The Glenn Beck Program - The Big Britney Spears/Bill Cosby Mix-Up | 7/1/21

Episode Date: July 1, 2021

Stu and Pat discuss how Bill Cosby was released from prison, but Britney Spears’ plea to end her conservatorship was denied. Tragedy struck Florida when a condo building collapsed, and of course climate change is being tossed around as a possible cause. Democrats have been wrong about climate change for decades, but somehow, they’re always right. What is Bobby Bonilla Day and why is he paid so much every year? China has a death grip on American celebrities. New York City’s mayoral primary is hitting a major snag, and officials are blaming the voting system instead of their own incompetence. Trump visited the border, and he had a lot to say, while CNN’s Jim Acosta has lost his fame. We’re getting a January 6th Commission after all. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome to the program. It's myself and Pat Gray today in for Glenn Beck, who's on vacation. Well, he was on vacation earlier this week. He just still showed up and did the show. He just acted like he was on vacation. The effort percentage level is suboptimal. Really? Yeah.

Really? No, you could just tell he was in, his head was in vacation mode a little bit. That happens. I did an interview with him yesterday on Studez America. and he just, I don't even think he mentally showed up for it. He was very funny and he made some good points, but he was basically falling asleep in the middle of it. Really?

That's kind of the... I noticed a lot of yawning in the middle of his... He just breaks out in full frontal yawn. What, 80 times a morning? Yesterday was probably a top five worst day ever. Would you say, Sarah? Probably one of the five worst days I've ever seen him. He was just from the beginning of the show to the end of the show every time he had to take a breath.

Sometimes in the middle of sentences. It's crazy. It really is. I don't know anyone else like that. I don't either. I get tired, too, but I don't yawn a thousand times in day. I know, especially while you're on the air. I just bored the snout out of myself.

Oh, man. I'm Stu for Glenn today. We, there are just a ton of things happened yesterday. They're fascinating. Bill Cosby. Britney Spears. Donald Rumsfeld died. Very sad.

88. Struck down on the prime of life. He was the master of press conferences, though. He was fantastic. No nonsense guy. Put the hammer down. All right. We'll get into that and lots more in 60 seconds.

All across this great country of ours, and indeed all around the world, there's a class of human beings who exist for no other reason than to try to illegally take what is yours and put it into their own pockets. It's called the government. No, I mean, it's actually called cybercriminals. And you ignore the danger they pose at your own peril. So the question is, what are you personally doing to protect yourself? You depend on the government and pass some laws and try to protect you. I wouldn't. It's important that you understand how cyber crime and identity theft are affecting our lives.

Every day, we put our information on the internet at risk. And in an instant, a cyber criminal could harm what is yours. Take what is yours. LifeLock helps detect a wide range of identity threats, and if they detect your information has been compromised, they will send you an alert. You'll know about it. It's a big part of the battle. Plus, you have access to a dedicated restoration specialist if you become a victim. No one can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses. But you can keep what's yours with LifeLock identity theft protection. Join now and save up to 25% off your first year at LifeLock.com with the promo code, Beck. call 1-800 LifeLock, 1-800 LifeLock, or head to LifeLock.com. Use the promo code Beck.

Get 25% off. It's LifeLock.com. It's Pat Gray and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program, AAA 727BECK. Really surprising development yesterday. All of a sudden, because I didn't know this was in progress court-wise. Bill Cosby had his conviction overturned by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and he left prison yesterday.

Yeah. Bang, just like that, he's out and free. That was wild. Really something. A lot of times you hear these cases get overturned and then they wind through the court for another six months. Right. Right. And they're overturned and that day he's leaving. Yeah, you're free to go.

See ya. Not even like the, you're under probation. Nothing. He's just home ready to. Now, I don't know that he's going to leave the house all that much. but I don't think I don't think he's quite as popular as he was in the late 80s

It's been a slight falloff from the Cosby show years I don't know if people have sensed that If you don't monitor The entertainment industry closely You might not have sensed that But there's been a slight falloff In his popularity from the most popular And beloved figure in all of America

To the To not so much To rapist Yeah to serial rapist really Yeah. And that's not necessarily the move you want for your career. Now, he's always maintained his innocence. And that's why he said during his prison sentence that he's probably going to serve the full 10 years because he's never going to admit what he did.

And that was part of the, apparently part of the process to be released in three years instead of 10 was he had to admit. admit that he did it when he says he didn't do it. In fact, not only was he not going to admit to any wrongdoing whatsoever, he wouldn't attend their sexual predator class either. He wouldn't do the therapy. And he just flat out refused. So he would have not conforming to the conditions of early release. He wouldn't have been released early.

Yeah, he would have been there for 10 years. 10 years. Probably dies in prison. Probably. Probably dies in prison. Now, it was a very strange day with that case. in that you don't expect a guy at that high profile level to just be released and go home the same afternoon. I mean, it was a very strange development.

But when you really look at this case and this has been true the entire time, it really was, in my view, a miscarriage of justice. Really? Yes. And I know. I didn't follow it that closely. I think a lot of people did what most people would do, which is to look at. Okay, look, wait a minute. He did what?

You get the quotes that you hear. Yes, I got Kualudes and I was drugging women or whatever. He didn't quite say it that, but that's how it's portrayed every time. And you look at his fall from grace, the fact that he's been beat up by everybody. No one likes him anymore. There's really no defenders of him. Except Felicia Rashad, which is the same. She has been the lone defender of this guy.

In fact, she said, finally. Yeah. Justice has been served or whatever she said yesterday. She was the one person who tweeted something good about him. Yes, that's true. She has, she does have that one defender. And she's the one, by the way, yeah, who played his wife on the Cosby show. Claire Huxable was it?

Yeah. That's been a while. It's been a while. But so stepping back for a second, did Bill Cosby do these things to these women? I don't know. I wasn't there. Seems to be a lot of women who were accusing him. obviously you can't just make it about that.

He definitely said some things in the transcript of the trial for the civil case that would lead you to believe he was certainly not a good guy and maybe very well did some terrible things to the women. So let's just assume for a second he did these things. 100% we know mentally that he did these things. He still should not have gone to prison. And here's the thing. If you go back and look at how this progressed,

basically this woman accused Bill Cosby of of these terrible things. He said he didn't do it. He denied it. And they were going to bring him to criminal trial. The prosecutor at the time, the DA at the time, says, okay, I'm looking at the evidence here. We have nothing except she's saying it, right? She's saying it. And he's saying that it didn't happen.

No physical evidence. This happens all the time in these types of cases. This is why, by the way, if something, God forbid something like this happens to you, go immediately to the authorities so that they can get as much physical evidence as possible and circumstantial evidence as possible. Because once you let a few years go by, it's impossible to look at these things unless you have the person admitting it. And there were way more than a few years.

Right. Yeah. And in a lot of these cases, it was decades and decades and decades. Yeah. So the DA says, okay, I'm looking at the evidence here. There's no way we're going to get him convicted in a criminal suit. There's no way because he's just going to say Fifth Amendment right. to not to not have to testify,

and they're just going to throw it out of court. So their solution to that was to say, hey, you know, Bill, what if we give you immunity in this case in exchange for you to testify in the civil case, to give some answers to these questions? So you'll be guaranteed you will not be convicted and go to prison

if you give, actually tell your story. and answer these questions. So they think about it. Now, look, if you're totally innocent, do you just say, screw it, I'm going to court anyway? Maybe, but you're taking a huge risk, right? So in his telling of the story, he said, well, look,

I can get rid of the possibility of going to prison, and the worst cases I'll have to go, and I'll defend myself in this case, and I might lose some money in a civil case, right? So that happens. They go through, they wind up settling, the civil case eventually. He pays a few million dollars. This testimony is sealed, guaranteed to be sealed, and guaranteed that he cannot be convicted

of this crime and go to prison. That DA leaves. The new one comes in and says, you know what? The thing is, when we made that deal, there wasn't this comedian that went viral about the case. So let's reopen it and just forget all the stuff we told him before. Instead, we'll just say, you know what, we can use all that testimony that had to be sealed. And you know what? You can be convicted for it. Sorry. And so they just redid it all totally against what had been guaranteed to him this entire time.

It goes through the process. He obviously, now they have the testimony of him saying the Kululut's thing and all of these other things. So he looks much, much worse than he would have looked initially. They just tricked him and overturned their own promise. That's crazy. And that is absolutely not our legal system. I'm sorry. Like, as bad as this guy may be, he may very well be a serial rapist.

But just like everyone else in this country, you get rights in the legal system. And the government cannot continually screw you and tell you one thing and do the other. Did he admit to all those things in the civil trial? He didn't admit to them. So he said things like, you know, I bought Kualoo. Did you ever buy Kualudes to be with women? Yes. Did you ever, what was your intent when you bought?

bought the quailudes, were you wanting to have sex with these women? Yes. Now, when they asked him, did you have sex with him without, you know, when they were asleep or against their will? He says, no. So basically, again, I'm not saying, I believe his case, but his case is... So give him quailudes, just to relax him. Get him in the mood.

Yeah, his case, his case was basically like, you know, in this, you know, it's an avrodisiac. That's all the quailudes are. Right. It would like, take it, take quailudes, because no one uses quailudes anymore. It's not, it's not even a thing. Oh, it sounds a luge. You should ask Jeffie in here because he'd be able to...

60s or 70s. This was his point. The 60s and 70s, Quailudes were like wine. You know, again, I'm not, again, I don't agree with his point. But his point is like, basically I bought a case of beer to drink with a woman and then in my hopes I was going to sleep with her.

That was kind of what he was, his point was in these moments. Of course, quailutes now are much more associated with drugging of women. And that is, by the way, their accusation. That he was slipping the quailutes into drinks or whatever. whatever, they would drink them and would not, they would fall asleep and then he would have his way with them. He completely denies that. We don't know the truth here.

There's so many accusations. It's easy to believe that it is true. However, they basically went to Bill Cosby and said, hey, we're not going to pursue any prosecution. You will have immunity in this case. In exchange for that, you have to abandon your Fifth Amendment right. to be able to not answer these questions. Your constitutional rights gone

because you cannot be convicted. So you have to answer these questions. And so they used that against him in the criminal trial? Yeah, they brought all of the information they got from the civil trial and said, okay, now you can be convicted and we can use this information. I mean, that is completely

insane. There's not a lot of people are going to be sympathetic, though, because he clearly did something. Yes. In the eyes of the American people, he did something wrong. I think in a way, he's a rapist. This is a positive development for our legal system because we have decided as a country to start doing justice via social media, via documentary.

You know, like they came out with a documentary against this person. We now know they're evil and they never get to do anything in society again. And when we have an actual legal system that's supposed to go through this stuff. And just because, like it seems like, People were like, well, Bill Cosby, we all think he's bad. He's really bad. In fact, it looks like he did some really, really bad stuff. And we don't like him.

And this is different than a normal person because we really don't like him. And he made us like him before. And so now we don't. So it's even worse. Yeah, we feel burned by that. So we're just going to, you know, the whole legal system? What if we don't do that for now and just instead focus on the fact that we really don't like him? Yeah.

You know, like, what if we overturn all these rules and laws? Because Bill Cosby's really bad. Mm-hmm. And look at all these tweets. Have you seen the Hannibal comedy session on it? It's really funny. People, look at all the views on YouTube. Maybe he should be convicted.

That's not justice. It's not the way this system works. Yeah. And even when it benefits the worst people among us, those rules still get to be applied. And the other interesting aspect of this, he was admitting to all of that stuff with his wife in tow, with his wife hearing it all. And supporting him. And sticking with him.

And supporting him. The whole time. She's still with him. Yeah. Still with him. What kind of weird arrangement did they have? I don't know. Wow.

That's something. There was never a point where he was like, I didn't cheat on my wife. What are you talking about? I mean, there may have been a point, but that point is long past. Not lately. Yeah. Not during the case. And not during the trial. And not during any interviews.

Did he ever say? And she sat there right by him a few times in interviews. And they talked about this stuff. And they really amazing. And it's one of those things. There's a million accusations. It was a known secret in Hollywood for a long time. There are people who, you know, I was talking to somebody who went to Temple recently.

And he was like, you know, everybody. Everybody. It was like a known secret around there. Like he would always be down like having his arms around the young girl. It was just a thing, you know? And but that's, that's neither here nor there when you're talking about putting someone in prison. Yeah. Like you can have all the beliefs you want about somebody, but you can't, you can't throw them in prison.

And I do feel like there's this thing that's happening in our society right now where we, if enough social media pressure exists, it's just okay to break the rules to punish that person. It's just okay. sure you might have like you might have the right to be to to not be in prison but we we don't like you it does seem to be almost the long and the short of it like there's a lot of accusations against you we have no evidence to put you in prison however you should go to prison because look at all these freaking retweets yeah that's not america going to the first amendment pat what it's everyone always says it the speech the first amendment protects is the speak, people hate.

Because it's not, everybody who says nice things to each other. No one's trying to censor hallmark greeting cards. It's the stuff that you don't want to hear. It's the stuff that's difficult to hear. That's what it's there to protect. It's supposed to be there to protect the worst people in society. And I think that may very well be the case here.

But the fact that that still stands in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Because they're not going to want to, they're not going to have fun at dinner parties here for a while after this one. That's for sure. People are not going to like it. AAA 727 B-E-C-K. More in one minute. Whether it's for work or play this summer,

take your Raycons with you. I'm at the ranch right now, and I'm going to be plugged in as I get onto my tractor, more of a bulldozer now, and move some earth and then hit the hills. I'll be wearing a pair of Raycon wireless earbuds in my ears so I can listen to podcasts

or I can listen to great music while I make hay, if you will. You'll get crisp, powerful beats at half the price. of other premium audio brands. Raycons, they look great, they feel even better, and they come in a range of cool colors with customizable gel tips included for comfortable in-ear fit.

They're the most comfortable earbuds I've ever owned. Get 15% off Raycon's at Buyraycon.com slash Beck. Plus, Raycon has a 45-day happiness guarantee, so give them a try. I think you're going to be pleasantly surprised, and you will never go anywhere without them. That's Buyraycon.com. slash back for 15% off your order by raycon.com slash back.

It's Pat and Stufer Glenn, AAA 727 B-E-C-K. So Bill Cosby walking free today. He's free as a bird, back with his lovely wife. And his committed, loyal wife, apparently. Very loyal. I would say. Very, very loyal.

I don't think if there's anything to question in this case, it is not her loyalty. Not for sure. The other thing that happened yesterday, celebrity wise was astounding as well with Britney Spears. And her thing, her freedom went the other way. I am astounded that she wasn't set free from this conservatorship. Her dad still has control over every aspect of her life, apparently.

But now I think he shares control with some corporation. Because Brittany asked the judge that, okay, if you're going to at least keep this in place, can they at least be? join this situation because she doesn't apparently there's not a good relationship there with her dad and he's controlling every aspect of her she claims to all the way down to her dance moves what dance moves she does yeah amazing um and i don't understand how in the united states of america with a 39 year old adult this is even possible how do you make a ruling like that yeah he's going to continue to

control your life sorry uh and they didn't even say sorry actually so the only way this can happen is if you have dementia of some sort. Clearly, she doesn't have dementia. Or you're completely mentally ill to the point where you're a danger to yourself or others. That doesn't seem to be the case either. I mean, I know she's a little strange. She's a little weird. She's always been.

But why would you completely lose your freedom over that? If she's a danger to herself or others, she should be in a mental institution. how do they continue to allow her dad to control her money? I don't understand that. How is that even possible? With the things that she testified to and the support that she has with the American people, of course, I guess that didn't enter into it. But how do they rule against a 39-year-old adult who is a U.S. citizen?

And nope, sorry, you can't be in control of your life. I don't know how that happens. Yeah, the social media pressure on this one was not enough. Not even, not at all. To take it into account. Because that's certainly where everyone seems to be on this. And I think they should be there. Yeah, we should talk about this a little bit.

I think you're probably right. I mean, the idea that you can just overturn someone's life. I mean, you know, the imprisonment thing is a little bit of hyperbole. Yeah. And she's, you know, a multimillionaire in a very, very nice house and all of these things. but there's, you know, by her telling, I mean, it does not seem to be something that should be allowed in the United States of America. And clearly, he's in control of her finances. And she's living a good life.

Yeah, she's got a nice house. But that's a small part. Yeah. I don't mean to say that that's the end all be all of human existence, though. I mean, you get to do, you should have freedom. You should have complete freedom over your life decisions. Yeah, unless you're a criminal or unless you're so mentally incapacitated that we can't. trust that to you because you'll hurt yourself or somebody else.

Well, that's not the case here. She doesn't have Alzheimer's disease. She doesn't have an early onset dementia. So how does this continue into 13 years now? That's really something. I don't fully comprehend it. Weird ruling as far as I'm concerned. All right.

Triple-8-7-27-B-E-C-K. It's Pat and Stu today for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. Has a new home crossed your mind? Maybe you want something bigger or you're ready for a new neighborhood. Well, listen to this. Mortgage rates continue to be at historic lows, which means home ownership is incredibly affordable, especially when you work with American financing

because they're top-rated family-owned mortgage lender that has been working for you, helping homeowners for the last 20 years, doing what it takes to get you into a home for less. They don't work for the bank. They work for you. A custom loan program to down payment assistance, to affordable monthly payments,

their mortgage consultants can do it all without ever charging you any up-front fee, without any high pressure or anything like that. Process simple, straightforward. They're even open at night and on weekends. So get your financial house in order, and don't put off your dream home. Call American Financing at 800906 2440,

800906 2440, or apply online at Americanfinancing.compancing. American financing, NMLS-182334, www. nmLS consumer access.org. Doing our part to keep free speech alive. There's much more after the break on the Glenn Beck program. It's Pat and Stofer Glenn, AAA 727BECK. We're talking about Britney Spears.

I've got the Bill Cosby situation too, which is incredible. He's now a free man. Conviction overturned. Can't be tried again. So he's free now for the rest of it. his life. Well, unless he rapes again or does something illegal again and gets caught for it. But Britney Spears lost her bid to get out of her conservatorship with her father yesterday. And it just seems bizarre to me that a 39-year-old woman can't run our own life if she's not a

danger to herself or others. And, you know, we were talking during the break. Maybe she is. And we just haven't heard. Maybe we just don't know all the facts. That is the one thing that should cause a little bit of hesitation with this. Because if it is, if the situation is as it's been presented in the media, it's absolute injustice, right? If she's just, like maybe she's got some issues. It's un-American. But so many un-American things are happening right now.

It's like, oh, okay, well, here's another one. I will say very well may be exactly what we think it is on the surface. Maybe it is completely un-American and completely out of control. It's very possible. That's just the truth. I mean, we have a background of information on this, right? Where the parent of a child star wants to take in their millions and is dedicated to basically ruining their life in that pursuit.

Yeah. We certainly have plenty of evidence on that from other cases. The only thing I would hesitate, and I don't know the laws in California per se, but I will say, you know, having to go through, you know, some stuff recently regards to. to people, you know, with mental health issues and seeing people try to handle those issues. It is, it's not like you walk in to a courtroom and say, I'd like a conservatorship over that person. Can I have one? And they're like, oh, yeah, sure, here. Here's the paperwork. Like, this is like, it's not easy. It's hard to get to get the conservatorship. And so the question

is, like, people are like, well, I can't believe that her dad would say she's forced to take an IUD. and she's every one of her dance moves goes through her dad. Stop for a second and think, what if, what if he didn't do that? Just what if everything she said was completely made up?

What if every one of her claims exists in her mind as reality, but is not reality? That's what mental, severe mental health looks like. Yeah. And so we don't know, for example, you know, I'm just this, I don't have information on this, but just throwing this out there. Like, did Britney Spears try to commit suicide eight times?

I don't know. I'm not saying that the court does know it, though. And so they might be dealing with a completely different set of information. Very true. And like, I will say some of the claims, you know, that she was making, I read her testimony where she made all these claims. and they sounded familiar from other people I've heard going through these situations. Like people who have gone through and said, you know, there's like a new accusation every day. There's a new sort of like a thing you've never heard of some, and they're very often crazy scenarios that are shocking to hear.

But when you investigate them with someone dealing with severe mental health issues, a lot of times what you find out is they just made it up. You know? I mean, as crazy as it sounds, and it may not be Britney Spears. I'm not defending the dad. I don't know enough about the situation. I just think that when we look at it, we have to understand that these situations a lot of times are a lot more complicated. Like, I've seen cases where, you know, something will happen. A dramatic event will happen to a family member.

and, you know, someone dealing with mental health issues will hear about that event and then adopt it into their own life. They'll all of a sudden start telling people it happened to them instead of the other family member because it's just like the brain is just, you know, it's just not working. It's just not working anymore. And it's really sad and hard to deal with. And if you think about yourself as a dad, if your daughter is going through something like this, you're going to do what you can to try to protect them. Now, given that it's Hollywood, given that we're millions of dollars on the line,

given that she is seemingly coherent enough to come out and speak and do some basic things, it does appear that change should be made in some way. But I would just, you got to, there's a reason I think you need to at least have hesitation to believe like this is the ultimate injustice, open and shut case. The court knows a lot more about this than any of us do.

And if she really has been a danger to herself, or if she's a, you know, if she's a person who is incapable of sort of like landing in reality and that, you know, every time she has a dealing with someone else, she can't keep track of what is real and what is not. That's a basic thing we all need to have. at times it feels like when you listen to the media you listen to the government

doesn't feel like anybody has it anymore but like you need to be able to say hey last week I went to Arby's and got a roast beef sandwich and a curly fries like all of us when we would say that we would know we were at that Arby's

what if you weren't at the Arby's what if you never went and got the curly fries a lot of there are people who go through severe mental illness where they can't decipher the difference between what is real and what is not. And to get a conservatorship over a celebrity with millions of dollars of legal backing behind them. And millions of supporters.

Yeah. That is very young to get a conservatorship at all. I would argue at least from my understanding of it, it is incredibly difficult to do. And when you look back to when you remember what was going on in 2008 with her. Yeah. She was going through some things. Very public meltdown. Yeah.

She had some meltdowns and she shaved her head and stuff. But I mean, you can shave her head if you want to. If that's all it is. But she melted down. And I think there were bigger issues than shaving her head. Right. And so that's how the conservatorship started in the first place. So there were things going on.

She was doing weird things. She was saying weird things. She was acting erratically. And that's how she, lost control of her of her financial life. Yes. And the legal system should err on the side of freedom, right? So if she's even close to being able to deal with anything in her life, even if she is a

disaster, even if she's a person who's going to go out and take the second she's free, go to a casino with all of her money and bet it all and lose it all, even that she should still be free. Like that she should be able to do what she wants to do. but you know it may be more it may be more significant than that and we should remember that everything that she said in her hearing should not be taken as as truth you know it's true you know it is really important that if if she's at all capable of handling her life she should be able to handle her life and even if she's incapable of it you know even if there's a lot of

people who I mean there's people I know who are you know in this building who work here I mean, Jeffrey should not be able to allow it to handle his life. How many times did we argued that he should not be able to be around his children? Many times. You're right. Should not be a lot in the building. Right. Right.

You know, but I mean, no one's going to want a conservatorship for Jeffrey. That's nobody's going to want that. Nobody wants to try to untangle that mess. No. No. No, thank you. But. Not even Brittany's dad could intervene and make that one work out.

It's like the reverse bit, Brittany. You get the conservatorship and suddenly you owe millions of dollars. And you're like, how did this happen? But, you know, so the legal system should always err on freedom. So likely probably this should change. But there is, there should be at least consideration to the alternative. Yeah, I guess so. Because it did seem like the judge was pretty solid in his ruling and pretty definitive that this needed to continue.

And then, but somebody else joined in the, she wanted some institution, some financial institution to be part of it. And so now he's got to share that conservatorship with somebody else. So maybe that'll make her life better. I don't know. But it's going to continue for an indefinite amount of time. I don't know how many times you can revisit that and try to overcome the conservatorship, conservatorship. I don't know how many times you can revisit that. So I don't know either.

And, you know, look, if it's, that's the other thing that you could argue here is that it, let's just say it was a really bad situation. Most people probably are unable to do what she's done here, right? You can't, it's hard to come up with the legal, you don't have the resources to mount a legal challenge against it. You also don't have the, the public support to go through something like that. Nobody cares, right? You're just wasting away in conservatorship land. But she has the resources to be able to challenge it in ways that other people wouldn't. So maybe, you know, in this world where it actually was a good decision to put her in conservatorship, if you accept that for a second, most people wouldn't be able to get out of it where she might be able to get out of it because she has those resources.

So are the resources helping overturn a situation? that was appropriate is the other way to look at it. Right. And again, I don't know, but it is one of those situations. It does feel like in a similar way with the Cosby thing where social media, documentaries, we do justice by documentary now. The New York Times released a documentary that said Brittany had really unfair treatment of her when she was younger.

And there's some convincing evidence to that. So we now kind of, everyone's on that side of things. Mm-hmm. And we now kind of look at. at this and say, all right, well, that's the way it is. Maybe it may not be the way it is. Yeah, it might, it might not. Yeah. AAA 727BECK. It's Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. So I am trying to eat healthier and I am, but the thing is, I don't like healthy food. I don't like any of it. You've heard of a fat suit, right? I mean, there's got to be, when are we getting a

skinny suit? Something that will make me look skinny because I just want treats all the time. I grew up a bakery for the love of Pete. The bad news is no skinny suit is coming. You actually have to do the word, blah, blah, blah. That's why I am eating built bars. It satisfies my sweet tooth, but it's a protein bar, but not like, you know, that's like eating stuff at the bottom of my chalkboard, usually. This is 100% real chocolate. It's low carb, low sugar. If I'm eating a protein bar as a treat, come on, you got to know it's good. And I am, mint, brownie, cookies and cream, the new flavors that are coming out all the time they're fantastic. Go to builtbar.com and use the promo code

Beck 15 for 15% off your order. Your mouth is going to water just looking at them. Trust me, builtbar.com promo code Beck 15. It's Pat and Stufer Glenn, AAA 727, B-E-C-K. It's amazing the things that are racist now. In the last few months, We found out quite a few things are racist that you may not have known about like highways. Highways are racist.

Why is that? Because I think less people, Bipoc people drive on them. Is that? Yeah. And more Bipak people get killed on them. Oh, really? Per capita. Is that really the reason?

Yes. Because I've heard that, well, these highways get built in places that divide communities. There's also that. There's that thing that they try to do, which is not even. true in most cases. There's an accusation I think it was against the Chicago mayor that he did it intentionally. Like he put a highway in to keep essentially black people away.

Yeah, from a long time ago. Yeah, from like a long time ago in the early 1900s. And when you look at the actual facts of the case, it was planned before he was even mayor. But like, no one cares. Who cares? You say it anyway. Yeah, you just say it anyway. And that's what they've learned, really.

You just keep saying it until people believe it. And people will believe it if you just. just keep saying it. Even when others are saying that's a, it's a stinking lie. Yeah. It doesn't matter. You just keep repeating it.

It doesn't matter. Don't even respond to the people who are saying it's a lie and just keep saying it. And eventually people do believe it. There was that time where, and I feel like it wasn't that long ago, where people would have this weird internal thing happen to them where they felt like they needed to answer it or justify it. Right.

And that's just gone. That's gone. It's gone. It's gone. It is. You know what? Yeah, we just, you know what?

We're the party. that said we shouldn't defund the police. That's us. They're just doing that now. Right. They're acting as if the last year just didn't occur. It didn't happen. Yeah, Democrats are able to pin this on Republicans now.

Okay, wait, no, no Republicans wanted to, I don't know of a single Republican who wanted to defund police. Democrats were screaming about it all over the country. No, no, we didn't. What do you mean? No, that's Republicans. Those are Republicans who did that. That very thin, very young, crazy person with the weird eyes from New York is actually a Republican.

No, I think that's AOC. I think she's a Democrat, right? Yeah. They are able to deny it because they get the assistance of the media to help them further those odd narratives that they pick. It surprises me that it works, though. I don't know how it works. I know. And I love this from Towson University.

now. They recently hosted a virtual anti-racist pedagogy symposium. I'm so sorry I missed this. I try to go to all the pedagogy symposiums and especially the anti-racist one. I really wanted to attend but couldn't. But it criticized university writing

curriculum and programs for being racist and perpetuating whiteness with proper grammar. So proper grammar now is also racist. There's such a strange thing in this anti-racist,

Ebram-Keddy, white fragility type of world where they just pick the things that are good about people and say that's white people? Those are white people things. Like showing up on time. It's just a white person thing. It's like, wait a minute. Being productive members of society.

Yeah. That's a white person thing. Legitimately, being polite. Yeah. They say is a white person. person thing. And it's like, wait, that's just racism. Like David Duke said the same things 20 years ago. And you're just like, yeah, you know what? Duke was right. That seems to be their argument. Like, yes, you know what? All those things that you like about society, people being polite to each other. People being, uh, people being advanced on their merit is another one that they say is a white. Is a part of the white culture. People being, because it shouldn't be about your merit.

It should be a guess about your skin color. Do you guys remember how? this turned out last time we tried this. Last time we were like, you know what? We should make decisions based on skin color. It didn't go well for anyone. It went well, I mean, it went well for racists. And by the way,

racists are now here in the movement calling themselves the anti-racism movement. That's what these people are. They're racists. It's clear. It is quite clear. Triple-8-727-B-B-E-C. More Pat and Stufer Glenn coming up.

There's a lot going on. Oh, man. This is one of those days that I'm glad we have a show because I would go insane without one. Yeah. We're going to talk about some climate situations coming up here in a few minutes. Also, I love the fact that this first lady is treated like she is so classy and so beautiful and so wonderful and just got a vogue cover. When Melania Trump was completely ignored. She's an actual beautiful supermodel who still looks like a supermodel and is one never got on the cover of Vogue or I don't think any other magazine

Any other big fashion magazine. I honestly think it's the most pure example of what they call Trump derangement syndrome. Yeah, absolutely. She's got nothing to do with these policies at all. It's just association. She's married to a guy. They don't like his politics. And so they don't like her.

They don't like her. And they just basically act like she's not pretty. Like it's insanity. It's amazing. And when it's brought up, hey, what about Melania Trump? You know, Michelle Obama had incredible arms.

Oh, incredible arms. Oh, my gosh. Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck Program, 727-B-E-C-K, is the number to call if you'd like to get involved with a show today. They are already speculating on whether or not climate change caused the collapse of the building in Miami. last week. It's just, I mean, it's unbelievable. It is unbelievable. And of course, then you've got the heat wave going on in the northwest, which I think is subsided now. But that, of course, is also climate change. And so we'll get

into some of that coming up in 60 seconds. Okay, so you've done your time with all those other grills, you know, the little R2D2 lookalike that rusted out the first time it got a little rainy, the propane grill that still carried the imprint on the surface of the very first piece of meat you ever burned on it. Yeah, those were, you know, cute and all, but you've graduated to a higher level now. It's time to get a rec tech. You've heard Glenn talking about it. You know he's right.

You've heard all the details. The smart grill technology combined with a sleek, sturdy, solid, stainless steel body. It's going to take your grilling and smoking to, even your baking game. You can even bake with these things to the very next level. With rec tech, you don't have to worry that you're going to burn the food or that it won't have amazing flavor. It self-adjusts the heat to produce a... perfect cooking experiments every single time. And with the taste of your favorite wood pellets

flavoring the things you're cooking, you can't lose with this. It's Rectec. It's summer. It's the season for R-T-T-T-E-T-E-T-Media. Follow R-T-T-E-T-E-R-T-E-K media. Sign up for their newsletter as well. It's R-E-C-T-E-K at the end. R-E-C-T-E-K-E-K-O-K-K-O-K-K-K-W. Pat and Stufer Glenn. We had this horrible tragedy in Miami with the building collapse. with a condo collapse the other day. And it's taken the lives of, you know, what is it, a dozen people so far that they've actually found? And then 149 missing still.

And it's just an awful, awful tragedy. It just shouldn't happen in America. But then you take that tragedy and you politicize it, which is what they're doing already. The Energy Secretary was on CNN. And she was being asked about whether or not, This is a Gretchen, is it Gretchen Granholm? No, it's not Gretchen.

Jennifer Granholm, thank you. So Jennifer Granholm is on talking about, and she's asked whether or not climate change had anything to do with it. In terms of climate, you brought up what's happening what we're seeing in the Pacific Northwest. But we've been talking a lot about what happened in Florida at the Surfside Condominium Building that collapsed. We don't know exactly what happened.

this point but given what we know about the changing climate given that we've seen an increase in these so-called extraordinary tides and the impact that that can have in areas like south florida do you think that climate no could have played a role in that buildings collapse well obviously we don't know fully but we do know that the seas are rising i mean we know that we're losing inches and inches of beaches not just in florida but all around um not over by a tsunami we're on from They, you know, we've seen the loss of beaches because the waters are rising. So, you know, this is a phenomenon that will continue, whether it will have to wait to see what the analysis is for this building. But the issue about resiliency and making sure we adapt to this changing climate, that's going to mean levees need to be built.

That means seawalls need to be built. That means infrastructure needs to be built. We need to make sure that we invest enough in clearing out the forests so we don't have these weather. We need to invest in hardening our transmission lines, maybe burying wires so that we can protect areas that are like Tinderbox dry. There's so much investment that we need to do to protect ourselves from climate change, but also to address it and mitigate it. And hopefully these infrastructure bills are taken together. It's a huge step. And allow America to lead again.

She's still blabbing about this? Is that agonizing? I will say, Pat, there are days that I just, I kind of just, why. want to be a liberal. You know, it's so much easier. It is. Life has to be fantastic for these people. They come out and they say, well, look, every time there's a bad event, they say, look,

we don't know for sure if it's climate change. What we do know is that everything that's bad in the world is climate change. So we'll look at the details. We'll look at the analysis later on. We don't know yet. But we do know that every bad thing you'll ever hear about is about climate change. Right. And then when something happens that is the opposite of what they predicted, they say, oh, that's not climate.

That's weather. You're confusing climate with weather. That's the problem. You're not, you don't understand it. Yes, obviously, it's been cooler than normal for the past year. But that's just, that's weather. No big deal. Don't even focus on that.

You've got to talk about the trends. Well, what about this one singular event that would agree with your trends? Well, that's obviously going to work. 116 degrees in Portland, Oregon. That's clearly climate change. Of course. Clearly. Clearly climate change.

They're going to happen more often. It's 62 degrees right now in Portland. That isn't climate change, but it was two days ago. Yes. It was two days ago. You have every single time something happens that's bad. It proves your point. And every single time, the opposite of that thing happening also proves your point.

This is the greatest thing in the world. Sure is. It's the ultimate. scam. They're right no matter what. No matter what. They've completely rigged the discussion so that whatever happens, they're right. And even when they're wrong, they're the ones that get to tell you that the previous position they had is no longer the science. Right. So they're just going to like, well, but they're not wrong now. They're not wrong now. And they weren't really wrong then. They're just more right now. They're just more right now. Like, you know, the example that a lot of people use,

we've used it many times here on the air is the, the push in the 70s to say that global cooling was coming at an ice age, another ice age was coming. And if you ask the left about that now, they'll say, well, look, that was just a couple of scientists. It was not

the mainstream position. Look at the articles. They don't. They were all. They all say it was a mainstream position that it was definitely happening. It was only a question of how bad it was going to be and how fast it was going to come. They were completely sure about it.

And their argument now is, well, you can't blame the scientists for that because that's just the journalists saying that in an incorrect way. Well, that is who we're blaming, though. Like, I'm not sitting here blaming climate scientists for how badly you cover the climate. I'm blaming you. I'm blaming the journalists for doing it. They're the ones and the media and the politicians in this particular case are the ones. are the ones furthering this nonsense, at least in this particular way. And, I mean, let me give you an example here, Pat.

This comes back from 1995. NewsBusters pointed this one out. I hadn't, you know, there's so many hyperbolic complaints about the climate. You lose track of them over time. And you don't remember to look back at them. This is a terrible, terrible report about how bad. the climate is going to be. It's called scientists say Earth's warming could set off wide disruptions from September 18th,

1995. So now we're not in the 70s now. Okay. All right. We're in the 90s, in 1995. They say that a continuing rise in global sea level, which is likely to amount that more than a foot and a half by the year 2100, would inundate parts of many heavily populated river deltas and the cities on them, making them uninhabitable.

It would destroy many beaches around the world. This is the most important phrase in this entire article. At the most likely rate of rise, some experts say, most of the beaches on the east coast of the United States would be gone in 25 years. Now, you may recognize if you're a mathematician that 25 years from this article, would be 2020 last year. I happen to be completely sure there are still beaches on the east coast of the United States. How do you know that?

I've been at them in 2021. When, no. When? When? When? After the year they said they'd be gone. Yeah, but what month in 2021 were you there? Let's see.

It was a couple months ago. Okay. How old were you a couple of months ago? Come on now. Come on. That was a long time ago. I don't think I was even. born a couple of months ago.

Really? Really? I'm going to go ahead and say just with visual evidence that maybe you were. Yeah. But I mean, just barely. Barely. Barely. Probably preschool in that particular month.

And it's funny. It's just ridiculous. You look at this article. This is in the paper of record. This is a peer reviewed report about how bad the climate's going to be. And it is presented in a way. It is not the worst case scenario that the, There would be no beaches on the east coast of the United States.

That's not the worst case scenario. That is the most likely rate of rise. The most likely scenario. No beaches on the east coast. And how many times did they say things like the West Coast or the West Side Freeway? Is that what it's called in New York? You know, the one that we used all the time going into the city? Yeah.

It was going to be completely submerged underwater by, was it 2000? It was definitely before we worked there because I did a segment. And I went down to that particular freeway. And it was still there. And people were driving on it. And we have quote after quote after quote from this is from James Hansen, who was the lead NASA scientist that was testifying in front of Congress telling us how bad global warming would be. Right.

And of course, shockingly enough, they were totally wrong. mentions in here, the Granholm thing here, and she's a total global warming nut. I mean, she's Al Gore, basically. She's that far. And what she mentions there is interesting because, of course, because

she's a Democrat, she is in infrastructure pitch mode. And what she's saying is if this continues, we'll have to build sea walls. Okay, let's just go down this road a little bit. What the hell else would you do?

right? If the sea levels do rise, you build sea walls. It's not a building a wall is not a, it's not a reason to shut down all industrial progress in our country. Like when the realities hit you, what she's saying in a, in, in that little tiny chunk there is true. When you have, which sometimes you do have a changing environment, changing climate, what you do do is adapt to that climate. Well, they did that in 1900 in Galveston, Texas. They sure did. They raised the city 17 feet.

In 1900. In 1900. Yeah. So, yeah, you adapt. You modify. You, if the conditions change, you got to change with them or move. It's going to be one of the two. Yeah, it's funny because if you read Michael Schellenberger's book, which is great, by the way.

I love it. It's a really, is it? Apocalypse Never. Apocalypse Never. Thank you. It was a play on a movie title. Apocalypse Never. It's a great book. And you go through it and he explains, and Bjorn Lomborg has a great book out as well that

explains a similar thing as well where you'll hear these estimates that in like Bangladesh, you know, a hundred million people will be displaced by climate change. You're like, wow, I mean, that sounds really bad. How do they come up with an estimate like that? How do they do it? and legitimately how they do it is to say that the sea level will rise, let's say a foot they predict.

And what will happen is the people of Bangladesh will literally do nothing about it. They will sit here and every day and be like, wow, there's more water in the house today. What should do now? Ages went up another four inches overnight.

What she would do about that? I don't know why they have a... They will do nothing to mitigate it. creepy accent like that in Bangladesh. It's a very strange country you're describing. I don't know why the people from like, you know. Probably not many Agneses in Bangladesh. Probably not.

Probably not. Probably not. There's only a few Agneses. But that Agnes is sitting here going like, wow! Look at all that. Now the water is up to the middle of the refrigerator. What do we do now? And it's like, okay, yes, we understand that there's poverty there and it's difficult.

But however, this is what you do. There are multiple ways to mitigate a situation like that. Things like sea walls. Things. Things like, you know, all sorts of technology that can change the way the water, the tides work, the way that you're protected from the tides. All of these things have been in place in other countries around the world for decades and can be easily utilized in a situation like this. And they talk about like people moving. Well, that's another part of it.

Like worst case scenario, if you did nothing, what would people do? Would they all just die? they'd all just sit there and drown no they move and like that would even that's an extreme situation and of course there's a million steps you take before that situation

but that is not it's just not real life and so they take a thing like that and they say what if the sea level rose and everyone in Bangladesh did nothing and the water just came up to their knees and then their chest and then their heads and they all drowned

it could kill 100 million people okay I guess if they all just stood there but we are a society that is going to come up with amazing new technologies that we are doing every single day. We've improved all of these technologies that can not only mitigate the situation, but also make green energy better. If you would allow, let's say the ultimate green energy, which is nuclear power, to actually develop. All of these problems would have been solved a long time ago.

But you environmentalists stopped it. It's so infuriating. AAA 727BECK. More in one minute. In a world that's long. lost its way, lost respect for logic, law and order. Who can you count on? Well, Amac, the Association of Mature American Citizens, now over 2 million members strong and growing. Amac believes in the values that we constitutional conservatives care about.

Amac represents courage, faith, and reason in these trying times. They stand for national solvency at a time of runaway debt, national security. With a full-time presence in Washington, AMAC pushes back against the radical lefts push towards socialism. That's why now more than ever, it's time to join AMAC. Beyond advocacy, AMAC membership gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts that will save you money. And you'll also get AMAC's great bi-monthly magazine. So join AMAC today.

Benefits are great, but the cause is greater. Join now at AMAC. That's AMAC.usBEC. That's AMAC. That's AMAC.com. Amac. It's better. Better for you?

Better for America. Pat Gray, Stubergear. For Glenn, AAA 727, B-E-C-K. Hosts of Pat Gray Unleashed and Stu Does America, they're available if you have a podcast app listening today. Wherever you are, you can listen to the program on podcast apps or YouTube. Go to there and subscribe, if you would. We'd really appreciate it.

Do us a little favor. I mean, it's a holiday season. Celebrate your Independence Day by clicking a subscribe button on an app. Right? That's what the founders wanted. And then rate and review it, like five stars. And then it'll rise to the top. And others will see it and join you in your enjoyment.

And it's important to say when you rate Studez America, the Glenn Beck program, Pat Gray unleashed, you rate them five stars. You review them. It not only helps us, but it hurts others. And that's what's important. That is what is important here. Yeah. You're, think about like Rachel Maddow looking at the rankings on the podcast list and thinking, gosh, how the heck did Pat Gray unleashed

and Studez American? Glenn Beck, I know that guy, Glenn Beck? Oh, God, I can't stand him. Why is he moving up the list? And it hurts her. It hurts her. And for that reason, you should do it. We were talking a minute ago about James Hansen

and his predictions about the West Side Highway being underwater, completely underwater. And I believe it was by 2000, maybe even before that. But it was certainly before we lived in New York in the 2000s. I just read a headline a couple of weeks ago that concerned James Hansen from NASA. And it said, James Hansen wishes he wasn't so right. How do they keep doing this? How do you write that article about this guy?

He's never been right. Are you kidding me? None of these guys have been right. And yet they act as though. And people treat them as though. They've never gotten a single prediction wrong. I know. When he did his testimony in front of Congress, where they intentionally turned the air conditioning

off to make people look hot, he actually came out and said, hey, I'm going to give you three scenarios of what could happen. We could have my scenario where everything goes great and we turn off the emissions and we cut them and everything's great. We could have a medium scenario or a really worst case scenario. And what wound up happening was the temperatures were better. than his best case scenario. So like better than his situation where we cut emissions lower.

They were lower. And the emission, actual emissions were worse, were worse than his worst case scenario. So he thought the emissions went up more than he thought was possible. And the temperature was lower than he thought was possible. And he's like, I'm a genius. What you should take from this is that I was right. I don't understand it. And you know what?

Part of that might be because their whole premise for this may be completely wrong that CO2 drives temperature because sometimes that's true and as Al Gore has admitted sometimes the opposite is also true. When he said this,

I think this blows the whole premise. The temperature goes up before the C2 goes up. Sometimes that has been true in the past. The opposite has also been true. I mean he admitted that sometimes temperature drives up CO2 sometimes CO2 drives up temperature

well then doesn't that destroy your whole argument that CO2 is behind this and it's the it's the greenhouse gas that is killing the planet when it might be the fact that the temperature is going up and that's pushing up the CO2 what that is an incredible

premise is ruined right and then that's there's that they have not changed their mind on that I mean, that's still the truth. But it's a great illustration as to they can have this both ways every time. It doesn't matter if what they say is proven correct. Just, you know, look, I mean, they just get to go along with it. They just continue to be able to take whatever position they want. And no one goes back in the New York Times and say, wow, look at this dumb thing we wrote 25 years ago.

We should write a new article updating it and saying how wrong it was. That never happens. It's left to us to be. do it. The only person who's ever done that has been Glenn Beck. Hey, I'm sorry for what I said a while ago. That's it. Nobody else ever does that. No one. This is the Glenn. So there is a great service out there. It is called Vid Angel. It allows you to skip unacceptable stuff in movies and TV shows. And you know what I mean when I say unacceptable. The blood, the gore, the salty language, the risque, Mrs. Robinson, are you trying to seduce me moments? Well, that's where Vid Angel gets in.

watch the show or the movie you want, but you can filter out all the stuff you don't want, and you decide where that line is. VidAngel is so easy to set up that anyone can do it. It's a piece of cake. You just go to vidangelbeck.com, you sign up, you connect your streaming services, you set your filters, and that's it. You've just made a movie a lot friendlier. You can watch all those movies that you've wanted to watch, edited really by you through

vidangel. If you go to vidangelbeck.com today, you have ever. enter the promo code Beck at checkout. You're going to get 50% off your first three months. Don't worry, though. You can cancel it any time. Just go say yes to your kids with Vid Angel. Your daily antidote to the socialism virus.

You're listening to the Glenn Beck program. Join the conversation, 888727 Beck. It's Independence Week. And to celebrate one of the founder's main claims is that No shipping without representation at Kexie cookies. We're removing all shipping. Wow. Yeah, no shipping charges.

Just like the founding fathers wanted. Just like the founding fathers wanted. Yeah. No shipping without representation. So we're not doing any shipping charges because you don't have any representation in our company. So you can go to kexie.com. And it turns out to be the biggest sale we've ever had in the history, dating clear back to the late. well, the early

2020s. Can you explain something to me? I'm at your website, which is K-E-K-S-I-com. And there is something called a butter beer cookie? Yeah, based on the, you know,

butter beer drink in... Harry Potter? Is that what it is? I've never seen a Harry Potter really in my life. But I have heard of butter beer. Is that like a butterscotch? Yeah, kind of. Yeah.

Very similar to that. Creamy, buttercotch. Oh, it's so delicious. So great. Very cool. Yeah. All right. My wife said she was going to do one. She was going to, she decided she wanted to try to invent this.

And I thought, okay, that's going to be tough to do. Nope, she pretty much nailed it. I'm going to stop doubting her from now on because she's really good at this. So cexe.com. Anyway, AAA 727 B-E-C-K. Also, today is Bobby Bonilla Day in New York. It is Bobby Bonilla Day. My favorite day of the year.

July 1st. July 1st is Bobby Bonilla Day. If you don't know what Bobby Bonilla Day is, it is a holiday that is celebrated in New York every year. And I love this story because it's just, it's very satisfying. But he basically, Bobby Bonnier was a very good baseball player. You know, All-Star, you know, many times.

And he signed a very large contract with the New York Mets at the time. And as his career sort of winded down, they decided they were going to, they didn't want to pay him. All of the money they owed him. It is an understandable instinct. I don't want to pay people the money I owe them either. So the Mets thought, instead of paying the amount that they owed him, which is multiple millions of dollars, they said, what if we defer this money?

At the time they wanted to pay, I think they owed them $5.9 million. They didn't want to pay them $5.9 million. They were in the midst of a championship run, they thought. They wanted to go sign some free agents. And what year was this? Do you remember? 1999. Yeah, I thought it was over 20 years ago. Yeah.

So they said, instead of paying him the $5.9 million, they owed him, they said, what if, Bobby, let's listen to this. Just listen to us. What if we don't pay you that $5.9 million in one chunk? And instead, we'll give you $1.193 million every year from now, 1999, till 2033. Make that deal. Why would you make that deal? It's a great deal.

So instead, we don't want to pay $5.9 million. Right. How about we pay you $30 million? Yes. It's essentially what they were saying. Yep. It would be $29.8 million instead of $5.9. But they don't have to pay it.

They will pay him a little bit until 2035. So you think about it from your Benia, you're like, wow, even if I screw up and I become the typical athlete that blows it all in a car wash or something. We're going to get a million dollars every year. I'm still going to get a million dollars. coming up the next year and I never have to worry about it ever again. Great idea. For them, why would they do it?

Well, there actually is a reason they did it. And it's actually something that everyone is somewhat familiar with. But the truth is, at the time, the owners of the Mets were heavy investors in a fantastic fund run by a brilliant hedge fund manager named Bernie Madoff. and they looked at the numbers and they thought... He was a good friend of management, I believe. Yes, he was. And they looked at the numbers and they said,

well, we're making 20, 30, 40% a year on this. If we just keep the money with Madoff, all of the money we're making off that investment will pay for Baniya and we won't basically have to pay him any of this money. We're going to wind up saving money by deferring the cash for all that time. Now, you may have heard in the news that the Bernie Madoff situation did not turn out. out as expected.

Apparently he was running a giant Ponzi scheme and he's now dead. So it didn't turn out great. We lost him. We lost him. He did lose him. But today's the day he gets his check. The check of $1.19 million. It was actually $1,193,000, $248.20.

So essentially $1.2 million every year till 2035. Yep. And he still has... Just unbelievable. Half of the time. left, which is in almost half the time of this situation continuing. And since then, those owners don't even own the team anymore. But what foresight on Bonilla's part to say, yeah, okay.

All right. Instead of pay me $5 million, you pay me $30. Okay. All right. Sounds great. Are you sure? Ow, ow, oh, okay. The other side of this was they did this multiple times, by the way.

It wasn't just Bonilla. They did it with other players as well around this time because they were convinced they were getting such great return from this Madoff guy that like anything that they could defer would wind up being a good investment. What's interesting though is they did, it did allow them to bring in new free agents, a pitcher in particular, which actually led them to the World Series that year. So in a way, it did kind of work. But that being said, it doesn't feel like that every July 1st, I think, for the Mets. So happy Bobby Bonilla Day. This is what we need, Pat. We need like to go to Glenn and say look we will fill in for you every time you're out and you don't

have to pay us anything now you just have to pay us X amount of dollars one let's just I mean it's already here 1.19 million we'll just call it the same why why play with the numbers yeah every year every year until say 2060 yeah totally fair totally fair yeah yeah I like it something and Knowing Glenn's history with investments, he probably would. He probably would go along with it. Let's try it when he gets back. See how that works out. I think it's worth a shot.

I think it's worth a shot. Have you been following the NBA playoffs at all? Not since the Jazz lost, no. All right, yeah. So, you know, I find it very difficult to get interested in them at this point. Yeah. Because the sport is basically a Democratic. party operation that occasionally

bounces a ball. Yeah. That's like that's a same right now we're at the point where it's basically the socialist party plus three pointers. That's essentially where we are with it. Or the, you know, the new Black Panther party plus occasionally

you know, there's a, there's a buzzer beater. Like it's not. It's about it. It really is like incredible. It's a lot of stuff that you put. in a Black Lives Matter sort of context, the most extreme elements of Black Lives Matter. Listen to the interviews of these guys after they get off the air or after they get off the court.

And they sound like the most extreme Black Lives Matter person you could find. And similar to the Black Lives Matter founders, they also own multiple houses. So it works well. One of the things that has been entertaining to me is to watch the breaking news about LeBron James, which is he's still not in the playoffs anymore. They lost.

First round. First round exit. And they're not in the playoffs. Nice. Really sad to see. I mean, those Lakers, they just seem like great guys.

And it's sad to see. But it's shocking that they didn't play as well with the actual best player on the team, Davis, who's actually better than LeBron James at this point. But beyond all of that, I'm not exactly a LeBron fan, as you may know. One of the things that they,

LeBron James came out and said, is we saw these injuries and I predicted this. LeBron predicted everything. He's always right on everything. He's right the fact that the Uyghurs, he shouldn't really comment on them because I don't know,

people might have their pocketbooks hurt. So he's right on that. Sure, it's a million people in prison, but let the Chinese people just continue to roll all over those people's lives on a daily basis and torture them and re-educate them

because you know what? I need an extra few days. dollars out of China. That particular stance is despicable. It's totally fine, apparently, in our society. But he came out and he said,

I knew this was going to happen. All these injuries are happening because we had a short break in between the seasons. Now, you know, COVID, obviously, the 2020 COVID season went long. So they didn't have the normal, full off season as they were to come back. And we've had some playoff injuries.

Janus was hurt in the playoffs. Trey Young was hurt in the playoffs. like big players are out. And he's using this as a like victory lap. So apparently the theory here, Pat, is that there was a short break in November of 2020. The players came back, played a full season. And then in the playoffs, they're getting hurt because of the short break in November.

So the injuries just sat back a little bit, waited until June. and July and now are just vindicating his idiocy. That's the theory we're all supposed to accept now. So they didn't get hurt in January or February. They got hurt now in June. He's an idiot. But people like to complicate the LeBron James thing. He's just an idiot.

It's not necessarily that he, I mean, he doesn't care one bit about the people whose lives are being destroyed in China doesn't care a bit. He cares about LeBron James solely. So he doesn't care about those people in China at all. But he also doesn't know anything about them. It's

not that he's made a decision and looked at all the evidence and decided to side with the socialists and the communists. He's just an idiot. And he doesn't know anything about any of these topics at all. That's why, of course, we did

I mean, I don't know that I'm an unbiased observer here. I do have for sale, don't be an idiot, idiot, don't be a LeBron t-shirts. That is actually at don't be a LeBron.com. And the reason why those exist is because LeBron is an idiot. And the word idiot should be used as a synonym with the name LeBron when it's associated with LeBron James at least. There's probably like a LeBron Johnson who's like, what the hell? What kind of shirt is that?

I understand. Might be a little offensive. It's not about you, LeBron Johnson. It's about LeBron James. And I'm just so sick of these athletes who come out here all the time and preach to us about how smart they are and how just their world would be if they were only in control of it. Well, you're not in control of it. I'm sorry to tell you about that. The China situation is getting worse and worse every day, too, not just for the Uyghurs, but for the rest of the world.

Yeah. Xi Jinping just gave this big. speech at a at a celebration of their of communism where he said only socialism can save China and only socialism with Chinese characteristics can develop China

we will never allow anyone to bully oppress or subjugate China he's trying to send a message to everybody else who's saying hey you know maybe you do something about the Uyghurs in your country and stop putting him in concentration camps and so he's talking directly to the United States here when he says anyone who dares to try to do that will have their heads bashed bloody against the great wall of steel

forged by over 1.4 billion Chinese people. So you got Xi Jinping now talking like he's Mousy tongue back in the 70s again. And Vladimir Putin kind of doing the same thing in Russia because you see the weak leadership we're stuck with right now. And the situation in China is just getting worse and the NBA basketball players continue to ignore it and continue to. It was Nike in fact who just said this week that they are a company of China and for China. Incredible. Amazing. I was listening to the Barry Weiss podcast. She is a podcast now and I think it was her second episode she interviewed Mark Cuban, the owner of the Mavs here in Dallas. And, you know, Mark Cuban, you like him or not, he's got billions of dollars and says whatever he feels like, right?

Like, that's his, that's his schick, right? So he's coming out there and every question she's asking him, he's answering confidently and, you know, like you'd expect Mark Cuban. And then she comes to China and asks the questions that we would ask about China. Like, hey, well, how the hell are you ignoring this, basically? And all of a sudden, he's a different person. He acted as if he, well, look, we just, I don't want to get involved in. in other countries and we just have to make sure that I don't want to say by the way that we're criticized

and yes it's wrong this might be wrong but we should also can we talk about anything else in the world it was really like awkward that's embarrassing he just changed it's embarrassing why did they hold this power over us I don't understand it money just plain and simply money

that's their next big market triple eight 727 PECK Sunshine and backyard cookouts are back in the forecast and blinds.com wants to help you soak up the savings during their Fourth of July spectacular with up to 45% off everything. Transform your backyard into the perfect oasis this summer with their top-selling outdoor shades. Blinds.com makes it a breeze to get made-to-order custom blinds for any room in your home or outdoor space.

Whether you do it yourself or have them handle the install from start to finish, blinds.com will make ordering custom window treatments online, super easy. With free samples, free shipping, and 100% guaranteed perfect fit. With over 25 million blinds sold and 35,000 five-star reviews, there's a reason why blinds.com is the number one online retailer. I want you to go there now, Blinds.com. Their 4th of July spectacular, receive up to 45% off everything at blinds.com.

Rules and restrictions may apply. Sadly, Pride Month is. is now over. What? Yeah. It's only a month long. Can we still have pride? Yes.

I say you should. And we should probably extend Pride Month throughout the year. You know, but what we can do is keep it at our hearts year round. Oh, we can. Yeah. That's official? Yeah. Good.

Ikea for Pride Month made some LGBTQIA2 plus couches. They made couches for transgender people. Pansexuals, non-binary, asexual, gender fluid, and bisexual, and then one simply for progress. And these couches all had different themes to them. You know, it's weird. All of my couches are asexual. Are they? Yeah.

You don't have sex on any of them? Well, I mean, I try to. And then I'll work out. But I will say the couch itself. Maybe it was too much information. I'm not sure. The couch itself has no preference at all. None.

Seems to not be interested in sex whatsoever. That's weird. Yeah. Never says anything. anything about it. Weird. Well, the bisexuals are confused by their couch because, you know, they come in all these crazy colors and then they have some writings on them, some sayings.

And one of the sayings on the bisexual couch was, nobody believes you. Wait, what? Where'd that come from? Gosh, I've missed him. I've missed him. Yeah. I love to watch him again because it's been a while. you know, since I've seen a lot of

he doesn't dominate the news as he did. No. Which is, you know, of course, any president would be in that situation. But now that he's not on social. Yesterday, he just, he doesn't, he just says things to him. He's like, we built this wall. It was an impenetrable wall. It's not an impenetrable wall.

And he's like, we almost finished it. You didn't almost finish it. What are you talking about? You know, he just... Well, they finished about 4% of it or so. That's almost finished. Again, like, there's so much hyperbole with him.

Yeah. It just built into his character. Like, you know, every, you go back to the old Selena Zito thing of you, you take him, you don't take him literally, but you take him seriously. Like, what he's saying is,

we did a good job on the border much better than Joe Biden, which is true. It's totally true. Yes. What he actually said about the border, If you break it down word by word, maybe not as true. But whatever.

I mean, again, do people miss them? The answer to that is yes. Oh, yes. It's Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. AAA 727 B-E-C-K. Former President Trump speaking out again. This is kind of interesting because in California, they have just allocated $500 million to thin out their forests

in lieu of the upcoming wildfire season. Huh. What do you mean you're going to thin out your forest? Why would you do that? Another suggestion from, you know, I mean obviously others, but President Trump made that suggestion and they thought it was so ridiculous when he was in office. How stupid is that?

We don't need to thin out the forest. That brush is just great kindling. Yeah, that's kind of the point. We've got that and much more coming up in 60 seconds here. You ever feel like the school in your neighborhood should be renamed Carl Marx University? If you've been paying attention at all lately, you've noticed that our schools are full of leftist, socialist ideologues, who just want to push things like critical race theory on your children so they can raise them to be good, docile servants of the state. wokeism, which is a stupid term, just a few years ago, it now dominates the guiding philosophy

and our country's history is being ripped apart at the seams so we can pretend that we live in a terrible racist nation that was founded on the preservation of slavery. Well, it's not true. I can't recommend them highly enough. The Tuttle Twins books. They are books for kids that teach them about real American history, books that teach them about freedom, what it means and what it costs. You need to go to Tuttle Twinsbeck.com right now. They're running a sale so you can get free workbooks as well. Don't let the left cancel our history in these books. Get them for your family at Tuttle Twinsbeck.com.

Another fascinating situation is what's going on in New York City right now with the mayoral race. It's just so embarrassing. I mean, according to the Democrats, at least during this last election cycle, There's nothing that can go wrong with voting. Shut up. There's no problem there. There's no problem with the ballots. There's no problem with the system.

And then what happens in New York in the very next election? Problems with ballots. These test ballots, what was it? 135,000 of them? Unbelievable. Left in the machine. Oops. Counted.

Yeah. Uh-oh. And what I find to be fascinating about this is they're trying to blame this on ranked choice voting when in reality they're just a bunch of morons like ranked choice voting didn't make you put test ballots

in the actual vote count that's not ranked choice voting's problem if you've never done rank choice voting if you don't have it in your area basically it's the idea that you have let's say there's 10 candidates running for mayor

instead of just picking the one you want the best the one you want the most you would pick and rank your top five. So you'd say, okay, I want this one the most. But if I can't get them, I get this person. And you rank them one to five. This is not brain surgery here.

This is pretty freaking easy. And anybody who can't handle it is a moron. Enter New York City, who apparently is filled with a bunch of morons, at least in the Democratic Party. Because they, it really has nothing to do with the voting system. It has to do with them screwing up. But basically, the way they do,

it is you go in, you vote for your number one. And if let's say your number one is in last place, well, then your votes go from your number one candidate. They go to your second choice. The concept here is interesting. And I like ranked choice. I like rank choice voting overall because it gives you a chance to vote. I've never had the chance to do it.

It's really, have you had rank, rank choice? I've never done it, but I've followed its progression throughout the country. And it's, it's been popping up. Now, some conservatives don't like it because the results sometimes don't work. for you, right? Like, are you, but are we looking at it from the results or what the actual concept is?

And the concept, I think, is right, which is basically, if we do live in a center-right country as we claim to live in, I don't know if we still claim that, but if we do, overall, this should be good for conservatives long-term. A lot of times these voting changes occur and everyone thinks they're going to be bad for their side, so they oppose them. We saw this in Georgia, right? the runoff voting in Georgia that was implemented and had been used in the Senate was implemented not by Republicans but by Democrats who's thought the reason they wanted to do it is because they

thought they'd win every election until the end of time. And now they've, with the exception of this most recent year, which was a bit of an outlier, they'd lost every single one of the runoffs, every one of them. They thought they were going to win them all and they lost them all for a very long time. So you can't look at how you think the result might come out. The concept is, hey, I might like the libertarian, or maybe there's a candidate who is the, even further to the right. Maybe there's a nationalist candidate you like.

You get to put them number one, and there might be like a squishy Republican that you don't really like. They're running for the Republican Party. What do you do in this situation? In normal situations, you'd have to pick either the moderate squish that I don't like, or the candidate I really do like, but I don't think it's going to win. This gives you the freedom to pick that person who you don't think is going to win,

even though you think they're a better candidate, without feeling like you wasted your vote because your vote will go to the better of the two main candidates at the end. And in a center-right country, that probably works out pretty well for Republicans at the end. In theory, yeah. In theory. But regardless of it, whether it works out,

well for Republicans in the end. It still, I think, is a better, it's a better telling of what the people really want. You know, it's not people trying to come up with this calculated way to vote. It's not people trying to figure out how, well, if I vote for him, am I taking my vote away from this person? Like, you know, there's a lot of votes who went to Gary Johnson, for example, back when he was running for a libertarian against, say, the Trump-Clinton election.

You know, if people, if there was ranked choice voting, they could have put Gary Johnson one and Donald Trump too. Right. So when Johnson was eliminated, those votes would go to Trump. I mean, again, this is not brain surgery, but New York is trying to turn it into brain surgery. And they made the explanations incredibly dumb and complicated. So no one in the city understands it. And then now the representatives and the election officials in the city have just screwed up.

Basically, they've taken fake votes and put them in with the. real votes. And they've admitted it now. They screwed it up. That's nothing to do with ranked choice voting. That's just them being idiots. And it was 135,000 of them. Yes. So it's a really significant number that changed the election. Yeah. Completely. And it's, you know, and now we might might not know who's going to win until mid July. Which is again, not the fault of rank choice voting. It's the

fault of Democrats who came out and have made the argument for the past year that you should be able to send in absentee ballots weeks after the election is over. Now, I don't understand why. It is wrong to suggest that if you want to send in an absentee ballot,

you should maybe make sure the ballot arrives before the election. That is not, again, not brain surgery. you should be able to get a piece of mail to a location on time. That is not hard, especially when it's something that's required every few years. Is this really that difficult? We all pay bills and they have to show up on time. If it shows up three weeks late, the credit card company says,

we're fining you or we're giving you a fee or whatever. The American people are able to send in mail on time. But because the Democratic Party has. made this argument that it's essentially shutting down voters' rights and hurting minorities who apparently don't know how to use the mail or something.

Yeah, well, they can't get online either. They can't get online. They can't get the ballot. They don't know how to send it in on time. No. They don't know where the DMV is, so they can't get ID. They can't get ID. But we're the racist. The Republicans, the conservatives are the racists. When they're saying that about minorities.

How does this stuff work? And so they made this big argument that the only way an election can be just is if we count ballots multiple weeks after the election occurs. Okay. Well, now you've made that argument. I mean, you made it in states all across the country. So now you have to stick to it. And that's why the election results won't be known until mid-July. It's got nothing to do with rank choice voting.

And the other option was, they're old. option was they were going to have a whole new election in this situation. So they would just take all the results that came in from this last set of ballots and then throw another election in a few weeks. That can't possibly be better. One election is more than enough. Just have the one. So all of these people who are now running for their lives from the responsibility of

putting 130,000 oopsie ballots inside the machine, those people now are going to come out and blame, I guess, ranked choice voting as if it's the fault of all the numbers. It's pathetic. It's so pathetic. It's absolutely pathetic. They're going to turn out to be like Israel doing four elections in two years because they can't

get them right. Yeah. I will say you watch the rest of the world and you say, okay, well, you know, our system kind of sucks at times, but it's a hell of a lot better than what they're doing. Yes. I mean, Israel's like, yeah, I don't know, like we can't tell who won another election. Everybody show up

the polls again in two weeks. What? What do you mean you can't put together a government? What? Wait. So you're putting together a government every single time you have a vote on your prime minister that's really stop doing that. Yeah, that's dumb. That's dumb. That's your problem. Yeah. Yeah. It really is. The whole parliamentary system is. It's ridiculous. It's ridiculous. I just seems to me that the person who's like the prime minister of your country shouldn't be telling you when elections are going to happen. They're like, oh, this is a risky move. She's calling for a new election.

Okay, but why? Why don't you just schedule them in advance? Why is the prime minister calling for one? I really don't understand how anyone could like this system. I don't either. It's absolutely bizarre. AAA 727 B-E-C-K. Also, President Trump went to the border.

And I think this is what prompted Kamala Harris' visit to the border late last week is that President Trump was going to make it to the border. And I guess he made it yesterday. And so he met with Texas Governor Abbott at the border. And here's what he had to say. The real question is, do they really want open borders or are they incompetent? There's only two things. You're either incompetent or for some reason you have a screw loose and you want to have

open borders. Now the problem with the open borders is that countries are opening up their jails. They're opening up their prisons. You guys see this. And they're letting all their prisoners out. You notice their prison populations are way down. They do it very slowly because they don't want people to know this, but I know it. And they're letting all of their murderers, rapists, drug dealers, and human traffickers out. And they're coming into the United States, of America at a level like we've never seen. They weren't coming in with us. And in fact, one of the quick stories I tell is that when we first started, I said,

get them out. And I said to, I said really more than anybody, I guess, to you Mark, you and Tom, I said, get them the hell out. The MS-13 gang members who they say are the worst in the world. They certainly might very well be. I see what they do with knives where they cut them up into small people. They cut people up into small pieces because of the, it's more painful than using a gun.

I said, get them out. And Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador would not accept the people under the Obama administration. They wouldn't take the people. So the people came back to me just routinely. Sir, I'm sorry, but they won't take them. I said, who won't take them? Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador, they won't take the people back. I said, oh, really?

Why? They don't want them. I said, okay. How much money do we pay them? Sir, we pay them $500 million a year. What does that have to do with it, sir? a lot. We're not paying them anymore. And then I got a call the next day

from the heads of the three countries. We would love to take MS-13 back. They are wonderful people. We'd love to have them back where they belong. And why not? Why not? You know, if they won't cooperate with taking their own citizens back

when we're deporting them and we don't want their gang members here, why would you continue to give them the foreign aid that they seek every single year? It's just brilliant. It's just a good way to do business as far as I'm concerned. And the media wants to sit back and criticize Trump and the Democrats want to say he was doing this terrible job on the border.

We're seeing now what the alternative is, which is obviously much worse. There's no argument here. I mean, we can't even get the vice president to show up within a few hundred miles of it. It's amazing. I know I'm running this whole operation supposedly, but you know what's, you know what? the border I love the border town of Oklahoma City. That sounds like a lot of fun. Like it's not, it's just like it's so transparent that the left has caused chaos on the border.

And the exact opposite treatment has come to them from the media. They said Trump was causing all this chaos. And now they're saying that Biden is in the middle. with few exceptions, I should say. There are some exceptions to this, but basically they're accepting this. It's not a crisis. It's a challenge.

It's a challenge. It's a border challenge. Yeah. You know, it's like a Taco Bell eating competition. It's a run to the border challenge. Who knows how it could turn out? I ate six chalupas yesterday. It's not the same.

Not exactly. It's not the same. No. Triple-8-7-27-B-E-C. Nothing better than snuggling up next to the wife at the end of the day, putting on a movie, and then both of you staring slack-jawed at the screen as blood and gore and profanity, and you're like, oh my gosh, can we stop? The kids are in the room. Here's good news. Vid Angel connects to your streaming services and allows you to skip all the violence and the gore that you like or don't like.

Nobody else is doing this for you. You say what's acceptable. Vid Angel is also available on all the big market devices out there so you can use it on your iPhone, Android, Roku, Apple TV, Fire TV. have the power now to skip whatever it is in TV and movies literally at your fingertips. Once you set it up, you can set the preferences and then you go about your merry television and movie watching way. Go to vidangelbeck.com today. Enter the promo code back at checkout and you'll get 50% off your first three months. Don't worry, you can cancel it any time. Now just go say yes to your kids and that movie with vidangelbeck.com. As you would expect, uh, with Former President Trump at the border.

Also, CNN showed up. And Jim Acosta, who's not getting nearly enough attention now because Trump's gone. You know? And nobody cares about Jim Acosta anymore. Since January 20th, I don't think I've uttered the name Acosta. I don't think I had either until today. And the only reason I'm doing it today is because he's at the border with Trump hoping to get, you know, his face. name out there again.

And so he's yelling at Trump about apologizing for January 6th. Check this out. Apologized about James. Okay. You're apologized for January 6th. What do you expect him to say? Yeah, I do. Yeah.

Yeah, because I really tried to incite that violence. So let me go ahead and do that. That would be notable. That would be notable, wouldn't it? He's just, it's a desperate plea for attention again from this guy. Nobody cares about Jim Acosta with the exception of Jim Acosta. Yeah. And is he married?

If he's married, if he's married, I don't think his wife even cares. Oh, there's no way his wife cares. No. If he has, if he's married, his wife cares less than we do. Yeah. Oh, for sure. You know. Yeah.

I mean, it's got to be. Imagine, imagine that's, imagine that relationship with a guy who does his business like Jim Acosta does. I mean, he just basically sat there for four years, screaming questions that were not answered and then publicizing himself on the internet, for doing it. And now that Trump's gone, they've lost all of their fuel.

It really is interesting to watch this entire industry collapse since Donald Trump has left office. The cable news industry basically is no more. They've lost 70 and 80% of their audience. They don't know what to talk about. No, it really is. It was a Trump-centric world for those four years with people, you know,

that worked on CNN and MSNBC. It's all they talked about. It's all they cared about. Every single story, no matter how disconnected to Donald Trump was always made about Donald Trump. Sure was. Now what do you say?

And like, it's funny because they all argued for him to be eliminated from social media. Well, now they don't have his tweets to talk about. They don't have... I think they regret a lot of what they did to get rid of him.

I remember saying during the campaign, be careful what you wish for, CNN. because this is what you built your stupid ratings on. And when he's gone, you're not going to have ratings anymore. And they don't.

They don't at all. I think they wanted him gone so badly that if you ask them, if you somehow found them with truth serum in a quiet room and they told you the truth, they would tell you the 80% drop in ratings is worth it. We wanted him out that badly. But it is...

That's how much they hate it. That's how much they hate him. But that's, that being said, it still is that kind of consequential to their to their viewership. No one is watching these shows anymore. No one. I love the headline on the

news aggregate website, spin quirk. Chris Cuomo comes in first place on CNN. Right behind 14 Fox News shows and seven MSNBC shows. Give it 22nd. Because they nobody, nobody cares about Cuomo anymore. Nobody cares about Jim Acosta anymore. Nobody cares about CNN anymore. The only notable things Chris

Cuomo does are off the air. Right? Like he's either advising his brother on how to avoid Me Too charges or getting in arguments with people cycling by his house while he's got coronavirus. Everything else he does is just a boring dolt 99%

of the time. That's for sure. Amazing how nobody's talking about his brother's Me Too charges anymore. Isn't it? This is the Glendack. It's time to stop saying inflation is on the way. You know and I know it's already here. What's on the way, according to Bank of America,

is transitory hyperinflation. Great. Have you noticed how your groceries are going up? That's not the price of things going up. That is the value of your dollar. Too many dollars chasing too few goods. We're not making the goods and we've pounded dollars out. So, gold. I highly recommend gold and silver because in the end, The world always comes back. Everything that glitters is not gold, according to Rudyard Kipling's famous poem. There is real reason to have physical gold.

Call them right now. Talk to them about the 6% free precious metals promotion for self-directed IRA acquisitions at 866 Gold Line. 866 Gold Line. Doing our part to keep free speech alive. There's much more after the break on the Glenn Beck program. It's Pat and Steele for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. You can listen to my show just before this one every weekday morning.

7 to 9 Easter or anytime on podcast anywhere you get your podcast. And then same with really Stu does America. You pretty much listen to that, watch that anytime you want available wherever you get your podcast. Yep. And on YouTube as well. We'd love for you to subscribe and check it out. We're filling in for Glenn here for a few days as he's on vacation far away from here. And he's missing out on some big things.

Like we were going to have a January 6th commission after all. Yay! Aren't you exciting? Yay! Yeah, that'll be great, won't it? Yeah, it's going to be really exciting. Now, this one's done by the Democrats in Congress. So it's not this.

They were initially going for this special commission by, bipartisan variety. That's not going to happen. Republicans did not get on board with that. And for good reason and that obviously was not an honest attempt to get the information needed. I am of the thought. Now there is information we can get from a commission looking into this if it was honest. This one isn't going to be honest.

But I would like to know there's certainly questions like why the hell was the security so bad at the Capitol. Why was this possible? I mean, think about this for a second. Yeah, this was a, you know, there was a mob. A lot of people, there were some people who were pretty bad in the mob. A lot of people who were just, you know, there for the speech and didn't do much of anything. What if it was a foreign group of terrorists that decided to do this? What if, what if, yeah?

Remember, this is an announced rally down the street where they knew it was a contentious time. They knew that a lot of these people obviously believe what was going on in the Capitol. was very bad and they didn't prepare for it really at all what would happen if like a foreign terrorist group did try to go in and kill a bunch of our representatives I don't know

like that's the type of a bad thing a really bad thing and like if we had an honest government and people who actually cared about the outcomes in these matters there would be reason to really look into this and get a report why wasn't the National Guard out there in less than what was it four hours why did that take four hours? Why did that take four

hours. That's insanity. So there are reasons to look at this. It's just not going to happen with a commission like this. I mean, you look at the New York Times put out a documentary yesterday, about 40 minutes on January 6th. And of course, obviously, you know the Times is coming. You know the story they're telling. I don't need to tell you in advance what story they're telling. It was the worst event in American history. The worst event in American history. Now, so they don't spend any time on the people who were not violent. There was, you know, I don't know how many people were at that particular rally,

but thousands and thousands and thousands of people, we've talked to many of them who were there and didn't even know any of this occurred. There weren't any nonviolent people there. Were there? Shockingly, there was. You know, with all the judging by all the piles of dead bodies, I wouldn't think there was a single nonviolent person. I know. It's shocking. But a lot of people, like, went to the Trump speech and went back to their cars. Yeah. Like, there's a lot of that, and they, of course, don't show any of that. And there are people who went to the Capitol and didn't go into the building. There were also people who went to the Capitol did go in the building but didn't break

anything or steal anything or hurt anybody. Now, we do, because all of that, what you just said is true, we do at times forget that there was a lot. I mean, there were a lot of people. There were some bad things that happened. Did do bad things. Yeah. It was an embarrassment.

Yeah. I mean, 150 police officers were injured. And like, they have legit. The Times does this thing very well. if you go back and look at, for example, they did the exact same thing for the Las Vegas shooting. And it's really a legitimately incredible thing to watch. They have a zillion videos.

They kind of place them on a map so you know exactly where they happen. Like this person was driving by this building. You hear the shots going over their head. You get views. I mean, really, when they do like actual journalism, you can get some value out of the New York Times occasionally. This one is obviously much more. more partisan than the Las Vegas shooting was, but they do have a lot of video. And there are

legitimately bad people, you know, bashing police officers over the head with stuff. That doesn't mean that they died. But still, like, I'm never, I don't give a crap about partisan nonsense when it comes to, if you're a person that hits a police officer over the head with something, screw you. Yeah, you need to be, you need to be punished. Yeah, I've had officers in my family. These people risk their lives for us every day. The same way that I don't care what you think about the George Floyd case, don't throw a brick at a police officer. I will stand by that till the day I freaking die.

The same thing with January 6th. If you had a Trump flagpole and were bashing police officers over the head with it, screw you. Honestly, I don't, I don't, it was not nothing. that being said, what are they going to find in this report? What are they going to do here? You know, was it an insurrection, some calculated attempt to actually take over the government? Were there, they have messages and they have a lot of people saying those types of things.

So it was not no one in the crowd. It was not zero people in the crowd who were thinking that way. There were some, but it was an overwhelming minority. of and almost all these people were unarmed. How the hell do they think they were going to actually take control of the government? Right. Like it was a riot. The right way to say this is it was a riot.

It was unacceptable. But it was not what the Democrats are saying it was. They are trying to make every grandmother who's in 300 miles of this thing and voted for Donald Trump into a criminal. It's insane. And while the events of the day, might lead you to say, hey, maybe we should be prepared for this next time. And maybe we should take an honest view and look at how we can do that. Because obviously, the way we're doing it now does not work.

That would be something that a commission might, a serious country with serious people and a serious government might look into and say, hey, here are the steps we should take next time. instead, they're just going to make this into a way to try to make January 6th into a date you remember like 9-11, right? It was the worst thing that had ever happened to us. And despite the fact that the business of the government continued on the same day, also January 6th, kind of indicating maybe it wasn't, you know, Pearl Harbor or 9-11, it was a bad day. but it was not what they're trying to make it out to be. They want to make that out to be the only thing that's happened. And I would be, I think there was a really legitimate request by Republicans who said, look, we'll do your bipartisan commission.

It's great. But we're going to do it. And we're also going to look at the violence that happened over the summer when billions of dollars of damage were done. When way more people were killed, far more death occurred in those riots than the one that happened on January 6th. Far bigger loss of property. Yeah.

Much more damage to property. People died all over the place. And there were federal buildings that were attacked. It was government stuff as well as just property as they like try to demean, you know, of someone's life's work and their local business. Huge swaths of American cities actually taken over by mobs. Yeah, by mobs. And they act as if that should be investigated too.

I would like to know what is the truth there? What groups, where did they get the money for? Totally legitimate. What they were doing. How about the money that was raised by, you know, one of the people serving in the administration who was tweeting out links to bail the criminals out of jail? Huh. Why was that? Who would do that?

How was that set up? Kamala Harris. Who would do that? Not Kamala Harris. Kamala Harris? What? Why would you say Kamala Harris? Oh, she's laughing.

I can't believe it. I would like to know that. I think that's part of this, right? It's part of political violence in the same in the same time frame. Totally reasonable to look into that. Yeah. And instead it's, it's, they're, they're, oh, how dare you? Yeah.

They're seen as totally different events. And you know what the real truth of this is, at least in large extent, I think. The truth of the reason why they weren't prepared for January 6th is because they had seen nine billion conservative leading rallies not go awry. And they probably thought you know what?

There's always people who are saying stuff like this. You can always find somebody online who says, we need to take, that's our house, let's take back our house. All right, we've seen this a zillion times. The bottom line is these rallies have occurred all over the country

for a really long time. And there's never been a problem like this. And there's never been a problem like this. So they probably thought they were going to be fine. And in reality, you can't sit, you have to be able to be prepared for these situations and the off chance they do occur. But when the left marches,

these things go awry all the time. And so you need to prepare for everybody like you prepare for the left, I guess. Yeah. But there's no answers in a commission like this. There's just not going to be any. And, you know, they put, Liz Cheney's going to be on the commission.

She's accepted the invitation from Pelosi. Not going to win her any friends. the Republican Party, obviously. They're saying they're going to strip her committee assignments over it. So, I mean, they're going to claim it's a bipartisan thing because Liz Cheney's on there. And obviously, Liz Cheney has a, has her mind made up on this one. And that's fine. She has a right to her opinion.

But, you know, we can't act as if this is some bipartisan fair commission. It's not going to be. It's just going to be a way to make January 6th into the only thing you're supposed to think about. And the only thing you're supposed to vote on. And the only thing that's supposed to influence you. And obviously that's not the right way to think about our country right now. We've got a lot of problems going on. And ongoing Trump-related riots at the Capitol are not one of them.

That's not something that's just not going on. You know, that was a one-off event, I think, in our history. Well, and they acted like it was going to happen again and again and again. What was the next date that was supposed to be? Was it March 4th or something? January 20th? You had the actual inauguration. You had a date in March.

That's right. Then fourth or something, sixth or whatever. And nothing ever happened. And I don't think anything was ever being planned. Yeah. Because it never came off. You know, a lot of this comes back to the way you get to retroactively look at things like social media. You know, something goes awry.

Yeah, you can go back and look at people who are talking tough. Everybody talks tough online. I'm tired of it, but that's what everybody does. Yeah. You know, everybody's saying all these things. And everybody says they're going to. You know, look at the left. You tell me, you can't, every time we look,

we're able to find hundreds of people who say they're going to go burn down buildings and take over the government and, you know, assassinate public figures. It's all over the internet. So after something that happens, you can retroactively go back and prove any case you want. But in reality, these things are always out there in a society that values free speech. And all you can do is try to prepare yourself in case something. bad does happen. You know, yes, you can always, I mean, think about if, if you went back to the days of like the 90s and there was real social media back then, like, what would Timothy McVeigh have on

his Facebook page? You'd be able to go back and say, this guy was saying this stuff on his Facebook page over and over again. And, you know, we're in a different era. You can always go back and find people who say bad things, you know. And look, the people who. did those things, particularly to the officers, should be. You should go after them. I have no problem with throwing the book of those people. But, you know, what they're trying to do with this

event is just, it's, it's kind of like left-wing fan fiction. You know, they're just trying to make this into this thing that it isn't. It was, it was a, it was a day that we should know and we should make sure that people who are responsible for those bad things are prosecuted for them. But like, let's be honest about it for a second here. And there's no ability to do that in the media. AAA 727 BECK. More patents due for Glenn on the Glenn Beck Program. 888721.

Sunshine and backyard cookouts are back in the forecast. And blinds.com wants to help you soak up the savings during their 4th of July spectacular with up to 45% off everything. Transform your backyard into the perfect oasis this summer with their top. selling outdoor shades. Blinds.com makes it a breeze to get made to order custom blinds for any room in your home or outdoor space. Whether you do it yourself or have them handle the install from start to finish, blinds.com will make ordering custom window treatments online super easy with free samples, free shipping, and 100% guaranteed perfect fit. With over 25 million blinds

sold and 35,000 five-star reviews, there's a reason why blinds.com is the number one online retailer. I want you to go there now. Blinds.com. Their 4th of July spectacular receive up to 45% off everything at blinds.com rules and restrictions may apply. AAA 727 BECK. It's Pat and Stu for Glenn on the Glenn Beck program. Washington Post reporter has been accused of peddling some false information on DeSantis's FEMA response. That's because the media lies. That's why.

We just read a study, a poll on how many people trust the media around the world. Like, you know, in Finland. I mean, I think there was 49 countries. And the least trusted media in the world is here in the United States of America. Good job, everybody. We did it. We're numbered 49. Well, if you reverse the list, we're number one.

We're number one. For least, distrust. And it's because of stuff like this. Washington Post reporter, Hannah Dreyer, been accused of misleading people on Desantis's response to the residential building collapse. Now, she says it took him 24 hours, over 24 hours to do anything about it. Well, as soon as he got the request from the mayor, he signed it in less than an hour. less than an hour

24 hours one hour is there really that much of a difference yeah 23 hours 23 hours difference just 24 times the amount though yeah no it's pretty bad it's bad it's bad because you know

I think it was Charles CW Cook who made this point and it's a really good point which is you are a journalist and you go into this job as a journalist and around you is a structure that's supposed to keep you essentially in line right there's editors there's people around there. And what journalists have done have just gone to social media where they get the

credibility of being a journalist but then don't have any of the controls around them. So they just tweet things or whatever constantly with none of the trappings of editors or fact checkers, but they still get the sort of prestige of being from the Washington Post. That is a bad system. It really is. It is not turned out well, frankly. All right. We'll be back again tomorrow for Glenn, and we'll have some fun on the Friday.