at all. I go to America for the majority of my treatment. My brain treatment was done in Texas. It was donated by American donors to defenders of freedom. I have gone through significant amounts of psychedelic treatment through Heroic Hearts Project, who again is American funded. But at the same time, speaking of the shooter, the very male shooter, should we say, I'm a psychedelic integration specialist, and I've been on the pharmacology cocktail this guy was on. And I got to tell you, when you combine those with psychedelics and then you don't have any proper care, you know, you're going to get a psychosis.

You're going to get these situations. And so, you know, we just had a case in Ontario where a guy actually won the right for the government to pay for his new vagina because he wanted to transition so badly. You know, we have to stop affirming mental illness, which is the first part. And then in 2027, which is really terrifying and people should pay attention to this if you are Canadian or American because it starts at track one and then it makes its way down. So in 27, it's when you are allowed to be killed. I say murder. So I know it's aggressive, but I believe this is murder.

Your doctor's allowed to murder you in 27 if you have a mental illness only. So that's depression. That's PTSD. That's major depressive disorder. That's postpartum mummies. You know, I'm pregnant right now. I'm almost seven months pregnant. And I went through postpartum with my last child.

I can't imagine if I was having a hard time going into an ER saying, I need help. Can you help me protect me from myself? And we had a case of this. I talked about it on trigonometry where the nurse said, you know what? How about maid? And this was a lady asking and screaming, please, I don't want to kill myself, but I feel like I might. And she put her hand on her lap and said, have you heard of maid? So this is a coercion program.

This doesn't stay at grandmas and grandpaws with ALS, like Governor Kathy Hogle started with. It doesn't work that way. It goes from there and it trickles down and now Quebec is suggesting children from zero to one. Kelsey, I would love to have you on for a longer period of time. I love to have any of a podcast. You keep doing the good work. You're doing God's work. Thank you so much.

God bless you. Thanks for having me, guys. You bet. The Kelsey Sharon perspective, you can find her at Kelseyshiren.com. Thank you.