The Harry Sisson Show - IT JUST GOT EVEN WORSE...

Episode Date: February 4, 2026

Harry Sisson breaks down newly discovered Epstein docs that reveal Trump's cover up.

All right, folks, look, I just discovered evidence in the Epstein files that proves 100% without a shadow of a doubt that Donald Trump, his Department of Justice, and his FBI, are actively protecting rich and powerful men who committed crimes alongside Jeffrey Epstein. Now, transparently, we kind of knew this already, seeing some of the documents and the redactions, it's pretty obvious. But these files we're about to look at have not been talked about before, and they are especially bad. You'll see what I mean in just a moment. And if you're MAGA and you're watching at home and you still somehow defend Donald Trump, I would love for you to attempt a justification of these documents in the comments down below. I just want to see what crap they can come up with. But otherwise, please make sure to subscribe down below, drop a like on the video, comment.

Let me know what you think about these documents. If you're on Spotify or Apple, please make sure to rate the show five stars and follow along. It goes such an incredibly long way. I am still going through the millions of documents that have been released to try to bring any relevant information to you. But now, enough chit-chat. Let's get into it. I want to start with this video right here, which is very relevant for what we're about to look at. It is Cash Patel in front of the Senate saying that they have no evidence that anybody else around Epstein committed crimes. That's what he said. Listen to what he says in this clip. It's insane.

You've seen most of the files. Who, if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young women too besides himself. Himself. There is no credible information. None. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals. And the information we have, again, is limited. So the answer is no one?

For the information that we have. In the files. In the case file. Okay. Now. So just to be clear, before we look at these documents, we have Cash Patel on the record in front of the Senate saying they have no evidence, no evidence, no information that would indicate that Epstein trafficked anybody to anybody, any of these little

girls to any other rich, powerful men. That's what Cash Patel has said. That's what Pambandia has said, that there's no client list, there's no other people involved. It was just Epstein and Galane Maxwell. Well, I'd love for them to tell us more about these emails that we've just discovered that I've just found in the Epstein files. So if you are interested and want to read this one for yourself, there's the number down there below. EFTA, 027.2606. 746. You can look it up yourself and read it if the Department of Justice doesn't take it down. But look at this. It is from an email from a redacted name, a redacted name to Jeffrey Epstein. And it reads, New Brazilian just arrived, sexy and cute equals 9.0, which stands for 9 years old.

9. And this is a document that's in the Epstein files. And the Department of Justice, the FBI, has redacted the name of the person that the document is from. Why? Why are they redacting this name up here? Why are they protecting this person? This person is saying to Epstein that a quote, New Brazilian arrived, which I can only imagine how they were able to obtain this human being, it's seemingly that they're referencing, and that they're nine years old. I'm genuinely, before this video, before this episode,

I was sitting here trying to find some reason why the Department of Justice would redact this. There's something out there. And I can't come up with anything. There's no reason why the DOJ should be redacting this name. We, the American people, should know who said this. And it's insane that Cash Patel said that there's no evidence that anybody else was involved when we have emails of somebody saying a nine-year-old just arrived and that they are, they like them, they're attracted to them. what is wrong with these people?

And all this other information is redacted as well. For some reason, it was also in a French, I believe this is. And that information was redacted as well. All of it. And this, like, what is this? What is this down here below best regards? What is that? It's all redacted.

Why are they protecting this person? And it doesn't end there. It actually gets much, much worse. This is a document as well. The case number or the document number is EFTA 070-5860. if you'd like to look it up yourself again. These are coming directly from the Epstein files. Maybe they took them down by the time you're seeing this.

But here's another one. A redacted name from somebody who we don't know to Jeffrey Epstein. This was sent back in March of 2020 or excuse me, 2014. And it reads, Thank you for a fun night. Your littlest girl was a little naughty. I mean, what? And Cash Patel, Donald Trump,

Pam Bondi, Todd Blanche, all of these people have the nerve to get up there and say, You know, actually, we just don't have any evidence to suggest that other people who are involved. We just don't know. We have no idea. We have no evidence to suggest it. How about this? How about the evidence that we're looking at right now?

Your littlest girl was a little naughty from a redacted name. Why are they redacting that person's name? The only explanation for this person's name to be redacted, this person's name to be redacted is they are protecting them. That has to be. it's insane that we have this evidence of somebody, we don't know, saying it to Jeffrey Epstein, saying it out loud, they're not even trying to hide it, they're not speaking in a cryptic language. You know, it's nothing like that.

They're just saying, yep, your littlest girl was a little naughty. Disgusting. Disgusting. Here's another one. An eradacted name to Jeffrey Epstein. Happy New Year. Yes, I'm here. Just got my visa.

I'll go to the 2B agency tomorrow, a modeling agency if you want. I walk around. There are little girls. They have good bodies, but the faces are weird and they are not so tall. Somebody openly saying, and we know that Epstein would use these modeling agencies, he worked with people in modeling agencies who participated in similar activities that he did, similar crimes. We knew he would use these agencies, and somebody is telling him, yeah, I'll go to the agency

and find the little girls for you. Why is that person's name redacted? Again, I'm asking the same question. Why is this person being protected? Why? Why? And in other news, the DOJ has just been completely incompetent, irresponsible with their redactions. For example, this is one that might as touch found the other day. Wow, I wonder who's in this redacted photo. It's text messages between Steve Bannon and again, a redacted name. Why their name is redacted, we have no idea. And look, they redacted Donald Trump's face. It's obviously Trump. If you go to the article here that the link, it's Donald Trump. That's Trump in the photo, as if you needed me to,

to tell that, it's obviously Donald Trump. They redacted his face. These redactions are insane. They're protecting powerful people. For some reason, they're redacting Donald Trump's face in this. They actually removed the black square once this was called out on social media. But what is going on here? It's so obvious to me.

It's protections. And we actually talked about this on the show the other day. This is a journal written by a 16-year-old girl who is being abused by Epstein and other powerful people. Again, just completely contradicting what Cash Patel said. She mentions a number of powerful men in this journal, but she also wrote it in code. So you'd have to read it down and then diagonal. So you go D-O and then E-S, then T-I, or excuse me, then T-H, then I-S-L-A.

You get the idea. And what's interesting about the journal is that Ivana Trump, Donald Trump's former wife, is mentioned in the journal. There's a cutout of it that the 16-year-old girl inserted, and the cryptic message next to it says, doesn't this lady know you can't have any dignity if you've been with him, I know I have none, only Skittles. That's a cryptic message next to a cutout of Donald Trump's ex-wife. And then on this page as well, there's a redaction up here, a five-letter redaction. Could it be T-R-U-M-P? That's five letters. We don't know. We have no idea. No idea.

But it says, blank should not brag because that was yucky. Written by a 16-year-old girl, but the name is redacted. Why is it redacted? They are, I'm saying, I feel like a broken record, but they are so obviously protecting these powerful men. And there's other mentions to Mar-Lago in the journal as well down here, actually, or excuse me, more references to Donald Trump and the people around him. There's a reference to Mar-Lago. It says, like Mar-Lago, and where I'd see Mr. Joe and Miss Anne. And this is on a page where it's talking about women's bodies being sold and children being sold and things like that. And so there's a number of references to Trump, the people around him, his property.

and whatnot in this journal, but why is that redacted? Again, I really do feel like a broken record. But it's insane. We're seeing these emails in Cash Patel and Donald Trump says that there's no evidence, there's nothing to see here, except these emails tell us that actually there's quite a bit to see here. So look, I will leave the video there. Thank you so much for watching. Make sure to subscribe down below, drop a like on the video, comment. Let me know what you think about the story. Let me know how you're doing. I know this stuff is really heavy and we're depressing, candidly. It's very depressing. So I hope you're doing well. And again, if you're on Apple or Spotify, please make sure to rate the show five stars and follow along.

I'm going to continue to go through these documents, report anything back to you, but have an amazing rest of your day, and we will talk soon.