The Glenn Beck Program - Best of The Program | Guests: Sen. Rand Paul & Nick Rekieta | 11/18/21

Episode Date: November 18, 2021

Senator Rand Paul joins to discuss Dr. Fauci and his gain-of-function cover-up. Kurt Gladfelter joins with his lawyer Jeffrey Schott to discuss why Kurt was permanently suspended for removing his mask, despite following the health department's rules. Attorney Nick Rekieta joins to give an update on what’s happening with the Kyle Rittenhouse trial and what’s happening with the jury. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome to aboard of Viarai. Embarked and profite. Embarque and celebrate. Rigolet. Publiere. Savoyed. Admirate. And profite.

Viarai. The voice that we love that we have. COVID Fauci mandates. That's the podcast today. We have ran Paul on and a review of last night's special on Blaze TV. Facebook took it off while it was still airing live on Facebook. About three quarters of the way through, they took it off. YouTube still has it while it lasts.

It's already been demonetized and then re-monetized and then demonetized again. We also go over the jury deliberations in the written house case. It's getting a little nerve-wracking day three of the jury deliberation. All that and more on today's podcast. Don't forget blaisTV.com slash Glenn is the place to go to subscribe to not only get access to the special, but also to support future stuff like this. This research takes a lot of time and gets pulled off the internet all the time. So we appreciate you. Subscribing to Blaze TV. Again, it's blazTV.com slash Glenn, the special right now, 25 bucks off. If you use the promo code

Fauci lied. You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck. Arrogance, the absolute, unashamed arrogance of Anthony Fauci is reason enough to have him removed from such an important position he is out of

control with his arrogance and he is lying every time every time you watch Rand Paul and as I said this the other night is there anybody that's actually

looking out for you and really going after these guys besides Rand Paul. I mean, he's relentless on it. And he's right. As we showed you in the special last night, Fauci is guilty as sin on not only the gain of function and paying for that, but also for all of the cover-up, the phone calls and the meetings that happened to,

cover his butt right at the beginning of COVID is astounding. Rand Paul is joining us now. Hello, Senator. How are you? Good morning, Glenn. Thanks for having me. You bet. So, you know, you've been on this for a while.

Last night I explained and laid out the history of Fauci. All of the documentation made the case. It's truly open and shut. Why isn't anybody else on this? Why isn't Fauci squirming? It is kind of amazing, particularly that no one from the opposite side of the aisle seems to care at all about the dangerousness of this virus and that it might have come from the lab and all likelihood did come from the lab. Not one Democrat is curious at all. You know, you would think that Democrats have at least some sensibilities about, you know, the danger of things. They tend to be the ones who want to regulate away things that could be dangerous in the workplace, but they don't see.

to be caring about something that could kill millions and likely did kill millions of people. Now, this virus has a 1% mortality and killed 5 million people so far around the world. Can you imagine if the next one that comes out of the lab has 15% or 50% mortality? And they are doing experiments as we speak with viruses that have 50% mortality. And Fauci seems to have no problem with this. He says, we raise the risks versus the benefits of the research. and I come to, he comes down on the side that the risks are worth it. But there are some dissenting voices.

I mean, in the Washington Post about a month ago, a professor from MIT, Kevin Esfeld, wrote that these are risks to civilization that are not worth a gamble. So that that was the thing that really struck me as I was doing this special last night was, you know, these guys are making these decisions. and all of humanity could be wiped out if they make a tragic error. This is not something that the elites should be the ones making the decision. We should all be involved in this decision. There's no bigger decision to make than should we be playing around with things that don't exist necessarily in nature that have jumped to humans? should we be playing around with these things, making that? So in case it jumps to humans, we can kill it with a virus, with a vaccine.

This is insanity, insanity, especially with arrogance coupled to it. And we're not involved in any of these decisions, none of us. Yeah, and I think the real danger here is that Fauci, has a casual disregard for the science, but also for individuals. liberty. You combine the two, ignoring the science, and then having no regard at all for individual liberty, and you have a really dangerous situation. But it's also dangerous because we've centralized the authority. And what I tell people all the time is, look, I have opinions on where the virus came from. I have opinions on how to treat it. But they're my opinions, and you don't

have to take them. It's through persuasion. If you agree with me, you can listen to my opinions. With Dr. Fauci, it's not the same. He has opinions, but he wants you to be full. forced to do, as he says. So it is the difference between coercion and freedom. And in freedom, there are many choices. But the real danger is, as we centralize authority, ultimately you get authoritarianism. And I think that's, he could easily be a medical dictator if he were allowed to be. Oh, yeah. One of the things that we found through our research, let me see if I can grab it here. I have a, I think it's a hundred and, yeah, here it is. It's like a 180 page contract between the NIH and Moderna.

Did you know that we are the co-owner of the vaccine from Moderna? Surprise me, but I don't know all the details of the contract. Okay, so the contract was, they started negotiating this contract with Moderna. the government said we'll give you all the mRNA stuff and you try to do make a vaccine for all the new coronaviruses. In 2015, right after Barrick and she made their first Frankenstein COVID, the NIH says, hey, we should get into bed and start making vaccines with Moderna. that contract was negotiated in 2015 Rand they signed the contract on December 12th 2019

that's a little odd don't you think yeah the patient's in anticipation of it no no no but five years or four years in advance then they're not talking about it and they rush to a signature on December 12th what did they know why the rush to the signature then the other problem too with the government and moderna owning is there's a huge stock of the vaccine now and the current vaccine's not working very well and in fact what i would be doing instead of saying that's russia

booster of the same old vaccine i would be releasing the newest one which is a delta variant which might go back to a 90% efficacy this one may have only you know fairly soon it may only be a 30% advocacy, almost, you know, a crapshoot as far as even taking it. But the thing is, is that a Delta variant might be enough. When the vaccine was effective in April and May of last year, it wasn't for lack of numbers that we didn't get to hurt immunity. I thought we were very, very close in April and May. There were many doctors, Dr. McCarray of Johns Hopkins, others saying they thought we were getting there. I thought we were close. We got down to less than 10,000 cases a day, and then it burst through because it developed resistance to the vaccine.

basically. So unless you have a better vaccine, you keep using the old one, they're just going to keep boosting it. And if three is going to be mandatory, what about every month? Maybe you need a vaccine every week, Glenn. I mean, what are we going to dictate to people over time with this? When in reality, probably what we need is a new vaccine each year like we get for influenza. But it still ought to be your choice to take it. And for the high-risk people, you know, it probably is a reasonable thing to keep doing the boosters or to have a new one. But a new I think would be much better than the booster of the old one. Let me ask you a question.

Let me go back to the federal government or the NIAID and NIH own the patent. They share the patent with Moderna. You can look at this a couple of ways. Hey, good for the United States. They negotiated a deal. And so they're making money on this. If we are making money. you know, pay the taxpayer back.

That'd be great. Get it for half price. That's great. I don't like the idea that we're in business like this. I don't know of another vaccine like this, an emergency vaccine. I mean, Salt didn't patent his work. The flu vaccine. It's open source all the time.

This is the government forcing a vaccine that they co-own. And if we're, if we are getting paid, where's the money? Why hasn't this been made public? And my theory is, and this is just a theory, Rand, you'll probably be able to get to the bottom of it, is if they are getting paid, the money is going to NIAID or NIH, and it's going to be funding more gain of function research, almost like a black ops. I think that's one possibility. We'll get a hold of the contract. Now that I know a little more about this. We'll actually make some phone calls today and write some letters and see if you get the contract. But I guess my first suspicion would be that this is government we're dealing with.

They probably signed a contract where they co-own it, but profits only float to Moderna. I can't imagine any of the money. The government is so ineffective at trying to recoup costs on anything. So you're right. If they are getting the money, probably it's under Fauci's control and it just allows him to create more mischief. But I would say that there's a reasonable chance that there's no profit going to us and it's all going to Materna and maybe we take the liability if they lose money, we'll probably have to avail them out somehow. That's unbelievable.

Unbelievable. So for example, if there's about a hundred million doses left and the variant comes out, that's why they're not one to release a variant probably is they don't want it to compete economically with the one they've got out there. And so if you have a self-interest and you already own it, you know, you might not want

the new vaccine to come out because it would compete with your old vaccine. The companies are going to be hesitant on putting it forward too because they want to sell all their old one before they get caught up in a new one. This is why the government doesn't get into business with people. You don't get into business like this because there's no police then. When they're doing this, the government has no interest in exposing this and saying, hey, hey, hey, you've got a vaccine that you're pushing on everybody and it doesn't work.

there's nobody to run to because the government is the police. They're the last stop. Right. You have to realize also that the big billion dollar companies have been bailed out by this or the health insurance companies. So in normal times, if you have health insurance and if it covers your medications, your vaccine would have been covered and your monoclonal antibodies and all the different treatments. Instead, the government but all this stuff and now the government's in charge of distributing it, But now you get into the conflict of interest, but what if deplorable people need more of it?

What if Republicans need more of it? The government, you know, has already indicated that these people are using too much of it. And they've talked about limiting the supply for Florida and Texas. But you can see how the real problems get into play when the government's in charge of the distribution and the decision making. Rand, you can get the contract. I can send it to you personally. Or you can go just go. Anybody can go to blazedtv special.com and all of the research from last night show,

including all every page of that contract, uh, will be sent to you. We, we want everybody to have copies of everything. Uh, so they know exactly what was going on. So we'll get that contract to you or you can go there. What?

Yeah. And if there are questions that are murky, what we can do is then address them directly, you know, where does the profit go? How's the profit divided? Because it may, it may be murky from the contract. So we'll get to the bottom of it.

Yeah. Come up for it. Yeah. Thank you very much. Rand Paul. Appreciate it. Thank you. You bet. Bye-bye. That's Senator Rand Paul. Paul. Paul.com. I can't wait until he gets a hold of this and another chance to talk to Fauci. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. Welcome to the Glenn Beck program. We're glad you're here. There was a story that came out earlier this week about a guy who's a single co-parent

father, two boys, third and fifth grade students at the same school district that he was working for. He was working at the Northern York County School District. He was a high school social studies and civics teacher. He had been there for 10 years. He's an alumni of the school, graduated in 2001. his focus for instruction has been teaching honors government and economics. So I'm going to let you tell, I'm going to let him tell you why and what he did that made the school district want to fire him.

His name is Kurt Gladfelter. His attorney is also on the phone. It's Jeffrey Schott. And I welcome both of you to the law. the program. Hi, Kurt. How are you? Good, Glenn. How are you? Very good. So you are teaching government, you're teaching civics, and what do you do and why? Well, when Governor Wolf announced that that he was going to put another mask mandate for public school employees and students, I indicated that I was unwilling to comply with such a mandate for a multitude of reasons.

And through a chain of events that really kind of began at the end of September before Labor Day break, we got to the point that now the school district wants to terminate me for their perception that I am violating the mask mandate. however, I am in compliance with the mask mandate. Okay. I mean, I have your attorney explain. What are they going for here, Jeffrey? What's, how is this working? Yes, well, just as a matter of background, over the summer, a lot of school districts, including Northern York, where Kurt works, passed resolutions making masks optional.

This was apparently overridden by the acting state health secretary's orders. But that order contained a really broad exception for people who state they have a medical condition that precludes the wearing of masks. It doesn't require a doctor's note. It doesn't require anything else. And Kurt did exactly this. So he was actually in compliance with the order. and all the charges against him that they are trying to fire him for stem from his alleged violation of this order.

So you said that you had a medical reason, Kurt? I had medical, mental, emotional reasons. I mean, there's a lot of reasons for why I'm doing what I'm doing, but the exception order itself, the one that we originally filled out that was sent out by our school board, did not require you to list in detail what the reason was. It was just that you were claiming an exception or an exemption from the mandate order and that the school district would allow that if you signed it and turned it in, whether you were a student or a teacher, which I did. That did not last very long, though. That was their initial policy after a week or so, our board, and I should say really,

our administration, because our board did not vote on this, reverted to, a policy that was more strict than the verbiage of the mandate order itself, and then required teachers and students to get medical documentation, pretty strict medical documentation. And for teachers, it was a disability under the American Disabilities Act. So that is what was needed from the point on to be exempted from... unbelievable. Mandate. This is unbelievable.

Okay, so you're placed then on permanent suspension, and the district is now taking steps to terminate your employee because you refuse to comply with the mandate. Right. After speaking at school board meetings, talking to administrators, trying to get other teachers to kind of unite to fight back against this, I got to the point where those were not working and on October 20th, which was a Wednesday morning, that was the day I decided that I was not going to wear that mask anymore. About halfway through the day, I was approached by principal and some administrators that I was going to be paid on unpaid suspension for two days.

Then I was instructed to show up Monday morning, October 25th, to conduct a louder mill meeting, which I informed them that I was in compliance with the school's policy that they voted on twice. Our school board voted twice to allow masks optional in June and of August of last year. And I said I was in compliance with the school board policy. You making the decision to move ahead to terminate me based off of an invalid unconstitutional mask mandate coming from the Pennsylvania Department of Health Secretary is quite frankly ridiculous. And I couldn't understand why they were doing what they were doing. There's no reason for them to enforce the mandate in a more strict way than what's actually

on the paper itself. And we have other school districts in York County of Pennsylvania who are not doing it. They are still allowing the general exception to the mandate order for students and teachers. and I just want them to go back to do that so I can go back from doing my job and teaching kids. So what do the school board say? Did they weigh in on this? They have weighed in several times, and I don't want to vilify them, but I feel like they're making decisions based off of fear now when they made decisions based off of reason and rationality earlier on the year.

We had a full-throated debate in our community about this. What do parents want when their students came back to school in August? And they filled out, you know, a poll that asked, and it was 90% that, you know, parents did not want the mandate, the mass mandate to be. They wanted to keep it optional. Right. And so they made the correct decision initially. And then, you know, Wolf gets on his high horse. and after expressing several times over the summer that he would not implement a new mask mandate

for public school students this year, he went ahead and did that. And Glenn, if you could have seen the deflation was announced in my classroom that day, most of my students are 11th grade students, not had a normal high school year yet. These are young teenage kids who want to enjoy their youth, and they're just simply, able to do it. You know, their ninth grade year was cut short, our district dismissed earlier, because of coronavirus. Last year was experience for students. We did some hybrid system that was virtual, you know, two days in school, two days out, and it was a terrible experience. And I just, I, I, it was enough was enough. You know, I gave you last year. I understood people were scared,

but you can't let fear govern your actions for the rest of your life. So, so let me ask, Jeffrey, what is the path to victory here? It would be a public hearing of the school board. Now, I don't know in COVID age what that public hearing is going to look like. And the school board is going to have to make a vote to Texas, man. You've got to move to Texas. We're open for business here, and we're fine. Anyway, go ahead.

Don't tell my wife that. She may take you up on it. Yeah, yeah, well, she should. Yeah, so the school board is going to, in the end, have to take a vote on whether to uphold the termination and the charges are not. So something else, in the meantime that has happened, which makes this especially interesting, is the Commonwealth Court, which is in Pennsylvania just below the state Supreme Court, did hold that the acting health secretary in issuing the order in the first place was acting

without the authority to issue. So the current state of the law is that the order that forms the whole basis for this itself was was void because it was without authority. Unbelievable. Unbelievable. It was my position the whole time. What did you say? Yeah. What was my position the whole time?

You know, before it was just like, oh, this social study teacher is making this statement. Now I have, you know, four judges on a Commonwealth panel backing my argument. Exactly. Yeah. Well, I think all of these mandates are going to fall in the court system. I mean, they're clearly, clearly not constitutional. Kurt, I know there is a give, send, go page to help while you're on unpaid suspension. And I imagine your attorney fees are not going to be cheap.

If you would like to help, go to give, send go, and just look for a teacher in Pennsylvania fights for liberty. and help him pay his attorney fees and also be able to last while he is out on unpaid suspension. Give, send, go. Teacher in Pennsylvania fights for liberty. Thanks, guys. Please keep me up to date. When you find out anything is moving in either direction, please let us know, will you? Certainly.

Thank you very much. The best of the Glenn Beck program. Just going through some of the email that came in after the special last night, Don wrote in, said, Glenn, I work at a hospital in Ohio over the years. I have gone for many periods of time not listening to you because you can be crazy and depressing. Well, gee, I don't know. It's a great point. I don't know why you bring it up.

Yesterday I chose to subscribe to the Blaze just so I could watch your documentary. My mouth dropped open each segment, and the last one made me gasp. I read the Nature article. Now, this is the written Nature article that Peter Dasick wrote that says, this is not made in a lab. This is absolutely. And anybody who says it is a crazy person. It's pretty amazing once you know the history behind him and who was in on making these decisions. She said, something wasn't wrong, and I kind of believed it was lab made, but then I read that article, and it dampened my skepticism.

You dropped a bomb on that last night. Thank you. I'm not sure what I can do with this information, but I can now try to inform colleagues that information is being suppressed. Don, it is. And you could verify that just by watching the special. By the way, do not, do not quote me. Don't, you know, don't go to your friends who hate my guts and, you know, think all the things that George Soros paid to have people say about me is true. I want you to go to blazedtv special.com.

BlazTV special.com. And all of the original documents are available there. They're in, some of them are in Chinese, but you can have Google translate, translate them for you. You can go through these yourself so you know it. You make the case. You have to make the case and you have to know it if you're going to stand. Otherwise, people are going to say, that's crazy. Where'd you get that?

And they're going to pick you apart. Tim wrote in, Glenn, I watched your show last night in The Blaze, Anthony Fauci's involvement in its genesis. and successive cover-up. I have to say, I believe this is the most important piece of journalistic work since Watergate. I'm a little depressed in that while radical Democrats in the Biden administration are currently blowing themselves up with their actions and policies, I don't know that a red wave in 2022 and 24 is going to solve the kind of exposure to deep state actors that you gave last night with a completely conservative Congress and president,

are we going to get back to the real America while people like Fauci and all of his deep state staff exist in the government? Is it possible to clean house over a four-year term? I don't think it is. And if you are looking for Donald Trump to be president, then you should hope that he will pick Ron DeSantis as his, vice president. I think if DeSantis is the guy, he should ask Trump to be Speaker of the House.

But that's just, that's just me. You just want that for pure entertainment. Pure entertainment purposes. You can't do it in four years. We need at least eight years to be able to do it. And Fauci, I hope, will be gone by 2023 because I think the Republicans are going to win the house and if they are not part of it, they will get rid of Anthony Fauci. How will they do that?

With Biden, it's still as president. I think they will just do investigations. And eventually he's like, ah, this is enough. I'm going to go work for some pharmaceutical company. I don't know. I'll go work and we'll grow new people in petri dishes. Ooh. Let me, let me, let me show you some of the stuff.

that we uncovered last night. Last night, I don't know if you know this. DARPA was approached by Dr. Barrick, who is the doctor who did the mouse hybrid, and Dr. She, who did the bat poop coronavirus. You put those two together, and it's like the key master and the gatekeeper. Maybe we should keep these two apart. So one's American, one's Chinese working at the Wuhan lab. And then there's Peter Dazek, who is the go-between, between them and Fauci.

Fauci gives Peter Dazek's company money, and then that money goes to fund this gain of function research. That's why Fauci won't answer Rand Paul's question. Well, did you fund Peter Dazek? Because that was gain of function research. Fauci doesn't like answering that question. But what most people don't know is, I think it was in 2017. You've watched the special. In 2017, DASEC and his EcoHealth Alliance requested funding from DARPA.

Now, this is what they listen to what we have, the DARPA proposal. You can get it at blazedtv special.com. We have the proposal to DARPA and their response. But listen to what it is. Forbosed injecting bat coronavirus collected by the Wuhan lab into transgenic humanized mice from Dr. Barrick's lab to try to create coronavirus vaccines. They even mentioned using test cave sites to do some of the experiments. If you look at the people involved, it's the same story over and over and over. again. Now, DARPA said, yeah, I don't think so. Listen to what they actually wrote back.

Your team discusses risk mitigation strategies to address potential risks of the research to public health and animal safety, but it does not mention or assess potential risks of gain of function research. Now, remember, this is Fauci funded, this little group of people. And even DARPA is calling him out and saying it's too dangerous. And here's DARPA, probably the most sophisticated group of big thinkers in our country, at least working for the government. And they're saying it's gain of function. So they say we're not going to fund it. But the funding continues from the NIH to Peter Dazek. So now let me take you to.

to when it actually all started. When the, when, when did it start? When did we know about it? We started talking about it probably around January 8th because we were on vacation for Christmas when I first heard about it. I heard about it over the Christmas holidays. Was that your recollection when you heard it? It was right around then.

And then when we got back, we had heard about it, we talked about it, and then we started seeing videos. Well, the first time everybody thinks the pandemic officially began December 31st, because December 31st is when China finally said, hey, there's a problem, we've got a virus, but it's not transmissible human to human. Okay? They knew that wasn't true.

Listen to what happened. In the summer, of 2020. So after COVID it already started, is we're in the 15 days, you know, to flatten the curve. In that summer, the Wuhan lab with Dr. Shee, they release a study. They release a paper on COVID viruses in humanized mice. And the study is released in, I think it's August of 2020. but the actual research was done in the Wuhan lab in the summer of 19. Now, why do I bring that up? Well, because it's exactly the same players and the same thing that was proposed to DARPA.

Now it's happening in the Wuhan lab. But where it gets interesting is the timeline. On September 12th, they had the Wuhan. archive system which allows anybody to go into their archives and see all of the records, see what they're working on, everything else, and all of, all of the scientific stuff is archived. Well, it shuts down on September 12th, gone. And they don't open it up again.

Now, the BBC asks Dr. She what happened and she says, we were hacked. We were hacked. Okay. Maybe. maybe they were hacked, that happens. So somebody's hacking the Wuhan lab for some reason, trying to get all their information. So they shut it down.

On the same day, they ask for security. So they increase security in the lab on the same day. Now, okay, all right, if somebody's hacking into you and you want additional security, those two things do kind of go together. And then all of a sudden, everything starts to shut down. And then they say, oh, we need to fix our air handling system. We need a new air system. Okay.

All right. Then the world military games kick off in Wuhan. Now, this is just a few weeks after the air handling system incident in October. 10,000 international athletes attend for more than 100 countries. Now listen to this. In the reports at the time, one athlete attended said the streets of Wuhan were nearly empty. It was a ghost town. This is early October.

Upon arrival to the airport, athletes had their temperatures recorded and were forced to wash their hands when they entered buildings. Now, is that standard practice? Multiple athletes later got sick with COVID-like symptoms. and went home and their families got sick. We have a document that you can get at blazedTV specials.com. The document is a hospital report that has been leaked from the Chinese ministry. We found it in the research that was provided by Drassic. It shows at least 10 hospitals in Wuhan were already receiving COVID patients in October.

So we have the weird activity. the report of what they were doing in the summer. Then we have the weird activity at the beginning of September. Then we have people start getting sick. We have temperatures check. The streets vacant. One athlete said, this is early October. The rumors were that the government warned the inhabitants not to go out.

Okay. Now let's go back to the Wuhan lab. We already have 10 hospitals that are taking COVID people. we have the weird temperature thing and on November 3rd three researchers from the Wuhan lab get sick COVID-like symptoms

they go to the hospital so between September through November something's going on but China doesn't tell us inside the lab on now December 3rd they made another request they needed to get an air

incinerator. Hmm. Hmm. And then it's just a couple of weeks later that doctors start speaking out in China about this. We saw the videos. And they kind of just went missing.

No, no.