The Harry Sisson Show - Kristi Noem PANICS And LETS IT SLIP During LIVE COLLAPSE

Episode Date: January 11, 2026

Harry Sisson reacts to Kristi Noem's disastrous interview on CNN today as the Trump regime continues to crumble.

All right, folks, look, let me just start this by saying, Christy Nome is one of the worst, most slimy, shameless politicians out there who feels no guilt, no remorse whatsoever when she gets on TV and lies to the American people about some very important topics. Today, she had an interview on CNN with Jake Tapper, and she was pressed on a number of issues, but mainly the murder of Renee Nicole Good. And her answers, or should I say the lack thereof, because she didn't really answer any of questions.

you just went to typical political BS talking points is disgusting. And I think it should disgust any American. I'm going to show you some clips from this interview. You'll see what I mean. Before I do any of that, make sure to subscribe down below, drop a like on the video, comment. Let me know what you think about the story. Let me know what you think about Christy Nome. And of course, everything going on.

I always like to hear from you folks at home. But without further ado, let's get into this. The first clip I want to show you where Jake Tapper asked her, why did you not wait for an investigation before making your comments regarding, of course, the shooting of Renee Nicole Good. She went out there, claimed it was domestic terrorism that she was this or that, and this was her answer. You've also been criticized for your comments. The shooting, we should note, was Wednesday at 1037 a.m. Eastern. Just over two hours later, the Department of Homeland Security put out a statement definitively asserting what had happened,

defending the ICE agent, accusing Renee Good of domestic terrorism. That's a characterization that you reiterated in a press conference half an hour later. Now, Republican Senator Tom Tillis said, quote, it was very unusual to have a senior law enforcement official to draw a conclusion about an event where the scene was still being processed. Generally speaking, law enforcement would recognize that a life was lost, that families are changed forever, the shooter's life will change forever, we're collecting video, we're trying to assess the situation. Why did you not wait for an investigation before making your comments? Everything that I've said has been proven to be factual in the truth. This administration wants to operate in transparency.

I have the responsibility as the Secretary of Homeland Security to know this information as soon as possible, had just been in Minneapolis the day before, had already had conversations with officers on the ground and supervisors and knew the facts and decided that the department and the people of this country deserve to know the truth of the situation of what had unfolded in Minneapolis. With all due respect, Secretary, the first thing you said was, quote, what happened was our ICE officer, were out in an enforcement action. They got stuck in the snow because of the adverse weather that is in Minneapolis. They were attempting to push out their vehicle and a woman attacked them and those surrounding them and attempted to run them over and ram them with her vehicle. That's not what happened. We all saw what happened. It absolutely is what happened. Those officers had been out

in enforcement action. A vehicle had been stuck. They had come to help get that vehicle out. That's when this individual started blocking traffic for minutes and minutes before this. You said that the woman attacked them and surrounded them and attempted to run them over and ram them with her vehicle. Blocked the road for a long time and was yelling at them and impeding a federal law enforcement investigation. This is, this is, I'm going to, I'm going to get pissed off. I'm going to get pissed off. I'm going to do my best to stay composed. This is what I mean when I say she's so slimy. You can just, you know, you get it, you know when you meet somebody and you just get the vibe, you're just like, oh, there's just something not right here. I don't know, what it is. It's your gut telling you. That's the vibe I get with Christy Nome. Before I even hear her answer a question, I'm just like, there's something, it's slimy, it's distrustful,

it's something like that. That's exactly how I describe and how I think about Christy Nome. Everything she just said there was a lie. She's confronted with the fact that she got it wrong. She jumped the situation before having all the facts before seeing the video before knowing what actually happened. She jumped in. She said it was domestic terrorism. She Renee Nicole Dudd did this, this, this, and all these other things, these outlandish claims. She got it wrong. She's confronted with the fact that she got it wrong. And she doubles down saying, Noah, that's exactly what happened.

She surrounded them and tried to run them over with her car. Is that what happened? Chris, you know, that's not what happened. We all saw the footage. And the fact that she can't just say, you know what, I got it wrong. I should have waited. That at least could garner some respect, I think, from the American people. If you're willing to own up to your mistakes, she's not doing that.

She's doubling down, tripling down, saying, no, I got it right. And in addition to that video, Jake Tapper followed up, why are you so certain that your interpretation is the truth when an investigation hasn't even happened? And this is what she said. Their training prepares them for. What evidence are you looking at that so many other people around the country look at and they say, it looked to me, her tires were turned to the right, she was moving her car, and they see a woman trying to flee.

you say she was trying to kill the officer. No investigation has happened. Why are you so certain that your interpretation is the truth when an investigation hasn't even happened? Jake, I'm watching the videos. I'm talking to officers and coming to a different conclusion. Everything that we've stated as the Department of Homeland Security in this administration has been factual.

And I wish we would talk factually about what we see every day from these protesters, what they do, what they say, how they chant over and over, kill. attack law enforcement, how they're trained to perpetuate violence against them and to stop the work that they do every day, each of these law enforcement officers takes an oath to protect this country and uphold the law. They go out every day and enforce the laws of this country to keep people safe. So these individuals that are out there harassing them why they do that work, doxing their identities, threatening them and their families, it's unacceptable. And that's why

President Trump is so strong in supporting their operations in all of these cities. See, see, see, just the bullshit political talk she goes back to, oh, Donald Trump is so in favor of the ICE agents and protecting them and their families and the rule of law. She just goes back to these generic talking points of which we know isn't true because Donald Trump did January 6th and then pardon the people who beat police officers. She can't even run with the excuse that Donald Trump loves law enforcement and crap like that. That's not the truth. We all know that's not the truth. And yet she still runs with these like generic ass talking points that don't mean it. anything. She said, oh, I'm watching the videos. So are we. We're watching the videos. And everything

that we've stated has been factual, except that is not true. Time and time again, it's been proven that not everything they've stated is factual. I want to go on to the next video where Jake Tapper said, what's the reason for the second and third shot through the window when he's not in the line of sight of the car? And, you know, it's just basically trying to figure out why did he do this? And this is what Kristiannome said. Again, doubling down. The question is when he's out of harm's way, what is the reason for the second and third shot through the window when he is out, he's not in the line of sight of the car? This investigation will continue to unfold and more and more information will come forward. But until that comes, what I would appreciate is everybody sticking to the facts

of the situation and recognize that this law enforcement officer took action based on his training to protect himself and the public. I'm just waiting for the investigation to come through. I am, can you believe what you just heard? So wait, we're asking. We're asking, about the second and third shot. What was the reason for that? She doesn't have an answer and she says, I defer to the investigation. Let's wait for the investigation to happen. On every other point we've heard so far in this interview, she did not refer, or I should say defer to the investigation. She jumped the gun. She said, oh, I know this was an act of domestic terrorism. I saw the videos and she was surrounding them and trying to ram them. She wasn't referencing an investigation then,

but when it comes to a very valid question of this guy firing at this woman in the face three times, two of which were, he was nowhere near the front of the car. The first time he wasn't even near the front of the car. This second and third time, she was driving by him. When it comes to that, it's, oh, I'm going to wait for the investigation. Slimy, slimy, slimy. The final clip I want to show you, I'm going to fast forward a little bit because they play some footage of January 6th. And the question being asked to Christy Noem here is a vital one.

Jake Tapper says, these are. officers being attacked on January 6th by this standard, would any of those officers be justified in shooting and killing the people causing them physical harm? And this is what Christyneum said. Shooting and killing the people causing them physical harm? Every single situation is going to rely on the situation those officers are on. But they know that when people are putting hands on them, when they are using weapons against them, when they are physically harming them, that they have the authority to arrest those individuals. The president pardoned every single one of those people.

and make sure that they're getting justice for their actions going forward. President Trump pardoned every single one of those people. And every single one of these investigations comes in the full context of the situation on the ground. And that's one thing that President Trump has been so focused on. Can I just pause it for what she just said doesn't mean anything? What is she, it means nothing. What she's doing right now is just trying to fill space. Just speak. Just keep speaking. Just keep talking.

Keep talking. And keep filling it with the talking points. Donald Trump, the investigation on the ground. She just, it's like she's trying to hit a word count on an essay. What she just said means nothing. I mean, oh, my. It's making sure that when we're out there, we don't pick and choose which situations are in which laws are enforced and which ones aren't.

Every single one of them is being enforced under the Trump administration. And the clarity of the law stands. And if people don't like it, these members of Congress and elected officials should go change the law and make sure they have that debate and policy. I just showed you video of people attacking law enforcement officers, undisputed proof, undisputed evidence. And I just said President Trump pardoned all of them. And you said that President Trump is enforcing all the laws equally.

It's just not true. There's a different standard for law enforcement officials being attacked if they're being attacked by Trump supporters. We just saw that. This individual in these instances and these investigations all have to be taken and done and done correctly in context of every situation that is happening on the ground. So what we are doing today as the Department of Homeland Security is out there with our law enforcement officers making sure that we're targeting the worst of the worst and that we're

talking fast. Quite frankly, you really just don't need to see the rest. Like, is it even worth it to interview Christy Noam anymore? I mean, maybe for embarrassing moments like this, but you're never going to get an answer. Not that I think anybody really expected one. But what she just said means nothing as well. She was asked, you know, is this not completely hypocritical saying Donald Trump protects law enforcement wants people to follow the rule of law, but then pardons these people who are Trump supporters. It seems like only cops when they get beaten by Trump supporters, it's okay. But if they're not Trump supporters, it's not okay. And then she just says, she goes back, well, you know, the investigation on the ground in the context of the investigation

means nothing. She's just filling the air because there is no response. The thing for the MAGA representatives right now, the admin officials, is that this is the corner that they get put in all the time and there really is no answer, right? Donald Trump says, we care about our law enforcement, but he pardons people on January 6th. There's no argument to counteract that. They can spend millions of dollars in messaging at these DC lobbyist firms. There's no message that's going to come out that's going to be an effective rebuttal to that. And that's what you just saw.

Christine Nome live on air getting humiliated when approached with this. And I really mean it. She is so slimy, so dishonest. And one of the worst. One of the worst. So anyway, I will leave the video there. Thank you so much for watching. Thanks for listening to me just like rage for 10 minutes straight.

I know you feel it too, though. I read your comments. I know you feel it too toward Christy Nome and everybody, of course. But make sure to subscribe down below, drop a like on the video, comment. Let me know what you think about this story. And as I always say, I greatly appreciate you. And I hope you have an amazing rest of your day.