The Glenn Beck Program - Best of The Program | Guests: Donald Trump Jr., Sharyl Attkisson, & Steven Crowder | 9/30/20

Episode Date: September 30, 2020

BlazeTV’s Steven Crowder joins after his debate livestream with his thoughts on the carnage and a preview of his upcoming rally in Michigan to hold Gov. Whitmer accountable for her terrible handling of the coronavirus. Investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson reviews the debate and news that Obama was briefed in 2016 about Hillary Clinton possibly planning to tie Trump to Russia. The New York Times claims some of the biggest election misinformation is on the subjects of mail-in voting and George Soros. Donald Trump Jr. argues what Biden got away with at the debate. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Holy cow. What a night. Right, Stu? Lots of fun. Oh, my gosh. What a great debate. We cover this one six ways to Sunday. We also have Stephen Crowder. We have Cheryl Atkinson on to talk about the theft of the election, the actual voting process with mail-in voting. George Soros. Then we have Don Jr. on. We have a way for you actually to make a different. This is a full meal. Today we're offering you all of it.

Supersized. And you have a big special coming up tonight on Blaze TV. Isn't that true? Yes, it is Civil War Part 3. This is the only place you will see the future. In their own words, what the left is planning beginning on election night. Go to Blazetobie.com slash Glenn. If you use the promo code, Glenn Debates, is that still active, I think it is.

Anyway, you can save 20 bucks off your membership to Blaze TV, and you can watch the entire special. and the two previous episodes that lead up to this, all there, part of your membership as well as access to Stu Does America and Stephen Crowder and Mark Levin and Chad Prather and many, many others, Pat Gray, everybody. Check it out, get your membership and, of course, join us. If you have a moment on podcast as well to rate and review this program,

we would really appreciate that. Helps us spread the message of the show and do the same for Stu Does America, where you can subscribe for a podcast every day. as well. Here's today's episode. You're listening to the best of the... Very different than your standard debate.

He was dressed as a fighter and I always love to see those crotch shots up your shorts there. Stephen, it's great. It's definitely the best part of the coverage. Oh, there's a hell of an intro. They were regulation sized boxing shorts, but I didn't realize they don't typically do the interview seated

And they don't have these disgusting Scottish American thighs. Great show last night, Stephen. Tell me your reaction to the debate. Your thoughts? There were really no winners and there was no moderator. So, I mean, that's kind of the summary. Here's what I would say. On the issues, on the substantive issues, I've been asking everyone,

can you name me any specifics from Joe Biden? So we'll go to the personality in the shouting match, you know, and kind of two guys with their walkers, you know, and someone coming in with a folding chair. Look, the economy outside of raising the corporate taxes to 28 percent, anything else? What about violence and riots in the cities? Yeah. Anything? Anything. Just stay out of the way. Right. How about COVID? Aside from Donald Trump being racist. Anything, anything specific. The only thing I can really remember is him saying that he didn't support the Green New Deal before he used the rest of his time defending it. And, of course, his website does praise the Green New Deal.

Right. Which, by the way, is a five-page bill that takes over the entire economy in all of your rights. So if you ever had any doubt as to who was pulling the strings with Joe Biden as to who the puppeteers, it's the Harris's, the AOCs, the squads of the world, and he was really veering to the social justice left. Outside of that, I don't think Trump did a great job in giving Joe enough rope to hang himself. Exactly right. Right. Exactly right. Joe just needed to leave him alone with his thoughts.

and you can't find them. Yeah. I got it in you someplace. Stephen, last night we were watching it and we were talking and I don't think people really understand and I'm going to I have Cheryl Atkinson on next hour

and we're going to talk about what the press is doing and also what social media is doing and preparing people for unbeknownst to them of the silencing of voices once this election happens. If you disagree with the mainstream media,

you're going to be silenced. How real do you think it is if this election goes awry, your voice, my voice, just not going to be able to get out? I don't know if we won't be, they won't ban people like us. And that's the thing.

Sort of like with the media, people say, why don't you talk about Rachel Maddow? Listen, come on. When you have an open lesbian with the Princeton number three, boy's haircut out there talking about how Donald Trump is Satan incarnate. I don't really have a, I don't have any gripe with her. She is who she is. My issue is with the lies by omission is by

people trying to act objective. And so my problem with social media is if they say, well, we're not going to ban. We want all voices. And then they change the rules and they do things behind the scenes that limit your reach. Something hilarious. Do you know I was fact, do you know that I was fact checked early on in the COVID pandemic? Because we had friends at Origin Maine who had made masks and at this point the CDC was saying don't wear masks it's actually worse for you and I went on air I just said hey listen the truth is if you look at the science in these countries if you happen to be sick yourself or you feel the sniffles and you're working in close proximity with someone else this was before the lockdowns I said may not be a bad idea to use one of these

cloths cloth mask it's not an n95 mask it won't prevent you from from breathing in any actual respiratory droplets or any aerosols but yeah if you feel sick and we were fact-checked because at that point they said masks are bad for you And these people are the ones in control. I know. The same thing happened with us. I said, if it doesn't work, then why are all the people in the hospital wearing them? If they don't work, of course.

Of course they work to some degree. Well, see, your problem there, Glenn, is you're looking to medical professionals who are actually serving patients as opposed to the experts like Fauci who haven't served a patient or taken care of anyone for four decades. You have something coming up on Friday that I cannot, I can't wait for. You are taking your show and you're going to hold a Michigan rally on the steps of the state capital. And you're demanding what? Well, we're going to have a hashtag. We're going to have a call to action for people. And we're going to have thousands of signs that Michiganders can put in their yard.

Let me kind of tell you where this comes from. I'm from Michigan. I was born in Detroit. I lived there for years. We only recently moved away from Michigan. We still have a home up there, a small home cottage on a lake that we go to. I have a 97-year-old grandma in Michigan. I have several family members and good friends who are nurses,

who, of course, have been laid off for furloughed in Michigan. And if I have to see one more god-awful sign that says, thank you, Governor Whitmer, for keeping us safe. Let me be really clear here. The only leg that Governor Whitmer has to stand on in Michigan is that she locked everything down, irreparably destroyed the Michigan economy to keep people safe. She actually enacted policy that has directly led to the death of the most vulnerable citizens in Michigan,

the sick and the elderly, and she has refused to give an account, to give a tally, and to be transparent about what kind of results her policies have created. What do you mean she's... What do you mean she's refused to give a count? Yeah, well, she gave out a count that said 34% of all deaths come from nursing homes. that's not even close. That comes from less than a tenth of the actual homes that are licensed in Michigan. And we have some numbers that we're waiting to verify, Glenn.

I don't want to speak out of turn. We should have them by Friday or not because the governor said she doesn't have to respond to requests for information to which we're legally entitled because it's a pandemic. Oh, how convenient is that? But there are some numbers here that are startling. Here's the thing, too. It's going to be in Lansing. I should be clear here, probably if I'm going to be plugging it, right?

October 2nd on the state Capitol steps at noon. If you want to protect old people, Glenn, if you, and we all do, this is the thing, Republicans want to protect the most vulnerable among us. If you want to protect the sick, you would do the exact opposite of what Michigan has done. What do I mean by that? Let's say you lock everything down. Is there any safer for an 80-year-old two months from now when they come out? No. It's the exact same situation.

You don't quarantine the healthy. You quarantine the sick. And instead, in Michigan, they quarantine the healthy. By governor's order, by the way. And Republicans presented a bill to stop them. and she vetoed it. But let's go through the first step. The governor quarantined the healthy, the entire state, while sending not old people back into nursing homes, right,

who were sick, who went to the hospital, got COVID. 20-year-olds, 30-year-olds, who had COVID into nursing homes, an adult foster homes, and homes for the age. Yeah, you saw that video that the gentleman beating up the 85-year-old who eventually ended up killing himself? That's because the guy had COVID. So they sent the paranoid scum. schizophrenic, who, by the way, his own dad said had no business being in a nursing home.

And Governor Whitmer said, well, you know what, we have fail safes in place that'll stop these people from getting into nursing homes and cross-contaminating. You couldn't stop a crip in the making from beating up grandpa. Keep in mind in these nursing homes, the clap has been on the rise by like 52% because old ladies get around slowly, literally, but figuratively very quickly. This is a problem. If they can't control that, how are you going to stop? people who go in there with COVID.

It's the only state that I know of that has done it, and they have not given an actual account of what the death total is. It's not even close to 34%. What they're saying is what they're saying is 1,947 nursing home residents and 20 staff members died of COVID-19. Those account for one-third of all virus deaths in Michigan. Is it worse than that? Sorry, I sound evil because I'm thinking of government.

or Whitmer. It's not even close, Glenn. It's not even close. That number comes from 442 nursing homes. They're over 4,000 currently active. Oh my gosh. And I thought, Glenn, I thought, now, to be clear, that's not even the worst part. They're comparing it to Indiana, to Illinois, to other states that have comparable rates, right? You go, oh, okay, it's somewhere around 30%. Those numbers, 30%, 32, 33, depending on the state of all deaths in these other states come from nursing homes, assisted living facilities, homes for the aged, and adult foster homes. Governor Whitmer is including that 34% total of all Michigan deaths from 442 homes, and there are many, many thousands. You would have to assume there was not a single death than any of the others,

and we're going to have some more official numbers on Friday. But it is, when I was looking into this, Glenn, I was saying, first of it's my home state. It should be the best state in the union. It's beautiful. the natural resources voted the most beautiful national park several years running sleeping bare dunes and it has been brought to its knees by Wuhan Whitmer so that when I started looking into these numbers

thank you when I started looking into these numbers I thought I must be wrong or this is really deeply evil and then I had to say why why would she do this like what is the reason to send

20 year olds 30 year olds non-nursing home patients into those homes with COVID. Well, here's the thing. Let's look back there. What did everyone say before this pandemic, Glenn? What did we have to do? We had to flatten the curve.

Right. Instead, they flatlined grandpa. They said we had to flatten the curve. You know what they did? They said, look, look, look, look. Our hospitals are not overburdened here in Michigan. Toss them in the old folks home. So Governor Whitmer can go out and claim that she flattened the curve because 25% keep in mind, Glenn, 25% of all deaths

in any given month come from nursing homes. and assisted living facilities. So at that point in time, they can say, which was the most important, right, this was the most important point in their multi-pronged approach to fight COVID was flatten the curve. Well, they did flatten the curve in Michigan. You have record layoffs and furloughs for nurses, and instead we have a debt. We sent these sick people to nursing homes like a buzzsaw. I don't know how you justify it outside of optics.

And now she wants to launch an investigation into President Trump for not doing enough with COVID. Okay, Governor Whitmer, you first. And you didn't not do enough. You did too much. You enacted policies that directly led to the death of American citizens. And anyway, if we're going to find common ground, let's find common ground on the truth. You should have the far right, far left, and every centrist in between right now say, hey, you know what?

We may not agree on the policy going forward. Even if I agree with a full lockdown, or I think we should reopen our economy, we certainly are entitled to knowing how many people actually died as a result of these policies. If you are not interested in that, you are not interested in the true. And we are going to have signs that you can put up right next to those. Thank you, Whitmer, for keeping us safe. And I'm very happy with them. I want to hold this little authoritarian that could accountable.

I will be in the backyard. What are the signs say? Can I, you know what? Okay, that's all right. It has to do with Whitmer. It has to do. I'll give you a hint. It's in Michigan and it has to do with Whitmer.

Okay. This rally is going to be noon on Friday, October 2nd, at the Michigan State Capitol in Lansing. I mean, I want to put one of the signs in my yard, and I live in Texas. Go, if you are anywhere near Lansing, go and see and be with Stephen Crowder to hold this, as he said,

authoritarian wannabe. Hold her feet to the fire. This, if those, what you're saying, if you have the numbers and they are much, much worse, this is, I mean, this is, I mean, this is, this is just slaughtering people. It's slaughtering people for political reasons. And what happened to trusting the experts? The experts said, we can't handle these people in these homes.

She said, sure you can. They said, no, we can't. And then you saw these deaths. And then you saw that video, that guy getting beaten up. They couldn't prevent a young, known, criminally insane person from beating up an old man. How do you think they're going to quarantine people in the same building, which they had no interest in doing? All right. Stephen, thank you so much. He'll be there 11 a.m. Eastern time handing out signs, live streaming the rally on YouTube.com slash Stephen Crowder. Also, blazedTV.com and Stephen's Facebook page.

That is noon eastern on Friday, the Michigan State Capitol in Lansing. You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program. Cheryl Atkinson is with us. And Cheryl, this is going to be called a conspiracy theory. I'm sure you're aware of the transition group that the left has put together. That is, they're plotting different scenarios on really how to throw the country into chaos and how to negotiate a win for Joe Biden by, in their own words, encouraging Washington, Oregon, and California to secede. Well, I don't think that's going to happen.

And I think some people would welcome that if it did, by the way. But I do think, well, you know, Lannie Davis got on Twitter the other day and said, this is former or the current, I guess, Hillary Clinton confidant friend, and said something like New York, California, we ought to just, we're going to leave. And a lot of people tweeted back like, please be my guest. How soon can you go? Yeah, I know. But I agree this.

that, you know, I heard, again, in 2016, something that some of my contacts on the right were saying was that the left accuses us, they mean the right, of doing everything that they did. And I just thought, I kind of chuckled like, oh, that's kind of a funny saying, but I didn't really think of it as literally true until now you look at their refusal to accept the outcome of the election, which they're, you know, accused Trump of doing in 2016. and now again in 2020. And then I get chills when I think about Ukraine, accusing Trump of interfering with Ukraine when they knew some months before that this was probably going to come up. Yep. Because of what Biden and his family had been involved in,

which was exactly what they accused Trump of doing. Only their deeds were documented and acknowledged versus the sort of accusations, the generic accusations that turned out not to be true against Trump, although he was impeached for it. and yeah, I just go back to the friend who said that and I'm like, you're kind of right. You're proving right. So when they say something, a lot of times it makes me now think, okay, what have they done that they may be trying to deflect from or what are we going to learn, you know, that they did do. When I was uncovering the Tides Foundation back in 2008 and George Soros, that's what I told my team.

They will self-diagnose. Whatever they accuse us of, they're doing. because you recognize disease in people because of you. You know what I mean? You're like, they're probably doing this because that's the way you behave. And they can't help themselves. They always self-diagnosed.

This is what's happening, but it's actually happening on their side usually. The New York Times, let me see if I can find this, came out today, or this was yesterday, about disinformation in the 2020, presidential election. And they say election misinformation, the biggest category of election misinformation is the mail-in ballots,

that there's going to be a problem with the mail-in ballots. And the other one is George Soros, the investor and Democratic donor. There's so much misinformation about him. We continue to get flagged all the time. when I say things like George Soros is investing in district attorneys, and he is trying to change things by changing the system from within at the local and the state level. That's all proven. How is that a conspiracy theory?

Agreed. Because if you don't dig in the way you have, it sounds crazy. It sounds far-fetched. And I thought so, too, you know, at one time before I looked at some of the, the details. And most people don't have time to look into it and they can't believe that stuff, you know, the stuff can be connected or how it's connected. I mean, the mail-in ballots, and I wrote about this at length and slanted, how can the media fact-check in advance the future? You had people fact-checking as false Donald Trump's prediction that there would be fraud with the mail-in ballots.

And I'm like, how do you false fact-check something that hasn't occurred yet, but you have no idea what's going to happen. Right. And then you follow the money and you find out that, you know, the fact checks, let's say in the case of Google doing a fact check or, you know, taking down information and they're owned by alphabet, which is one of the biggest contributors to Joe Biden's campaign when you look at, you know, employees by company. And they were the biggest contributor to Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton, I believe, or one of the biggest in 2016. And then you start looking at all the fact checks, and this is, again, sounds conspiratorial until I looked into it for an article I wrote for real clear investigations. So many fact checkers and particularly

the board at the supposedly independent board at Facebook have connections to Soros groups. Oh, yeah. I started getting chills when I looked. I'm just like, oh, maybe a couple of these people will have links to Soros. One works directly for the Soros organization. And I think all but one or two out of, you know, more than a dozen had worked with these groups. He's founded and funded or paid for, gotten money. It's just so much money out there. The odds are that if you're looking at any kind of advocacy on the progressive side, it's been touched by money from a Soros group.

And what is your opinion on Soros? Why does he do? The people say to me all the time, he's a capitalist. He's a rich guy. Why would he want to destroy capitalism, the free market system? Why would he want to do these things? I don't know. I can only assume, and I just don't know, that he's a real believer in these causes.

But it seems like the way he funds a lot of them, he's giving away his fortune. He's doing something that's not benefiting himself financially in a direct sense. So he must believe in it. But it does tend to be disruptive in terms of a chaotic, sort of throwing chaos into the mix, trying to, it creates confrontation, the types of groups and the cause that he takes on and the way that he takes them on. My objection is not so much with him because what he's doing appears to be perfectly legal, but it's so successful in a sneaky way of getting the media, I blame us, to report things a certain way and not scratch beyond the service and to pretend that things that we see are, you know,

majority opinion because somebody says it is or because they want us to think we all should feel a certain way, the media is not doing a good job at sorting through these ties so that we can at least give information in a neutral sense and with context and not just pick up these narratives that are being pushed out by big money interests in these second and third hand ways that people are completely unaware of. Let me go back to the story in the New York Times and ask you what it means. The story in the New York Times is about how misinformation, false misleading information about this election has got to be curbed.

And I'm going to give you the leading categories. This is from the New York Times. Mentions of absentee voting or ballots such as the false idea that it is an unreliable way to vote. That's their first misinformation. Is that even close to true that it's not an unreliable way to vote? reliable way to vote when you're throwing away, sometimes up as much as 30% of the ballots? Well, certainly they're not in a position to state as if it's a fact that they've somehow disproven or established that it's, you know, not an unreliable way to voter that they're saying

it's completely reliable. They can't, this is my problem with the fact checks. That's not really a fact check. That's an opinion. Yeah. Prediction. That's a claim that they're making, but they're presenting it as if it's a founded fact. And then, I look at the big picture how many things have the New York Times been wrong about. You can go look at my media mistakes in the era of Trump and see how many times they're on the list for completely false information and reporting, whether by accident or on purpose doesn't matter. But then they want to be the arbiters of misinformation for the 2020 ballot issue.

Number two, they say is misinformation, mentions of voter fraud, such as mentions of misleading stories about criminal conduct involving mail-in ballots. Well, you know, if there's criminal conduct and there has been, I've been tracking some of those stories, again, this is a new notion of fact-checking, the idea that you shouldn't, and this is very Orwellian, that we should be censoring facts off the top, even when true, because we don't want people to conclude a certain thing about the facts they hear. That's just crazy. That's just not, you know, facts are facts, and you're not supposed to, like, shape and curb them or clob them. that they're somehow illegitimate if they're true just because you don't like the outcome

or what people might conclude from them, but that's quite the trend. So the book that comes out around Christmastime or Thanksgiving, the subheadline is how the news media taught us to love censorship and hate journalism. We're in real trouble, Cheryl, if we can't get the facts out. And if the public square, Facebook, Google, everything else, shuts people like you or discredits people like you or even me, if we can't have opinions and a different look at different facts that are not being reported and we have the documents, we're over. We're over. Well, that's my biggest concern. And I agree that even, you know, I've had pieces of mind that

are completely 100% factually supported, no opinion, no conjecture in it on my part, both sides represented, fair, not controversial, flagged as fake on Facebook by, it turns out, people that are conflicted if you can even find out who's doing their fact checks. They're people connected to the story. And I worry, as I say, and slanted that in the not too distant future, like my child will harken back to her kids, that there was a time when you could get all kinds of unfettered information on the internet, because we're reaching a time where you can't. And you won't be able to search and come up with true information about topics you care about because someone will have decided off the top, you know, in the beginning when they were saying don't wear masks,

that's all you would have been able to find because Google made a partnership with the World Health Organization to direct your searches to who and who was wrong by their own admission. If, you know, today, if you want to take their word for it. So they're deciding to direct you these third parties, corporate and political interests to information they want you to see and they're keeping you away from what may be true information they don't want you to see. Think about that. You know, it's very frightening. Is there free speech if your voice, my voice, others are relegated to our own websites

and we cannot advertise or put anything out into the public square? Do we really have free speech in America? It's a good question. And I'm kind of redefining censorship. people say, well, you're talking about censorship, but those are social media companies and it's the news. And I'm arguing they're so inextricably tied now to government. For example, when Adam Schiff can call Facebook and say, take down this story on vaccine safety, because whoever I'm assuming pays him or donates to him doesn't like it.

And then Facebook does it. I think that's, you know, that becomes government censorship reaches into a whole new definition. And I think that's what we're saying. seeing. And if this isn't dialed back, there may be some people who are perfectly happy to have their news curated and their information sorted through. But obviously, they're not thinking down the road of, well, someday it's not going to be the people you want to do it who are doing it. You know, just think about the consequences once you open the door, the slippery slope to allowing people to tell you what you ought to see and think versus you being able to decide for

yourself if you'd like to. Cheryl, thank you so much. Always great to talk to you. appreciate it. Thanks, Glenn. That's Cheryl Ackison. The name of her book, it's out for pre-order. We'll have her on to talk about her book sometime. But it's called Slanted. You could order it now.

She is somebody, he used to be on 60 Minutes. I mean, is an actual journalist who's telling the truth. That's great to have her on. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. Donald Trump Jr. joins us now to give us his thought of the the debate last night. And Don, I don't know why your father won't answer for the 847th time. Why, you know, how bad the KKK is.

I mean, he did issue an executive order last week saying that they were a terrorist group. But why are you holding clan rallies in the White House? Glenn, you just can't make it up anymore. And by the way, he answered the question twice. No, yeah. The problem is they weren't talking about that. They were talking about Antifa, so I think he was trying to figure out what the heck he's even talking about. Joe Biden doesn't have to denounce Antifa.

He can pretend, you know, it's an idea, Glenn. It's an idea that magically burned down half the cities in this country that are looting and rioting that are literally killing people. It's an idea. Like, this is the double standard by which we go again. So Donald Trump can literally call the KKK a terrorist organization. Donald Trump can actually do things to fix the African-American community. like prison reform, opportunity zones. Joe Biden gets to talk about it for 50 years, not do anything,

have his own vice presidential candidate essentially call him a racist during the debates, be friends with the biggest segregationists in the world, push for crime bills that destroyed so many in the African American community. But it's Donald Trump. I mean, this is sort of the insanity. The question of tell Joe Biden to denounce Antifa. I mean, they've waited six months to denounce Antifa, but no one talks about it. And that's the problem.

That's why Donald Trump needs. to be out there needs to be that aggressive. You know, it's not the tone we'd all love. We get that. We're up against that sort of onslaught. It's insane. I mean, when we last spoke, I talked about it a little bit, but like, it's actually very personal to me because these ass, you know, clowns, you spent three years trying

to throw me in jail. You know, they tried to say that I was colluding with Russia and doing it. But now we hear that Hunter Biden is actually that guy. There's treasury wires that confirmed that Hunter Biden took money from a known associate of Vladimir Putin, the wealthiest woman in Russia. Guess what? You don't become the wealthiest woman in Russia without associations with Vladimir Putin, and they won't talk about it. This is the dream, Glenn, that if I'd have done it, this is what they were looking for years. This is everything that they, everything that they

accused you, your family, your father of, they themselves have done. Hillary Clinton, the news came out yesterday that Hillary Clinton, uh, uh, Comy, uh, Bremer, who else was involved? Peter Struck. They all knew. Strauch, Paige McCabe.

They all knew. They all lied about it. The ones that actually didn't lie about it before Congress still went on TV for two years after their sworn congressional testimony saying exactly the opposite, you know, because they can get away with it. And that's the problem. So when people are like, well, he's very aggressive. I was like, he has to be. Look at the hypocrisy. He's had to deal with. I mean, Hunter Biden has now a tie, a direct tie to Vladimir Putin in Russia.

And you don't think they would use that over crackhead hunter? Like, you don't think that we need leverage over Joe Biden later on in light. You know, same with China. You know, yes, no one's ever heard of Hunter Biden. He's never been an investor. He's never done any of those things. The Chinese government just gave him a billion dollars because, you know, they thought he was going to be really good. Come on, man. Like, it's insane. It's insane. I love the- We can't talk about it. You're using the Biden, come on, man, come on, man. I mean, that's his answer for everything. So he wasn't pushed on any policies. He didn't have to articulate. And he's able to say he doesn't support the Green New Deal, even though it's on his

web page, the best of all worlds. Then Chris Wallace lets him speak for two minutes. But the problem with that, they're like, well, Trump interrupted him. You can't let the guy to lie. Like, just things that are just demonstrably false. He denied that Hunter Biden got those payments. He said it all above board. he denied that he had the thing that he's on videotape, essentially bribing Ukraine with a

after lie, after lie for a minute. My father's not supposed to get involved. He's not supposed to interrupt. And then when it's done, well, sir, you already had your chance to answer that question. It's like, well, I'm not supposed to retort to just never-ending lives. And that's been the story of this presidency. The media has chosen to be the marketing arm of the Democrat Party. And Chris Wallace is no different.

Everyone's always from Fox. It's like, is anyone really believed Chris Wallachian? Right. You know, I saw last night and I thought this was the choice in front of America. They were talking about COVID and Biden was talking about masks and safety. And your dad was talking about opening the country up, trusting people to make the right decision and open things up. And at one point, your dad said, people want their life back. They want to be able to live their life.

and Biden immediately after said they want to be safe. And I thought, that's really the argument here. A big government that keeps you safe from everything except for them. And freedom. That's the deal. Well, but what's safe, Glenn, when your business goes out, when you lose your job because the company that employs you can't stay in business because of an artificial mandate that's ridiculous.

You've seen Florida and conservative states have treated it differently. They have less death rate than New York, which went a much more extreme lockdown while destroying businesses. But the real problem is the left doesn't care if they destroy your business. You may become dependent on big government. That's a win for them in the long run. If you're independent, if you're successful, if you don't need big government, like the left, it doesn't offer you all that much. So that's part of the problem, this notion that, you know, well, we're going to keep you safe. I don't know, Andrew Cuomo didn't keep New York safe and he destroyed the economy.

Ron DeSantis down in Florida, a Republican. and governor has an older population, a larger population, a fraction of the death rate, and he didn't destroy the economy. When they talk about the economic numbers and the rebound there, Glenn, they said, well, the economy is doing pretty good. They've rebounded like never before. They don't even talk about that. Well, how about New York, California, Michigan, Pennsylvania, major states, they're not even back into the economy yet. And it's already doing well because Donald Trump built a fundamentally great economy. The fundamentals are there. These guys would love to shut them down forever. It's ridiculous. And by the way, they don't even talk about the notion of

when you lose your job, when you lose your home because you can't go to your job, when you end up in a divorce, when you start drinking heavily and taking drugs and the suicide rate that ensues, they don't talk about that. His never-ending shutdown policy for nothing would probably do much more damage than anything COVID would do at this point. I will tell you, your father answered that question, I thought perfectly, perfectly. Stop with this fake, you know. Is there somebody at your your table that, you know, is missing a chair or whatever the hell he was. And your father put compassion in its rightful place. Yes, we care about those people. But what about everyone else whose life has been destroyed? Let me ask you about accepting the election. In my opinion,

I think most Americans like the peaceful transfer of power. Your father pointed out there wasn't a peaceful transfer of power for the first time under Obama. They were attacking him and plotting against him. And now we have the evidence. But we want a peaceful. And I will accept what the people vote for as long as it's not dirty. And I've actually heard people say, I've heard people say, hey, Nixon walked away even though he knew it was dirty in Chicago.

Well, and what's your point? if it's dirty, it's got to stop. And I'm not, I won't on this, at this point, I won't accept something that's dirty unless the American people want to choose that, then God help us all. But, I agree with you 100%. I mean, all we want is a fair election,

but you see what's going on. You saw what was going on in Pennsylvania, and the magical ballots all of a sudden disappearing. You know, they try to conflate the issue of absentee voting in states that have been doing it for years with a new brand new system in a state that's never done it where they're going to send out 360 million ballots to every American

in the world. I hope that someone's honest. The Democrats are now pushing to make sure that the signature does not have to match. So the signature on the ballot doesn't have to match the registered voter who's apparently voting that one. I mean, like, you give me one possible reason why the signature wouldn't have

to match unless you were planning on cheating. Of course not. So we want free and fair elections. But that's not what the Democrats want. It's not what they're doing. And the problem is in many of these states, Republicans sort of roll over to their asinine rules that will allow them to create a system in which they cheat. I mean, look at just what's going on in the last couple of days with James O'Keefe and what he broke with Project Veritas on the stuff in Minnesota, H. H. H. On Omar's district.

Did you hear that they have videotape of people buying ballots? But the New York Times reported today that that was a setup, that that didn't show anything illegal. That's the New York Times today. It's a setup. The guy's saying, I'll tell you the values. for $200 and you can fill them out how you want. That's a setup. That's like Nancy Pelosi saying the hair salon set her up. Guess what? If you're able to get up,

if you're number three in line for the nuclear codes and you're set up by your hair salon, maybe we should rethink your position in government. It's ridiculous. But that's the problem. The Democrats can say that. And it's like, oh, oh, oh, it's a setup. Oh, wonderful.

Everyone toes the line. Everyone buys the sound bites. Like I said, if I had done a fraction, He's sitting in jail right now calling you from a pay phone feeding quarters from Riker. Right. And your father would be impeached. Your father would be impeached. 100%.

Yeah. 100%. And rightfully so, by the way. Impeached and removed from office. If I was raking in trafficking and prostitution rings, and Joe Biden can get on stage. Oh, that's been debunked. No, it hasn't. There's a wire from the U.S. Treasury, Joe.

But again, Chris Wallace doesn't say that. No. He doesn't question it. You know how many people in media are talking about it today? Zero. Now, that didn't stop them from lying about me for three and a half years, running all sorts of wild conspiracy theories. CNN was doing it every day. I was in direct cohoots with Russia.

I was a real estate guy before we got into politics. It's what I did. I looked at a deal. I took a meeting with someone. In the past, that's what you do. It's called maintaining relationships. Someone's like, hey, can you take a meeting with my friend? Sure, you do it.

Okay. Hunter Biden is taking money from a Putin associate. $3.5 million. For what services? What exactly is it that Hunter does and knows about Russia? What is it that he knew about energy in the Ukraine to get, you know, a hundred grand a month in fees for a no-show job and a business he doesn't know anything about and a language he doesn't speak? Please, because I want some of these jobs, Glenn. I just have a feeling if I had these jobs, I'd actually pay bigly for it.

Let me. I think America feels like we're going to war with each other. And there's just this impasse. and it's because we're not talking about real things like real corruption and real fairness. We're being told that America is a racist nation. White people were born bad and they'll always be bad. All this stuff that is just absolutely anti-Christian, anti-Christ in a way and just destructive lies. We're going down this path.

Tonight I'm doing a special on their war game. I'm reading their words, their own words, where they are talking about secession as one of the options. The label is, if it's a clear Trump victory, what do we do? And it's a whole war game of the chaos that they're going to cause after election night. I mean, are you? Well, that seems to be their plan. I mean, they don't have a ground game. They're not knocking on doors.

they're not trying to be out there. They're staffing up legal teams to challenge this later on. But that should be no surprise. They've been doing it to Donald Trump for four years. They haven't accepted the results of the 2016 election yet. That's becoming more and more clear. Again, now that we know it's the other side doing it, all of a sudden, there's no interest in that knowledge. But does this surprise you at all?

The reality is this. They talking last night about results. Joe Biden's been there for 47 years. I can't name a single accomplishment of him. other than shipping jobs to China, he was really good at that, destroying the American middle class and getting his family rich. But those aren't good things for America. Donald Trump, whether people like his attitude or not, he has resolved. He gets things done.

That's why we have peace in the Middle East. Another thing not even brought up. Another thing not even brought up. Because it's positive for Trump. How about ending the endless wars? Because a couple of generals want to end up on the board of Raytheon in a couple years. Hey, you know what? I'll send your kids to die in Afghanistan for another 33.

freaking years. Like, that's their plan. I've been in the room with my father, but he's like, okay, guys, tell us why we're still there. Please. Well, sir, it's complicated. Okay, well, I'm the president. It's kind of a big deal. Like, tell me. Well, you know, they want to be on the board of Raytheon so they can, you know, stay in the war so you can make missiles and that's how you get your board seat in your retirement package. That's what it is. So Donald Trump has the guts to take on the military industrial establishment, the establishment from both sides that is all part of that, you know, never-ending game. When our own generals can't articulate why we're in

wars for 25 years. That's problematic. And Donald Trump is the first guy to actually push back and get those things done. Why is Donald Trump the first guy funding the task forces to prevent human trafficking and the child sex trade that the Democrats seem almost in favor of at this point? When I'm looking at what's going on with cuties and all of this nonsense, they're literally normalizing pedophilia, Glenn. This is the evil of the other side. I mean, I came out against it really strongly. Now, I usually do that. So I'm pretty much all in on any issue. that I, you know what, even in 2020, even with the device of this, you know what, this is an issue every American can agree on. Turns out I was wrong.

Right. Turns out I was wrong. I had blue checkmarked Twitter, liberal Twitter, trying to cancel me for being anti-pedophilia. Now, they're fine with anti-Fa, which is not anti-Fi at all. It's just Fah, right? It's just their actual FAA, I mean, they're literally, you know, taking every page out of the fascist playbook from the 40s, calling themselves Antifa, I guess people are dumb enough to believe it, and the media will run with it as though that's the gospel too. But, I mean, think about it.

I'm canceled by blue checkmarked Twitter for being anti-pedophile. And the left is normalizing. No one's asked Susan Rice why she's on the board of Netflix and what her opinion is on this. I don't know what her qualification is, presumably none, other than she's an Obama-lucky. So that's the payoff for being Obama. No one's asking Obama who's getting $100 million from Netflix if he's okay with this and thinks this is normal type behavior. that's what we're up against. And that's why I appreciate, again,

and I know that it doesn't always rub people the right way, and I know you had issues with it in the past, but I think you would sort of understand now the actual that Donald Trump faces every day, which sort of is why he has to fight back hard. He's the only conservative actually fighting that way in government. You know, there's guys like us that are loud and vocal, but he's a guy that's actually a decision maker.

Most of our guys, the second you have any sort of adversity, oh, they tuck tail and run. They roll over and die, mostly because the other side would let. you too. I mean, that's not the way we fight. Don, Don, I hate to cut you off, but I have to. We have network responsibilities. Thank you for being on. I understand. By the way, thank your father for everything he's doing on the sex crimes against children. He is remarkable on that. Nobody's talking about it. He's done remarkable God's work on that and thank him for that. William.

I'll do that. I appreciate it to make sure everyone, you know, everyone else that you can get understands it because it's such a big issue. It's actually probably the thing I get the most applause with when I'm on the road. And again, so few people cover it. And I just sort of wonder why no one in government? Why didn't Obama? This is a problem at all this time. And no one

will address it until Donald Trump did. So, thank you very much. I'd like to see it's getting done finally. God bless. Thank you so much.