The Harry Sisson Show - New Epstein Files FULLY EXPOSE Trump... He's Done

Episode Date: December 23, 2025

Harry Sisson breaks down more Epstein files that have been released where Trump is mentioned. Safe to say Donald and MAGA won't be happy. ...

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 All right, folks, look, it has been a crazy 24 hours with all of this new information we are getting about Donald Trump's deep connection to Jeffrey Epstein. Yesterday, the DOJ dropped a bunch of new Epstein files, many of which implicated Donald Trump, including this letter, which I talked about earlier today on this show. It's that bad. It requires its own episode, which implicated Donald Trump. It is allegedly a letter that Jeffrey Epstein wrote just days before he died to Larry Nasser, that former gymnastics coach who was convicted of, similar crimes that Epstein was convicted of and accused of, and in this letter, he implicates Donald Trump. Remember, this is one predator writing to another. He said, dear L.N, as you know by now, I've taken the short route home, as in taking his own life. Good luck. We shared one thing, our love and caring for young ladies at the hope they reach their full potential, absolutely
Starting point is 00:00:48 disgusting. Our president shares our love of young Nebio girls. When a young beauty walked by, he loved to grab snatch, whereas we ended up snatching grub in the mess halls of the system. Life is Fair, yours, Jay Epstein. Again, one predator saying to another predator that their friend Donald Trump likes young women like they do. That's as bad as it gets. That's as implicated as you can be. But this was not the only document that mentioned Donald Trump in a very negative way. So I covered this earlier today. I thought it deserved its own video. We're going to cover these other documents right now, which are equally as bad. I really think they're not great. So make sure to subscribe down below, drop a like on the video, comment. Let me know what you think about the
Starting point is 00:01:29 story. And without further ado, let's get into some of these other documents. So this is one. It's from somebody to somebody, but the names are redacted so we don't know, but it was signed off by an assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York. And it reads, for your situational awareness, wanted to let you know that the flight records we received yesterday reflect that Donald Trump traveled on Epstein's private jet more times than has previously been reported, or that we were aware, including during the period, we would expect to charge in a Maxwell case. In particular, he is listed as a passenger on at least eight flights between 1993 and 1996, including at least four on which Maxwell was also present.
Starting point is 00:02:12 He is listed as having traveled with, among others, at a various time, Marla Maples, his daughter, Tiffany, and his son, Eric. On one flight in 1993, he and Epstein are the only two listed passengers on another. The only three passengers are Epstein, Trump, and then, 20-year-old blank, blank, blank redacted name. On two other flights, two of the passengers, respectively, were women who would be possible witnesses in a Maxwell case. So these are women who knew what was going on,
Starting point is 00:02:41 knew what Epstein was doing, knew what Galane was doing, would be witnesses in a case, and were flying on Epstein's plane with Donald Trump. Insanity. We've just finished reviewing the full records, more than 100 pages of very small script, and didn't want any of this to be a surprise down the road. why is whoever this is emailing somebody else that this might be a surprise down the road?
Starting point is 00:03:04 Why are they giving them a heads up that Donald Trump flew on Epstein's plane? Many times that have previously been unreported. I would like to know that. I think that's pretty suspicious. But a damning email that Donald Trump flew on Epstein's plane more times than has been reported, more times than even they knew with people who might be witnesses in a Galane case with a 20-year-old blank, blank, blank, whose name is redacted, which is curious because maybe that person is a victim.
Starting point is 00:03:30 I don't know why they're redacting them in this instance, but pretty bad. But here's more. Here's an official document from the FBI, an official complaint, where it included Donald Trump's name in a pretty disgusting way. So you can read through it if you'd like, but just to give you the brief rundown of it, it says Villeneuve, I'm not sure if that's how you pronounce your name, but Villeneuve, took blank back inside and someone told the party that Donald Trump had invited them all to party at Marlago.
Starting point is 00:03:57 Blank told Villeneuve, she wanted to go, but Villeneuveu told Blank, it wasn't that kind of party. It was for prostitutes. Yikes. And Brian Krasenstein says here, a victim, I assume, since the name is redacted, claimed that a woman named Galane Lisa Villeneuveu told her that the party Trump invited them to was Marlago. So I imagine is that Galane Maxwell or somebody else? I don't know. We don't really know because a lot of it is redacted. Here's another one where a witness whose name is redacted claimed.
Starting point is 00:04:27 that there were recordings of men, including Trump and Clinton, and criminal activity, which happened over multiple states. Now, I will say this is not a conviction document, so of course, we don't know any of this for certain. These are allegations that were made. Blank knew about criminal activity, which happened in multiple states, on airplanes, etc. Blank claimed that there were films of men who were recorded. These men are prominent figures such as Epstein, President Bill Clinton, and Donald Trump. Maxwell is also on the tapes, says the document. Here's another one. This email, and this one's pretty bad, this email shows that there were at least 10 alleged co-conspirators to Epstein, including a wealthy individual in Ohio.
Starting point is 00:05:07 So who were these men? Subsequent pages of names are redacted by the DOJ. Why? And the email reads, again, we don't know who's sending this to who. Of course, it's all redacted. But it says, of the 10 co-conspirators, three have been located in Florida and served G.J. subpoenas, one in Boston, one in New York City, and one, I believe that says in Ohio, but it's covered. were located and served.
Starting point is 00:05:27 Four of the ten are outstanding with attempts having been made. One is a wealthy businessman in Ohio. That's the Ohio one. Elite is being sent to CV. The remaining three are currently out of pocket. So this is email saying that there are at least 10 alleged co-conspirators who are being subpoenaed.
Starting point is 00:05:45 Keep that in mind for just a second. And then here's another email on the conspirators. Blank does not need to head out. We made contact with blank last night in New York. Contact was made with blank, blank, blank, blank. Attempts were made to Blank and Brunel. Blank is confirmed to live in New York but was far away for the holiday weekend. Blank did not have a good address for, but attempt was made at a residence in New York.
Starting point is 00:06:04 Attempts to Maxwell are being made in Boston today. Blank will be approached in Florida and blank in New York, but hasn't as of yet. I do not know about Ohio contacting Wexner. So all of these different co-conspirator names are redacted. They're all blacked out, which is like why. I thought we were the most transparent administration in American history. But when I read this, it made me remember the memo that the Department of Justice put out in the summer that really kick-started all of this,
Starting point is 00:06:31 they wrote, quote, in their memo saying that they've done all their investigation into Epstein, there's nothing more for you to see, just be quiet about it. That's what they said. Remember over the summer where Pam Bondi said it's done? There's no more investigation to be done. It's all done. They wrote, quote, this systematic review revealed no incriminating client list. There were also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his action.
Starting point is 00:06:55 we did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties. So we have emails now where officials at the DOJ, the FBI, are talking about co-conspirators, of which names are redacted, that contact was being made with them to subpoena them. We have them talking about them in different locations. But over the summer, the FBI said that there's no client list. There's no other co-conspirators and there's not enough evidence that could predicate an investigation against church third parties. They also said that there's no blackmail, but we recently learned about some pretty major blackmail, such as this, Epstein threatening to burn someone's house down if they revealed he stole photos of young girls and sold them. This was the complaint that he, if she tells
Starting point is 00:07:42 anybody about the photos, he will burn their house down. That sounds like blackmail. So there are so many holes in the Department of Justice's story, Donald Trump's story, Pam Bondi's story, Cash Patel's story, it's all bad. And these documents of which Donald Trump has mentioned, whether it be the letter we talked about earlier or in this video or any of it where Donald Trump has mentioned is bad. And it paints a pretty bleak photo. So look, I will leave the video there. I just had to cover some of these documents. Of course, again, this letter. Make sure to subscribe down below. I'm going to keep my eye out. Keep going through all the files. Make sure to drop a like on the video as well. It took a lot of time to go through all of this
Starting point is 00:08:18 stuff. I'm pretty tired, as you can probably tell right now, the bags are not doing me any favors. But make sure to comment as well. I appreciate you. Let me know your thoughts. Have an amazing rest of your day. And we will talk soon.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.