The Glenn Beck Program - Best of the Program | Guests: AG Andrew Bailey & Gene Hamilton | 6/24/24

Episode Date: June 24, 2024

Missouri AG Andrew Bailey joins to explain his lawsuit against New York City for engaging in what he describes as political lawfare against former President Trump. Whistleblower and registered nurse Vanessa Sivadge joins to expose the horrors she saw at Texas Children's Hospital. America First Legal executive director Gene Hamilton joins to expose the Department of Homeland Security's possible targeting of Trump supporters as "domestic terrorists." Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Want to go electric without sacrificing fun? That's the Volkswagen ID4. All-electric and thoughtfully designed to elevate your modern lifestyle. The Volkswagen ID4 is fun to drive with instant acceleration that makes city streets feel like open roads. Plus a refined interior with innovative technology always at your fingertips. The all-electric ID4, you deserve more fun. Visit vw.ca to learn more. SUVW, German-engineered for all.

Wow, I don't even know where to begin today, Stu, on the podcast. Holy cow, have we covered a lot. We started with new videotape from CBS and 60 Minutes of apparently the Saudis being involved. I mean, on record being involved now with 9-11. Minor development. Right. One of years after? Right.

What does that mean? I'll tell you, and I think you're going to get an opinion, you're not going to hear anywhere else. Also, Andrew Bailey. Andrew Bailey, he's the aging from Missouri. He is now suing the state of New York. Ezra Levant joins us. He's up in Canada,

where he is being now investigated for a hate crime because he drove around in a truck, you know, one of those digital billboards, that shows what's happening on the streets of Toronto with these anti-Jewish protesters. Also, the registered nurse who blew the whistle on pediatric sex change operations happening at Czech Texas Children's Hospital. She's now being investigated. She's on to tell her heroic story and so much more on today's podcast.

Have you ever noticed how every time you go to buy meat in the grocery store these days, the price tag is just a little higher, but the package feels a little lighter at the same time. It's weird, isn't it? In this inflation-riddled economy, one of the best things you can do for yourself and your family is to lock down the price of things when and where you can. If you think the price of meat is high today, just wait. You can do this now and lock in your price with good ranchers right now during their April price shield sale. Not only are getting delicious 100% American beef, chicken, pork, wild-caught seafood here in America, But if you subscribe during the month of April, you'll also lock in your price until 2026.

I can't even imagine what the price of meat will be in 2026, plus 10% off with the promo code Beck. Always assuming Jesus hasn't come back before then, when the price of meat will probably be different. Prices may vary. The price on meat, you can lock it in to 2026, and it could save you a ton of money. With this exclusive price shield offer ending at the end of April, you want to secure the best price on meat until 2026 right now. Go to good ranchers.com. Use the promo code back. That's good ranchers.

com. Use the promo code back. Save 10% off your subscription and lock in your price. The price lock guarantee until 2026. Good Ranchers.com. American meat delivered. Now back to the podcast. You're listening to.

The best of the Glenn Beck program. The Missouri Attorney General, one of the better Attorney Generals in our country, Andrew Bailey, joins me now from Missouri. Hello, Andrew. How are you? Hey, Glenn. Thanks for having me on. Yeah, you bet. You bet. So tell me about this. I read this last week when you announced it, and I'm trying to figure out how you can do that.

What is your standing to be able to sue New York? Well, Glenn, somebody's got to do something to fight back. against this unconstitutional lawfare that's depriving all voters, but specifically in my instance, Missourians of access to and to hear from a presidential candidate in the heat of a national election in the most consequential presidential election in this nation's history. And so, Missourians are being harmed by the actions in New York that have taken President Trump off the campaign trail and will continue to take him off the campaign trail after sentencing and have silenced him through the gag order.

It's called Perrin's Patriot. That's the standing argument. Essentially, Missouri has a sovereign interest in a national election and being able to participate in that national election. And I will tell you, the founders contemplated just this kind of dispute when they codified in Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, a method by which states could resolve differences with original jurisdiction at the United States Supreme Court. That's where we're going. When states have a problem with one another, they go to the Supreme Court. It happens all the time. And in this instance, Missouri has a real problem with New York's lawfare against President Trump. So the Supreme Court going on vacation Friday night. When are you going to argue this? Yeah, we're going to get it up to the court this week. I mean, we've got to get it on file and put the marker down that red states are ready to fight back against this kind of election interference. This is an attack on our democratic process. We've got to stop looking at lawfare in terms of individualized cases.

and start seeing not just trees, but the forest for what it is. They have silenced conservative voices. They have silenced President Trump. They have censored free speech on Big Tech. They have kicked President Trump off the ballot in certain states. They've sanctioned him through civil suits. And now you've got the crooked Department of Justice leading an effort at the federal and at two different state levels in order not to obtain a legally valid conviction of President Trump,

but again, to deny voters access to a presidential candidate. important to remember, the First Amendment right to free speech applies not only to the speaker, but to listeners as well. Every American who wants to hear from President Trump has been armed, not only by the gag order, but by the illicit prosecutions that take President Trump off the campaign trail and put him in a courtroom. So when you, the founders were genius. Quite honestly, I have appreciated the separation of federal and state, more and more as we go down this road on how states can choose to do their own thing as the rest of the government wants to take those rights away. But you say that we have to grab hold of the Constitution again and we have to restore the law in order. So what does this actually look like?

What do you have to prove to win this case? Well, as he pointed out, we've got to first and foremost that Missouri has a sovereign interest in Missourians participating on equal footing with other states in a presidential election for a chosen candidate, a candidate that Missourians through the caucus process have chosen as one of the leading parties in this presidential election. So that's the standing argument. The second issue that we have to adjudicate is the harm. What's the harm? Well, the harm is, again, it's not only a speech issue, but an access issue.

When President Trump is tethered to a Manhattan courtroom for months of time. After sentencing, what's that going to look like? Is he in a prison cell? Is he on house arrest? Is he doing community service? Because all of those things take him off the campaign trail and deny Missouri's access to a presidential candidate, ultimately interfere with this presidential election. And then it's the gag order. Again, there's a strong presumption because of the First Amendment against gag orders. And one of the things the court looks at in determining whether or not a gag order is appropriate is whether or not speech will prejudice the defendant's right to a fair trial.

the presumption against that gag order should be heightened in the middle of a presidential campaign when you're talking about a leading presidential candidate. And so it's not only that President Trump's right to speak out on these issues was violated, but Missouri's right to hear from it. We've got to fight back. The founders contemplated that I would submit to you that we have not seen this kind of perversion of the law, weaponization of government against political opponents since the Alien and Sedition Act of 1798. And if you remember what happened, there was such a backlash against the federal

that they lost all power in 1800. I predict the same thing happens here. This lawsuit puts a marker down and starts to make a stand where we fight back. Have you gotten any other states to join you in this? Right now, it's Missouri going to the loan. I'll tell you, we would welcome other states. I think that for far too long,

Republicans and conservatives have sat on the sidelines and watched this happen. This didn't happen overnight. This happened back in 2016, when the deep state suppressed the Hunter Biden laptop story, and injected the Russian collusion hoax into the American body politic that undermined President Trump's the first years attempted to undermine the first years of his presidency. And it has gone on in 2020 and now in 2024.

And we've got to start taking steps to fight back against it, or we will lose our Democratic Republic. What do you say to those people who say we don't have a republic? We have a democracy. Well, they're wrong. I mean, there's structure in place in order to mitigate against the capricious winds. and tyranny of the majority, and that structure matters. And so things like original jurisdiction at the United States Supreme Court for disputes between states, I submit to you as a little R Republican

structural mechanism that, again, it's a timeless principle of separation of powers and the balance between federal and state authority that matters to our system. And I would, I lament the fact that the left has jettisoned this traditional approach that, you know, we used to agree that we would elevate the rules of the game above the players and the outcomes. But the left, hates Donald Trump so much, they're willing to destroy our system of government to retain power and destroy a political opponent. That is shameful. We are looking at a country now that, you know, the left learns. And they learn if nobody stands against them.

Nobody is willing to play hardball. They'll play hardball every step of the way. They did it with the boycotts of sponsors. until now that's just accepted from the left. They've done it now with the silencing on social media. And their biggest one yet, I think, is lawfare. And this is, they're going after the president's attorneys, putting a chill through the air.

What happened in Connecticut, I think it was last week, where the Bar Association of Connecticut said, you can't speak out against this judge or they'll be held to pay. This is, when you're starting to go after, the attorneys and you're using attorneys on your side to shut everyone down, that's a final stage of freedom, is it not? Glenn, I think you're absolutely right. I think one of the most unreported problems with the lawfare is that the left has

criminalized the practice of law. Let's go to New York and look at the fact that essentially what they said was the false entries in the business record where President Trump paid his attorney to enter into a contract were illegal? Well, certainly the founders understood that we had a right to seek counsel, and they would have understood that counsel would assist with contract, because contracts often end up in legal disputes. And so criminalizing the practice of law, again, it destroys the very foundational principles of one of which our judicial system is based. I mean, this is, it hurts President Trump today, but it also hurts voters today, but it's going to hurt

all of us down the road when we're denied due process, when we're denied the right to counsel, because those things have suddenly become criminal. So this is not going to be something that is heard right away. This is something that you're laying the marker down on the table for later. We're laying the marker down on the table and asking the Supreme Court to put a stop to the lawfare against President Trump in the instance of the case in New York, to allow issue in order to allow President Trump to remain on the campaign trail and continue to court the electorate and talk to the American people and have, look, the American people,

have access to their chosen presidential can't. So you're asking for an emergency hearing then before they Absolutely. Okay. All right. I hope you win, Andrew. I really hope and I applaud you for standing up for the system. And it is it is time for all of our states to do this. I mean, you know, I don't mind if we go and we vote and we disagree and you vote for somebody that I don't like. I don't mind that. I don't mind that. I don't mind that. I don't mind if your guy wins. As long as it's fair, I don't mind going after my guys if they're corrupt, as long as we go after your guys as well. And they should stop being my guy or your guy when they're corrupt. And I think that's what most Americans, most Americans are still fair,

but they have been so warped with what is true and what is not that I don't think they even understand what fair is anymore. Andrew, thank you. Thanks, Glenn. Appreciate you. You bet. Andrew Bailey, Missouri, Attorney General. You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program. Brought to you by Relief Factor. If you are living in pain, I'm sure you have thought, you've tried absolutely everything. But if you haven't tried Relief Factor, then you haven't. It was the last thing I tried for pain, and it has changed my life forever. I got my life back. Maybe today is, the day you should try. Maybe today is the day you begin to get your life back. Relief factor is a daily supplement that helps your body fight pain 100% drug-free, and it was developed by doctors to

help reduce or eliminate pain. Over a million people have tried Relief Factors Quick Start, and 70% of them have gone on to order it again and again. See how Relief Factor can help you with their three-week Quick Start kit. It's 1995. It comes with Relief Factors feel better or your money-back guarantee, so give it a try. Relief Factor. or call 1-800 for relief. 1-800, the number 4 relief. When you feel the difference, you know it works. Relieffactor.com.

Vanessa, Civage, is with us now. And Vanessa, welcome to the program. Thank you so much for having me. Thank you. Now, Vanessa, I don't know what I can ask you, what I can't ask you, because you're involved in legal action now. So I just want to hear your story that brought you into the position where the government's now looking at you. Absolutely.

Well, the story really starts in 2021. I accepted a new position in a pediatric, multi-specialty clinic at Texas Children's Hospital. And, you know, at first, my background is in cardiology. and so I was helping babies born with congenital heart anomalies and through a series of medical interventions and surgeries were saving their life. However, I just contrast that with the endocrine clinic where I started seeing perfectly healthy patients and teenagers

with functional anatomy and we were harming them. The hospital was turning them into a patient dependent on a medical system for life through puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. And so I started to see this rise in transgender patients coming to clinic and specifically in something I feel like we don't talk about enough, which is teenage girls who are confused about their sex, but not only are they confused about their sex, they're also suffering with depression, and many of them are autistic, and many of them are coming into the emergency room

because they've tried to commit suicide and take their life. And it was just very clear that there's so much going on and they're truly suffering with just a variety of issues. And that was really devastating to me. So how did you get involved in blowing the whistle? Tell me that part. I know that a doctor who we talked to a couple of weeks ago, who is also under investigation himself now for blowing the whistle, Dr. Heim. Yeah.

He did an article. He was anonymously giving information anonymously to Christopher Rufo. Correct. And he blew the whistle. And when did you get involved? Right. Well, it was May of 2023. And I had contemplated quitting on a number of occasions because, you know, I was being asked to do things that were against my beliefs in my faith.

and would come home crying to my husband because I couldn't fathom what was being done to these children. And it was in this time that I read Christopher Rufo's article with an anonymous whistleblower, who we now know is Dr. Aton Haim. And, you know, I knew I had to come forward to corroborate his account to just affirm that everything that he was seeing was true

because I was also seeing it where I was working. And so that's when I came forward anonymously in May of last year and worked with Christopher Rufo and just provided a different perspective from an outpatient clinic nurse that, you know, transgender patients were being seen and it was true. So when was the first inkling that someone knew who you were? Yeah. Well, you know, life went on as normal for a little bit.

And I thought, you know, I had done my part. I had come forward. I had helped expose what was being done in secret. I felt like that was a redemptive opportunity for me. And, you know, it was the evening of July the 24th of last year when we were having dinner with friends in our home. We were laughing in the kitchen. And I think we were making burgers. And all of a sudden there's a knock on the door.

And my husband goes to answer it. And he didn't come back right away. And I just thought, oh, my goodness, maybe someone's selling something, you know. So I go out and I, to the front door. And at my front door are two federal agents who are asking to speak with me about issues at my work. And, you know, I think in that moment, I can say that time just stood still. And I couldn't believe it. What was happening.

But they essentially said that I was a person of interest in an investigation where they were seeking to unmask the identity of this first whistleblower, who we now know is Dr. Heim. But, of course, I had no idea who he was. And I, you know, listened as they talked about how he had broken HIPAA are releasing, you know, patient confidential documents. which is not true. Which is not true, absolutely. And I referred to him as a whistleblower. And they immediately corrected me. And they were like, no, he's not a whistleblower.

He's a leaker. And he is broken HIPAA by releasing patient information to the public. And I knew that they were lying to me. Not only that, but then... Wait, wait, wait, wait. How did you know they were lying to you? Because I had read Chris Rufo's, you know, his article. and there was absolutely no patient identifying information on those documents.

Everything was blacked out and redacted. And I knew that. And so that's when I knew they were lying. And so anyway, they continued and they said that they threatened me and said they promised they would make life difficult for me if I was trying to protect this quote unquote leaker. They claimed that I was not safe at work. They claimed that someone had given my name to the FBI. and it was a very, I felt very coerced and intimidated.

And they, you know, to seal the deal, they said that they wanted my help to expose Dr. Heim. And, you know, I was, I was never going to help them. There was not a scenario under the sun in which I was going to help them. And you didn't have the information at the time anyway. No, yeah. I had, again, I had no idea who he was. This hospital has 20,000 plus employees. Like, I do not.

I did not know him. And so anyway, they were, they acted as if they wanted to be my friends, but they said, of course, if you don't help us, we can't protect you. And so it was very terrifying for me. And they left. And I just remember looking at my husband and stunned disbelief and shock at what had just transpired. We were so scared, but we also knew that they had crossed a line and we would not be intimidated into silence. So everything after that point, everything changed. Did you have any moment at all?

I mean, having the FBI come into your home and say those kinds of things and say, we're going to make life miserable for you if you don't help us. I mean, that's, it feels like Stasi kind of stuff, quite honestly. Was there a second at all that you went? Oh, I don't want to be this person. I don't want to be here. I don't want to be here. You know, no.

No, absolutely not. Because, you know, the hospital has a reputation of lying to the public. And I felt like I was helpless. and I was the only one who had these deeply, these religious beliefs that motivate everything I do. And I felt like I could no longer be silent. I felt like someone, I know that I'm not the only nurse in America who feels this way. I know that I'm not the only nurse who has seen illegal things happening in the workplace. And so I feel a sense of responsibility to bring to light what has been done behind closed doors.

I talk to a lot of people and some in your situation and I can hear it in your voice how nervous you are or how frightened of the situation. You're not some zealot. You're just a woman trying to do the right thing. Can you talk to other nurses? Because as you said, there are other nurses. that see it, and you said see illegal things happening in the workplace.

Can you talk directly to them and give them courage to speak out as well? Yes, absolutely. You know, I believe that the saying is true, that courage is contagious. It just takes one person. And the world is in desperate need of people who will stand for what is good and right and beautiful and true. and other nurses around the country must feel like they can come forward if they are seeing something illegal happening at their workplace. You know, do no harm has to mean something. Medical professionals, you know, whether it's nurses or others, they just, I want them to feel a sense of responsibility to tell the truth about what they are seeing.

And that's regardless of the outcome. And so regardless of the consequences, because the truth is always worth it. So I want for others to feel emboldened and to feel empowered to protect children from irreversible damage and lifelong regret because ultimately it's their lives and their well-being that are at stake. When you say you saw crimes being committed, you're talking about Medicaid fraud? And how was that done? Yes. You know, I started noting some discrepancies in the paperwork, some red flags that were very concerning. For one, I saw that the hospital was using Medicaid to pay for transgender treatment.

And this is Medicaid fraud, plain and simple. The Texas Medicaid policy, which is, you know, available online, just clearly states, that any medications or surgeries related to gender affirming care are not covered. And so, in essence, we, you know, I saw a healthy teenage boy who was being prescribed estrogen to feminize his facial features and sexual characteristics. And likewise, a healthy teenage girl was receiving testosterone to masculinize her facial features and sexual characteristics. And both in both of these examples, the insurance listed on file with Medicaid.

So it wasn't like they were trying to conceive. feel what was going on. This was easily, you know, it was available. But not only that, the hospital, you know, was using Medicaid to pay for transgender treatments, but on several instances, I noted that the patient was intentionally misdiagnosed for the purpose of justifying the prescription of cross-sex hormone. And that's even worse. So to justify the medical need for medications like estrogen,

and testosterone, the hospital was listing false diagnoses for these patients. So, for example, a biological male was said to have a diagnosis of estrogen deficiency. And this fraudulent diagnosis allowed providers to prescribe estrogen-based therapies to biological males in order to feminize their physical and sexual characteristics. and likewise with biological females. A female was said to have a testosterone deficiency, which is ludicrous. Like, you know, it's clinically incorrect. But that then just decides the quote-unquote need to prescribe testosterone for a healthy female.

Vanessa, thank you. Thank you for standing up. Thank you for remembering who you are. Thank you for knowing who you serve. Thank you. God bless you. Thank you so much. You're listening to the best of Glenn back.

Need a little more? Check out the full show podcast. Wow. If you missed a second of today's podcast, you need to go back and listen to it today. This one is worth usually, you know, you can listen to the recap and you get the highlights. And you're like, okay, yeah, I get it. I get it. Glenn.

No trouble's going to blah. Blah, blah, blah, blah. This one. Jam packed. Jam packed with stuff that I don't think you're going to hear anywhere else. Do you? I don't think so. I mean, it's some really important stuff that I just don't think you're going to hear anywhere else.

And you can get it wherever you get your podcasts. But make sure you look for today's podcast. Now, on Friday show, we told you something that neither Stu nor I remembered this. Right. Yeah. It was on the front page of our show prep on the day that it happened back last fall, I think. September, I think. Yeah.

And we completely forgot about it. Well, thank God. American First Legal did not. These are the people that are going after the government on really important issues. And one of them is the targeting of average citizens. What was happening was the deep state was weaponizing DHS. And they started to release a few of these documents last week because of this court. thing. They shut it down immediately, which is strange and suspicious because they don't ever

shut them down. They just relabel them. But this was trying to get you to snitch on your neighbors, going in and influencing teachers, to get their kids to snitch, to get mothers to snitch. I mean, it's incredible. Gene Hamilton is here. He's not only got the stuff that was released last week, but I think he has some stuff that I didn't hear about who they're labeling domestic terrorists. Welcome to the program, Gene. Glenn, thanks for having me, sir. You bet. So let's start at the beginning of the story.

This was something that was done by the two former Clinton intelligence people, Clapper and Brennan, right? Correct. And what was it? So DHS has had an office of intelligence and analysis since its creation in the Homeland Security Act of 2002. So it has been around. It has traditionally been the least effective and most in search of purpose organization you could imagine in the entire federal government. Of course, it was stood up in the wake of 9-11 and the threat. of attacks from Paris abroad, but because of misincrease and because it had no actual purpose,

it's the same exact entity that over the last 20-odd years has had routine issues with documents and policies that aim to target conservatives or that describe conservative Americans or Americans with traditional values as though they pose some kind of threat to the country. So, fast forward to last year, and Joe Biden stands up in advisory committees of so-called experts to help this office figure out what it actually needs to do. And he stacks this committee with people like John Brennan and people like James Clapper. and they have meetings in secret behind closed doors and they start to try to scheme out based on their experience, based on their political biases, what it is that they think that this office should be doing to achieve its goals. And so we, thanks to our litigation that shut this down, at least in its prior form, this committee, obtained all of their internal notes.

in all of their internal kind of, you know, documents and discussions. And we started releasing these last week. We're releasing another set today. And we're going to release a set of information every single day this week. But as a, you know, for example, the group, and this is something that we released on Friday, described that most of the domestic terrorism threat now comes from supporters of the former president. And so if that's your framing,

and if that's your thinking, and if that's who is advising this committee at the Department of Homeland Security as to how they should do their job, the kinds of things that they should be focused on, we all know that only bad things come from there. Only bad things like getting, you know, neighbors to report on neighbors

and kids to report on parents and all the kind of stuff that you would never imagine happening in the United States. you would only traditionally think about happening in communist China or the soviet block or other places is potentially going to be happening here in the united states if we don't make drastic change in the way that we do things soon so what is coming out today what are you releasing today Well, we've got a lot more of the organization's notes today that we're putting out related to their discussions about domestic violent extremists about how there were reservations before January 6th to engaging in monitoring of American chatter and things like that. online in that how somehow now post-January 6th of 2021, maybe there is an appetite for doing so.

Now, this not, of course, notwithstanding the fact that Congress has repeatedly, and of course, we also have the First Amendment, but has repeatedly refused to allow law enforcement and intelligence agencies to engage in these types of activities are things that this group is now discussing as potentially being within the ambit of stuff that should be looked at for the department, which is just shocking and alarming. There's a lot more coming, and it will be out here very, very shortly. The thing that really concerns me is these people believe it. It wasn't like the notes I saw, it wasn't like there had people going, wait a minute, wait

a minute, wait a minute, this is way out of line. these people believe it. And if you actually believe that the greatest terrorist are, in fact, I saw a report might have been from you guys, that it is Trump supporters, religious people, service members, and people who fly the flag. Yep, that's right. Same committee. same committee here is identifying those types of folks as the greatest threats of, you know, domestic terrorism to the United States. Now, I mean, Glenn, there's another issue that is underwriting all of this, which is it's not just that they're doing this. And it's not just that they view and they truly appear to believe that conservative Americans pose the greatest threat.

But it's the same people advising the same department that's responsible for. for bringing in foreign nationals into the United States, including foreign nationals who were supporters of Hamas, who were going crazy on college campuses all across the country. And you think that this same Department of Homeland Security Committee or any of the out or any of its entities within DHS or having discussions about taking action to stop these folks from rioting on college campuses for incitivial

inciting violence and inciting terrorism and actually finding ways to deport people who are supporters of terrorism from college campuses? No, of course not. But they are more than happy to characterize in label conservatives, Trump supporters, people with servicing the military, et cetera, and being threats to this country and that should tell you everything that you need to know. You know, we've changed the wording of fascism, which is the government, allowing private citizens to own property and to own companies, and they can keep that as long as they do exactly what they're told to do and play ball with the government. That used to be called fascism.

Now, the Biden administration calls it a public-private partnership with NGOs. And the public-private partnership is usually where these things end up. They'll start there. They get shut down. and then they just move money and people over into an NGO. Any evidence that that has happened with this? Well, we haven't seen it yet here with this. That doesn't mean that it's not happening.

Obviously, everyone, every one of your listeners probably understands now that that's precisely the way, of course, that they manage to achieve their censorship goals. at the start of the Biden administration was to outsource the censorship model to NGOs and to universities and to other nonprofits that were stood up to engage in the pressure and collaboration and collusion that resulted in American speech being censored by big tech platforms and they did it through their allies, their outside allies, because they knew that they couldn't necessarily get away with it on their own. And so they outsourced it, they put it out.

There's a record, there's a pattern, a practice of them engaging in these types of things. And so, you know, look, we're going to keep working hard at America First Legal to explore and to expose and to hold accountable those bad actors who would subject the American people to violations of the Constitution. Thank you so much, Gene. I appreciate it. Gene is the executive director, senior vice president, general counsel of American First Legal. If you can donate to these guys, they're doing God's work. And if you're an attorney, call them. Maybe you can get involved as well. AFlegal.org.

It's American first legal, a.flegal.org. When you were little, you had braced, you've been having to negotiate, change these cards of hockey, de bonhom, these bracelets, even des colations. You know that each has a value well before to have been

before having to the things have been really changed. Negoti-tit-Titre TD you can't to renewing

with your instinct of negotiation. With without operation gratuit, no amount of minimum and

no free mensue. You're made for negotiate for the appellate-tit-t T-D is made for

you help you. Telecharge it right now.