The Glenn Beck Program - Is the New 'Havana Syndrome' Link to Russia a LIE? | Guests: Bill Essayli & Steve Friend | 4/2/24

Episode Date: April 2, 2024

Glenn and Stu discuss the Israeli strike that happened in Syria and how this will affect the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. Do we finally have an official answer for what caused the Havana syndrome attacks? Pat Gray joins Glenn and Stu to discuss press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre’s response to the backlash to Biden recognizing "Transgender Day of Visibility" on Easter Sunday. Former investment banker Carol Roth joins to discuss whether America is reaching the point of no return on our federal debt. Glenn and Stu discuss the inevitable failure of enabling people to depend on the government. California State Assemblyman Bill Essayli (R) joins to discuss how property rights in California are under attack under the Democratic leadership. FBI whistleblower Steve Friend joins to discuss an upcoming Tennessee bill requiring the FBI to receive approval from the “chief law enforcement officer” in each national security investigation.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

AI was supposed to take over the parts of the job you hate. Turns out it made your job even harder. Instead of doing the work, it gave you homework. ServiceNow's AI specialists get work done from start to finish. Cases get resolved. Loops get closed. With ServiceNow, you can do the parts of your job you're best at and delegate the rest. To put AI to work for people, visit servicenow.com.

My Patriot Supply is our sponsor, this half hour. After you hear the first half hour, you might want to call them. I don't know. That strike on. Yeah, it does feel that way. Yeah, a strike was a little interesting. Yesterday, we will talk about that coming up in just a second. But my Patriot supply is there for you if you want to prepare your family for whatever might come next.

What could come next? Nothing bad. There's no possibility of bad things. No, I can't think of anything. They've helped literally millions of Americans prepare for what. whatever might come their way, and many of them start with a three-month emergency food kit. 22 food and drink varieties, so you find something that you really like. The meals contain 2,000 calories every day, so they're going to get you through any emergency

situation. It's mypatriotsupply.com. You'll get each kit for $200 off. Mypatriotsupply.com. They'll ship fast and free. Mypatriotsupply.com. All right. We're getting ready for the first hour of the broadcast.

Stand by for you. Well, hello, America. Welcome to the Glenn Beck program. We've got a lot on our plate today. First, we're going to start with the Israeli strike in Syria. What does it mean? And then I want to take you back not just to this Sunday, this last Sunday, where CBS did a special on 60 Minutes on the Havana Syndrome. And it seems pretty clear that all kinds of things are happening with Russia.

and they're targeting our intelligence. Or are they? I want to take you also back further than last Sunday. The 60 Minutes Report, I want to take you to a joint intelligence statement from the United States after an investigation that ended last year. You tell me what's going on.

We begin there in 60 seconds. Grace wrote in about her experience with relief factors. She says, I've lived for decades in a lot of extreme, pain with my lower back and legs. I heard you talk about Relief Factor Glenn on your show and I tried the three-week quick start. Within a short time, even the people at work were noticing that my pain was gone. Personally, I was so grateful for a relief factor. I've gotten my life back, never ever thought that was possible. Thank you. Grace, thanks for writing in. It's 100% drug-free.

Over a million people have tried Relief Factor's Quick Start. It's a supplement. 70% of the people who have ordered it, have ordered it again and again. It helps reduce or eliminate the everyday aches and pains that you're experiencing, so try it. Relief Factor, 1995 Relief Factor. The three-week quick start, 1-800-4 relief. 1-800, the number four relief. When you feel the difference, you know it works.

Relieffactor.com. Hello. Glenn, how are you? Oh, my gosh. I am so good. Good, good. good things. Actually, some really, some really funny things. I mean, you know, we went, we thought to the point of insanity. And I think we're just starting to scratch the surface of

insanity, you know? That sounds wonderful. Yeah, we were at a, we were at a place of kind of piss you off insanity. And now it's gone so insane. It's kind of funny and entertaining. Okay. Okay. Good. Let's start with the Israeli strike in Syria. Killed seven, including three Iranian commanders these are the commanders of the al-cud's force uh now al-cuds is

you know I remember them from our conversations over the years but I don't remember all the I know I had to remind myself too the al-cud's force is the Jerusalem force okay so these are the the Iranian

very high highly trained Revolutionary Guard and the kind of special forces of the Revolutionary Guard are the Al-Quds. So their job is to

regain Jerusalem. Okay, so, but don't worry about it. They have no ill intent on Israel or the Jews. Oh, good. Then you have the Al-Aqsa Brigade, which is the one that Hamas is, and Al-Axa is the Al-Axamai.

on the temple mount in Jerusalem. So I think we know what they're targeting. Both of them. Okay. So this is the arm, direct arm of Iran is Al-Quds force. Hamas and the Al-Axa, they're more like, what? We don't, Iran, what? Oh, yeah, I'm sure we get everything from Iran, but we're,

We're definitely on our own. Al-Axa is that. The Kud's force is definitely Iran. By coincidence, they happen to do a lot of things that Iran seems to want. It is just a coincidence. Just a coincidence. Okay. So apparently they went in, and I don't know if you saw the, did you see the pictures of it?

I didn't see any pictures, no. Oh, my gosh. You have to see it. See if we can find some pictures of it in the control room. This is the most surgical thing I've ever seen. So it's a place in Damascus where all of the embassies are. Now, you don't necessarily think bombing an embassy among many embassies would be a good thing. Right?

You miss a little bit. It could cause some issues. Correct. So this is a building very tight next to other buildings. And they're all embassies. I've seen them now. Yeah. Okay.

Yes. Look at the precision of that. They've completely destroyed the one building they were targeting and the other ones are completely fine. Completely fine. Completely fine. That is, that's an expert military. That is a surgical strike if I've ever seen one. So, uh, that is the consulate for Iran.

And apparently the guys who were in charge of the, uh, of the Al-Quds brigade. were in the Iranian consulate. That just happened to be there. It was like, what? We weren't talking about business or anything. No, no, of course not. Again, they just happen to have some things they do that happen to agree coincidentally. And Israel is saying, I mean, they're saying off the record that they were responsible for this,

but also saying that this particular building they deny has diplomatic status. Yeah, because it wasn't the embassy. Right. It was on the complex, right? Yes. Okay. And so it was kind of like if you, I don't know, if you bomb the Blair House in Washington, which is right next to the White House, you'd be like, we didn't touch the White House. Right.

Well, no. It's pretty aggressive tactics, certainly. But for good reason, it seems. Right. So we don't know what Iran's response is going to be. we should wait and wait and see. Of course, they called for the death of the Jews and the destruction of Israel and America. But I don't think they mean the America part, you know.

By the way, two ministers in the new Palestinian cabinet have made statements supporting terrorism. So, you know, they got that going for them. they they demand that the Palestinian Authority be revitalized you know they're in the Gaza Strip which is great I hear this time of year so anyway so you've got that going for you now there's something else that is bothering me in fact let's can we play from yesterday's clips can we play the 60 Minutes former Pentagon investigator says U.S. officers attacked by Russians.

This is cut four. This is really important to listen to this. Are we being attacked? My personal opinion, yes. By whom? Russia. Greg Ed Green ran the investigation for the Defense Intelligence Agency.

He would not discuss classified information, but he described his team's work from 2021 to 2023. We were collecting a large body of data, ranging from signals intelligence, human intelligence, open source reporting, anything regarding the internet, travel records, financial records, you name it. Unfortunately, I can't get into specifics based on the classification, but I can tell you at a very early stage I started to focus on Moscow. Can you tell me about the patterns you began to see? One of the things I started to notice was the caliber of our officer that was being impacted. This wasn't happening to our worst or our middle range officers.

This was happening to our top five, 10% performing officers across the Defense Intelligence Agency. And consistently, there was a Russia nexus. There was some angle where they had worked against Russia, focused on Russia, and done extremely well. The impact has been that the intelligence officers and our diplomats working abroad are being removed from their post with traumatic brain injuries. They're being neutralized. They're being neutralized. And Russia was involved. Cut two, please, from today.

It was like this piercing feeling on the side of my head. It was like, I remember it was on the right side of my head, and I got, like, vertigo. Olivia Troy was Homeland Security Advisor to Vice President Mike Pence. In our 2022 report, she told us she was hit outside the White House. And then severe ear pain started. So I liken it to, if you put a Q-tip too far and you bounced off your eardrum. Well, imagine taking a sharp pencil and just kind of poke in that. And this man told us he was among the first publicly known cases in 20,

from our embassy in Cuba. That's how the incidents became known as Havana syndrome. He's medically retired from an agency we can't name, blind in one eye and struggling for balance. Okay. All right. It's really weird. It is weird, isn't it?

What do you go away with? On that particular report? What you just heard? What do you take away from that? Russia is apparently attacking our government officials with some sort of weapon, not really explained there, but we've heard about Havana syndrome before. And it seems to be really affecting people that are hit with whatever this is. Now let me take you back to 2023. It's a briefing from the State Department.

Got three, please. It has been the broad conclusion of the intelligence community since March 2020. That is unlikely a foreign adversary is responsible for these anomalous health incidents. It's something that the intelligence community has investigated extensively and continues to look at. We will look at new information as it comes in and make assessments inside the State Department and with a our intelligence community. You can't confirm whether INR agrees with that in this building? No, I said we do. They do share

that. You do? Okay. Okay. I remember that. That was a big story. Yeah, this is from the Washington Post a year ago. The mysterious ailment known as Havana syndrome did not result from the actions of a foreign adversary, according to an intelligence report, that shatters a long disputed theory that hundreds

of U.S. personnel were targeted and sickened by clandestine, enemy wielding energy waves as a weapon. The new intelligence assessment caps a years-long effort by the CIA and several other U.S. intelligence agency does explain why career diplomats, intelligence officers, and others serving in U.S. missions around the world experience what they described as strange and painful acoustic sensations. Many of the afflicted personnel say that they were victims of a deliberate attack, possibly in the hands of Russia, or another adversarial government, a claim that the report contradicts in nearly every respect,

according to two intelligence officials who are familiar with the assessment described to the Washington Post. Seven intelligence agencies participated in a review of approximately 1,000 cases of health incidences, the term the government uses to describe, a constellation of physical symptoms, including ringing in the ears, followed by pressure in the head and nausea. Five of those agents determined it was very unlikely that a foreign adversary was responsible for the symptoms, either as a result of purposeful actions such as directed energy weapons, or a byproduct of some other activity, including electronic surveillance that made people sick.

They spoke on the condition of anonymity. One agency, which the officials did not name, determined that it was unlikely that a foreign actor was at fault, a slightly less emphatic finding that did not appreciably change the consensus. One agency abstained in its conclusion regarding a foreign actor, but when asked, no agency dissented from the conclusion that a foreign actor did not cause the symptoms, one of the intelligence officials said. Now, that came out a year ago. So one would have to ask the government,

were you lying then or are you lying now? Is it that these are just people within these investigations who are disagreeing with the final conclusion of the government report? Because I remember that report. It was a big story at the time. I mean, it was a big thing. Like everyone, for years and years and years, we were told about the Savannah syndrome, very suspicious and strange. But no one really knew. And then they came out with this report.

And it was, okay, this is. our conclusion. We came up with it. It wasn't anybody. It was, I mean, they kind of made it seem like these were unrelated sort of general health ailments these people were going through. Let's go through some of this. 60 minutes spoke

with retired general officer Lieutenant Colonel Greg Elgreen. Now, remember, he said one agents, or the report a year ago said one agency didn't agree. So let's just say that Greg is the guy who said, I'm not taking a position on this one.

Okay. He said that a Russia appeared to be the common denominator across most cases concerning Havana syndrome. One of the things I started to notice was the caliber of our officers. Okay. Remember what he just said? Our top five or 10% performing officers. So let's look at those who were targeted.

The investigative journalist also claimed to have obtained an accounting document linked to a top secret Russian intelligence unit called 29155, which outlines a bonus payment for an officer who worked on a project concerning potential capabilities of non-lethal acoustic weapons. When I saw it, I literally had tears in my eyes because it was spelling out what they had been doing, said one of the victims. It's not definitive proof of Havana syndrome cause. it's the closest to a receipt you can have, however, for this. Okay. So who are some of these people? Who are some of the people that were linked?

And is it real or a hoax? Let me go there. Next. It seems like the battle in this country is always uphill, especially when it comes to fighting against the less constant. efforts to destroy America from within. But hope persists, and one of the things we can do, is patronize the businesses who stand for the same principles that you and I stand for.

Patriot Mobile is one of those businesses. They offer dependable nationwide coverage so you can access any of the three major networks that everybody's on, but you don't have to worry that part of your bill is going to fund leftist causes. I just had dinner with these guys last night. a fundraiser. And they are, man, they are everywhere, everywhere. And doing some amazing things behind the scenes to help us save the country and the

Constitution. Their 100% U.S.-based customer service team is going to make this switch over to Patreon mobile really easy. Whether you're keeping your number or your phone or you're upgrading one or both. Just go to patriotmobile.com slash Beck or call 970. 2, Batriot. Make sure you use the name Beck and you get free activation when you use that offer code. So join me in the switch today.

It's Patriotmobile.com slash Beck. Patriotmobile.com slash Beck. We're called 972 Patriot. 10 seconds station ID. Okay. Let's look at what's happening with CBS report. CBS doesn't have

and neither does the FBI have any interest in protecting one of the main sources there that is supposed to be high level intelligence nobody seems to care about hiding her

identity. Moreover CBS acknowledges on multiple occasions that the FBI has been in the loop regarding her appearance and talking points on CBS. This means that CBS and the FBI have been working in concert on this story, which leads to a variety of questions about the independence of 60 minutes

in reporting the story accurately without any bias. Remember, the deep state, they keep going to the same sources that have lied to them over and over and over again. Throughout the piece, there's a stunning lack of real evidence that delivers a direct link between the Russian agents, directed energy weapons, and the variety of claimed injuries. Now, is there any link? Are there any questions that should be asked? Well, here's one. Why isn't Moscow using this weapon against Zelensky? Why is there no evidence of Russia using these devices on any battlefield such as Ukraine or Syria? There's a journalist

his name is Hans Hans McAney he noticed and spoke on X he said it's really important to scrutinize the individual current and the former government agents who claim to be suffering so who are they well one of them is retired from the CIA in 2019 currently an MSNBC contributor he was one of the many former former government agents who claimed that Hunter Biden's laptop was disinformation. Miles Taylor, another one, wrote the infamous anonymous anti-Trump letter, made a career of leveraging his government credentials to write bestselling Trump bashing fan fiction. Olivia Troy, she's a former advisor to Mike Pence. She's followed a similar path to Mr. Taylor. And the last one, waged the campaign to get social media to censor critics, falsely accused several people, of being Russian-controlled accounts.

Seems like we have the same kind of people running around. All right, let me tell you about Berna, when you're target practicing the whole time, you're standing there looking down range at that man-shaped target, you're thinking of yourself some version of shoot to kill, right? You should be. If you have to draw that gun in defense for yourself or other members of your family or whomever,

it's not an option, shoot to kill. But not everything is a shoot-to-kill moment. The folks over at Burna Technologies are very pro-Second Amendment, but they'd like to offer you option 2B, the Burna launcher. It's a non-lethal alternative to safeguarding your home that will send potential threats running in the opposite direction. It is legal in all 50 states,

no permits or background checks required, and can be used by all age groups over 18. Burn a launcher, powerful deterrence like tear gas, and kinetic rounds with a 60-foot range. Burnah, proudly American, get it now. Burnah, b-r-n-a.com slash glen, burna.com slash glen. And blaz-tvee.com slash glen. Use the code, Glenn. You'll save 20 bucks off your subscription to Blaze TV. Welcome to the Glenn Beck program.

So when you're going over this piece on Havana syndrome from Jordan Shackdell, right? Yeah. So it's in the dossier. It's really, really well written and I think well thought out. He's asking the question, why now? Why is this story? And this is something that came up to me yesterday when we were talking about it on the air that 60 minutes had covered this thing. Wait a minute.

Isn't that the same thing that all of the agency said was? not a foreign actor. Yeah, well, he thought the same thing. And he went in and he looked into who these people are. And they're all people that, you know, have either been anti-Trump, pro-Hunter Biden. There are all the people that were involved in all of this garbage over the last few years about Russia. and so that's kind of a coincidence. I mean, incredible.

He points out in his article, is it perhaps because the House is set to vote on both the massive seizing of Russian assets and the infusion of cash for the war in Ukraine? They're set to vote on that right around the corner. So are they, is this just another set? set up by the government using CBS to carry the water to say, see, see how bad they are? It doesn't make sense to me. It obviously doesn't make sense to him either.

What does make sense is that you're being set up and lied to, because you were either being lied to last year or you're being lied to now. Which is it? Which is it? Well, I would imagine that you're probably being lied to now seeing that money is involved. And you watch. You watch. They're going to come out with the Ukraine money, and they're going to say, it's a loan.

It's just a loan. We're just going to loan them this money. They'll pay us back, but it will be a forgivable loan. You watch. All right. Pat Gray is with us from Pat Gray Unleashed. Hi, Pat. Hi, Glenn.

How are you? Oh, man. Did you take your transgender tree down yet? No. I keep it up for the rest of the month. Really? Of April. There's so many holidays coming up.

I know. There's like 47 LGBTQ holidays. Yeah, I know. But I just kind of combine them after transgender day and just keep it all there. Yeah, you do it for a month because I like to keep mine until after June. Oh, wow. Yeah. I guess I'm a hater because I only keep it up for a month.

Yeah, I think so. And I, we built a storage. We build a storage shed because I don't like what you're doing when it comes to only one tree for transgender visibility day. Oh, wow. I switch them out for each individual holiday. So I have a whole storage facility built in my property now for all the tree storage, yeah. Wow. I guess I'm a hater.

Yeah. Because I only keep it up. We both are glen. Yeah, I only keep it up until the end of June. Yeah. You keep it going year round. You know, it might be because you probably are just looking for the LGBTQ community. And I'm talking about the LGBTQIA2 plus community.

That's important. Well, I will tell you that, you know, I have a farm. Yeah. And I'm growing all of my plants. In fact, I'm not, a lot of it's really not useful except for the environment, but not for people. Some of it will kill people. But I've planted a whole bunch of flowers and a bunch of grains to actually make the LGBTQ2 plus AI. I plus plus.

I think you missed one of the cues, but yeah. You did. You did. Either the queer or the questioning. Right. So I'm questioning whether or not you're really a supporter. My flag right now. But I have like I have like a hundred acre.

Are you a true ally? He's not. He's not a true ally. When people are flying over the flyover country, they'll see this hundred acre flag that I've made. That's not good enough. Not not for, not for this. Is your farm a queer farm?

Are you a queer farmer? Because that's what I want to know. Is your livestock questioning? Ah, actually, I think, yeah. I think they might be. Okay, that's okay, then. So, yeah. What fascinates me is that from January 1st to March 31st,

transgender people are invisible. And then on March 31st, they're suddenly visible. It's really strange. Now, I don't know if they've gone invisible again. Are they only visible on that day? On that one day. I know that's a good question Yeah, that's a good question

I'm questioning that question Well yeah well You're the other cue I left out Thank you That's why I'm so offended The good thing though Is that Joe Biden didn't do any of it

He doesn't even know what you're talking about On Easter with the Transgender Visibility Day Well Is that entirely true Of course it is He didn't have anything to do with it He didn't do it

I didn't do it I didn't do it. Really? Yeah. Okay, just one of your minions did it at your direction. Is that what happened? They really are just hoping you can't believe your lion eyes. They're like really hoping that works.

Yep, with everything. Yeah. With everything. You know, inflation, it wasn't real. The economy's fantastic. Everything's going really well all over the world. And they just keep saying these things and assuming you'll just start believing in them eventually. Did you, did you guys play the.

KJP thing from yesterday when they were, she was asked about it. No, we have it for my stockpile. Just a couple of things. And really, um, so surprised by the misinformation that's been out there around this. And I want to be very clear. Every year for the past several years on March 31st, transgender day of visibility is March. Yes, we know that. And as we know, for folks who understand the calendar and how it works, Easter fall,

on different Sundays. What? Every year. And this year, it happened to coincide with Transgender Visibility Day. And so that is the simple fact. That is what has happened.

That is where we are. That's where we are. What's the matter with you? Yes, we had to remove all religiosity from a religious holiday. And it just happened to jump around to where these two coincided. That's all.

So we took out all the religion for me, and instead inserted transgender visibility day and it just happened to work out like that what are we supposed to do I mean like I get the point of the you know it falls on the same day but like it also they're like well if it's

going to happen five times this century and it happened already in 2013 this is a point they make to defend themselves well why wasn't it a controversy in 2013 right because they didn't make a big deal about it right they didn't say anything about it because back in 2013 which

seems like it wasn't that long ago. Barack Obama was president of the United States. Now it was like four universes ago. It does. It was. You know why? Barack Obama had just admitted he favored gay marriage. And now we're at Trans Day of Visibility.

Right. Plastered over Easter. They didn't talk about it in 2013. Which is why it wasn't controversial on Easter. Yep. Because they didn't mention it. Well, you know what? You know, I have to say, they erased all of the religious.

I mean, I've heard this argument, and it is so ridiculous. If you look at the president's statement, okay, that he didn't know about, it has the Easter Buddy right by the White House. Oh, wow. So when you look at the top of the page, you're missing the very religious symbol of the Easter bunny. Okay. All right.

I did miss the very religious symbol. Yeah. Dang it. I love that. That was their legitimate defense. They're like, yeah, look, the Easter bunny's right by the logo there. We were talking about the Easter bunny. It wasn't that Easter we were talking about.

It's like, nobody's canceling Christmas. We have Santa Claus right there. No. Here's a thing, just a little hint. Easter's not about eggs. Easter eggs or Easter bunny eggs. Really? Yeah, it's not.

It's not. So why even, seriously, why even call attention to? Easter, if you're this administration. If you're removing religiosity from Easter, you don't have an Easter. That's all it's about is something religious, something sacred to Christians. So you take that out and any reference to that, you don't even have a day. So the assistant secretary for health, Admiral Rachel Levine, who was born a man, still is a man, but wears a dress. He said that this is this is all nothing but a lie. It's just that this Sunday was Easter,

which is a very important holiday, a very important event, but it also happens to be on the 31st. He said, you know, there's a quote from Yoda. Oh, yeah. You want to quote him? Yoda?

Please do it. All right. It's... He actually said this. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to No. Fear is the path.

Fear leads. Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering. Yes. Yes. No.

No. He said, I think things will get better. And I think things for transgender and non-binary people will improve. Can I ask you what? Transgender is a dude and address, non-binary. is just like, I could be anything today. Is that way? Yeah, well, you're not either or.

Don't. You could be the X. What are we looking for? We're looking for non-binary. Let's see if I can get a quick answer for you on that. It just means you're not bound to either male or female. You can bring something else if you want. By definition, you'd assume, right?

It's not just, but it is a described agenda that does not fit strictly within the traditional categories of male or female. They may experience. There's just so many of us, doesn't it? I mean, listen to the way this is written. Non-binary individuals may experience their gender identity. May experience their, God, this is just such a screwed up country. It is.

As being outside the binary gender framework encompassing a wide range of gender experiences and expressions. None of this is saying anything that may not conform to conventional gender norms. I just said 80 words and nothing came out of it. Bring on the meteor. Yeah, no, I'm rooting for the media. A Christian woman says Starbucks fired her for refusing to use transgender people's pronouns. And she said, I'm a Christian. I cannot lie.

I cannot lie. And she just won't do it. But she can monger in hate. She can't. Well, yeah, she can do that. I'm encouraged. I understand. You guys know who Richard Dawkins is, right?

Yeah, big atheist guy. Big atheist guy. Okay, all right. This is from the Washington Examiner. Richard Dawkins, one of the world's foremost atheists who have spent much of his career advocating his atheism and ridiculing anyone who disagrees, has some regrets. In an interview over the weekend, Dawkins admitted he is concerned about the decline of Christianity in the Western world and even described himself as a cultural. Christian. I do think we are culturally a Christian country, he said. I call myself a cultural Christian. I'm not a believer. And so you know, I love hymns and Christmas carols, and I sort of feel

at home in the Christian ethos. If we substitute Christianity with any alternate religion, that would be truly dreadful. Wow. Richard Dawkins. Wow. All right, let me tell you about our sponsor this half hour. It's American financing. There used to be a time in this country when you'd see in television movies, as well as in real life, men and women taking a pair of scissors to the old credit card and cutting it into pieces.

That's because we understood that on the whole credit cards were kind of a bad idea. Something to be used only in an emergency usually. Well, a lot of people are in an emergency right now. And because of that, they have run up their credit cards. Maybe this is you. And now you're facing high credit card debt. No fault of your own. You're just sitting there trying to hold things together.

Thanks, Joe Biden. Well, now, if you're looking at losing your house, would you please call American Financing 8009062440. They can talk you back from the edge. It's Americanfinancing.net. If you're a homeowner and you want to work out ways to get from underneath the high-interest credit card debt, please call American financing. 800906 2440. 89062440.

NMLS-182334. NMLS Consumer Access.org. APR for Rates in the 5 starts at 6.799% for well-qualified borrowers. Call 800906 2440 for details about credit costs and terms. Glenn's newsletter is free and full of useful info delivered every day right to your inbox. sign up at glenbeck.com so when was the last time you checked the title to your home if the answer is you know never you need to know about fast-growing cyber scam the FBI calls house stealing a scammer forges your signature on a fake transfer document stating that you sold your home and then they file it with the county and now you know they're the owner of your home then they

take out loans against your equity as collateral and disappear and see you later by by the way they're gone you have to worry about this now we're talking about $16 trillion in available equity in our homes, and that's not an all-time high. That's why you need protection from this scam, where the equity in all of our homes is the target. That's the thing. If you did everything right, you're the biggest victim of this. If you've been paying your bills all this time, if you've done everything you should be doing to protect yourself, you're the target. You need triple lock protection from home title lock. They keep an eye on your title, and if you're ever a victim of fraud, they're U.S.-based experts to take action to help restore

your home back to your name. The first step is to check in on your home's title to make sure it is still in your name. Sign up with your address at home titlelock.com. And be sure to use the promo code Blaze. They will send you a complete title scan to see if you're already a victim. It's $100 value.

It's free. Not only that with the promo code Blaze, your first 30 days of their triple lock protection is free. Do this today. Don't let the bad guys target your equity. Hometitlelock.com. The promo code is Blaze. Hometitlelock.com.

promo code Blaze. I can't believe Dawkins would say what he said, but I want you to hear it from his own lips. Here's Richard Dawkins on Christianity. I do think that we are culturally a Christian country. I call myself a cultural Christian. I'm not a believer, but there's a distinction between being a believing Christian

and being a cultural Christian. And so, you know, I love hymns and Christmas carols, and I sort of feel at home in the Christian ethos. If I had to choose between Christianity and Islam, I choose Christianity every single time. I mean, it seems to me to be a fundamentally decent religion in a way that I think Islam is not.

I think you're going to have to explain why you say that, Professor Dawkins. Why is Islam fundamentally not decent like Christianity? Yes, I mean, the way women are treated. I mean, Christianity is not great about that. it's had its problems with female vickers and female bishops and things but there's an active hostility to women which is promoted I think by the holy books

of Islam I'm not talking about individual Muslims who of course are quite quite different but the doctrines of Islam the Hadith and the Quran it's fundamentally hostile to women hostile to gays and I find

that I like to live in a culturally Christian country, although I do not believe a single word of the Christian faith. All I kept thinking is, You're watching a dead man, huh? You're watching a dead man. Who in London can get away with saying what he just said? Oh, the Christians are going to rise. Oh, I mean, wait.

I mean, that is a dangerous. dangerous thing to say. There's a cancel. Precancellation alert? Precancellation? Well, yeah, cancellation in the big way. In the big way. All right, more in a minute.

I'm going to talk to you here about the economy and what's coming our way and that you should be prepared for any eventuality here in a few minutes. But let me tell you first about Jace Medical and how you can prepare for a shortage of items or, you know, a shortage of funds. that maybe can help you buy those items. Personalized emergency kit contains five essential antibiotics from Jace Medical. These are the most common for deadly bacterial infections. Jace is also working to expand their medication offerings.

They've added Ivermectin as an option in the Jace case. Plus, you can gift card your family for loved ones so they can get a Jace case of their own and personalize it for their needs. It's jacemedical.com. That's jacemedical.com. Please have these things on hand. You can get a year's worth of your drug supply from Jace Medical now at jacemedical.com.

Do it now. When you were little, you had braced some of course of recreat, always in trying to negotiate and do make some exchange. The apply negotiates-titre T-D you permit to renouwer with this instinct, with without operation gratuite,

no amount of minimum, and no free mensuel. You're made for negotiate, and the TD is there for you

aid. Well, people in the States are starting to push back a little bit on their renewables. As more

states see their electricity rates continue to rise with little in the way of benefits, Arizona is turning back

and saying, hey, let's stop all of this global warming stuff for a while. They're voting to pull back the

energy targets. California is really leading the way, not only in renewables, they went from 3% of the state's electricity generation to a mix of 25.7 last year. They also pay the third highest electricity rates in the country just behind Hawaii and Rhode Island. So which way you're going? Some of the states are following California right off a cliff. Speaking of California, looks like, you know, their budget, they had a big surplus. Yeah, yeah. Surplus of $97 billion.

Then they went and spent all of it, all of it. They doubled the general fund spending, and now they've got a giant deficit, and they don't know what to do. Huh, isn't that weird? Meanwhile, farmers are revolted. over the radical green agenda that is reshaping the European Union. They're back in their tractors and on the roads. Protests over carbon price hikes halt traffic also in Canada. Protesters

are saying they've had enough. What's happening? People are starting to feel the effects and we're about to really feel the effects. We crossed a Rubicon recently and Carol Roth is here to tell us all about it in 60 seconds. I've been telling you about Gen 90 for a while. It's the latest breakthrough in skin care from our friends over at GenuSel, along with all the other wonderful things it's doing for your skin. It's also helping you with the annoying bags and puffiness under your eyes. You know, if you have a lack of sleep or if you've been a little overworked, you had a little

stress. Even the seasonal allergies can affect this stuff. Well, you know, you can do something about it with Gen 90. Anywhere you use it, it's luxurious, silky smooth, and best of all, it starts working in seconds. you can feel the instant tightening as soon as it touches your skin. And now you can get GenuSel's classic under-eye bags and puffiness serum along with every Gen. 90 order.

Plus, they're luxurious GenuCel XV, collagen builder and moisturizer for stunning results day after day. Just go to genusel.com slash Beck right now for incredible packages, over 50% off during GenuCel's spring sale. Results are guaranteed or your money back. GenuSale.com slash Beck. You can order right now and get a free limited edition. spa box with the bonus gifts and free shipping right now at genuCell.com slash Beck.

It's G-E-N-U-C-E-L.com slash Beck. So Carol Roth is joining us. And Carol, I sent you a story a couple of days ago about how we are now paying more in interest than we are in, I think, Pentagon spending and Social Security. I have heard that this time was coming for a long time. Are we actually there? So just to sort of set the stage, we're not exactly there yet. That's the only piece of good news I'm probably going to deliver to you, Glenn.

We are on a trajectory, and this is projections that I believe came out of Bank of America. So, you know, a Wall Street analyst came up with these projections and basically said, that if we continue with interest rates where they're at, the Fed doesn't cut interest rates this year, and we continue on the spending trajectory, he modeled that out to the end of the year and said this year, we will pay $1.6 trillion in interest if nothing changes.

And if we were to hit that point, then yes, then it would become the biggest item in the budget, you know, far exceeding what was paid for the military and then even exceeding, you know, all of those other, expenses, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and the like. So this is the trajectory that we're moving into and is a very scary one that we've been warning you about because of what is

something called fiscal dominance that you guys, you and I have talked about before. Basically, we are in a scenario where we have high debts and we have high deficits and we have inflation that is too high. And so when the Fed tries to do this monetary, policy and to raise rates in order to bring down that inflation, it ends up being dominated by that horrible fiscal position of the United States. It means that the interest on the debt explodes. It means that the deficit, because that interest is bigger, widens. It means that we have to then finance those bigger deficits, and that puts us into a vicious cycle. And it's something that many of us have been warning about, and it really looks like we're sitting right in the middle of it.

And it begs the question, why didn't the Fed reset all of the loans when we were at zero? Why didn't we take out all these loans and lock them in long term at zero? We were there for a very long time. Now we have all of these loans that are starting every month. They come in and we have to reset the loans. And our interest rate is high. And that, like you said, I just really want to. people to understand that because we have all of the $34 trillion and it is it is resetting all the time

different parts of it, we're paying that high interest rate. So what's happening with you and your credit cards is now happening with the government. Yeah. And I actually have an answer for that, Glenn, because this was something that I was very curious about too. You know, to me, we had near 15 years of zero interest rate or almost zero interest rate policy. And so it would say to you, why wouldn't you go ahead and lock that zero interest rate in forever? And there's been some really great research that I've following that I will probably reference several times today from Luke Gromman at FFTT. And he went back and he looked at, you know, central bank holdings of treasuries versus how much debt we have increased. And over the last, I think it's,

10 years, we have increased more than $16 trillion in debt, but at the same time, central banks have actually lightened up their reserves. They've sold $100 billion. So the 10 years prior to that, you had central banks that were loading up on treasuries, and they were there as a buyer. And now all of a sudden you have this huge buyer that is out of the market. So it doesn't mean that there were no buyers. There's certainly banks and insurance.

companies and other foreign buyers, but the price that they would have had to pay wouldn't have been zero. And I think that's the reality, and that's an important piece of the discussion that we're having today, is that the federal government, even though everybody else may say, well, I can still get a loan or I can still do this, the federal government is having a very difficult time getting long-term loans in particular at a interest rate that is anywhere near acceptable, and that would keep the treasury market from going into mass chaos. So here's the problem. They need to keep the interest rate low for them,

but they don't have any buyers. And the way you increase the buyers is you offer them more money, in other words, a higher interest rate. And you say, no, look, we'll pay you back, you know, 4%, 6%, 8%, whatever it takes to get people to buy the bonds. Nobody's buying. And if they keep raising, the interest rates, our debt completely cripples us. You can't pay the interest rates.

Yeah, this is why I have been saying and still believe that the Fed is going to be forced to pivot. They want to keep these interest rates high in an effort to try to control inflation. But the U.S. government and their rampant spending, their dereliction and their financial duty to be responsible has created that as an impossibility and is now meaning that if you keep interest rates high, that in and of itself will also stoke inflation. So the Fed has been doing a lot of things in its toolkit to become more accommodative. When you talk about lowering rates, it's more accommodative or looser fiscal policy. And while they haven't come out to do that quantitative easing, the straight up buying of the bonds that we saw that brought their balance sheet from a couple

trillion dollars up to almost nine trillion dollars. They've been doing a lot of things that look and taste and feel a lot like that. In Jerome Powell's last press conference, he's basically said our policy of taking, letting the assets on the balance sheet run off. We're going to slow that down. So now they're going to still be in the market buying a little bit more. And the last thing that they're holding out on, because remember, it's an election year, is lowering that interest rate. At some point, that's going to be the only thing that they have left other than just a wholesale buying a bonds program. And they're going to have to do that. And what that's going to do, boys and girls, this is the important thing is that is going to restoke inflation.

Anybody who is an asset holder is going to see their assets melt up, continue to rise in value. And the middle class, the working class is going to continue to get crushed because this is basically one of the only. only things that they have available to them or certainly the only one that they're going to be willing to enact is to inflate the debt away. Well, that's happy news. So what does the average person do, Carol? Buy stuff now? It is a really tough, tough question. It's one that I have multiple times on a daily basis. And it's a horrible scenario that we have to be in this discussion and worry about the American dream slipping away because we know asset prices have already increased.

And so I do think that if you are in the middle and working class and you're worried, you've got to do everything you can to try to get your expenses down and to live with as much austerity as you can to have some money to put them into a diverse portfolio of assets. You know, things like hard metals, you know, the gold and the silver, some sense. stocks, you know, real real estate to the extent you can. And I know that I can just hear right now Glenn people are yelling and saying, but, but Carol, I can barely afford my rent or my mortgage or my groceries. And I understand this is a horrible, horrible position that the government and the Federal Reserve has put every American into. And we just have to do the best that we can to try

to hold on to something to preserve some level of wealth because this is what we are facing because we don't have the fortitude of politicians who are willing to do the hard work. They weren't willing in the Biden administration to go through a small, you know, a longer term recession. We had a tiny recession, but to make that a little bit longer term to help normalize us, normalize things and get some breathing room. And I think that politicians are going to continue to act like politicians. so you have to be prepared for that.

So Art Laffer told me years ago when we were talking about the interest rates. And I said, if we keep just printing money like this, there's going to come a time where you have to raise the interest rates. And, you know, I said, Art, when you did it, it was, you know, 18, 19 percent interest rates. And I said, you can't do that to the economy in this scenario. And he said, no, it will stop the heart of the economy. It just collapses at that point because it's too weak. You can't, you, everything stops. It's a different time.

This is what people need to understand because they're going to go back and look historically at other periods in the United States and say, well, this is what we did then and this is what we did then. But it's different now. We don't have that luxury because we have debt to GDP that exceeds 120%. We have the balance sheet of basically an emerging market in crisis. that would have put it a while ago if we didn't have the world's reserve currency, which we know that a lot of folks are trying to get away from. We didn't have $34 trillion in debt and a massive deficit that just kept running and running.

We didn't have all of these interest payments that were going to pay for things that we've already bought and not new spending. So we are in a different world here today. And as we've talked about before, you get close to that cliff and eventually you come off and you never know that exact point in time. but we are speeding towards it. Just look at how fast the debt, the deficits, the interest, how fast this is growing, it is starting to spiral away from us. Back in just a second.

Stu, do you remember when we were talking about Obamacare? And I think the government, at that point, if they took Obamacare, they would rule about 30, 25 to 30 percent of the, of the economy. Do you remember that? I don't remember the statistic, but I do remember the general conversation. The general conversation,

and it wasn't that high. I mean, it was like 30% and we were like, oh my gosh, it's almost 49% now that the economy is driven, almost half of it is driven by government spending. Incredible.

And that's what's putting us here. All right, more just a second. Sophia wrote in about her dog's experience with Rough Green. She says, My dog suffered from severe skin issues that had him on antibiotics every two to three months for several years. I knew it wasn't healthy for him to be on antibiotics that much, but it was the only option I had to relieve him of blisters on his skin and constant itching. Oh my gosh.

We decided to give Rough Greens a try. I am so thankful we did. After we started, we've never had another bout of skin issues and he's never been on antibiotics again. Thank you, Rough Greens. Well, you are welcome. Boy, that's horrible. I'm so glad it's working out for you and your dog. This was started by natural pathic doctor Dennis Black.

He knew that your kibble food is just not giving your dog the nutrition that they need. They need the green stuff. If it's healthy for your dog, it's probably in rough greens. And you just sprinkle it over your dog's food. They love it. And they'll eat again. And they'll have the nutrition that they need. Rough greens.

R-U-F-F-Greens.com slash back. You get your first trial bag for free. You just pay for shipping. Call 833-Glen-33. That's 833, glen-33, Roughgreens.com slash back. 10 seconds. Station ID.

So are we at the point now, Carol, that there's no way to pay this back? So there's always a way. And there's different, right? There's, well, there's different mechanisms. The first thing is that we could have. growth. And obviously, growth is our path forward. But realistically, to get us in a really good place, we would need some sort of what is called a, you know, a productivity miracle. We would need

someone to make a breakthrough on quantum computing or nuclear fission, you know, energy or, you know, something like that that's like a massive, massive leap forward. And I think that could happen. Yeah, I mean, it can. It can. And those are the things that we should be focused on because That is our key forward. Certainly just regular, you know, three plus percent growth, which again, for us is pretty high. We'll get us to a place where we can kind of pause and maybe deal with it. So we have to be focused on growth. We have to focus certainly on cutting the size of government. That is a non-issue, but we have to do that in a way that's balanced. We can't just kind of slash all at once as much as I would like.

like to because of this precarious situation, because that means then that could have an impact on the economy. We won't get enough revenue and we're still going to be in this deficit situation. So we have that piece of it. And then, of course, there is the inflating of the debt scenario, which is the worst for all of us. So there are these different mechanisms, but you have to ask yourself on a human nature basis, what is the likely stance going to be of politicians, what's in it for them versus what's in it for us. And also, you know, can we really bet on this growth and productivity, particularly since everything the government seems to do is throwing up barriers to growth

instead of trying to have, you know, real free market-driven growth. So we do have a path forward here. But the path forward is filled, you know, with these horrible trolls on the side of the road called politicians and government. And they're the ones not letting us through, Glenn. So let's, let me switch to California. California is, has gone insane as well. Gone?

They, yeah, I know. Well, I mean, I told Stu earlier today, we thought we were living in a world of insanity. But now it has become just almost like a clown show to where, you know, guys, guys. I mean, what are you doing? You know, they've, they've made their prisons smaller. They've released a lot of people from prison. And then they went and they spent $3.4 billion on a new prison system. And it's now costing $159,000 per prisoner to keep them.

They've spent so much money. Department of Developmental Services more than doubled up 117%. The Department of Social Services, up 89% health care services, 87%. They're just spending money and they're spending themselves into oblivion. Yeah. So when we talk about the federal debt, we're not talking about the state's debt too. So you take a state like California, which is supposed to be this rocking economy where Gavin Newsom bragged when he got those COVID dollars that they had a quote unquote surplus.

And now they have a massive deficit. And I believe I saw the debt number with something like $1.6 trillion. Does that sound right too? Yeah, it does. Let me look it up. You keep talking. I'll look it up for you. So it's something, and what is so frustrating,

in addition to California being the incubator of all bad ideas in America, you guys can laugh and say, oh, Californians voted for this. But if it starts in California, it's going to seep out like a bad flu or something to the rest of the country. So you have to pay attention. But what's so frustrating, whether it's California or the rest of the nation, is they're spending all this money and what are we getting for it? This is our money.

We're not making our lives better. We don't have better infrastructure. We have a porous border. We have more crime. We have inflation. What is the average American getting for this? Nothing. Our lives are worse off.

Carol, as always, thank you. God bless you. Try to bring us some good news next time, right? Trying. I'll be the next time, I promise. All right. Carol Roth, you can follow her and find her online. Grab her newsletter.

You can find it now at carolroth.com slash news. When you leave to work every day, who's keeping an eye on your house? I mean, besides the burglar who's thinking about breaking into it, that guy is doing an excellent job of keeping his eye on your house. But I recommend you get somebody else, somebody who'd rather not steal your stuff. Been a fan of Simply Safe for a long time now and recommend that you check them out yourself today. Simply Safe is different. Simply Safe offers advanced home security 24-7 monitoring plans for less than a dollar a day.

And with their live guard protection, Simply Safe can act on alarm within five seconds of receiving the signal. No long-term contracts. You can cancel it any time. They earn your business. They don't feel like, you know, You owe it to them. They earn your business. Simply Safe.

As given me and many in this audience real peace of mind because they are there watching over you. I want you to have that feeling of security as well. Get 20% off your new SimplySafe system when you sign up for fast protect monitoring. Just go to SimplySafe.com slash Beck. That's simplysafebac.com slash Beck. And it's blazedtv.com. slash Glenn. promo code is Glenn. You'll save 20 bucks off Blase TV.

Hello, America. Welcome to the Glenn Beck program. We're glad you're here. You know, we were talking about the debt. And Carol kept saying, Carol kept saying, you know, if nothing doesn't change, if something doesn't change soon, we're not going to be able to overcome this. and the one thing that could change it for a while is all of a sudden just rapid growth, rapid growth. And I think you could get that from a Donald Trump because he'll cut all of these regulations that we just did. Remember, low regulations, low legal costs, a stable environment, educated workers, and energy.

that's what made America what America was. So he can go in and he can give low energy. He can go in and cut all of these regulations. And he could give it more of a pro-growth, pro-business kind of, and I mean small business. I don't mean the big business, small business attitude. And he can create jobs like that and increase our productivity, I believe. I think so.

I think he'll definitely help those things. I mean, we are in a weird problematic pattern here where we just keep having one president that goes one way and changes all the regulations. And then the next guy comes in for four years and changes all the regulations. We're not doing it through the law. I know. We're doing it through executive orders and administrative. And look, much better to do it that way than eight, 12, 16 years of all sorts of regulations. I'd rather have it improve when a Republican president gets in.

There's a different. There's a difference between a law. Yeah. And a regulation. Regulation wasn't passed into law. Yep. Regulation is just a council of people that you don't know, never met, who went, you know what, we're going to do this.

We need to be a country of laws, not regulations. Right. You know, and we were going through that Supreme Court ruling or a case recently where they were talking about Miffa Prestone, the abortion drug. And, you know, that was, again, just a regulation. Like these regulations can change. They can just switch when a new president comes in. Trump will definitely do a much, much better job than Biden.

I mean, these are the lowest hurdles in the world I'm describing. But Trump will clear all of them very easily and do a really good job cutting regulation. That's one of the things he's good at. Spending, you know, that's another story. Right. But he could buy us time. He could buy us time. He only has four years.

So who he picks as vice president is crucial. is crucial. I don't know that it switches too many votes. I don't know that it's like huge decision as far as... No, but that's the future of the Republican Party. Right. That person probably, although, I mean, people would have said the same thing about Mike Pence, I suppose, back in the day, and that didn't turn out. So who knows? But he, they would be the most likely next candidate in 2028. Correct. So, but one of the things that Carol said really hit me as she was describing our financial situation. She's described, basically, it's completely unsustainable. if things don't change. And at some level, when you make projections like that, it can give you misleading results, right? Like, oh, if things don't change. Like, if I were to say to you, hey, you know, your son's off, I'm looking at your finances,

your son's ordering off Uber Eats every night. And if this does not change. You have been looking at my finance account. I'm in a few of your accounts. Not a big deal. So don't look for those transfers. Right. But, hey, if things don't change with all your kids' Uber Eats orders, you could be in trouble.

You're going to be in debt. You're not going to be able to pay your credit card bill. That's talking to the individual because things would change. Right. Things would change, right? I would say, right? Knock it off. No more.

No more than the wild wings. Right. Right. Like you'd make the change. So in some ways, like projecting if things don't change, you're going to go bankrupt, is stupid because. Things do change. When you realize these things are an issue, you change those issues. Are you saying that the government won't change? No. I am not saying that. Listen carefully.

Because if things don't change is not how you can project the government spending. Things will change. They will get worse. They will spend more. They will spend more. We know they will have new ideas of program after. program after program. Let me just give you the Francis Scott Key Bridge that the government, that Joe Biden is saying he's going to pay for, which will now be renamed something definitely different. Right. Wait a minute. Hang on just a second. Wouldn't it be weird if that bridge didn't have insurance? I, that's a good question. I hadn't really thought of that. He's saying he's going to pay for it. So that's why I hadn't really considered that. But you're right.

Doesn't that have insurance? That's a good question. I don't know. Yeah. You'd think it would. You'd think it would. You'd think it would. Yeah. But I don't know. The insurance. It's pretty expensive thing. Yes, like buildings, and that's why buildings don't have insurance. Of course they have insurance. They always have insurance. The Empire State Building has insurance.

Everyone has insurance. It's a great question. The World Trade Center has insurance. Why doesn't the Francis Scott Key not have insurance? And if it does have insurance, why are we worrying about it? That's fascinating. What I had not thought of that. But broadening of this,

every two weeks there's another reason they come up with to spend another hundred million or hundred billion dollars of your dollars. Let me give you a better scenario here. As they continue to spend and as things get more and more expensive because of inflation, the American people will demand you've got to help us out. Yep. And they'll just keep spending money to help you until we're a full. fully socialized country until they're the only one spending money.

Yeah, and this is something that I think people miss a lot of times when they look at the way the government operates and the way the left is operating right now. We talk a lot about like, hey, we shouldn't pass policies that are socialist, right? Like if they try to right now come out and say, hey, we're going to turn into a socialist country, no ownership, blah, blah, blah, blah, everyone would reject it. I mean, at this point, I would say 90 to 10, but. maybe more like 70, 30 at this point. But it would lose in the United States quite clearly.

But what they do is they take elements of that and they package it in popular ideas. The easiest one to understand is the minimum wage. Well, it's really hard to pitch to people, hey, we're going to redistribute wealth, right? We're going to take money from these people and give it to these people. Everyone will be like, wait, that's not the American way. But when you say, we're going to raise the minimum wage to 15, 20, 25, we heard $50, $50, we heard $50, $20 an hour from a representative recently. When you do that, which is a policy overwhelmingly popular, 70 and 80% approval, which means a lot of Republicans say yes, raise the minimum wage, you do it that way.

You have the same outcome. And what happens? You close businesses. Businesses go out. You need to now pay more unemployment. Yep. You need to have a new program to create and re-educate. new people for new jobs.

So they've created dependency, and then they've created new problems, new programs, because they created this other problem by raising the unemployment, or by raising the rate. So now they have all of these programs that also grow in size, and people are like, yeah, you've got to take care of us. You have to. I can't afford my health insurance anymore. And that will be approved too, 60, 70% percent. And as, you know, as Thomas Sowell has pointed out, you know, the actual minimum wage is zero dollars, right? So a lot of those people who are making a, you know, $7.25 to $15 will get laid off. And those people will also need to be helped and become dependent on the government. And everyone will approve that policy too. And so, like, this is a way you slowly implement this nonsense over a long period of time. And honestly, a lot of people on the right fall for it.

Well, look, I have always believed we should raise the Social Security age to the age just as it started, to the age of death, of the average death. Of life expectancy? Yes. So, you know, what are we up to now? They're asking for like six months and everybody rejects it. Everybody rejects it. But it should have been raised as it goes. As it goes. so because it was never designed to be a 20 year plan or a 15 or a 10 it wasn't designed to be a one year plan guys you was used to call SSI right social security insurance in case this thing happens that we don't expect to happen that you outlive your spouse by 10 or 12 years then you'll have something to fall back on that was the design of the and it was designed to take care of the women not the men because men generally died it I think 62. That's why it was 65. Okay. So the men were probably dead by 65, but women lived a little longer. And so we took care of the widows. That's what this was. We're not doing that now. Now this is a retirement fund. How did that happen? And one that could say you a terrible return

on your investment. Horrible. Horrible. Absolutely horrible. It's a disaster. Back in just a second. And inflation starts off subtle, creeping into things here and there. You might not even really feel it at first. Then slowly you start to notice that your money isn't going as far. What you're experiencing right now is inflation, big inflation. And it's going to get worse. A shopping cart. I went to the store.

When was it? Saturday? We didn't get much. And it was like $56. And it was one bag. And I'm like, what? What? Did you put caviar in here? What? How does this happen? This is just an ugly, ugly thing called inflation, and it will get worse. Please, I want you to find out how you can protect your wealth. And when I say protect your wealth, do you have anything in IRAs, 401Ks? Do you have money in savings?

That money is going to get worth less and less until it is worthless. Free Wealth Protection Guide right now from Lear Capital. I want you to go and call them. No strings attached. Just get the information. 800-957 gold. 800-9-7 gold. Call them now.

They'll open up an account if you want to buy something and credit $250 towards your account just because you're a listener of mine. So make sure you tell them that. 800-957 gold. Gold or silver. Do it now. 800-957 gold. You're listening to the Glenn Beck program.

Welcome to the Glenn Beck program. We're glad that you're here. I had dinner with Chuck Norris last night. Oh, or name dropping? Yeah, yeah, intentionally, just because I know you're a Chuck Norris fan. Sure. Who isn't a Chuck Norris fan? Yeah.

Come on. But I don't think you've had dinner with him, have you? I have not. Yeah. No, I didn't have. People don't like having dinner with me. Well, I brought up some. something. And I'd just like to hear from the sheriffs of Texas. The Sheriff's Association of Texas,

I have a letter here that is one, two, three, four, five, five, six pages of just signatures, okay? Six pages of signatures. Every sheriff in the great state of Texas went to the governor of Texas and said, hey, we need to do a little more here. We need to do a little more on the border? Yeah. As sheriffs, we must faithfully preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution in laws of the United States and Texas. We respectfully request that our Texas border be immediately secured by any lawful means. We recognize the indisputable and unprecedented atrocities occurring at our southern border.

Unvetted migrants crossing into Texas for more than 120 countries, including cartel members, gang members, known or suspected terrorists, human traffickers, all of whom pose a clear and present danger to America and her citizens. The influx of illegal drugs has irreversibly damaged our communities. The mass death by illicit drugs originating from Mexico alone, more than 100,000 deaths per year, could be considered a weapon of mass destruction. Equally alarming is how our unsecured border is directly responsible for numerous criminal victimizations of citizens and non-citizens, as well as numerous human rights violation, which are included but not limited to, murder, child and adult sexual assault, abuse, human trafficking, kidnapping, indentured servitude,

forced child labor, identity theft, and exploitation of workers. The unsecured border is a deliberate, destructive and inhumane violation of Texas law and federal law. It overwhelms the resources of Texas and the United States and encourages continued invasion by unknown criminals and unvetted persons. We request that our dangerous, chaotic, quote, Texas border emergency, end quote, be officially declared a United States constitutional crisis and crimes against humanity. We further request that the United States government without delay assist in securing our border. Border security and immigration can and should be mutually exclusive.

An antiquated immigration process in need of improvement does not infer or require our government to have an effective, unsecured, and dangerous southern border. A southern border, a southern border is a national security issue which jeopardizes the United States sovereignty and the safety of her citizens. Texas sheriffs agree that an unsecured Texas border is in direct opposition to our primary responsibility to defend and maintain the United States and Texas sovereignty to provide security and to promote the general welfare of Texas and the United state citizens. The Texas sheriffs, we are, as to Texas sheriffs, we are compelled by this petition to adhere

to our constitutional oath. We stand in unity. So did anybody get that message? Because there was a photo op and then that was it. Tomorrow I want to talk about this. I want to see if we can get some of the sheriffs on to talk about why this. why this letter was so important, the language is very strong. Was it meant to be a photo op?

Or was this meant to get the governor and the United States government on the stick? And if they don't get on the stick, what then? Because every word of this letter is correct. It's crimes against humanity on our border. Are we all just to stand around and wait for our governor or wait for our president or Congress, which has absolutely no intention of doing anything? Maybe we'll find out from the sheriffs tomorrow. Back program. There's something else here now.

Something new. From exclusively on Paramount Plus, it's the series Stephen King calls Scary as Hell. Everything here. It's impossible, but it's also real. Sci-fi vision comes at the best show streaming right now. We're running out of time and we still don't know the rules. Don't miss what the movie blog calls something you need to watch. Saving those children is how we all go home.

From Binge All Episodes exclusively on Paramount Plus. America, welcome to the Glenn Beck program. You know, the World Economic Forum has discussed how you're going to be broke. You won't own anything. and how much you're going to love it. You're just going to love it. You won't own anything. Well, wait a minute.

How do you square that with a nation that understands property rights, that it is one of our God-given rights, to own our own stuff, to own property? Well, that's going to have to change. Now, how do you do that? Well, you inflate the money by spending way, way, way too much. that causes people to spend too much money because they can't afford food and housing. Then you also do little things like, I don't know, make it almost impossible for people to get insurance

because the insurance rates are going through the roof. Then you have that wonderful little thing about state income taxes, or in the case of Texas, you have property tax, which I think is absolutely immoral. Property tax is immoral. That's just me. Well, in California, it looks like the theft of property, property rights, on the ropes now in California. We're going to talk to a California State Assemblyman about what they're doing to property rights in California in 60 seconds. Sometimes the cost of doing one's duty becomes very, very, very high.

The heroes in this country and a broad service member. and first responders alike who will give up everything of themselves, up to and including paying the ultimate price in service to their nation. Who's there to help them? Who's there to help their families? Who exactly is on the front line for those who are on the front line? Tunnel to Towers Foundation. This is a fantastic charity.

I love these people and what they do. Their gold star fallen first responder, smart home, homeless veterans programs, comprise their in the line of duty programs. They're dedicated to honoring our nation's heroes and their families, engaging people in 9-11 remembrance across the country. They host 80 runs, walks, climbs a year, dozens of golf outings, all to be able to pay for these programs. They run the Tunnel to Towers 9-11 Institute,

which educates our kids so they'll never forget either. Maybe they'll remember it for the first time because they're hearing it for the first time in schools. More than 95 cents of every dollar you donate goes to Tunnel to Towers and its programs. Never forget the sacrifice of our country's greatest heroes. Donate, please, $11 a month to tunnel to towers. That's T, the number two T.org. T2T.org. Bill O'Saley is with us, California State Assemblyman. Welcome to the program, sir. How are you? Good morning, Glenn. Thank you for having.

me. So you say that California property rights are under attack. How exactly? Well, California historically has had strong property rights protections. We have this Proposition 13 that was passed by the voters in the late 70s. And it did really two things that limited how much your property taxes could go up based on appreciation. It caps it at no more than, I believe, 2% a year. And what that did is it's it's kept property taxes historically low in California because when property values go up very quickly, the state would love to reassess the value and tax it. So that is historically kept us with lower than usual property tax. The other thing Prop 13 did, and this is what's really under attack right now, it's said to the government that if you want to raise taxes on the

people of the state of California, you need to submit, you need to get a two-thirds approval either through the legislature or through the voters to raise taxes. And we've had this high bar now forever. What happens, though, and this is what the left does, they never stop and they look for loopholes. Well, the court gave them a loophole and said, oh, but that's a tax initiated or sponsored by the government. If there's a tax proposed by a private person or a union goon, that's not subject to the

two-thirds requirement. Wait. So, how does the union goon have standing to propose taxes? Private citizens in Calv. We have the initiative process. We're a direct democracy in some sense under our Constitution. So citizens have the ability to place measures on the ballot. So the Howard Jarvis Association is who initially wrote Prop 13 has now come back with

a new initiative and says, no, no, no, we're going to close that loophole. It's a taxpayer protection ballot initiative. And guess what? We've gotten the signatures to put that on the ballot and to close all these loopholes. And it will ban things like they're doing now. They want to do income-based electricity prices. So the more money you make, the more they charge you for electricity, all this crazy stuff. So we got this on the ballot. How do the Democrats respond? They're putting a competing ballot initiative that says if you put anything on the ballot that raises a threshold to vote. So from majority to two thirds, your initiative has to pass by two thirds vote.

And this is a poison pill. And that's what the legislature has put on the ballot now. So they put that on to try to kill it. So it's very difficult to pass a constitutional amendment on two thirds, which is what this is. And at the same time, Glenn, they've gone to the California Supreme Court. They've made some, they're done even coherent arguments to get the court to take off our ballot or a taxpayer protection initiative off the ballot. that's what the left does here in the state of California. So wait a minute.

So what's on the ballot? What is on the ballot? There are two competing initiatives. The first is our initiative, which is the good one. It's going to close the loopholes. Which is, what is the proposition number? They won't give us the numbers yet. So I can't even tell you.

You'll have to have me back. They play all kinds of games to make it hard for us to campaign. So we don't have the numbers yet. We will get them sometime this year. The second initiative is one put on by the legislature, Glenn, and that says if you're going to raise the threshold to raise taxes, your initiative on the ballot has to pass by the same number, by the two-thirds number.

Prop 13 didn't even pass by two-thirds. So this is the type of gamesmanship that they're more than happy to do here in California because it's all about serving their party. It's all about getting more money to the state and the people be damned. How much does the state need? Because you had a surplus. You've blown through that. Now you have a deficit.

And if they can just continue to raise taxes, they will. They will. And they'll drive everybody out of California. Our budget is totally out of control. And last year was about $300 billion, which is about double than what it was in previous decades. So we have plenty of money. But what happens is when they get a windfall, like the COVID money, we got a hundred billion dollar surplus. As a business person, you would say, well, that's not money we could expect to get every year, right? Right. So we would do

maybe one time spending or put it in the reserve. No, they, they spend it on ongoing programs that are not sustainable. So now we're facing that. We have according to the governor of California, Gavin Newsom, he says, oh, it's only about a $38 billion deficit. Well, the legislative analyst office, who does tend to be nonpartisan says, no, it's actually $73 billion. And we have a budget deadline, Glenn, at the end of June, we have to pass a balanced budget. These Democrats up here are in total denial. They've not cut anything. And these people we've had up here because of term limits have never been here to cut any. They never cut anything. They barely cut their hair. So I don't know what's going to happen here in June, but we have a financial cliff, and I think they will be more

than happy to raise taxes than to cut any of their precious programs that they've passed. Can we talk about the other erosion of property rights, and that is the home squatters? Yes. This is nuts. It is nuts. So this goes back. You have to understand neo-Marxism. I call it neo-Marxism because it's a new thing now.

They don't talk about Marxism. They talk about people who are oppressed and people who need help. Correct. And so now the people who need help, Glenn, are the renters, the poor renters who are being taken advantage of by the mean, greedy landlords who keep raising rent. And so they've built in all these protections that make it very impossible to kick people off property who are not paying rent, or let alone they're just squatters. The people who showed up and moved in. And the police will not lift a finger because the laws are written in such a sense that, You have to go to court to evict even a squatter.

And good luck. It takes months to go through the court system. And for a while, during COVID, we had an eviction moratorium. For over two years, you couldn't even go to court to get an eviction. And it all, you know, there's two ways to seize property, Glenn. It's either through force to the government or in this way, they're letting the people that they've deemed to be oppressed to seize the property of other people. And they don't care. I mean, we have in the legislature very unsurious.

activists who run the legislature. They're not serious people. They just formed, and it's embarrassing. They formed the renters caucus because they're proud of how many legislators in the state are renters. You know, they're not even home. These are adults. They're not, they've never had a mortgage, and they're proud to be renters, and they're going to look out for the other renters. That's the people running this place. God. I don't know. Have you heard about the rapid transit system with the new cards? I have not heard that. Okay, Bart, on, Friday. This is for northern California,

of Bay Area Rapid Transit. Bart on Friday posted instructions on ask for these new cards. You can ask any station agent for Bart's free bystander intervention cards, which you can

use if you're experiencing or witnessing harassment in stations or trains. Apparently, the post includes a video featuring two female college students who ride Bart and explain how the cards work. When the writers are being harassed, they hand out the,

You Got Me cards as a request to help. When writers believe they're witnessing others being harassed, they can hand out the, I've got you card to the perceived victim. Now, I don't know exactly what these cards are supposed to do, and I don't know. If I'm being beaten up, I don't know if I can reach into my pocket

to get my stack of, do you have me cards? I mean, the people in California have gone insane. I've said it, Glenn, they have unsurious people up here running the legislature. Most of them are former union activists. A lot of them are former staffers. They're people who've never done anything in the real world. They're here to serve the state.

Not just Democrats, by the way. That's on both sides. So we need serious people to step up to run for office. Because that's one of the reasons I ran. I gave up my job as a prosecutor to come up here and serve. And I bring the perspective of the people. And I don't, we know when I'm in this meeting, they said, oh, but we have to fund this agency or they're going to lay off. I go, I don't care.

We don't have the money. Defund them. I will not vote for the budget because it is not balanced. And I'm one of the few Republicans who votes no down the line on the entire budget. And the others, you know, they're afraid of being called names because there might be a nice program in there that, you know, helps people. I don't care, but we need serious people in office to take control back of our government. It is the senior staff and these activists are running the joint here in California. So what is the plan for these people who don't want to cut the budget when you have a balanced

budget amendment? You know, Glenn, it's a good question. I don't know what they're going to do because, like I said, we have a deadline in June and they're going to have to make tough cuts. Now, one thing that came on my radar is what Senator Paul introduced an amendment in the Senate that did not pass, but it really raised. alarm flags for me and he had an amendment to ban the feds from buying up state debt. So can the feds intervene and buy up the state's debt? Because I'll tell you the people up here do not walk around at any concern. I feel like something's up. But you know, but you know in 2008 we learned an important lesson blend and there was some entities are too big to fail. And if we bailed out the banks, do we really

think they're not going to bail out the states. So I don't know to answer your question, but I'm very suspicious. If they bail California out, I think you're going to hear voices from all over the country. I mean, I've always wanted to live in California. But the people there are so insane that they wrecked living there because of all of their stupid, impossible schemes. And I just couldn't live there because I'm not paying that kind of tax for things that are not going to work.

And if you guys pass on your debt to us, oh my gosh, I'm going to have a really hard time paying my taxes. Really hard time. Really hard time. I don't blame you. But this is what I worry about because they feel at the end of the day, the feds will be there to bail them. Uncle Joe will come to their rescue.

you is sort of the vibe I get up here. But I can't, I don't have any direct knowledge. They don't include me in any serious conversation in the super majority. But go ahead, this is the symptom when you have a super majority government, a party that is totally out of control, the Democrat Party here in California. And they serve one thing, their own power and their own party. It is party over country. And I see it firsthand.

And people really need to make a change. And I advocate in California, what can people say? say, what can Republicans do? I don't like to be always down, down in the dumps. And I said, we get to learn from the Democrats and how they win elections. We don't go run on a 10-point plan with all these nuances. We got to pick an issue in California that is widely popular and that's emotional and it resonates with voters. The Democrats pick abortion. I personally think the issue of Republican voters should be parental rights. They are coming for your kids. They want to indoctrinate them. They're going to transition them at school.

they're not even going to tell you. They're going to let your girl get out compete by a boy, and they're going to medically sterilize your kids. How can anyone stand for the sterilization of children? We're going to look back at this glance and say, what the hell were we doing, sterilizing children? And that should be the issue of the Republican Party. It's been a tough sell to the party bosses,

but I'll tell you, at the grassroots level, it really resonates. Yeah, of course it does. And I think that's our issue. Of course it does. Don't listen to the party. These Republicans that are running things are just the biggest dopes in the world. They continue to lose time and time again and then say, well, it's because we didn't do it, you know, right enough. Well, that sounds like a Marxist on why it always fails.

Bill, thank you so much. Bill Isayle, he is a California State Assemblyman. Keep up the hard work. God bless you. I don't know how you stay sane. No, thank you, Glenn. Happy to be here. If any wants to follow us, they can as Bill as Saly at on our social stuff.

Thank you. Okay, thank you. By the way, it's spelled E-S-S-A-Y-L-I. What a California way to spell you see. Find it an easier way. I mean, I know it's your name and everyone, but give us a break, man. Okay. Relief factor sleep.

I'm going to take a wild shot in the dark here, and guess you don't enjoy those nights where you just can't go to sleep. I mean, you know, it's great when you're young. You know, you're out partying. My idea of partying is just, it's 7 o'clock. What do you think? Can we just go to bed? If sleep is eluding you, what can you do about it?

Well, I don't have trouble sleeping. Very often, when I do, I reach for relief factor sleep. Then I sleep. Just like the regular relief factor that you take for pain, Relief Factor Sleep is 100% drug-free, so you get a good night sleep that you really need without feeling like you got hit by a truck the next morning. It's blend of natural ingredients designed to promote healthy sleep by reducing anxiety and distress, improving mood, and promoting relaxation.

I know from experience that it works when I travel out to the ranch, you know, we have a time change and I have to go to bed so early, I have a hard time going to sleep. That's really when I take Relief Factor Scare. sleep. Unleashed the power of great sleep by calling 800 the number four relief. 800, the number four relief. Relieffactor.com. Dream big and sleep tight. 10 seconds. Station ID. All right. You're sick freak. Hello, Stu. Glenn, how are you? You know, nice of you to ask two and a half hours into the show. Let's see you care. Well, that's what one would do that doesn't actually care about the answer. Hmm? That's what one would do if they didn't care. about the answer. Are you still talking? Yes.

Unfortunately, yes. Yeah. Okay, what haven't we hit yet? We've got Steve Friend coming in. Center for Renewing American Fellow. He is the FBI whistleblower. And there's an upcoming bill in Tennessee that is going to require the FBI to receive approval from the chief law enforcement officer in each national security investigation. I think this is fantastic. So in other words, you're doing something on one of our citizens? You've got to go see the sheriff.

I like that. I like that a lot. It would protect the citizens of the states from an overreach because they're just going in to places and just walking in doing whatever they want. You've talked about this before. What's the significance of the sheriff in our system? The sheriff is supposed to, well, he's the, he only answers to the people and the constitution. He doesn't answer to the governor. He doesn't answer to commissioner or anybody else. He is directly responsible for the people and the constitution. So when you come in and you're serving a warrant, you're supposed to go to the sheriff and say, hey, we're serving this warrant.

because he's the chief law enforcement person in the county. So you go to him and then he watches the FBI and watches you, protects you, or make sure that everything that the FBI is giving you is legit and is protecting you from an out-of-control government. That's what they're supposed to do. This law will make sure that that happens. Seems like an improvement if we actually utilize that. function. Yeah. I don't know that we do. Doesn't seem like we do. Well, no, we don't. Uh,

some sheriffs do. They demand it. Um, other sheriffs don't. You, you, when, if you're voting for a sheriff, you need to ask them about, hey, you know, your relationship with the FBI, is it really tight and cozy? Back. Uh, well, our very, very, very Catholic president is doing what all good Catholics do, Finding to restore Roe versus Wade is the law of the land. I mean, that's what the Pope is really, that's what he's doing, I'm sure. One can only hope he doesn't actually realize the weight of evil that rests on this country's shoulders. Maybe he'd change that. We've murdered 65 million unborn children since Roe versus Wade,

and every day abortion claims more baby's lives, because now they're just using the abortion drug. The ministry of preborn standing in the gap, defending the lives of the unborn, showing God's love to expecting moms in crisis. By introducing and expecting mom to her unborn baby through a free ultrasound, preborn doubles the chances that she's going to choose life. They've rescued over 280,000 babies through love, compassion, and free ultrasounds. Help change the world. Donate anything you can. Donate securely at dial pound 250. keyword baby that's pound 250 keyword baby preborn.com slash Beck. And you can subscribe to Blaze TV at BlazeTV.com slash Glenn.

Promocode is Glenn. So the FBI comes to town and they're investigating, you know, let's say a parent for being a terrorist because they spoke out of the school board meeting. And the sheriff deputies and some of the police officers are asked by the FBI, Joint Terrorism Task Force to join. And they do. And then they find out what the case is all about. Well, the sheriff or the police chief doesn't have any right to know because they don't have a need to know, according to the FBI.

So your funds for the state are going to this task force and you don't even know what they're doing. Are they wasting money by going after somebody who, you know, was praying at an abortion clinic? Steve Friend is here now. He's the Center for Renewing America Fellow. He's an FBI whistleblower. He objected to being part of the January 6 raids. Steve, welcome to the program. Great to be with you, Glenn.

Thanks for having me this morning. You bet. Okay, so you're just trying to put up a line of defense of the people using the last really constitutional string that you have, and that is the sheriff's office, right? Precisely. This is really just 101 stuff. It's a very simple bill that is on the table here in Tennessee.

It's Senate Bill 2804, House Bill 2912, and essentially just says that the sheriff has to be read in and approve of any of the terrorism investigations that his deputies who are on loan to the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force, any of the cases that they're working on. It will create sort of a bulwark because the FBI then has to bring it to the chief elected law enforcement official who the people voted for. The people don't vote for an FBI. They vote for their sheriff.

And not for nothing, he should be aware if there's a legitimate terrorism threat in his county. That's his charge. Let me read this entire bill. And it's quite a bill. Amend Senate bill number 2804 House Bill 2912 by deleting all language. after the enacting clause and substituting Section 1, Tennessee Code, annotated, Title 38, Chapter 8, Part 1 is amended by adding the following new section. Now, here's where the rubber meets the road to see if you can follow this.

In the event, a law enforcement agency within the state nominates personnel to be deputized as a federal task force on a joint terrorism task force, the chief law enforcement officer from the nominee's respective law enforcement agency must approve each national security investigation in which the nominee participates. Then he gets into a very complicated section two. This act takes effect July 1st, 2024. I mean, that's an easy to read bill and very, very clear. What kind of opposition are you coming up against?

Well, unfortunately, the Tennessee Department. of safety and homeland security, which is an arm of the governor's office, has opposed us on every avenue here with this. And the communications we've received from them is they don't feel that sheriffs are entitled to know about what they work with the FBI on. So they're all in for the federalization of law enforcement, which is pretty a constitutional from any, any conservative standpoint. So what is their excuse for saying? The sheriff, the only elected enforcement in the whole group here. How come the sheriff doesn't have a right to know? They believe that it will impede their ability to work with the FBI. I think that the FBI is a pretty symbiotic relationship

with a lot of these state-level agencies. The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation has expressed a proposition as well to us doing this. And I think that they are in with the FBI, and the FBI gives them the goodies, and they get the credentials. They are all in for what's going on at a higher level. And with the nature of, as you move up the chain of command within our government structures, you sort of feel like the plebeian swine at the lowest level, even if it's sheriff, isn't entitled to know what you are working on from on high, which is opposing anything that we expect of our law enforcement agencies. I mean, we want to keep the community safe, and we elect the sheriff to do that. We elect him to bring crime down to confront terrorism.

and if he's unable to do that because he doesn't have a need to know from the FBI's perspective, he's unable to fulfill that charge and he can't do his job. And we should not be at a state level paying deputies or police officers using those funds of the taxpayers provide to the state to go and do the bidding of the federal government. And we don't have any oversight of it. We've disempowered local law enforcement. And if you want to make the argument that we're all about supporting police and we don't want to defund the police, This is empowering local police where it really matters.

So is this mainly for to stop the people that are praying, you know, at the abortion clinic or the abuse of parents who are called terrorists? That's really what the genesis of the motivating factor here is. We've been able to galvanized support across the aisle as well. There were some Democrats in the House that were intrigued by the argument I was making because the FBI has clearly broadly overinterpreted. its national security mandate. We're seeing things where they're starting to articulate and connect First Amendment protected activity to some of the things that they deem to be within their purview. So you have the recent argument about Christian nationalism. Well, the FBI has a caveat that says that they don't investigate First Amendment protects activity like the right to speak or

religious worship. However, they're using these quote unquote nonpartisan organizations like the public religion research institute, which generates a report. and says that Christianity is refracted through a lens of white supremacy. And now the FBI is cooking with gas because they can say, well, we do investigate racially motivated violent extremism. So we're going to go and investigate people who say have a preference for the Latin Mass when they attend at their parish and recruit people to inform on them so that we can open assessments on them as anti-government extremists.

And this, hopefully, you know, the sheriffs are open to, you know, investigations on actual terrorism, no matter who it's from, no matter which side it's from, but actual terrorism. And this would protect the people. It would not allow the sheriff, however, to alert the people or stand alongside the people if they're being investigated for praying at church. It just means nobody's going to be using local or county or state money to help on that. right yes and i think as a a sheriff who's elected by the people if the FBI says we want your deputies as task force officers here to work on investigating a mom at a school board and the sheriff opposes that he'll pull those people out and i would imagine he would be rather loud about that

and let his people know that the FBI is something even if it it violates a security clearance because that's an inappropriate investigation i would hope that a constitutional sheriff would would focus on that rather than a mere clearance as many Wesselblowers have lost theirs for transient reasons within our federal government. Well, as our government has lost control of the police force, you know, the federal police force, the only elected law enforcement official is your sheriff. And if when you're going in to vote for a sheriff, you better ask him, who do you work for and what does that mean what happens if the FBI comes in and they you know are doing an

investigation on on parents at the school board where do you stand on that you have to have serious conversations with your sheriff if you have a sheriff up for election they are critical to this now in Tennessee you're trying to pass this what when when does it go up and how can we help? Oh, thank you for this. So the Senate Judiciary Committee is actually taking this under consideration today at 2 p.m. Eastern time. They will be looking at it.

And then the House is looking at it. And that's Senate Bill 2804, House Bill 2912, and the House Criminal Justice subcommittee is taking this up tomorrow. So if folks in Tennessee or around the country want to reach out to the members of those respective committees, to express support for this. That would be a huge help. I mean, this audience, my friend Garrett-O-Boyle felt the weight of this audience when we were here talking about his store. He had more sales in two days than he had in the entire history of his store. So I know the Glenn Beck audience is down to support this sort of initiative.

Yeah, and they also just got a very important initiative passed in Tennessee, I think, here recently. This audience is really, truly amazing. So if you are in Tennessee, you want to call the Tennessee Senate. It's in committee tomorrow. What committee is it? The Senate is today. The Senate Judiciary Committee is having it at 2 o'clock Eastern. And tomorrow, the House has it in front of a subcommittee under the criminal justice.

Okay. Subcommittee of criminal justice. That's tomorrow. That's the House. You can call them today. the Senate Judiciary Committee is meeting at 2 p.m. today, so you want to call them. And again, you're looking in the House at the bill number 2912, and the Senate bill 20404. If you can't remember the name of the bill, what would they just call it, if something simple so people would know?

it's just basically being called an FBI bill by the layperson there. Everyone sort of knows what we're talking about. And again, this is empowering the local sheriff. This is nothing to do. It's not going to limit your ability to keep the community safe. It just says that the chief law enforcement officer who's elected by the people should know what is going on. And that should not impede any righteous investigations. And we'll actually bring the FBI back into focus of what they should be focusing on rather than moms at school boards or people.

who like to go to Latin Mass. Steve, you're a very brave man. Thank you so much. God bless you. Thank you, Glenn. God bless your audience. Trying to get this out of the committee's judiciary committee today and the House Subcommittee on criminal activity tomorrow in Tennessee. Call them and say the sheriff and the FBI bill, you want to go in for a full vote. Pass this in committee. That's in Tennessee today. So if you're looking to buy or sell a home or both, someone says, you know, I know a person, most of the time, run, run. The person in question probably, you know, dips his or her pinky toe into the real estate business after watching a real estate video on YouTube and the rest of the time they're sacking groceries if

you're lucky. Believe me, I know I have dealt with my fair share of them. What you really want, what you need when you're dealing with something as complicated as a real estate transaction, you need somebody who is dedicated, a professional real estate agent who knows all of the best practices, who's going to be able to walk into a room and tell you everything you need to do to prepare your house and who's going to help you put a team together. You really need somebody who's going to be in that corner and find somebody with real estate agents. I trust. That's where you can find them. Just tell us where you're moving from and moving to. If you have a house that you need to sell that, you know,

I'm afraid of squatters, maybe it's a parent's house. Real estate agents, I trust.com. Real estate agents, I trust.com. This is the Glenn Beck program. So, you know, California, New York mainly are having real problems with squatters, people coming in. Stu, when somebody comes in and just claims that your house is, their house.

I mean, it's stealing, right? That's what I would call it, yes. Yeah, right. We keep calling it squatting as if it's something different than just stealing someone's home. Like grand theft house. Right. We have grand theft auto. Grand theft home maybe.

I don't know. Whatever it is. It should be there. You'd think that there'd be more of a penalty than just even removal. Like, even as we're upgrading. the charges and the punishments for these people that were like, ah, well, before we let them just live there, now we're going to remove them if they get caught doing this.

How about they get thrown in prison for the rest of their lives? You know what I like? Kind of where I would start. This is Florida Sheriff Grady Judd. He heads up the sheriff's office in Polk County. Polk County, you know, in Florida. Judd said that past police action in Polk County already has been making life difficult for squatters. We've never had that problem because we go into the house.

We determine, well, the real owner doesn't know who these people are and entered into no contract. So we load them up. We give them a one-way ticket to county jail. It's just that simple. You don't have right to bog it down in court. You just do what's right. It's always been this way in the country. You know, they pop smoke on.

us and leave us wherever they, whenever they get out of jail, and they're gone. I mean, they're gone fast because we just don't put up with it, and that's the bottom line. Across this nation, if you get tired of doing it, do something about it, he said. We've got a 50-year low in crime in Polk County. I wonder why that is. What do you think that is? One thing I've noticed about stopping crime is enforcing the law seems to help the problem. Like, If you were to take the laws that you have and enforce them and not, let's say, release the same criminals into the environment over and over and over against, they can continue to commit crimes, recidivism is a real problem and maybe just stop that. Well, let's watch. Let's watch because Oregon's governor has signed a measure to reimpose criminal penalties for hard drugs and the mayor of Portland, Ted Wheeler. says this, you know, free drugs, free hard drugs, you know, drugs everywhere and no criminal

penalties. He says that's a failed experiment. Yeah. Didn't work out. Yeah. Yeah, it didn't. It didn't. So anyway, they're going to, they're going to recriminalize drugs. But see, this may not work just because it's against the law. You see, they'd have to enforce it. Oh, yeah. And I'm wondering if, I mean, you know, as great of a guy Ted Wheeler is, love him. He's fantastic. He's fantastic as a mayor. As great as he is, I'm wondering if he's going to allow the police to enforce that. Or is it just against the law?

I kind of thought those were the same things until recently. Like, I thought, I feel like whenever I go five miles an hour over the speed limit, someone enforces the law on me. Yet it seems like that Hunter Biden and so many others in. our society have developed a totally new system of justice. You just have to tell them they pull you over for speeding. You just say, I've got a squatter on the pedal there. I like that. And he refuses to leave.

I wasn't speeding. It was him. And he just, he just wants to squat on the pedal. Can you just identify as one of your personal enemies each time you get pulled over? What do you mean? You know, like I identify. I'm Glenn Beck. When I get pulled over, it's just that easy.

The Glenn Beck Program.