The Glenn Beck Program - Best of the Program | Guests: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna & Lindy Li | 2/12/25
Episode Date: February 12, 2025Former Democratic fundraiser Lindy Li joins to share her journey from being a DNC insider and raising billions for Democrats to becoming an independent thinker who has officially left the Democratic P...arty. Glenn plays the Democrats' new screeching opposition chant: "Which Side Are You On?" Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) joins to discuss the new task force she will lead on the declassification of federal secrets, of which the first hearing will focus on the JFK assassination. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The
Beiréi. Embarked and profite.
Embarked and relaxes.
Cirotay.
Bookine.
Oh, that also.
And profite.
Villaray, the voice that we love that we love.
The Democrats have mounted a pretty strong defense against Elon Musk.
They asked the question, musically, of course,
which side are you on?
It's something that you need to hear.
Also, Lindy Lee is with us.
us and Anna Paulina Luna. Anna was yesterday appointed to a new congressional hearing or committee
to release all of the national secrets. What does that mean? And how fast is this coming
at a breathtaking pace? You can't miss Anna Paulina Luna on today's podcast.
85% of all grass-fed beef in America is imported now. That fact really
didn't sit right with me, probably you, and the people over at Good Ranchers. So here's what
they're doing about it. Every cut of meat from Good Ranchers, beef, chicken, pork, all raised
right here in the U.S. It is free from hidden additives like antibiotics and hormones or even
seed oils. It's just meat, American meat. They're upholding the values and the traditions
because when you shop with Good Ranchers, you're directly supporting local farms and ranches
here in the United States.
These are the people who have been feeding us Americans for generations now,
and Good Ranchers is working to keep them in business.
Kind of a good idea, good cause, and it's great meat.
You can get free ground beef, free chicken breast,
wild-capped salmon in every box for a year,
plus you get $25 off when you subscribe at Good Ranchers.
It's not too late to start the year off right, Good Ranchers.com.
New Year, new meat offer.
visit good ranchers.com. Use the promo code back to claim $25 off and free meat in every box for a year.
promo code back at good ranchers.com. That's good ranchers.com. American meat delivered.
You're listening to the best of the globe. People are freaking out in the Democratic Party and they
should, especially if you had anything to do with the last election. I mean, you know, they raised a billion dollars.
and it looked like a lot of it was wasted.
Where did that money go?
I don't know.
But there's somebody that has been seen on many podcasts now.
She's former Democratic fundraiser.
She is left.
I don't know.
She's still a Democrat, but she left the DNC as an insider and has become an independent thinker.
Lindy is joining us now.
Lindy Lee.
Welcome, Lindy.
And it's so good to be.
be with you. Thank you so much for having me. Now, I'm guessing that's something you never,
ever thought in your life you would say. Um, good morning, Glenn's back to me. Yeah, good morning,
Glenn. I watched you from afar for much of my life. So I, um, I think it would be happening this
week, though. He's certainly right. It's been a world wind. And I'm no longer a Democrat.
Oh, really? Because I just read some place that you haven't led the, you haven't left the party,
but you have now officially left the party? I have left the party. Absolutely. This is
not how I saw my year going, but the party left me with no choice. I just can't abide by the woke
in trans insanity, not to mention the gross mismanagement of the money that I spent work so hard
to raise. And Glenn, I hate to correct you, but it wasn't a billion. It was $2.5 billion,
because the campaign weighs $1.5 billion. And the Super PAC Future Forward weighs another billion.
So we essentially say- Where did all that money go? Where did it go, Lindy?
To oligarchs, to celebrities, to five-star hotels, half a million dollars is spent on putting Kamala Harris's mug on a sphere in Las Vegas.
Obviously, that was a wise decision.
And on mega celebrity concerts, even right down the street on the steps of the Philadelphia Art Museum, how many votes do you think that garnered for her?
I would wager maybe like negative votes because people were pissed off at the traffic were snarled in the entire day.
and who puts the bill for that?
Taxpayers, right?
And the damage done to our community.
And she did this in so many cities.
Like, who thought that was a good idea?
Actually, I know exactly who thought that was a good idea, but it was just these people are brain dead.
You say that you can name who the president was.
Who was the president in the last four years?
Glenn, the thing is, there were like 10 of them.
Because you have like Steve Roshetti and Mike Donald and.
and Nita Don and Barack Obama orbiting around and all these people who are unelected senior advisors
running the show. It certainly wasn't Joe Biden. He was just a figurehead signing the executive
orders and not really understanding what he was signing. And it's just a very, very grave
situation that I tried to flag for everybody for a number of years now. It took me a while to get here,
though. You know, they will excoriate you and I'm still paying the price. I haven't,
Glenn, I haven't, it's been really hard time for me. I haven't slept. I didn't sleep last night. I've
been having trouble sleeping. I'm being attacked from both the left and the right, by the way.
Somebody on the right is trying to defame me. And the left is just insane. So it's just, it's not a,
it's not easy, Glenn. So, so I, and I know that. I mean, I have been excoriated by both sides
because I'm, I'm not predictable. I just am who I am and sometimes I change my mind on things.
I love that about you. Yeah. You.
been outspoken, literally my entire life.
And it's difficult if you don't choose a team when your team is just, I want to be true to myself
and true to what I believe is true.
For instance, you know, I really thought America was a great place.
And I still believe it's a great place.
But we have done really bad things.
And I don't mean in the distant past, I mean recently.
We've done some really bad things.
And we have to admit those things.
and it doesn't mean you're anti-American.
It just means, I just want the truth.
Let the chips fall where they may and let the people decide the direction.
Because I think the people in America are good.
When the government detaches itself from the people, we always go wrong.
So I've lived your life before.
But can you see at all you were somebody, I mean, who defended all of this stuff,
hard during the campaign.
Did I have a choice?
I don't know.
I'm not, so you know,
Lynn, look at what I've lost
all of my so-called friends.
I've been excommunicated.
Not just excommunicated, but
they try to discredit me,
to destroy me, to defame
me. They're a hit pieces out there
about me.
I know. They just cannot believe that there's someone
who doesn't have skeletons in our closet,
so they invent these skeletons.
I am just honestly, just a, I am just honestly a well-behaved Asian girl.
You know, that's how I was raised.
I've been a Christian conservative all my life, and I had to hide that aspect of me because
it's not acceptable to be that.
When you go to a liberal university, I went to an extremely liberal university, I live in
an extremely liberal city.
It's not acceptable to be a Republican.
So my transition and my journey to becoming who I am, it took, this is a years-long
process for me. I know. And so you know, Lindy, you're not walking into a hostile room. I just,
you know, as somebody who. I'm really happy and it's honored to be here. I appreciate you. I hope you
understand. I hope you sense that love coming from me. I do. Thank you, Lindy. But I just, you know,
we have to have honest conversations because there's a lot of people that will cloak themselves and say,
I've got to be on this side for a while. And, you know, everybody is who they are, whatever.
But I only want to be around, I have no problem being around liberals if they're reasonable and we can talk about things and we can disagree and we can live side by side forever and it's not a problem.
The problem is just exactly what you described, a left and some parts of the right are like this as well, but not nearly like it is on the left.
They'll just destroy you.
If they don't, truth does not matter.
Absolutely.
Right.
And those people are really, really dangerous.
So what was your turning point?
What was the last thing that you're like, okay, I just can't do this anymore?
Well, actually, Glenn, I haven't said this publicly.
The person that I love most in the world is a Republican, and he's always been Republican.
He's from the South.
and it's something that I haven't disclosed, and I don't want to say more because it's a private individual and he's not a public figure.
But when you love somebody, you kind of want to be aligned with them.
And because I've been protecting his identity, people just say that...
So this is a personal relationship.
This isn't somebody that you've been...
Oh, this is just, you know, one of many factors.
This is what this...
My becoming who I am publicly wasn't just one, it wasn't one catalyst.
There are so many countless.
But I'm just saying that when you love somebody, you kind of want to be on the same page as
them.
It's only natural.
And I've just never, I don't want to drag them into the public square.
It's just not my place to do that.
But in terms of specific things, there's so many.
I mean, I was attacked on the streets of Philadelphia multiple times in the past year.
That's a result of the progressive DA that we have, Larry Krasner, and the George Soros-funded
prosecutors that we have around the country basically destroying our cities but not only that the
dnc chair publicly humiliated me after i raised questions all i did was raised questions about the campaign
spending he called me a narcissist and accused me of taking selfies at the campaign election night
party that's his worst okay that's their worst the dnc chair's worst allegation against me that's how
thin you know their argument against me is but
He could have, they all had my number, okay?
Every one of us were on a first-ane basis.
He could have picked up the phone and we could have talked about the campaign spending.
Instead, he chose to, you know, indulge his far-left influencers and publicly humiliate me.
How could I possibly be a part of that team after something like that, like that happened?
And he acted like he was five years old.
He said, he tweeted gifs at me.
He sent me a jiff of like a flaming dumpster fire, which is supposed to exemplify.
me, I guess. So this is the, this is how the leader of the Democratic Party behaved to well-meaning
criticism. I don't want to be a part of this clown show. So, Lindy, let's talk about the, the way the
Democrats are behaving now. As I said just a minute ago, and Bill Ackman just retweeted this,
that over three times more people in D.C. are Googling criminal defense.
lawyer than anywhere else in the U.S.
The Democrats are saying that, you know, Elon Musk is destroying democracy when all he's
asking for is transparency.
And I think, honestly, I think that's part of the thing that when people were talking about
hope and change with Barack Obama, I think that's what a lot of people thought they were
going to get was transparency.
We're going to read all the bills before they're passed.
You're going to be able to see everything that we do.
When it comes to our tax dollars, the, the great.
gross mismanagement, and that's putting it in the nicest possible frame, the gross mismanagement has got to stop.
And when you see what happened with $2.5 billion in the campaign, how do you approach people like you that were on the other side that are now standing up and saying, this Elon Musk, what's happening is destroying democracy?
How do you talk to them?
What do you say to them?
one phrase give me a break you're complaining that elon musk wasn't elected and therefore has no right to help the country
what about the team of the cabal of people around joe biden who wasn't elected over the past four years
they were literally running the country on his behalf so don't even start with me that's what i would
say but also you know the people in washington this swamp they're so used to spending o pm other
people's money and so they're just addicted to that they don't they had
no sense of fiscal responsibility. My family and I, we're naturally as immigrants, by the way.
We came to this country with very little money, $200. We didn't take a handout from anybody.
We worked like, we worked hard as hell to get to where we are right now, to build a beautiful
life, to create hundreds of jobs. And that is the mentality that Elon is kind of imposing on
the federal government. You know, to make sure that line by line, every line can be justified.
That is the kind of attitude that I actually want.
Lindy, it's great talking to you.
I hope we get a chance to talk again
because I know you're being accused of being a Chinese spy
and your family escape communism
and I just would like to hear more of your point of view.
Can we even settle that right now?
Like, what do you need me to do?
Someone from the CCP killed my great grandfather.
Right.
So I don't, I think the only thing I used to be done
is just that.
People just need to know, no, your family was persecuted
by the Chinese communist, it wouldn't make any sense for you to be.
My father is a dissident.
Are we allowed to curse on here?
No.
We're on federal.
Yeah.
Oh, it's family friend.
FCC.
Let me just say that I hate the communist, the Chinese communist regime.
I hate them.
I've condemned them all my life, my entire adult life.
Five years ago, I went on Fox News, and I openly condemned the communist regime.
What do you want from me?
Like, what do I need to do?
you're just looking for a way to destroy me because you I don't know you disagree but I'm not going to let people get away
anyone who defames me by the way my lawyer will be reaching out lindy appreciate it hope we talk again
i know you have to run thank you so much for being on with me thank you so much Glenn you
bet take care you bet Lindy lee uh i like her she seems nice i you know like to go a little more in
depth with her but uh my initial response is
I like her.
Let me talk to you a little bit about the burner launcher.
The burner launcher is something that my wife has in her car.
I have in my car in the glove box.
I'll carry it from time to time.
My daughter has one in her purse.
And it's much better than mace or pepper spray.
This looks like a gun.
It's legal in all 50 states.
You don't need a permit or background check or anything because it's less lethal.
and it fires a kinetic round that will put you on the ground for a while.
And then it also has tear gas.
I load mine kinetic round, tear gas to kinetic round tear gas.
So I'm going to hit you first with a kinetic round, and if that doesn't get your attention,
tear gas I'm hitting you with next.
And that'll put you on the ground for 45 minutes.
It is really a great thing.
Sometimes you're in need of a gun.
Other times, are you going to pull that gun?
if you, you know, only pull a gun if you're prepared to kill somebody.
And sometimes you have to.
I hope I'm never in that situation.
Most times we'll be in a situation where you want something like a Burna launcher.
Burna, B-Y-R-N-A dot com slash Glenn.
They've made a 10% discount now off your purchase if you use the promo code Glenn when you get that.
That's burna.com slash Glenn.
Burna.com slash Glenn.
Go there now.
Now back to the podcast.
This is the best of the Glenn Beck program.
And we really want to thank you for listening.
Welcome to the Glenn Beck program.
We're so glad that you've tuned in today.
Thank you so much.
We're from Miami today.
I'm in Miami, W-I-O-D.
Thank you so much for your hospitality
and good friend Grace Blazer
for everything that she has done for this program over the years.
I want to talk to about, well, let me apologize first, okay?
Before we start talking about,
I do want to apologize because this,
This is going to be in your head now forever, but I, I just don't know any other way.
I have to present this to you.
The Democrats, I think, have lost their mind.
And so they are now, you know, standing up for the Department of Ed and they're standing up for USAID and all of these crazy things.
The Department of Ed, when we start to see what the Department of Ed actually spends its money on, I think you'll agree.
Our test scores are we spend more money per student than anybody else in the world.
And when you look at the test scores, we're not getting anything for it.
The Department of Ed doesn't do anything.
All that money should go back to the states.
And the federal government could help those states that just can't afford things, but it shouldn't be run by the unions or anybody else.
it should be run by the local school districts and certainly not by the federal government.
Well, they're very upset at some of these cuts.
And I just, they've got a new chant.
It's more of a song than a chant.
And I just think you should hear it because it's very, very compelling.
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
Yeah.
Which side are you on?
Sing it.
Which side are you on?
Give me an amen.
We'll fight against Joege.
We'll fight Ivan Musk.
Yeah.
The windlass gap within our walls.
We'll fight from dawn to dusk.
Oh, which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
Boy.
Which side are you on?
Yeah.
Which side are you on?
All right.
Oh, she's got more.
He wants us all to fail.
Lovely singing voice.
He wants us to bow to him, but we want him in jail.
Yeah.
Which side are you on?
Okay.
Which side are you are?
I'm sorry.
That is going to be in your head now for the rest of the day.
You're going to find yourself, and don't curse me.
I'm just doing my job, bringing you the news.
and so don't you know you'll be three o'clock this afternoon maybe maybe nine o'clock tonight and you'll be like
don't blame me don't blame me don't blame the unions in Washington blame the organizers in Washington
that are saying which side are you on the cuts of graft and corruption and just not knowing where
the hell your money went I think I'm on that side my question is which side are they on
you know what I mean?
The one's singing, especially the woman leading.
Which side is she on?
Because I think this helps my side.
Not their side.
But I, you know, maybe it's just me.
Maybe I don't have the right appreciation for the fine arts.
And that super, super classic.
By the way, they've changed the words, but that is something, a song that was written for the labor movement by the socialists in 1931.
It came again back in the 60s.
And what a surprise.
The same socialist are singing it again.
So which side are you on?
Oh, which side are you on?
Now, I don't know, and I haven't heard this for a while, but the only thing I can compare this to in quality is, do you remember the woman in Seattle years ago that came up with her own song about there's a hole in the sky?
Where the tree once was.
Go ahead.
Let's pull this super, Super Clesco.
There's a hole in the sky where the tree once was.
Somebody's making money.
Stand up.
There's a hole in the sky where the tree once was.
Somebody's making money.
Yeah.
Laws protect exceptional trees,
but the city grants exemptions to these.
Instead, they reward the developers' greed
and sanction the murderer's deeds.
hole in the sky where the tree once was somebody's making money yeah there's a hole in the sky
where the tree once was she missed her calling she should be on broadway no more leaves shimmering
with golden light no more gentle shedding of rains oh no tulip blossoms rustling in the wind now
nothing remains but hey okay stop stop stop stop stop
Could we play the other one?
Because I'm just trying to, which one is better?
That one's really good.
That one's really, really super good.
I could see it on Broadway.
And it's only competition.
I think in years is this new one, which side are you on?
Play a little bit.
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
Tell me.
Which side are you on?
I like that.
Tell me.
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
We'll fight against
Joe
We'll fight
Elon Musk
Not sure she's
Little pitchy dog
Little pitchy
You know
I have to say
I have to say
As somebody who does like Broadway
I think that's the winner
That's the one that I'm leaving the theater singing
You know
Well as a man who's produced a top selling
Christmas CD
recently.
You have an eye for talent,
and I think,
is there a possibility
that your daughter
and one of these singers
could do a duet?
Is there a...
Nope, I don't think
there's a possibility of that at all.
No, okay.
Not even in the slightest.
By the way, don't you owe us a duet?
I was hoping you wouldn't bring that up,
but...
You owe us a song.
Yeah, I do.
Yeah, you do.
Okay.
I just haven't had a chance
to get around to it.
I always say vocal performance-wise,
I think the hole in the sky, there's a clear, a clear cut advantage there.
Yeah.
For the ability as far as singing goes.
And lyrics, lyrics.
I mean, you know, you don't have a lot of shimmering leaves in, you know, in regular March songs.
This is more of a ballad, really.
When you throw the word musk in, you know they're going to dusk.
Yeah.
Because there's not a lot of songs that you can't rhyme tusk all that often unless you're singing about like, you know, prehistoric animals.
You're not going to get there that often.
So there's not really that much to go to.
So I thought it was pretty bad.
Could you go to bust with Musk?
I mean, it's a stretch.
It's a stretch.
Not a true rhyme.
Yeah, but I don't think I can hold him to that standard anyway.
And like, what are they?
I love the idea here that like they're trying to make Musk into this, this guy who's
actually the president of the United States right now.
And there's like multiple reasons I think they're doing that, you know, but one of them is, I think, you look at like his, what he's trying to do is so fundamentally obvious to everyone. Now, you might not think he's making the right choices in that process. You could say, okay, well, I think this particular program is beneficial and the others aren't. But like fundamentally, he's just trying to get rid of waste and it's so obvious this stuff exists. And I don't even think that they're necessarily like, are.
arguing. Like, they don't argue the specific points he makes up.
Oh, no, wait a minute. Wait a minute. Play that song again.
Oh, yeah, that's true. I think you might be...
Which side are you on?
Okay.
Which side are you on? Okay. Now, listen to her case.
Which side are you on?
And ask yourself, which side are you on?
We'll fight against George.
We'll fight Ivan Musk.
Yes.
No way. Let's scab within our walls.
We'll fight from dawn to dusk.
Oh, which side.
So something about scabs in their walls.
I don't think that's the best verse for this case that you were making.
Can you get to the second verse there for me?
Are you on?
I'll meet which side are you all?
Well, that's the part.
You keep playing it.
It'll just never leave your head.
Trump's coming for our unions.
Trump's coming for the unions.
He wants us all to fail.
He wants us to bow to him, but we want him in jail.
Oh, what a great.
Okay, so that is a really good point.
And I don't think people are sick of the jail talk.
You know what I mean?
No, it works so well in the most recent election.
You go back to it.
I mean, when they get halfway through the song and they say the word,
Bittler, you know what's coming.
That's right.
I think that's in the fourth stanza.
It's in the fourth stanza.
Yes, it is coming.
Most people don't sing it, but they'll bring it up.
Can I bring up one other argument?
I want to get your take on, Glenn.
Sure.
Whether, what the media is trying to do with all this Elon Musk talk.
Obviously, they want him to fail at what he's attempting to do here.
That's clear.
But, like, he's on the cover of Time magazine sitting at the Resolute desk.
Yeah.
I think they want to break up this little relationship.
Of course they do.
They are trying to taunt Trump.
into thinking, well, actually, it's Musk that's the president and thinking Trump's ego will step up and say, no, it's not.
In fact, he's gone.
Like, they want to create that.
I don't think Trump is dumb enough to fall for it.
No.
But I do think they are trying to do that.
Oh, they don't understand the fundamental change in Donald Trump.
You know, maybe in the first term, maybe, maybe you could have gotten away with that.
But not if he was locked in as much as he is on what Elon Musk is doing.
and knowing who Elon Musk is and what he's capable of.
He has some profound respect for him as a cutter,
as somebody who can look at a big picture
and break it down into his head in the fundamentals almost instantaneously.
You know, and Donald Trump knows that he has that skill
and knows what role he plays.
And he's not concerned about anybody thinking he's not,
president of the United States.
You know, they did that the last, he's not really president.
He was selected, not elected.
All of that stuff, it doesn't mean anything to him.
He has his mojo back, and it's just, it's not going to work.
It's not going to work.
I mean, did you hear his response to that from Time Magazine?
Did you see, Mr. President, Time Magazine, had Elon Musk sitting behind this, a quote,
your resolute desk.
What, do you have any comment on that?
You know what his comment was?
Is Time Magazine still in business?
It's fantastic.
It's fantastic.
Yeah, that's the right response.
It is.
It is.
So I don't think it's going to work.
And the other thing that makes his fall apart is Bernie Sanders.
I've been warning about millionaires and billionaires having access to our government and creating an oligarchy.
Really, Bernie?
I don't remember you saying anything about George Soros.
I don't remember you saying anything.
In fact, as we are now looking at all of the NGOs that are run by all of your friends,
that are all getting millions and millions of dollars from the government,
I didn't hear, in fact, you're defending that now.
How is this consistent at all?
I love Hillary Clinton when she comes up.
This is disgusting.
Really?
Ms. Clinton?
The Clinton Global Initiative?
The Queen of Benghazi?
I don't think you have any credibility on this.
No, they're mad at Elon Musk because he's a billionaire
that isn't giving his money and efforts to them.
Lots of the other ones are.
They like a certain type of billionaire,
which is the one that's feeding them money.
That's the kind they like.
And every other kind is bad.
Right.
And I have to tell you, when he gets into the Defense Department, that's when we should really be saying great things.
That's when he's uncovering the graft and the waste in our Defense Department, which you know is there.
We've done that ever since I was a kid.
All of that.
That's when we have touchdown after touchdown because they're protecting their little graft scheme.
our side, which is supposed to be big defense, I don't want any of it protected.
I want those people to be exposed.
And if they broke the law, I want them to go to jail.
And I want the money to be accounted for.
So what are you going to say to that?
Well, they just are big war business.
The evil guy with the electric car company.
That's the real enemy.
Wait, I thought the biggest.
What side are you on?
Corby.
This side are you on?
It's crazy.
So bad.
You're streaming the best of the Glenn Beck program,
and you can find full episodes wherever you download podcasts.
Yesterday, big announcement came from Anna Paulina Luna.
She announced a new role for her in Congress.
Listen to this.
It is with profound honor that I have been entrusted by Speaker Mike Johnson
and Chairman James Comer to lead the House Force or the House Oversight Task Force on
declassification of federal secrets. Together with the help of the White House, our intelligence
allies, the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, we'll be conducting investigations
into the following. The assassinations of JFK, RFK, and Dr. Martin Luther King, unidentified aerial
phenomena, also known as UAPs, and I've identified submerged objects, also known as USOs,
the Epstein client list, the origins of COVID-19 and the 9-11 files.
Elena Luna is with me now from Congress. She's just been appointed to lead the task force on declassification of federal secrets.
Anna, welcome. How are you?
Hey, Glenn. Happy to be back on. Thank you.
Okay. Now, I just have to say yesterday, unbeknownst to me, before you are appointed, I was on a show with Patrick Pet David, and I said within 15 days, they're going to release the client list for Jeffrey Epstein.
No way. That can't be true. And I said, I'm telling you,
Cash Patel, I talked to him over the summer. He is for radical transparency.
It's in the hands of the director of the FBI. I think he does it day number one.
But let's give him a few days to settle in. They didn't believe me. They said,
we're going to track this. So, Anna, you're going to make me look bad.
And I don't care if lives are destroyed or whatever, but you can't make me look bad.
No, you know, we actually also sent a letter yesterday to the Department of Justice. As you know,
Pam Body, Dondy is heading up that organization.
Yeah.
And we also asked for it there, but I also, I'm in the same belief that Cash will get confirmed.
I think that he is going to be absolutely pushing for radical transparency.
And I'd like to also, too, just point out that, you know, at the same time that we're basically
announcing our press conference and this declassification task force, we actually also found out
that the FBI just so happened to locate thousands of pages of, you know, a previously undiscovered
JFK files. So look, I know a lot of people are like, well, the American people need to see that
information first. And you actually will be able to see it. It's going to be declassified. But the
reason why we're doing the task force is A, just because President Trump signed an executive order
doesn't mean that bureaucrats in these intelligence agencies won't attempt to block it. So we want to
make sure that that's followed through. And we do have, you know, punitive authority to hold them
accountable if they don't, A. And then B, I think it's incredibly important to look at the evidence that
we know now, which is sure as heck a lot different than what they have.
you know, even 60 years ago and what we're finding of what I have said is from what I have looked at,
just stuff that's already out there, also too, taking into account many of the doctors that were actually
at that initial responding or at that initial hospital, I do think that there were two shooters.
And I think that, you know, the whole magic bully theory that the Warren Commission pushed,
I think that that was faulty.
I know the president at the time also believed that that was a faulty theory.
And so, you know, I'm eager to uncover this.
I know that there's many Democrats and Republicans that also want to get to the bottom of this.
And I'm simply asking the questions that every American has been asking for decades.
So I have a really good friend, Paul Vians, who is, he has the Museum of the American soldier in Texas.
And he had, and he spent a long time to get the exact right gun, the way it was modified, scope and everything else.
and he just had it redone, and I have to tell you, I've held it.
I'm going to take it out to the range next week, but I've held the gun, I've looked through
the scope.
I just don't think you could do it.
I mean, it is, it's just so difficult.
There were reports from doctors at the time, some of which were, you know, first and second
year med students who were at the hospital in the room where Kennedy was brought, and they
reported an entry wound in the neck from some of the footage that you.
you can see that's actually videoed.
You can see obviously Kennedy getting shot,
but then also the doctors that ran the autopsies
at Bethesda, Maryland, had reported seeing an entry
one in the back.
And so we're talking about multiple shots here.
I think the whole idea that they would try to just ignore
that evidence or at least tried to bury that
and not even answer the question is suspect to me.
And so I think this whole idea of wanting to push
against declassification or even trying to poo
the evidence that now has been brought to the forefront,
look, it's the obligation of the U.S. government to release this information to the American people.
Kennedy was arguably one of the most popular presidents, and he was fascinated.
So why did they try so hard to push back against any questioning?
And that's where I come in and where the task force comes in.
You know, I'm also telling people, though, if you are seeing people with large accounts in social media,
especially pushing against declassification or attempting to discredit,
and I saw immediately after my press conference trying to discredit the efforts of Congress
to actually follow through and get this done.
In my opinion, bad actors exist on both sides.
If you really have nothing to hide,
then you should not be afraid of the questioning.
You should be afraid of information getting out to see people.
So let me ask you, let me push back on a couple of things,
just from, you know, playing devil's advocate.
Why would you start with the JFK?
Why is that even important?
I mean, it happened a year before I was born.
Yesterday was my 61st birthday.
How is this relevant?
How is this relevant?
So when we chose to kind of go through the hearing timelines,
it's the MLK files and JFK files that are going to be released first.
So we wanted to help go through that information
and then also correct some of the historical narratives
that were painted on these assassinations.
Obviously confirming or holding hearings that actually present new evidence,
I think is important for knowing and fully understanding the story, right?
So that's the first thing.
Are these going to be open hearings?
Yes.
Yep, these are all open.
And the reason I want them open is because I think the American people will be able to also go through the evidence.
I'm also going to be doing something similar to what I did when we ran the UAP hearings and allow people to ask questions.
And we're also bringing in experts.
There's a few individuals that I want to bring in from the previous investigations that actually were pointing out some pretty incredible evidence that pointed to potentially a second shooter.
And they were pukooed.
And I think that those people deserve a platform.
And if we find anything, and having cash confirmed is incredibly important because he's also going to bring forward files that I would argue have been hidden from the American people.
And so, look, this is obviously a big effort.
We're not perfect, but we do know that the American people deserve this.
And that's what we're fighting for is total complete transparency.
Okay.
So the other pushback question that I have, and this one is actually pretty sincere from me.
and that is, once we get Congress involved, then we're relitigating everything.
The more Congress gets involved, the slower it will happen.
And the higher the percentages, it's just not going to come out.
We're just going to get pages and pages of redacted crap.
Well, so the whole purpose and objective of this task course is actually to ensure that
with President Trump's executive order, that the agencies and the bureaucrats in those
agencies do exactly what that executive order says, which is to declassified.
So we're not going to be siloing or holding any information that won't be available to the
American people.
So this is all going to be out there.
You will be able to go through it yourself.
It will be online from what I gather similar to how they've declassified previous documents
from the FBI and the CIA.
So again, we are simply reopening, reopening the investigation with new evidence, also
bringing in credible witnesses that will be verified.
and confirmed via House oversight, the committee itself.
And we are going to be opening this up to the American people.
So you will have access to the same documents that we are looking at.
We are just simply ensuring that we are not going to get blockaded,
blockaded or this information is not siloed.
Unbelievable.
And when do we get to the things?
By the way, the answer to, for me,
the answer to my first question to you was it's relevant because I think they've been doing this kind of stuff forever.
And it shows a pattern.
If they were doing it in 63, what are they doing now?
I just don't think...
Go ahead.
You know, what's interesting is if you ask those questions, there are some people.
And to be clear, these people largely exist in the media, and they're largely, in my
opinion, bad actors.
But when you have someone that instead of answering the question and having a respectful dialogue,
to discredit something as a conspiracy theory or tries to gaslight you into thinking that
you should not be asking the question, that's when you know that they're hiding something,
right?
So in my opinion, you have...
I've talked to many Democrats, many well-known Democrats that are just like we want in on this
commission or on this task force because we have questions.
And it just doesn't sit right with.
Look, this entire task force, I don't believe that this would be possible had President
Trump not gotten into office, had our CIA director not been confirmed, had there not
been people placed in positions of power that are true ideologues like you and I.
You know, to be clear, I think that also Marco Rubio is going to play a part at the
the Secretary of State's office.
I think that, you know, there are going to be many people in some of these investigations
that will at least give us access to whatever information.
Look, we've asked to declassify everything that I listed in that press conference.
COVID-19 origins, 9-11 files.
I mean, look at what just came out yesterday.
We find out that the FBI was what basically ordering lunch for someone that was working
with the pilots that crashed the planes into the Twin Towers.
I mean, that's ridiculous.
and that's all just coming out now.
And so that's why we ask these questions on the 9-11 files.
How could have it prevented?
How much did the government truly know?
I mean, look, I could care less if people think I'm crazy for doing this.
I can tell you that I'm joined by many high-profile people in Congress to include Democrats
that have the same questions.
And so we're not going to stop.
Jeffrey Epstein, when's that coming out?
Well, I have a letter out to Pam Bondi.
I know that cash has been supportive of it.
And so hopefully once they're confirmed previously, they said that the Epstein list could not be released.
This is, mind you, under Biden, Department of Justice, because there was an open case, right?
And that's what they kept pointing to.
But you're even hearing that Pam Bondi, even before she was confirmed that she was actually calling for the release of the Jeffrey Epstein client list.
So we're pushing for it.
We've sent the, go ahead.
Will Pam and Cash be the ones to make the decision?
we're going to release it or does it have they will be the ones yes they'll be the ones again i'm going
off of what we were told in previous administrations but look they were saying that there was an open
investigation so i believe that pam has the authority to release that and look i don't believe
that any of that should have been classified if there are people that we're doing bad things we should
know about it it's unbelievable i mean radical transparency it is the only thing that will heal our
nation is if we deal with all of the corruption that we've been dealing with, that we know
has happened. And if we can get an honest look, you know, maybe the Warren Commission was
right. I don't know. But we should be able to know that and look at evidence for ourselves.
Yes. All of the evidence. All of the evidence without protecting anybody.
Anna, thank you. It's got to be, I mean, what was it like to be, did you get the call from the
president? And I mean, how did this work? So initially, in full transparency, this was actually
supposed to, the task force looked a little bit different. And I chose to expand it because even our
investigators said, you know, there's a lot here for truly our absolute objective is to begin,
you know, restoring trust in the relationship with the American people. We have to go into these,
you know, different theories, go into these cases and investigate and actually find the truth.
and then let the American people decide.
And I agree with them.
But also, Glenn, I think there was two other members
that were potentially going to be taking over the initial task force.
And they turned it down because there was a climate of fear
that it was considered dangerous territory.
And what I will tell you is,
I do not believe that it's dangerous territory
because we have, you know, the 800-pound girl in the White House
and our allies and the intelligence agencies
that are pushing for this transparency.
not just one person. I think where you had, you know, previous historical events that occurred,
it was one person that was leading out the charge. But when it's a group effort pushing for this,
it's a systematic change that occurs. And so, in my opinion, I think I'm going to be okay.
But, you know, a lot of people, I had a reporter that called me actually a very well-known reporter
from Fox News yesterday said, you know, it's interesting, but a lot of the people, one of the initial
reporters that had reported that there were three shots heard at the JFK assassination, one was
one of the prize for writing, and he actually committed suicide several years later.
So, you know, stuff like that has happened in the past, and I just, I'm in the perspective and
belief that right now we have a very small window of time to bring true change.
You see everything happening with USAID.
Mike Benz is uncovering a lot.
Elon Musk is uncovering a lot, but there's a lot of good people that are really cleaning
the system.
You saw, what, 40,000 federal employees resign, or not resign, but chose to leave.
the workforce. So you're seeing a big change happen. And I'm not saying that this is a, you know,
complete fix, but it definitely is going to change, I think, our country long-term and historically.
And I'll also tell you this, Glenn. Yesterday after we made the announcement, I saw a massive
orchestrated campaign, specifically coming from a lot of other pages that had typically been
political on social media that were trying to discredit what I was saying about potential witnesses
and trying to spin it. And the reason why they were doing it is because the warning,
Commission presented a faulty theory on the single bullet, the magic bullet theory, to think
that that was how Kennedy was taken out and then hit the Texas governor. I mean, that whole
thing. But they were saying nobody's alive. So who were you going to? Well, well, first of all,
I wasn't necessarily saying I was, I was using the Warren Commission as an example of the commissions
that had been set up or the hearings that had been set up. But who were, we are actually
looking to subpoena. I don't want to say their names yet.
We're not going to even.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
No, no, no.
Don't.
Don't.
Are individuals that, A, were at, are at Bethesda in the room during the 8 p.m. autopsy that the military did.
Individuals that were on the assassination board that did not agree with the findings initially
and with the due evidence coming out, I think that they are going to make great witnesses,
and plus they were government employees, so they should pass backgrounds.
And then there's another individual who's going to be very key, and I think resetting the narrative on Kennedy.
Interesting.
Anna, thank you so much. I appreciate it. Just know, and you sound like you are. You know exactly what you're walking into. There's a new stat out this morning. Over three times more people in D.C. are Googling criminal defense lawyer than anywhere else in the U.S. right now. So you got a lot of people who are freaking out. Keep up the good work. God bless you. Thank you. Thank you for your support. You bet.
can be a guy of the finance.
Not a reason to have a gross
monger in art,
to play to golf,
or to be a pro of the crypto.
Not even
no more.
In any case,
you have always
always made the
appellee-nogist-tit-t
t-ed-tend,
you add to renewing
with your instinct
of negotiation.
With the
support 24-hour-
per-jour,
no amount of
minimum,
nor fray-mensue.
You're made
for negotiate,
and the apply-tete-tit-tit-tid
is made to
you help.
Telecharge it
right now.
