The Glenn Beck Program - Best of The Program | Guests: Bill O’Reilly & Allie Beth Stuckey | 8/6/21

Episode Date: August 6, 2021

It’s time for Drunk News with Glenn Beck! The Left will move into any state and destroy it. Bill O’Reilly joins with his take on vaccine passports and the controversial eviction moratorium. BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey was thrown into Twitter jail for calling transgender weightlifter Laurel Hubbard a biological man. She joins to explain why she’s not backing down. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Now, Pat and I are not, I would say, we're not food scientist per se, although I am a doctor and you run kexycookies.com. Yes. And so we're pretty qualified. But we have made a discovery that we test tried today from the cakegirl.com. It's cake in a cup. It's a small business that, we just tested it. I mean, I didn't want to. Did you want to eat all that cake?

Not at all. Not at all. No. So we tested that today, and perhaps you should too. And speaking of small businesses that are struggling to make it, maybe you're in that boat. Or you're struggling to make the payments on your house because you are a landlord and own one house. What is the government doing? How is this all affecting us?

And what is the real thought behind it? Oh, we'll tell you today on today's podcast. and Bill O'Reilly has great insight on Governor Cuomo and what's going on in New York, all on today's podcast. You're listening to The Best of the Glenback program. Oh, and good evening. I am your local anchor that has been doing the news here in your hometown for quite some time. And I've just been drinking just a little bit because I have to, be able to tell you the news.

There's a new Oregon, the state underneath Washington, a valid initiative that would criminalize hunting, hunting and breeding livestock, even, even, you know, when you spray the cockroaches, even that would be illegal. under a ballot initiative back by the Oregon animal animal rights activist and opposed by farmers the damn farmers the proposal initiative petis pettive and it number 13 would lift virtually all exemptions to state laws related to animal animal abuse neglect and and sexual assault the vast majority would sounds like a good idea would would would would ban common farming practices uh such as artificial insemination i don't want to be one of

those guys and used in targeted breeding and killing animals for meat in in in addition ip 13 would further restrict hunting, fishing, trapping, and and in, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, hurting an animal, intentionally. That, that would, uh, also ban, uh, research labs from experimenting on non-human mammals. So, or is it okay to experiment it on human? Non-inhuman mammals birds fish reptiles and if and fish that walk around All the activities listed with carry criminal penalties The organizers say that the state's 5.7 billion dollar farming industry

would just have to adjust to the laws accordingly in other news President Joe Biden took a jab at one of his foremost critics and perspective and somebody wants to run for president in 2024 Ron DeSantis

passing off as if he didn't recognize who the Republican governor was Biden responded Thursday when asked about the recent comments DeSantis made about battling the federal government's COVID-19 strategy, he said my response is, uh, governor who?

Which, I mean, the man doesn't know the difference between his sister and his lovely wife, uh, Jill, which I'm thinking might be a little bit awkward. Honey, I wasn't cheating on you with your sister.

I thought. it was you. And that's all the news I could possibly muster today. I have to tell you, the Oregon ballot, if this doesn't make

everyone want to move out of Oregon, what are you doing there? What are you doing? They are destroying the state. You can't call pest control. If this passes, you can't kill cockroaches. You can't trap rats.

It's from the same city that has allowed absolute anarchy. But this is for the whole state. Yeah, that's true. This is for the whole state. True. Now you know why. It's pretty conservative, too. I know.

That's why half of the state wants to join Idaho. And I as an Idaho part-time resident, so I don't want to speak for Idahoians. Is that how you? Idahoians. I don't want to speak for them, but the more the merrier, the more people who understand freedom, the more the merry. If you

understand freedom, please move to Idaho. If you understand freedom and are willing to stand for it and not like, oh, we all love the Constitution, but, you know, but I mean, there are things, no, no, move to Texas. Move to Texas. If you don't get the hell out of here, get out of here.

You already have all those crappy states that you have destroyed. Go fix those. We could, but you won't listen to us. So go fix those. Make those your utopia. Have you noticed they have all of the good places? Have you noticed? I mean, I'm not saying that, you know,

conservative cities are crappy, but they, the progressives move in and they move into places like Jackson Hole. And then they just destroy. it destroy it well we've got to have our skiing lodge and it's just so beautiful and natural here we need to make sure that it's preserved that way meanwhile because you're preserving it you're burning the damn state down have you seen what is happening in california with the water situation no okay they haven't built a new dam or a new reservoir since like 1972 yeah okay

they won't do it We're not going to dam the rivers. I'm lovely. So they have no water. Now they're in a drought. Now, what is their electricity? What is the electricity that they all love? Hydroelectric.

But if you're not building dams, you're not getting hydroelectric power. And if it's not raining, you don't have water to fill up to run the hydroelectric plant. They don't have enough water. They think they may have to shut down all of the hydroelectric plants because of the drought. You're not having rolling brownouts. You're not going to have power. You're not going to have power. You're not supposed to run generators.

For days and weeks on end. Oh, yeah. They won't have power. Oh, welcome to Venezuela. Welcome to Venezuela. And California, all you people who have voted for all of this nonsense and bull crap, this whole time. You deserve it. You deserve every bit of it. Every bit of it. You think we deserve COVID because Texas isn't masking up. No, you know what? We actually believe that man is built to survive.

Man is built to survive. Did you see the latest study? Latest study shows that people who have had it have a better immune system than those who are taking the vaccine. But you're never going to hear that. you have more defense if you've had it. It's why people had chicken pox parties. Your natural immunity is much better. No, not on this one. No, no, no, not on this one. Oh, it's that way on everything except this one.

Yeah. Okay. Yeah. So you're saying that we're actually, you know, the people who have had the vaccine, you know, good for them. I'm glad they had it. I would take the vaccine possibly if it wasn't, if I didn't already have it. I had a bad, bad bout of it.

I'm pretty sure my body has the antibodies now that I need. You know, I'm sorry. I'm not doing your little vaccine thing, but I believe in nature, you know. And by the way, let me just say this. my body my choice not with this no no because your choice is affecting me yeah yeah it's like it's not affecting the little baby inside of you exactly my body my choice except when you know the government wants to put stuff into you can you imagine if we go for this this mandatory vaccine and we have vaccine passports. America, dear God almighty, you will deserve everything you get. If you go for the,

if you go for the vaccine mandates and passports, you will deserve the dystopian future. Do you know what we have taught this government? We have taught this government that we, in fact, let me just say this. We've taught them that we're sheep. We have taught them that they can do anything to us and we will abide. You know, when the, when, uh, the, when, when FEMA was first around and the federal government, before that it was named FEMA, the federal government tried to come into a, to a state, I, it was one of the southern states. And they were coming with all the rescue trucks and everything else because there was a bad hurricane. And they were coming into the trucks. the people of the state met the government trucks at the border with shotguns and said,

turn your trucks around. We don't need, nor do we want your help? You know what happened? They fixed it. Oh, by way, another one, when they were first voting on giving federal aid to a state, the state of Texas because of a hurricane, Texas went crazy and said, we don't, we don't want your aid. Everybody's like, oh, we've got to hate them.

Poor Texans, they're not going to be able to handle it. You know what happened? The private sector raised more money than the government was ever thinking about doing. We are losing everything about us that makes us different. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. Well, Mr. Bill O'Reilly is here from Bill O'Reilly. The author of Killing the Mob. Hello, Bill O'Reilly.

How are you, sir? The Glenn Beck program. Yes. So I think you should bring back the English lady who used to say this is the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment. I like her better than the robot guy. That's just my suggestion. Well, I haven't had that opinion from anyone because, you know, other people are paying attention to things that might be. slightly more important, but I will jot that down.

We will bring the English woman back. I'm a detailed guy. I like the English woman because it has this masterpiece theater aura of it. Well, that's what we're all about here. So this portion of the program underwritten by the Ford Foundation. Bill, what was the big story of the week? Cuomo. No, Cuomo is the big story because it's not being reported accurately as usual.

And, you know, COVID, but we talked about COVID last Friday in great detail. Not a lot has changed on that front. So the Cuomo story, I think, is something people should pay attention to, even if you've never been to New York State and never intend to come here, which might be a good plan. Right. Yes. I mean, this is a guy who's born in New York. It's wild to hear you say stuff like that, honestly.

Bill, you have been around these guys for a very, very long time. My thesis is that Andrew Cuomo is very much, in a way, Harvey Weinstein in this way. Everybody knew it. Everybody knew he was vindictive. Everyone knew he was nasty. And everyone knew that he was a predator. And nobody wanted to say anything because they were afraid of him. I'm not sure that is fair.

I wouldn't make the Weinstein comparison to that. Well, I don't mean in gravity of crime. Yes, I mean, look, but the most important part of this is not what the allegations are. That might become the most important part when the courts kick in. But it's the nasty hardball politics that not only take place in New York. state, but in every state, and certainly in the federal government. So let me just lay this out to you. Andrew Cuomo was the most powerful man in New York for 12 years, by far. He was a dictator. He was like Huey Long in Louisiana. He controlled the legislature. He controlled everything. And as you rightly

described him, he's a nasty piece of work. Okay. And if you, he, you, you, got on his wrong side he would try to hurt you so that's all true but somewhere along the line the progressive left in new york which has been gaining power for the last three or four years decided that he wasn't progressive left enough and they want

letitia james the attorney general to be governor so the only way that could happen is if you get quomo out of the way, because Cuomo is going to run for a fourth term. So you've got to destroy it if you want Letitia James, who is way to the left of Cuomo, if you can even imagine that. So Letitia James is the attorney general, and then Presto, all of a sudden, all of these people come out, and they're saying, Andrew Cuomo did this, did that, did that, bum, bum,

B, bum, b'am. And whose place in charge of the investigation? Letitia James. Okay, so wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait, wait, wait, wait. So are you saying these are trumped up charges?

I'm not. No, no, I'm not. Okay. I'm not. And I would never even get into that because I have no blank an idea. Okay. And neither is anybody else, by the way. We will have an idea when there is court hearings and if there is an impeachment.

Okay. all right but the structure is Cuomo's got to go and as again you rightly pointed out there were whispers all over the place that he was not a good guy

yeah and that he was taking advantage of his power to set up his dating life or whatever you want to say those rumors were around so what should have happened in a honest state

is that it should have been investigated. Absolutely. But not by Letitia James. Not by the person who wants to take his job. It should have been the Attorney General of the state of New York says, I'm appointing somebody from outside government to do this investigation. And it's going to be due process.

And the governor is going to have his attorneys present whatever he wants to present. Well, but isn't that the way, wait, wait, isn't that the job of the Attorney General? Yeah, but she didn't do it. she says I'll investigate. No, I know, but isn't, I mean, she can't she? Can she what? She can do that. As Attorney General, she can take that on.

Of course she could. And then if the independent person came back, and it had to be somebody outside of New York State, by the way, no ties to the state, and said, look, X, Y, and Z, then we would have less intrigue. and we would have less politics in this situation. The second really important part of the story is that Cuomo is going to take everybody down with him.

All right? He is that kind of guy. The three most corrupt states in the union are Illinois, number one, California, number two, and that governor, I believe, is going to be recalled on September 13th, and New York State number three. These are like organized crime families. They're run by like the mob. And who knows more about the mob than me, Beck? No one.

I will tell you this. I will tell you this. It is interesting. And I would put Michigan on that list. These are all states that have been run by democratic progressives and socialists forever. That's right. And you can throw Michigan in, but it doesn't rise. to Illinois, New York, and California.

So what is this going to mean to New York? What is he going to throw out? He has stuff on everybody. And right now, his battery of attorneys basically going over what they are going to put forth to the public. That's what's happening now. So he basically going to send a message to the legislature.

If you impeach me, then this is what we're going to put out about all of you people. He's been an office for 12 years. Yeah. He knows. So everybody's going to die. And see, this is not reported anywhere back. Number one, the investigation and how it should not have been that way is not been reported. and number two, the consequences of going after Cuomo and destroying him, because at this point, Cuomo has nothing to lose.

He's not going to quit. He's not going to admit any wrongdoing. He's not. Okay? He's going to say, all right, you want to tango? We're going to tango. So what happens, do they do they tango? Here's what happens. Here's what happens. Okay. There are four district attorneys now, and this is really, Interesting. So Letitia James, the Attorney General in New York, comes out, and says Cuomo broke the law, committed a criminal act. And that's all centered around the female state trooper. Yeah. Which accused Cuomo of whatever.

Yeah. Okay. That's a serious person. And I'm not seeing the others aren't serious. But that's his main problem. Yeah. The female state trooper. So James says, he committed crimes. He committed crimes. and I'm not going to

I'm not going to indict him though we're not going to charge him why well wait wait wait if he committed a crime or you believe you have evidence that he did why are you not going to prosecute him right

does that make any sense to anybody it does in today's world but not in any just society I got you but I'm just going down the corruption meter right I'm going down the corruption meter. So she farms it out to four district attorneys, four different people. You do it. You investigated the criminal thing. I'm not going to do it because I want to run for governor,

and I don't want to be involved in this while I'm running for governor. You see what I'm talking about? All right. So you've got four guys, including the unbelievable corrupt Cy Vance in Manhattan, okay, investigating Cuomo on criminal charges. If they are, have it. If they have it, all right, then Cuomo might have to make a deal. I'll leave if you don't, if you don't expose this. Priminal. Yeah. That's the only way he gets out of there without a blood bath as far as an exposition of, well, you think I'm bad? Look at this one. Look at that one. Look at this. And so that's possible that he'd make a deal because he doesn't want to go to a criminal trial. But believe me, when I tell you, Andrew Cormo will take this into civil court all day long,

all day long. And you'll have one after another, after another, after another, after another. Now, the impeachment's another thing. But don't be surprised if all of a sudden the New York legislature says, well, maybe we're not going to do it because he's only there for another year. Let the people decide. And the reason that I picked this on your program is the most important story every week. Okay, sorry. Hold on. Oh, vicious, vicious dog.

She will take your ankles and the tops of your feet down. You ever try to get close to Bill O'Reilly. You there, Bill? Yes, I'm here. All right. The reason why you pick this story is why. The Tara dog is so upset about Andrew Cormwell. I know.

I know. You know, she just heard our discussion, and she's appalled because she lives in New York State, too. I know. She's a taxpaying, Doug. Yeah, yeah. And so she's here. Holly, come in here and keep quiet.

We're going to take care of Governor Cuomo. Don't worry. She's very, very worried. So anyway, I want to, I want your national audience and international audience to understand a level of corruption in this country on the political, on the political side. I mean, it's just staggering and nobody reports it. You know, I read this in the New York Times. You can see any of this.

And the reason I can tell you this with certainty is, as you pointed out, I've been covering New York for decades. I know all these people. And I know what's going on here. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. So yesterday, one of our own, Ali Beth Stuckey, was talking about the Olympics. and Laura Hubbard, who's the guy who is competing on the women's Olympic team.

And she wrote, Laura Hubbard, failing at the event doesn't make his inclusion fair. He's still a man, and men shouldn't compete against women in weightlifting. Well, she was put into Twitter jail because she was violating the rules against hateful conduct, promoting violence and threatening and harassing people, bases of race or ethnicity, of national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Well, I would like to challenge you because this is, if you don't push back now, if you're not willing to speak the truth because of, oh, no, Twitter jail, you're not going to speak the truth. and and Ali does business and Twitter is important to her and Twitter is important to me as a business person, but not more important than the truth.

So I just tweeted two things and I invite you to retweet them or tweet them yourself. Anyone who acts with hate and violence to lies or truth, I reject. I stand with Ali on Laura Hubbard. hashtag Laura Hubbard. Biology is clear. It isn't hate. It is science that states he is and always will be a man. I will call him Laura to be nice, but scientifically, he's a man.

And I also tweeted, because this is happening up in Harvard with a professor up there, a guest lecturer, Carol Hoeven. She refuses to, say, you know, other genders. She's like, you're a man or a woman. I reject hate in violence and embrace kindness and the individual's right to be who they are. But I also stand with Harvard's Carol Hoeven, biologically, scientifically, men are men, women are women. And that's the biological reality. Hashtag follow the science. I would love for you to retweet these or just make them your own words.

And if you're afraid to go into Twitter jail, imagine how afraid you're afraid. you will be when things really get tough and they're talking about real jail for speaking the truth. I invite you to do that today. Exercise your courage today. Allie is on with us now. Hi, Ali. How are you? I'm doing well. How are you, Glenn? So were you surprised by this or did you see this coming? I was a little surprised because I've said stuff like this before. This is an issue I care about. My goal is not to be purposely controversial. It's certainly not to purposely offend anyone or hurt anyone's feelings. It's just a state of fact, which I think is important when you are talking about the fairness,

the protection and safety and the rights of girls and women. And that's something that's really important to me. Well, I think it's, you know, I've said this story a million times, but it is so true. I talked to one of the righteous among the nations, one of the women who saved over 100 Jews, and she told me basically you cannot participate in the lie. You don't suddenly become a superhero. You just refuse to participate in any of the lies. And they are moving us closer and closer to the edge.

Every time we refuse to say, no, that's not true. I don't hate you. I'm not going to fight you. But it's not true. Exactly. Exactly. And I think that conservatives, obviously we have a hard time with this because people on the other side are controlling all these major institutions. And while it's not being put in actual jail yet that we have to worry about, some people do depend on outlets like Twitter to make money to get their voice out there. So I understand absolutely the fear. And maybe a few years ago I would have said, you know, pull back on some of your speech. But I just think that we are in such an important moment right now. that courage is maybe more necessary than it's been in a really long time in the United States. And just saying that which is objectively true.

I mean, you think of people who went to war all throughout our history for whatever reason. They went to war. They lost a limb. They can't walk. They lost their mind. They lost their life. Whatever it is. The blood and sacrifice that all of those people made.

And we're too cowardice to actually speak. biological, scientific truth? Wow. What a waste of lives. Right. And it's little things that I think that we acquiesce on that we think, you know, aren't that big of a deal. Like you said, you know, calling someone by the name that they now have,

that's fine. But I, as long as I can, and as much as I can, when appropriate, I am going to use the pronouns that correspond with someone's biological sex. I don't do that to be hateful at all. I don't want to be controversial in that respect, but if I am committed to not living by lies, if I am committed to speaking that, which is true, and not giving into the absurdity, then I do have to be careful about the things I say in making sure that I'm in alignment with that, which is true. See, I've always referred to Bruce Jenner as Caitlin Jenner.

And to his face, I would be saying, you know, I don't, the idea that Bruce Jenner, a hero of mine growing up, was living in this, oh, my gosh, this dystopian view in life that he had, that miserable. If this is what makes him happy, I'm fine. I'm not going to participate in it. But, you know, I'd call you Caitlin Jenner and, you know, you know, you know, she and et cetera, et cetera, when I'm there. But if I, if I having to tell my kids, if I'm having to go to the hospital, if I'm having to talk about science, no. Right.

It's a dude. It's a dude. Is there a line there where we can, we can be truly kind and gracious and go the extra mile for people, like Caitlin Jenner without participants? in the lie? Yeah, I think that you draw a really good line there. Obviously, it's difficult and people kind of have to make their own decisions. But if our goal is to speak the truth in love, which I think it always should be, that means that if I am talking to someone, no matter how they identify, I'm going to go out

of my way to be kind to them. I'm not going to purposely make them uncomfortable. But if that also requires me to just say explicitly, look, I believe you're amazed in the image of God and have incredible value. that, you know, I want you to have a happy and whole life. Here's where I stand, though, on biological sex, and this is what I believe. And I'm not saying that to be hateful. And I want to be your friend.

And, you know, I consider you my neighbor that Jesus calls me to love. But look, I also believe that biology matters, that sex differences matter. And maybe it's just being that explicit and that open about what we believe. maybe that is the way that we can be both loving. So I think that drawing the line, too, as you said, between public and private, depending on the context that we're in and depending on what we're talking about it, how we're talking about it, I think that makes a difference in kind of the language that you use surrounding this kind of transgender issue.

Allie, Bethsuckie, thank you so much. By the way, you're out of Twitter jail. I'm out of Twitter jail. I'm free. I'm a free woman. Okay, did you have to retract your tweet? Well, I had to, they make you delete the tweets that they say violated their rules in order to get back in. Now, I've said basically the same thing a thousand times in a different, you know, in a thousand different ways.

But those two tweets, they did make me delete in order to be able to tweet again. So I don't know how long I'll last on the app, though, because they said that I could be suspended forever if I keep if I keep saying that biological fact. Your first tweet was, Good Morning. I'm out of Twitter jail. Men are still men. Thank you.

Yeah. Yeah. So we'll see. All right. Allie, thank you very much. I appreciate it. Thank you.

So again, I just tweeted, I don't know if I'll go to Twitter jailed. Is anything, what was it that they said about her that it violated the rules against hateful conduct? You may not promote violence

against, threaten or harass. people on the races of base ethnic ethnicity national origin sexual orientation gender gender identity religious affiliation age disability or serious disease and her original post didn't do any of that didn't do any of that promoting violence no it didn't ridiculous so so what i just tweeted does that i mean that that states clearly anyone who acts with hate and violence to lies or truth i reject i stand with alie on laura hubbard biology is clear it isn't hate it is science that states he still is and always will be a man.

I will call him Laura to be nice, but scientifically he's a man. I reject hate and violence and embrace kindness and the individual's right to be who they are. I also stand with Harvard's Carol Hooveen, biologically, scientifically, men are men, women or women. That's the biological reality. Hashtag follow the science. Two tweets. Do I make it through the day? Why the hatred?

Yeah. And there's no hatred and I'm not trying to be controversial. I don't think you do. I urge you to go look at my tweet. You don't have to retweet mine. Go look at your tweet. Go to your tweet. Look at mine and copy it verbatim.

And you say it. I mean, it is time to push back and it is time to stand. When the science is clearly on your side, isn't that the best way to push back? Isn't that the time to push back? We are always told every single day. We follow the science. We follow the science.

We follow the science. Well, we're following the science. Following the science. And you just don't like the science anymore. Correct. You don't like it. Correct. And, you know, the same with the science of COVID.

Yeah. If you have not had COVID and you had a vaccine, I had COVID. Studies show that I am, I have stronger antibodies against COVID than you do. That's a scientific fact. Why I can't say that, I don't know. But it's a scientific fact. You know, you get, you get a vaccine and you're going to be safe from COVID.

No, science is showing now. now that about 35% of those who had the vaccine or have the vaccine are getting COVID again. Mm-hmm. Okay. All right. Well, that doesn't make the vaccine, you know, bad. It doesn't make it, you know, completely worthless. It's just a fact.

No, no, no.