The Glenn Beck Program - Only Morons Believe Trump Is Selling Classified Documents | 9/7/22

Episode Date: September 7, 2022

Pat and Stu discuss the Left's struggle with coherence, like Kamala Harris' absurd grape avoidance claim and Senate candidate John Fetterman's weird criticisms against rival candidate Dr. Oz. Actress Jennifer Lawrence had some strange admissions regarding Tucker Carlson in a recent interview. The guys discuss the latest updates on the FBI raid on former President Trump and the types of documents that were seized. Stu analyzes some of the elections that have taken place post-Dobbs to gauge what America is feeling. Scientists are sounding the alarm on Antarctica's melting "Doomsday glacier," but Pat and Stu aren't buying it. Pat and Stu discuss California's attempt to go completely electric despite not having the power to do so. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

60% of the vans on Amazon come a vendor independent like Sac Magic. Hello, here Camille of Sac Magic. Our compresses, show of fraud are fabriced in Quebec, and our presence on Amazon

enlarge our clientele to world entire. Trouve of little enterprises like that other on earth. Let me tell you about Cheryl. Cheryl, Pat, you're a little bit in the shot again.

Just so you know. Thank you. Yeah, that's good. Okay. Cheryl wrote in about her dog's experience with Rough Greens. She says, I was actually skeptical that would have any effect

on my dogs, but the difference is unbelievable. I ordered this when my 11-year-old dog had to have surgery and wasn't doing well. Within a week's time, she was playing like a pup. I'm totally amazed at how much better both of my dog's digestion has been as well. Thank you, Rough Greens. Rough Greens, not a dog food. It's a supplement developed by naturopathic Dr. Dennis Black. You sprinkle this on your dog food, basically.

It's a chock full of vitamins, minerals, probiotics, antioxidants, all the good stuff that you need for your dog. the stuff that you probably don't eat, and you should probably eat more often. I don't know if you should sprinkle it on your food, but your dog will love it. The folks of Rough Greens are so confident that your dog is going to love it. They have a special deal going on for you right now, Roughgreens.com slash Beck. They're going to give you a first trial bag free. Free right now. All you pay is shipping.

Go to Roughgreens.com slash Beck or call them 833 Glenn 33, 833, G-E-N-N-33. Give them a call today. It's roughgreens.com slash back. Pat and Stu in for Glenn today on the Glenbeck radio program. Starts in just a second. Fusion of entertainment, this is... On the Glenn Beck program, AAA 727BECK. We've got some close races going on around the nation.

We're going to fill you in on a couple of them and show you some of the candidates that are available, that are really going to, I think, really going to do a good job in the U.S. Senate, especially. We'll get to that, and K. JP had some fascinating things to say yesterday. All of that and more coming up in 60 seconds. Well, sometimes in life, the best thing you can do is learn the hard way.

But that's not the case when it comes to real estate transactions. You don't want to learn that way with real estate. When you're trying to buy or sell a home or both, the truth is that the school of hard knocks is a thing to be avoided at all costs. That's why years ago Glenn started a business called Real Estate Agents I Trust. They pair you up with the best real estate agents in your area so that your chances of having the best outcome possible, go through the roof. It's a free service to you, and if you need someone who's really going to be able to navigate you through a difficult real estate transaction in this market, every one of them is difficult, especially if you're buying over the past couple of years, you need to make sure that you have someone on your side, and that's why real estateagentsitrust.com exists.

The name says it all. Real estateagentsitrust.com. Go there now and check it out. Real estate agentsitrust.com. Welcome to the program. It's Pat and Stu in for Glenn today on the Glenn Beck program. He's on vacation back next week. And I think many brains on the Democratic side are also on vacation.

As you see them attempt to speak. This has been an interesting trend I've noticed lately, Pat, that none of the people on the left seem to be able to talk and or tell a story in any way. Keep a train of thought. Yeah, like I was fascinated by the Kamala Harris story from the other day where she claimed to have never eaten a grape. Oh, I missed that. You did? She claimed to never have eaten a grape? And I thought to myself, weird.

Why would anyone tell another person they had never eaten a grape? And you think, never eaten a grape. Why, Pat, let me, this is interesting because if you haven't heard this story, I have not. I would love to hear your guesses as to why she told people she had never eaten a grape. Why would you want people to know that information? Now, I might say because, you know, I've never had fruit before and I'm not healthy. That's one answer, but I don't think the Kamala would say it. I'm allergic to grapes.

She's allergic to grapes. That's a great answer. No, that's not why. No. Because there's no political gain in telling people that you're allergic to grapes, right? Right. There's no political gain in saying you don't eat healthy. Republicans like grapes.

Republicans like grapes. And so I have avoided them my whole life. You're pretty close. Really? It's close. No, apparently the unions boycotted grapes back in the day. What? And so she said she never ate grapes because she would never cross a picket line.

You've got to be kidding. Now, some people decided to say, you know, normally I would just believe Kamala Harris. Does she drink wine? That's great. You know she drinks wine. Uh-huh. Has there been a day that has gone by in the past. 25 years she has not had eight or nine glasses of wine.

I doubt it. I do too. And just so everyone knows, grapes are in wine. Yeah. In case you're wondering, like, what's that magical juice made out of? It's grapes. So, no, the reason why is they boycott it.

Now, people were like, wait a minute, normally I would just trust Kamala Harris with whatever she says, because she's so trustworthy. You're right. Right. And, but there was apparently one person, probably only one, who said, you know, I'm a tad skeptical of that claim. How dare they? Right.

Exactly. How dare they be skeptical about anything Kamala Harris has to say. Right. Now, there was a union boycott of California grapes, not all grapes as far as I know, but California grapes. Okay. For, I think it was 20 years or something. Did they not have any unions in the grape industry? Apparently they were anti-union in the grape industry at some point.

I know they had a California raisin situation. I'm not sure if that cost all the claimation money went there and they didn't have any money for the unions. I'm not sure what the conflict was. But this period, she said she had never had a grape until she was in her 20s was what her claim was. However, the period of the boycott lasted from before she was 20 until she was 36. So there's no way this story could be true. And it's so typical of her. She had an...

Bizarre. Do you remember the story what she said? She smoked pot back in 1986 listening to Snoop Dog. Oh, right. And then we all found out

that Snoop Dog didn't release an album until 1993. Right. So a bit difficult. I mean, maybe he was just in a room singing to her. I don't know. But apparently that wasn't true either.

And this is typical of Kamala Harris. And it's interesting. You look at the left right now. It seems like all of them can't communicate. for different reasons. Mm-hmm. You know, Kamala Harris can't tell any true stories.

Joe Biden can't speak because he seems to be going senile. Nancy Pelosi can't speak because she's drunk all the time. Right. John Federman can't speak because he had a stroke. Yeah. Are you assailing a man's health situation? No, I'm not saying. Is that what I'm hearing right now?

No, that's not. You're taking a shot at a man who has just been ill. Well, because there's no shots taken of Donald Trump after he had COVID. Not one. Right. Not one criticism. He had a nice, remember that wonderful period of the Donald Trump presidency right before the election when there was no criticism of him? Oh, I remember that.

Because he was getting over being ill, and that's why. Yeah, no, I'm not assailing him for being ill. In fact, I hope he gets better. Yeah. But he should get better in a place that isn't the Senate. I think so, too. That would be nice. He can recover in a, I don't know, a hospital, or he could recover at home, or he could recover in a rehab facility.

Yes. But not the U.S. Senate. All really good option. Now, of course, if he is fully recovered, he also should not go to the Senate. That's for other reasons. He would be a terrible, he's Bernie Sanders in a hoodie. Yeah, he is. And that's a problem.

Yeah. And he was brilliant during his campaign stop and this speech. Please understand the stakes in this race. Send me to Washington, D.C. to send so I can work with Senator Casey. What? And I can champion the Union Way of Life in Jersey, excuse me, in D.C. Thank you. Thank you very much. And it's an honor.

Okay. I live eight minutes away from here. Wow. And when I leave tonight, and I got three months. miles away. What? Dr. Oz in his mansion in New Jersey. You've got a friend and you have an ally.

Send me to Washington, D.C. Thank you very much. Thank you. A friend and an ally at Dr. Oz's mansion? Is that what he's saying? That's a surprising tactic. And vote for me because I only live eight minutes away. That's a great point.

If you're in walking distance, you've got my vote. If I can walk to your house. within 20 minutes. I'm going to vote for you. If John Federman moved into my house, then I would definitely vote for. Well, I just need him close by. He's probably willing to move into your house. He'd love that.

I mean, I love that. I don't know. Is parents still paying? I mean, you know, if there's a rent situation, I would consider it. No, he stopped doing who was 50, which was ancient times, like three years ago. Jeez. This is, look. What a bizarre.

I mean, and obviously. He's having some issues there. And it's sad, really. Yes. It's sad. I laugh at his reasoning that the only thing, look, doctor, I don't, I don't think Dr. Oz was the right candidate for this particular race. To be clear.

But like, there seems to be enough to criticize about Dr. Oz. Like, I do, I mean, honestly, do you know any of his positions? No. I really don't know any of Dr. Oz's positions. Yes, he's stated some of them. recently. And I don't know him well enough to believe if he's, you know, conservative or Republican or anything. He's not my ideal candidate. But John Fetterman, the only criticism he seems to have of him is his address. He's rich. He's rich and he lives in New Jersey.

Yeah. He has a big house, lives in Jersey, and he's successful. Don't vote for this man, because he has a big house and he's successful. He keeps pointing out the only things I like about him. I like the fact that he's successful. I like the fact that he's successful. I like the I really like it when you're a loser. And you've never had a job, really, that could support you or your family and that your parents have paid your way for your whole adult life. That does seem appealing. Now that you put it that way. Wait, is this person wearing a hoodie as well?

Yes. Yes. All right. Long as he's wearing a hoodie, then I would vote for. Now, how many times would you vote for him? 50. Yes. Yes.

I'm wearing my Philadelphia Eagles hoodie today in honor of John Federman. I don't know. Very nice. Yeah, it's very nice. And I think there is a, there's an odd, odd thing going on here. He has no message.

Yeah. Now, he has, this is different than not having an ideology. He does have an ideology. He is a socialist. And it's really terrible. He is a Bernie Sanders candidate. He is as far left as any candidate in the United States.

That is John Fetterman. He, just because he wears a hoodie and grunts a lot and is large, does not make him any different than Bernie Sanders. Bernie Sanders is a socialist. John Federman is a socialist. He is an AOC candidate. Yeah, but he's not 6'8.

He's not 6'8. Who? Bernie Sanders? Okay. John Fetterman is. I mean, AOC doesn't seem to be 4 foot 8. No, I know. But, yes, John Fetterman is tall.

He's tall. He's large. He wears hoodies. He grunts. He almost died. He almost died from a stroke. Still can't talk real well. Like, I feel bad when someone has a stroke.

I've had family members who have had strokes. I've had family members who have all sorts of physical ailments. Never did I think, you know, that qualifies them for the Senate. You know, like, if anything, you'd say, hey, something that is messing with your cognitive abilities is something that you that would disqualify you from a high profile role in our leadership. In the United States of America. For some reason, that does. It's just not a thing. If you are compromised mentally, that's fine with Americans.

Yeah. And how do you know that? Because so many people voted for Joe Biden. Joe Biden, for sure, is a great example of this. Nancy Pelosi is super compromised as well. Yeah. I think Kamala Harris is compromised in some ways. To listen to her speak, it's like, I don't know if she's just stretching so much

because she's not intellectually capable of making a point? Yeah. Or if there's something wrong with her. With Kamala, it feels like she's always calculating what she should say and cannot say. Yeah. To not to reveal too much or what's the most beneficial thing at the time. She's constantly making calculations and her brain doesn't work that fast. I mean, she's just not that smart.

Now, maybe a really smart person could do something like that. She's just unable to pull it off. So she winds up talking. to her, you know, talking herself into stories about how she's never eaten a grape. And she thinks this is amazing. A good idea. Right? Like that, where I don't think that's what Nancy Pelosi is doing.

Pelosi is probably just sloshed. Also, a little, but she's got at least a dash of the Joe Biden issue. I think so. Federman. She's what, 80? Is she 80? I think she's very close, if not 80, maybe even 81 right now. You sure there's reports now that Nancy Pelosi, if the Republicans take the house,

and she doesn't want to lower herself to. not be Speaker of the House anymore. She'd be minority leader. And she now is entertaining the idea of being named ambassador to Italy. Oh, that's a good place for her. First of all, all about that. 100%. I can support that. Our nation

needs her in Italy. Yes. Yes. 100%. Finally. We've got a former speaker of the house who's now ambassador to Italy. Yeah, I think that's great. But the other, a lot of people have pointed out, wasn't this the place she was just on vacation in her bikini? which was a hot set of photos. I mean, we have to all acknowledge those were really attractive.

There's nothing like an 80-year-old in a one piece, of course. And she pulled it off well. But, you know, is it possible that Nancy just wants free trips to Italy all the time? Yes. Very, very possible. Which, again, corruption in government is bad. We can all agree on that. But the amount of...

of corruption that leads to Nancy Pelosi being in Italy all the time and not here is good. That's good corruption. Sometimes you have to acknowledge corruption is wonderful. And in this particular moment, having Nancy Pelosi constantly on vacation in Italy is something I support

taxpayer dollars going to. We should pay for all of her vacation so she stays in Italy forever. She'll love it there. It's beautiful. It will love it for her being there. The wine is fantastic. the food is incredible, the scenery, the history, Pat.

Right. All of the above. I mean, I know she loves, she seems to really like dig that Mussolini period. Whatever she's doing over there, go over there, soak it in. Love it. Soak in the sun. Trip-Lade 727, B-E-C-K, or in 60 seconds. All right, I want you to take a minute out of your busy day.

And just ask yourself an important question. How many bits of personal information, your information, are our, online at any given moment. Your name, yeah, of course, your social security number, almost definitely. Your bank information may be credit card numbers. It's certainly possible. Are you concerned? Because if you don't have life lock, you probably should be. It's important to understand how cybercrime and identity theft are affecting our lives. We do everything online these days, and you don't want to cut internet safety out of the budget. So get 25% off a subscription to life lock. It's the top of the line in cybersecurity with both preventative measures to

keep you safe and access to a restoration team if you do end up having your information hacked into. No one can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions and all businesses, but you can help protect what's yours with LifeLock by Norton. Join now and get 25% off your first year with a promo code Beck. 1-800 LifeLock or head to LifeLock.com. Use the promo code Beck for 25% off at LifeLock.com. 10 seconds. Station ID. It's Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

Interesting piece in vogue about Jennifer Lawrence. She, you know, the actress from passengers, for one. Passengers. Yeah. Hmm. Mm-hmm. You never, of course, you're not into sci-fi, really. Not really.

So that was a space shift. Would you say like the hunger games would be the-hunger games might be. The thing that you'd point out. When you're talking about Jennifer Lawrence's career? Probably, yes. Probably better known for Hunger Games. Then passengers, although passengers is more recent. That's why it popped into my head.

Maybe you go Silver Linings Playbook because it was an award-winning film. What award did it win an Oscar? I think it won an Oscar. Didn't she win an Oscar for that? I think she did. Really? It was a pretty good movie, mainly because it was Philadelphia Eagles themed, which is the reason I remember it. But it did win, I feel like multiple, it was at least nominated for multiple awards.

Eight Academy Award nominations, Best Picture, Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay. Wow. Lawrence won the Academy Award for Best Actress in a Leading Role. Okay. So, I mean, those are the two, I would say highlights of General Ours. If you're going to name moments, I would not name passengers. I mean, is it on the list? I don't know that you're probably two.

Her iPhone was hacked before you get to passengers. But, yeah, no, I think maybe you go Hunger Games. I think you probably lead with that one. Okay. This is just my advice to you. Whatever. as a Jennifer Lawrence themed broadcaster. Anyway, she had some

interesting revelations in that article, including one that she has been troubled and has spoken to her therapist about her recurring nightmares she has about Tucker Carlson. That's psychopathic.

Yeah. And my guess is she's never even watched an episode of Tucker Carlson's show. That would be my guess. No, but if, If Tucker Carlson does not start his show either last night or tonight with Jennifer Lawrence's dreaming about me, I will be very disappointed. He's got to. He's got to.

Absolutely has to do that. If anyone watched Tucker Carlson last night, if he did not, because what did the story come out? I think yesterday. I do remember hitting yesterday, I think. So if he did not, I will be very disappointed in Mr. Carlson. I mean, would that be the greatest thing in your life if Jennifer Lawrence admits that she's had recurring nightmares about you? I think so. It would be great.

I mean, that's pretty awesome. You know, maybe she's tortured by how attracted she is to him. And that's the nightmare. That is the first thing you list on your resume from now on. Yes. That is how she, he should have that out of his lower third instead of Fox News host is in Jennifer Lawrence's dreams. Because I don't know.

You don't get a better anecdote than that. But Vogue also noted to her that her family, I guess, voted for Trump in 2016, which was very disturbing to her. The Republicans, right? I believe they are. Yeah. So she said, I just worked so hard in the last five years to forgive my dad and my family. And to try to understand it's different.

The information they're getting is different. Their life is different. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And maybe you should apply that to yourself too because I'm guessing, again, she's never watched Fox News. She's never looked into an alternative publication to the New York Times.

Times or Los Angeles Times. You know, she's getting all of her information from CNN and MSNBC. Oh, I think you're lucky if that's true. CNN and MSNBC. Probably not even then. Yeah, it's probably left-wing blogs. Yeah. But I think she, because she grew up, I believe,

in a Republican House, she may have some familiarity with it and is, you know, rebelled against her parents over the years and decided to change, which whatever, I mean, it happens from time to time, especially when you're in Hollywood, seems to happen often. Yeah. But this idea that you have to forgive your parents for their political beliefs.

Unreal. I mean, I have relatives who are liberal. I don't need to forgive them. I could try to convince them, persuade them, perhaps. I need to forgive them. They didn't have permitted a crime. But that's what it's like to the left. If you believe differently than they do, it's actually a sin to them.

Yeah. Because climate change and all of these things are their religion. Abortion is their religion. So she was asked about political exchanges with her family. members. And she said, I broached the subject in the sense that I unleash text messages. Boom, boom, boom. They don't respond. Oh my gosh. And then I'll feel bad and send a picture of the baby. That's kind of funny. Nice though that her parents just let it lay. Yeah. And just leave it alone. At some point, you need to make a calculation of what's good for your life.

Yeah. The Glenn Bank. Responding to Jennifer Lawrence over and over again on text messages about politics is not good for your life, to be clear. How would you like to look? How would you like to look? look 10 or 15 years younger. Do you want to look like Nancy Pelosi in that bikini? Well, if you do, you don't want to use Genucel. But in case you think maybe you want to look a different way, GenuCel exists. It's the best in skin care. I've been talking to you about GenuCel for years.

It's because it really works. My wife and my mom have both used GenuCel. They love it. If you're dealing with the crow's feet around the eyes or maybe a little old turkey neck, it might be time for you to give GenuCel a try today. GenuCel has got the last couple weeks of its genucel's. summer blowout. Every most popular package is over 65% off. Plus, you get a complimentary gift with every subscription order. You'd say goodbye to fine lines, forehead wrinkles, dark spots, sagging jaw lines,

even those annoying bags and puffiness, they'll be all gone without the risky work getting done. And with its immediate effects, your results are guaranteed as little as 12 hours or your money back. You're not risking anything. Try genusel.com slash Beck. GenuSell.com slash Beck. If you order today, get the summer essential absolutely free. It's a great gift as well for anyone coming up with an opportunity for a gift. Go to genusel.com slash Beck. It's G-E-N-U-C-E-L.com slash Beck. And don't forget to check out my show, which is immediately preceding this one every weekday,

beginning at 6th Central, 7 Eastern, Pac-Rae in Leach. Pat and Stufer Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. We've been reviewing the illustrious career of Jennifer Lawrence, because Stowe took exception with my pointing out that she was in passengers. I just said, I didn't remember passengers like many people. And you should have. I should have, I suppose. You should have because it was a hit.

It was over $100 million. What was the budget of that thing? I don't know. Probably $200 million. Oh, yeah. I don't have the budget of it, but I wouldn't be. Don't bog us down with, did it actually make money? Production budget $110 million.

Okay. Well, but worldwide, it made $300 million. Yes. However, you don't get all of the money that comes into the box office. So I wouldn't say it was a hit. I would say it may have made its money back, which is, hey, that's good and maybe a little bit of a profit. But not much. But again, you look at her career, I think you're going Hunger Games where she's made billions of dollars in the box office.

She's also in a bunch of the X-Men movies, which I didn't see any of. But she's, what is she? The blue thing? Yeah, the blue person. The blue person. You know who that is? Martin? Who's the blue person?

Yeah, Mystique. The one that she plays drums, right? And she, there's a bunch of blue people. They got painted blue and they ham on like cans. As a different blue people. And trash cans and stuff. Yeah, no. So she's in that.

And, but yeah, no, it did okay. Silver linings playbook. Yeah, Silver Linings playbook. She won a best actress. An Oscar for that. Wow. Best actress in a leading role. That's a notable.

A notable part of her career. She may remember it. I know you didn't. But she might remember that one little thing. But yeah, no, you're, she has not had a, she's not had a huge hit in a while. I mean, the last, this is, Passengers was probably her most recent moderate success. You know, she's been doing some artsy stuff, you know, she's been getting her iPhone hacked. Even things like that have been going on.

Did that happen? She was the main character and I don't remember. What year was that? I didn't remember that? Like, somebody broke into a bunch of iPhones and leaked naked pictures of celebrities. It was a big story at the time. And she was, I would say, the most prominent one. She was like at the peak of her celebrity and, uh, and, and.

She talked. Again, I don't understand the fascination of taking pictures of yourself naked. I don't either. Maybe if I look like Jennifer Lawrence, I'd feel differently about this particular topic. It'd be really weird if you looked like Jennifer Lawrence. That'd be very, very strange. How dare you, Pat? I know. I know, because women and men are exactly the same. Is there time, Martin, to dump that comment by Pat Gray's to save his career. because if it is acknowledged that he believes it would be quote unquote weird, strange, if I looked like Jennifer Lawrence, as I could easily identify as a woman at any moment.

You could. Maybe I do. Maybe I'm a G. You don't know? No, I don't. But I would never accuse you of looking like Jennifer Lawrence if you do. That's true. I don't think I'd be that attractive of a woman.

I don't think so. But she looks great. I just don't think that necessarily her politics. Oh, she's so psycho. rise to the level of her appearance. She's so ridiculous. And, you know, almost all of Hollywood is. But it's true.

You know, I feel like, can I draw out an analogy here? Tell me if you believe this. Corinne Jean-Pierre is sort of like if you take the average Hollywood actress and put her in the role of press secretary. Yes. Right? Like, Corinne Jean-Pier, I think, is a, she seems pretty. Like, she's not a bad-looking lady. Yeah.

It seems like that's what they picked her for. Like she, her appearance seems to be outside of her main three qualifications. Number one, her genitals. Number two, the genitals she prefers. Number three, the color of her skin. Those are her three main credentials for the job.

But I think the fourth one is like, she kind of just has that way about her. Like, she's heard of these topics before, right? Like she, it's not like, you know, if I were to talk to you about some topic in deep astrophysics,

you might be like, I don't even know what you're talking about. Where with her, like, she's, she like been on Twitter and seen these topics mentioned, right? Like, she knows that, you know, she knows who won the 2016 election. She doesn't know much about it, but she knows who won it, right? Oh, actually, that's the one thing she doesn't seem to know. I was a bad example because she actually said it was stolen. But generally speaking, she knows the general topics about politics. She knows their student debt.

She knows that maybe Democrats want to relieve some of that student debt in some way. She's familiar that the topic exists in conversation. But that seems to be the limit of her understanding. So she reads most of her answers. In the great big book of everything. The great big book of everything. And then a lot of times she doesn't realize that what she's reading doesn't answer the question. And also she apparently gets caught at times.

when people realized she was tweeting that elections, previous elections were stolen. Yes, she was asked about that yesterday, and here's what she said. We're all in agreement that it is incorrect to say the 2020 election was stolen. What about the 2016 election? Look. I'm not going to go back to where we were or what happened in 2016. We're going to focus on the here and now. We're going to focus on what's happening.

The 2020 election. is the past two. Right? Do you understand that? 2020 election is not the here and now. Right. I don't want to look back at, well, if you don't want to look back

at the 2016 election, then you shouldn't need to look back of the 2020 election. I should point out to everyone, man, but a lot of people don't seem to understand this. Donald Trump is not running for office currently. He is not on the ballot

in any state for any job. He may run for office in 2024. No one thinks he's going to be on a Senate ballot anytime soon. He's not going to be running for a house seat. He may run for president in the future, but currently is not running for president.

So the idea that you're going to make him the focus of this campaign, which is clearly what they want to do, is an interesting political bit of gymnastics, but it is not reality. He's not on the ballot. Talk about the candidates that are running for office. Can you do that? And the answer to that is no. No. They really can't. So, Corinne Jean-Pierre gets asked this question because this is not just her.

It's all of them. This is her saying a stolen email, stolen drone, stolen election. Welcome to the world of unprecedented, unprecedented Trump. Get it. Unpresented. And, you know, this is her in 2016 saying the election was stolen. She said the election was stolen in Georgia as well. Right.

And look, you can have criticisms. You can say if you want to have the position that you believe it's wrong for Donald Trump to say the election was stolen, okay, but you don't also get to say all of the elections you lost were stolen. You can't criticize someone else for saying the election is stolen when you've claimed multiple times that the election was stolen. It's just you can't have both of those things. Except they do. They want to. I don't think the American people are going to go along with that. I hope you're right.

I do too. I really hope you're right. All right. So let's hear more of Corinne jump here. But just in trying to understand the new attention on the MAG of Republicans, you tweeted in 2016, Trump stole an election. I was waiting, Peter, when you were going to ask me that question. Well, great, here we go. You tweeted Trump stole an election.

You tweeted Brian Kemp stole an election if denying election results is extreme now. Yeah. So let's be really clear. That comparison that you made is just ridiculous. I have been, I have been, well, you're asking me. Ask me a question. Let me answer it. And you said it was ridiculous. I was talking specifically at that time of what was happening with voting rights and what was in danger of voting rights.

That's what I was speaking to at the time. And here's the thing. I have said, Governor Camp won the election in Georgia. I've been clear about that. I have said President Trump won the election of 2016, and I've been clear about that. What we are talking about right now is, let's not forget what happened on January 6th. 2021 when we saw an insurrection, a mob that was incited by the person who occupied this campus, this facility at that time. And it was an attack on our democracy. Let's not forget, people died

that day. I love the appeal to the emotions there at the end. Let's not forget. Died. People died. Well, yeah, Ashley Babbitt died that day. One other person who was a Trump supporter died that day. But the others didn't die as a result of, I mean, even Brian Sicknick's family said he died from strokes. They didn't attribute it to the mob that I've ever seen. And the other police officers committed suicide. They didn't die that day. That was later on.

It's just absolutely infuriating that they keep promoting that lie. It's just, it's a flat out lie. And they won't let go of it. They continually attribute five deaths to January 6th. Well, that's just not the truth. That's not what happened. No, I mean, that doesn't mean it was a good event, good day. No, and I'm tired of even a carnival hedging that with, with an explanation because it's so obvious that we all know it.

Yeah, we all know it. We all know that it shouldn't have happened, but they have blown it so out of proportion. It really has overwhelmed the day. It has. It's overwhelmed what actually occurred. Like, their nonsensical treatment of it has overwhelmed the things that all of us were concerned about. I mean, no one wanted that. And, you know, it was so, the reason why it stands out so much is because on the right, it's so rare.

You don't see us going to cities to burn things down and break things and break windows and throw things at police officers and hit police officers over the head with flagpoles. That's the left's job. They do that all the time. Go to literally any day in Portland, Oregon. Go to any day in Seattle. Find, just find the area that pick the federal building. They're attacking that particular evening. Go to a six-month period in 2020 where it happened every night in major cities all across the country.

All across the country. And it was excused constantly. We see this happen every single time that one of these, you know, one of these things breaks out, we see the same excuses from the media over and over and over again. And it's a disgusting set of excuses, largely based upon,

well, you have to understand, you know, they can't control themselves. That's essentially their attitude. They can't control themselves. Yeah. And like, I don't know about you, but every person I've met

who would fit into any of the groups they're describing has plenty of control over themselves. It's the left that thinks that they don't. It's the left that doesn't expect basic civilization to hold up when something goes wrong. And it's appropriate to call January 6th a riot. Yeah, totally.

It is, totally. Asinine to call it an insurrection. It's ridiculous. It's not an insurrection. Oh, on. And I watch, you know, we know this, Pat. There are certain movies when they come on. You must watch them.

If you're, if you just flip into the channels and it's on, you have to stop what you're doing at any moment. Godfather, for instance. The Godfather is an. example of this. I would put Valky into this discussion. Valkyrie's in there? Yes, you might not like Tom Cruise, but man, is that a freaking good movie? And it is

the movie about a literal insurrection against Hitler. They tried to assassinate him. They tried to take over government buildings. They took over the government communication apparatus and communicated orders to underlings to stop listening to Hitler

because he's dead and go with us instead. That's an insurrection. An insurrection is not a bunch of people wearing horns on their head, walking in and putting their feet up at Nancy Pelosi's desk. That is not an insurrection. It's a bad thing. It is not an insurrection.

It's a different... They're two separate things. And, you know, that doesn't mean both of them are good or both of them are bad. They clearly are both bad. But they're different scales here. There was no plan.

Now, they go through the communications of some of these people who actually were inside the Capitol, and you can see there are a few of them that seem to have that on their mind. But that is totally different than accusing the president of the United States of an insurrection. It's a totally different thing. There are always crazy people. There are thousands of people in America right now planning some sort of insurrection that likely will never even be attempted and certainly will not succeed. That is something that has been going on forever. It's idiotic, but it's true.

that's totally different than what they present January 6 as. And this is their whole campaign is relitigating January 6. And she's like, oh, we can't look back at the past. That's all you're doing all the time. You don't want to look at the present. That's the problem with this election strategy and why we should reject it. 3,8-727-B-E-C-K. More Pat and Stufer Glenn coming up.

The Glenn Back Program. Pat and Stufer Glenn on the Glenn Beck Program. 3-8-7-27-B-E-C-K. It looks like CNN may be considering firing another couple of people. At least that's the rumor now, and Jim Acosta is one of them. Oh, no. Oh, wouldn't that be sad? Oh, gosh.

Who loves Jim Acosta is Jim Acosta. Yes. He's the only person who loves Jim Acosta. Yes. He loves himself some of Jim Costa, though. Gosh, does he love... He loves himself enough for all the rest of us. Oh, yeah.

That's why I don't do it. Because he's done all the work for us. he that dude loves hearing himself speak oh my gosh loves it yeah he thinks he's the smartest the best looking uh and and and just has the biggest best takes on everybody uh on network television he he he's the man who knows it all and uh he's not afraid to tell you but hopefully he won't be at CNN much longer Now, supposedly they've been planning to do this for a really long time. And then finally, they did get rid of Brian Stelter.

But we'll see if it happens to Acosta as well. I'm talking to our very own Rob, you know, here at the Blaze. He's a media critic. And I said to him, I'm like, is there any chance this is like real? Like CNN is actually changing their ways and improving? I asked him, on one to 10 scale, how would you rate the CNN transition from, you know, and he's obviously conservative here at the Blaze. skeptic, not a fan of Brian Stelter,

et cetera. And he think he gave it a seven. Like, it does seem like so far, so good here with some of these changes. Like they're really going to do it. Like maybe they're actually going to... I know they're not going to do it. Every time I get optimistic, I think, what are you doing?

Don't get optimistic. This is just... They're just... Lucy is putting the little football down, and I'm going to miss it again. Yeah, yeah. She's going to pull it away. She's going to pull it away.

But I'm going to try to kick it again. I'm going to try anyway. But then they gave us another little linkling with this Acosta story. It would be great. A lot of work to do, though. Yeah. A lot of work.

The Glenn Back program. Wow. That was a lot of wasted time until we got to now when you can get the flu shot and the COVID shot at the same time. He wasted about 5,000 years on the two arms thing. A lot of wasted arms. It is a lot of wasted arms. But thankfully, we now have a use for both. Yes.

Which is great. Let me tell you about a sweat block. Now, Glenn uses sweat block and loves it, raves about it all the time. He's got the wipes that he says, I guess it's something like a seven days. It somehow wipes out. your sweat for seven days, which is incredible. But every time I think of this product, all I can think about is Jeffie. Like, Jeffie is the sweatiest person ever.

Ever. I don't know. Jeffie was given two arms by God for two shots, but he was also apparently given a lot of sweat glands more than anyone else I know. And he uses it, doesn't he? He actually had really good results from it, which is incredible. Yeah. If you could stop Jeffrey's sweat, sweat block can do anything.

If you or someone you love, that's not really a description of Jeffie, but if they have a problem with sweating, please remember that Sweatblock worked for Jeffie when nothing else could. Try the deodorant stick as well. It's great. You can get it all today for 20% off at sweatblock.com. The code is Beck, sweatblock.com. promo code is Beck.

It's sweatblock.com. People are actually debating whether or not Donald Trump was going to sell nuclear secrets to the Russians. We'll get into that and much more coming up in one minute. Sometimes in life, the best thing you can do is learn the hard way. Not with real estate, though, because you blow a real estate transaction. It can screw up your financial future for such a long time. And you know if you've ever gone down this road and had a bad real estate agent,

it can be the difference between a really great transaction and a great move for your financial future and the destruction of it. It's a really serious thing. And it's so funny how we pick real estate agents. Usually it's just like somebody I kind of know. Somebody I kind of know has a relative who's a real estate agent. And they do it kind of part-time from time to time. And they can come in and sign the paperwork. It's much more important than that.

You need to take time to figure out who the best agent is. And of course, you don't have that time, nor do I. But that's why we have real estate agents. I trust.com. Real estate agents, I trust. com sorts through the real estate agents for the best performance in your area, finds the best person for you and matches you up, and then they will help you through the entire process.

It's real estate agents, I trust.com. The name says it all. Go there now. Real estate agents. I trust.com. It's real estate agents. I trust.com. Pat and Stufer Glenn on the Glenn Beck program,

AAA 727 B-E-C-K. Even on Fox News, there was a host over the weekend, who was wondering aloud if Donald Trump was selling nuclear secrets. I mean, to me, that is just so assidine. You have to be a pretty big Trump hater to believe that he would sell secrets, nuclear secrets, to the Russians or the Saudis. It's like a bit.

It is. It's like a comedic bit here. If you have evidence of this, please. Yeah, please provide it. Because I will tell you this. You know, there's a lot of things that I think the right will excuse. on Donald Trump. They'll give him a big break

on his offensive tweets or his, sorry, his truths. Yes. His truths and his re-truths. Yes. But if he was selling nuclear secrets to our enemies, you know what? Seriously?

Seriously? It's such a ridiculous idea. They have no, seemingly have no evidence of it. And they are trying to make this the thing because they realize this scandal is silly? I, you know, I do have some people

around me who I've talked who think it's a big deal. And I can't wrap my arms around why it's a big deal. I'm not saying Donald Trump did everything perfectly here. I don't know. We don't have the evidence or the knowledge to know that. But like, if what he did was have a bunch of documents that as president of the United States, he had already seen.

Yeah. And stored in his brain. And he brought those documents home and put him in a, what I guess is being described as a less than perfectly secure closet among other papers and you're going to what? Not let him run for president because of it? Put him in jail?

Put him in jail over this? I mean, I just, it seems completely ridiculous. Is the implication that, that Baron is going to read some of those documents? Is that the, is what we're worried about? Yeah. Well, his son could have gotten access to some of those documents and write them.

And then what would happen? Right. And then maybe Barron is selling those secrets to Russia. Yeah. I don't know. Here's my question for any journalist who wants to investigate this. Get yourself a nine iron. Mm-hmm.

Okay. Yeah, okay. Pick up a titleist. Mm-hmm. And go out there, walk out to the seventh hole of Mar-a-Lago, and see if you can steal a few holes of golf. Hmm. See how easy that would be to do. See if it would be easy to do.

to accomplish stealing a diet coke from the bar. See if you could pull that off before you start telling me how insecure these documents were in his private residence in a locked closet. Like, I get that that is not how we should be storing high level security documents that are under high level security. I understand that that's not the technical process. Does he not claim, though, that the archivists were down there and directed him to do certain things to keep them secure? I think he did say something. It's hard to know, honestly. There's so many claims, so many things have been leaked.

I don't honestly know. But I'm going to the worst case scenario for a reason here because I can't find why this is such a big story even in the worst case scenario. Unless you jump to what you just mentioned. He's selling nuclear secrets to Saudi Arabia. The left legitimately pitched this as a reason for him to get live golf tower events.

Right. Now, I guess if that were happening, it would be a big story. There's no evidence that that's happening. There's no reason to believe it. It's completely ridiculous in every single conceivable way. And I don't believe it happened. So unless you've got evidence of something like that, I mean, if you've got texts of him, be like, hey, Prince, bring the live golf tour, which by the way, doesn't exist yet. Bring it to my golf clubs and I'll give you these nuclear secrets.

If you got that, you're going to have something. And I'm going to be eating these words in a big way. But like the fact they're like, oh, well, technically this is not the process for storing these documents. It's like, think of the scandals that Donald Trump has been accused of and survived. You're telling me, document storage is the thing? You're going to take this guy down over documents storage? Oh, they're hoping. They really are.

They want this. Yeah, they want it badly. I mean, Joy Behar. The brilliant Joy Behar yesterday suggested that he was actually selling secrets. people keep asking what he's doing with it well he's going to sell him okay really he's going to sell documents the former president of the united states of america who loves this country quite clearly why else would you put up with everything he's put up with over the last you know six years uh and now he's planning to sell nuclear secrets to the russians i mean it's just ludicrous

And have we not been down this road? Didn't we do a Russia gate thing? Wasn't there multiple years of these complaints that turned out not to be true? Yes. And it was a complete hoax. And yet we're still doing this and people are still believing it? And I just don't understand. This is the way, like I could understand if he was actually dealing with Russia in some way that, you know, they came out with evidence of this in the Mueller report, like why you'd think that was a big deal.

if what the accusation you hear is that they just went in for this raid because he was storing documents and not telling them the truth about it or maybe he wanted to keep things that they wanted back like all of these things he has already seen

this is not him breaking into some vault and taking something he didn't have access to he was president of the United States he's seen all the documents whether he has the documents in his hand or not he's already seen them when you see something it gets stored in your memory banks

and you can recall bits and pieces of that information. He could have, at other points, written down in a journal, the things he wanted to remember from the documents. We know he takes a lot of notes and apparently flushes them all down the toilet, which is also something we're told. So I just don't under, like, it's not as if he went in and took documents he didn't have access to. He already, the reason you're accusing him of taking them is because he already saw them. it's because he knew what they were because he put eyes on him himself and he had rights to do that as president in the United States.

It's just like there have been scandals throughout Donald Trump's, you know, prominence as a politician that I thought, if true, were really problematic, right? This is not, I don't understand if you have an actual accusation that he's done something with these documents for his own political benefit. that's the line you need to cross if you're the left for this to have any relevance to anyone other than you because if he misstored documents, no one's going to care. If he was really

reckless with the documents and again, we have to focus on this because being reckless with the documents is not putting him in a private closet. That is probably the wrong thing to do as far as a procedure but like any single thing stored online

is more at risk of being stolen. then something in Donald Trump's personal closet. It's hard to get next to the president of the United States personal closet. And in that context, why didn't they care about Hillary Clinton's emails? Right. And I think, like, if he was really reckless, let's just say he was printing these documents on the back of the kids' menus, there was a maze on one side and nuclear documents on the other, just really reckless, handing them out.

You got the kids' menu, they're circling their grilled cheese on one side. And on the other side is some high-profile North Korea. nuclear secret. If that were true, it might rise to the partisan scandal level. And that's what Hillary Clinton's emails were, right? The right cared about him. The left didn't care about him. Some people in the middle cared about him, but not many. I mean, it was really more of a conservative story with the exception of James Comey coming out 10 days before the election and kind of reigniting it, which made it have real impact for the election. But like, the right is not going to care if he was. was a little reckless in the way he stored documents that we have no evidence were taken.

Again, if they were taken, if they were stolen, we know Hillary Clinton had all sorts of email issues around this time. We know John Podesta, who they just put back in control of like global warming. He had his emails hacked. These things actually occurred. But the idea that he kept them in a reckless way and they might have been at some point, at some future juncture stolen is just not going to excite anybody other than the MSNBC hosts who already are excited about everything about Donald Trump. You'd have to show malice.

You'd have to show that Donald Trump took these documents out of the White House to benefit himself financially. And the hurdle to clear, to prove a claim like that is impossibly high. I can't even imagine what you'd have to come up with evidence-wise to show proof of that. And if they've got it, every single person in this audience would want Donald Trump to be in prison. If he was actually doing this, we'd all want him in prison. He deserved to be in prison. He just didn't do this. I mean, I feel confident enough to just go straight out there.

How much money was he going to make from this? Are you going to give me $5 billion for this piece of paper? I doubt it. I kind of doubt it. It's just silly. It's assinine. I mean, just to make. a really big impact in Donald Trump's life where it's going to be worth it for him to take some document and sell it to a foreign power?

It'd have to be quite an arrangement. Yeah. It would have to be a big payoff for it to make a difference in his life. AAA 727BECK. More Pat and Stufer Glenn in 60 seconds. If you are a charitable person, but you like to make sure that your money is going to the place. that, you know, I don't know, it's going to be responsible with it. May I recommend that you check out the Tunnel to Towers Foundation?

They're honestly one of the best organizations we've ever worked with, and we're proud of all the work that they do. When a first responder or military service member doesn't come home, young children are left behind. Tunnel to Towers pays off their mortgage to lift the financial burden and also brings their family stability. U.S. Army specialist Jason Wheeler is one such hero. He is re-enlisted after 9-11,

but training and accidents and injuries left him unable to walk after years of trying to manage specialist Wheeler and his family moved into a mortgage-free smart home that was custom designed for his needs. What a great organization this is. Our nation's heroes who put their lives on the line for us every single day need your help. This is a charity that I believe in. I know Glenn does as well. Pat, I think does as well. I'm going to go out in line. Jeffrey, I would definitely not be sure of. He might be working with the terrorists. But I will say, this is a really, really good organization and they do a lot of good. You can donate $11 a month at T2T.org.

That's T the number two, t2t.org. T2T.org. 10 seconds. Station ID. KJP, got more from her yesterday, which is fantastic. She was asked a question about the pipeline. And I don't want to spoil it. Check this on.

So you've heard us say this, that what we see Russia's doing, and we've been very clear about this, is that they're using energy, they're weaponizing energy, and it's choosing to, one of the things that has been out there, they shut down the pipeline of Nordstrom 1. Oh, no, they shut down the pipeline of Nordstrom 1.

They had a direct pipeline. Oh, my gosh. Direct pipeline right to the women's lingerie section. Really? Yeah, and they shut it down. Shut it down. They shut down luxury goods at affordable prices? Yes.

Or maybe not so affordable prices. But still, that's incredible. But that is the motto, right? It's luxury goods at affordable prices. I don't know if that's her motto. I just made it up, but that seems like that's right. It should be if it's not. Right.

It should be their motto. That's just a place that very predictably, Corinne Jean-Pierre probably shops at. She dresses very nicely. I think is that, is that anyone? We don't have any fashion. I thought Sarah might be in there. She might be able to.

Glenn would definitely know. Glenn would know. I would say like she dresses nicely. Yeah, she does. I would say she spends more money on her clothing than the average salary in the United States per year. At the pace she's going at. I bet that's true. I bet that's true.

Yeah. I've never seen her in the same thing. Have you? I've literally never seen her in the same outfit. Yeah. And they all seem like really nice. Like she's spending a lot of money on clothing. And it's probably Nordstrom.

Yeah. It might even be undercutting. And that might be bargain basement for Corinjean, Pierre. I don't know. But she does seem to spend a lot of. of time on her appearance, which again is one of the top four reasons she's got the job. Now, she's obviously talking about the Nord Stream pipeline that they shut down, but... We don't know that.

We don't know that. Do we know? Is it possible that luxury goods are coming through a pipeline somewhere, and she's commenting on it? We don't know. And there is a Nordstrom pipeline that delivered luxury goods. But this is a great example of what we were talking about earlier. She's aware that there's a pipeline that sounds like Nordstrom. Like she's heard of it.

It's not like she's completely in the dark. She's not pulling, you're not pulling somebody off the street who's never read a news article. She just is so unfamiliar. She has no depth. So like to her, she heard Nordstrom pipeline

and she just kind of assumed it was the same name. I had a program director early on in my talk radio career who said, dude, you just got to, dude. Because he said do it a lot.

Do it a lot. Okay. Dude. You just need to be an inch deep and a mile wide. So you needed to know a little bit about a lot of different things. Yeah. That's like her. That's what she is.

Except she's not a talk host. She's not a talk show host. Dude, she should be a mile deep. And maybe an inch wide. I don't know, but she should know more about the topics she's asked about. She does not need to be a mile wide. She does need to be more than an inch deep. on a few areas, though.

And she's not. She's an inch deep on everything. It's like she doesn't, I don't know, don't you have people you talk to at the White House about these issues? Aren't there advisors? I think she does. And I think that's the thing. People come to her and they explain these things to her.

But she has no knowledge, right? It's like talking to Glenn about sports. This is happening. This is legitimately a real thing. We'll go into a monologue and Glenn's about to do a monologue. And he'll ask me about like a reference to sports. like, you know, some thing that, you know, he's trying to make an analogy. It's like when Babe Ruth called his shot, you know, and he'll try to, he'll work through it with me before we go on the air.

And he can get to a point where he can talk like he kind of knows what happened, right? Yeah. But when he veers at all off of script. Or if you were to ask him a question about any of it, forget it. He'll be like, he'll be like, well, it's like when Babe Ruth hit that free throw. Like he's going to have no idea, right? Yeah. And it's like it's things where, you know, I'll say, I remember him doing one thing where I was talking about a pass interference penalty.

And like the way he said it, like he had no idea which part of that to emphasize because he had never really heard anyone talk about it. He had just heard me say it two minutes before. And he was trying to make an analogy of something he did fully understand and bring it to sports. And that's what it's like with her. It's like someone has sort of. talked her through an answer on some of these things beforehand. She's sort of, she's read a couple tweets about it. She's sort of like, has a surface understanding that it is a thing.

But that's it. Yeah. And she's trying to answer questions from people who have a much deeper understanding than her every single time. I mean, that's a difficult place to be. You're putting this, it really is, it's unfair to her. They're putting her in a position. She has absolutely no chance to succeed in.

you know, it's like I really do feel like Jen Saki went to a PR firm and said, how can I make myself look good? And they said, hire her. That's how you do it. People will be like, oh my God, remember the amazing dream Jen Saki was. Because in comparison.

In comparison to her, she was. Again, at least she had read the full blog entry, not just the tweet linking to it. That's the difference. I'm not saying Jen Saki was good at her job. She wasn't. But in comparison, it's like the difference is monumental. Yeah.

Yeah. She's like Mozart compared to KJP. Yeah. She's the Mozart of White House spokespeople. And that's sad. Yeah. Because you've got to be pretty bad to make Jen Sucky look like a Mozart character. It's incredible.

Like none of these people can play Beethoven, right? Yeah. However, like, Jen Saki's taken a few lessons, right? So she can play a little bit of piano, where Corinne Jean-Pierre has seen people play piano. That's her qualification for the job. She once saw someone play piano. So she knows the fingers sort of move around on the keys, but she doesn't know which one's to press. She's no idea which ones to press.

She has like, she's like acting. It's like she's got a role. You're going to be press secretary today. And she doesn't have a script. She's improvving her responses to these things unless she literally looks down at her script and reads word for word what's on the page. What she does often. Often. And I will say the one thing you could say about her is she can read.

She like literally can read words and say them out loud. That's the best thing you can say about her. But it's her only qualification, unfortunately. But that's what happens when you're hiring special interest groups. The Glenn Back Program. Take a minute out of your busy day and ask yourself how many bits of personal information? Your information are online right now at any given moment. Your name, your social security number, your bank information, your credit card numbers.

It should make you concerned. And if you don't have LifeLock, you probably should be concerned. It's important to understand how cybercrime and identity theft are affecting our lives. We do everything online these days and you don't want to cut Internet safety out of the budget. So the people at LifeLock are going to help you with that. They're going to give you 25% off a subscription to LifeLock. It's a top of the line effort in cybersecurity with both preventative measures to keep you safe and access to a restoration team if you do end up having your information hacked into. No one can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses.

But you can help protect what's yours with LifeLock by Norton. Join now and save up to 25% off your first year with a promo code, Beck, 1,800 LifeLock or head to LifeLock.com. cybersecurity is a real problem. You need to protect yourself, especially in 2022. It seems to be getting worse and worse. LifeLock.com or 1-800 LifeLock. Use the promo code back at 25% off. From the fine people at LifeLock.

It's LifeLock.com. Check out Glenn, Stu Does America, Stephen Crowder, and my show, Pat Gray Unleashed, BlazeTV.com. Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck Program, AAA 727, B-E-C-K. Let's go to Mike in Georgia. Mike, you're on the Glymbeck program with Pat and Stu. Good. I'm doing a day. Doing well.

Pretty good. Yourself? I'm a retired Navy Chief for 35 years. I handle documents like they're talking about now. And Trump selling documents is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Yeah. For starters, our enemies already have an information. information, so why would they want to buy it?

Right, because this is information about foreign countries is the new act. The latest round of leaks from the FBI says that these are documents about, like, let's say, North Korea's nuclear arsenal. And it's like, well, I mean, is North Korea going to buy documents about their own nuclear arsenal? I guess other countries might be interested, but there are our enemies. So I don't think it's necessarily a huge problem that they might know. Right, right. Not to mention that he didn't do it. I mean, this is a ridiculous conversation anyway, because the president of the United States was on selling nuclear secrets.

Yeah, it's just, I want this. We are, they already have it. Mm-hmm. You know what I mean? Yeah. Yeah. All right. Thanks for the call, Mike. I don't understand.

I don't understand anything about this story, frankly. I don't understand it. I don't understand why it's as big a deal as it is. Now, me neither. I kind of get the politics of it, right? We're coming up to an election, and that might be related. But, like, let me give you this. The special master thing.

Donald Trump wants a special master. to have someone unrelated, an independent source, look through the documents and see what should be, you know, what these documents are, what they contain, right? Is he selling secrets to the special master? Is that what's going on? Maybe that's it. Maybe that's it.

So he wants this to happen. What is the, I know all the political arguments. What is the justice argument? If we're looking to maintain the reputation of our justice department and make sure that we all believe that, the former president of the United States is either held responsible for some crime

or treated fairly by the Justice Department. What is the argument against a special master? That they've already reviewed all of the documents. The FBI's already thoroughly gone through it. There's no reason to go through it again. First of all, obviously his complaint here is he's being

treated unfairly. So the FBI going through it would actually work in his favor. Yes. You would think so. But that's what I heard them say is we're already done. But again, that's not a justice argument. That's a timing argument. Right? Like that's not getting to the truth. That's, we need to get there quicker. Right. We need to get there in a more heightened fashion because it's just too important. We need to get it right now, right now, right now. Special Master might delay things a little bit, but would be a more direct path to the American people being comfortable with the outcome.

Right? Right now what we're seeing is, uh, uh, unprecedented situation where they raided the home of a former president, which I'm sorry, is notable. If you don't see why that would be a notable piece of history, I can't help you. But, I mean, like, it's a big deal. Whether he's guilty or not, it's just a big step to take. So this big thing happened, half the country thinks it's total BS. Half the country is going to believe anything you say that's bad about Donald Trump. So why wouldn't you take an extra step to have real transparency, to have an extra person, an extra set of eyes on these things to make sure everything fundamentally goes the right way so the outcome can be trusted?

And I believe I have an answer to this question. I believe I have an answer to this question. And that answer is Friday. Two days from today. Two days from today is Friday. And something important happens on Friday. Friday is 60 days before the election. And if they do not indict him before Friday,

the unwritten rule of the FBI is to not take major political impactful positions within 60 days of an election. It's not a hard and fast rule. It's not written down, but it's what they've always seemed to do. Because they violated that rule in 2016. With Hillary. Went nuts.

And they went nuts. And the FBI has vowed not to. do that again. Yes. They've been very clear about that. They like that rule. We saw that with even Bill Barr supported that rule.

It's one of those things that they want out of that window. Now, it could still happen. But I think part of the reason why you don't want a special master is so you can rush through an indictment that gets through within a window

that the DOJ is comfortable with and lines up with their unwritten standards. That's Friday. I mean, that's how close we are to this thing. Yeah. Which is crazy when you think about it. That's 60 days away from the election.

So we are in that primetime area where they're not supposed to be announcing major indictments of former presidents. So we will see if they hold to that. But the special master's already been, you know, looks like that's going to happen. So that may delay it long enough. They may need to hold off an indictment if they actually believe it's coming. I will say, like the indictment is being promoted as it's this big thing, but it's like if the indictment is basically he had some documents and didn't return them in time, I just don't think people care. The same people who care about every little twist and turn in the Donald Trump saga will care about it. And the same people on the left who care about every little accusation and believe every little thing are going to make it out to be a very big deal.

And the people on the right who don't care about anything that Donald Trump does aren't going to care. so I don't know who this moves and you're like oh well you know he's had all these big these big high profile scandals that we've been talking about for months and months at a time we've spent millions and millions of dollars in the investigation but you know what's going to get him the filing cabinet that's going to be the big thing that he put it in the wrong filing cabinet you know he didn't put it he put it in his private residence

you know it's not like he rented a you hall or and dragged it to a public storage and put it in there without a lock. It's in his house. They act as if it's so... They're like, well, some people may have gone into this area. Like, I mean, it's possible, and that's probably not the best practice. But, like, if you think you're holding onto your job and not getting tackled by security officers outside of Mar-a-Lago

if you try to steal documents from there, I mean, you're insane. This is not... That's not what's going on here. And didn't Barack Obama have documents delivered to a warehouse in Chicago? It wasn't even on his premises. Yeah. It wasn't even near his house.

It was just this big warehouse. And he had all these documents, thousands and thousands of documents, delivered to some warehouse. Nobody cared about that. Nobody had any interest in that. What was Obama going to do with all that stuff? It does seem like there's arguments

between the archivists and the former presidents every time they leave. Every time. They're always taking documents. They're not comfortable with them taking. Yep. The question is not that. Like, I don't really, like, I never sat here and railed on radio about how Barack Obama took too many times.

I mean, like, it's just not, like, I'm not that interested in it, frankly. The only one I can ever remember really making a big deal about was Sandy Berger, who went in and took 9-11-related documents. He smuggled them out in his underwear. He stuffed them down his pants. And that just seems incredibly suspicious, storing documents that you'd already seen. It's also unsanitary. Who wants to touch those documents again? I don't.

Maybe that was the plan. Maybe. You know? I don't know. It's possible. That was the whole idea. It is possible. It is possible.

And you know, you bring up the point that we're only 60 days on Friday. So we must be, what, 62 days from the election now. Good math. Thank you. That's awesome. Thank you. I did that all on my own in my head. I didn't even use a calculator.

It's incredible. So, yeah, right? Corinne Jean-Jiro would be reading it right now. She'd be like, 60. Hold on. Let me get the calculator out. 61. And then you put one more on top of that. 63. 62.

Yes. Are you still optimistic about Republicans having a good chance to take the Senate? You know, it's interesting. There is this narrative. Maybe we can go into this a little bit today at some point. But there's this big narrative that there's huge momentum on the left. I keep seeing that. Yeah.

And man, I got to be honest, this is part of my job. to look at the stuff every day. I just don't see this overwhelming amount of evidence that would suggest this momentum is there. Oh, that's so great. Now, there is some evidence that would support it. And basically what the left is doing and the media is trying to promote are these special elections, where you're seeing results that are disappointing for Republicans. We've seen three or four of them since.

The, uh, since the Dobbs decision in particular, the overturning of Roe versus Wade, uh, 624-24-22. Like the Sarah Palin election in Alaska. Yeah, the Palin one, but the Palin one is a terrible example of this. Like Sarah Palin is a divisive figure, right? In Alaska. Yeah. They either like her or you hate her. And, you know, what the, the reason why Sarah Palin lost in Alaska is because Republican voters, Republican voters voted for the Democrat. That's how that happened. Right. It was like, she didn't win the first round of voting. And then she didn't, then a bunch of Republicans, 28% of Republicans that voted for the other Republican, a good chunk of them switched to the Democrat. That's what happened in that race. That's how she lost.

And a lot of that was resentment over her leaving the being governor early. I'm not knocking Sarah Palin here. But like she became a giant celebrity and was governor of the state and then just decided to leave in the middle of her term. Like Alaska didn't like that. They didn't appreciate it that much. And she's still only lost by two points. But I think, you know, look, it's one of these things where that one I don't think is a good example of it. There have been three or four special elections that have gone on since the Dobbs decision.

And probably the best piece of evidence here would be the Kansas abortion referendum. And they went against Republicans. Some Republicans still won, but they won by less than expected. some were, you know, purple-ish-type races that went the Democrats way. And so people are like, oh, gosh, that shows, you know, that the left is animated by the Dobbs decision. The right is incredibly animated by the Dobbs decision, but we just won that one. You don't get, you don't get, I got to go to the polls to support the thing we already have, right? Like, that is not what animates Republican abortion voters.

And in this particular instance, the Dobbs decision, I think unleashed a period of, this is a theory of mine. So I want to, this is not necessarily, we don't know the outcome of this yet, but this is what I believe. The Dobbs decision did animate Democratic voters earlier than Republican voters in this cycle. So they got on board and got into election mode a couple of months earlier than Republicans, which have led to some of these special election results. That makes sense. It makes sense. Republicans have not turned on their election attention yet. And that will start this week and really kick into gear next week and the weeks after.

And with all that being said, you're still seeing polling in a lot of these Senate results that show tightening of these races. Dr. Oz was down by 16 points three or four weeks ago. He's now down by four or five. Blake Masters was down by eight. He is now down by four. We're seeing a huge lead in Missouri for Schmidt. We're seeing good results out of Florida. We're seeing a lot of things that do not line up with a democratic bit of momentum here.

So I think what we're going to see is these races continue to tighten over the next few weeks. You're going to see an election that I think the House is still a heavily favored area for Republicans. and the Senate is they may still even be the underdog there but they definitely have a chance to win. This idea that they really have a 25% chance to win, I think is not correct. I think you've got to give it a few weeks.

If we're still looking at the same polls in four or five weeks, I will change my thesis on this. But I don't think that's true. I think right now the left wants this to be true and they're desperately begging America to believe this momentum story so they can create the momentum that's not actually there.

And the media is going along with it so it's starting to look like maybe they're right because the media is pushing that. They're trying to start pushing this train down the tracks, hoping the engine goes and can start hauling all

of this very heavy freight. It's a lot to carry and it's not at this point, I don't think the evidence is there to support it. Well, I'm going to go with that. Yeah. Because I just feel better now. Yeah, there you go. Triple 8-7-27-B-B-E-C-K.

And informed. Sign up for the free newsletter today at glenbeck.com. There's something else here now. Something new. From exclusively on Paramount Plus, it's the series Stephen King calls Scarious Hell. Everything here is impossible, but it's also real. Sci-fi vision calls it the best show streaming right now.

We're running out of time and we still don't know the rules. Don't miss what the movie blog calls something you need to watch. Saving those children is how we're running. we all go home? From binge all episodes exclusively on Paramount Plus. Hello. It's Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. We were just noticing at the kexie.com website.

What was it that you're concerned with? There's a box of 12 cookies you can buy. Yeah. Okay. And this is at kexie.com where they have the world's finest cookies. They are fantastic. But the box of 12 has how many cookies pictured in it? Twelve, I would say.

say, right? Yeah. So following that pattern, when you buy a box of eight, how many cookies would be in the picture of the box of eight cookies? Obviously six. Well, you are correct. I don't know why you would think that's the right number, but you are correct. There's, in a box of eight.

Yes. Okay. And then you also offer. You offer a box of six, which you'd think, okay, if there's a box of six, wouldn't you use six? You would think there's probably four cookies in there, right? That's exactly right. The box of six.

And I think it's because somebody's already eaten two of them in each of those boxes, but they haven't gotten to the box of 12 yet. Right. It's a weird pattern of eating. It is. But yes, the box of six shows that there's four cookies in the box. However, I think when you order it, you actually get six. I'm going to talk to somebody about that.

I don't know who, but somebody at management there. Right, right. Somebody who might have some sway. Yeah. Yeah. At cexe.com. Okay. I want to make sure I understand.

Man. We got to tell you about this. Doomsday Glacier. Oh my gosh. Yeah. Oh my gosh. Why they call it that and what's about to happen. Come on a line back program.

Let's talk to you about built bar, Pat. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Built bar. Yes. How did a little candy bar that can't weigh more than a few ounces? How can that make you gain like five pounds if you eat one? It happens.

And if you would like something maybe a little bit more healthy than that, something that can put aside that sweet. tooth a little bit. You got to try Bill bars. My wife, one Lisa Page, of the Lisa Page made me do it, Instagram feed. She's the one that really discovered these things. And Glenn likes to take credit for it. Oh, I found Bill Pard. No, you didn't. Lisa found them. And then Lisa told Tanya. And then Tanya told you and try to harass you and actually eating something healthy for once. Bill Pards have like 130 calories, four grams of sugar, four grams of net carbs, 17

grams of protein. They're great. They taste delicious. And you're going to not pack on the pounds eating them. That's a great way to go. Built.com is a place to go to get your built bars. Built.com. Use the promo code back. Get 15% off your first order. The promo code is back for 15% off at built.com.

Is the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment. This is. Pat Grace, Super Gear for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program, AAA 727BECK. Got to tell you about the Doomsday Glacier. Oh, man. What now? We'll tell you about it.

Coming up in 60 seconds. Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenbeck program, Triple 8-2-7-27B-E-CK. Join me from my show, Pat Gray Unleashed, immediately preceding this one live every weekday, six to eight central time. And then Stu does America. Yeah.

Happens daily. You don't need to do anything else with your life. You just need to listen to Blaze shows. Yeah. And so take all of them. You'd be a lot happier to do. Consume all of them. Yeah.

You don't need it. Talking to your family is so overrated. Why do that? No. Instead, just listen to. to our podcasts and make sure to subscribe to them. We do appreciate it. And I will say, after watching the media and the way they're looking at the election and

everything else, we were talking about this a little bit last hour, you need, we all need places like the Blaze that will actually talk about the truth because you see the narratives develop before they even take hold. You see what they're trying to do in the media? They're trying to push you down so many different roads to believe all these things that aren't true, that they don't have evidence to support. And if you don't have places to push back, there's going to be an issue there. So, you know, I'm thankful that the Blaze does.

Because by the way, you can subscribe blazTV.com slash Glenn. The promo code is Glenn there if you want to save $10. But we do appreciate you being part of the movement and part on the effort to push back against mainstream media. Well, something else to push back on. The Antarctican glacier. Antarctica has a glacier called the Dooms day glacier. It's nicknamed that

because of its high risk of collapse and the threat to the global sea level. It has the potential to rapidly retreat in the coming years. That's according to scientists applying concerns over the extreme sea level

rise that would accompany its potential demise. It's actually named the Thwaites glacier, but it's capable of raising sea levels by 16 feet. That's pretty bad.

Yeah, it's really bad. How big is this glacier again? Very. It's very big. Really big. Yeah. It's eroding though along its underwater base as the planet warms in a study, I love this.

In a study published yesterday, or the day before, I guess, in the journal Natural Geoscience, scientists mapped the glacier's historical retreat, hoping to learn from its past, what the glacier will likely do in the future. Wait a minute. If it acted like this in the past, why are we so alarmed by that in the future? This is what it does naturally. This is how the glacier acts. But I will say this.

You know, when melting ice, you've seen ice melt in a glass, right? Oh, yeah. You've had a bunch of ice in a glass and then it melts. Yep. And then it floods your house. Right. Raises the water level in your house by, you know, 10, 15 feet sometimes. You've had that happen.

I've had it happen. Everybody's had it happen. Because when the ice melts, obviously it's going to overflow in the glass. That's not really what happens, though. It's not, is it? Well, is this a, so this glacier, because they talk about these, the ice melting on land, and then it flows into the water and that can obviously. That would increase things, yeah.

But this, I mean, it's already in the water, right? So you've already got the volume there. So what are we worried about? You know, it's like, I guess if, yes, if the ice melts on land runs into the water, that would raise the level. Though, I mean, the amount of ice would need to be significant. More than like a couple cubes. Yes.

it would be more than that. It would be more than even on large snowballs. Like think of the biggest snowman you've ever seen would be bigger than that. It would? Yeah. Wow, that's pretty big though. Pretty big.

I've seen five or six foot snowman. Yeah, that could be life size. You know, they can be like human size. But you're talking bigger than that? Bigger than that. You're talking seven, eight feet. At least. An NBA basketball player like that size.

Like they keep, they constantly act as if every one of these things is yet another another critical situation that's going to have all of humanity running for the hills and not being able to adapt, of course, not being able to figure out a way to manipulate our surroundings to survive these things. Now, you know, this happened through the heat wave here not that long ago that hit Europe. They're like, look, the heat wave is here. we how how you know this is what could happen to places like they would have to deal with temperatures like this and I'm looking at the thermometer here in Texas and thinking yeah this this what you would do is build a bunch of air conditioners and they're like well they don't have air conditioners they would need to get some if this were to occur on a constant basis that's how you solve problems like this you can do the air you can do that you can do that and you can do that really inexpensively like less expensively than trying to control the global temperature well what a control in one of room. What if we not only try to control the global temperature, but we paint all the rooftops white?

What if we did that? Would that be helpful? I doubt it. I will sincerely doubt it. Because I've seen that kicked around a little bit. Let's paint all the rooftops white. Or put plants on all the rooftops. That's another one they kick around. Oh yeah, I like that too. You know, it puts some greenery up there. I just don't understand

how, like, we adapt to these situations all the time. Countries all over the globe are in different situations and have dealt with every one of these issues individually on their own. Yeah, but there's, it's never been hot before. It has been hot. It's hot here every year. It's hotter here every year than it is in Europe during a heat wave. And yet we somehow survive it.

And so the answer should not be how do we change the global temperature. Yeah. The answer should be, hey, like, let's come up with enough energy to supply the needs of modern civilization. Wow, that's radical. It's a crazy idea. Thank you. Wow. Thank you, Greta.

Greta Tunberg, chiming in on the program. You have to be able to come up with enough energy to supply the needs of the human population. That's the answer. The answer is not going to be putting a nest thermometer on the earth and twisting it. That's not, that you can't do that. You can't do that. You can't even do the most basic things you're trying to do. Like control inflation.

What if we put a... heat screen between the sun and the earth. What if we did that? A heat screen? A heat screen? How would that, be you floated up there on spaceships? Yeah, you would somehow, you know, hang it in space. Mm-hmm.

Maybe between two space stations. Like window tint? Kind of, yeah. Okay. Yeah. So you would tint the globe? And we put that between us and the sun. I mean, don't get ridiculous with a bunch of details.

You know you could do this if you wanted to. Really? I do know that? You're saying I know that. Yeah, you know that. You know that. So if we tinted the earth, it would be a little bit cooler, right? Just like your car when you put that screen in the windshield.

Oh, right, like the sun shield. Yeah. Yeah. You just have to do that. Sunshield. You just do that in space so that the heat doesn't get here. That'd be one way to go. That would be a way to go.

That I will grant you. I just don't know. I've actually seen that proposal. On The Simpsons? Put forth. I think they sit, yeah. It was actually in an article about global warming. Montgomery Burns did this, if you remember.

He blocked the sun. Did he? He blocked the sun. He blocked the sun. I don't remember that. Because of the evils of nuclear power. Remember when that was the thing? Because now all of a sudden the environmentalists are like, you know what?

You're not going to believe what we've discovered. Power from an atom. Yeah. We can do it. We can do it, boys and girls. We swear. And these right-wingers want to stop us from doing it. but we're going to do it this time.

It's like, wait a minute. We've been saying we want a nuclear power. Forever. We've been saying that this would be a major solution. By the way, it's clean and it's renewable. Yeah. So you don't have to worry about any of the problems. We're always going to have atoms.

Now, this only does not solve every problem that fossil fuels does solve. And, you know, like they're, it's just an electricity solution more than anything else. And that doesn't, you know, that's not necessarily the right solution for heavy transport and, you know, industrial heat processes. and lots of other different things. But I will say it would solve a lot of our problems when it comes to electricity. And I'm old enough to remember,

just as an example, John McCain running for president, on a platform that advocated hundreds, if not thousands of nuclear plants being built. Right? And they laughed at him over it. Now, the green movement is saying, you know what,

what if we just count nuclear power as green, which it should have been all along? We just change, we just act like we didn't protest. for the past 50 years, and we now embrace it and say that's ESG friendly too. Now, that's a good development for society that they recognize that, and it's good if we start building nuclear plants.

But it is so impossible to swallow the fact that they are now trying to claim that they're the ones who want nuclear power. Wait a minute. This is what they do with everything. They're trying to say, you know what? Hey, guys, did you know the right wants to defund the police? How could you possibly believe people are going to actually swallow that? But they do.

And a lot of times they get away with it. The media goes right along with it. That's true. There was this bill. This bill came out and there was a line in there about funding a national police force. And they said they didn't want it. It's like, well, yeah, that's a different thing than what we're talking about. And you know it.

What we want is like stop burning buildings. Arrest people when they break windows and make sure that the police are there to stop crime. you wanted them all to go home so that when all this stuff was happening, no one was able to protect themselves. And you also wanted the Second Amendment to go away so they couldn't even fire their own guns at these people. That's their line.

You know, look, America can choose this if they wish, but it's a bad decision. It's my hope that they won't. It really is. AAA 727 Beck. More coming up. Pat and Stufer Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. AAA 727 BECK.

I love these global warming articles where within the context of the article, they show how flawed their thinking is oftentimes. Let me read these a couple of points that they made in the article on this gigantic glacier in Antarctica that may melt and they're worried about that. They found at some point in the past two centuries, the base of the glacier disloged from the seabed and retreated at a rate of 2.1 kilometers per year.

That's 1.3 miles. That's twice the rate that scientists have observed in the past decade or so. So in the last two centuries, it's been retreating faster than it is now. But it's climate change. It's global warming. The swift disintegration possibly occurred as recently. I mean, this is as recent as they get. the mid-20th century.

So in 1950, it was, it was disintegrating faster than it is now. And yet, we're supposed to believe that we need to change everything we're doing, spend $100 trillion and fix this climate change problem. Just don't make any sense. You know, I'm old enough as well to remember a time where Glenn Beck was constantly mocked for his due. room. Remember they used to say that like Stephen Colbert and John Stewart and those guys and be like, oh, he's, you know, Glenn Beck spreading fear, spreading, you know, all of this cataclysmic fear mongering that that Glenn Beck does in his doom room. It's like, do you guys listen to yourself? All you do is say the world is ending. It's like 90% of your propaganda is related to the fact that

we're all going to die because of a 0.7 degrees Celsius temperature warm over a century. despite all the evidence that shows that we've been able to adapt much quicker than this process exists. Yeah, can you imagine if by the year 2100, which oftentimes that's, you know, for those who have some kind of common sense and realize that we're not going to be over by the year 2030, the year they project a lot is 2100. Can you imagine if in the next 78 years we don't come up with something that helps us get rid of CO2, if that's what we really, really need to do, is lessen the CO2 in the atmosphere? There will be no discoveries. There will be no inventions. There will be nothing that helps us on that. This is literally how they do these projections.

They literally, literally go through. and say, what if nothing happens? What if no changes happen? No innovations. I mean, that's impossible. No adjustments by humanity. Like, you've seen this... Look at the adjustments we've made already.

Of course. Like, look at, you know, you go to... There's this big study that came out a while ago that's talked about how many people would have to move from, like, Bangladesh because of the flooding that comes from global warming over the next hundred years. You know, the number's gigantic. When you dig into the study, they literally, literally are figuring out if no one changes any of their behavior.

Now, why on earth, if the sea level was rising, why on earth would no one change their behavior? At the very least, they would move. Right? At the very least, they wouldn't just stand there and drown. If the sea level is rising 16 feet, I would think Miami residents would want to say, hey, you know what? I understand Iowa is really nice this time of year. Exactly. And that's the, that's if it happened so quickly, they couldn't do nothing about it. Most likely what they would do is they would do what Holland has done or they would build sea walls or they would come up with other technological

solutions like we have done all across the globe to deal with water getting in the wrong places. In 1900 with that technology Galveston, Texas raised the city 17 feet. Think about this. Because of a hurricane that hit them and

wiped out the town and maybe killed 10,000 people. So they raised the city 17 feet. Clear back then. Jeez. With the technology we have today, what could we possibly do? And we're the ones that are pro-science here.

Right? Oh, for sure. We have faith in science to actually develop things that make life better. You know, I mean, think of the LED light is a good example of this. You had a situation where, you know, this is George H or George W. Bush who did this. But he, you know, I think it was Christmas Eve or something, passed through something that made incandescent light bulbs. Oh, I remember that. Yeah.

And they banned them basically, except for artistic uses and stuff. And the thought was, well, we'll force everybody to use fluorescence, which sucked. Then here came LED lights. And LED lights, which work on a fraction of the energy of even the fluorescence, they last forever. They're easily customizable. They just outperformed everything else on the market. And now that's basically all you can buy. Yep.

Right? Like it's because it just won. It's better. It worked. You didn't need to force people to do it. People wanted to do it. Yeah. And therefore they did.

And that is going to be how all of these changes happen in the real world. You can put all these laws in, you know, we should go into California maybe a little bit coming up because they're in the middle of a power crisis. In the middle of a power crisis in which they are telling you you can't charge your electric cars. Which they just encouraged you to buy. Yep. And now you can't charge it. incredible how fast this has happened. You know, days after they banned gas powered cars in the future, they can't, they are going to their citizens and saying, hey, decades, a decade before, this is reality, you need to, we can't even deal with the power or needs we have right now, let alone in the future.

That is how Gavin Newsom could possibly be considered a presidential candidate is beyond me. I mean, he's been a complete failure in everything he's. absolute disaster. A disaster through COVID. A disaster with energy. And during under his tutelage for the first time in its history. California lost population. Because of

the way he's screwing up California. People are just fed up with it now. And you really don't want to have your wife near him. Because he seems to have sex with a lot of the wives that his best friends have that are nearby. Right. So you don't want to that either. There's a lot to be critical of Gavin Newsom.

And now I guess for a Democrat All this stuff adds up to presidential hopeful. But I can't imagine to the rest of the country, it does. It does tell you the sad state of the Democrat Party, though, that they got nobody else to turn to. Who else is there? Even Hillary Clinton said she's not going to try it again. No, Kamala Harris?

I mean, she's never eating a grape, or at least not in children, so maybe she's the next one. It's bat and stew for Glenn on the Glenn Beck Program. Triple-8-7-27-B-B-E-C-K. California is being forced into some interesting decisions here. We were just talking about the climate change situation and how that's affected places like California. But they are making some laws and some regulations

that are just not going to be advantageous for them in the future. For instance, right now they're in a situation. situation where they've goaded everybody into buying electric cars. They've told their residents that you won't be able to drive gas-powered vehicles in 2035. The only ones that will be available will be electric vehicles. And then they tell their residents, oh, by the way, yeah, we can't have you charging your electric vehicle between 4 and 9 p.m. in the afternoon. But other than that, other than that, it's great. Totally plausible solution to your transportation needs.

Yes. Just make sure you don't have to travel in that time period. I mean, you know, it's only five hours of the day. How hard is it? At 3 a.m. Right. You go to work at 3 a.m. instead. You know, why not?

Okay. That'll be, that's an easy way of doing it. What if my shift isn't at 3? What if my business isn't even open at 3 a.m. You know, one phrase that should come to your mind is being on time is being late. you should always show up early. Really? So show up at 3.30 a.m.

For a 9 o'clock opening? Huh. Yeah. You show up. All right. That's one way to go. You sit out front. You do some,

maybe just some exercise. And just, you know, keep the engine idling. Well. Right? And listen to the radio or whatever until, well, you can't do that. Because then you'll have to charge your car between four and nine on the way home. So you can't do that.

But just figure it out. Suck it up. Figured out. You know, people don't. It's not that hard. I don't think people realize. what this electric car situation is like. And like, you know, there, for certain people in certain circumstances, there's nothing

wrong with an electric car. Elon Musk has built some really nice ones. I mean, you know, they're not necessarily built to the specifications of, of what enthusiasts enjoy. But they are very fast cars. Yeah. Very fast. And they're good looking.

He makes a nice, he makes a nice looking car. The Tesla Plaid is basically the fastest car ever built unless you're spending a million dollars. And it's, you know, it's, you know, zero to six. and you know near two seconds and that's just fun it's but even doing that though is going to just drain your power right fast you're going to have to charge it again i have 300 miles per charge not if you're driving it like you drive a tesla plaid then you've got eight miles you know i mean it's really really uh drains the battery quickly but again like if what you're doing is commuting 10 miles to work and back every day you can probably pull that off now uh i looked at a couple of

electric cars. As you know, my car saga is still ongoing in some ways. And I still don't have the one you ordered. No, the one I order has now been over a year. It was August 20th, 2021. I put the order in. Incredible. And they still, it's still on hold sitting in a lot somewhere in Michigan, without chips, apparently. But it's built. It's built, but not built because it doesn't have the chips it needs to run. It still really doesn't have the chips. I guess that's the reason. That's what they tell me. And this is after I removed features on it to get it built at all. If I didn't remove those features, it would still not even be accepted for order at this point. Wow.

So that's where we are in America. That's Joe Biden's America, everybody. Make sure to remember it in November because this is the world you live in right now. And, you know, so I started looking at some of the ones I looked at were electric cars. And you think to yourself, okay, well, my life pretty much is a life that would generally work with an electric car. I drive from home to work and no longer have the ridiculous community I had in the Northeast It's now 15, 20 minutes

It is door to door It's not too bad I generally speaking drive here Drive home maybe a stop or two on the way home But that's about it on a normal day I don't have take tons and tons of long trips Though I do take them sometimes And I would need to probably wind up renting a car

For all of those and it would be a hassle But theoretically I could do that Or I could sit around on the side of the road and hope a charger happened to work out on my long trip. But like, I don't take enough of them that it would be damaging. And if we did it as a family, my wife has a giant earth-killing SUV that we could drive in that. Wow. Yeah, because I don't- Why does she hate? I think she hates animals and plant life. I think that's her position. She's trying to kill them. She's trying to kill them all with her SUV. So we could- Is she just randomly cut down trees? Oh, yeah. All the time. All the time.

Or she'll poison them. A lot of times she just spikes them. You know, she's poisons. Clubs baby seals. Oh, yeah. That kind of thing. She sees a baby seal. She will club it. She will. Oh, yes. She will club it.

So our family is one that could adapt enough to deal with an electric car. And again, that should not be the thing you do when you purchase an automobile. You shouldn't be like, how do I adapt to make this work for my family? But in theory, I could. So I started looking at some of them just to kind of check them out, as I've done a lot of research on a lot of different cars over a year. And the charging was fascinating. If you bump into a fast charger, and you can actually get one that works, number one, and that is not one of the lower level fast chargers.

You've got to get the high level one. Usually when you have a slew of electric chargers, only one of them will be the right kind for the fast charging. Some of them will be more like your home charger level, which takes a lot longer, as I'll mention here in a moment. But if you go and you go to the fast charger, it might take 20, 30 minutes if you're lucky. Now, that's not bad in comparison to what we're used to with electric cars, but it's really not great. I filled up yesterday in two minutes. I timed it.

I filled up from zero to in two minutes in my car and was able to drive it away without even thinking about it. At most, it might take three or four minutes. Right. It's just an easy, it's just a great process. Yep. Even though I don't like buying gas, the efficiency of that process is really, really great. Not to mention, it gives me an excuse to go inside and buy snacks. The electric car, if you have it at home, the most likely thing you'll do is install

upgraded electricity to the 240 in your garage, if you have one. And if you have the opportunity, to do that, you're probably looking at something like anywhere from $500 to $1,500, depending on your situation, maybe even a little bit more in some areas, where, especially these days, to get this installed in your home. Now you get that and selling your home. So again, you're starting off down $1,000, let's say. Then I will note that this electricity is not free. People think because they're not seeing the credit card numbers,

you know, inserting their card and watching the numbers go up, that it is free. However, it is not. You will be charged for this electricity. If they allow you to use it, as we're seeing in California, if they allow you to use it, you will be charged for this electricity. So there's no magic electricity that flies out your butt into your car and charges it almost instantly? I will say I've never tried to put the charger in my butt, but if it works, it's news to me.

So I don't know. I'm not sure I'd try it. I wouldn't try it. I will not be the one leading that experiment. Just like milk. I wouldn't have been the first one drinking out of a cow's teat. That wouldn't have been me. I mean either.

You know, I wouldn't be number one in that parade, but somebody was. Somebody was number one and good for them, you know, because a lot of delicious products came out of that experiment. And I'm not sure the same would be true with the electric cars. So you put this 240, you know, 240 in your garage and you go through this process. And I thought that would be like, when I was looking into it, I thought that would be like, all right, that's the fast charger, right? You can put it in there, you can get the 20-minute thing.

It's worth having, but maybe I won't even bother with it, right? Like, no, that's the thing that charges it overnight. So if you upgrade the electricity in your garage, you can fill it with an full overnight charge. That's the upgraded electricity. If you plug it into your normal wall socket, three days, three days of charging to get it full. Now, this is one particular car that I looked into. But three days. So basically completely unusable in that format, right?

Completely. Unless you never drive it below, you know, 50% and you're just constantly like filling up and you're only driving at a few miles a day. It might work. Like it might work for, you know, for you. You know, you're a company that, that, you know, you maybe have a, you're going to a company that's a very limited amount of distance. You're always working at the same place. you don't have to drive it around a lot, you don't have to take long trips.

There's a lot of things that you just have to eliminate out of your life. And what they're seeing is, which is really just absolutely adorable, is people buying electric cars to go back and forth to work and then keeping a third car

that they use for longer trips, which, you know, again, if you have the means, go for it. However, it does nothing for the planet. If you've got a third car, you are now... And it's gas power.

Yeah, it's going to be, you know. So there was a, we went over this on Studios America, I think it was last week. And we played clips from this one TED talk from this environmentalist. He's like, yeah, I think I saw this one. The electric cars. Yeah. And he's like, really good. Yeah, it's really good.

Because he's an environmentalist. He, you know, is 100% on board with global warming and all the things. This is the one whose thing was, yeah, but you got to look at the whole production of the car. The whole production of the car. And see how unfriendly it is to the environment. and how the electricity is produced. And you have to make the range equal. If a gas power car has 400 mile range,

you can't compare it to 120-mile electric car. Now, there are some Teslas that are up there now, three and 400 miles. But again, that means you're a lot more when it comes to the production of these cars. You have a Tesla that's got a 400-mile range? I think the long-range one, it's at least been announced.

That's not bad. No, it's not bad. I mean, look, Elon Musk is good at his job. I mean, this is a good, Tesla is a good company. Yeah. Like, I don't, this is the problem is it seems like when you're skeptical of these things, you just don't like electric cars. I don't, I think there's place for electric cars.

We drove a Tesla. And we both loved it. We both loved it. And we both wanted to buy one afterwards. Yeah. And then I just decided, it's not practical. I can't. Yeah, it's too much of a pain.

Yeah. But this is before, the one we drove was before the Model S performance, which preceded the plaid. So we were two generations ago, and it was still breathtakingly fast. I can't. Was fastest I've ever been in. Oh yeah. By far. It's so fast that it's almost, it's almost uncomfortable.

Yeah. Like I bet it would. It's almost too many G forces. You did it too much and like your stomach would be rattled. You wouldn't, you know, but it is that fast. And it's, you know, look, that's great. I like the fact that they're in. And in order to get the next two generations, don't you just download into the Tesla?

I think, I don't think you can. You can't on this. You can improve the car that way over. over-the-air updates and you can add horsepower. Like, they'll give you an opportunity. Hey, you want to buy an extra 50 horsepower? And it's $1,000. Wow.

You can just say yes. Shees. So anyway, it's incredible. I'm not saying the technology isn't amazing. And there's in many ways electric cars will outperform gas-powered cars, especially when it comes to just raw acceleration. There's no way to equal it with a gas-powered car. There's a lot of other things that you don't get out of them as well.

But look, it's just not. feasible. You know, it really is, I think for a lot of people, it's just not feasible. And they're going to make you, they're going to force you into this life. And look what's happening in California, where days after they declared a statewide grid emergency, and they're facing the possibility of rolling blackouts, well, they've had to activate their gas powered emergency generators to take care of it. Yep.

Amazing. And now they are saying, by the way, the nuclear plant, they were so focused on taking offline, they're going to delay that closure for five years because they can't even do it now. They're 5% of their cars are electric and they can't even power them now. What do you think's going to happen when it's 100%? This is going to be a disaster. Catastrophic. The only hope is that they just admit failure.

That's the only hope. The only hope is they go down this road and it's so bad they stop. It's the only hope. They did this, by the way, in the 90s. They tried to force electric cars in and it got so bad that they stopped. So it's possible. But man, they're going down this road really fast. AAA 727 B-E-C-K.

This is the Glenn back program. Pat and Stufer Glenn today. I like this stat too. We're talking about California's energy, well, the climate change nonsense. And California may be the biggest subscriber to the climate change nonsense. Um, ahead of Labor Day weekend, Californians were advised to set their thermostats to 78 degrees or higher. No, thanks.

No. Avoid using large appliances all day, of course, and charging electric vehicles only, uh, in the off periods. Like, you can't do it between 4 and 9 p.m. So what happens if you're, what happens if you're somewhere where you need electricity to get to your next destination between the air hours of 4 and 9 p.m. Well, you're out of luck. Suck it up.

Yeah, suck it up, buttercup. Pretty much. Sit. Incredible. Incredible. It really is. If this had happened in 10 years, it would be embarrassing. The fact that it's happening before they even implemented any of these rules is like how can they, how can the state be taken seriously?

How can Gavin Newsom be considered a presidential candidate? I don't know. It's been a nonstop catastrophe. every minute of his life. And this guy, they're like, what about him? He's alive, which is more than they can say from most of their other candidates. And he's got good hair. So between breathing and having pretty good hair, who else are they going to get?

They got frigging Herman Munster running for Senate in Pennsylvania. I don't know. What else are they going to do? How dare you assail a man's health condition? I think Herman Munster had. great health. He seemed to live for hundreds of years. Didn't he have bolts on his neck, though, or something? He did need a couple bolts on his neck. Okay. Now, that's what you're saying then.

That John Federman has bolts on his neck? I will say Herman Munster much more well-spoken than John Federman. It's not a fair comparison. But, I mean, there's some similarities there. They're both like eight feet tall. And they seem to have the same intellect. although I will say Herman Muster embraced the free market much more than John Federman does, that's for sure. Just embarrassing.

It is an embarrassing freaking time. The Glenn Back Program.