The Glenn Beck Program - Prince Andrew ARRESTED After Epstein Files Release?! | Guests: Buck Sexton & Brendan Carr | 2/19/26

Episode Date: February 19, 2026

Glenn starts the show by discussing the recent arrest of Prince Andrew over suspicions of misconduct in public office after accusations that he shared confidential information with Jeffrey Epstein. Why has nobody been arrested for the crime of harming children? Glenn discusses Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) claiming the GOP will be "massacred" if Texas AG and Senate candidate Ken Paxton (R) beats Cornyn in the Senate primary. Glenn blasts Sen. Cornyn as part of the reason the GOP is currently in disarray. Co-host of "The Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Show" and "Manufacturing Delusion" author Buck Sexton joins to discuss how to stand up against leftist propaganda. New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani (D) released the city's new budget, and it's more than the entire state of Florida. How is that possible? "Birthgap" writer and producer Stephen Shaw joins to discuss the global decline in birth rates and the potential causes. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr joins to discuss the false claim that the FCC was involved in Stephen Colbert's show not airing an interview with Texas state Rep. James Talarico (D). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Don't miss the Devil Wears Prada 2 in theaters. Merrill Street, Anne Hathaway, Emily Blunt, and Stanley Tucci are back. In light of the recent scandal, I'm here to restore your credibility. I did not hire you, and all I need to do is find my time until you fail. On May 1st, I'm going to make something of this job. Rain. Be the bridges I burn. Night my way. Forever.

I just love my job. Get tickets now. The Devil Wears Prada 2 in theaters May 1st, directed by David Frankel. Will you ever get that weird feeling that you're, you're paying for something and somehow you're paying again without knowing it. I mean, you hand your money over every single month to a service that you just handed it over to people who you just assume that it stays in the lane of, you know, providing the service. But more often, the big mobile companies, your bill doesn't just cover talk and text and

data. Part of that money ends up funding causes and organizations that don't line up at all with your values. Well, Patriot Mobile was built as an alternative to that whole model. Same nationwide coverage that you're used to. Competitive pricing. Customer service based right here in the U.S. with a completely different philosophy about what your dollars should support. So go to Patriotmobile.com slash Beck or call 972 Patriot. Use the promo code Beck for a free month of service. It's Patriotemobile.com slash Beck. Call 972 Patriot. Promocode Beck. Make the switch today. Hello America. You know we've been fighting every single day. We push back against the lies, the censorship, the nonsense of the mainstream media that they're trying to feed you. We work tirelessly to bring you the unfiltered truth because you deserve it. But to keep this fight going, we need you. Right now, would you take a moment and rate and review the Glenn Beck podcast? Give us five stars and lead a comment because every single review helps us break through Big Tech's algorithm to reach more Americans who need to hear the truth.

truth. This isn't a podcast. This is a movement, and you're part of it, a big part of it. So if you believe in what we're doing, you want more people to wake up, help us push this podcast to the top. Rate, review, share. Together, we'll make a difference. And thanks for standing with us. Now let's get to work. Hello, America. We got a lot to talk about today. I've got the chairman of the FCC on, who is getting it from all sides. Are we now censoring, or is this what the FCC? should be doing um Brennan Carr is going to be joining me to answer those questions

um we also have Stephen Shaw on the population collapse that is coming apparently everybody is gay now or bisexual or transsexual that's what everybody is yet no youth is having sex now and our population is absolutely collapsing and it's happening all over the world uh why that why that matters I'm a little pissed off

at Hershey for Reese's peanut butter cup. I'm glad to know that I'm not insane. I had one last week for Valentine's Day. And I, you know, you put things in your mouth and you're like, and you almost want to spit it out because you're like that. What is that? That's not what I was expecting. I thought it was just me.

I thought it was just me. Sarah said the same thing. We want to talk about this because Mr. Reese's has come out and he is pissed. He's like, I've had. Reese's peanut butter cups my whole life, obviously, none of this is real. The chocolate isn't real. The peanut butter isn't real. I mean, what is, what is happening? What is, can we just, please, can someone just, just anchor us back to something that we grew up with that hasn't changed anything, please, something can something be real? But I want to start, uh, not with Cornyn,

who is pissing me off and the Republican Party who is pissing me off. I want to start with King Charles' brother, Prince Andrew, the former prince. They arrested him. Apparently, apparently they have arrested him today. Why? It's in connection with Epstein. We're going to get to that here in just a second. First, rapid radios. When you are out hiking with your friends, sometimes you get separated, you know, or so I've heard, I don't actually hike.

You know why? I have good reason. I don't hike. because if God wanted us to hike, he wouldn't have allowed us to invent ATVs. Okay? And then also, just to stop you from hiking, like, oh, it's so healthy. Really? Two words. Mountain lions.

Okay? That's all I need to say. But if you want to get eaten by a mountain lion, hope you have a rapid radio with you. You know, when you mix trails, trees, mountain lions, you know, distance. Hey, let's split up. We'll meet at the car. It's a really bad idea. I'm just saying.

This is why I stay out of the outdoors. Anyway, Rad 1 from Rapid Radio's built for exactly these kinds of situation. You can charge it, turn it on, you're connected, no fiddling with apps, no praying for bars, you know, on your phone, just clear direct communication. Hey, I've just been half eaten by a mountain line. Can somebody come find me? Or I'm running towards the car. I'm not sure where I am.

Can somebody help me? Yeah, Rapid Radio's can. Rapid Radio's.com. Rapid Radio's, the radio built for. real life. Communication redefined only at rapid radios.com. So I'm guessing Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. Oh, God. Even that just sounds so snotty, doesn't it?

I just, I'm glad we don't. I like watching them from afar. I'm glad we don't have any of this crap. Or do we? Or do we? The Windsor family, I mean, really, you should look up, you should look at, you should look up inbreeding and it should have their pictures there. I mean, this is what happens when you're so inbred that you just kind of, you know, you start falling apart and you look insane and you're

probably a little retarded. And then you start thinking, maybe I could get away with having sex with kids. Anyway, he's, you know, still under scrutiny for his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but notice nobody is going to jail for actually having sex with children. Okay. Nobody is is nobody know that that's not the accusation with anybody why why is he why was he arrested he was arrested for wrongdoing well i think having sex with underage kids is wrongdoing but that again is not the wrongdoing he apparently uh was had some sort of misconduct with Jeffrey Epstein on possibly, is it secrets again?

Because that's why the UK ambassador is in trouble because he was releasing secrets to Jeffrey Epstein. And then the prime minister is in trouble because he knew that the U.N., the U.K. ambassador to the United States was still friendly with Ebbstein. and it came up in the security search and he said, ah, just dismiss it. And then he later said, no, I didn't know anything about that he was friends with it.

And now we have the document show he did know. So nobody's going to jail at all for any of this stuff. And there's a new poll out that most Americans say that, in fact, seven out of 10, 69% of Americans, this is really quite large. believe their views were captured very well or extremely well in the statement that the way the files have been handled with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein show that the wealthy and powerful people are rarely held accountable. That's a problem when you have 70% of the population of the United States of America saying if you're powerful or you're wealthy, you get away with anything, including raping children. 17% of the respondents believe the statement aligns with their views somewhat well.

Okay, so you got nobody left. I don't even think in this poll you have anybody going, I don't know. And you can't take a poll about anything with people having an opinion. I don't have an opinion. I don't know. I can't comment on. Nope, everybody is, everybody's cleared. Everybody's clear on this one.

It's not good. 53% of respondents strongly agree that the files have, lowered my trust in political and business leaders, along with 24% who say somewhat agree with it. Republicans, 33% strongly agree, 35% somewhat agree. So you're almost at 70% just with Republicans. 71% Democrats strongly agree. 17% somewhat agree with Democrats. I mean, this is, this again is a little like, hey,

Should we ask for ID before you vote? This is universal. And yet, all that we're seeing is people playing politics with it. That's it. They're just playing politics with it. They're saying one thing, and then they get in and they do it. We're going to do some investigations. And then what happens to those investigations?

I mean, how long do we have to go with these unanswered questions with Jeffrey Epstein? Honestly, UN panel on, Epstein, U.N. panel says that Epstein, his crimes, may constitute crimes against humanity. That's the UN, crimes against humanity. But who is having sex with kids? Who was it? I don't have that answer. Do you have that answer?

Have lots of suspicions, lots of suspects. But nobody's been named as. doing that. Here's a guy who ran in the highest circles of power. The UN now says his crimes are crimes against humanity, a man who trafficked minors, or did he? A man who somebody was operating in plain sight. Everybody seemed to know it.

A man who died in federal custody. Or did he? Was his body taken out? Or was that just a bunch of boxes underneath a sheet? What the hell? at a time when we need trust more than ever this is happening. Well, we're going to get to the bottom of it. Well, really, because what's following is not clarity at all.

Does anybody, I have more questions on this every time I think we're, we're getting going to get the answers. But they release stuff and you're like, wait a minute, well, that just opens up more. It's not clarity. It's fog. And it's happening everywhere. Both sides of the Atlantic. Investigations into child exploitation rings. You hear about that?

The grooming gangs in England? We care so much about our children. Well, you know what? The problem with the Republicans, the problem with the conservatives is they don't care about your children. Okay, here's a group that is their grooming children to rape them.

It's a massive problem. Fierce debates, going on. The grooming gangs are all there. Should we investigate it? I don't know. Let's have Parliament vote on it. And Parliament votes, no. We shouldn't look into this. Wait, what? What? I don't think you care about our children. I'm beginning to think you're not really human. I mean, really? I mean, how much, what happened to your humanity? Do you have any humanity where, you know what? I think we should get down to the child rape stuff. here in the United States, unresolved questions about Epstein's network, missing records,

you know, destroyed, they've destroyed, you know, who knew what, when they knew it, who was involved. And the Republicans and the Democrats, I think, have both done it. And then there's the border. Tens of thousands of migrant children crossed into the United States over the last several years under Biden. Nobody said anything about it. the government reports have acknowledged that many were released to sponsors with no real follow-up, and then they just kind of disappeared. Now, what was happening there?

Okay, this is not partisan rhetoric. This is documented failure. Now we found them, and nobody seems to care that we found, what, 100,000 of these kids? Where were they? What was happening to them? I don't see any follow-up. And the outrage that we all have on any topic lasts about 72 hours. and then we move on. Have you noticed that one?

I don't know what that says about us. Is it say that we're overwhelmed, that there's just a new thing to be outraged on every 72 hours, that we're exhausted, that's all we can do? Does it say that we were fragmented into so many tribes that we're only pursuing accountability when it hurts the other team? Or does it say something even darker that we've become totally accustomed to scandal? or worse, this is the one I really fear. Nothing's real anymore. Child rape's not real anymore. Even our outrage isn't real anymore. Because why do we have to have the media, both new and old, keep fueling our outrage?

If we didn't have social media, Epstein would be gone. It would be over. Because the mainstream media would not be covering it. Okay. So what does that say about us? You know, there was a time in Great Britain, in the West, in the entire West. If there was a whiff of corruption at high levels, national reckoning. I mean, Watergate, for the love of Pete, when's the last time? Clinton, I think, changed all of that. I did not have sex with that woman. Yeah, you did. You did. Well, it depends on what your definition of sex is. And we did. We did. And we did. moved on. And I don't think we've ever recovered from that. Now, as long as you just waded out, it just goes away. But now there's something new. It's not going away. It's becoming worse. It's becoming this, this national poison that is turning into something much bigger than it probably is. I'm not saying that it's not big. It's huge. But because nobody's doing

anything about it, it's only, I mean, you're gonna, I mean, eventually you get to, you know why? Because they're actually lizard people that come from space and they're eating our children after raping them. That's what it'll turn into eventually because it just gets worse and worse and worse. And if nobody addresses it, people just go off the deep end. And nothing changes. If powerful people abused children, aren't we all kind of live in a place where like, yeah, they should face justice. I don't care if it's a Republican. I don't care if it's a Democrat. I don't care if it's an independent. I don't care your title, your party, your passport. I don't care. You're raping kids. You go to jail. And part of me kind of hopes that the institution, you know, that you're sitting in,

they still hate pedophiles as much as they always did. You know what I'm saying? If any institution covered them, why aren't we exposing that? And not selectively, not strategically, completely. Is there no one that is really fighting for this? Because I don't see them, at least high up. And the other problem is, what are you fighting for? Because I, as I've said, for two years now, I don't believe any of this stuff actually exist anymore. The Democrats had it. The Republicans had it. the Republicans, the Democrats, didn't use anything against Donald Trump when it was in their possession. And they'd use anything. They make stuff up about Donald Trump. If they actually had stuff on him with Jeffrey Epstein, you don't think they would have used it. So they don't have it. Now that the Republicans have it, now they can just fuel Trump rumors. You know what? He's in the Epstein files. It appears that what's in the Epstein files, it appears as though he was one of the only guys that was standing up.

against him that were in those circles. So they had it. They didn't use it. Now, when they had it, they probably cleaned their own closet out. And then the Republicans got it. And there's been enough time for the Republicans to have it that they clean their own closet out. So I don't know what you're going to get out of this. Because accountability has to be rooted in evidence, not headlines. But when the public believes that elites operate under different rules, when governments fail to explain themselves clearly, when investigations just disappear into bureaucratic silence, trust implodes. And when trust collapses society's fracture, you cannot build a free republic on suspicion. You can't. And you can't preserve it if the powerful are shielded from the consequences. The issue is not gossip. It's not tabloid thrills. The issue is this. Do we still believe that justice applies upward or only downward? If children were harmed anywhere, that demands relentless, transparent investigation. It demands consequences. If governments lied, consequences, exposure. If claims are unverified, you have to say that too. Because abandoning the truth in pursuit of justice, only,

only destroys both of them. And this moment matters. Because a society that stops demanding accountability decays. A society that stops caring about vulnerable children, whether trafficked broad or lost in bureaucratic systems at home, it's lost its moral compass. The question is not whether one country is worse than another one party is where. The question is, do we still have the courage to demand the truth even when it implicates our side?

Justice without favoritism. without hysteria, protection of children without politics. If we can't manage that, then the scandal is not under one name Epstein anymore. The scandal is us. More in a minute. Legend has it. Chuck Norris once fell pain. Yeah.

Pain cried uncle. And that's the way it is. I can't confirm that story for sure, but I can confirm that most of us are not Chuck Norris. Most of us shift in our chairs and avoid. certain movements, but the truth is, you don't have to be a martial arts legend and bonafide TV superstar from the 90s to decide you're tired of living that way. Relief factor was developed by actual doctors to support your body's natural response to inflammation. It's not about,

you know, toughing it out or pretending it doesn't hurt. It's about giving your body what it needs so it can move forward comfortably and get back to living your life. Over a million people have tried it. Three quarters of them have gone on to take it every single month. Order it time and time again. I'm one of them because I'm not going to have the pain win in my life. If you're waiting and you're dealing with daily pain, stop waiting. Launch the three-week quick start. See what Relief Factor can do for you. 1-800-4 relief, 1-800-4 relief or go to Relieffactor.com.

How will it feel to be out of pain? Relieffactor.com. 10-second station ID. We're looking for three singers to perform live at Ellis Island on May 2nd. Download the songs and submit your audition at glenbeck.com. So did you see there's a story in the blaze today. Boy Meets World and Mrs. Doubtfire actor Matthew Lawrence has some knowledge to drop Hollywood's superficial obsession with inclusion and compassion masks, one of the most ruthless businesses in the world, especially if you're a child star.

He's saying they'll eat their own. And we all know this. This is another one of these scandals. why does no one seem to care about what's happening in Hollywood? What's happening to these child stars? How they are, I mean, everything that you hear from child stars is, yeah, I was raped, I was used, I was sexually abused, I was drugged. I mean, again, why do we care? Why do we not care? Why does it seem that the rules apply to us and not to the elites?

That's got to stop. It's got to stop, or you will not have a civilization anymore. All right. I want to turn to Congress and the Republicans next. All right. So how was your sleep last night? I actually slept well last night. if you have a problem with sleep, you know, what you need is Z Factor.

Z Factor. Z Factor is a sleep supplement from the makers of Relief Factor. I just told you about them. Designed to support a healthy sleep cycle so your body can actually wind down and rest. Even if your brain just spent, you know, three hours thinking about geopolitics. I was with Peter Swizer last night at a speech and he, he's talking about, you know, what's really going on with immigration. I'm like, oh, geez, man, I'm not going to sleep.

Well, I take Z Factor. I had a good night's sleep. Right now you can save 46% off your first order at 1995 for a 30-day supply call 800 for relief, 800, the number four relief, or visit Relieffactor.com. Start the new year with Z Factor, get the sleep you need. Relieffactor.com. Relieffactor.com, 1,800, 4 relief. Glenn has a secret, and he'll reveal it soon to Torch Insiders during the Torch Insider Show.

Our founding member offer and the perks for it in next week. Get in now at glenbeck.com slash Torch. I'm just looking at the latest polls here on voting, and it is, it is absolutely insane. It is insane. Let's see, nearly six in ten Americans, 59 percent, disagree with President Trump, that Republicans should take over the voting in 15 states in order to nationalize the 26 midterm elections. 19% say they would favor the idea.

I'm with the 6 and 10. I don't think we should do that. I don't want to nationalize it. That's only going to lead to trouble. And that is not what the Constitution says. It's got to be run by the state. The federal government needs to oversee it. That's also in the Constitution.

But I don't like nationalizing elections. asked who is more likely to rig November's midterm elections. How do you think that goes? 44% say the Republicans. 33% say the Democrats. 11 point margin. Wait, it gets worse. Far more Americans disagree 50% than agree 34% with a statement.

Democrats bring undocumented immigrants to our country to vote. and help them vote illegally. Republicans agree 73% rather than disagree 11%. Americans are more divided over the question whether fraudulent voting by undocumented immigrants is rare and it does not influence the outcome of elections. 42% agree. 36% say it is common and it does influence the outcome of elections. And then they split right down the middle when asked the same question,

about fraudulent voting, mail-in voting, okay, 40% to 40%. Far more Americans say they would favor 62% than oppose, 23%, requiring proof of citizenship. The number is 62 now. Usually in the form of a passport or a birth certificate in order to register to vote. Nearly all Republicans, 89% favor the idea. Democrats are divided. 39% now in favor, 45% opposed. that is completely different than what we have been seeing.

Making it harder to vote by mail, 46% opposed, 38% favor. Making it harder to vote early in person, 57% opposed, 21% favor. Banning or cutting back on mail-in ballot drop boxes, 42% oppose, shortening the early or absentee voting period, 41% opposed. I don't believe this. I just don't believe this. I find this really hard to believe. But if those numbers are true, I mean,

you're going to see, you're going to see this is what they're going to go after. If they try to, you know, drag this, you know, vote out, this is what they're going to go after.

They're going to go after, you know, the Republicans are rigging it, blah, blah, blah, blah. So far, that's not working. If this is true, maybe it is working, but I don't, this just doesn't feel right to me.

Because it's too much of a swing. But cuddly knows America changes on a dime. Now, John Cornyn is warning that there is going to be a GOP massacre. John Cornyn, of all people. A GOP massacre if Texas votes for Ken Paxton as the AG. He wins the primary. He says it's going to be a massacre. Okay, I'm not listening to you, John Cornyn,

I'm not listening to you. You are the reason the GOP is going to be massacred all over the country. Not Ken Paxton. Now, that's a separate issue. Maybe, maybe not. But I'm not listening to John Cornyn. Tell me anything about what the Republicans can do. Because it's people like John Cornyn that has gotten the Republican Party where it is.

Remember, Donald Trump is not a Republican. He's not a Republican. He is a guy who's turning the tables over. He's not going with Republican policies. He's spent the last 10 years trying to get enough momentum so he can actually change. Republican policies are, let's go to war. Let's spend even more money. I mean, it's all progressive.

It's all progressive. And John Cornyn is one of the main leaders of that. so please give it a rest you know Republicans this time around if they don't stand for the things that they've told us they were going to do and I'm telling you the Save Act is one of them it's critical look at what you've already done look at how you've handled the Epstein thing you think that helped you you're you're not only risking the midterms you're risking the uh the party. If you keep pretending that procedure is principal, you're going to help lose the republic. And this time, if you fail this time, you're not going to be just blamed by the left.

You're going to be blamed by your own voters. It's going to happen, John. Your own voters, they've had enough. You will be blamed by your own voters and you'll deserve it. Look at what the difference between John Cornyn. How long has he been in office and what has he accomplished. Look at the difference. President Trump comes into office. He moved like a man who understood the clock was ticking. Executive orders. Why? Because he couldn't get Congress to move. Regulatory rollbacks. He moved faster than any other president in U.S. history. He has a clear vision. He is literally reshaping the entire world, trying to get rid of the people who are trying to forced the U.S. taxpayer and citizen to live under their unelected officials and rules.

He's changing all that. He's done all the heavy lifting. He's taken all of the arrows. He's forced the fight. And what is it John Cornyn you and the Republicans have done? You passed one big, beautiful bill that he practically had to jam down your throats. And you want to run on that? that's not leadership. That's hiding behind a man doing your job for you. So let me talk about the excuse of the hour. If I read one more time from a conservative, you can't touch the filibuster.

Demanding a talking filibuster is dangerous. You're changing the rules. I'm going to lose my mind. Do you ever read? Do you even know what history is? Enforcing a talking filibuster does not eliminate the filibuster. It actually restores. the filibuster. The modern filibuster is the silent one. It's a 20th century convenience.

Clocher, a word nobody knows about that was added in 1917. G, who was the president in 1917? Cloture gives you the 60-vote threshold and they weaponized it in the late 20th century. What we have now is not tradition, it's drift. And that drift was, that ball was starting to rift. From whom? Woodrow Wilson. From 1806 forward, if you wanted to block a bill, you had to stand up on your feet and you talked. You held the floor. You sweated. You read from cookbooks if you had to. You physically sustained opposition. That's not nuking the filibuster. That's requiring it. That's requiring courage. It's requiring that the Democratic, or whoever uses it, the senators who literally can barely stand have to stand.

You can't sit while delivering a filibuster. How many of the 90-year-olds can stand that long? And here's the real problem with the Republicans, and I'm going to say it. The reason why the Republicans are trying not to do it is because it's going to require them to show up in the middle of the night. It's going to require them to do hard things. And they don't want to do that. They just want to go home.

historically the talking filibuster was used to delay banking legislation in the 19th century. It was used during World War I. It was infamously used by the Southern Democrats to try to stop civil rights legislation, and they did in the 50s and early 60s. Strom Thurman had his 24-hour speech against the Civil Rights Act in 1957. Notice something? Notice anything? They're all standing. when somebody believed that something mattered, whether they were right or wrong, they had to stand there and they had to pay the price.

Today, a senator just sends a little email to leadership. I object. And then suddenly it's 60 votes to get this thing on the floor to vote. That's not constitutional reverence. That's laziness. The Save America Act has passed the House multiple times. It's overwhelmingly popular with the U.S. population. Voter ID pulls through the roof, including among Democrats. And yet the Senate Republicans whisper, yeah, but we don't have 60. You don't need 60. Make them stand up and talk. Make them hold the floor. Make them defend opposing voter ID in front of the American people for days, weeks, months. I don't care how long it takes. That's not destroying Senate norms. Republicans, conservatives, pundits. You're not this stupid. Are you? This is not destroying the filibuster. If they wanted to destroy the filibuster, I'd be with you. But I did my homework because I thought originally, wait a minute,

we're changing the filibuster. I don't want to change this filibuster. I want the filibuster go back away it was with, you know, Jimmy Stewart and Mr. Smith goes to why. That's what this is. That's what this is. And either you don't understand Senate history, which is unacceptable, or you do understand it and you're choosing comfort over confrontation. Both are failures. Meanwhile, what do the voters who want to vote Republicans see? Republicans joining Democrats on bloated appropriations. Millions for gender transition clinics while you're telling us you're against it. Billions for refugee resettlement, a refusal to strip pork, votes to protect activist judicial judges, votes to protect agencies that Americans now see as ideological enforcement arms. And then, of course, we get the

speeches on fiscal discipline. You think the voters are stupid. They're not stupid, and they're growing pissed. They see the stall tactics. They know what it is. They see the spending. They know what it is. They see members who are more afraid of a nasty op-ed in the stupid Washington Post than a primary challenger back at home. And here's the fatal miscalculation, John Cornyn, and all you like him. Republican voters are done being managed. They're done being told to wait. They're done being told, well, now is not the time. When is the time? We're done watching the left use power ruthlessly, while we don't even want to use anything that's legal.

If Republicans lose the majority, you are going to be blamed by the left for extremism. If you lose your base, you're going to be blamed by constitutional conservatives for cowardice. Go ahead, cowards. When you're blamed by both the left and the right, history tends to be a little unkind to you. This is bigger than one bill.

This is truly about whether the Republican Party still believes it's an instrument of constitutional government or just a speed bump in front of progressive expansion. Trump has done all of your heavy lifting. He's taken the hits. He's reset the board. Now the question for you is simple. What did you do other than protect procedure, other than protect. procedure other than protect comfort, other than protect incumbency. It's not too late, but I'm telling you the clock is ticking. There's time before November,

reconciliation exists, talking filibusters can be enforced, spending can still be cut, the Save Act can be forced to the floor, and you can win, but that requires energy, backbone. It requires senators who are willing to sweat on the floor instead of sweat in the green room explaining why nothing can be done. Because here's the reality. If you as a Republican, if you keep running out the clock, you're not going to just lose the chamber. You're going to lose your primaries.

You're going to fracture your party. And in the vacuum created by inaction, something far worse always grows. History teaches us when institutions refuse to act while the public loses faith, republics don't stabilize, they destabilize. And this time, if it collapses, is nobody's going to believe it was an accident.

They will say to you, you had the House, you had the Senate, you had the presidency, you had the mandate, and you chose alibis over action. Finish the damn job, or I warn you, history will finish it for you. Done in a minute. All right, let me tell you about our sponsor this half hour. It's life lock. You know, unless you're planning on moving to the moon, anytime soon and even then I'm not sure it would help but it's a pretty safe bet that cybercriminals

are out there and they have far more access to your data than you'd like to think about pieces of your life are floating around in databases that you've never even heard of and the scary part is a lot of data breaches don't happen because you did something wrong they happen because some company you once gave your information to got hacked you can't control every system you can't monitor every database but that's where LifeLock comes in. They monitor millions of data points every second for threats to your identity and alerts you to suspicious activity that you might never see on your own until it's too late, like loans taken out in your names or crimes committed by somebody pretending to be you.

And if you do become a victim, a U.S.-based restoration specialist will work to fix it. Guaranteed. Protect yourself with LifeLock. Join now, save up to 40% off your first year with the promo code Beck, 1-800, LifeLock, 1-800,500 LifeLock.com. Use the promo code back. 40% off now. Terms do apply.

LifeLock.com promo code back. Once you recognize a sci-op or psychological operation. Everything changes. Stay informed, citizens. At glenbeck.com. A lot of people try to power through stress, like it's just, you know, part of the deal. The problem is when your body stays stuck in that keyed up mode, Everything from focus to mood starts to feel harder than it should, and that's where CBD from CB Distillery fits into real life.

People use it as a way to help their system settle down a little bit instead of staying stuck in a go mode all day long. In fact, the majority of CBD users say they feel more relaxed when using CBD, which makes a real difference when you're trying to stay steady and not wired all the time. CB distillery also makes it easy to choose products based on what is actually going on, like what you want support with, whether it's stress or mood or sleep or post-workout recovery. Their lineup is clearly labeled and built around practical uses, which is not like, you know, the typical hype stuff that you get with some of these products. Quality is a big part of why people trust them. And every day, CB distillery is putting out third-party tested products without artificial dyes,

without artificial fillers, and it's backed by a company that has already served more than two million customers. They also stand behind their products with a 100% money-back guarantee, which tells you they expect people to notice the difference. So if you're ready to start sleeping better and stressing less, and just feeling good again, go to CB Distillery at cbdistillery.com. Code is blaze for 25% off. CBdistillery.com. The code is blaze. From the founding to today's front page, learn the past and decode the present by joining the Torch community at glenbeck.com slash torch. I have to tell you, this community that we're building at Torch is so helpful to me. I am learning so much.

You know, I don't get anything from reading X or anything else, you know, reading comments because I don't know who those people are. But being able to read every day and hear the comments during the show helps me so much. we have a we have a something i'm going to announce here in about five or six minutes but i've never heard a national radio program or podcast ever do ever i think it's never been done before uh insiders you're going to hear about it here in about six minutes you're not an insider join us glenbeck dot com slash torch blenbeck dot com slash torch join a join the movement join the community do it today here's something uncomfortable you don't always realize that you're missing things. You just notice you're working a little harder. You lean in a little bit

more during conversations or you ask people, can you say that again? You've then pretend you caught it the second time even though you didn't. By the end of a long dinner or family gathering, you're worn out, not from talking, but from straining just to keep up. This is what gradual hearing loss feels like for a lot of people. You're still present, you're still engaged, but everything takes more effort than it used to. What holds people back from doing something about it isn't just pride. It honestly the hassle, the appointments, the tests, the follow-ups, the price tags that make hearing feel like a major medical product. Audion Hearing is trying to make that first step a lot simpler. Their Adam series over-the-counter hearing aids are designed to be approachable,

easy to use without prescriptions, no complication, no fittings. You just get started. You put them in, charge them, and then you're hearing better than you have in a long time and you hear what you've been missing. Don't wait. Go to Audionhearing.com. So there's been a lot of people who have written books about indoctrination and how it happens. But a guy who really knows where to look and knows the history of the CIA and other countries and their spy operations is Buck Sexton.

Buck is a former CIA operative who then strangely wanted to go into banking and I convinced him, no, no, no, you should do radio. You should come over to the blaze and he did. and now he is on the Premier Radio Network and killing it every day, replacing the Rush Limbaugh program. But no hard feelings there.

Buck, none at all. Anyway, so he's written a book called Manufacturing Delusion. Manufacturing Delusion is a book that will explain historically. How did these dictators do this? and then he's going to tie it together on what did they do that we're now doing in our own classrooms, in media, what's happening, and how do we break it?

Buck Sexton joins me in just about 60 seconds. First, Rough Greens. Imagine if he ate one heavily processed meal every single day for 10 years. How do you think you'd feel? I mean, I had a McDonald's hamburger the other day. I'm not even sure that was meat. I'm not sure anymore.

you'd probably feel a little crappy. You'd move slower. Digestion wouldn't probably be great. Your skin wouldn't look the best. You'd probably notice something wasn't quite right. Now think about your dog. Your dog will eat the same dry, highly processed kibble day after day, year after year, and it might keep them full, but that doesn't mean it's giving them what their body needs to thrive.

And that's where Rough Greens comes in. It's not a new food. It's a daily nutritional supplement that you put right on top of the dog food that you're already feeding your dogs. they love it I mean, Uno used to run to the bowl to eat and he ate. We used to have to hand feed him. It was like feeding a baby. Open up here comes the airplane.

It was crazy until we started putting Rough Greens on his food and then he loved it and he changed. More energy. You felt better. You could just tell. You cover shipping and you get a free Jumpstart trial bag.

Use the discount code Beck to claim your free Jumpstart trial bag at Roughgreens.com. RUFFF Greens.com. Use the promo code Beck. Buck my man. you. Glenn, I'm great.

Thank you so much for having me on. And thank you for convincing me 15 years ago not to go to an Ivy League business school and to come work for you instead at your company. It all worked out, Glenn. It all worked out. I mean, imagine how different you would be if you had gone to that Ivy League education. Maybe it would have been different for you because, I mean, you talk about it in manufacturing delusion.

You know the tricks of Indeastern. So maybe it would have been different from you. Yeah, I would hope that I could have continued to stay sane. I mean, look, the basis of this book, the basic idea, it comes out of the madness of COVID, but it's not a COVID book. It's okay, everybody, we know we read about these other places. We're familiar with mind control in the Soviet Union, with the culture revolution in Maoist, China, and how insane that got, with the reality of North Korea.

today. We know that that all exists and that all has happened. But how is it that in this country, we basically, collectively, not all of us, but as a country, went insane during COVID. And I was like, well, if it's possible on that, you know, it's possible on other things, too. And there's actually smaller bouts of politicized insanity, BLM, climate change, the gender madness. I mean, I have a whole chapter, Glenn, and you would love this, by the, legitimately, I'm sure people says, Glenn, you will actually love this book. I go back into the writings of a World War II Dutch psychiatrist named Dr. Juist

Mirlu, and he coined the term Mentoside. He wrote a book called Rape of the Mind. He sat down with Nazis, Nazi prisoners of war to say, how did you do this, basically? How did you make a whole country go insane? And he approached this as a psychiatrist, as a practitioner, and came up with this framework.

Well, the framework, Glenn, is applicable to some of the brainwashing, some of the things we see going on here in America today. And so that's why the book, it's history, but it's a history that informs what's happening right now. And the gender madness we're seeing is a huge part of chapter two. So, Buck, I just want you to know, you had me at former German scientist. I just, you had me there.

So where are we seeing this really, because I think it were, it's, we're being hit by education, we're being hit by jihadis, we're being hit by Marxists. Are they all using the same tactics? Yes, there is a similarity. Now, the reason I broke it down

into the chapters, the chapters are essentially all variations on the theme of what we call brainwashing. That's the most general term. Practitioners, Glenn, psychiatrist, control or coercive mind control.

And that will include things like cult indoctrination. In the book I get into under the identity construction chapter, I'll get into jihadis, I get into some of the cult stuff, Omshin Riccio, and that's stuff that people should be very aware of as well because it's effectively a totalitarian state without the state. It's the full control of individuals that is achieved through this mind control process without having a massive secret police. It's one thing for the Soviet Union to do it.

It's another thing for Maoist China to do it, but to operate on an individual or a much smaller basis, that's obviously what you see going on in cults. But I break this down to do conditioning, and I start with Pavlov. Fascinating stuff about Ivan Pavlov, Nobel laureate, and really the beginning of our scientific conception

of understanding that what your brain is taking in affects your body directly, right? And there's this, you get into the sort of the reflex and the conditional reflex, which is initially what it was called. We call it, you know, conditioning now. It's a whole series of behavioralism training, but conditional reflex.

But here's what Pavlov learned. That was really interesting, Glenn. There was a, it was at the time, it was Leningrad, St. Petersburg. They've changed name a bunch of times. But there was a flood at his lab. And the dogs in the lab almost drowned. And it was one of these things

where the water was rising. the water's rising these dogs. And I'm a huge dog person. So I get like upset just thinking about this. But the dogs were, were freaking out and freaking out. The lab technician, not Pavlov, got there, freed the dogs last minute. And they had not only a complete erasure of the conditioning that they had had because of this trauma, they also had extreme behavioral changes apart from that, meaning some that were docile became aggressive, some that were aggressive became docile. So this set this light off. And you know who thought it was really interesting? That there was this new series of behavioralism training going on?

Lenin himself. Lenin. Yeah, Stalin, the Soviets. And they started paying very close attention to this. And they came up with Glenn some step by step and some here's how you do it. And that's a lot of the meat of the book is looking into those practices, you know, isolation, keeping people confused, keeping people atomized in society. There's all these different things.

you know i've heard from because i've changed my approach to the show um recently you know in the last it's been happening over the last three four five months um and i'm trying just to explain things more than anything else just try to help clarify things so people can understand it less opinion maybe and more just here's what's actually happening and how it works um and and my gut has told me that is so important because the world doesn't need more opinions and it doesn't need more electric shocks to it. The only way out is through reason. Am I accurate on that at all? Do you see any evidence? I mean, how do you get out of this? This is where I go, this is where the book sort of finishes in the last chapter and the final arguments are people need to understand

that the advice, the call to arms, if you will, from Solzhenitsyn, the great Soviet dissident of Live Not by Lies, you have, people ask me, how do we avoid this stuff? Because this lays out the different tactics. It lays out confusion and degradation as the twin pillars of menticide, for example. It lays out, wait, wait, atomization. Wait, just, wait, explain each of those as you go through them real quickly. Just explain them. So in the menticidal process, in order to unmoor you from your ethics, your sense of self, your sense of reality around you, they want to keep you confused. Now, they can lock you in a cell, cut you off from all daylight and, you know, blast music in. There's things that they can physically do, but also there are ways that you can just try to

keep people confused through propaganda, confused through messaging. So they don't have the basic moral understanding. And degradation is really a degradation of your ability to understand the most fundamental truth. And this is why I get into the transgender madness that sees this country, because Glenn, under a menticidal framework, if you are willing to affirm the most obvious madness, which is that a man can become a woman and that there's no biological advantage of these sorts of things, you are not just conceding on that issue. You are degrading your own brain's ability to make the most basic distinctions and undermining the confidence that you have in your perception of reality. This is a key step in Mirleu's menticide. This is a key step and how,

and this is why it can be done with extreme force, but it can also be done with extreme messaging all throughout the society around us. And so that's what we get into. But it was, and I, some of, some of that is through extreme force, because if you didn't, if you didn't go along with it, you were ostracized. Of course. Yeah, it's just a difference of what the punishments are. I mean, one of them, there's a whole, there's a whole chapter, Glenn, where I get into what really happened in China and the incredible, now the Chinese, the Maoists,

borrowed from the Stalinists, who of course were like, hey, we had this new Soviet man that we're going to build. This guy, Pavlov, you know, Pavlov, by the way, actually hated the Soviets, the whole other thing. But this guy, Pavlov, we can build on his scientific knowledge and we can, just basically turn people into robots. Not really that easy, right? That's one of the good news parts of this is that every human being, you could say because

of our underlying makeup, you could say because of our soul, you can't just flip a switch and get the same outcome. It's not actually a machine, but there is a process here. And what they would do in Mao's China, and there was a psychologist Robert Lifton who traveled there right at the early phase of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. And he said one of the things that they would come up with is people would have to, they would force confessions, Glenn. This also goes to degradation. Forced confessions. No, and the people would write things that were crazy. And the point was they had them go through it over and over and over again.

And they would tell them, your confession is not sincere enough. So they would know that they're lying. Everyone knows that they're lying. They're confessing to crazy crimes, you know, treason that they never could have done. It'd be like me sitting here writing that I assassinated Abraham Lincoln. They're like, well, that is not a sincere enough confession. Try again. Try again. This is how they break people down. Glenn, this is to your point when you don't use the preferred pronouns. Maybe you get fired. You say man up. Maybe you get an excuse from the corporate meeting. Like these, these are threads. These are trends in mind control that have seized this country. In Pavlovian conditioning, wear a mask, even when everyone knows you're outside. I mean, all these things that we

did, these physical manifestations of obedience are meant to train our minds into a way that we can be molded and weaponized for politics. And to what you're saying about all the messages everywhere and why it's so important not to live to live not by lies now, because of technology and AI, I'm sure you come across this too. Sometimes even among my own staff

on the show, we'll say, oh, guys, is this AI? Is this real? And we do this for a living. Trying to figure out what's real, what's not. I know. This is only going to increase. And once you add neural implants, which are just over the horizon into the game, mechanistic mind control.

I mean, really controlling the synapses becomes more of a scientific reality. So the ultimate control is control over your mind and in manufacturing delusion. You will understand how the bad guys do this and how you avoid this. Glenn, it took me 18 months to write. It took the CIA six months to clear.

So this is a true labor of love. And I really think that everybody, it's meant to be read, and it can even be read chapter by chapter. You have to read the whole thing at once, although I think some people get through it quickly. It is readable more than one. It is readable as a reference. And I throw some cool CIA stories in there that I've never told before because the time has elapsed and I can talk about it now.

So there you go. Can I hold you over for a break real quick, one minute? Of course. I love it. Absolutely. Okay. Yeah. All right.

More of a Bucksxton here. I want to get into the solution here. But first, let me tell you about the burner launcher. Let me paint a picture for you. It's Saturday afternoon, youth soccer game, dozens of parents lined up along the sidelines. You know, they got chairs and coffee cups and, you know, everybody's trying to pretend there. they're not more competitive than their kids. Everything is normal, right?

Until two dads, two dads decide, you know, it is. In fact, the World Cup. And voices rise and shoulders square and one of them takes a step forward, a little too aggressive. And now you got a crowd, you got kids watching, situation escalating faster than it should. Here's a thing. Moments like this can get out of hand and go from that to life and death at a drop of a hat.

It starts out sometimes as ego as heat and somebody who doesn't know how to back down. and that is the situation to where, you know, you do not want to get involved, but if it starts to really get out of hand, you have a burner launcher, chemical irritant projectiles that will stop the threat coming at you and create distance without using any kind of deadly force. It's legal in all 50 states, doesn't require a permit. Right now, Berna is offering 10% off sitewide in honor of president's day. Just go to Burnab, B-R-N-A.com slash Glenn.

Learn more about it. Try before you buy it, a sportsman's wear. house located near you. It's Burnup, B-Y-R-N-A-com slash Glenn. 10 seconds, station ID. From the Pilgrims to the Bill of Rights, the American Story, the Beginnings, is an immersive audio series on the founding of America, exclusively for torch members at glenbeck.com. So, Buck, I want to first teach you how to sell a book. Whenever you're doing an interview, you should say in like every other sentence, as I say in manufacturing, delusion. As I talk about in my book, Manufacturing Delusion, make sure you just keep hammering

the name of your book. Oh, sure. I will. But here is the, here's, you were just talking about with AI. You know, I've been thinking about this. Gutenberg, he, when the press was done, he made, he gave ownership to the truth. People could own the truth because really only the very, very few had the truth because it was written down. But then this started to spread the ownership of the truth. And then radio comes in and we start to hear the truth and we relate to it differently because we've heard it firsthand. Then television and now we see and hear it. So we relate to it again differently. The internet comes in and it starts to destroy credibility. Now AI, AI, I believe, is going to make the truth irrelevant if we're not careful.

Because why tell one big lie when instead you can tell a hundred million little lies, each one built for that individual that will take them way off track? I mean, truth is something that is becoming very slippery, very slippery. Well, it's absolutely the case that we're entering a realm now where, first of all, you have people that are claiming to have an absolute control over the truth as part of living in a free society, which is, of course, contradictory. But we just went through this with the disinformation czar. I was calling her Marxist Mary Poppins. Remember her under the Biden administration? this notion that we are going to be able to have government bodies and bureaus that are the gatekeepers of conversation and what is allowed to be said and what's going on.

That we're already there. And you see this in other places. And one of the reasons I talk about North Korea a bit in the book is just so people understand. In what book was that? In another one. What book is that? I'm sorry. Thank you, Glenn.

Manufacturing Delusion, which is a fantastic book, which you should. all yet right now. I am behind on the list right now, Glenn. As I say in my book, as I wrote in my book, Manufacturing Delusion, that's all you have to add. Anyway, so go ahead.

As you're writing your book, manufacturing delusion, what? I need the massive audience of Glenn back to help me because I'm stuck behind a woman named Bunny X-O on the list right now. I'm sure she's lovely, but I want to get ahead of Bunny X-O. I think it's jelly roll.

wife. So her memoir is rocketing up the charts. Anyway, I was like, Bunny X, oh, wow. Point being, look, the reality here of the technology that we're facing and what this is going to do to people's perception, we are running

an experiment right now that has never been run before with humanity where we are subject to, and that's why it's brainwashing, indoctrination, and propaganda, right? Propaganda is the stuff that's just, it's everywhere, it's anywhere, it's anytime, all time, all the time. And we carry around, you know, you're obviously Glenn, a radio guy for,

for many, for decades now. We carry around these multimedia propaganda devices with us 24-7 and are subjecting herself. So in manufacturing delusion, I get to how you need to view, first of all, propaganda didn't even start out as a bad thing per se. It actually comes from the Catholic Church, which I think is particularly interesting. It was for the propagation. of the faith. There was a Latin term, and that's where we got propaganda from. It was the true faith was being spread by the Catholic

Church. That was the origins of the term. And then in the 20th century with the rise of mass media, most notably radio, but also, I mean, in Stalinist Russia, the Soviet Union, there was a massive effort of using posters and cartoons and things like that. Now we're at a place where they can make a video

of some figure that you think is on your side, who's saying something you hate, We have to be more attuned to the truth. And in manufacturing delusion, Glenn, that is the mission. And that's why I need everybody to go get the book. All right. Thank you so much. I learned.

See, you know, he's been teaching me for 15 years. You know, it's good. It's good. It's good. Buck Sexton, get the book. Manufacturing Delusion. I will be ordering it when we go into the break. Manufacturing Delusion.

Get it now. Buck, always great to have it. Thank you. All right, let me tell you about Preborn. Preborn helps save 80,000 lives last year alone. 80,000. That's not a talking point. That's not a theory.

80,000 babies who are alive today because a mom in a moment of fear and uncertainty was given a chance to see and hear the life she was carrying. I like to double that number because I think it saved not only the life of the baby, 80,000, but also 80,000 moms who are not walking around with that kind of weight. on them and that kind of regret, you know, preborn's not trying to make a statement here other than it's a baby, it's a baby. And when moms see that baby and they see that ultrasound and they hear that heartbeat, it changes the conversation, changes the atmosphere and it turns the abstract decision into a human reality.

Preborn connects women with local clinics that provide free ultrasounds and compassionate care so they can slow down, breathe, and make an informed choice. 80,000 children in one year. That's what happens if you get involved. Please give. Dial pound 250. Say the keyword baby. Keyword baby pound 250 or go to preborn.com slash Beck.

One week left to join the Torch insider community for our special inflation proof membership for life. Join today at glenbeck.com slash torch. Don't wait. Welcome to the Glenn Beck program. Thank you so much for listening. Let me go to Tracy. Hello, Tracy. Welcome to the Glenn Beck program. Hello, Glenn, Jason, and fellow insiders.

How are you, buddy? I'm good. I just, I had a question or get your opinion on something. Republicans set on all these committees that are led by Democrats. I guess that's how it works. Do they fear retaliation and losing certain perks if they've voiced their opinions? Yes. And is that why they stay quiet? Yes. Yes. They, they, you know, you always, you will always sell your soul. You'll know when you're talking to somebody who has sold their soul. And they've done it honestly. They think they're doing the right thing, but they've ended up selling their soul. They will say, I had to make this compromise because I wanted to get onto this committee because it's so important that I'm on this committee. When you hear that, they'll mean it honestly, but you can look them in the eye and say, dude, you sold your soul. Once you take that first step and compromise like that,

it's just now it's just, now it's just going to keep going downhill because now what will you do to stay on that committee? And, you know, the other, the other big thing you'll hear from representatives and senators is, I got to stay here because if I'm gone, who's going to, wait a minute, you? I mean, you're the one.

I can't tell you. many times Mike Lee has called me and went, I'm going, I'm leaving. I can't do it anymore. And I'm like, Mike, you got to stay. You got to stay. I mean, there are those senators and congressmen that I do know that just do not want to be there. Because they at times feel like it's a huge waste of time. And they're the ones usually that will stand up against all odds, all odds. Thank you for being a Torch Insider, by the way, Tracy.

Let me go to Scotty in Kansas, who I think, also is a Torch Insider. Hello, Scotty. Hi. I am Colin. I just wanted to give a big thank you to you, Glenn, and all of our our Torch family. It's been a roller coaster recently and I have found so much strength from you. My wife and I are about to celebrate our 10-year anniversary. And we now have three children. Our twins were born just back in November and has been so great to hear from you and to just be uplifted every day, to feel empowered, to know what might be coming down the line and to be able to prepare. But I just wanted to share some good news. You know, families are being

built. My wife and I just bought our first house back in September. And it's a lot of hard work, but it's worth it. And I'm just so grateful for everything that you do. Thank you, Scotty. I appreciate it. Happy anniversary. What's your wife's name? My wife's name is Jenny.

Jenny. Well, Scotty and Jenny, happy anniversary. Thank you so much. Thank you so much. I want to talk to you about it is so easy to get lost. It is so easy to be down. And Scotty is right. I'm going to talk to a guy here about 20 minutes.

He's talking about the population collapse. that is coming our way because nobody's having children for a myriad of reasons. And we don't even understand all of the reasons. But it's easy to get down. You just have to focus and do the next right thing. Live your life, raise children, get married, love your wife, love your husband, make God the center of your universe. And everything is going to work out the way it's supposed to work out.

It may not be easy, but it will work out exactly the way it's supposed to work out. I want to take you to New York now. I'm giving you a little positive. Let me take you to New York and Mom Donnie. This is insane. So Mom Donnie has just released his budget. His new budget is $127 billion for New York City. So you know that is $10 billion higher than the entire budget of Florida.

Okay. Florida is three times the population. New York City has 8.5 million. Florida has 23 million people. And there's somehow or another getting by with $10 billion less. How's that possible? New York City is so small you can fit 178 New York cities into Florida. And somehow or another, Florida is a... able just to get by. Now, he knows, even though his budget is going to be $127 billion, he knows he now has to raise taxes. What a surprise. But he also has to cut the budget. Here's his latest proposal on cutting the budget. By the way, I wish I would have bought more property in Florida because, I mean, if you just have the money, buy all kinds of Florida property,

because you're going to become very, very wealthy because Florida and Texas land is going to go through The roof. Here's what he's doing to New York City to cut the budget. He is going to cancel the hiring of 5,000 policemen. New York City was putting an extra 5,000 police officers onto the streets, hired him. He's now canceling all of that. And he's proposing cuts to the police, not just in personnel,

but to the police department. He's going to propose cuts. That's where he's going to save money. Get the hell out of there. Get out of there. Get out of Washington State. I think get out of California. They are going to trap you and your money there.

They are. It's just, it's a matter of time. Look at what else he has done. Mom Dani has hired another three founders of the Muslim group that blamed Octavis. 7th on Israel. On October 7th. Not like months later.

They were saying this day one. He has just appointed three officials. Let's see. They said all kinds of crazy things. I don't need to go through that. One of them is Alia Latif. She is good friends with Linda Sarsour, notorious anti-Semite.

She became the executive director of the mayor's office of faith-based partnerships. Okay, that's going to go over really well. The mayor announced it in an interfaith breakfast, at which she urged city clergy to resist immigration enforcement. She also has just reposted accusations that Israel is committing genocide. She also was reposting support for Marseilles. Ellis Williams. He is a Muslim convicted of murder who was executed in September of 2024. He was found guilty of stabbing a reporter with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. But it

happens to everybody, especially when you stab them 43 times. She was standing with that guy. You also have Alvaro Lopez. He's a former official with a Democratic Socialist of America. Lopez called people who ripped down flyers of Israeli hostages, heroes. He wrote a socialist strategy for Palestinian solidarity in 2024 that included convincing voters that U.S. aid to Israel causes declining living standards. Mamdani also hired Drashdi Bombat, who led a campus movement calling on Brown University to divest from companies that do business with the Jewish state as a college student, and he was an advisor on the 100-day planning

and implementation of that. Also, he replaced the executive director of the mayor's office to combat anti-Semitism with a left-wing activist who has openly bashed Israel. So they're in charge of stopping anti-Semitism. Huh, that's really interesting. Another co-founder of the Muslim Democratic Committee in New York, FISA Ali became commissioner of the mayor's office of immigrant affairs on Tuesday. Between 2007 and 11, Ali worked for the New York branch of the Council of American Islamic Relations, otherwise known as care. This is the same care that was happy to see on October 7th, happy to see the attack on Israel. During Ali's time with care, She was a vocal supporter of the proposed Ground Zero mosque.

Do you remember that? She dismissed anybody who was against the building of that mosque near Ground Zero as an anti-Muslim hater. She also represented Care at a 2010 press conference. She was one promoting that project. Ali also defended Zara Bilu, the leader of San Francisco Bay Area Care Chapter, who refused to denounce jihad or Sharia. Does any of this sound like maybe the Islamatization of New York? I told you this before he was elected.

What this really has to do, in fact, I'm going to give you what Linda Sarsour said. Linda Sarsor, she is a raging anti-Semite and, you know, Muslim Brotherhood style, Muslim Islamist. I put her into the Islamist category. She said right before the election, the story is not that it's random. It's not a random story that Zoran ascended to the mayoral race. It's Muslim money, I'm quoting. And she said, if the anti-Israel extremism actually sends you to city hall, I will hold Mom Dani accountable.

He will not do whatever the hell he wants when he gets to City Hall. So we now know, I mean, I don't think he's going to have to be held very tightly to the Islamists, you know, dealings and everything that they want Mom Dani to do, as well as the socialist, because I think that's who he is. But this is the Islamization of the West and of New York City. is going to happen in city after city. You've already seen it. It's happening in Dearborn. It's happening in Minnesota. It's happening all over.

And it's well planned. It's out in the open. You know what? I was with Peter Swizer last night. He was giving a talk in West Palm. And he was talking about his book, The Invisible Coup. If you're buying Buck Sexton's book, you should also buy this one as well,

The Invisible Coup. I think this is one of the most important books to understand what is actually happening with our border, why they are protesting so hard to make sure that we don't pick any of these people up off the street, that this is not ended and exposed. This is the book, you know, I saw that the FBI and Trump now is reaching out to the Mexican government because they think that Nancy Guthrie, Savannah Guthrie's mom, is actually maybe over the border in Mexico and they're looking for help. The Mexicans are,

they're a hostile nation. And I know that sounds crazy because I've never considered them a hostile nation until you read this book and you see the facts that Peter has laid out. The president of Mexico and so many others in their Senate are saying this is a hostile takeover of the United States. we are going to take our territory from the Mexican line all the way to Montana. We're taking that territory back. And they're openly talking about it, but we're not talking about it here.

No, he's talking about it here. You need to know these things because we are, we have hostiles in our own country. And until we can name the problem, we're never going to solve it. All right. More in just a minute. Let me talk to you about Patriot mobile. Let me ask you something strange. If you found out your grocery store was donating a portion of every purchase of everything that you buy there.

And they were donating it to something you completely disagreed with. Would you keep shopping there just because it was right around the corner? Or would you go find one that was maybe a few blocks down? I mean, that's what I would do. I'll take my business elsewhere. Yet every single month, most of us pay a cell phone bill without everything. about what the company is funding, who they support, or what ideas they're actively promoting. Patriot Mobile exists for people who don't want their money drifting into places they'll never

personally walk into. They would never support it. This America's only Christian conservative wireless provider and they are very intentional about supporting the First Amendment, Second Amendment, sanctity of life, the men and women who are serving this country. You know, they're probably not with Mom Donnie on the cop thing. You know what I'm saying? you're not sacrificing service. You don't have to go a couple of blocks away. All you have to do is pick up the phone. They'll make it really, really easy.

It's not a protest. It's just consistency. Go to Patriotmobile.com slash Beck or call 972 Patriot. Use the promo code back. Get a free month of service. Patriotmobile.com slash back. 972 Patriot. Use the promo code back.

Make the switch today. We don't need to agree on everything. Just enough to stand shoulder to shoulder. Glenn Beck is back in a minute. Discover George AI and Glenn AI perspectives on modern events by joining the Torch community at glenbeck.com slash torch. You know, the conservatives, we're not used to using every tool in the toolbox. You know, that's the big problem with the standing, what do you call it? The standing filibuster.

We're not used to it. That is, that's the way the filibuster is meant to do, meant to be used, but nobody wants to use it because they think it's going to be changing things. It's not changing things. It's actually using it the way it is supposed to be used. Woodrow Wilson changed it. It still stands that if you have the backbone and spine and the will to say, okay, well, Senator, you can filibuster all you want, but we're not going to have 60 votes. We're not going to vote on cloture. You can filibuster as long as you want. And then we'll go back to 50 votes. And we'll vote. on this after you're done filibustering. That's the way it works. Think of Mr. Smith goes to Washington. But they're trying, Republicans are trying to make you feel like this is changing it. It's not.

It's just requiring to do some work. The same thing is happening, I think, with the FCC. He is enforcing, Brandon Carr is enforcing some laws that are on the books that we haven't done before. Now, I like fewer laws. on the books. But Brendan Carr is going to be with us. He's the chairman of the FCC to talk about what's happening with the view and Stephen Colbert. And I want you to hear him and then you decide

where should we fall on this? That's coming up next hour. Also, Stephen Shaw on the population collapse. Next. 60% of the vans on Amazon, proven to vendors independent, like sack magic. Hello, here Camille of SAC Magic. Our compresses, hot-fraud are fabriced here, even, in Quebec, with the tissue that we've got to buy wine that

pussed on Sagnet. Our presence on Amazon enlarge our basin of clientele to the world entire. SACC, magic, is the compress that all the world prefer. At from here, we're grandi. Trouver of little

enterprises, like the on Amazon.ca. Welcome to the Glenbeck program. There is a... There's something going on with humans. all over the world and we don't understand it. There's lots of supposed reasons for it,

but before we even get to the reasons, let's understand what this is, this population implosion. We are not having children. There is declining birth rates everywhere in the world. And a guy who is a data scientist, Stephen Shaw, who has, been studying this and probably the leading expert on it's going to be joining us here in just a

second what is actually happening why does he think it's happening and what does it mean to us in our everyday life and for our children we'll get to that in 60 seconds first let me tell you about real estate agents i trust this is one of my companies and uh it is something that was born out of frustration my brother and i were both trying to sell our house at the same time and neither of us knew how to interview an agent and know that we had the right person. And we were both having problems selling the house. So we started working with the 500 best real estate agents in the country. That's according to the Wall Street Journal. And we learned from them. I remember asking them over and over again. So what makes you different? Why are you so successful? What do you do that

others don't? And I learned so much. And my brother and I started talking, why don't we do a referral service? and we'll go and seek these people out beyond the 500 best. Let's use their own set of what made them great and look for those qualities in other real estate agents and that way we can recommend them to people. It's a free service to you. I don't charge you anything. Just go to real estate agents.

I trust.com. We'll show you the best real estate agent in your area, at least according to our standards and what we look for. They're all pretty much fans of the show as well. and there's only, I think, maybe 3,000 of them, 4,000 of them around the country. We have a waiting list over 10,000. We just can't monitor that many people because we want to make sure that they do what we're telling you they're going to do. Treat you right and sell your house and buy your next house with the best experience you can have and save the most amount of money.

It's real estate agents.itrust.com. Real estate agents, I trust.com. Stephen, welcome to the program. I don't even know where to begin with you. Well, I like your introduction because this is a crisis unlike any other crisis that we're facing. We're facing a lot of crises, Glenn. And this one, I think, should be at the top of the agenda simply because we don't know what the solution is. I think every other crisis, we could kind of come up with ideas of solutions, nuclear proliferation.

If you want to go down other avenues in the environment, you could at least have a conversation. But this one, really, there's no example of. a nation that's ever recovered from this. I'm going to get into the stats here in a second with you. I want you to explain, you know, how bad the problem is. But do we even know what's causing the problem? Well, we've a pretty good idea of what it's not. Okay.

So that's a good starting point. All right. So let's get into that. Let's get into that here in a second. Tell me what is the problem. What are the numbers showing? The numbers are showing. Two things that, to me, you know, really take us down to a much deeper understanding than saying that we've got a birth rate problem.

That's much too generalized. What are those two things? Mothers have been remarkable. I guess that is too, but we got so much data on mothers. That's what we talk about. Do you know that mothers in the US are having more children now than they were in the 80s? Even mothers in Japan are having the same number of children as in 1970. across much of Europe. So once you have your first child, you're actually going on to have

two, maybe three children, just as much as your mother's generation and even in some cases grandmother. So it's not about mothers. Yeah, I mean, this is through incredible shifts in education opportunities for women, political shifts, cultural shifts, and many parts of the world. Mothers are to be incredibly resilient and by inference fathers too. No, this is a about childlessness. It's about those people, and I believe the majority of them, did plan to become parents. In fact, I'm quite certain of that. This is about the people who probably would have wanted to become a parent, but things didn't work out. And that really takes us down to a much deeper understanding of why is it that many people who plan to become a parent?

and I know this will resonate with many of your listeners. And to be honest with you, the people I have met who have been in this category, they often talk of grief. So my heart goes out to any of your listeners who dreamed of a family. And for whatever reason, not meeting the right partner, things not lining up, divorce, breakup. And if you look at the data from Japan to Europe, US, even now southern India is saying the same thing. you're finding the number of people with no children who dreamed of it is the real heart of this issue. Okay, so is that possibly linked at all with the way our society now is saying don't get married early, you know, do your career.

And so you're in your 30 sometimes before you get married and then things, you just wait a couple more years and all of a sudden you've just timed out. Is that have anything to do with it? I mean, you're exactly on the money. It's not only linked to it from data. We can take data now from about 40 different nations where we've got good data. And all we need to know is what's the average age that a woman is having her first child. And a little bit about how earlier people starting family, how late. But it's really that middle age.

And for the US right now, that's 20. years old for many countries that's 30 or older for first child. That alone predicts about 80 to 90% of birth rates. So it's all linked to age. And again, to me, what's quite remarkable, we're very good. Every nation talks about its own issues. It's the price of real estate. It's a work life balance. It's, you know, Southern Europe, it's youth unemployment. It's gender issues in Korea. But no, you look at the data and it cuts through all reality years. Without exception, every nation has a straight line in terms of the age of motherhood. It goes up every year, up and up and up.

And with it, birth rates come down. And we're noticing this right now, Glenn. You know, it's in the news almost daily in some cases. The reality is this started in the 70s, but we didn't really notice because people who delayed parenthood in the early 70s, mostly had a chance to catch up and have a child mid-20s, late 20s. We're now at a point where people are starting so late, it gets more and more challenging for different reasons to really have your first child.

You know, 33, 35, 37, of course it can happen. But for more and more people, it simply doesn't. So where is it the worst and why? South Korea. and the word I have, yes. So the average woman in South Korea is having 0.7 children. Oh, gosh. The U.S. is 1.6.

That's not good because we need around 2.1 children per family. Basically, everyone having two kids on average for a population to remain stable. South Korea is at one third of that level. Why? Why? Why is South Korea so bad? Well, they've got the double triple whammy going on. What has happened is not only has the age of motherhood now reached nearly 33 years old, that's for first child. It's reached so late that the likelihood of a woman ever becoming a mother in South Korea is now less than 50%. Only 45% of women there ever become mothers.

and the extra challenge they now have, because it's happening so late, 40% of women there only have one child. Usually it's around 20% of most nations. Even neighboring Japan, it's around 20%. So not only is incredibly unlikely now for a woman of a child in South Korea, it's more and more likely that she'll only have one. So is this at all caused by, Western civilization.

I mean, the way we have, the way we've prioritized our lives now, and in many cases away from, you know, creationism, away from the family is sacred that, you know, that humans are supposed to multiply and be fruitful. Instead, you know, put yourself first, put the, you know, your, your, your, your business first or whatever.

because is this happening across all cultures or is it just the western culture? Glenn, this is every culture you research and even southern India now has birth rates as low as 1.6, the same as the U.S. and has been at that level in some cases. It's not Islam, is it? No. Well, do you know, I get to, you know, I'm lucky I get to speak in places around the world. I get to meet governments around the world. and I've been to the Middle East three times in the past year

with governments deeply worried about the rapid falling birth rates in the Middle East. So what's the common link? Because you're not too far, well, to be honest with you, you were really right. We've lost something in all communities. And what is it driven by? Perhaps inundantly, perhaps otherwise, we have turned our 20s into a decade of education, education,

without thinking about family, future family. And then career development, career development, career development. And when you, when I get to talk to young people that in the U.S. today, a woman turning 30 without a child has at most a 50% chance of ever becoming a mother. Age 30, if you haven't already had your first child. And that's the same in all of these countries. In fact, in Japan it's even younger. It's only 26.

so much other things other than family. And frankly, haven't been honest to ourselves, partly because few people have known the data. I hope that changes. That unless the societies, yeah, the reality CDC data will tell you that around 90% of women either have or want kids. And that really hasn't changed very much. It's come down a little bit.

But note what you might hear in the press. Nobody wants kids. Really, that's twisting certain facts. I see it all the time. 90% are more of women do want children one day. But when you hear the reality today for the U.S. is we're looking now close to as few six out of ten ever becoming mothers. You know, that gap in, I think, people's dreams for family and young people's assumptions that, hey, society's got me covered.

They're telling me to get an education. They're telling me to work hard. And of course then I'm going to be able to meet someone and settle down because that's what most people want to do. And then finding out as many as 30% of women, dreaming of a family, end up childless. Stephen, does the fact that for some reason this new generation is not having as much sex as every other generation before, is that going to pile on to this and make it worse? We haven't seen that yet, and I'm not sure it will, but when I, when you look at all of the challenges that my kids are in their 20s, you know, you see the challenges of this generation, you know, relationship, sex, certainly in terms of devoting time to, you know, spending time

alone, perhaps gaming, etc. To me, those are not causes, they're actually consequences. It used to be in all societies that a young man and women would have a family by mid-20s. They have different responsibilities. They mature in certain ways. Right now, let's say you're 20 years old and there's someone you're quite interested in. You're not thinking at that age, mostly, they might be the person I settle down and have family with because for many people, that's 10 years away. So what do you do?

You fill up your 20s. with other things. What's the point in investing in a relationship? What's the point of, you know, developing a path in life that would prepare me for our children? That comes in the 30s. And I think, you know, my speculation is

a lot of the current issues and challenges with younger people stem from the reality. We're no longer doing what we used to do in our 20s, which was start to raise a family. Yeah. Hold, you hold for one minute. I got to take a quick network break and then we'll be back.

It was Stephen Shaw talking about the population implosion that is coming. And what does this mean for the future, near future? And what can be done to correct it? NMLS-18234. NMLS Consumer Access.org. APR for rates in the five starts at 6.799% for well-qualified borrowers. Call 800906 2440 for details about credit costs and terms. There is a difference between making money and keeping it. A lot of people work hard.

They budget. They try to be responsible. Yet every month you feel like, you know, money is leaking through your fingers, you know, with the interest payments and the debt that never really shrinks. That's not necessarily a spending problem. It could be a structure problem. If your mortgage isn't aligned with your current financial reality, if you're carrying high interest credit card balances while sitting on equity,

you could be working hard or much harder than you need to. And that's where American financing can make a real difference. Their salaried in-house loan consultants take the time to look at at the whole picture and walk you through the options that may help you lower your monthly payment, consolidate debt, or restructure your loans, so it actually works for you. It's not about a quick gimmick or a quick fix. It's about making sure the money you've already earned isn't quietly working against you. If you have problems with your financing, you just need some help. You need somebody just a fresh set of eyes to look at it. No obligation. Contact Americanfinancing.

net, Americanfinancing.net, 800906, 2440, 800906 2440. 10 seconds. And back with Stephen. Torch members get exclusive access to audio series, an insider show, documentaries, and a rapidly growing like-minded community. Join your friends at glenbeck.com slash torch. You know, it's really amazing to me how many people have an opinion about what's going on with the FCC and they have no idea.

They don't know their butt from their elbow. I've been in this business radio for almost 50 years. And I don't really even understand all of this. The guy, before you form an opinion or go off and blast and tweet something, why don't we get the facts from the chairman of the FCC on what is actually happening? And I'm not sure which side I'm even going to come down on, but he joins us here in about 10 minutes. So stand by for that.

Stephen what does this mean and when are we you know you say this started in the 70s and we didn't really see it because it was slow now it's starting to creep up and people are starting to be aware of it but when do we see it actually where it's take your breath away impact

yeah well to focus on the US for a moment we're already seeing the impact in parts of Europe and Japan and Korea U.S. has benefited from more open immigration than many countries is a balancing factor. But the low birth rate is now at a point really where balancing this with immigration will be a challenge even for the U.S. So if you look forward, I like to look at the time frame that the total number of births in a country will half. For the U.S., births are going to half.

If they stay the same as they are now, and that's the final thing they're going down, births are going to have. births are going to have in the U.S. every 80 years. So by the end of the century, instead of something close to 4 million births, you're going to have around 2 million births per year. Now, even in the year 2100, you may not notice that in New York City or Chicago because you know what people most likely will still flock to cities. There will still be congestion. It will feel crowded.

But you go to the slightly more urban, slightly more rural areas, and you'll find those are communities that will be decimated. Communities with the first thing that happens is the schools close down. What happens when schools close down? Young parents, potential parents, move away. They move to other areas that become more expensive because that's where the jobs are and the older people get left behind in the decaying towns.

Social security, well, we already have issues with national debts and being able to afford social security and health care. These are the good days. when it comes to that. I just can't imagine how we're going to face the mounting debts from the shrinking number of workers that this implies. And yes, it may be the AI and robots will help our efficiency. But the scale at which we're going to need to increase productivity

to counter that, to keep our societies maintain the way they are, is a very big question indeed. So basically all the cards are against us in terms of how government functions, how we look after society as well as the idea of, you know, I spent about seven years in Detroit City, in the suburbs, of course, because at that time anyway, around the time of the bankruptcy in 2013, and no one lived in the center then. Everyone lived in the suburbs because you know what happened. Now, that wasn't because of population decline, but the exact same impact of decaying,

the imploding cities and bankruptcies. Yeah, we're talking multiple city bankruptcies and not being in. able to yeah Stephen I'm fascinated by this my staff said Glenn once you talk to Stephen you're this is all you're going to think about

I'd love to have you back and I'd love to spend a podcast with you and talk about you know the rest of this but also what can we do besides go out and have sex and have children go have children and you can educate yourself go to

birthgap.org birthgap.org Stephen Shaw is the writer and producer of Birth Gap. Check out the information. Check out his website. And Stephen, I'd love to have you back. Thank you so much. I'm looking forward to. Thank you. You bet.

We have the chairman of the FCC on with us next. Interested to see how this is going to play out in America. First, let me tell you about our sponsor. It's Relief Factor. You know, when did you start accepting pain as just part of getting older? okay because that is your first thought as you're getting older you're like ah it's just getting older don't don't do that don't do that um you know you things your body starts to reject you know the stairs or whatever um you know just standing up somewhere along the way a lot of us just shrug

and say okay that's how it is but it doesn't have to be does it relief factor developed by doctors to support your body's natural response to inflammation because inflammation is often the real culprit behind that daily aching and stiffness. This is not about masking discomfort for a few hours. It's about giving your body consistent support so you can move more comfortably over time. And the track record is strong. Over a million people have tried Relief Factor. Two-thirds of them go on to take more month after month because pain is just, it stopped negotiating with it. You don't have to live that way. Don't wait if you're dealing with daily pain. Launch your three-week quick start now. See what Relief Factor can do for you. Go to Relieffactor.com or call 800

for relief, 800, the number four relief. Relieffactor.com. How will it feel to be out of pain? Torch Insiders get the Glenbeck podcast before anyone else. Tonight, the Special Forces vet who pulled off an insane rescue mission from the Duro's regime. 6 p.m. Eastern, only at glenbeck.com slash torch. You know, I find this next topic so fascinating because there is a difference between equal time and the fairness doctrine. and people always confuse the two.

And you would only know about either of those, I think, if you've ever been, you know, regulated by the FCC. Most people don't even understand what they are. But there are rules on public airwaves, and they're different than cable and everything else, because those are public airwaves. And me, I love deregulation. I'd love to see the FCC pretty much go away except for very few things to make sure that we, are, you know, you know, we're still safe. But at the same time, we are living with a bunch of conservatives that always say the same thing. And that is, you know, the left uses every weapon in the chest. And then they make up

other weapons that aren't even in the constitutional chest. You know, we got to fight back and use our, well, here's the FCC using the actual law, the way it is supposed to be. applying those and then conservatives get upset. I want you to hear it from the horse's mouth on what is actually, what is the law, what is actually happening. And then we can have the conversation of should that be that way or not. Brendan Carr is with us. He is the chairman of the FCC. And he is here to talk to us about what's happening with the view and Colbert. Brennan, how are you, sir? I'm doing great. Good to be with you again. Appreciate it. Yeah, good. You bet. Okay. So did the FCC give CBS legal guidance about the interview with Tala Rico, the equal time?

No, not at all. I woke up Tuesday morning and logged on to social media. That was the first time that I'd even heard about this. And I woke up to a politician claiming that the FCC had somehow not aired is what they said. The FCC refused to air this segment. And that wasn't true at all. Not only was that not true, but the subsequent claim that, well, it was CBS that refused to air it was also proved to be a hoax as well. That, in fact, CBS apparently had advised Colbert they could run the exact interview that they wanted, and they just needed to be mindful that it could trigger an equal time obligation for other candidates. And again, that would be a circumstance in which Colbert himself wouldn't even have had to conduct the interview.

But to your point, you know, step back, broadcast TV. fundamentally different, as you noted, than cable, then streaming, and social media, because you've got a license by the government. And the reason you have a license is because we can't have multiple people on the same airways at the same time. So the government, in broadcast, but not cable, not streaming, picks winners and losers. They say, you get a license. And necessarily that means your friend or your neighbor don't get the license. And so when you broadcast, you're supposed to stand in the shoes, not just of yourself, which is what you do on cable and everything else. It's a public trust model. You're supposed to,

operate in what we call the public interest and to look out for the views and interests of those that were denied by the government a license. And so one of those specific statute of requirements is called equal time. And the idea here was that Congress didn't want media gatekeepers picking winners and losers in elections. They wanted individual people, the voters, to make those decisions, but they knew that the powerful broadcasters could put a thumb on the scale and tip elections by putting preferred candidate on the airways and denying others. So they said, equal time. If you're going to have one candidate on, provide equal time for the other. And it's funny for me to see people claiming that this is censorship. It's the opposite of that.

There is nothing about the equal time rule that would ever prohibit anybody from having any candidate on the air. It simply says their opposition. candidates should get an equal opportunity potentially down the road. Now, Congress then stepped in. Hang on, just a second. Hang on, hang on. Let me just speak as a broadcaster. But what it does do, this is what the fairness doctrine did.

And again, they're separate. But what the fairness doctrine did is it made broadcasters, I know because I lived it, say, it's not worth the hassle. I just don't want to just forget the interview. And so it is limiting only because they choose to limit. I mean, you're going to have to have three different candidates. on. If you do that candidate, you're going to have to have three candidates on for the equal time rule. And then they get to decide, is that worth it or not? Correct? Well, one one reason that's

slightly different than the fairness doctrine is the fairness doctrine said, if you're going to cover a controversial issue of public importance, right then and there, you've got to give the left perspective and the right perspective. With equal time, mean, is you can have just one candidate on your broadcast TV or radio program, but at some point in the future, a different host, a different time, they get equal comparable airtime. It doesn't require you to do it in the moment

the same way that the fairness doctrine would have done. But Congress admitted and said, you know what, let's create some exceptions to this. And they create exceptions for what are known as bona fide news programs. So if you're a bona fide news program, Congress was thinking about meet the press and different programs like that, that you're just actually doing

sort of journalistic work, you're not trying to put a thumb on the scale for a candidate, you're just trying to interview someone with normal journalistic questions. You don't have to abide by equal time. Okay, flash forward. Over the last 30 or 40 years, everybody came to the FCC

and they were getting Dexterer ruling to say that they were bona fide news programs and therefore exempt. And people effectively read the exception is swallowing the rule and they said anything goes any tv program any radio program is now bona fide news the exception swallows the rule and when we did the beginning of the year was we said listen that's not what the statute says that's not actually what the fccc law says so just be mindful it's political season there's legally qualified candidates you're going to have on and be mindful of the equal time rule and again

on the colbert episode they were apparently given advice that they could do this but colbert apparently did not want to have Jasmine Procket on, who's running in opposition in the Democrat primary to James Tala Rico. And it appears to be that he ran a hoax that he knew he could fool the mainstream media, the legacy media, by claiming he was censored. He could drive clicks and donations and get a leg up on Jasmine Crockett. And the national news media just went a long hook line and sinker because it fit with all their priors that this was Trump censorship. but this was a decision by Colbert and by Tala Rico to put a hoax out there that they knew the media would run for purposes of Tala RICO, apparently, scoring political points against Jasmine Procket. If I was Jasmine Procket, I'd be pretty upset by that.

All right. So tell me about the view. What's happening with the view? The view is similar. So the view apparently is claiming that they are a bona fide news program and therefore can have one political candidate on and not, afford equal opportunity to other candidates. And what we have said is that the view has not established. They've not made the case to the FCC that they do in fact qualify for the exception to the rule. And so we have started an enforcement inquiry taking enforcement actions to explore this issue with them and move forward. Again, they have not made the case that they are a bona fide news program and we're actively looking at that. the one thing, Brendan, that I've always loved about you is you're a small government guy.

And I will tell you one of the effects of this, I don't know if I'm sure you saw it, the Washington Post editorial today about the abolition of the FCC rules. I mean, it is, let me see if I can pull it up here. It is absolutely incredible. They are now talking about how maybe, listen to this, the Trump presidency ought to be an education for progressives in the way government over, and the way government over regulation can distort politics and business. Passed by Congress as part of 1934 Communications Act Equal Time Rule says,

blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, the FCC is charged with enforcing it. The government shouldn't be dictating the political content of late night television, nor any other entertainment Americans choose to consume. But that's exactly what the equal time rule does. It says that it is outdated. and needs to be deregulated. Could we maybe have an opportunity here where we can get rid of a lot of this regulation because they're suddenly for it?

Well, I don't think everything they're saying there in terms of their understanding of the way this rule operates is right. But listen, if a collateral unintended consequence of me doing my job is we've got a lot more converts to small government conservatism, I guess I'll take that as a win. But to your point, think about it this way. a lot of times the Republicans are in government and they get gavels. They take their gavel and they go to the farthest flung corners of the earth and they bury the gavel in the sand and they say if we were to actually just apply the law in an even-handed way, then Democrats will get the gavel again and they'll weaponize it.

And where that fundamentally misrease among other things is we have a job to do. The statute requires this, let's apply it. Let's not weaponize it. Let's not abuse it. Let's not be biased about it. But let's apply it in an even-handed way. I'm doing. Now, what Democrats do when they get gavels is they weaponize it. And we saw this at the FCC. When the Democrats were charged in the FCC during the Biden years, they went after Fox broadcast TV

station and threatened to not renew their license for programming they didn't like on Fox News cable, which is not regulated by the FCC. You had Democrats that pressured cable companies to drop Fox News and OAN and Newsmax. And that campaign worked. You had senators on the Democrat side calling for the FCC to investigate Sinclair, a broadcaster, for news distortion because they were viewed as a conservative outlet. And so Democrats actually weaponize. Whenever Democrats get gavels again at the FCC, let me tell you something. They're going to weaponize. What we need to do is that when we're here, let's just apply the law.

Let's not weaponize it against Republicans or Democrats, but the law's on the books. If people want to get together and go to Congress and say change the law, then they should do that. But up until then, we're just going to do this in a fair, even-handed and balanced. way. Honestly, Brendan, if you said to me, Glenn, you know, you haven't applied for news status or whatever has to be done. And you, you know, it's in question that, you know, the Democrats are saying it's in question that you're a legitimate news program. And I say, well, what does that mean? And you'd say, you can't have just one politician on that's running for office. You at some point would have to have, you know, the others on as well. I would take that as a giant blessing. Really?

Thank you. And I don't, I wouldn't have them on anymore. I just, I wouldn't, I think it might make the show better. I think it might make Colbert even better by not having them on. But that's the only consequence of this, right? Is just candidates running. If you air them and you're not a legitimate news source, you or the network has to have the other candidates on in an equal.

kind of time scenario, correct? That's effectively right. That's how the rule operates. And again, the idea here is let's let individual people, voters, get more information, and they pick the winners of primaries and of generals. Let's not have the media gatekeepers abuse their

position of power, the position of public trust, of being on the airwaves to unfairly advantage one candidate or party over another. So it's a leveling of a playing field. It's about more speech, not less. But again, people can go to Congress and try to change it. I would love for anybody who wants to make the FCC smaller or any government agency smaller. And you're right. And we're well enough to know that you're the same guy. And we are doing it. We're actually running the largest deregulatory initiative in the agency's history. We've gone through our big stack of code of federal regulations and we are deleting and

deleting and deleting. We've getting rid of hundreds. of regulations at this point. A lot of dead wood, a lot of regulations we don't need. On the broadcast side, though, again, it's just a fundamentally different medium. And on social media, my position is very clear and continues to be. We want wide open, robust, uninhibited debate. And that's what we want to see. But if you want to be on the unique medium of broadcast TV,

you've got to comply with the rules of the road there. Yeah. Brendan, thank you very much. I appreciate it. FCC chairman, Brendan. car. Good talking to you. All right. Take a final break here. My Patriot Supply.

Thought experiment. Flip a switch in your house right now. And imagine it doesn't work. No lights. No hum of the fridge. No Wi-Fi. No heat. No way to charge your phone. Just silence. For the first hour, it's an inconvenience. And then it starts to get dark and you light a candle and you check the breaker. And you'll assume that's going to be on soon. By hour six is starting to become a real problem.

Day two, it's a different world. Modern life is built on systems we never see until they fail, and we trust that they're not going to fail, but they do. Most people don't realize that our world has been built for comfort, and when that fails, the world gets very uncomfortable very quickly. That's why I talk about my Patriot supply, whether it's long-term emergency food that doesn't depend on the grid or backup power solutions, like the Grid Doctor 3,300 solar generator,

that thing is made so your home can function even when the system can't go. If you go to PreparewithGlen.com, when you order a Grid Doctor generator, you're going to get over $800 in free preparedness gifts, including a four-week survival food kit, water filtration, cook stove, and so much more. This is the basic of what you need. They're not going to be around long, so go to PreparewithGlen.com right away. That's PreparewithGlen.com. Glenn Beck.

It's something else here now. Something new. From, exclusively on Paramount Plus, it's the series Stephen King calls Scarious Hell. Everything here is impossible, but it's also real. Sci-fi Vision calls it the best show streaming right now. We're running out of time and we still don't know the rules. Don't miss what the movie blog calls something you need to watch.

Saving those children is how we all go home. From, binge all episodes exclusively on Paramount Plus. Three singers, two songs. one unforgettable performance. Do you have what it takes? Show us at glenbeck.com slash contest. You know, I'm looking for the story that is in our show prep today. If you subscribe to glenbeck.com, just look for the show prep and it's mail to you free every day.

And I can't seem to find it. It's the story about Reese's, Mr. Rees's, as in Reese's peanut butter cups, very upset at Hershey Chocolate because they've changed the recipe. And I'm reading this today. and I'm like, oh my gosh, I thought it was just me. I had one last week for Valentine's Day, and it was absolutely awful. And Sarah, how long have you been living like this? Probably not sharing this information.

Seven, eight months, maybe. Really? I just stopped eating them. They're disgusting. Right? I mean, I took it out of the little, I mean, and I mean, and I mean, little because they're not the same size anymore, but I took it out a little pack, and it even, like, almost disintegrated in my hands.

And it, it's not even, I read this. article today, it's chocolate candy, which means it's not actually chocolate. Okay. It used to be milk chocolate, which by law has to be a certain formula. And this is chocolate candy. And it's not even peanut butter. They're calling it like peanut butter flavored or I don't know what they're called. But it's not. It's nothing is real in it. It's awful. It's awful. It's awful. And can I jump in? Brad, Mr. Reese. Can we not go to LinkedIn?

Can we maybe go to a better social platform so that everybody knows that this trash? I need to troll this now. I've had a jihad against LinkedIn since the very beginning of LinkedIn. And I actually thought of joining LinkedIn just to be able to reach out to him and say, I'm with you, brother.

We grab the pitchforks and we head to Hershey Penh Pennsylvania because I've had enough, had enough. All right. We'll see you tomorrow. Don't forget, a podcast, great one out tonight.