The Glenn Beck Program - Best of the Program | Guests: Sen. Mike Lee & Brendan Carr | 10/21/24

Episode Date: October 21, 2024

Pat Gray joins Glenn and Stu to discuss Kamala's horrible response to the heckler saying "Jesus is Lord" and President Trump's Reagan-esque campaign. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) joins to discuss the absurd notion that real conservatives should vote for Kamala. FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr is calling for an investigation of CBS over its selective editing of Kamala's "60 Minutes" interview, and he joins to lay out what happens next. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We'll say, in the phone, all the people can be a guy of the finance. Not to have a gross monger in gold, or to be a pro of the crypto. Not even, no, no more.

In any case, you have always done for and the apply negotiat-tit-tit-titre t-d you add to to renouet with your instinct of negotiation.

With the support 24-hour-pard-hour- any amount of minimum, and free-mensue. You're made for negotiate, and the apply-tigocit-tit-tid

and fete to you aid Dead. Discharge it right now. Shocking, shocking news. This whole Ronald McDonald, Donald Trump thing has been a scam from the get-go. No. Yes, on today's podcast, prove it. Reve-reve-ed McDonald's Gate.

All on today's podcast is so much more. Let me tell you about relief factor. If you are living in frequent and debilitating pain, let me please ask you just to try something. We need every single person to be feeling their best. It's why I'm losing weight. I'm trying to get into shape. I'm getting my pain under control.

I'm doing everything I can because we need each other. Anybody who is awake today, we need you in the fight. So please, just try relief factor. It's a daily supplement that helps your body fight pain by fighting inflammation, which is a source of most of the pain in our bodies and a lot of our disease. So instead of treating the disease, treat the inflammation that leads to the disease. It's 100% drug-free. It's nature's way to get rid of the pain and make yourself healthier.

70% of the people who order it go on to order it month after month because it works for them. Either that or they're, I don't know. So rich, they just don't even notice what they're doing. It's relief factor. Three-week quick start. It's 1995. That's less than a dollar a day. Visit relieffactor.com or call 800 the number four relief. 800 the number four relief. Relieffactor.com. You're listening to the best of the blue.

So Donald Trump working at McDonald's, which we have revealed, Packray joins us now, was just, and I hate to break it to you, according to the left, just a, quote, publicity stunt. Scam. He did not actually work at the McDonald's. I didn't believe it either. I didn't believe it either. Are you saying he didn't go through the regular interview process or a manager?

That's what we're saying. No, you're not. Seriously, I didn't buy it either initially. What about his next shift? When is that? He doesn't have one. He doesn't even have one. He doesn't have another shift schedule.

No. What about like this weekend? No. Like a late night thing? No. No. No. And he started.

right at the top special favors. He started right at the top, Pat, at the drive-thru. That's something you have to work a long time for. You'll just step out there to the drive-thru on day one. They just gave it to him on a silver platter. And they've also exposed the drivers in the car. They were all checked. They were all.

Not by secret service, I hope. And selected by the campaign. Oh, no. Yes. They weren't just normal customers going up there at that time. That's what I thought. I thought this was a very popular McDonald's because I saw the crowds. Thousands of people lined up.

I thought, wow, this is, I mean, it's popular in this part of Pennsylvania. But no. No. No. It's lies, Pat. Oh, lies. How do you believe? How can you believe a word?

Amen, brother. Not one word can you believe. Amen. Wow. Amen. Well, I don't know. Kamala Harris, when, you know, she said to that person who said, Jesus is Lord, you're in the wrong rally.

I believe that. Yeah. I was true. That I did believe. That was true. I believe that. What I didn't believe was when she said, you should be at the smaller one down the road because that one was three and a half times as large as hers. Yeah.

So I didn't believe that part. Right. It's, you know, it's bad. It's bad. It is bad. Bad. It is bad. So have you noticed that Donald Trump is, like, channeling Ronald Reagan right now?

Yes. He's very optimistic. He's very different. Yeah. He has been. This, this, this, the shooting thing changed him. Yeah, I think it did. It did.

How could it not? Yeah, true. Really, you take a bullet on stage. You have that moment where you stand up and you say fight, fight, fight, and all the, everything that went along with that, like, how could you not change? At least at some level. Well, I, I don't know if I told this on the air, but I was with him last weekend or weekend before last, whatever. And I was watching him thinking. how much he has changed.

And, you know, you don't go through that without some introspection, you know, without going, you know, am I willing to die for this? Yeah. And I really feel he is serving something bigger. And I think it's the American people. I think it's you, you know? He gets up every day and he is, he's the, what he's, serving that's bigger than him is you.

Yeah. And I don't know that he's a super before this, that he was a super religious guy. I will tell you, but I think he's more so now. Yeah, I will tell you, I've heard him talk about God in ways that's, you know, not, you know, not, what is it? Two Peters. No, yeah. Two Corinthians. Yeah.

Two Corinthians. walking into a bar. Did he give a religious speech about how much he hates Christmas? No, he didn't. No, can we play that again? Because, too, you gotta remember. It's not Donald Trump that said that. Oh, who wasn't?

And when we all sing happy tunes and sing Merry Christmas and wish each other Merry Christmas, these children are not going to have a Merry Christmas. How dare we speak Merry Christmas? Yeah. How dare we? Yes, I'm going to the polls right now for Kamala. Right?

I'm poised off. She's pissed off about Christmas. She despises it. That's not all. That's not all. Cut 12, please. Should never again have the privilege of standing behind the seal of the United States. How do they think that's going to work? Never again.

It's remarkable. Never again. Never again. What was that quote that Hillary said? I am tired of telling people that I'm tired. What different? does it make? No, she said,

she said, I'm sick and tired of people saying, you're not patriotic. If you question your government, which is hilarious these days. The same party who's like, oh, you,

how dare, it's not anti-American to question a war? Gee, what happened to that whole philosophy on the left? That's changed quite a bit. But yeah, no,

it's like, you just think they would, she would have that one moment, where she went off off the cuff. It was like, you can't stand. She never stand behind us. Hey, a lot of president. That would happen one time and everyone would go to her.

Go, Kamala, good God, never again. Don't, whatever you do. Don't hit that note, whatever that note is. Don't do it. No, that's the strategy now, though. Yeah. She really kind of. That wasn't a one-off?

No. No. You're kidding me. She didn't just say that once. I guess. Yeah. Yeah. Best yours each time.

It's unbelievable. Who would want that? Wow. Reverse course if you're Kamala. If you're the campaign, no, no, no. I mean, for me, for my purposes, continue to do exactly that.

But if you're in that campaign, aren't you like Kamala, literally anything else? I'd rather have her cackle. I'd rather have her cackle for 20 minutes on stage. But she did. She did. The Brett Baer interview with that attitude the whole time.

Yep. The whole time. This is again, I think, a strategy change. You know, the whole attitude of, I'm speaking now. I'm speaking now is so annoying. Sarah, is it just guys that feel that way? I can't stand her voice. She's worse than Hillary for me.

Yeah, okay. I think that's very common. Yeah. I think that is very common. Especially like there's something about her trying to yell forcefully that is so irritating. But real. But real. I think that's her.

I think it is too. I think it's much closer to her than the joy. Like, I'm going on Oprah and here's your car. Yeah, what happened to the joy? Right. The joy didn't last very long, did it? It's just dead? Because the people who are currently institutionalized that worked in her office for a year.

Yeah. They left and they're rocking back and forth going, is that comma? Is she coming? She's coming around the corner. She's got him around the corner. And isn't it like dozens? of people that quit her employee?

Oh yeah. Everybody but too. Everyone but two. Yeah. And that was okay to talk about before she had the nomination. Yeah, now those people are been snuffed out. Now the mainstream media won't even discuss their own articles. By the way. Printed about it.

Did you hear that Donald Trump said he's going to release the names in the Epstein diary? I did hear him say something about that. Love that. You think he'll do it? How does he have it? Well, he doesn't, but the government does. Oh, okay. Yeah. The FBI has it. You know, so it's in safe hands. Yeah.

You don't seem to believe that. No. It would be terrible if there was a fire in that room. Wouldn't be terrible? Yeah. Oh, we lost it. Dang it. January 18th or 19th.

You know. Wow, that would be. Jeez. That would be awful. Yeah. That would be a real, real sad moment. I think he'll do it. I think he'll do it.

Don't you? I mean, I think the guy is like, this is so far gone. It's got to be burned down. you got to take all the bad guys, burn it out. So you think he will release the Epstein names? Yeah. Yeah.

I mean, he talked about trying to release some of the JFK stuff and got blocked on some of it. Well, he blocked. He blocked it. He got, yeah, there were like a couple of big things that he left in or, you know, kept in the vault. Okay. And he said, if you would have seen them, you would have done the same thing. I don't think so I don't think so

but now not only do you have the Epstein files you got the Diddy files too that may be pretty telling and pretty incriminating for a lot of people Oh Yeah I think I think definitely Maybe they got some information on some people Who weren't at first

Usher saying anything about who they support for president And now all of a sudden Now all of a sudden they're all over the Kamala Harris campaign. Oh, really? Yeah. Well, he was asked, I think, on the view, or was he asked about it? And he didn't want to say. And he just, he just said, yeah, I'm not, I'm not disclosing that. Well, now he's come out and endorsed her at a rally. What are you implying? I'm implying that he's on the ditty list. Yeah, that would be the implication there. Apparently, I talked to somebody over the weekend. But I don't know that for a fact. Right. No, you don't know.

You're a guest to me. Yeah. You know, I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't don't know much about the ditty parties either. The only thing I know about them is there ain't no party like a ditty party. And I learned that from, of course, LeBron James, who said that exact thing. There ain't no party like a ditty party. Quote, LeBron James. Just wanted to point that out in case anyone was concerned about where LeBron stood on the issue. Well, at least he wasn't lying. That does seem like there's a lot of parties like that. Maybe there are, though. Maybe that's part of our problem. There are too many parties like ditty parties. So I'm, I'm out of time. And I want to play some of these a little later on the program. But let me just play one thing. Here's Elon Musk over the

weekend doing rallies himself and taking questions from the audience. The most awkward guy ever, you know, he's, you know, Asperger's. And so he's taking questions from the audience. And he's asked about, you know, voting in California. Listen to this. Cut A friend of mine went to vote in Palo Alto in California because he was like, is this real or not? And he, like, tried to show his ID, and it was like presenting a cross to a vampire. Like, they're like, no, no, put the idea away. You know, like, they literally, they weren't allowed to look at his ID, even if he wanted to show it to them. That is the extent of the madness. This is a real thing in California right now. And if the dams were nationally, they'll do it nationwide. Obviously, that's what's

going to happen. And there will be no democracy. It's amazing how clear-eyed some people are. And now he is, I mean, he's, as he said this weekend, in fact, where is that? Here, cut six. Listen to this. Hopefully, I don't get shot. I was just on the cover of some big, like I think it's the biggest magazine in Germany called Der Spiegel. I was just like their time magazine or something. I'm saying that I'm enemy number two.

You know? Yeah. I'm like enemy number two of what? Democracy? I mean, I'm pro-democracy. Well, I'm literally trying to do is uphold the Constitution and ensure we have a free and fair election. I'm definitely upgrading my security.

You know, it's like... So, I guess I've had to cancel that open co-operate. I'm just kidding. All right. Thank you, Pat, for stopping by. Let me talk to you a little bit about Lear Capital. Lear Capital knows that we are in dire straits right now. In just, I think, it's next week,

Bricks is meeting. That is, you know, India and Brazil and Russia, all of the people who are now out of the American alignment. And they know that the American dollar is in real trouble, that we could kill it. But they wouldn't mind killing it and giving us a hand at killing it. What they're doing is they're going to be talking next week about forming a gold-based currency. When that happens, and we have any more jolt to our system, people will flee to that safety of gold from the brick countries. So how do you protect yourself

from this insanity? Well, there is one thing that has been used since the beginning of time, since the beginning of money, and that is gold or silver. Now, Lear Capital can help you buy your first or your next group of gold or silver. They have $3 billion in trusted transactions, thousands of five-star reviews, and a 24-hour risk-free purchase guarantee. So if you're looking for a balance in, you know, maybe your retirement or your 401K, please don't have that all in U.S. currency denominations. Please make sure that you think maybe 10% of what you have and what you have saved for the future in gold or silver. Collier Capital right now.

They're also going to give you $250 towards your purchase so you can call them at $800957 gold. Please do this now, $800957 gold. Now back to the podcast. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. Senator Mike Lee, how are you, sir? John Fred, it's good to be with you. Thank you. You know what?

I saw Jeff Flake's tweet and then your epic response to it over the weekend. And I just, if I may, I just want to quote it here. Let me just pull it up on X. It was so great. He, come on, open. Okay. He writes, I'm voting for Kamala Harris, not in spite. of being conservative, but because I am a conservative.

Conservatives believe in the rule of law. Wow. That, just that says a lot. It does. It does. And I've known Jeff for a long time, and he's a friend. But I could not disagree more with this assertion. Look, if you don't want to vote for Donald Trump, it's your right to vote for whomever you want. But for somebody who actually vote for Kamala Harris, and to say that, they must vote for Kamala Harris because they're a conservative.

I don't know how one justifies that. Now, maybe what I've written will invite a response, but I identified a number of things that Kamala Harris wants to do, like entirely gut the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Okay, hang on just a second. Hang on. Say that again and explain it because I think people will roll their eyes when you say, oh, she wants to gut the First Amendment and, you know, all the religious freedom. they'll roll their eyes because they don't know.

Right. All right. So, Carla, as a senator, she spent four years in the Senate. She and I were colleagues in the Senate. She was there for four years, one of her top legislative priorities as a U.S. Senator, focused on a bill called the Do No Harm Act. Google it, if you're curious. The Do No Harm Act, ironically named like some of the other Democratic showpieces,

because it would do immense harm. What the Do No Harm Act would do is essentially say that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act does not apply, cannot offer any protection to the free exercise of religion. If somebody experiences what they call dignitary harm, if they experience harm, including dignitary harm, meaning you have insulted my dignity as a person by doing X, Y, or Z. So let's say if you go to a, I don't know, like the religious hospital, for example, and you want a late abortion or you want a sex change operation or something like that. And that religious hospital says, sorry, it conflicts with our religious beliefs and policies

to perform that procedure. We're not going to do it. And then that person sued to try to enforce them. This seems to be a favorite trick of the left. The Religious Free and Restoration Act would do you no good there and would disappear because Kamala would have neutered it. Look, there is very little left. of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act if her bill passes. So if you, let's say,

let's say you are a church, you don't, you know, you have only male priests and you don't marry gay people. Would you be forced to marry gay people and would you be forced to have female priests? Okay, this is a question. I'm glad you're raising this, because the left loves to point to this. They love to point to Barack Obama's promise when Obergefell was decided, look, I'm not going to force any of your clergy to perform gay weddings. They don't want to perform. They love to say, we're not going to do that.

We couldn't get away with that anyway. Well, look, maybe that's true. That's usually not where they're going to go anyway. It's actually going to go in the direction of religious institutions and religious individuals. for not complying with what it is that they want. So it might not be a court order saying, you clergyman, X, Y, or C must perform this ordinance. It's more like, yeah, if you want the ability

to participate in this government program, if you want to maintain your tax exempt status for that matter, you cannot do certain things that we regard as discriminatory. Therefore, comply or be punished. That's usually how it manifests itself. And Kamala Harris would be just fine with that. How do we know that? Well, because she wrote a bill that would do that. Okay, so you start with Jeff Flake and say, Kamala wants to gut your religious freedom. That's not conservative, nor is it okay.

Correct. Then you go on. Yeah, I go on. Say she likes price controls. That's not conservative. That's what Marxists do. Price controls don't work. Price controls buy into the Marxist theory of economics, which doesn't work. and it's certainly not conservative. I can point out that she's got an unhealthy preoccupation with abortion, not conservative. She wants to imprison her political enemies, as she's been just fine with this lawfare campaign against Trump, not conservative. She's been hiding Biden's dementia for nearly four years, not conservative, wants to raise taxes, not conservative. She's all about the Green New Deal.

She was its principal advocate in the Senate, Green New Deal, not conservative. she wants to pack the Supreme Court, same description, she tells Christians that her rallies, you're at the wrong rally, that's not conservative. I go on, there are about 20 of these, I point out. I cannot identify a single thing that she does that can be reconciled with conservatism, much less compel a conservative to vote for.

I just want to go on. Kamala wants to shut down X for not suppressing conservative content. Kamala led in 10 million illegal aliens, also let in enough fentanyl to kill hundreds of thousands of Americans while enriching international drug cartel to the tunes of tens of billions of dollars a year. Kamala thinks it's a good idea to use taxpayer money to pay for sex change operations for prisoners. Kamala believes it's okay for elected federal bureaucrats to make 100,000 pages of new law every year. Kamala wants to tax unrealized capital gains.

Kamala wants to ban fracking. Kamala wants to give free health care to illegal aliens. She wants to force women to compete against biological men in sports rather than a tortured reading of Title IX. Kamala actively encourages lawless, violent protest in 2020, pledging to give money to rioters to pay for their bail. Kamala said she wants to decriminalize immigration offenses. Kamala believes there should be no restriction on abortion up until the moment of birth. Kamala backed tyrannical policies punishing Americans for not getting the COVID vaccine, even if they had legitimate medical or religious reasons to avoid it.

I can't identify a single conservative reason to vote for Kamala Harris, not even one. I have to tell you, you look at that list. I mean, Mike, how does somebody, how does a religious person not just see the Democratic convention and the free abortion vans that they had parked outside and say, oh, no, this is cool to attend this. I mean, you'd never go to a concert if they had free abortion vans out. You would just go, this is kind of evil. Would you?

No. Democratic Party was treating abortion as if it were a sacrament. As a set were just some holy rite if they had to participate in. They had to make it available that week, of course. Look, you don't do that. And you certainly don't vote for that candidate and call it conservative. So look, I implore it all within the sound of my voice. If you've got issues with Trump, I understand that.

But for heaven's sake, look at what we're looking at the other end of this. Look at Kamala Harris. And do not tell me that you're. your conservatism compels you to vote for Kamala Harris, because on no planet, can that be true? It just isn't. Mike, let me switch topics. Who do we really need to pay attention to in the Senate races? Who are the ones that you're like, I got to have, I got to have them.

Please, please vote for this person. Well, look, obviously, let's start with a couple of incumbents. Ted Cruz and Rick scout are both up for the election this year. They're both in tight races in Texas and in Florida. Is Rick getting any help from Turtle Face? Well, if you're asking whether he's getting any help from the Mitch McConnell run Senate leadership fund, I heard he was not and neither was fed. Unbelievable.

Neither did I when I was in a tight race in 2022 beyond some advice. But I didn't get it done. And my understanding is that neither Ted nor Rick have either. Yeah, no, Ted hasn't for sure, but I haven't talked to Rick about it. Yeah, yeah. Then let's move on to the other races involving potential pickups. So we've got a significant opportunity. Look, we're going to win West Virginia.

Jim Justice will win there. That's good. I think we've got a decent shot at winning in Montana. Tim Sheehee is coming very close to John Tester. and I think he's got a really good shot of beating him. Bernie Moreno in Ohio. I just got back from Ohio where I was campaigning with Bernie Marino. He's doing really well.

But he needs every little bit of a push that he possibly can. Those guys are in a very good position. And we jumped down a tier of people who are not necessarily right on the verge of victory and could close the deal, but still could get there. you've got Dave McCormick in Pennsylvania, Eric Hubby in Wisconsin, Kerry Lake in Arizona, and Sam Brown in Nevada.

Those are probably the next most likely to win. I think we were in a good position. I think we could easily get the Senate majority. That would be a dream come true. The Nebraska thing, they're doing in Nebraska exactly what they tried to do to you. Yes. Oh, thank you for reminded of Nebraska.

I neglected to mention Nebraska. So my friend and colleague, Deb Fisher, base is a challenger, somewhat reminiscent of the guy who ran against me. She's facing a guy named Osborne. It was running against Deb Fisher as an independent, but he's actually pushing leftist policies and getting away a lot with just saying, well, I'm an independent, so I'm different than everybody else for me. He's got socialist.

So Nebraska, show up and help Deb Fisher. He actually has social. working for him. I mean, from Democratic Socialist, you know, organizations. I mean, it's just nuts what these people are trying to get away with. And I don't know if you heard this, but Bernie Sanders over the weekend, Bernie Sanders came out and said, look, you know, Kamala flip-flopping on major issues. Her goal is just to defeat Trump.

That's what she's doing. wait, wait, why? So he's admitting that she hasn't changed on anything. Are we that stupid, Mike? Well, we're not, but they think we are, and that's yet another reason why no person who has any sympathies toward conservatism should ever vote for Kamala Harris.

But they really are that transactional minded. And you saw John Pester recently, the Democratic Senator from Montana, was being interviewed and why he wasn't going to Kamala rallies. And he said, because I'm up for re-election. So it's just very transactionally minded, very open about saying, well, yeah, I can't act like the liberal that I am because I've got an election that I've got to face. So that's not, that's not cool.

Look, the Democrats do think we're dumb. They do think that they can rest. the fact that we've all been marinating in Marxist indoctrination for our entire lives because, well, we have, is primary education, secondary education, higher education, news media, and entertainment media have all been under the control of leftists for pretty much all of our lives. Yeah. We've been taught the language of politics in the terminology used only by the left.

Mike Lee, thank you so much. appreciate it. Godspeed. Thank you very much. Good to talk to you. Good to talk to you. Mike Lee from the great state of Utah. You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program. The commissioner, Brennan Carr. How are you, sir? I'm doing great. Good to be with you, Glenn. Yeah, great to have you on.

So can you explain what the FCC's role is on something like CBS News and their quote unquote license? Because I don't believe they have one. Yeah, that's generally right. I mean, one of the things that we've seen recently, as you noted, is there was a complaint filed at the FCC regarding CBS's coverage. It was a complaint filed under something called a news distortion rule. And this is a rule that's on the books. It's been on the books for over 50 years. But it's really something that in, you know, one case out of a million, is there any legitimacy to a claim? Most of the time, we get people that bring news distortion complaints, but it's really about, you know, editorials. decisions they disagree with, you know, First Amendment protected positions of journalists, you know, the mind run of cases are just complaints about people not liking the news and they're sort of dismissed out of hand. Where it's a little bit different sometimes is when you bring forward some extrinsic evidence that an outlet intentionally did something that was just, you know, really inaccurate. So for instance, there's been cases where actually a news program, you know,

put explosives on a car and made it explode and claim that it was a problem with the car. But there's also been other cases, for instance, where, yeah, where, so again, we're talking about stuff that's like, you know, pretty far out there because we don't want to get into, like, authenticating news or becoming a ministry of truth. But the doctrine does have some application. Another case was where an outlet took an answer that someone gave as yes to a question, and they replaced it with them saying no to a different question. So we're talking about really high bar, really egregious stuff that requires evidence. In this particular case, I don't think this should be a federal case. I think, you know, Catherine Harage used to work at CBS, that in her view,

it just makes journalistic sense to release the full transcript. And I agree with Catherine Herod. There's plenty of precedent for CBS to do that. In fact, Catherine Herod did a, I believe, a Trump interview back in 2020, and they ended up releasing the full uninterested. transcript. And so, in my view, you know, that's the best way forward here. Release the transcript and there's no reason to even have this before the FCC at that point. So I agree with you. There's no federal case here. That's why I suggested to the audience that they write their local CBS affiliate and say, you know, you're doing a great disservice to our local community. When we can't trust the news, you're getting from CBS. Can you please?

call CBS News and ask them so our local community here knows what's true and what's not, what to believe or not to believe. I suggested going to the local affiliates to put pressure on them to put pressure on, because you do have, I mean, they have inspections for their license. Yeah, that's actually part of the news distortion policy is we say, look, as a first step as an initial matter, we encourage people that have a dispute with the broadcast to go to the actual broadcast or the licensee and see if they can sort of get the concerns addressed without the federal government getting involved. Again, as this particular complaint, I haven't reached a view on the merits, but in terms of whether it's sort of frivolous on its face, I don't think anybody can reach

that conclusion either. But again, that's why I just think the best way forward here is simply to release it. Now, maybe CBS has a position, it's, you know, violates our first member rights to do that, or whatever. Well, they've done it several times before. Right, right. And you have an exclusive interview with somebody who doesn't do interviews at that time, and you've got 40 minutes. I know they've done this before, too.

See the entire interview at CBS.com. You know what I mean? They've released the transcripts when asked, and they also release full interviews, you know, if they have to cut them down and it's a big interview. It doesn't make any even business sense why they wouldn't release the full interview. Yeah, again, I go with, you know, Catherine Harage, who worked at CBS. She put out a post, I think, this morning where she said releasing the full unedited transcript is consistent with journalistic transparency.

And it stands behind the integrity of the entire Kamala Harris edit, not just the clips under scrutiny. I think that's, you know, the best way forward. I think, you know, CBS should just release the transcript. Can I switch topics here with you? Elon Musk was on the campaign trail, and he was talking about the loss of freedom of speech and, you know, the First Amendment going awry if the election goes, you know, towards Kamala Harris. Can you tell me, because I just, I could hear people's eyes roll when you say things like that because people just don't think that could ever happen here. What are the dangers, and you know, I don't ask you necessarily to pick aside, but what are the actual dangers that you see on the horizon for freedom of speech? Yeah, to point, putting aside, you know, this particular election, which I have to under the hatchack, I think you can look at the ghost of Christmas future in Europe and in Brazil, right? We just saw an instance where the Lula administration in Brazil is engaging in a full scale, crackdown on free speech. You had the government of Brazil sending secret orders to social media

companies, including Facebook and X, demanding that they censor the posts of their political opponents. We only know about this because X objected, and Facebook did not. So think about this for a second. At the very moment that Mark Zuckerberg was writing a Maya Kopa letter to our Congress saying, We're so sorry that we secretly censored in the past. We're not going to do it. At that exact same moment, his company was knuckling under in Brazil to secret orders to censor core political speech. So the idea that the First Amendment is there and that's been enshrined forever is not something that you can take for granted. Because globally right now, again, whether it's Europe or Brazil, there is a strong movement towards censorship that doesn't necessarily, you know,

know, stop short of our shores if we're not careful. Brendan, I thank you, as always, for everything you're doing. It must be tough being in the minority and being a conservative that is more constitutional. At least that's the policies that I hear from you are the constitutional things. Just keep it fair, keep it balanced, keep it, you know, with the law and the Constitution. And I thank you for your fight. Yeah, thanks so much. Look forward and always always glad to talk to you. But again, I mean, to this point of censorship, we're still seeing it right now where there's been a lot of attention recently on the fact that Vice President Harris has been leading this $42 billion internet infrastructure program for over a thousand days and hasn't connected even a single person. While there was a quote unquote fact check run on that over the weekend, and as a result, Facebook is now censoring posts that simply point out that fact. I get that it's inconvenient. but it's a truthful post.

And I think it's important that people hear the information that both Facebook and Harris officials don't want them to know right now. Thank you so much, friend. I appreciate it. Bien to aboard, Viarai. Embarked and profited. Embarked and relax. Ciroat, bookine, oh, that also.

And profited. Via Rae, the voice that we love that we love.