The Glenn Beck Program - The Algorithms Are THROTTLING the Ukraine Special! | Guests: Dr. Robert Epstein & Rep. Chris Stewart | 10/07/19

Episode Date: October 7, 2019

Glenn’s special, “Ukraine: The Democrats’ Russia,” is already the BEST-performing video on BlazeTV, but YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter’s algorithms DON’T want it to go viral. Brad Parscale and Charlie Kirk’s reposts are also being shadowbanned. Dr. Robert Epstein weighs in on how Big Tech craftily suppresses information. And a second whistleblower has come out against Trump, but even if he has firsthand information, Rep. Chris Stewart argues that so does the public. Glenn saw “Joker” over the weekend and believes it’s the defining film of our day and NOT what it was made out to be. And when Houston Rockets GM Daryl Morey tweeted his support for Hong Kong, the NBA showed how much power China has over it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

What a special, special day it is today. We've got some interesting things to report today. Can't wait to hear from news from that guy. Yeah, that guy. Because you're special. He's great. So we'll explain that in a little while, probably. Did you see The Joker?

Do you see Joker this weekend? Did not. Did not. I did. It's all in-cell violence, I heard. It's just trying to get in cells to shoot up movie theaters. I don't even know what in cells are. But if they mean get Antifa all riled up, yeah.

Yeah. That's what I heard. I heard the politics of it really are left wing. Oh, big time, big time left wing. But it is, it's not what everybody is selling. It's not the most violent. Reservoir dogs is much more violent than this. Is it the most violent or it's the most likely to get?

people. It's supposed to basically say that. It's a very, very good look at, very smart look at what's happening right now. What's happening right now. I heard it's also the most like realistic villain. Yeah, it's not a cartoon. Genesis. It's yeah, it's it I thought it was for a Genesis story. I thought it was absolutely fantastic. He will get an Oscar and if he doesn't he's been ripped off. He's that good. It is really, really, really good. He's weird, but he's Good. Joaquin Phoenix? No.

It's a weird dude, but he's good. You know, it's always a little weird when you have evidence that your voice is being silenced. And boy, silenced in a very big and obvious way. That in my review of Joker, which kind of go hand in hand. In one minute. This is the Glimbeck.

program. You and I both know that if you want to find out anything at all about guns, the last person you want to ask is a member of the mainstream media. In fact, you should always treat a gun, as if it's loaded, unless a member of the mainstream media tells you it is. According to the 1994 CDC survey, Americans use firearms to protect themselves and their loved ones over one million times a year. So what does that mean? That means that without firearms, over a million more crimes per year

would have been committed every year. I cannot express in strong enough terms how bad of an idea disarming the public actually is. That's why the USCA has given you seven free chances this week to win $1,000 for self-defense education and training. Text the word Glenn, G-L-E-N-N, to the number 87-22-2, and learn more and claim your free entries. It's 100% secure.

The confirmation text is going to be sent, but you'll want to hurry because this offer ends October 12th. Text the word Glenn, G-L-E-N-N to the number 87-22-2. Glenn to the number 87-222. For more information and rules, go to Protect and Defend.com, message and data rates do apply. So we have some news about our special last week. We want to thank you so much for being a Blaze subscriber.

I just got some data points last night. It is now the most watched video on the Blaze platform that the Blaze has ever produced. That's in nine years. This is the biggest video we have ever produced. Most watched video we've ever produced. That's saying something because it was a two-hour special. And just the chalkboard is 50 minutes long. Now, here's where it gets weird.

If you go to YouTube or if you go and look for it online, it's not the biggest video we've produced. Isn't that weird? So inside the platform, it is gigantic. It is the biggest thing we've ever done. But if it's shared off of the Blaze platform, all of a sudden it's like, it's okay. Now it's still big.

Still has almost 2 million views now on all of the different platforms. But really? Strange, right? I mean, usually, I mean, we've seen this a million times. When we have something that hits with our audience here, it tends to hit with the YouTube audience and with the... Everybody. With everybody.

Very standard procedure. We're a media company. We watch these things closely. Uh-huh. Uh-huh. And so we've noticed that it's like somebody shifted us into first gear. Now, it couldn't be Google and Facebook, could it? Now we have something last night or yesterday, I guess, Brad Pascal, who is the

I know he's the Trump's social media guy. He's a big role in the campaign, I believe, now. Yeah. Okay. So last night, he tweeted, investigate, or this was 17 hours ago. Investigate. Glenn Beck nails it. The fake news media wants to ignore this.

If anything close to this existed, the GOP. would play 24-7 on every channel. He breaks down the origin of it all in the real collusion against real Donald Trump. Okay, then he embeds the link. Then this morning, he just tweeted, my average tweet gets 250 to 400,000 impressions. A great tweet gets a million.

This tweet has 40,000, the lowest of any, tweet since I became campaign manager. Hmm. Cards are so stacked against us. You won't stop me from getting this out, Libs. Then Charlie Kirk last night wrote to me, and he said, just saw the video Glenn. It's unbelievable.

He said, tweeted it out right away. Charlie just also tweeted. A typical tweet of mine will get 150,000 impressions and 36,000 engagements. Yet when I shared the Parscal tweet about truth behind Ukraine, the video of mine, it only got 237. 237. I choose to believe that Google, Facebook, Twitter are all innocent and people just don't like you. Now, I don't know if that's true.

That is what I'm hoping. There is a possible. That is possible. So if you look at this, this is, by the way, that's not engagements. Okay. Impressions 159,000 is, you know, he just compared, his average is 150. So impressions 159,453. This is impressions, not engagement. Impressions, 237. That's not even possible.

It's not possible. 237 impressions. Impressions. So then Pascal just, or how do you say his name, Parzcal, he just tweeted this. This appears that Glenn Beck's website URL is causing a conversation quality conversion. What now? I'm sorry, what was that? He says it's a conversation quality conversion.

Ah, okay. Which means impressions are. not being shown on those links once one step within those that follow me. So in other words, if you follow, you may get the link. But if you are one step beyond, the algorithm is stopping it and choking it right after those who voluntarily said, I want your tweets. So not everybody's getting that, but no one's passing it on. The algorithms are not passing it to anyone else. Right.

It's not going to top tweets or, you know. And they do that. And look, it's probably their right to do it. But it's an interesting thing that they are doing. And if you're going to get protections from the government, how is this possible? Yeah. I mean, this we should get Ted Cruz on.

We should get everybody else that's on with Google. I'd like to talk to Robert Epstein and have him look into this. Yeah. Because if he's seeing it happen as well. There is absolutely no reason why this video is not being shared. There's no, by the way, it is, it's a banned video. You know how they ban for that, that, it's only 2%, you know, where you can't watch it in, in college, you can't watch it in a school campus, you can't watch it.

It's restricted. Yeah. Right. It's restricted. Yep. It's a, and they do it, like, it's a legitimate idea of the restriction. mode thing, right? Where you would say Well, yeah, if it's, if it has...

Restrict, like, let's say, you know, there's content things. Yeah, they don't put porn on YouTube, I don't think, but they don't, but it's stuff like, you know, sometimes there's violent videos, there could be like, you know, sometimes the story with, uh, of, let's see even the Holocaust, right? But with all the imagery might be in

restricted mode, it's really meant more for parents right than anything else. Correct. But again, like, your video, while it has, um, I mean, other than boring children to death is not going to do anything harmful. No, there's no swear words. There's no swear words on it.

There's not even conspiracy. I love the people who have been saying, oh, it's a conspiracy. What conspiracy? Everything we showed you was documented. You can look into that. Yeah. I mean, in fact, I want you. I engaged so many people who are just, just haters, just haters, that were like,

oh, Glyde Beck, you're an idiot. That's great. Thank you. I appreciate that. I accept that. Can you just tell me where we got it wrong? I engaged over and over and over this weekend. Let's just stick to the documents, the court documents, the sworn affidavits, the audio recordings.

Can you just, let's just stick to those. Don't make this about me. Stick to those. Can you tell me what's wrong with any of those? Nope, not a word. audio recordings typically of officials on tape saying they worked with the Clinton people to

hurt Donald Trump during the election this is a hidden recording by the way of them at dinner so it's not like they were like on stage for some reason to try to send a message or anything like that play the tape again if we happen to have it still here it's it's in it's in Ukrainian so you won't be able to understand it

but maybe you'll be able to understand the word Clinton in there. And we had the translation by the way. We had to go through multiple hoops to get the translation from an actual Ukrainian translation company because there wasn't an English translation that existed

of the video which is weird. It was on the front page of one of the papers in Ukraine. This was part of a trial where they convicted two people in Ukraine two people

I mean you want to talk about closely related to the Obama administration the guy who was running the anti-corruption bureau and picked really to run this bureau

that they put in because they thought Ukraine was too corrupt right and then they lost seven billion dollars and as the government was trying to investigate

the anti-corruption bureau with Obama was like no no No, no, no, no. We don't need to investigate that. Let's look the other way. Wow. Here's the, here's, here's the video. This is the audio.

Did those Russians help him? Your people? Speaking of Trump. I think they did. But I helped them too. Not him. I helped Hillary. Yeah, right.

But then her position tottered. Well, this is how they write about it, right? Hillary's humanitarian aid. What the, stop for a second. What? the hell does that even mean? Her humanitarian aid. They're bringing up, well, she, her position teetered, yeah, well, her humanitarian aid. Why would two officials in Ukraine be talking about the Clinton Foundation when they were talking about how corrupt they were in helping

win the election or helping Hillary try to win the election? How is that? I mean, think of that. It's very strange. It's almost as if. Clinton administration wasn't really a charity. Right. Right. I mean, you think about it, how much, I mean, maybe they're doing all sorts of incredible things right now and I'm just missing them. Yeah.

But I haven't heard word one from any journalist about all the things the Clinton Foundation has done for people since the election ended. I mean, it's been three years. I haven't heard that, are they even in operation anymore? I don't even know. I honestly don't even know. Are they still in operation? Are they still accepting donations?

Are they still doing things? You know, I haven't heard word one about these. It's really weird because if you lost, wouldn't this be like your retirement thing to do if it was really a charity? At least Jimmy Carter went and built houses. He's still building him now. Right. Right. He's like 100 years old. He's still nailing boards together. It's strange. It's almost like all those countries that gave money and then strangely got a meeting with the Secretary of State.

Yeah. It's almost like that was the business. Almost like it. But definitely not, right? No, I'm not worth looking into. No, okay. No, not worth looking into. So here are these guys on.

tape saying that they helped Hillary Clinton and they don't know about the Russians. I suppose they tried to help Trump. But these are Ukrainians. And they're admitting that they work to help Hillary Clinton. And the main guy who is speaking here is the guy who ran the Anti-Corruption Bureau. The guy who's like, yeah, I helped. Yeah, you bet. You bet.

That's the anti-corruption guy. So here's the First of all, I told you this a few weeks ago that it is really important that you sign up for my newsletter at glenbeck.com because that's a way that we have to directly contact you with no filter. Nobody's cutting our communication. It is important that you are a blaze subscriber. I almost, almost think, maybe, possibly, have the purse strings almost open to be able to get the, to be able to hire some investigative journalist and hole them up in a room like the New York Times does

and really take this open because nobody's going to do it. We're at the same position we were at Fox, same place. We have all the goods. All it requires is some organization to take it on and actually do it. And no one will. Well, we just, that's probably a million dollars to be able to do an investigation like this. We need you to support us and please subscribe to the Blaze. And it is the only way that I can guarantee that you will see our videos.

Our videos are now being blocked. they are being throttled even on Twitter. The president's people are being throttled. Why? Why do you fear this story? Tell me that, Google. What is wrong with this story? We haven't violated any of your standards.

There's nothing offensive on it. It's all documented. There's no conspiracy here. It's all documented. Why are you so afraid of this? Why is the media avoiding this? And why is Google and Facebook doing everything they can to make sure that this word doesn't get out? Join us at the Blaze.

BlazTV.com slash Glenn. Do we still have the 20? I'm just going to say, GB20 off. I don't think that's still active, but you can try it. Give it a whirl. Give it a whirl. Or use Glenn, you'll get 10% off. It's 10 or 20.

I don't know. try GB20 off, see if it goes through, because I think it should be 20 off. It should be more than that today. We want everybody to join us at Blaze. BlazTV.com slash Glenn, try GB20 off. If not, just try promo code. What is it, Glenn?

Yeah. And that'll get you to the 10% off. All right. I want to tell you about Florence. She is a longtime listener of this program, and she is the type of grandma who still loves baking cookies for her family when they come over to see her. I love this.

Oh, a house that smells like grandma's cookies. Not any of the pre-packaged stuff that you buy in the store. I mean, she makes them from scratch herself. Well, that became really hard for Florence to do a few years back when our constant pain and her fingers and her wrist began to settle in. For a long time, Florence was afraid that she'd never be able to bake cookies again. Then she heard me talking about relief factor. You know how the story ends.

if you walk up to Florence driveway right now, you're apt to smell the warm cookies that are baking in her oven right around the time the kids come over after school. Relief factor. It reduces inflammation, the major source for most pain, and it works for 70% of those who take it.

For 1995, you can get the three-week quick start. Small risk for the potential of living the rest of your life with less pain. If you want a drug-free natural way to ease your pain, get your life back. Go to Relieffactor.com. That's Relieffactor.com.

And Florence, you can send us cookies anytime you want. 10 second break for station ID. Oh, it does? Yeah, I was looking at the Clinton Foundation to kind of close this loop here. Yeah. Unfortunately, you're going to be, you're going to be, this is really sad.

If you're on the, if you're driving. No, they're still open. As far as I can tell, they did have a precipitous drop in donations, though. Huh. Which is weird because, I mean, all they were doing was curing malaria and stuff. That's all they were doing. Yeah.

You would think that they're, just because she's not president, you would think that it would. It's not to do with anything, right? Nothing. No. It's not about access. It's about children. Yeah. And so their revenue was lower than any year it was in operation, which is weird.

Her profile is much higher. Wow. You know, people know who she is and they know the work that has been done by this organization. And I think that may be why. the donations have dropped off because people do know the work of the Clinton Foundation. They still brought in $38 million in 2017, which is the most recent year. It's available. We are coming up quickly on the tax extension deadline.

So we may find out this new number. Usually by the end of the year is when you get the previous year's number for charities. But they brought in $38 million, spent $54 million. So this is as far as I can tell. They're running it like the government. Yeah. As far as I can tell, really, though, the first year they've had that issue, where they spent a lot more than they took in. Studyingly before, they got so much money.

Like, for example, you know, in the run-up to the election, let's say 2014, 15, they brought in $180 million and spent $80 million. If you note the separation there. Wait. And then she began to run for president. They had another good year in 2015 and brought another $120 million-ish, spent less than $100. and then if you remember the controversy boiling up

and all of a sudden the donation started to go down and then 2017 even even worse So it's a sad story especially for all of the children Who've been helped by the children All the children all those faceless children And I mean faceless they don't they don't have faces Yeah because they're not real Yeah well no these are real children without faces

Oh real children without faces born without eyes nose mouth Identities It's a horrible, yeah, they have no identity. You can't track them. You can't track them. But they're actual children. You might think those faces are blurred out in all the photos? No.

They just don't have faces. That's what their face came out as. So it takes a lot to feed these children because you don't even know where their mouth is. No, you don't know. You kind of just have to throw food in their general direction. Well, you might ship it there. Or you might just think about shipping it there. Right.

I mean, well, you have other things to pay for. I telepathically feed these children with enough money. I can do that. You don't usually use telepathically in tax documents, but I believe they did in this case. They made it, oh, if you could just, you could hear the cries at night, but you can't because they don't have any mouths.

But the Clinton Foundation is there for them. Best thing about these kids, too, is they don't inhale and exhale. So no CO2 being exhale. Carbon neutral kids? Oh, the best. American Finance Corporation, NMLS-182334,

or www. nmls, consumer access.org. Those kids aren't the kids we have to eat. 2019 has been the best year for mortgage rates since 2011. Large part of that has been the result of the Fed policy and the trade war with China. Major updates on either front could cause kind of a volatile reaction in those rates. I've been saying for a long time,

now is the time to get your financial house in order. This is your chance to pay off any high-interest debt or lower your mortgage rate while the markets are still in your favor. Or if the time is right for you to purchase a home, now's the time to take advantage of the historically low mortgage rates. You need to call the people at American financing. I've known these people for a very long time.

They are salary-based mortgage consultants who are going to talk to you. And in about 10 minutes, they're going to be able to advise you on what the best options that you have available and how best to go achieving them. No upfront fees, no pressure, just good solid advice on your financial future you could close in as early as 10 days. It's American financing at 800906 2440 American financing. Dot net. Go to blazTV.com. Use that promo code Glenn. You can try GV20 off. Maybe it'll work. But 10 bucks off for promo code Glenn on your subscription. Subscribe now. Isn't it? Is there really? Wow. Yeah. It's major. All right.

Welcome to the program. Welcome to the program. Boy, we've got some major breaking news. According to, now, Stu and I don't think there's any big deal to this. Of course. I noticed you guys were avoiding the real issue. Second whistleblower. Great. Yeah, you talk about that special all you want. Notice you're avoiding the real issue of the second whistleblower.

Welcome to the program, Pat Gray from Pat Gray. Thank you. It's good to be here to finally tell the truth. All right. So the whistleblower, Stu and I both tend to agree that what's the point? He's just regurgitated. He's also, he's another guy who also has second or third-hand information. I noticed he won't even talk about that.

But wait, no. That also hates Trump's guts. Wait. No, but they're saying that he actually. He never lie. He wouldn't lie this guy. We don't know who he is, but we're pretty sure he wouldn't lie about it. Okay.

Wait. Because my understanding was the big deal was this guy has firsthand information, which was part of the interesting story before the transcript was released. Yeah. It's not part of the story. now. Like we already have the call in which these things were discussed. We know exactly what was discussed.

So we don't need a person with firsthand information. Not to mention, Donald Trump has said many of these things publicly, which is we all kind of have firsthand information of it. Right. When he says it publicly and Giuliani goes on TV and talks about don't we all kind of get firsthand information? We're all

hearing it. Right. The only thing we need to parse really is whether he did it for political purposes or whether it's in the interest of the country. I think it's both. I think it's both. I think, look, I don't like, it happened to be in the same alignment

in this particular. Yes, I don't like the fact that he brought up Joe Biden. I don't like the fact that he did that. But I'm sure that happens all the time. Well, but don't you think I don't want to go down there. My dad, remember what lesson did I learn?

From my dad with Nixon's impeachment. Do you remember? They all do it, right? Yeah, my dad said they all do it. He just caught. Got caught and I hated that. I do think that's true. Yeah, but it is a hundred percent true. The issue here is, you know, I don't think Barack Obama was on these calls saying these names in this way. Like, there's a different way these things get communicated typically. Yeah. And it's because of the way Trump runs his organization, right? He wants to be involved in every, every part of that. Trump doesn't care about finesse. No. He doesn't care about that. So there's no finesse here. So it's a little bit more overt than you're

going to find, I think, in other administrations, but we all know these things happen. Hillary Clinton. Yeah. I'm not sure she had a velvet hammer to her hammer. Yeah, you might be right. I think Hillary's much more of a person, though, that has underlings and people doing these things for, as we see with the Ukraine thing, right? Like, the Ukraine thing is, and we have the video of this, or excuse me, the audio tape

translated, but it's these officials talking about this. their dealings with the Clinton administration, or the Clinton campaign, there's not a recording per se of Hillary Clinton specifically asking for that, right? Right. And that is what I think the issue here is that they have Trump on record. But again, Trump was on record before this call was out there. Giuliani was on television saying he was going to Ukraine to investigate these things. This is not a surprise to anybody who follows the news, but that is really the target here.

It's people who don't follow the news and didn't know these things were going on. whole time. Well, it is, it's, it's, uh, grotesque that he said, uh, and by the way, I want you to, but I think it is in the national interest. And I wish you just would have left it with the, you know, uh, what? 541 words before he said. Yeah. You know, uh, because what he's, what he said was, look, there's corruption. And there is. There's seven billion dollars of your money that is missing. $7 billion. That's an issue.

That is a real issue. Barack Obama. Except you. Yeah. Nobody's talking about it. Barack Obama and the changing of the embassy and making sure that we have an ambassador there that is blocking all of the prosecutors from coming into the country, our country, and telling us the truth.

I mean, there is real problems here. That doesn't mean. you don't investigate Donald Trump as well. Fine. You want to investigate? My personal opinion is Donald Trump should say, investigate all you want. I've been saying this to the American people and Rudy Giuliani have been saying,

we told you we were going to do this about a year ago. And you guys didn't want to pay any attention because you know what we'll find in Ukraine. So I made a phone call. Yeah, I did because there's a new president there. I'm not talking to the old president because I know the old president was all set up by Barack Obama and his team and they were all part of the corruption. This guy's been brought in to clean up the corruption. And I'm not going to, quite honestly, I'm not going to give them a dime. Now, he hasn't said this.

And I don't believe there was quid pro quo for the money. But I wouldn't have a problem with it. If he said, I want to know you're actually cleaning up corruption. I want to see what you're doing before we send you another dime because we sent your country $7 billion. Totally appropriate. It was lost. It's only not appropriate if you only assign negative motives to Trump.

Correct. If it was only about his personal gain, then it's bad. But it wasn't. I mean, look, this is clearly in the U.S. interest to find out what happened with this money, what happened with corruption with a former vice president. These are all things that are in the U.S. interest. Do you think, I mean, is there a good argument to say, say that Donald Trump was partially at least motivated by politics? Yeah, probably. But again,

these people are people. It's not mutually exclusive. If they can find something that is good for the country and they think it benefits them politically, they're all doing it, breaking news. This is 100% of politicians that would do these things. Now, here's my problem. We said during the campaign as advice to President Trump, don't piss off the intelligence community. Don't piss off the intelligence community. Yeah, he continues to do that. Yeah, he made nothing but enemies. Both of these guys are from the intelligence community. Both of these whistleblowers are from the intelligence community. We know the second whistleblower blower is CIA guy. Yeah, we know he's from the intelligence community. So we know that. And supposedly it's first hand knowledge of the things that we

got the transcript of. So think about that. Right. I also have first hand knowledge of that because I read it. Yeah. Right. I can testify to what was on that phone call because I read it. Yeah, I read the transcript. Yeah, I can testify on that. So, you know, but I think there's going to be, I think you are seeing, if you looked at the chalkboard, you saw the intelligence community, the State Department, were both involved in this corruption under the Barack Obama administration. you had William Brenner who was running. Was it William Brenner? Yeah. Brennan.

Brennan. William Brenner was the actor, wasn't he? Or the director? But anyway, you had Brennan running that place. The guy who said that, you know, the Muslim Brotherhood is largely secular. That was Clapper. I had that. I just checked on that this morning because I was confused as well.

Really? Yeah. Clapper. Brennan is the one who said that we can't call it Terra because Tara is a frame of mind. We can't call it Giod because Giod is a holy struggle. He's the one who did that. It was Clapper who said the Muslim Brotherhood is largely secular. Okay, well, you can see why I confuse them because they sound exactly right.

So they were put in by the Obama people and you know they brought Obama people into the intelligence community. And if you believe that you're on the right side in the intelligence community and you have the philosophy that many in the, many in the Obama administration had, what, you're not going to, you're not going to hurt this president? You're not going to, I mean, it is a deep state operation. And if, if you think that's a conspiracy theory, I want you to call me. Please call me right now. I want to be wrong.

I want to believe that the State Department and the intelligence community and the last administration were not doing the things that we have affidavits on, we have eyewitnesses on, we have text messages, we have emails, and we have an audio tape. But just call me and just tell me how do I dismiss those things. everybody's trying to make this all about Donald Trump and you're just trying to bail out Donald Trump. No, I'm not. I don't have a problem with what he did other than I think it was grotesque.

But I don't think that it was, if Biden wasn't running, who would have a problem with this? He should do this because we lost a lot. We lost a lot. Would they do that with Cheney? Would there be any, if Cheney had some, complications or some corruption allegation and they were checking on that. Would they, would anyone worry about this at all if, uh, if, if, if the Democrats were doing it or the Republicans were

doing it for that matter? Of course not. I mean, it is, they're, they're inserting the politics. Look, it's all part of this conversation. I'm not denying that. But they are denying that finding out where seven billion dollars of our money went is in the national interest. Right. Which is insanity. You have to acknowledge that both are there. And they're denying. They're saying that there was no wrongdoing. There's nothing happening in your. Ukraine. Explain the affidavits. Explain the court case. Explain the audio. Explain the text messages. Explain the ambassador of the U.S. Explain all of it. No one ever will. No one will. You know, one of the more disheartening parts of this is that it's not going to stop either.

If it's not this, it's going to be something else. And they're just going to be relentless all through. If he wins a second term, they'll be doing the same thing all through the second term as well. They're just, they hate him so much. They're just going to keep going. I think that is the hope that they are pushing right now. They think they can paralyze him. They think, though, no, I think they are hoping that the American people will come to the conclusion that you just gave. And they'll say, we're not going to get anything done.

We can't have another four years of this. Yeah. That's a definite possibility. Yeah. I think that's what they're doing. It's just flowered and pivot at this point. Just throw as much as you can add. until they just get tired of it.

You overload the system. People say, okay, I can't take it anymore. Just vote for the other person, whoever it is. Well, look at what's happening. It's interesting that it is the year anniversary of the Kavanaugh hearing. And what were they doing? They were losing. And so then they came at the last hour with a witness.

That witness didn't seem to be credible, so they didn't actually bring that witness up the right way. And then so then they bring her up. They paraded around, say he's got to go. Trump doesn't fold. The entire thing falls apart. She's discredited. But there's more.

There's other whistleblowers on him. But none of them are credible. This is the same movie. We saw it last year. And they're still dragging out those. Right. Right. Incredible.

Exactly right. Exactly right. We know what they're doing. And if the press would have ratted out this scam last year, they might have had credibility this time. But they have no credibility. Okay. Our sponsor, this half hour, is Simply Safe.

When I heard about Simpleysafe's video verification team, my mind went someplace that, I, we're probably alike. It goes to bad places. Wait a minute. If there are people watching cameras in my home when I'm away, making sure that someone isn't breaking in, what keeps them from watching when I'm there?

Okay. SimplySafe has worked on this concern forever. In fact, they didn't come out with their video camera. I think it was like two years late. They spent almost two years developing this camera that has an automatic cover that audibly, clicks into place when you're home and audibly opens and they had to get the right metal to make the right sound so it wasn't irritating but so you heard it every time that camera would open up because

they know they're just like you i talked to the i talked to the founder at simply safe and i said what are you doing it he's like what glen that's exactly what went through my mind i don't want a camera that's exposed in my house all the time he said that's why we made it this certain way These guys think like you do, and it's all in the small details that makes the difference. This is why their round-the-clock monitoring and their system is top of the line. It's $15 a month for the monitoring, and it will reduce the time that police get to your house from 45 minutes to seven minutes. And right now they have a huge deal going on on the system. SimplySafebeck.com.

You get a free HD security camera when you order. that's $100 value, and you'll have eyes on your home 24-7, video evidence if somebody tries to get in. You are safe. It is simply safe. Get your free HD security camera. Now it's simply safebeck.com. That's simply safebeck.com. You're listening to Glenn Beck.

Welcome to the program. There is a controversy going on with the NFL and the Houston Rockets. is it Daryl Morey? Yep. Tweeted, I stand with Hong Kong. I know. And now he's NBA, by the way, not NFL. Yeah, sorry, NBA.

I was thinking NFL because I wanted to make the point that the NBA is doing this because they need the viewership in China and they want the market in China. And it's the same reason why the NFL you would think would not allow things to go like the, you know, kneeling but that's because they're trying to expand their brand internationally as well. America for these big corporations have just become, not their home, just another market. Yeah, I mean, the NFL is much more, I think, nuanced than that. The NBA is outwardly defending the Chinese government in this country and the policies. And it's incredible.

All I said was I stand with Hong Kong. And now the NBA, who pulled their All-Star game out of Charlotte because they didn't like the bathroom policy of North Carolina is now not just working with China, but outwardly defending the government in China that has killed 60 million people. This is

insanity. Insanity. Because why? They want to recruit Chinese basketball players? And the Chinese... No, it's a market. It is. Well, it's partially that. And it's, you know, the rockets are the most popular

basketball team in China because they had Yao Ming, who was on their team. for many years. And they work very closely with China. And look, a lot of U.S. companies do. But it's a different story to come out. And, I mean, there's owners today writing long Facebook posts about this

separatist movement that you don't understand. Hong Kong. It's dangerous. What the hell are you talking about? They couldn't be more dangerous than killing 60 million people. I'm relatively certain of that. Unbelievable. This is what, three times as many people than the Nazi regime was responsible for? And we have a

bunch of basketball teams coming out and defending. them it's insanity it's sick it's sick we have forgotten who we really are you're listening to glen back you know it's interesting is south park has has more backbone than almost anyone else in business today um i want to talk to you about relief factor relief factor is a way for you to be able to do the things that you love to do i was up in chicago this weekend had to give a speech and I would give speeches and I would almost collapse after the shows from so much pain. And they would always have to, if I had to do something, they would always have to have a private room that they could whisk me into so I wasn't seen by anybody.

I got off stage and they were like, do you need to go? And I'm like, no, I'm good. Let's stay and let's meet the people. That comes from relief factor. And I am grateful, grateful for the pain relief. you will be too. If you're in pain, start doing the things you love again. Try Relief Factor. It's not a drug. It's just, it reduces your inflammation, which causes pain. Relieffactor.com, relieffactor.com. Go there now. Get your three-week quick start. Get out of pain. And enlightenment. So it's fascinating to me that last week we did a chalkboard on what's really happening in Ukraine. and everything on the chalkboard was backed up by court records, affidavits,

firsthand accounts, texts. We had emails, banking records. We had everything. Nothing in that special of that 50-minute chalkboard has anything conspiratorial or anything that is not provable. And yet, we seem to be blocked by Google and Facebook. We are so throttled down.

Charlie Kirk wrote this morning and said, Glenn, I usually have 150,000 engagements and impressions on my tweets. I tweeted a link to this. and what normally is 157 or 150,000, this time was 237. Only 237 saw this tweet. Gee, you think we're being throttled? More in one minute. This is the Glymbach program.

Our country is being embroiled yet again in a battle against corruption and wrongdoing. The Democratic Party seeks to impeach the president. I'm not here to defend the president or to impeach him. I'm here to look at the facts. Isn't that what we should all be doing? Let the chips fall where they may. Seems like in this particular case, the lion's share of corruption happens to be on the other side in their own backyard with the Democrats. And we have a hard time getting the voice out and letting people actually see the facts.

The constant assault on conservative voices, the constant assault on our Constitution, rule of law, liberty, is subsidized by so many large corporations right now in the United States. And your cell phone company may be among one of them. Patriot Mobile is the only cell phone company fighting this insanity and donating the causes that you believe in. Freedom of speech. The plans start as low as $25 a month. you can get nationwide service with U.S.-based customer service, and there's still time for you to get a Moto Z3 play for only $5 a month, but they're running out, so don't wait.

And when you use the offer code BECK, they're going to wave activation on up to two lines. So switching is really easy. You're going to save money, and it's the same great cell service that you already have, because they're on the same cell towers. Go to patriotmobile.com slash beck. That's patriotmobile.com slash beck. or call 877-367-75-24.

That's 877-367-75-24 or Patriotmobile.com slash back. So I want to go to Dr. Robert Epstein. He is a guy who we have had on several times. He is a guy that was a Clinton supporter and voted for Clinton. He's from the other side. The other side has eaten him now because he does. dare cross the line and say, hey, there's something going on with

Google and their algorithms. And he has been watching the election and we've got to help this man raise enough money to be able to document what this next election, what is happening with this next election? Because Google,

we know they have said, we can't let this happen again. And he's the only one that is in the position to document this. And he is not a fan. I don't think of either side. He just wants the truth. Welcome to the program, Dr. Robert Epston. My pleasure, Glenn, nice to be back. That's good to have you. So I wanted just to touch base with you today because we have, we have some interesting things happening. We have, I produced the biggest video, the, the Blaze has ever

published. It is a video that has more views on the platform by far than anything we've done in almost 10 years. And yet on YouTube and Facebook, it's performing well, but not like that. We now have two people who have tweeted it who have gigantic followings and they can't, One had engagement of 237. They have, you know, millions of followers. I have two million followers. I can't get this thing over, you know, 2,000 likes. How do we prove that we're being throttled here?

Well, as you may recall, in 2016, I built a monitoring system, which allowed me with people's permission to look over the shoulders, of users around the country. At that point, I had 95 field agents in 24 states and basically see what they were seeing on their screens as they were conducting searches on Google, Bing, and Yahoo. So we preserved more than 13,000 election-related searches. 2018, we built a bigger system. We preserved not only search results, but we also preserved search suggestions and answer boxes. 2020, we're going to build an enormous system with thousands of field agents, and we're going to preserve lots of things.

I'm not going to go through the whole list, but among other things, we're going to preserve tweets that will document that will show without any doubt that will quantify what at Twitter is called shadow banning. And that's what you and your colleagues are running into. basically if Twitter personnel believe that you're violating any of their terms of service, which were not. Well, you know, that's very subjective, though, on their part, very subjective. What they do is they can either downrank you, and they admit this, by the way. They can either downrank you so people don't see you because you're not high in any lists. You're popping up very, very low.

or actually shadow ban, which means you sent out a tweet to your 2 million followers, but your 2 million followers aren't getting the tweet, period, or just a small portion of them are getting it. But we now have a way of actually documenting this, recording it, quantifying it. So we're going to have rock solid evidence in 2020. If Twitter is doing this, we are going to document it, prove it and we're going to release our findings to the media and to a federal election commission to various authorities. So we're going to be tracking all kinds of things with a very

large panel of field agents in all 50 states, including shadow banning. So we also are having a problem with YouTube and it's not popping up the way it should in YouTube. So it's part of Google, right? Yeah, it's part of, it's part of Google. Are you going to be watching YouTube as well? Positively. We're going to be watching YouTube. Many, many different ways in which affect five different ways in which Facebook suppresses material. I'm not even going to tell you how many ways we're going to be monitoring Google. No, don't. Please don't.

Google is the biggest threat there is to the free and fair election. But I can tell you, I am positive that these companies, if there are, There's no monitoring system in place. These companies are going to go all out. And together, I calculate that they can shift 15 million votes next year with no one knowing that they've done it and without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace. I'm having real problems getting my MySpace posts to even be seen. No one's looking out of it all.

MySpace is. I don't know if you can look into that for me, doctor. So the scary thing here is that this is such an obvious shadow ban. There's just no way these metrics are even right. And they don't care. They don't care that I'm on the air talking about them doing this. They don't care that you're doing. They don't care.

I mean... Well, they don't. They don't care. In fact, you know, we learned a lot about shadow banning January of 2018. from a Project Veritas investigation. And let me just read you a quote from a former software engineer, his last name is Vadravo, V-A-D-R-E-V-U, about shadow ban. So here's a former Twitter software engineer, quote.

The idea of a shadow ban is that you ban someone, but they don't know they've been banned because they keep posting and no one sees their content. So they just think that no one is engaging with their content. content when in reality no one is seeing it end quote so uh project gyrtos interviewed about a half a dozen current and former employees of twitter and they all admitted that this occurs then Forbes magazine did a fabulous piece i recommend people look that up which is entitled is twitter really censoring free speech where Forbes went to Twitter and asked, you know, asked these tough questions. And in this

wonderful article, they report Twitter's responses. Twitter, like Google, like Facebook, they answer questions about content suppression, about censorship in very creepy ways. Because Twitter said, no, we don't shadow ban, but, oh, yes, we do downrank. And we make decisions about how to protect, you know, our users from content they shouldn't be seeing. Right. That is an amazing, it's an amazing quote. Yeah. They, they, let's, I have it here.

Let's see. There's, there's no external audits. They won't allow any external committees or, you know, to come in and look over what they're doing. They don't allow that. and they will not release the demographic characteristics of the people they use to make decisions about suppressing content. That's amazing. Here's a quote. Twitter does not shadow ban accounts.

We do take actions to downrank accounts that are abusive and mark them accordingly so that people can still click through and see the tweets if they so choose, which of course, no one does, right? That's not the way people use Twitter. They don't go, they don't click on the named accounts. And we know this happens, right? This is essentially their own mute feature. I use it all the time. I freaking love the mute feature, but I'm choosing to do it. There's tons of people who are calling me a Nazi every single day that I don't see,

but they think I see it. Like they're wondering, they tweet all the time negative things to me, and I'm just like mute, mute, mute, mute me because I don't care. But that should be something that the user does. That should not be something that Twitter is doing for us. Well, this is the problem, or I should say one of the big things. three problems. The first one is the surveillance. Second is the censorship and the third is manipulation. And here we're talking about the censorship problem. And you know, you don't know what you don't know.

So censorship is so dangerous because, you know, if material is being suppressed, content is being suppressed, how would you know that? And, of course, what I study is how, you know, these kinds of of activities shift people's thinking, beliefs, attitudes, and, of course, shifts their voting preferences. And it is astonishing the impact that these kinds of manipulations have on people's thinking and behavior and on their votes. And again, you don't know what you don't know. You know, it's really interesting because I read the New York Times. I listen to the daily every day, you know, because I want to be informed on what they are talking about. I need to understand all sides of an issue.

And I want to see what, you know, what they are publishing or what they aren't publishing and what their spin is when they do. And it is incredible to me that there are many people who are on the right who don't necessarily know. They'll blame the New York Times for never covering such a, and they will have. But it's the New York Times. It's not the mainstream media. However, the mainstream media in bulk, they don't watch, listen or pay any attention to what people on the other side are saying and report it as fact or even just this is the way half the country feels. And after the last election, I had a friend come down who was a liberal and paid no attention to the other side. And we told him about all of the different things that had happened in the Obama administration, like the IRS investigation.

He had never even heard of it. And so they can report things, but by the way they reported or by the way they downplay it, et cetera, et cetera, half the country isn't even aware of what the other half thinks. That's a real problem. Well, this also is a worse problem than any censorship in history. Because when these big tech companies suppress material, there's no way. way to counteract it. In other words, Google has no competition, has no competitor, really, anywhere in the world, neither just Facebook, neither just Twitter. I mean, if these platforms

want to suppress material, you can't counteract it. In other words, if the newspaper published, you know, on one side of Pittsburgh wants to suppress something, well, you know, chances are there's a newspaper something or other on the other side of Pittsburgh, where they're going to bring that material out. But you can't, you can't counteract it when Google, Facebook, or Twitter suppresses material. There's no way to counteract it. In fact, generally, unless someone like me builds monitoring systems, you can't even detect what they're doing. Robert, I can't thank you enough for all of the hard work that you are putting through. If you would like to donate, please donate. And if there happens to be wealthy people that are listening right now, please donate.

generously to my Googleresearch.com, my Googleresearch.com. This is the guy who's actually just searching for answers and the truth. It is legitimate research. And right now he happens to be on the outs with the left because that's, you know, who's generally controlling these companies. But do the same if it was controlled by the right. Please donate to my googleorgelresearch.com. Thank you, doctor.

We'll talk to you again. Thanks, you bet. So we've been rebuilding an old 1880s cabin. And when I say we've been slowly doing it, I mean slowly because we're trying to do it justice. And we're also trying, you know, it's not exactly on the top of anybody's hit parade to, you know, to spend money on an old 1880s log cabin. But we have taken about 10 years to do it in the beds and the quilts and the stove, all of it.

Perfect. So when it came to window coverings, I wanted to make sure that I could provide, you know, the fusion of the rustic look and, you know, also a little contemporary, you know, and I say contemporary in the last century. And yet have, you know, linen and everything else that was real natural and would look right in that cabin. Tanya and I went to blinds.com. And here was the shocker. When we were typing it, it was cheaper than. other places that we had shopped around looking for blinds. And so I was like, see, look at this. And then we started to check out and promo code came up. And I said, did you put the promo code in? And she said, no.

And I said, put the promo code in. It was 50% cheaper than the lowest price that we had already seen any place else. We were floored by how much money we could save and the quality of the blinds. every order at blinds.com gets free samples and free shipping, and they have 100% satisfaction guarantee, which means if you measure incorrectly, you pick the wrong color, they're going to remake your window treatments for free, and they have 30,000 five-star customer reviews.

I'm one of them. Blinds.com go there today, save up to 40% on everything, plus save an extra $20 with promo code back. That's blinds.com for up to 40% plus an extra $20 off with promo code back rules and restrictions apply. 10 seconds station ID. All right. So we know that we have been banned.

This is why we ask you, please, please sign up for the Glenbeck newsletter. Go to glenbeck.com and sign up for my newsletter. Also, if you can become a subscriber to blazTV.com because you're not seeing everything that we're putting out. Like I said, this is the biggest video we have produced in almost 10 years. The numbers on the platform are, are dwarfing everything. Now, that should translate to the general population, to the people that are not members of the blaze, but at least members of this audience.

But if you're tweeting it, if you are trying to send it to your friends, you're being you're being squashed and the algorithms are squashing the release of this video that shows the facts on what is going on in Ukraine and I don't think that there is a more important message right now and I honestly

I don't care who gives it I was talking to somebody last night and I was like have them just take all of this information they don't have to credit me they don't have to say just get this out this is really important we would ask that you would watch it if you haven't already and send it to all of your friends, but also ask your friends if they will.

Ask your friends if they would also join the Blaze and become members. I really, really want to hire an investigative reporter because nobody else is going to do this. we urge that you support us because I want to take some of that money and I want to hire somebody that will actually go over and look into Ukraine and dig up the things that we already have but then go even deeper and go to China as well. So join us please. BlazeTV.com slash Glenn. Use the promo code Glenn and you'll save 10.

percent now. BlazTV.com slash Glenn. Join us now because you're not getting the truth. All right. When we come back, we have another way of getting things out. It's a tweet storm today that we just started. We'll tell you about it next. You're listening to Glenn Beck. So over the weekend, I had to stay at a hotel, as I told you. And let's just say the quality of sleep not so good. I don't want to, you know, besmirch the reputation of the hotel that I stayed at right at the airport. There's nothing better than that. Just listen to the planes fly over your head every night. There's nothing great.

Anyway, to suggest that maybe the pillows were actual burlap sacks full of cast iron skillets might be a little much because I might be just so spoiled with my my pillow that everything feels like that. right now you can get great discounts on all MyPillow products if you go to MyPillow.com and click on the new radio listener specials. You're going to see some amazing offers, including their buy one, get one free. If you buy one pillow, you get the second one free. MyPillow.com comes with a 60-day moneyback guarantee, a 10-year warranty. Just click on new radio listeners specials at MyPillow.com. You'll get the deep discounts on all MyPillow products, including buy one, get one free on their pillows.

Enter the promo code Beck, 800, 966, 3117. All right, it's blazTV.com. Promocode is Glenn. Make sure you subscribe and support. The sort of research you're about to get from this tweet store. We'll tell you about that coming up next. It's Monday. This is the Glenn Beck program.

And Congressman Chris Stewart joins us. Now as he's getting on an airplane to, God forbid, go back to Washington, D.C. Chris. he's not on yet. Okay, hang on just a second. You know what it is? Google, Facebook Twitter. There's screwing with our phones?

Yeah. I'm curious to ask Chris, you know, obviously these latest developments, what he's seen, what he can talk to us about because he can't talk to us about a lot of it. Right. He's on the intel. He's going through security. He's taking off his belt and shoes. So, yeah, when he gets, when he picks his phone back up out of the little round cup,

we'll have him on. Because has he seen the second whistleblower? He's seen the second whistleblower, and we want to talk to him about that. That would be interesting. I don't know how much he can talk about with that. I think he can... I don't know.

They said this is like, not only the smoking gun, it's the second smoking gun. The first one wasn't really smoking. Now, is the smoking gun when Rudy Giuliani was on television saying he was going to do these things? I kind of thought that was a smoking gun that they were doing it. That was kind of an interesting turn of events. Now, there is more to it, I guess,

with the money being withheld, learn more about that. We still haven't. But there's still, you know, I do want to ask Chris if he's, if he's also seen the full testimony or was present of this person, of the people talking about Volker and the other people involved here talking about the texts that came out last week. Oh yeah, yeah. Because if you remember, this was like when some of the Trump officials were saying things like, look, you know, is my, is it my understanding that we're supposed to withhold this security assessment, the money essentially for, until this investigation starts? And then

the other guy's like, oh, no, you misunderstand what the Trump administration would like to do. We want to do only the best things with unicorns and puppy dogs. It's like one of those things of where you could tell both of them are trying to get on record. They're not actually talking to each other. There is just both texting to get on record. But predictably, after this testimony happened, the Democrats bring out everything that I would assume is the worst most damning information. And we haven't heard anything from the other side of it. Republicans universally that have seen this information seem to be coming out in

saying if you see the full testimony, you're going to understand what was going on. Why don't they release the full testimony? And the Democrats have it. So that's interesting and it's an interesting point. But, you know, it's also predictably partisan lines. This is breaking on. I wonder if Chris has any more insight. Obviously, he is a Republican.

But he seems to be pretty honest. He's putting his belt and his shoes back on right now. Welcome, Congressman Chris Stewart. How are you, sir? I've got to get my shoes here, Glenn. Give me another minute, all right. All right. So, Chris, good. Did you see the whistleblower report and can you talk about it? Yes, and somewhat. Okay. We've seen it. I think much of it has been released. There's been some redacted portions.

But this is pretty much in the public realm. So we can talk about almost all of it except for some small portions. Okay, so go ahead. Tell us your POV. I mean, this seems like just another guy who's saying, saying, yep, that phone call happened. Well, we know that. Yeah. Right? You're talking about the second whistleblower. Second whistleblower.

Yeah, yeah. Well, no, it was obvious. I mean, I said yesterday on some media that I thought this was going to come forward because it was obvious that this guy had been having some conversation, this guy or girl had been having conversations and that they were interested in talking about it. But as I said yesterday, what difference does it make? All they can say is, as you started saying, Glenn, yep, I listened or I read the

transcript and yep that's a phone call well again we already have that information you could you or any of your listeners could read that in in seven seconds and other than that what what can he tell us it's helpful at all and the answer to that is nothing we can read it we can make our own judgment i don't need some you know some secret analysts who tells me what this means it's very simple what it means anyone can read it themselves all right so tell me about um if you can the the text messages that were last week they were revealed. Can you talk about those at all? Yeah, although a little more limited

because it was an executive session and we have to be, you know, have to be careful on it. But this is just the bottom line on this. And this is so malicious and it's so deliberate because what they have done is they've taken little snippets of it. Not even an entire short text in its entirety, but little pieces here and there, And they leak that, because once again, this is an executive session, and it's not supposed to be released.

And it creates an impression that is absolutely 100% contrary to the facts or the entirety of this hearing. And that is, Mr. Volker and others came and they said there clearly was no quick pro quo. There clearly was no linkage. He has very plausible, very, very reasonable explanations for the timing of the meetings. you know, the timing of their intention to withhold this, this AGD crane that was based entirely on them trying to pressure Angela Merkel and others in the EU. And these guys will take little pieces of it. They'll leak it to the media.

The media course runs with it. And by the time the truth comes out, when they'll release a transcript that will show in its entirety what it actually means to the damage is already done. So, Chris, I did a special last week. I don't know if you've seen it. But I laid a chalkboard out, and it took me about 50 minutes. Everything in it we have verified sources on. There wasn't a bit of conjecture or maybe this happened or whatever.

100% based on fact. And it outlines that the Democrats did in Ukraine exactly everything that they are accusing Donald Trump on. And yet no one in the media cares to cover this. being throttled like nobody's business. It's the biggest video we have done in almost the 10-year history of the blaze. On the platform, it's gigantic, but we are being throttled down. You know, Charlie Kirk said he gets about 150, about 150,000 views of everything that he does. When he retweeted this link, it got 237.

Yeah. And I'm wondering where anyone is on turning this around back on the Democrats. Is there anybody who is on this trail? Well, we're trying, Glenn. I mean, there's a number of us who are trying. And I was actually listening to you earlier as I was running and talking about this 50-minute chalkboard and the lack of response on Twitter. And I would ask, I mean, I'm not terribly surprised. In fact, frankly, I would have been surprised if you wouldn't have had that kind of response from them and that kind of throttling.

I don't think it's muted, but it's clearly throttled. But this is just one example. And, Glenn, let me give you another one that we've been talking about for years that is ignored. I mean, the Democrats are making this argument that the president needs to be impeached and removed from office because of one sentence in one conversation that he readily made available. He released that thing within a few days of anyone asking for. On the other hand, versus this story, Hillary Rodden Clinton and the DNC paid a foreign agent who then worked with other Russian agents to do what? To dig up dirt on their political opponent in order to the effect the outcome of an election, which is the rubage you hear all the time regarding President Trump, what he said Ukraine. We know that they did that.

They did it far more brazenly, and when does the media ever talk about that? I just think it's one more example. Your experience here is just one more example of them. Look, to call them biased is an incredible understatement. They're advocates now and they're dishonest advocates. And I don't know what to say. They just have to accept it and do what we can. Well, so the only solution here is that the Senate, because you can't in the House,

that the Senate starts to look into this corruption with the Democrats. I mean, why are we playing defense when we should be playing offense? Why isn't the Senate taking this on and saying, you know what? We'd like to find out exactly what was happening in Ukraine. And you go ahead, investigate the president. We're going to be investigating what was happening in Ukraine and why people went to prison or were convicted. I think it was overturned, but it's back in court today.

But they were convicted for international. interfering in the U.S. election, we have them on tape. On that, on the video, we have a tape of the guy who is the head of the Anti-Corruption Bureau in Ukraine actually admitting to helping Hillary Clinton win the election. Yeah. I mean, you know, tried to win the election. Well, and as you said, they're in the house. I mean, I'm as powerless as a kitten in the house being in the minority, unfortunately, which is why we got to change that. But as you said, the Senate, Lindsay Graham and others in the Senate do have the authority to investigate this. And I think Lindsay's indicated more than a willingness to do that. And there's one other tool that we have that I think may be more effective. And that is Attorney General Barr. Oh, my gosh, this guy is a hero to me because he is fearless.

He's committed. He's not out to make a name or a reputation. He's been there, done that, doesn't need to do it again. And I believe he is, as I said, committed to investigating not only the origins of the FISA warrant and the other, as we know, the other activities going back to 2016 in Russia. But I think I think it would be surprised if he didn't look at Ukraine as well. That FISA warrant is going to fall apart. We have documented evidence, Chris. Please watch that video.

We have documented evidence that a DM. operative, put all of this information together and sent it to Michael Isikoff. Now, I'm not saying that Michael knew what he was, what he was, that he was being used. But in that text message, she or that email, she's alluding to the Steele dossier, which is one of the things, if I'm not mistaken, that was used for the FISA report, was an article from Michael Isikov. Yeah, yeah, yeah, for sure, Glenn. I mean, look, this was talking about circular reasoning or circular. Big time. This was a FISA document based on the steel dossier, which I just described the origins of that too.

By the way, painfully hidden under there was the fact that they knew that it was paid for by the DNC. Yeah. But in a footnote that I defy anyone to read that footnote where they described where they got this information and who funded it. And to actually understand who did it, it's a very clear effort. to be to be deceitful and deceptive in that. But then as additional evidence, what do they use? As you just said, Michael Isakov's reporting, which, where did he get his information from? From Christopher Steele.

So, I mean, their backup is the same document. It was just leaked to a reporter and they claim that that is a secondary source. And clearly it's not and they knew that it wasn't. Chris, thank you so much. We'll talk to you again. Thanks for the hard work you're doing on this. I appreciate it. Thank you, Glenn.

I appreciate the opportunity. Representative Chris Stewart, second district, Utah. All right, we're doing something to get this word out, and we're going to explain it to you on Twitter. We need your help on it. We're going to explain it to you here in just a second. First, our sponsor, this half hour, is Relief Factor. I want to talk to you a little bit about Florence.

She is a listener of this program. Been a longtime listener. She loves baking cookies for her family when they come. over to see her. She's, you know, she's a grandma. She's like my grandma, I think, who my grandmother used to make the best cookies ever. And when you'd go to her house and it smelled like cookies, it was the best. Well, that's the kind of grandma Florence was. And she always believed in making them from scratch. You know, she didn't, she didn't buy them at the store and then bake them off. But it really became hard for her to do because she had constant pain in her fingers and now

the risks and it began to settle in. And she was afraid that she wasn't going to be able to to make cookies again. You know, she was like, it's not going to be very long before. I just can't. I just can't. I can't mix them. I can't, you know, put them out of the tray.

I can't even pull them out of the oven. Then she was listening to this program. She heard me talk about relief factor, and you know how the story ends. If you walk up Florence's driveway nowadays, you're apt to find the smell of worn cookies lifting you off the ground because she's back.

And this time, she's baking. If you want a free, a drug-free, natural. way to ease your pain and get your life back. Do what I did. Do what flow is done. And that's Relieffactor.com. Go there now. Order your three-week quick start at Relieffactor.com. This is the Glimbeck program. We welcome to the program, our head researcher, the guy who's done 99% of the work on our Ukrainian special. It's Jason Butrill. He's been so busy. He hasn't watched any of the last two weeks of Cowboys games.

You missed them both. Thank goodness. Yeah. Thank goodness. How are you, Jason? Doing good. All right, so we're doing something on the Twitter feed today, on my Twitter feed, and we would ask that you would retweet every 10 minutes today. We are tweeting another fact about the chalkboard and what the Democrats did in Ukraine.

This Twitter thread might like. last for the next seven to eight months. I think we figured it out. What is it? It's six hours. Every 10 minutes, another fact from the chalkboard, and it takes six hours to go out. We should probably keep it open-ended, too, because there's no reason to believe we will not be adding to this thread in future weeks.

Oh, yeah. No, we will be. We will be. So tell me what we're, so tell me how you've laid this out, Jason. So if you've pretty much, if you watch the special, you've got kind of a general idea of this is laid out, but this will go back from, it's laid out all the way, it's a, it's about, what, five plus years of corruption, of greed, of coercion, of everything, strong arming, manipulating the U.S. election.

It's all of that, and it goes back a lot further than the July 25th supposed phone call. But it goes all the way back to 2014. So when you go through this timeline or through this Twitter thread, you're basically going back in time five years to 2014 and you're going to go sometimes month to month, sometimes week to week, sometimes the day after some of these things will happen. But you'll go all the way back then and you'll just kind of, it reads almost like an indictment pretty much on what everything the left has been doing since. And we have included the documents. All the backgrounds of everything you need to show. If someone says, what about this? Then you can go and actually look at it

and say, okay, well, how about this? How about this? Show them court documents. Show them audio recordings for crying out loud. Show them everything. I'd like you to tweet this to Lindsay Graham and also to Barr at Justice. I think we need to concentrate making sure that these people are paying attention to this. I think Barr is aware of it.

Lindsay Graham, I think probably is aware of it, but I don't know. But they need to investigate in the Senate. I wonder, because we know that there's some Ukrainian. prosecutors that still haven't gotten to the United States, I don't think. Why not? So they should be getting visas today and getting over it, especially that part of the tweet thread. When you read that, tweet that directly at the Attorney General or Donald Trump, because they need to get over here now. Okay, it's Glenn Beck at the Twitter. I've just checked my Twitter feed. Please subscribe and you'll get all these tweets today and pass them on, please.

You're listening to Glenn Beck. review of Joker here in just a second. Stand by for that. This half hour, sponsored by real estate agents, I trust.com, over a thousand agents strong with another 5,000 who are on a waiting list to join. They share my vision on how real estate should be done all over the country. We named the company, real estate agents, I trust.com for a reason, because they are the people that we have found that I can trust and I trust sending them to you. They show a very high sense of urgency. My team will respond within minutes, not hours, usually five, ten minutes at the latest. They'll show professional conduct at all times. They return the calls. They do what they say they promise to do.

They're experts in property evaluation. They know the value of your home and the homes around it on the market. They exemplify the truth lives here, and they have a long track record of performance and success. There are no part-time agents or people who have poor history. It's important to us that we send the right person to you. When you're looking to buy or sell a home, please just go to real estate agents. I trust.com. We'll send them to you so you can find the right real estate agent. Real estate agents.

I trust.com. Get moving now with real estate agents. I trust.com. You know, I am not a sports fan. It doesn't come as a surprise if you've listened more than one day. But what's happening with the NBA is sickening. And the butt kissing of China by these giant corporations is absolutely un-American. I mean, if you want to put the almighty dollar ahead, go right ahead.

But I think it's important that we know who you are. You know, when you're saying, oh, you know, they're misunderstood over in China. They killed 60 million people. 60. They've got millions in concentration camps. And you're saying this so you can make money off of basketball? It's disgusting. We'll talk about that and my review of Joker in one minute. This is the Glimbeck program.

So you've got a business to run and it comes with responsibility of hiring new people when positions open up. And, you know, what's great about it is it's not a hassle. It never takes a long time. the interview process is a piece of cake, or it's the exact opposite of all of those things. We can change all that. ZipRecruiter is now on the scene. ZipRecruiter.com does not depend on the candidates to find you.

It goes out and finds them for you. They have technology now, and I've been to the ZipRecruiter building. It's enormous. It's like how many stories was that building? Like five. Were you with me on that? Like five-story building. One of them is just data analytics where they're just going out.

All these scientists are looking to find the algorithms that can go and specifically look for the people that you are looking for. You get qualified candidates super fast. In fact, four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get quality candidates through the site within the first day. Many times. It's within the first hour of posting. See why ZipRecruiter is effective for businesses of all sizes. ZipRecruiter.com slash Beck. Do it now. It's free. ZipRecruiter.com slash Beck. ZipRecruiter. Dot com slash B-E-C-K.

ZipRecruiter, it's the smartest way to hire. So I went to, I went to Joker and not knowing what to expect. but after hearing so many people talk about it, I was expecting the most violent movie ever filmed. And I was quite surprised. On the way there, I even, you know, said to myself, if it turns out to be that kind of gratuitous violence where it's man's inhumanity to man, I'm leaving.

And I'll walk out. Because I just don't want to put that in to me. I just don't like... I just don't like watching, you know, torture. Pretty much any Mel Gibson movie, there's a part where they're always just torturing Mel and he's hanging from chains. And, you know, you're like, okay, I got it. I got it. I got it. So I expected Joker to be really, really, really twisted.

And what I found was the opposite in many ways. this movie is unlike any superhero or any comic book movie I've ever seen. This one is realistic. This takes place in the 1970s. They even open with the old Warner Brothers logo from the 70s. It looks like it's made on film, at least at the beginning. I mean, it is really, it's. It's really, really well done.

Joaquin Phoenix is brilliant in this movie. But what I didn't expect was that for the first three quarters of the movie, I would find myself saying, this is a tragedy. This is so incredibly sad because he's clearly disturbed. and and Joaquin Phoenix really plays this very, very well. And he plays a character who is a clown in the first scene. I won't give anything away. The first scene opens with him getting, you know, mugged by some kids.

He's doing a, you know, a clown thing on the street. And he gets mugged and beaten by these kids. And you come to find out that. that's kind of the life he lives. He has lived this life where he's always been picked on, always been bullied. He's obviously clearly, very mentally unstable. He had already been in Arkham when he was younger. He lives with his mom. He has no real life, none whatsoever. And nobody sees him and nobody listens to him. And when they do, they beat him up.

And you will go through the first three quarters of this movie, I think, feeling really bad for him. And I don't like movies that turn the villain into the good guy and the good guys into a bad guy, which I thought was where they were going with it. It's not. and I was greatly relieved of that. I don't know the director and the writer's POV. I don't know what they were trying to do, but the Joker pretty much is leading, you know, in the end,

we all know that he, you know, becomes a leader. Wait, what? That's a total spoiler alert. Yeah, no, and he hates Batman. Oh, my. Okay. Oh, thanks for giving the whole, I don't have to watch the sequel. But this is, this is Occupy Wall Street.

This is Antifa. Yeah. I've heard that from several people who said the politics of this are not as they've been advertised. No. He's a left winger, essentially. Well, he's, or at least the group seems to be. Here's where, here's where you could see it as left is if you think that the left cares about people.

But really, Because he's, he is genuine on, it just can't we be nice to each other? The social media commentary that at least I got from it. They don't talk about social media. It's just taken in the 70s. But to me, his rant is about us. You know, nobody's nice to each other. Why does everybody mean to one another?

Why does everybody just say horrible things about one another? That's not with the crowd. is doing. The crowd is getting you know the anti-rich hate the wealthy, hate those in power, disrupt the system, burn it all down. That's not what he's saying. And I would guess in future movies,

I'm hoping he is asked to be playing the Joker again in sequels. Because I thought he was brilliant. He deserves an Oscar for sure. But he's going to end up again, I think, just being used and beaten because he's clearly insane and not smart enough to be putting things together. He's not like the Joker that we've all seen where he's this mastermind. Right.

He's not. That's interesting. I mean, it does seem like the media is ridiculous, right? They make these fake controversies out of everything. And this was, you know, the initial push on this was, well, it's got a cost. mass shootings. Well, if it does, it'll be because of the left. Because it is the message of the left, not the right.

It's Antifa. Base keeps saying it's in-cells. It's going to make in-cells, essentially involuntary celibates, I believe. Just used to be the losers. Well, it might. I mean, look, if you are unstable and you go to see this, you will relate to him. And so it's the same way that people would relate to. Edward Norton in Fight Club, right?

Yeah. You're like, you kind of, like, there's these anti-heroes that wind up being heroes to certain segments of the society. He's not a hero in any way. But neither, I mean, could, you know, Edward Norton, I mean, again, spoiler alert was a terrorist. Right.

It's impossible to see him as anything else if you actually watch the movie seriously. Right. Not Edward Norton, the person, by the way. I'm talking about his character in this particular movie. And, you know, it's one of those things where that happens a lot. What was his face? What was the one where Anonymous was using it?

Guy Fawkes, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Guy Fawkes was not a good guy. But Guy Faw, that was 1600s. But the movie was not 1600s. Yes, yes. The movie came out, you know, relatively recently. Yeah.

And was used as a symbol for a lot of... But he was for Occupy Wall Street. And that fits. They weren't good. Well, but they... They thought they were good. shooter says that they're heroic in some way, right? Like, everybody thinks, you know, Hitler thought he was heroic, right?

Everybody thinks they're heroic or comes up with a way to justify their hero. I personally think that if we all saw Joker and we could all be adults, we could have a very good conversation. I think it's a great conversation starter. You know, it's one that you can walk out of and say, so what does that say about society? who are who's he talking about and and and have a real conversation because it's i mean how many of these shooters do we know are crazy they're not they're they're they're not getting proper care you know and they feel isolated and bullied well that's what's really happening our our society is sick it's sick and i think this is the movie of our day

I really do. I don't know what to compare it to, but it is, I think it's the maybe Saturday night fever of the 70s where it was, it just encapsulated that time. And it was like, that's that year. This is now.

So two questions for you. Yeah. Number one, I like movies that do challenge me, make me think, maybe have conversations after. However, that needs to be paired with it actually being a freaking

good movie. Okay, so here's how I, here's how I, by itself, is it a good movie? Here's how I reviewed it. This is a great film. 100%

great, one of the better films made. It is also one of the best movies I've seen in a long time. Wow. Okay, so it works. It's not an,

do not go to it thinking that you're going to. Be preached to? No, you're not going to. to be preached to. You can take it if you want to find it. You can add additional layers of conversation if you want to, but you don't have to. You don't have to. Just a good movie. Yeah, it's a good movie. Nobody's preaching to you. It's still a Gotham movie, but it is the least Batman. It's probably the lowest body count Batman, even on television. I mean,

from Adam West. I mean, it's a, for a movie in today's world of, you know, violent movies, this is a very low body count. Okay. My second question is more personal. I find myself falling into a very familiar pattern, which is I don't like superhero movies, and then everyone starts talking about a superhero movie, and I think, ah, maybe this one's going to be good. And then I go to see it, and it sucks.

This one's not a superhero movie. Did you like the Batman, Christopher Nolan Batman? I liked Batman Begins. I remember really liking the, is that the one before the one with Heath Ledger? The one before that, it was very dark. and I liked it. Right. That's Christopher Nolan.

Yeah. Christopher Nolan, I think, did the best Batman. You know, the Batman series. It was very dark. Yeah. And it was realistic-ish. You know what I mean? Yeah.

This is, you could say, you could say that this is not in Gotham. It's in New York City and there is no Batman. And you could, you would be comfortable even the way he dresses in the, in the outfit with. the green hair. You would go, I could see that happening. It's a realistic origin story.

It's a very, it's the most realistic Batman or any super movie that I've ever seen. If you make me go see this movie and it sucks, I'm holding you personally responsible. It's going on your record, you will be noted. I just, I just want everybody else to know. I'm only giving this review, so he will go to this movie. It's awful. It's awful. Don't fool me again.

You always do this. No, you got to go. You got to go to it. I think you will like it. All right. But it's not what they say it is. It is, it's not even, I can't say. You know, silence of the lambs.

Disturbing. Disturbing. This one's sad. This one's really sad. Did you see it this weekend? Yeah. Really sad. All right.

Bernie Sanders, speaking of jokers, almost certainly out of the presidential race. Joe Biden. Wait, wait. Is this an announcement? Yeah, I think so. Joe Biden, come on. He didn't have a heart attack, by the way, with Sanders.

Now they're saying, yeah, oh, yeah, by the way, we know that thing we said he was going to rest for a day or two. Well, yeah, it was a heart attack. No big deal. He'll be back on the stage in a minute. Stay where you are. Stay where you are. Don't worry about that. Keep donating.

I want to go over what you said about Joe Biden earlier today, Stu, after the break. After this commercial, we'll go to Joe Biden. But I think Joe Biden, I think Stu is right on Joe Biden. It's fairly obvious, I think, that Elizabeth Warren is going to be the Democratic. nominee. Oh my gosh. Wouldn't it be great? Wouldn't it be great? If the Democrats could find a way, so everybody was really sick and tired of the scandals with Donald Trump, that everybody would just eventually just go, yeah, I'd rather have the socialist than all this. Yeah, if we have a social, if Elizabeth Warren becomes our president, warning, take your money out of the stock market,

take your money out of the banks if she becomes the president of the United States. I would highly recommend gold or silver, something physical that you had. And I think that this kind of stuff could be bad for the stock market and bad for the dollar. If she really looks like she's going to possibly win the election,

it'll be bad. Call Goldline now, right now. Find out if Golder, Silver is right for you. If you've never called them before, you've not thought about it before. Just get their information, look at all the risk about it and everything else. But get their information and really study it out in your mind and listen to your gut. Listen to what, don't listen to these advisors who are trying to sell you stuff. Don't even listen to the gold line people. Just read the information and do your own homework. I think you're kind of probably end up like I did

and put, I have 10% in gold. I'm sorry, government. I have 1% in gold. At goldline.com, goldline.com, go there now. Call them, they're waiting for your phone, call physical gold or silver. It's where the world always returns after a bout of insanity. It's 866 goldline. 1-866 Goldline or goldline.com.

We break for 10 seconds. All right, so Pat, I mean, Stu, you got to tell me the, You got to tell the audience what you told me earlier today about Joe Biden. Well, something's been perplexing me a little bit about Biden in that when the focus went to Ukraine and in the impeachment situation that we're dealing with now, there was a pretty widespread, I would say, view that it would hurt Biden because Biden would be dragged into a scandal. And I thought with some smart campaigning, there would actually be a real advantage here. for Joe Biden. Because Biden is essentially, think about this from the Democratic perspective for a second, not what we think about the Ukraine thing or none of that. Take it just from the Democrat perspective. The main thing they are voting on is who can beat Donald Trump. Who is the most electable?

And I think there's a real argument to be made that Joe Biden should come out and say, hey, I don't know if you guys have noticed this. But the president of the United States was harassing foreign leaders to get dirt on me to try to beat me because I'm the one he's afraid of. All these other guys have great policies. You understand. You know, I love Bernie. Love Elizabeth. And there is some evidence that maybe he did this with Elizabeth Warren as well,

at least reporting that he called China Elizabeth Warren, which I don't even know what that's about. We'll maybe find out more about that. But I might ignore that if I'm Biden at this point and say, look, none of these other people are getting called. The president's not doing that. Yeah, he doesn't like him. He comes up with the little nicknames.

He'll come out and tweet about them. but the president of the United States was making calls risking his presidency to destroy me because he's terrified. He knows that if I am the candidate, I will beat him. And you know,

you can say, listen to all these guys, all they want, a lot of their policies are great. But there's a difference here. The American people need someone who's going to beat Donald Trump not just come up with different ideas

and really exploit it. Like, if I were Biden's campaign, that's what I would be doing. Okay? However, he's he's played around a little bit of the edges with it he said things sort of in that vein

but not really going that far could be I guess that his campaign is just really incompetent and maybe thinks that you know I don't know we shouldn't we shouldn't go crazy on this I don't know however here's my actual belief at this point Biden is looking at this and not making a big deal about it

because he is actually worried about what will come up if this is the defining campaign issue of this next election. If the media, if everyone gets on board into looking at what actually happened with Ukraine, not only with him, but also his son, it could not only hurt him dramatically and maybe destroy his campaign, but also really hurt his son's future. And I don't think Joe Biden's a bad dad. I think he loves his kids.

I think he wants to protect them. And I think that's why he didn't run last time. He convinced himself to go for it this time, but I think the media getting into this, and the media diving into this full force actually legitimately scares him as to what outcome comes out of that. So instead of using this as Trump would, right, Trump would be like, he would come out and say just exactly what I said if this happened with Obama and Biden. He'd be like, look, they're targeting me.

They're targeting me. They're not targeting Ted Cruz. They're not targeting Markle Rubio. They're coming after me because they're scared of me. because the number one issue these people are making their decisions on or not about socialism, it's not about taxes,

it's not about Green New Deal, it's about who beats Donald Trump, period. And the fact that he is not exploiting that shows either mass campaign incompetence, which is possible, or he's actually afraid about what comes out if people start looking under this pile of wood. There's a lot of bugs down there.

I cannot wait to tell you about the recluse spider that is hiding in that stack of logs. Because this is something that I talked about about six or seven months ago. And it's happening. You're starting to see it now. I will remind you here in a second. This is the Glebeck program. A good real estate agent has a lot of responsibility when it comes to helping you buy or sell a home. They act as kind of a firewall of safety between you and the terrifying monstrosity that is the act of buying or selling a home. There are inspections, the pricing, the listing, the paperwork.

I mean, spare us from the amounts of paperwork. But when you have a bad real estate agent, anyone or all of these things can end up not being done correctly and it can be a real hassle for you. That's one of the reasons why we start a real estate agents I trust. Our network of real estate agents is top of the line. We only invite those who have a great track record to join us. And those who aren't doing this kind of as a lark, they're not invited. If you don't have someone in your area that is the best that we have found, we won't recommend one. That's how seriously we take it.

We want to make sure this is a real estate agent that I would trust. That's a real estate agent you can trust. Find the person that will help you buy or sell your next home now at real estate agents. I trust.com. That's real estate agents I trust. dot com. All right, blazTV.com. Use the promo code Glenn.

You can watch the special on Ukraine. You can also watch that on YouTube and on Facebook, assuming they haven't banned it yet. Welcome to the Glenn Beck program. Every 10 minutes at my Twitter account, we are tweeting another piece of evidence on the corruption of the Democrats in Ukraine. And it's not a conspiracy theory.

I love these people who were all over me all for the last four or five days saying, oh, Glenn Beck's crazy. Just talk to me about the facts. Okay, sure, I'm crazy. I'm nuts. I'm out of control. I'm a liar. Don't talk to me about me.

Talk to me about the facts that I presented. Nobody seems to want to do that. And there's a reason for it. And we're tweeting it out. We are being throttled shadow band. massively by Facebook and by YouTube, massively by YouTube and even Twitter. We got a couple of things today, one from Charlie Kirk, and the other one is from the president's campaign.

Is he the manager? Campaign manager, Parzcal. That's right. He said, my average tweet gets 250 to 400,000 impressions. A great tweet gets a million. This tweet has 40,000, the lowest of any tweet since I became manager. Hmm. Cards are so stacked against us. You won't stop us from getting this out.

And what he was talking about was he emailed or he tweeted the 50-minute monologue that I did at the chalkboard. Charlie Kirk saw the same thing. He said a typical tweet of mine will get 150,000 impressions and 36,000 engagements. When I shared the tweet about the truth behind Ukraine, it only had 237 impressions. From 150,000 to 237, the algorithm is taking anything with my monologue on it, and they are suppressing it. We need your help to get it out. Now, this is the biggest video the Blaze has ever produced in almost a 10-year history. It is gigantic on the platform.

This is why we ask you, please subscribe to the Blaze. If you subscribe to the Blaze, go to BlazeTV.com slash Glenn. Use the promo code Glenn and you're going to save $10. But we are being suppressed and throttled and shadow banned by the media trying to get this out. The reason why is because when people see it, they connect with it, when they act. actually watch it. So what they have to do is they have to discredit me, call this a conspiracy, train people not to watch it, and while they do that, make sure it's not really available. We need your help. So today I'm also tweeting every 10 minutes, another fact from the chalkboard,

every 10 minutes. We're just to go through the chalkboard is going to take us six hours today. and I would ask that you would retweet this. And if you will, just to target Lindsay Graham and the DOJ and Attorney General Barr because I think they need to see it. Barr is, I think, working on this. And Lindsey Graham needs to open up an investigation in the Senate. If the press won't talk about it, fine. investigate. They're the only ones that can.

By the way, if you subscribe, I'm asking you to subscribe today because your subscription is what paid for this original video and investigation. And I want to hire an investigative reporter to finish this because no one in the media. We learned this from Fox. We did all that research

and thought somebody in the media would pick it up and they never did. Fine. Not playing that game a second time. I could really use your subscription because your, you know, $9 a month or I think it's $10 off, $8 a month, we'll go to pay for a investigative reporter that I really want to hire to finish this job. But we need your support at blaisTV.com slash Glenn. All right, I want to talk a little bit about this mess in the NBA. I think this is

sickening. Absolutely sickening. So is he the GM of the rockets? And GM of the Houston Rockets, Daryl Morey. Okay. And if you don't follow the NBA, before we get into the China part of this, which is the big controversy,

if you don't follow the NBA, you don't know who Daryl Morey is. But he is no less than a legendary figure in the NBA. He has essentially changed the way the entire sport has been played, basically diving into analytics at a much higher rate. He's, you know, it's very similar to like a money ball story where he's, he embraced this very early.

He's really one of the first people who embraced looking at the sport in a totally different way. You know, and it's the reason why people shoot so many three-pointers now instead of two-pointers, why people stop taking mid-range jump shots. I mean, he legitimately changed the way the game is played. He's a legendary figure. He is, I mean, maybe he doesn't get into the Hall of Fame because, of China and his comments on China, but like he's a Locke Hall of Famer, in my mind at least.

He's never won. You imagine. You imagine. You don't get into the Hall of Fame. And you've changed the sport because you stood against China after they killed 60 million people and have probably another 10 million in concentration camps today. Yeah. And you say,

stand with Hong Kong stops you from being a valued legend? Yeah, I mean, I'm not saying he didn't even come out really against China. He just basically came out with one short tweet deleted quickly after. Stand with Hong Kong. Stand with Hong Kong. That's it. And now he's, you know, this has gone completely out of control to the point where the the rockets basically attacked him

immediately on it, his own team. There is talk now that he may be fired. This is a guy who took the rockets from a middling team to the verge of winning NBA championships. He hasn't been able to pull it off yet, but they went from nowhere to... Is there anyone within the sound of my voice that makes money in an international business that thinks that maybe we shouldn't be coddling communist China? Is there anybody that has a problem of Facebook?

What are they doing? They're helping them find people, Google, helping China find people to put them in concentration camps. I mean, what are they doing? And it's amazing too right now that this is happening because, you know, Donald Trump just took a beating, and I believe rightfully so, for congratulating China on its 70 years of communism

or whatever he tweeted the other day when they had their 70th anniversary. It was not a good moment for the president in my mind. And he got a lot of criticism not only from the right, but also from the media as a whole, saying, hey, wait a minute, you know, is this the right thing to do? Well, I mean, I hope this gives a moment of reflection here because the Rockets, just to give you the timeline here, Mori comes out and he says, hey, you know, stand with Hong Kong. The Rockets take, you know, attack him immediately on it. We are not a political organization.

You shouldn't say these things. One of the reasons for this is they have a very close tie. to China. Yao Ming played there. They are the most popular NBA team in China, which is obviously a massive market. So they start pushing back on them. He deletes the tweet.

He writes an extensive apology for it, which he should be embarrassed for. Other owners have come out and said, well, what people don't understand when they're attacking the NBA for saying these things is that, you know, this is a separatist movement. This is a separatist movement.

Yeah, against. For freedom of speech and freedom to be who you want against a communist dictator. This is a government that currently, as you point out, has millions, if not a 10 million people as political prisoners currently. And also is responsible for more than three times as many people as Nazi Germany killed. They killed in this government. They also are responsible for organ harvesting today. They're also raping our country with intellectual property. This is inexcusable.

Inexcusable. And, you know, this is an organization, the NBA. Two things. Number one, pulled their All-Star game out of Charlotte because they were so offended by the bathroom debate, the transgender bathroom debate. And that law that they passed that said, you have to go in the bathroom of your biological sex at birth. that was so offensive. They pulled a massive event out of Charlotte because of it. This is an organization that has banned the use of the word owner

because it's racially insensitive. And yet, right now, millions of Uyghurs in China are imprisoned because of their political views. Christians as well. And we know, I mean, we don't need to go through the list of human rights abuses with China. this audience already knows the story. But it is completely insane. And I actually had a moment of optimism, which happens very rarely for me.

A moment of optimism in which I thought, is this the thing that gets people, a couple of people in the media to have 30 seconds of reflection? Nope. To say, hold on. Nope. To say to themselves, you know,

nope, when we do stuff like this, like, for an example, they talk about some, Muslim issue will pop up. Some Muslims having some issue in some city and we're talking about hatred and something Ilan Omar will break up and bring up. And conservatively, hey guys, you know they're throwing gay people off of roofs. You know, you know, they're just executing gay people for no reason.

Maybe you should change your priorities a little bit. Let's take care of that together. And then we can worry, we can fight all back and forth about the bathroom thing, right? And will there be a moment where this is not. So clear. No. Look at the way China is controlling the NBA. No.

The NBA made a statement apologizing to communists because one general manager said they stood with Hong Kong. That is completely insane. Well, the NBA, Mike Bass, spokesman for the league, said that it was very regrettable that Mori's views deeply offended many of our friends and our fans in China. You know, he has a right to say it, I guess. But we have great respect for the history and the culture of China and hope that sports and the NBA can be used as a unifying force to bridge cultural divides and bring people together.

I mean, and I think it was Clay Travis who made this point the first I heard it, but it's a great one, which is where are all these players? Where are the LeBron Jameses of the world who come out every time There's a divisive issue here in the United States. Where's he? Where's Steve Kerr? Where are all these guys that are lecturing us every single time? There's a divisive issue.

He wrote, Clayton Travis wrote, Will Outspoken NBA woke activist, Steve Kerr, LeBron James, and Greg Popovich. Stand up for Darrell Morley and his support of democracy in Hong Kong. They're awfully outspoken about Trump. Surely they'll condemn the NBA. for bending the knee to China over GM support for democracy, right? And I think the answer to that will be no. I mean, I hope I'm wrong. I mean, they haven't had enough chance to really probably come out and comment on this.

Give them a few days. But it is full, I fully expect that they will not. And there has to be some limit of this, right? I mean, this, the entire league is folding to communists. that sounds like a crazy conspiracy theory. It is happening in front of us. They're making statements so that you know that they're taking this stance. They're not even doing it behind the scenes.

No, they don't think you mind. They don't think you mind. They don't think you mind that we are in bed with. I mean, and it's not even 2000, the year 2000 anymore. You know, in the year 2000, you were kind of like, ah, well, China, it's kind of backward and blah, blah, blah, blah. No, then, you know, oh, and they're poisoning our. dog food. They don't really care about it. No. Now they are literally rounding people up using

American technology and American brain power to put their people behind walls in a concentration camp where many are reporting that they're being sterilized to wipe an entire population of people out, a country that has already wiped out 60 million possibly, possibly, many more. And nobody seems to care. Everybody's like, yeah, I know. Yeah, I know. I mean, look at that. Social credit. That's crazy over there in China. Hey, can we sell them some crap?

This is the kind of capitalism that is grotesque. All right. Simply say, video verification. Video verification. They want to make sure that you understand that nobody's watching you in your house. This video verification does not have, just because, Because they can have eyes on your home at all times. Doesn't mean they do.

For instance, their video verification cameras, and these are the only ones that do this, they have an actual cover on the lens. And I talked to the, actually, the original owner of SimpleSafe, the creator of it all. And he said, you know, I'm so weirded out by cameras. I just want to make sure that I know a camera is off and closed. it's not enough for the little red light to go off. I want to see that lens cover. And so they delayed this camera for about 18 months

because they wanted the sound of the lens cover to be heard and to be solid and for you to be able to hear it, but not an irritating sound. I mean, it took 18 months to come up with this. So you know when that camera opens and when it closes. because you don't want people watching you. This opens up when somebody's trying to break into your house. You have something on your back door, your front door.

That's when that thing opens up and people are monitoring and it takes your response time from the cops from 45 minutes to seven minutes. SimplySafebec.com. Go there now. Simplysafebac.com. Their coverage is $15 a month. No strings, no contracts. You own the system at simplysafebeck.com. You're listening to Glenn Beck.

Hey, don't forget on my Twitter feed all day today. I ask that you would retweet it. And if you can, tweet members of the Senate and Attorney General Barr. But specifically, I think, Lindsay Graham, we are tweeting all of the facts from last week's chalkboard on what happened with Ukraine, all the evidence. It's going to take six hours coming out every 10 minutes, but please retweet it and share it with friends.