The Glenn Beck Program - Best of the Program | Guests: Sara Gonzales & Jonathan Skrmetti | 12/6/24

Episode Date: December 6, 2024

Sara Gonzales, BlazeTV host of "Sara Gonzales Unfiltered," joins to celebrate the current Texas House speaker, Dade Phelan, abandoning his race for a third term after being exposed as a RINO. A mysterious stranger infiltrated the studio while Glenn and Stu were broadcasting. Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti joins to discuss the case going before SCOTUS that aims to protect children from harmful gender-affirming procedures. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It's something else here now. Something new. From exclusively on Paramount Plus. It's the series Stephen King calls Scary as Hell. Everything here is impossible, but it's also real. Sci-fi Vision calls it the best show streaming right now. We're running out of time and we still don't know the rules. Don't miss what the movie blog calls something you need to watch.

Saving those children is how we all go home. From binge all episodes exclusively on Paramount Plus. The Attorney General of Tennessee joins us. Jonathan Scermetti, he is the guy who is taking on gender-affirming care. We get his thoughts after the argument of the Supreme Court this week. Sarah Gonzalez joins us to talk about the news that Dade Phelan has now decided he's not going to run for the Texas Speaker of the House. This is earth-shattering news, and she'll explain why on the podcast. Also, what happens when we're trying to discuss something serious? like abortion and buddy the elf shows up in the middle all on today's best up podcast let me first

tell you about relief factor i owe a lot to relief factor it turned days that were overshadowed by constant pain into weeks and months and years that i've actually been able to enjoy myself again and feel good i love talking about relief factor because it broke the back i don't even know how but it broke the back of pain that nobody could figure out how to stop. It's a daily supplement that helps your body fight pain by fighting inflammation, which is the source of most of the pain in our bodies and a lot of our disease. It's 100% drug-free, developed by doctors to help reduce or eliminate pain, whether it's neck, back, joint, or muscle pain. Relief factor can help you feel better, and that can help you start to live better. Over a million people have tried Relief Factor's

Quick Start Kit, and yours truly is one of them. And 70% of them, including me, has gone on to order it again and again. Stop masking your pain. Start fighting back naturally. Give Relief Factor a try. Right now, their three-week quick start is only 1995. Less than a dollar a day. Visit Relieffactor.com or call 800 the number four relief.

800, the number four relief. You're listening to the best of the Blenbeck program. So there's some big Texas. The Texas House could have a new speaker as soon as this week. Now, this is big because the Texas House Republicans have a speaker that for some reason has done every time he comes in and he's like, you know what? Yes, we won, but let's be fair. Let's give the Democrats half of the power. What?

He is absolutely against school choice. He is, I mean, he was the guy who tried to bring down. Ken Paxton. He's the guy who was drunk on the floor. Allegedly. I think I could. Your Honor, may I be sworn in as an expert witness on. You do know something about this topic, don't you?

He was drunk on the floor. And for some reason now, he's decided, yeah, I'm not going to, I'm not going to be here. I don't, me run. What? Have no idea. somebody who has been on this from the get-go is Sarah Gonzalez from Blaze TV. Sarah, what happened? This story just broke.

Do you know? Yeah. Well, I mean, what happened was Dave Feeleyn finally realized that he was not going to have the votes to maintain his speakership simply because of what you just referenced. He ran the whole impeachment sham against Ken Paxton. You know, a lot of people think that Donald Trump is like the OG of. of having, you know, this weaponized lawfare against him. And Ken Paxton has been dealing with it here in the state of Texas for nearly a decade. So he was behind that.

You know, he barely won. He barely hung on to his seat by like something like 300 votes over there in the Beaumont area. So, I mean, you're looking at a guy who is seeing the wrath of the Texas grassroots activists. They have come out in force against this guy. And now you're seeing all of these, even if they're rhinos, we have. have a lot of work to do in the Texas House. We have a lot of rhinos remain in Glenn. But the problem is going on just a second. Let me, let me explain this to if, you know, if you live, you probably know this in like Oklahoma or places where it's very, very red. People who are

Democrats, they're like, I can't, there's no way I can win as a Democrat. So I'll say I'm a Republican when they're Democrats. And so they become these awful, awful, rhinos and people who don't know will just go, well, you're a Republican. That's great for me. And that's the real problem. Texas is red, but it's not as red as its population is because we've been voting in rhinos because that's a Republican. Exactly right. Exactly right. And so the problem for all of these rhinos is that Texas grassroots activists have had enough. There was a bloodbath at the polls. we have something like 25 new incoming freshmen House representatives. They're shaking up the system.

These are elected by Texas conservative grassroots. I mean, they are as conservative as it gets. We're going to pass school choice. We've got the votes for that. And so we're seeing the makeup of this legislature changing. And Dade Feelein simply did not have the votes from all of these incoming freshmen, these actual true conservatives said we're not voting for Dade. We want to change.

The people elected us to come in and change things. we're going to do it. And so Dave Feeleyn finally had to decide to step down. Now, I will say, Glenn, the fight is not over because we have Dave Jr., Dustin Burroughs here in the state of Texas, is filing to enter the speakership race. And he's the same thing. I mean, they're friends and they, you know, are in cahoots. He would be the mouthpiece for Dade. Yes. He would be the mouthpiece for Dade if he won it. You know, my hope is that the grassroots activist will still continue to let their voices be heard, put pressure on their representatives to say, you do not vote for Dustin Burroughs. We don't want that. And there is, of course,

David Cook would be the grassroots activist choice for the speakership here in the state of Texas. So what would it mean if we did get David Cook in? Well, what it would mean is that we would have someone who would not put Democrats in key committee chairs. I mean, that is the most significant, one of the most significant things. Have you ever heard of that as Stu? Sarah, in any other state? Have you ever heard of a Republican putting Democrats in key positions leading key committees? You don't think so.

I've never heard of it. No, I mean, it's the most backwards thing. Imagine the people elected, the people decided we want a red legislature. And all you do is you turn over the keys to the car to the Democrats to drive it. I mean, you're talking about key committees like the calendars committee, you know, they decide what comes up on the floor to debate. I mean, these are really, really key committees. And he's handing the keys over to the Democrats. So that won't happen with David Cook.

You know, David, David Cook will be driving the bus into a more conservative, you know, a place. So I do think, you know, is he, would he be my choice if I had the makeup of every single Texas legislator there? probably not, but the grassroots have said, this is the guy that we can get through. This is the guy who can win the votes. And this is the guy who is going to take us. He has been put on notice that he is to govern in a more conservative way. So, I mean, look, I'll take the win. Getting gayed off of this, having him withdraw is huge for us.

Huge, huge. Because we will have school choice now. Yes. Texas has been trying to do this for a long time they've been trying to do it. And it is because of this speaker of the House who is just in the pocket of somebody, probably the teachers unions, and just will not let it come to a vote and stomps it down every single time. Sarah, did you say, I think you say that we do have the votes you think for it now? Yes.

Everything that I'm hearing indicates that we do have the vote for it now. because even people who were a no last go-around, they saw what happened at the polls. They saw all of their friends. They saw all of Dave Blackies get decimated over the topic of school choice. You had Governor Abbott out there, you know, endorsing people in the primaries solely based off of their school choice vote. So, I mean, it was just that they saw what happened at the polls. They want to hang on to power.

If it scares them enough and they're still rhinos at heart, but they're scared enough that they're going to vote our way, you know what, I'll take the vote because it's embarrassing that we still don't have school choice in this state. So what do you know about, let me change subjects here, what do you know about our gold-backed currency that we're working on? I don't get into that topic very much, but I do know that they are working on it. It is something that they have said that they do want to take up in the session. Yeah, we should get David, what is his name, Kevin Freeman on? Because I think this is something that he has been pushing for a long time. and I read his book about it, and I think he's right.

I think he's absolutely right. And it would, you know, every state needs to strengthen itself. You know, the idea of let's close the Department of Education doesn't mean we don't care about education. It means we want the money that our states have to stay in the state and we want control. We don't want to send a dollar and get 30 cents back in. education and then be told exactly what we have to do. It's ridiculous. We have to strengthen our states. And when it comes to the dollar, I mean, I'll never forget, sitting in Rick Perry's office, probably 2010, and Germany had just asked for their gold from the Federal Reserve. And the

Federal Reserve is like, well, it might take us five years to get it to you. I'm like, what? And I talk to Rick and he said, I'm very concerned. And I said, where's our gold? And he said, federal reserve. And he said, I just asked for it back. And we got it back. So now we have, we have Texas has its gold in the state. And they're now talking about doing what Utah has done and have some sort of gold back currency that is, you know, good for trade. And I think that's, I think that's really smart, really smart. Sarah, thank you so much. Appreciate it. Thank you. Yeah, the big news coming out of Texas.

Yeah, and Sarah has worked really hard on that issue. She is. She's a pit bull. Oh, yeah. She gets her teeth in the way. Don't get in the way. She's coming. Yeah.

Yeah, she's done so much for, not, I mean, not just this issue, but so many other issues, you know, particularly the stuff like, you know, the transing issues and such. So, she's worked so hard on this. She's not all the time on the weekends, like, you know. She is an activist. She's an activist. Let me play one thing, I guess. Speaking of her, this is so insane.

This is how insane the transgender thing is getting. Let's see. Let's play cut 10 here. Trans child worried. What concerns have you had about speaking out? That I'm going to be like murdered. Like one day, I'm going to be walking down the street. street and somebody's going to come up and like shoot me or something.

That's a really scary thing to be worrying about it 10 years old. Yeah, where would you get an idea like that? Yeah, that should not be a worry. Yeah, well, yeah, you know, it's interesting. That's, I would agree. Yeah. You know, we talk about bipartisanship. Here's some bipartisanship for you. I agree. She shouldn't be worried about that. Stop telling your child they're going to be murdered on the street. Can you imagine that? What would they get that idea from? Their parents. It's either their parents or like, TikTok that you've left them with over the past, you know, every day for eight hours. Or school.

Yeah. I mean, like, you know, some activist. Some crazy. But again, at school would be one of those two explanations as well from one of their friends. Yeah. You know, it's the same, this very similar thing goes on with climate. The same thing. These activist parents that are insane, terrify their children that they're all going to die from climate change.

That is just like, that is borderline child abuse to, to, to, to, to, you know, to put that in your kids head like that. I have to tell you, I tell my kids, you know, my kids, they live with me. I mean, that's practically child abuse. You know what I mean? They're just like, world's coming to an end. Terrible. But like there are real worries.

And I think especially when they're at that age, I do everything I can to shield my kids from those words. Tanya has shielded them from all of the stuff, you know, and I have brought it to them now that they're 18, et cetera, et cetera. I do talk to him about, hey, these are the real concerns. These are the things you probably shouldn't have to worry about. But these things you should watch. As an adult now, you need to watch these things.

You don't tell a 10-year-old child you're going to be shot in the street because of who you think you are at 10. Yeah. I mean, I think back to March 2020, where all of a sudden, like, NBA games They're just getting canceled with 20,000 people in the stadium. You know, Donald Trump is out there. And we're in that 15 day, 30 day to slow the spread, all that stuff. We still don't know where this is going.

And there's moments in that where you're like, even if this is wrong and, you know, it's not as serious of a pandemic. Like, what's the government going to do? What happens to our economy? Can we reboot this? Will life ever get back to normal? Those are real questions that you asked. We forget about a lot of them now, but there were moments where you're like, what the hell is going to happen here?

And I remember thinking to myself, all I can do is try to make my kids' life not feel that way. Right? All I can do is I hope when they get older, they will look back at this period and remember, hey, remember when we did all that cool stuff with mom and dad when we were home for all that time? Like, that's how I want them to remember it. That's not how these parents operate at all. They're terrifying their children. Remember, what in their childhood?

2016? Who was it from ABC or it was Stephanopoulos, I think, who said his children were sleeping in their bed, crying themselves to sleep every night because of Donald Trump. Are you out of your mind? Why? That's you. That's you. That's you. That's you.

Half the world is poised to use a gold-back currency. The Bricks Nation, moving toward it in an effort to unseat the U.S. dollar is the world's reserve currency. if we hadn't have won this election, I think they would have done it. I think, honestly, I think they're going to try. Texas is standing up and saying, yeah, you know what? If you tube the U.S. dollar, Texas will stand. They're doing the Texas-backed gold-backed currency. But more and more people and institutions are rediscovering that gold is one of the most stable things you can anchor your currency to.

We're not. Momentum for higher prices. strong. This is where you come in with Lear Capital. They can help you get started to protect your savings. Anything that you've saved for retirement, anything, it's going to be worth less and less and less as the dollar just keeps going down. Now is the time. Go to Lear Capital. Thousands of five-star reviews, 24-hour risk-free purchase guarantee. Get your free wealth protection guy. Call them today. 800 957 gold 800 957 gold

it's Lear Capital 800 957 gold Now back to the podcast This is the best of the Glenn Beck program And we really want to thank you for listening Name of the album is Home for Christmas By Cheyenne Grace You can pick it up now You will love it and I can't

I'm sorry I'm talking about this I am such a proud father It is so amazing to see My daughter I got home yesterday and she said, dad, I just got an email. I don't even know how to answer these questions. You know, she just turned 18 and I said, what? And she said, Billboard magazine called me and wanted to know about the orchestra and everything else.

I said, do you know, I was 30 before. I mean, you don't get your name even in Billboard magazine. And she's making the chart of Billboard. And it's just, it's exciting as a dad. and I can't thank you enough for listening to it and buying it. And it's great, too. It's not just being nice to you. It's really enjoyable.

It makes me smile every time I hear it. Yeah. It is really, I'm so, I was so afraid it wouldn't be good and we couldn't release it because I would, I said to her. I said, if it is not, if it's not high quality, something that we would as a family, not knowing you, listen to over and over again, I will not be that dad who's, like, look at, you know, that Simon Cowell would go, who the hell has been telling you you have talent? Yeah, you don't want that moment. No, you don't want them.

I will tell you, that's definitely not the case. I went into my daughter's room last night as we should put in her down, you know, to go to bed and she was just listening to it again. Again? She loves it. This is all she listens to now. Wow. Which is very, very cool.

The other part, too, is that we saw her perform live, her first live performance the other night. You, it was just fun for number one. to watch Glenn insides just churned. Like, the stress on Glenn, it was like 10 times what it was on Shaghan. Because I was so, because I've been 18. You know what I mean? I was 18. And this was the very first time she ever did anything on stage.

And I was more nervous than she, you know, she'd come up and she'd be like, Dad, I'm nervous. I'm like, you're going to be great inside. I'm like, run for your life. But my point there was to say that like she, look, you can do a lot of stuff in a studio. I mean, you can't. You can make anybody,

you can almost make you or me sound good at a studio. But she's on a mic on a little stage outdoors with, you know, I don't know, 100 people there. And she sounded just like, just like the CD. She sounded incredible.

Yeah. There's a guy that most people don't know. His name is Roger Love. And he is on the premier payroll. He was for Rush and I. Because if Rush would lose his voice or I would lose my voice, we would call him. He's one of the best vocal coaches in the world.

And I mean, he does it for Elton, John, and Lady Gaga and everybody. Sure. Beyonce. You've known him for years. I've known him for years. He's a great guy. And I said to him, hey, Roger, this is like three years ago. I think my daughter might have talent.

And I know you don't really do a lot of, you know, vocal lessons. And he's like, for you? and I said, yes, if that's a positive, no, if it's not. And he said, no, what are you looking for? And I said, my daughter. And he said, Glenn, let me listen to her. If she has talent, I'll take her. And so he's been working with her.

And it's, I mean, she's, she's good. She is a proud, proud daddy. Anyway, I'm sorry for that. Christmas is almost over. I'll stop talking about her soon. Let's see here. We were talking about coming together for the holidays and being able to have conversations. And I think this conversation with Anna Kasparian yesterday, who is on the Young Turks.

I mean, she asked me, she said, would you, would you be willing to come on to the Young Turks? And I said, probably not. And she said, why? And I said, well, I would if it was just one-on-one with you. but I've had so many bad experiences with others that I did not ambush you. When she walked into the studio, I got up to greet her, and I grabbed her hand and I said, I welcome to my home. And she said, thank you.

And I said, I never invite anyone in my home to ambush them. please feel relaxed just to have a conversation. I'm going to ask you challenging questions, but I am not looking to get you. And that has been your policy and you stuck to it since the beginning of time. Yeah. And so it gave us this moment, you know,

where she was really, she would stop and ask me, she asked me about, you know, about war and Ukraine and abortion. We had a great conversation on abortion. Sounds like a joyful time. It's a good old. old the Ledbeck Christmas party.

Right there. We had a great conversation about a portion. It's happening tonight. You know what else is red? Blood. Let's talk about a portion. Merry Christmas, everybody.

No, but, you know, because she was talking about, you know, transgenderism and, and it got to women's rights. And she was shocked. It shows how much we don't know about each other. Yeah. You see the worst. of everybody online and clips and everything.

Let me ask you a question. Oh, boy. I don't know exactly how I feel about it yet, but I am a little concerned about it. Yes. I think I'll bet you, I'll tell you what I'm thinking after you say, but I bet you we have the same concern.

My concern, may I just say? Please just come in. Just, oh my God. I'm not going to just address it. This is just something that, you know, if you are a Blaz TV subscriber, you'll enjoy. Anyway, your concern. My concern is, this is going to be very difficult to do now. Okay, go ahead.

Okay, so the concern is that we are working now with many disaffected members of the left. Do not eat the candle. I'm sorry. All right. With many disaffected members of the left who've kind of said, hey, this is a little bit crazy. Like what's going on right now is insane. Yeah. Even though we don't agree on a lot, it's good that we talk.

And you've done this forever. You've done interviews like this forever. Right. Where you will, you know, have conversations with people across the island. Just, you know, get different understandings. That's not abnormal for you. As far as the movement goes, right, conservative movement. Yes.

There's a lot of embracing of people who previously were not really welcome in conservative policymaking and now are. Like I was watching this Elon Musk thing develop and everyone was like, hey, there's a Democrat joining the Doge committee. Right? Great. Great. Is it? Is it, though? Because I'm a little concerned not only that it's just a Democrat, but also that a congressman.

is now in this process before it's really even starting. And like my guess is the Democratic congressman at the end of the day might be a good guy or whatever. I'm concerned he might get a little bit in the way. Of like a I'm sorry. Buddy, the elf is in the studio and it is. Smiley face. It's so distrared. Thank you.

Thank you, buddy. Flynn, I drew a butterfly. Yeah. That's great. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. Very nice butterfly. So anyway, good.

Now, I can't concentrate. I had to go through the whole question. You let them dance around and eat tissues and lick candles. And now when you get to answer, you're going to. Santa! Santa! I know him! I'm not Santa.

Get out of here. You give me this a bad name at the North Pole. You no longer look like Santa. You look great. See, look at that. Thank you, buddy. I love you. I love you.

Buddy the elf. Thank you. Thanks, buddy. All right. This is unbelievable, though. I have to go through this. entire long rant while all this is going on. Right.

What's the website, buddy? Where do people go for you? What is it again? The elf.net. The elf. Or you can follow me on social media because we have a lot of fun there and you can follow my adventures. I'm at The Elf Live on most socials.

The Elf Live. Thank you, buddy. I love you. I love you. Good news, everybody. What's your favorite color? I love red and green. They're the most Christmassy.

Thank you. Thank you. Okay. So I don't even know if my point made sense. Yeah. Okay. So yes. So I am of the same concern because I think that there are those. I think the Democratic Party is going to recalibrate and want to do the same thing that they already have done. But they'll just change the language and they'll try to appear like they're, what are you? You know what I mean? That's Republicans do that all the time. Oh, I'm with you. And then they get in and they're not with you.

So I am concerned about that. However, that's a different concern than I think what we're talking. Oh, okay. I'm sorry, Buddy was distracted. No, no,

what I just said, I think in the buddy context here, was the point you answered. And so I think that that's concern number one. I think structurally, as this goes on, it's good to bring new people into your fold. Right.

That's what you want to do. As a party, as a movement, get people who used to vote against you to vote for you, right? Like, you want that to happen. So you have to have that happen, but you have to make sure you stay to your principles and you have to worry. Like, I really worry with like the Doge thing that like the motivations of some of a Democrat hopping on this committee is not the same as my motivation. I agree. Right? Like, they're not really going to be cost cutters. Like I don't see that,

see that there might be a little bit they can agree on. That's great. When it comes to the, the, like you had a conversation with Anna Casparian about abortion. You mentioned this. And you had a really, I think, interesting exchange. And you found, I think, some common ground, even though you don't agree on the issue overall, which is, and this is something we've discussed many times. At the end of the day, legislation can be part of it, but you have to get to a place where you're winning hearts and minds. So you know, I don't happen to have this clip. She came at me because she was saying something and I'm like, huh, sounds like the 10th of Man.

amendment. And she said, well, it is. It's states rights. And she said, but let me ask you, Mr. States rights. Yeah, yeah. Would you support a blanket ban on abortion? Now, the answer is, I believe it's murder. So yes, murder is illegal. You think that should be illegal in all the states, Glenn? Wow. What a radical position. But wait, wait, wait, no, I know. So it is murder. So murder is, I said, but you cannot legislate that now because no one. half the country doesn't believe it's murder. Well, you wouldn't get it through. Right.

You wouldn't get it through. That doesn't answer whether you support it or not. But it doesn't stop it. I said, you know, I have a new understanding of abortion where it's always been about the children. And it is about the children. But it is also about the mothers. And what they're saying is, hey, moms go have an abortion and shout your abortion. 80% of the women who have abortions regret it within 12 months and they begin to have real behavioral and psychological issues with it.

This is not a happy thing for women. If you care truly about women and women's health, we have to then look at the woman and say, what is causing her to do it? And there's two things. One, they're believing the lie that it's not a baby. Okay, it is because that's why ultrasounds are being fought by Planned Parenthood. They don't want any ultrasound because you see it. You see the heartbeat and everything else and you're like, that's a baby.

Right. Okay. The second thing is once they get past this, we talk about this with preborn. That's why I like them so much, is they feel trapped. I can't tell you how many nurses I have talked to and they've said the boyfriend or the father or the mother or the mother. other even, you know, the mom of the girl will come in and go, she can't have this. There's no support. There's nothing, yada, yada, yada. And the girl is like, I have no other choice. So if we begin to look at the actual issue, not the political issue, the actual issue, what is causing

these women? Those who have abortion as a form of birth control, I think. that should you know absolutely that you can regulate no you're not having six eight 10 abortions for birth control sorry you have to do you get a punch card yeah you're 10th one free um but that's not the vast majority of women very minority right and so let's fix that problem and change people's hearts on that because no legislation is going to stop. It's like drugs. No legislation is going to stop the drugs. Guns. You can take all the guns off the streets. It's not going to stop murder. They'll go to knives. Let's start looking at actual solutions and the actual problem and what would work. Yeah. And I agree. Like the long-term eternal solution to this, right, is similar to what I think

has happened with slavery, right? Slavery, if you overturned amendments and made slavery legal and someone tried to come out and pass a bill to say, hey, African-American should now go back to the fields. It wouldn't even come close to passing. Everyone who supported it would be thrown out immediately. It would be we would reject it easily as a society. I want that to, that is the long-term solution. However, I just don't want to avoid the fact that like, I want a constitutional amendment to ban it right away. I agree. We can't abandon those things. Even with slavery, we still buy all of our products made by slaves in China. You're streaming the best of the Glenn Beck program and you can find full episodes wherever

you download podcasts. Mr. Attorney General, Jonathan, how are you, sir? Great, great. Thanks for having me. So I listened to the case, and I don't know how your head didn't explode with some of the questions that were coming from some of those on the left, so to my or for one. But overall, how did you feel it went? I think we did a great job of getting our points across the court. I mean, it went on for two and a half hours or so. The court has a lot of questions.

They're clearly thinking hard about this. It's going to be a long time before we get our opinion. But I think we did everything we could to win this case. I feel really good about our part of it. Now it's up to the justices. You know, there was a, well, first of all, tell me exactly what the case was. what does it actually cover and what will it do if it's decided in in favor of Tennessee? So we have a law in Tennessee, our general assembly post the law that prohibits giving juveniles,

puberty blockers, hormone treatments, or surgery for the purpose of gender transition. Surgery was not an issue in this case. So this is just about whether the Constitution prevents the state from banning puberty blockers or hormone treatments for the purpose of gender transition. So if we win, our law will remain in effect, and kids won't be able to be subject to that in Tennessee. Potentially, depending on how we win, it could mean that all laws dealing with gender identity

are reviewed under a rational basis standard, which gives the people's elected representatives a lot more latitude as to how they regulate. You know, when you were discussing this and it was Justice Sotomayor said, every medication has, you know, side effects, even aspirin has side effects. I don't know how you took that question seriously, but you answered it very well. Explain to the average person why this is so different than any, anything else that is prescribed for kids?

Every systematic analysis of the evidence shows little to no benefit for kids from these treatments for gender dysphoria. Meanwhile, the risks are enormous. They face losing fertility for the rest of their lives, never being able to have children. They risk losing their sexual function for the rest of their lives. Kids don't know what they're giving up. They risk tumors and blood clods and cognitive disorders and bone density. disorders, all sorts of serious lifelong medical complications.

And meanwhile, the evidence is this doesn't help them. You're talking about very severe physical interventions for psychological problems with no evidence that it's helping them with the psychological problems. And so we're looking at a situation where kids are really at risk, where there's not a good medical reason for putting them at risk, and where there are these people saying the Constitution prohibits the state from protecting kids, even where the evidence is so powerfully in opposition to allowing this to happen going forward. I think it was Justice Souter who asked the opposite side.

You know, you said that the science backs this up. Well, now we have all this new science that is coming out. Do you want to withdraw that statement? what has happened since you started this process to the evidence that's coming out from everywhere now? So there was a lot of evidence beforehand, but the Cass Review in England is a large-scale, long-term study by an extremely respected pediatrician that looked really hard at these issues. It's controversial around the world. You know, England is not a red state. It is not Tennessee. They were making these procedures widely available to kids for a while. And they looked at the evidence and they determined that they should not be doing that. That the evidence showed this was hurting kids. They should severely restrict access. And they did. And the cash report gets into it very thoroughly. It was discussed with a lot of specificity by the court. You know, it shows there's no reduction in suicide, which is one of the things that we constantly hear. You know, if you don't let kids, do this, they're going to kill themselves. We don't want kids to kill themselves, but the evidence is doing these life-altering

interventions doesn't make a difference. You know, it just looked at a lot of evidence from a lot of kids, and it showed what we already knew, which is that there is no benefit to justify these radical interventions. So what does this mean if it comes out the way we hope it does? Does this have any effect on bathrooms and and sports or anything else. So it really depends on what the court does. I mean, there's a way that we could win that's narrower that only deals with kids' transitions, or there's a way we could win that's broader if the court says that gender identity issues do not rise to the level of intermediate scrutiny under the Constitution,

in which case a lot of the litigation we're facing about bathrooms and school sports and all the other things people have sued over would be pretty easy to resolve. So it could be very broad ruling. Did you see any indication that any of the judges were leaning that way? Were there any questions that made you, gave you any indication that that was possible or probable? There were indications that the justices are thinking about it. There were questions about sports that came up, but I don't know whether that means they're thinking about issuing a broad opinion or they're just concerned about, you know, the potential effects.

And, you know, they want to think through exactly how this is going to play out because there's no constitutional law from the Supreme Court on gender identity stuff. We have one case about a very narrow, very specifically worded statute. And the lower courts have been all over the place. They need guidance. They need clarity on this issue. You know, you can't go into a tattoo parlor if you're young without parental permission. You can't buy a gun at 12 or 16. You can't get married.

There's all these laws because we know you're not mentally prepared to make those kinds of decisions. How does that logic not work for this issue? argument that it's sex discrimination and therefore the Constitution provides a heightened level of scrutiny. But, I mean, we've done this forever. The law treats people differently based on their age. Kids can't consent to things that will have lifelong consequences, whether it's entering a contract or smoking a cigarette. The consequences for these procedures are so much more profound. And we think we have a strong argument that the state should be able to regulate this.

particularly given the evidence that it makes no difference, that it does not help, and it increases the risk of all these different horrible outcomes for the kids. The other side just seems, quite honestly, and I don't mean to slam people, but they seem unhinged. I want you to listen. This is a mom who is standing outside of the Supreme Court building while you were arguing the case. Listen to what she said about her child. Cut for her.

What motivated you to come out here today? We're supporting our child, Violet, and her access to the medical care that she needs. Yeah, we're here for her rights and her ability to be who she is. And she's not going to let anybody silence her, and we're not going to stand in her way. In what age do you think most trans kids

determine that they're trans? Violet told us when she was one and a half, She's been telling us since she could speak. So she knew since birth. 18 months? 18 months she knew? Dad. I have a three-year-old last week.

She told me she was a pirate. That is a true story, by the way. Children dysphoria is a real thing, and it is really hard for kids to deal with it. But we have seen an explosion in these cases that sure looks like something very weird is going on. And I don't see how it doesn't come out eventually that there's massive overdiagnosis. In England, a doctor's high 4,000% increase in the number of girls seeking hormone treatments. And, you know, the evidence is very, very strong that the large, large majority of kids, kids who have any sort of gender identity confusion grow out of it unless they're put on medications.

For most kids, this is a passing thing. Doesn't mean it's not hard for them. Adolescence is really hard, and I have to think gender confusion makes it that much harder. But most of them are going to grow out of it, and for all of them, the evidence of a benefit. Well, we'll be praying for the Supreme Court, and I thank you so much for you filing suit and trying to get this corrected. It's truly madness. I don't, you know, I don't, I don't care what you do as an adult.

I mean, I actually do, but it's not my business if you're an adult. But if you can't decide things like smoking, drinking, you know, be responsible for enough with a gun, you certainly should not be able to do things to your body that are permanent and game-changing. It's insanity. It's insanity. We've got to stop. Jonathan, thank you so much. It's an honor to be on the show. Thanks for having me. Merry Christmas. Merry Christmas. Jonathan Scermetti, he is the Tennessee Attorney General who argued just a what day before yesterday at the Supreme Court to protect children from gender procedures.

And we should, by the way, take what he said seriously. If his three-year-old is about to plunder passing ships, we should report that to merit. time authorities. Don't forget the pillaging and the raping. Yes, immediately. We must take it seriously. If we can save one pillage, pillage at. One pillaged. We can save one person from being pillaged.

We need to act now. Isn't it worth it? Isn't it worth it? It's just as insane. It really is. sounds like a joke. No. It is exactly the argument they're making in front of the Supreme Court.

How many of our kids have said, I want to be an astronaut, I want to be, you know, I want to be whatever. And then later in life, they're like, yeah, I said what? No. I mean, it's so insane. But I think we just voted for a cure. So let's see how that goes. When you were little, you've been braced, you on have braced,

of the affairs in the course of recreat, always in trying to negotiate, to change the card of hockey, the bonhom, these bracelets, even of the collation. You know that

each thing has a value, well, before having to have been the things have not really changed. Negoti T-D

you can't to renewing with your instinct of negotiation. With, without operation gratuit, no amount of

minimum and nocurements money, you're made for negotier, and the app Nogsitititit TD is

made to you help you need to now.