The Glenn Beck Program - Best of the Program | Guests: Paul Sperry & Blake Masters | 8/23/22

Episode Date: August 23, 2022

Glenn reviews a speech by Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav warning how fast the Western world can fall into evil practices comparable to Nazi Germany, such as Canada's euthanasia laws. Author of "Infiltration" Paul Sperry joins to discuss his Twitter ban for discussing the link he believes exists between the FBI raid on former President Trump and Russiagate. Senate candidate Blake Masters joins to share his fight to flip an Arizona seat from Democrat to Republican.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It's something else here now. Something new. From exclusively on Paramount Plus. It's the series Stephen King calls Scarious Hell. Everything here is impossible, but it's also real. Sci-fi vision calls it the best show streaming right now. We're running out of time and we still don't know the rules. Don't miss what the movie blog calls something you need to watch.

Saving those children is how we all go home. From binge all episodes exclusively on Paramount Plus. Hey, welcome to the podcast, Stu. How are you doing? You're doing? Really well, Glenn. Thank you so much for asking. I appreciate that.

Yeah, yeah. Well, I asked you very sincerely, too. It seemed sincere. Oh, it was. I hope you're doing well with your health. Well, I hope that your marriage lasts forever. May you never get cancer this week. This is a very odd greeting.

Greeting, but I do appreciate it. All right. We have a great. podcast for you today. We have Blake Masters on. He is a guy who is running for the Senate. We also have a guy who just kicked off Twitter. He is an

investigative journalist. He was kicked off forever because he said I have evidence coming out that shows that the FBI knew exactly what they were doing and they were trying to get documents back that make the FBI

look bad. What can you say in America? Carol Roth is with us. She's going to talk a little bit about your economy and what is coming. All this and so much more on today's podcast. BlazTV.com slash Glenn to subscribe to BlazTV. Use the promo code Glenn to save $10. And don't forget to subscribe, rate and review this podcast, along with Studeas America,

available every weekday. And Saturday right here where you get your podcast, you're going to hear my interview that I had yesterday with Rob Schneider. really funny, surprising, really a great, great guy. That is going to happen on Saturday for everyone, or if you're a Blaze TV subscriber, it will be coming Thursday for you.

It's one that you don't want to miss. If you're one of the millions of Americans who suffer every day from pain, listen up. There is hope, you sick, twisted freak. It comes in the form of Relief Factor. Relief Factor can help you get out of pain. Well, not everybody. About 70% of the people who try it go on to order more month after month.

They want to make sure that you know that in three weeks you're probably going to know. Sometimes it takes a little more, but you'll see some indication that this is working for you. So try the three week quick start. After three weeks, if it's not working, stop taking it. 70% of the people go on to order more month after month. You want a drug-free and natural way to get your life back? It's Relieffactor.com. That's relieffactor.com.

Here's a podcast. You're listening to. I came from Nuremberg to provide historic context to the global threat confronting our civilization today. These past two and a half years have been especially stressful as painful memories have been rekindled. In 1941, I was three and a half when my family was forced from our home in Romania and deported to the Ukraine. We were herded into a concentration camp, essentially left to starve. Death was ever present. My father died of typhus when I was five.

In 1944, as the final solution was being aggressively implemented, Romania retreated from its alliance with Nazi Germany. The government permitted several hundred Jewish orphans under the age of 12 to return to Romania. I was not an orphan. My mother lied to save my husband. life. I boarded a cattle car train, same train that continued to transport Jews to the death camps, even as Germany was losing the war. Four years elapsed before I was returned and reunited with my mother. These are the words of Vieira Sherev. She gave a speech in Nuremberg just a couple of days ago.

She was speaking at the Children's Health Defense Conference. Her speech is titled, Unless All of Us Resist Never Again, is right now. She talked about how we're supposed to remember. We're supposed to remember the Holocaust, and it is the symbol of unmitigated evil. She said the moral norms and human values were systematically obliterated, not all at once, but over several years. She said the Nazi system destroyed the social conscience.

And millions of people worked and they were worked to death as slave laborers. Others were abused. Some were experimental human guinea pigs. She said it didn't begin in Auschwitz. The Holocaust was preceded by nine years of incremental restrictions on personal freedom and the suspension of legal and civil rights. She said the stage was set by fear-mongering and hate-mongering propaganda. She said a series of humiliating discriminatory government edicts demonized people as spreaders of disease. Jews were compared to lice.

Why am I telling you this today? I want you to hear the rest of what she said, but I'll tell you why I'm saying it. This just came from the Associated Press. Canada, a country with perhaps the most permissive euthanasia laws in the world, will soon make those laws even more permissive. I'll give you the rest of the story. After I finish telling you what Vera said, she said the real viral disease that infected Nazi Germany is,

and eugenics is the elitist ideology at the root of all genocides, the elitist ideology. She said it is cloaked in a mantle of pseudoscience. It was embraced by the academic and medical institutions as well as the judiciary. Eugenicists justified social and economic inequality. They legitimized discrimination, apartheid, sterilization, euthanization, and, and genocide. The Nazis called it ethnic cleansing for the protection of the gene pool. She said, but medicine was perverted from its healing mission and it was weaponized. First, it was control of reproduction through forced sterilization. Then it was to eliminate those deemed as subhuman.

The first victims, however, of medical murder were a thousand German disabled children and toddlers. This murderous operation was expanded to an estimated 10,000 children up to the age of 17. Then the next victims were the mentally ill, and then they were followed by the elderly in nursing homes, and they were all worthless, useless, worthless eaters. She says the purpose of the Holocaust memorials is to warn and inform future generations about, how an enlightened civil society can be transformed into a genocidal universe ruled by absolute moral depravity. Remember, the Germans were the smartest among us.

They were the most educated among us. This was not a third world country. This is the country that led the world in science and education. How did that happen? She went on with her speech. She said the Nazi era, the study of history and most of the humanities, including philosophy, religion, and ethics have been overshadowed by an emphasis on utilitarian science and technology. She says as a result, few people recognize the foreboding similarities between today's

policies in today's Western world and those under the Nazi regime. By declaring a state of emergency in 1933 and in 2020, constitutionally protected personal freedoms, legal rights, civil rights were all swept aside. And repressive discriminatory decrees followed. In 1933, she said the primary target for discrimination were the Jews. Today, however, the target is people who refuse to be injected with experimental, genetically engineered vaccines. then and now government dictates were crafted to eliminate segments of the population. In 2020, government dictates forbade hospitals from treating the elderly in nursing homes.

The result, she says, was mass murder. Government decrees continue to forbid doctors to prescribe life-saving FDA-approved medicines. Government dictated protocols continue to kill. The media is silent as it was. then. The media broadcast a single government-dictated narrative, just as it had under the Nazis. Strict censorship silences apposing views. In Nazi Germany, few individuals objective, but those who did were in prison in concentration camps. Today, doctors and scientists who challenge the approved narrative are maligned. Their reputations trashed. They risk losing their license to practice

as well as having their homes and workplace rated by SWAT teams. She says the moral significance of the Nuremberg Code cannot be overstated. The Code is the most authoritative, internationally recognized document in the history of medical ethics. It's a landmark document that was formulated in response to the evidence of medical atrocities committed by Nazi physicians and scientists. the Nuremberg Code rejects the ideology of eugenics and unequivocally asserts primacy and dignity of the individual human being as opposed to the greater good of society. The Nuremberg Code defined foundational and universal moral and legal standards and the human rights that it protects apply to every human being. It sets limits on the parameter of permissible medical experiments. Equally important, the Nuremberg Code holds doctors and research investigators personally responsible

to ensure the human subject's safety and to ensure that the person freely gave his voluntarily fully informed consent. Finally, she says the genocidal culture that permeated the Nazi regime did not end in 1945. It metastasized in the United States. at the end of the war, the U.S. government agents helped 1600 high-ranking Nazi scientists, doctors, and engineers to evade justice at Nuremberg. These technocrats facilitated the murderous Nazi operations. They were Hitler's partners in crime. They were secretly smuggled into the U.S. under Operation Paperclip. This was a violation of explicit orders by President Harry Truman. These Nazi criminals were placed in high-level positions at major American.

scientific and medical institutions where they continued their work. What's more, these Nazi technocrats trained a generation of American scientists, doctors, and engineers. She said in 1961 in his farewell addressed to the nation, Dwight Eisenhower, warned against the increased dominance of the military industrial complex, whose total influence, economic, political, even spiritual, is felt everywhere. We must be alert to the danger that public policy itself could be captive of a scientific technological elite, a posse of ruthless, interconnected global billionaires, she said,

have now gained control over national and international policy setting institutions. They have embarked on implementing a diabolical agenda to overthrow democracy in the Western civilization, to depopulate the global population, to eliminate nation states and establish one world government, to eliminate cash and establish one digital currency to inject digital IDs or artificial intelligence capabilities into every human being. If these objectives become a reality, we will be digitally surveilled 24 hours a day, seven days a week. In May 22, she said, the World Economic Forum in Davos, Klaus Schwab, the architect of this dystopian Great Reset, declared, let's be clear, the future is not just happening. The future is

built by us, a powerful community here in this room. We have the means to impose the state of the world. She said the ultimate goal of these megalomaniacs is to gain total control of the world's natural resources, the financial resources, and also to replace some humans with transhumans. Transhumanism is a biotech enhanced caste system. It's the new eugenics. Klaus Schwab, the lead advisor.

is Yuval Noah Harari in Oxford University trained Israeli. He's a proponent of the new eugenics and transhumanism. He refers to humans as hackable animals and declared, we have the technology to hack humans on a massive scale. This is the new eugenics. Harari declares that there are too many, quote, useless people. To me, that sounds too close to the Nazi term, worthless eaters.

These megalomaniacs have paved the world for another Holocaust. This time, the threat of genocide is global in scale. This time, there will be no rescuers unless all of us resist now. Never again is now.

Now, back to the story from Canada in 60 seconds. If you haven't been stockpiling food in anticipation of the coming shortages, it's really time for you to consider getting started. Thank you for being awake. There's a difference between being woke and awake.

And I am wide awake, are you? You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program. We have Paul Sperion with us now. Hello, Paul. How are you? Hey, how are you? Good. Good. Paul is a senior staff writer at Real Clear Investigations.com,

columnist also at the New York Post, and he is also a Hoover Institution Media Fellow. We have him on because tomorrow night's special, Wednesday night special, is a weaponized government, how the Mar-a-Lago raid is an attack on all of us. So, Paul, what was it that Twitter found so offensive about your reporting? Well, that's still a mystery. They kicked me off the day after Trump's home was raided, and I was in the middle of tweeting more about the raid.

and suddenly I got a message that popped up, said you have been permanently suspended. You permanently? Yeah. Wow. No reasons given. Didn't say what rules or policies I allegedly had violated to prompt that. Yeah, so they canceled my account without any explanation, which is, by the way, a violation of their own rules. Because if you look them up, they're supposed to, quote, explain which policy you may have violated.

Yeah. which content and which content was in violation, and they did not do that in my case because they know I didn't break any rules. So isn't one of the guys at Twitter, isn't he a former FBI high-ranking guy? Yeah, the Deputy General Counsel is the Comey's Jim Coney, Comey's General Counsel, former General Counsel, the FBI Headquarters, his name's James Baker. So he was disgraced after the FISA warrant abuse scandal. He left and then Twitter picked him up. And now he is, I'm sure screening any matters, any content-based matters that may have a legal issue, something like that would be run up to him. And so he has a lot of influence at Twitter.

Do you have any idea if he's the one who banned you? No idea. Okay. Yeah, they're kind of a black hole of information, isn't it? So talk to me a little bit about, because I'm really concerned about the FBI and the whole government. Right now, government agents have a bigger, I don't even know what you would call it, police force, then we have Marines. That's a little staggering. Yeah, it's the out there. I mean, this has also gotten very personal between the former president and the FBI.

And, you know, this is like a full-blown war between the ex-president of the United States and the federal police. You know, when does that ever happen? Never that I know of. So how concerned are you, I mean, are you hearing from good FBI agents and enough of them to give you confidence? that at least the average rank and file is not involved in this and won't put up with it? Or what is your feeling? Well, a lot of them aren't putting up with it. There's been a number of whistleblowers that have come out to Senator Grassley recently.

So they're getting fed up with the politicization of the Bureau. And unfortunately, the same FBI division that ran the corrupt Russia Gate operation, and, by the way, coddled Hillary and Hunter in those investigations, they ran the questionable Trump raid, and they're now running what appears to be Rushagate 2.0. Jeez. It's the counterintelligence division in Washington, even though it's the focus of Special Counsel Durham's investigation of that prior corruption.

I talked to John Solomon yesterday, and he said that he was fairly confident that these documents still exist. He's trying to get them from the National Archives, copies of them, but he wasn't quite sure what documents they were really looking for. Do you have any idea on that? Well, some former FBI and DOJ officials told me, they suspect the FBI may have used a raid to cover their tracks in this

Russiagate scandal. They may be trying to deep-six any evidence that Trump might have kept on them. In other words, you know, Trump may have had proof of their crimes, and they had to make sure that proof never saw the light of day.

It's a pretty, it's a fairly reasonable assumption that they're sifting through those boxes to look for that information. information that would have a vested interest, especially if they're under investigation criminally by Durham right now to make sure that those documents, if Trump had them, you know, do not become public.

And is it true that Biden was signed an order saying, we're not going to release these things and, you know, his order to release and to make this? them public is rescinded, which it's my understanding. That's never happened before. Yeah, yeah, when A.G. Garland came in, the Justice Department put the kibosh in that declassification order. And it was literally the last hour of his presidency, wasn't it, that they pulled them. And so they have their own roadmap. They know what, um, was in that binder, and they want to make sure that there's not some copies in the 7 boxes that they pulled out of Mar-a-Lago.

By the way, a careful reading of that warrant shows basically, they basically, that the warrant basically allowed the agents to take anything they wanted from Trump's home. So no telling what they got and what they're going to do with it, how they're going to use it against Trump. It looks like it was a complete fishing expedition. And by the way, that belies occurrences that we got in that press conference from the Attorney General. He said that he told everybody, you know, that the investigation was narrowly focused and the search warrant was narrowly scoped.

Not even. It was a general warrant. Yeah, the release of that warrant shows that he misled the public and acted. that that already gives anybody, including most of all, Trump, pause skepticism to believe that their current assurances of the affidavit, which is

the document that supports, or allegedly would support probable cause of a crime being committed to warrant such a raid and a search was properly supported. You've got the whole track record, the FBI, acting dishonestly and unethically in swearing out warrants for FISA court surveillance on one of Trump's advisors. So Trump is not a dumb, stupid man. He is not. He plays three-dimensional chess at times. He might appear to be flying by the seat of his pants. And I think sometimes he has, but he's smart enough. to if he has those documents, not just leave them in a box.

He would have copied them or given a copy to his attorneys or someplace for safekeeping. Would that be illegal? No, and he had Skiffs set up for him in Bedminster, his place in Bedminster and also Mar-a-Lago. People won't report this, but he was very careful whenever he would. go to these homes, you know, second White House homes, like every president, the Secret Service built under the direct intelligence community, sensitive compartmented information facilities within his residences. And that's where he would receive his presidential daily briefings. He would store classified documents in there. So this whole notion that he's just reckless.

guy who's strewning around, you know, top secret national secrets, nuclear secrets everywhere. That's BS because he had skiff set up. This was all done just like every other president has had done in their secondary homes. How concerned are you or when does this end? What will it take for this to end? The collusion between the government and, for instance, Twitter or others. where the government we now know has told people clearly at Twitter,

you really need to do something about this person. What is it going to take? This is such an end run against our Constitution, these public-private partnerships with these media companies and with social media. Do you see a way to stop that? Well, you're right. in big tech have so much power over our free speech these days.

And you would have to have somebody like Elon Musk, a very deep-pocketed billionaire to come in and take over, which doesn't look good now, especially with this latest cybersecurity whistleblower coming out and saying that there was a lot more fake accounts than they let on. So that kind of strengthens Musk case to back out of the day. deal. It's not very hopeful for guys like me or, you know, political prisoners locked in jail. But, you know, he, someone like that would have to get in there and, you know, rid of this, this, this, Twitter's new CEO, this guy, you know, he wants to focus, he actually was caught saying that he wants to focus less on free speech and more on, quote, choosing who can be

heard, especially in election years, apparently. So, yeah, that's the guy who's running this thing. He says, the Indian fellow, I forget as a, I think it's Pagram or something like that. You know, it starts from the top

and guys like that, you know, they're mostly very liberal Democrats who are running Twitter, including their board. And so that's what it would take. Put some fair-minded people in there who, you know, respect and love-free speech.

And, you know, not one way or not conservative way or the other. And I think that Elon Musk would be someone like that because he really does want a free-for-all. Yeah. On a social media platform, he doesn't want to skew things. One way or the other. Right, right. And that's how it should be.

Yes. You know, or inciting violence. You put it out there, and it's up to the people decide what they want to believe or how, you know, and leave it up to the debate. and eventually the truth will percolate up through free debate. And that's not what the current Twitter powers that they want. They want, like this guy said, we want to choose who can be heard and who can shape our political narrative the best.

And people who are running fact-based content like me and fact-driven content that is inconvenient to that narrative, they don't want on their platform. Well, for now, you can find Paul Sperry at realclearinvestigations.com. That's real clear investigations.com. Paul, thank you so much. God bless. Keep us up to date, will you?

Thanks, Glenn. You bet. Bye-bye. You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program. Lake Masters, welcome to the program. Hey, thank you for having me. You bet, you bet. We had dinner six months ago or so.

And I walked away really impressed by you. You're now, you've won the primary. You're now going for the general. And you're going up against Mark Kelly. Can you tell me, give me three things that make you different from him? Well, one, I'm actually independent. And, you know, that's something Mark Kelly promised to be. He promised in 2020.

He was going to be an independent voice in Arizona. And so some people bought that. turns out not so much. Mark Kelly votes basically in lockstep for the Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, open borders, inflation agenda. You know, two, and you mentioned this a little bit, I think we need some younger people in Congress. You know, I'd be the youngest Republican senator, almost the the youngest senator in the whole chamber. And, you know, the average age of the Senate, 64, 65 years old, you know, I'm 36 years old. I'm just getting into my prime. I've been around long enough to to acquire a little bit of wisdom. And I see the country heading in the wrong direction. I think we need a

useful dose of energy to go in and reset things. And then the third thing, Glenn, it's just, I have this America First Agenda that makes sense. It's what we needed in 2016. I think it's what we needed in 2020, and we didn't get it. And look how badly we're suffering now under this Biden-Harris regime. So I want to restore American energy independence. Right. I want to stop the government from printing so much money that we just cause this massive inflation. I actually want to seal the border so that we don't have this crazy border crisis and stop illegal immigration. Mark Kelly is the opposite, substantively on all of those points. What do you think about ESG? I think it's dangerous. I think it's scary. I think we need to ban it. You know, and I'm like the only congressional candidate,

apparently, the only senatorial candidate nationwide that's saying, we need to ban ESG. You know, the left, they've drafted corporate America into their plan. You can think of ESG scores, right, as just kind of a scorecard for how well does your enterprise comply with left-wing prerogatives, with left-wing social justice activism. And it's really dangerous, you know, it's basically trying to co-opt business into this left-wing, you know, socialistic agenda. I think we need to study it. I think we need to understand exactly how they're doing it. I think we need to ban it. Tell me how you feel about the FBI. Well, I wish I could trust the FBI and increasingly, you just, you just can't. You know, sometimes when I say this, people attack me and they say,

oh, Blake's attacking law enforcement. No, I love law enforcement, right? And the whole point of law enforcement is you enforce the laws neutrally. It's the rule of law. And the problem under Merrick Garland, under Joe Biden, the DOJ, the FBI, they've just kind of obviously become weaponized. I think there's probably a lot of great rank and file agents, and they're probably more pissed off than anyone at what's happening. But what's happening is the upper layers of management. They are left-wing political operatives. And I think they're just going after political enemies. And that really corrods the rule of law.

I think if we let this go on just an inch more, we're really at risk of losing the country. You can't have weaponized to partisan federal law enforcement. It just doesn't work in every country. Tell me what you think, Blake, about, I mean, there was an op-ed piece that was out yesterday, I think, yesterday, a day before, from the New York Times, where they actually said it is time to jettison the Constitution of the United States, that it's an old document, it's outdated, and it is slowing down progress, and we should get rid of it. Tell me what the oath that you would be taking means to you. about your understanding of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, why should we trust that you would be different than those already there who don't really take that seriously? Well, you know, and action speak louder than words, so people will see once I get in there

that I do take these things deadly seriously. I'm running because I've just, I've grown up watching a government that cares less and less about our foundational principles that cares less and less about the rule of law. And look what it's given us, right? It's led us to this situation. And so, no, I mean, I think these documents were literally divinely inspired. I think America's the greatest country in the history of the world, this remarkable experiment in liberty, and ordered liberty, right? It doesn't mean just do whatever you want, no rule. No, ordered liberty per our constitutional design. And the scary thing, Glenn, is if we lose that, then it's just gone to history. You know, there's nothing preordained that says,

America has to last forever. And the founders knew this, right? They knew that every generation needed to reinvest. Certainly you needed to grow up becoming acquainted with these foundational principles of liberty and learn about the Bill of Rights and the Declaration, Independence, and the Constitution. And we're failing to teach our kids that, well, if we let it slip away, right? It's the cliche Reagan quote, freedom is only one generation away from extinction. And never have I believed that more than I do now, how to have young children. If we let this slip, if we lose this country, it's gone forever in thousands of years of, you know, relatively dark pages. And so I think this is our last stand, 2022 and 2024, these elections go together. We either get the right kind of

Republican in office. It's madness or we're going to lose the country. Literally think the choice here is that start. So, you know, we've done this before, and I believe you're exactly right. this election and the last election, I believe it's last call. If we get these two elections wrong, and that could mean getting the wrong Republicans in, if we don't take control of the Constitution and defend it and protect it and restore its powers and put the powers in each branch back to where they belong, we don't make it. So why should somebody vote for you that has maybe given up on the Republicans? And I mean, who are you going to, you can't be completely independent.

You need a group of guys that, you know, you're like-minded with that you're working together. Who would be the senators that you would want to be around and work with? Well, certainly Senator Rand Paul, I think is great. I was a Ron Paul guy back in 07-08. Senator Josh Hawley is a friend of mine, and he's endorsed me. I think he's an excellent senator. Tom Cotton, especially domestically, I think, is pretty good. There's Ted Cruz, you know, it's always two steps forward, one step back with Ted Cruz,

but I think he's getting better. The issue is we have like 10, maybe 15, like pretty good ones, but there's 50. There's 50 Republican senators, and there's a lot of them that just, you know, kind of the ones people haven't heard of. And they go along to get along, and I think it's probably all too easy

when you get into the U.S. Senate to lose touch, right? You live in this, even if you go in with good intentions, even if you go in, you know, and your heart's in the right place, you're still part of the Washington, D.C. cocktail party scene, and you just lose touch with ordinary people. and you know it's something I know that I'm never going to do and I'm just going to go in and represent Arizonans because they're badly badly lacking representation right now Mark Kelly he promised he'd be independent he promised he'd be moderate and instead he's voting for open borders and trillions

and spending and basically anything that Biden wants Mark Kelly's there to say yes sir happy to happy to do that sir it's interesting like watching Arizona because we were told that Kelly was going to be the moderate and then it's Kirsten Cinema, who's been the only one who's pushed back at all against anything that Biden has done. Do the people of Arizona see that? Are they noticing this? I think they are. They are, absolutely. The issue is, you know, Mark Kelly, I mean, you've got to give them credit. They're good at the schick. The stick is, you know, around election time, you come out and you just dominate the airwaves. They raise lots of money. You know, they have the act blue machine. There's a lot of, you know, dark money.

money. And so Mark Kelly, yeah, he's on the airways right now, pretending to be reasonable, pretending to not have voted for open borders, pretending to not have voted for all this crazy spending. And so most people, you know, just they're not political activists, they're normal people. They're just living their lives, you know, they're upset at the open border. They're upset at, you know, skyrocketing costs at the pump and everything you need at the grocery stores. She's getting more expensive. But then they see Mark Kelly on TV. He's emerged from hiding. you know, you're eight weeks from an election. And he says, I'm really concerned about inflation.

That's why I'm doing blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. I'm really concerned about the border. We need to finish the wall. And it's like, what? I'm sorry. The Democrats have just spent the last six years talking about how Trump's wall was racist. But all of a sudden, Mark Kelly, who's done more than anyone else to enable open borders in Arizona is pretending to be pro-border security. He likes the wall all of a sudden.

So basically, you know, I've got to get the message out that, hey, this guy that he can see on TV, he's basically lying you. He's trying to con you. He's not on moderate, and here's his voting record. You can just look up his voting record. He's voting in lockstep with Schumer and Biden. Seems like a problem. So that's the race that we're in.

I have to just tell the truth, and Mark Kelly has to lie about his record. What is the best way to help you? Best way to help me. If you live in Arizona, I'd sure be honored for your vote and for your activism, right, your time. Go whip the votes. We need to fundraise too. Fundraising is the name of the game. Like we said, Mark Kelly has that mountain of money. A lot of it's dark money. But if people can ship in, five, 10, 20 bucks, goes a long way. Because I might get out spent in this election, Glenn. I actually think I will. But again,

we have the advantage of only needing to tell the truth. I tell the truth about me and what I bring to the table and what Mark Kelly's done and voted for in the Senate. I'm not going to attack his character, but I will attack his voting record because it's super, super left wing. Mark Kelly, he's got to use his money to lie about me, to slander me, to lie about his record. And ultimately, I just, the only gets naive, I think it's just true. The truth wins out if we, if we work really, really hard to spread the word. Well, I think, you know, people have to make their own decision, especially in Arizona. But if you want to help out, You should. This is a possible win for the Senate and sounds to me like the right kind of Republican that we would get.

We don't need another Mitch McConnell. We don't need any more of those. We need some people that stand from a different place and somebody who is young and gets it. His name is Blake Masters. He is running for U.S. Senate. If you'd like to help him out, fundraising or just volunteering if you're in Arizona, blakemasters.com, blakemasters.com. When you were little, you've been braced in court of recreat,

always in trying to negotiate, exchange these cards of hockey, these bonhomes, even of collations. You know that each thing has a value, bien-in-a-to-savort to have known. And, before, Well, the things have not really changed.

Negoti-titre TD you permit to renouye with your instinct of negotiation. With, without operation gratuit, no amount of minimum and no frets mensuel, you're made for negotiate,

and the apply-Nogistit-T-D is made for you aid. Telecharge it right now.