The Glenn Beck Program - Sanders the Sexist vs Liz the Leaker | 1/14/20

Episode Date: January 14, 2020

It’s three weeks before the 2020 Democratic primaries and Democrats are complaining their own field is too white! But at least Trump got a warm welcome at the LSU vs Clemson football game, although Vince Vaughn might now be cancelled. Elsewhere in the 2020 race, Tom Steyer’s face is all over Nevada, Bloomberg will spend millions to control your life, and in what sure looks like a leak, Elizabeth Warren confirmed that Bernie Sanders told her a woman couldn’t win the presidency. But while Bernie still denies it, an old article he wrote about weird fantasies sure seems sexist. And Obama’s Secretary of State John Kerry not only admitted that giving money to Iran would fund terrorism, but that he was okay with it! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Morning. Good morning. Hillary's voice update back to 47%. I know. I wish I could say it was because I was out like cheering on the Kansas City Chiefs this weekend or partying, but no, it's just laryngitis. Wait, you're a Chiefs fan? I am by marriage. My husband's from Kansas, so he's a huge Chiefs fan. And that was actually a really great game, I have to say. And I will say this. We are all Chiefs fans, except for Pat, right now. I'm dying for the, I want the Chiefs to win so bad. I'm almost like a legit Chiefs fan at this moment. I really want. I want Andy Reid against Super Bowl. Well, you want the Packers, obviously.

Yes, I want the Packers to win the Super Bowl, but I want the Chiefs to get to the Super Bowl. Yeah, okay. And if the, let's just say, the off chance the 49ers were to win against the Packers, you'd be rooting for the Chief. Definitely. Yeah, I really want the Chief. I love Mahomes.

I love, their team is awesome. Andy Reid's a good guy. Great coach. Yeah, I wanted to. Probably the best coach without a Super Bowl title. Yeah, I mean, he's probably a Hall of Fame or even without the Super Bowl, but he gets one of him is automatic. Yeah.

Anyway, so lots of football talk. coming up today on the Glenn Beck program. Glenn is out today. We'll get to all the news of the day in just a moment. The fusion of entertainment and enlightenment. It's Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck Beck program, AAA 727, B-E-C-K, phone number. Liberals eating their own.

You got to love it. And right now it's happening in the Democrat Party with Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. They're a little upset with each other. these two good friends for the last 20 years. So, who do you believe in this little affair? This is fascinating. Are you in, first of all, it's debate mania.

Are you excited for tonight? Oh, man, am I? Am I ever excited? Riveted for the six-person debate. I'm really interested to just see, I'm just fascinated by Tom Steyer, who's such an electric character. Isn't he, though?

Yeah, you know. Yeah, he is. He's so exciting and so, It's on fire. He really is. And that's what I'm excited for tonight. But he's in there. And of course, Warren and Biden and Sanders are the main attractions.

This Bernie versus Warren thing that's developed over the past couple of days is fascinating to me. Now, these are two people who have been friends for 20 years. Yeah. Close allies and pretty much everything they work on. And they had a truce aligned at the beginning of this campaign, which is pretty shady to me. Right. I mean, you go into an election basically saying, we're not going to attack. each other were both these socialists, obviously.

In the private meeting, they were saying that they were socialists. In public, Elizabeth Warren denies this, but we all know it to be true. And so they are going to stay aligned and work through the campaign together. Now, everyone knows this has to dissolve at some point, right? Like, you can't, they can't be allies and just go in and they can be co-victors for the Democratic nomination. One of them actually has to win, and he kind of assume eventually gets to a point where they're at least critical of each other, which has to.

hasn't really happened all that much. So this starts the other day where Warren gets word of Bernie Sanders underlings using a series of talking points about Warren's appeal to the elite. She says she's a candidate of the elite, unlike Bernie Sanders. Now, of course, there's some backing to that. I mean, she worked in the high-level finance, and she's not exactly as pure a socialist as our friend Bernie. And this is apparently now in the United States of America is a bad thing.

Yes. It's the worst. It's the worst accusation you can level at a Democrat. Yeah. So, and so Warren is very upset about this and comes out publicly in this thing. I'm very disappointed in Bernie for trashing me in public. Now, Bernie didn't trash her in public. His underlings did.

And if he hold Bernie Sanders responsible for everything, his underlings did, then you'd be talking about how he's responsible for attempted mass murder of all Republicans in the Congress. That's just unfair. You can't hold the Sanders campaign responsible for every little talking point they put out or every attempted mass murder. Those things are unfair. So you can't do that.

And it's a little bit ridiculous, right? But they're looking for a way to separate from each other. You know, Warren is looking for a way to differentiate. She's the one of the losing sight of this at the most key moment. So she's the one who's the aggressor here. So after this happens, mysteriously, a report gets leaked to CNN, which says at a private dinner in 2018, Bernie Sanders said he didn't believe a woman could win against Donald Trump.

Did not believe a female candidate could win the presidency because I guess Donald Trump's so mean and evil and therefore would use sexism and drive a wedge and be able to defeat any woman. This comes out and Bernie Sanders, of course, immediately denies it. You look at that and to me, I think, is it possibly said something in that realm? Like, you know, there's no way Bernie Sanders is like, by the way, no women could ever be president. And that's not what he said. That's how it's being portrayed. It's not, I can't imagine he said that. He probably said something to the effect of, you know, all those Republican, all those

racists and sexists in Pennsylvania and Michigan, they're just not going to go for a woman because they're bad people and we're great progressives and you know this is a strain of thought on the democratic side it's why biden does very well the idea is that you know all these these blue-collar people can handle women and people of color so they're they we got to run a white guy that's a strain of thought that's pretty straight through the republican party or excuse me the democratic party and it's also what fueled the initial birtherism it's what the the initial memo from the clinton campaign about bertherism was about it basically said they're going to everyone's going to see baroque obama as this other, this person, this foreigner, and we need to stand up on our side and make sure

everyone believes that because Hillary Clinton is Apple Pie America. So then, after Bernie denies this claim, Warren comes out yesterday and confirms it. So 100% clear that Elizabeth Warren was the one who leaked it, their campaign. And now she comes out and actually confirms it saying that I thought a woman could win. He disagreed, is the way she said. But we're still friends, and of course, we work together. And I don't want to get caught up in any of this. Well, you shouldn't have leaked it then and then confirmed it on the record.

Right? You could have easily, if you have a friend of 20 years, denied that he said it or denied he said it in that context, right? And so I totally, I believe Sanders may have said something. I don't believe it's how Warren is portraying it. But the big takeaway for me here is this whole story shows you what a terrible person Elizabeth Warren is. this is a person who you've been aligned with, Bernie Sanders, who you've been friends and close associates for 20 years. And now you're coming out on record and saying he's essentially a sexist three weeks before the election.

Yeah, but her point is he started it by calling me an elitist. Yeah, right. Which again, he hasn't done. Is Sanders guilty of these under, you know, these weird campaign tactics under the, I think he is? And probably is trying, but like, elitist is something a little bit different than he doesn't believe women are capable of doing these jobs, right? Like, essentially, you don't think a woman could win. I mean, that is an absolute sexist allegation. And Warren takes out of a private conversation, leaks it to the media, and then defends it on record.

hard to imagine there being a more underhanded tactic and it just shows I mean every one of these candidates they're just awful so bad they're awful but this is a particularly bad one from Elizabeth Warren

I mean she's she's she's trashing her buddy you know what happened to comrades they're supposed to be tight comrades working together for the future victory of the Soviet Republic

and look at all this it's sad it is sad it is triple 877 B DCK. More coming up in 60 seconds. Let me back program. All right. Did you know that our brains are not designed to remember pain accurately?

It's kind of a biological defense mechanism that allows us to live better lives. It helps mothers to be willing to undergo childbirth more than once. And it was keeps, I mean, who would do that? You'd do it once and who would do it again? Yeah, luckily there's just a, you just forget it. That's the mechanism. It's what keeps you from remembering the time you fell out of the tree and broke your leg every single time with the full memory of that pain.

Best thing about pain, aside from learning from it, is when it goes away. But it doesn't go away for a lot of people. Sometimes it lingers making life a lot harder. If you're suffering from pain, I mean, you put almost any price on making it go away. Who cares? You just want to make it go away. Well, how does 1995 for a three-week quick start sound? That's what relief factors are offering.

They've got 70% of people that find that it helps them get rid of the pain. It was designed by doctors, and it's not a drug. It's really the only thing you need to lose is your pain. 1995 for a three-week quick start. You try it if it works for you. Fantastic. 70% it does. If it doesn't, you're only out in 1995.

If you want a drug-free, natural way to ease your pain and get your life back, go to relieffactor.com. It's relieffactor.com. This has worked wonders in the life of one Glenn Beck. And it can work wonders for you as well. Relieffactor.com. Pat and Stufer Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. Big debate to,

tonight and we lost an important cog in this wheel. And, you know, these racist Democrats that have ignored yet another minority candidate that they could have voted for. What a bunch of racists. Cory Booker is out. Only explanation. Only explanation is that these are racists who don't want a black person to be president of the United States again. Well, let's just look at the evidence. you're not thinking about this, right? I mean, you've got

Joe Biden, white, Bernie Sanders, white, Pete Buttigieg, white, Elizabeth Warren, white, white and Native American. Probably whiter than any other American on this continent. Yes, actually, yes. I think you might be right on that. Um, Amy Klobuchar, white, Michael Bloomberg, white, Tom Steyer, white,

Andrew Yang, there's your person of color left in the race at this point. But he's not in the debate tonight. not in the debate tonight. Michael Bennett, white. And then you have John Delaney, who's still in the race. White. And I guess you have to count, you have to go to Deval Patrick now to find an African-American candidate. Okay, that's right.

There is one left. There is one left who launched like seven minutes ago. And it never had one percent in any poll, I don't believe. And then you do have Tulsi Gabbard, I guess who's a P.O.C. But also a person of color who has been trashed by the Democrats the entire time. Oh, yeah. I mean, she's been enemy number one in the race. So basically they have three minority candidates left.

And one of them has never even ranked in a poll. And the other two are the ones that the Democratic Party has overlooked consistently since the beginning. I mean, Andrew Yang has outpolled a lot of these candidates and never gets any attention. He's out-fundraised a lot of these candidates and never gets any attention. Chelsea Gabbard has out-polled a lot of these candidates. It doesn't get any attention. And they dismissed them completely. And then Deval Patrick has never had any attention at all.

I don't know that I've even heard anybody on CNN mention his name. No. Maybe I'm on his announcement day. Yeah, maybe. Then. And that, not since, though. Deval Patrick, I've completely forgotten he was even in the race. Yeah, he's not doing anything.

There was an article about Michael Bennett in local Colorado media that said, is Michael Bennett still running for president? You don't want that to be the headline three weeks ahead of Iowa. What was the answer to that? Is it undetermined? I don't know. I guess he is. He's still staying in there.

And I don't understand this, Pat. You're Corey Booker, okay? Corey Booker is a relatively well-known national figure. Okay. He's in the race. He's not doing anything. He's been a giant zilch since day one. I mean, never made an impact.

Despite constant praise from the media, every one of his debate performances was the greatest debate performance of all time. And he hasn't made a dent in this race. race. However, you've gone through all of this time, you're three weeks ahead of the vote in Iowa. Three weeks. Why on earth are you dropping out of the race now? Why not sit back and say, look, maybe, let's just say Joe Biden flames out. Let's say, we got this news yesterday that apparently Burisma was hacked. Okay. So let's say emails leak and it shows Joe Biden, you know, sending selfies to the head of Burisma to bribe him to give his son more money.

I don't know what's going to come out of it. If that happens... That would be fun, though. It would be fun. I don't want to see the pictures, but it would be a fun scandal. If Biden lets us just, he drops out, he completely dissolves. He makes them huge error and drops out three weeks before the race. Where do those votes go?

I mean, they probably go to Buttigieg or Klobuchar. But if you're Booker, why wouldn't you want to be in the conversation for those votes? Who knows? You're already all the way here. I don't understand... Unless you have zero dollars left. Unless you just can't go another moment and you can't pay for it. I don't know.

And I understand that from someone who's like, let's say John Delaney, right? Who can't do anything. Cory Booker is a U.S. Senator. Corey Booker is on TV all the time. You run the campaign with no field offices and no knocking on doors. You just go on television 900 times and talk about whatever you can and hope. Yeah. You know, I mean...

It is a strange time to drop out. It's a strange time. The only reason you do it, I think, is if you have some sort of a range... with one of the candidates or a belief that maybe you're going to be a future VP. And that is the talk about Booker because he's so nondescript. There's no one who's, he has no base. He's not the type of person who's going to overshine or outshine the lead candidate. So does a Joe Biden say, hey, you can be my VP.

Does a, you know, Bloomberg or, I mean, I don't know, maybe a Buttigieg. I don't know who would, who else would pick. I don't think a Sanders or a maybe Warren would. Might be smart for Buttigieg since he's got no support. Yeah, exactly. That's great point.

In minority communities. No. It might be a good move for him. Maybe. I mean, there was a poll that came out the other day that was, I mean, you made the point of the racist Democrats who will not support their minority candidates.

And let's say, it might not be true. That might not be the reason. However, I will say there's a lot of, if it was a. Republican, if the Republicans, that would be the reason. Completely. Right. Yeah.

Listen to this poll. This is, uh, this just came out the other day. Um, and it's pretty, pretty fascinating. Talking to African American voters, uh, what would you be comfortable with supporting? Uh, for example, um, you know, a person younger than the age of 40, okay, Pete Buttigieg, younger than 40. Mm-hmm. Uh, 63% say they'd be, uh, comfortable with support.

or enthusiastic about supporting. And there's 25% that said, I'll have some reservations, and only 8% would be very uncomfortable supporting someone under 40. Another characteristic of Pete Buttigieg is that he's gay. How does that play with African-American voters?

Well, instead of 8% who are very uncomfortable, it's 21%. I mean, basically a fifth of all black voters are very uncomfortable supporting a gay man for president. That is a gigantic number, bigger than any other number of all the questions that they asked, including the second place was a billionaire, by the way. That was the second one.

But a white man, a white woman, younger than 40, older than 70. They don't have any reservations. The reservations are if they are gay. And another 20% have reservations. So 41% of black voters are uncomfortable voting for a gay candidate. That is not a minor deal. That's amazing. That's a big deal.

if you're Pete Buttigieg. How you overcome that? I don't know. I don't know. I mean, that seems to be something that if it was, if you found that 41% of Republican voters were on that, and I'm sure we will hear that there's some poll that shows that. And it's like that will be a big deal if Buttigieg is the nominee.

So far, it hasn't had a lot of press, but I don't know how Buttigieg gets over that hump. It's hard to win the Democratic nomination without support from black voters. Yeah. Maybe that changes, but he's got an uphill road there. AAA 727 B, EECK. More coming up in 60 seconds. All right, welcome to the new year.

Perfect opportunity to take your business to the next level by hiring the right people. Sometimes finding quality candidates can be challenging. It's hard to find good help these days. It's been kind of a cliche, but it's not just a cliche. It's kind of a reality. Do yourself a favor. Go over to ziprecruiter.com slash Beck today.

What you're going to find there is going to be positively revolutionizing to your process. The way you do hiring. and that's going to be good for your business. ZipRecruiter sends your job to over 100 of the web's leading job boards, and they don't just stop there. It's not just a multi-post operation. With their powerful matching technology,

they scan thousands of resumes to find people with the right experience and invite them to apply to your job. As applications come in, ZipRecruiter and analyzes each one and spotlights the top candidates so you never miss a great match. ZipRecruiter is so effective that four out of five employers who post with them get a quality candidate within the first day right now try zip recruiter for free at ziprecruiter.com slash Beck ZipRecruiter.com slash Beck is the place to go.

It's the smartest way to hire ziprecruiter.com slash Beck. We break for 10 seconds. Station ID. Wow. So, you know, obviously hacking is a terrible thing and we don't condone it. But I'm sure fascinated to find out what these Russian hackers found when they successfully hacked into Burisma. Are you not curious?

Would you not like to know what they came up with? Again, I'm with you on this. This is not the way to get... Just so wrong. The Russian... Stop. Don't. I mean, look, the Russian government

they're not good actors. No, they're not. They are not. You're not sharing this stuff on. Though, you know, we're not going to have a choice here. It seems apparent that this stuff is going to come up. So now that they've done it, let's find out what they found. I am, I will be interested to see it. Because, you know, this is going to be internal stuff and stuff that, you know, no one would have any, any way of accessing.

Now, my understanding is it's not entirely certain what they came up with, if anything, really. I know they were trying, they were trying to fishing scams. They're fishing scams, right? So they got access to some email boxes, but we don't know how many. We don't know of who. We don't know if there's any information whatsoever as it relates to the scam. And there may be. But there may be.

But last time there was. Yeah. You know, last time they did hack into the DNC situation. and they did release thousands of emails. I'm of the belief that it really didn't have much of an effect at all on the election. However, a lot of people like to say that that DNC hack was a big deal. I mean, what did it do? Embarrassed Debbie Wasserman Schultz?

I mean, how can she not be embarrassed walking through everyday life? I remember. She's always embarrassed. Yeah. I remember talking about, I thought there'd be a lot more. Yeah. I actually, you almost admired the restraint of Podesta. some circumstances, I thought.

You know, I mean, they basically, there was the one thing where they were sort of favoring Clinton over Sanders. So what? First of all, was not the reason she won by four million votes, by the way, over Sanders. It was not that close of an election, first of all. And second of all, look, everyone knew the Democrats would rather have Clinton than Sanders. And they didn't want to run a socialist. You know, that was back in the day when the Democrats wanted to hide the fact that they were socialist. That's no longer the case, apparently.

As you see, Warren and Sanders are basically leading these early states. But still, this was at a point where they wanted to kind of downplay the socialism in the party. But that was about it, right? I mean, there wasn't much there. I didn't think that that really did anything. This is one of the things I think, you know, the media likes to do, which is blame it on the hack so that we can say Trump won unfairly. Well, like, Trump just won.

I mean, just at some point. point you need to get over that. He just won. He won the election. You know, it is important for us to look at Russia and what they're doing because they want to turn elections, but they didn't successfully turn this one. This one just happened. And it's just at some point you have to recognize that, don't you? Yes. At some point, you get over this? You would think, but they, I don't know, they never seem to. We'll see. Triple 8-27-B-E-C-K, but it will be fascinating to keep an eye on this and see if we ever get any information on the Biden's due to this hack. You're listening to Glenn.

So 2019, rough year in some ways. Data breaches, hacks and attacks dotted the cyber landscape as we were just talking about. The victims were all over the place and they ran the gamut from city and state governments. There were hundreds of them to hospitals, hotels, and universities, to websites and apps, social media and tech companies, banking and credit giants. This is our world that we live in now. That's just the name a few. Cybersecurity experts estimate that less than half of organizations are fully prepared for a cyber attack or data breach.

Burisma may want to get on this. You need to understand something. Breaches aren't going to stop. When cybercriminals have access to your personal information, they can open up new accounts in your name, file tax returns by property. The list goes on and on. If you're only monitoring your credit,

you could miss something big. That's why you need LifeLock. LifeLock detects a wide range of identity threats and their agents work with you to fix them. Now one can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses, but LifeLock can see threats that you might miss on your own. Join now and save up to 25% of your first year by using the promo code Beck. Call 1-800 LifeLock or head to LifeLock.com or use the promo code Beck for 25% off.

1-800, LifeLock. Want to hear more from conservative voices? Go to blazTV.com slash Glenn. Use the promo code, Glenn, and you'll get $10 off. It's Pat and Stu for Glenn. on the Glenn Beck program, AAA 727BECK. Pretty exciting. We're what?

Two and a half weeks away from the debut of, I don't know, some new show. Somebody's doing. What is it called? Stu Does America. Stu Does America. Featuring who? I'm not sure who hosts this program. Yeah, no, a new show starting on The Blaze here in a couple of weeks.

I think next week we're going to start with some preview content. And then February 4th, day after the caucuses. Okay. I'll be there for an election-related show. And it's going to be an hour every night. So please subscribe. If you go to Stu DoesAmerica.com, you can get all the social things to follow. And the good thing about this, and this is happening, I believe, with your show as well, Pat Gray Unleashed,

is you're going to be able to get these episodes now, not just with your Blaze TV subscription, but also for free on YouTube, wherever you get your podcasts. Yeah, we're pretty excited about that. Yeah, I mean, it's going to be, really, it opens the show up to a whole new world. You know, we got on SoundCloud. Yeah. Is that the one or it was a, it was, what's the other one that's. Myspace?

A friendster? It was MySpace. It was MySpace. Yeah, we finally got on MySpace. Pat's on MySpace now. Which we're really excited about. Yeah. So.

My understanding is if you put Pat and your top eight friends, you're going to win a prize. Yeah. It's illegal. share it, but everybody's doing it anyway, so just go ahead. It's amazing how those things have changed. I mean, there's a graph I saw the other day

of all the social networks and how they've risen and then fallen. And the Myspace one is just sad. I mean, it peaks, destroying all of them. And then just goes away within like two or three years. And the only thing it's around now for is occasional scandals of photos that were posted

on MySpace in the past. Like, for example, there was a guy who, it was a judge on some tattoo-related reality show. I know there's a bunch of those. I don't know which one this was exactly. But he's been a judge on the show for 13 years. Okay, so he's, again, it's amazing the television age that we live in

and that shows that can be popular enough to be on the air for 13 years, we have absolutely no knowledge that they exist. But apparently this is a pretty big show. And he, someone digs up his old MySpace page and finds pictures of him in blackface. Big scandal.

He has to resign or gets fired. Fascinating, though, to watch that go down. Because here is a guy who, there's no evidence that he was a, you know, some, it wasn't like posts where he was praising Nazi ideology or was like, he was at, 14 KKK meetings. He has two pictures

of himself on Halloween where he's dressed up as an African American person. The same way Joy Behar did the exact same thing, dressed up as used blackface. And she's fine and on the view and there's no problems with it

because she's substantially liberal enough. If you're progressive enough, if you like taxes to be high enough, if you want abortion to be easy enough to get, if you want babies to make sure they don't really have a great chance of survival. That makes it okay to wear blackface. That's okay.

Yes, it does. So this guy, bad, is dressed up in blackface. Again, not something. Just safety tip. Kids at home. Not a good idea. In basically any circumstance. Okay.

However, he did this. He was dressed up as someone from the Los Angeles Lakers. interesting because it harkens back to mind specifically one Jimmy Kimmel who dressed up as Carl Malone in Blackface on national television and received no repercussions whatsoever and continues to be a liberal megastar. But he's great with babies being killed in the womb. He's fine with that. So that makes the Blackface thing like you said, just perfectly fine. He wants taxes to be sufficiently high enough.

He wants health care to be given to you by the womb. the government, so therefore blackface A-O-K. That is the policy. And it's funny because one of the comments, you know, and it was one of these stories, and this drives me crazy. But it's like, here's, here's one, the first paragraph

of the very basic details of the story. And then it's, this Twitter user said, and then there's just like 25 comments from random people on Twitter that I guess the person writing the story found interesting instead of writing comments themselves. They're like, let's just on copy and paste this on there. But the first comment that they

thought was so brilliant was, well, I'm glad this guy's learning the lesson of Justin Trudeau. You don't use Blackface. What lesson did he learn? But he's the Premier of Canada. Yeah. He's a prime minister. Yeah. If you use Blackface, you can run countries?

Is that the lesson he was supposed to learn? Or is it that he's supposed to learn, you can run states like in Virginia? Yeah. Which one is it? What lesson are he supposed to learn? And of course, what is fundamentally built into this and, of course, the larger perspective, is you should be progressive, you should be liberal, because you know what happens when you are?

You get excused for all the mistakes you've made in your life. It's a wonderful get out of jail free card. You'll never have to pay a price for the things you shouldn't have done, because if you are sufficiently in favor of government health care, we'll exonerate you. And that is an incredible free pass to life if you happen to be someone on the left. What a wonderful thing. What a great way to live.

man. You never have to deal with the arguments of the other side. You just dismiss them as racist. And if you screwed up, if you happen to have a little Me Too violation here, or you had a little bit of a blackface incident there. We don't even talk about it. Don't even worry about it. So I don't know what this guy's politics are, but he's ejected from society now. And people like Jimmy Kimmel will remain on television. You know, people like Governor Northam, people like Justin Trudeau. They maintain everything. Perfectly fine. The liberal left-wing country of Canada goes and supports this guy and re-elects him after the scandal. Yeah. Do you think Donald Trump survives a black-faced scandal in 2020?

No. I'm going to go with no. No, he does not. I'm going to go with no. That's for sure. And, you know, you'd think in today's day and age, because, you know, like, for example, Sarah Silverman, who is pretty left and has had minor repercussions from her own blackface scandal. She did blackface on television. why to parody and mock and demean racists that should be looked at as the same thing as

Justin Trudeau who just thinks it's a okay and funny to go out and dress up as someone just for the laughs that's that those things should be treated differently we've just treated them the opposite way the repercussions have gone to the person who was against racism and Justin Trudeau skates through okay It is a fascinating world to navigate, Pat, because you can't find the end. There's no way to know who gets cleared, who gets prosecuted, whose life gets ruined, and whose life, you know, gets promoted.

And a lot of times it's politics, but not always. I was just looking for the quotes of Justin Trudeau about the airliner being shot down in Iran. just to add to the Justin Trudeau insanity. He's essentially, without actually naming Donald Trump, blames it on Donald Trump. Because of the heightened tension in Iran, the airline was shot down. Those Canadians would be alive who were on that flight today

if it weren't for the escalation intention in the Middle East, which, you know, he's obviously blaming on Donald Trump. I mean, this guy is, he's going to make it. increasingly difficult to work with Canada who's, you know, our biggest trade partner, one of our closest allies. And he was, first of all, he's pissed off that we didn't alert

him to the fact that we were going to drone Qasam Soleimani. And he's a little upset and hurt about that. Oh, I'm sorry. You're not exactly... That was nice. That was really nice. Not exactly best friends with Donald Trump. So he's probably not going to get in touch with you.

and run that past you? No? No. And then for them to be blaming Donald Trump, like all the Democrats, it's just despicable. It's despicable. It's just not a good argument. At all.

Right? It's just not a good argument. This is something the left struggles with so mightily. The person who commits the crime is the one responsible for it. When Iran shoots down, an airliner, Iran is responsible for it. Yes. Not the United States.

Not the people who dared to get on the plane. I kept hearing like, I can't believe Iran didn't close down airspace. Well, closing down airspace would have been a good idea, but really the problem was firing at the planes that were in the airspace. Right. It wasn't exactly. A lot of planes came and landed during that period. They didn't have much of a problem.

And this plane had taken off two minutes before it was shot down. Unbelievable. I mean, it's really, you can't keep track of that? Come on. If you can't keep track of it, perhaps no one should be flying into your country, which, by the way, another safety tip, don't fly to Iran. I mean, were you surprised? I was surprised that there were 63 total Canadians in Iran, let alone on one flight. Yeah, I was too.

I mean, that's a lot of Canadians to be in Iran. What are they doing there? Has that ever been explained? Are they in oil over there? Because I don't think there's that. Are there 11 Americans in all? of Iran? I don't know. I don't know. I find that this is another part of this too, which look, plenty of people.

You know, I have a relative who was born in Iran, came over here, married into our family who's a great dude. Like, there's plenty of people, you know, there's lots of people who've come over here from Iran that, you know, who love freedom and great people. Yeah. However, obviously, when you're talking about a war-torn region and an enemy of the United States, you have to have a high level of sensitivity to toward the population to make sure that you don't, the wrong person doesn't get in. Well, think about this, 63 people were flying into Canada, a border we have completely unguarded.

Basically, you can get over that border incredibly easily. And on one flight, 63 people were coming from Iran to Canada. You know, it's something that, you know, look, the northern border is a much more difficult border to secure with a lot less people crossing it. And, you know, resources-wise might not make sense. though it's something that we've seen I mean they wanted to blow up LAX

and we caught someone coming over the Canadian border and that was this is back in the Clinton years and that was their target this is a real threat so it is something that that is it's a little a bit of an interesting aside to the story I was I would say

unaware that there was that much travel going on between Canada and Iran definitely that's a little bit of an eye-opener yeah AAA 727 Beck is the phone number. I want to tell you to subscribe to the YouTube page associated with Stu Does America. It's my new show starting and we're going to start some stuff next week and then it real launch is on February 4th.

If you go to Stu DoesAmerica.com, you'll have all the links there, including the YouTube link. Please go and subscribe. Subscribe if you are listening to this podcast. Anywhere you are on your podcast, you can find Stu Does America as well as Pat Gray Unleashed. make sure you get to that YouTube page as well sign up and do it for America because you know who doesn't want you to sign up

to our YouTube pages? Soleimani. It's one of the last things he said. He said, I don't care if I live or die do not subscribe to Pat Grand Leashed and Stu does America on YouTube. Yeah, Ayatollah said the same thing. Yeah. Same exact thing. And that's, look, if you like the Ayatola,

if you're a huge fan of Soleimani, don't subscribe. But if you happen to care about America and this, maybe you don't want people murdered around the globe. Then you'll sign up for both of these. Right. And in your value will be judged on whether you do that.

Exactly right. That's the Stu Does America and Packray unleashed guarantee. AAA 727BECK. Well, the poets say home is where the heart is, and that's true, of course. Home is also where your mortgage is. And those poet types, generally speaking, leave that part out. But how is your mortgage doing? Are you paying more than you'd like to?

are you looking to refinance? Maybe get down to a more reasonable rate. There's such great rates available right now. Would you like to consolidate some debt and get yourself back on track to face the new year? A little spring in your step. It's a good idea. Or maybe you're looking to take that first step into owning a home altogether. These are the things the salary-based mortgage consultants at American financing can help you answer. A 10-minute phone call could be the first step towards changing your life. American financing is a family-owned mortgage company that's been helping people for over 20 years, including me, by the way. They're a fantastic company, and they are the real deal.

They save their customers up to $1,000 bucks a month, sometimes more. They have an A-plus with a Better Business Bureau and over 4,000 Google reviews. So why wait? Call them today. Call American financing 800-906 2440, 800-9062440, or Americanfinancing. Dot net. American Financing Corporation, NMLS-182334, www. or www. nmls consumer access.org.

It's Pat and Stufer Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. Please say a prayer for Glenn's daughter Mary today, who's going in for some surgery, some brain surgery today. Really a big day for her and for the Beck family. So if you could keep them in your thoughts and prayers, that'd be great. And of course, that's why Glenn is not in today, although we do expect him back tomorrow. This was something that they had planned for a very long,

time and is a big deal and you know hopefully it has some really positive uh positive outcome for mary yeah hopefully it's some positive effects for her life and we're really we're excited about the other side of it but of course it's a it's a tough day and uh and makes everybody nervous so uh your prayers would definitely be uh helpful there also uh jeffy went to the emergency room last night because he had some stomach trouble for the last few days and he just got worse last night so amber his wife took him to the hospital they admitted him because he's got an inflamed gall bladder, pancreatitis,

and elevated liver enzymes, whatever that means. I don't know. I don't know. So we see in a GI Dr. Upper, you know, the GI area, which is the, like your intestines, I think, right?

Your intestines and your stomach. And anyways, that's what he's got going on. So if you could keep him in your prayers today as well, that'd be great. What a surprise that he wouldn't be. completely healthy. I was stunned. I was legitimately stunned.

He looks like the picture of health. Right. You know, it's like a Jack Lalane in the day type of situation. That's Jeffrey. And then, you know, here you go. But they did, but she made a point to say this is not a heart event. His heart is fine. So that's a good thing.

It's not a repeat of last year, which is, wow, it's been almost exactly a year since the last time he was in the hospital. And you had to think, you know, if it's once a year, serious health issues for Jeffie, it's pretty good for him. I kind of feel like it would be more, more often. That is one way to look at it. I love the guy as much as we hammer him. It is, it gets scary. And you get to this age. My wife's totally freaked out by this. It seems like everybody around us is either sick or dying. And that happens. I guess you just like, as you get older, everyone you've known, your entire life starts hitting these ages where they have massive issues. Yes. And just a, this is kind of just a reminder that life sucks.

entirely. I mean, it's just a constant series of disappointments. That's a good way to look at it. And you'll hear more of them tonight on the Democratic debate. Constant series of disappointments in every single chair. You're not a Star Trek fan, are you? Stu. Are you, Hillary? You don't like Star Trek? You said you were going to check out of that one. Yeah, I wasn't interested in it. I thought it was interesting.

He hasn't played that role for two decades. So it's going to be interesting seeing him back in that role. I'm probably not going to be watching He's got to be what, 80 now? He's got to be 80. Close to it, yeah, I would think so. Yeah, it's weird they're doing this a lot now. I was walking through an airport

a few weeks ago and there's posters all over the place for Matt About You? 45. Remember Matt about you? Yeah, barely with Helen Hunt and the 90s? Yeah, the 90s, right? Yeah. Paul Reiser, right? They're doing it again. Did you know this? They're doing it.

New episodes, they're just older. No. And they're just like together, I guess. Like, at least that was what the poster seemed to indicate that, like, everything had worked out and they were together. And there's new episodes of the show. Like, that was a huge show back in the day. Apparently, it's back on the air. No idea. Nobody's ever been clamoring, though, for, you know what we need to have come back?

Mad about you with Helen Hunt and Paul Reiser. I don't think anybody's ever said that out loud. Not even Paul Reiser? No. No. Okay. No. Not a good sign.

Wow. The fusion of entertainment. and enlightenment. This is the Glenbeck program. It's up Pat and Stu for Glenn today. AAA 727B-E-C-K. Vince Vaughn's in a little hot water with the left. I'm very disappointed in him.

Man. I don't know how he could do this, but we'll tell you about that coming up in 60 seconds. This is the Glenn Beck program. Well, you never saw it coming. Oh, you know the stats, of course. One out of every five houses has home security. Only one out of every five.

That seems impossible. And there's a break in every 20 seconds. But those numbers, they're just numbers. Don't worry about it. Except not anymore. Now you're standing, gosh, in the tornado path of wreckage, marking the trail of a person who just decided one day that it was your turn to be the victim. One thought swirls around around in your head as you begin to assess the physical, financial,

and really emotional damage. It really doesn't have to be this way. But that's a little bit too late. This is where Simply Safe steps in. If there's a break in, Simply Safe uses real video evidence to give police an eyewitness account of the crime. And that means police dispatch up to 350% faster than for a normal burglar alarm. All this is monitored by 24-7 security professionals. You can set it up yourself or Simply Safe experts can do it for you.

I select the second option because I'm lazy. There are no contracts and you're spending about 50 cents a day. That's not a lot for security. That's not a lot for peace of mind. Go to SimplySafebec.com today and get the first. free Simply Safe security camera. It's normally $100, but if you order today, you will get it free.

Go there now. Don't be one of four out of five people who have no security system. That's insane. Simplysafebac.com is the place to go. Simplysafebec.com. Pat and Stu, you can listen to my show, Pat Gray Unleashed,

immediately preceding this one on the Blaze Radio and TV network, and then anytime in podcast form. And don't forget to get the YouTube page as well. Subscribe there. And you can get the show and watch it there every day, which is pretty cool. Plus Stu's new show, Stu Does America.

Yes, coming soon. First content comes out next week, and then February 4th. It's going to be a daily show, five days a week for an hour. I would love for you to tune in. You can check it out on YouTube for free every day or on podcast, wherever you get your podcast for free. Please go and subscribe. I encourage you to do so.

It would mean a lot to the children of our world. And the children in your house as well. Mainly the children in my house. But they're in the world. Yes. And there are in the world. You get all the links at stew doesamerica.com. And make sure you go to YouTube and subscribe to that.

And also Pat Gray unleashed. They had the national championship, the college national championship last night, which, as everybody knew, was going to happen. It was won by LSU. It did seem pretty clear. Although it was a little bit in doubt in the first half. A little bit.

And they got somewhat close in the third quarter, too. But in the end, it was 4225 LSU over Clemson, which I think is a little bit of a refreshing change. You know, Clemson, Alabama, Alabama, Clemson, Alabama, Alabama, Alabama, Alabama, a little different. A little different. It still had Clemson, which I'm a little tired of Clemson as I am Alabama. I'm just about there. I'm not quite there, but, you know, it was, I mean, that LSU team is one of the greatest college teams of all time. I think so.

I mean, really good. Said all sorts of records, undefeated, pretty much blew everybody out. It's a remarkable story. Attending the game last night was Donald J. Trump and his wife, Melania, and sitting next to them.

Oh, my gosh. I mean, so disappointing. Right next to them. Talking to them. Talking, the mouth. Actually touched him. Touched them both.

Shook hands with each of them. Oh, my gosh. Actor Vince Vaughn. Oh, geez. what a disappointment. Oh, what a horrible person. How could you do that? How could you talk to the president of the United States?

Yeah. This went viral yesterday because someone posted it on Twitter, someone on the left, and said, I'm very sorry to have to share this clip with you. Like to say, like, now you have to hate Vince Vaughn. And I know you liked him before, but now you have to hate him because obviously he's talking to Donald Trump, which makes him a bad person,

and now you can't watch his movies anymore. Like, that is legitimately the tone of the way the left handled this. Yeah, so ridiculous. I just don't understand that. I mean, you know, and maybe it's because we've been on the wrong side of this for so long in that almost every single person in Hollywood in entertainment is far, far left. And they all go perform for Democratic candidates. They all have their music used by Democratic candidates.

They all show up at Barack Obama's White House. They all come out in ads for socialized medicine and, you know, rich people are. evil despite the fact that they are them and guns you shouldn't have them you're not responsible enough and you shouldn't drive that SUV you're a bad person by the way my motorcade killing babies is not a problem in fact it's desirable it's desirable and if you don't allow people to kill babies then you're a terrible person we're so used to that with every celebrity that i mean i don't even price it in like i go to a movie and at no real point do i uh do i factor in whether the person's has a left or right-leaning politics. It's like, it's just not something I consider with the possible

exception of some people who are so in your face about it that it's hard to separate them from the characters they're playing. Robert De Niro is like that for me. De Niro's getting there. You know, Mark Sheen, Alec Baldwin, you know, Barbara Streisand. Jim Carrey has gotten to that point for me. Yeah. And there are certain, there's a certain level of activism that gets so on your face. It's just tiring and you no longer see. the person as the person they're playing. You only see them as some left-wing activist that's in your face trying to give you a message. Right. And that's a

different line than the average celebrity who certainly votes probably 95% of them vote Democrat. But at least you can kind of brush it off. With the the left is not used to that that arrangement. No. If you come out and you publicly are not, and there's no indication

by the way that that Vince Vaughn was supporting Donald Trump, he was just speaking to the man. Right. Just speaking to the man in a friendly fashion. Now, he probably does support Donald Trump, as we know. But I don't know that a lot of people put him in that category. Yeah, I mean. He might lean Republican or libertarian.

I remember when I heard it, it was surprising. But Vince Fawn is really more of a Ron Paul, Rand Paul type of guy than a Donald Trump guy. Now, I don't know, maybe, you know, I haven't heard much about his politics recently. But if it came to Trump or Hillary or Trump or Biden, I think he's going to. Given the choice, he's going to lean Republican. though he's not exactly the same brand of Republican that you'd necessarily associate with Donald Trump. I mean, you know, he is much more of a libertarian-leaning guy. Though, again, he's not, he has not made politics so in your face as a part of his day-to-day life.

He's an actual person, an individual, that supports politicians just like everybody does. However, he doesn't make it your, you know, his business to put it in your face all the time. the fact that he can't have a polite conversation. Not even just some random candidate. The president of the United States. I mean, it used to be that that was sort of expected. You'd at least have positive interactions with a president, even if you didn't like them.

And now we're at that point where it's trendy to just not show up to the Oval Office. And you see that occasionally from time to time over the years. I remember there was a guy on the Boston Bruins who was a Republican and did not go to see Barack Obama. Right, but those were few and far between. Very few and far between. Now it's like the entire team won't go. And the Golden State Warriors famously would not go see Trump.

You know, I can understand, you don't have to go. You don't have to make it a big deal. However, the idea that you can interact with people across party lines in normal conversation, like that has nothing to do with politics. That's just a normal human way of dealing with life. Yeah. Yeah. That's not supposed to be controversial.

You do realize that when you walk into Starbucks and you buy a cup of coffee or you go to McDonald's, there's a 50-50 shot. You're dealing with someone who doesn't agree with you politically. And I, you know, I don't need every interaction I have in my life to be with someone I agree with on every topic. I don't need that in my life. Nor do I want it to be honest. And I don't, honestly, more than that, I don't want to even know. I don't want to know.

I don't care what you believe. I, you know, I'm going to obviously fight for what I believe is right. But this idea that you, like, you know, Ellen dealt with this a few weeks ago, where Ellen was sitting with George W. Bush. And they're friends. And they're friends. You know, and, you know, are they friendly? Right.

I mean, I'm sure they're not hanging out every day. But they can't even interact in a positive way. I mean, it's crazy. Ellen does more for the Democratic position when she does something like that than any crazy activist does. Yeah. Because she shows she's a normal person. she shows that she is willing to

to talk to someone she disagrees with and that makes Republicans, conservatives like her more. Yeah, you know, it means maybe they're going to be more interested in when she does make a point about liberal politics on her show, maybe more conservatives might listen to it and consider it. They might not like it. They might not agree, but at least it'll be part of the conversation.

And with Vince Vaughn last night, it's not like he was at a fundraiser with Trump or for Trump or for the Republican Party. Isn't the national championship football game? Yeah. And Trump happens to be sitting next to him. I mean, it's not like he went there specifically to see Donald Trump or support Donald Trump. And the fact that, you know, he was pictured talking with him and you're not, I guess you're not supposed to even acknowledge he's alive.

Yeah. It's just, it's gotten so ridiculous in this country. Where does that end? It can't end in a good place. if we keep this up, if we keep insisting that you can't even talk to Donald Trump or people who support him or you're a racist, you can't even be near them, you can't touch them, you can't talk about him in a decent way. I mean, I don't know where that ends up, but it can't be in a good place. It doesn't seem like it would be. No.

But it goes back to, I think, what we discussed last hour, which is the design of this approach is not necessarily. different than when we talk about how, you know, the left can get away with a blackface scandal like Trudeau or Northam, but someone on the right who would do it would obviously be thrown out of society immediately. And it's not about whether you wear blackface or not, or whether you are a Republican or conservative per se. It's about ostracizing anyone who would even be mildly friendly to one of the these people. So what do you do if you're in Hollywood?

Vince Vaughn is Vince Freakin Vaughn. Vince Freakin' Vaughn can do whatever he wants, right? Like he is a huge star. I mean, he's been making critically acclaimed movies over the past few years, dragged across Concrete being one of them, that have been really well received and have done really well with critics.

He hasn't been making as many of sort of the old school Vince Vaughn comedies lately, but the guy still has a really good career and honestly can kind of do what he wants. he's able to survive these things. But if you're a young actor and you're coming up and you want to be the next Vince Vaughn, you want to be the next Chris Pratt, you want to be the next big star, you know, you're not going to talk about these things publicly.

You're not going to go say hello to Donald Trump at the football game and shake his hand and be respectful because you know it might destroy your career. And that's the message that is being sent here. The message being sent is you are not acceptable in society if you interact with the president of the United States in a normal human way. Not out there raising $50 million for the guy, but shaking his hand and being polite to his wife.

That is now off limits. And that message is being sent. It was sent as well as we saw. We did a few stories about this last year with the book about Oculus Rift, the guy who, you know, guy in a trailer. creates this amazing virtual reality technology,

gets to the point where Facebook buys it for multiple billions of dollars. He is spotted at one Trump fundraiser, and they destroy him. They fire him. He gets thrown out of the... He has to release a statement lying about the candidate he voted for. I mean, all of these crazy things happened.

It was in Blake Harris's book. It's worth going back in reading. A fascinating thing. And it's tossing people out of society. despite their accomplishments because they have moderately pleasant interactions with a person.

Like, that's what we used to freaking cheer on. There was a time where you say, okay, look, I know you disagree with that guy, but that's great that you guys are still friends and you still talk to them

about these things. Now that is like something that gets you thrown out of polite society and it's something where if you are coming up in technology or entertainment or one of these big fields,

you're going to hesitate being honest about who you are, which is the exact opposite of what Hollywood says they want. They kept saying, oh, they're going to keep everybody in the closet, and they want to say, put, you know, scared communists, the red scare and all these things. Well, what is it now? You have organizations that are basically like AA for conservatives in Los Angeles

so they can talk to someone openly. This is not a healthy environment. How often did Chris Matthews talk about Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neill? Over and over and over. They disagreed politically, but then they'd have the dinner and drinks together. I mean, we heard that a billion times. You can't do that now. I mean, now that's not acceptable, I guess.

It's only good when the conservative, when this is utilized for a conservative to abandon their principles and support some liberal policy. Exactly. Then it's great. Yeah. You know, oh, wow. Like this senator has decided to vote for socialized medicine after he went out to, you know, this happened with Orrin Hatchelot back when he was senator. This was like, this is, this is, this is Kennedy. This is actually copywritten

as you have to write a sea after it. It's the Oren Hatch. And Hatch would go out with Kennedy and they'd come up with some, you know, left wing philosophy on education that Hatch would be the main, quote unquote, conservative voice to stand up for. And everyone on MSNBC would say,

this is bipartisan. They went out to dinner, I assume with Hatch not drinks, but went out to dinner and said, hey, we're going to, you know what? The thing I've been supposedly standing for and everybody in Utah voted for me. I'm not for that anymore.

I'm not for that. I believe the opposite. I believe what Ted Kennedy said because those ribs were tasty. That is not a good way to run a country. However, being friendly with someone is fine. You can be friendly with them. You just don't abandon your principles just because you're friendly with them. That's a trick that many in Washington can't seem to master.

AAA 727 B.E.C. More coming up in 60 seconds. Well, let's talk about a shave secret. You know, Glenn has been talking about Shave Secret for a very long time and thousands and thousands of people have made the switch because they found out about a simple truth. You don't need expensive blades, creams, soaps, or gels for a clean, close shave.

Just need Shave Secret. Shave Secret is a proprietary blend of essential oils that dramatically reduces nicks, cuts, ingrown hairs, and even that pesky shaving rash. You don't want that. If you want proof, check out the five-star reviews all over Amazon, Google, and Facebook. Shave Secret will replace all your shaving creams and gels.

It's got to add three to five drops to a wet palm, massage into your skin, and boom, you're ready to shave. I've used this before. The thing that's great about Shave Secret is, like, you're using, like, three drops, so it lasts forever. Like, one bottle lasts you forever. It works with both men and women and is widely available. You can find it online at Amazon and ShaveSecret.com. Give Shave Secret a try. You'll see that thousands of others have also come to the conclusion.

Shave Secret is the best shave out there. You've got to give it a shot. Shave Secret is available regionally at H.E.B. And Wegman's grocery, as well as online at Amazon or ShaveSecret.com. If you go to shavesecret.com, make sure to use the promo code Beck and you're going to get a 10% discount. It's shavesecret.com. Pause for 10 seconds. Station ID. This is interesting.

Apparently, the House is preparing a likely vote tomorrow to transmit the articles of impeachment to the Senate. and didn't they already, they voted on the articles of impeachment, don't you just send them to the Senate now? They got to vote. Now they're going to vote about whether or not they're going to send them to the Senate? And then they got a vote on whether they should vote. Then they'll vote on the retroactive vote. And then they'll vote on, if they vote to send them to the Senate,

when should we send them to the Senate? We'll have a vote on that. And then they'll vote on whether they have a quorum. Because they got to have a quorum call. There's always a good quorum call mixed into one of these big dramas. That's the biggest moment. It's why the first Star Wars was so successful because they really went through the parliamentary process

in that first one, the prequel, when they were just like, hey, let's talk about trade policy for about 40 minutes of this movie. And everyone was like, that's almost too sexy. You know, I want more trade federation talk. That's what I need. Yeah, the trade federation talk was definitely sexy.

It really was. And you know, that's why people were so annoyed at Jar Jar Jar Binks. We need more trade federation talk. There's actually an edit. This is totally off the subject, but there's an edit online of Star Wars of just the Trade Federation talk.

Really? It's like the Trade Federation edit. And it's just to show you how much horrible trade talk there was in that movie. There's a lot in the Phantom Menace. So it's interesting they have, they're right, they're going over. Trump is obviously now he's been impeached.

They have to come to the situation where they name the house managers. It's another big part of this. they're going to and that's going to they're going to bring the articles of impeachment over then you have the trial preparation they're trying to get they think they're going to do this trial in like a week now I believe the Clinton one was a month

so they're really cutting the short they want to you know both sides it seems like want this over with the Democrats are proposing they you know they're they're acting as if they want all these witnesses and in reality I think they want it over with too they got a bunch of candidates they know they lost yeah they know they lost

they want this over with this is an embarrassment And this is a massive failure and will be one of the things Nancy Pelosi's legacy is remembered for a massive failure when it comes to this. Yes, she got the word impeachment associated with this president but this is obviously going to fail.

There's never been a point where people in the middle considered their argument on this. It's never been one of those situations where you had the Susan Collins out there saying, you know what, I might vote for this. This seems very serious. You get a little bit of lip service occasionally but no one crossing the aisle.

No. They tried to make us think that maybe Mitt Romney would, maybe Susan Collins would, but maybe Lisa Murkowski would. But really, I don't think there was any danger of any of them. Yeah. Voting for impeachment or for conviction. It's not impossible. You'll see a moderator to switch.

It's not impossible. However, you know, with Clinton, there was a period in which there was an honest question as to whether these serious allegations would motivate some. Democrats enough to maybe make a difference to actually stand up and say, you know, no more of this, we're impeaching and we're going to remove this guy from office. There's never been that hint here. I mean, it's just

they have not produced nearly enough evidence. They themselves say the big problem is they need more evidence. If you had a good case, why would you need John Bolton to testify? You've already made your case, right? Right. But I mean, you know, this is the convenience of being on the left.

You don't have to answer these questions. You're listening to Glenn. You ever have those days where you're sitting there at your desk trying to get something important done and you can't focus because it feels like you're sitting in a chair that was specifically designed to torture you and twist your back into like the awful pretzel? It's got the one squeaky wheel and what feels like rusty bed springs is about to poke up through the fabric. Oh, awful. Well, may I suggest considering X chair, treat yourself.

Treat yourself, I believe these to say. You'll be both productive and comfortable throughout your day. I can vouch for this because I sit in one every single day here on the show, and I love it. With its patented dynamic variable lumbar support in 10 settings, the X-Chair is what you need around your house if you want a comfortable workday working at home or if you're at your office. X-Chair's 30-day, no questions asked guarantee of satisfaction. Gives you a situation where you have zero risk. Most companies don't make that kind of offer because most companies aren't X-Chair.

Don't settle for less than the best. Get an X-Chair today. And are on sale now for $100 off. Go to X-Chairbeck.com. That's X-Chairback-B-E-C-K. Or call 844-X-Chair. Go to X-Chairbeck. com right now and use the code back.

You're going to receive a free set of the new X-Wills with your chair. It's X-Chair.com. Code is Beck. Glenn, Mark Levine, Stephen Crowder, and me, Pat Gray, all-in-one-one location, plus coming very soon. Stu Begare. Stu-D-E-D-M-A-U-D-M-A. Use a promo code, Glenn.

Get $10 off at BlazedTV.com. It's a Pat and Stufer Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. Big debate tonight featuring the six candidates who qualified for the debate tonight. Not all six have really equal shot at winning this nomination. Some, in fact, might as well just get out of it now and stop wasting money. I mean, there's Amy Klobuchar. I'm a little surprised she's still in this thing. Although, was she at 15%?

percent in Iowa? No, I've seen it at 8 and 10 percent here and there. Tom Steyer got 15 percent in South Carolina, which is, was odd. And I believe hit 12 in Nevada. And, you know, I was in Nevada over Christmas break and everywhere. I mean, Tom Steyer's face is everywhere. He's, he's buying every billboard. It's like it's either, it's either massage parlor, naked ladies, Tom Steyer.

And I associate the two. because of the sexiness of Tom Steyer. Oh, yeah. It's just hard to... Super sexy. Just the overflowing sexiness, the utter sexuality of a Tom Steyer. It's almost difficult to ignore.

Yeah. But he's everywhere there. And it's funny to see this because Steyer is trying something really that's never quite been done, which is dump money as a billionaire into early states and take yourself from no one knows who you are to absolute, you know, just you blanket a state and then try to build yourself into a personality that people will vote for.

And he started this and he got down this road and he spent $70 million and then Michael Bloomberg was like, well, I'm a much better billionaire than you. Why don't I just do this better? So now Bloomberg has spent, it looks like by the time Super Tuesday rolls around, Michael Bloomberg will have spent a quarter of a billion dollars of his own money on ads.

Wow. You saw them in the national championship game probably last night. He ran several. It could be more than this. It could be almost a half a billion dollars. And all on Super Tuesday states, which is really fascinating because he is running in states essentially unopposed. These Super Tuesday states, none of the candidates are, they're all focusing on the early states. So he's just like, I'll just wait.

So he's blanketing and he is rising in the polls and he's doing, you know, he's been hitting 8%, 10% in some of these early polls in these states. And he's up to 5% or 6% nationally. So he's kind of doing the Rudy Giuliani trick, whenever that was. Was it 2012 or 2008, I believe, yes. Where he waited until Florida, but he didn't spend all the money that Bloomberg is spending right now. No. I mean, that's the key. And so that was his big mistake.

By the time it got to Florida and he was waiting for everybody, it was over. He was done. Yeah. Nobody cared about him. And because of that, he has such a unique path. Yeah. I mean, you're right. With Giuliani, it was, you know, look, all these New Yorkers moved down to Florida.

They love Rudy. He'll be able to win. did not work. Now, Bloomberg is facing something, and his path is different, where he's rooting for there not to be a, the worst thing that can happen for Bloomberg is Biden wins the first four states. Because if Biden is there,

and he's the obvious frontrunner, Bloomberg's toast. However, if one of the two other things happen, he's got an argument. One being, there's a big split. Buttigieg, let's say, Buttigieg wins Iowa, Sanders wins New Hampshire, Warren wins Nevada,

and Biden wins South Carolina. All four of those are very possible, very possible. Now, the dynamics change. If Buttigieg wins, Iowa, does he win also New Hampshire? I mean, there's a good argument to be made that that momentum will help him.

But if those four split up, then Bloomberg comes in essentially as the guy to say, look, this is a mess. I'm going to win. these other states and insert myself into this conversation. The other one is a dominant performance by one of the liberals. So let's say Sanders wins Iowa, then Sanders goes back to back and wins New Hampshire, which if he wins Iowa, he's got a really good chance of winning New Hampshire. That's possible too. Yeah, he wins those two, which, by the way, he's leading in many polls in both

of those states. If he wins those two in a row, very good chance he wins Nevada as well. So he goes three for three. No candidate has ever won the first three states and then lost. the last one who did this was Al Gore. Al Gore in 2000 won the first three states. And when he won the first three states as a non-incumbent, he went on to win every primary. Now, obviously, someone like Barack Obama, who was already president, it's a different story.

But when you have a non-incumbent, it's not as easy to do this. So if Sanders win the first three states, good chance he also wins South Carolina. You know, who knows, Biden could be destroyed by that point. Then you have, you have to ask the Democratic Party, do you really want, do you really want, Bernie freaking Sanders

to be your nominee. Because if you want an avowed socialist as your nominee, you can have him. He's way ahead. But you know who else is there? Michael Bloomberg with his billion dollars. And you're not going to have to worry about fundraising. You're not going to have to worry about any of that stuff. He's going to pay for all of it himself.

And you know, you might not like Bloomberg, but you know what? He's super liberal on guns. He's super liberal on climate change. He's super liberal on almost everything, with the exception of some business issues. And you deal with that so you don't get Bernie Sanders. But is he universal health care as well?

I don't know if I've heard his health care plan. You know, that's a good, I think he is. I think he's Medicare for all, though. He's not like full-fledged Medicare for all. He's a more Buttigieg approach, Medicare for those who want it, as they say. In other words, the public option. So you could still keep supposedly, like they liked to us before. If you like your health care, you can keep your health care.

Until we take it away. Yeah. That's the full sentence that got muddled a little bit. The applause. It was always behind the scenes. Yeah, I think, I believe that's where he is. I'm giving, we can confirm that 100% to make sure, but he's not, look, Bloomberg is running overtly as a supposed moderate, which is hilarious when you see him.

He is not moderate. He is as extreme as anybody, probably, in all honestly, more extreme than Bernie Sanders on guns. That is, that is, oh, no probably about it. Bernie actually supported the Second Amendment. He had his time, I mean, he's from Vermont. And he had his time where he was like, yeah, maybe people in rural communities. Now, he denies a lot of that now, and he's distanced himself. Although he was just asked about confiscation, he said absolutely not.

Yeah, he's not there. That's not there. That's crazy because, I mean, Bloomberg is there. Yes. Bloomberg, with the exception of his security personnel does not want anyone to have a gun. Right. Now, his security personnel, totally different story. And he'll certainly use guns to come in to make sure that your SUV is not operating on gasoline.

That's coming in a future Bloomberg administration, for sure. But, yeah, I mean, I think that there is an argument there for Bloomberg. Steyer is a tougher case. I mean, Steyer would have to somehow win a couple of these early states and then become the only liberal standing. So if you look at this as a situation where, let's say Biden is doing very well, there's no liberals left. Biden is cruising and Steyer can win a couple of states.

Maybe Steyer can make the argument, look, I've got a lot of money, I can fund this thing myself, you know, stick with me. I don't think there's a real Steyer argument, though. I mean, the Steyer thing, he's so bad as a candidate. He's so boring. It's just hard to imagine him catching fire. Well, Bloomberg is at least a character. I mean, I think he's a jerk in every way known.

He wants to take away my freaking soda and my straws. And I cannot think of anything more offensive to my soul than going after my soda. He even tried to take away your salt in New York. Yep. And he did take away our walking spaces. I know that. He closed off all kinds of streets where you're going to. can't drive anymore and actually made them walking spaces, made them plazas.

Yeah. I mean, it just made things tougher to get around and navigate. One of the big things he tried to do in New York, too, was to have this big commuter tax where you'd pay huge amounts of money to drive into the city. As you remember, Pat, of course, you were driving in the city every day. It was already really freaking expensive to park your car and paying tolls. He wanted to make that much, much higher. Think of what he would do to the national capital.

I mean, as president. I mean, think of the things he would push. through there. That would be, I mean, D.C. would be even more of a mess than it is. He's totally fine with controlling your life, with telling you what you can and can't do, what you can and can't eat, what you can and can't have, because he knows better than you. He honestly believes he knows better than you, that there are people, and he's one of them, who are just way smarter than you are, and they know how you should live your lives. And that's how, that's what he believes. Yeah, it's interesting, especially if you've been listening to this show for a long time and

listening to Glenn talk about early 20th century progressivism and Woodrow Wilson and how that all developed. And if you listen to this show for more than five minutes, how could you have missed it? I mean, is there have been a five minute period on this program where Glenn has not mentioned Woodrow Wilson? I mean, five consecutive minutes without Woodrow Wilson. No, there has not been in the history of the show. But if you know that, there's two candidates, I think I like personify that Woodrow Wilson philosophy better than anyone else. Elizabeth Warren is one of them and Michael Bloomberg is the other. People who are, who absolutely believe they know better than you how to live your life.

Now, of course, there's elements in every single one of these candidates of this philosophy. But in Bloomberg is maybe the most pure example because, I mean, all the way down to running massive campaigns to take away larger soda cups so we can manipulate the amount of calories that you're eating, you know, getting rid of straws, getting rid of, as you point out, you wanted to get rid of table salt. I mean, think of this. He wanted to ban salt from your restaurant experience. There was another thing he was talking about recently where he wanted the poor to stay poor or pay higher taxes.

Yeah. So that they didn't have enough money to hurt themselves with. Right. They would buy it because if they have too much money, they'll go out to eat. They're going to go buy bad things and put into their body. Yep. So then they can't buy drugs. I mean, that's incredible.

Oh, and that is progressivism. in a nutshell, right there. It's the other side of the coin from a Warren who wouldn't say something like that, but still thinks it. You know, a lot of her policies lead to the same exact things, and it's one of the reasons conveniently, Medicare for all will raise taxes on the poor

and the middle class. I mean, Bernie admits it. Warren doesn't quite admit it, but it's obviously true, and she even gets beat up by the left on her denial of these claims. But it's going to be interesting. 538.com released their model

of the, entire primary. Again, like people like to beat up on polls. But you look at the accuracy of the poll. I mean, you know, the national election, they projected it almost exactly as far as the popular vote was, which is what they were projecting. Some of the states they missed on, and a lot of these forecasters did miss on that. But the idea that polls are worthless is largely a myth.

I mean, you know, polls got about 45, 46 states right. the popular vote they got it right you know Donald Trump's surprised in certain areas in you know to a point of all reporting shows that even their internal polling showed that they were not going to win some of those races and they did so it's not always perfect but it does give you a good idea

this is really imperfect though because the polling in primaries and caucuses is much less reliable than general election polling it's harder to do especially a caucus I mean what goes on in Iowa where everyone's in a room trying to convince each other is such a different process. It's really hard to do that. And then everything has an effect on everything that comes after it.

So, you know, in Iowa, you might say, okay, Joe Biden's got a 30% chance to win Iowa. Well, if he wins Iowa, his chances might go from 20% in New Hampshire to 40% in New Hampshire. Everything, whatever happens in Iowa is going to affect all these other races. So to try to project all of these things in a row is basically, an impossible task. And you should know going in that these things can't be perfect, but it is an interesting effort.

They say Joe Biden has a 38% chance right now to win the majority of delegates for the Democrats. And 38% chance of winning is obviously he's the favorite by a pretty wide margin. On the other hand, there's a 62% chance he doesn't win. So there's a much better chance

that he does not win the majority of delegates than he, does, which is a way that you have to kind of think about this. This is a race that's really up in the air. Sanders, 23%, Warren, 13% chance of winning the majority of delegates. Buttigieg, 10%. All others, with the exception of, all others is, you know, about 1% chance of people like Bloomberg and down the, you know, Klobuchar. The one that's really interesting, though, is they say there's a 15% chance.

No one wins the majority of delegates, which means you're probably going to have a contested convention. invention, yeah. A 15% chance they project right now, which is significant. Yeah. All right. More coming up. 728-727 B-E-C-K. It's Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program.

Reinventing yourself in the new year is hard. It's a lot easier to do your home, luckily, though, with blinds.com. From cellular shades to wood blinds to Roman shades and more, Blinds.com has you covered when it comes to overhauling your home's look. So you're about to get the deal of the century here. Let's do it. Today only, you can save up to 40% at blinds.com. Plus, you'll get an extra 20 bucks off when you use the promo code back.

Every order gets free samples, free shipping, and free online design with their consultation. I've gone through this process, by the way. We have blinds.com in our home, and we absolutely love it. It was really easy, and they showed how great these things would look. Before I even had them in my house, I knew it was going to look great. And they do. They've changed the entire dynamic of the room, and it's just a great way to invest in your home. and their 100% satisfaction guarantee means that if you aren't totally satisfied with the style,

color, or quality, they're going to remake your window treatments for free. The people at blinds.com care how your home looks as much as you do, and that's why they are our number one online retailer, retailer of a custom window coverings. They've been doing this forever. I mean, I remember when Blinds.com started doing this. It was like way before people were buying things like this on the internet. They know this stuff better than anybody. Go now, today only.

We're going to say 40% off. plus an extra $20, excuse me, an extra $20 off with promo code back. It's 40% off today only plus an extra $20 off with the promo code back. Blinds.com promo code back. It's blinds.com promo code back rules and restrictions may apply. You're listening to Glenn. 888727BECK is the phone number. It's Pat and Stu in for Glenn today.

Glenn is out. He's with his daughter who is having brain surgery today. and we have them in our prayers. I hate to say this. Our thoughts and prayers are with Glenn today. Oh, wow. Which is one of the worst things you can say. Because if you're thinking or praying for someone,

that means you're a bad person, as we've learned for the media. It does. It does. That means you don't care? Because that means you're not actually conducting the surgery. Right. Why am I not doing anything?

Yeah. I don't even have a scalpel of my own. No, you don't. No. That's because I don't care. You don't care. But my thoughts and prayers are there. And what are prayers to a Christian?

I mean, that means almost nothing, right? Right? It's like, hey, we're setting the most meaningful thing we believe in our, in our deeply held faith. Oh, well, that we need more than that is what every Democratic candidate says, which is so nice after every single event. Yeah. But he is, he'll be back tomorrow. He's just out with her today as she goes through a planned but serious surgery. So we're, you know, Mary is in our thoughts and prayers today. As is Jeffie, who's in the hospital again. He's got some kind of. upper GI thing going on. Yeah. Just one thing, if you do visit him in the hospital,

don't bring Holy Water because it will burn him. That's, if Holy Water gets near him. We've seen this. I mean, it's just, it just happened last time who's in the hospital. Sears the skin. That's not good.

Sadly, yeah. You're listening. Margaret, I think what you're saying there is that the president tweeted about this and then I came on the show and now I'm talking about it. and I'm just not telling you anything about it

because I'm talking around what you're saying. I'm going to recap the events here. So that I don't really have to answer the question. Eventually we'll run out of time for the segment and we'll not have to say anything. That's the John Kerry Way doing this. That's how I ran as president. That's how I ran Secretary of State.

That's how I'll do this tomorrow. So thank you for your time. I left them $156 billion before, well, no, I just like, left him $156 billion on the tarmac. That's all. Does some of this going to be spent on child porn? Absolutely. That's why, look, that's a big... Yes, of course, of course.

We knew that going in. They could spend it on whatever they want. It's their money. What are we supposed to do about that? Not give it back to him? It's Pat and Stufer Glenn on the Glenn Beck Program. AAA 727BECK. Big debate tonight. A little problem.

between Bernie and Elizabeth. Get into that. Coming up and lots more in 60 seconds. This is the Glimbeck program. You know, Mike Lindell changed the face of sleep with his company, My Pillow. And he knows that if you're, look, if you're a big part of this,

you know what's going on with this company, where it is today. And he's wanted to give back to you in a big way, and he's found that way. Say hello to Giza Dreamsheets. Ah, yes. These are wonderful. myself. These sheets are made from the world's best of cotton, geese cotton. They're ultra soft and

breathable and yet extremely durable and they get softer the more you use them. Only bad news is once you sleep on them, everything else is going to feel just awful. It's going to feel like a giant disappointment. Right now, the Geese at Dream Sheets are buy one, get one set free with the promo code, Beck. Remember all my pillow products come with a 60-day money back guarantee, but you're not going to want to send them back because they're great. These sheets are great. I know a lot of people out there become sheet snobs over the years. And if you're a sheet snob, you're going to love these Giza Dreamsheets. Go to MyPillow.com and click on the new radio listener specials to buy one pair of Giza Dream

sheets and get one free. There are also deep discounts on other MyPillow products as well. Just enter the promo code back or call them at 1-800-9663117 for these great radio specials. And thank you from Mike Lindell. So the big debate is tonight. Six Democrats qualified for this particular debate. And everybody is expecting the main action to be between Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren,

the two good close personal friends who are having a little bit of a tip right now. A little trouble. Warren was upset that some Sanders underlings were saying that she was an elitist. So she decided to blatantly, obviously, leak a report about a private meeting between Elizabeth Warren and Sanders back in 2018, where apparently Bernie Sanders said he didn't think a woman could be elected president. Now, he denies that, but she says she's confirmed it. Yeah, she's now confirmed it on record that that I said that I thought a woman could win and he disagreed.

Now, it's hard to imagine the sort of sexist implication is something he actually said in person because it just doesn't, I mean, you know, he probably was trying to say, you know, strategically, maybe a man has a better case, if he said anything at all. Maybe the man has the better case of winning some of these states that Trump won. That is a very common analysis, by the way, in the Democratic Party, very common. It was the same common analysis used back when the Hillary Clinton campaign was running against Barack Obama, which eventually led to the birther situation. It's also very common among the left who, if you, it works with progressivism, right?

They say we're progressives, we're wonderful, but these little people in their blue-collar worlds, they can't understand a woman being president. We have to give them a white dude. They can't take a minority. That's just, you know, that's sad, but we're so much better than them. At some point, they'll come along to our philosophy, but right now they're not ready. So we have to have white, whitey, whitey, Mick Whiterson. And only Whitey McWhiterson can win.

We need a man. We need them to be white. And that's the way we need to go. And that is like legitimately a big part of the, it's half of the party, believes that. No, yeah. They believe that, you know, the reason why Hillary Clinton lost is because she's a woman and there was enough people who couldn't take a woman being president that they voted for Donald Trump. That's their analysis of the situation.

They don't even take into account the Clinton death list. They don't even take that into account. We're still in the Clinton death list. I love it. Yeah, I know. Yeah, I love it. It's one of your favorites. What is it up to now?

Like 5,000, 6,000? I think that's about half of where it is. Really? Yeah. And we know definitely Jeffrey Epstein Oh, he's definitely on that list Now did they break into the prison themselves and do this Or do they have someone else do it?

No, they had somebody else do it Okay, yeah Because that would be ridiculous They'd be stupid I mean, you wouldn't even believe that they did it themselves Now why didn't they kill him in the 10 years He was walking around Miami? There was no reason to

Oh really? Yeah, even though his name was in the book Yeah, they thought he was going to get away with it. Oh, okay, so they just didn't bother. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, that's that makes a lot of sense. It does, doesn't it? Yeah.

Yeah. So Warren goes on, takes the really unusual step of confirming the story. All she had to say was, look, it was, I mean, she started with this. It's a private conversation. We're not going to talk about what happened there. That's already kind of a jerk move from Warren, who is supposedly been friends with the guy for 20 years. She could have just said no. Of course.

And he said something about a female candidate did not mean he was a sexist. Like, if this was leaked by someone else, that's how she would have responded, right? Because she leaked it herself and probably. designed the email that leaked it to whatever CNN. She came out and said, well, yes, he did say that. Which is an incredibly, it's an escalating move. It's the killing Soleimani of this campaign, right?

Like, that is a big, it's like, you know, it actually kind of makes sense here. Bernie Sanders using his proxies to kind of get under Elizabeth Warren's skin over and over again. And at some point, Warren's like, screw it! We're sending a drone. And I'm going to confirm on the record that Bernie Sanders is a sexist. Now, she also says in the statement, which I find to be fascinating, that they're still friends,

they still have all these wonderful things in common. They're going to work together. They're both. He's a great guy. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. And it's like, well, which one is it? Is he a sexist, which makes this a scandal? Or is he a great guy?

Because if he's a great guy still, then why do you, what's the scandal with the comment? The only reason the comment makes news is because, in theory, behind the closed doors, he's a massive sexist. Well, there's no evidence for. the past that would lead you to believe that Bernie Sanders is a sexist. Right? That's the good thing is that there's... I hate to break this to you.

There's a little bit of evidence down that from. Really? Like what? Only though, you know, because you could say, well, what is it? Like some off-the-cuff comment? I mean, that would be... Right, yeah. Okay. But I mean, it's a little bit different than that. It's a carefully crafted essay

that appeared in, you know, this is many, many years ago, 1972 essay, and you've heard some of this before, though I believe there's a little bit of additional stuff we need to go over. Just to remind you, and if you have children in the car, now's a wonderful time to go to Kids Bop. Okay. But this is an article called Man and Woman, written for the Vermont Freeman, an alternative newspaper.

All right, and there might be some sexism from Bernie in this, you're saying. Well, yeah, you know, I can't judge it. You help me bring this along. All right. He says, he's defining what men and women think. You know, this is the reality. Let's be real. You know, when you're in an alternative newspaper, Pat, you can just be real.

Yeah, we're going to hold back. This is the mainstream media. We're going to real. That's what we're going to do. All right. He says a man goes home and pleasures himself with his typical fantasy. This is the typical thing than a man does. A woman on her knees.

A woman tied. up a woman abused. Now remember, this is Bernie Sanders summarizing an entire gender and he believed that's the typical typical fantasy of a man. So who is the man who believes that's the typical fantasy of a man?

It's a man whose typical fantasy is what he just said. That's, of course, reading maybe a little bit too much into this. But again, is able to summarize the entire female brain as well. He says a woman enjoys intercourse with her man. as she fantasizes being raped by three men simultaneously. Then he goes on to, I mean, I mean, this is,

how this is awful. Awful. How this guy has been able to maintain a standing in public society with this on his record is remarkable. I mean, something 150th as offensive as this would sink any Republican can. Oh, what was it? What's his face said a few years ago, you know, on the race? They don't get pregnant or something. Yeah, yeah. They usually don't get pregnant when they're raped. Right. That's wrong. But, I mean, he wasn't saying rape's good or people fantasize about rape. It was nothing like this. And it cost him his career. He was done. Now, I will say, you might point out, well, you know, there's been offensive things said. And Donald Trump does seem to have some immunity on offensive things he said. However, again. He's the only Republican who does. The only Republican who does. The only Republican who's ever been able to pull that off, number one.

And number two, a lot of it says off the cuff, you know, as he would say, locker room talk, right? This is a deep philosophical point about that's written. Again, writing something is different than speaking it out loud, off the cuff. He says, then the man and women get dressed up on Sunday and go to church or maybe to the revolutionary political meeting. Now, this is something I think I can talk to you about, Pat, because I know you've experienced it. Have you ever looked at the stag, man, hero, tough magazines on the shelf of your local bookstore? Now, I know you're a long-term subscriber to stag. Stag.

Hero, man, tough. I know you're a big, you believe. I don't even know what that is. I don't know either. Is that four magazines or is that one magazine with a long title? I don't know. Stagg seems like it would be the name of a magazine. But man is supposed to be a name of something.

But man? Is man a magazine? That's a great title. They're like the first person the guy. Man magazine. Yeah, like it's like the first person who got on Twitter and it's like, my name's Steve. I'm at Steve. Like they got, they really got the name.

It's just man. They got one of the two genders is the title of their magazine. Then hero and tough. I don't know any of these publications. Do you know why? Now listen. Again, kids, please, if you have them in your car, again, another warning here. But listen to this.

This is a sentence. The guy who's arguing. leading the race for the Democratic nomination. Vote himself. Do you know why the newspaper with the articles like Girl 12 raped by 14 men sell so well?

Do they? Is that something that people want to read about? A 12-year-old assaulted by 14 men in Bernie Sanders' mind, this is a fantasy, a thing that people dream about. That's freaking... Like, that is like... massively twisted, massively twisted.

And he says... He was what, like 30 at this time? Yeah, something like that. Because he's not like 12 at the time. No, no, yeah. This isn't like a high school essay. Or 15 or something. He's 30. He's a man.

He's a 172. I mean, I don't know his age, but I think... It's 50 years ago and he's 78 years old. Yeah. It's 28, 30 years old. I would have guessed he's even older. Jeez. Because, I mean, he doesn't look young.

So Sanders then go... I love this because he goes on and says, you know, Many women seem to be walking a tight rope as their qualities of love, openness, and gentleness were too deeply enmeshed with qualities of dependency, subservience, and masochism. He's saying women have the quality of dependency and subservience to men emmeshed in them. This is Bernie freaking Sanders writing this. And then he writes, what are they, what is it? Men are also confused?

What do they want from a woman? Are they at fault? Are they perpetrating this man-woman situation? are they oppressors? He then goes on to, and this is fascinating part of this. This is, I'm reading this from an NPR review of this article.

Now, you would think that this would just be massively horrified the tone of this. Instead, the title is, the Bernie Sanders rape fantasy essay explained. So he gets an,

a nice little excuse built from NPR about how you can't really hold them to this stuff. He didn't really mean it. Listen to this. I mean, Listen to the tone of this. One way to read the essay is that Sanders is doing, in a supremely ham-handed way, what journalists do every day.

Draw the reader in with an intention getting lead and then get to the meet of the article in the middle. That's how you summarize this article? It's crazy. And then they point out because they are forced to, though he only sticks to his larger point for three paragraphs. So all of this rape fantasy setup leads to a three paragraph. point. And what supposedly is the point? The point is basically that men and women

have a confused way of dealing with each other. They all have these dark sides that they don't talk about and then they all act polite and polite society. But I don't think that excuses what he wrote at all. Not at all. It just explains it. Right. He's just summarizing without the rape language,

what he feels, which is that women want these terrible things done to them and guys want to do them to them. And that's what people are. I mean, and that is a... That's unreal. It's a massively amazing thing. It's amazing what this guy gets away. He's a socialist in the United States of America.

He's got this freakiness in his past. He's 78 years old. He's had a heart attack. How is this guy even in the race anymore? How does anybody support him? And this is also a candidate, by the way, that had major Me Too problems with it in his campaign. not against him, but within his campaign last time you're right.

And another minor thing to mention, which is of interest to some, is that one of his campaign volunteers tried to kill 10% of elected Republicans at a softball field or baseball field. Yep. You know, it's a kind of overlooked thing. But, you know, it's... Wouldn't be overlooked if it was a Trump supporter. I'll tell you that.

Yeah. I mean, if I try... Can you imagine, you know, this is one of the biggest... This is almost one of the worst incidents in American history when it comes to to government officials. And only the idea that there were a couple secret service people there that were able to stop this guys. And he got a total pass on it.

And like, I sympathize with the past. Except in the world that they have created. Yes. He shouldn't, if that's the world we live in. He himself will go out and blame Donald Trump when a Trump supporter, not a volunteer, but a supporter will go out and do something terrible. Blame, blame, blame, blame.

For the airliner disaster in Iran. He didn't even do it. Right? I mean, this is like his enemy shot down an airliner and he'll blame Trump. And look, I think as an honest human being who's not going to sell my soul for politics to make a point against Bernie Sanders, that as I've said a million times, the person who commits the crime is the one responsible for it. We are individuals. If Bernie Sanders was out there with even much worse rhetoric, he still wouldn't be responsible for someone who's going and shooting people. That being said, in the world that he's created, in the world he continues. to participate in blaming people who are not responsible for their crimes for the crimes.

He is probably the best example of this. He continually vilifies Republicans, says they're out for only rich people and to kill and make people die because they don't get health care because they want to benefit some executive. He wants them to die from climate change. He wants to kill millions of people because of climate change to help line the pockets of oil executives. He gives you that rhetoric, and this guy goes out and it targets Republicans. Well, I mean, under the Bernie Sanders logic here, of course Bernie Sanders is responsible for that. Yet he doesn't hold any responsibility for that. He doesn't hold any responsibility for the Me Too stuff in his own campaign.

He doesn't hold any responsibility for the allegations against him. And for the weird rape fantasies for his vacation homes, none of that has anything to do with him. It's really interesting. It is an amazing magic trick. Right back in 60 seconds. Well, talking about literally anything, religion, politics, anything uncomfortable is way, way easier than talking about something like ED. Oh, don't want to talk about that with anybody other than a doctor. You know, look, it's tough to talk about, but with Roman, they've made it easy.

You can talk to a real doctor who can prescribe real medication. With Roman, you can get a free online evaluation and ongoing care for. E.D. all from the comfort and privacy of your own home. The doctor will work with you to find the best treatment plan and if medication is appropriate. Roman will ship it to you with free two-day shipping. Whole process is straightforward, simple

and discreet. To get started, go to get Roman.com slash back and complete an online visit. Look, this used to be tough to tackle but that was before Roman came on the scene. They've made it easy. You don't have to talk to anybody. No uncomfortable face-to-face meetings, none of that stuff. Just complete an online visit today

and connect with the doctor and take care of it. Go to get roman.com slash Beck. Get a free online visit and free two-day shipping. That's get Roman.com slash Beck. Free visit to get started right now at get roman.com slash Beck. 10 seconds. Station ID. Triple-8-900.

It's AAA 727 B.ECK. It is Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. Our thoughts and prayers with Mary, who he's with right now. She's getting brain surgery today. So it's a big day in the Beck family. and our thoughts and prayers are with them. And also with Jeffrey, who just happened to be back in the hospital again today.

So, yeah, the prayers are with him as well. And it is a, it's been a tough road, man. It seems like everybody has to have an issue. I guess that's what happens as you get older. Everybody you know goes down. As we summarized earlier, life is just a terrible, terrible series of tragedies. And you should recognize that going in.

And then when you get through a day, That's not miserable. You're like, wow, this is pretty good. I'm a little ahead of the game today. That's awesome. Good day, good day. It's a good way to look at it. We're going to get into this John Kerry thing in a minute.

I think, you know, we're not going to have quite enough time here to get into it right now. But John Kerry has some interesting statements about Iran and the way the Obama administration dealt with it. And you're just not going to get this from the mainstream media. They're not going to go into detail. Now, I will give a little bit of credit here and we'll give credit to the show that actually called him out on. this. It does happen occasionally, but it's never the focus. It's never, it's never really, you know, it's always after the fact. You can talk about Bill Clinton was a sexual abuser, a serial sexual abuser now, now that the Clintons are no longer useful to the left. Yeah, sure, they'll talk about it.

They'll talk about, they'll go into Epstein now after the fact. That's why you need something like the Blaze. And it's one of the reasons why it was built in the first place. BlazTV.com. Actually, you can go to blazTV.com.com slash stew now if you want to subscribe. It's helpful because the honest truth here is that the media is not going to do these things and tell you the truth on them. And if you don't have a place where people can be conservative and creative and a place where they're not going to get fired every time they say something that's controversial to some activist, if you don't have that place, I mean, you have nothing. You have only the mainstream media. That's why blaisTV.com exists. We encourage you to sign up there.

What kind of shows what I find there, though? Oh, there's a few. You can get, of course, the Glenn Beck radio program that you're listening to now. You get the video of that, of course. You get the Glenn Beck TV program. All right. Wonderful thing. You should check that out.

I like both those. You can also get a Pat Gray unleashed. Oh, I like that one. Oh, that's a really good one. And coming soon in just a week or two. Stu does America, brand new show. Wow, that sounds pretty good. With me every day.

So we're going to get Pat and Stu and Glenn on every day, plus tons of other great personalities, Chad Prather, and even Jeffie. You even get that as well. all part of your subscription, or you can go to YouTube right now and subscribe to my page or Pat's page. You can get all my links at stewdoesamerica.com. Makes it easy.

Or go to Pat Gray Unleashed as well. Subscribe now. We need to have a safe place for conservative views to live on. You're listening to Glenn Beck. So 2019 is a rough year for a lot of people. Data breaches, hacks, attacks, dotted the cyber landscape.

If this happened to you, Oh gosh. The victims were all over the place and ran the gamut from city and state governments to hospitals, hotels, universities, websites, social media and tech companies were hit as well. Banking and credit giants.

I mean, this is just such a big part of our lives now. Cyber attacks are real. Just to name a few, it really is rough. Cyber security estimates that say now that less than half of organizations are fully prepared for a cyber attack or data breach.

You need to understand that breaches are not going to stop when cyber criminals have, access to your personal information. They can open up new accounts in your name. They can file tax returns by property. They can do all sorts of stuff to screw your life up. If you're only monitoring your credit, you could miss a lot of stuff. That's why you need LifeLock.

LifeLock detects a wide range of identity threats and lets their agents work with you to fix them. No one can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses, but LifeLock can see threats you might miss on your own. If you join now, you can save up to 25% off your first year by using the promo code, Beck. It's 1-800 LifeLock or head to LifeLock.com. Use the promo code Beck for 25% off at lifelock.com. Well, it's officially on. You can spend some time with Glenn this 4th of July at Gettysburg. Go to glenbeck.com slash restore to get all the details. This is Pat and Stu. For Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. He'll be back tomorrow.

We think AAA 727 B-E-C-K. Somebody actually asked John Carrey. about the payment that the Obama administration made to Iran. What was it, the $150 billion that was supposedly left on a tarmac that they say wasn't left on a tarmac? But he was asked about that situation, and here's what he had to say. I think that some of it will end up in the hands of the IRGC or of other entities, some of which are labeled terrorist, you know, to some degree, I'm not going to sit here and tell you that every component of that can be prevented. Why, though, did you think that that was a risk worth taking if you knew the possibility

of what would happen with that money? Good question. Well, what I was really saying, I think, first of all, Margaret, you are an expert at this. You were there. You know that the president's tweet is a lot. And the president tweeted this morning because I am coming on the show and he knew you'd ask me the question or he'd push you in a place where you did ask the question. You and the media, I think, need to call a lie a lie. Well, what I'm saying, Margaret, is that what I'm saying is I'm trying to avoid the actual direct question that you asked me about why we took the chance that this could end up with the IRGC.

and the answer to that is that I'm going to talk around what you've just asked me and really put the blame on you for reading the president's tweet. I love that. Yes, of course, I said this, but the problem here is that you noticed it. That's the real scandal. Is that you and the president noticed it. What does that say about you?

That's really kind of what he's trying to do there. Yeah, it is. It's basically saying, like, since the president brought it up, it's not okay to bring up. It is awesome. I mean, it's a very clear delineation of how they actually feel. Margaret, what I'm saying is that you notice this in a fashion reminiscent of judges con. And there's a chasm between what I'd like you to notice and what you did notice.

I love the overall point is so bad. I love money is fungible. It's a fungible thing. I love that. You don't know where it's going. Sure, some of it going to be used on child porn, absolutely. There's nothing we can do about that. We expect that to happen.

Approximately 30% of all money we spend goes to child porn. Another 20% goes to injecting little cute puppies with heroin and getting them addicted. We know this is going to occur. Is some of that going to happen? Of course it is. Of course. Is some of this going to fund Harvey Weinstein rape parties? Absolutely it is.

Yes, of course it is. All money goes to Harvey Weinstein rape parties. Will some of this go to the assassins that the Clintons pay to kill an Epstein type? Yes. Of course. Yes, it will. Of course. But we believe up to $8 of this $160 billion will go to help the Iranian people.

And we know that it's worth it. People in need. I mean, if we could just supply one cheese steak or one hot dog, if we can get one bratwurst to the air. Iranian people, it's all worth it. That's basically where he is on this one. Yes, it is where he is. I like this idea.

I think this is a great... I mean, it's funny because money isn't fungible unless you give it to a terrorist regime to use in this fungible way. One way to present the fungibility of this particular money would be to not give it to Iran and their regime so that they can spend it on terrorism. What a concept. It's an idea. I'll say it's an idea.

Yeah. And it's one maybe we should have taken. Well, they were collecting interest on that fungible money, though, and the interest was accruing, and we didn't want it to anymore. So we just gave it all to them. Right. It's like, well, wait. I mean, I'm willing to take any amount of money that is accruing interest and throw it in my account. I'm good at that.

That was part of his argument, was it was accruing interest. And so we had to give it to them before it accrued more interest. Yeah. And if I remember, right, the money, their argument is it was a. Iran's money. Yes, to begin with. When they had the revolution, we just kind of held on to it. We're not going to give it back to them in the middle of this.

Right. So we've just been holding on to it. Accruing interest. And then it's fungible. So we just gave it back to them now. 40 years later. And again, it's the same borders, but it wasn't the same country. It wasn't the same government.

It was one that took over the government by force. This isn't some like wonderful thing that, yeah, okay, look, you know, it was Teresa May and now it's Boris Johnson. That's not what we're talking about here. It's not their money. They shouldn't have ever received it back. Right. And the reason we froze it in the first place was because they attacked us and took our people hostage for 444 days.

And we didn't appreciate that very much. It's weird. Yeah. Of course, some of this money is going to be used to attack Americans and hold them hostage. That's just part of the game. That's what happens when you spend money. Much of it will go to ending the lives of Americans. And that's just a risk we were worth it.

We just thought it was worth taking. Will they buy intercontinental ballistic missiles from the Soviets with this? Yes. Yes, they will. Are they building a death star with this money? Of course they are. Of course they are. That's the price you pay when you get money to terrorists, though.

Some of it's going to go for terrorism. You act as if you can give money to terrorists and they're not going to spend it on terrorism. That's an absurd point, Katie, or whatever your name is. I believe it was Margaret. Margaret. Margaret. It's either Margaret or Katie. All Margaret and Katie's host shows on Sunday mornings.

And I'll say this about you. Look, we're giving money to serial killers are going to spend some of it on serial killing. That's just part of the agreement when you do this. If you take action A, giving money to a child rapist, some of it's going to go to child raping. It's just part of the equation. Can you believe he actually made that argument?

And then it's on television defending it all these years later. That's amazing. There's this weird thing that you can't admit when you were blatantly wrong. These parties can't do it. Great example of this is the 2012 debate where Obama says to Mitt Romney, the 1980s called and they went their foreign policy back when he said Russia was the greatest geopolitical threat. Well, now their entire party is, and every argument they make is based on the idea that Russia is the largest geopolitical threat. And occasionally they'll come out and say, well, you know, I don't, you know, look, I didn't agree with that at the time or that was a little bit of a harsh way of putting it.

Rarely will they actually say, look, we were completely wrong and honestly looking back at it probably, we probably should have given the presidency to Romney. That was such a bad mistake. I mean, in retrospect, maybe we give him six months as president now. And anyhow, he acts like a Democrat part of the time anyway. Maybe it's okay. It's hard for these parties to get over that hump and admit these things. But how can you possibly argue? How can you possibly argue that giving all this money to a terrorist state of Iran,

who's used it to come after American citizens over and over again, American military over and over again? It's unbelievable. It was a good idea. It's not just fungible is not an acceptable, acceptable explanation. for that. As you said, when you're given $150 billion

to John Wayne Gacy, some of that money is going to wind up with eating people. That is. Some of it will be for his clown shows, so too, and transportation and expenses to entertaining the children

before he murders them. What is? To expect the guy not to eat? Look, if you're going to give money to a mad scientist trying to create a biological weapon, some of it's going to go to widespread Ebola. That's part of the equation.

And you just have to learn to accept that. That's why that money is fungible. Fungible. Wouldn't it just be great for a week to live in the world as a hardcore leftist where you can just explain away hundreds of people being murdered by your policies? Yeah. And just use the word fungible and you get away with it. It's crazy.

You're still on the campaign trail. I say surrogate for Joe Biden. Such is the life of the left. That's got to be amazing. Because I mean, we're so used to this where our lives are spent justifying things that are completely rational, but the left pretends not to understand. Right. Like you make a joke and they pretend to think you meant something horrible and serious about it.

So you have to defend yourself. We're there the exact opposite. They will say something truly despicable and never have a moment to even try to defend it in any serious way. Because, I mean, look, we talked about the Sanders thing earlier, where Bernie Sanders is talking about these rape fantasies. Listen to this paragraph. If you didn't listen to last half hour, I'm not going to go through the really hardcore stuff in here. But, I mean, he's talking about basically the worst things you can say about a woman or a man. And what she fantasizes about.

And also that they are subservient. They have a deeply entrenched view of being subservient to men. Bernie Sanders saying this. And is this NPR's explanation of it? That's the title. The Bernie Sanders rape fantasy essay explained. Because you need an explanation. You can't just take it at its face value.

So after paragraph after paragraph of justification on here, it says, so what does this say about Sanders' attitude towards women? Good question. It's a great question. Seems to say that he believes they want to be raped. Yes.

And that they fantasize about underaged girls being assaulted. That's all throughout the essay. But NPR says, you can draw divergent conclusions from the article itself. On the one hand,

he's talking about liberating people from harmful gender norms. Now, I didn't get that from the article. I didn't need. either somehow. I have to say. On the other, with his nameless hypothetical man and woman characters, he also seems to imply that men fantasize about raping women or that women fantasize about being raped.

No, he really doesn't seem to imply. He doesn't seem to imply anything. He just directly stated it. Yes, he says that's what it is. He doesn't imply it. He doesn't seem to do anything. States it emphatically. it emphatically as the central thesis of his argument, an argument that led him to the potential Democratic nomination for president of the

United States. It's unbelievable. So there is some evidence to Elizabeth Warren's point of sexism here. There's a little bit of a backup to that from long ago. But that is a different world. You don't, I mean, if a conservative

wrote something like this, there's no NPR article that comes out and says, actually what they're doing is liberating gender norms. You're just done in society. If you're conservative and you write that, you're done. You're done. And it doesn't matter if it came out in 1972. You're still done. No.

It legitimately doesn't matter. Even if you could deny it was you and it wouldn't matter. No, that's right. It really, it's just a totally different world and it's got to be a lot of fun, at least for a little while. Until you feel like you've let down all of humanity in some dark moment, it's got to be fun. AAA 727 BECK. Lots of stuff going on with the economy, Chinese trade war, interest rates being cut by the Fed, Iran missile strikes, retaliation, what are these and so many other things that happened in 2019 have in common?

Well, there are likely contributors to the fact that gold soared up 30% over the course of this past year. If you ever had any doubt about gold, now is the time to diversify and protect your portfolio. Give the people a gold line a call. Talk to them about it. Understand what the risks, what the benefits are, and then make a decision. Let me tell you about the new deal gold's got going on now. Their new 1880 gold, $5 half liberties are an extremely popular diversification and protection tool. A lot of people are going into this. You can get all the benefits of a collectible coin for less than the price of a modern

bullion product. These coins were designed to be used as money, and for 140-year-old coins, they're an excellent condition. Plus, you can get 20 silver coins with every tube purchased. This is the last week for this. Stop waiting to make a decision to protect your portfolio. Diversify Contact Goldline now. Give the friendly account executives at Goldline a call to learn about this limited time

protection. And this is really cool. It's only going on for a limited time. This is the last week. 866 Gold Line is the number to call to take advantage of this offer. It's 866 Gold Line. Call them today. You're listening to Glenn Beck. Pat Gray from Pat Gray at Leashed, which immediately precedes this show. And Stu from Stu does America very shortly. Anyway, you start doing little teaser things next week, right? Yeah, next week we're doing a little content preview. view. Show starts on February 4th in full form every day. Which is what an hour?

Yep, an hour every day. Okay. So please check it out, subscribe at the YouTube channel right now. And you can do that for free. Get every episode for free, whether it's podcast or YouTube. Check it all out for free every day. And you can do that. Get all the links at stewdoes America.com.

Also, of course, Pat Gray Unleashed, you should be subscribing to as well. And your YouTube pages up now, too, for the first time. Yeah. So that's available now as well. Go sign up. Okay. Let's go to Rick in Utah. Hey, Rick.

You're on the Glenn Beck program. Hey, how you doing? Doing well. Good. Hey, I looked up fungible and it says to serve in place of. So you guys are fungible for Glenn today. One thing I keep hearing is that the far left Democratic Party and the news media are just like misguided. You know, I don't believe that for a minute.

I believe they know exactly what they're doing. I think they're organized. they've got an agenda and they're held on destroying our Constitution. And most importantly, the bill writes and that they want to destroy everybody who doesn't agree with them. So because I believe the truth is that our Constitution was divinely inspired and these people wanted to destroy all truth. And that's why I'm glad for you guys, because you guys do bring the truth, you know, in place of the news media. You're one of the only sources that will tell the truth. And I think that the greatest thing that will allow evil to exist is a good people do nothing.

You guys are good people. Well, appreciate that. It's very nice, Rick. Thank you. Thank you. I mean, look, it's important that people, I mean, this is something that didn't even exist. I think to go back, you know, a few decades. And there's no voices, really.

I mean, talk radio kind of started it. And it still exists, of course, and it's going strong today. But, you know, the internet is there now and podcasts and Blaze TV. All of these things are there because there has to be somebody standing up and saying, you know, the last 27 things you said, none of them are true. And here's why. You got to have that. You've got to have that.

And, you know, this is to have a functioning republic, you need to be able to speak freely. And this is what fundamentally, Democrats on the left, many of them are trying to stop. Oh. They're trying very hard to silence. Anybody on the right. Anybody. Even when you're not even saying anything political, as we saw with Vince Vaughn yesterday, just having a pleasant conversation with the president.

Just sitting next to the president was enough for them to try to just shut him down. What do you want to bet? There'll be a left-wing effort to, boycott his movies now. It's despicable. All right. Hopefully Glenn's back tomorrow. I will see you on Pat Gray Unleashed immediately

before this show. And again, when Stu's show comes up starting next week. Yeah. Stu Doesamerica.com. Get all the links there. And Glenn would definitely appreciate you putting Mary, his daughter, in your prayers tonight. We'll talk to you tomorrow.