The Glenn Beck Program - Diddy’s NOT GUILTY Verdict Shows How Sad Our Legal System Is | 7/2/25

Episode Date: July 2, 2025

Pat and Stu in for Glenn. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed in the Senate yesterday and heads back to the House. How much government spending will be added to fund this bill, and how much will be cut? A part of the bill that is up for debate is something called “Trump accounts,” where the president plans to give $1,000 for each new baby born between now and 2028. Pat and Stu discuss the downside of what that would lead to, especially if illegal aliens are allowed to qualify for these accounts as well. A new poll shows that Democrats have a lower level of pride in their country than in 2001. But a further dive into the numbers show how much the change has occurred over the last decade. Is it because they were not ever truly proud to be American, or is it because of Trump derangement syndrome? Sean “Diddy” Combs was found not guilty on three of the five charges, with guilty verdicts on two counts of bringing a prostitute across state lines. What does this outcome say about the state of our legal system?  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

60% of the vans on Amazon come a vendor independent like Sac Magic. Hello, here Camille of Sac Magic. Our compresses, show of fraud are fabriced in Quebec, and our presence on Amazon enlarge our clientele

to the world entire. Trouve of little enterprises like on our own.com. Think about what you did to protect your home last year. Maybe a new security system, maybe some cameras, maybe some stronger locks.

All while the biggest threat to your property was completely invisible. In 2025, home title theft has exploded across America. These are criminals. who are targeting you through public property records. And with a few keystrokes, they can forge documents. They can legally transfer your home title without your knowledge.

Once they control that title, they drain your equity through massive loans. And the first sign of trouble usually is like a foreclosure notice or a credit alert when the damage is already done. The average American assumes their bank protects against this, but it doesn't. It's unfortunately not true. Standard identity protection services don't do this either. they miss title fraud completely. Homeowner's insurance? Not even close.

No, home title lock fills this critical security gap. Their specialized system creates a virtual fortress around your property records. They monitor your title. They continuously alert you if you have any big problems. The team can help you block fraudulent transfers before criminals can steal your equity. AI is changing the world. Don't let it change the name on your home's title. Go to home titlelock.com.

Hometitleck.com. use the promo code Blaze. Home Titlelock.com. The promo code is Blaze. Hello, America. You know we've been fighting every single day. We push back against the lies, the censorship, the nonsense of the mainstream media that they're trying to feed you.

We work tirelessly to bring you the unfiltered truth because you deserve it. But to keep this fight going, we need you. Right now, would you take a moment and rate and review the Glenn Beck podcast? Give us five stars and lead a comment because every single review helps us break through Big Tech's algorithm to reach more Americans who need to hear the truth. This isn't a podcast. This is a movement. And you're part of it, a big part of it. So if you believe in what we're doing, you want more people to wake up. Help us push this podcast to the top. Rate, review, share. Together, we'll make a difference. And thanks for standing with us. Now let's get to work.

Today with Pat and Stu, AAA 727BECK. It's our number. Well, had some news from the big beautiful bill front. We'll get into that and much more coming up. Now, if you're a financial life for a house, what kind of shape would it be in? Maybe it looks fine from the curb, but inside the floors are crooked and the foundation's cracked and there's a busted pipe leaking all over the place. If what I just described sounds pretty accurate to you, I want you to know something. It doesn't have to be this way. You really can set things straight and make it so you're not having to live.

paycheck to paycheck, constantly stressing about debts. This is where American financing comes in. They're not just mortgage brokers, their financial repair crews, custom-building mortgage solutions that actually work for you. Whether you're refinancing, consolidating high-interest debt, or just trying to catch up, they'll walk you through the options without junk fees or high-pressure sales tactics. And best of all, they don't work for the bank, they work for you. Most people wait far too long to fix their financial house, and by then, it's way more expensive to repair. Please don't do that. Make the decision today to get it fixed. Call American Financing 1-800-906-2440 or go to Americanfinancing.net. It's Americanfinancing.net.

800906 2440. NMLS-182334. NMLS Consumer Access.org. APR for Ritz and the Five starts at 6.799% for well-qualified borrowers. Call 800906 2440 for details about credit costs and terms. Exactly. Yeah. Yeah. What he said. I'm just going to say the same thing. It's weird that that was on both our minds at the same time. All right. So yesterday, the big, beautiful bill happened in the Senate. And here's what happened with J.D. Vance in there.

On this vote, the yeas are 50. The nays are 50. The Senate being evenly divided. The vice president votes in the affirmative. The bill as amended is passed. Tata! Wow, the excitement is palpable. And the crowd goes wild.

There's just nothing like a good C-SPAN to get you fired up for the 4th of July. Yeah. And you're welcome. You're welcome. So we haven't talked much about the Big Beautiful Bill together. That's true. What are your thoughts on this passage of the Big Beautiful Bill in the way the Senate just passed? Right, because it's not at all passed.

And there's still a lot of work to do on the Big Beautiful Bill. there is a sort of fakey deadline of July 4th, which is not actually a deadline. I keep talking to me about like, I've got to get this done. July 4th is right around the corner. It doesn't matter, actually. It's an artificial construct. It is. It is a very good usage of that term.

Basically, Donald Trump said he wanted it done by a holiday. Yeah. And everyone was like, well, Donald Trump said we need to get it done by the holiday, so we better get it done by the holiday. That's essentially all it is, right? There's no legislative reason it needs to be done by July 4th. But, I mean, I think there is a legitimate worry that if they don't get it done by July 4th, it could, you know, you know how Congress is, right? Like they start getting focused on other things.

They come up with new complaints they didn't know about. They might, I mean, this is the worst case scenario. They might read the bill? No. And then figure out what's in it. No, that would be crazy. I mean, I doubt it. That would be crazy.

Someone in their office might read. A, chat GPT might get all the text in it to tell them what they're. they should oppose in it. So that happens. I think like it's actually a somewhat complicated picture, I think. And that does tend to happen when you have thousand page bills. There is a lot of- 100 pages that they did have the,

they did have it read. Was it Monday? They did the 16-hour thing? Oh my gosh. I only stayed around for 14 of the hours, though. You're kidding. Why? What did you have something going on?

Is everything okay? I had to go to the bathroom. Yeah. I sat there listening. and watching intently for 14 hours, and then I'm like, I got to go to the bathroom. See, I had a television

that only carries C-SPAN installed in my bathroom. Oh, okay. So now, even if when I have to go to the bathroom, I don't miss any bill readings. Oh, that's awesome. Yeah, that's just a great idea. We had it installed when we bought the home.

It was the first thing. We said, we will buy this home. However, there is a, there is. We need the C-SPAN television in the bathroom. That was our big negotiation. Yeah. So we got that. And you got it.

Got it. Nice. There is a lot of good in the bill, right? The tax cuts being made permanent. And that has to happen. It's big. Yeah, it's huge. There's other things. You know, you get rid of some of the green subsidies.

You know, there are... You got some border. Border stuff is important. Yep, that's a big one. I have an entire list of everything in the bill. It's a lot. Yeah. It's a lot.

There's a lot. And some of the cuts are pretty good, I think, as well. There's not enough of them. There are a lot of problems in the bill. They, of course, to get votes. There's two ways to do it, Pat. You either bribe people like they did with Lisa Murkowski to get the 50-50 vote. They just bribed her, just gave her all sorts of stuff that she wanted for her state.

Or the alternative, which will also occur here is Donald Trump comes and yells at everyone and they do whatever he says. Those are the two ways you pass bills in today's Congress. You bribe the congressman or Donald Trump yells at them. That's what we have here. And threatens him to be primary or whatever. Yeah, he'll say you're not Maga, you're going to get primaried. Tom Tillis was one of these. And there's two ways to react if you are a Republican.

You almost never stand up for what you believe in. Why would you do that, though? You can't do that. Why would you? With exceptions, Rand Paul being one of them. We all knew Rand Paul was going to be known to this bill because it's a giant bill that increases the debt a lot. And he's been consistent on this every single time, basically, since the dawn of man.

He opposes these things. You knew he was going to be a no from the beginning. You know, he said, I might be able to get to a yes, but at no point did I believe he would go and get to a yes? Because he has a ideological opposition of this. And I, I respect that. I tend to respect that. A lot of people don't. No.

A lot of people are just pissed off at him. Yeah. I'm not one of them. Right. I'm not one of them either. I'm not mad at him. I'm not mad at Thomas Massey. No.

They're both really good legislators. They're both good representatives. And they stick to, as a rule, what they believe. Yep. And I don't have problems with people like that. No. You know, Chip Roy is another one who actually did vote yes initially on this and is now saying this version of it.

He can't support. He will be very happy to tell you exactly why he's doing that. It's not because he didn't read the bill. It's not because he doesn't have any idea what's in it. It's not because Donald Trump hasn't yelled at him enough yet. Right? It's not because he hasn't been bribed enough yet. There are a few representatives who think that way.

It's just really rare, really rare. So, I mean, I think a better solution to this, and I love to get your thoughts on this, Pat, would be a less big, perhaps I would argue, more beautiful bill that did, attempted to do less, attempted to do, you know, didn't have a lot of these giveaways, didn't have all this stuff in there. I just talked about this on my show. Break it up into a whole bunch of different bills, if you have to. Let's get the tax cuts done. do that separately. Let's get the border bill done. Let's do that separately. And then, you know, we can we can hash out all the rest of the stuff. There's no reason, I don't think, to put it all into one big, beautiful bill. Because it's not as beautiful as it could have been. Right. The only thing is, of course, the reconciliation process. And it's like to get that, to get only 50 votes, you have to have, you only get one shot at that here. And that's fine. And I think you can put, I mean, you can, I think even put in the tax cuts and the border package and a couple of other things. But like they have, I mean, you know, the list of things that are in here, I mean, if I started

reading it right now, just the list, not the whole bill, we would not get through it before the end of the show. I mean, there's just so many different things. Wow. Wow. That are in there that are just, you know. Well, it's 1100 pages, I think they said when they started reading it. So, I mean, yeah, there's a lot of.

stuff jammed in that thing. Yeah, a lot. A lot. It's a ton. And nobody can know everything in it, you know? Even though they read it, you know, they weren't paying attention. There's not a single human alive who knows all the things in this bill. Right. It's like one of those Netflix series about 1700s England.

Like, you might watch the series, but you don't know what's going on. Right. They're just saying these words and they sound like English, but no, they don't mean anything. As you would say, Pat, they're just speaking gibberish. Right. So no one could possibly know. I think so at the end of the day, I would love to have a bill that was less big and more beautiful. You know, I think you do need to get these tax cuts passed.

It has to happen. It's a requirement. I think the, I think it's sensible. People are like, well, this is what Donald Trump ran on. Some of this is what Donald Trump ran on. You know, I mean, sure, the border and the tax cuts are on there. things like no tax on tips, which, you know, again, and it's fine. It's a very, by the way, it's a very small piece of this. When you look at the overall, you know, what are the costs,

Pat, the costs in here. The costs are almost $5 trillion of it are the tax cut extensions. Okay, so almost all of it. The, the next highest cost. To me, that's not a cost. To me, it's not a cost either. First of all, it's the current law. Right. Number two, it's not a cost. that the government takes less of our money. It is not a cost to the government. Sorry, that wasn't yours to begin with, so that's not a cost to you. I reject this completely. Yeah, that pisses me off.

It's an infuriating construct, Pat, to call this a cost, but that is what one of, that's by far the biggest cost of this bill. Second biggest is other tax provisions. What's that? It's stuff like, you know, no tax on tips. And the cost on no tax on tips. is $32 billion over 10 years. Okay?

It is not even... That's $3.2 billion a year? I don't even wake up. I don't even wake up for $3.2 billion a year, Pat. No, we don't. And you certainly don't get out of bed for that. No. So, absolutely not.

You roll over and you go right back to sleep for that. No. It's like a lot of these programs that people talk about are not even factors in this. There are also some temporary tax cuts that kind of come on and expanse. buyer. One of his other, there's kind of those no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, I think is one of those. Oh, right, right. There's no tax on, you know, they wanted to do no tax on social security. They didn't actually do that, but they did wind up cutting. A decent tax cut for seniors, I think you'll see out of, out of this bill. There is a lot there. It's just one of those situations where that's

basically all it is. When it comes to savings, they keep talking about Medicaid cuts. Have you looked into what the Medicaid cuts are, Pat. The cuts to illegal aliens? You know, that's, you know, there is some of that, like, they keep saying, well, it's waste, fraud, and abuse. And every, first of all, the reason they say that is every single person on Earth is against waste fraud and abuse, right? It's 100% of people, yeah, except for the people abusing and, and wasting.

That is, those are the only people who actually ever say anything about, about that. but the biggest Medicaid cut, and I'm going to put this in massive air quotes for those listening on radio or podcast, the cut is, and I was like, I kept looking at this. I'm like, why do they keep saying this? How are they coming up with this being a cut? They keep saying they're cutting it because of work requirements. And I was like, well, it can't be what I'm thinking here, right? They can't be saying a work requirement is a cut for the.

reason I'm thinking. And I was like, I can't be it. So I did a bunch of research on this. You'll be surprised here. It's exactly what I was thinking. Oh, wow. Which is, what they're saying is, they say, hey, you have to work 20 hours a week to get Medicaid. Okay. And there will be a bunch of people out there who will say, A, I don't want to work 20 hours a week. Or B, I don't mind. I, I, I don't really feel like doing the paperwork to prove that I tried to work 20 hours a week. So therefore, I'm not going to bother attempting to get Medicaid. And that's a cut. So it will cost less.

And they're saying that's a cut to Medicaid. Unreal. Which is insanity. To say that it's a cost that our taxes won't be as high. Unbelievable. Is insane. I think it might be more insane to say it's a cut. No people who are eligible to Medicaid will lose their Medicaid.

Only people, they will just say because they're adding some requirements, some extra paperwork. And we all know how these programs work, Pat. Like, if you've ever known someone who's been on, you know, who went on unemployment, you go on unemployment, the first, I don't know how long. I'm just estimating this. But like, like, I remember I had a relative who went on unemployment. And he was like, well, you know, it was like, the first 13 weeks were basically nothing. He had to do basically nothing other than just apply to the program and get accepted.

And then after 13 weeks, they were like, hey, you need to prove that you're doing some interviews. And so he did. He would go and he would do the interviews. But I don't know how interested he was really in getting a job. But he went and did whatever basic requirements they did. And it was not particularly hard to stay on there. Eventually, you do get to a point where it gets kind of difficult to stay on or it runs out. Right. Yeah. That is the situation with these Medicaid.

We all know that for a while you're probably going to just get the Medicaid if you say you're trying to get a job. And eventually they might get a little bit harder on this. They passed a program like this in Arkansas where some people did fall off the Medicaid rolls. But again, I keep saying this. Oh, no. If you will not go through a basic round of requirements to get this program, you probably don't need the program. Now, there could be some exceptions, right? Someone with like severe health problems that maybe can't get out.

So, you know, you have a heart attack in the middle of this process. You don't file a paperwork. You lose your Medicaid. That shouldn't happen, right? There are certain things that need to be covered. But generally speaking, that is the Medicaid cut they're talking about. They're talking about people who don't fill out the forms. By the way, if you don't get a job, okay, because there are people who maybe can't get jobs

and work the 20 hours requirement, right? those people can fill up forms saying I'm trying to get a job they can volunteer in certain circumstances there's plenty of other ways to get around this so it's not just like oh because I could see you know you want to get a job and you can't get it that happens to people so you have to have a way to carve that out of course there are these carve-outs for this they're just saying some people won't go through with it now wow I think there's a good argument to say that at least some of those people probably didn't need Medicaid they probably have some other way of getting what they need. Some people might be too lazy to do it. Some people might be too stupid to do it. Some people might get caught up in red tape for real reasons, as we were discussing. But generally speaking, that's what they're saying. That's what they're all worried about. We can't cut Medicaid. Have you heard any Republican explain that to the American people? I don't think I have. I don't think I have either. I don't understand why they can't do it. Which is why I had to look it up. I was like, wait a minute, this can't be what they're saying. How is it possible that you can't explain that to the American people?

We'll find out in just 60 seconds or so. You know those brutal summer nights tossing, turning, flipping the pillow, trying to find the cool spot? I've been there. It's exactly why I switched to cozy earth sheets. They're made from viscos from bamboo and they are designed to naturally wick away the heat and the moisture, which helps your body stay several degrees cooler at night. I didn't realize how much of a difference it would make until Tanya and I tried him. Studies show that when your body sleeps cooler, it releases more melatonin, so you fall a

sleep faster, you sleep deeper, and you wake up feeling actually rested. Plus, cooler sleep can even help regulate your mood. Cozy Earth will completely transform your 5 to 9, the time that matters most. And with their 100-night sleep trial, you've got nothing to lose. Test them out during the hottest nights of the year. And if you don't love them, send them back. But I don't think you're going to want to because they work. Upgrade your summer. Go to cozyEarth.com. Use the promo code Beck, save up to 40% on temperature regulating sheets, apparel, and so much more. That's Cozy Earth.com promo code back. Sleep cooler, lounge lighter, stay cozy. Yeah. We were just talking about what is what is bad in the big beautiful?

From a conservative standpoint. Yeah. What what are the things that we would object to? Despite the best efforts of some of the people we talked about, there are some green subsidies in here. There are some Biden spending programs. You know, because we always talk about these big bill, these big programs. People get used to them, right? They get locked in. And we said this with Obamacare at the time. People are going to get used to their free health care. and then they're going to say, well, you can't take away my free health care. Right. Now, some of that stuff makes sense when the program has been in place for 20 years, right?

It doesn't make sense when it was passed by Joe Biden. However, some of that spending, not all, but some of that spending is still in there. Some of the green subsidies are still in there. You know, there's been a big effort by conservatives to say, hey, wait a minute, get rid of these completely. There's no reason we can't get rid of the green stuff passed by Joe Biden in the last term. Right. A lot of that money's not even spent yet, Pat. some of the money that's not spent they got rid of

some of the money where projects have already been designated they're like well they've already started and so a lot of that money still gets spent right like the Senate was worse on that in the house yeah oh well stop them yeah um not that hard so that's in there I mean the biggest problem is again the scope of it you're talking about a five trillion dollar increase in the debt limit most of that's from the tax cuts right making them permanent

Well, yes. Yes, I think that's true from a cost perspective when they say, quote unquote, cost. Yeah. There's also some defense spending, new defense spending. There's Homeland Security and Immigration spending. And then there's a slice of a bunch of a bunch of other stuff in there. Most of it is the tax stuff. Now, tax provisions also uses some of that, you know, green subsidies and things like that would be included in that.

I don't like that stuff. there are a lot of people in Congress who have these projects might employ a thousand people in their states in their districts. And so they say even though they're quote unquote conservatives or Republicans, they say, well, I've got to be loyal to my state. These people are working. Or they're going to have these jobs and I don't want to cut these jobs, which again, I don't agree with, but that's the reasoning behind it. and the tax cut extensions to me should not be thought of as a cost at all. Nope. But with all that said, the trillions of dollars are going to pile up because we're not balanced now.

So extending current policy now and adding some new spending is still going to increase the deficit. This is the Rand ball problem with all of this, right? Yeah. You know, we are, we're not in alignment with how we're supposed to be spending. We're not spending what we make. And that is a big problem. So it just locks in for multiple years in a Republican vision of the future, massive debt and trillions of dollars of spending.

So that is, I think, the biggest problem with it. AAA 727 B-E-C-K. More Pat and Stu for Glenn coming up. This is Glenn Beck. Are you ready to give your home a fresh new look? look for the summer? Blinds.com has you covered with their Fourth of July mega sale going on right now. Whether you're a DIY warrior or prefer the full white glove treatment or maybe something in between, blinds.com makes it easy with no pushy salespeople in your home or big showroom markup.

Tanya and I love their design experts who help us make the perfect selection on our schedule. Plus, they can even handle everything from measure to install. Style every room effortlessly with blinds.com. Classic shutters for living spaces to motorized options for total convenience. and don't forget the outdoor shades as well. With over 25 million windows covered and 40,000 five-star reviews, it's no surprise that Blinds.com is the number one online retailer of custom window treatments. Plus, every order is backed by their 100% satisfaction guarantee.

Don't miss, Blinds.com's spectacular 4th of July mega-cell. It's happening right now. Save up to 50%. Plus, get free professional measure. Hurry before the holiday deals are all gone. Up to 50% off for a limited time at blinds.com. Rules and restrictions may apply. It's Pat. Stufer Glenn,

triple 877, B-E-C-K. So also in the Big Beautiful Bill, is a provision for all babies born between now and 2028? They all get $1,000. Yeah, you were asking what's bad in the bill? Yeah. This would be an example from my perspective of something bad. Just a flat-out giveaway.

Just giving away. Because you got born, you get $1,000. Yes, they're called Trump accounts. Okay. And, you know, again, the president's done many good things, you know, but this one I would, I can understand why you'd want your name on it, right? A family has a baby born. They need money.

They like money. You know, having a savings account where there's a giveaway to your child, they will appreciate that, right? Someone handing you $1,000 is something appreciated typically. You're not going to say no to it. You're not going to say no to it. So that is why he want to put Trump. It's why he, when they did the stimulus checks, he put his name on it.

Right. Like, you know, that is, he understands that dynamic well. Trump accounts to me are a terrible idea. And I really, I hope they get stripped out of this bill somehow. I really doubt that they will. Basically, it gives a tax advantage savings account for children when they are born, $1,000 per child if they are born between 2024 and 28. Now, you might pop into your head.

Number one, this is a government giveaway program. It's an entitlement. I mean, as pure as entitlements can be, all, the only requirement is birth. Okay. That is as pure as an entitlement can be. Without regard for income. Right. Without regard to income.

So you could be a billionaire, have a child, and that child will get a $1,000 account. Yeah, someone actually pointed this out. One of the congressmen who was opposed to it. I remember who it was like, Elon Musk has like 12 kids a week. We're going to keep giving him $1,000 every single time he has a kid? That's enough to bankrupt America right there.

I'm terrified by the cost of this. Oh, man. And this is interesting. Listen to this carve out. Late changes to this provision, this according to New York Times, late changes to this provision removed a requirement that a parent be a U.S. citizen to qualify for the $1,000 contribution. They removed that requirement.

They removed that requirement. So you could be an illegal alien who just gave birth to a child. That child gets $1,000? Yeah, or at least not a citizen. They could be maybe a green card holder or you could be a visiting student or whatever. But if you have the kid, and of course the kid, by the current interpretation of the 14th Amendment, is it going to be a citizen no matter what? So they all get the $1,000 as well. So two students that come over, hook up.

that's the $1,000. Now, a couple things on this, Pat. Number one, do you believe in 2028 or in the middle of this presidential campaign that there's going to be either candidate, either a Democrat, or likely J.D. Vance, running on a, you know, a third Trump term, essentially, is going to say, we need to get rid of these $1,000 giveaways to babies. Absolutely not. It won't happen.

Of course. There's one thing that will happen, though. one of the two sides, probably the Democrat, but maybe J.D. Vance, I don't know, will say a thousand dollars isn't enough. It needs to be two thousand. What can you do with $1,000? Maybe it's $5,000. Maybe it's $10,000 per baby. There's no way this just becomes $0 in 2029. No. It becomes much more than a thousand. Of course. It does. This is the start of a massive entitlement program that is in the middle of this bill and should just be stripped out. It's silly. You don't get a thousand dollar lottery ticket scratch off that wins every time when you're born. Come on. I mean, it's just, I can't even believe we have to make this point. I understand why it's in there. I understand why it seems like a wonderful giveaway or why you might promise it during a campaign. But come on, this is the United States of America. We should not be we should not be buying children for $1,000. No. That should not be the thing that we do.

And certainly not under a Republican administration. And a Republican majority in the Senate and the House. There's no reason for that. Because we all know that the Republican position will be the most restrictive possibility for this going forward. And when it becomes $5,000 in four years or eight years or whatever that occurs, there will be some evil Rand Paul character that will come. I mean, and say, I think we should cut this to only $2,000, and everyone will call him a fascist and that he hates children. Yes.

And that he is the, they will show every poor mom who wants to, wants their kid just to have $10,000 and free money and they don't have it anymore. Or they will show the kid who got the savings account and spent it on college and now has a wonderful family and is a doctor. doctor, they will show that sob story and they will say, gosh, why is it only $10,000? It should be a million dollars. You know, I mean, this is the, it's the minimum wage argument. It's everything. And they will be presented, by the way, as a cut. They will.

They will say to only $2,000, that's a cut. You're cutting money to poor families. Blah, blah, blah, blah. We've been through this so many freaking times. And the only way to stop this is why we were so hardcore on. Obamacare at the time is before it starts. That's the only time to stop it. This is the week to stop this program.

And the perfect example of that is Social Security and Medicare. Those two programs, you can't even speak about cutting or making more difficult to obtain in any way or just pushing back the time that you receive all of that stuff. It's just completely out of the question now. It's untouchable now. we've become so accustomed to it that it's just part of our lives. And we demand it. We don't just expect it. We demand it now.

Yeah, I mean, Pat, Donald Trump will call his opponents fat slobs on television. He will say literally anything about anyone. That's what, one of the things we love about him, right? Yep, yep. Even he, he has said over and over and over again, he will not touch any of those programs, which is why it's so dumb, the big attack on him every single case. campaign is like, oh, he's going to cut all these programs. He has said over and over again from the beginning, he will not touch any of them. He just said the other day, I don't like doing a lot

with cuts. He just said it the other day. I don't like doing a lot with cuts. That is it. That's, that's the Republican president. Who by the way, I think has done a lot of really good things. But there's no appetite for this anymore. There used to be at least the appetite to say. They wanted cuts. They don't even do that anymore. That's where we are. So you implement a new program that, you know, again, supposedly only cost $15 billion to start for four years. What's that going to cost in 10 years, 20 years, 30 years?

I just, again, it's a bad idea. Stop it before it starts. I don't think anybody voted for Donald Trump because of the Trump accounts. And there's anybody who's like, gosh, I'm going to vote for him because I want $1,000 and a go to a savings account that my kid can spend in X amount of years. I don't think that that is You know it's a nice There's some nice feelings behind it

Pat Yes Nice feelings behind it There's a lot of nice feelings behind A literal socialism as well And we should avoid those things As much as possible Because I mean that

I don't know Is there When you have a giveaway To someone just for being born And I think there's an argument From some on the right Who say well this is encouraging Families

I don't know Pat you had a 91 children It's 92 now. 92. I'm sorry. I didn't have it. Very early this morning and my wife just had a baby. Oh, really? I was going to say, you're like Joe Biden with grandkids. I can't even keep track of how many you have. And some of them, I think you acknowledge all of yours, which is great.

That's really nice of you. But the point is, you know, would you have had fewer children or would you have had more children? Would you have 96 children today if you got promised $1,000 for each one? I would not. No. That's not how people live. No. Especially when you can't access the money right away.

Right. Like it's a savings account that it's going to be for the child, like, you know, throw it towards college or throw it towards a new car when they needed or whatever later on in life. It's not like you just get $1,000 to spend on baby stuff. And if you're having kids based on financial considerations, it's going to cost a lot more than $1,000 to have the child. It used to be something that we were very critical of back in the day. You know, there was a time where we said, hey, you know, people who are having lots of children to get,

if it's like welfare extra welfare money, that's a bad thing. Very. So I don't, I don't understand why this would be a, I can understand why Democrats would propose something like this. I just don't. But again, we should point out, it's a small part of this bill. And there is a lot of good. There's probably more good in the bill than bad.

So I think that's why a lot of these congressmen are like, well, I guess. I mean, did you hear the Lisa Murkowski thing? I love the Lisa Murkowski thing. she is the holdout of the Senate. So of course, what they do, again, there's two things you can do. You can have Donald Trump yell at her. Murkowski largely immune to that. She does not seem to care that much about Donald Trump yelling at her.

She's one of the few who doesn't care about that part. She is not immune at all to bribery. So she's like, well, I want these things for Alaska. So she gets all these things for Alaska. And then she's like, all right, I'm a yes. And then she says, well, I really hope the House rejects it and sends back something else. this is a bill she voted for and she's saying

she hopes the House doesn't vote for it and then sends it back to them in another version which may very well happen it might this thing is not going to happen by Friday

it would be surprising but I'm really clear that it's Wednesday we got one day to get this done and then signed in both chambers

I don't think it can happen and Trump by the way again is a negotiator he knows he says it must be done by July 4th over and over again. Everyone acts as if it needs to be done by July 4th. And then when it comes to

July 4th, he'll say, well, July 5th. You know, like, he's he made it seem like a strong deadline because he wants it done soon. Yeah. And so I understand that. And it seems to work on a lot of these people in Congress. Like, they act as if they all know the rules.

There's no reason it needs to be done by June. It needs to be done by the end of the year is when it needs to be done. And you know, at least for the tax cuts to be put into place so we don't get the rise. It's important. That's a really important deadline. July 4th is not a really important deadline.

That's a holiday. So it's an important holiday. Our Independence Day is something we love to celebrate. It's not necessarily germane to this bill. But I don't think, you're right, it's probably not going to get done. But again, Donald Trump has a way of just saying, do it. Yeah. And they do.

And they do. You know, it's the jump and how high. And for 95% of Republicans, that's usually enough. I don't think, I don't think most of them even think of it. Think of the situation beyond that. Does Donald Trump want it? I think you're right. Yeah.

You know, and this is something I've been thinking about a little bit. I was talking to Chris Bedford on my show last night about this. We have this criticism. We've made a million times, Pat, of Republican GOP Congress. Oh, well, you know, they never do the right thing. There's the establishment, the Mitch McConnell's of the world, and we've said all that stuff a million times. Does that apply to our current situation anymore?

Who are these people? I guess Tom Tillis is your example? Yeah, I guess. Who are these people? Lisa Murkowski's on it. I mean, I guess Susan Collins voted no. Rand Paul is a totally different situation we've already discussed. None of these people are going against what Donald Trump is saying to do.

There's a few in the House and Congress that you have to deal with. But it's, I mean, Donald Trump. Trump is saying he wants this. He is saying this is the bill he wants. Now, we all know it's not perfect. It's not exactly what Trump wants. And there are things in there that I'm sure Trump would strip out if he could. But he says this deal is good enough.

And almost all Republicans are going along with this. This idea that there's this big stress between some establishment figures in Donald Trump. Where is the evidence for this these days? Yeah. 10 years ago, in 2017 or whatever, 2018, I think you did see that. I don't think you really see it anymore. No, you don't. There's not much of it.

They pretty much will go along. If he finds it to be really, really important, they'll pretty much go along with it. AAA 727 BECK. More coming up. Can't believe he used to be a top 40 disc jockey. But anyway, we still love him. Glenn Beck, we'll be right back. So many people are living with pain every day, and they think they're just stuck with it.

I mean, it just is what it is. But it doesn't have to be. I want to tell you a story about Jenny, she lives in Texas. Let me share her Relief Factor story. She said she was out for a walk one day and she was hit by a car, unfortunately. Nothing she tried for her lower back pain worked. Her husband heard about Relief Factor on the program. Jenny said, okay, it's worth a shot.

Well, Relief Factor worked perfectly for her. Her pain decreased, her range of motion increased. And to say that she's grateful, I am told, is an understatement. My pain started when I hit my 40s. I tried everything, but nothing worked until I tried Relief Factor. and that broke the back of my pain. If you're living with aches and pains, see how Relief Factor,

a daily drug-free supplement, can help you feel and live better every day. Give their three-week quick start a try. It's 1995. In a few weeks, even in a few days, you'll feel the difference that Relief Factor can make. You don't have to be stuck living with pain. Visit Relieffactor.com.

Call 800 the number four relief. That's 800 the number four relief. Relieffactor.com. Let me ask you a question. If I told you there's a, you know, a cactus that could help curb your appetite, would you believe me? I wouldn't believe myself, honestly, for a long time. But there's a specific variety that grows in India, and for centuries, people there have

eaten it, not just as food, but to help suppress hunger naturally. And today, doctors have taken that same principle and included it, along with a bunch of other key ingredients, in a remarkable weight loss supplement called Lean. If you have bold summer weight loss goals, but injections, maybe not for you, the doctors who formulated Lean have this message for you. This supplement was as close as we could come to the benefits of those popular injections without the needles. Just like those injections, lean was created to help maintain healthy blood sugar and help control appetite and cravings and to help fat by converting it into energy. But with lean, there are no needles required. You get no injections, just results. Finding a way to lose weight has always

been difficult, but with lean, doctors have created a healthier way to lose weight by capturing the power of natural ingredients, so why not take advantage of it? Give it a shot, especially if you're someone who'd really like to lose the weight, but for whatever reason, you know, I just not, I don't want to get stuck with a needle once a week, okay? Let's get you started. 20% off right now. I use the code blaze 20 at take lean.com. It's take lean.com. The code is blaze 20. It's a different approach to weight loss. Give it a shot. It's lean.com. Takelein.com. The code is blaze 20. There's something else here now. Something new.

From exclusively on Paramount Plus. It's the series Stephen King calls Scary as Hell. Everything here is impossible, but it's also real. Sci-fi vision calls it the best show streaming right now. We're running out of time and we still don't know the rules. Don't miss what the movie blog calls something you need to watch. Saving those children is how we all go home. From binge all episodes exclusively on Paramount Plus.

It's Pat and Stu for Glenn today, AAA 727BECK. This is a really nice message from an unexpected source. Ilan Omar, actually yesterday wished everybody a happy Independence Day. You might think, well, that's a little early, but okay, that's really nice. That's nice. You're glad to see that. You feel like he wouldn't get that normally from an Ilan Omar character. Yeah.

But the reason you're getting it is because she's talking about Somalia. That's the Independence Day She's speaking of So happy Happy Independence Day Everybody in Somalia Alana Marr still thinking about you Okay

Somalia first Shocking Isn't it though It's so good It's unbelievable Do now will we get a Happy Independence Day on July 4th From my last is

No Now maybe because she did this She would do it as a throw away Maybe and you would think that But a lot of times she'll surprise you by, nope, not even then. She doesn't even feel the need to do that. You pathetic losers. She does not care at all.

You know, all of these, the Hamas squad, you know, Alana Marz and Rashid Talib and all of those people, they don't seem to care what Americans actually think of them. They seem to be representing who they believe are their constituents. And for Alana Mar, that's people who immigrated here from Somalia. For Talib, it's Palestinians. I mean, they don't care what Americans think of them. But they keep getting elected. So I don't know when they're going to wake up in Minnesota, but no time soon, apparently. AAA 727 B-E-C-K, much more coming up with Pat and Stu for Glenn today.

Let me tell you about Jay's Medical then. The world has been mighty, unpredictable lately. conflict between Israel and Iran. You've got immigration flashpoints across Europe. You've got riots right here at home in Los Angeles. Anyone looking at that landscape and thinking, yeah, everything seems super duper stable is either in denial or living under a rock. And I know that's not you. You're paying attention. This is your lot in life, unfortunately, for you. You're making yourself a little bit miserable by paying attention to this stuff. You know that when things go sideways, the time to prepare isn't when pharmacy shelves are already empty. And that's where you

Jace case comes in. The Jace medical people are just great. They provide long-term emergency medication, antibiotics, daily prescriptions, critical supplies. The Jace case as well, if you're, you know, you don't want to be caught off guard in a crisis so they can help you with that, whether it's a natural disaster, a supply chain failure, social unrest, you'll have what you need to take care of your family. Jace offers a simple online consultation to get started. No hassle, no waiting rooms, no last minute panic when things get tense. You hope you never need it, but if you ever need it, but if do, you'll be grateful that you listen to that still small voice that said, get ready.

Go to jace.com. Jace.com. enter the promo code back at checkout. Get a discount on your order. J-A-S-E.com. The code is back at jace.com. Pat and Stu for Glenn. We got this gallop poll. You may have heard some about. We got to get into this, dig into

how proud Americans are to be Americans and break it down by political parties, ethnicity, and age groups. We'll get into this a little bit coming up in one minute. We're entering some very uncertain times with everything that is happening overseas. We need to be on alert at home as well. You should have a burner on you at all times, especially one that is small enough to conceal wherever you go.

Meet the new compact launcher. It's touted as the world's smallest, less lethal pistol launcher. The same size as a smartphone, but it has all the firepower that you need to stop an attacker in their tracks without dealing with a mental or financial repercussion of using a real firearm. These are equipped with tear gas and kinetic ammunition. It's designed to stop somebody right in their tracks and incapacitate them for up to 40 minutes. The compact launcher is perfect for women who want protection, but don't want to really carry a firearm.

And if you're traveling this summer, Burna is legally in all 50 states. It requires no background checks and can be shipped directly to your door. Berna is proudly American with every unit that is hand assembled in Fort Wayne, Indiana. So visit burnah.com today and find the right launcher for your family. That's berna.com. So a Galluphole has shown that Americans apparently are not quite as proud to be Americans as they once were. Back in 2001, they did a survey that found that 90% of Republicans were proud to be Americans. either very proud or extremely proud.

And 87% of Democrats were either extremely or very proud to be Americans. That's changed just a little bit in the last 24 years. In fact, it's gone up for Republicans. It went from 90 to 92% for Republicans. For Democrats, a little bit different. It went from 87% to 36%. percent. It's noticeable, Pat. It's kind of noticeable.

Yeah. Yeah. A little bit of a drop off. You might be thinking, well, okay, was that when it was abnormally high right after 9-11? This is the exact question I had for a glad when he brought this poll up because, you know, if you look back at George W. Bush's approval after 2000. He's in the 90s, right? Like, yeah, it was a lot of weird stuff going on in polling in 2001 after 9-11. Yeah, we were together and everybody was kind of on the same page for about a month.

Mm-hmm. So did it happen then? Is that what, is that why there's such a big difference? And it turns out that's not the case, though, right? No, it was interesting because I had the same question and I was like, oh, gosh, you know, what was it just 9-11? Actually, no. The Democrats remained positive on America for quite a long time. Like, I don't have the numbers right in front of me, but it was like, you know, 10 years later, 2000, like, let's say 11. Still in the, they were like in the 80s. It wasn't quite as high as 2001, but it was still very high. Almost all the drop-off has happened since about 2016. Now, you fill in the blanks under what happened in 2016 that you think may have occurred in the Democrats' mind to say that they're not all that impressed with America anymore.

It did bounce back up, you'll be surprised to hear, for about four years. And now it's dropped off again to the lowest point of all time. This has something to do with Donald Trump very specifically. Yeah. With people on the left, they don't like him. Now, it had dropped off, though, from the heights of 90% before Trump, but most of the drop has happened since Trump came into office. So I don't know. Is that a good thing or a bad thing?

Is it, okay, maybe they just, you know, they're partisans. They don't like this. They have Trump derangement syndrome. Maybe it's not as large anti-American sentiment. I tend to think it's long-lasting. I think it's going to last longer. I think it is, too. Yeah.

Yeah. Fascinating that independence, if you're independent, you still, 53% of independence are extremely or very proud of America. It breaks down with 63% of men, 55% of women. White, 66% are proud of the country. Non-white, 45%. So quite a bit lower. The real problem area, though, is with the youth, 18 to 34-year-olds. The youths today?

The youths are down to 36. 36% are either very or extremely proud of America. And I think you can blame a lot of that on what's going on in education. They're being taught that America is not something to be proud of. From 35 to 54, the number is 60%. And 55 plus 72% of people are proud of the country. Interesting. It'd be fascinating to see how proud, for instance, Somalians are of Somalia.

Proud to be a Somalian. I've heard Elon belt that one out on Independence Day the other day. It's wonderful. Yeah, yeah, that would be, I think, you know, it's interesting. I think there is a, let me give you two scenarios here, Pat. Okay. And you tell me which bad one is true. Okay.

Okay. Okay. Scenario number one. I think the one we're kind of all thinking here. Democrats, we used to be a more united country. People love the country. Over time, Democrats have turned more negative on it, have faded away. As I pointed out, a lot of this has happened since the Trump era began, and now they hate it.

Okay? That's scenario one. Yep. Okay. Scenario two. Democrats, even in 2000, 2001, didn't really love the country all that much. Maybe they were more negative than they led on, but they knew the right thing to say was they loved America. And now that cadence, the current of the river that is America has stopped pushing people to think they need to say that.

Right. Now the current is going the opposite direction. And it's pushing people to say, hey, you know what? I think it's cooler now on the Democratic side to say you hate the country rather than it's a good place but there's got lots of problems. Yeah, I think that's, yeah, that could be part of it.

I think it's definitely be part of it. Yeah, maybe it's both of those things. Because I do think that's part of it. Like there probably were a lot of people. I mean, I don't know. I remember 2000, 2001, 2002. There's a lot of complaints by Democrats about America. They didn't like it all that much.

Yeah. Certainly less than Republicans. I have this poll now in front of me, Pat. In 2001, it was 90% of Republicans, 87% of Democrats, 84% of independence who thought it was great. If you fast forward 10 years, you've got 92% of Republicans, 78% of Democrats. So it had fallen off from 87 to 78 in that period. Okay. Go to 2000.

But Republicans were the same or a little bit higher. Yeah, basically the same. And that was during Obama's reign of terror. Let's go to 2013. Yeah. Okay. Democrats, 85%. Wow.

So you think about that, they've gone from 87 to 85 in 12 years now. Okay. And Republicans, by the way, are at 93 in that scenario and independence at 80%. So again, in the middle, you think of 2013, this is right after Mitt Romney loses. I mean, this is a moment of real despair for a lot on the right because a lot of people point at that. and say this is what's changed the Republican Party. A lot of people say that loss for Mitt Romney in a time where obviously Obama was not doing a good job as president. And that's not me saying that.

His approval ratings sucked and he got reelected. And a lot of that was to do with Mitt Romney's performance, frankly. And obviously, as we saw after that, not really a conservative. But that factor led into such frustration on the right that they, wanted somebody who was going to do something totally different. And that's when Donald Trump stepped into that void and was able to really change the party in a lot of good ways. Some ways you might not like, some ways you might love. But like, certainly the change is noticeable from that party. 93% Republicans approve of America at the time. 85% of Democrats, 80% of independence. The fall

all starts after this. 2015, it's still 80% for Democrats. 2016, 68%. 2017. 67, 2018, 60%, 2019, 51%, 20, 42%. It bounces back up for the Biden era, but only to 62%. Then drops to 52 in 2022. 2020, 53, 55%,

2024, 62% in an election year. And then they lose that election and now it's 36%. So some of this is partisanship, some of this is Trump. Some of this, I think, is, I think it's fair to say, especially when you look at the Biden bounce back, if you will, only going up to the 60s and 50s, a lot of this is just core in the Democratic movement. There is a core element of the left

that is based on the idea that we are not a great country that has had some problems. We are a horrible country that's done maybe a couple of good things here and there. That is the major separation because throughout this entire period, Republican approval never dropped below 84%.

And what year was it 84? 2022, which is the peak of inflation during Biden. It actually improves the last two years of the Biden administration, if you believe that, up to 85%. And now, of course, it's gone back up. It just goes to show, though, that it's not affected by who's president with Republicans,

not affected all that much. Yeah, not really. Because it only vacillated from 93 to 84%. That's amazing. Yes. Given who was president during some of that time, during 12 of those years. You had Obama for eight of them, which we hated. We hated the Obama years.

And then the Biden years were even worse. So for 12 of those years, we had presidents. We really disliked, very strongly disliked. You have had? Yeah. Uh-huh. I very strong, but still love the country. Still love the country. Still very proud to be American. Still very much say this is the best place to be.

Tells you a lot. You know, I agree with you. I think there is an element that has creeped in a little bit on the right. I think it's, but I mean, it's quite clearly in the polling, is very much of the fringes saying, you know, we, you notice this a little bit with some of the Israel, Iran stuff. Like basically, well, we kill people too. And, you know, we do bad things too. It's not just Iran. How can we be, get on our house?

horses and say we're better than Iran, and we are. It's pretty easy. We can easily say it. Very easily to do. I can do it without any problem at all. Can I give you the most concerning thing in this poll for me? I'm not shocked, frankly, that Democrats are, you know, don't like the country that much. As I said, I think even in 2000, I think that number's inflated for Democrats.

They're saying the right thing early on in this polling for the first 10 years of this. It will be. Yeah. The thing that's concerning to. to me more than anything else are independents. Independence start off at 84%. And this is pretty standard through the first, I don't know, 15 years of this polling,

which is they are about at the level of Democrats and oftentimes slightly lower than Democrats saying America is a great place. Okay? Their fall, though, has been pretty consistent since the Trump era began as well. Started in 2015 at 76%. This is down a little bit from the very early days in 2001.

of 84% so 84 to 76 and 14 years 2015 at 76 goes down to 73% 2017, 70% 2018, 606, 2019, 64, 2020 and he say,

okay, well, maybe they didn't like that first Trump presidency. He was certainly a figure that divided people, maybe it's that, but they don't bounce back for Biden, right? They continue to see, this is a crap heap.

It goes down, to 63% down to 60% in 2024. And then how it's dropped now to 53% in 2025. So just barely a majority of independence say America is great. And I think that in some ways backs up the theory number two of how to read this poll. It has now become kind of okay, popular, the cool thing to say that America is a bad place. rather than it's generally a good place. And now you're seeing people,

independents who aren't necessarily pushed around by partisanship as much, agreeing to this, I mean, from 84 to 53% among independents. It's almost like a social contagion. Yeah. Yes. It's why we have 19 times the amount of trans people in our society every month. Yep.

Exactly right. I just, I'm concerned about that. because I'm not concerned that the left I'm concerned about it but I'm not surprised at all that the left would turn against America. It's frankly fundamental to everything they believe in that America is a bad place. If you if you want something like Zoran Mamdani, yeah, of course you think America sucks, right? It's doing it stands for everything this person is against. Yeah. It stands, you know, against capitalism.

It stands against free speech. It stands against so many of these things that a Mamdani or a Bernie Sanders would be against. If you're on the left, I can kind of get why you might have problems. If you're in the middle, though, we shouldn't be seeing fall off like this. Yeah. Especially, you know, and again, in a period where things are better than they are.

And again, I know maybe Elon Omar would choose Somalia over this. But other than that, I don't think there's many people who would. And speaking of Ziran Mamdami, we'll get into some interesting policies of his Coming up in one minute. Do you wake up every morning wondering how pain is going to affect your day? Well, Michael from Connecticut used to, but not anymore. Let me tell you his relief factor story. Michael was dealing with elbow pain, which made using his hand and his arm very difficult.

Nothing he tried work until he started taking relief factor. Well, his elbow pain went away. And then he noticed my other aches and pains are going away on top of that. He felt like he had more energy. I mean, his life changed. Same here, Michael. I couldn't write. I couldn't paint because of my pain.

I tried Relief Factor. I had lost all hope until I tried Relief Factor. If you're living with aches and pains, see how Relief Factor, a daily drug-free supplement can help you feel better and live better. Join the over 1 million people who have turned to Relief Factor, just like Michael. Call now and try their three-week quick start for just 1995.

It's less than a dollar a day. Don't let pain keep you from living every day the way you want. Relief Factor, dot com. 1,800 for relief. 1,800, the number four relief. Breaking news, Pat.

Breaking news, here on the Glenn Beck program. 877 BECK is the number. We looks like we have verdicts in the P. Diddy trial. Oh. What am we supposed to call him? Sean Combs?

Sean Combs. The Sean Combs trial. They had gone back and forth. And there was five charges. They had four of them set yesterday. And they were still stuck on the fifth one, they said there was no way they were going to get to resolution. Then this morning, they came and they said, hey, we came to a resolution on the fifth one.

So it is a unanimous. They have unanimous around all five. I'm just reading through this. Count one, not guilty. What was that count? Does it say? USS, US, my write-up does not have that. Sex trafficking of Ventura, not guilty.

Transportation for prostitution, guilty. Oh. Sex trafficking, not guilty for the other, the woman Jane, which is known as Jane, transportation for prostitution, for Jane guilty. So basically, they got him on the prostitution stuff, not on a sex trafficking. So flying from state to state is what he's being, what he got convicted for, right? Yeah, I think taking these women across state lines, it sounds like. Yeah.

But he wasn't sex trafficking. But that is, you know, again, I think. Interesting. It's an interesting line. I will say when you look at the facts of the case, you know, the sex trafficking thing, you know, I don't know, taking it out of the law for a second here, talking as people who have an understanding of the basic English language. When I think of sex trafficking, what I'm thinking of is someone who's got a team of prostitutes that they're forcing in a slavery way to do a bunch of things. I don't know that that describes what he actually. actually did, at least my understanding of it.

Do you agree with that? I do. I don't know. I think of something totally different when I think of sex trafficking. And I really haven't followed it closely because I have never been a P. Diddy fan or what? Yeah, Sean Puff Daddy Combs or whatever he called himself. I've never.

You? Surprising, right? Yeah. I don't have a single. Wow, that's shocking. P. Diddy, Puff Daddy. album if he has them. None? You don't even know if he has them? I don't even know if he has them. I'm sure he must. He must. Right? He must have something. Odds are he does. Odds are he does. And I don't

own any of them. Nor have I ever listened to him on let's say a Spotify where you wouldn't own, but you're just kind of borrowing the song to play it whatever you want. Right. Never done that. So are you sure? I haven't followed him all of that, all that closely. But it's, it's interesting. I did hear that he probably wasn't going to be convicted on the sex trafficking thing. And sure enough, he was not. And he was not guilty on a racketeering conspiracy either. It's tough, too, because, like, there's a lot of texts that would indicate, at least for a significant period of time, the women were into this, right? Yeah.

There's definitely, now, again, if they decide to change their mind on that, they deserve that opportunity. Mm-hmm. And that wasn't always given to them. and there were seemingly, I mean, the stuff I had read that I was more shocked and horrified about was seemingly physical abuse towards these women. It wasn't necessarily transporting them for prostitution. There was absolute proof of it in video form, right, in that hotel hallway. Thank you. Yes, that's true. Yeah. It wasn't just the text. Really ugly. It was accused. It was video of it. Yeah. But he wasn't being charged with that.

But bizarrely, that's not what this is about. Right. Very strange. The law is very complicated, Pat. It is. But it looks like P. Didy is convicted on two counts, not guilty on three counts. We'll see if we can give you the... The biggest one was the racketeering conspiracy charge, which was not guilty. So that's the biggest one. We'll give you more detail coming up.

This is Glenn Beck. Are you ready to give your home a fresh new look for the summer? Blinds.com has you covered with their Fourth of July mega sale going on right now. Whether you're a DIY warrior or prefer the full white glove treatment or maybe something in between, blinds.com makes it easy with no pushy salespeople in your home or big showroom markup. Tanya and I love their design experts who help us make the perfect selection on our schedule. Plus, they can even handle everything from measure to install. Style every room effortlessly with blinds.com.

Classic shutters for living spaces to motorized options for total convenience. And don't forget the outdoor shades as well. With over 25 million windows covered and 40,000 five-star reviews, It's no surprise that blinds.com is the number one online retailer of custom window treatments. Plus, every order is backed by their 100% satisfaction guarantee. Don't miss blinds.com's spectacular 4th of July megasell. It's happening right now. Save up to 50%. Plus, get free professional measure.

Hurry before the holiday deals are all gone. Up to 50% off for a limited time at blinds.com. Rules and restrictions may apply. It's Pat and Stufer Glenn. AAA 727 BECK. Let's go to JD in Ohio. Oh, is this J.D. Vance? Hanging out in his home state.

Hey. Welcome, J.D. We shouldn't have kept you on hold so long. Sorry about that. Well, luckily, I was on a little meeting here in the car, so it's okay. Okay. So I want to talk about this child bank account. Okay.

So if you do the math, there's about 3.6 million babies born a year, besides the one that are killed in abortion, but the ones that are actually born. If you give them an $8,000. bank account the day they're born they don't touch it the rest of their lives at age 63 it's worth over a million dollars That cost annually is about 30 billion dollars So if we could really get rid of Social Security by Allocating about 30 billion a year for this program And that's that they never put another dollar in it if they put something else in it if they contribute to it's worth

You know even more millions more much more yeah now of course that have to get rid of social security though to make that viable, right? I mean, that's what that's what you're proposing? There'd be a transition phase, you know, from people, you know, I'm in my 40s, somewhere in that age, you know, we'd have to transition now. I don't know exactly how to do it. Yeah. Yeah. The cost up front would be, you know, the cost savings would be huge. Yeah. It would. Now, and now I love this world that you're talking about. I love it. I'd like to live there, right? Let's talk about how it would look here, though, JD. And I think you'll agree with this. What would happen, number one, is we'd give $8,000 to the baby accounts. Then we'd keep Social Security. It would not go anywhere.

That is right. Then there would be arguments that you have to raise the $8,000 to more. It would have to be $20,000. Why isn't it $20,000? Because, you know, AOC would come in and say it should be $20,000 or $30,000. And then, of course, the other thing that would happen is in the interim, the government would spend all those $8,000 accounts, and say they were in a lockbox, spend it all another crap. and then people will get to the end of their lives and not have any of the money. Does that sound about right?

That sounds pretty accurate. You know, obviously, I'd be some safeguards put in, but that sounds pretty accurate. Yeah, unfortunately. But I do. It would be great, though. Yeah, thanks. Thanks, JD. Can I get a quick basic example of what J.D. is talking about?

We had a proposal that was similar in a way to what J.D. was talking about. It was made by George W. Bush in 2005. Man, I wanted that to happen. He came through the 2004 election, and he used what he believed, was his political capital to try to get through social security privatized accounts. And the left beat the crap out of him. Beat the crap out of him. Made it,

made it like he was trying to steal your social security from you and ruin social security when, A, it was optional. It was optional. Yep. You could not enter it if you were really close to retirement. Right.

They would not allow it. Right. It was a very small, I think it was, it was between 4 and 8% of your social security accounts. Yeah. So it was very, very small amount that you can contribute into these. At the time, though, Pat, you could see some of the worry of people who are like, well, wait a minute.

What happens if the stock market goes down and all these things could go wrong? And we don't know what's going to happen in the future, which is true at that time. It is no longer true, however. We do now know what happened in the future. And what would have happened is people would have had between two and five times the amount of money that they have now. in Social Security. It would have worked in incredible fashion, as J.D. was essentially hinting to.

In an accurate way. If you actually had a country that was disciplined that could do this, you're right in basically all scenarios. And that was the truth with the George W. Bush plan. In all scenarios, everyone from the beginning to the end of the program that would have entered it would have wound up in a better place than

and actually they are today. All of them, 100%. Because there was a drop-off, I guess, it was 2004, so that great financial, great recessions period, 2008-2009, we had a drop-off in the markets, but no one could have retired in that period would have been affected by that

because they weren't eligible. Not to mention, again, it was only 4 to 8%. I think there's two different proposals. I just went over this data a little while ago, but the proposals were like a minimal amount. It wasn't like, hey, you could put all your money in its stocks. They didn't even allow that, which again, I would argue that if it's our money, maybe we should be able to do what we want with it. But this was just a very small slice.

And even that, it would have been much, much, much more than we actually do have for these people. So we basically, this nonsensical argument that everyone in the media made against George W. Bush at the time, he was proved completely correct about and costing people who are now retiring tens and sometimes six figures, low six figures, in income that they could have had today. So good job, everybody. Good job. Yeah, we did it. We did it, America.

We did it once again. We did it to ourselves once again. Unfortunately, this is the real world we live in with a media that does these things. Yeah. You know? It's why I, when the Fairtax used to be talked about all the time. It's one of the reasons I basically opposed that because... Can you remind people what the Fair Tax was?

The fair tax was a value-added tax. It was a sales tax, essentially. National sales tax. On everything that's new. So if you built a home, you would pay the tax on it. If you bought a new car, you would pay the tax on it. If you bought an existing home or an existing car, you don't pay the sales tax. So it was originally talked about to be around 23%.

So it's a hefty tax. However, they said they would do away with. the IRS. So you would have no income tax at all. Your gross is your net. It's the same number. That's appealing. So if you make $100,000 a year, you get $100,000, not $60,000. So you get all your money and they eliminate all of the hidden taxes and all of the FICA stuff and all of that. And it would be replaced by the sales tax. Well, I just knew that what would happen is they wouldn't get rid of the IRS. They would tell you they're going to try or they're going to do it, but then they wouldn't. And you would wind up with both the sales tax of 23% and the current income tax. Which, by the way, is the situation in Europe. Right. Right. Like they have all of those types of taxes. That was, that's what you get hit with in Europe like crazy. I agree. That's probably what would have happened here. I mean, the argument by some of them at the time was, hey, you know, it has to be essentially part of the same amendment of the Constitution. which would be the only way you could even entertain.

Yes, you would have, first of all, get rid of the IRS. When you do that, then, okay, yeah, maybe you can talk about the sales tax, the national sales tax, or a flat tax would be great. And I don't know that you necessarily have to get rid of the IRS if you just do a flat tax. You do 15% or whatever it is we decide on. But everybody pays the same. That's another tough sell because supposedly the rich would be paying less than or the exact same as the poor, which is so ridiculous.

Yeah, I was listening to, and you just realize how this stuff happens. I was listening to a CNN interview, unfortunately, with a congressman about the big, beautiful bill. And the setup to the question, I wish I could remember the congressman, we could find the audio,

but the setup to the question was so offensive to anyone who knows anything about the situation. It's like, Donald Trump is going to increase the deficit by $5 trillion with tax cuts that almost exclusively go to the wealthy. And it's like all of this stuff.

And you're like, this is not true. It's not true. None of it. None of that statement. It was true. No. And the congressman was like, well, I'd take issues with the way you framed this, first of all. And he went through the stuff. And it was, it was, yeah, I gave what I remember to be a relatively fine answer.

But, you know, they're not always there to push back, right? All these stories are written with that tone. Yes. Before anyone gets a chance to push back. And then when you push back, you're just seen as this, like, the Medicare Medicaid cut thing we talked about earlier. If you missed this earlier in the show, we went through what they call, what are they are calling Medicaid cuts. What they are largely calling Medicaid cuts are these, what they say are work requirements. So they're saying, hey, you got to, if you're able-bodied, so not someone who's disabled, for example.

I know that's not the right terminology, differently abled. different if you're differently able so stupid if you're disabled or if you're out of the age range like if you're you're a senior or whatever you have Medicaid you're not affected by this at all what they're saying is work requirement if you're a 35 year old guy that's totally fine you got to get a job or at least try to get a job okay you can't just sit at home which is reasonable no income at all yeah and no work requirements and still get our free or very heavily discounted medical care. What they are saying, what they are calling a cut is that they figure that some people in

that group will just not bother. They won't file the paperwork, so they won't, or they won't want to work. They'll choose to not work and not get the insurance. And those people will not go into the Medicaid system. Therefore, the Medicaid system will cost less. It's not that they won't have access to the program. They will have access to the program. cutting anybody's access to the program at all.

They're just saying if you don't hit these requirements, some people will just not bother to get it. And then the program will cost less. They're calling that a cut to Medicaid. That's what they're calling a cut. And it's insanity. It is insanity. But that is what they're doing.

And when that is so much the conversation that you probably before today haven't even heard that's what they're doing. You understand how these programs get locked in forever, and I have no ability to have any optimism over an $8,000 account that will solve our problems when the babies are born. It's just, frankly, it's just not the way our country operates. The media will always be there. The Democrats will always be there. And frankly, a lot of Republicans will always be there saying, oh, these are Medicaid cuts. We have Republican senators today saying the reason they won't vote for this bill is because of the Medicaid cuts.

when this is the reality of the situation. So, I mean, I think you got to deal with the world that we live in, unfortunately. Yeah. And it's not always so positive. Yeah. And it's stacked against any kind of conservatism. Mm-hmm. Because you got the mainstream media that you have to navigate against, and you have the left.

So it's very difficult. Triple-8-27-B-B-E-C-K. You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences. There's rough terrain ahead. Saddle up, my friend, and stay tuned. Glenn Beck will be right back. You know those brutal summer nights tossing, turning, flipping the pillow, trying to find the cool spot?

I've been there. It's exactly why I switched to cozy earth sheets. They're made from viscos, from bamboo, and they are designed to naturally wick away the heat and the moisture, which helps your body stay several degrees cooler at night. I didn't realize how much of a difference it would make until Tanya and I tried them. Studies show that when your body sleeps cooler, it releases more melatonin. So you fall asleep faster, you sleep deeper and you wake up feeling actually rested.

Plus, cooler sleep can even help regulate your mood. Cozy Earth will completely transform your 5 to 9, the time that matters most. And with their 100-night sleep trial, you've got nothing to lose. Test them out during the hottest nights of the year. And if you don't love them, send them back. But I don't think you're going to want to because they work. Upgrade your summer. Go to cozy earth.com.

Use the promo code Beck, save up to 40% on temperature regulating sheets, apparel, and so much more. That's cozyeer.com promo code Beck. Sleep cooler, lounge lighter. Stay cozy. We'll say, in the phone, all the world can be a guy of the finance. Not a big world in art, to play to golf, or not be a pro of the crypto. Not a business.

No, no way, you have always made sure. You have always made these affairs, and the apply Negoti-Titre T-D you add to renew with your instinct of

negotiation. With the support 24-hour-hour- -hour-day, no amount of minimum nor fray-mensual. You're made for negotiate,

and the appli-Nogist Titre T-D is made to you know. Telecharge it right now. It's Pat and Stu for Glenn.

This is amazing that CNN has claimed now that shutting down USAID, which happened, I don't believe yesterday was their last official day at USAID. But it's going to contribute to 14 million deaths. 14 million deaths.

14 million. Cut eight. Here's CNN talking about it. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is hailing the end of USAID, the nation's largest foreign aid agency. Get this. Even as a new analysis finds that its closure could contribute to some 14 million deaths in the next five years. Really? 14 million?

14 million. Yeah, this is the problem I have with conservatism overall, which is, I mean, we were shooting for at least 20 million dead, right? Well, I was hoping for 100 million. Yeah, well, yeah, but I was shooting for the sky. Yeah, you're hardcore. You know, I am hardcore. The majorities aren't large enough to get 100 million dead. We were shooting for at least 20 million, though, 25 million, maybe.

Yeah, yeah. And we're only getting 14 million dead. Well, short of that. And that's over five years, too. So that's not even... Some of those might not even happen. What is that? Three million, a little over three million a year?

Some of those people might even escape us. They might. And that's terrible news. So stupid. What are you talking about 14? Where is that coming from? Seriously. It's got to be some UN analysis.

I'm sure it is. But I want to hear the breakdown of how all of these people are dying because of the non-existence of it. Well, a lot of it assumes, by the way, in a big chunk of this is they assume nothing ever happens in its place. Yes, that's true. Like we fund a bunch of like, for example, HIV medication for Africa. And it's in a program that has been largely successful. Yeah. And we pull that money away. They say everybody who now dies. Now, in reality, what will happen, of course, is charities. Maybe other nations will chip in for some of this. I don't know. We've been doing it for, you know, for a long time. Maybe they'll step up. Maybe the countries will find

to be a priority. Somebody? Right? Like, it's not all us or nothing, but that's how they assume and come up with these ridiculous numbers. And by the way, here's what Russ Vote was talking about them,

spending that money on anyway. Americans have been funding the following. 5.5 million to LGBTQ advocacy in Uganda. Oh. 800,000 for transgender people, sex workers, and their clients in Nepal. Their clients are helped. They don't talk about it.

They don't talk about it. No. cooking, psycholoids, psychosocial counseling, a cyber cafe, and the dance focus groups for male prostitutes in Haiti. Okay. Okay. Female prostitutes should get some of that money too. Come on.

And what about the gender non-specific? Right. Where is their money? Only male prostitutes are getting this dancing cash? That's sad. So yes, while 14 million people may be dying over the next five years, most of those are going to be male prostitute dancers in outer Mongolia. Oh, no.

Or someplace. somewhere. One-legged deaf transvestite nuns. I mean, I'm sorry, do we live in a world where we want our male prostitutes to be bad dancers? No, we do not. Of all things. No, we do not. I don't want that world.

Well, it would be a total embarrassment. I want them to be fantastic dancers. I want the choreography to be brilliant when I get... Whenever I'm hanging around male prostitutes, I want them to just be able to get down at the first note. With their bad selves. Yes. Yeah. And not only that, but when they're...

tipped while they're dancing, these male dancing prostitutes, I want them not to be taxed on those tips. That's true. That's true. I mean, I will say waiters, waitresses, strippers, whenever you get tipped. Right. And I don't know if this is going to help everyone. I mean, I guess it will. It helped me a little bit because, you know, I do it on the weekends. Right. But it's only a part-time job for you. I don't think it's central to your vote. You know what I mean? When you're when you're doing your exotic dancing, that's usually only a Saturday afternoons. Usually. Sometimes it goes into evening, but... We've got to get into the Zeran Mandani situation.

This is the communist, Islamist, running for mayor of New York City's lead candidate right now. Can anybody stop him from becoming mayor of New York City? Doesn't look good, really. We'll get into that and talk about some of his policies. The grocery store policy is interesting. We'll talk about that coming up in one minute. We're entering some very uncertain times with everything that is happening overseas. We need to be on alert at home as well.

You should have a burner on you at all times, especially one that is small enough to conceal wherever you go. Meet the new compact launcher. It's touted as the world's smallest, less lethal pistol launcher. The same size as a smartphone, but it has all the firepower that you need to stop an attacker in their tracks without dealing with a mental or financial repercussion of using a real firearm. These are equipped with tear gas and kinetic ammunition.

It's designed to stop somebody right in their tracks and incapacitate them for up to 40 minutes. The compact launcher is perfect for women who want protection, but don't want to really carry a firearm. And if you're traveling this summer, Berna is legal in all 50 states. It requires no background checks and can be shipped directly to your door. Burna is proudly American with every unit that is hand assembled in Fort Wayne, Indiana. So visit burnah.com today and find the right launcher for your family. That's burner.com. It's Pat and Stu for Glenn.

Oh, good. I love Pat and Stu for Glenn. We're talking about Zoran Mamdani. He is the Democratic nominee for mayoral. I heard him babbling the other day about not moderating your message. as a socialist, right? Oh, the one when he's in space? Yes.

Do not moderate that message. Why did you run as a Democrat then? Weird. Why didn't you run as the lead socialist of the socialist party or a communist? Why, what are you talking? Of course, he moderated his message so that he could become the Democrat nominee. He's not a Democrat. Yeah, you know, I think that's this clip. This is the one where he's talking about seizing the.

means of production? I think it's the same clip. I mean, do you have that? Yeah, he's in space. Here's, here's, here's Zoran, Mamdani, with a weird background of a video where he's actually in space. What the purpose is about this entire project, it's not simply to raise class consciousness, but to win socialism. And obviously raising class consciousness is a critical part of that. But making sure that we have candidates that both understand that and are willing to put that forward at every which moment that they have and every which opportunity that they're given, we have to continue to elect more socialists and we have to ensure that we are unapologetic about our socialists. There are also other issues that we firmly believe in.

And why run as a Democrat? Whether it's BDS, right, or whether it's the end goal of, I'm seeing the means of production. Where we do not have the same level of support at this very moment. And what I want to say is that it is critical the way that we organize, the way that we set up our, you know, up our work and our priorities, that we do not leave any one issue for the other, that we do not meet a moment and only look at what people are ready for, but that we are doing both of these things in tandem. Marxism with a smile.

You love to see it, don't you? That's a big part of this. Huge. I will say, you know, the delivery mechanism of someone like Bernie Sanders with this exact same message. Or I will even say AOC, who's often angry and dower and like, you know, again, she's a more attractive package, I guess, than Bernie Sanders. But like, you know, there's very rarely smiling happening with AOC. She's angry at everybody. This guy is doing it the totally different way. He's so nice about his Marxism. The biggest smile he has in that entire thing. And he

smiles throughout the entire thing. But the biggest smile he has is he said after we seize means of production. Right. Right. Like he's saying, he knows what he's He knows what he's doing. And if you really like listen to what he said there, it's basically like we can't just take the popular parts of socialism, right? Like free health care and just push for that. Right. We have to go for all of it.

However, he is doing that with his mayoral election. He's just doing it with a smile. And an example of this is his, when you say seize the means of production, a good step of this is taking over grocery stores and making it so. Which he plans. to do. Yeah, this is one of his central policies. This is how it's going to become affordable to live in New York City. You don't have to pay for your food, I guess, or he's going to lower the prices so low because their government run that they can operate at a loss or just a break-even

spot? I don't know. This is infuriating to me. It kicks me into a rant that I always have on this thing, because this seems crazy. Would you say, like, to the average person living in Ohio in a medium-sized town, it would be crazy for your town to just open up a grocery store. Yes, it would be. A town owned grocery store. And anybody who said they were going to do that would lose. Yes, I agree. And you'd think, too, like if they were to say, hey, and one of the big benefits is we'll

make it, will undercut the prices of the actual businesses that opened in our town. Because we don't have a profit motive and of course have no reason to actually make the budget balance as no one seems to have in government. We always raise taxes more. We have that backing. We'll get it built for free. We won't have to pay that back. We'll take all tax dollars. We won't have to spend a dime of our money to build it.

We'll get all tax dollars to build it. And then we'll undercut the people who are here actually paying taxes to the community. That would be a really bad idea. I will note to almost everybody in a medium-sized town, in the entire listening audience, this is exactly what every town does with rec centers instead of gyms. And it's like everyone seems to think that's okay. Well, we're just going to build a beautiful multimillion dollar rec center in our town.

And the established like gyms that people pay, you know, membership fees to will undercut those membership costs. And then we'll still collect. money from our competition to pay for our gym. This happens all over America. It's not just gyms, but that's just the easiest example. It is amazing what flavors of socialism will put up with, and which we won't. I know that no one else cares about that issue except me, but it just isn't infuriating to me.

It's like, wait, why did I have to spend all this money in taxes for you to build this thing when there's three gyms in the area? Then I don't want to go to any of them, by the way. I should know. I didn't say, hey, well, I really want to go to a gym. I quite clearly do not. Anyway, but that is what he's proposing here. The exact same thing, except with grocery stores, exact same thing.

He's saying he's going to build grocery stores. He's going to take, now he's going to pay for these patents. That's the tough thing, because you know what? The conservatives will say, how are you going to pay for this? This is his proposal, as he describes it, with giant smiles throughout, how he's going to take over the grocery store system in New York. Grocery prices are out of control. The cost of eggs and milk has skyrocketed.

Some stores are even using dynamic pricing, jacking up the cost over the course of a day depending on what they can get away. It doesn't need to be this way. I'm Zahran Mandani, and as mayor, I will create a network of city-owned grocery stores. It's like a public option for produce. We will redirect city funds from corporate supermarkets to city-owned grocery stores, whose mission is lower prices, not price gouging. These stores will operate without a profit motive or having to pay property taxes or rent,

and we'll pass on those savings to you. Now think about how how unbelievably unfair that would be to other grocery stores. He's going to, he's not going to, they're not going to have to pay rent. They're not going to have to pay taxes. They're going to get all the buildings built

for buy taxes, right? And so all these places are like, wait a minute, we need to charge $3 for eggs. They get his charge $2 for eggs in theory. Again, this is all in socialist theory. But there's a bigger problem with this particular proposal. He's smiling throughout,

that, by the way, it is the exact pitch you got for Obamacare. If you remember, the public option? I do remember. Right? Yeah. That was, you're going to pay $2,500 less per family per year. If you want to keep your grocery store, Pat, you can keep your grocery store. If you like it, you can keep it.

But no, here we are now with grocery stores and we're all like, I mean, and it does sound completely insane. But it's better than that. It is better than that, Pat. Because what his plan is to pay for that, that would be the first thing anyone would point out. Like, wait, how are you got to pay for that? You raise taxes? No, no.

He's going to redirect money that's going to corporate grocery stores. Yeah. The big evil, big grocery. Big grocery. We all hate so much. Right. So in theory, like depending on what your grocery store is around you, Kroger and Albertsons or a stop and shop or a Whole Foods, whatever it is, he, he, the New York. city government is taking millions of dollars and giving it to these grocery stores for some

reason. Now, that to me stands out as something odd. It sure does. What do you mean? Why are they giving away money to grocery stores? Why aren't grocery stores just doing whatever grocery store? My understanding was, they just come in and they open it up if they think they'll be profitable and they stay open as long as they can be. That's my understanding of grocery stores. Now, it's so funny to hear this, because first of all, it's built on a left-wing lie. First of all, the reason why there would be any reason to give money to grocery stores in New York City is because they complained about food deserts. They said there's no grocery stores here for people to eat. They have to go too far to get their groceries.

so we are going to try to promote a program that forces these places or incentivizes them, I suppose, with lots of money, to build grocery stores in these areas where there are none. Now, I had a series called Wonderful World of Stew on Blaze TV, which preceded the Studeas America. And in that, we had a series called Deserted, was a segment we did. And we would go to the government website, and we would find food deserts, and we would travel to the food deserts, and I would take people inside the grocery stores that very much do. did exist inside of these food deserts. Right.

There really weren't food deserts. These were lies. In fact, some of them were in New York City. Yeah. So that on its... This was big when we lived in that area. Right. When we lived there, they were talking about food deserts.

All the time. All the time. And we're like, where is this food desert? Right. There's food everywhere. Restaurants, food, food, bodegas, everywhere. Yep. So this wasn't even true.

But the only reason this system exists at all that he's proposing, which is money going to corporate grocery stores is because the left demanded it happen. Okay? However, there's even more to the story than this. Because what happened with this program is he's saying $140 million goes from New York City government to these grocery stores.

However, where this is not true at all, where he gets this number is a program and he describes it called Fresh. It's called food retail expansion to support health. Again, does that sound like a conservative program. It is not. It is a food desert attack program, supposedly. It's called Fresh. If you go

to the website, they have a fancy website tells you about the program. And let me just show you, Pat, the and you can explain this to the audience. But this is the website here. And you see, that's like promoting the website. Hey, look at all these wonderful things that we did. You saw the,

what did you see? The one big yellow box, right? There's one big yellow box on the website. The yellow box says $140 million the amount of money invested in New York City's economy through Fresh. That's the program name. Okay. So that's what he's saying. He's saying we're going to take

that money and give it to socialist grocery stores instead of the evil Kroger or whatever they have in New York for Whole Foods. Yep. Okay. So in some ways you'd say, all right, I guess that kind of makes sense. I mean, it doesn't make sense to me, but in a socialist mindset, you're a New York City voter. Maybe that makes sense to you. The problem with it is,

the $140 million number that's in the yellow box on this website is actually not the amount of money given from the government to corporate grocery stores. That number is the amount that corporate grocery stores have invested to bring grocery stores into New York. This money does not come from the government. It comes from the corporate grocery stores who invested their own money to build and open up grocery stores inside of New York City. This website is bragging about, hey, we did this system and we brought in all this corporate money into New York.

That's what they're bragging about. It's not money that goes to the grocery stores from the government. The only thing that happens with this program, in fact, no money, Pat, goes from the government to these stores. Zero dollars. The only thing that happens is they get a couple of tax benefits that is something like a couple of a million dollars, which again is not

New York City's money. It is the corporate money of the grocery stores, and they get a slight reduction in their taxes to come into these areas. So none of this money exists. Now, this is a central program of his mayoral run. It is

the thing he's probably promoted, more than anything else outside of free no rent increases, which is a whole another socialist catastrophe waiting to happen. So now let me take it to another level because this is a fascinating story to me. This story was written by Tim Carney. Tim Carney is a guy.

You might know him. He's been on my show. Maybe he's been on yours. He's a conservative writer. And he writes for the Washington Examiner. Tim Carney is a good guy. He's a good writer. I'm glad he did this story.

Why is it left to Tim Carney, a conservative in a Washington newspaper? to figure this out. The New York Times has probably written a thousand articles about this race. And at no point did they bother to look at any detail of one of his central proposals.

Wow. That's unbelievable. How on earth did none of the New York media, basically the center of all media in the United States. But not even the post. Nobody. Nobody bothered to look at anything that actually.

actually was going on with this story. No one said, hey, wait a minute, where is this money coming from? Shouldn't we check into that? Are we really giving $140 million away to Whole Force? Why would we do such a thing? Nobody bothered to check it. And of course, the answer is they're not. They're not. They're not giving that money. So where is he going to get that money? Well, he doesn't have it now. And of course, does he come out and say, gosh, holy crap did I blow it? I'm so sorry. I just saw this yellow box and based my entire campaign on it. No, he doesn't bother to do that.

What he instead does is just ignore this and does anyone pushing him on it? No. Nope. Nope. Nope. Even after this, no one's pressing him on it. Not been asked at all. No. No, he hasn't really had to release a statement. Incredible. At least as of several hours ago, maybe he's addressed it. But this

has been several days since the story came out. Wow. So the money doesn't exist. The program is based on a lie, a misreading of a giant yellow box on a website, that's the amount of research he did to announce a brand new program. This guy might be mayor of our largest

city and our financial center. Not good. Not only is he a socialist, and as we noted, a couple of minutes ago, has shown support for communism multiple times. Yep. That guy might be mayor of New York, and no

one's even bothering to fact check the nonsensical socialism he's proposing. Oh, AAA 727 back. More coming up in one minute. So many people are living with pain every day and they think they're just stuck with it. I mean, it just is what it is. But it doesn't have to be. I want to tell you a story about Jenny. She lives in Texas. And let me share her relief factor story. She said she was out for a walk one day and she was hit by a car, unfortunately. Nothing she tried for her lower back pain worked. Her husband heard about relief factor on the program. Jenny said, okay, it's worth a shot. Well, relief factor worked perfectly for her. Her pain decreased. Her range of motion

increased, and to say that she's grateful, I am told, is an understatement. My pain started when I hit my 40s. I tried everything, but nothing worked until I tried Relief Factor, and that broke the back of my pain. If you're living with aches and pains, see how Relief Factor, a daily drug-free supplement can help you feel and live better every day. Give their three-week quick start a try. It's 1995. In a few weeks, even a few days, you'll feel the difference that Relief Factor can make. You don't have to be stuck living with pain. Visit Relieffactor.com. Call 800, the number four. relief. That's 800 the number four relief. Reliefactor.com. It's Pat and Stufer Glenn. You see that the actual Iranians have now admitted.

This comes from government spokesperson, Fatema Maharani, he just admitted that after assessing the damage in Iran, done after the bombing, it, was severe is how he labeled it. Severe damage was done to their nuclear sites. Hmm. So the leakers here in America are trying to do their very best to hijack the narrative and hurt the president and the country and the message. But this comes directly from Iran.

Amazing. Amazing. It was another acknowledgement that, Fordo, Isfahan, and Itans, the key sites within the nuclear program, had been seriously or severely damaged by the American strikes. And that's from their state-run news agency. And it's probably more reliable than some of the leaks we've been hearing lately. You think so. I think it would, you know, what would motivate them to lie about that, for instance, to say that,

the damage was more severe than it actually is. I mean, I guess maybe... Maybe to stop the bombings. Yeah, you don't need to bomb anymore. You really hurt us bad. I mean, it's possible. That's not usually the way they handle these situations. It's not likely, though, because, yeah, they like to, actually, they like to do the

opposite with their people and try to, I mean, it's like their Ayatollah crawled out from underneath a shelter and claimed victory. Yeah, they, I mean, Israel is. about to be wiped off the map, but that's the only reason the American stopped bombing. That's what they said. They actually claimed that they destroyed one third of Tel Aviv

and that millions were fleeing Israel. Oh. Hmm. You're seeing different reports than we are. That's for sure. I think we'd notice it. But that is the way that they typically handled those things. So that's a good sign for the efforts.

Triple-8-900-727, actually. B-E-C-K. This is Glenn Beck. You know me. I believe in preserving the things that truly matter, and there is nothing more valuable than your family and their memories. And Legacy Box gets that. They've digitized over 15 million hours of home videos and photos, helping families preserve their history before it fades away forever.

Now, here's how it works. You send in your old tapes, your film reels, your photos. They digitize everything by hand right in the U.S., and they send it all back, along with digital copies, you can stream, download, and share from the cloud. Like so many people in the audience, Tanya and I have just become empty nesters, and we spent last year preparing mentally.

We have spent countless hours rewinding memories of moments in our kids' lives that have helped get them prepared to strike out on their own. The memories are going to fade over time, but we use Legacy Box to safeguard those wonderful moments that we captured on video and on film. Right now, they're offering 50% off. So if your attic is full of family history,

it is time. Get it out of the attic and preserve it. Go to Legacybox.com slash back and claim 50% off. That's Legacybox.com slash back 50% off. Preserve your family legacy with Legacy Box. For Glenn today, AAA 727BECK. So Diddy was found not guilty of three of the five charges. Including the most serious ones.

Yes. Sex trafficking, the racketeering situation. The only thing he got convicted on was two charges of transporting prostitutes across. This is so weird. It's always that. It's always the problem. We seem to be totally fine with people having prostitutes in state. Like, as long as you're doing it in your local community, it's totally fine.

But if you bring those prostitutes from Florida into Georgia, outsourcing. That's where the problem. You've got to put our foot down now. I think it's even okay to travel to Georgia to hook up with Georgian prostitutes. You just can't bring them from Florida to Georgia. Okay. That apparently is a big line in our society, which, is odd. It's a weird line. Right? It seems to always be the thing that is the big issue.

Well, they transported them across state lines. Yeah, but like, isn't the thing they were doing with them the problem? Like, my problem with Diddy has been, I don't know, his tendency to be beating women up in hotels. Like, that seems to be really bad to me. Yeah. Yeah, that was not good. And like, prostitution, not a good thing. Not a good practice, Pat, despite all the hullabaloo around it. But, um, but, um, My issue with it isn't typically the flight. It's more of the prostitution and like the even more importantly forced prostitution for some of these people. Wow, you're a stickler. You're really a stickler.

It doesn't like it seems like there was a lot of prostitution going on with Diddy. But much of it, at least supported by a lot of text messages, was showing that it was agreed upon. between the parties, at least for a large chunk of it. The issue that I think the main problem most people would have with it was when it went beyond the situation of agreement and, you know, fists were thrown to enforce it. That kind of seems like the bigger issue. And it wasn't even charged with that. Yeah. I don't understand our legal system sometimes.

No, it's very bizarre, very bizarre. But he could, I guess he faced. Is it 20 years? Yeah, up to 20 years in prison. Now, I don't think there's any indication that's going to be the penalty. Yeah. Like, his supporters are very happy with this outcome, it seems. Like, they were celebrating outside the courtroom.

He was saying thank you to the jury afterward. So it does appear that they are happy with this outcome. You would assume a first-time conviction for someone on prostitution charges is probably not 20 years, right? Yeah. It's a year or two maybe, maybe probation. Probation and a first-time conviction. fine. Yeah.

Like that's sort. Usually. Yeah. You know, we have, again, like, we seem to sometimes give punishes away, punishment away to, like, people who, like, molest children. And it's like, probation. And, like, you know, someone speeds too much in a particular zone. And they go to, you know, they go to Gulag for 40 years.

Like, I don't understand what's happening sometimes in our system. But that, it does seem to be, the punishments are strange to me. Very. Yeah. But not a good guy. I think we could say that. Again, we have this on video where he's beating women up in hotels, and for some reason that was not the charge.

Into some weird things, but, you know, who am I? You know, to decide what is weird and what isn't. He was into some different things, though. And yeah, and then there's the video of him actually beating his girlfriend in the hotel, which is really horrible, really horrific. All right. We got this climate act. former friend of Greta Thunberg, who now says that the climate change movement is a scam.

A decade ago, Lucy Biggers was like a lot of people in their 20s. She believed that climate change posed an immediate and catastrophic risk to mankind, that we should rapidly eliminate fossil fuels to address the problem, that renewables are up to that task and that our wealthy privileged lives in the West are a mark of shame. Her fans cheered her on. She interviewed people like Greta became friends with her. Over time, though, she began to question her leftist ideals. And she started to see the climate movement as anti-human and ultimately harmful.

She now calls the climate movement a scam. And she's making videos on TikTok and elsewhere in hopes that young people will consider a more positive view of modern life, one they can hopefully be grateful for. In turn, they can escape the anxiety, she says. The climate movement causes young people to feel. Man, is that not so true? People like, well, Greta Thunberg, who obviously believes the world is about to end. She said years ago that we had, what, 12 years left before catastrophic extinction begins on this planet. And that's what's being told to these kids.

And so they grow up with this fear that the world's about to end. So, yeah, there's a lot of anxiety in this movement. I mean, it's legitimately a terror. It terrorizes them, right? Like you think about a horror movie, right, that has some scary villain, some boogeyman that would scare a child. And like they would, their lives get changed. Every time they want to go to bed, they were afraid there's a monster under their bed.

That is how a lot of kids actually are right now because of climate change. Because of a 0.9 degree Celsius temperature rise over a century. They're sitting here freaking out thinking that they're not going to make it to their golden years because the world is going to end. Think of what a psychotic thing that is to do to a child. You're ruining their lives. It's despicable. It's despicable for your mind. Mungering.

Yeah. With no concern for what it does to kids. No. Michael Schellenberger wrote a great book about this. And one of his main motivations was seeing his daughter's friends terrified by global warming, worried they were going to die. Yeah. Because he too was a believer. He was a believer.

But he was, I don't think he was ever that psychotic about it. Like, you know, he was like, you know, I remember the first time I remember seeing him was he was in a documentary about nuclear. power. And he was talking about, I mean, that was one of the things that was featuring. He was an advocate, I think, for nuclear. He was saying, hey, you know, nuclear power would be a great way. We have really serious climate concerns. This is a great way to address them. And so he was always, you know, he was, he got all sorts of environmental awards from the left. But he was maybe a little bit more sensible than some of the crazy people, the Greta's of the world were. But, I mean, think of what the population and the media in general did to this poor girl. I mean, They completely used her to try to get their plans through. They use the emotional, we look, this is no secret.

One of the greatest correlations with youth is stupidity. Okay. When you're young, you're kind of dumb. You start off, you don't even know the language, right? You don't understand math. You slowly grow out of your stupidity as you grow. That doesn't mean you land in a place where you're smart. but you supposedly learn things as you go on through life.

And so when you're 11 years old and you're skipping school because you think the world is going to end from climate change, the appropriate response from adults is, honey, I understand you're concerned here. We can go through some of the facts on that, but it's not appropriate to do what you're doing. And there's no reason to panic like this. Yeah, sure, we have concerns in our world,

but there's no reason to be like this. Instead, it was, she's right. She's the only one telling the truth. she's so brave. Look at all the wonderful things she's doing for the world. Every piece of this idiocy was awarded and rewarded over and over and over again. Yep. And so she understandably, I think, for her child, took that as everything I'm doing is great.

Everyone's approving of it. I'm being lauded by the United Nations for what I'm doing. And therefore, I should continue doing it. Now she's taken it to another place that is rewarded by the United Nations hating Jews. That's where she is now. Amazing. Yeah. And again, now there's some people who are like, gosh, you don't know, maybe we shouldn't have just, I don't know,

embraced her so hard. Maybe we embraced her so hard. We suffocated her and her brain turned off. But, I mean, she was, you know, again, like a child who's at some level, at least at one point was a victim in this. Now she's an adult now. So it's hard to feel that way. headed at one point right for Gaza. She was going to support Hamas at Gaza when the Israelis headed her off and said, yeah, you're not going.

And kidnapped her, Pat. They kidnapped her. They kidnapped her. They did. It was frightening. It was a weird kidnapping. It was. I told her about it in advance.

Yeah. And they didn't actually take her anywhere and keep her someplace. No, they put her on a nice jet, fed her, put her on a nice jet and flew her back to her home. Now, you know, someone pointed this out and it was a great observation, which was it was the first ever kidnapping where the only qualification to get out of the kidnapping was to leave. The only request was, please get out of here. That is a weird kidnapping. Usually a kidnapping means you must stay. Right.

Their kidnapping was you must go. Oh, wow. Which is, ah. Sort of defeats the purpose of the kidnap. I mean, maybe the Israelis are just bad at it. They don't, you know. They're bad at that. Yeah.

They're bad at genocide. Yes, terrible at genocide. It's really bad. They keep feeding the people they're supposed to be killing. Yeah. Which is strange. And warning them to leave places that they're about to bomb. That's not a good way to commit genocide.

Yeah. Yeah. So they're really good at killing terrorists, but bad at genocide, bad at kidnapping. Yeah, they need to work on it. They're going to have to work on it. They're going to need to work. Yeah. But it is sort of like, I mean, first of all, it's good to see that some of the kids that

were in this movement at the time. Friends with Greta are coming out of it. Yes, it is good to see that. That's good to see. Again, you can look at climate change. Some people do think there are issues with climate change. However, when you look at it, this is something that we're very capable of handling. Yeah, the biggest problem with climate change right now is that there's more food, which, man, I hate that because it's making us all.

fat. That's the problem we're having on this planet right now. We're getting too fat because there's too much food to go around. Yeah. Gosh, that terrible abundance. I just, I actually saw an honest article written a week or two ago. And they were talking about the fact that the warmer temperatures are causing more food to grow. Wow. Good for you for at least acknowledging that aspect of it. Now, if we get to the, what is it they're afraid of, Fahrenheit, like five degrees Fahrenheit or four degrees Fahrenheit or whatever, if we get to that point, yeah, that would be a real problem. And then the food becomes burned up and we've got famine at that point. But I mean, that is, A, not happening right now.

And the forecast for the temperatures to end up where are they trying to keep it under two degrees Celsius? Is that the deal? Two or two point something degrees. Yes. I can't remember the exact number. I mean, they change it all the time. Also, you know, it's such a ridiculous standard.

Like, like as if there's this switch that goes off at this particular. As if we can control any of it anyway, which I, I, I, I guess if you believe that every bit of the increase is brought on by CO2 coming from mankind, I guess you think that cutting back on the CO2 is going to fix the problem. But you could remove every car in the planet, and it still wouldn't. It wouldn't be enough to get them where they want to be. No, of course not. And of course, we've also had real improvements on this anyway, right?

Yeah. I mean, just the switch from, you know, coal to natural gas has led to a real decline in emissions. We've declined ours quite a bit without all these massive climate initiatives that they said they wanted. Yeah. And let's talk to China about the fact that they burn more coal than not just the United States, but every country on Earth combined. So. Yeah. And they are by far the number one of emitters of carbon dioxide. So it's a situation that is laughable and is obvious to anyone who's not a child, right? Like if you're not a 15-year-old skipping school, this is probably pretty obvious to you. If you're embracing it, most likely you have another agenda, right? At least especially if you're in this world, right? These politicians, I mean, I think there's a lot of people who are just generally left-leaning that are, you know,

oh, I like the, you know, I like the planet. clean air, clean water. Of course, everyone's for clean air, and clean water. Everybody likes the planet. It's just this stupid catchphrase. And I can understand a lot of those people just being fooled by this, right? Yeah.

I mean, it's a scary thing that's out there somewhere. This future that could collapse on you at any moment. You can see how it works on some people. But like, you know, the people that are proposing it know. AAA 727 BECK. They want you silent, obedient, and blind. Well, shoot, here we are with open eyes and a bit of rebellious nature. Hold in line, my friends.

Glenn Beck will be back in a minute. You know those brutal summer nights tossing, turning, flipping the pillow, trying to find the cool spot? I've been there. It's exactly why I switched to cozy earth sheets. They're made from viscos from bamboo, and they are designed to naturally wick away the heat and the moisture, which helps your body stay several degrees cooler at night.

I didn't realize how much of a difference it would make until Tanya and I tried him. Studies show that when your body sleeps cooler, it releases more melatonin. So you fall asleep faster, you sleep deeper, and you wake up feeling actually rested. Plus, cooler sleep can even help regulate your mood. Cozy Earth will completely transform your 5 to 9, the time that matters most. And with their 100-night sleep trial, you've got nothing to lose. Test them out during the hottest nights of the year. And if you don't love them, send them back.

But I don't think you're going to want to because they work. upgrade your summer. Go to cozy earth.com. Use the promo code back. Save up to 40% on temperature regulating sheets, apparel, and so much more. That's cozyeerth.com promo code Beck. Sleep cooler, lounge, lighter, stay cozy. Something we didn't get to today. We'll have to get into this tomorrow because the University of Pennsylvania just agreed to take back the performances of Leah Thomas. Yeah. And his swimming records at the University of Pennsylvania. Well, he didn't have swimming records.

He had female swimming records. Female swimming, yes, right. Right. And medals and awards. Because when she was a he, he was finishing, he was finishing last in the races against men. Yeah. And then switched and started competing against women.

It wasn't a little better for her. Well, actually, Pat, there's no scientific evidence that men are better at sports than women. No, none at all. None at all. Like, there's not a under 15-year-old boys' team that just beat the women's national Swiss soccer team seven to one. That's not science. That's not science.

No, that's just circumstantial evidence. Exactly. There's, all they are is just endless anecdotes. Right. That's all it is. Over and over and over again. Throughout all of human civilization. But other than that.

No proof. No proof. This is Glenn Beck.