The Glenn Beck Program - Glenn Beck Reacts to Passing of Pope Francis | Guest: Daniel Kokotajlo | 4/21/25

Episode Date: April 21, 2025

Just one day after Easter, Pope Francis died of pneumonia, sparking a new papal election. But will the next pope revert to conservative tradition or stay globalist? Glenn recounts his eerie trip to the Vatican and why he believes Pope Benedict was the first victim of the global deep state. Glenn raises credibility concerns regarding the New York Times, which criticized historian Darryl Cooper for his comments on Winston Churchill, but endorsed the debunked "1619 Project." A new White House website admits that the COVID-19 lab-leak theory is true, but Glenn asks: Will people like Dr. Fauci and the legacy media finally be held accountable for their cover-ups? Glenn critiques former MSNBC host Chris Matthews, who compared Trump’s deportation policies to Hitler’s actions. Glenn welcomes AI Futures Project Executive Director Daniel Kokotajlo, who sheds light on the companies that are building an artificial intelligence "army of geniuses.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

I want to talk to you a little bit about ammo squared. Ammo squared will help you be prepared. It will help you stock up on ammunition if you need them for practice, for hunting, for, you know, break down a society, whatever it is. That way you can defend yourself and you don't have to worry about, you know, your ammo. It just automatically does it every single month. You get a subscription and you choose what you want, how much you want, how often you want it. Then quietly and consistently, consistently your ammo stack just kind of grows. it's stored for you in a secure vault until you want it.

And then they'll send it right to your door. You can pause, adjust, ship, liquidate whenever you want. All you have to do is just go to Ammosquared.com. This is the great, I think the best way to be able to have ammo on hand, especially if you shoot a lot. Amosquared.com, Ammosquared.com. Take the work out of buying ammo. A hundred thousand members and 100,000, you know, five-star ratings cannot be wrong. It's Ammosquared.com.

That's Ammoed Square. dot com. All right. It's a freak. Hang on. We're from Washington, D.C. We'll tell you what's going on in the world in just a second. Oh, America. You know we've been fighting every single day.

We push back against the lies, the censorship, the nonsense of the mainstream media that they're trying to feed you. We work tirelessly to bring you the unfiltered truth because you deserve it. But to keep this fight going, we need you. Right now, would you take a moment and rate and review the Glenn Beck podcast? Give us five stars and leave you. to comment because every single review helps us break through big tech's

algorithm to reach more Americans who need to hear the truth. This isn't a podcast. This is a movement and you're part of it, a big part of it. So if you believe in what we're doing, you want more people to wake up, help us push this podcast to the top. Rate, review, share. Together, we'll make

a difference. And thanks for standing with us. Now let's get to work. From our nation's capital, Washington, D.C., it is the Glenn Beck program. why am I here? I'll tell you about that coming up. Also, we want to talk. I really, I have a few things to say about all of this back and forth on Donald Trump being again as dangerous as Hitler because he's sending people out. He's liquidating people. He's what?

He is going to do, every time he takes an illegal immigrant out, he is closer to taking out an African American, a citizen. Are you even listening to yourself? I'm going to give you the real facts that you can share with your friends coming up later on in the program. I also want to talk about this nonsense back and forth that platforms,

one way or another, should not voice opinions. Now, I guess, our side is saying that we shouldn't allow some people to be heard. Excuse me? No, I think everybody has this upside down and inside out. I'll explain that coming up. Also, the Pope died.

While you were asleep, we'll have the latest on that. And what it all means in 60 seconds. First, let me tell you about our sponsor this half hour. It's Relief Factor. There is something deeply human about being useful, about moving with purpose, about carrying the groceries, fixing the fence, even mowing the yard.

When the smallest task that you can, you know, can do, will give shape to your day. and it will also give your life a little bit of meaning. I was talking to my sister about my aunt yesterday, and she said, you know, she doesn't like it when people come over and tell her exactly what she has to do. I know. I know. I don't like it.

I don't think I'm going to like it when I'm 90, you know. I like to be in charge of my own destiny. What happens when pain starts taking that usefulness away in your own head, when every movement becomes a calculation, when you start handing off the things you used to do without giving it a second thought. Well, that's why you need relief factor. Four natural ingredients, no drugs, no gimmicks, just a real shot at getting your usefulness back because you weren't made to sit on the sidelines.

You were made to build, to carry, to lift, to move, to live. It's relief factor. 1995. Try relief factors three-week quick start, less than a dollar a day. Call 800 the number four relief. 800, the number four relief, relief factor.com. All right, so yesterday for Easter, by the way, happy Easter, Stu. Happy Easter, go ahead. A day after Easter.

Yes. 364 days till the next one. Thank you very much. Wow, how do you do that? Are you a mathematician? No, that's right. J.D. Vance was with the Pope on Easter, and then the Pope dies. That's all I'm going to say.

I'm just going to leave it there. I'm just going to, you draw your own conclusions, America. No, he had a good conversation apparently with the Pope and the Pope died. He was very, very sick in the hospital. He had pneumonia. So we're back to the voting for a new Pope. Now, if I may, let me just tell you a story that I don't think most in the media even understand. And if they do, they certainly won't touch it.

But I was there back in 2013. I think. Rob, what did we decide? It was 12 or 13, something like that. I was at the Vatican. I was supposed to meet with the Pope. I met instead with a bunch of the high advisors for the Pope, and it was Pope Benedict at the time. And I just want to talk to you about what I learned there and what we need to understand on this last Pope, because there was a quiet coup inside of the of the Vatican. The first public victim of the deep state was not a president of the United States. It was the Pope. It wasn't a priest, wasn't a whistleblower. It was Pope Benedict. Benedict wasn't just a conservative, although he was a staunch conservative. He was absolutely immovable. He was elected in

2005. He stood for everything the modern world wanted the church to abandon. He was moral. He had moral clarity. He was a traditionalist and a spiritual authority. And my first, my first realization that Pope Francis was going to be none of these things is when the media was talking, you know, they kept doing the white smoke and the black smoke. And they finally had, I don't remember what it is, the white or the black smoke. And it came out and they knew they had a pope. And so they were waiting and they were speculating. Everybody on CNN and ABC, they were all speculating. Who could it possibly be? and they started to speculate, and they would say,

oh, it's probably this cardinal. Oh, he's a real hardliner. He's going to be really bad, blah, blah, blah, blah. Then they finally came up to this Pope. I don't remember what his real name is, but they mentioned him, and they said, well, we don't know much about him. And within 10 minutes, everybody on every network started talking about how great

he was going to be. He was practically Jesus. and then when he was named Francis, oh, see, he is Jesus or St. Francis, take your pick. And I remember looking at you, Stu, and saying, oh, boy, we're in trouble. They like him. This guy's going to be a nightmare. So you had, you had Benedict who would not compromise on life, no surrender on marriage, no applause for, you know, the modern world. and the globalist hated him. The media called him rigid, progressive called him dangerous,

and the machine went to work behind closed doors, because that machine is in every government, and make no mistake, the Vatican is a government. Scandal after scandal, corruption, abuse, all real problems, yes, but they were used to discredit this Pope and destabilize his papacy. and he refused to ban and then suddenly in 2013 he resigns now i remember when this happened gang let's let's let's put this into what we now know okay we now know who replaced him we now have

seen the deep state in governments all across the world okay we have seen people being voted for and the deep state didn't like them and so they say nope not him we've seen them throw people into jail. Okay. So by 2013, he resigns, and he's the first pope in 600 years to resign. And it's because he was too frail. He was too frail. He was too tired. Biden wasn't, but Benedict was. Okay. And yet, he lived. For nearly 10 years, he lived. He wrote, he was speaking, he was warning, he stayed in the vat. Vatican inside the walls. He stayed in the Vatican. He wore white, white. He signed his name, Pope Emeritus. That's not retirement. That's him not really resigning. That's resistance. That's what that was. And into that void came Pope Francis. Immediately everything about the church changed. There

was global applause. Oh my gosh. Climate change sermons. Remember those, they were great. Doctrinal ambiguity to where the point where Catholics were like, wait a minute, what is he saying here? Suddenly the church is less about salvation, more about sustainability and collective salvation, less moral compass, more moral relativism, and it seemed as though the fix was in. Now, even members of some press overseas were saying, this was a coup. Apparently, Benedict left a box, it's called a white box, full of scandal files. And it was not a gift to Pope Francis. It was a warning.

He knew he saw it coming. So it wasn't a resignation. It was a removal from office, a soft coup by the progressive faction inside the church, who was eager to align Rome with Davos. and make no mistake, Davos was there, the UN was there. You know, all the global priorities of the UN and Davos were there that have nothing to do with God. But now the church was aligned with all of it. I remember going, as I said, we were supposed to meet with the Pope, and I went, I met with several cardinals, I think the good cardinals.

And I saw stuff that I had never seen before. It was amazing. I saw the church as political and as spiritual at the same time. I'm a former Catholic, so I respect the Catholic Church. I also, you know, I'm no dummy. It is a political organization. I think most churches can, you know, go that direction. But especially one that's, you know, what, 2,000 years old, 1900 years old. I think it could probably go awry from time. to time and go political because that's what it that's what it was for a very long time and i remember seeing the guy who i think was in charge is jason out there see if jason can come in for a second

there was a guy that jason was with me can you rob can you open up one of those mics do you know um jason remember when we were at the vatican you were in the room remember that big map room it was like we were in the godfather yeah okay i don't remember what that place was but it was you know like near the vatican right around the vatican and it was a place where they went and they held you know dignitaries and held functions there and it was amazing it was like a three-story room that we were in and they were the biggest maps of the world i've ever seen and all of the i mean it was incredible and it had to be 400 years old would you agree with that oh yeah Okay, so it's just steeped in quite honestly, Dan Brown kind of.

Totally Dan Brown. Right? Totally that. And I had just gotten out of the archives the night, the day before. And I don't even know how I got this invitation, but I was given an invitation. And even the guy who consulted the Pope for doctrinal issues, when we were, I don't know, a quarter of the way into the archives, he was with me. And I asked him a question and he said, don't ask me. Ask him, I've never been allowed in here.

And the next day when we were getting a tour from the head of the Vatican Museum, he said, you'll never guess where they were yesterday. And we said, you know, they were in the Vatican archives. And she stopped. She was the head of the museum. She stopped. And she looked at me and she was like, tell me about it. What was that like?

So like, I don't know how we got in there, but we were asked to go in. So we're experiencing all of this stuff. And that night we were with, I don't even remember who they were, but they were the most Christ-like, you know, cardinals and preachers or whatever they were, that I had been with the whole time. They were so kind. You could just feel the goodness coming off of. They were real servants of God. And we were all standing around talking and you could tell everybody's guard in that group, everybody's guard was up. and all of a sudden, and I'm not kidding you, the room dropped 10 degrees.

And I happened to be facing looking at the door way across this huge room. And here comes this guy. I don't know if he was a cardinal. He was, wasn't he in charge of all of the Pope's schedule or something? Something like that. Yeah. Okay. So he was, he was the main guy that, you know, you had to get by if you were going to get to the Pope.

And the room dropped. it became cold and I said holy cow who is that guy and the whole the whole group of really nice guys turned around and looked at him and one of them turned back and went oh you can feel that and I said oh yeah just feel no offense I didn't know if they liked him or not I said no offense but he doesn't seem like a good guy and he was way across the room and they were like oh good sense on you oh no no He's leading the opposition. So he's the guy, I think, that was helping thwart Benedict, and he was on in the inside. It's exactly the Trump story. Would you agree? Yeah. It felt like it felt almost like a game of thrones within the Vatican, didn't it?

That's like the best. And it was the weirdest, weirdest feeling. Yeah. And it's exactly what we saw in 2016. I had never seen that before, but it's exactly what we saw in 2016. It's what we're now seeing in the EU, where the people with power are just taking people out. The pattern here is really familiar because we've seen it in Washington. We've seen it in Hollywood.

We've seen it in the media. It's the replacement of the immovable with those who are more amelible, the strong replaced by the inclusive, the faithful with the faithful with the fashionable. That's what happened. And this deep state doesn't just run in governments. It runs in everything. It runs in institutions. And when those institutions start to resist the world's direction, they're infiltrated, they're neutralized, and they're repurposed. And it is in everything. It happened at the Vatican. I saw it. And Pope Benedict was the warning shot that we all missed. He was the first Donald Trump, I believe. Now, what happens next? Are we going to get somebody, you know, as the church is starting to grow again, the Catholic Church is starting to grow. And it's growing with Generation Z who are saying we want our traditions back. We want marriage. We want truth. We want eternal truth as it's laid out in the Gospels of Jesus Christ. As it's growing. will the church grow in that direction?

Or has Francis put such a cabal in there that you might get somebody who says that, but is doing, is it going to be, yeah, we just elected a new guy and he's doing exactly what the last guy did, just the way it happens in our government and every other government on earth. We'll see. It begins today. All right, more in just a second. First, let me tell you about the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews.

Israel is under attack still. Missile fire has resumed from terrorist groups, dedicated to one thing, the complete destruction of Israel and the death of her people. And, you know, people are cheering it on here in America. It is crazy what's happening. You put your kids to bed. You don't worry if you're going to have to grab them in the middle of the night because there's a missile flying.

I mean, that doesn't, we would never put up with this. We would never put up with going to church and having to worry about somebody coming into our church and blowing our church up or shooting all of the members of the church. We wouldn't do it. It's real. It's right now. And it's happening in Israel. That's why the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews is there. They are an organization that is on the ground every single day.

They are providing the critical equipment that saves lives in times like this with bomb shelters and flack jackets and armored vehicles and armored ambulance. and everything else. And every dollar you give goes directly toward protecting those who need it the most. Give a gift today and help protect the people of Israel. Go to support iFCJ.org. That's support IFCJ or call 888-488-488-IFCJ. That's 888-48-48-I-FCJ. 10 seconds. Station ID. You're not going to hear that opinion anywhere. Do you think, Stee? an interesting considering it happened very very recently

it wasn't exactly the way I thought you were going to come out but that's all right it's an interesting interesting start to the program as usual I mean you know I wish I don't wish anybody any harm

obviously and you know he was the Pope and I have respect for the Pope but I have no respect for the policies that he held I'm not Catholic so who am I to say it's you know I might as well be talking about women, you know, as astronauts. I've never been to the moon. So what do I know? I'm not a

Catholic, so I, you know, I don't mean to impose my, but it is my viewpoint. And what I witnessed there. And it's really fascinating. It's going to be fascinating to watch. You know, yesterday I posted on X, something that was happening in, where was that, in Ethiopia. And, And I saw this thing that happened on Easter Eve in Ethiopia. And there had to be a million people out in front of this giant cathedral. And they were all holding candles and singing. And it was amazing, amazing what's going on in Africa and all over the world. People are waking up again.

And it will be interesting to see what happens. And who is selected by those. in charge. And, you know, we've seen it before where I think there were like two popes. Wasn't there two different popes that died right before in between Pope John Paul the second? Because there was Pope John Paul the first and he lived for like 10 days. And I think there was another one that died right before that. They went through this and it was kind of like God was like, now, not him. And then, oh, okay, John Paul. So we'll see. Did you just swipe right on a Pope? Is that what you were doing? I did. Okay, I did. I mean as God. I think God was like

Swipe right. No, right. Yeah, I people are fascinated by this whole thing too, right? What there was they had the the movie that just came out right, which where they were that was one of the best picture of nominations. You know, people are I get I didn't see it. I don't know. I'm not you know as as you are. I'm not Catholic. I don't, I'm not all that. I'm not all that. involved in the in the process other than just kind of watch from afar but they're the it's pretty amazing the wide range between Benedict and Francis is a really interesting thing that the Catholic Church is going to make a big decision on here real soon and that's going to be a fascinating thing to watch yeah because it's not just the future of the church but it's so influential you know in our politics and globally so yeah it's going to be an

interesting next few weeks will the will the church turn back around back towards tradition and truth and the Bible, or is it going to keep going going to world economic form? Glenn Beck. NMLS 1-8234, NMLS Consumer Access.org. APR for Rates in the Five starts at 6.799% for well-qualified borrowers. Call 800906 2440 for details about credit costs and terms. You know that feeling when you clean, like you clean out a closet that's been sitting there

and you've been wanted to do it and wanted to do it. Maybe it's your garage. And when you finish, like the air feels cleaner. You know, you didn't realize how much that clutter was affecting you until it was all gone. Now imagine feeling that way about your financing, all the debt that you've been carrying around on your shoulders, the car loans, the credit cards, the personal loans, the random subscriptions. What if you get rid of all of that? Had a team, your team, who sat down with you and said, okay, here's the better way to do all of this. That's what American financing does.

American financing is a family-owned mortgage company that specializes in helping get your financial house in order without pressure and without any gimmicks. Their mission is to help you save money, real money, to free up your life. You just need the right plan, right people in your corner. And I think it's American financing, Americanfinancing.org. The consultation is free. The impact on your life is massive. call American Financing at 800-9062440, 800-9062440 Americanfinancing.net. Head over to blazeTV.com slash glen. Subscribe, get 30 bucks off. BlazTV.com slash glen.

Welcome to the Glenn Beck program. We're glad you're here. I want to take on something else that I don't know. Maybe I should just keep my big fat mouth shut. Because I think this one's going to piss off everybody, but it's the truth. There was a story in the New York Times. The podcaster asking you to side with history's villains. He was in the New York Times.

Let me read some of it. Daryl Cooper is no scholar, but legions of fans, many on the right, can't seem to resist what he presents as hidden truths. All of a sudden, everyone was coming for Daryl Cooper. There were the newspaper columnists, the historians, the Jewish groups, repugnant, says the chairman of Yad Vashem, Israel's Holocaust Museum in a statement. Even the Biden White House released a statement, calling him a Holocaust denier who spreads Nazi propaganda. So it was for a time for Mr. Cooper, one of the most popular podcasters in the country, to do what he does best, hit record. In a special episode of his history program, Martyr Made, Mr. Cooper addressed the controversy,

which had exploded out of September 2nd appearance on the Tucker Carlson Show, the podcast started by the former Fox News host. At first, Mr. Cooper, a gifted historic storyteller, but not a trained historian, defended the claims he had made on Mr. Carlson Show, one that Winston Churchill, was the chief villain of the war, ridiculous, not by implication, Adolf Hitler, the two, and two, that millions had died in Nazi-controlled Eastern Europe

because Nazis had not adequately planned to feed them. Okay, not true. He then said, you know, the story goes on to say he then kind of retracted some of that stuff. This emotional ventriloquism is part of Mr. Cooper's approach and appeal. On TikTok, a fan praised him as one of the best historians of our time

because he tries to go out of his way to understand the perspective of everyone involved in a situation. These critics have probably helped make Mr. Cooper bigger than ever. He has been the most subscribed to history newsletter on Substack, one spot ahead of the eminent economic historian, Adam Tuzes, in the wake of the Rogan interview, Mart, Mart, Marder Made, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Okay, so they go on and on and on to talk about how this just can't stand. I mean, we've got to, there's got to be some sort of, filter. And, you know, Joe Rogan just can't have on whoever he wants to have on. That's the

problem. Is it? New York Times? Is that the problem? Hmm. It's really interesting. Now, let me just look in the past here and see if we've had this exact same problem with anybody else. Because the person that came to mind was not Daryl Cooper, but Nicole Hannah-Jones. Because I think those two are the same coin. And the coins counterfeit, but just opposite sides of the same coin. The Martyr Made podcast spins a tale of grievance and distrust, and it's wrapped enough in enough fact to keep it plausible. But there are some facts in there.

Okay. Jones, she did the 1619 project. She did the same thing in reverse, except I think she's actually worse. I mean, because I think she made up almost everything in that. She recasts American history as racist from the very inception of the country. Neither one of them is telling the whole truth. Neither one of them. Neither one wants to, I think.

They're both in the business of narrative and not history. So am I. But I try to be fair. The real problem is not these two. honestly it's the new york times because in their sunday styles right up on cooper the times poses as a concerned observer wary of growing influence among the disaffected right why are we disaffected why is the right disaffected we're disaffected because um you have tried to take our country from us everything that we believe our history our values our traditions and you've tried to

denigrate them and destroy them every step of the way. And you've done it with one lie right after another. Okay. Why are they framing him, not with facts, but with suspicion? Not because he's dishonest or not dishonest, but because he's popular. They clutch their pearls because he has an audience. And only the New York Times can have that audience. But where was that concern when they gave an audience to Nicole Hannah-Jones and gave her a Pulitzer for a project now so discredited by the very historians that are now talking about Cooper. Where was the caution when they declared that 1619, not 1776, was the true founding of the nation? They didn't question her authority. They didn't say, well, she's not a historian. They printed it. In fact, they taught it and endorsed it. They platformed it

in schools. That's different than anything that Joe Rogan is doing. They platformed it in schools. So let's be clear. Okay. I think both Cooper and Jones are wrong. They may have points worth considering, but I think that they get it fundamentally wrong in a few places. They are looking at facts to sell the story and not necessarily reveal the truth. Now, maybe I'm being too sick. cynical. But that's the way I see it. And I'm not condemning either one. I'm condemning all of those on the left or the right that are now doing the same thing that the New York Times did with Cooper, but didn't do with Hannah Nicole Jones. Only one of those two was lauded by the New York Times as legitimate and a necessary corrective, even though it was all alone.

lie made up. So that's what, when I'm reading that op-ed in the New York Times, I can't take the, oh my gosh, the hypocritical nature of it. I just, blood shoots out of my eyes. Because that's what the New York Times is actually saying. Don't you little people understand? We must decide what stories are acceptable. Not you, not somebody like Joe Rogan.

We will decide which distortions are. virtuous and which ones are dangerous. Not you. We get to choose the false prophets that get a column, and which ones are called conspiracy theorist. We, at the New York Times, we in the media. And that is the problem. This isn't about the authors. Okay, First Amendment gives them a right to say whatever they want. You may not like it. If you don't like it, stop listening. Well, but other people might listen. Yeah, well, other people might listen. And maybe we should pay more attention to our education in our schools. Maybe we should pay more attention so we don't become somebody that is a dummy themselves. Because this is the problem. We don't have a press that exposes lies anymore. We have

a press that curates the lies. I really think this is why I started collecting. You know, we have now the third largest collection of founding documents in the American Journey experience, along with David Barton's wall builders. It is, it's only behind the National Archives and the Library of Congress. Most people don't know it because, you know, we don't talk about it yet. Beginning in 26, we're going to be making a big deal out of it. We also have the largest collection of Pilgrim era artifacts and documents in the world, the largest. So I can tell you what happened in Jamestown in 1619. I can tell you this, the ship that Hannah Nicole Jones talks about, there were no slaves on that ship. How do I know? We have the manifest. No slaves. Hmm,

that seems problematic, doesn't it? And the Mayflower did not launch a system of slavery. In fact, they fought against it. We, I mean, this is so crazy. What the pilgrims did against slavery, was remarkable, remarkable. When a slave ship accidentally came into their port, it was slavery was against the law. They called it man stealing. It was against the law. And as soon as that slave came in a port, you could smell a slave ship. They knew exactly what it was. And they marched, marched up and they arrested the captain of the ship. They put him in irons and put him in jail. And then these people who were already paying 50% of everything they made, these poor people, 50% of everything they made to a king that they despised, but they paid it because they wanted just to stay alive.

They took up a collection from each other, not outside, from each other. Got a new captain, refueled, restocked the ship, and sent those people, those slaves back to Africa so they could be freed. That's who our pilgrims were. Don't believe me. You don't have to take my word for it. We have the evidence. Please. You know, the longest running treaty with Native Americans happened with our pilgrims. And you know who broke it?

Not the white man. It was the Native Americans. And you know why? Because after years and years of the pilgrims and the Native Americans getting along, Christianity was starting to seep into their culture. And they needed to go to war with a tribe. And the war that the way they used to fight it, the Native Americans, were it was okay to enslave your enemy. In fact, you needed to. You could torture them after you won

just to make a point. And then you could enslave anybody you wanted. And Christianity said, no, you can't do either one of those things. And so the Native Americans that were part of this tribe that were friends and under this treaty with the pilgrims, they started telling their chief, you know, we can't do these things. And the chief got so pissed because he's like, we're fighting a war and we're fighting in the way we've always fought it. that they broke the treaty. Did you know that? Nah, no, we were just horrible. We stole the land. Oh, y, y, y'all. Did America live up to its ideals? No. Has anybody ever? Have you? Has the Pope? Has anybody really lived up to their ideals all the time? No. But you have ideals and that's what matters.

By the way, on the other side, I also happen to own a few original Nazi documents from the actual perpetrators. I've got documents from the engineer that actually calculated how much Zyclon B it would take to murder a room full of Jews. Okay? It wasn't because they didn't want to, they didn't have enough food. This was calculated. I have the final prescription signed by Dr. Mangala for a thousand liters of luminal for the so-called Children's Hospital. That's how the Reich was killing the undesirables in the Children's Hospital. They didn't do it in a frenzy. It in a riot. It wasn't out of desperation. It was silence in lab coats with bureaucrats and experts signing off and the press like the New York Times refusing to say a word about it. The scariest people

are not the ones in the streets. They weren't. They were the ones with titles, with offices, with press credentials. They were the ones with the doctorates. They were the people who decided what could be published, who could be punished, what could be known, what could be said. And that's the danger that we're staring down right now, not from fringe theorists on a podcast, not even from overzealous academics with a Pulitzer, but from the institutions that bless one distortion and condemn the other. Not based on truth, but based on usefulness. Is it useful to our side? I just want you to know this is my stance on this

and make this very, very clear. The First Amendment does not exist to protect comfortable speech. It doesn't exist to protect Cooper as opposed to Jones. It exists to protect both of them. It protects uncomfortable points of view. Things you do not like to hear

and disagreement. It protects people who are absolutely wrong. and even those who are lying. It protects the process so you can figure it out. There is no licensed priesthood in our country, you know, that are the priesthood of truth tellers, no official ministry of facts. That's where countries go wrong.

The Times should be exposing both sides of these stories, just like I'm doing, the distortions of the right and the left. but instead they become exactly what they've warned us about, a newspaper that prints dogma and not dialogue. And the real problem here? No, the real solution here is you. Jefferson warned that a man who reads nothing, but newspapers,

a man who reads nothing is better informed than a man who only reads the newspaper. Okay, I would say the newspaper is today's social media. Man who reads nothing is more well educated than a man who just only reads social media. But today we might say, better to be ignorant than confidently misled by trusted media. They see themselves not as a watchdog, but as a shepherd and we are the sheep. So I'm not defending either one. I'm defending the idea that we the people, not the institutions, not the elites, not the New York Times, not Joe Rogan, you decide what.

what's true. And that takes work and it takes curiosity. Maybe the other guy's wrong. I don't know. Maybe I don't have the whole story either. I don't know. Look it up. Because the minute you let somebody else decide what you're allowed to hear, you have already surrendered your freedom to think. All right. Z Factor. Intentionally or not, you've been robbing yourself a little bit lately, a little bit here, a little bit there. There've been those late nights in the early mornings. How many times you've found yourself saying, I'll catch up on sleep on the weekend, but you never do. You can't catch up up on sleep. You can't. Somewhere along the way, you've started to forget that rest and what it feels like, rest is so important, real rest, not just collapsing on the couch, not waking up more tired

than when you actually went to bed. I mean, that sinking in bone deep, peaceful sleep that actually restores you. That's what Z Factor is for, and it's not a drug. It's a nighttime formula with naturally occurring compounds that support your body's own natural sleep. so you don't wake up in a fog. You wake up, actually awake, clear, and refreshed, ready to face the day. First time Z-Factor buyers will enjoy 46% savings. It's really, really good, and it works with your body. It's not a drug. It's all natural. 1995, 30-day supply. Let's your own body, just help boost your own body's ability to get you to sleep better. Relieffactor.com. Call 800 for relief. 800, the number four relief.

won't you silent, obedient, and blind. Well, shoot, here we are with open eyes and a bit of rebellious nature. Hold in line, my friends. Glenn Beck will be back in a minute. You don't have to be falling apart to know that something's off. Maybe it's your sleep. Maybe it's stress that creeps in and won't let go. Maybe it's just that your body feels tense, overworked.

Like it's carrying more than it should. That's where CB Distillery comes in. they make high-quality third-party tested CBD products designed to help you feel more balanced naturally. No gimmicks. Just a daily tool for calming your nervous system, supporting better rest, and giving your body a chance to breathe again. Would it be nice to have fewer racing thoughts at night, maybe a little less tension in your shoulders, and a sense that your body isn't constantly stuck in overdrive. CB distillery offers oils and gummies and sleep formulas and even topical relief, all made with clean ingredients and none of the mystery that you find in

gas station brands or no-name bottles. It's kind of an interesting approach, something maybe a little different than you've tried before. They're one of the most trusted names in the industry. They're used by over 2 million people because they focus on results, transparency, and simplicity. So if you're tired of feeling just off all the time and you're looking for something that helps you reset without kind of sedating you, try CB distillery. because sometimes peace of mind is as simple, it's just giving your body what it's been asking for. CBDistillery.com.

CBDistillery.com. Use the code VIP right now. You can get a discount on your order. It's cbdistillery.com. The code is VIP. Check it out now. C.B.distillery.com. Oh, I have a few things to say about what's happening

with the return of the illegals. That is, this is an outrage. We have got to stop. This is, do you know, this was actually a point of view on MSNBC. One, that this is exactly what Hitler did. Surprise, surprise. And next, this is just Donald Trump lulling African Americans to sleep. You're next.

He's going to deport you. African, oh my God. Are we really this stupid that we're just going to allow this? And why the concentration on this? We'll talk about it next. Glenn Beck. There are threats you can see and there are ones that kind of hit you out of nowhere. And home title theft is one of those. It doesn't start with a broken window or a strange knock at the door like you might be thinking a typical theft might. It starts with a hacker

sitting halfway across the country or the world who finds a way into your online title and forges a new document suddenly kind of out of nowhere. One of those situations where you don't see this coming at all. It's just kind of pops you right in the face at the moment. what you least expect it. That's home title lock. That's why it's there. It's to defend you against these types of things. Home title theft isn't something that your bank covers or your insurance covers.

It's a simple layer of protection that monitors the title to your home 24-7 and watches for any suspicious activity and locks down your most valuable asset before the damage is done. Because once it starts, it starts fast. AI is changing the world. Do not let it change the name on your title as well. Go to home titlelock.com right now and use the promo code blayette. It's home titlelock.com. The promo code is Blaze. Protect yourself, protect your assets, protect your financial future. It's home titlelock.com. The promo code is Blaze. Hello, America. Welcome to the Lundbeck program. We're glad you're here. I'm in Washington, D.C. I'm going to meet with the president on Wednesday. I would really like to hear from you on what would you like me to ask the president? What if you had one question to ask the president, what would it be? You can tweet that to me. And you could also try to call in. I don't know if we're going to have time to get the phone calls today,

but I would tweet it at Glenback. And I'll ask the questions, hopefully that you want the answers to. I've got a lot myself. But that happens on Wednesday. I think I'm talking to the Secretary of Education tomorrow. I hope I'm going to be talking to the Secretary of Treasury as well. And perhaps Cash Patel trying to get. in with Cash Patel.

We'll see. And a few other things this week. So we'll get to that here in a second. I just want to talk to you about some actual numbers and just see if we could cut through the bull crap on all of the stuff that's going on with Donald Trump, is Hitler yet again. Chris Matthews said, what he's doing? He's just like Hitler. Here's what Hitler did to the Jews.

Really? is it? We'll get into this here in just a second. First, let me tell you about our sponsor. Our sponsor this half hour is Legacy Box. The funny thing about time is it moves quietly and you don't notice it until the VCR

tape just won't play anymore until the photos start to fade around the edges and you're like, oh man, is it really that old? You're imagining that box of old memories in the closet and thinking someday I'm going to do something with one of those things. You should probably do that now. Make that someday today. Legacy Box is the nation's

most trusted way to digitize your family's old tapes, your film reels, and photos. And right now, they're making more affordable than ever to be able to do this with their All-American sale, just $9 per tape. Legacy Box is making sure you can still preserve what matters without breaking the bank. Every memory is handled by skilled technicians. The process couldn't be simpler. They send it, you send it all to Legacy Box. You fill out your old tapes, photos film, you put it in the box, they do the rest,

carefully. They digitize your past. They send back all of the originals so they're safe and you get the digital copies as well. Protect your memories and take advantage of Legacy Box. All-American Sale. Visit Legacybox.com slash records. Get their $9 tape offer digitized by hand in the U.S.

Legacy Box. You get free access to the Legacy Box Cloud. Legacybox.com slash records. American made trusted by families. All right. You know, I was I was in, I'm staying at a hotel right across the street from the White House.

And, uh, my wife and I, we got here yesterday afternoon and we went out and we were on the balcony. And I'm, I'm looking down and we're right, we're right at Lafayette Park. And Lafayette Park is where they tried to pull down all the statues and they set the church on fire. Remember a BLM? And then, you know, of course, Donald Trump was, he was a Nazi because he tried to put that down. and it's somewhat cleaned up now. It's not as nice as it used to be, but it's somewhat cleaned up.

And when I get there, everything, nobody's in the park. And there's just some people that are fighting for, you know, peace in Gaza, you know, death to the Jew, peace and that kind of stuff. And then there was, there were these people that are, you know, saying that, you know, we got to stop sending people to El Salvador because they're citizens too.

No, they're really not citizens. And nobody was in the park. And it was just sad. I thought, what, what's happened? You can't go into the park right across the street from the White House. It used to be such a beautiful place. And about an hour later, I come over and they're opening up the gates to the park and they're letting everybody in.

And these two boys are playing baseball. I just throw a baseball between themselves underneath the trees in this park, right across the, right across the street. street from the White House. And it just was so iconic and so American. And it kind of just, I don't know, it just kind of renewed my soul just a little bit that, yeah, America still does exist. It's fading quickly. You know, because we don't know what truth is it anymore. We have no idea what truth is. I mean, do you remember the truth when, when Arizona was fighting to make sure that they could deport illegals in their own state because it had become the number one kidnapping capital in the world.

I think there was maybe it was number two in the world. And it was in Arizona. And you're like, what? And so they were fighting. And of course, Obama administration, they fought and said, no, no, no, you can't do anything on your own as a state. Now the state is fighting to make sure that they don't cooperate with ice. They don't ship anybody out. And I'm thinking to myself, who, what Americans think that this is okay?

What Americans, what are you fighting for? Are you really, are you really that unplugged? You're just so Pavlovian that you just start to, you just go vicious when the, you know, when you hear Donald Trump and his name. Chris Matthews, Chris Matthews was doing an interview on MSNBC. and he was talking to Jim Acosta. Boy, there's a brain trust for you. And Chris Matthews said, you know, I'm in Washington. Cab drivers talking about the OJ trial all day, that this is what it's like.

What? They're talking about the cab drivers are all talking about the, if you're in Washington, D.C., there's not a single person that's driving a cab that knows who O.J. Simpson is. Okay, not one. But, you know, they were all saying how that just dominated our. life and this is the way this is, you know, but I've got some questions, you know. Isn't this exactly what Hitler did? Now, I don't know how you get from Adolf Hitler, or Adolf Hitler from O.J. Simpson. Maybe, well, I mean, because they were killers, maybe,

I'm not sure, but Chris Matthews says to Jim Acosta, you know, what did Hitler do? What did Hitler do in the Holocaust? He took people from Germany to other countries. Yeah, says Jim Acosta. There was no German law. There was not even a pretense of German law. They just took them to Poland and Hungary, you know. Well, it gets them out of the country, just like our president's doing in El Salvador. Are you out of your mind? Then later on MSNBC, they have a new host. I mean, they just, I don't know where they get these people. Simone Sanders, she claimed on Saturday that the deportation of Salvadorian citizen suspected of MS-13 gang member membership is. just one step on the road toward Donald Trump deporting black Americans. Yeah, I think you try to, go ahead. I'll give you time to do the math on that one. If they can do it to them, if they can snatch students off the streets without any pushback or recourse, they'll do it to any one of us.

To be very clear, it's going to be the people of color and the vulnerable communities that are next in line. I mean like the Jews? I'm sorry, Simone. I mean, then you must be for the Jews, right? The most vulnerable among us? I mean, oh, you're not. Oh, okay.

Again, you make my math, you know, you make the math part of my head hurt because I don't understand how you're getting there. But since we're on math, let's just do a little of the numbers, shall we? I just, I just want to go over since Bill Clinton. And Bill Clinton, I mean, this is when it really started. I mean, you could say that it was Eisenhower, but it wasn't even clever. close. Wasn't even close. So let's let's go back to Bill Clinton. How many people did Bill Clinton deport a million? Well, 12.3 million. Okay. That includes 11.4 million returns and then 0.9 million. So a million formal removals. Okay. So the returns are mainly at the border.

93% of the total. And then a million, he actually went into the city and he scooped him up and he sent them back home. All right? How many court injunctions were there? In the eight years. In the eight years, how many court injunctions were there? Well, if you're being very generous, there were 12. Most people say zero.

But if you want to be very, very generous, 12. Okay, in eight years. Clinton had the 96 illegal immigration reform and immigration responsibility act. You know, when everybody was like, hey, we should enforce our laws. They're not citizens. It could be harmful for jobs. It could be harmful for our children and communities. It's really bad for our schools because we have to have translators in every class now, all of that stuff.

Then George Bush gets in. Now, this is right after 9-11. So how many people did he deport? 8.3 million returns. That means 8.3 at the border. And 2 million kicked down the door, haul them out and send him home. Okay? Two million. Twice the number of the kick down the door, but still less overall than Bill Clinton did. How many court injunctions for this one? Six. Okay. So that's from 2001. until 2008. All right. How about Barack Obama? Barack Obama deported 5.3 to 5.5.

I don't know why we don't know the exact number. I guess we get sloppy with our math. Oh, I know. We're doing Common Core math at this point. I don't know. I can't give you an exact number, but I can tell you how I got there, even though the number's wrong.

Oh, that's good. That was 3 million formal removals. So that's under Barack Obama, that's a million more formal removals than George Bush did. Okay? Two million more than Bill Clinton did. Formal removals. Okay.

Bill Clinton still did more than anybody else, but he was turning away from the border. Okay. All right. So you can see. Now, what are Donald Trump's numbers, you know? I mean, it's got to be bad, right? Mm-hmm. Well, in 2017 to 2021, he deported $1.5 to $2 million.

Our math is even getting more sloppy now, including 1.2 to 1.5 million removal's and fewer returns. We were deporting people. It was lower than Obama's, partly due to reduced illegal immigration and Title 42. but in fiscal years 2017 and 2020 about a million removals. Okay, million removals. Then in, you know, 2021, we, you know, we go the opposite way. We just start bringing people in by the millions.

All right. So how many court injunctions for Donald Trump on his first term? 30. 30. Okay, wait a minute. Wait a minute. What was it? Bill Clinton had, how many did he have in two terms? Court injunctions. He had 12. Some say, you're really being generous. If you give it 12, it should be zero.

Okay. George Bush, court injunctions, six. Barack Obama, this is because of DACA and everything else. He had 12. 30 for Donald Trump. Now, that might tell you something. Maybe we're looking how to weaponize the courts. but that was only in his first term. Okay. The second term. Now remember, he just started this year. He's got another 30 injunctions that he is working against.

And how many people has he deported? Because it's got to be huge, right? I mean, it's got to be enormous. No, actually not. Actually not. Approximately, again, we're getting even worse with our math. This is so appropriate for America. We just get dumber and dumber like, I can't count.

I don't know how I'll put numbers on paper. 100,000 to 138,000. Okay. He deported 37,660 in his first month, estimate suggesting 2,500,000 daily removals thereafter, 60 days, 1,500 a day. That is, that pace is now slower than Biden's final year. but very aggressive for a first term.

Okay, he's got 30. He's doing less than Joe Biden did in his last term. And everybody's saying he's Hitler? Could I just remind you again about the numbers for Bill Clinton? See, this is why you have no leg to stand on. None. You cannot have an argument with me or somebody who knows the facts. You just can't.

Because these are the numbers. Numbers don't lie. How are you totally okay? I don't even remember when I found out that Bill Clinton was the actual king of deportations, I was shocked. I had no idea. I was sure that it was Eisenhower. He's not even in the boat.

He's not even close. Eisenhower. He did Operation Wetback, you know. He did nothing compared to Bill Clinton. nothing compared to Barack Obama. Come on. Now, he was the worst. Well, he was also.

Oh, my gosh, he was a Republican. Isn't that weird? And then George Bush, he was a Republican. So, of course, he was demon. And then when I went down to the border and I said, you know, they're keeping these people in cages. They were like, no, that's not true. That's Glenn Beck in a conspiracy.

And then when Donald Trump gets in, they show the same cages that I showed. And they were like, Donald Trump built cages. And I'm like, no, they didn't. I showed these. I tried to get this information to you, Chuck Todd. You wouldn't have it. Why?

Why? Why wouldn't you have it? Because this is all political. So it's really not worth your time. It's worth your time to learn the truth. Not worth your time to sit here and worry about it. Because it is, all the world is but a stage. Back in just a second, let me tell you about Good Ranchers.

You would tell a lot about the country, by the way. It feeds itself. And right now, America's dinner tables are filled with meat from foreign countries, shrink wrap, stamped, ship from half a world away. Why? There is another way, good ranchers. It's a return, return to honest meat that was born, raised, harvested right here in the United States of America.

Because when you buy from Good Ranchers, you're not just getting a better cut of meat. You're putting money directly into the hands of American ranchers and American farmers who still believe in doing things the right way. Before the end of the program today, another rancher another farm will go out of business in America. That has got to change. Men and women who are still working, the land, feeding families, feeding you and me, good ranchers, they know that what goes on your plate still matters.

So go to good ranchers.com right now. Subscribe and get your choice of protein for a year. everything comes from America. Stand with Good Ranchers because they stand with American ranchers. It's good ranchers.com. Good Ranchers.com American Meat delivered. 10 seconds, station ID. So, Stu, do you know the story here about what happened with the bus load of

illegals that were going to El Salvador and then in the middle of the night they were turned around because the Supreme Court issued a stay? I wouldn't say I know more than I've, you know, the basics I've seen reported that you kind of just outlined there. I mean, it's an amazing, it's an amazing time right now because they're trying to fight this out in the courts and, you know.

And nobody has the facts. Nobody has the facts. You know, even Samuel Alito coming out. And, did you, may I read what Sam, this is what Samuel Alito wrote. The court has just issued an unprecedented and legally questionable relief without giving the lower courts a chance to rule,

without hearing from the opposing party within eight hours of receiving the application with dubious factual support for its order and without providing any explanation for its order. That's incredible. You want to talk about a court system that is out of control. Can you imagine? Imagine if Donald Trump and the court was just doing that

in the middle of the night saying, nope, no more, and didn't even alert their whole case. court and didn't even ask for the other side just ruled in the middle of the night. You can you imagine what they'd be saying. We couldn't be saying anything worse than they're saying now. So I guess it doesn't matter. But holy cow.

It's supposed to. One of the things they've been relatively consistent about, at least in their writings over the years, have been, we're supposed to wait for the process to play out. Right. That's supposed to be what happens here. You're supposed to wait until the lower court's rule. and then it goes up the chain. Unless there's like some emergency order that like, you know, we've seen occasionally around specific events where they've kind of cut this corner.

But it's pretty rare. And it usually is because of a specific deadline, like an election, you know, for example, that they have to rule on something quickly. It's a very odd approach. They seem to be trying to just send a message to Donald Trump constantly, which I don't know. That's all they're doing. I'm worried about the way that they're, I'm worried about the, the matchup that they're setting up and how it's going to turn out.

This is one of the things I am going to ask the president about. I am going to ask him, where's Pam Bondi? Where is the Justice Department? Why are you not going after people that are breaking the law? You're trying to with the illegals that are breaking the law. But what about, I mean, did you see what they released on Fauci? We're going to get into that in a second. Do you see what they released about COVID?

That's amazing. Now, where is the punishment for that? Where is it? Like, I don't know if you heard about this judge in New Mexico that just resigned from the bench because he was harboring a guy in his house that was an MS-13 gang member. Okay? And was shown, you know, firing automatic weapons and everything, nothing he could do, showing him shooting them in New Mexico,

they found him in the judge's house. I don't know. There might be a problem. Might be a problem. And will that judge go to jail? Who knows? This is Glenn Beck. We all love our dogs like family,

but we don't feed them like family. We pour the same dry, shelf, stable kibble into a bowl every morning, trusting that whatever's in the bag is good enough. but it's barely food at all, honestly. It is. It's heat processed, preserved for up to two years. It has to sit on a shelf without going bad for two years. Are you going to give that to your kids?

Stripped of all the nutrients your dogs actually need, and that's where rough greens come in. Rough greens. It's not a replacement for your dog's food. It's what's missing from your dog's food. It's a powdered blend of vitamins, minerals, probiotics, digestive enzymes, the omega oils designed to bring

your dog's food back to life. You just sprinkle it on top of your dog's food, on their meal every day, and you'll begin to see it in their energy, their attitude, their eyes, their coat, the overall health. It's really an amazing product. Get a free jumpstart trial bag for your dog today. Just cover the shipping. Go to roughgreens.com. Use the promo code back. That's rUFFFF greens.com. promo code back. You don't have to change your dog's food to improve your dog's health. Just add a scoop of rough greens rough greens dot com promo code back if you want to support uncensored media join our mission at blaze tvd tv.com slash glen use the promo code glen and you'll save 20 bucks this morning there was a story stu can you check this out for me see what gold is at right now uh early this morning when i got up

around 5 a m eastern uh gold was spiking again the highest place it's ever been gold i mean the dollar was starting to fall. Not good. It was today. I think it was 3,300 and I don't know, 60, something like that. Do you have the number still? Yeah, 3,000435 currently. Holy cow.

Up another 3% today. 3,500. Almost 3,500. That is, this is not good. This is not good. The gold going up is a sign. of confidence. And the rest of the world, the central banks, are buying gold up.

And, you know, again, what do rich people know that maybe you don't know? That things are shaky with the dollar and things are shaky with gold. So you might want to consider that. I mean, I'm not a financial advisor. This is not a commercial. But I'm just telling you that this is a big warning sign. Big, big, big, big, big, big warning sign. We're 3,500, approaching $3,500 an ounce.

It was, what was it? You said this just last week. I had to look it up, Stu. It was at the beginning of the year that it was $2,500? It's almost, almost gained $1,000. Yeah, I mean, let's see. No, you're right on there. It was, yeah, 2024, we were still at around $2,000 an ounce, early 2024.

Who? unbelievable. Yeah. Unbelievable. After about five. We're not even halfway through. Yeah, about five pretty flat years for gold between 2020 and 2020, 24. And then it started going up in, you know, early to mid, 2024 and it's been kind of like a roller coaster street.

You're still just climbing. It's up on about 100 percent in the past five years. But, you know, in the past year, most of that gain has happened. So. And again, you know, you know, yeah. you've mentioned this for a long time. Obviously, you know, we talk about gold being a good hedge kind of against insanity and, um, a good piece of your portfolio. However, you, you kind of almost don't want it to be this high because it's just indicating such, such scary times.

No. No. Before I lost my gold in that horrible boating accident, uh, he, uh, you know, terrible. You would like, you'd like, I mean, it's gold is an investment. You'd like it to go up. I don't want it to go up. I don't want it to go up anymore. I'd like it. come back down. This is a very, very bad sign. All right. So the media over the weekend, they were like, oh, did you see what Donald Trump did with the COVID.com or dotgov website? And you put it on the White House.com website now, all the lies about COVID? You mean all the corrections on COVID? this is this an amazing thing and I'd love to hear your thoughts on this

stew about what they what they published at whitehouse.gov the origin according to public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak theory was prompted by dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID 19 originally originated naturally point one the virus possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature number two Data shows that all COVID-19 cases come from a single introduction into humans. This runs contrary to previous pandemics where there were multiple spillover events. Three, Wuhan is home to China's foremost SARS research lab,

which has a history of conducting gain of function research, gene altering, and organism supercharging in an inadequate biosafety level. Number four, Wuhan Institute of Virology. Researchers were sick with COVID, with symptoms. in the fall of 2019 months before COVID-19 was discovered at the wet market. We talked about that. I mean, probably within a couple of months of COVID happening. We had that information.

We're like, uh, let's look back. Why were they redoing all of that, uh, that, uh, institute? You know, they completely gutted all of the air ducts, everything else. They completely upgraded it around November. And then, lo and behold, in December. we start to find out that, whoa, something in the wet market happened. By nearly all measures of science, if there was evidence of a natural origin, it would have already surfaced, but it hasn't. This is from the White House now.

And it goes through all of it. And then it goes through Fauci's pardon and his obstruction and eco-health's obstruction. And Dr. David Morens and, you know, the obstruction of, you know, the obstruction of, you know, your favorite person, I think you'll, I think you'll really like what they say about Andrew Cuomo on the website. Yeah, that was private. I think it's the best place on the entire internet for that reason. We found it. Cuomo's failure? It just says Andrew Cuomo failure. Failure. And it's a great summary of his entire life, not just this particular issue. But yeah, it's, I mean, I thought a lot of it, if you follow this stuff closely, was not new information, right? It was a

Good summary and a breakdown of the stuff that we have learned over the past few years on this topic. I think the key thing maybe, you know what? I still don't think that it is recognized as the official thing. I mean, this has been out now for a long time. You know, we started doing most of this stuff we had within, what, six or eight months of the actual outbreak. We knew by the summer.

And we were broadcasting all of this. And we didn't have all of the documents. but we had everything that led up to the document that said, hey, we got to change all this. We had the document before going, hey, I think you guys are wrong. Then a document that said, uh,

we should probably talk offline. And then the next document we had was, no, everything we were saying is the complete opposite now. We didn't have the middle document there. And that's been released now. So we had all of this stuff, just not the smoking guns.

All the smoking guns are there. And I still don't think. I mean, and it's partially because who's going to jail over this? Millions of people died. Millions. Is anybody to be held responsible for this? That's a great question. It doesn't seem.

I hope that's a high priority of the administration. There's several things out of this level. I would also throw something like Joe Biden was mentally incapable to be president of the United States and everyone was hiding it. I'd put that into the same category. But like, I think the key. that from this which I don't think enough people know is the cover up you know I think yeah that's real I mean it always is you're you're right we said a lot of these things in the in the months after

COVID came out and a lot of it really early frankly but part of the problem as to why it didn't become I think the consensus at the time was all of these institutional mainstream sources disagreeing with it, right? And like, you know, no offense to the fact. I mean, Stu, we couldn't say anything about COVID and not get banned and demonetized. I mean, you know, all the shows that we did, unless you were a member of the Blaze, you didn't see them. Because we put them online and you didn't see them. Yeah. And to be clear, our solution to the problem was to say it anyway and get banned and demonetized. Right. You know, again, what else are you going to do? I don't know why else we would have this job if you're not going to go for for that. But.

But there was a, that situation where we, sure, we were saying it. And sure people in this audience heard it. And yes, some people on the right were familiar with the skepticism and the pushback on this stuff. But because no, none of these mainstream media outlets really adopted any of those positions or took them seriously or even gave them a fair hearing, a lot of people just, you know, I mean, understandably, if you're on the left, you're looking at this stuff and you see, okay, well, Glenn Beck's saying it doesn't, I'm not going to. to believe it. The New York Times is saying it's a conspiracy theory. I'm not surprised they just believed that. That cover up where people right under Fauci are on record saying they want to delete the email so that they can't, so that no one finds out about what they're talking about, that sort of stuff, while I think the lab leak theory and some of those other pieces of skepticism that the conservative side had early on have been very much vindicated, the cover up as to why it needed to be vindicated has not really had the attention it deserves yet. 100% true.

Now, why? Why? I mean, it's the same people. I will say, you know, some of these places have written about this now. Some of these places have talked about it. But it hasn't been a, you know, the, hey, did you know, Donald Trump is Hitler's sort of march? And you'd think it would be.

I mean, you're, as you point out, millions of people died here. You'd think that it would be something they would focus on and draw a lot of attention to and continue to kind of beat the drum until someone was held responsible. And they don't seem to have any interest in that whatsoever. They kind of like, it seems like now they're in that stage where they want to say, look, we have this op-ed. We've talked about it. And, you know, most of them have run an op-ed by now, right?

Like, they've run. But it's not been this constant thing. It's not this deep dive constantly sending reporter. after reporter after reporter to find out what actually happened. That stuff doesn't seem to be of interest at all. If we make a mistake, we correct it because it drives us crazy that we made the mistake. And I don't want anybody to believe that I'm standing behind something that we found out was wrong and a lie. I mean, we might be wrong from time to time, but we've never knowingly lied.

I think some of these groups, they knowingly lied. The New York Times, they were knowingly lying about Joe Biden and his senility, knowingly lying. They knew. People in the media knew. They just didn't want to hurt, or I should say it this way, they just didn't want to help Donald Trump. So they thought that a senile old man with the buttons is much better than a Donald Trump. They thought not knowing who the president of the United States actually is, you know, they say their defense. the Constitution now, because if we don't have a constitution, if we don't have rule of law, we have no country, where was your rule of law with Joe Biden? Who actually was running the White House? Who was running it? You don't want the rule of law. You want control. That's what you want.

And, you know, I would be horrified if I had been a part of any of that. Horrified. They're not. And you know what? There's no, there's no consequence. They're not going to lose any advertisers. The New York Times hasn't lost any real money because of this. Their people just continue to watch. I mean, if we were this wrong about things, I would hope that we would have seen a lot of cancellations. I would hope that people are like, you know,

I don't know if I can trust you anymore, Glenn. Because we would have earned that, especially after a couple of years where I'm like, oh, by the way, all of that stuff we said was wrong. Hey, in other news. And that's what they're doing. They just run one little story like, everything we say it was wrong.

And then they go on it, but Donald Trump is Hitler. Why should I? That's the thing I just don't understand. How do people continue to believe the people who have been so wrong about stuff that is this important? They lied to you. They knowingly lied to you. How? You know, Donald Trump,

appointed somebody to do Doge. Well, he wasn't elected. Who was the president of the United States? Because the guy we elected, he wasn't the president. Why does it matter now that Doge, which the president has absolute right to do? He's not the president. He's not making these calls on his own. He's reporting to the president.

Why is, why is Doge such a problem? But, you know, Joe Biden crapping his pants and. looking, you know, trying to find old jelly beans in the couch from, you know, Ron Reagan days. That's totally fine. I mean, I don't know. I don't know how people live with themselves. Yeah, wouldn't it? They do, strangely.

At the very least, give you a sense of fallibility. Like, hey, you know, I can get sucked into something like this and be totally wrong. And I should really watch myself next time I decide I want to write, you know, story number 9,345. that Trump is Hitler, maybe question whether my certainty is warranted. And I think that's something. They just never have that moment of self-reflection. None. None.

It's come out. Everything about, you know, the Russia Gate came out now in court documents that, you know, Hillary Clinton was the one who approved all of that. And she knew it wasn't accurate. But she approved it. Why? Why? Why doesn't anybody know about that?

Why doesn't anybody care? Because nobody in the media actually cares. ends justify the means. They just hate Donald Trump so much. They'll do anything, anybody. They will sleep with. They will sharpen the knives of anyone that says they'll put that in the back of Donald Trump. All right.

Back in just a second. Buying or selling a home isn't just a transaction. It's a chapter. It's the moment you leave behind, you know, it's what you leave in the house. You leave what, you know, what you leave in the house that, you know, the marks on the door frames where your kids were growing up, the kitchen where you had that argument that you still laugh about now. Real estate agents and real estate is just gotten so big and so complex.

I mean, don't put this in the hands of somebody you don't know anything about. Put this into the hands of somebody that you know you can trust. They know what they're doing. You need an actual real estate agent that you can trust, not because they have a business card, but because they've been vetted, because they've been proving themselves to people just like you who care about results. This is your home and it's your investment.

My company, real estate agents, I trust. The people we work with are full-time professionals who know the market, understand strategy, they understand what it takes to win for you. So whether you're buying your first home or selling the one you raised your kids in, it's real estate agents, I trust. It's not just a business, it's personal. So put it in the hands of people who treat it that way. Real estate agents, I trust.

Real Estate Agents I Trust.com. What you're hearing are your thoughts? Via the mind and mouth of Glenn Beck. More. Next. When you were little, you have braced some of course of recre. Always in trying to negotiate, exchange these cards of hockey,

these bonhomes, even de collations. You know that each thing has a value, well, before to have to be able to happen. And from, the things have not really changed. Negoti to Citre TD

you can't you can't renew with your instinct of negotiation. With without operation gratisite,

no amount minimum and no free mensual, you're made for negotiate, and the app

Negotiate TITT and FET for you aid. Telecharge it right now. We are,

I'm thrilled to have the Time Magazine's 100 most influential people in AI

joining us here in just a little while. We're going to talk about AI and what's coming.

And this is a guy who used to He used to work for Open AI. And he left and he was like, I think they might be a little irresponsible here. So we're going to talk to him about what's coming, what's coming next. Good things and the bad things.

And he says this is a reckless race. Okay. What does that mean? And who should be running this? We're going to talk to him in just a second. If you missed any portion of the program, make sure you get the podcast, wherever you get your podcast.

We start with the Pope and a perspective on what's happening in the Vatican that you will not hear anywhere else. Make sure you get today's podcast. Let me talk to you about Jase. Most of us don't think about parasites. I don't want to even think. I mean, I really don't want to even do this commercial.

I don't want to think about those. No, thank you. You hike near a lake. You know, did you drink from a well? No, I'm not. Not an animal, man. Poorly washed piece of produce can introduce something into your body that doesn't belong there. When it happens, when a parasite takes hold, you need medicine quickly.

You know, most of us have these things living on us, but we just don't even know. We don't check. Jace Medical, that's where they come in. They have a new parasite kit, full box of prescription medications designed to fight some of the most common parasites. Things that you can, you know, can lay you out pretty quickly. I know I take Ivermectin once a month, a couple of days of Ivermectin once a month just for this. Go to jace.com, enter the promo code Beck at checkout for a discount on your order. It's promo code Beck at Jace, J-A-S-E.com.

Best time to prepare, you know, for any of your medical needs is right now before you need it. So I'm in Washington, D.C., and we've already done two hours. And, I mean, I could do more on things like this? Could we play cut to Jasmine Crockett? Here it is. But here's the reality. As far as I'm concerned, he's a lot less criminal than the person that's sitting in the White House.

Because last time I checked, he doesn't have any criminal convictions. I don't even think he has any outstanding cases versus the guy that still had cases pending when he was sworn in on January 20th and also has 34 felony convictions. So listen, I don't want to hear anything from the Republican Party about how they trying to keep us safe when their fearless leader is actually the biggest criminal thus far that we have seen because I haven't seen anybody would have. a rap sheet that looks like the presidents. Okay.

Jasmine Crockett for president. That's all I have to say. Wow, how delightful that is. I mean, I could go there. But really, do we have to? I mean, don't we around? I mean, I think we all get it. You know, it's a day after Easter.

And I don't know, I'd rather talk about bunnies for an hour. But I have a, I have something so much better than bunnies for an hour. I have one of the ones that. one of the guys he is time magazine called him uh one of the 100 most influential people in i mean i i i hate to break it to him but i was i was one of the most 100 most influential people in the world at one point so it kind of takes the shine off of that whole thing but he deserved to be on that uh he is uh the executive director of the ai futures project he is a former open ai researcher and he's got some warnings on some things.

And I thought, you know, after last week when I saw the thing from Eric Schmidt where he was like, you know, we really don't know what's coming. You know, in a couple of years, it's going to be smarter than all of us. And what does that mean? You know, I don't know. I thought we should just spend a couple of minutes on that, you know? So we're going to do that here in 60 seconds. Stand by first.

For years, without even realizing a lot of things. of us have been funding causes we disagree with through companies that take our money and turn around and use it you know against us big tech big banks even big wireless they've gotten so comfortable they don't even hide it anymore and you know i appreciate that they don't just tell me who you are i mean i live next door to you know i just want to know what you believe in and you know we can disagree and then i can decide to do business with you or not do business with you you know these uh places like verizon they they donate to places that are actively working to dismantle the values that you stand for.

And then they send you a bill at the end of the month for that privilege. But there is a choice. Patriot Mobile. America's only Christian conservative wireless provider. They don't just share your values. They fight for it. Every time you pay your phone bill, a portion goes to support pro-life causes religious freedom.

Second Amendment, First Amendment, freedom of the press. You know, they're dead set against quartering any horses and soldiers at your houses, I'll tell you that, right? They're big on the Third Amendment too. Anyway, Patreon mobile, you're going to save a lot of money. You're going to get the same coverage. You're going to be working with people that, you know, believe in the same things that you do.

Get a free month of service with the promo code back. Switch today. That's patriotmobile.com slash back. Recall 972. Patriot. So we have Daniel Kokotelo, and he's a former Open AI researcher. Daniel, have you been on the program before? I don't think you have you have you? No, I haven't. Yeah. Well, welcome. I'm glad you're here. Really appreciate it. Thank you, sir. Um, we wanted to have you on because I am a guy who, I've been talking about AI forever.

Uh, and it is both just thrilling and one of the scariest things I've ever seen at the same time. And it's kind of like not really sure which way it's going. Um, are you, how confident are you that, what'd you say? It's going to go both ways. Uh, it's going to be very thrilling and also very scary. Yeah. Okay, good, good, good. All right. Well, well, thanks for start my Monday off with that. So can you tell me, first of all, let's start with some of the good things that you think are coming

and are right around the corner that people just don't understand. Because I don't think anybody, the average person, they hear this, they think it's, oh, it's like social media, it's going to be like the cell phone. It's going to change everything,

and they don't know that yet. And I think probably people are familiar with systems like chat GPT now, which are large language models that you can go have an actual normal conversation with, unlike ordinary software programs, they're getting better at everything. In particular, right now and in the next few years, the companies are working on turning them into autonomous agents. So instead of simply responding to some message that you send them and

then, you know, turning off, they would be continuously operating, roaming around, browsing the internet, working on their own projects, on their own computers, checking in with you, send you messages, like a human employee, basically. Right. That's what the companies are working on now. And it's the stated intention of the CEOs of these companies to build eventually superintelligence. What is superintelligence? Superintelligence is fully autonomous AI systems that are better than humans at absolutely everything.

So on the surface, that sounds like a movie that we've all seen. and you kind of, you know, you say that, and you're like, anybody that's working on these, have they seen the same movies I've seen? I mean, what the heck? Let's spring and let's just go to see Jurassic Park. You know, X Machina. What do you think? I don't, I mean, is it just me or do people in the industry go, you know, this could be really bad?

Yeah, it's a great question. And the answer is they totally have seen those movies and they totally think, yes, it could go really bad. fact, that's part of the founding story of some of these companies. So what do you mean? What do you mean? So Shane Legg, who is, I guess, arguably the technical founder of Deep Mind, which is now part of Google Deep Minds, which is one of the big three companies building towards superintelligence.

I believe in his PhD thesis, he discussed the possibility of superhuman AI systems and how if they were not correctly aligned to the right values, if they were not correctly instilled with the appropriate ethics that they could kill everyone and become a superior competitor species to humans. It's not yet, Tim, lots of the people at these companies, especially early on, basically had similar thoughts of, wow, this is going to be the biggest thing ever.

If it goes well, it could be the best thing that ever happens. If it goes poorly, it could literally kill everyone or do something similarly catastrophic like leading to a permanent dystopia. People react to that in different ways. So some people sort of stayed in academia, some people, you know, stayed in whatever other jobs they had or founded nonprofits to do research about this sort of thing. Some people decided, well, if this is going to happen, then it's better if good people like me and my friends are in charge when it happens.

And so that's basically the founding story of a lot of. of these companies. That's sort of part of why DeepMind was created, and that's part of why Open AI was created. I highly recommend going and reading some of the emails that surfaced in court documents related to the lawsuits against Open AI, because in some of those emails, you see some of the founders of Open AI talking to each other about why they founded OpenAI. And basically it was because they didn't trust DeepMind to handle this responsibly. And did they go on to come up with, did they come on, did they go on to say like, you know, and that's why we've developed this and it's going to protect us from it? I mean, or did they just lose their way? What happened? I mean, it's an interesting sociological question. My, my take on it is that institutions tend to be, um, tend to conform to their incentives. over time. There's been a sort of like, there's been a sort of evaporative cooling effect where

the people who are most concerned about where all this is headed tend to not be the ones who get promoted and end up running the companies and they tend to be the ones who, for example, quit, like me. You'd be, let's stop there for a second. Hang on, just stop there for a second. You were a governance researcher at Open AI on scenario planning. What does that mean? I was a researcher on the governance team. Scenario planning is just one of several things that I did. So basically, I mean, I did a couple different things at Open AI.

One of the things that I did was try to game out what the future is going to look like. So AI 2027 is a much bigger, more rigorous version of some smaller projects that I sort of did while I was at Open AI, if that makes sense. Like, I think back in 2022, I, like, wrote my own, like, gears gaming out what the next couple years were going to look like internal scenario, right? And then now that I left, how close are you? I'll get some things right, get something's wrong. Okay. The basic trend is hard to miss, right?

A.S. system is getting better and better, becoming more autonomous, et cetera. For how close I was overall, I actually did a similar scenario back in 2021 before I joined OpenAI. And so you can go read that. and judge what I got right and what I got wrong. I would say that that's about par for the course for me when I tend to do these sorts of things, and I'm hoping that 2027 will also be, you know, about that level of right and wrong.

So you left. The thing I read in 2021 is called what 2026 looks like in case you want to look it up. Okay. Well, we'll look it up. You walked away from millions in equity in OpenA. what made you walk away? What were they doing that made you go,

I don't think it's worth the money? So back to the bigger picture, I think. Remember, these companies are trying to build superintelligence. It's going to be better than humans, better than the best humans at everything, while also being faster and cheaper, and you can just make, you know, many, many copies of them. To the CEO of Anthropic, Dario Amadai,

he uses this term, the country of geniuses on a data center to try to visualize what it would be looked like, what it would look like, because quantitatively we're talking, you know, millions of copies, each one of which is smarter than the smartest geniuses, while also being more charismatic than the most charismatic, you know, celebrities and politicians and everything, right? So that's what they're building towards.

And that raises a bunch of important questions, like, is that even a good idea for us to build, for example? And, like, how are we going to make that safe? and also who gets to control the army of geniuses in the data centers, you know? Right. And what orders are they going to be given? And who gets to the side, right? And these are some extremely important questions, right?

And there's a huge, actually, that's not even other question. There's a long list of other very important questions, too. I was just scratching the surface. And what I was hoping would happen at OpenAI and at these other companies is that as the creation of these AI systems gets closer and closer. It started out being far in the future. But as time goes on and progress is made, it starts to feel like something that could happen in the next few years, right? Yes, right. As we get closer and closer, there needs to be a lot more waking up and paying attention and asking these hard questions and a lot more effort exerted

to prepare to deal with these issues. So, for example, For example, opening I created the super alignment team, which was a team of technical researchers and engineers specifically focused on the question of how do we make sure that we can put any values into these AI systems. How do we make sure that we can control them at all, even when they're smarter than us? So they started that team and they said that they were going to give 20% of their compute to working on this problem, basically. How much percentage went?

Well, I don't know, and I can't say, but I think it's much less than 20%. I would imagine it is. It was a big step up, right? Yeah, yeah. So 20% was huge at the time because it was way more than the company, than any company was devoting to that technical question at the time. So at the time, it was a sort of leap forward. It didn't pan out.

as far as I know, they're still not anywhere near 20%. And that's just an example of the sort of thing that made me quit, where I'm like, we are just not ready, and we're not even taking the steps to get ready. And so we are going to be anyway, even though we don't understand it, don't know how to control it, and, you know, it's going to be a disaster. That's basically what caused me to leave.

So, hang on just a second. Give me a minute. I'm going to come back, and I want to ask you, you have an opinion on who should run this? Because I don't like opening eye. I mean, I like X better than anybody only because Elon Musk is just open to free speech on everything. But I don't even trust him. I don't trust any of these people.

And I certainly don't trust the government. So who's going to end up with all of this compute? And do we get the compute and enough to be able to stop it or enough to be able to be dangerous? I mean, oh, it just makes your head hurt. We'll go into that when we come back. Hang on just a second. First, let me tell you about our sponsor this half hour. It's pre-born every day across the country.

There's a moment that happens behind closed doors. A woman, usually young, scared, unsure, walks into a clinic with a choice in front of her. A world that seems like pressing in, it's pressing in on all sides. And she just doesn't know what to do. This is the way, I mean, I hate, you know, the abortion truck thing, you know, where everybody's screaming at each other. Can we just look at this mom for just a second? and just see that in most cases, it's somebody who has nobody on their side,

doesn't have any way to afford the baby, and is scared out of their mind. And so they just don't know what to do. She's been told a hundred times, you know, it's easy, this is just normal. But when she goes to a preborn clinic, if she happens to go there, she'll hear the baby's heartbeat. And for the first time, that changes anything. That increases the odds that mom doesn't go through with an abortion by 50%. Now, the rest of it is all in, but I don't have anybody to help me. Okay, so that's the other thing that pre-born does, because they care about mom as well as the baby.

And that's what's always lost in this message, I think, is mom is really important as well. And so they not only offer the free ultrasound, but they are there for the first two years. They help pay for whatever the mom needs, all the checkups, all the, you know, all the visits and the doctor, even clothing and everything. Really, honestly. It's amazing. $28 provides a woman with a free ultrasound and another moment, another miracle, and possibly another life. And it just saves two people, not only the baby, but also mom. Please dial pound 250, say the keyword baby, pound 250, keyword baby, or visit preborn.com.com slash Beck.

It's preborn.com slash Beck. It's sponsored by Preborn. 10 seconds station idea. Daniel Kokatello, he is a former OpenAI researcher, AI Futures Project executive. director and talking about the reckless race to use his words to build AGI. You can find his work at A.I.27.com. So Daniel, who is going to end up with control of this thing? Great question.

Well, probably no one. And if not no one, probably some CEO or president would be my guess. you want to understand why I think this and in general like in general if you want to understand you know my views the views of my team at the future's project and sort of how it all fits together and and why we came to these conclusions you can go read our website

which has all of this stuff on it which is basically our best guess attempt at at predicting the future obviously you know the future is very difficult to predict we're probably going to get a bunch of things wrong but this was our best guess. And that's AI-20207.com? Yes.

Yeah. So, yeah, as you were saying, it seems like we're going to, if one of these companies or several of these companies succeed in getting to this army of geniuses on the data center, the super intelligent AIs, there's the question of who controls them. There's a technical question of, can, do we, does humanity even have the tools it needs to control super intelligent AIs? that does anyone control them. And I mean, it seems to me like...

I think anybody who really understands this, it's like, you know, we can build gates, but it's like a baby gate. I mean, you know, imagine a baby trying to outsmart the parent. You're not going to be able to do it. It'll just step over that gate. And I don't understand why the super intelligence

wouldn't just go, oh, that's cute, not doing that. You know what I mean? Totally. And getting a little bit into the, literature here. So there's a division of strategies into AI control techniques and AI alignment techniques. So the control techniques are designed to allow you to control the super intelligent AI or the, you know, AGI or whatever it is that you're trying to control, despite the fact that it might be at odds with you. And it might have different goals than you have different

opinions about how the future should be, right? So that's the sort of adversarial technique. where you, for example, restrict its access to stuff and you monitor it closely and you use other copies of the AI as watchers to play them off against each other. There's all these sort of control techniques that are designed to work even if you can't trust the AIs.

And then there's alignment techniques which are designed to make it the case that you don't need the control techniques because the AIs are virtuous and loyal and obedience and trustworthy, you know, et cetera, right? And so alignment techniques are trying to sort of instill the specified values deeply into the AI's in robust ways so that you never need the control techniques

because they would never, you know, so there's alignment techniques and control techniques. Both are important fields of research. There's maybe a couple hundred people working on these fields right now. Hold on because both of them sound like they're not. They're not going to work, but we'll come back with more in a minute. Glenn Beck. This is a movie.

We're living in a movie. All right. You can feel the unease in the markets, a sense that something is moving right underneath the surface, and you're just trying to stay a step ahead of it. For a lot of Americans right now, the question isn't if there's going to be a collapse. It's when and how bad. I was having conversation with Chad GPT over the weekend about $5,000 gold. and I said, you know, what does the world look like at $5,000 gold?

Because I think I know it wasn't pretty by any stretch of the imagination. And I think one of the scariest lines was, and it's not really a matter of if now. It's just a matter of when because things are, you know, they're spiraling out. So you might want to call and see if gold is right for you, gold or silver. I don't care if you have a dollar in it. You know, $5,000 gold. We're at 3,500 or what is it, 3,500 or 3,600, today. 12 months ago, it was at 24.

All right, I mean, that's not good. Not good. You might want to, you might want to check. Find out if gold or silver is right for you. Call 800-957 gold. 800-957 gold. Be prepared. Now's the time to join Blaze TV.

Go to blaz-tobblaz.com slash Glenn. Use the promo code Glenn and save 20 bucks. So everybody in the office now is looking at AI-27.com. And let me just say it's not going to improve your mood much. Let me just give you this. At the end of 2025, let me give you just this. Do the fully trained models have some kind of robust commitments to always being honest, or will this fall apart in some future situation?

Because it's learned honesty is an instrumental goal. instead of a terminal goal, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Could it be lying to itself sometimes as humans do? Researchers try to identify cases where the models seem to deviate from the spec. Agent 1 is often sycophonic. It tells researchers what they want to hear instead of trying to tell them the truth. In a few rigged demos, I don't know what that means. We're going to have to ask him in a second.

It even lies in more serious ways, like hiding evidence that it failed on a task in order to get better ratings. However, in real deployment settings, there are no longer any incidents so extreme as in the 20, 23, 24, Gemini telling the user to die. And Bing Sidney being Bing Sydney. I don't know what that means, but the guy who does know what that means is with us. Daniel, this is your website. What is that last sentence or two mean? That this is kind of under control now? So if you Google Bing Sydney, you might find this New York Times article by a journalist who chatted with basically a version of chat GPT and tried to like convince him to leave his wife and stuff like that, right?

Yeah, it was just pretty unhinged and just in general with a lot of users was behaving in some pretty erratic, crazy and scary ways. Yes. So what we're saying in our AI 2027 projection is that the company is sort of like hammer away at these bad behaviors and at least make them seemingly go away or like make it less obviously bad over the next year or two. I should mention by the way that it's not just back 20203, 24. To my mild surprise, the AIs are still. lying quite often. There is just something I saw from this other organization called Transluse that does

interpretability research and reteming where, yeah, it feels like, it seems like even today's chat type models will sometimes just pretend that they answered your question or completed your request, even though they didn't. And then if you ask them about it, they'll double down on it and try to sort of gaslight you. So I've been using, I've been using, go ahead.

I was just going to say, this is a huge glaring problem right now, is that whatever honesty training the companies are doing is not working. But we are projecting that because there's such a PR risk and such an obvious market incentive, the companies will like hammer away at it and figure out ways to like at least make the obvious failures or the obvious dishonesties and lies and so forth go away by you know by the time it's 2027 but then that leaves the remaining question of like well has it actually become actually truly deeply honest or have you just sort of like trained it to be better at not lying in ways that are obvious and get caught you know so Daniel let me let me ask you because and please feel free to just say, okay, that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. But the way I, the way I look at what's happening is, you know, if you think of a giant tank underground, all of that compute is down there. And we're just up above, you know, with a spicket, and we're just opening it just a

little bit at a time and say, no, no, not a lot of that, but it's still down in the tank doing those things. Is there any kind of, does that make sense to you? Is that the, is that the, the way you could understand and help me look at it that way or differently? Well, the way that I would recommend thinking about it is modern AI systems are neural nets. They are not traditional software programs. So if you were to sort of open them up and look inside them, it wouldn't look like a bunch of lines of code that were written by humans, where the program sort of like follows those lines of code and strictly executes on the instructions.

written down in those lines of code. Instead, they're sort of like a giant artificial brain with lots of connections or neurons, right? And rather than being designed by humans, they are trained. So they're put in some sort of training environment, and the system sort of automatically learns to score highly in that training environment. So it's more like training a dog, you might say, or training a child, than building something. And so that leaves to, this is maybe getting back to what you're saying, it means that we don't have a way to actually check whether it's really learned the values that we wanted to learn or whether it's just, for example, literally lying to us and

pretending to have those values. Or a third alternative, it has sort of learned the values, but not quite in the way that we wanted and we're only going to find out later. There's all these different possibilities and we don't actually have the way to just open up the system and check, you know? There are people working on building such a way. So there's something called interpretability research, which is an exciting new field of technical research that's aimed at fixing this issue.

But is this what good fire is? Good fire? Good fire? The startup, I think it came out last year and it's, I don't know, they put a million dollars into it, and it's to help AI developers understand the inner workings of what's happening inside. I don't know if you've heard of it. Sounds like it.

I haven't heard of it, but yeah, there's a couple different startups. So, like, Transluse was the group that I mentioned previously that was showing the recent report of lying in AI. Yeah, they're an example of this sort of startup that, like, is working on interpretability research. So it's not like the situation is absolutely hopeless. if there's enough progress made in interpretability research, then it'll be a whole different ballgame and we'll be able to actually, you know, determine what goals and values a given AI system has and predict how it would behave in future scenarios. But we're not there yet. This research is sort of very, this field is very young and not ready for prime time.

What happens? What happens is from my understanding, that the government a couple of years ago said, you know, to Silicon Valley, don't worry about developing any of this stuff. We're going to own it. We're going to control it, which scares the life out of me. But what happens if we don't get it and China gets it first? I mean, do you have any idea how real the race is?

Are we way ahead, kind of ahead, behind? where is this? Great question. So, first of all, I think that what happens, whether we get there first or China gets their first,

is probably the same either way because we probably just lose control of it, and if they get their first, they probably just lose control of it. Jeez. However, however, however, I might be wrong.

You know, we might be wrong. It's possible that enough progress will be made on the technical alignment and control problems that whoever wins the race will actually stay in control of their super intelligent army. And then we get into sort of concentration of power issues, right? So then it matters quite a lot who wins and who they are and what they do with their army, right? And obviously, we would rather it be us than China, for many reasons, which I probably don't

need to elaborate on. There's also the question of, like, well, who among us, exactly? Exactly. Like, is it going to be a CEO? Which CEO? Oh, I know. Or is it the president? You know, I think ideally we should be trying to avoid a situation where any one man or any small group of men has that level of power, right? If there is going to be an army of super intelligences, it should be, you know, like the United States Army, loyal to the Constitution, loyal to the American people, rather than loyal to, you know, for example,

the president or the CEO of the company that train them. Yeah, but do you know anybody that thinks like that? I mean, I'd be okay with that. If it understood the, you know, the traditional values and principles that make us good people and, you know, just war theory, all that kind of stuff, and trained on the Constitution, I'd be okay with that. I don't believe that it ever would be tight, but, I mean, is anybody doing that? Is anybody working in that direction?

I'm not sure which you mean. Can you say more? Is somebody working towards a, you know, a constitutionally centered, you know, bill of rights? You know, I'm going to first do no harm to humans. You know, is anybody doing that? Yeah. So Anthropic, which is one of these big three companies, maybe I shouldn't say big three. One of the major companies that's explicitly trying to build superintelligence soon and thinks they might succeed, they have their constitution, which they train the AIs on, and I think you can go read it, and it's, it's the, a written document that describes the goals and principles that their AIs are supposed to have. Of course, we haven't made that much progress on the technical Lema problem, so the AIs don't actually have those goals and principles, at least not fully, but, but at least this is like a written document describing the intended goals and principles. And similarly, OpenAI has something called the model spec. You can, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, it's just like a written document describing, describing, uh, it has something called the model spec. And so can go Google this, they have it up on the website, that is their version of this that describes the goals

and principles that their AIs are supposed to follow, or at least they're publicly available AIs. They don't make any claims about whether this covers their internal AIs. Oh, geez. So yeah, so you can go read those documents and you can get a sense of what goals and principles these companies are trying to train into their models,

the AIs, that is. There's still the question of like, well, who gets to write those documents and who gets to say what those goals and principles are. And in fact, there's even the question of who gets to know what those goals and principles are, because apparently the company is under no obligation to actually tell the public about what goals and principles and values and agendas, et cetera, they're putting into their AI systems. And in fact, there's been a few scandals relating to that where a company basically gave their AI is a hidden agenda and instructed the AI is to not tell the users about it.

And then this blew up. So there's definitely an unfortunate point that's been set. I think what I'd like to be in a world, you know, AI 2027 is a predictive exercise. It's not a normative exercise. So it is just our sort of modal prediction of what we think the future looks like, at least at the time that we wrote it. Obviously, our views are constantly changing. as we update based on new evidence.

But it wasn't an attempt to recommend what people should do. But if you do want to know what I recommend people should do, one of the things that I recommend is transparency. I think that there should be firm rules that the companies are required to follow. They basically say you have to tell the public what goals, principles, et cetera, you are trying to train into your AIs. You mean like an open AI? Right. I mean, and again, none of this matters if you haven't solved the technical problem of

figuring out better training methods that actually results in the AI as having the goals and principles that you want. But if you do solve that problem and you do manage to get them to actually have those goals and principles, it becomes the most important question in the world of what are those goals and principles and who gets to decide. Daniel, I'd love to have you back for a podcast. We can spend a time without any commercials or anything else. So just talk about this and really dive deep into it. Can I ask you, I've only got about 45 seconds. So it has to be kind of a short answer.

But I've taken the approach of I want to be in AI and using AI. And I have my own kind of bright lines of, don't go past this. Because I think it's a tremendous tool at this point. Do you recommend that? or do you say stay away from it entirely? Oh, I recommend using it. I think the best way to, you know, I think that the individual consumer decisions

aren't going to change the outcome. And, you know, it's like getting plastic straws versus paper straws or whatever. Like, on an individual level, you should just be learning about what's going on, learning about this technology, using it as much as you can. And not get sucked into it. And yeah, as a political matter, like, we need to have a sort of political conversation about

are we actually going to do this people? And like, if we're going to do this, how are we going to do this in a way that is safe and in a way that's, you know, actually democratic instead of the sort of mad free-for-all between CEOs and politicians? Thank you so much. I really appreciate it. I hope to have you on, again, you're fascinating. What you're doing is so important, Daniel.

Daniel Kokatelo, he is a former OpenAI Researcher, AIS future project. You can find his work and please read it at AI-2020.com, A.I.27.com. Daniel, thank you so much. Back in just a minute. Let me tell you about our sponsor. It's Cozy Earth. Mother's Day is almost here. And when it comes to that particular holiday, you know, it's really not about the gift.

It's about the meaning behind it because it's not just a holiday on the calendar. It's a chance to say the things we often think, but really rarely say out loud. I see everything you've done for me, sweetheart, and I haven't forgotten. Yeah. And it's also about good. Did I forget to get a gift? What the hell is wrong with it? That's why cozy earth makes a perfect gift because it isn't just a robe or set of sheets.

It's a feeling. Some of the softest fabric on earth. you can get the pajamas or the sheets or whatever, but she's going to love cozy earth. Go to cozyearth.com slash Beck. CozyEarth.com slash Beck. Use the promo code Beck. Get up to 40% off the sheets and pajamas and the towels and so much more. CozyEarth.com slash Beck.

You know, truth makes the left so mad. And right about now, they're all losing their minds. We must be doing something right. Stick around. Beck will continue. right after this. AAA 727 BECK is our phone number. So much going on in the world.

So many things to deal with all at once. A decent time for our own Glenn Beck to be speaking with the president of the United States. He'll do that this week, as well as a bunch of other administration officials. You can get access to all of this as part of your Blaze TV subscription. Go to blazTV.com slash

Glenn. Use the promo code Glenn. You'll save 20 bucks. And of course, we'll have much of that on the radio program as well. We'll see you then. Glenn Beck.