The Glenn Beck Program - Investigate Who Covered Up Biden’s Mental State NOW! | 5/5/25

Episode Date: May 5, 2025

President Trump made it crystal clear once AGAIN on ABC's "Meet the Press" that he's not cutting Social Security or Medicare. The DOGE is cutting the fraud, waste, and abuse that bleed these programs dry. Filling in for Glenn, Pat and Stu focus on Democrats' fearmongering tactics, using blatant lies to scare seniors into voting by falsely claiming Trump plans to gut entitlement programs. After a five-year pause, it's time for borrowers to repay their student loans. Biden tried to wipe out billions in debt illegally, punishing those who paid their loans and rewarding irresponsibility. Jen Psaki, former Biden press secretary, denies noticing Biden's mental decline during her tenure. The guys argue for a full investigation into the cover-up that misled Americans about their mentally compromised commander in chief. Will humans ever land on Mars? Lastly, Stu discusses the disturbing trend of countries helping their citizens end their lives through government-assisted suicide. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

When you were little, you have braced in the course of recreat, always in trying to negotiate, to exchange these cards

of hockey, the bonhomes, the bonhomes, you know, you know that a good before having to have been a

time, and the things have not really changed. Negoti T-D you can't to renew with your instinct

of negotiation. With, without operation gratuit, no amount of minimum and any money and you're

made for making for negotiate, and the apply the case to you Eddie.

Telecharge it right now. Good to be back and excited to tell you about everything going on. Pat, well, more like Pat's going to tell me about what happened over the past week. But let me tell you first about Berna. Burna launcher, they're great. You're going to love your Berna launcher. It is one of those things. And we have one.

I actually got this for my wife for, was it her birthday or Mother's Day or something like that. I was like, you know, I do something a little bit different. And we went with the Burn and Launcher, and she loves it. It's great. Basically, it is a, you know, it's a non-lethal alternative to a firearm. You get in these situations where you are worried about, you know, something that's going on. You can use this without the fear of the additional circumstances that go along with, of course, taking a more lethal choice. Burn a compact launcher does not require a background check.

It doesn't require a permit. But it does provide something just as important. Peace of mind. Take action now. Protect what's important. Visit berna.com slash Glenn. Get 10% off your purchase right now, B-Y-R-N-A.com slash Glenn, where safety meets responsibility and preparation means peace of mind. It's berna.berna.com slash glen. Hello, America. You know we've been fighting every single day. We push back against the lies,

the censorship, the nonsense of the mainstream media that they're trying to feed you. We work tirelessly to bring you the unfiltered truth because you deserve it. But to keep this fight going, we need you. Right now, would you take a moment? and rate and review the Glenn Beck podcast, give us five stars and lead a comment because every single review helps us break through Big Tech's algorithm to reach more Americans who need to hear the truth. This isn't a podcast. This is a movement, and you're part of it, a big part of it. So if you believe in what we're doing, you want more people to wake up, help us push this podcast to the top. Rate, review, share. Together, we'll make a difference. And thanks for standing with us. Now let's get to

work. 727 B-E-C-K. President Trump went on into opposition territory, I guess, again yesterday. He's just, he's unafraid of going to the media that is not friendly to him. He was on Meet the Press yesterday with Christian Welker. Get into some of the things he had to say coming up in one minute. Let me tell you about real estate agents. I trust.com.

Buying or selling a home isn't just a transaction. It is a major life decision. and you wouldn't just trust a random stranger to walk you through something like that. I certainly wouldn't do that at least. So that's why I always tell people, don't settle for just any real estate agent. Find the right one, the kind that actually earns your trust before they ask for your signature. That's what you get with real estate agents at trust.com. These are professionals who don't just sell the ins and outs of the housing market.

They also know how to navigate it specifically for you. They're vetted for integrity, track record, and the ability to communicate clearly when this stakes are high. You won't get passed off to just some assistant. They're going to be pressured. What you will get as a partner, someone who understands the pressure you're under and knows how to help lift it. Whether you're looking to move across town or just across the, really anywhere, across the country, across the housing complex, wherever you're going. It's real estate agents. I trust.com. Real estate agents I trust.com. Go there now. Check it out. Real estate agents. I trust.com. A free service to you. Real estate agents I trust.com.

So President Trump sat down with NBC News's Christian Welker over the weekend. And lucky him. Lucky him. I don't know how many times he's going to have to answer this question. Do you know what the question was? It's always Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security being cut. I mean, how many times does he address this? The only one's talking about it are the left.

The only ones who are threatening your social security. security or your Medicare Medicaid are the Democrats. They're the only ones I ever hear bring this up because President Trump has said multiple times. I'm not cutting Social Security. We're not cutting Medicare and Medicaid. We're not doing any of that. We're cutting fraud and waste, but who doesn't want that? Well, that's the best part of Medicare and Medicaid is the fraud and the waste. Yeah. Everyone loves that. Yeah. It's funny. I mean, there was a time where conservatives made arguments that this is none these are unsustainable programs and need to be reformed that time is long it's long it's it's gone it's dead it is a dead is a doornail there's nobody who's coming

up now and saying uh really much of anything about this trump's been really clear since the beginning going back all the way to 2016 yeah where he said look I'm not going to go after these programs at all and that's where we are there's no there are zero parties looking to cut this right now zero right There's not one. Right. No one, no one wants to do it. But here's the question and the answer. What happens if it comes to your desk has the tax cuts, but also cuts to Medicaid?

Would you veto that? Well, we're not doing that. Did you veto that? I would if they were cutting it, but they're not cutting it. They're looking at fraud, waste, and abuse. And nobody minds that. If illegal immigrants are in the mix, if people that aren't supposed to be there, people that are non-citizens are in the mix. Nobody minds that. Waste fraud and abuse. But we're not cutting Medicaid. We're not cutting

Medicare and we're not cutting Social Security. This is not over and over. I guess the same thing. He's been saying as it's at 2016. It's really 2015. Yeah. Where he's been talking about this. I remember him being on the stage of one of those debates early on where there was still kind of strains in the Republican Party of wanting to reform these programs. And he was kind of seen as an outlier. He was like, no, I'm not doing it. And when everyone else is like, well, of course, make these, you know, we'll cut these programs. They never use the word cut. They would just say reform, which essentially, you know, they would be talking about things.

Paul Ryan did this back in, you know, the early Paul Ryan days where it was like, hey, we're going to change maybe the retirement age. Right. Right. To reflect from reality. They extend the retirement from 65 to 68 or 70 or whatever it was. And they were the most genteel proposals, right? It was like, if you're born today, then you will have no change whatsoever.

But in 70 years from now, we're going to extend it's like all these stupid stuff. And it's like they weren't even hardcore reforms back then. The Trump was very outspoken about opposing even that. The last time I remember actual reform being discussed by Republicans was under George W. Bush when he was talking about privatizing it. And we blew that completely. It would have been so great. Oh, it would have been so great. I was just going over something, this is before vacation was just going over this because

there was some, I don't know if it was an anniversary or something of when he first proposed that Social Security reform, which was again, genteel. It was like you could take 10% of your, I think it was 10% of the money that was going into Social Security and you could put it in an account to invest it in the market. But you didn't have to. You didn't have to. Remember that? If you don't want to do this, you don't have to do it.

But if you want to privatize, all or some of it, you can. And it was not available to people who were really close to retirement. So people were like, you know, a few years after that was the 2008 collapse. Yeah. Like, oh, what would have happened? Nothing. Because the way the bill was written, you couldn't have been in the program for the 2008 collapse. In fact, they went back and looked at it every single year.

It was available. Every single year. Even then, you know, you're retiring in 2020. every single year it was available, it would have worked out for the people who would have joined it. And of course, it only gets better and better as time goes on. Right. But we didn't do that.

We didn't do it. Because people are, they're going to cut Social Security. They had a fit about it back then. And they convinced everybody, they scared the crap out of them. They fear mongered like they always do. And scared the crap out of elderly people. Like, it's going to, you're going to lose it. You're going to, no, no.

Are you listening to what's being said? No. No. Again, I am not a fan of these programs. I don't like them at all. I think the idea that FDR came along with this BS, well, it's actually like your own savings account thing that they did to get the government more money. Why don't you let me do that? Yeah, exactly.

It's supposed to be your own responsibility. You can join a program like this if you want. Of course, people don't always choose that. and they certainly wouldn't choose this type of program that they get offered from the government, which is terrible, horrible returns. And by the way, all the money you put in there is spent immediately. It's not saved. There's no saving.

There's no returns because the money has been spent on people who are retired now. And it's totally insolvent program that everyone knows is a disaster. But let's all pretend like we should protect it until the end of time. Because let's pretend to, let's make it act. Let's all seem like it's a good idea to protect a program that we all know is. failing in front of our eyes, but let's do it because polls like it. People like when they get money, when they get checks in the mail. And again, that's not to say that there's no program for elderly people who are in the situations that the program was originally designed for. People who like had their spouse die and they're there, you know, sitting there long after they're able to work and need assistance. That is something totally different than the program that we have today. Yeah, it is. Totally different.

It's a long-term paid retirement plan with money that we don't have. And in 2032 or 233, when this thing goes belly up, we're going to wish we'd done something long before that time. To save it. Yeah. And what they will, of course, just do is say that we don't want to reform it and they're going to just add to our taxes. That's what they'll have to do. We'll wind up doing. Yeah.

Our children will wind up bailing it out or something at some point. But or we'll just continue to just continue to print money and inflate our way out of the problem. Well, there's that too. Yeah. So again, there's no good options here. And I think, you know, President Trump has, as I think recognized the political realities of the situation. Yeah, he is. Which is that no one likes the things that we're saying currently.

Which I get. I mean, you know, you have to. Look, the reason why the Democrats say this crap all the time is because it's a, effective. When people get scared, they're going to lose their programs. Right. They vote for the other guy. Every time. Or in the most recent election, the other lady. That's how it works. And so I understand why this happens. It is a real problem, though. When we talk about, you know, look, Doge, 97,000 Elon Musk's could not touch the problem that we're talking about when it comes to these programs. Yeah.

These programs are what is completely upending our budget. And, you know, I don't care how much fraud, waste, and abuse that you go after, you're never going to be able to get to the core of our financial problems if you don't go. We touch these programs. That being said, what he is offering to do here is not touching these programs. He's saying, look, we're not going to give social security benefits to illegal aliens. Or dead people. Or dead people. Or people who haven't been born.

for another hundred years. Those types of things. It seems rational. It does. It does. But it's not to the left for some reason. But they also discussed, of course, tariffs and China. You're not dropping the tariffs against China to get them to the negotiating table.

Those tariffs are staying on. Why would I do that? Would you lower them? At some point, I'm going to lower them because otherwise you could never do business with them. And do they want to do business very much. Look, their economy is really doing bad. their economy is collapsing. Okay.

That's true. I mean, a lot of people, we focused on the harms that have happened to the United States since all the stuff started. But it's really bad for China. I mean, we are their market. Yeah. So it is really hurting them a lot. Yeah. And they're going to have to, they're going to have to make a deal, you know, probably sooner than we do.

Although, they hold some cards. They're not like, they're not like Volatimier Zelensky who have no cards. I mean, they do have the medication card and they have the rare earth minerals card. And those are pretty impressive cards to hold at this particular time. They also have the card that if they want, they can just let millions of their own people die, which is an interesting card to hold. And they play. Time to time.

Frequently, they'll just kind of play it throughout history. Hey, wait, but if you do this, 20 million of your people will die. So? Yeah. That's kind of in their answer. historically. So we'll see if that changes at all. Because I mean, they don't have the political pressures that our president has to deal with. Right. You know, it is one of those things where they, you know, there's that kind of standard trope of, well, you know, the Middle East and, you know,

Chinese think things in much longer terms, right? They don't think of it in two to four years cycles like our political environment does. Like centuries in advance. Exactly. At the very at least a decade. And I think they think they can hold out longer than us. The question, I mean, at some level, this is a beneficial relationship between us. You know, both countries do benefit at some level, in certain areas, at least, from this relationship. I would much rather be in business with a country like India. Me too.

You know, like if we can get a... Somebody friendly towards us. Something friendly towards us to make our stuff. Yeah. And look, some of it doesn't make sense. I think everybody acknowledges not everything needs to be made in the United States. We don't need to be North Korea. North Korea, as everything, you know, mostly at least insular and made within their country, you'd be surprised to hear that it's not going well.

I'm not that surprised. Have you ever seen the overhead picture from the satellites where North Korea and South Korea? That's what happens when you have absolutely no relationships outside the country. You know, that's not to say that everything needs to be moved here. I don't, that's not what Trump is even arguing. But it is a, a situation where if we have these, the tariffs at this level are essentially an embargo, right? Like, we're just not going to have any relationship at all.

Like, I was listening to some guy who runs a shoe company. And I guess they do their manufacturing in, in, in China. And they charge, I think, $175 for their high-end shoes or whatever they are. and with the tariffs, they're now going to be like $350 of tariffs on each pair of shoes. Wow. Because I think the shoe,

his shoe, he said the percentage was 175 or something like that. Because it is different. Everyone's saying it's 145. It's different in all different areas. Squid, it's super high. If you're importing your squid from China,

oh my gosh, the squid prices, Pat, I don't know. We don't have any squid in our cookies. So I don't have to deal with that. Not a single squid cookie. So, well,

that's, that's okay then. You'll be okay. What a relief. But all your competitors, which by the way, I don't know if people know this, all other cookie companies, most of it is squid. Yeah. Yeah. Most of the recipe, the batter is made of squished up squid.

Yeah. I'm pretty sure. I'm not positive on that, but that's what I hear. For legal reasons, but like most of them just import Chinese squid. Yeah. And put them right from the shores of Wuhan. Right directly into their cookies. Even though there's not really shores.

And they put them directly into the cookies. That's why, that's why I prefer. Kexi. Thank you. Myself, Pat. I don't know. I just don't want to eat squid. Completely squid free.

Wow, really? Yeah, every cookie, squid free. That's quite a statement. I hope you're... That's a promise that I can solidly make right now. You cleared that with legal? I did. Okay, good.

I did. But if you're going with the other cookie guys, wow, your price is going to go through the roof. Yep. It's Wuhan squid all day long. Triple 8-7-27. Back more in one minute. Sometimes in life, if you want to get to the truth, you have to look at the numbers. Unfortunately, 50% of all dogs over 10 years old will die of cancer.

The other 40 to 50% are going to suffer miserably from skin issues or joint problems. This is widely attributed to your dog's diet. These numbers are what inspired naturopathic Dr. Dennis Black to create Rough Greens. But here's the good news. With thousands of testimonials and five-star reviews every single month, Rough Greens is now the number one all-natural dog supplement in America. They have helped millions of dogs, like mine, stay active and be healthy. And your pup could be next.

You don't have to change your dog's food to improve your dog's health. Just add a scoop of rough greens. Fetch a free jump start trial bag for your dog today. Just cover the shipping and go to roughgreens.com. Use the promo code back. That's RUFFGreens.com promo code back. You don't have to change your dog's food to improve your dog's health. Just add a scoop of rough greens.

All right. There was more discussion about tariffs between President Trump and Kristen Walker on Meet the Press yesterday. Here's how that went. Sir, you acknowledge when you announced your tariffs, for example, the stock market dropped. It's been volatile. It has since gone up. Do you take responsibility for that? Yeah.

Do you take responsibility when it dropped? Ultimately, I take responsibility for everything. But I've only just been here for a little more than three. months. But the stock market, look at what's happened in the last short period of time. Didn't it have nine or ten days in a row or 11 days where it's gone up? And the tariffs have just started kicking in. And we're doing really well psychologically. I mean, the fake news was giving me such press on the tariffs. The tariffs are going to make us rich. We're going to be a very rich country. Okay. All right. I like it. And yes, the

stock market's been up nine straight days, I believe, right? Isn't that, I don't know where the futures market is headed right now, but it was up for nine straight days. And it's, it's nearly made up for the losses that it had, uh, from the beginning. So, uh, when are we measuring this from the, uh, from the beginning of the losses? So the beginning of the losses, I would not say that that's accurate. We're not, we haven't. We, so if you go, I guess if you go to, the beat, if you go to the, I'm just looking at the chart here as we're speaking. I was on vacation last week, so I did not follow the markets at all. Do people do that? Do people follow the markets when they're on vacation? I don't know. I do not. I do not. But I guess if you're kind of going

from April 1st, which was, he put him on April 2nd, right? They went into effect on April 2nd, Yeah. Which would not hold some of the previous, you know, losses into, wouldn't count those. But if you kind of just take it from that day, it was at 40, let's see, 42,000 and we're back to like 41,000. So it's close. Yeah. It's pretty close. It was as low as 38, right around 30.

But it was as high as, what, 45 at one point? Yeah, it was earlier in the year. Yeah, 45. So, yeah, we're a little off of that, Mark. Sure. I mean, we're well off of the highs. but, you know, from when these things kicked in, they've regained most of their losses, which is great.

That is great. And hopefully that will continue. I mean, again, like, I think it's a fair thing. You know, when the markets were down, Trump was saying, well, you can't just look at the markets, which I think is fair. I mean, I mean, it's absolutely. It is a long-term projection of where the economy is going,

not necessarily what's important on a day-to-day, right? Yes. You know, you have to look at those things in longer-term, I think. chunks. And we all knew that, okay, initially there's going to be some pain. You know, prices, some prices are going to go up on some things until we reach some deals and things kind of even out. So yeah, initially there's going to be some problems. And there's going to be a little volatility in the market. And prices are going to go up. And there, I mean, the thing now is that he just said over the weekend that instead of getting

30 dolls for your kids for Christmas, you might get two or three. Meaning that the toy manufacturing that is done in China is going to slow down for us. So if you're looking for Christmas gifts,

now might be a good time to get them. Yeah, we haven't seen any of the price increases yet. No. Right? I mean, I don't think so. Largely, and we saw this in the economic report that came out with the GDP being down, it was a part of that was a lot of people importing goods in advance of the tariffs, right?

So people loaded up. Like I've talked to a couple of business owners who were like, we just loaded up on stock. So we just filled our warehouse with stuff pre-tariff, which will last us a couple of months before these prices start going up. And then they're going to have to start dealing with it. So, you know, that's, those are all, it's going to be fun. It's going to be an interesting time.

It's going to be fun. It's going to be fun. It's an adventure. Yeah. All right. It's an adventure. Glenn turned me out of that approach a couple years ago. And it works for me every time.

If you kind of think of life as a movie, that's got to be an interesting movie. All right. AAA 727 Beck. This is Glenn Beck. So this is the part of the season where legends are made. Every possession matters. Every shot echoes. And if you're one of the fans who just love the momentum shift before, you know,

the announcement, you kind of pick it up before even the announcement. sponsors notice it. Prize picks was made for you. This is Daily Fantasy Sports and it is dialed in. It's streamlined on a great app. And you can play pretty much anywhere anytime. You just pick two to six players. You predict if they'll go over or under their stat projections. And then you're locked in. The rest is kind of just pure adrenaline. If you were watching the playoffs last night, lots of fascinating games last night. Steph Curry moving on. Price picks keeps things simple. So you can focus on what really matters, reading the floor. spotting the hot hand, trusting your gut. And right now, with the playoffs coming and everyone's watching them,

you get the kind of where everything's kind of tightening up for the teams, for the players, for the fans. It's your time to make a call and ride it all the way in. Download the app today. Use the code Stu to get $50 instantly when you play your first five bucks. The code is Stu to get $50 instantly when you play your first $5 lineup. You're going to love prize picks. Check it out now.

It's prize picks. Run your game. Don't forget to use a promo code Glenn to get $20 off your subscription at blazedtv.com. It's Pat and Stu for Glenn this week. He'll be back later in the week. AAA 727BECK. Been going over some of the things the president had to say on Meet the Press yesterday with Kristen Welker. He keeps going on these shows.

At least they can't say he's ducking them because he's not. No, he loves this stuff. He does love it. He loves defeating these people. people. It's like, I feel like with him, it's like he has his job. And then I think we all have like things that we do on the side for fun. This is what he does on the side for fun. This is like, I think that's accurate. He just likes it. He does. He likes torturing these people. He does it well. He does do it well. He does. He was asked about the possibility of a recession.

Here's what he had to say about that. Some people on Wall Street have expressed concerns that the possibility of a recession is increasing. And I want to know what you think about that. Are you comfortable with the country potentially dipping into a recession for a period of time if you are able to achieve your long-term goals? Well, you know, you say some people on Wall Street say, well, I'd tell you something else. Some people on Wall Street say that we're going to have the greatest economy in history. Why don't you talk about them? Because some people on Wall Street say this is the greatest thing. That's what I'm getting at. That's what I'm getting at, though. It's the same question. There are many people on Wall Street say this is going to be the greatest windfall ever happen.

I love that. Because she doesn't ask it that way because that wouldn't be a negative spin on it. Right. So, of course, she could talk about the negative Wall Street people who say that we could go into a recession or a depression. That's what she wants to hear about. It's agonizing every time. But he turns it around nicely. Yeah.

Yeah, for sure. I mean, again, I don't know that, you know, when he got in trouble for saying back in the day, like, oh, well, they're not sending us our best across the border. If we remember that controversy, I think the same thing is applying to the media these days. I mean, this can't be their best. Right? Like, this is, this is. No, this is what they keep thrown out of him. Yeah, apparently.

But he really, I think, does just relish these moments. No, I think you're right. It's like a nice distraction from it, from which I would assume is a very difficult job of being. actually president of the United States. And this is part of the gig, but it's the fun part of the gig. For him it is. Yeah, he likes a lot don't like it. No.

A lot of people would not enjoy this particular aspect of it. I think it's smart for him to do this. Biden never wanted to be challenged, that's for sure. And you know, Trump didn't do an awful lot of this during the campaign, interestingly. They sent J.D. Vance out to most of these interviews. And Trump did a lot of the podcast stuff, if you remember during the campaign, which was also a very workable strategy. It worked really well.

I mean, J.D. Vance was really good in these moments. And Trump was, I think, really likable in the podcast. So they could go back to that whenever they feel like it. But, I mean, he wants to dip his toes in, too. You know, I think he... Yeah. This is just, you know, this is the stuff that I think he loves. He loves this sort of jousting.

He got a little help, too, from an unexpected source. On Bill Maher, Kevin McCarthy appeared. and Bill Maher was kind of talking the president down and the economy down, and Kevin McCarthy kind of jumped in and really defended him. Also the first 100 days, and, you know, this is traditionally what they call the president's honeymoon. You know, presidents do big things in the first hundred days. Obama did Obamacare. Biden had the infrastructure thing because you really get a brief honeymoon.

Yeah. So this is the honeymoon. What is the rest of this, Marathon? going to look like. Yeah. Because I just want to read some of the stats. I've read some of them in the monologues. 7% is the S&P 500 is down.

Economy is shrunk for the first time in three years. The value of the dollars down 10%. Consumer confidence down. Trucking volume starting to tank. Jamie Diamond says the best case scenario is a recession. UPS is cutting 20,000 jobs because they expect less packages to be delivered. Even McDonald's is down 3.6%. Goldman Sachs says we will experience the lowest economic growth

and the highest inflation of any big boy country in 2025, even empty seats at Beyonce's concert. Wow. I guess what I'm asking is, Kevin, so everybody knows something except Trump, or is it the other way around? We're all wrong and he's got it right? We're not all wrong, but this is the point,

a couple things you didn't mention. This is a stock market up for the first time, nine straight days. That's only happened eight times in the last 25 years. Up from where it was way down. But you haven't been every single day for nine straight days. That's only happened 31 times in 97 years. And why did that happen, I'm asking? Well, I think we've gotten over that we know the tariffs are in negotiation.

It's not going to stay this way. I think people are seeing the investment coming back. You look at the jobs numbers today. it surpassed the second time. And if you read into the job numbers, nine thousand jobs were cut in government, but the private sector has grown. So he's doing a disruption,

but you're seeing kind of a little light at the end of the tunnel. Now, if they get in the next 60 days a couple trade agreements, I think you're going to see this market take off. That's an unexpected place to find a little support for the president. Although Trump backed McCarthy, in that battle. That is true. They were,

they weren't enemies. He was more of an enemy, I think, of the rank and file. You know, a lot of the conservative members of Congress didn't like him very much and a lot of,

you know, some conservative voters didn't like him very much. But, you know, him and Trump got a lot. That is true. Yeah, he did support him for Speaker. Yeah.

Yeah. Did support him for Speaker. Did support him in that battle with the Chuan of obviously going to Johnson at later. That's a, yeah. I, we don't know where that this is, this is why you just can't freak out about this stuff, right?

Like, you know, I don't know, look, look, I don't know that the stock market being up for nine days is that big of a deal, frankly. It's like, it's like, if it, it wasn't a, I don't think it was a big, big deal when it went down either. You know, I think it evens out. It evens out. I think, look, there's a long-term approach here that you have to take. I think if you really want to know about the long-term health of the economy. Again, I mean, tariffs are not my favorite policy. I, you know, we've been clear about that for many,

many years. But like I don't think that it's not the type of thing that, you know, when you're talking about a long-term like economic destruction, you can have that type of policy. If what McCarthy's saying is accurate that this is just a negotiation, and I don't know. Do you think, are you comfortable with that analysis of the situation yet, Pat? Like, this is just going to be a negotiation. This is all going to go away. I mean, that's not what Trump is saying. Where are we getting that from? We're just guessing, I think. I don't know where that's coming from. I know. We're hoping. There have been like rumbling.

Sometimes Besson kind of seems like he's saying that it's just a negotiation. But Trump kind of put that to rest over the weekend when he said, look, these are permanent in most cases because otherwise, why are they going to move their manufacturing plants here? Exactly. He said it himself. He said it himself a lot of times. And I feel like there is a contingency on the right that doesn't particularly like tariffs and is convincing themselves that this is what he's doing. but when he's saying the opposite, I mean, he seems to be dedicated to this idea

that you can bring these jobs back, or at least some of them back. And if that is true, that doesn't happen in a week or two weeks or nine straight days. It happens over 10 years. Yeah. And, you know, if that's what he's trying to do,

which is what his stated goal is, right? And he keeps saying that he wants to do this, then I would say that these things probably are in effect for a long time. And forget the China one, because that one at 145%, I think, seems so ridiculously high that it's likely that it won't stay there. He kind of, I think it's likely that one comes back down to earth. But the other is where you've got 10, 20, 30 percent on various industries.

Probably stay a lot of them. They probably stay and are probably just, you know, long term, eventually long term price increases that the economy is going to have to deal with. That's not something that's going to destroy. destroy the economy and make all of us have no jobs. And yeah, but it's going to be a strain on the economy. It's going to slow things down. And if it doesn't, then jobs don't move.

Right. Like you can't have both of those things, right? It's not like, oh, well, it's going to bring all this money in. And also it's a negotiation. Oh, it's going to bring all these jobs back. But actually, we're going to dissolve it in two weeks. Like, none of that, those things don't make sense together. And I feel like there's like what Trump is saying and

what a bunch of Republicans who don't like the Trump policy are saying, like McCarthy, I would put into that category. He probably isn't a tariff guy. And I don't remember exactly, but I don't think he's been a tariff guy. I've been on record being super supportive of that policy. So, like, the people who don't like it are just like self-internalizing this thing that it's just a negotiation, which I don't think there's a lot of evidence to support that. I hope it is, by the way. I hope it is just a negotiation and we get great deals out of it and we can kind of go on. and, you know, things improve. But I don't, it doesn't seem like that's what Trump is doing.

At least, at least, you know, judging by the words that comes out of his mouth. He wants things to be made in America again. And I think that's his ultimate goal here. I think it's a legitimate goal and a heartfelt goal. I think it is. You know, he loves America. He wants things to be made here. And it's a reasonable goal.

I, you know, and what other way is there to, that goal than what he's doing right now well one way I would say is incentivizing right not just like and I think that is by the way part of his plan it just hasn't had the attention that the other part has and I think incentivizing and making business better to do here rather than worse to do overseas but they both kind of work in conjunction but like it's certainly a much more politically we were talking about the the Medicare stuff earlier like there's a political way to go there that is beneficial to you. I think with both of these things

being part of his policy, the more emphasis he can put on saying, hey, we're going to cut taxes for companies coming in here. We're going to make business to do easier. And he's doing that. And he is doing it, but it's not getting the attention. And, you know, a lot of that's the media. But a lot of it is he

likes tariffs, too. So he talks about them a lot. And he's mentioned the fact that he does like tariffs. I mean, basically what he's saying is, we're going to increase taxes on companies doing business overseas and we're going to decrease taxes on companies doing business here. Only one of those two policies is getting any attention right now. And I think for his political benefit, I mean, like, you know, we're at a situation now where very quickly, people are

saying, you know, this is a, if you remember, this, I always remember this with George W. Bush because they would always say that's still Bush's fault when like three years into the Obama administration. We're like, really? He's still running the economy? Think about that. How long did that go on? Two, three years after? Even longer. Even longer. I mean, even into, if I remember, into his second term, people were still saying this is

actually Bush's fault. Yes. The American people have already said now this is the Trump economy in poll after poll after poll. In three months. In three months. Now, again, this is a lot of this is the media. But like, Trump's already got responsibility to the American people on this one.

And, you know, when you think about all the really good things that we talk about all the time that Trump is doing and wants to do, you know, protecting that economic wall is really important when it comes to your presidency. He knows that, obviously. Yeah. But that's why I just think emphasis-wise, talking about those really good things he's doing on the regulation side and on the tax side and the business environment side here in America is really crucial for him to make that transition here at some point soon.

And I don't know if it's the big beautiful bill that does that. But that is, I think, right around the corner to me, the sooner the better. Triple-8-7-27 Beck, more coming up. You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences. There's rough terrain ahead. Saddle up, my friend, and stay tuned. Glenn Beck will be right back. Did you know that, just like here in the U.S., Israel celebrates their Independence Day?

In case you missed it, this year, Israel's Independence Day was just a few days ago on May 1st. But for the people of Israel, freedom is really nothing more than a daily struggle just to survive. There's no real peace, only terror. It's difficult to find moments of joy while there's so much suffering. And the Israeli government relies on the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews for its ongoing help to make sure of the elderly, the sick, the wounded soldiers, and impoverished families don't fall through the cracks. We can't even imagine the courage of the Israeli people. They're so brave and worthy of our prayers that we'd like to ask you for a gift to the fellowship today.

It'll provide life-saving aid, medicine, hearty meals, safety, and comfort. And I believe when we bless God's people of Israel, we unlock God's blessing in our own lives as well. So show your support for Israel. By making a life-saving gift today, call and make your gift at 888-488-488-I-F-C-J. That's 888-48-I-F-C-J-4-8-4-8-4-4-4. Or go online to supportIFCJ.org. Most of us assume that our homes are safe simply because we've got the deed to them. We paid for it.

We live in it, and no one's knocking on the door trying to take it away. But in the digital age and the age of AI, the thief doesn't come through the front door. He goes through your online title. And it's called home title theft. It's one of the fastest growing cyber crimes in America. Hackers can forge your signature. They can transfer your title into their name. And they can start taking out loans against your equity.

Sometimes without you finding out until it's way too late. The worst part is banks and lenders and identity theft programs don't cover this. This is where home title lock comes in because they do. They know what they're doing. they don't just monitor your title they put a virtual barrier around it if any suspicious activity shows up they alert you immediately and help you take action before the damage is done this isn't something that you know want to discover after the fact because once your equity is drained it is a legal mess to fix up this expensive and time-consuming process it's a really stressful thing you don't want to

go through it so protect your home which maybe your largest investment probably is with real proactive title protection because if it has value, someone out there is trying to steal it. You know that. AI is changing the world. Do not let it change the name on your home's title. Go to home tidalock.com. Use the promo code Blaze. Make sure you protect your home, your equity, your financial future, your financial legacy

with Home Titlelock. Hometitleck.com. The promo code is Blaze. Hometitleck.com. promo code is Blaze. Welcome back. Triple 877, BECK is the phone number. Glenn is out this.

today and tomorrow, right? He comes back Wednesday. Back Wednesday. Although, I will say, I think he's been working a lot because he posts more on social media when he's on vacation than when he's off of it. Does seem that way. How do I know everything about his vacation already? Yeah.

I don't even have to ask him any questions. What'd you do? I don't know. He was in Italy and he did all sorts of really incredible things there. They've been shopping. They've gone all over the country. It's, yeah. He takes vacations differently, too, than I do.

Like, yes. You know, one interesting thing I noticed. from Glenn's vacation pictures is he's never taking them. There's always somebody else, some other. Is he being stalked? I'm concerned. There's always someone there taking pictures of him walking through a shop. You'd almost think he's got people, do people with him.

You'd almost think that, right? But I'm sure he's just getting another tourist and saying, Hey, would you mind photographing us? Hey, I'm going to, me and my wife are going to walk through this store. Will you take pictures of us from behind? Sure. That happens all the time. All the time.

All the time. It does seem like a nice trip, though, I will say. It seems like he said... It does seem nice. It seems like he's done... You know, Glenn's done well with us. Especially considering the middling level of talent he has. It's incredible that he's been able to achieve all the things that he has.

Yeah, it is. Radio Hall of Fame member. Do you know that? What? He's in the Radio Hall of Fame. Holy cow. He'll tell you about it if you ask him. Really?

Or if you don't. What if I don't want to hear it? You'll still tell me about it. Yeah, it'll still tell me. He tells people, I'm sure, a bunch of Italian tourists heard the story. Yeah, they all know. Yeah, they all know. All right.

I've gone through an entire week without having to bust on Glenn, so I have to. Yeah, you've got to get it out somehow. I got to get it out. It was hard. No one wanted to hear it on vacation. No one wanted to hear all my insults. There's almost no market for it at all outside of this show. What would I do without this show?

My only marketable skill is making fun of them. Glenn. And it's only really marketable right here. Right here, like in this room. Yes. Everywhere else, it makes it difficult. No one cares at all. No.

I guess I could always go to the mainstream media. Insulting Glenn does pay off in the mainstream media. I can get a gig there. That's for sure. Perfect. All right. Triple-8-27-B-E-C-K to get in touch with us today, if you'd like to do that. Much more coming up.

Is Glenn back? I'm going to be back, Pat. like I, you know, you get into that vacation mode a little bit, you lose the, you know, in the, you're not following every little bit of news. You come back in, it jump right back into it. It's fun. And it's almost like you never left. It's almost like you never left. Yeah, it's great. There's a lot to talk about, I will say. Yeah, there is. Never, never a shortage. No. You know, there might be things that become scarce. It's not going to be news. There's plenty of that to talk about today. In fact, maybe we'll get into this at some point today.

the Trump doing something really positive on student loans, we're just making people pay them. That is really positive. It's crazy. Yeah. I think it's unfair, though, Pat. I listened to all this news coverage on this, over the past 24 hours that people who took out these loans may not have to pay them back.

This could be rough for them. Oh, no. Could it? Yeah. Could it? Yeah. But they agreed. They agreed to take out.

Of course they did. And pay it back. Yes. And many of them have the money to pay them back. I've just decided not. to pay it. But they'd rather spend it somewhere else. Yeah, they'd rather go. Yeah. With Pat and Stu today, Glenn's back on Wednesday. Triple 8-727 B-E-C-K. Ah, boy, some news on student loans. We'll share that with you. Also, Jen Saki talking about

how dangerous it is to say that people were covering up for Joe Biden and his mental decline. It's dangerous to talk that way. So I guess stop talking that way, even though it actually happened. And it's quite obvious and pretty much everybody's admitting it now. We'll get into that and lots more in one minute. Right now, Jewish families in Israel are facing fear and violence and displacement on a scale that we haven't seen in years. And in the middle of that chaos, there's one organization stepping up every single day,

the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. They're not just sitting in offices, drawing up plans. They're on the ground, delivering food, bringing blankets, getting medicine to the elderly, helping children sleep and safety. You know, basics. It's not easy there, though, as you know. It takes resources and it takes a lot of prayer as well. And it takes people who are kind enough to care and stand with them when it counts.

It's not about politics. It's about real people, people who need our help and they need it right now. When you give to the fellowship, you're not just sending aid, you're sending hope, and you're reminding the people of Israel that they're not alone. Even the smallest gift can make a real difference. A warm meal, a safe place to sleep, a moment of peace in the middle of unimaginable fear. That's what your support provides. Show your support for Israel by making a life-saving gift today.

Call to make your gift at 888488-488-I-FCJ. It's 888-488-4-325. Or go online at supportifcj.org. Supportifcj. Oh, you know who's mean, Donald J. Trump. Yeah. He's mean. I've been hearing about that.

Yeah. You know, even on vacation, Pat, that one broke through. Well, it has to. He's mean. He's actually making people pay back the student loan that they agreed to pay back. And what did they do to get this punishment? Right? All they did was sign some paperwork.

Take out a loan and signed paperwork that said they would. Yeah, they got the money. They went to school, they graduated. Yeah. They built up this debt and now they're expected to pay it back. Not all of it. No. Of course, not the agreed upon terms, of course, obviously.

Not actually. Why should you pay back your entire debt? I mean, who even believes you should do that? No, that's, there's... What kind of creton would you have to be? Is it cretan or cretan? I'm going to go with cretan, but I like cretan, too. But cretan, uh, I don't know, for some reason, sounds even worse.

It sounds worse. It sounds more judgmental. It does. And it is because these are crittins that would make you pay back your entire agreed upon loan. Yeah. Well, and not everybody. We should be clear. Not everybody.

No. Okay. Like for example, you know, if you don't have a job. Yeah. You know, let's say you have no income. Okay. You don't have to pay it back right now. Oh.

No, no, no. Well, that's good. In fact, you, and they are going to limit how much of your salary you would have to pay back. to I believe 15%. So, you know, if your payment would go above that 15%, you just don't pay that extra part at this time. Okay. And by the way, we should also note, there's a minor distinction here. You have had five straight years of not having to pay.

Right. So that's, you know, I don't know what you could do with that time. There's that. There's some ideas I might have. If someone were to say, hey, you're just going to suspend the payments for five years, perhaps you could utilize that time to build up a little bit of that money you would have given to the loan. Right. To put it aside to pay the loan back later.

That's one approach. But as we know. But that's crazy. That's nuts. You can't expect people to do that. They had to spend it on something they'd rather do along the way, you know, those last five years. Exactly. Yeah.

What if they wanted to go to a movie and go out to dinner or maybe go to the south of France with that money? Yeah. You can't expect them not to. That's true. Right? Right. Yeah. You know.

And I'm concerned, Pat, because of all this COVID-19 going around. Have you heard about this? It's a virus. It was a virus. It was started when a bat mated with a pangolin in a soup. I hate when that happens. In a Wuhan fair. So it's bat pangolin soup?

Yeah, bat pangolin soup. Delicious. There was a mating ritual that occurred when they made the broth. All right. It's not something you want to think about. I'll tell you that. I don't. I really don't want to.

But somebody had a big old bowl of it. And now they're spreading it all over the world. Now there's a virus. It's all over the place. And luckily, because of that, we took action. Yeah. And we said, hey, you don't have to pay your loans back until all virus goes away, I think, was the plan. There's just wait.

When there is no more sickness on earth, then you have to pay it back. But right now there's still sickness. And this Donald Trump guy, who, by the way, is the person who implemented the initial policy is saying maybe maybe that policy is we should stop that policy now that COVID-19 isn't really a factor in our lives anymore. So mean. That's the best summary of it, Pat. Thank you.

This guy is mean for making you pay your bills. How dare he? How dare he? Now, did I get my education? Yes. Are you taking the benefits of that education and utilizing it in the workforce? Sure. Yes, of course.

Of course. But, but. pay it back. Right. Because that's a hardship on me now. Right. That gives me less spending money. I should also say if you can prove financial hardship, you don't have to pay it back.

Oh, okay. Well, that should be easy. Well, I mean, it should be at least part of the process, I would say. Wow. Because what's happened now, Pat, is you have this pause for, yes, and I'm being serious. It's for COVID-19. Yeah. And it's been five years now.

Five years that you didn't have to pay your loans back. And, of course, obviously, we all know, that Joe Biden tried to unconstitutionally codify this and basically say no one has to pay their loans back. And he ignored the Supreme Court order that multiple times. Multiple times. And try to put it in multiple different ways. And some of them have been overturned. Some of them have not yet been overturned.

But a lot of these people who believe that their loans have been forgiven may have that reversed in the future. Oh, no. Yeah. I know. Well, it would suck. It would suck if someone came to your house and said, hey, by the way, you're more. You no longer have a mortgage. so you stop paying the mortgage and you move on with your life.

You're like, wow, now I have this money. And then they come back and say, actually, your mortgage is back on. That does kind of suck for those people. It does. It does. You know, it's a ridiculous way. Perhaps you shouldn't have been told your mortgage was off. You think?

In the first place. When it was totally unconstitutional? Right. Okay. Yeah. That's an interesting approach. Yeah. But yeah, now we're talking about, and you think about, I heard this stat this morning,

which I couldn't believe. Because obviously, like, suck out all of my sarcasm here for a moment. my belief that when you enter an agreement. If we take out all the sarcasm, we don't have anything left. We were just silent for the past eight minutes. Oops. So if you like sarcasm, this is the show for you. Yes.

But let's suck out the sarcasm for a minute and suck out my, and I believe your is well, Pat, belief that when you enter into agreement, you should fulfill that agreement. Okay. So if you say I'm going to take a loan out and get the benefits of that loan, perhaps you should pay it back. I just believe that's like a moral right. Okay. I just think that's the truth and that's the way our society should operate.

But suck that out for a moment and think about like the real world situation, right? You had a situation where the economy shut down. It was not necessarily a person's fault that they couldn't go to work. You know, like people, the government came to them and said, hey, screw you guys. You can't go into the office anymore. and millions of people lost their jobs. True. Right?

So not to their... So it made sense at first. It made sense for a while. Right. Okay. Yeah, I can go with that. You turn that back on. You probably do have some people who were unable to just restart their careers.

This is one of the reasons why we opposed those policies by the way back then. Yeah. But like people who, you know, wanted to maybe can't jump back in to life at the same level. Maybe they have a lot of leftover. in other areas where they, you know, they still are paying. Maybe they had a job at a certain level of a company. The company had to close or they got fired. They can't get that same job.

Like, I think there is a... Some of it makes sense. Some of it makes sense. And even five years out, there are probably cases where some relief would be understandable. Right? Yeah. Yeah. That being said, what percentage of people have...

started repaying their loans. Now, think about it. There have been really good economic times mixed in. Some industries have had really, really good time. Obviously, some of the people who had loans in 2020 have succeeded, have moved on, have great jobs, are making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Yes. What percentage of people have started to repay their loans that had them when the pause began? Ah. And.

Any idea? I would think... I would think it would be 80. Would you think 80? Let's just think of like real world scenarios. Now, 80's low because obviously 20% of people. But because of the way you've set this up, I'm thinking pretty low. Pretty low.

Which is where my 20% comes in. I believe the number is one third. Okay, so it's about 30%? About 30 to 33%. So... Now, you're telling me, I want to make sure I understand it, 67% of the people who got a pause initially cannot make those loan payments. And the answer to that, of course, is no.

A lot of them can make them. In fact, we know it because of the economic data. These people make plenty of money and can make these payments back and can make the payments. Why aren't they making the payments? They don't want to. When given the option, first of all, why would you pay them? right? Like if people say, hey, actually, you don't have to pay them, most people are just not going to pay them. And they've come to expect it now. And they've come to expect it. Because of Joe Biden. That's true. And they've been told that these are going to be relief. So they're probably sitting back thinking themselves, what if these payments get, you know, forgiven later on? And that's the thing that I think is the central problem here. Right. Is that in reality, with all my criticism built in here, it's actually kind of dumb to have made payments. Because at any point that money. Under these circumstances.

might be wasted. You're right. You're going to give it to the system and then two weeks later they're going to tell you you you don't have to make any payments. I mean, if I were in that situation, I'd be like, well, wait a minute, until they tell me I have to make them, why would I make them? Yes. Especially when you've got one guy who's up on the stage until he became so dementia riddled

they just dropped him telling you that they're going to be forgiven and you're never going to have to pay them. What happened to those people who paid their last payment in February 2020? All those people got screwed. Yeah, they did. Right? They got screwed. They paid back all of their education.

Yeah. What about everybody who has faithfully paid back these loans because they were supposed to? And now they see everybody else being told, yeah, you don't have to, you don't have to worry about it. Well, are you going to pay me back my student loan? No, those people just get screwed. Yep. And, you know, what is Trump doing here with this approach? He's saying, hey, you know what?

not the truck driver's responsibility to pay for your college education, which, by the way, we should point out, is just a giant subsidy. This loan program in and of itself is a giant subsidy to what wind up being upper middle class people who get college degrees. Yeah. It's people who don't have college degrees paying for the education of people who will wind up being their bosses potentially later on,

which makes absolutely knows. sense. Oh, man. It is an absolutely ridiculous system. So do we know what the exact percentage of people who will be asked to pay it back is? It's not 100%. I mean, it's not. Certainly not 100.

Basically, if you can go to the government and say I have financial hardship. You have some sort of hardship. I can't do this. You have to, but now. It won't be forgiven forever, though, right? I don't know. It would just be given a grace period. Yeah.

And at least in theory. Yeah. But again, where, where, and Trump is probably the only guy who would do this. But what politicians have the balls to step in and say, okay, well, no, you have to pay it now. Like usually what happens is they say, well, okay, we'll give you more time. That's usually what happens. What we're going to do is just print more money or borrow it from China. Because the mainstream media will paint you as mean.

As they have. You're mean. And they have and they will. So. But if there's anybody who can stand up to that, it's Donald J. Trump. AAA 727. Beck, more coming up in one minute. Prime is at an all-time high.

might get worse before it gets any better. You might already own a firearm, but we should always start with less lethal to avoid the financial and mental repercussions of pulling the trigger. This is where Berna comes into the picture. That's B-Y-R-N-A. Burna's less-lethal launchers are equipped with tear gas and kinetic ammunition and designed to incapacitate an attacker for up to 40 minutes. Burna, very excited to introduce their all-new, sleek, compact launcher. It's slim, it hits like a sledgehammer. It's the same size as a smartphone allowing you to conceal carry everywhere, comfortably with confidence. It fires at 400 feet per second with 41 joules per square inch of stopping power. To stop aggressors in their tracks without

having to deal with all the complexities of a homicide. Burnah, legal in all 50 states, requires no background checks and can be shipped directly to your door. Burna, proud to be made in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Try before you buy. Visit burna.com. To find a burner dealer partner near you, it's at Burna.com. It's Pat and Stufer. Glenn, he'll be back on Wednesday. AAA 727 B-E-C-K. This student loan thing is insane. You were talking off the air there about what the payment is.

So the way they have it set up is the maximum amount you would have to pay of your income is 15%. No matter how much you make. No matter how much you make. So obviously if you make a million dollars a year, you'll make whatever payment you were scheduled to make. initially. It's never going to go higher than what you were initially supposed to pay. But if you have a job that pays you $100 a month, and that's it, and you're only working a few hours, the most you can pay is $15.15. That's it. So basically, 15% is the maximum of your salary. So if you don't have a job, again, everybody in the media is like, oh, well, what about these people that don't have jobs? Can't make these payments.

If you don't have a job, you literally can't make a payment because it's 15% of your income. So if you have no income, you can't make a payment at all. They will not require you to make a payment. Now, obviously, there are people that have all their bills and other expenses. This is an expensive society, and we had to go through Biden inflation, right? This is a society that is strained when it comes to economics. If you just have to pay 15%, an additional 15%, essentially tax, as you might see it, on your income, it's going to be a lot harder to make ends meet for a lot of people.

So it's not that there's no impact here. But again, it's part of your, I don't know, when you enter into an arrangement. Well, this is where the whole, the term predatory loans came in years ago. They started doing this predatory loan thing. Like bank managers were going out into the street and putting a gun to people's heads. I think that happened. And saying, you must take out a $100,000 loan for college. Okay.

Where do I sign? These are the least predatory loans of all time. They're all at lower rates that you get in the free market. They all have to come from the government now, right? A lot of them do. Yeah, most of them. Most all of them are from the government. And so who's the predator here?

I guess is the government tracking people down and forcing them to take out student loans? I don't think so. You know, as we've talked about so many times, the unfairness of this, there were so many people in the past who worked their way through college. or worked leading up to college. Or decided they couldn't afford the loan and decided not to go to college and did get those benefits of that education, which again, the education at this point is somewhat questionable when it comes to benefits. But the accreditation certainly is there. If you get that degree, it certainly can help you in the workforce. Whether it helps you in regular life or whether you actually got educated at the university seems to be unrelated to the fact of whether you have the piece of paper or not.

but I mean I think of how many people did that I mean that was one of the reasons I decided not to go that route and I was like you know it's so expensive I don't want to be $100,000 in debt I'd rather I'd rather go into the industry that I want to be in which I knew was this so you go you have that approach and this if you graduated from elementary school you're pretty much overeducated to begin with oh my God in this particular industry knowing words hurts you in this industry certainly not how to pronounce them as Glenn has proven. Right. If you know how to pronounce words or names, you can't get anywhere. No. No. So that's a, the free pass to get into the Radio Hall of Fame starts with mispronouncing everybody's name that you're currently talking to.

It does. In the middle of the interview. So that's convenient for a lot of us. It is. It's great for us. It's great for us. But it is a real thing. Like you, you make that decision.

I remember, because I used to listen to Rush Limbaugh. And I would listen to him, this is, you know, and I was like, cool, a really cool. kid listening to Rush Limbaugh in high school. And I remember him talking about, you know, what a bad deal college wound up being for so many people. Because you take, you go, at that point it was probably more like $30,000 or $40,000 of debt. But you take in all this debt that is, like, if I went on a credit card, it would be a, everyone would know it was a terrible idea. You wait, you put how much on your credit card? You put all this money on your life credit card and have to pay it back.

you're starting in a hole. You're starting your entire life in a gigantic hole. So you better have, like I had a friend. I remember he went to like an engineering or some great engineering college. And it's like, okay, kind of makes like you can probably make a pretty smart bet that engineering degree is going to pay off into a life that you wouldn't be able to get into. Get a really high salary. And you can pay that back. And probably 10 years after you start your working life, you're probably ahead of the game.

And that's great. It does happen for people in certain industries. But so, you know, when you talk about predatory lending, I agree with you. You make your own decisions. You sign your own paperwork. But if there's any predator in that situation, it is the universities. These colleges that, first of all, benefit from this society-wide idea that everybody has to go no matter what you're trying to do with your life.

And then they bring them in there and they give them a bunch of liberal nonsense that gets them nowhere. It gives them a giant zilch when it comes to actual benefits. So they spend $100,000, get nothing out of it, then they're at a regular job they could have had without the education trying to pay back $100,000 debt. Or if you've gone to an Ivy League school, it's even worse as far as the indoctrination and the money invested. Because now it's 200,000 or more.

This is Glenn Beck. Well, Easter may be behind us on the calendar, but the season of resurrection, season of hope, is still very much alive. And nowhere is that hope more visible than inside a preborn clinic where mothers on the edge of abortion are shown the truth, the beating heart of their baby. That's the moment everything changes. That's when fear gives way to courage. And despair turns into new possibilities. And life begins again. Preborn doesn't offer judgment. They offer ultrasounds. They offer support. They offer the kind of love that reflects the very heart of the Easter message that every life matters no matter how small. For just $28, you can sponsor

an ultrasound that helps a mother choose life for her baby. And for many of these women, the single act of this really is the first time anyone's ever believed in them. New life and new hope is what Easter season is all about. And it's the very thing that preborn lives out every day. So please donate your best gift today. Dial pound 250 and say the keyword baby. It's pound 250. The keyword is baby. Or you can visit them online. line preborn.com slash Beck. Preborn.com slash Beck. It's a great organization doing incredibly important work.

If you don't know them, the organization is preborn. Preborn. Preborn. Prebore.com. It's sponsored by Preborn. Glenn Beck, Stu Bregere. Steve Dase and me, Pat Gray, listen to all your favorite conservative voices at blazedtv.com. promo code Glenn. Pat and Stu for Glenn, who's back on Wednesday.

You know what we've been discovering ever since the election was that everybody in everybody you would have expected to know about the decline of Joe Biden during his presidency knew about the decline of Joe Biden during his presidency. Even though they denied it, they lied about it the whole time, they covered it up. They kept telling us how brilliant he was and how active he was and how he's the best communicator in the White House. And he's so sharp. Nobody can even 20-year-old interns can't keep up with this man. And then everybody afterwards admitted the lie, including Ron Clayne, his chief of staff, who said that he couldn't even comprehend what was being said at that debate. Wow. Where were you then? Is that a problem? Do you want your president to be able to comprehend a lot of stuff?

I'm a little picky that way, probably. I'm probably more picky than the average person. I'd say yes. I do want my president to understand. virtually everything said at a debate. Wow. Really? Yeah. That's a crazy standard. It's a high bar. I know.

I realize it really is a high bar. You probably want people to pay their student loans back to. I do. Yeah. I do. I do. Okay. Now I understand you.

You're just one of those right wing. Now you know, I'm a kooky right wing white supremacists. Mean. And mean. Mm-hmm. Which may be the worst of all. I'm just mean. Well, Jen Sucky talked about Biden's

mental decline. And here's what she had to say about that. I left in May of 2022, just for the facts here. And I have seen Biden once since then when I took my daughter to the holiday party this last December after he had lost. And so I hadn't seen him in person during that period of time. I never saw that person, not a single time. And I was in the Oval Office every day. That was on that debate stage. I'm not a doctor. Aging happens quite quickly. We're things that people saw during that period of time that were similar to that or would have been in a category of that? I don't know, possibly, right? And all these books are going to tell us. Do you think that they were, were they actively covering it up? Were they sort of in denial? Or was it or was that just a bad debate? Like, what is your read on that?

Well, this is what I mean about cover-up is a very loaded term, I think. Well, you knew that it was really bad and you're pretending otherwise, versus you're diluting yourself, which I think is what people do a lot. Well, I understand, but I still think it's like cover-up is often like a crime. right we're talking yes yes they say it's worse than the crime people use that term as they relate to watergate or the covering up of not sharing public information about a war and i'm not accusing anybody of a crime i understand but other people have used that term and i think it's a bit of a dangerous term it's not a dangerous term it's an accurate term yes it's the truth people covered up for him and

they're admitting that now they're saying yeah he it was bad we knew in the in the circle he was bad he just wasn't the same. He declined. Well, okay, now it's bordering on treason because you, you were saying the whole time that he was fine, that everything was great, that he's sharp as attack. I mean, that borders, to me, that borders on treason. When you're talking about the chief executive of this country,

it's unbelievable. Yeah, and I think, you know, Saki herself has a, has some plausible deniability here in that when people acknowledge, everybody acknowledges all these problems happened with Biden, she was gone for multiple years. Now, I, of course, believe these happened long before that while she was there. I don't believe the evidence of it.

Yeah, I don't even think it's a close call. We all saw before he was even elected that he had lost a step or 12 in that process. So I don't buy her answer here. However, she probably has some plausible deniability as opposed to people who were actually there with him every day during that period, right? like the wrong claims of the world. Yeah. I do think that I'm totally fine with at least discussion of what crime was committed there.

If I'll say this, if there was no crime committed, we need to change the law. Yeah. It's not the truth. Because we can't, this cannot be an ongoing thing. No. You know, we saw it back in with the Woodrow Wilson days where he wasn't even president. His wife was basically running the country. He was literally in a coma.

At a coma for part of the period. Yeah. The same thing basically happened here. It was a waking coma. It was a waking coma. But a coma, but basically Dr. Jill Biden was president for a time. Yeah. It seems at the very least we needed a full investigation to know what the hell happened there.

I want to know everybody who took steps to, using this term very accurately, cover up what was going on. But by the way, they've now admitted they were doing. Yes. Over and over. Over and over have admitted that they were doing things to make sure we didn't know what was going on. They would take steps to hide to the American people, what lapses he was having. I mean, that's despicable. And again, it borders on treason.

It should be illegal. Yeah, absolutely. It should. The American people had a right to know that their commander-in-chief was compromised mentally like that. And we saw it the whole time. And it wasn't just since 2022, as she was alluding to. Because we saw it all during the campaign in 2020. 2019 and 2020, he was not the same guy he was back in 2008 when he ran.

He just wasn't. He was half gone at least the entire time. Am I wrong, too, Pat, to think that this should be a bigger issue? No. I care a lot more about what happened during that Biden at the end of that Biden presidency or throughout the Biden in presidency when it comes to covering this stuff up. Then I do what happens to some potential gang member who was taken to L. South Dakota prison. Now, again, we should get everything right. Everything in the country should go the perfect way, obviously. But it's not going to happen, first of all. But secondly, like when it comes to focus, like I let me

let me say another one here Pat care a lot more about what actually happened behind the scenes during that Biden period than I do about the JFK situation in 2025 you know a lot of things that we've spent a lot of time on

like there should be full out investigations going on as to whether we as a nation just suffered through a period where a president was unable to do his job and was and people with names that we know actively took steps to hide it from us. That's way more important than about half the stuff we're talking about right now.

Very egregious. Yeah. It's egregious. And now, you know, you brought up the Maryland man. The father? The Maryland father? The saint. Yes.

Yes. The Maryland man. It's interesting because they're, you know, he, they did all of the, without adjudication, without a due process. And the administration is making some cases now that he did, there was a lot of due process because he had multiple court appearances. He was, he had a deportation order. He was deemed a gang member by the courts, not once but twice. I mean, so there were things. The only thing that was really violated there maybe was the fact that he wasn't supposed to be deported right then back to El Salvador.

Back to that place. That actual place. He should have been deported. But in theory, because of a court ruling that you can agree with or not agree with, he shouldn't have gone back to El Salvador, but he should have gone somewhere else. Yes. And deporting people who are here illegally is not a violation of the Constitution. And that's what they're trying to make out of it now.

Are you sure, Pat? I'm very, very positive. It seems like it would be a violation of the Constitution to deport people who are aren't supposed to be here. I can't understand the arguments for the media anymore. I know. How could the Constitution possibly, if Constitution is essentially a framework for the nation to run, another framework for the nation to run are its laws.

Yes. The laws quite clearly would indicate when you say someone to see her illegally that removing them would be a rational. Sometimes you just have just come to like rational thought should enter the conversation. They've entered the chat. Rational thought has entered the chat. Hey, when you come here illegally, you should leave.

It's quite a concept. I mean, that's out there. That's out there ways. Over the weekend, I saw a headline yesterday, actually, about President Trump says he doesn't know if he has to follow the Constitution. I'm like, what?

Did he say that? that? He actually, he actually said it in regard to whether or not we need to do due process on all the illegals that we deport from here on out. Like you're going to go to court for a court action for a million or two million people or however many they've decided they're going to depart. You can't possibly do that, which the left knows. And so they're trying to stop all deportation. No, too, you don't like due process is a loaded term. Like they're trying to say basically, every single person you deport has to come in for a full trial.

That's not what the law guarantees at all. No. People are turned back all the time and removed from the country without any due process. But when he's saying without any due process, it's misleading.

The new process is built into the law, which is you could just be removed. Right. And it's not in every circumstance. I don't believe it's in the circumstance of the guy that was sent to, what's the same, Kilmar.

Yeah. Obrigo Gargars. Garcia, there was a due process he went through and was not supposed to be sent to that country, which is something that, by the way, the Trump administration has acknowledged multiple times. The issue here is, like, it wouldn't be that you'd be having millions of people going to individual trials over this because that's not how the system operates. Like, the law, due process is the law. It's another word essentially saying, like, you need to follow the law. And the law should be followed. but the law does not require millions of individual trials for every single person who crosses the border.

It's silly. You couldn't possibly do that because the number they acknowledge is 11 million. Are you going to have 11 million trials for these? And really more like 20 or 30 million and not all are going to be deported. But there's going to be a big number of them according to the administration. And there's just there's no way you can do that. But when they're here illegally, they're going to face deportation. And I will note that easy. By the way, Pat. And I know you will. agree with this. If they did do 20 million trials

and they found 8 million people should be deported by those trials, what the media would do was say the trials were unfair and they would say the law was horrible and they would say you were destroying the lives of the people who went through those trials, which by the way is essentially

what they're doing with Garcia, which is oh well he was deported to the wrong country. If he were to come back and then they were to send him to name the third country, whatever one you want, Colombia,

what they would say it was unfair that he was sent to Columbia and it was horrible and was unconstitutional. It's so ridiculously predictable. You understand why

I think a lot of the reaction from the Trump administration, even though they've acknowledged this was not the right way to handle this, it's just like kind of shoulder shrug.

Yeah. It's like, well, what do you want us to do? We can't take your criticism seriously. You just say whatever's in front of you

that benefits you at the moment. Right? Like whatever, whatever argument it will work for them in that particular moment. They just blurt it out. Even if it makes no sense, even if they know it's nonsensical, they'll just say it

anyway. We'll share a great example of exactly that. Coming up. Hang in. They want you silent, obedient, and blind. Well, shoot, here we are with open eyes and a bit of rebellious nature. Hold the line, my friends.

Glenn Beck will be back in a minute. When you hear the term living better, what do you think about? More money, bigger house, maybe a yacht? Or do you think how you feel physically? How you wake up every day? How you sleep? What activities you can and can't do? When you feel good, life is good. It's easy for us to take our health for granted until we can't. I came to that reality when I started feeling pain every day at about 45 and I started to lose hope until I found relief factor. Relief factor is a daily supplement that fights pain naturally. Develop by doctors, it doesn't just mask the pain temporarily. It helps reduce or even eliminate pain.

In fact, the longer you take it, the more effective it is. Give their three-week quick start a try. It's 1995, less than a dollar a day, and it takes one phone call, 800 for relief. That's 800, the number four relief. Wherever you're hurting in three weeks or even days, relief factor can give you a chance to rediscover the true meaning of living better again. Relieffactor.com. Relieffactor.com

1-800 for relief. Great to have you with us. It is Pat and Stu for Glenn, who returns on Wednesday. We were talking about how, well, Democrats lie. That just is a universal truth. I don't make universal truth. I just live by it.

And that's one of the big truths in the universe is the Democrats lie. Constantly? Constantly. And that's part of it too. If their mouth is moving, as the expression goes, they're lying. Which is interesting because James Carville shared some thoughts on why Democrats don't lie. And he was actually serious about this.

The other thing I would say, and I will say this repeatedly, people say to me all the time, James, why don't we just do like the Republicans, just stand up and lie? Because people wouldn't stand for it. If I stood up and lied, you would be the first person to say, James Carville lost all credibility last night when he said X, Y, and Z. This is so not sure. Is that incredible? I can shade.

Everybody does that. Yeah. They just like look you right in the eye and lie. And then our people say, well, we ought to lie like them. No, we shouldn't because they would not do that. It would not go over well. That might be just the biggest lie he's ever told right there. It would go over incredibly well.

It would. And it does. It does. You have an entire industry doing it constantly. So it would go over very well. That is stunning. I really wish it was true, though. I do too.

I wish it was true. But nothing could be further from actual truth than that. Also, over the weekend, whoever was running the White House account on X seemed to be having some fun. First, there were four simple truths that they pointed out. Could go to the four simple truths. One, they have a picture of Kamala Harris. She is not president. Then just to the right in the next box is a photo of Abrago Garcia, not a Maryland man in the lower left-hand quarter.

That's a good point. I hadn't even thought of that. He's not even a Maryland man. No, he is not. He's not even supposed to be there. They have the NPR logo, not real news. And then a photo of the map of the Gulf of America. and it says underneath, not the Gulf of Mexico.

So, just some truisms for you there from the White House this weekend. We still have much more, barely even scratched the surface on everything that was going on just over the weekend. More of that coming up. Gladdy finally said that. That's a good thing. Thank you, President Trump, for not trolling people on that particular issue because it just, to me that discussion kind of plays into them saying he's never going to leave he he intends to be a dictator he wants to stay that forever okay now he just told you

so are we going to continue to have to deal with yeah he's trying to stay that forever I'll bet they'll still do it well because you know in three weeks he's going to be like well I am considering it like a lot of people want me to of course he's going to I don't know what I mean that just what he likes doing. He does like doing it. Yes. It is going to count.

You know, again, I think he will continue to play that game because he likes the game. He does. Here's another example of how much he likes. It's the Pope. It's Donald Trump as Pope. Yeah. He's just trolling people with that. And he does enjoy it quite clearly.

Let's do it today. Glenn returns Wednesday. Triple-8-727. B-E-C-K, the White House has released an outline of the 2026 budget. We'll get into some of what's in that budget. Coming up in one minute.

There's a quiet kind of stress that settles in when your bills start to control you. It's not always loud or dramatic, but it's constant. The credit card balance that never seems to drop, the mortgage rate that looked fine a few years ago, but now feels like a trap. The slow realization that the money you work so hard

for is being swallowed up before it even has a chance to build anything lasting. That's where American financing comes in. They take time to understand your full financial picture, your income, your debts, your goals, and then they help you find a custom path forward that can actually make a difference, whether that means consolidating high-interest loans, refinancing your home, or simply restructuring your budget with a little dream of sanity in your fiscal life. They're here to help you make smarter decisions without the pressure. So give him a call. American financing 800906 2440, 800906 2440, or go to Americanfinancing.net.

It's Americanfinancing.net 800906 2440. NMLS 1-82334. NMLS Consumer Access.org. APR for Rits in the 5 starts a 6.79% for well-qualified borrowers. Call 800906 2440 for details about credit costs and terms. So when was the last time the United States of America actually had a legitimate budget. We actually passed a budget. Wasn't it before Obama? Yes. I believe it was 2008, 2009. I think that was the last fiscal year. Is that incredible? 15, 16 years ago.

And so for them to even propose a budget, of course, that you're going to have weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth. And that's what we've got here. But this budget apparently reduces non-defense discretionary spending by $163 billion or 23% down from the 2025 inactive, inactive level. It guts a weaponized deep state while providing historic increases for defense and border security. It's the lowest non-defense spending level since 2017. The savings come from eliminating radical diversity, equity, and inclusion, and critical race theory programs.

to believe we were hampered with that stuff to begin with. Green new scam funding, as they call it. Large swaths of the federal government weaponized against the American people. Remove those. Moving programs that are better suited for states and localities to provide. Defense, actual defense spending will increase by 13%. And appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security will increase almost 65% to ensure that our military and other agents,

repelling the invasion of our border have the resources they need to complete their mission. So there's an awful lot going on because, again, we haven't had a budget in probably 16 years. They just keep doing the continuing resolution. They just keep raising the debt ceiling. And so we just keep spending ourselves into oblivion. And then print more money, which diminishes the value of. our money. So it's really, it's been irresponsible. It's been stupid. It's reckless. And in order to stop it, we're going to have to really take a stand here. And that's what he's trying to do with

this big, beautiful bill. But some of the other highlights of it, they're going to defund the harmful, woke, Marxist agenda. I like that. Every agency across the federal government. was engaged in funding and advancing DEI and other radical harmful ideologies, such as $315 million for grant programs to push intersectionality, racial equality, and LGBTQIA2-2-plus programming for preschoolers. Housing grants that funded activities like equity audits to reverse land use patterns that have roots in systemically, racist policies in Los Angeles County and addressing white supremacy in the STEM profession.

Okay. A lot of white supremacy in the STEM profession. I wasn't aware of that, but I'm glad we're going to ruin it out. Oh, yeah. Yeah. That's pretty obvious to everybody but me. You know, numbers are racist. You know that.

Oh, of course. Okay. Yeah, obviously. It promises to secure the border, realign foreign aid. Rebuild the military. Achieve American energy dominance. So I guess that would mean more drilling for one thing. Make America healthy again, the Maha program.

Support our veterans. It says preserve Social Security. Right. But you know they're trying to get after you're going to cut your social security. Probably the whole program. That's what we hear from the left all the time. Right. Streamline K through 12, education funding, promote parental choice. Make America skilled again.

There is support in this bill for spaceflight. Let's see. They're going to allocate $7 billion for lunar exploration and another billion in new investments for Mars-focused programs. I think we'll ever do that. Will we ever go to Mars? I'm starting to doubt that. Elon wants to go. I know he does.

That's his big thing. I know he does. It's been pushed back so many times, though. Yeah. It was supposed to happen in, I think, like, 2020, then 2024, then 2026. But by who? The federal government? Yeah, that's a good question, too.

Because I think, like, the possibility of us going to Mars basically lies on the shoulders of Elon Musk, not the, like, if we're going to depend on the government to do it, we're never going to do it. He wants to do it. He's willing to bet his own resource. sources on doing it. And so I do think eventually he will get it done, probably, but I mean, it's still going to be very difficult.

He also renamed that area in South Texas. Did you see that over the weekend? They had a vote on whether to change the name of the area is kind of unincorporated territory. But SpaceX has had that. They've built a ton of infrastructure there. They've got four launching pads and a bunch of employees. And they built a huge complex down. there. And so they wanted to change the name to the city of Starbase. And that passed over the

weekend. So you might expect it to because out of the 240 some homes and dwellings in the area, all but 10 belong to Elon Musk and his employees. So, wow. Not a surprise. It's one way to win an election. I like it. Yes. Yes. By the way, on this on this front, I love the way this is spun in the media because you take the Elon Musk and the budget and they're talking about cutting all the stuff and one of the complaints has been that they're cutting research NIH research. Now, the fundamental argument of the Trump presidency, right, when it comes to these issues, was, hey, like, we should be doing real research on things. We should not be doing research based on LGBTQ, DEI type stuff, right?

Like, these should be things that are, if they're going to do this research, it's got to be benefiting everybody. And it's not like, hey, what is, you know, let's do a research study on LGBTQ hamsters. And. Well, you don't care about LGBTQ hamsters. Just LGBT. The Q hamsters, I'm just not interested in. You don't like queer or questioning hamsters? I don't even know which one it is.

Is it queer or questioning? It's both. The cue is for both. Well, you got to add the second cue in there. So LGBTQQ. A2 Plus is the way I like to That gets you in with everybody. Honestly, you could just do plus.

If you're going to use plus, LGBT plus would work, right? Why not just plus? Yeah. Plus gets everybody. Of course, it might also get some of those weird straight people. And you don't want that. That's just gross. They're icky.

But so the fundamental argument of the Trump administration coming in is, hey, let's not base these on sexuality, race, gender, let's just do things that are good for everybody. Good for everybody. Right. How does that, when he implements that, how does that get spun by the New York Times? Trump administration slashes research into LGBTQ health. Nearly half of NIH grants canceled through early May, together worth more than $800 million,

address the health of sexual and gender minority groups. Now, again, this was his central argument is that you shouldn't be doing research on this basis. So it would make sense that the stuff that he's cutting is the stuff like the LGBTQ hamsters. Right? That's the stuff he's saying is a problem. But they're flipping that around and saying he's targeting these groups, which is, of course, not what he's doing. He's saying everyone should benefit from this research, not just. specific groups.

This is not the type of research you need to do. Let's do research that benefits everybody, not just specific groups like this. But when you, I mean, if you want to twist it, you can always come up with a negative headline. And that is seemingly the entire business of the media these days. Yes. Yes, it is. Some other

things that this budget will do is maintain support for tribal nations, which I've been arguing for forever now, forever. Not just the Lumbie tribe, but every tribe across the length and breadth

of this great land. That is the bumper sticker you have on your car. It is one of the many. You support Native Americans. Tribal nations. Tribal nations among the length and breadth of this land. That is what the... It's a long sticker, but it's worth it.

It goes the entire bumper. It does. It does. The budget does, however, weed out radical woke grants and programs and streamlines. other programs for tribal communities that were ineffective. It addresses drug abuse. It supports artificial intelligence and quantum research.

It amply funds research in AI and quantum information science at key agencies to ensure the United States remains on the cutting edge of these critical technologies, development and responsible use. And that's the thing. Do we keep that use responsible? that's it's kind of the fear as this thing kind of rockets to new heights and we start to see these breakthroughs almost weekly in AI. It's pretty amazing how far and how fast that has come. And how much farther and faster is it going to go from here on? I mean, that's something that needs to be monitored, I think, pretty carefully. There was some story over the weekend about humanoid robots

breaking out of their out of their restraints. Did you see that story? I saw that, yeah. Yeah. Is that real? I never know with the robots going crazy videos, whether they're real. But I guess all we have is their word for it.

But apparently this robot was attached to some restraints and it started flailing its arms all over the place and started moving toward the humans in the room until one of them somehow got control of the robot. but we're led to believe there that the robots are already starting to become sentient. Do we know if robots are, let's just say they rise up and they start coming off of their restraints and coming after people? Yeah. How will that affect LGBTQ people? More adversely, obviously. Yes.

They'll be disproportionately affected by that? Wow. Yes. That's negative. And we don't want that to happen. We need a new study. Let's start with hamsters. Okay.

And then we'll move on from there. And then, okay. All right. I like it. I like it. But hopefully this budget, I guess, as I've seen it so far, it looks fairly promising. And it looks like we might actually have something that has a structure as far as our financial future. Will it pass, though?

I don't know. That remains to be seen. 3.8-7-2-7-B-E-C-K. More coming up in one minute. Most of us go through the day without thinking twice about our identity until the moment that it's stolen. And when that happens, it's not just about someone opening a credit card in your name or draining your account. It's about the hours spent on hold, the frozen bank transactions, the fear that someone's out there pretending to be you. Sometimes it starts with a breached email or a leaked password. And before you even realize what's happening, the damage is already done.

That's why LifeLock exists. They monitor things that you can't, your information on the dark web, your credit profile, your online footprint. And if something suspicious shows up, they alert you fast. And if you do become a victim, they have a dedicated team ready to help you clean it up

and get your identity back. Because in a world where everything is connected, your peace of mind shouldn't be the thing that's left unprotected. Thankfully, it's easily to protect yourself with LifeLock. If you join now, you can save up to 40% off your first year with the promo code back. Give them a call, 1-800-Liflock, 1-800-Liflock or head to LifeLock.com and use the promo code back for 40% off.

It's 1-800-Liflock or LifeLock.com. 10 seconds, station ID. Pat and Stufer Glenn, who returns on Wednesday. Happy Cinco de Mile, by the way. Did you realize it is Cinco de Mayo today? I did not. Yeah, yeah. So it's pretty exciting.

Some cities, however, are canceling their cultural events due to fears of ice raids and deportation. Act. Again, again, it's that mean Donald Trump. He is mean. I will say like, you know, his border policy, I think, has been very, very positive.

Obviously, what's happened to the border. Really effective. Has been very, very effective. But we have not actually seen large scale deportations. We haven't.

You know, my one criticism on what's gone on with the Ebrego-Carsia situation is like, I don't know. It's not like, it's not central to the overall problem, right? It's one person.

So all this focus has been put on this one person who, again, I don't think should be here, obviously. But like, the Maryland man, you don't believe should be here? He should be in Maryland. Right. He's a Maryland father. He should be a Maryland. Yes. Now, he should be deported to some other country, apparently.

That's the rule. Whatever the situation is, I don't want him to be here. I don't think he does not seem like a good guy, at least according to his wife's, Well, I mean, did you, in her own voice, they've, I should find that because it's stunning. I mean, she was talking about the beatings he gave her, the bruises that she had. It's awful. She took photos of it. But did you see what she said about it, though?

When she, because she was asked. She's like, hey, wait a minute. You said she was this great guy, this great guy. Right. And now you're. And now we're finding out. He's not. But she clarified.

that. Okay. In 2021, she filed a protective order against her husband alleging domestic violence. Yes. In a statement last week, this is a couple weeks ago now, she said, quote, she did so in case things escalated. That's right. Yes.

Adding that they never did. So he's fine. Oh, yeah. He's fine. Completely fine now. I mean, do you believe that as even as an excuse that you'd even print that? What do you mean? No one files a restraining order for domestic violence in case there's domestic violence.

That is literally never occurred. Why imagine doing that to your husband? No. If there was no reason for it? No. He's like, ah, gosh, I'm just worried you might start beating me soon.

So I'm going to get a restraining order against you now, just in case you started up. So you're saying that's unreasonable? Unreasonable. Yeah. Unreasonable. So she's, but now we have evidence that this is not accurate.

You're saying? Yeah. You're saying in her own words. Yes, in her own words. She's talking about the times he slapped her most. multiple times, hit her, gave her bruises, threatened her life. I mean, it was not good and not a peaceful domestic situation. What's the reason then for this approach from her?

Like, because part of, I mean, I guess there's a, the best case scenario is they had real problems before she feels like they're through them now. Yeah. And she's now just going to lie. Yeah. And defend him. And I think that happens. That does happen.

Quite a bit. I think also there's an element of when these things become these big national stories. There's this idea that maybe this turns into something beneficial for the person. Maybe. You know what I mean? Like I'm trying to think of another. There was another. This happens with, you know, sometimes these racially charged murder cases where people will come in and say, oh, well, well, if I can step in here and now, like, you know, even though there's a case that you used to cite all the time of the, the father was not even involved in the kid's life anymore.

and had been like abandoned years and years and years ago. And he's now in the front of the media saying, my son, my son, my son. You know, that type of stuff does happen. People jump into that fray. I don't know if that's the situation here. I mean, I don't even know what to root for. The bottom line is it seems like the damage was done a long time ago.

There's no way, unless she was lying back then. I guess that's the best case scenario. But if you were planning to attend a single. Cinco de Mayo celebration parade. Yeah. Get together of any kind. You might want to call ahead and make sure it's still on. Because for the past 45 years, for instance, in Chicago's little village neighborhood,

they've celebrated Cinco de Mayo with a parade featuring Mexican bands, floats, and dancers, and a festival at a local park afterwards, and up to 300,000 people show up for this every year. They canceled it. It's off now because, you know, Because why? Because of mean Donald Trump. You know, ICE might show up and start deporting people. And it won't even matter if you just look like you might be Hispanic.

They'll just arrest you and deport you, of course. But event organizers said many Latinos, whether legal or illegal, fear being arrested if they gather publicly in large crowds. Yeah, well, thank you, Democrats. That's their doing. Advocates also report that some are afraid to attend church. go to work or even take their children to school. Let me just recommend if you're here illegally, you should always be afraid of all of those things.

Really? And maybe you return to a place where you're a legal resident. And then you won't have to worry about it anymore. That's out there ways, though. I know. That's available to them? That is available. You could self-deport and go back to your country of origin where you are, in fact, a citizen,

and nobody will deport you. Crazy? That's a great idea. I wish someone should tell them about that. Because that seems to be the rational way to handle it. But apparently not. AAA 727 BECK. More coming up. This is Glenn.

The basketball playoffs are here on prize picks. The best place to cash in on all the action. Whether it's points, rebounds, or assists, don't miss your chance to cash in as the league's best fight for playoff glory. The app is simple to use. Price picks just ask you to pick two or more players across any sport. Pick more or less on their stat projection, and you can win up to 2,000 times your money. With millions of members, PrizePix has made Daily Fantasy Sports accessible to all.

PricePix offers Venmo, MasterCard, and Apple Pay for more quick and easy deposits into your account. You can join PricePix America's number one daily fantasy sports app, available to play in more than 40 states now, including California and Texas. Get on board. Download the PricePix app today and use the code stew. you'll get $50 instantly when you play just $5. The code is stew on price picks to get $50 instantly when you play only five. Win or lose, you'll get that $50 just for playing and it's guaranteed.

Price Picks, run your game. Must be present in certain states. Visit Priced.com for restrictions and details. Glenn back. Miss his show? Listen anytime, anywhere, podcasts you're found. Stick around. More after the break.

Pat Gray, Stu from gear. For Glenn, who. May or may not, it appears. Be back on Wednesday. We're not sure right now. There's a bit of an issue. You can check in with this ongoing situation, apparently on Twitter, where Glenn is posting, or X, I guess,

about his flight difficulties. Oh, no. At the moment, he is apparently stranded. I don't know where to Heathrow, maybe? No. Trying to get home to do the show for you. He is complaining to American Airlines. who they bumped Glenn off the flight.

Oh, no. According to Glenn. Uh-huh. He says, they made it on time with 50 minutes to spare, but they will not let him on the flight. And then they let someone else who showed up two minutes before the flight on the flight, but kept him off of it. What? Really? That's what he's saying.

Now, Glenn has been complaining about American Airlines for years. Yes. Which is... With good reason in some cases. In some cases, good reason. However, I will say when you complain of... publicly about an airline. I don't know that that makes you more or less likely for this to happen to you.

I don't know. I don't know. I think I would think normally with a big audience like Glenn has that... You might want to make it a better experience for him. Right. In case you talks about you again, which he obviously is going to. Seems like they go the opposite direction with that one. Yeah.

So we think Glenn's going to be back on Wednesday. Or he'll be doing the show from a Heathrow bathroom. One of the two. Probably the more likely. Yes. As the Heathrow bathroom. At this point, honestly, that seems like the truth. You have an interesting story about a 90-year-old economist.

Oh, yeah, this is an update. We did the story last, or two weeks ago, I guess now. If you remember it, basically the story of Daniel Kahneman, who is a, I guess, psychologist slash economist. He did a lot of work in behavioral economics. And his story, he wrote a book called Thinking Fast and Slow, which is kind of a, you know, kind of a well-known book about how the brain works, right? Like that you have one part of your brain that thinks it makes, you know, instant decisions based on instinct and reaction and another part of your brain

that kind of like logically works through problems. And, you know, it's a really interesting book. The concept, you know, it's kind of a work how you can, you know, live your life better and understand how your brain is working in certain circumstances, but also how to design policy. you know a lot of times we you know like why do people smoke cigarettes right why do people eat foods that are unhealthy well this that instant reaction brain takes that instant reward right and and prioritizes it over the logical thinking over a long term that hey maybe this is an unhealthy behavior right makes sense yeah

yeah so it's interesting stuff so anyway he lived a very interesting life you know won Nobel Prize was featured in a Michael Lewis book about about his life with one of his co-workers so he lives this life, gets to 90 years old and decides to basically go through assisted suicide I think he flies to Switzerland if I remember correctly and basically gets himself killed we hear that he dies

that's a story at the time we don't know how a couple weeks later an op-ed in the New York Times runs written partially by someone you might remember from back in the day Pat Peter Singer. Yes. The ethicist, quote unquote, from Princeton, who basically advocated for abortion up to two years after birth. Yeah.

And then corrected himself to say, actually, there shouldn't be a time limit on it. Basically, once you hit consciousness, that's when you become a human. Okay. Was his argument. But you could. In theory, abort a 20-year-old. I mean, I think in theory, especially if you had like maybe a mental condition. Yeah.

That did not live up to Peter's standards for human existence. A great guy. Yes. I think a horrible, horrible belief system that he has. He knew Connemon, they apparently talked about this and he checked out. Now, the op-ed was basically, hey, what a thoughtful guy this guy is. and one of the pieces of information that was so interesting was he didn't have like terminal cancer. He didn't have some disease that was going to kill him in weeks.

He basically said, I'll read this one excerpt. In explanation, Professor Connman included a letter that his friends would receive a few days later. I have believed since I was a teenager that the miseries and indignities of the last years of life are super, perfulous and I'm acting on that belief. I am still active, enjoying many things in life, except the daily news, and will die a happy man. But my kidneys are on their last legs. The frequency of mental lapses is increasing and I'm 90 years old. It's time to go.

So no disease, nothing. He just decided he didn't want to be 91, essentially. Wow. So the update on the story is the New York Times wrote some letters. they ran some letters in their paper to the editor letters to the editor and of course you'd think there'd be some outrage

you would think there are a couple letters in here that are mildly uncomfortable I would say with the process of killing yourself for no good reason you know hey I don't know about this sounds like I'm a little uncomfortable

with it basically the time yes you think you're uncomfortable you can't find anyone who's like this is horrible or this culture of death is awful, none of that. Yeah. Most of them are like this, though. I admire and respect Daniel Kahneman's decision to end his life at 90,

and I hope I'm as able to be as clear-headed and resolute in another decade or two when my time comes. Wow. Wow. That's one from G. Steve Jordan in New York. You don't have to be a Nobel laureate to understand Daniel Kahneman's concept of a complete life. and his decision to go to Switzerland. That was all. Just a decision to go to Switzerland.

It was like he's taking a vacation there. I didn't go to Switzerland, but I could have. If I could get through Heathrow, maybe that's where Glenn's going to go next. I believe that our freedoms include the right to die with dignity. If an individual who's cogent and psychologically stable believes that he or she has lived their life well, that her life is complete and that their future will not,

be, will not bring enjoyment or joy. She should have the right to make the decision to terminate her life, period. I'm 77 years old and I've talked with my husband, but two adult children about my wishes. While I'm not ready to make the decision today, I want them to understand my choices when the time is right. So this is someone who's basically saying, yeah, I'm going to pull the trigger on this. And maybe literally. Wow.

On that one. Wow. Let's see. Over and over and over again. talking about how courageous it is. Having helped care for my father-in-law, my stepfather, both who had Alzheimer's, I have profound respect for Professor Kahneman's decision. I hope to meet death with bravery and humility when my time comes.

Now, again, I think there's real problems with the concept of doing this. If you do have a terminal disease, right? Major, major problems. However, the concept here of this just being a thing now where we roll into our age, 80s and 90s and just decide, eh, what I see in the future for myself doesn't seem all that wonderful, therefore let's just end it.

That's a terrifying reality. That's where we are, though, Pat, I think. It again tells you, it shows you what a death cult, the left and the Democrat Party. They're just, it is. It's a death cult. I mean, between abortion, which they show that they have absolutely no value

for human life. The CEO, of the insurance of the IHC CEO who got shot in the back and the guy who shot and killed him has become a folk hero.

You got the Carmelo Anthony thing right here in the Dallas Fort Worth area where he stabbed someone in the chest just because they touched him and they're making that okay. It just doesn't matter. A lot of people said it was inconceivable to me

but many people's comments were that that the 17-year-old who was stabbed in the heart got exactly what he had coming to him. Again, there's no evidence that he did anything. Right. He didn't do anything to this guy, except to ask him to leave and go to his own tent. Yeah. It is despicable, and it just shows that this is a mental disease, that if you're on the left, there's something wrong. Yeah. If you believe these things.

Speaking of a mental disease, may I give you the final letter to the editor on this particular story? You'll love this one, I think. To the editor, it probably doesn't need to be said that the biggest barrier to the acceptance of assisted suicide in our culture, to its wisdom and its compassion, is the widespread belief that only God gets to decide when it's time for someone to go. a god in scare quotes a god who would prevent the end of needless suffering and then damn one to eternal suffering for the act doesn't sound like a very compassionate god to me said david cohan from oak park illinois written like a true atheist right here's a here's what i don't understand on this one though pat we have no evidence that he was going through any suffering at all if what you're going to do because this is an obviously dumb atheist trope it's a stupid

argument that any it's been disproven and and argued so many different ways it's just nonsense so casting how stupid it is aside even if you believed it right what you would believe in this guy's case is that he gave him an incredible life of achievement that he is going to be remembered for his life's work. And he's done all these important, incredible things and lived all the way till 90 years old with no pain or discomfort and still enjoying his life. Right. So why on earth would it need to be ended? Right. It doesn't. Even if you are living in this bizarre upside down world where nothing makes sense and you're just continually enforcing your own stupidity upon the population around you, even in that circumstance, it wouldn't make any sense.

But that's where we are. That's where we are. And, you know, it's not just Switzerland either. I think in Oregon, we're getting closer to being able to do that as well, right? Even without some, because I know a lot of places now have it if you have a disease. Yeah. Like if you have some sort of disease or discomfort, you can do this. Many countries around here, Canada is a big proponent of this now.

And they are just moved into the circumstance where now. it's kind of be like, well, what if you're uncomfortable? What if you just don't feel like you want to live? Yeah. That's a really great thing to do. That's a good concept because you want to get that started because it's not going to be people. It's not going to be, it's going to be those people who are drains on our society. Yeah, they're not producing enough potatoes.

Yeah. Right. If you're not producing at least as much as you consume or a little bit more, we should have a little trial for you. Or you can come out and you can say, are you proving your worth to society? Are you doing? what you need to do for the good of the collective I hope so because if not

we're gonna off you we're gonna off you it's over how far are we away from that I mean these are all things that I thought we turned away from in the I don't know 30s and 40s right but no they're back making a nice comeback

triple 877 Beck what you're hearing are your thoughts via the mind and mouth of Glenn Beck more next as we celebrate the many pro-life victories going forth. Rejoice. Preborn's network of clinics have a unique opportunity to advance even further without political persecution. What does it look like? Well, Preborn is the greatest threat to the abortion industry. Last year alone, Preborn rescued over 67,000 babies,

and they're putting a serious dent into the abortion tragedy. But there are still thousands of babies who are slain every single day, and Preborn's goal is to rescue all of them. Please join us in saving all of these precious lives and their moms. The ultrasound is the game. changer. Once a mom hears the precious heartbeat, she is twice as likely to choose life. If you consider yourself pro-life, can you help? One ultrasound is $28.5 is $140.000. And $5,000 sponsors the entire network in the country for an entire day. How many lives can you alone save? Every child is a beautiful gift from God. Please join the cause. Donate securely. Dial pound 250. Say the keyword baby. Pound 250, keyword baby. Or visit preborn.com slash Beck. That's preborn.com slash Beck. Sponsored by Preborn.

Welcome to via rail Embarked and profite Embarked and relax Ciroat Bookiné Oh,

so see and profite Via Raille The voice Weak We're like Welcome back Triple 877

BECK is the phone number If Glenn can get out of Heathrow Airport He'll be back on Wednesday You can follow that Escapade on Twitter

He's been tweeting about it He's currently stuck in an airport somewhere on us There's never a dull moment. Never a dull moment with Glenn.

With Glenn. That's great. We were just talking about the 90 year old who, who flew to Switzerland, took his own life. He was a, so he was a therapist. He was a, he was a psychologist, I believe. But he was kind of best known for his work in economics. And there's a lot of people that support this,

being able to, you know, kill yourself if you, if you feel like it, if you want to, whether you're sick. or not in Switzerland, they'll go ahead and help you with that. And, you know, there's been people who have favored this kind of stuff over the years for decades. We've played this from George Bernard Shaw, who is the celebrated playwright. And you might remember he had this to say, I think it was like 1933 or so. Just put him there and say, sir or madam, now will you be kind enough to justify your existence? Justify your existence.

You can't justify your existence. If you're not pulling your weight in the social vote. If you're not producing as much as you consume, or perhaps a little more, then clearly, we cannot use the big organization of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive. That's amazing. That is amazing. Clearly, can't keep you alive. I can't use the big organization of our society to keep you alive.

for the purposes of keeping you alive. It's mind-boggling. Gosh, the next sentence of the vet is really good as well. Do you remember it off the top of your head? Life does not benefit us, and it can't be a very much use to you. So your life does not benefit us, and you can't be a very much use to yourself. Yeah. It's so good. So good.

And this is a guy who's still respected. Yeah. Like I remember when we first started playing that audio, which is a, you know, a core argument from the progressive, early progressives that Glenn, you know, talked about so much. And it was a foundation of essentially everything that came in progressivism after it through eugenics and all the rest. I remember going to a diner. I was out of diner and they had quotes from George Bernard Shaw on the menu. It was like, you know, the place the placemat.

The little placemat they put down there and they have quotes from famous people. I'm like, this is this. Now, they didn't use that quote. I suppose not, yeah. But they were quoting him like he's some brilliant guy years later. And he's still considered that. Yeah. And he's essentially outlining Hitler's, a large chunk of Hitler's philosophy. Exactly.

That was behind the Holocaust and so many of others his other atrocities. Amazing. Well, have a great day. We'll see you back here tomorrow. You're Glenn Beck. What do you give the mom who gave you everything?