The Glenn Beck Program - Nap Time with Robert Mueller | Guests: Tom Fitton, David Steinberg & Justin Haskins | 7/24/19

Episode Date: July 24, 2019

Hour 1 Nap time with Robert Mueller. Glen and Stu's long awaited play-by-play of the political snoozefest ...IIhan Omar Special Tonight on BlazeTV ...Hank Johnson, the dumbest congressmen speaks ...Louie the bulldog Gohmert has been released  Hour 2 Judicial Watch files house ethics complaint against Rep. llhan Omar over potential immigration, Marriage, tax, and Student Loan Fraud.Tom Fitton joins to discuss ...Brotherly Love and IIhan Omar with journalist David Steinberg  Hour 3 Hypocritical socialist Bernie Sanders wants more pay for workers. Justin Haskins joins to explain how Bernie and AOC are cut from the same socialist cloth ...The Squad are squeaking again and this time we're all Islamophobes Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The fusion of entertainment and enlightenment. There are so many stories to get to today. We're going to mainly focus on the Mueller report and just kind of go through that as it happened. We are going to go through that today. Also, we have a special tonight on Elon Omar. You get a 20% discount just by using Glenn 20 is the promo code of go to blazedtv.com. This is something you don't want to miss. We're going to have one of the authors of one of the stories that really did a lot of the legwork on this story.

He'll be on today. Also, on radio, we are going to have Tom Fitton. He's the president of Judicial Watch. They have just filed an ethics complaint against Elon Omar over the potential immigration, marriage, tax, and student loan fraud that we will be explaining tonight. We'll talk to him about that. And, I mean, there is still more on the transgendered woman who wanted someone to wax his, her, Romney. And we'll get to that as well, all on today's show. This is the Glenbag program.

First, let's address something that maybe you are dealing with. I hope you're not. But if you are, there is help. It's pain, constant, nagging, awful. I can't live this way anymore. kind of pain. I'm in that kind of pain or have been in that kind of pain. I was in that kind of pain for probably, gosh, eight years. And I got to the point where I'm like, I can't. I mean, I'm in my 50s. I don't want to be like that. What am I going to be like when I'm 90?

I can't live this way. Most people think they have to live this way. You don't. You don't. Please. I've met with members of the audience who are veterans who just couldn't get out of bed because of pain. They just couldn't take it anymore. I understand. Please, just try Relief Factor. I swear to you, I said this the other day. I feel like I'm begging you, but I really am because I know me. I was stubborn.

I didn't want to take it. I didn't want to try it. It's not going to work. Why try it? Why try it? Because if it works like it has for me, you get your life back. It is so well worth just trying. trying it. If you happen to be a wife of a really stubborn man like I am, do what my wife did.

Just take it. I'm not going to listen to you whine about it anymore if you don't just try it. You got to try it. All right. All right. So relieffactor.com. Relieffactor.com. Go there. Just try it for three weeks. Get there three week quick start. If it works, you're out of pain. You have your life back. If it doesn't, yes, you're out 20 bucks. but 70% of the people who try it go on to order more month after month. I take it three times a day as directed, and it works for me. Relieffactor.com. That's Relieffactor.com, 800, 5383-84. All right, if we can bring up the Mueller testimony just a little bit so we can talk over it

and hear if there's anything interesting when he gets to questions or answers. But... Page two of volume two reads as follows. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent. presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him. Now, I read that correctly? Yes. All right. Now, your report, and today you said at all times the special counsel team operated under, was guided by, and followed

Justice Department policies and principles. So which DOJ policy or principle sets forth a legal standard that an investigated person is not exonerated if their innocence from criminal conduct is not conclusively determined. That's a question by Congressman Ratcliffe. Which DOJ policy or principle set forth a legal standard that an investigated person is not exonerated if their innocence from criminal conduct is not conclusively determined? Where does that language come from, Director? Where is the DOJ policy that says that?

Let me make it easier. Can I agree? Go ahead. Can you give me an example other than Donald Trump or the Justice Department determined that an investigated person was not exonerated because their innocence was not conclusively determined? I cannot, but this is a unique situation. Okay, well, you can't. Time is short. I've got five minutes. Let's just leave it at you can't find it because I'll tell you why. It doesn't exist. The special counsel's job, nowhere does it say that you were to conclusively determine Donald Trump's innocence or that the special counsel. Radcliffe from Texas by a Republican order. It's not in the special counsel regulations. It's not in the OLC opinions. It's not in the Justice Manual and it's not in the

principles of federal prosecution. Nowhere do those words appear together because respectfully, respectfully, director, it was not the special counsel's job to conclusively determine Donald Trump's innocence or to exonerate him because the bedrock principle of our justice system is a presumption of innocence. It exists for everyone. Everyone is entitled to it, including sitting presidents. And because there is a presumption of innocence, prosecutors never, ever need to conclusively determine it. Now, Director, the special counsel applied this inverted burden of proof

that I can't find, and you said doesn't exist anywhere in the department policies, and you used it to write a report. And the very first line of your report, The very first line of your report says, as you read this morning, it authorizes the special counsel to provide the attorney general with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the special counsel. That's the very first word of your report, right? That's correct. Here's the problem, Director. The special counsel didn't do that.

On volume one you did. On volume two, with respect to potential obstruction of justice, the special counsel, The special counsel made neither a prosecution decision or a declination decision. You made no decision. You told us this morning and in your report that you made no determination. So respectfully, Director, you didn't follow the special counsel regulations. It clearly says, write a confidential report about decisions reached. Nowhere in here does it say write a report about decisions that weren't reached.

You wrote 180 pages. 180 pages about decisions that weren't reached, about potential crimes that weren't charged or decided. And respectfully, respectfully by doing that, you manage to violate every principle and the most sacred of traditions about prosecutors not offering extra prosecutorial analysis about potential crimes that aren't charged. So Americans need to know this as they listen to the Democrats and Socialists on the other side of the aisle as they do dramatic readings. Thank you, Texas. This report, that volume two of this report was not authorized under the law to be written. It was written to a legal standard that does not exist at the Justice Department, and it was written in violation of every DOJ principle about extra prosecutorial commentary.

I agree with the chairman this morning when he said Donald Trump is not above the law. He's not, but he damn sure shouldn't be below the law, which is where volume two of this report puts him. All really good points by Ratcliffe. I would like to have heard Mike Mueller's response. Answer there. Oh, no, now we go to another

Texan. Sheila Jackson Lee. The Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort was passing sensitive voter information and polar data to a Russian operative. And there were so many other

ways that Russia subverted our democracy. Together with the evidence in volume one, I cannot think of a more serious need to investigate. So now I'm going to ask you some questions.

about obstruction of justice as it relates to volume two. Why is she wearing like Napoleon's jacket? You state we determined that there were a sufficient factual that evil basis. All she has to do is stick her hand into the jacket and she's Napoleon. Is that correct? You put some of you put some tassels on her hair and it looks like his hat too. Which portion of that page? That is, we determine that there were.

was a sufficient factual and legal basis to further investigate potential obstruction of justice issues. She doesn't know where it is on the page because someone pulled the quote form, put it on a separate page. Your report also describes at least 10 separate instances of possible obstruction of justice that were investigated by you and your team. Is that correct? In fact, the table of contents serves as a very good guide of some of the acts. There is a table of contents.

Is that correct, sir? Yes, and that serves as a guide to find what you wrote. Is that correct, sir? Yes. These numbers seem to be page numbers identifying where these pieces of the report exist. Yes. Yes. Yes.

The president's orders, dime again, to deny that the president tried to survive. Are those same numbers on pages later in your report? I direct you now to what you wrote, Director Moller. All right, here we go. pattern of conduct as a whole sheds light on the nature of the president's acts and the inferences that can be drawn about his intent does that mean you have to investigate all of his conduct to ascertain true motive no and when you talk about the president's pattern of conduct that include the 10 possible acts of obstruction that you investigated is that correct when you talk about the president's

pattern of conduct that was dressed like a british obstruction that you investigated I'm going to report for how that is characterized. Thank you. Let me go to the screen again. And for each of those 10 potential instances of obstruction of justice, you analyze three elements of the crime of obstruction of justice. An obstructive act, a nexus between the act and an official proceeding, and corrupt intent. Is that correct?

Yes. You wrote on page 178, volume two. Oh, God. So this is a strategy, though, Glenn. And it's important to understand what Democrats are doing. What they believe is that the American people have not read this report. They don't know what's in it, and it would be damning. So what they're going to do is read sections from the report,

basically pick the things that look worse for Trump, the worst things they can find, and then just have Mueller say, yes, that is what I said. So it's giving them, they're trying to get these viral moments out of reading the report because they know he's not going to say anything additional. This is why this is such a circus. Can you please get the theme from Barry Lyndon because I need it under Sheila Jackson Lee as I'm just watching it? This is not a viral moment at all. And I don't think the American people are really interested.

I think Congress is interested in this. And I think for all the wrong reasons, the media is interested in this. But I don't think you're going to find anything from Mueller today that is new at all. And you're just going to solidify people's positions of where they already are. I would have liked to hear, and at some point I'm sure they'll get back to it. I would love to hear Mueller's response to the questions from Ratcliffe. Me too. Like, hey, you know, you invented this new thing where it's not innocent or guilty.

It's, well, we couldn't prove the guilt, so, and we couldn't prove the innocence, so maybe he was guilty. That new legal standard. I'd love to hear that one explained for Mueller at some point, and hopefully we get to that today. Yeah, well, we'll see. I doubt it. All right, I'm going to pause for just a second, just to tell you about 23 and me. It's our sponsor this half hour. If you're a fan of trivia, here's a little nugget that has been floating around for a while.

Did you know that 16 million people on the planet today are directly related to Genghis Khan? Now, that is a surprisingly large number when you consider that in the 13th century, Khan was blazing a trail of violent conquest across much of Eastern Asia. Apparently, one of his favorite things to do after a hard day of burning and pillaging was to spend time with the ladies and, you know, often against their will. But he spent a lot of time with the ladies. So here's a question. Are you related to Genghis Khan?

Does your heart beat with a thundering rhythm of the warrior? Do you feel like you were made for something greater? Like you should be out riding a horse and shooting arrows rather than sitting at your desk? Sometimes do you stand outdoors facing east and think, I bet I could take Dave's house if I really tried. Sounds like you might have some soul searching to do, but you also might want to find out if you're a direct descendant of Genghis Khan.

23 and me can help you do it. In addition to finding out whether you're, you know, descended from that bloodthirsty killer, 23 and me will also offer the state of the art look at the part of your genes and what it plays in your everyday life. For instance, if you've always suspected that you feel sleepier than others after missing a night's sleep, you're probably not imagining things. Your genes could be involved. 23 and me, their reports don't diagnose diseases or describe. overall likelihood of developing any disease.

But 23 and Me test selected gene variants. And they will tell you what you might be predisposed to. 23 and me slash Beck. Important test information. Order your health and ancestry kit at 23andme.com slash Beck. Let me say it this way in case you are related to Genghis Khan. Order it or I'll kill you. Number 23 and me.com slash Beck.

10 seconds, station ID. Man, ex, uh, uh, the, uh, the council here, uh, is, uh, they spent two hours yesterday. The, the Democrats in, uh, closed door session rehearsing and practicing. Now we go to Mr. Sensenbrenner, uh, and his cross-examination of Mueller. pages in raw evidentiary material, including hundreds of references to 302, which are interviews by the FBI, for individuals who have never been cross-examined, and which did not comply with the special counsel's governing regulation to explain the prosecution or declination decisions reached, correct? And where are you reading from on that?

I'm reading from my question. Then, could you repeat it? Okay. have 182 pages of raw evidentiary material with hundreds of references to 302s who were never been cross-examined and which didn't comply with the governing regulation to explain the prosecution or declaration declination decisions reached this is one of those areas which i declined to discuss okay and would direct you to the report itself well i looked at that 182 pages that is of it, you know, let me switch gears. He's too. He kind of looked like something that would be happening at a nursing home.

Yeah. Like, let me change you somebody else. Well, I don't know. You'd have to check the papers for that. It could be a sequel to Last Vegas. This scene happens in. Grumpy old man. Yeah.

The number of occasions in his report stated that the President Clinton's actions may have risen to impeachable conduct, recognizing that it is up. to the House of Representatives to determine what conduct is impeachable. You never use the term raising to impeachable conduct for any of the ten instances that the general woman from Texas, right? Is it true that there's nothing in volume two of the report that says that the president may have engaged in impeachable conduct?

Well, we have, we have, um, previously kept in the center of our investigation the our mandate and our mandate does not go to other ways of addressing conduct our mandate goes to what developing the report and putting the report into the attorney general respect you know it seems to me you know that there are a couple of statements that you made you know that said that this is not for me to decide you know that this is not for me to decide and the implication is that this is for this committee to decide. Now, you didn't use the word impeachable conduct like Starr did. There was no statute to prevent you from using the word impeachable conduct. And I go back to what Mr. Radcliffe said. And that is that even the president is innocent until proven guilty. My time is up.

Your Honor, his time has expired. Really? That's a really good point. Do you understand what he was trying to say here? Yeah, I just like this. All right. you don't need me. Well, you have the whole audience you could explain it to.

I can't hear them. Go ahead. Everybody that don't need to. What he said there was, now I can't remember. Wow. By the way, just to remind you, Glenn, nominated for the Radio Hall of Fame this year. What he was saying there was, look, you can put opinions out there and say it's up for this committee

because impeachment is your own standard. But you didn't say impeachment. You were talking about possible crimes. And, well, I don't know. I mean, you could look at it this way. You would look at it that way. I don't know. Well, that is, that's putting the president below the law.

Right. And he's also making the point that, hey, Ken Starr did see it as impeachable. He put it in his report. Why didn't you put it in yours? And of course, implication is there that it wasn't impeachable. He didn't agree with that, per se. Also, they were old. This is Mr. Cohen.

Particularly you, because of your outstanding reputation. Democrat. Prior to your appointment, the Attorney General recused himself from the investigation because of his role in the 2016 campaign. Is that not correct? Recusal means the Attorney General could not be involved in the investigation. Is that correct? That's the effect of recusal, yes. And so instead, another. Trump appointee, as you know Mr. Sessions was, Mr. Rosenstein became in charge of it.

Is that correct? Yes. Wasn't Attorney General Sessions following the rules and professional advice of the Department of Justice ethics folks when he refused himself from the investigation? Yes. And yet the President repeatedly expressed his displeasure at Sessions' decision to follow that was ethics rules to recuse himself from oversight of that investigation. Is that not correct?

That's accurate based on what is written in the report. And the president's reaction to the recusal is noted in the report. Mr. Bannon recalled that the president was mad, as mad as Bannon had ever seen him, and he screamed at McGahn about how weak Sessions was. Do you recall that from the report? That's in the report, yes. Despite knowing that Attorney General Sessions was supposed to be. This is ridiculous.

This is, I mean, this is really. It's in the report. Yes. Yes. And, of course, it's just a show. Again, it's the Hollywood for ugly people thing, right? Like, that's what this is a show. Right.

And they're trying to just read from the report. Questions they know are in the report. Right. So here's the thing. We could just take the Republicans because they're saying something new. And then you could read the report. You know, if you want to hear, Oh, yes.

You just read the report. Back in just a second. You're listening to Glenn Beck. Man alive. You know what makes, you know what makes all of this worth doing every day? Sitting in this chair every day coming in, the X-Jare. the X-chair. X-chair is so good for your back and your body.

You will be comfortable as you're sitting in your chair, doing whatever it is that you do. And if you're working in a cubicle, I'm sorry. Sorry, dude. I know that you didn't grow up thinking, man, if I could just take this cubicle,

that bull by the horns. But you know what? You might as well be really comfortable in it, and it'll make you feel much, much better. about going to work every day. It's an X-Chair. Really comfortable. X-chair.

It's got 10 different settings. Stu is really thrilled with the chair just in the factory settings. Then I went, you know, you can move that. What? It's really a great chair. X-chair. Experience for yourself, 30-day money-back guarantee. It's X-chairbeck.com.

You can call them at 8444-4-X-Chair or see all of the different models from the X-Basic to the X-1 through X-X-4 at X-chairbeck.com. Use the promo code X-wheels. Every other show is going to be reviewing Mueller all night tonight. Not us. It's Ilan Omar special. Go to blazecTV.com. Use the code Glenn 20.

Save 20 bucks. That's true. Man, I'm really excited to welcome a brand new sponsor to the show, Tukovus. I know how ridiculous a great pair of boots can cost. Tukovus makes great boots and accessories. They sell their boots directly to the customer, so their boots are half the price of anything that's even similar in quality. They're all handmade with a 200-step process with only the best materials.

Their entire line honors the timeless traditional boot styles. No silly stitching or sequins or loud colors or anything else. These are just great boots like my grandfather would have worn. With Tukovus, there's no need to break them in. They arrive already ready to be worn immediately comfortably. They're easy to order with tremendous. customer service, TECOVUS always has free shipping and free returns. Check out their boots and their clothing and accessories right now.

Tocovis.com slash back. That's T-E-C-O-V-A-S dot com slash back. So we have, we're just, we're just covering the Mueller report and the the questioning of Robert Mueller. And this is now a question. Let's bring this up. This is Hank Johnson. Correct.

And in fact. He is quite possibly the dumbest congressman we have. Just saying something. Yeah, it is. Yeah, there's a lot of dumbness. Isn't that true? I refer to the report on that episode. Well, page 85 of volume two speaks to that.

And also, Director Mueller, D.OJ ethics officials confirmed that you had no conflicts that would prevent you from serving a special counsel. Isn't that correct? That's correct. But despite Don McGahn and, and the Department of Justice guidance around May 23rd, 2017, the president, quote, prodded McGahn to complain to Deputy Attorney to Rosenstein about these supposed conflicts. Just reading from the report.

Yeah, he's just reading from the report. These aren't real questions. Again, which I'm bummed because he is so good. When he asked questions, if you remember, oh, yeah. when Hank Johnson from Georgia, by the way, what the hell is going on with Georgia politics? Cynthia McKinney, Johnson, the woman who this earlier this week was like, the guy told me to go back home, which was completely untrue. Now they have the videotape showing that everything she said was bogus.

It's not great. Oh, it's amazing. It's amazing. By the way, you can keep the Hank Johnson questioning up. We're just going to keep monitoring. this in case anything exciting happens. Well, in case the whole committee tips over and capsizes. That's what Hank Johnson.

That's what he said in committee. He was asking a general about sending more troops to Guan. We have it? Play this. I love it. My fear is that the whole island will become so overly populated that it will tip over. and capsize. Listen to the general.

We don't anticipate that. The greatest response of all time. Of all time. Do you know how islands work, sir? Because it was still respectful. And yet, at the same time, relate how ridiculous the question was. It's not like a floaty in a pool that can just travel around. I don't know if you know that.

Can we talk about another development here with Hank Johnson? Did he have like a tube in his throat in like a recent surgery or something that I don't know about. Massive shaving problem? Did he have a shaving incident? Because it looks like he cut himself shaving and still has the paper towel under his chin. Watch when he looks up. No, he does. Is that what it is?

I think it is. You can kind of see it a little bit. A little bit. But when he looks up, watch him look up. There he is. He's like, I got toilet paper stuck to my neck. That first weekend phone call that's done McGahn. I mean, you fire your entire staff after this, if this is what this is.

It could be something we don't know about medical issues. With our luck, it was something he was in the hospital getting a blood transfusion last night. And then this will all be Twitter going, look at how insensitive. They just hate him because he's black. Well, you know, that is why we mentioned, of course, that it could be, it could legitimately be something medical that I don't know about. But it does appear to be that it just, he just cut himself shaving. A little shaving accident. Well, maybe he was shaving on an island that was in the middle of capsizing.

Oh. Possible. Sometimes when you move your arm to one side or the other of the room, and that room just starts to move a little bit. Exactly. You've got to be careful while you're shaving. Why don't shave on planes? We learn that from the documentary airplane back in the day.

Not a documentary, but I appreciate that. By the way, tonight at 5 o'clock, you've got to join us, Pat. You've got to be. Is this the Alonam-Omarthing? Yeah. Yeah. It is really going to be a good special tonight. I bet.

We have an hour long special. Do you delve into the, or maybe you don't want to give this. No, go ahead. Delve into the marriage with the brother? Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay. Yeah, we're trying to explain, A, what this controversy is because most people are like, this can't be true. What's about this?

He married your brother. What is this? And so we explain what all of the controversies are. From her all the way back to Somalia. to today and we are also giving all of the evidence that has been found and it's, it is, I think it's enough to call a grand jury. I have been absolutely dumbfounded by the fact that nobody has been able to,

maybe until tonight, has been able to follow up on this. She married her brother for immigration purposes and nobody can actually track that down. Well, we're not sure. How can that be? Yeah. How could it be? Because she won't answer the question. But there is no birth certificate because Somalia was such a nightmare.

Okay, so there was no birth certificate. So you just have to take and piece together what she says, what he says, follow the pictures, follow the immigration, and what they said when they were coming in. So there's no records of that family in Somalia? No. Wow. It was a civil war. It's a civil war. It's not in a refugee camp.

We had one too and we still have records. It's possible we had a more developed government than Somalia. Even then. Even then. It's not unusual for not to have birth certificates. And it's really important that we don't make this into a birth certificate thing. Right. Because it's not.

We're not questioning how she got here. We know how she got here. But there's illegal potential illegal activity there. There's illegal activity that seems. pretty likely on how she got in. The family was broken in half. Half went to England under one name. The other half came here under the Omar name.

And then we have all of the photographic evidence. You're just going to have to decide for yourself. It's enough to be able to go now and say to a grand jury, you need to investigate this. There's a felony on entrance. There's possible felonies on lying about who people are for educational purposes, for discounts, fraud. There is a felony of her tax forms where she was, I mean, incredible. There's 28, is it 28 tickets and citations that she and.

her husband slash brother received in this time period where they where they state their address and their address is the same address where her quote ex-husband lived so it looks like she was living with her quote new husband most likely brother with her with the husband so it was supposedly divorced it was big a me yeah no she didn't divorce well didn't she at one point No, she said, yes, in the Muslim tradition. Right, okay. Okay, so she married him in the Muslim tradition. Right.

And what's really strange is most people don't know this. She's back to being married to him again. Correct. But when she married her brother or whoever this guy is, she married with a Christian pastor. Now, why would a devout, why would a devout, why would a devout, Muslim who wears a hijab and a devout Muslim male

marry with a Christian pastor Why indeed? Diversity, that's why. I mean, there's just a lot of stuff like that that's just bizarre. Just totally bizarre. But there are, I believe, crimes, serious crimes. And the

Impeachable crimes? Oh, yeah, jail crimes. Yeah. Felonies. Yeah. Not high crimes of misdemeanies. actual felonies. You don't have to have an opinion on this. If these things are true, she should be going to prison. And Pat, you definitely want to watch this special tonight, right?

I definitely want to. Okay. You should use Glenn 20 as your promo code then when you sign up at blazTV.com, you'll save $20. Wow, that's unusual. It is unusual. It's twice the amount of the normal savings. Wow. And that's good today? It's good today. Glenn 20, G-L-E-N-N. It's two ends. Two ends. That's wasteful. Yeah, it is. Wouldn't one be sufficient? It would. He doesn't believe in global warming. Of course not. Glenn 20 at blaisTV.com. Make sure you get that.

Real quick, let's go to Louis Gomer. The element of any of those obstructions you referenced requires a corrupt state of mind, correct? Corrupt intent, correct. Right. And if somebody knows they did not conspire with anybody from Russia to affect the election. And they see the big justice department with people that hate that person coming after them. And then a special counsel appointed who hires a dozen or more people that hate that person. And he knows he's innocent.

He's not corruptly acting in order to see that justice is done. What he's doing is not obstructing justice. He is pursuing justice, and the fact that you ran it out two years means you perpetuated injustice. I take your question. The gentleman's time has expired. The witness may answer the question. I take your question. What does that mean?

The gentleman from Florida. This is like everyone was just senile just talking at each other. I got gin-eye and I like pizza. What the hell does that mean? I take your question. I guess it's just I understand it. I, yeah. He's not going to, he doesn't respect, I guess, the question.

I heard that you said that essentially is what he's saying. I mean, isn't that a good, isn't that a good point, though? Yeah, see, like it. I mean, I'd like to hear your. And then in your report, you wrote about multiple calls from the president to White House Council Don McGahn. And regarding the second call, you wrote, and I quote, McGahn recalled that the president was more direct saying something like,

Call Rod. Tell Rod that Mueller has conflicts and can't be the special counsel. McGahn, recall the president telling him Mueller has to go and call me back when you do it. Director Mueller, did McGahn understand what the president was ordering him to do? I direct you to what we have written in the report in terms of characterizing his feelings. And in the report it says, quote, McGahn understands. Look, I should be eating pudding at this time. I don't usually think like this now. I think I wrote it down.

Maybe you should read it. But it appears as though that's all you're doing is reading the report and asking me to leave my pudding time just to say, yeah, that's what the report said, I think. Return momentarily to the nursing home trial. It is unbelievable. Agonizing. Unbelievable. Okay. Thank you so much, Pat. Our sponsor, this half hour is ablines.com. Summer is here and I don't know what it's like at your house, but it's about 15,000 degrees here in Texas. But the good news is it has just a hint of humidity. So if you burst into flames, your sweat puts you back out.

It's great. Anyway, if you would like to save a lot of money, and reduce the heating cost and the air conditioning cost of your house, please call blinds.com, the number one online choice for affordable quality custom window coverings. Plus, every order gets free online design consultation, free shipping, 100% satisfaction guarantee. They make it really super easy. And I have to tell you, I have bought blinds from blinds.com.

I have bought them from the stores. and I hate waiting for somebody with the apron who will say, oh, yeah, yeah, I'll find somebody for you. And then you wait. And then they just say, well, here's what we have. And you can just look through this book. Well, I can do that online. And I can get all the sample sent to me overnight. Blinds.com.

Do it from the comfort of your own home. Save a buttload of money right now. 40% off for a limited time plus an extra $20 off with promo code back. It's blinds.com for up to 40% off plus an extra $20 off with promo code back. Blinds.com promo code back. Alonamar, the special on her coming up tonight at 5 o'clock. This is, I think this is going to be a rather funny one. Sad, tragic, yes, full of crime, you bet.

But also, we're trying to explain this very, very complex, situation. And that's one reason. That's not the reason the mainstream media is doing it. But it's one reason why people don't know more about this is because it's so complex. So how do we explain something in a way that people really will enjoy watching it? Well, you'll see tonight. We have, we kind of, we're, we're, we're trying to look at shows from the 1970s that kind of fit. The Brady Bunch is the Omar bunch tonight. And also, all in the family and three's company might also play a role with Al-Amar playing, I guess, what was her name, Suzanne Summers, with a hijab. So you don't want to, well, maybe not with a hijab. Did she get

married with the Christian pastor? She got married with a Christian pastor, but in the Muslim tradition. That's all. It's easy to understand. Very strange situation. And I will say seeing it visually is going to help you actually understand it. So when everyone accuses you of being some hateful racist for questioning crimes,

you can actually explain all the details. That's where we've gotten to now. Before it was hey, I think they're a socialist. Racist. Now you're like, they're a felon. Racist. Wait.

It helps her. by, for people to not understand this story and you will understand it and you'll have a tool to where you can explain it to others tonight. That's if you're, of course, a subscriber at blazeddiv.com. Use the promo code Glenn 20 to save 20 bucks for tonight's special on Elon Omar. You don't want to miss that. Join us. You can cancel tomorrow if you want, but you won't because it's good.

All right. Also, Tom Fitten is coming up with us in just a. couple of minutes. He's the president of Judicial Watch, and he has filed a House ethics complaint against Omar over potential immigration,

marriage, tax, and student loan fraud. Which we're going to be covering all of those things tonight. And I think there is a I think what we're going to present tonight is a jury ready, I should say a

grand jury ready argument. you'll see tonight there's enough there to indict with a grand jury for some pretty serious crimes. So we'll get to that. Coming up, Tom Fitton is next, and also more on the nursing home food fight. It's happening in Congress right now. Did you write this? I don't know. I think so.

Did I use a typewriter? I don't really know. That is an exciting episode from Congress today. We'll cover it more coming up. You're listening at Glenn Fusion of Entertainment and Enlightenment. Tom Fitten, the president of Judicial Watch, has just yesterday filed a House ethics complaint against Representative Elon Omar over potential immigration, marriage, tax, and student loan fraud. We're doing a special tonight on this only at 5 o'clock on the Glenn Beck program on Blaze TV. You get a $20 discount if you sign up today right now to watch this.

We're going to explain all of it, but these are serious crimes. This is not no big deal. This isn't Ethics Committee look into it and slap her on the wrist. These are serious felonies. We talked to Tom Fittin about that in one minute. This is the Glimbeck program. So to Google and social media, we are nothing more than a product. They want our information, and then they sell our data to the highest bidder.

And then even worse, they shadow ban and discriminate against our views. Now, you have a choice. You can reclaim your privacy. Now, I'm talking to senators and congressmen about several things when it comes to privacy and it comes to these organizations. I don't want them regulated. I want them to lose the right to call themselves a platform. They're publishers.

So they shouldn't get the government protection. But also, we should have the right to our own data. I, that's me. They shouldn't have the right to this data. They should have to buy it from me. Or they can, you know, they can't gather anything. And anything that they gather has to come to me. Now, listen, I choose Norton SecureVPN.

If you want to go online, You need a virtual private network. You need to have that protection. You need bank grade encryption to hide your online activity. Norton Secure VPN creates a secure tunnel for the information that you send and receive online so the companies can't see your browsing activity. Norton SecureVPN. If you want to have all of today's technology,

but you don't want all of the snooping and everything else, get a Norton Secure VPN. Secure your connections today. Go to norton.com slash VPN. Protection starts at 333 a month for the first year of annual enrollment. That's norton.com slash VPN. Now, Tom Fitten is the president of Judicial Watch. That's a public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption. They have been around for a long time.

Tom Fitten is their president at Judicial Watch. and they have just filed a House ethics complaint against Elon Omar. Welcome to the program, Tom. Glenn, good to be with you. Thank you for having me on. Thanks. We're doing a special tonight. And, you know, the mainstream media makes this into conspiracy theory, or they say this is just crazy, you know, right-wingers.

But we've had the Minneapolis Star Tribune do an investigation themselves and verify the investigations by crazy right-wingers. And they either can confirm, they can confirm about 60% of it. And the rest of it, they say they can't disprove without her participation. These are serious, serious crimes. What we're presenting tonight, I believe, is enough for an indictment and a call for a grand jury. I gather you're at the same place. Yeah, there's certainly enough evidence to warn a criminal investigation into what went on there.

And, you know, Glenn, you've been looking at this, I'm sure, for as long as we have. It's kind of been this, like, low-grade fever type of corruption scandal. And when her hometown left-wing newspaper essentially puts its stamp of approval on the concerns that we've had for a long time. But it was going on there, I think it's pretty hard now, the Justice Department to ignore it, Department of Homeland Security, the IRS. And, you know, there's a political process for handling ethics concerns related to this type of activity, which is what we're trying to pursue with the House. We're not naive as to the interest in Democrats in doing this.

But we just got to try to make the system work. We've got to try to remind these members they're not above the law and hold other members accountable if they're going to try to let them get away with it. But I think that he is, they do think they're above the law. I mean, we're talking perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, state and federal tax fraud, federal student loan fraud. If it was you, Tom, or if it was me, how much trouble would we be in? How much jail time would we be looking at? Yeah, this would be an easy prosecution if it were a regular individual involved in it.

But this is a politically connected figure, now a member of Congress. I'm sure the Justice Department would be horrified of having to do something here. But that's the goal of filing this ethics complaint. Not only will it put pressure on the House to do something about it, but highlight the issue for the Justice Department to follow up. So hang on just a second. You say it would be very easy. Why would it be very easy?

It's complicated. Well, it's not that complicated. You know, so your listener should know, it looks like Ms. Omar came into the United States. States using the name of another family. The Omar family. Her siblings, including her brother, went to the United Kingdom. It looks like she married her brother to give him some type of immigration benefits here

in the United States. It's unclear how that plays out. So it's so bad that it's, we can't be confident that, as we point out, it's not her, she's going by another name that's not her own as a member of Congress. extraordinary. So it seems, it seems to be pretty well documented that this is what happened. What I can't figure out is why did she come with her father, I think, her father and her sister and go under the Omar family with the other siblings going to the UK. Is it because the Omar's could only take a certain number of people? Or why do you?

didn't they take the whole family under the Omar name? Do you know? Well, I'm not, I'm not sure about that, but, you know, remember, this is, you know, these are refugees. They're in, they were in Kenya at the time. I mean, who knows what was going on, you know, maybe they could only bring three individuals in with under the other family's name or the other, or her other members wanted to go to the United Kingdom for other reasons. You know, my guess is this is just a tip of the iceberg and probably not an unusual story in terms of a fraud associated with refugee settlements here in the United States. Apparently DNA evidence shows that 80% of Somalis coming in are not related to the people they say they're related to. Yeah, you know, and, and, you know, that might be happening with a wink and a nod from authorities.

The point is to get the refugees in and the specifics of the names. However, important it might be to national security and the rule of war. are terribly relevant to helping the refugees. It's amazing. But if you're going to run for Congress, you've got to make sure all your ducks in a row, and that hasn't happened to you. It's amazing to me that under Obama, we couldn't take Christian refugees because we just didn't know.

But if you say, and I believe this to be true, authorities look at this with a wink and a nod for Somalian Muslim refugees, but they don't have a wink and a nod for Christian, Syrian, or Iraqi refugees, there's something really toxic in our system. Well, you remember, the refugee program, the vetting of refugees was outsourced to third parties, UN officials and folks like that. So the United States just essentially accepted the word of the third party betters. That's what they've been happening with the refugee program, which is why President Trump tried to reform it to get more security measures in place.

So let me go here. As you're looking at the fraud of the marriage, she marries her husband, let's call him Ahmed I. She marries Ahmed I, but she says she only marries him under a religious ceremony. Is there any documentation of those two being married legally at all the first time? No, and I think, you know, some of the religious ceremonies were officiated by a Christian minister, which is... Well, that was Ahmed two. Ahmed 2. Ahmed 2.

Ahmed 1 was a religious Muslim to the Muslim tradition. Ahmed 2 was a legal and Christian ceremony done by a Christian pastor, which I just, how does this woman who's wearing a burqa get married by a Christian? It doesn't make sense. I encourage all your listeners to go to the Powerline blog so they can start creating their own genealotia. charts and marriage charts for the congressman from Minnesota. And this is why the ethics committee needs to get into this because she was playing fast and loose with our marriage laws.

She was filing IRS forms, pretending to be married to one person when in fact she was married to another. She was, we have the... She had to amend the form. She said that's good enough, but it may not be good. That wouldn't be good enough for most any other American. No. If you committed marriage fraud and you were just caught on an IRS form doing it.

No. And she also committed perjury on like 26 different, I think their traffic violations and other violations that she and Ahmed 2 got. And they put their address down as the address of Ahmed 1. So apparently they were all living together in some strange three's company kind of marriage with her children and both husbands. I mean, I don't even know what that is. Well, you know, if you're engaged in marriage fraud, it makes perfect sense.

Correct. I understand she's living with her brother, her husband's there too. On paper, the brother's married to her, but it's nothing substance beyond the paper marriage for purposes of immigration, who knows what other purposes to have them, get some benefits from that marriage. And on top of that, you have to wonder whether the House was defrauded in terms of descriptions about her name and other background material in terms of filings with the House. This is a, you know, there's criminal liability here potentially, but she could do from Congress if the House does his job here and concludes the evidence shows what we suggest it does. But isn't she also, I mean, aren't these felonies?

Yep, yep. You know, the U.S. attorney, I don't know who the U.S. attorney in Minnesota is, but if you ain't looking at it, he ain't doing his job. Tom, you've looked at this stuff and you've been in this business for a while. How comfortable are you with the Facebook? A lot of the stuff, we can't go any further because all we have are Facebook posts of her and Ahmed too, the timeline, et cetera, et cetera. They were deleted from her timelines.

They were deleted from her and her alleged brothers' posts. All of this have been in a race, but we have access to those things. How comfortable are you that these are legitimately her and her families? Well, when I see our good friends at the Paraline blog, who I trust, even though the big media pretends you can't trust them. They were quite diligent in trying to ferret out all this information. And then you have the legacy media come in, the Minnesota newspaper come in,

and essentially say, yeah, there are a lot of questions here, and she's acting like she has something to hide and essentially repeats the reporting of our conservative friends there in Paraline. You know, as you point out, I've been doing this for a long time. you kind of, you know, people sometimes come to the wrong conclusions about publicly available documents. And I think the right conclusions about this is that something illegal took place. Scott Johnson, who runs Tareline Blog, did all a reporting on this. He was in the media the other day. He said he was 98% certain marriage fraud took place and 90% certain the marriage fraud was with her brother.

So something needs to be done here. So, and if she, she's innocent, then let the investigation figure that out. Right. And or, you know, what's have an investigation so that we can conclude one way or another, whether we should move on. Shouldn't be. And she should be. There is a presumption of evidence, you know, there is a presumption of that in a sense. Right.

But there's enough evidence that any other citizen would be subject to a criminal investigation. Yes. Tom, thank you so much. Tom Fitton from Judicial Watch. He is the president of that. We are doing a special on this tonight. This is serious, serious allegations. And we want to explain the entire story to you.

It's very difficult, especially when you're reading it or listening to it on the radio. It's very difficult to follow. We're going to make it really easy for you to follow tonight at 5 o'clock. And we urge you to watch it and share it with your friends. This is a dangerous situation with somebody who has. I believe dangerous connections, connections to care, high-level connections to care, which is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is the parent organization that supports Hamas. Or is it Hezbollah? No, it's Hamas.

So this is a dangerous situation that we need to clear up. You can subscribe to the Blaze now at blazTV.com slash. If you use the promo code, Glenn, we're going to give you $20 off today. So make sure you use Glenn 20 as your promo code. Glenn 20 as the promo code and you'll get $20 off, 20% off now for your year's subscription. That's tonight at 5 o'clock. Make sure you subscribe. One last note on this.

The writer that we have been in touch with is David Steinberg and he's done a lion's share of this. a team effort, but he's done the lion's share of this. He's going to be with us in about 10 minutes. He was working for PJ Media at the time he began this. He gave this story to us about a week and a half ago. I've been in touch with him off and on over the last year. And he gave this story to me for the Blaze to run. We wanted to make sure that we did all of our due diligence. And Powerline beat us to it by a few hours. But, But we have Leon Wolfon, who is an attorney and our chief editor here at the Blaze, to go over what he did and what he went over, where he felt that there were any flaws. We, I guess, approved this story about 2 o'clock in the morning, and that was too late.

So we didn't get the exclusive. But I want you to know, we didn't run it because we were wanting to make sure it was all buttoned up. We did approve the story because it is buttoned up. So we're taking this very, very seriously and see this tonight at 5 o'clock only on blazedtv.com slash glen. promo code Glenn 20. All right. I want to talk to you a little bit about blinds.com. Blinds.com is the greatest.

They will help you in every single way. It is not like walking into a box store where you're like, can I find a guy with the apron that's supposed to work in this department? Yeah, and then they just bring you a big book and you look through the book and you're like, I don't know. This is something that is totally different. Tanya and I, we're going to redecorate our bedroom. Saturday morning, we've been promising ourselves that we were going to do it forever. So we finally go and we go online at blinds.com.

We're looking. It's a little overwhelming because their selection is gigantic. And so I said, I don't know. I think we need help. So we get somebody to help us at blinds.com. Within a few minutes, they're on the phone with us. I thought we were going to have to make an appointment. They're just right there.

We text them and say, hey, could we get some help? They text back immediately. How about right now? Okay. Get a great designer who helps us pick out the right thing. They send us samples. The bedroom completely is just transformed. Do it.

It's really simple. Blinds.com. Use the promo code back. And right now, you're going to get 40% off for a, limited time plus you're going to save an extra $20 if you use the promo code back that's blinds.com for up to 40% off plus an extra $20 with promo code back blinds.com promo code back we break for 10 seconds station ID uh we have been keeping our eye on the uh the Mueller uh testimony now in congress it's nothing but the republic the democrats uh just reading from the report

Did you say that? Oh, yeah, I guess I did. Yeah, sure. That's what I said. And the Republicans making good points all the way along and then him just going, well, then, yeah. I mean, he's really not saying anything. It's a complete waste of time.

I mean, the guy wrote a 448 page report. And what he keeps saying to every question is, that's in my report. And when they say, hey, you wrote this, he says, what page was that on? They say, page 157. Yes, on page 157, I did say that. It is that ridiculous right now. Now, there are good points being made by, I think, Republicans talking about the standard of proof that has been used by Mueller, the way justice sort of reversed itself in this report. And Democrats, though, are not actually even attempting to make points.

All they are doing is reading what they believe are the most damning parts of the report and having Mueller confirm. whether those were actually in the report. And to give you an example of how that's working, hang on just a second. Let me go take this real quick. Let's listen to this. Questioning by a Republican. But you say nothing about this in your report. Well, sir. Meanwhile, director, you're quite loquacious on other topics. You write 3,500 words about the June 9 meeting between the Trump campaign and Russian lawyer, Veselnitskaya. You write on page 103 of your report that the president's legal team suggested, and I'm quoting from your report, that the meeting might have been a setup by individuals working with the firm that produced the steel reporting. So I'm going to ask you a very easy question, Director Mueller.

On the week of June 9, who did Russian lawyer Vessel Nizkaya meet with more frequently? The Trump campaign or Glenn Simpson, who is functionally acting as an operative for the Democratic National Committee? Well, what I think is missing here is the fact that this is under investigation elsewhere in the Justice Department. And if I can finish her, and if I can finish her. Yeah, yeah. And consequently, it's not within my purview. Department of Justice and FBI should be responsive to questions on this particular issue. Wow.

Wow. Okay. Let me tell you about our cruise through history that's going on next spring. We only have 200 cabins left. If you have been thinking about this, you got to get on board now, all right? 200 cabins. We have 3,000 people now. on board with us. This is going to be a cruise of a lifetime. Bill O'Reilly will be there. I will be

there. David Barton, Rabbi Lapin, Stu. We have Jim Caviesel. I haven't heard the confirmation yet myself, but I hear he's coming. Also, what's his name from? Oh, you are? Tim Ballard. Mary Ann, the professor, and the Howells. are also going to be there. You don't want to miss it. Cruise through history, we are going to go to Athens. We're going to go to the Holy Land. We're going to go to Venice. This is an unbelievable thing where you can learn history of Europe, of the Middle East, and how it affected us in the founding of our country and the covenant that George Washington and Abraham Lincoln made.

Come sailaway.com. Bring your family if you can. But act now. Very few cabins are left. come sailaway.com. To get the full investigation on Ilan Omar, it's tonight. Use blazTV.com. The promo code is Glenn 20, save 20 bucks today only.

We have David Steinberg on with us now. David is a journalist. He has been following the Elon Omar case for how long, David, a year, over a year? I've been on this a little more than a year. Scott Johnson and Prey of Samson, I started this. It got on it back in August of 2016. And this is when nobody was on it. And it actually started, these claims started with a Somali blogger, if I'm not mistaken.

Yeah, there was a message board used by members of the local Minneapolis Somali community. And just in the hours after Ilhan first won a primary in August of 2016, they probably posted the first evidence that her marriage was a sham and that this person was actually her genetic brother who she had married in 2009. And what was the, what was the evidence then? The evidence then was photographic and it was also referencing, they specifically referenced when she got married to the person who she claims. It was her husband at the time, that's Ahmed Hersey. And he pointed out where we could dig up the documents, that the document should be there.

And so I... Go ahead. I talked to you about, I don't know, I think we started first talking about eight months ago or so. And you were on this. And I know you were working with people in England to get more documentation because half the family went to Virginia when they left. Kenya. They're from Somalia. They were in a, uh, a refugee camp in Kenya. And they were trying to get out to the west. And half the family went to Virginia with the Omar family. And that's when she

allegedly changed her name to Omar. She's not an Omar, apparently. Uh, she is an Elmi. And the rest of her family that, uh, I think three others went to England. Do you know, know why the family split at that point? Why didn't they all go to America with the Omar's? Do you know? Well, what we've heard from sources in the Somali community who, you know, who were involved with this wave of refugee immigration to the U.S. at that time, we're well aware of what people were doing to gain access to both the U.S. and the U.K. at that time. Several people gave us the same story. about how Ilhan and her father arrived in the United States. They said there was this family, the Omar's,

which apparently already had a relative in the United States. So they were using the P3 refugee application program, family reunification, which allows you to apply as a refugee in a bit quicker fashion if you already have someone in the U.S., which legally, legally, is referred to as the anchor relative. Now, so that was the Omar family.

It appeared they already have that. And this was somebody, the Elmer family is within the same clan as Ilhan's father. Okay. And they had a discussion over in Kenya at the refugee camp. The Elmar family allowed them, allowed Ilhan's father, Ilhan's sister and Ilhan, to fraudulently apply as part of this P3 program as members of the Omar family. And then Omar's brother and sister went over to the UK under the family name of Elmi.

Correct. That's what we also heard. They applied for asylum in the United Kingdom under their legal names, which was Ahmed Nersaid Elmi, Leila Nersaid Elmi, and Mohamed Nersaid Elmi. Those were three siblings of Ilhan. Okay. So why didn't those three, any idea why those three did not come under the Omar banner here in America? Was there a limit? or what do we do we know anything on that i don't have anything to verify what i've heard from

sources as to why those three did not come but what i have heard from sources is that they're just simply wasn't a likelihood of getting that many people okay all of them correct all right so now we have Ahmed elmi apparently her brother who she's later going to marry living in camden uh in the United Kingdom, and Lila Elmi, who also lived in Camden, at apparently the same address. Do we have, I know you talk to, or I know you have both of them in Camden. Do we have anything that shows that they're at the same address? Yes, I have them at the same address, which I haven't published because I believe either they or relative are stolen at the address.

So I haven't published that, but I do have both of the Matthews' same address. We have, I have verification that, both from the school itself and from Ahmed Elme's own social media, that he attended the junior high high school, which was in that neighborhood. all right so can you if if we don't publish or anything it's just for our eyes only so i can verify this can you send me the information that you have where that places them at the same address so i can absolutely uh because that is those are the only two questions that i had on this was okay don't understand the split up other than it was not likely to get all of them in under the omars and the other is do you have anything that is confirming confirming that they were living at the same address?

Because we do know that Leah Elmi is Lela. Lela Elmi is Omar's sister because of what evidence? The evidence that I published was what is the problem is that he was a minor at the time. Right. So coming up with anything beyond address records legally is not something, you know, I've been able to do the whole investigation without requesting that anybody leaked me something and put themselves in jeopardy. Correct.

I didn't want to start. So that's been difficult. What I have been able to show, though, is he wasn't enrolled at that school, that they lived up the same address, which I'm happy to forward to you. No, no, no, but I'm asking about Layla. How do we, what are the connections there that we know they are sisters? Because once we know they're sisters and we have Ahmed as a youth living with her, I mean, we pretty much have that.

I mean, that's pretty much done. Right. So what I published as far as a connection showing Ilhan and Leila are sisters, uh, Ilhan has on multiple occasions referred to her own father. as a band named Nurse Saeed. She's been photographed with him. She's called him, Nurse Saeed.

She tweets his name was Nurse Saeed. Everyone in the community knew him by that name. And he, his social media, he refers to himself as Nurse Saeed. I pull up a marriage document from 1997 from Camden, it's a borough of London. and Lela Nersaid Elmi, when she got married in 1997, she lists her father on the application form as Nurse Ayd Elmi. Now, at the age of, we know his birth date of the one in the United States that is referred to, that Ilhan has referred to as her father,

there is nobody else in either the United States or the United Kingdom named Nurse Saeed Elmi that I can locate. There is certainly nobody close to the same birthday. Now, then I also published photographs, which had originally appeared on Ilhan Omar's social media back in 2016, which she deleted once Scott Johnson first got on this case. The photograph I published was Leila Elmi, Ilhan Omar, and the... Nur Saeed, the father, all with their arms around each other on a family vacation in late 2011. I published another picture of Ilhan Omar visiting Leila Elmi in 2015 in London.

And remarkably, Ilhan put a caption on the page, I heart my sisters. And then I also published another social media post by someone who appointed an event in late 2018 in Washington, D.C. With Ilhan Omar and Leila Elmi. He says, I just had dinner with Ilhan Omar and her sister, Layla Elmi. He had no, there is no rational objective reason for him to incorrectly identify the person he had dinner with as Ilhan's sister, Layla Elmi. Now, this event actually took place a couple hours after. Ilhan had filed a police, she didn't file a report.

I'm sorry about that. She had been in a taxi, and she claimed the next day that the taxi driver had harassed her and said, uh, threatened to pull her hijab off. and called her a terrorist, et cetera. She said I was in the cab with my sister. She later, a few days later, filed a report with a DC ethics, DC ethics commission and the taxi cab commission that stated, I foyered the report.

It stated, I was in the car with my sister. Now, we know, so she knows, we know she has testified here. this is a legal document. She could be punished for perjury for filing that falsely. Then the person she was with, she identified as her sister. This person who we can place at that event, having dinner with her, said that sister was Lela Elmi. Which makes her second husband her brother. And this is a, it's a very complex story, but it is very buttoned up.

David, I salute you and all those who have risk. so much and spent so much time on this story, I think this story is finally going to get its due. Hopefully, justice will be done. There is enough here to demand legal action to be taken as in form of an investigation. She should be presumed innocent until proven guilty, but if I were on a grand jury, there is more than enough to say, yes, prosecutors should look at investigating her and buttoning these things up. If these things are absolutely true, she should be compelled to testify and answer some of these questions. And these are, it's not only fraud, it's forgery. I'm sorry, it's not

only forgery and fraud. It is a felony. David, thank you so much. Appreciate it. Thanks, luckily. You bet. If you want to see all of this tonight, You just have to sign up for the Blaze TV. Sign up BlazTV.com slash Glenn. Use the promo code Glenn 20. And you'll be able to get a 20% discount. You'll save 20 bucks tonight. It's at 5 o'clock.

We'll do it live today. Don't miss it. Five o'clock, the true story of Elon Omar, as if that is her real name. Did you know on average it takes 45 minutes for the police to respond to a home secure alarm almost an hour and that's not the fault of the police that's because they know most home alarms are just set off by accident it's a you know it's a it's a false alarm so it goes to the bottom of

the 911 list however simply safe home security has video verification technology now this is the they're the only company that does this video verification technology which helps police get on the scene three and a half times faster now if you're a giant corporation You're Apple. You have video verification. You can do that. But no home service offers this. They can visually confirm that a break-in is happening. They call the police. They let them know. The average police time goes from 45 minutes to seven minutes. You want to protect yourself in your home. This is the way to do it. Simply safe. The monitoring is $15 a month. There is no hidden fee, no fine print, and no contract. Simply safe. Huge deal going to be. on right now simply safe beck.com you'll get that free hd security camera when you order for the video verification it's a hundred dollar value it's yours free have eyes on your home 24 7 it is simply safe beck dot com do it now simply safe beck dot com so i'm going to australia in about 10 days and i'm going with the nazarene fund as we return a

a young girl to her mother. Her family, about five years ago, was destroyed by ISIS. Her brother was killed, her father was killed. Her mother and her were taken by ISIS and used as sex slaves. They were separated. We rescued her mother about three years ago and then got her to Australia. When we rescued her, she talked about her daughter. Where's my daughter?

Where's my daughter? Through extensive sources on the ground, we were told that her daughter was dead and she moved to Australia. The mother did to start a new life. Well, we just rescued a new batch of sex slaves from ISIS just recently. About three months ago, we realized one of them was the daughter of the mother. She was asking about her mother. and when we did a cross-check, we realized this is the mom that is in Australia. So after a lot of maneuvering on the ground, she is finally ready to board an airplane and go to Australia to be reunited with her mother.

I will be there when that happens, and I want to bring that story to you. That'll be in the next couple of weeks. If you would like to be a part of this, please join us. at the Nazarenefund.org. Nazarenefund.org. Truly, miracles are happening every day. I'm Hillary. That's your four-minute buzz. And now here's Glenn and Stu

with the last hour of the show. All right. And we want to talk to you about Relief Factor. Yeah, relief factor is something that Glenn has been taking for a very long time. And in fact, you might say, hey, what's it like working with Glenn? And I would answer that. Well, there's two answers, I guess, to that.

One of the pre-relief factor. answer and won the post relief factor answer. And the pre-relief factor answer is that it was absolutely horrible in every way. And the post is it's horrible, but it's not nearly as bad because he's not in constant pain. That is the big difference. He's at least tolerable-ish, is the way we phrase it here. Now, this has been a big improvement for Glenn, I know, and, you know, this is a, he has his ranch up in Idaho and he actually, who knew, goes outside and does things. And it used to be something that really, like, destroyed him for weeks afterwards now. That's not the case. 70% of people who order the three-week quick start have a similar experience to Glenn, where they order more because it's working for them.

That says a lot. Why not, when you're talking about your, you know, quality of your life on the line, why not take a chance with 20 bucks when you have a 70% chance of real success? I tell you, it worked for me, and I'm so glad my wife forced me to do it. Take it. I'm not going to listen to you anyway. All right. It's so well worth it. It's relief factor 1-800-5-803-84 relief factor. All right. We've got a great last hour of the program coming up begins in just about 10 seconds. Stand by. Socialists. The gift that just keeps giving.

We begin there in one minute. This is the... Glenbeck program. Somewhere in America, within the sound of my voice, is a man who just doesn't feel like he belongs where he is. He's living in the big city, an unending, complicated dance with millions of partners all around him every day, and he wanders through the complication of his day, bumping constantly into the willfully estranged, all while engaging on a daily basis with more people than he had ever met before in his life. The city's pulses and pounds in his ears and it doesn't stop at night except for one part of him and in one

part of the city where modernity forgot to continue to take over there's this place it's not a big place it's not cramped either on the jukebox Hank Williams sometimes contends with Jimmy Rogers to see who can make the most money per night while a much slower version of the city life plays itself outside of the interactions and the patrons. It's in this den that our man, once in a while steps, a hat on his head, pearl snap button up, and jeans that have a crease down the middle, the articles of clothing from another world. On his feet, comfortable, and radiating the warm dream of the place called home is a pair of Toccovis boots. Now, he wears these tocovas here, but it's the one thing that keeps him grounded when he's out in the city.

Yeah, he may wear a suit all day, but he's got his pair of Tukovus. You know, it takes 200 steps to manufacture a pair of Tukovus boots. They're built to be comfortable right out of the box, handmade with high-quality, full-grained leathers by world-class bootmakers. Decovus boots. They come in lizard and alligator, some of the world's most exotic leathers. and by selling them right directly to you, Tocovus ensures that their product is either half the price of a similar quality boot or twice the quality of a similarly priced boot. Check out their site, Tocovus.com slash Beck. Anything leather you might need you'll find there.

T-C-O-V-A-S dot com slash back. Walk the Walk, the one you were meant to walk with Tocovus. Justin Haskins is in studio with us. He's the executive editor of the Heartland Institute. And correct me if I'm wrong. Justin, didn't you and I first interact because you were started, you started, was it the Heartland Institute? You started this expose, if you will, or the exposing of socialism.

So, yeah, we started stopping socialism.com. That's what it was. That's right. Stoppingsocialism. com. Go there now. back in the summer of last year, so basically a year ago. It was only a year ago?

It was really spurred on by the rise of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and some of the stuff that I was seeing with my own generation. I'm a young guy. Yeah, yeah. Seeing people fall in love with socialism all over again. It's crazy. And you really have to not be able to think, you know, or you're just, you're in willful ignorance and there's no critical thinking engaged.

at all? Not at all. And, and, and, and, I mean, you talked about willful ignorance. I mean, it's sort of willful, but it's also my generation grew up. I went to a public school in the liberal Northeast. And so I get it. I mean, I was indoctrinated like everybody else. I mean, it didn't take with me, but it took with just about everybody else around me. So I understand. So how was it, how was it taught to you? How was socialism? You say indoctrinated. I grew up. I went into school. I went, I was in school in the 70s, a graduated high school in 82. So I missed. apparently I missed all of this indoctrination. How is it, how is it presented in school?

It's, it's presented in school as capitalism is for greedy, heartless, terrible people. You're a terrible person if you're a capitalist. Okay. And socialism is basically charity. That's what it is. It's some kind of form of charity. And yeah, there are all these socialist governments all throughout history that screwed it up. But that's because they were authoritarian socialist governments.

If they had only been democratic, then that would have solved. all of their problems. So we can fix it. Although they were all Democratic, at least at first. They all got in with a vote. Yeah, that's right. That's how it always starts. See, it always starts with democracy and then it devolves very quickly into tyranny.

Right. Yes, yes. Yeah, they skipped over that part of the history lesson in school. But that's how it's always sold. It's, look, we're making progress. Things are getting better. We just need to put the right bureaucrats in place. We need to have the right.

Oh, my gosh. I mean, it's the same. This is the end of Wilson's dream. It is. It really is. Before I came here, actually, on the plane, I was re-listening to Liars, a great book, by the way. Thank you very much. Thank you. And when going over that history all over again, it's astounding how much, this is just repeating itself. Over and over and over again. It's the same story that was in the early 1900s and even late 1800s is playing out again, a hundred years later. We've learned nothing. We've learned absolutely not. Bill Gates,

Steve Jobs, Elon Musk, they will be known unless we turn the tide this time. They're going to be known as the robber barons of this era. Yeah. And look at the good that they have done. Absolutely. I talk about this all the time with people. My wife is a doctor, so I know a lot of doctors. They love single pair health care.

They're all academic doctors. Love it. It's crazy. It is because I tell them all the time. Look, who do you think they're coming for, first. Who do you think is going to be the first scapegoat when things start to go wrong? When costs are too high. You guys are all making $500, $600,000, $700,000 a year, the surgeons and stuff like they? Do you think that they're just going to let you do this forever? Of course not. Do you think

they care that you have a half a million dollars in student loan debt and all this stuff? No, they'll forgive it and you have to work for them. And then you work for them at whatever price they pay. So that is absolutely going to come. They're going to be demonized too. There are all sorts of, this is how socialism always plays out. There is always a shifting group of people who become, if only we could get rid of them or if only we could somehow put the chains on them. Yes. They're the problem. Not us, them. Right. Right. And it shifts because as soon as they put the chains on one group, that doesn't work, they have to put the chains on another group. Correct. And it goes back and forth over and over and over. And if, you know, I'm a watch collector. And I love the story of, uh, one of them is a Glashute and

the other is A. Leinons and Sohn. And these were really great watches that were made in Germany until the Soviet Union took over. And all of the watchmakers fled and they went to the West. Okay. So they all went to Switzerland and they all started making watches there. As soon as the wall came down, they went back to those areas. And now they're making these, you know, timeless brands again. But the funny part about this is, is that is why the Russians had a hard time keeping time, literally keeping time. They killed anybody who knew who was a watchmaker because they were part of the, you know, they were part of the upper crust that were crushing the masses. And so they left and they killed the ones who didn't. And forever they had a hard time just making a watch.

Yeah, that's amazing. And we've seen this especially in China. I mean, China had a remarkable history of elevating one group of people to being this special class of people and then killing them all off and imprisoning them because they're the problem. And then the educated people were the problem. So then we have to imprison all of them and we have to kill them and we have to get them out of the way. And then it was the farmers who were the problem. And then it was back to the educated people. Correct.

It's the same because it can never be them. It can never be the people in power. Or the ideas. Right. You can never impugn the ideas. Exactly. So a good example of this is the people in power can always do what they have to do, but they never hold, they never allow that to happen any place else. And let me give you an example.

Bernie Sanders, $15 an hour. Okay. Everybody has to do it. And you say, Bernie, it doesn't work. What will happen is people will either. reduce the hours that those people work, which will hurt them, or they will, they'll fire people. Tell me the story about Bernie Sanders. This is, I think, my favorite story of this year. I love this story. So Bernie Sanders, a socialist running around the country telling everybody, it's not just a good

idea to have a $15 minimum wage, but it is immoral if you don't. You're exploiting people who do not earn $15 an hour. While he's doing this, it turns out, he's not paying his own. He's not paying his own lowest wage workers $15 an hour. He's making them work 60 hours a week for about $13 an hour, okay? Which is just astounding in and of itself. But the best part is 60 hours. Yes, 60 hours. Right. 60 hours. The best part is, though, that he, the workers who are unionized, by the way, the campaign workers are unionized, they get together and they complain and they say, hey, this isn't fair. I thought this was a living wage. We're not getting paid a living wage, $15 an hour. So they go to the bosses, which is now the socialist presidential candidate is now the boss negotiating with a socialist union in a presidential campaign, which is amazing.

And they say, hey, we need more money. Give us more money. And they say, all right, all right, we'll give you more money. But only if, only if you're willing to take a cut on your health care benefits, you have to contribute more to your health care. It's the only way we'll give you the pay raise. Well, wait a minute. I thought health care was a human right. Isn't health care a human right?

So now you have Bernie Sanders, a socialist, exploiting his own workers. When they complain, he then tries to take away their human rights. This is amazing. I mean, this is the best story. And then it gets even better. Finally, they come to a resolution. I love his passion. Finally, finally, it comes to a resolution.

They say, all right, guys, we'll settle on, it amounts to basically $16 an hour. And we're not going to cut your health care benefits because the media found out. which is a whole other thing. The media finds out, right? So then the next day, basically, Rashida Talib, another socialist from Michigan, a member of the Democratic Socialist of America, she comes out and says, you know what?

$15, that's not enough. You've got to pay $20 for a minimum wage. $15 was good before when we started all this, but now we need $20, $20. So Bernie Sanders, according to Rashida Talib and other socialists, is still exploiting his own workers. I love that.

And with the candidates and the way the socialists are working now, it's almost like an auction. I got 15, 15, 15, do I hear 20, 22, 22, 22, 22, thank you, ma'am. Do I hear 25? I mean, it is just an auction on who can be the highest bidder. And the results are the same. Did he not have to reduce everybody? And some people quit. I believe some people were fired, were they not?

Or their hours were reduced? The end result was we're only going to make you work 50 hours. And originally they wanted him to work six days a week. They ended up settling on, we're working 50 hours and we'll pay you a salary. So he's not, but you're not going to get what you wanted initially. I'm sorry, we just don't have enough money. So we're going to have to cut hours. We're going to have to maybe cut staff.

How is it that people don't see or is it just willful blindness? I think that people, and I think we saw this with Barack Obama, and I think you see it a little bit with Bernie Sanders, maybe not quite as passionately, but people desperately want to believe in this guy. They want to believe that there is some alternative answer that's going to fix all of our problems and that he represents that. He's somehow above it all, which we saw that with Barack Obama. People wanted to believe it. They wanted to even when all the facts pointed to something else, they said, I want to believe in this guy. And I think that there are a lot of people on the left who want to believe in Bernie Sanders, even when he's, according to his own logic, exploiting his own workers and denying them human rights. So that's ridiculous. You have Elizabeth Warren now at times in some polls beating Bernie Sanders. Let me take a quick break.

And then I want to talk to you about the socialism of Elizabeth Warren. And how do you think this is going to play out? They have a mutually assured destruction pact going on. Don't say anything because we don't, we'll just kill each other. And I want to get your advice on or your thoughts on how you think this is going to play out. Because Bernie Sanders is not going to be the candidate, just not going to be the candidate. But you're smiling at me. Maybe you know something I don't know.

We'll get to that here in just about a minute. Stand by. So I don't know if you saw the news yesterday. The IMF came out and said, hey, there's a problem. It looks like the United States is still the floatiest piece of poop in the toilet bowl. However, the whole thing is going to be flushed, according to the IMF. They say one of the problems is the trade deal, that the world has become so unstable because of the trade war we're in that if everyone in the world isn't extraordinarily careful, catastrophic failure could happen. Okay, I don't.

I don't know. I don't know. I just know it's a lot like socialism. Numbers are numbers. Okay, you can only fake numbers for so long. And then it comes the gods of the copy book headings with blood and terror return. I was reading yesterday that poem by Rudyard Kipling. And it said, we, you know, we listen to the gods of the marketplaces who promised us all of these wonderful things. And then we had the promise of abundance for all. And so we, we, we robbed selected Peter to pay for selected Paul. And what happened? Even though we had lots of money, there was nothing our money could buy, meaning

inflation. Right now, last night, I did an episode where I talked to somebody, who was it? Where was she from? Stu, do you remember the guest I had on TV last night? Heritage, right? Yeah, Heritage Foundation. And I asked her about this new, what is it, economic? Modern monetary theory.

Yeah, modern monetary theory. Did I do this interview or did you? You did, yeah, I know. I barely remember. But anyway, modern monetary theory, which is basically government can print as much as it wants. It doesn't need to borrow anymore. This is a song to anybody who is a socialist. wait, I don't have to borrow money.

We can just print it. Yes. This is a new wrap package of something that is old and rotten inside. That's hyperinflation. That always ends in hyperinflation. But I'm afraid there's too many people in Washington who are going to start convincing themselves this can be done. And we're all going to be the losers.

Please consider gold or silver now. please please please consider gold or silver now i don't know when it comes but it is going to come gold and silver may be your lifeline for your family 10% take it out of your you know IRA or whatever and and invest it through your IRA in gold or silver they can help you do that at goldline call them now they're waiting for your call at 866 gold line 1 866 gold line or goldline dot com We break for 10 seconds, station ID. Justin Haskins. He's the executive editor of the Heartland Institute at heartland.org.

You can follow him at Justin T. Haskins. Welcome to the program, Justin. It's great to be with you. So let's talk about the candidates. Somebody said to me, who would you vote for if you had a gun to your head and had to vote for? for one of these people. I think I might have said Elizabeth Warren

because she's so unlikable. I just don't think she could get anything done. However, I don't know. I'm surprised that she's doing as well as she is. She has a pact with Bernie Sanders. Are they cut from the same socialist cloth, do you believe? Yeah, probably.

To be fair, I think that 80% of the candidate are probably cut from the same socialist cloth. But I think that those two, the fact that one's from Vermont, one's from Massachusetts, they've worked with each other on a lot of different things. I think that they both have the same kind of animus towards corporations and towards banks, especially. Elizabeth Warren is just, I mean, she hates banks. She hates bankers.

She hates the whole financial institution, the whole financial industry. So I do think that they are cut from the same cloth. I think they also both know that there is no way. that either of them can win while they're both in the race. Right. Which is really important for them to understand. If they've learned anything from what happened with Donald Trump, and I know that you guys remember, Donald Trump primary.

What we learned from the Donald Trump primary is that one guy who has a following, a loyal following, can beat the field, even though the field, any one of those members of the field could probably beat him one on one. But if you have devotions divided amongst that, amongst that, group of people, there's no way to beat, you know, the one person, Donald Trump. In this case, it might be Joe Biden. It's somebody who can classify themselves as being a little bit more moderate, a little more sane. Maybe it's Mayor Pete. I don't know who it is. It's somebody like that. If the far left wing, socialist wing of that party can't rally around one person, then whoever

emerges as being the so-called moderate, which isn't really going to be a moderate, but that's how they're going to classify themselves. That person is going to win. So the socialists have to know that. So this is all going to come down to ego. Can they back out of the race? Can they do it? I mean, John Kasich was apparently mentally incapable of getting out of that race.

Right. So there are some people who just will not get out no matter what. Right. Do you think Bernie Sanders is that guy? I think Bernie Sanders would get out of the race if he had to. I do. Before it's too late? Before it's too late.

But the thing with Bernie Sanders is he has some of the most loyal, passionate people behind him. Right. But if he steers them to an Elizabeth Warren, he could actually make an impact and get the nominee. That's potentially true. But I think that Bernie Sanders, he spent a lot of time with Elizabeth Warren. He knows how unlikable she is. Can you imagine Elizabeth Warren being the candidate? I mean, she's like, she's maybe more unlikable than Hillary Clinton.

I think she has everything except the history of corruption that everybody knows. True. She's like grown in a lab to lose to Donald Trump, though. She really is. She really is. That's why I said, if I had to vote for one of them, I vote for Elizabeth Warren. She's not even from a state that helps. I mean, there's nothing about her at all that helps.

She's incredibly unlikable. There's that stupid Native American thing that's going to follow her around forever. She should get the Native American vote, though, at least one, 1,024 of it. Yes, yes. All 10 people. Back in just a second. This is the Glimbeck Program. American Financing Corporation, NMLS-182334, www.

www. nmLS Consumer Access.org. Right now, anyone who has a mortgage or is buying a home, you have an incredible opportunity right now. Interest rates are dropping again. So we have a chance to lock up a fixed low-rate interest mortgage. That is, that's going to make the world of difference in the few. future. Let's not, uh, let's not dismiss a 4%. If you have a mortgage over 4% or you're in a variable rate loan, you should call American financing for a mortgage review right now. They can

help you within 10 minutes, a phone call of 10 minutes. It might save you tens of thousands of dollars over the term of your loan. You got to look at your whole financial picture and they'll help you do that. They'll look over at credit cards and everything else. Maybe you should consolidate into a fixed rate that is around 4% as well. The money that you can save every month may mean the difference of survival and real struggle in the future. Call them now 800906 2440, 8009062440,

Americanfinancing.net. Tonight is a night, Ilan Amar special. Go to blaze TV.com. Use the code Glenn 20 today only and get 20 bucks off. Ilan Omar. Tomorrow we're going to have a lot to talk about. I mean, a ton to talk about.

And you want to be up to speed. You need to watch the Alanamar special tonight. It's an hour-long special at 5 p.m. Only on Blaze TV. BlazTV.com slash Glenn. If you use the promo code Glenn 20, you're going to get $20 off. So make sure you join us today. Be a part of the team that I think is changing the way television and radio and everything else is done.

You get Mark Levin. Why are you laughing at that? You're right. Just no one else would make a song like this. So it is changing the way television is done. Right. So, waiting to you hear the other songs. Tonight's special, we have lots of songs

trying to explain the Alon Amar mess. So you don't want to miss that tonight. It's going to be a lot of fun and very important that you see. it and we'll be able to talk about it tomorrow. Join us now, blazTV.com. BlazTV.com slash Glenn. Use the promo code Glenn 20 and you'll save $20. It could be interesting to see what the reaction is on this one.

Because, you know, it's easy to keep talking about Elanamar and saying that there's just hateful people who are saying hateful things about her because of the color of her skin, which has literally nothing to do with this. at all, because when you really look at the facts of the matter, you can make this sort of argument maybe that

well, not every single piece of it is proven. It's why you keep saying, you know, this needs to go to a grand jury. Parts of it, though, are proven, and we're going to show you all the documents that do prove it. It's just interesting to see because you can't dismiss it after seeing all this evidence.

You can't dismiss it and say, well, this is just an attack on the squad. Have we ever had something this buttoned up? I mean, we had a lot of evidence on the Tides Foundation. I mean, a thousand pages. We had a ton on George Soros, Van Jones. But I'm not sure we had anything this buttoned up. Yeah, I mean, some of it is completely buttoned up. Right. Some of it, about 60% of it is verified by people who, disagree with us 100%. Yeah, yeah. And that's

kind of, because some of that's the criminal stuff. But even some of the crazier sort of allegations that when we started this, I was like, come on, that can't possibly be true, is backed up by, at the very least, massive scrolls of social media posts that indicate

from them. From them. From them. So like they're posting on their own pages that not Omar, but people in her life, other people around indicating that all of this is true. And then add on to that the fact that major media organizations have gone to them and said, hey, this is weird. What do you say to explain yourself?

And she says, nothing. She'll say like, oh, this is just a crazy attack. Islamophobia. And she's trying the defense of Islamophobia, but there's way too much here stacked against that. Way too much. And you will see it all tonight, 5 o'clock only on Blaze TV. Now, she had a problem yesterday in the house. Her and Rashida Taleb made a move for the BDS movement.

And the BDS movement is the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement against Israel. She wants to make sure that we are not supporting Israel, that we cut them off at their knees because they have stolen the land from the Palestinians. Here is Rashida Taleb on the BDS movement. Listen. Our right to free speech is being threatened with this resolution. It sets a dangerous precedent because it attempts to de-legitimize a certain people's political speech and to send a message that our government can and will take action against speech it doesn't like. Madam Speaker, the Supreme Court has time and time again recognize the expressive conduct is protected.

by the Constitution, from burning a flag to baking a cake. To baking a cake. To baking a cake. I can't even. Is she really saying that she's complaining that people's voices are going away because of their political views? She's doing that? Yeah. What?

I don't understand your problem. You really don't understand it? No, I don't understand. What are you saying? Because it seems like I've noticed conservatives' voices being tart. targeted for these things. No, that's crazy, that's crazy conspiracy theorists.

And ask, I'm sure she's against things like the fairness doctrine and others. Of course, of course. That is a fascinating one. Yeah. They really will say, may I just say? Islamophobia. What about, what about? Well, Islamophobia.

I mean, I think we all know that, you know, people like you are Islamophobic and so you should be shut down and not listen to. You should be drummed out. You know, people like you and Robert Spencer. You know, a guy who used to, you know, give counsel to presidents was one of the leading scholars on Islamacists. Not Islam, Islamacists. And he's such an Islamophobia according to, Islamophobic according to care, that he can't even post anything on Twitter, Facebook, a book, YouTube,

God forbid he ever publishes a book or speaks anywhere. So you're an Islamophobic because you didn't hear what she was saying. I guess not. She can't, she worries that people's speech is being infringed.

And again, she's like, well, this is the government cracking down on speech. How exactly? It's a resolution that basically did nothing. It just said that they denounced, they did not, they condemned the BDS movement. Right, not shut it down.

No, it's just condemned it. We don't agree with it. We think it's really, really bad. I think you can make an argument that it's sort of a pointless thing to do with Congress. Yeah. They're just saying, hey, we don't like this thing. Here's what I would. I mean, it was obviously just to get people on the record.

Correct. Here's what I would really have liked. This is Chuck and Nancy just a short while ago talking about the Israel boycott. Now listen to this. When the world tweets everybody one way in the Jew or the Jewish state another way, there's only one word for it. Anti-Semitism. Let us call out the BDS movement for what it is. We must also be vigilant against bigoted or dangerous ideologies masquerading as policy.

And that includes BDS. Now, they both said that when they were standing at A-PAC. They're in with the Jews, you know. They said that when they were standing in front of APEC, but it would have been really interesting to hear them say that to Rashida Taleb or to Elon Omar as they proposed this BDS sanctions against Israel. If I can quote Chuck Schumer, we have to call it what it is, anti-Semitism. So why wouldn't they call those who propose that anti-Semitic? I seem to remember that they also failed to call Elon Omar anti-Semitic in the past,

which is almost like they're afraid of care. Almost. It almost seems like that. Almost. Though it certainly can't be. Yeah, I mean, this is not a surprise, right, from this group of Congress, congresswomen and men who voted for. I think it was 17 total who voted against it.

And some, there's definitely some, there were a few Republicans who voted, either against it or present because I think just the process and saying, why are we voting to condemn things like this? Just sort of like a stance on that, although it obviously passed overwhelmingly. You wonder if, if the Democrats are going to. to continue to tolerate the squad and their squad mates. Because there is a pretty significant movement within the Democratic Party to say, hey, number one, you're taking the four people that make us look the worst and throwing them on

television 25,000 times a day and letting them lead the party. Is that a good move if you're a Democrat? I know if I were a Democrat, I would not want Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez representing my movement. But the good news is, you're not a Democrat, and so we'll keep that to ourselves. Well, we get to celebrate it. Yes, because I love it. It is a gift that never stops. It gives new every day.

It is like you go into one of those buffet places that's really good, like in one of those casinos. It's like a $50 buffet, and you just eat every single little bit of it. That is the combination. between the squad and the Democratic primary, where you have 25 socialists arguing with each other to see who can be the most socialist. And then all of them lose to the most prominent members of the party, the squad.

This is a dream. Think about this, Glenn. For what, a hundred years? Republicans tried to say, you know who are a bunch of socialist, Democrats? And every single time until this last couple of years, they would say, well, no, they're not. How dare, that's racist.

What is socialist? There's no socialism here. And now the people leading their party are admitted democratic socialists. So in the Mueller, the Mueller hearings today, did you hear the first congressman said, I know the Democratic and the socialists on the other side. And nobody booed. Nobody said, ah, here, here, here, out of order. they're accepting it now.

They're just accepting it. And it's wonderful. It is absolutely wonderful. Now, you will know if they have had enough of the squad. I will tell you, if the Democrats don't clean out their own party, they will be Jeremy Corbyn's Labor Party by 2024. Guarantee, no questions asked. They will be so extreme, so racist, so anti-Semitic by 2024 that Jeremy Corbyn may even feel a little uncomfortable. If they want to clean out and begin to send a message to people who are socialist radicals, hey, sit down.

Their last chance may be Ilan Omar. because here they have, as you will see tonight, you have felonies. And while she deserves every opportunity to be innocent, presumed innocent, until proven guilty, we're not here to prove her guilty. We're here to show you the evidence that should be brought to a grand jury. The Minnesota Attorney General should be ashamed of himself or herself. You know, look this up. I bet you the Attorney General.

is a George Soros person. Do you remember that when he put all the Attorney Generals in? The SOS? Was it the, or no, that was Secretary of State Project. See if it's a, see if the Attorney General was funded by George Soros, I wonder. But there's a reason. I don't know what it is that the Attorney General in Minnesota is not going for this. Maybe it's fear.

Maybe. I don't know. But it's certainly not based on fact. And we'll show you that tonight only on Blaze TV. Blaze TV. slash Glenn, use the promo code Glenn 20 and receive $20 off. Alonimo more. Every week, I tell you about a new cyber criminal plot that threatens your...

No, go ahead. You found it. I forgot. Attorney General, Minnesota, right? Oh, no. It's Keith Ellison. I forgot about that. And by the way, he did, George Soros did donate $100,000 to Ellison's campaign.

It's Keith Ellison. I forgot about that. That's got to be added in tonight's program. Yes. Oh, my gosh. All right. This week, a new report reveals how some new apps can infect your phone, take your money, control your device. One suspicious app had more than 10 million downloads before it was revealed to be tricking people into paying for what would otherwise be free.

When personal information is exposed, someone can use that to commit identity theft. And that's why LifeLock exists. LifeLock detects a wide range of identity threats like your social security number on sale for the dark web. And if they detect your information, any of your information is out there and unsecured, they send you an alert. Now, nobody can prevent all identity thefts or monitor all transactions at all businesses. But if they see that threat that you have missed, they send you the alert. They ask you, is this you? If not, they have a trained professional here in America that is going to take care of it.

Now, get 10% off your first year of protection by using. promo code back. That's promo code back at 800, LifeLock, 1-800,800, LifeLock.com, and use the promo code back and get 10% off. That's LifeLock.com, promo code back. LifeLock.com or 1-800 LifeLock, promo code back. You're listening to Glenn Beck. You know, this is, the Mueller report is just, it's like a really bad Godfather 2. Let's say they just took the old clips from Godfather 1, repackaged it and said it was completely a brand new movie. It's not.

It's that we already know everything the Democrats are doing. And they put older and tired, more tired actors in it. Yes. So we have that going for us today. We're talking about Elon Omar tonight on our special. There's one thing that we want to share with you. You know, the president is so racist because he said, we'll send you back where you came from or you could go back. And everybody says that's racist.

Here's Ilan Omar in, I think, 2012 on Twitter. She said, we are citizens. Someone was, she was fighting with someone about culture. She said, we are citizens and can't be deported. Why don't we deport you to wherever you came from? Now, we were told by the journalists that that's, it's automatic racism, if you say that. Rashida Taleb also said to deport Donald Trump. Yep, wanted to deport Donald Trump.

I find it interesting, too, if you look back at Ilan Amar's tweets. There's another thing she points out, what are we here? We always say the same thing. We're a melting pot of cultures, right? Not to Ilan Omar. She actually says no. She says she totally disagrees that America is a melting pot of cultures. I mean, it's hard to, she could be saying that she totally disagrees, period.

America as a melting pot of cultures. But didn't she go on to say something about Saudi Arabia and Somalia, the only difference is freedom of religion? Yep. The only difference between Saudi Arabia. Arabia or Somalia or Thailand. She says the only difference is America is a freedom of religion. We must accept. Freedom of speech. Freedom of press.

I don't know if she caught this. Functioning government. The Saudis, you know, chopped up a journalist for saying things they didn't like. I don't think that sets us apart, too, just a little bit. Just a little bit. Don't miss the special tonight. Elon Omar only on blazedtv.com slash Glenn. promo code Glenn 20.

Thank you.