The Glenn Beck Program - Best of The Program | Guests: Sen. Mike Lee & David Steinberg | 9/28/20

Episode Date: September 28, 2020

The New York Times’ newest “bombshell” report shows that Trump used legal loopholes to lower his taxes. Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, and the Democrats’ past extreme tactics could lead to her confirmation. CNN’s Wolf Blitzer forced Sen. Richard Blumenthal to admit that Barrett’s confirmation wouldn’t exactly be illegal. Sen. Mike Lee describes why Barrett is a “fantastic” pick and how Democrats may attack her and delay the vote. Project Veritas uncovered major voting fraud in Ilhan Omar’s district, and investigative reporter David Steinberg breaks it down. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hello, America. Welcome to it. Great to have you along on this Monday. We have a great podcast for you. Steve Dase and Stu kind of have a nerd fight about polls. Not as exciting as I wanted. I really wanted a little full flag. Kind of nerd out. But they did. They did a little bit. Sorry to disappoint. Yeah. But we talk about the polls. What is it going to take for Trump to win? We talk about the election fraud that Elon Omar appears to be a part of now that was released over the weekend. We also have a lot of coverage on Amy Coney Barrett. Why are we waiting until the middle of October? Isn't that cutting it a little close? Mike Lee chimed in on that.

All of this and so much more on today's podcast. I've got an announcement to make. I was all for voting for Donald Trump. I was on the bandwagon. It was on the bandwagon. Then the New York Times came out with this just absolutely can't believe it is true story about his taxes. My God. That he took advantage of tax code loopholes?

Not only that, but he hit it while he was admitting that during the last debate. Well, no, he didn't. He actually admitted that he took advantage of the tax. Yeah, no, but not, he didn't, he didn't go that far. He just said, I'd be stupid if I didn't. But in 2016, when he said he paid almost no taxes, this confirms that. Right. It does. It does. This is not going to change anybody's mind. There's, you notice, there's nothing illegal. There's nothing illegal. They're not charging him with anything illegal. No, but he actually took advantage of tax loopholes.

The bastard. Is there anybody within the sound of my voice that if it was legal, you're not going to jail? You had the attorney to do it and you were paying zero or $740 a year in taxes? Anyone within the sound of my voice? A big enough liar to call me and go, I wouldn't do that. I would send a check to the government just to help. And a little bit extra. And a little extra.

Give it to somebody who needs to. Yeah. You know, it would be your patriotic duty. honestly, it's your patriotic duty to pay taxes when they're not pissing all of your tax money away. But when they're pissing your money away, when they're a horrible, bad steward to your money, I can guarantee you that the money I give in tithing and charity, that money goes further than the, what, 50% that they take from me. You know what I mean?

Yeah. By far, by far. And there's stuff in there that, like, he might have to pay fines for in theory or, that he could get in quote unquote trouble for, but this is all. Trouble as in fines. Yeah, fines, right? He's been in a long-term battle over about $70 million that he got in a return, which doesn't seem exactly like he followed the rules on it.

But the bottom line is exactly, exactly, zero minds are changed by it. Exactly. But can you count all of those minds? Yes, zero. No, not one person would change. In fact, I found myself. and I've never found myself in this position. I found myself this morning listening to the news again

the way it was reported by the New York Times, and I was cheering. I was cheering. Good for him. Damn right, zero. How do I get those attorneys? I know, geez. And I don't know what their,

what the point of this is. I mean, the only thing about it is, of course, how did they get this? How did they get 20 years of his tax returns? Well, they don't want to say that. They can't. They can't even show us the documents. No, they can, they have to, they have to preserve their one, their one anonymous source.

And I'd like to show you the paperwork, but I can't. You know what else is great? Not a word about the fact that he accepts no income as president. That he doesn't take a dime from the government. He doesn't get any of the $400,000 in salary. I mean, wouldn't that be a good place to mention Owen? By the way, he doesn't take a salary. by the, you know, for president of the United States.

Here's the thing that everybody should be talking about. Here's a guy who has a global hotel chain, okay? And it pretty much verifies what we all know. It's successful at times and really not successful in times. You know what I mean? So we all know that. So there's no surprise there. Here's the thing that everybody should be asking about.

Joe Biden's $3 million tax. returns. Yeah, where's that money coming from? He's a guy who is, is, you know, living on a government salary. Now, I know when you were vice president, you wrote a book, etc.,

but how is everybody in his family so, so rich? I mean, that's a middle class Joe. Three million dollars? Lunch bucket. Wow. That's a lunch bucket. It is laughable.

It is laughable. And it's funny, too, to think back. and all the things that we begged the media to dig into during the Obama era that they never did. We never even like his college transcripts, like basic crap that wouldn't have made a big difference at all. We never got. There were all those years. They were able to get 20 years of Donald Trump's tax returns in something that is not illegal for the New York Times to do. But whoever gave it to them certainly committed a crime.

Right. That's why, that's why, well, we can't reveal our source. Because it's a criminal. Right. Because the person who gave it. it to you just committed a crime. Don't they think it was Mary Trump? Isn't that what they suspect?

Is that what they think? I think so. Yeah. No, serious. Seriously? I think seriously. I don't know. I can't remember.

I read an article though that they suspected strongly that it might have been married. Well, I have news for you. I mean, you say how would she do that? She's a judge. You don't think that there's people that she could call because it came from that court case. No, not the sister. The niece.

Yeah. The one that wrote the book. Yeah. That doesn't make sense. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, unless they might share the same accountant to me. Right. But still, there would have to be somebody who did something very wrong here.

Again, just because he's the president of the United States does not mean he does not have the right to privacy. So let me ask you, uh, Amy Coney Barrett. You know who's going to be responsible for her becoming Supreme Court? I really think in the end. Uh, I've got a couple names. Yeah. One would be Harry Reid. I was going to say Chuck, Chuck, Chuck Schumer.

Chuck Schumer. Chuck Schumer. Nancy Pelosi. I was going to Diane Feinstein, I would say, is the number one. Diane Stein. These, they did everything. They are the reason why you don't have a 60-person vote. Yep, Harry Reid.

That's gone. That's gone. Right. Started that ball rolling. I mean, they did everything that just the Kavanaugh turned enough people that they said, this is not right. Kamala Harris was big on that one. Oh, big.

Big. And, and the, the one specific question about the dogma, lives loudly within you came from Diane Feinstein, which is like the kind of the big slogan of the, of the Amy Coney Barrett nomination. And I love this. The dogma lives loudly. So in other words, you have a problem that I believe in the things I profess to believe. That's that's the dogma. So, so Nancy is fine because she's not Catholic.

The Pope is coming out and like every 10 minutes going, hey, stop with abortion. You know, but the dogma doesn't live loudly. It doesn't even live in her neighborhood. The dog catcher caught the dogma. What's this about dogs? By the way, I should point out, we have the notorious ACB shirt up now on stewdoesmerch.com or really shop. Blasemedia.

Studeasmerch.com will get you to the whole store, but the notorious ACB. I feel like I got to have that. I love it. That's one you need. Yeah. Can you get those overnighted for all of us? Uh, probably. I can at least detect us. Because we have the, uh, we have the, uh, we have the debate tomorrow. We're going to do, uh, what, what is the promo code?

Uh, Glenn's debate. Hold on. Let me just, don't guess that. Anyway, yeah. So, so, so sign up for the blaze because tomorrow we're doing our, our, our, uh, mystery theater 3,000 thing, right? Yeah. Yeah. Well, Stu's starting his show at like eight o'clock. So he'll do his show. Then we go in at nine o'clock into just it. We're really second screen. We're going to be saying all the things that you want to say. We're also going to be doing some live fact checking. But we're not going to try not to interrupt, except when we cheer or have really something very sarcastic to say. That's happening tomorrow. And then at 10 o'clock, and this will be on YouTube and the blaze and everything else, we're going to give you our rundown and our analysis of the debate. Because quite honestly, I don't care what anybody says anymore. Do you? No, I don't care what any of these people on.

TV say anymore. Oh, in fact, I can't listen to it. I can't either. That's the fact. Yeah, I just can't listen to it. So we're going to be the group that you can listen to. So tomorrow after the debate, make sure you go to Blaze TV or the Blaze TV YouTube channel and listen to our recap of the debate. And it's blazztivet.com slash Glenn.

The code is Glenn Debates. Did you actually see the Wolf Blitzer? Save 20% by the way. Interview Richard Blumenthal over the weekend. Oh, gosh. No. Once in a while, every once in a while Wolf will do something, I don't know, journalistic. And it blew me away.

I don't believe that. That's a pretty strong word in today. It is. It is. But he called him out. Because here it is, real quick. What are the Republicans doing that is illegal or illegitimate? Because the Constitution says the president has to nominate Supreme Court justices.

The Senate has to advise and consent and confirm. So what is illegal about? what the president and the Republicans are doing. You say it's illegitimate. It is illegitimate. It's illegitimate because... Where does it say, Senator, where does it say that's illegitimate

in the U.S. Constitution or in the law? Where does it say that what they're doing the Republicans is illegal? Illegal. It may be not under the Constitution. Illegal. It's legal. It may be not.

And unwritten rules of the Senate is illegitimate. the unwritten rules. You agree that there's nothing illegal or totally illegitimate as to what they're doing. Third time. It may not violate the letter of the Constitution. Right. The letter.

Or even the whole words or the spirit of the entire document. You could take one of those needles that they're jamming into Joe Biden's chest tomorrow right before he goes on stage. Do that to all the founders. And they would also say, no, no, uh, has nothing to do with the Constitution. Do you remember doing an interview with him? Gosh, it was a long time. Was it Fox or wasn't CNN? I don't even remember.

Someone sent it to me this weekend because they were like, he's doing the same thing. Because you had him on about AIG bonuses or something. It was some story. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. And you were holding his feet of car because he was trying to make this big deal about it. And you're like, what is illegal about this? And he did the same thing. The same thing.

Well, it's not illegal per se. It's ill tempered. Yeah, ill, yes. It's ill. It's, you are the, at the time. you're the attorney general. You should only be only concerned with what's illegal, right? You made that point pretty clearly to him.

That interview was not happy you did. By the way, so you know, all the social justice warriors, relax, Wolf Blitzer had his beard removed with duct tape right after that interview. So he's learned his lesson. He's learned his lesson. Really? Oh, yeah. Wow, that's terrible.

Wait till you see him today. Well, nobody will see him. He might even, by the time you see him, probably have his beard grown back. My guess is Wolf's beard would grow it every day. If you removed it every day, it would grow right back in. His name is Wolf. That's what I mean. It's just there. This is the best of the Glenn Beck

program. The state of Utah. Senator Mike Lee joins us today. Senator, how are you, sir? I'm doing great. Just, you know, eating bill bars. Yeah. One right after the other. Yeah. And blind car shield and all that. Yeah, shut up.

Have you ever had a Bill Pard? Never. You should. I mean, look at you. You're a little pudgy. Yeah, no, in Utah, we're going to speak of or eat little else other than Bill Bar. It's going to be all Bill Bar. All the time.

Good. It's a Bill Bar economy, really. I'm glad to hear it. What are you drunk today? This is the, I mean, this is the Mike Lee I know, but Mike Lee that is usually on the air is very buttoned up and very serious. Yeah, this is what happens when a Mormon has a Diet Coke before 10 a air. All right. So, Mike, congratulations on the nomination. I think this is the person that you really wanted.

Out of all of the lists, is this the person you would have picked? I think she's going to do an amazing job. And I told the president this really was good work on his part. We're going to get her confirmed. So may I ask, why is it going to take until October 12th to start the president? process. Yeah, that's a fair question. I wish we could start it faster than that. I was told by the chairman that that would be the day that we would start.

There were a couple of us who asked whether we could start it a week earlier or even sooner than that. And he pointed out that there's a lot of paperwork that has to be filled up on a nominee, a lot of process that it has to occur behind the jury. She's already filled that out. Yeah, but the FBI's already done that. We were told nonetheless. Uh-huh.

what we were told needs to happen. So look, let me put it this way, if he decides to start the hearing tomorrow, I'm here. I'm ready to go. There's nothing in the Constitution. There's nothing in federal statute. It requires us even to hold a hearing. There's certainly nothing in the Constitution or federal statute requiring us to wait a certain period of time before starting said hearings if we're going to have them at all, which we're going to do. So I think we ought to do it sooner rather than later because the sooner we get that started, the sooner we can get her confirmed. So the...

We need to face down the uncertainty, and we need to resolve the uncertainty so we can get this job done, so they can't pull crap like what they pulled with Brett Kavanaugh. The reason why I say, October 12th, is in the year 2020, that's a lifetime. We could all be speaking some space language by that time. And it pushes the vote to October, what, 29th, Stu? October 29th, that's right away just a few days from the election.

If it's stalled, delayed, anything changes, you could see a vote that doesn't happen until after the election, and then you know, well, I won't put words in your mouth, put words in my mouth. Then the Romney weasels will all scatter and go, well, I don't know. Trump didn't win the election, should he not win? Yeah, let's just say that we'll stipulate for the record that that would be bad if we were to push until after the election. Because it's sort of like crossing the streams on gross busters. Once you do that, all sorts of bad stuff starts to happen. If you wait until after the election, then if we lose the election, either the Senate majority or the White House or heaven forbid both,

then you've got some people doubting whether we should be doing this or not. And so, yeah, this needs to happen sooner or later than later. he needs to get started ASAP. So did you read the op-ed from Bloomberg written by somebody who I think clerked with her for a different judge for a different judge in the Supreme Court? And he said, I disagree with Trump's judicial nominee on almost everything. But I think she's brilliant. And he's a lefty who doesn't agree with, you know,

know, with the way she does things or what she's going to pass his verdict, he said, but she is so smart that you want someone like her on the court to analyze. He said, even though I disagreed with her, he said, I would go to her for the understanding of what these tangled words meant sometimes, because she could just so clearly cut through it and explain it. Yes, it's fantastic. And I think it's one of the many reasons why she needs to be confirmed. why she will be confirmed. I mean, look, this is somebody who has dedicated her life to law and also dedicated her life to raising her seven children.

She's fantastic. And Professor Noah Feldman was exactly right. She needs to be confirmed. So we've got to get the show on the road. So do you have any inkling on what the Democrats are going to try to use again? Because if they use religion or they try another Kavanaugh, it's going to kill them. It's going to kill them during the election. Yes, it is.

And so one would ordinarily think that that means that they won't try that because it would be extraordinarily harmful to them. But it's sort of like those nature videos you watch on the Discovery Channel. When you see the wildebeest approaching the water that they know is going to be infected by that they're really thirsty. Yes. They've got to get to that water and they can't help themselves. That might be what we see here. The last time in Judiciary Committee, when I brought up with some of my colleagues, you know, maybe we shouldn't start questioning a judicial nominee's religious beliefs because there are at least two, arguably three provisions of the Constitution that prohibit us from doing that and because it's evil. Because it's evil. A couple of them piped in. And they honestly said, oh, no, no.

We really think that if a nominee has crazy religious beliefs, we're going to attack them for them. It's on the record. This was in the light of day. So you don't think that they're going to stop because they did something, I think, just as bad. It's not unconstitutional to do this, but they attacked her adoption of her non-white kids. And somehow or another, that's racist. Yeah, apparently so. I didn't know that. And neither did she.

But apparently they are the deciders of such things, and they have made that decision. They've also made the decision, as came out in her last confirmation hearing for the U.S. Court Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, that she was apparently too Catholic, that the dogma lives loudly within her, and that that's somehow bad. So, yeah, I suspect those things will come out, not because it will do them any good, not because it will enable them to defeat her, not because it will help them in this election, but because they can't help it. Do you think things would have been the same? Do you think she would have been nominated and you could be as assured as anyone could be that it will go through if Kavanaugh wouldn't have happened? I think they really pushed their luck on Kavanaugh. I think they threw the Hail Mary pass in the very final seconds of the game and they lost. I do think it's going to be a little bit harder for them to pull this trick this time, especially because, as I pointed out in our Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday,

I went through the list of people they personally attacked and just getting started, just rattling off a few names. You know, there's Brett Kavanaugh, and of course there's Robert Bore. of course there's my former boss, Sam Alito, and then there's Clarence Thomas, all of whom had their character personally attacked to the core on things that turned out to be really untrue and really uncorroborated. And I said, no, I challenge you guys to name me one, name me one Democratic nominee who's ever been treated that way by Republicans. Crickets. This is from a group of people who can't shut up. This from a group of people who spoke for a really, really long time that day about everything else.

They had no response to that because that's not how we roll. And so I think deep in their mind, they realize that what they're doing is wrong, that what they're doing be clowns them, and demeans the process. And so I hope they will find some conscience in there. Talking to Senator Mike Lee, speaking of Democrats be clowning themselves, Great word, by the way. Yeah. They are threatening all sorts of procedural delays, including and up to throwing random impeachments in the process to try to delay this thing so they can get it past the election.

Is it possible that any of that can work? It's possible they can delay it. So I was on the ABC Sunday news show yesterday, and one of my Democratic colleagues, Dick Durbin from Illinois, was opposite me and being. questioned by George Stephanopoulos. And Mr. Stephanophil asked Senator Durbin whether they would be doing that. And Senator Durbin, as I recall, basically said, look, we can delay this by maybe a couple days, but I really don't think we have the procedural wherewithal to just stop it.

I hope that that remains the case. I hope that that's not bluffing and that that's his true, sincere, and correct assessment. have to plan for that because there are procedural tools that they can involve impeachment that can at least make it more difficult for us. So off of the nomination of the Supreme Court here. And one last question, because you will know what this means. You know, when we declare an emergency, people don't understand that that gives all kinds of new power and spending and everything else.

There's a story that came out over the weekend, President Donald Trump slated to announce a measure that designates far-left movement Antifa and the KKK as terrorist organizations. What does that designation mean? Anything? Okay, so it's been a while since I've looked at that designation, but it allows the president to utilize certain assets, certain levers of authority within the government, including a treasury department, to block a month. other things, financial transactions carried out by the organization in question so that we can stop them from engaging in acts of terror. And so this could be a significant move. I certainly think that

in both cases, in the case of the KKK and TIFA, you've seen a whole lot of evidence that terror is their game. So, and I know of no reason why the law as written wouldn't extend to those categories. So it makes sense to me. Okay. Mike Lee, thank you very much. God bless. Hey, thank you very much. You bet.

Bye-bye. Back to your Diet Coke. Dijer is here. He has had information on Ilanamar, as I understand it, hasn't been able to share it because he didn't have the smoking gun. He had bullets. And now may be willing to uncover some of those things that he had found on ballot harvesting fraud.

It's legal to ballot harvest. I don't know why in Minnesota, but the fraud that goes along with it was exposed by Project Veritas this weekend. Welcome, David. Glenn, thanks for having me again. Absolutely. So let me play the audio here from Project Veritas

so people know what the new information is. Listen. Who is the one filling out the absentee ballots? Yeah, we didn't look at it out. People who work for the people who work with, like Ilhan Omar and other candidates work for them. Ilhan has a handful of people that work for her. They came to us to our apartments. And they tell us that this year you're going to vote for Ilhan.

And they tell us that this year you're going to vote for Ilhan. You don't go to have been We'll have taken to us where we're going to put in our We don't go know where you stay for We will go out for you. You'll have a ballot. When it comes, you will come and get it. You just know where you stay here.

They fill out for us. They then fill out the ballot. They sign the ballot for us. They do it, but by themselves. And then they... Where do they pay the money? The minute we signed the thing, David. That's pretty stunning, David.

Yeah, it's pretty stunning. This has also been circulating, well, locally, it's been known since 2016, her first election. It was simply an open secret. Now, this reached me and, uh, Scott Johnson at Powerline, I believe we've been hearing this since late 2018 regarding her having arranged a massive, massive vote buying campaign in her primary win in 2016, the general in 2016, which is when she was elected as a state representative. And then again, in 2018, it was the primary and the general when she was voted to Congress. So this program is not new. It was massive.

I have hinted at it. I did discuss it with you briefly on the year back May. Right. And I said, look, this is everywhere. And the way I put it was, look, we are already talking about potentially the worst string of felonies committed by a congressperson in U.S. history. And that's before we get to the bad stuff. and the bad stuff, which we were referencing, is this historically large vote buying campaign for several elections. So because voting is controlled by the state, do we need to have the Attorney General who is watching her back?

It's Keith Ellison. Or can the federal government get involved in this? Good question. The answer is Keith Ellison can be bypassed here. It cannot be or can be. The charges are federal. Federal, okay. And of course, this is not something that, this isn't a situation like Portland where you get arrested

and released and not charged and no bail. If a candidate is caught bribing a voter for as little as a candy bar, you could be facing five years in person. And now we are talking about hundreds, perhaps thousands of votes over at least four elections. But you have to believe that those in the Somali community are going to be very apprehensive to talk to investigators. I mean, it's a scary, if this is truly going on, then it means that everything else that is linked to it, the threat of violence, et cetera, et cetera, if you, you know, blow the whistle here, that that's also true. Well, sure.

We've published plenty of evidence that her campaign, I mean, we have video evidence. Once again, what we have here, this person actually posted online, the video that O'Keefe has posted, he was bragging about what he was doing, just posted it online, it was out there. That's the same thing we had back in 2016 when Alpha News, Minnesota, of course, posted a video taken at an Ilhan campaign event. We're talking about whoever it was in the community who had leaked the news of her fraudulent marriage. They had to hunt that person down and get them out of the community. And this was at her campaign posted on their Facebook. the person who actually recorded that video, his name was Guwah Hachie, was at the time for a triple

stabbing in Ohio. In Ohio, he was now in Minnesota running intimidation campaign. That's right. I remember that. The same guy, he's running this co-intimitation campaign. He's going door to door, knocking on doors, allegedly saying, we want to know that you're going keep your mouth quiet. If I mark down here that you gave us 25 bucks, we'll know we can trust you. So he's running a protection racket. We also have them, have talk of them, simply running a vote

buying campaign where they have bags of money going out, organized by Ali Issie. He was the campaign manager, spread among 11 different building managers for the, these 11 towers that mostly housed the Somali refugees in Cedar Riverside. The money was getting spread around to each of them. It was simply, if you show up or get in this van and we drive you down and boat, we'll give you a set amount. I've heard the amount of 50 for the primary and 125 for the general. So, David, is anyone going to look into this?

Well, this was given to the FBI, I can confirm earlier this year. People, and again, remember, giving false information to the FBI is a felony in itself. We had locals who were willing to give this information face to face to the FBI early this year regarding these four prior elections. Now, we did not have any concrete evidence. evidence. All we had was several people confirming this. Now, again, early this year, after speaking with the FBI, someone said, you know, let's call James O'Keefe. Get him down here, see if he can patch them in the act this year. And as we can see, he was successful. So we now have our foot in the door with proof of her doing it this year. We can go back and look at 2016 and 2018. I feel very

confident now about this. Also, just last night, O'Keefe spoke. with the Hanapan County Attorney's Office. So he said, what you have on that tape is illegal, and we are looking into it. So it's a great start. Let me play a little bit more of the tape. This is the ballot harvester, what is it, Leibn-Mohamed, where he is on social media, making a video here about the stack of absentee ballots in his car that he collected for the campaign.

of a Democrat. Listen. Numbers don't lie. Numbers don't like. I'm a present ballot for a subpoly for a subpoch. He says all these absentee ballots can't just see they're all here.

My car is full of them. Today have 300 ballots for Jamal. Is that is that enough? Because really he could have 300 ballots for Jamal just because he was knocking on doors, which is called ballot harvesting, which is fine, at least in Minnesota, I don't think it's fine, but he could just go and get the ballots from people that were, you know,

signing them of their own volition. Well, that's not exactly correct. It is fine to collect three ballots, 300, according to Minnesota law. Ah. So it is not fine. It is already illegal. Of course, we've got. folks like Mark Elias, that Perkins-Cooey election law attorney, he has led the vote-by-mail suits,

have been, I believe, three dozen lawsuits to get vote-by-mail, ballot harvesting, the signature law to get that relaxed, to get everything relaxed to have votes be able to count one, two weeks after election day. That's Mark Elias. He's the one who's been suing everything. every state to make what you're seeing in that video legal, not the fact that he's purchasing votes. Right. But to make harvesting 300 ballots just going door to door like that legal. It's an uphill fight across the country in every state.

It is an absolute crisis at this point. And it all should have been avoided. They've been doing this since March of early this year. You'll remember the moment the coronavirus lockdown started to begin, guys like Mark Elias and the Democratic Party immediately, millions and millions of dollars came out of nowhere and they started these suits all over the country to implement vote by mail and to relax all these other laws. Now, vote by mail has never, ever been implemented in eight months. March until November. The states that do have it and do a fairly decent job of it, it took them several years of refinement and lawsuits and refinement

and process refinement. He was trying to do it in eight months. They knew from the start this was going to be a disaster. We now have on camera just how big of a disaster we're going to face in November. David, thank you very much. David Steinberg investigative reporter covering the news that came out from Project Veritas. this weekend about ballot harvesting fraud in Minnesota. People are risking, literally risking their life to bring information out.

You're not going to see this information in the mainstream media. It's important for you to share these things with your friends who are still undecided or, you know, are just normal people that maybe aren't hearing things. People are not hearing the truth because they're only watching one side. or the other. Thank you very much, David. Appreciate it.