The Glenn Beck Program - No Taxes, All the Spending! It’s Just Like Disneyland! | 11/6/19

Episode Date: November 6, 2019

Yesterday was voting day, so Glenn and Stu review the badly worded constitutional amendments Texans voted on. As direct democracy usually goes, new taxes weren’t popular, but government spending was. But we need teachers who are free to TEACH, not flashier schools! Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin lost after fighting the teachers’ unions, but he’s not conceding yet. Should we say the name “Eric Ciaramella?” He MAY be the whistleblower, and while Sen. Chuck Schumer says nobody knows, Sen. Rand Paul seems to. New evidence reveals there WAS an investigation into Burisma, and the company name-dropped Hunter Biden to try to stop it! And 11,000 scientists say that the Green New Deal doesn’t go far enough – we must DECREASE the population! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Yeah, welcome back, Stu. You can see what the people walk. Some of us have been toiling here. Well, you've been off with Mickey Mouse. Welcome to it. Thank you. Yes, Disney trip accomplished. Parent of the Year right here, you're looking at them or hearing him.

That's me. The thing I like about it is you're in such debt right now. I know there's nowhere. You're not going anywhere. Oh, yeah. I'm here for the rest of my life now. You're here for the rest of your life. There's no way you're retiring.

You know, you think like, you're not. hey, you're going to Goofy's Kitchen. Here's a guy who screws up. I mean, he's famous for screwing up everything he does. It must be a cheap restaurant. No, it's not. Goofy's Kitchen, very expensive. Very expensive.

Yes, it's very interesting how that works. But you're like, hey, you want to take a photo with Minnie Mouse? Sure. Great. Give us 5495 then. Yeah. And we'll let you see the picture that we took of you and Minnie Mouse. So you sold your home.

Yes. Or do they just sign it over now? You sign it over to Disney. It's now officially part of the park. Yeah, that's great. That's great. That's great. Well, welcome back. I'm glad you're here. A lot to talk about the elections yesterday. Didn't bode well for a lot of Republicans. So there are elections all over the country yesterday and can't figure people out. Just can't figure people out. We'll get to that here in just a second. Also, 22-year-old Instagram star says learning about World War II harms mental health of millennials. Oh, does it, sweetheart?

Hmm. I'm going to feel bad for you. But we're going to keep teaching World War II and the Nazis and the gas chambers and everything else. Oh, that sucks. Otherwise, you can just round people up for any kind of reason because it'll all be new and fresh. Oh, kind of like the new idea of population control because the Green New Deal isn't enough. So now we need some. sort of population control because

11,000 scientists told us, the hour is growing growing nearer and nearer. We have got to cut the population. Now, the last time that happened, Paul Erlich was talking about starvation of entire

countries. Oh. Well, how very Stalin of you. We begin with the election in one minute. This is the Glenberg program. Did you know that according to the FBI, on average, a burglary somewhere in the country? Every 23 seconds.

2 million per year. Here's the interesting thing. 83% of prosecuted burglars have admitted that they specifically look to see if there's alarm in the house. If there is an alarm and it's on, they move to the next house. Most houses don't have an alarm system. Simply safe. Can correct that easily. And it doesn't come with any strings, any contracts.

It's very affordable and the 24-7 monitoring is only $15 a month and can cover every vulnerable area inside and outside your home with full-time security. Keep your precious cargo safe. Get Simply Safe. Simply Safe with a great deal right now at Simplysafbeck.com. Get a free HD security camera when you order. It's $100 value. You'll have eyes on your home 24-7.

Video evidence if someone tries to get in. It's your free HD security camera. Now at simplysafebeck.com. That's simplysafebeck.com. You say welcome back to Stu, who had a vacation with his family in Disney, California. You see the new Star Wars thing? I did, yeah. Good?

It's really cool. It points you're standing in the middle of this area, and you feel like you're just in the movie. Because it's all encompassing. Like, everywhere you look, it just looks like Star Wars. So that was pretty cool. And I, you know, I've mortgaged my home, sold it, sold a couple of the children. You kind of had to get rid of them. You kind of had a fire sale on that.

I was a little surprised. Yeah. Kids wanted to eat while they were at Disney too. Yes. They wanted a big elephant ear. Yeah. Those things are expensive. Yeah.

Every time you hear about economic problems, you don't see them at Disneyland. People don't mind spending $54.95 on a corn dog there. Oh, no, no. They do. No, no. They do. I don't think they do. I think it's a point where it's,

just like the American people. You get to a point where you just have to eliminate the idea that finances exist. And if you do that, things seem great. Right. Like there's a fancy mouse walking around and there's this goofy guy and he seems pretty funny. And there's Pluto. It's a dog and he's cool. And I have no more money.

And that is this. Right. This is what happens with the American people. Right. Like you go out and you vote. We were talking about this with Texas. Texas. This is not California.

This is not New York. Texas had 10 ballot propositions. You could vote on last night. Texas. No, they were good. They were good. Oh, they were good. And you look at it and you're just like, well, is there any way to stop a ballot proposition from passing if you say you're spending money on something?

Especially if it's something that sounds moderately positive. No. But additional Texas water development board bonds, should we be doing that in Texas? Of course, 64 to 36 gets approved. Hang on just a second. The constitutional amendment, constitutional amendments. These are all constitutional amendments, but we're doing. Providing for the issuance of additional general obligation bonds by the Texas Water Development Board

of an amount not to exceed 200 million to provide financial assistance for the development of certain projects in economically distressed areas. This is sort of on the back of Harvey, Hurricane Harvey. This would permit the Water Development Board to use bonds for projects in areas of state with greater financial need. That's great. And, of course, that's approved. Of course we have to do that. We've got to do that.

64 to 36. Yeah. Temporary property tax exemption for disaster areas. Again. All right? Yeah. Well, you know, this has been damaged by a disaster. And there's been an official disaster declaration.

Let those people get back on their feet. Let's just cut the taxes. It's a little more spending a little less revenue in the first. couple here. How about prohibiting state income tax on residents? Now, of course. Don't even have to read it. No. Well, you don't, you want to prohibit.

So the answer is actually yes. This was a big confusing thing that was going down to the line of the vote. But if you want to prohibit the state income tax, you want to vote yes. So it's a little confusing. The constitutional amendment prohibiting the imposition of an individual

income tax, including a tax on an individual sheriff partnership or unincorporated. Association income. The answer is, yeah, I don't want any income tax in the state of Texas. We don't have state income tax now. And this is a constitutional amendment saying we'll never have it unless you amend the Constitution. Which is not that hard. Apparently not that hard. I don't know why it's 70. It's not 70%. This should be two thirds of the state to amend the constitution. Right. This is just 50% here in Texas. So that one passed 77 to 23. How about sporting goods sales tax to fund parks, wildlife, and historical agents.

Of course. Well, those are good things. So therefore, the answer is yes. We're hunters and we want to make sure that we take care of our state parks and our wildlife. Are you anti-park? Yeah. Is that a position you're taking? You're anti-park?

No, well, 13% of the evil people here in Texas did take that position. 13%. 13%. 87 to 13. Which was the final vote on that one. How about increasing bonds for cancer prevention and research institute? Now look. Do you want cancer? Do we want cancer? Of course we don't want cancer. Nobody likes cancer. Cancer. Bad in all circumstances. But here's the thing, 64 to 36 for more money for it. So now we've, if you've noticed the pattern here, and this is the California problem. It's the same problem in California, same problem in Texas. The same problem with everywhere that has these constitutional amendments where the average person can go vote on them instead of a representative democracy, representative republic like we were given initially. You can vote for. no taxes and all the spending.

What a one, that's like, that's a great way to do it. It's like going to Disneyland, right? You can go, as long as you don't care about all the, but you can get all the pictures you want with Minnie Mouse, she's just going to charge you $54.95 every time the flashbul goes off. Just don't look at it. Don't worry about it. Yeah.

Don't worry about the account. Someone else will pay it down the road. Right. How about increasing the, increasing distributions to the state school fund? Kids? It's got school. It's got school at it. Of course we need that money.

Right. 73 to 20. How about a creation of a flood infrastructure fund? We need that. Of course. That sounds good, right? You want flood. If there's going to be a flood, you need infrastructure. You need infrastructure to go against it. So that passes 76 to 24. Another property tax exemption for precious metals. Hang on just a second. That is actually the one that I look at and go, that one probably should. Constitutional Amendment providing for the creation of flood infrastructure fund to assist in the financing of drainage, flood mitigation, and flood control projects. A lot of this stuff came on the back of Hurricane Harvey, which hit Houston so badly and all over Texas. Yeah.

I think the problem. If the people in New Orleans would have done this, it wouldn't have been so bad. But they never did it. Right. But here's the issue. There's not anything on this list that you'd look at and say, oh, well, we can't, we don't need to fund cancer research. There's nothing on here where you'd say it's a bad idea. Of course you want all those things.

But that's the problem. When government offers all those things, the people take all those things, and the same thing goes for the taxes. Of course, people don't want to pay extra taxes for all these things. Yes, they see tax exemption in one of these things. They're going to vote for it most of the time. It's almost impossible to find something with the word school or cancer or health or floods or disaster in it that will not pass in one of these situations, which is why our founders kind of said, you know, what isn't a good idea? is having all of our

expenditures being designated and doled out through votes through democracy. This is, this was the plan from the progressives. You didn't do this before. You had a representative democracy or republic.

You hire, you have an election. You hire someone who's supposed to be good at what you're asking them to do. And then they go in there and they figure the stuff out and then you vote them in or out of office. Right. But you couldn't get them to do the things that progressives want. So they started in California, and they went directly with these kinds of things for a direct vote. Because we all love democracy.

Well, democracy gets you California. Democracy is getting us this. So you look through all of these. Yes, on all of the spending, and any of the taxes are no, including property tax exemption for precious metals in depositories. Now, we just built in Texas a massive depository for gold. We got all of our gold back from the Federal Reserve. So all of that gold that Texas held gold that went now into some underground vault that has been built. So Texas has all of its gold.

Now listen to this. It's a constitutional amendment. Tell me why people voted yes or no for this. The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation, precious metals held. in a precious metal depository located in this state. I would guess that less than 1%

knew what Ad Valorum meant. Right, even though what it means. Yeah, don't even know. It could be like a property tax or excise tax. Well, I don't really like ads. I think they should be commercial free. Commercial free gold. From ad valorem taxation.

Right. Basically, it's a property tax. You know, a million people voted on this. Did 10,000 know what Ad Valorum meant? No. No. No, right? No, which is why it was close. It was yes, 54, no 46, because people were like, Ad Valorum.

That sounds fancy. I don't know. That's a trick. Yeah. I don't like those. Who's writing this thing? Someone's speaking a different language. Therefore, I'll vote now. They're tricking us.

Well, I think, honestly, the only thing there that saves that one and makes it close is it sounds like precious metals. it sounds like rich people. So people are willing to vote against it. But the bigger issue here, I think, is something we've all vilified as it's terrible. We should all be pragmatic. We should all be, we should all just want to, I just care about what's right. I'm not ideological. I don't have an ideology.

These ideological, ideological people are the problem. No. An ideology is simply a group of beliefs and policies that, and this is important, work together. So if you believe in lower taxes, what you're saying is I want a smaller government that does less. If you believe in all excessive spending, then you need to believe in higher taxes to pay for it. What we get are people who don't want to pay any of the taxes, but do want to pay for all the free stuff. Which side is Ad Valorem on? I don't know.

Because that's what I'm against. Okay. That's the one I'm against. Okay. Yeah, he seems bad. May I just point out one more thing? Yes. I'd like to see the Constitution of Texas

because it's a really crappy Constitution and I don't like to take on Texans on their Constitution but Proposition 10 is a constitutional amendment to allow the transfer of law enforcement dogs to qualified caretakers in certain circumstances. The law and constitution. When your constitution is covering dog handlers.

I don't know if it's a constitution anymore. It's more just a rule book, you know, that we... A list of stuff I want. Yeah, that's... It's almost like Santa's list at that way. What, you don't like police dogs? You want them to just be destroyed?

Is that what you want? I want all those gold holding police dogs that have cancer to die in a flood. That's... Wow. You would have voted known a lot of the stuff. Yes, I would have. and they should all be paying higher taxes. Income taxes.

Now, let me tell you about Gary. Gary's a guy you'd expect to see in a health food store, checking to make sure that things that he was about to eat were all good for him. You might see him at the gym doing his daily workout regimen and, you know, with the kind of enthusiasm that everybody really likes and I piss me off. But this is what you would expect. You wouldn't expect him to have massive pain. First, it was in the shoulders, then the knees, finally in the lower back.

It got so bad that eventually Gary wasn't sure he was able to even exercise anymore. He was drawn to Relief Factor because it wasn't a drug. All of the ingredients were botanical, and that is what appealed to Gary and that and the fact that, you know, it might relieve his pain. As it turns out, Gary got his life back, and so can you. When taken properly, relief factor attacks the inflammation that causes much of our pain. It works for 70% of the people who take it. It only costs 1995 to start with their three-week quick-start trial. If you want a drug-free natural way to ease your pain and get your life back, do what I did.

Do what Gary did. Go to relieffactor.com. That's relieffactor.com. We pause for 10 seconds. Station ID. Well, it looks like Matt Bevan, who was our guest yesterday, Matt Bevan lost in the gubernatorial race. He has not conceded yet, though, has he? No, as of at least as of. this morning he had not.

It was, I mean, it's a very close race. It was a few thousand votes. And it looks like he wants to see a recount, which is, I think, within his right. You know, usually something, an election with several thousand votes does not normally get overturned. But it's within that range where why not look at it again? It's an important decision. Yep. I don't, you know, Kentucky, I think, is going to regret this election in the future.

but you know this is it's it's not an easy train for Republicans this is what happens when you you hire somebody and they put you on an austerity diet. It's exactly the thing we're just pointing out yeah if you do the thing that I'm advocating you lose elections this is what happens if you go out and you say you know what actually people we can't give you all the free of all the free funds and all the free school spending and all the free things you know what you can't really have all of that you can only

have a little bit of it. When you say that to people, they say, oh, okay, well, get out of here. There's the door. You can have all that. You can have the whole door. Walk through it. It's really cool. The district I live in, the school district I live in, they wanted even more money. And I'm like, what do you want? Do you want a helipad for the kids? What do you want? I mean, it is insane. It's insane how you can just say kids and school and pass anything. Pass anything. Anything. I've never seen one. Fail. that puts that in there. I've never in my life seen it.

Now, I'm sure it's happened. Now, it's, but I've never seen it in a place I've lived. We should be starving these schools to death for money, only because they're not working. They're not working. Our school systems and our educational standards are the lowest they've ever been.

Our test returns, lowest they've ever been. People don't even know our history. We should be starving these schools to death. And look, all of the, so much more of this should be private. Yes. In a country like the United States, it should be much more private.

Like, even if you have a system of public schools, it should be a fallback option for places that need it. Not the only option in the main thing people go to. I mean, we should be looking at this as we should, all these things like school vouchers used to be important policies that Republicans pushed for and were very popular, by the way. But, you know, those things have been abandoned. Just because of the teacher's unions.

Yeah. I think the teachers. And that was one of the things Bevin was one of the reasons why he lost just because he went after teachers. Yeah. And it was all about the kids in school. Yeah. Everybody, oh, we got to take care of the kids. We've got to take care of education. You don't think

Matt Bevin wants to take care of kids in education? Of course. It's a failing system. And you are you are, let me tell you something. If a teacher likes being told exactly what to do in every situation, in every classroom, they're not meant to be a teacher.

They're really not. I want the teachers who think out of the box. I want teachers to have their own control. I want teachers to be able to come and find a different way to teach. But all of these teachers are told you have to teach exactly this and exactly this way. have we not learned anything from every Robin Williams movie? I mean, this is essentially his entire career was built on. He was a doctor with a red nose.

I'm doing surgery differently. I close my eyes and I do it with a heart in one hand. And the guy was like, it sounds like a terrible idea, but he did it differently. And then there was, you know, he was always in front of a class. A dead poet society was not him to. Yep, yep. Or, hey, I'm doing everything differently.

All the rules, you throw them out the window. And I'm going to be funny for me. about 12 seconds in this movie, even though you're expecting it to be a comedy. That's real, right? I mean, there is, yes, some structure is good, of course. But, you know, these are people who are trying to create. Good teachers can engage a kid's mind because they're creative. They're giving them a different way of thinking of things.

They're excited about it. And every kid is different. And if you don't capture their imagination, especially in today's work, You got nothing. Yeah. You got nothing. They're going to be on TikTok in five seconds, you know, watching some stupid video of a person running into a wall.

And that's going to win most of the time unless you're really, unless you really engage teachers. And how people don't think that our local systems should be empowered to work this all out. I mean, what is it? Do schools get 3% of their money from the federal government, something like that? And it's like 80% of the paper. for federal government? I mean, it's insane.

One of the best principals around, I read this story about a principal who spends all of her day just filling out all the paperwork saying to the federal government, yeah, we're doing all that even though they're not doing it. I mean, the federal government is making people lie to be able to have a better school. It's just insane. It's insane.

It doesn't work. Why are we, why do we keep voting for more? We keep giving them more money and the scores keep getting worse and worse and worse. What are we doing? I wouldn't want that to happen to us, you know, as a radio host. I wouldn't, I want to be the guy who could break the rules like, you know, good morning Vietnam, something like that, where you're just the one DJ that's breaking the rules of the military because this is the only role I ever do and no one ever noticed it. And now I'm dead and people are just starting to pick it up. You're listening to Glenn.

I don't, I think you might be the only one. American Financing Corporation, NMLS-182334, www. nmLS, consumer access.org. Managing your debt and managing your investments. Those seem to be opposite ends of the financial spectrum, but they're not. The one thing that very often ties them together is a home mortgage. And here's the honest truth. Mortgages and mortgage finances are very complex.

More importantly, they're not always advisable. So who do you trust to give you good advice about, mortgages. May I suggest American financing? Give them call today and in 10 minutes they will know where you're at and where you need to be. Now here's the best part. They'll tell you about it. There are no contracts, no upfront fees, just people who want to work to ensure that you're going to make the best, soundest financial decision you can. So here's some advice. Find 10 minutes out of your day today and give them a call. You'll thank me later. It's American Financing, 1,800-9062440, 800-9062440, or Americanfinancing.net.

So let's say you were at Disneyland and you might have missed the second special on Ukraine. Well, you can watch it all this week at blaisTV.com. Use the promo code Glenn and get $10 off. Welcome to the Glenn Beck program. We're just, as Pat said, bitchifying. just a little bit about the elections yesterday and really local referendums because if you voted yesterday, I'm sure your state and your area did exactly the same thing. Yes.

Vote for all kinds of new stuff, but no new taxes. Oh, except for the bonds, which those are just free money. The bond is a free money. Okay, here's the first thing. Okay, here's the first thing. As we discussed earlier, no Latin in any of. of the measures. Okay.

No Latin. Ad valorum was in one of the, nobody knows what ad valorem means. Just say it's a property tax, okay? Ad valorem. Next thing. Bonds should not be called bonds anymore. It should call them what they are.

Should the people of the town take out a loan that the people are then responsible for paying? should they give that money in taxes to the city so they can do whatever. Everybody's like, oh, a bond. Oh, sure. I'm going to vote for a bond. That's a magic device. They make you feel so guilty about it.

It's like, have you seen Little Timmy's classroom? Little Timmy's classroom has the 905 freight trained Oklahoma City go through the middle of it every single day. They have to stop the first grade arithmetic class every day because the train is rumbling through their classroom. And then you go and you see Little Tini's classroom and you realize he's at a school that's a mile and a half long that has four arboradums and three 50,000 seat football stadiums.

Okay, now what you don't? Little Jimmy's doing really well. Okay, here's the difference. There are places where schools are just nightmares. Texas is not one of those places. We've got beautiful schools that are beautifully staffed. I went to, I went to, I don't know, what it's like now, but I went to Seahome High School in Bellingham, Washington.

And it was a fine art school that was a really good school, like really nice, okay, really nice. I go to, I go to schools around here, and it's like, it's the slums. It's like I'm expecting like J.J. Jackson to come out and go, Dino, my, it looks like it stopped in the slums in 1973. And you're like, whoa, what, what is this? Saying the school you went to. The school I went to in comparison to what's around here. It was just a horrible, you know, inner city nightmare. And there's plenty, as you point out, plenty of bad schools.

And those schools, we should, you know, there is an acceptable level. But there's also an acceptable level on the upside where you're saying, can we stop now? can we stop? They don't need four arboretums. And that's real in a school here in Texas. That's real. Yesterday they just passed another $315 million bond for the school district. And then...

Was it a close vote? Yeah, it was like 70 to 30. Really tight. Really tight. And they passed it, I think in a larger margin, the $825 million bond for the county community college. So $1.1 billion in new bond money that we're responsible for. And I don't know, people think that's just magic money. They do.

They don't know. It passes every time. Yeah. It passes every single time. And the next year, they'll come back to us again. And they'll say, well, it's for the children. Don't you love the children? You don't love the children.

But you know what? The space doesn't, the space doesn't matter. the space does not matter the teachers matter you want it to be safe and clean and you want the curriculum to be decent right you want the curriculum and the teachers yeah but like I mean just the basics like for example when you take out a loan you need

you need details of that loan if I were to say to you hey you want to take out a $30,000 loan for a car that's not enough information how long of time how much time do I have to pay it back what is the interest rate on this loan what happens if interest rates go up around the world. Is ours adjustable?

Is they going to fly up as well? You never have those details. You never. What does it cost me every year? Right. What does it cost me? Every year. All those things should be included in, I love your idea of changing the language.

And that's a constitutional amendment you could actually probably do. From now on, in constitutional amendments, the word bond will be replaced by loan taken out by the taxpayer and see how many of these things start passing. because I bet a lot less of them do. But they intentionally word them this way so that people are like, well, the question comes down to fundamentally, do I like schools or not?

That's how people are actually answering these questions. Do I like schools? Do I like cancer? Well, no, I don't like cancer, so I want to stop it. So I'm going to fund the cancer support. What are the, what is the accountability on these things? Do I find out later on if it worked? Did we cure cancer?

Because I've paid for about. Five million bonds to cure cancer. I'm pretty sure it's still around. Hang on just a second. This was an update. That cancer one was an update. You were already giving three million dollars or three billion dollars. I can't even billion, trillion, million.

They're all such huge numbers now. They're all interchangeable to me. For the very first time, I really understand when people say, well, there's such a big number. You really can't get your arms around. I don't know how many times. I say million, billion, trillion, and I'm not sure which category it's in. I just know it's a lot. Right.

Right. You know, they do that thing. There's a huge difference between million billion and trillion. Right. They always do this thing. They're like, it's a $1.9 billion with a B. That no longer is even effective to me anymore. Like I'm so.

A billion dollars. It's like a minute of spending. Yeah. A minute. And no one knows what we're getting. Like, do we go back and look at these schools and say, oh, well, this school least improved in this area. We spent $230 million bond for your school.

What did you get? Well, what you got was likely a better sports stadium or more iPads for the kids in kindergarten. So wouldn't that be important information, let's say on the cancer thing? Okay, you've been spending $3 million, billion or trillion every year, every year since the last time you voted. Now we want to double that.

And we want to make that six million trillion or billion. We don't know which. Shouldn't it say, hey, we invested every year $3 billion, and this is what we got for it. And would you like to continue with that? Or would you like to add more because these are the things that we can do? Well, that would be called accountability. And there is no such thing.

Nobody wants to be accountable. Nope. I remember, Pat, you coming in here and saying, you know, the school board election is up and this is going on. And you were quoting all these details. And I thought you were an alien. Like, you're the only person in America who knows who's being elected to these school boards or whatever it was. I don't remember what the election was at this point.

I mean, there are deeper analysis into this stuff and they'll show you all the details. But literally, no one reads them. So you just go in there and it becomes a fundamental question. Do I like schools? Do I like schools? Do I like schools? No where to find them. Right.

And they certainly don't want to tell you about it. They don't advertise it. They don't say, hey, if you really want to be informed about this bond issue, the $1.1.1 billion you're spending, go here and look at these details. They don't do that because they don't want you to know. And frankly, if they did, we still wouldn't look. We still wouldn't look. That's probably true. Look, this is why our founders knew democracy doesn't work because you do stuff like this.

You don't know. Look, you're busy. You're doing all kinds of stuff. That's, didn't I, didn't I just vote for that guy? So his life can suck by looking at those numbers all day. That's what I hired him to do. Yeah. And a good example of that is, was, I think it was the first issue on our ballot in our area that was, it was something like, are you four judges to be, are you okay with judges having multiple judge jobs?

No. First of all, I don't know. I don't even know what that means. What does that mean? Is it a part-time job that he has now and he wants to do another part-time job? Is it a full-time job and he wants to do two of them? Is there time enough to do both? I have no idea.

I don't know. I go no on that because my assumption was... No idea. So does that mean he could also be voted for in another district? So is my judge vote going to be diluted because, you know, Dallas County could be able to vote for him or not vote for him? and so then I'd have their crappy judge telling us what to do. Right. I mean, I had no idea.

People look at it sort of as, it's worded almost like it was like a power grab, right? Like some judge can now be over this big area. So that one is the only one that failed. Yeah. I believe it was the only one that failed. And I don't even know what it really entailed. Yeah. I don't know that anybody does, do they?

A constitutional amendment permitting a person to hold more than one office as municipal judge at the same time. If passed, this would allow elected municipal judges to serve in more than one jurisdiction. currently only judges who are appointed to their posts are allowed to do this. That's, I mean, could you possibly even swallow more information? I'm so we should understand. No, that's too detailed. That's way too much. Hey, should we do something with judges?

All right. Wait. No. What? I don't want judges to be in too many areas, so no. I don't want them to be in too many areas. They should stay in their fence. Don't we still have a pen for those people?

The dogs have a fence around them. Why not judges? Thanks. Pat Gray Unleashed. Get the podcast. Everywhere podcasts are available. I can't wait to talk to you about the new Green Deal idea. Oh, it's so good.

You're going to love it. I mean, unless you're human. Less you're human. All right. Good intentions. I wish we lived in a world where good intentions were a given. Be nice to think that everyone out there only has, the collective good in mind when they go about their daily business.

But sometimes the road to hell is paved with good intentions, and a lot of times people don't have good intentions. Anybody who works at a bank or a credit union for any length of time will tell you that cybercriminals tend to prey on the people who have the least ability to defend themselves against identity threats. Whether it's an elderly person who doesn't know his or her way around the internet, or just somebody who isn't careful enough with information, the successful cyber criminals out there are going after them first.

You don't have to be one of these people. LifeLock defends and alerts you about a wide range of identity threats. Nobody can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses. And LifeLock can see the threats that you might miss on your own. Act now and get an extra 10% off the first year with promo code back. That's 1-800 life lock. Call them now, 1-800-life-lock or visit lifelock.com. Use the promo code back and save an extra 10% off your first year.

That's lifelock.com or 1-800 life lock. This is the Glenback program. Welcome to the program. We're glad you're here. Matt Bevin losing in Kentucky, I think, is a very bad thing. People of Kentucky decided they didn't, they didn't, like him, I guess, you know, going after the spending on schools and he went after the unions. And he has not conceded it yet. We should point out. Right. But he was running a campaign, basically, a referendum on Donald Trump. And he shouldn't have done that.

I don't know if people have noticed this in the Republican Party. The Donald Trump thing seems to work only for Donald Trump. Right. Which is, of course, understandable because he's Donald Trump, right? But this is unique. He is, you know, the same thing happened with Barack Obama. Barack Obama could win an election, but people that were trying to be Barack Obama, they would lose. Yeah. It doesn't seem to work for anyone else outside of Donald Trump. And that's not a knock on Trump.

It's a knock on Republicans instead of just being themselves trying to emulate what they think the thing of the day is. Oh, everyone likes Donald Trump's the Republican guy now. We need to be just like him. He should be yourself. Right? You don't need to be like Donald Trump. Let Donald Trump be like Donald Trump. He's pretty good at defending himself. I don't know if anyone's noticed this.

He's really quite good. Let him be him. I have to tell you, I think this Donald Trump impeachment thing is going to turn around on the Democrats. And I think it's going to turn around hard. Do you? I do. I do. You know, the whistleblower thing, you know, we all know the name of the whistleblower now.

We know who it is, but the media won't verify it. everyone in Congress knows who this person is. And this person is a diehard political operative that we now think that that's who Lisa Page and Peter Struck were talking about. You know, in those love letters. Yes. And at one point they're like, hey, should we send quotation marks Charlie in? Well, I don't know. Charlie, we can't let him be found out and him being in that room so many times will it seem

suspicious, blah, blah, blah. We now think that was the whistleblower. We now think that he was working with them. That's interesting. I mean, this whistleblower thing, it all starts to come apart. But the whistleblower thing, help me with this a little bit. The whistleblower thing, what did the whistleblower actually do? The whistleblower told us, essentially, let's just, you know, give them.

media's case here for a second. The whistleblower informed us that Donald Trump made this call about Ukraine, right? And so, and accused him of maybe a quid pro quo as it was related to this. Since that has happened, we got the transcript of

the call that Donald Trump made to Ukraine in which we can read all for ourselves and analyze how we wish. So it was, yes, it tipped off the beginning of this, but we now know what was in the call. Right, but the whistleblower was part of the deep state.

This whistleblower worked with, what was her name, the Taco Bell, Chalupa. I want another Chalupa. Worked with Chalupa. So he was working, you know, in the Obama White House, bringing all of these,

you know, AGs from over in Ukraine into the White House to have the meeting of what can you dig up on Donald Trump. That's him. Working with Chalupa. So he wasn't, he was worried about, this is the case of the chalkboard.

They're not worried about Joe Biden. They're worried about being found out for all of the other stuff that they were doing. They didn't want anybody looking into, was there election fraud going on with the DNC? Were they using operatives in Ukraine? Did they orchestrate all of this stuff about Russia and Donald Trump? Did they orchestrate it from Ukraine? I think that's all really important, right? And that's why we've been doing all these specials.

Another special on TonightblazedTV.com, promo code Glenn. But isn't it one of those things where the identification of the whistleblower is less important than the stuff we were finding out about the entire operation? No, because he is, when you name him, then you put him right in the center of it and it blows anything that he said about. Oh, well, I was worried about this. It just blows it all apart. We're going to talk to you about the new Green Deal. It's not going far enough for 11,000 scientists. They're saying we need dramatic action.

And, you know, eating less meat and shifting to new renewable energy is not enough. We need to start eliminating some humans. Oh, this is going to end up great. It's going to be swell. Also, who is Eric Carmelah? Who is that? I don't even know. Nobody knows the name of Eric Caramella.

Nobody. Not Joe Biden, not Chuck Schumer, not Nancy Pelosi. Of course, the media knows Eric Caramella. And it's been printed online several times. It's important that you know who Eric Caramella is. But nobody wants to say the name Eric Caramella. Well, I'll think it through and see if I'm willing to say Eric Caramella next. Stu, how do you pronounce the, how do you pronounce the name?

Caramella? Caramella. Are you talking about the... The whistleblower. Oh, I thought you're talking about the candy bar, caramel. No, no. Caramela. Caramel. Eric Caramello is the candy bar. Right. Caramel. Chocolate delicious. I know this is Eric Caramala. Caramel.

Is he the air to the caramelel? I'm not really sure. I'm not sure, but I think, you know, we're not supposed to say the name, apparently. Nobody knows the name, Eric Caramella. And that's the whistleblower. And nobody wants to reveal. Nobody in Congress has the guts to reveal Eric Caramella's name. And Eric is at home right now going, geez, I hope somebody doesn't say Eric Caramella on the air,

because that will blow my whistleblower status. And, gosh, I, you know, I don't want Eric Caramella just being said all the time. because that would hurt Eric Caramella, the whistleblower, who we don't know who it is, Eric Caramella. I'm going to think this through, and I'm going to come back to you in a second. I'm not sure if I'm going to say Eric Caramella or not. Rand Paul is almost, he's getting close. He's like, I'm going to say the name.

And Chuck Schumer says, well, if you even know the name, you should come to me privately because I don't know Eric Caramella. And we'll think about that and we'll get back to you in just one minute. This is the Glymbeck program. You know, I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that if you're listening to me, you probably have a lot of the same values that I do. Then again, you might be listening to me, and your name's Eric Caramella,

and you don't have any of the values that I have. But I'm going to guess, like me, that you're not particularly happy when you know that the money you're spending is going to corporations that fund things like Planned Parenthood and La Raza. I'm sure Eric Caramala doesn't have a problem with that, but maybe you do. Sometimes it can't. genuinely cannot be helped.

There's so many things that you can strenuously avoid in your daily life, but other things you just can't. With your mobile phone service, you can avoid having your money go to fund Planned Parenthood. Big mobile companies subsidize

the leftist causes that erode our values, our rights, and our country. Patriot Mobile is the only sell company donating to the causes that you and I both believe in. Eric Caramel is not going to going to sign up for this, but he's a whistleblower. I think. That's why we made the switch here at the Blaze. So have a ton of Patriots just like you. Join me in the thousands of other Americans

using a U.S.-based Patriot Mobile today. Eric Caramella need not apply. Get reliable nationwide coverage with unlimited talk and text plans starting as low as $25 a month, plus free activation on up to two lines with the offer code Beck. We were thinking about using the promo code Eric Caramella, but it's hard to spell. So we just went with Beck. Call 877-367-75-26 or visit them online at Patriotmobile.com slash Beck. That's Patriotmobile.com slash Beck. Charmella?

Charmella? I'm getting this in now. Eric Charamella? Yeah. Charmella. It is like a C-I-A. Eric Charimella in the morning. Eric Charimella at night.

That doesn't quite work. I'm writing, I'm working on a song called Eric Charmella or Caramella or Caramel Molo. I don't, I don't, I'm not. Maybe that's why they don't want the name out because, you know, confuse it with a candy bar. They don't know how to pronounce it. I'm not really sure. Could it be the media is just holding this back because they don't want to pronounce it wrong? It could be.

It could be that. Could be. Doubtful, but could be. In about three years, we're going to get a great video of like an AB. news anchors saying how they had this whole Eric Charamella's story down and they wouldn't let us go with it. Wouldn't let us go with it. Wouldn't let us go with it. I had every aspect of this lockdown. Now here's the game that's being played on Capitol Hill.

Now listen to Rand Paul. Here's Rand Paul yesterday being stopped by a reporter asking what are you doing? You can't release his name. Here it is. The whistleblower laws, though, they protect a whistleblower. You know it's illegal to out a whistleblower. You see you got that wrong too. We don't. We should work on the facts. Here's the thing is the whistleblower statute protects the whistleblower from having his name revealed by the inspector general. Even the New York Times admits that no one else is under any legal obligation. The other point, and you need to be very careful if you really are interested in the news, is that the whistleblower actually is a material witness completely separate from being the whistleblower because he worked for Joe Biden. He worked for Joe Biden at the same time Hunter Biden was receiving $50,000 a month.

So the investigation into the corruption of Hunter Biden involves this whistleblower because he was there at the time. Did he bring up the conflict of interest? Was there a discussion of this? What was his involvement with the relationship between Joe Biden and the prosecutor? There's a lot of questions the whistleblower needs to answer. Yeah, there's a lot. And it kind of falls apart once you know who Eric Caramella is. Once you know who Eric Caramella is and you see all the connections, then you're like, oh, we should say the name Eric Caramella.

Now I don't Or Charamella Or Charamella Whichever it may be I'm not sure I'll take it from him That's the one thing I'll take from him

I'd like to know Would you believe him If he told you How to pronounce his name? I don't know I would need A second source I would need a second source You can't

ban words and names By law coming out of A regular citizen's mouth That's not the way The country operates Oh listen to me Listen to me

We don't know. Even Chuck Schumer. Play the Chuck Schumer conference yesterday. He said he doesn't even know the name of the whistleblower. The calls to make public the whistleblower's identity are despicable. The whole purpose of the whistleblower law was to protect people when they had the courage to come forward. This whistleblower is obviously coming forward because he was so concerned about where President Trump was leading America. And every single Republican senator, including the Republican leader, ought to denounce this.

This has nothing to do with answering questions about the status of impeachment or the status of the trial. This has to do with what America is all about and a law that was passed in a bipartisan way. Whistleblowers should be protected, period, period. And no one knows who he is, or if you do, you should let me know. Nobody knows who he is. Nobody knows who he is. Everyone, everyone knows who he is. This is the biggest lie.

Everyone knows who the whistleblower is. And the reason he's being protected is because you ask him any question. You just look at his job history and it confirms everything on our blackboard. Confirms it all. Confirms it all. This guy should watch out because it's not going to be a Donald Trump. supporter that would ever do anything. This guy could be Jeffrey Epstein in a heartbeat by all of the people in the DNC. Because this guy is a danger to what they are actually hiding. Now, let me give

you an update. First of all, let me just say this. One of the problems with the whistleblower is seven months ago in April, Senator Chuck Grassley wrote a letter to Attorney General Bill Barr asking about a text message conversation between two FBI agents struck in page. Do you remember them? And that was made into, this is just a relationship thing. This is just a guy cheating on his wife. That's all this is. Well, is it?

Because Chuck Grassley wrote and said, Can you find out what this is all about? He wrote, quote, talking with Bill, Do we want Joe to go with Evanina instead of Charlie for a variety of reasons? Grassley notes in the footnotes that all aliases are known with the exception of Charlie. Who's Charlie? The conversation goes on with Page's response, quote, Hmm, I'm not sure.

Would it be unusual to have him show up again? Maybe another agent from the team. Now, why are they worried about the optics of a Charlie showing up to a meeting with Trump's transition team? Why are they hiding Charlie? Who is Charlie? Or is he the CI guy? Hmm. Because if he could assess if there were any new questions or different demeanor,

if Kate's husband is there, he can see if there are people we can develop for. potential relationships, end quote. They're using what we now think may be the whistleblower to go in and recruit more people to turn against the president of the United States. This is a coup. Now, that's not all the whistleblower was doing. The whistleblower is also. His presence, his presence takes apart the lies of the lies of.

of the Democrats saying that they had nothing to do at the embassy, that they had absolutely nothing to do. They were not doing anything at the U.S. embassy, the Ukrainian embassy in the U.S. They were not pumping the Ukrainians for information. And Chalupa, she's just this sweet little mom that's a housewife and there's no connection there. Well, we know that's not true, but we also know because we have her. and the whistleblower together, working the investigators in Ukraine,

telling them you need to find stuff on Trump. Go back and find stuff on Trump. We now have them. Is that the whistleblower? Because the whistleblower's name that's being bantied about is the same name as the guy who is helping her. Now, in another update, a U.S. Representative for Burisma Holdings sought a meeting with the Undersecretary of State,

Catherine Novelli, to discuss ending the corruption allegations against the Ukrainian firm where Hunter Biden worked as a board member. These memos have been obtained under a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. What is it the Democrats are hiding.

Well, because of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which by the way is not like some mysterious whistleblower, these are facts on paper. Three weeks before Burisma's overture to the state, Ukrainian authorities raided the home of an oligarch

who owned the gas firm employed, which employed Hunter Biden. A signal the long-running corruption probe was escalating in the middle of a U.S. presidential election. So three weeks before, they raid Burisma. Hunter Biden's name, in fact, was specifically invoked

by the Burisma representative as a reason the State Department should help. According to a series of email exchanges among U.S. officials trying to arrange the meeting, the subject line for the email exchanges just read simply Burisma. quoting, per our conversation, Karen Tramont, whatever, Karen of Blue Star Strategies, requested a meeting to discuss with the U.S. representative, State Department representative, Novelli alleging Burisma of corruption. Email between the state officials read, she noted that two high-profile U.S. citizens are affiliated with the

company, including Hunter Biden, as a board member. They would like to talk to Novelli about getting a better understanding of how the U.S. came to the determination that the company is corrupt. According to Tramamoto, there is no evidence of corruption. There's been no hearing or process, and evidence to the contrary has not been considered. Noveli was the most senior official overseeing the international energy issues for the state. The other woman was a lawyer working for Blue Star Strategies as a Washington firm hired by Burisma. Another Blue Star official, Sally Painter, both alumni of the Bill Clinton administration, worked with New York-based criminal defense attorney to settle the Ukraine cases in late 2016 and early 2017.

Burisma Holdings Records obtained by Ukrainian prosecutors state the gas firm made a $60,000 payment to Blue Star November 2015. She was scheduled to meet with Novelli on March 1st. State Department officials were scrambling to get answers ahead of that meeting from the U.S. Embassy in Kiev. So what happened? What happened? The Vice President, the State Department, knew that Hunter Biden was going to be investigated. Burisma came to the State Department and said, you've got to help State Department.

this investigation because Hunter Biden and a couple of other people are involved in this. So the State Department scrambled to do what they could to figure this out and to stop the investigation, which Democrats say never happened. They said there was no investigation. We now have the State Department emails showing that three weeks before he goes, there is an investigation. They are talking about it. They know exactly what's going on. We also showed you in the last special the documents that prove that the general prosecutor in Ukraine, kind of like our attorney general, he went to court and filed the case four weeks before Joe Biden came in. So he filed an active case four weeks before.

What does the whistleblower know about any of this? Because he's with the State Department. What's the State Department know? And what are they really hiding? One week from tonight, we'll show you. You're not going to like it, but we'll show you. And quite honestly, I think this thing, it could end like a Jason Bourne movie. Because this is corruption at the high,

levels and corruption that is not going to sit well with Democrats, Republicans, independents. They are not going to like this. We expose it next Wednesday. Make sure you're a member of Blaze TV. Go to blazTV.com. Use the promo code Glenn, and you're going to save 10% right now. Don't miss it next Wednesday.

All right. You've trusted the name of Norton in the realm of cybersecurity for a very long time. Cyber criminals are out in force and their numbers are only going to rise as time goes on, and we all become more and more dependent on the internet. If you've been listening to this show for a while, you already know about Norton's secure VPN. It uses bank grade encryption, and that helps block the hackers from stealing the information you send and receive over Wi-Fi. It's also part of the multiple layers of protection you get with Norton 360, and it includes Norton Secure VPN, device security, password manager, so much more.

Don't risk compromising your online privacy with the wrong VPN. You need to get a VPN, and the one you should get is Norton 360. Norton 360. Make sure that your online future is as secure as possible. Nobody can prevent all a cybercrime, but Norton 360 is a powerful ally for your cyber safety. Sign up today, save up to 50% off Norton 360 at Norton.com slash back. Norton.com slash Beck. 50% off, Norton 360.

Norton.com slash Beck. We break for 10 seconds station ID. So let's go from the media, not willing to say the name of the whistleblower, Eric Caramella. A lot of people are saying Caramella. It's Charamella. Charamella.

Charamella. Because it's Italian. Yeah. And the emphasis should be on the third syllable. The charamel. Okay, got it. Can you do it like that? Yeah, I can.

Eric, Charamella. Oh, yeah. See, now I feel it. You feel it. I'm almost in the room. Charamella. I feel like I can see him scheming in this back room. You're painting a picture.

Right. With the way you're pronouncing it like it's a fetuccini dish. Exactly right. Charabella. Pettuccini charimella. That is how people will remember. Right. Grated Charamella over the fetichini. Oh, that's what's delicious.

It's yummy. You know what? I never say, I never say stop. They say, hey, when you're ready, you had a lot. Just stop. Just stop. And I never do. Never say it. Okay, that's good. Thank you for that. So what is it that they are hiding? And can you believe the media?

Well, they've done this before. And yesterday there came a tape from Project Veritas of an ABC anchor that was, talking about how they had the goods on Jeffrey Epstein three years before. Listen. It was unbelievable what we had, Clinton. We had everything. I tried for three years to get it on to no avail. And now it's all coming out.

And it's like these new revelations. And I freaking had all of it. I'm so pissed right now. Like every day I get more and more pissed because I'm just like, oh, my God. We, it was, what we had was unreal. Other women backing it up. Hey, yep. Brad Edwards, the attorney three years ago saying like, like, we, there will come a day,

but we will realize Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific pedophile this country has ever known. I had it all three years ago. Now, ABC came out and said, uh, no, we, we, we didn't. We have very high journalistic standards, you know. Oh, and we saw them on display. I've seen them so many times. Like, for example, during the Kavanaugh hearings, where they just would not put any of those accusations on the air.

They wouldn't do it. I mean, sure they had interviews, but they, what? X and A on the Avanos gay stuff. No, let's not bring that up because that shows. They're putting tweets up there, like, accusations are like, I think I slept with Kavanaugh once too, and he abused me. They're taking like TikTok messages and putting him on the air. They have a very high standard.

Very high standard. It must be super duper Republican to put it on the air. Not just middle of the road, not moderate. It's got to be super duper Republican. Yes, that is their journalistic standard. You can't claim journalistic standards there and then do what you did with Kavanaugh. You can't. Sorry, ABC.

You're listening to Glenn Beck. Taking seven months off to recover from an injury, not really an option for a lot of people, Although, ow, I just, oh, Stu, I mean, yeah. Oh, no. Seven months, doctor just said. Seven months? Seven months to recover. That's not reasonable for most people.

Robin was, you know, she was determined, actually, to get back to work. After hearing about relief factors, she began taking it regularly. She broke her wrist. And doctor said, you're just not going to be able to use your wrist at all. Robin was able to return to work almost three months early. The swelling and pain had gone down. She had been able to recover rapidly. Now, she's obviously born tough.

She works at a prison. But even then, Robin admits that she is thankful that she had relief factor to help her get to the other side of the pain and get her life back. When taken properly, relief factor attacks the inflammation that causes much of our pain. And it works for 70% of the people who try it. So just try their three-week quick start trial. Go to Relieffactor.com. Relieffactor.com and get your life back. It's Relieffactor.com.

There's a lot of confusing news about people like Eric. If you want to know the latest, you can go to glenbeck.com or blazeTV.com. Use the promo code, Glenn, to save 10 bucks. Welcome to the program. You could actually make this T-shirt? I want to, yeah. Can you call Alexander Dickamonion? I want to make a, I want to make a,

Caramella. Charamel. Charamel. You know, like that pizza guy, throw in the pie, you know? Right, like on the top of the pizza box. Yeah. It's like hot, delicious charamel. Yeah, and I want, you know, for all of your whistleblowing needs, you just call, you know, for hot and ready. Charamel.

So we eat some charmermella t-shirts. And it looks like the real pizza. Yeah, the real pizza guy. I would totally wear that shirt. Yeah. That's fantastic. Yeah, that's great. I want this guy exposed. I want this guy to testify.

You know who doesn't? The Democrats. It was odd that they were like, they're going to put him in danger. They're going to put him in danger. It's going to be you're going to have blood on your hands. Really? Because every Republican wants his name out. They want him to testify.

Excuse me. Mob. But the good guys over here would like him to testify to come out into the open. Not because we need to know him so people can get him. that would be your side that would not want him to testify. You don't want him known because you don't want his record known. You don't want people to know that he was actually sent back to the Pentagon because he was one of the main leakers in the White House.

You don't want anybody to know that he was one of the guys that had been scheming to try to get people to flip against Trump in the White House. in the White House. You don't want anybody to know that. Donald Trump does. Republicans do. And that will come out. Republicans need to be very clear.

Protect this guy at all cost. If you watched the untouchables, this guy is the accountant. This guy is the accountant. The FBI would like, in that movie, would like the accountant to testify. Al Capone doesn't Right

And you'd think that The Republicans Would of course want that They want this on record And it's interesting Because I think it will paint A parallel story Right

A story that shows The Democrats were up to no good And Oh no, it shows that this has been a hit job Since before he even won But is it So I guess the Democratic argument here The media argument is

Let's just say this comes out and let's say you're right. Let's say they buy into your narrative here of this guy was, he was out for Trump. I mean, we know Page and Strzok were out for Trump from the beginning and they were looking for ways to do this. Let's just say this.

Their argument, I think, would be the end of the day, yes, they were out to get him. However, they got him, right? Like Gary Hart said, go ahead, follow me around. And they followed him around. And then they saw him with the woman. Except that's the, that's the, that's the narrative the media wants you to buy.

Right. But let me go play the Chuck Schumer audio again. Listen to what he says, this whistleblower confirmed. The calls to make public the whistleblower's identity are despicable. The whole purpose of the whistleblower law was to protect people when they had the courage to come forward. This whistleblower is obviously coming forward because he was so. concerned about where President Trump was leading America and every single... Wait a minute.

That's not quid pro quo. He was concerned where this president was leading America. That's what the whistleblower testimony says. That's what the two ambassadors testimony says. It's not quid pro quo. Their testimony is he was changing policy in Ukraine and, and it was going to be very dangerous. Right.

They had what they believed was a legitimate disagreement with him on the policy. In fact, they told him, I don't know if it was him, but they told the administration at least, that at least one of them said they would not, they would quit immediately if they tried to change this policy. Yeah, well, go ahead. The president of the United States runs the state department. Exactly. So what they are covering up is the fact that the state department, is its own deep state.

It doesn't care what this president says. It's going to do what it wants to do. But that's not even the big thing they're hiding. They said the Democrats set up a way to use foreign intelligence, foreign operatives in Ukraine for their purposes. And that's not even enough. because when you see what their purposes were in Ukraine and are in Ukraine as designed by Barack Obama Hillary Clinton at the State Department level, oh, that's when you have real trouble. Playing devil's advocate again here. Is the defense essentially from the Trump administration that, yeah, we did these things, but they were justified because,

So look, the State Department is acting irrationally. Quid pro quo happens all the time in response. It happens in business. Well, then he was actually right when he was out there. He got beat up for that statement, but he was telling the truth. Yeah. It does happen. We have Joe Biden on tape doing it.

Yes. He said, we're not going to give you a billion dollars and the president's already okayed this unless you stop this investigation. That is exactly the opposite what Donald Trump did. Donald Trump said we're not going to pay. And he didn't actually. say this, but you can infer that he said this. We're going to

stop paying you the 400 million, 600 million less than Joe Biden. We're going to stop paying you the 400 million until you do an investigation because you have bad guys around in this order. You have bad guys around you. We think that the

Ukrainians were helping the DNC throw the election and do ops on me. We think that your oligarchs are still in bed with these people. We think that you have bad people around you and I can't do business with you if you still have those bad people around you. Oh, and by the way, would you also look into the Burisma thing? So he's asking, I want to know what happened to our $7 billion. Now, the question,

this is the question that President Trump should ask the American people every time he steps in front of a microphone. He should start with this. Again, I just want to ask the American people, which is more in line with our national interests? Somebody who says, I want you to investigate to find out where our $7 billion went, who it went to. I want to find out if somebody was trying to throw our election. I mean, we just spent billions of dollars trying to find out if I was connected with Russia. That answer came back, no. But it looks like there was some interference in our election. and let's find out. Also, is there corruption in our own government and in our state department?

Which is more in line with the national interest? Me saying, hey, I need, I'm not going to give you any more money until you find out what happened to last money and some of these other things. Or a vice president saying, I'm not going to give you a billion dollars more because we gave you $7 billion, and I won't give you a billion dollars more unless you stop investigating what happened to the same. billion dollars. That's what he should say every day. Every day on television. Like a cuckoo clock.

Just say that. Which one's more in line? And I think that would have been a much better defense if they had used it. Instead, what they used was they set the goalpost at no quid pro quo. And I think most people are going to look at this and say, first of all, you have Trump on the call. You're right. He doesn't explicitly say a quid pro quo. However, they now have people that Trump appointed, people who are donors to Trump,

not just people who have been in the State Department for years and years and years and years, but people who are very close to Trump saying, well, yeah, we basically understood this to be a quid pro quo. Which I don't have a problem with, and neither did. As anyone on the Biden situation, if you had a problem with Ukrainian corruption and you actually believed it was really important, we shouldn't be giving them money unless they get that stuff cleared out. The problem here is that the Republican Party, in their constant efforts to be more inept, have created this goalpost and said it seven million times

that the goal post is, can you find quid pro quo? And it's going to be, I think, to the average American who is heard only, hey, quid pro quo, and then they're going to look at this and say, not only do you have what seems pretty close to a quid pro quo, but that in addition to it, you have people around him saying, yes, there was an explicit quid pro quo. And some people say there's implicit quid pro quo. This is how you explain this.

Look, there is no quid pro quo. I wasn't saying you have to find dirt. This is what they are implying. You've got to find dirt on Joe Biden. I just did the responsible thing. I want answers to these questions. Now, when you can provide me answer to the questions like, what happened to the $7 billion?

Are you part of the corruption that we all know is going on? where are you going to find the people around you? I'm not giving you any more money until that. That's not quid pro quo. That's just before I give you any more money, I got to know. Are you part of the same team? Are you part of the corruption?

Or are you going to actually do something? Because this is the first time I've talked to you. And I hear good things about you. And I'm ready to give you that money. But I want to know what happened to the last. And again, that's a totally plausible defense that the administration and the Republicans should be using. But you can say that's not quid pro quo in the way the media is spinning it.

And I just think that it would have been more helpful to make that case from the beginning. Now what they're forced to do is they're sort of driving down the street and they need to kind of throw it in reverse and go the other direction, which is, you know, look, doable, doable. I mean, and I think correct, right? We've said this from the very beginning. number one, the thing they are accusing Trump of is the thing we have Joe Biden on tape doing.

Okay? We have him admitting explicitly that he was doing it. I mean, we have the video. We played it for you a million times, but we could do that if you want the proof of that. So we have that, and we said that from the beginning. Then you go down the road of only the question needs to be whether it was a smart thing to do as it relates to U.S. interests,

not what the media is doing, which is saying, Well, since the name Biden is in there, he must have been doing that to try to screw him in the next election. But this is why the media edited those, what was it, 147 words? Yeah. They edited that because that came first. He said, look, I need you to do me a favor. We're ready and we want to be your partner, but I need you to do me a favor. I want you to look into all this corruption.

That was the 147 words. And then the president of Ukraine came back and said, said, I know. No, I'm on the same page with you. It's dirty and I know it and we're working in the same direction. Great. Oh, by the way, could you also look into the Hunter Biden thing with Burisma? They had to edit all of that stuff out. Right. Because that's the quid pro quo that Trump is defending himself against. There was no quid pro quo. Find dirt on my, my opponent, and I'll give you the money. Yeah, it was find the truth on this topic that no one will touch. Right. And the more he can describe it that way. That also includes Burisma.

And it includes our own media in the United States. It's not just a Ukrainian problem here. Exactly right. Exactly right. And I think explaining it that way to the American people, that does, I think that is an understandable story. You don't have to get into every single person who's in Ukraine and every single political actor and every single group. That does get confusing. But you can. You can. And you've done it. But you did it over multiple hours and multiple specials. You can catch those at blazedtv.com promo code Glenn. the point though is he might not be able to give that elevator pitch every single day to the American people like you have the freedom to do. But he can't explain it as if this is important to America. It's my job not to listen to the State Department. It's to listen to you.

And when you lose $7 billion, I'm going to be on the case. That is something that is understandable to the American people. And it is something that the media won't even consider as a possibility. I think the president, look, this is should everybody, Everybody's elevator pitch should be this. Hey, was it right to look into the possibility that Donald Trump was colluding with the Russians? And would you have said yes to impeachment if he indeed were colluding with the Russians? The answer to that for everyone should be yes.

Sure. It's important that we find out what the Russians were doing and is our government in bed with the Russians trying to throw an election. If so, impeach the man. Well, we did the investigation because we all felt that that was important. Well, it comes back. He didn't do that. So why aren't we now looking at exactly the same thing but happening in Ukraine with evidence and people who have already been convicted for meddling in our campaign at the behest of the DNC and Hillary Clinton?

And are on tape discussing it. Right. I mean, look, you. are consistent or you're not. You're either for finding out what really happened in our election or you're not. And what's more responsible? Somebody who says, I want you to check into that and I want an answer of where our $7 billion went. That's not chump change. That's $7 billion. What happened to that money? I'm not going to give you another dime until you find out. That's in the national interest. That's all the president needs to say. And he should say it. He should rehearse it.

and he should say it every single day. First thing he says out of his mouth, every single day. How much you miss your X-Jare? Ah, a lot. The dynamic variable lumbar support system, you probably needed that after tracking the kids. We did 29,000 steps one day at Disneyland plus. I mean, I'm sure people who exercise

think that's not an impressive number. But, I mean, I think my average is $27,000. I was going to say that's like 20,000 times more than usually. Yeah, yeah, it's about 20,000 more. And then it was like 29,000, 24,000, 22,000. All I wanted to do is sit in a comfortable chair. You need an X chair. So here's a great chair for you to sit in.

And you really, you're really not going to understand it until you sit in it. It is the X chair. It has 10 different settings that you can change the way this whole chair functions. It also has the dynamic variable lumbar support. This is patented. They're the only ones that have it. Now, they've added a 30-day, no questions-ask guarantee of satisfaction, so you have zero risk. get this sent to your house and sit in it.

You are going to love it. And I'm telling you, there's no chair like it on the market. Most companies can't do a 30-day money-back guarantee because he couldn't afford the shipping back and forth. They'd go broke and people were shipping them back. X-Chair, on sale right now for $100 off. It makes a great Christmas gift. It's X-chairbeck.com.

That's X-Chair, B-E-C-K.com, or call 1844-4-X-Chair. Go to X-Chairbeck.com right now. Use the promo code Beck and receive a free set of the new X-wheels with your chair at X-chairbeck.com. When we come back, the new Green Deal, it's people. It's people. And how the National Health Service in England is going to play right into it. Thank you so much, Hillary. I want to talk to you about real estate agents.

I trust.com. If you are looking to buy or sell a house, you have to have a great real estate agent. And there is nothing like getting into a car with a real estate agent that you don't know. And, you know, you're just, they're saying crazy things. You're like, oh, yeah, no, yeah, the president. Oh, boy, let's talk about that some more. You have to know that the person shares your value, shares your vision, knows what you're looking for in a home and a neighborhood.

If you're looking to sell your house, you need somebody that knows, your neighborhood and knows how to sell it and sell it for the most amount of money, how to be able to price it just right. Real estate agents, I trust.com. These are the best agents in your area. If we don't have one in your area, we're not going to recommend one.

It's real estate agents. I trust.com. We have them all over the country coast to coast to help you on the biggest financial hassle, probably in your life. It's real estate agents. I trust.com. Go there now. Real estate agents.

I trust. dot com and get moving. Okay. Don't we even have time for this part of it? Look, we are running out of time, okay? I know we had 10 years, but that was, oh, so eight years ago. Time is running out on climate change, and it's no longer enough just to do the Green New Deal.

You know, it's not enough to stop eating meat and shift to renewable energy. We have 11,000 scientists now that have just signed a paper that said we have to reduce the human population. Oh, that's going to work out really well. We go there in one minute. The Glenberg program. I want to tell you about a special deal going on right now from MyPillow. Mike Lindell, the owner and inventor of MyPillow, has been wanting to show his appreciation for all that you, his customers and his new customers have done to make the company what it is today. He's changing the game now with his new six-piece towel set.

This is made with U.S. cotton, extremely absorbent yet still incredibly soft. You know, there's nothing. I hate towels that aren't really soft. They're not big. They're not soft. You know, and they come apart, and it's, I hate it. I have these towels now from my pillow, and they are great and priced affordably. They are extremely absorbent, really soft, come with two bath towels, two hand towels, two washcloths.

30% off now if you use the promo code back. Remember, all my pillow products come with a 60-day money-back guarantee. So if you get them and you're like, this isn't what I thought they were going to be. You ship them back and you get all your money back. It's not a problem. But you're going to love them. If you're a fan of MyPillow and the other great MyPillow products, including their sheets, if you haven't tried their sheets, six-piece towel set going to be just the great,

addition now for your bathroom and the other products you've been looking for. Just go to MyPillow.com. Click on the new radio listener specials. You'll get 30% off this six-piece towel set, as well as deep discounts on all other MyPillow products. Enter the promo code Beck or call 800-96631-17. 800-96631-17. Get these great radio specials now at MyPillow.com.

Well, I don't know if you know this, Stu, but... Donald Trump notified the United Nations. this last Monday, we're formally withdrawing from the Paris Agreement. It seems so much easier to get into these agreements than to get out of them. It's almost like Brexit. It's like Brexit. It's the same thing. Almost like Brexit.

In about a year, we'll have a referendum on whether we should actually get out of the Paris Accord. Now, it's a one-year process to exit. It will happen. Like a one-year process, he announced this like two years ago. Yeah, I know. I know. So it's not a one-year process. No, you had to have the two years in between, just a cooling off period just to make sure you're not going to go into a buy a gun when you're angry.

You need a two-year cooling off period. And so he's cooled off now for two years and he's like, yep, I still want out of the Paris Accords. So now it's a one-year deal and it actually will expire, I think, right around or on election day next year. Better get it started. Not a good day to call it sick. Got to get that start. Now, because Donald Trump does doesn't care about people, the planet, his children, air, water, any of it, hates water. He hates it. He hates it. He hates both hydrogen and oxygen. Oh, you put the two together. And it's, it's the opposite of the Reese's peanut

buttercup. He's like, you put hydrogen in my oxygen, you bastards. So he hates it. Anyway, more than 11,000 experts now. These are experts, do. Experts, they're scientists. Now, nowhere in the story does it say they're scientists of what. You know, I don't know. Maybe it's, you know, science of mechanics.

You know, science of race cars. I don't know. But they're scientists and they're experts. And they are calling for a critical addition. to the main strategy of dumping fossil fuels for renewable energy. These 11,000 now declare from the 11,000 scientists from around the world, I'm quoting clearly and unequivocally,

state that planet Earth is facing a climate emergency. And to secure a sustainable future, we must challenge the way we live, economic and population growth are among the most important drivers of increases in CO2 emissions so we got to stop this economic growth I just hate that civilization stuff

oh I do it's so irritating it's almost as irritating as water I know because when we weren't as sophisticated and we weren't as far along as we are now our air was so much cleaner like 100 years ago oh yeah oh my gosh it was so much cleaner. You know what? And then they paved paradise and they put up a parking lot. Not a parking

law. In paradise? Yeah, in paradise. Holy cow. The paradise of that shopping center down the street. Not the shopping. Oh my gosh. Yeah. That used to be paradise guys. And now it's a parking lot where you know vehicles can carry human beings at 100 miles an hour to hospitals

and shopping centers where they can buy things that help them live longer and live happier. What a terrible thing. Put up more. I want more flowers in that lot. Yeah. Because those are doing a hell of a lot of good. We don't, let me tell you something, hate monger. Okay.

We need transformations regarding economic and population policies because the population is still increasing by roughly 80 million people per year. That's more than 200,000 per

day. Imagine hearing that and thinking, why are you negative? Why are you in a negative? Hey, there are more people. around. Isn't that terrible? Why are you? I'm trying to tell you what the sign. Are you an expert? Obviously not. Are you a scientist? Obviously not. No, I'm a doctor. Okay. Which makes me an expert. I'm a doctorate. I can't tell you the studies that I had to go through. The years of studies and tests and, you know, those big long papers that you have to write. Right. It was like crazy for years convincing when you call them that. But I mean, I will say this. In your defense.

Yeah. We are talking about the population of humans, and your doctorate is in humanities. Humanities. So, I mean, this is you're pretty much, this is your expertise. This is, this is, this is, this is, this is, this is, this is, this is, this is Glenn Central. So, shut up. All right.

The world population must be stabilized and ideally gradually reduced. Now, this is within a framework that ensures social integrity. So now what they're talking, we're not talking about just getting rid of cows. Soilet Green, it's people. We're now talking about people. And it's kind of a passive population control. You know, they say we just need to educate people better because once they're educated, they stop birthing them babies.

And so they just, they want more education and they want a greater equality of the sexes. Oh, yes. That's a big. I mean, that's a great goal, but has nothing to do with the problem we're speaking. It actually kind of does. When you do have more equality for the sexes, women tend to be able to say, get off me. That much equality I think we're all for. And it's true that over and over and over and over and over again, and only every single

example of a country becoming an advanced economy and developing into the, you know, a level that we would call a developed country today. All of those cases, birth rates drop. Yeah, well, this, this one, we can't, we have to have birth rates drop and slow down economic progress. We can't have developing countries. Why? Because developing countries put up too much CO2.

Yeah, see, this is a problem here. I'm going to go with, that's a terrible idea. And I'm also going to say it's also completely unfair. And you go to a country who, you know, we would used to consider third world countries, right? Stop giving them televisions they don't have any idea. Right. Like that's the thing. We're like, oh, well, they don't need the stuff we have.

We're kind of special. Let's let them, they can, don't they have huts or something? Let them have the huts and not put any more CO2 out there and we'll do our thing. And we'll do all the expensive solar power. Excuse me. Do you disagree with the Star Trek Prime Directive? Hello. First, it would do no harm, right?

No, you're not supposed to. The Prime Directive, you're not supposed to help other civilizations. You can't get in the way, right? You can't get in the way. You can't help them. You can't expose them to things. You're like a documentary filmmaker. You're just there filming the tribe.

Exactly right. And you're not allowed to be seen. It's the Prime Directive. It is. Hello. It is the Prime Directive. We violated the Star Trek Prime Directive all over the world. world. Well, I felt we violated it the first time when we took all the trees and put them in a tree

museum and then we charged the people a dollar and a half to see them. I thought that was the first violation. But no. You know, I never made it to that part of as soon as you hear them go, ooh, I'm pressing the button. I don't want to find out if it's counting crows or the Joe. No, it's just, Joni. Oh, they do something to that parking. They made it into a parking lot. Yeah. Pave it over them. That's what I want to do. Pave over the band as they're playing the song. You know what? I like parking lots. In fact, I like him just plain without any cars. Just chew up some glass so anybody that pulls their car in there

because then they'll have to build another parking lot across the street. That's how much I care about your stupid song. Anyway, in a completely unrelated story, completely unrelated, the National Health Service Trust has announced in Great Britain that they are launching a red card to racism campaign. Oh, no. Yes, they don't like racism. That sounds good.

I don't like racism either. So I guess I support this. I'm going to vote yes on this one. Following a national trend, staff have reported that incidents of racism on wards have increased over the past year, so the hospital will be enforcing its zero tolerance policy against any kind of abusive behavior. That means any patient abusing staff will be challenged and warned, leading to a sports-style disciplinary yellow card, and then if they do it again, they get the final red card, which means treatment will be withdrawn.

So you can go to a hospital and they won't treat you if they think you're too racist? Yes. If you're sexist or racist. Now, I want you to know that the hospital has just removed the British flag from the... I want to get this right, what they call these. I had never heard of these, but boy, they're so good here. Hang on just a second. It was their knife vests.

The security, they don't have bulletproof vests because there are no bullets. Okay, so people don't want to hurt other people except unless they have bullets. So the security has knife vests to stop people from shiving them. And one of the patients saw the flag, the British flag, on one of the knife vests. And they've now removed those vests, I mean, not the whole vest, just the flag off that vest, because it has been deemed offensive. So those flags from those vests are not going to get any medical care. I mean, when you put those two together, they're going to, they're going to decide when you're too racist or sexist to give you medical treatment.

But by the way, the flag of our own country is offensive. Okay, so here it is. If you use racist or sexist language, gestures, or any behavior. Can you use the term tuts? I don't think so. Okay. I don't think so. No.

Okay. Sweet art? No. Okay. If you're making excessive noise, like, help, help, I'm on fire, that might, they may stop trying to put you out, you know, because you're on fire. If you have abused alcohol or drugs. Now that seems like a reason you go to the hospital. Not here.

This is the reason you don't get treatment at the hospital. You don't get treatment. Threatening or offensive language. Malicious allegations like, hey, they won't. put me out because I'm making too much noise. That's malicious. Yeah. And intentional damage to trust property.

To what? Trust property. Okay. So if you damaged the property. The hospital, yes. I'm, uh, this is, I mean, look, this is a terrible idea. And this is just, you know, one of many, many steps they have. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. To withhold treatment slash ration treatment. When they don't have enough money to pay for this crap anymore,

they can all say that we are saying too many swear. and then not do our surgery. Right. Now, there are some people in the hospital that don't like this, but they've been calling on all of the staff to join its Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic Network to join them and support because they want to stamp out racism and sexism. And that's what you get when you have a government-run, health care system and then you inject political ideas into health care.

Then you'll be able to just treat the people who have a reason to live. You know, the people who are adding to our society, why treat those people who detract, who make it difficult for people? I mean, I'd like to say go get your health care someplace else, but there is no other place you can get your health care because it's all been nationalized. Oh, how many Black Alley doctors will there be? Welcome to the Brave New World. You know, there are some things that are great.

For instance, the X-Chair. Does your chair have a dynamic variable lumbar support? I mean, I don't mean to sound like mine does. Because it can be yours. And if you don't think you can afford it, you should check, X-Chairbeck.com, because they make them very affordable. all budgets and all sizes, anything that you want. They also have financing available as well.

If you think you're comfortable in your chair, you have never sat in an X chair. This is the office chair that is the future of chairs. It really is. It has the dynamic variable lumbar support and 10 different settings. X chair is what you need when you are sitting in your chair all day long. You need an X-Chair. 30-day, no questions ask, guarantee of satisfaction.

You have zero risk. Try it out for 30 days. If it's not everything I say, they'll ship it back. And you get all your money back. People can't do that and stay in business if this chair is not what I say it is. It is great. X-Chair. On sale now for $100 off.

Go to X-Chairbeck.com. That's X-Chair, B-E-C-K.com. Or call 8444-X-Chair. But go to X-Chairbeck.com. use the promo code back and you're going to get a free set of the new X wheels with your chair. A great chair makes a great holiday gift, Xchairbeck.com promo code back. All right. Now, I just want you to know that, first of all, if you speak out of turn, no health care for you.

And the reason why you will never know what that leads to is because also I'm not going to teach you a damn bit of history. Here is a 22-year-old Instagram star who claims that learning about World War II harms millennials mental health. It was a hard situation in World War II, and I don't want anyone to think that I'm being disrespectful in that way whatsoever. However, I will stand by the point that I don't think it's as educational in the way that we, you know, there's so many problems going on in the world at the moment, like Brexit, that's not taught in schools and climate change, which is a situation that I feel like we should

be aware of. And, you know, when I left school, I felt like it hit me like a ton of bricks because I didn't know anything in general life. Oh, you didn't know anything in general life. Huh. Wow, that's weird. Okay, so he's saying, you know, Brexit, you know, things like that. We're not being taught that.

And there's nothing to be learned from World War II. In fact, it's scarring. but if you if you were talking let's say about health care and and let's say political correctness and being deemed an enemy for the things that you said or that you read you know the holocaust might be something that you might want to have in your back pocket to pull out and go wait a minute this looks a little like that just at the beginning of the Holocaust. You're saying you want to never forget? Is that kind of your concept there?

Like never forgetting that the Holocaust- Well, that's a little extreme. Okay. Okay, because that does seem a little extreme. Yeah. Never. I mean, that's a long time. I mean, maybe till 2025.

Yeah. One thing I find very interesting here is the reason we were able to write the history of World War II is because, you know, we won it. And the people who win the wars typically write the history of World War, of

any war, really. And the reason we won World War II were really a generation of people right around his age. Like the people a few years ago, right around his age, were winning against the Nazis.

And now we have Instagram people who were two worried to even hear about the battles they fought. But the Nazis are gone. That's old news. Wait, I thought, wait, I thought Charlottesville was just lying with them. I've told every day that 50% of the country are Nazis. They support Donald Trump.

Well, that's just here in America. He's over in Europe. Eastern Germany, Eastern German city of Dresden has declared now a Nazi emergency. As officials warned of a rise in the far right support and violence. City is the birthplace of the pedigah movement, which is Islam, you know, against Islam. They hold

weekly rallies while anti-immigration alternative fewer Deutscheland party, won 28% in September elections. Apparently, this city has a Nazi problem.

Well, don't worry about that. If you're an Instagram blogger, don't worry about that. You're not going to there's nothing to talk about there. And it has nothing to do with Brexit. I'm telling you, Brexit and any kind of Nazi problems or trouble in the streets or anything like it's happening in Paris, nothing at all to do with Brexit. No, no. On it.

People are morons. Is the Glenn Beck Program. Gary's a guy who expects to see in a health food store. Checking to make sure that the things that he was about to eat were all good for him. You know the type. he's also at the gym all you know he does his daily workout regimen with the kind of enthusiasm you again know that type now that's what you would have expected until the pain started then he's not going to the gym he got it in his shoulders his knees finally lower back it got so bad

that he wasn't sure he was going to even be able to exercise anymore this is a gift from the gods gary but he went to relief factor and he was drawn to it because it wasn't a drug. All of its ingredients were botanical, which usually means crap to me, but Gary's like, that's great. So you know how things turned out. Same thing that happened to me.

Gary got his life back and so can you. When taken properly, it attacks the inflammation that causes much of our pain and it works for 70% of the people who try it. Just try it for three weeks. Their three-week quick start trial. If you'll want a drug-free natural, way to get out of pain and get your life back. Go to

Relieffactor.com. That's Relieffactor.com. BlazTV.com. Use the promo code Glenn for $10 off your subscription. Get the background of what's going on in Ukraine and the lies the media is telling about it. Only on Glenn TV. So Donald Trump has withdrawn officially

from the Paris Accords, the climate accords. Now. Not yet. Well, Monday. No, Monday he did. Yeah, no, not really. No, he notified the United Nations. on money. Yeah, delifying is different than actually pulling out. What are you talking about?

Well, I mean, you might thought, wait a minute, I remember him doing this right at the beginning of his administration, at least the first year, which would have been a rational thing for you to believe. However, that's not how you get out of the agreement. How do you, it's a little more complicated than that, unfortunately. How do you? Now, you tell me. It just took a couple of strokes of a pen to get into it, right?

Right. They got, yeah, they were into it. That's not a problem. It's easy to get in. Right, okay. The problem is getting out. Okay? Because what the Trump administration announced his first year in office was he's intent to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. Now, this is not something that Donald Trump is doing wrong here. This is the agreement itself, which forces essentially a cooling off period, as you were kind of joking about before.

You can't begin to withdraw officially until three years. after the agreement goes into force. It's almost as if you want the chance for another president to get in. It's almost like that. Yeah. Now, how on earth do you think the founders are like, you know what, let's create a system in which people can agree to things that completely take the power away from the U.S. Constitution and the Constitution, the people, take it away.

And then even when they decide, oh, that was the wrong thing to do, locks them into long-term periods where they can't. do anything. They cannot pull out. Even if we decide, wait a minute, we've messed this up and the people revolt against it. We know for a fact because of the way they set up the elections and the way they set up impeachment proceedings

which the media seems to be very much a fan of these days that they wanted a way for the people to be able to react and say, wait a minute, you're doing the wrong thing. We want to go the opposite direction and they wanted that ability. Well, this, you join and in the agreement says you can't

pull out of this for three full years. Even if you decide no, okay, we can't, we want the opposite. Now, when the three years is over, of course, then you can get out of the agreement, right? Right. He notified the United Nations that he's going to formally withdraw. Yeah, yeah.

The problem is that is just notifying them. Okay. And that process, after you notify them, which comes after the three-year process where you can't notify them, now that you've notified them, it takes another year, which which now is four years.

And what was the thing you were talking about before? The four years... What's weird is when this is going to actually be able to do the next step is the day of the presidential election. Yeah, yeah. It's actually one day after. One day after. So it takes three years of... You can't even notify them.

Then you get to notify them. Then it takes another year. And it's after the presidential election when we can actually withdraw. Now, you might think with a process that complicated to withdraw. It must be very complicated to get back in, right? Right. I mean, it's got to be. This is a big process complicated.

Here's the process to get back in. Any signatory that withdraws from the pact can apply for readmission to the United Nations and can be back in within 30 days. So, as you can see, a very difficult process there as well. So when he signs this the day after the election, and if he loses maybe the night of the election, You know, does, does... Yes, let's say Donald Trump loses on... Are we done? Early November.

Is he done? We're out. We come out of the agreement. So we would be out of the agreement from November to January till President Warren. Warren gets in office. And then indicates, yeah, by the way, we went back in. And then 30 days after she's inaugurated, we'll be back in the Paris Agreement. Now, the Paris Agreement, as you may know, has been a runaway success so far.

No, it actually hasn't. What? It was in a, first of all, we had those three years where no one even complained, and that's a big deal. So no one even said they wanted to withdraw on that entire three years, and we should notice that means it's working. However, the United Nations did find recently that the NDCs, which are nationally determined contributions, and their voluntary, their voluntary pledges, which is what these are, pledges. It's like saying, yes, I'm going to donate $50 a month to your charity, everyone, all. comes through about 50 bucks every month.

But what they said they would voluntarily pledge will still, even if everyone hit the goals, including the United States if they had stayed in, they will still miss the limiting

of the global temperature increase that they targeted. And in fact, they will, unless more things start happening, they're going to miss the secondary goal that they set, which was two degrees in temperature increase.

So we're going to miss the 1.5, which they promise we were going to do. Now we're going to miss, the two, which they said was a complete disaster. And we should also point out that since 2007, the United States emissions are down considerably, including down since the beginning of the Trump administration, which is kind of a problem. All that being said, other states have decided to join it. So like an individual state can say, we're going to hit those standards.

Well, and that has not necessarily true. Well, they're going to say they're doing it. Yes. Which to me doesn't mean anything, but to them, they can't make the symbolic gesture of saying we're going to lower carbon does something positive for the environment. We don't know what it is yet. But if you say you want to help the environment, that's the most important thing for the environment. And people don't understand that.

People think it's the emissions. They think it's how much energy they're using. They think it's all these other things, clean air, clean water. No, if you can just signal your virtue. Well, that end if you could stop buying clothes. Buying clothes? You are such, you are, you hate hydrogen and oxygen, don't you? Especially when you put them together.

Water? Yes, I hate. You hate it. I guess. I don't think of it. You have to stop buying clothes. You have many people water kills every year? Can you be quiet for just a second?

Do you know how many people water kills every year? But if you are under it for a certain amount of time, you die. Yeah. People don't even talk about that. Yeah, well. You want it to be clean. How about not being a murder machine first? You know where sharks live in this H2O you're talking about?

You know what they do? They rip up individual surfers every year. Can you be quiet? And then Carrie Underwood makes movies about them. Can you be quiet? Because there is something very important that I want. Jane Fonda is fighting climate change. Do we have that audio, please?

Oh, my gosh. Here she is. So you see this coat? See that coat? I needed something red, and so I went out and found this cold and said, This is the last article of clothing that I'm going to ever buy. That's it. To say that I will ever buy in my life may not be much because we're going to live to a hundred maybe where she's going.

And that has also made me think a lot about consumerism. And I grew up when consumerism wasn't, didn't have such a stranglehold over us. So when I talk to people about we don't really need to keep shopping. We shouldn't look at shopping for our. just don't need more stuff that I have to talk to. Did you look up how old Jane Con is?

This is beautiful. This is beautiful. And listen to the crowd. Listen to the crowd. They go wild. There she is. And she said, look, I bought this red coat because I needed something red.

And that's usually... You got to have... You prioritize that over the earth, obviously. Yeah, I needed something red. But she said this is the last one that she's going to buy. She's not going to buy any more clothes. Now, here is this brave woman who has been in Hollywood and an icon forever who probably, I mean, God bless her if she has less than a 2,000 square foot closet. And here she is at 81 saying, I'm not going to buy any new clothes.

Now, what happens on her birthday at 82? If you buy clothes for her, maybe. I don't know. Maybe she'd reject them. But she's not going to do it. She says this is the last one. Now, she won't guarantee this will be the last one until the rest of her life. She needs something at another color at some point.

Yeah. She clarified. It's not necessarily the last one the rest of my life. Then what does it mean when you say this is the last article of clothing I'm ever going to buy? This week today? Were you saying this the last thing you were to buy today? I don't know what that means. But stunning that she didn't have more red, considering her viewpoints.

They seem like she's wrapping herself in a red flag. Red would be a very popular color for her, I would imagine. And can you make the case a pretty strong one, I would say, that one of the, let's just say everything they say about global warming is true. We're all going to die, emissions. That's the end of the all of the world, right? You can make a pretty strong case that Jane Fonda is singularly more responsible for the, problem than any citizen in the United States because she was the one who starred in the China syndrome which made everyone scared of nuclear power.

Yes. Which is an emission free form of electricity and the China syndrome. The safest. Yep. Electricity. Out of anything ever produced. Yes. And she started in the movie that freaked people out so we stopped building nuclear power

plants that could have actually done something about the emission problem. Instead, she continues to fight against nuclear power and she continues to complain in her nice red smoke. We want to be more like France. Okay? We just want to be more like France. I don't think you want to just say that. Well, I know exactly what I'm saying.

I'm sure they're not using nuclear energy at all. About 80% of their electricity is generated by nuclear power. So they're actually doing something about emissions. from electricity with nuclear power. Yeah, but their hats aren't as big as ours. Like, they have those little berets. That's true. So they have different hats.

And like our trucker hats, that's plastic in the back of those trucker hats. Those things are never going to decompose. French don't have that. So let them have their power plants. It's us with our stupid trucker hats that is destroying the world. Is that the movie that was filmed here, China Syndrome? There was some nuclear disaster film that was filmed here, wasn't there? A famous nuclear disaster.

I'm not sure. You don't know this? No, uh-uh. What's the other big nuclear disaster film around that same era? Godzilla. I don't know. No, I don't think it was Godzilla. Was Merrill Streep had won?

Silkwood. Silkwood. Maybe Silkwood was the one. But I don't think that's a nuclear, is it? Is it Silkwood? I missed those. I actually did see China syndrome. I love Jack Lemon, so I thought that was a good movie, but it's laughable.

And by the way, you know, it wasn't true. No. There's never any science behind it. No. No. The science behind it. If you remember the movie, it was that some corporation, just to make money, they faked the weld X-rays. Because in a nuclear power company, you have to have all of the welds x-ray to make sure that they're right and there's no cracks in them.

Well, this evil corporation that was building this didn't care. And so they just copied all the X-rays. They just did one. and then all the other x-rays were copied, and that's why it went down. Well, no, that's the story of Chernobyl. By the way, Silkwood was about a nuclear whistleblower and radiation leakages.

Really? We don't get it. We don't talk to leakages enough of these days. Pat has a special coming up on that on his program. Wow, okay. I didn't know that. The leakage is special very soon. Multiple trillions of dollars spent on the.

that budget already. You know, I do know this, that Merrill Streep's dressing room for that is your dressing room. Now, that's the one that Merrill Street had. Oh, just caught on fire. I just want you to know that. It might not write the second, but soon it will be catching on fire. If you own or manage a business, your time is one of the most valuable assets you can possess. Finding the right person to hire for various positions, I mean, is brutal. It is really, really brutal. you have to get some good candidates. You have to spend out time weeding out all the bad ones to find the good ones after you've actually found them online.

This is where ZipRecruiter comes in. ZipRecruiter doesn't depend on the candidates finding you. It finds them for you. Its technology identifies people with the right experience and invites them to apply for your posting. And the result is you get quality candidates fast. When you post your job on ZipRecruiter, you're going to be impressed on how quickly you have a great supply of candidates. Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter, get a quality candidate through the site within the first day.

So see why ZipRecruiter is effective for businesses of all sizes. Try ZipRecruiter for free at our web address, ZipRecruiter.com slash Beck. That's ZipRecruiter.com slash Beck. It's the smartest way to hire. It's ZipRecruiter.com slash Beck. You're listening to Glenn Beck. I remember in 1977, something really big with space happened, and it captured the world's imagination.

Anybody remember what happened with space, 1977? A Star Trek movie was made about it later. The first Star Trek movie, Viger, was Voyager. And the Voyager spacecraft, which had all the information, all the sound of life on Earth, It was sent off in 1977 to leave our solar system and to go out into deep space. NASA announced yesterday. It has officially left our solar system.

It was launched in 1977. That's how big our solar system is. Isn't that incredible? That is incredible. Yeah. They shouldn't have put a Pinto engine in it. It would have gone faster. Yeah.

It should have. have had the segue. It did change the world, by the way. Can we do this ABC thing one more time? This is, again, from Project Veritas. They have kind of, I don't know, they're in the studio, and it's, they're talking off air. Yeah, about Epstein. Yeah.

Listen to this. It was unbelievable what we had, Clinton. We had everything. I tried for three years to get it on to no avail, and now it's all coming out, and it's like these new revelations, and I freaking had all of it. I'm so pissed right now. Like every day I get more and more pissed because I'm just like, oh my God.

We, it was, what we had was unreal. Other women backing it up. Hey, yep. Brad Edwards, the attorney three years ago saying like, like we, there will come a day, but we will realize Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific pedophile this country has ever known. I had it all three years ago. Now ABC says, well, we didn't air it because we didn't have it all locked down.

We have very high journalistic standards, but that doesn't work when you remember how they behaved with Brett Kavanaugh. Can't have it both ways, ABC. I love how she's basically just pissed off that she wasn't the one breaking the story. Not that additional women were abused and God only knows what happened to them. And I should say not women. Girls. Girls.

Girls. Three years of girls being molested and attacked and all sorts of things. But darn it, I didn't get credit for that story. It's so unfair. She really is That's what she's pissed about in that moment But yeah I mean the Kavanaugh thing is a perfect point there

This is the Glymbeck program