The Glenn Beck Program - Debunking the Worst of the Pro-Abortion Myths | 6/27/22

Episode Date: June 27, 2022

Filling in for Glenn, Pat and Stu discuss the landmark Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade and the road to get that decision. Pat and Stu go over the Left’s emotional stupidity in their responses to Roe and debunk all the myths surrounding abortion. More Supreme Court decisions came out, including a case affirming religious liberty. How can anybody fight against the birth of more children in minority areas? Pat and Stu take calls from listeners. The Left is doubling down on fearmongering, as Pat and Stu talk about the issues that arise when you legislate from the bench. Pat and Stu expose the bottom line of the Left’s abortion argument: convenience over life. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

60% of the vans on Amazon come to vendor independent like SACMagic. Hello, here Camille of Sack Magic. Our compresses, show of fraud are fabriced in Quebec, and our presence on Amazon

enlarge our clientele to the world entire. Trouve of little enterprises like that other onracea. Let me tell you about Rough Greens. First of all, I have three dogs. I love those dogs.

I'm sure you love yours as well. Though it's possible, I guess, that your dog is terrible and you don't love your dog. I mean, I don't know your dog. So your dog might be awful. But I will say, if you love your dog,

you want to give them Rough Greens. You want to have them eating in a way that's going to contribute to their happiness. President Miles is one of my dogs. He's 17 years old, I think. And that means he's very old and he does not move around much, but he still cranks it up from time to time. He gets the Zumi's going a little bit. The Zumi's are a little slower than they used to be, though. But that helps even an old dog like Miles feel better, which is fantastic. Rough Greens isn't a dog food is a supplement that you sprinkle on top of the dog food and is filled with vitamins and minerals, probiotics. and antioxidants and those

watch it there Pat if you don't mind Pat says hello just go get rough greens will you? I mean go get rough greens right now you get a free bag of rough greens for your dog to try out all you pay is shipping go to roughgreens.com slash Becker call 833 Glenn 33 833 G-L-E-N-N-33

call today odds Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program just nothing to talk about the thing. I had the same problem prepping for the show today. What do we talk about? I don't know It's just really hard to figure out something because everything's so quiet. It's summer.

People aren't going on vacations. Remember when that used to be the case? It seems to happen once in a while. There was some downtime. Not now. And we'll get into some of that stuff. Seems like there was some kind of ruling on Friday. And we'll get into that much more in about 60 seconds.

Commodity prices, the war in Ukraine, supply chain chaos. That's all continuing to impact. inflation, and you can count on that going forward for quite a long time. Everyday items are continuing to cost us more, and interest rates will rise again because of it. It's extremely important for you to take care of your debt right now as much as you can. You need to find more ways to save more. And one of the best ways that I know about is to take, I don't know, 10 minutes out of your day and give American financing a call.

They can give you a free mortgage review and let you know what options you have available. American financing has been America's home for home loans for over 20 years. and their mortgage-based consultants can work for you, not the bank. They can talk to you about things like your home equity, create a custom loan that puts you in a better financial position, and they're currently saving customers up to $1,000 a month, and they never charge upfront or hidden fees. Why not see what they can do for you?

What's the risk? Call American Financing right now 800906 2440, 800906 2440, or go to Americanfinancing.net. It's Americanfinancing.compancing. for www. nmLS consumer access.org. Welcome. Glenn's on vacation this week. It's Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

The row ruling actually came down while you guys were on the air on Friday, right? Yes, one of our favorite things. Yeah. That every single Supreme Court release of opinion happens during our two of this program. So Pat, we've had many memories over the years of this happening, like the Obamacare. decision happening live on the air every single time. And by the way, today is no exception. We will have Supreme Court opinions coming down

in our hour or two today as well. There's still few big ones out there. I mean, obviously the Dobbs case for abortion, Rovers v. Wade being overturned is going to be the marquee thing for God only knows how long. But there's a huge case with the EPA and the administrative state is on trial, basically, and that one. and that one may be more specific to everybody's life, right? Like, that's one that can affect everyday life where this is a case basically questioning

whether these, you know, administrative state apparatus can just do things on their own, you know? Can they just, what if they want to regulate CO2 emissions on their own? What if we let them do that? Why pass a law? Let's just let them do it. That whole thing is on trial right now, and that affects every aspect of our lives. I mean, this country has been completely remade from what it was supposed to be by these, by the administrative state. And so that is, that's a big one.

There's one, big one on religious liberty, this huge one on the border coming up about the remain in Mexico. We could get all those today. I think there's eight remaining. So we will have those in hour or two of the program. And probably, I don't think we'll get eight in one day. They'll probably announce another decision day this week. But that's coming up today as well. The Dobbs case, though, is still, it's not a one day story, Pat.

No. No, especially with the reaction to it. Yeah. Did Biden speak in time for you guys to play his thoughts on Friday? I talked about it on Studez America on my show, which airs later on in the day here on Blaze TV. But I don't think it happened during the show. I think it was right after it. Yeah. Here's what Joe had to say about the ruling initially. Today is a It's not hyperbole It suggests a very solemn moment Yeah Today the Supreme Court of the United States

Expressly took away Constituces were right from the American people No No they did have it already recognized No They didn't limit it They simply took it away Mm-hmm

They didn't take it away It wasn't there It's so important to so many Americans Really is it They did it It's a sad day for the court and for the country. No, it was a great day.

Fifty years ago, Roe v. Wade was decided and has been the law of the land since then. Oh, wow. This landmark case protected women's right to choose, a right to make intensely personal decisions with their doctor and free from the interference of politics. I don't know what word that way. It reaffirmed basic principles of equality.

Oh, quality. The women have the power to control their own destiny. That's really. And it reinforced a fundamental right of private. No. Right of each of us to choose how to live our lives. You don't have the privacy to kill human beings. Now with Rogan. Well, if what you do in private?

It's be very clear. No, it's still. The health and life of women in this nation. Most murders happen in private. Really? Yeah. Is chairman a ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee? Is that why they always to make the distinction public execution?

That's like, that's the abnormal way of doing it. Right. I've studied this case carefully. I've overseen more Supreme Court confirmations than anyone today. Oh, so this is your fault. In this case, it was always discussed. It was. I believe Roe v. Wade was the correct decision.

No, you don't. As a matter of constant law and application of the fundamental right to privacy and liberty and matters of family and personal autonomy. It was a decision. Which you don't have with the vaccine, by the way. No, of course not. It's a careful balance between a woman's right to choose earlier in her pregnancy and the state's ability to regulate later in her pregnancy.

pregnancy. Right. The decision with broad national consensus. No. The most Americans of face. Hold on. Stop on. You could describe abortion a lot of ways.

Arguing there is a broad national consensus is not one of them. That is not a good. It's not a good summary. It's just a lie. Right. This is a very divisive issue. It's one that I think the other side is completely insane on. I mean, frankly, I can't even understand the arguments most of the,

at the time. They're so stupid. However, I can even acknowledge there's not a national consensus on abortion. There's a lot of disagreement. I mean, there's a national consensus basically on certain aspects of it. Like, for example, you shouldn't have it in the third trimester. There's basically a national consensus that the stated platform position of the Democratic Party is against the consensus. That we could be clear on. Other than that, really, there's not much of one. Maybe on life of the mother. I mean, life of the mother, even in all these states that are, you know, banning abortion like Texas, there's still an exception for life of the mother that was in there. That was basically in, it was in the Kavanaugh concurrence that, you know, it's signified,

look, if you go after life of the mother, we're not going to rule on your side on that. Like, I mean, that one seems to be the one that there's pretty much consensus on, I guess. But not a lot of aspects of abortion. There's consensus on Pat. No, that is true. And, you know, even he is at odds with himself. Yes. From 16 years ago. Here's what he said back in 2006. I do not view abortion as a choice and a right.

I think it's always a tragedy. And I think that it should be rare and safe. And I think we should be focusing on how to limit the number of abortions. And there ought to be able to have a common ground and consensus to do that. Is that amazing? He doesn't look at it as a riot. that's amazing. If that was a clip from 1982,

which by the way, he was still in public office then, maybe you could say, all right, he changed over time. 2006? Yeah. That's amazing. I didn't realize it was that recent. I had heard that clip.

I didn't realize it was that recent. 2006. That's incredible. Yeah. I mean, and, you know, I want to ask you this, Pat, because I was thinking about this over the weekend. There's so much to think about in this case, and we could honestly talk about this the whole time, I'm sure.

But would this, could this have happened in the era where Democrats sounded like that? Like when Democrats were pitching the safe, legal, and rare thing, when they were saying, look, it's always a tragedy. This is a, essentially, a necessary evil was their case. It's a terrible, terrible thing. We all hate it. But gosh, sometimes these circumstances require it and we wish they didn't. Now, no.

It's like, it's an amusement park. Yeah. Abortion is fun. It's fun. Shout it. Shout your abortion. We went from the safe, legal, and rare era to the shout your abortion era. Yeah.

And we see how well that worked for Democrats. Not very well. I think that that's part of what caused this. I think so too. I think they played their hand. They overplayed their hand. Yeah. And it went the other way on them now.

The pendulum swinging back the other way. Because of some of them. that craziness. You could argue that's why Trump got elected in the first place. Right. You could argue that was why Republicans were more apt to go along with justices who were, who they were really confident would overturn Roe versus Wade. I think you can argue, you know, remember, Republicans had enough justices to overturn this in place many times. And the reason why it didn't happen was because of people like Anthony Kennedy who who would flake at the last minute and decide, Oh, well, we've got a compromise position.

You know, Casey is terrible. Both Roe versus Wade and Casey versus Planned Parenthood were terrible decisions. Yeah. And a lot of it, especially Casey, seem to be fueled on this. Well, we can't really shake things out that much. You know, I don't think it's right to shake things up that much. We've obviously seen that sort of behavior from John Roberts. We even saw it in the Dobbs opinion.

And I think. Yeah, he just wanted the narrow ruling. Yes. Right? Just on Dobbs. he didn't want to rule on Roe v. Wade. Yeah, if it was up to him, and again, he even, he essentially says in his concurring opinion, yeah, these guys are pretty much right, but it seems mean.

You know, it seems a little upsetting and I don't want to be mean. I mean, it really does seem like he even is clear how bad it is. So his opinion would have been, okay, Mississippi can keep their 15 week thing, right? Yeah. We're not going to overturn Roe versus Wade, but 15 weeks is rational, and there's some sort of rational position. He wanted to do essentially what Casey did, which was come up with some new standard that, as Alito pointed out, neither side in this case even asked for. It wasn't just like it was the conservative side saying, hey, let's get rid of this. And the liberal side was saying, ah, let just 15 weeks or give us some other new standard that we can all work with.

Roberts just invented that himself. He's like, what if I, what if we do this? And that's what he does. That's what he does. Right? He's terrible. Time after time. He did it with Obamacare.

He's done it multiple times. He's agonizing. He really is. Agonizing. But I am still shocked. You and I have said many times, there's no way they're going to overturn Roe v. Wade. There is no way that's going to happen. This court will not do that.

Do you have any confidence this court will do it? No. Nope. I don't have any confidence this will do it. The Democrats all thought, yeah, oh, they're going to, and they were right. Fortunately, turned out they were right. The one time I will be very pleased to admit both, they are right and I was wrong. I did not think I'd ever see that day. No way. No. Especially not right now. I mean. And to be clear, in some ways, the same things we always worried about, one of the conservative justices flaking, occurred. It occurred with Roberts. who didn't go along with this.

And it sort of occurred with Kavanaugh who wrote a concurring opinion that basically said, eh, I don't know. I mean, I'm going along with this, but I'm a little wishy-washy on it. You know, like, it almost didn't happen this time. Right.

But thank God it did. Thank God. It was 6-3 on Dobbs, right? Yeah. But 5-4, I think, on overturning Roe v. Yeah, the way they say 5-3-1, essentially.

Like, when it comes to Dobbs, he went along with it, but he did not want to overturn Roe versus Wade, which is incredible. He's terrible. And it's incredible to step back at how many times Republicans missed with these Supreme Court justices. I mean, they just missed and missed and missed and missed. All of them missed. The only person you'd say, we don't have evidence of them missing on this particular case, is Trump, who seemingly went three for three or at least got three for three on this.

Three home runs. And he pointed that out. obviously on Friday. He pointed that out and he's right. He's right. He deserves a lot of credit for it. He deserves a lot of credit. Now, a lot of people have fought for this for a really long time.

Yes. But President Trump deserves a lot of credit for this. He deserves a ton of credit for it. You know, he said he would come. And interestingly, he said he would come in and pick off a list of 21 Supreme Court justices basically hands selected by the Federalist Society. And so the Federalist Society also deserves a lot of credit of this. But it's, it's.

interesting, he picked Gorsuch from that list and then expanded the list. So his other two picks, both Kavanaugh and Barrett, were not on the initial list. People forget this. He did not actually pick all three justices from the list. He picked one justice from the list. The other two were expanded. And the belief is, particularly with Kavanaugh, that Kennedy was just not going to step down unless he had the guy he wanted to step in for him. Anyway, long story short, he picked three and they were all right on this one. And honestly, like, we could talk about elections, we could talk about future appointments. All of that, none of it met.

I mean, like, Kavanaugh could suck from here on out and it would be disappointing. But the fact that this came through is already Trump's legacy, right? It's already done now, which is huge. You know, look, people, and we bash him all the time. And we also, Mitch McConnell deserves credit for this. Yeah, because he does. He delayed that for it, which is why they call it. it illegitimate, illegitimate Supreme Court. Why? Because they waited for the next, no, it's

perfectly constitutional. Yeah. They did something they're perfectly within their rights to do. You're talking about the Merrick Garland delay. Merrick Garland, delay. Yeah. Now, waiting until Trump became president. And that's part of it. He waited until Trump became president, which gave us Gorsuch. Although I will point out, the Republicans held the Senate at that time. So even if there was a vote and he didn't hold the line, that's true. They likely would have rejected whoever it was, which would have been okay. But I mean, he also pushed, you know, he got all three of these through the Senate. You know how shady the Senate can be at time with very small majorities. They got them through. And then the third, the third name we really need to give credit to, Pat, is Harry Reid. Because without Harry Reid,

upending the judicial filibuster in 2013. Right. Now, they wanted their power then. And this is a good lesson for Democrats. You want to grab power however you can. Elizabeth Warren's asking for packing the court. Think of how this feels later on. Think of it. Because you grabbed power with no justification and this is how that story ended. Exactly. And people forget that part of it. Yeah. All right. Triple-8. 727 B-E-C-K. More coming up in one minute. You know, the sooner you switch to Patriot mobile, the sooner you can start paying less. And I mean way less than what you're paying right now with your major mobile company. There's no reason to pay out the nose. And you know, how we're always telling you, that the major mobile companies donate a portion of your bill to leftist causes.

A portion of them right to this particular issue against the pro-life cause. Well, Patriot Mobile doesn't do that at all. In fact, they donate to conservative causes. Wouldn't you rather get behind something like that? Patriot Mobile has plans to fit any budget, and their 100% U.S.-based customer service support team gives amazing personal service. Patriot Mobile shares your values and supports organizations fighting for religious freedom, constitutional rights,

Sanctity of Life, and our veteran and first responder heroes. If you're paying too much for your cell phone service, make the important switch over to Patriot Mobile today. You can call them at 972

Patriot, or go to PatriotMobil.com slash Beck. Get free activation with the offer code back. Veterans and first responders save even more. So make the switch today between the left,

the media, the rhinos, everything. We need to stick together. Patriotmobile.com slash Beck, Patriotmobile.com. Or call 972 Patriot. It's 972 Patriot for Patriot mobile 10 seconds station ID. Pat and Stufer Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

There were some protesters over the weekend and some of them making incredible points. Here's a lovely young lady with a message about her uterus holding up a sign. And I believe it says for those just listening on radio, if my uterus shot bullets, would it have more rights? Oh, God. We have to talk about this point. The left thinks this point is really good. And it is.

There's no way your uterus can shoot bullets. That's true. That's a good point. Yeah. That's a really good point. It's kind of a moot. It's a bit moot. It is a bit moot.

Yeah. It is a bit moot. But there is a, this is a version essentially of a very viral tweet that went around that said, now women have less rights than guns and like you know 500,000 retweets. And you're just like, guys, do you understand how dumb you are? I mean, I'm not, I know you can't figure these things out. But I'm curious if you're just self-aware enough to realize how stupid you are. How that point does not, we should get into this point.

We should take on this particular point. Yes, and we will. Oh, good. And we will. Because there's so, it's so many people, you get to these things. things and you're just like, gosh, you know, this isn't a game. They really think these are good, these are good points. They do.

That's fascinating to me. It's inconceivable. It's inconceivable. It's inconceivable. But they do. That is a perfect word. And I might not think, I might not know what it means. You know, in the, in the princess bride's sense, I may not know what that word means.

I keep saying that word. Right. And I may not know what it means. You're using the word. Right. I don't think it means what you think it means. That's very possible. Where I am at this point.

I know. Because it does not seem plausible to me that half the country could believe such stupid things. Again, some of the stuff we disagree on, but some of it is just idiotic. The ignorance that you see online right now on the social media. Oh, my gosh. I pulled a full out Pat Gray this weekend. I said, you know what? Nothing good can come of me being on social media.

That's very true. Nothing good. Nothing good. There's going to be a lot of people who I could. currently like that I will no longer like, right? I will have family members I'll never talk to again. Right. I will have friends. I had friends who were like, if you are pro-life, unfollow me. I know. And I'm just like, you know, what's, why would I, why would I go on? Why would I bother? Why would I subject myself to it? What good could it possibly do?

It's really true. No good at all. No, it doesn't. It doesn't help. And, you know, there's a long, there's a long battle ahead of us. I'm trying to keep my head straight here. line back. So guess how many data compromises have already happened in 2022? We're halfway through the year now, basically. Not even. And, well, if you think over 400 major ones, you're correct. Maybe you should go to Vegas.

Data compromises are up to, are up 14% from just last year and are impacting more than 20 million Americans. Some of the most lucrative pieces of data cyber thieves want to steal our social security numbers, Gmail logins and passwords, and even driver's licenses. It's important to understand how cybercrime and identity theft are affecting our lives. Every day we put our information at risk on the Internet, and that's why LifeLock is here. They can't catch everything. No one can. But they can monitor things better than you can on your own. And if you do become a victim, their restoration specialists can work with you to help you fix the problem quickly.

No one can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses, but you can help protect what is yours with LifeLock by Norton. Join now and save up to 25% off your first year. With the promo code Beck, you can call 1-800 LifeLock or head to LifeLock.com. Use the promo code back for 25% off. I mean, why wouldn't you want to protect yourself, especially with 25% off with a promo code back at LifeLock.com or 1-800 LifeLock. And don't forget to use the promo code Glenn for $10 off your subscription at blazedtv.com. Pat and Stu on Glenn Beck program. We were just kind of about to get into this sign that was being carried by.

an abortion supporter over the weekend. If my uterus shot bullets, would it have more rights? It'd be a pretty special uterus at that point. I will say that uterus sounds pretty awesome. Yeah, I think it would. I think we should make that the president. I think if your uterus can shoot bullets,

it should be... It's the president of the United States, just automatically. I would support a constitutional amendment to that effect. That's just me, though. Yeah. No, it's me too. And here's a problem, Pat. it's not currently in the Constitution.

And that's kind of the thing you bump into here with these brilliant points from the left over and over and over. Gun rights as opposed to abortion rights. Yeah. One is in the Constitution. The other, not so much. And this is the problem. So. This is the fundamental

misunderstanding with your brilliance, guys. When you tweet... And they really do think they're on to something. They really do. Because, you know, and the only reason they do, Pat, is because these two rulings came down, one. after another in two straight days. So it's just in their very shallow brains still. They remember the Supreme Court said something about guns they didn't like yesterday.

And then abortion today. So they're like, what if we tie these two things together? Guys, why do women have less rights than guns? Woo! And then you increase your following by 100,000. And you get 265,000 retweets and 800,000. and 800,000 likes, and everyone's like, that's amazing. And then people take screenshots and they post them on their Instagram stories.

And everyone goes around and talks about what an incredible idea. Do you believe this country? Women have fewer rights than guns do. The fundamental biggest part of the problem here, Pat. And this is what the Supreme Court said. There isn't a constitutional right for abortion. Alito absolutely specifically. outlined that in the opinion.

Egregiously wrong from the start. Right. Okay. Not that it was a right and we took it away because we don't think women should have rights, but that the right does not exist in the Constitution, as has been admitted for decades by not only conservative legal scholars, but also liberal ones, who say, hey, we really like abortion. We really think it should be in the Constitution, but it's not. Including Ruth Bader Ginsburg for a really long time. Really long time.

Yeah, Ruth freaking Bader Ginsburg. She was a little bit, I think, radicalized once she got into the Supreme Court. It took a while, but she was, she turned around on it a little bit. She's quite clear, though, at the beginning. But at the beginning, she didn't like the law. And Ruth Bader Ginsburg. She wanted abortion, but realized it was not in the Constitution. So, and the other side of this is the Second Amendment is in the Constitution.

So the thing you don't like is in the Constitution, and the thing you do like isn't in the Constitution. This is why it's hard for you to understand these things, because the left has this understanding of constitutional law, Pat, which basically says, if I want it, it's in there. If I don't want it, it's not in there. And that's how they judge all, that's how Sonia Sotomayor makes every decision. It's in there. I want it. And then it's not in there. So I don't want it.

It's not in there. That's the way they do it. And just to put a bit of a fighter point on this one particular dumb argument about women's rights versus guns rights, women can own guns. So it's difficult to make the argument that guns have more rights than women when women can own them. And shockingly to the left, they do own them. Many women own firearms, Pat. Wow.

That's a thing? Yeah, and it's hard to say like, it's like arguing, you know, a slave has more rights than its owner. It's like if, if party one owns party two, party two does not have more rights than party one. That's kind of a good rule of thumb. Yeah. So this point in particular, while wildly popular in the left is so stupid. So ignorant. So stupid.

So much of this went on. I mean, it really is difficult to overstate. The emotional stupidity we witnessed over the thing. It really is. Really is. I will say this though, Pat. We should give credit where credit is due. Most, most of the country is not on fire.

Right. I mean, a lot of it is not on fire. Now, we did, of course, see, you know, protest erupt into violence across the country. We did see Fox News headquarters targeted. We did see fireworks shot at police. Yeah. We did see a pro-life woman attacked. We did see some journalists assaulted.

we did see bro abortion protesters try to storm the Arizona state capital sure we saw all that we did see a fire bombing or two but generally speaking the entire country is not on fire and that's just wow congratulations what restraint

yeah all the restraint is incredible I mean they got something they didn't like and for at least two days did not set the country on fire over it completely some of it they did but not completely and that's incredible What a great job. Also, NBC News analyzed for abortion supporters the distance to the nearest open abortion clinic in major cities.

Yeah. In 21 states that either have preexisting or pending state level abortion bans now. Get this. For someone living in Salt Lake City, it will require driving six hours and traveling roughly 335 miles to the nearest open clinic in state. Steamboat Springs, Colorado. No. That's inconvenient. No.

Yeah, they're going to be inconvenience to kill their baby. And I can't have that. You should be able to do it much easier than that. I think so too. You know? Yes, you should have an abortion clinic in every neighborhood and it should be within walking distance, less than two blocks to an abortion clinic. Well, I mean, I remember, I'm old enough to remember when everyone had an abortion

clinic in their house. You know, when you would be able to walk down the hall. And this is before these. conservatives got in control, but you walked down the hall. This was pre-Ragan. Yeah, yeah. I think he stopped it. He tried to stop it.

I still have the abortion room in my house, though. Oh, you do? Yeah. Just no doctor in there? Sometimes, yeah, I live in Texas, Pat. Oh, yeah. And they just won't, they won't allow this anymore. But usually, basically that the typical house would come with an abortion fund room.

And in there would be the doctor would just live there. Okay. You know, there'd always be a doctor ready for. Just in case. Just in case. Somebody in the house got pregnant and didn't want it. You just walk down there whatever he needed to. You know what I mean?

You walk in, you get your abortion, you go back to the couch. Now, this is men or a woman could get the abortion, right? Of course. Service either one. Well, can men or want to get pregnant? Duh. Obviously. Yeah.

Yeah. I mean, we're talking, the men with the uterus. You know, men striding men. Yes. Men strating men could walk right down the old. Or men strating people would be more correct. That's true. I'd be more comfortable with men.

I don't even like men. I don't even like men. I don't like it. I think we need to get that out of there. People's trading. Women's trading. People's trading is better. People trading.

That's the way it used to be, Pat. And now these conservatives are taken over and turn us into a Handmaids Tale. This is all this. I love the Handmaids. There's another brilliant observation that people use every minute of every day on social media. So I've watched the Handmaid's Tale. I've watched the series. And it's very, very well done as a, you know, as a production.

It's a, you know, they spent a lot of money on it. It's very well acted. Okay. You need to come up with another reference. Any other reference. There's been a lot of entertainment over the past, let's say, century. Can you pick any movie, any book, any show, anything else, a song, anything other than Handmaidstale? Are you saying Handmaidstale doesn't fit their narrative?

Is that what you're saying? They think it does. I know. And it's bizarre to think that they would because, you know, like, For example, they're like, oh, we're going to go back to the pre-Row days. We're going to go back to pre-1973. Actually, there was many more states that banned it then, which shows you it's not a constitutional right. Right.

Because when they passed the 14th Amendment that they based this ridiculous Roe versus Wade ruling on, three quarters of states banned it entirely. And they're like, well, that's what they meant. They wanted to have abortion as a right. Really, did they? Why would they not address that then? when three quarters of states had banned it entirely

when they passed the amendment and then of course Gorsuch made that point very clearly but like we're going to a place that we are still going to be we're going to have abortion available in this country at levels far more liberal

far more liberal than Europe it might not be available you might as you point out Pat you might have to get in a car we'll get this Stu this will shock you to your core okay really yeah

to your core from Boisey item The drive is more than 250 miles to the Walla Walla Health Center in Washington. Oh, my goodness. Get this. A patient in Idaho Falls won't even be able to get to the nearest clinic, approximately 290 miles away in Helena, Montana, without a car. Meaning there is no bus service and you can't walk there. Well, you could, but it would take a while.

Did they take our abortion in-house ideas seriously? How did people get abortions before? Did they not drive to the clinic? Now, I will say this, Pat. Increasingly, abortions are done by pill many times through the mail. So actually, I joke about having the abortion in the house, but that is happening in a lot of cases right now. Maybe the majority of cases, and certainly the majority going forward in a lot of these states.

Where did you say the place was? in Colorado Steamboat Springs Steamboat Springs Because I'm interested I don't even think that's true because there is

an organization Now Steamboat Springs is let's say I mean it's not really that close to the border of Colorado looking at it now You know you'd have to drive

a while Pat Well 330 miles from Salt Lake City However you don't know about the new mobile abortion clinics They're making

No I don't know about him See, that's the thing. They'll come to you. They will come. They're literally doing this. This is serious. This is unlike walk down the hall and have an abortion in your house with the danger who lives there. That one wasn't serious.

This one is, Pat. They are building like Winnebago's and they're driving them to the borders of these states. So you can just hop right across the border, get your abortion, and go home the same day. And they're doing it with pills and surgical abortions. and in addition to that, Pat, they're arranging charter bus transportation and flights, free flights, for people to go to these areas.

But they're charter busing, in theory, they're just setting this programs up now because it just happened this weekend. But they're setting up charter buses to go from wherever you are. You get on the abortion bus. You know, the wheels of the bus go round and round and you drive with all your abortion

receiving friends. And you make lots of new friends. Hey, we're all getting abortions together. We have something in common. And you go and you just wipe out an entire generation of children and then come home. Wow. On the same bus. That's really convenient. It's really convenient. That's great. And that's going to be available soon to you. I know the test program for this happens to be in Colorado. That's where they're starting it. So if you happen to live around Colorado, fear not. Fear not. You can just wipe out an entire football team of kids on one bus.

It's going to be great. Kind of work out wonderfully. 8-727 B-E-C-K more coming up. This is the Glenn Beck program. It's Pat and Stufer Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. You know, we're just talking about the availability of abortions and NBC News, in fact, trying to help people find where they can get an abortion in the nearest city or state and all of these things. But the other thing that's going on is companies are going to cover your travel cost. for employees to get an abortion.

It's like abortion tourism now. So some of the companies that have already said, look, we'll pay for your abortion and we'll send you to the nearest place, give you airfare. I mean, Amazon is promising people $4,000 to get an abortion. It doesn't cost $4,000 to get an abortion or to even fly to get an abortion. Somebody's going to be making money on that. I know that's funny too, because I doubt they're going to be direct payments.

they're going to go probably the employee who can say, yeah, it costs me 4,200. Can you give me the $4,000? That'll at least defray the cost. And it'll be like $800. Right. Or they don't even get the abortion at all. Because Amazon, I got news for you, is not going to be checking. They're not going to ask for a note that says, I mean, this could be a new business for me.

I might say, I'm a man. I got a uterus. You can't check that. You can't ask me about that. So I'm a menstruating person. Don't worry about it. And I'm pregnant. I need to go get an abortion.

I need to travel to Hawaii. You're going to need to pay for that. Hawaii's the only place where you can get an abortion from where I am. Yeah. And then I would go like 12 times a year. Once a month, I'm in Hawaii for my quote-unquote abortion. They can't ask me about it. I got pregnant again.

Dardt. I have just, you got to understand. I'm having so much unprotected sex. It's just unbelievable. I love it. And so can't help myself. So Disney will help you pay for this. Sporting Goods has offered their employees up to $4,000 in travel and expense reimbursement.

Amazing. Goldman Sachs. J.P. Morgan Chase. Levi's, of course, what a hideous company they've become. Of course, Amazon with the 4,000 Starbucks, Citigroup, Yelp, Apple, Match, and Bumble. And this is just a partial list. I mean, it's going to be virtually. It's going to do this.

It's amazing, too, how many things are not covered. by health insurance from these companies that constantly are in battles with their employees about when they have actual illnesses and they can't get them treated. Yet here we are with something. They just try so hard to make this seem like it's health care. And like, look, it's just, that's not what it is. You know, I really do think the left, and I don't want them to benefit, of course, but they would benefit by putting themselves back in the position that Joe Biden had in 2006.

To say, like, this isn't health care. It's a terrible tragedy. We can't stand that this has to happen, but sometimes we believe it should. That's a bad argument in my view, but it's one that would connect with a lot of people in the country. Unlike shout your abortion and we as a company will pay for your vacation to get one. Yeah. That's not a winning argument to the American people, I don't think. Way too extreme.

Triple-8-727-B-E-C-K. More patents too for Glenn coming up on the Glenn Beck Perva. Entertainment and Enlightenment. The Glenn Beck. Wow, still so much to get into on this abortion situation. And the reaction to the overturning of Roeby Wade. We'll get into that coming up in 60 seconds. How would you like it if every time you picked up your cell phone,

you're reminded not only of how much money you're saving every month because you switch to Patriot Mobile. But look, it's not only that. It's that you're doing something good. What if you could actually be working with a cell phone company that was doing something positive. Let me tell you this. This is behind the scene stuff.

My wife does some volunteering for, she was doing phone calls for some of these local school boards in Texas. You know, they've been, they've had these problems. There's been big debates. They've been national stories where there's this back and forth between the CRT sort of side of things and the people fighting against it. And, you know, we talk about Patriot Mobile donating their money.

You know, you subscribe to Patriot Mobile. They'll take portions of your money and it will go to good causes like that. But it's not only that. She was there making phone calls on this topic, and they were there too. Like Patriot Mobile, they never announced it, they never talked about it.

They were just, all these employees were there on a, I believe a work day. They just, Patriot Mobile was like, you know what, today, let's just go make phone calls on this. That's how important it is. They care, they believe in the same things you believe in. And instead of supporting somebody who is giving money

to plan parenthood, you can support a company that will give you the best service and also will help causes you believe in. Patriotmobile.com slash Beck is the place to go to get that service. 972 Patriot is the phone number. You get free activation with the offer code Beck. Veterans and first responders save even more. So make the switch today between the left, the media and the rhinos. We need to stick together. It's Patriotmobile.com slash Beck. Patriotmobile.com slash Beck or 972 Patriot. It's 972 Patriot.

Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program this week. something we talk about from time to time is how passionate the left is about abortion. It's fascinating. It's like a religion to them. It's more of a religion, I think, than even climate change is. They love abortion.

The fact that they can kill babies is just so important to them. And so when they perceive that they've lost that right, which again, they really haven't lost the right. There's still going to be places where you can get abortions if you really want it. But the reaction is amazing. Look at this woman who throws a pillow down. She's got knee pads on because,

she's very animated about the Roe v. Wade decision. Oh, wow. I'm sorry. That's just a little irrational. I don't want to be a flip-flopper here, but in her case, she should be able to report her kids. You know, I just, I don't think any of us are arguing for her to be a parent. That's unbelievable.

That's psychotic. Is that bizarre? It's so weird, too, the performative nature of it, because, you know, If you're listening to radio, you can't, you can only hear the screaming and the bleeping. She's in a leopard print, like, onesie thing, leotard deal. Yeah. She's doing that. And someone else, crucially, is holding the camera.

Yeah. Right. Like, this is a performance as if they think this is a good representation of their movement. Hey, honey, you film me while I throw a pillow down and then just go ape crap on video. How would that be? I'll just start screaming and shaking. and shaking wildly. And people are going to love it.

They're going to love the response. Yes. Amazing. Weird. Hey, Pat, let me break in here real quick just to give you a little news update. We are now in the middle of Supreme Court time. And we have a very good one yet again, more good news from this court.

Oh, wow. As Bremerton, Kennedy v. Bremerton, this is the case of Coach Kennedy. I think, I don't know if you had him on, Pat on Pat Gray unleashed. I had him on in Studeau America. We had him on here on the radio show. A coach who was who was praying at the 50-yard line after his games, never asking anybody to come join him.

They said that he got fired for this, and they said, you're not allowed, it's a separation of church and state issues. Again, something that's not in the U.S. Constitution. Another thing that isn't in the U.S. Constitution. Right. But that one was written by Gorsuch,

a 6-3 decision, as you would expect. So to Major, Breyer and Kagan on the wrong side of that, as they always are, but that is a big one. That was one of the three or four big ones remaining, and it goes the correct way. How do you see that? Any other way? Any other way. Then slapping that down. It's not, I mean, if you're a Supreme Court justice, you should know the Constitution well enough to understand separation of church and state is not really a thing in the United States Constitution.

The only thing about the church and state is that the state shall not establish a religion. They shall not make no law establishing a religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. Yep. That's it. That's it. I mean, literally to the point, Pat, that they encouraged states to form their own state churches. Yeah. There were state churches in effect when this went on. one of the first acts of the Congress was to have a prayer.

It was a congressional. And of course, we still have congressional days of prayer from time or time. They printed a Bible. They printed a Bible. Yeah. They held prayer. I mean, it's so over the top of the other way. And this is not even that. We're not even talking about like, oh, well, Congress should get together and pray every day on, you know, in the floor of, you know, of the Senate or whatever.

Which they do. Which they do, by the way. And still do. And they still have national days of prayer. And all this stuff still occurs. Yeah. But regardless of that, you can't do that. This is basically a coach who, after the games, because he had a crazy life and decided after all these games would end, he said, you know what, I've had gone through so much, I'm going to thank God every day.

And after these games, they're just going to go to the 50-yard line, take a knee, say a silent prayer. And you can only take a knee if it's in a protest of the United States flag. That's the only way. It's the only way that's constitutional. The same people who will say, Colin Kaepernick. What a hero. Has a right to be able to.

Now, of course, in a private business like that, he doesn't actually have a right to do that. Now, I don't care if he does it. Now, he can't get on the field because he's such a terrible quarterback. But if he could get on the field, I don't necessarily care if he does it. I don't take my political advice from athletes. That's not the way it works for me.

I try to come up with those opinions on my own. So they can come up with their own. dumb opinions all they want and express them however they want. I don't care. I'll just ignore them. But the NFL has, they can absolutely stop them from doing that if they want to. But however, like I guess you're able to fire a coach for just taking a knee and praying. That's just not true.

This First Amendment, the freedom of religion, does not stop at your door. Does not stop at the door of the church? It is something you're able to do. Just like we just learned, or at least the left just learned with the Second Amendment. the Second Amendment also doesn't stop at your front door. That's not where that right ends. It is a right and you can carry your gun around and they shall issue it to you that permit.

So anyway, long story short, that is a big case, probably one of the biggest ones remaining that you are apparently, you do have some religious liberty. This court, I will say, has been good on these issues. And people, let me give credit where credit is due as well to first liberty. Institute. Friends of the show, you know, all those guys over there, Jeremy Dice and, you know, the whole crew has done such a great job in in being relentless pushing for religious liberty and for

the court to respect it. And this was, you know, this was their case. I mean, they argued it in front of the Supreme Court. They, they've shepherded this thing through all the way and did an incredible thing. They've made a real difference. You know, well, there's been a lot of criticism. of conservatism, of originalism, of the conservative legal project in general, oh, we don't get enough results. I mean, it's hard to argue with this right now. This has been an incredible achievement. And I think you look at it, everybody from all aspects of conservatism has made this stuff possible. You know, you can look, we named a few of the names, President Trump, even people like Mitch McConnell, First Liberty Institute, the Federalist Society. These are widely

varying views in a lot of these groups, but all generally just wanted the Constitution respected, and we're seeing that happen. Yeah. It's incredible. And that's, I mean, another, as you mentioned, another great ruling. Maybe we'll get one on climate change as well, which would be great. Yeah. They've got an environmental opinion coming up.

That's the, I mean. Is that going to happen today? It may. So we just got another one as Concepcion, which we'll go through here in a minute, but not, EPA versus West Virginia is the, I don't know, maybe the biggest one I'm looking at right now. because that one I think will They might save that till Thursday or Friday or something

You know again, who knows? I will say they are always up for surprises Like Friday Yeah That was a big surprise I thought that would be the last one they announced And that's like a traditional thing They leave these sort of controversial ones

To the last day But that's not a rule Like they can do that They can do it whenever they want We do know that we have at least one more coming here As we're sitting here And it looks like this one was, okay. Well, we'll go through this whole thing in just a minute because we're running late already.

But this was, we would at least have one more coming today. There's eight remaining coming into the day. We have two so far. We're going to have a third one at least. Now, does this coach, by the way? Does the coach get his job back? Did they? I asked him that in the interview.

Did they go that far? I can't remember what he said. I think he was actually open to it. He was an interesting guy. I don't think I'd want my job back. Yeah, I told him I would like, I would hate these people. Yeah. Right?

They, they screwed him over, I believe, in a big way. Yes, they did. He had a totally different perspective on it. Like, his perspective was, number one, he's not like a pastor. This guy is not a religious zealot. He is not the guy who is going, you know, who is like, every time you talk to him, he's got a new scripture he's quoting. He's just like totally a normal guy who just believed he wanted to pray. Like it was he's not like you know what you would think of when you think of a guy standing up at the Supreme Court.

Did they warn him or ask him to do this somewhere else? Yeah. So what initially he started, if I'm remembering the story right, I think I am. Initially he started doing it by himself at the 50 yard line. Oh, did the team join? And then the team saw him do it. What a terrible influence. And said, coach, can we come pray with you?

And he's like, yeah, sure. Of course. It's America. Yeah. So he went, took a knee at the 50 yard line. He started, some of the players started gathering. remember that. Over time, even the other teams would start coming and gathering at the center of the field. No, it's unacceptable because you've got a whole bunch of people praying. We can't

have that. So, not on government school grounds. Now, that's a terrible point and not true. But that's what they said. And the school came to them and said, look, we know, we love you and everything, but you can't do it because people, everyone's, you can't bring other people involved because people are worried that you'll have influence over them. And he said, you know what? Okay. I will tell my team not to come out. So he told them, look, you guys can't come with me and pray out in the center because it's a big controversial thing. So then he went out and started doing it by himself again, and they still fired him.

Oh, man. So he was only doing it by himself and specifically asked for other people not to join. But his opinions seem to be closer to, look, I don't think they wanted to do this to me. They just felt they had to. I think that was really how he took it. Which again, like these people. the ignorance in this country about things that are not in the United States Constitution. They're such ignorance.

And just because people say it over and over and over that there's separation of church and state, separation of church and state. So people get into this little world where I'm sorry, you can't bring religion into this anywhere on school grounds. Well, what? What are you talking about? of course I can. But that's not the perception. And the perception has been reality for a long time.

And hopefully this decision will change that. Yeah, that's a big deal. It really is. Religious liberty is really doing well right now. And I think, you know, I'm hoping for, one of the big things I'm hoping for, is that many more of these cases and hopefully a definitive one gets to the Supreme Court as it relates to not just, not just church, but churches specifically when it comes to all the COVID restrictions. You know, the fact that they were trying to force churches to close down.

You have absolutely. I'm just trying. They did. They did. They did. I just don't think they did it legally. No, I don't either. We've seen some lower courts have issues with them and get some of that stuff overturned.

First Liberty worked on that stuff as well. But I would like to see one of these things go up to the Supreme Court level and have it be very clear that the government can make recommendations. They can say, hey, this is what we think you should do. Here's our best health advice. Here's what our experts are saying. And all that's fine. They can do all that stuff. They cannot stop you.

They cannot stop you. opening your business. I don't think that should happen either, but certainly when it comes to a house of worship, the government absolutely should not be able to do that. Yeah. And, you know, look, most churches went along with the advice and just decided, look, we think this is the best thing. And that's totally fine too. If that's what they believe the decision is, they can make that decision. But the government cannot enforce that. Absolutely not. It's insanity. And the whole theory is so upside down.

Like, the state needs to be protected from religion. No, that wasn't the founder's problem. The problem was religion being protected from the state. That's what they were concerned with. And that's what they were trying to do. And this ruling helps along those lines. AAA 727BECK. More Pat and Stufer Glenn coming up.

American Financing NMLS-18233. 3, www. nmls, consumer access.org. Fascinating lineup on the second decision. We'll get to it here in just a second. Strange bedfell fellows on this one. The country is facing an extremely significant slowdown as we move closer and closer to the brink of recession. Everything costs more lately and it's not going to get better anytime soon. So what do you do?

Do you have a plan yet? Do you know what you're going to do? You need to be saving money anywhere and everywhere that you can. And one of the best ways to do that is to give American financing a call. Let their salary-based consultants give you a free mortgage review. Why not? Once they do that, they'll know all of your options. They can lay them out for you.

I've worked with them before. That's what they do. They say, okay, you got option A, option B, option C, what do you think? You're talking about everything from paying off high interest debt, shortening loan terms. You can access cash from your equity. Tons of possibilities. And with the mortgage rates only going up from here, man, it seems like a good time to get this done if you haven't already. If you start soon, you could close in as little as 10.

10 days. Why not learn more? Call American Financing 800-906 2440, 800-906 2440, or go to Americanfinancing.net. It's Americanfinancing.com. 10 seconds. Station ID. That's Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. So another ruling is... Yeah, this is the Concepcion case. Now, it's about sentencing guidelines, basically.

Can you sentence to someone to a reduced sentence? There's not... We don't really need to get into all the details on the case. But I will say the line. is fascinating. It is Sotomayor wrote the opinion. Okay, so all right. Sotomayor. Usually going to be terrible. Sotomayor, Breyer and Kagan, as you'd expect,

grouped together, as they seem to always do. There's never really much exception from that. Every once in a while you'll see Kagan stray, but that's... It's rare, but it does happen. It does occasionally happen. Who joined them? What two, what two from the conservative side joined the three liberals on this case? John Roberts. You'd think John Roberts and...

And... Cavanaugh. would be the two that I would say. They seem to be the two centrist judges. Yeah. No, not in this one. Sotomayor, Breyer and Kagan, plus Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas. Oh my gosh.

Now that is a weird five right there. That is a weird five. Wow. Yeah. So you got that one. And we do have at least one more coming. And we know which one it is. Do we have the next one yet?

No. Oh, it's Rwan. This is one I looked at the other day, and I'm going to have to refresh my memory on what it is. Because, honestly, did you say it's Ron? Ron. R-U-A-N is the name versus U.S. This is about a physician alleged to have prescribed controlled substances outside the usual course of professional practice. Maybe convicted of unlawful distribution without regard to whether in good faith he reasonably believed that his prescriptions fall within the course of professional practice.

This one's going to burn down the country. Yeah, this is the riot. starting on this one already. I don't know if you if you look outside right now. They're pissed that the ruling hasn't even happened yet. Ruan! Look for that sort of graffiti on all, you know, walls of burned buildings here coming soon. It does seem to be in a unanimous decision.

Unanimous. Yes, Justice Breyer wrote it. And that is it for today. Okay. Looks like. So, yes. So that will give us down to, I think, five remaining for next week. Including the EPA one, which is.

is a big one. EPA also remain in Mexico Trump border policy is another big one on the docket. Oh. That's another one. Wow. Because Biden wants to get rid of it.

And so far the lower courts have said you can't. You don't have any justification for that. So as of right now, it remains a very controversial one. And one that the left is really looking at closely, of course. After this session, I think we're really going to have to fight off packing the court.

The court packing thing is really going to become an issue because they've lost several big decisions here during this session. Oh yeah. So what they're going to want to do is add a whole bunch of liberals to the court and you know, stack it with 13 justices and

Elizabeth Warren said as much today. Yeah. Over the weekend, she did. And you know, this is what the left does when they lose the popular vote or win the popular vote but lose the electoral college, they call for repealing the electoral college. When they can't get their judges through with 60 votes, they saying let's lower it to 50. Ask Harry Reid about that one in 2013, which

led to what we saw this on Friday. You know, this is what they do. When they don't get what they want, they just try to go around it. They never try to just win within the rules. But you look at this ruling, Roe versus Wade, conservatives won within the rules. They just used

the electoral process over many years decades. They fought with activism. They did everything they could. they at the very you know at league you know at law school well those levels developing conservative legal scholars and it finally paid off amazing the glenbank program so how important is your identity to you we know it's very important to so many people these days but your identity especially when you're talking online financially is a big big worry i mean it not only stands as a protective wall between everything you have financially and of course cyber criminals it also says who you are in the community what level of credibility

you have, with a tiny slip of information, it doesn't have to be much, all of it can be taken away in an instant. And it's important to understand how cybercrime and identity theft are affecting our lives. Every day, we put our information at risk on the internet. And that's what LifeLock is here for. They can't catch everything. Nobody can, but they can monitor things better than you can on your own, much better. And if you do become a victim, their restoration specialist can help you work through all the craziness that ensues. No one can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses, but you can help protect what is yours with LifeLock by Norton. Join now and save up to 25% off your first year with the promo code, Beck.

It's 1-800 LifeLock or go to LifeLock.com. You can use the promo code back for 25% off. Cybercrime is going crazy right now. You need to protect yourself and your identity with LifeLock. 1-800 LifeLock or LifeLock.com use the promo code back for 25% off. I would love it if you check out my show, Pat Gray, Unleashed. every weekday from 7 to 9 Eastern or anytime and anywhere you get your podcast. Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

What are we, a week from the 4th of July, right? It's next Monday. Yeah. Wow. Have it fast. If you still have a chance to get the greatest cookie on Earth, if you want, by the 4th of July, we can guarantee delivery if you order today from kexie.com. Today's the day?

Today's the day. Yeah. I will say I've had this last batch of cookies you've produced. Yeah. I mean, just with the salted caramel and. Yeah. The one that I fell absolutely in love with.

Now, they're all really great. But the one that I had a special relationship with was the coconut cream. Oh. Oh, my eyes love that thing. I did not expect. I mean, it was just fantastic.

That's great. It's the best one that I've had a while. I love it. I got to stay away from them. And by the way, that's available. Just go to kexee.com to order yours. We've been discussing the incredible insanity coming out of the left since the verdict.

And, you know, we were warned. We've been warned for the last, how long has it been since the verdict was leaked? Like three months? A couple months. And we've been warned the whole time to expect violence from both sides. And we were all, wait. Wait, why would? Why would we on the right go out and, you know, overturned cop.

cars and set buildings on fire. Why would we do that when we like this ruling? Maybe you forgot about January 6th. No, I didn't, but what does that have to do with anything? Well, that's just who you people are. That's really, and that's one of the reasons why January 6 really pisses me off. Me too. Now they have this one thing to punch me. Yes. They've got two things. They have Charlottesville and January 6th. And that's pretty much it. You know, I mean, like, concert, like, you know, obviously there have been over the years, unfortunately, a couple of high-profile abortion protester types that have

done really terrible things and have been immediately condemned. condemned by every single person I've ever known on the right. You know, Eric Rudolph and, you know, the Kansas abortion killer. There's been a couple

of incidents. I would not deny that there have been a couple. It's been very, very limited over the course of a 50-year battle to save. Very limited. Especially when the stakes are 65 million lives. Yeah. You know what I mean? Like when you think of how what a life and death situation this is.

I mean, in some ways, you're surprised there hasn't been more terrible behavior. It's really been done, as we mentioned before the break, within the bounds of the system, exactly the way it's supposed to be done. Yeah. You know, you have, you elect people. You, you have, but before that, long before that, there was a, a long term grooming of conservative legal scholars. activists who fought every day who did things like the, the March for Life, right? Year after year after year,

gather when it seemed completely hopeless. Yes. To the point. And we believed it was. When you'd turn on your favorite conservative talk show and you'd hear Pat Gray and Stuburg, you're telling you, it's completely hopeless. I mean, I didn't really believe it was that dire, but I never thought I would see the day.

No. where Roe versus Wade was even overturned. And there's a lot more to do on this fight. I mean, it does, you know, we really have prevented no abortions at this point. It's important to be clear. It just gives you the opportunity to argue for these things. And some of these states now, some of these abortions will not occur. And that's great news to me.

That means there will be people who will be alive will have a chance at life that did not previously. And I don't know how you can be fighting on the other side of that battle, frankly. I don't either. And they fight hard. Hard. They fight hard. and they make it an issue of race when we want to prevent abortions in minority areas.

You know, 80% of abortion clinics are in predominantly black areas, black and Hispanic. Yeah. 80%. And to me, that's awful. That says, okay, we want to abort and kill as many minorities as we possibly can. Yeah. We are saying, no, stop that.

Let those people live. Let them live. Yeah. And somehow we're the racists. It really is incredible. Bizarre. I mean, and you listen to the coverage of this, which is not every major media organization sent reporters to abortion clinics that found out about the ruling and then had to call quote unquote patients to tell them they could not come in because Roe versus Wade was overturned and now abortions are illegal in their state and them crying and sobbing. about how they want to help these poor women kill their children.

Why can we not? Please let us do it. Please. It's so sad. What a sad day. And it's like, is there no, no awareness in the press that the other side exists to this story? I guess not. They don't seem to have any interest in it.

And, you know, one of the reasons that the black population has stayed in this country between 12 and 14% for a hundred years is because of abortion. is because they're They're disproportionately aborted more than whites and we want that to stop. Yeah. And you know who doesn't want it to stop?

The left. And Margaret said here at the beginning of all this. This is why she started Planned Parenthood in the beginning. And it's been so successful. Look how successful it's been. And they love her. They adore her. They worship at the altar of Planned Parenthood.

And abortion. It's freakish. And there's just simply no way to get around it for the left that you can call us racist for a hundred different things, and they do. They'll call us racist for affirmative. There's a big case that's going to be coming in the next session on affirmative action. And I think there's a good chance that that gets limited in a major way by this court. And it should, you should not be making decisions by skin color.

That's something that we used to all agree on and is now apparently wrong. But you can call us racist for 100 different things. But we want the minimum wage level to be. What you think, you know, voter ID, all these ridiculous things they call us racist for. But the bottom line to all of this is if you implemented every single one of our policies, limiting welfare spending, voter ID, affirmative action, all these things, all to the conservative utopia, what the end result of all those policies would be is tens of millions of minorities. alive today that are no longer alive. And thriving. Some of them might not be thriving. Some of them. But more than are thriving now would be thriving because of the policies.

And they'd all have a freaking chance. Right? You know, like some of them will be doctors. Some of them will be astronauts. Some of them will solve society's great problems. Some of them will be crappy waiters at Chili's that screw up your order. Some of them will be the guy that cut you off in traffic. Some of them will be career criminals, but all of them deserve a chance to live their lives. You don't get to make this decision in advance for them. They get to make those decisions.

They might wind up screwing their life up entirely. A lot of us do. But you still get that chance. I'm fascinated at the idea that it's better for society that people should just be executed before they've done anything, before they've taken their first breath outside the womb. Let's kill them because they might. be a drain on society?

What the hell kind of philosophy is that? That is freaking psychotic. It's a eugenics philosophy. Yeah. And that's what it was based on. Fosters by Margaret Sanger. It was what it was based on. And you know what?

You look at white supremacy groups today and they are not pro-life. White supremacy groups support the right to abortion. And they will explicitly tell you the reason they do is because they like the fact that black and Hispanic babies keep getting aborted. Disproportionately. Disproportionately. They like it. So if you want to be on the side of white supremacy

and also not coincidentally, the Democrats, because they've been lined up for generations, hop on board to that pro-choice movement. It's working out well. It's working out well if that is your philosophy to life. But in reality, I don't understand how anyone can support this craziness. I don't either. Especially see it as.

the empathetic view. There's a column in the New York Times today by someone named Pamela Paul. She's an opinion columnist there. And let me just give you this how it starts. As the Fourth of July looms with his flags and its barbecues and its full-throated patriotism, I find myself mulling over the idea of American exceptionalism. What, if anything, makes this country different from other countries or from the rest of the developed world in terms of morals or ideals? In what ways do our distinct values inform how America treats his own citizens?

I land on a distinct absence of mercy. Witness the ruthless evisceration of Roe versus Wade and expand. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. So how about the ruthless evisceration of the babies inside the womb? Yeah. Up to and including a full-grown infant coming out of the birth canal and being torn apart and murdered right then and there? I mean, it's incredible.

My gosh. What lack of self-awareness could you have as a human being to literally define mercy as the constitutional right for one person to kill another? That's mercy to the left. How on earth can you think that way? I can understand you thinking the way of Joe Biden in 2006. It's a terrible tragedy. We don't want it to happen. We want it safe and rare.

We want it safe. We want it rare, but we don't want it to occur. That's gone. This is a totally different worldview than that person in 2006. Now, by the way, Joe Biden now holds the same worldview that I just discussed from Pamela LaPaul, the New York Times. But it's like this idea that murdering 65 million people is mercy is psychotic. It is exactly the eugenic philosophy that led to what we saw in World War II.

It's exactly that. It is what Margaret Sanger believed and has continued to try to carry out against this country through Planned Parenthood and other organizations all of this time. And it is fascinating that that has been presented and continues to be presented as this empathetic thing. We're supposed to listen to abortion clinic doctors who are unable to kill children for a day and hear them sob and feel, oh my gosh, these poor people. now have to drive an extra hour. That's supposed to be the empathetic side of the argument. Yeah. Incredible.

And just a reminder of what the left thinks of Margaret Sanger, who was a eugenics person, wanted to rid the country of minorities. I admire Margaret Sanger enormously. Oh, wow. Her courage, her tenacity. Uh-huh. Eugenics. Her vision.

Her vision was to eliminate. That's an important. To eliminate black people in America. That was her vision. Great friends, Ellen Chesler is here who wrote a magnificent biography of Margaret Sangerthold called Woman of Valor. Oh, wow. And when I think about what she did all those years ago in Brooklyn, taking on archetypes, taking on attitudes and accusations flowing from all directions.

Accusations like. I am really in awe of her. And there are a lot of lessons that we can learn from her life. Well, yeah, and Hitler did learn some of those lessons from Margaret Sanger. It's a matter of fact. It's interesting to note. AAA 727 B-E-C-K. Stay informed.

Sign up for the free newsletter today at glenbeck.com. It's Pat and Stufer Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. AAA-7-27-B-E-C-K. We've got four cases left now that the Supreme Court is going to decide this. session. One's on immigration. One's basically a climate change sort of issue.

One has to do with Native American sovereignty. You know, because they took the whole Indian nation and they put them on this reservation. How do they know? They took away their way of life, you know?

The Tomahawk, the Bowen knife. They taught, they took away their native tongue. Really? Yeah. What do they do? Instead, they taught their English to our young. Not mine, but speaking for the Native Americans. And, you know, maybe the worst part of this, though. Yeah.

All the beads they made by hand? Yeah. You know where those are made nowadays? In Japan or Taiwan or China, even more nowadays. Yeah, Bangladesh often. Bangladesh. Yeah, it's a big one. Yeah.

So I don't know if they're going to rule on that aspect. of it. Yeah, I think they will. I've always found it interesting because you've, you've said something similar to that many times, Pat. And I always, yeah, yeah, I don't know if you know that. I don't remember doing that. And I've always, I've always, I've always interested in the, as how the Native American in this situation would define their way of life as a Mohawk, or a Tomahawk, and a bow and knife. It just doesn't seem like that would be, a modern way to describe Native Americans. Yeah, and probably not how they would. Like, you know what defines us Tomahawk.

That's, if I'm going to say one thing. And what about your bow and your knife? That's a really, it's a pretty good point. It's too. Odd. Anyway, that, that is, of course, very much part of this case in the Supreme Court. They're going to be, I'm sure that's, if that does not find its way into a dissent, I will be very surprised. What was the fourth thing?

They're doing. I don't remember. And they'll either do this probably Thursday and Friday or maybe next week, because it almost always ends in early July. We don't know the day yet. We don't know the day. This is about whether Congress has the power to authorize suits against non-consenting states pursuant to its constitutional war powers. Honestly, it's not what I fall in. If that doesn't go the way I want it to, I'm going to be burning buildings down.

Really? I'm really pissed off about it. Yeah. Just thinking about it, make me angry. This seems like a really good approach. And I think it's working out well for the left. Yes. They're reaping the rewards of this right now.

This approach. See, I really do think, you know, you get the more and more psychotic you get, the more you wind up winning people over to your opposition. And I do think that at times, conservatives have that same issue. And you have to be careful about it. Because, you know, persuasion is still the name of the game here. You know, you can change laws all you want. You can get your memes, you know, and all your, you know, slam dunk tweets out there.

And that's great. But persuading people who might agree with you is still the most important thing. It's how you win these things long term. And I think we saw a very long, 50-year battle to achieve those ends here. Entertainment. Still much more to share with you on this abortion ruling in the fallout in the aftermath. We will get to that and much more in 60 seconds. Roe versus Wade, of course, just overturned the other day.

You might be thinking to yourself, you know, I'll believe I'll pack up and move to one of those red states I keep hearing about. Seems like they got the right idea. That's been kind of a common refrain over the past a few years. years since COVID especially. If so, we are happy to have you here in any red state, of course, but there's a whole matter of selling your home and then buying another one. If you didn't know, it can be a complicated mess, which is why it's incredibly important for you to have a good real estate agent.

Years ago, our own Glenn Beck, who's not with us today, he will be back after his vacation. But he started a company called Real Estate Agents I Trust. The whole idea was that they connect you with the best possible real estate agents. both in the area you're moving from and the area moving to. Whether you're moving across town or across the country, the agents they work with will do everything they can to make sure you succeed. It's a great service, and it has changed a lot of people's financial transactions.

And remember, this is the biggest financial transaction you may ever have in your entire life, so it's really important. Real EstateAgen'sitrust.com. The name kind of says it all. Go to real estateagents. itrust.com. It's real estate agents. I trust.

dot com. Pat and Stufer Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. Just a quick note here about CNN. Hopefully things are going to change there. I mean, that's the big rumor that they're going to get rid of. They're going to clean house. All these biased so-called journalists are apparently on their way out. I mean, that's the rumor they keep saying.

And I heard it was going to happen in the spring. It didn't. Maybe it'll happen in summer. Who knows? but Jake Tapper, who used to be a pretty reliable journalist, kind of did the same thing to both sides. He was just interviewing Boris Johnson, the prime minister in Great Britain, and seemed to be trying desperately to get him to bash the United States.

Tapper asked if he's worried about a decline of democracy in America. how can there be a decline of democracy when we don't have a democracy? This is just one of my pet peeves. I can't take it. But Tapper claimed his international friends are voicing concern. And I'll bet he has so many international friends. But they're voicing concerns that American democracy is eroding. Boris Johnson promptly dismissed these concerns.

she kind of surprises me. When I talk to friends in Canada, the UK, Australia, and elsewhere, people express concern about the United States, Tapper said, in terms of our ability and our institutions to thrive and continue after what happened with the election of 2020. What happened? Some people believe it's a fraud and so our democracy is in trouble? Well, then there was, of course, 1-6. The day democracy almost died. But Tapper said they're worried that democracy is on life support in the United States. Are you worried at all?

No. Johnson immediately replied, You're not? I want to say this to the people of the United States, Johnson said. I'm not. I guess get back to what I've been trying to say to you throughout this interview. I think it appears that the death of democracy in the United States It's grossly, grossly exaggerated. America is a shining city on a hill.

That's the Ron Reagan description. And it will continue to be so, he said. That kind of surprises me coming from him. AAA 727 BECK. Let's go to Ryan in Massachusetts. Hey, Ryan, you're on the Glenn Beck program with Pat and Stu. How are we doing? Good.

Very good. I just wanted to comment. I know it's kind of late in the show now, but on the church situation, we, you know, of course, we have a rhino for a governor here in Massachusetts, and he had ordered that all worship services be ceased because of COVID. Our church never did. We stayed. We maintained being open until we did have a small little COVID issue.

We did, and then we shut down for two weeks to make sure that we were doing our part. but we weren't doing it because the government told us, too. I have a good passive friend of mine in Worcester Mass, who runs the Adams Square Baptist Church, and they were going so far to shut him down as to having mounted police, police cruisers outside of his church before and after church services. And, of course, it didn't make national news. You know, why would a pastor standing up saying people need God, people need Jesus now, not to sit at home by themselves be isolated where Satan can attack him.

But he took a stand. Now, I also wanted to add that this pastor was a convicted felon. And he's actually since had his entire slate pretty much wiped clean from the governor in New Hampshire. And it's completely changed his life. But his point was people at this point still needed to be able to be in church. And the government shouldn't be able to stay. Well, the churches could maintain being open or closed. Right.

It was a personal choice if we wanted to go into church and expose ourselves to other people who may have COVID. Yeah, this is basic, right? I mean, when it comes to this country, this should not be controversial. You, the controversial decision might come from the church to stay open in a situation like this. You might say, hey, you guys are not respecting your congregation. You should take this thing online for a few weeks. You can absolutely make that argument. Many churches did, by the way.

Most churches did wind up taking some sort of delay and putting it online. But like the idea that the government can step in and stop a worship service, I would argue literally under any circumstance. I don't think there's any circumstance whatsoever that the government can be involved in that. They can take on behavior that's illegal. Like if they're sacrificing human beings inside the church, they can do something about that. But like, that's really the extent of it. You can't tell a church to not operate. That's not something you can do.

It's un-American, unconstitutional. Thanks, Ryan. Appreciate it. Now, you, I mean, there's exceptions to that. Right, because what if some people enter the U.S. Capitol building and start milling around and parading, then should you close churches? You'd agree with that, wouldn't you? Because, I mean, that is a crisis that you almost can't overcome. Really? Because I feel like you can overcome. And we have pretty well, actually. It was a crisis for a couple of hours there. That was pretty bad. And then, you know, like three hours later, the government did its business anyway. I've always wondered, okay, let's say that these insurrectionists were entirely successful in what they did.

Right. How would that even overturn our Republic? No, it wouldn't. Republic. It wouldn't. That's why I really don't like the word interrection. Yeah, stupid. Like, there, when it's just talking about the riot specifically, like it does, it's just not a good description of what occurred there.

What occurred there was a riot. Yes. You know? Yes. It does seem like there were a few people in that crowd. that had other aims. And a lot of those people were probably Antifa douchebags.

Maybe. I mean, I do think that there were people on the, on the, you know, the, yeah, some people got carried away. The proud boys sort of side of things. And certainly not even all the proud boys, but like some of them seemingly, there are communications that show

that they really did want to try to do something crazy there that day and had some planning to it. Although we just came out just this weekend. came out that Tario, who was the guy who was running the proud boys at the time, had a meeting with the proud boys and said, don't cross police lines. Oh, wow. Now, it seems like some of the proud boys didn't agree with that or didn't go along with it.

Yeah, and they went anyway. But when anyway, but the bottom line was there may very well have been some people in that crowd that did, did have those aims. But like, what is so? What does it mean? Like, you know, I don't. Those people should be prosecuted for that. That's what it means.

The people who try to actually overthrow the government, whether they had any rational basis for success or not, should still be punished. People who attacked police officers 100% easy for me to say should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. People who, you know, there were a lot of people who meandered in and meandered out and didn't do anything. Was that a good idea?

And still got prosecuted so long. Is that a good idea? No, I mean, I think you probably should have. probably should have known though as many of them have pointed out like we walked up to the doors and the police officers were like standing there letting us in so we didn't think it was that big of a deal I can understand how that might happen in the middle of the chaos some of the I don't understand I mean like there's obviously video of people smashing through windows those people knew they weren't allowed in right like we know some of this stuff would I don't

want to downplay the day it was bad but the left is brought it to ridiculous ridiculous lengths. And what they're trying to do with this commission largely is silly. Where do you stand on the idea? Trump basically came up and said, hey, we shouldn't have abandoned this commission. We shouldn't have taken the Republicans off the commission because now there's nobody pushing back. There's nobody giving the other side. There's nobody asking tough questions. It does seem like that probably was a mistake. I don't know at the time I remember Trump complaining about it, but at the time, it is a, it does seem to be a mistake here. There's no, there's no other side. There's no Jim Jordan. Now they took Jim Jordan off the commission, but like, there's no,

there's none of those figures sitting there and being like, wait, what about this? What about this? What about this? There's none of it. There's no pushback. That's, that's, that's, you know, probably not a good idea. I know my group, ashamed men, got our wires crossed a little bit. Okay. And instead of going to D.C., we wound up in Pocatello, Idaho. Really? Yeah. Yeah. Ashamed men as opposed to the proud boys. You're the ashamed men. Yes. And you guys went to Idaho?

Yeah. Pocatello specifically. Yeah. And then suddenly realized, well, there's not even a capital building here because this isn't the capital. So I think we got our wires crossed a little bit. I will say you guys are a pretty crappy organization. I don't mean to be offensive to you. But, you know, ashamed men have to have some outlet, don't they?

I don't know. No, you don't think so. I think they do. It's just on the internet in the middle of the night. All right, let's go to Dakota in Indiana. Hey, Dakota, you're on the Glenn Beck program. How are you guys doing this afternoon? Good.

It's only morning. I guess it's still 11. Yeah, yeah. All right, go ahead. I'm calling about the Supreme Court case of Dubbs and Rovers Wade. A lot of the states that have these trigger laws going on, there are also states that state that an abortion is considered an abortion if you are carrying a baby and you miscarrying you that baby has to be medically removed and a lot of the people that I have spoken to since this case has come out are traditionally vote conservative

but that's where they draw the line is because these states aren't and nobody's talking about that they still qualify that as an abortion but nobody it's not. Yeah, obviously. Appreciate the call, Dakota. They need to be careful about that. Yes. Some of the laws do need to be careful about that.

For example, I know for a fact, the Arkansas law is written with that as a specific exception, right? A miscarriage. A miscarriage. And then the removal, that's a specific exception in the Arkansas law. I believe most of these states are treating it that way. There may be a state or two that is not, not because they intentionally are trying to you know, make that a criminal activity.

They just didn't write the law as clearly as they should have. And that will be corrected by these states. I don't think they're going to have any problem with that. But if they don't correct it, of course, that's going to be used against the right and this ruling. This is what we're hearing right now, which is the fear mongering on top of this, right? A big focus of this is what Clarence Thomas wrote in his concurring opinion, which basically said, look, what we did to come up with Roe versus Wade, was insane. We just created these rights out of thin air. We've done this in a bunch of other cases either as well, and we should go back and address those, like contraception, like

gay marriage. We should go back and address these, like the anti-sodomy law that was in Texas. We should go back and readdress these. Now, he's not making the argument that any of these things individually are bad or wrong or should not be legal. He's just saying the case as decided was terrible legal precedent. And we can't just ignore that. However, we should point out they have one vote for that. One.

Now, it might very, I think it is the correct legal argument without question. You can't just manufacture law. All those rulings were poor legally. The judicial basis for it was poor. But that doesn't mean that there's

an appetite to go back and investigate those cases and overturn them. The only only thing, the Only literally they got one vote for that. They also got two votes of the six basically came out and said, we're not doing this at all. That was Roberts and Kavanaugh. And in the main opinion, it said this has nothing to do with those other cases.

Like they specifically came out and said it has a- It's only abortion. Yet if you go- Alito made that really clear. Alito was very clear. Thomas said, look, I agree it's only abortion in this case. I think we should go farther. He's the only vote.

on the Supreme Court for that. The only one. And I think, honestly, he's correct when it comes to a legal standard, but, you know, it's just not happening right now. Yeah. AAA 727 B-E-C-K, more Pat and Stufer Glenn. Coming up. You know, one of the things that the left is

screaming about is, oh, okay, well, watch out same-sex marriages, because you're next. Watch out trans people, because you're next after that. They're just going to put you in prison. Fear-mongering. Fear-mongering. This.

This is just fear mongering. You know, Clarence Thomas, again, is the only vote for this right now. Again, I think he's setting this up and saying, like, look, long term, we should move this way as conservatives because we know, every conservative legal scholar knows these decisions were decided improperly. That doesn't mean the under the, the foundational policy there is wrong. Like if we went back to the contraception case and overturned it, what would happen is every state in the union would allow contraception. Almost certainly. I don't think there's any doubt about that. Now, there's other, you want to talk about gay marriage, it might get a little bit more questionable.

But the state, the court in and of itself, they said they're not going back on any of those cases. They're not going back to them. And specifically mentioned it. Yeah, they specifically said this has nothing to do with it and does not influence it. that Kavanaugh specifically said, no, we're not going there. We know Roberts isn't going there. You know the three liberals aren't going there. So the idea that this is going to happen at least anytime soon is crazy. It's just fearmongering. And most of these policies would, you'd have no problem with them, even if these legal cases, the Supreme Court cases were overturned.

Now, again, there would be all sorts of problems that would arise from overturning them. when it comes to paperwork and other things. And that's part of the reason why they're not going to do it, honestly. You know, when it comes to something like gay marriage, that's one of the reasons they're not going to do it. They know it's a terror... Obergafel was not a good decision. It was not well argued.

It was judicial activism. That does not mean that they are taking a position on whether gay marriage is right or wrong. They're just saying that there's no enshrined constitutional right to it, obviously. I mean, I... They could have... written it into the Constitution if they wanted there to be one, right? Obviously, there isn't a constitutional right.

That being said, it may or may not be right or wrong policy. And a lot of states would just say, well, of course, it's finally, you know, let's go that way anyway. You know, this is one of the real, and Alito hit on this in his opinion, one of the real crimes of Roe versus Wade and several of these other opinions is it takes it out of the hands of the people. it implements this sort of top-down judicial hierarchy where you can go to the people and say, hey, we think this is right, and therefore you do it.

We want it to be in there, and therefore it is. And that is not how the Constitution, it's not supposed to be working like that. It's really wrong for it to be working like that. And look, the conservative movement has spent 50 years trying to prove that and now have come to the place where they have,

at least for the time being, until the liberals get control of the court and they reverse all of this, which I would not be surprised at all if they do. That wouldn't either. I mean, you get a 5-4 liberal majority in there? You think they bring an abortion case really quickly and overturn it again? Absolutely. All of a sudden, all this starry decisis talk will be out of the window.

Yes. No longer do they care about precedent. You know, I love, that's one of my favorite arguments on this, Pat. This overturns 50 years of precedent of a legal rights. to abortion. And so? What did Roe versus Wade do then? What did it overturned 150 years of precedent?

Right? It overturned 150 years of tradition and history, the rights of the states to manage this process. You know, sometimes decisions are, quote, egregiously wrong from the start, end quote. And that's what you do in those cases, correctly. Pat and Stufer, Glenn. The other Glenbeck program this week. We promised to show you some people who are very, very thoughtful over the weekend and had some brilliant things to say about the Roe v. Wade situation. We've had videos of this guy before.

His name is Dash Dabrovsky, and he's urging people to get out and vote. That's his thing. It seems to always be the thing, Pat. Yeah. You know? Yeah, it does. seem to be the thing all the time, especially from the left. When they come out and they say they have an issue, how do you solve it?

It's always voting for them. Vote for them. You know, and then you say, well, what's the problem? Well, it's racism or it's abortion access or whatever. What do you do about that problem? You vote for Democrats. And then when Democrats get elected, did they solve the problem? No.

No. It's always, it's worse than we thought it was. We thought it was bad before, but now it's even worse. Right. What do we do about it? Better vote for Democrats. Exactly. Is it solved yet? Well, no, it's even worse than we thought.

So what do we do? We better vote for Democrats. Oh, it's that circle of grift. Over and over and over again. The same idiots fall for the same things. Yeah. But this particular dash is upset about Roe v. Wade being overturned. And he's tired of the videos of women crying.

He was, he's very sad about that. And here's his advice. We knew this day was coming, people. We knew it when Donald Trump appointed three Republican Supreme court justices who said they would uphold Louis V. Wade and lied under oath just so they could get confirmation and then overturn it once they came into power.

We knew this day was coming. So what are we going to do now? Are we going to surrender? Are we going to say no, it's over. We're going back to the dark ages. No. No. Stop it. We're going to show up to the ballot box in massive numbers. Massive. We're going to make

sure women's reproductive rights return to where they belong in the hands of women. not in the hands of six Republican Supreme Court justices. Are you with me, people? No. Are you with me? And are you with the Democrats?

No. You better show up to vote blue this November because everything's on the line. I guess I'm okay then because I'm not with him. That was like a caricature of every social media personality together. Yes. I've never seen that guy before. Who is he? Uh, dash Dabrovsky.

Holy crap. Like the fake intensity. Yes. The wild hand gestures. Yes. The crazy, like... The eyes that are about to pop out of his skull. Oh, my God.

Was that terrible? Is this guy's a known quantity? Like, he's been out there? Well, he's known to us because we've played a few of his videos. Okay. That's a great find. I got to say, that's a great find. Yeah, he's something.

Some, you know, major problems with his thought process. Yeah. You think? Yeah. I can't, I don't know that I can name them. The one interesting part I always come back to on this is there's this idea that, you know, women's reproductive rights should be back in the hands of women, not decided by a bunch of male Supreme Court justices, Republicans in the Supreme Court.

Now, of course, Amy Coney-Barritz knew, so they don't include her. Now they just say, they're saying, oh, Republican justices. But, like, number one, the right of abortion, which is not a right and is not in the Constitution, was given to you by seven men, okay? Many of them Republicans, by the way. Right. So that was, that's number one, a Republican appointed. But it was seven men who decided on Roe versus Wade.

So the men gave that right that supposedly exists to women in the first place. So if you don't want men's hands on it, well, it's a problem because then you don't have the right in the first place. That's kind of a big problem for this argument. And, you know, I'm constantly like, I'm perplexed by these arguments in and of themselves. they're just silly. You know, they don't, they're not thought out very well, Pat. They don't, no, they should take less time posting and more time reading. That would be nice.

You know? Yeah, become informed on the issue before you post it. I don't know. That should be kind of a thing. Yeah. And, you know, learn, then vote. Yes. The order is important.

Yes, it is. You need to do that. But I was fascinated by this because I talked to the person who wrote the bill that led to this decision. Oh. on the air on studios america it's a great interview you should you should go back and check it out and you'll and now you'd think of course this is obviously a white man um that has no interest in women's reproductive rights but no it happens to be representative becky curry who is uh from mississippi who wrote the 15 week law who uh is a woman you may you may detect that from becky but these days difficult to tell on how someone might identify um but also was a nurse who worked in a maternity ward. Mm, okay. And also picked 15 weeks partially because she once delivered a baby at 15 weeks and

who struggled for life and she always remembered this, this little little girl. So it is the story of a woman who wrote a bill about a little girl, a baby girl, who she hoped would survive. And that led to the overturning of Roe versus Wade that we are told is all about men, implementing their will on women. Jeez. Incredible. Very. Wow.

Also, there's this CNN commentator who's talking about some issues in her own family and is seemingly saying that perhaps these people in her family should have been aborted from the start. The mother before, during, and after the child. I have not anybody to tell you

what you need to do with your life with your uterus. And because I have a family with a lot of special needs kids. I have a brother who's 57 and has the mental and motor skills of a one-year-old. And I know what that means financially, emotionally, physically for a family. And I know not all families can do it. And I have a step-granddaughter who was born with a Down syndrome. And you know what? It is very difficult in Florida to get services. It is not as easy as it sounds on paper. And I've got another another step grandson who is very autistic, who has autism, and it is incredible lives. And their mothers and people who are in that society who are in that community will tell you that they've considered suicide.

Because that's how difficult it is to get help. Because that's how lonely they do. Because they can't get other jobs. Because they have financial issues. Because they care that they're able to give their other children suffers. And so why can I be Catholic and still? think this is a wrong decision because I'm American.

I'm Catholic inside the church. I'm Catholic when it comes to me. She's Catholic inside the church. Inside the church. God, that is a great line. And I'm not Baptist. And you have no man right to tell them what they should do with their body.

Nobody does. All right. God, there's so much there. The Catholic inside the church is probably my favorite line of all time. I mean, Anna Navarro is continually idiotic. I mean, she has not said anything of value.

I don't think in her entire life, but she's on these shows all the time to, because she's, you know, they put an R next to her name or they say she's a Republican strategist, which there's no real evidence she ever was a Republican strategist. A Republican strategist. She's one of these like Republicans that comes on and does nothing but criticize Republicans. Like, you know the schick, obviously. She only has the R so CNN will put her on to bash Republicans. Right. And obviously she's terrible at this, right? So they don't want to, they have better people to argue

the liberal points, right? You could find a liberal that will make points much more coherently than her, but she gets very, she does the same thing that your Dosh Dombrowski guy does. Yeah. She stares at the camera. She gets really intense. She screams over the guests. She, I mean, she had a, I want to say a battle,

but, you know, it wasn't much of one considering the intellect of difference, but her and Jonah Goldberg, where she, I mean, she just says these things, you're just like, no one could possibly believe these are good arguments. She's just an idiot. She's a complete idiot. She's been an idiot since day one.

CNN puts her on because she just keeps saying the liberal thing over and over and over and over again. And here the liberal thing seems to be she wants several family members executed. Yeah. Like they were too much of a problem. We wish we could get rid of him. Her brother and her, was it, uh, nephew with, so her brother has the intellectual capacity of a one-year-old and he's 57. She's got a down syndrome and motor skills.

A down syndrome person in the family she once gone. And a step-grandson who just has autism. All of them, I guess, should have been aborted. Would have been a lot easier on her. Right. You know, and that's the most important thing. Not that they get a chance at life, but things are easier for her. That's what's crucial here.

And that is the foundation of the argument, guys. Everybody needs to realize that that is not some caricature. That's just what they think. They think it's more important for people to have easier financial lives than for people to be alive. And that's really the bottom line here. That's not, I'm not, that's not me coming up with some crazy character. You heard or just say it. That's really what they think.

And they're passionate about it. How dare you limit my life to keep someone else alive? Now, of course, all of these people could have been given up for adoption, right? you could have done several other things with them and they could still get the chance of life and you could not be inconvenienced. Like that is actually an option. You can drop off any child

at pretty much any fire station in America and they will get to it might not be the best life but they will have a chance at a life and I will tell you a lot of people who have lived bad lives would choose those bad lives over no life at all. I think most of them would.

You know? It really is a fascinating thing and again presented as this moral, empathetic case. We're the evil ones for trying to protect life. But they're the great, righteous people who, I guess, just want to kill children. That's the way to go somehow. Then we have this wonderful person on TikTok who had a message for the pro-abortion protesters this weekend. This person, I don't know their pronouns, but I'm guessing they, they, they,

them, something like that. But they want everybody included. Just a reminder, because it seems like everyone needs it, not just women get abortions. Oh, yeah. People with uteruses get abortions. People with uteruses. Trans people get abortions, trans men, non-binary people. Binary?

People of all genders get abortions. Oh, all genders? Really? Love you. Traditional cis men get them now, too? Yeah. I didn't know that because I know that men, without a, with a, with a, with a youth, uterus, which are just women who are saying they're men, right?

They're trans men as they're called. How dare you? I'm trying to explain this. How dare you? Spew your hatred right in my face. I just try to explain to the... How dare you? We have a lot of right-wing listeners, Pat, and I want to make sure those haters out there understand the categories.

I, of course, believe this is absolutely a man. Legitimate. It's a man who has a uterus. Right. But some people are not understand that. I'm saying is these are people that are just women saying they're men. Now that is not how I feel at all, but I want to make sure the audience filled with hate mongering haters understands. And so we can say that a woman who transitions to a man could have a baby because, you know,

they still have all the parts of a woman, or at least many of them. Then, but like can a man, like, I am a man. I have not transitioned from anything to anything. And don't plan. And don't plan. to in the near future, Pat. At some point, you never know when that's going to change. Obviously, very fluid. At any point, I could be like, you know what, I'm a chick today. But right now- So would you consider yourself male fluid then?

I would just say male. Okay. You know, I don't think male fluid sounds all that appetizing, so I'm going to just skip over that and just go right to mail. So I'm a male. Okay. And my continuing position throughout life has been I'm a male. And I don't have any other aspirations to transition at any point.

but no matter what I transition to, I will never have a uterus. You won't. No. So, but now she's saying even men can get abortions. Yeah. All genders, she said, could get abortions. All of them. All 97.

Facebook genders can have abortions. So I can have one too. Yes. I'm interested in this process. Your ignorance astounds me. Even as you're trying to perform for the right wing cooks, they're listening. Yeah. Still, your ignorance is.

astounds me. That hurts, Pat, but I think I deserve it. I don't know how exactly. 727. It's 8-88-7-27-B-E-C-K. The Glenn Beck. Pat and Stufer Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. He's on vacation this week. I hear that today we get some incredible relief from the intense heat that we've been suffering. It's going to be down to all the way down to 95 for the high today. Oh, really? Yeah.

I hope you brought a sweater with you to work. Utter Paradise. Did you bring a sweater? Because, man, I don't know how we'll deal with that. That's incredible. It's like 114 degrees cooler than it was yesterday. It really has been amazing down here. Oh, my gosh.

We had an year like this in, I think it was 2011 when we first came down to Texas. And we had, I don't know, something like 40 or 50 straight days in Dallas where it was over 100 degrees. There was one. It was either the year we got here or the year before where Dallas had, I think it was 70. three straight days of 100 plus. Yeah, that must have been it. That's unacceptable. Sorry, that's unacceptable. Even as a guy who continually complains about how cold Glenn keeps the studio.

It's too much. It is a lot. It's a lot to deal with. And obviously, that means that the government should federally regulate all aspects of our society and economy. Thank you. Because of the fear that it may increase another degree in 20, 30 years. And that would be the difference. You know, if it was only...

Only 107. It would be fine, but it's 108. Right. And that is... It's an extra temperature that global warming has is responsible for. Unacceptable. Yeah. Unacceptable.

Hopefully we can get the government to manage every aspect of our economy to deal with it. Even though that still won't make a lick a difference because China's not going to care. But ignore that. If you just ignore that, it makes it feel a lot better. Yeah. It fixes the problem. Yeah, really fast. If you ignore it.

Really fast. really fast. As with all problems, Pat, the best way to deal with it is to completely ignore it. Ignore it. And we will see you tomorrow to ignore more big problems in this country. And on Studeau's America as well tonight, 8 p.m. Eastern, don't miss it. Subscribe to the podcast and Pat Gray unleashed as well. All part of Blaze TV.

You get subscribed to blazTV.com slash Glenn. The promo code is Glenn. The Glenn Back Program.