The Harry Sisson Show - Trump GOES NUCLEAR As Kirk Shooter Past EXPOSED

Episode Date: September 16, 2025

Trump ABANDONS Kash Patel As Scandal GOES PUBLICTrump CAUGHT In Major Epstein Story At WORST TIMETrump GOES NUCLEAR As Kirk Shooter Past EXPOSEDVance LETS IT SLIP On Kirk Shooter In CRAZY Speech

Well, folks, it seems like Donald Trump and his administration have had enough of Cash Patel and the current leadership at the FBI. Error after error have completely embarrassed Donald Trump, whether it be the FBI's mishandling of the Epstein documents under Cash Patel or the recent investigation into the Charlie Kirk shooter. It has just been a complete disaster. And even Donald Trump and his team are recognizing that. So let's get into this article talking about how Cash Patel may very well be on his way out. But before I do so, make sure to subscribe to the channel down below. It goes an incredibly long way.

Drop a like on the video, comment. Let me know what you think about the story. And without further ado, let's dive in. Fox News. Yes, Fox News of all outlets is reporting that the knives are out for Cash Patel, despite Trump's support. And maybe Trump's public support isn't actually all that authentic. Monday. Today, former Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey will be sworn into a new power sharing

role with FBI director, excuse me, deputy director Dan Bongino. Bailey's installment comes at a perilous time for Cash Patel, whose leadership atop the nation's premier law enforcement agency is under fire, according to 10 sources, 10 from multiple federal offices granted anonymity to speak freely. I mean, this seems like the worst kept secret in government. I mean, 10 sources from different agencies kind of seems like everybody dislikes Cash Patel. But listen to this. The White House, Bondi, Blanche have no confidence in cash, according to one source with knowledge of ongoing personnel discussions. Pam in particular cannot stand him, Blanche either. That's of course referring to Pam Bondi and Todd Blanche. Bondi and Blanche denied the characterization,

and White House officials denied any plans to remove director Patel from his position. But listen to this. Allies of Donald Trump and Patel's harshest critics have begun to circulate word that contingency plans for Patel's ouster are forming. They also claim his hopeful successor, Andrew Bailey, made clear that he would not leave his post as Missouri's Attorney General or abandon his aspirations to run for state governor only to serve as Patel's number two. So it seems like this Andrew Bailey guy who is probably equally as crazy is coming into the FBI with almost a guarantee that he will be the director pretty soon. I mean, that's kind of how they're framing it with the way they're talking in this

article. And honestly, this is just not surprising. I mean, if you've been following the story with the Epstein documents, which many of you have, and of course with the Charlie Kirk story, I mean, Cash Patel just kept tripping over himself at every opportunity. He has no leadership skills, no knowledge, no experience to get the job done. And it's led to this very moment where Donald Trump, of all people, is saying, maybe he has to go. And this NBC news article kind of talks about all the different missteps during the Charlie Kirk shooting investigation.

Many of these missteps have been criticized by MAGA's most loyal people. And one of them is truly just so egregious that I wanted to start with it. The day that Charlie Kirk got shot and that evening, Cash Patel, while all all these different FBI agents were in Utah doing on the ground work, trying to figure out who killed Charlie Kirk. Cash Patel was dining at a fancy restaurant in New York City. And he was live tweeting the investigation from this restaurant, which inevitably led to a screw-up. Yes, according to NBC News, FBI director Cash Patel was dining at Rouse in New York on

Wednesday night after the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk. Patel had posted on X at 621 that the subject in Kirk's killing was. was in custody. Rouse, a well-known restaurant that is notoriously tough to get into, opens at 7 p.m. Then, at 7.59, Patel posted a follow-up post that the subject in custody has been released after an interrogation by law enforcement. And this is the tweet. This is the one he sent out that night just before his fancy dinner in New York City claiming that the subject had been caught. He thanked local law enforcement for getting it done. Then later, less than an hour later, or I should say around an hour later, he says, yeah, they've been released after questioning. And this was a huge

embarrassment for Cash Patel, but it also got worse. There was a heated phone call with Patel and Dan Bongino and agents around the country. With the suspects still at large the morning after Kirk's killing, Patel and his deputy, Dan Bongino, held a tense conference call with agents nationwide. Patel and Bongino said on a profanity-laced call Thursday morning that they were under intense pressure to arrest the killer, which cited, and this is according to the New York Times, three people familiar with the exchange. That afternoon, Patel chose to travel from New York to Utah after he attended 9-11 anniversary ceremonies. Two administration officials who spoke anonymously said Patel was told not to appear at news conferences in Utah or make other public comments until

there was an arrest. On Thursday evening, Patel appeared at a news conference in Utah with state and local officials, but did not speak. He was silent. We covered that on this channel, and administration officials said that he made the right decision by being quiet. They don't even trust him to speak. The White House is telling Cash Patel, don't say anything because you're going to mess it up. They told him to be quiet at this press conference. It was incredibly strange for the FBI director at this press conference, where the FBI is heavily involved, to not speak. But he was silent the entire time. time. It was very, very weird. And there have been some past firings that are now raising a lot of

questions. We know that he has been firing people who worked on January 6th related cases, but also Metab Said, hopefully I'm pronouncing their name correctly, the head of Bureau's Salt Lake City office was recently forced out by Cash Patel. Yes, the person who was the head of the FBI office in Salt Lake City, Utah, where this Charlie Kirk shooting was just recently ousted. So I imagine that power vacuum probably hindered the investigation a lot. Probably made it much harder for them to do their jobs. So all of these different messups in less than a week have completely degraded the White House's confidence in Cash Patel and his ability to do the job. And even MAGA fans, you know, these MAGA voters who are loyal to Donald Trump, even they are saying, this guy is just not

getting the job done. But here's the good news in all of this. We have Cash Patel maybe on the way out. It kind of seems likely with the way that Fox News reported it. We have all these different mess ups. The good news is Cash Patel is coming in to testify on Tuesday in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee. And I want you to hear from Senator Adam Schiff who talked about this upcoming questioning. Take a look. On Tuesday, FBI Director Cash Patel is coming before that Senate Judiciary Committee. You might remember this confrontation the last time he came before our committee. I want you to turn around. They're capital police officers behind you. They're guarding a Take a look at them right now.

Turn around. I'm looking at you. You're talking to me. No, no, no, look at them. I want you to look at them if you can, if you have the courage to look them in the eye, Mr. Patel, and tell them you're proud of what you did. Tell them you're proud that you raised money off of people that assaulted their colleagues, that pepper sprayed them, that beat them with poles.

Tell them you're proud of what you did, Mr. Patel. They're right there. They're guarding you today. Tell them how proud you are. Or you might remember these promises he made. when he testified before. I told you in your office, I have no interest, no desire, and will not, if confirmed, go backwards.

There will be no politicization at the FBI. There will be no retributive actions taken by any FBI should I be confirmed as the FBI director. Yeah, that was a lie. Or maybe you remember this podcast about the Epstein files. Why is the FBI protecting the greatest pederist, the largest scale pederist in human history? Simple, because of who's on that list. So there is a lot of who's on that list. So there is a lot for him to answer to when he comes to testify.

But I'm interested in what do you want him question about? What answers do you want from the FBI director? So please, share your thoughts with me. Yeah, if you have Twitter or Instagram or all the different platforms that Adam Schiff posted this on, go leave him a comment and ask him to ask Cash Patel some questions. Or you can leave it in the comments of this video. And let me know what you want Adam Schiff and other Democrats to ask Cash Patel. But look, seems like he might be on his way out. Seems like there's some friction between

the Trump White House and Cash Patel's FBI. So anyway, I will leave the video there. All right. So look, we've been talking extensively about the Charlie Kirk shooting on this channel. And I think everybody really has in politics across the country. It's a big topic. It's a tragic story. It's also a tragic American story. I think it's going to have devastating ramifications for our democracy and a country and political. violence as a whole. But something we absolutely need to stay focused on. Got to keep our eye on the ball is the Epstein story. We cannot let this die because you know right now Donald Trump is sitting there and he is so happy that everybody is talking about literally anything else other than the Epstein

files. So I'm going to continue to talk about it and I'm going to continue to cover the Republicans cover up of the Epstein files. And we just saw yet another example the other day. because Senate Republicans who have proclaimed to want the Epstein files to come out for years, have been calling it a Democratic conspiracy for years, just blocked Chuck Schumer's push to force the release of the Epstein files. That's right. We got them on record. 51 Republican senators, and this is important for the midterms, voted to block the

release of the files. Now, I want to get into this article and more, but before I do so, please make sure to subscribe to the channel. I'm trying to bring you news every single day about different topics. So your support goes an incredibly long way. Drop a like on the video, comment. Let me know what you think about the story. Without further ado, let's dive in. So as I mentioned, Senate Republicans just blocked this motion from Chuck Schumer to release the files. And let me get into the specifics here. The Republican-led Senate narrowly voted on Wednesday. So the same day that Charlie Kirk was shot to defeat an amendment introduced by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to compel the Justice

Department to release all of the Jeffrey Epstein files. If this amendment would have passed, it would force the DOJ to release all the files within 30 days. So we could have them on the way, but Republicans voted to block the release. The vote was 5149 in favor of tabling the amendment. Tabling the amendment just basically means that they're going to come back to it on a later date. That means that the bill is dead. Two Republicans ran Paul of Kentucky and Josh Holly of Missouri joined all 47 Democrats in voting against tabling the amendment. Josh Holly told reporters, a Republican senator, my position has long been, I think we ought to release those files and trust the American people, just like we did with the MLK files and the JFK files. In a surprise move earlier

Wednesday, Schumer had used a procedural tactic to force a floor vote on the Epstein files. So nobody really saw this coming. He kind of used this archaic measure in the Senate to get it done. And well, the vote at least happened. And while they didn't vote in favor of it, at least we got the Republicans on the record, we can say, hey, you and your swing state, this election that's going to be crucial for the Democrats, you voted against the release of these files. So there are some positives here. He pitched an amendment to the sweeping defense policy bill being debated by the Senate. His amendment mirrored the language of bipartisan legislation that we've talked about on this channel from Representative Thomas Massey and Representative Rokane, a Republican and Democrat,

respectively, who have vowed to force a similar vote in the files, or excuse me, in the House. There's been so much lying, obfuscation, cover-ups, the American people need to see everything that's in the Epstein files, and my amendment would make that happen. Schumer told reporters, and he's right, it would have happened if Republicans would have voted in favor of it, but they didn't. They are still engaging in this cover-up, and it's probably because we got this explosive reporting recently from the Wall Street Journal. We can't forget about this either. I mean, remember this birthday card where Donald Trump drew what appears to be a woman and some people have theorized even a young girl because of the shape of the body? And it's this conversation between

Donald Trump and Epstein where Trump says they have certain things in common. You know, they still haven't told us. Trump and the Republicans still have not told us what Trump has in common with Epstein and what they have to keep a secret. I mean, at the bottom it says, and may every day be another wonderful secret. And of course, it's signed by Donald Trump. It's a birthday card that he gave him. We all saw it. And have we forgotten? And I'm sure the Republicans have tried to forget about this photo where Jeffrey Epstein holds a fake check joking about selling a woman or a girl, as they refer to in the message below, as you can see in the bottom right, right there. You see that? Right there. The girl. They call this a girl where they joke about selling a girl to Donald Trump.

Have the Republicans forgot about that? I'm sure they're very very. very happy that nobody's talking about that anymore, but it's something we can't forget about. It's something that, as I mentioned, we got to stay laser focused on. This is a vital story. It's an important story in America right now, but thankfully, I am happy to report that not all hope is lost. Representative Thomas Massey just yesterday said we have 217 signatures on the discharge petition to force a vote on legislation to release the Epstein files. We need 218. One more. Will the 218th final signature, be a Republican or a Democrat. It's time for every congressman to support transparency and justice for victims. And the pressure is really piling on. And that's why we got to continue to

talk about the story. We got up to 217. We have Republicans like Marjorie Taylor Green, who has signed on to this petition. We got to keep the pressure on. We got to keep it going to force these legislators, Democrat or Republican, to sign on. Now, of course, all the Democrats have, but the Republicans have not. And you can even just see in the comments that a lot of these Republicans are not happy. Look at Rand Matthews and his Maga hat. No one cares about that. I think the victims care about that. How about that, Rand? I think the victims care. And I think the American people want transparency. David, with the American flag background, says, respectfully read the room. Epstein files and victims are important and you're fighting hard there. But we're in a fight

against the left, the media, and the Marxist radicals responsible for Merck. What? I mean, it's so crazy how they take literally any topic just to divert away from the Epstein files. He's says they're important, but you know, we got to do this instead. We got to make up a battle to be in. He says against the Marxist radicals. I mean, what the, what about this guy? Last one I want to I want to read. James says, how do you always find a way to make it about you? Stop trying to divide us. We're more unified than ever. Apparently some Republicans think it's divisive to want transparency on the worst criminal in modern American history, arguably one of the worst criminals in modern American history. It's crazy their response. They're trying to genuinely do anything they can

to cover up this story. And as I mentioned, like, these guys in the comments of, um, of, of Thomas Massey can yap all they want and say, oh, it's divisive, it's this, you're making it about yourself. But the victims want the files to come out. They've made this abundantly clear. They set it at a press conference in front of Capitol Hill saying, we want these documents public. We want them public now. For example, let's listen to Annie Farmer who talked about the Republicans blocking the release of the files. Take a look. I am bill wildered by you know why you would not want to be in support of this bill. As you said, it's extremely popular with the American people. It's very clear that the what the victims want and it just seems to not stand with us is really

taken the side of the perpetrators. And I think that's what happened for so long. People look the other way. People were not willing to stand with us. And so I just I hope that they do the right thing. Wow, it's a powerful comment that, you know, these Republicans who are blocking this bill, are standing with the perpetrators. That's a very, very powerful comment. And in practice, it's true. I mean, the victims are all saying, we want the documents to come out.

We want transparency. And the Republicans are saying, no, actually, we don't think so. It's gross. It's gross. Look, folks, I got to be honest. I feel like I've been losing my mind these past couple of days

with everything going on with Charlie Kirk's shooting and the political fallout as a result. I've been seeing all of these different Republicans get online, including the president of the United States, I might add, and spread blatant misinformation about the story to mislead their supporters. And then they make threats against the Democratic Party based on those lies. It's a disgusting and dangerous cycle that we're watching take place right now on the far right of American politics, and it's becoming more mainstream.

So I just want to go through a couple of stories that you need to know about right now in relation to the Charlie Kirk shooter, because this is where Republicans are in the country. So let's just dive in here with something that Donald Trump said yesterday. He had this impromptu press conference on the tarmac, and we're actually going to look at a clip from it in a moment. But I want to read you this quote regarding retaliation for Charlie Kirk's murder. It's not retaliation against the shooter, the guy who actually pulled the trigger, the guy who's actually responsible, but instead, just...

Democrats broadly, Hugo Lowell, who is a journalist for The Guardian, he's the White House correspondent for the Guardian for the Trump administration. He said yesterday, Trump claims the administration is investigating leftist groups in response to Charlie Kirk's assassination, saying, we'll be announcing they're already under investigation.

A lot of people that you would traditionally say are on the left, they're already under investigation. So he's investigating more people, and people on the left are all under investigation. That could be anybody. That could be your favorite liberal Democratic YouTuber who has a difference of opinion from Donald Trump, somebody getting investigated because they disagree with this administration. It could be anybody. And that's the scary part. When Donald Trump says we're investigating leftist groups in connection to the shooting,

so far, there is no connection. It seems like Donald Trump is just using this shooting to target leftist groups. And he doesn't mean like far left groups, which would already be crazy. because freedom of speech, freedom of expression in this country, Trump clearly means just Democrats. He's using the shooting to target Democrats. So retaliation is coming and he's not even trying to hide it. He's just saying, yep, if you're a left-leaning group, we're coming after you for something that you did not do.

It's so crazy the country we live in. And this is part of the reason, before we move on to this clip, part of the reason why I feel like I'm losing my mind looking at the discourse online. Here's another one where Trump said something blatantly false about the, you know, the reaction to Charlie Kirk's shooting. There have been some people online who have celebrated it. I have condemned that. I don't think people should be laughing at it or celebrating it. It is a tragic situation and also really bad for America. The slope we're going down right now is just dangerous. But Donald Trump said that the Republicans would never do such a thing, which is categorically

false. Take a look at what he had to say. They're already underinvesting it. Have you asked to start revoking with you? Have you asked to start revoking? of the foreigners who have celebrated Charlie Kidd's death? No, we haven't, we haven't, but we are looking at names. We don't like that. That's not right. We wouldn't celebrate if something happened on their side, and we don't.

These are sick people. These are really deranged people. Any progress on the fish here? He is such a blatant liar. He is lying to their faces, and it drives me nuts that none of these journalists pushed back and cited the many different examples where Republicans celebrated, violence against Democrats. For example, let's just use the Paul Pelosi example. You could look at Melissa Hortman, who was murdered in her home by an evangelical Trump supporter. Republicans laughed at that.

You could look at Biden's cancer diagnosis. Republicans laughed at that too. Let's just use Paul Pelosi for the time being. Donald Trump Jr. posted this meme about Paul Pelosi after somebody broke into the Pelosi family home and hit Paul Pelosi over the head with a hammer. He was looking for Nancy Pelosi and hit him badly and injured him badly over the head with a hammer. Donald Trump, Jr., laughed about that. Republicans laughed about that. And it wasn't just Trump Jr. It was actually Donald Trump himself.

He joked about Paul Pelosi getting injured. Take a look. We'll stand up to crazy Nancy Pelosi who ruined San Francisco. How's her husband doing, by the way? Anybody know? And she's against... Oh, and the crowd loved it. The crowd laughed.

They loved it. But this is the same... This guy just said they would... would never, ever mock political violence against the left. Look back just what? I think this was in 2024, I believe. Donald Trump mocking the assault of a Democratic Party member. It's just such blatant hypocrisy.

So I'm just baffled by the hypocrisy. I'm baffled by the lies. But I want to move on to some more factual information that Republicans are just kind of running with right now. And the lack of transparency here is just making the discourse worse. So earlier today, the Utah governor said that the Kirk shooting suspect held leftist ideology. And look, I've always maintained on this channel. That number one, I'll never BS you.

I'm always going to give you the facts. And I will obviously insert my opinion, but I'm going to give you the facts. I've always said as well that I believe this could be a case of radicalization on either side. And I still don't think it's certain, regardless of what the governor says. It could be left-wing radicalization. It could be right-wing radicalization. So far, the governor's saying that it's not. left wing. But both of these things happen. Both of these things are very real. And we as a society,

especially as Democrats, have to condemn both of these things. And so the governor in an interview said that Tyler Robinson was radicalized with and had a leftist ideology. It's not clear if the leftist ideology drove him to do this. But regardless, Governor Spencer Cox of Utah on Sunday provided new information about the background and political leanings of the 22 year old, excuse me, accused of killing Charlie Kirk, saying that the suspect had a leftist ideology and it also been in a romantic relationship with a partner who is in the process of transitioning from male to female. This also has had, like, kind of really vague reporting on it as well.

There's just so many questions unanswered here. We will be learning more soon. Mr. Cox, speaking on NBC's Meet the Press, described the suspect as a normal young man who appeared to have been radicalized some time after he dropped out of college. Mr. Cox did not go into specifics about Mr. Robinson's ideological views or offer details to substantiate his assessment of the suspect's views. He said that Mr. Robinson spent much of his time immersed in online gaming, message boards, and parts of what the governor called, the deep dark internet. And this is another part that is driving me crazy.

Why would the governor of Utah disclose what he believes Tyler Robinson's political ideology is if he's not going to provide examples? And we know that Tyler Robinson is going to be formally charged in court on Tuesday. He's going to appear on Tuesday. And we'll get the charging documents and more evidence will be released then. I'll cover it on this channel. Why not wait? Why not wait until Tuesday to provide this information? Why are Republicans so antsy to jump the gun and set the narrative?

Has patience completely evaporated in this country where people wait for facts and reliable information to come out? I'm hearing myself speak and the answer is yes. I mean, I think that evaporated a while ago, but it's just driving me nuts. And in addition to this, the governor in this interview kind of spoke as to how he got radicalized and he was still very vague. Just take a look. You got something you said on Friday. You said, quote, there was a radicalization that happened in a fairly short amount of time. How was the suspect radicalized? How quickly did it

happen? Well, again, those are pieces of information that we're still gathering, trying to understand. We do know. And again, this has been well publicized, that this was a very normal young man, a very smart young man, four-oh student. I think. I think of 34 on the ACT, went to my alma mater, Utah State University, but was only there for a very short amount of time. I dropped out after less than one semester. And it seemed to happen kind of after that. After he had moved back to the southern part of Utah. Clearly there was a lot of gaming going on.

Friends that have confirmed that there was kind of that deep, dark Internet, the Reddit culture and these other dark places of the internet where this person was going deep. And you saw that on the casings. I mean, I didn't have any idea what those inscriptions, many of those inscriptions even meant, but they are, you know, certainly the memeification that is happening in our society.

Like, I just, it's frustrating because nobody, like, there's no specifics here. Nobody understands what he means when he says this. like he's saying he was on deep dark corners of the internet message boards etc etc but like any specifics at all can he point to any one piece of evidence that establishes this and i'm not again i want to be very very clear that i am not taking a position here i'm not saying he was left wing i'm not saying he was right wing i think it's actually wrong for people to jump before we know the facts that's always been my position so i'm not taking a position here it's just that if you are going to take a position

and you're the governor of the state where this happened you might want to have you know just something to say in this interview that kind of backs up your theory and can, you know, maybe give the public some comfort, some solace, some understanding of what's happening here, just insane. And so the last thing I want to show you, and I'll make it quick, is that we've just looked at a bunch of Republicans spread lies like Donald Trump. We have the governor of Utah, not necessarily lying, but kind of in my view, jumping the gun a little bit on the motives and possible political belief of Tyler Robinson. So Republicans are now using that to declare war on Democrats and maybe even incite violence against Democrats. Elon Musk, for example,

said in multiple different posts over the past couple of days, said the goal is a trusted digital town square where a wide range of views are tolerated. This was a while ago. People don't break any laws or spam. For example, the incitement to violence will result in an account suspension. That's the groundwork that Elon Musk sent. But in the past couple of days, he said the left is the party of violence and hate. The left is the party of murder. Either we fight back or they will kill us. What? I mean, this seems pretty dangerous to be saying to your hundreds of millions of followers

on Twitter. And Nancy Mace also said that the Democrats own the shooting of Charlie Kirk, saying it's the Democrats' faults. Other Republicans have said it's the media faults, the members of the media, and it's on them because Charlie Kirk got shot. And here's just a bunch of Republicans. You can pause to read them if you like. A bunch of different accounts, including Laura Lumer, including Elon Musk, including

people who are close to the president of the United States, including the president of the United States himself, making incredibly inflammatory comments. They've declared war, for example. This is war. For example, members of the Democratic Party need to be treated like a terror organization, for example. This is insane. And that's why I feel like I'm losing my mind, because what are we doing as a country?

Why do we have the Republicans jumping the gun trying to set the narrative for political points? We're talking about a shooting. We're talking about gun violence. and they're looking at, oh, how can we make this a politically beneficial point for the Republicans? Oh, you know, I'm sorry. I feel like I'm making this video to really get this off my chest and speak to this, but there's just so much misinformation and people got to wait for the facts.

Uh, anyway, look, I'll leave the video there. All right, so check this out. Vice President J.D. Vance just gave one of the darkest speeches I've heard from him or from anybody in the Trump administration, and that's saying something. filled in on Charlie Kirk's show today, filming from the White House in Washington, D.C., and he used this opportunity not to unite the country and bring the temperature down, but attack the left, lay the foundation for the Trump administration, targeting Democrats simply because Democrats disagree with them. I mean, there are so many crazy moments in this speech. I have a lot to show

you, a lot to get through. And I want to start here, but before I do so, make sure to subscribe to the channel down below, drop a like on the video, comment, let me know what you think about the story and of course everything going on in the United States. But without further ado, I do want to start with this clip because it might be the most outrageous of them all, but all are pretty crazy. He in this speech, in this diatribe, he went on, said people on the left are much likelier to defend and celebrate political violence. This is not a both sides problem. If both sides have a problem, then one side has a much bigger problem. And he added more, of course, that's just a small quote. But take a look at what J.D. Vance, the current VP, had to say in

this clip. First, we must tell the truth. It's the only way to honor Charlie for what was he, if not a man who told the truth in every place, in every environment. Now, the most important truth Charlie told is this, that long ago a man, begotten, not made, came down from heaven, and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary and became man. For our sake, he was crucified under Pontchus Pilate and suffered death and was buried and rose again on the third day. Charlie believed, as I do, that all the truth he told flowed from that fundamental principle. I really do believe that we can come together in this country. I believe we must.

But unity, real unity, can be found only after climbing the mountain of truth. And there are difficult truths we must confront in our country. One truth is that 24% of self-described, quote, very liberals believe it is acceptable to be happy about the death of a political opponent, while only 3% of self-described very conservatives agree. Three percent is too many, of course. Another truth is that 26% of young liberals believe political violence is sometimes justified. And only 7% of young conservatives say the same. Again, too high a number. In a country of 330 million people, you can of course find one person of a given political persuasion

justifying this or that or almost anything. But the data is clear. People on the left are much likelier to defend and celebrate political violence. This is not a both sides problem. If both sides have a problem, one side has a much. much bigger and malignant problem, and that is the truth we must be told. You know, J.D. Vance is such a slimy piece of crap. I want to say far worse things here, but I won't for the courtesy of this video and to keep it PG. He is such a slimy piece of crap.

The data is clear. Republicans, right-wing extremists, not Republicans, right-wing extremists, engage in far more political violence than anybody on the left. All political violence is wrong. We can all agree on that, but it's mainly coming from the Republicans if you look at the data. And, you know, if you want to climb the mountain of truth, as J.D. Vance implores all of us to do in this video, let's do it. Let's go up and look at all the different examples of political violence that comes from the right. Paul Pelosi, Melissa Hortman, January 6th, the list goes on. I mean, there's so many examples that have happened over the years. Many of these examples, they laughed at.

They celebrated. Trump celebrated many of these examples. But I do want to look at the data because, you know, if J.D. Vance wants to cite a poll that showed this or this or this, let's actually look at the data and who is doing the political violence. This is from the Cato Institute, which is a conservative-leaning think tank. And they published this article that cited data from the 1970s, going back to 1975 all the way up until now. And you can see that murders in politically motivated terrorism excluding 9-11, the right, right-wing crime, accounts for 60s. 63% 63% left leaning ideology-based murders 10%. The difference is substantial. Also, if you just look at it from 2020, now to 2025,

right-wing accounts for 54%. The left, 22%. Again, the difference is substantial. So I have no idea what J.D. Vance is talking about with this rant he went on, but I want to continue because now J.D. Vance is engaging in cancel culture. The cancel culture that Republicans for years

said is so bad and so nasty and nobody should do it. J.D. Vance himself is promoting it. J.D. Vance said, when you see someone celebrating Charlie's murder, call them out, and hell, call their employer. Look, I don't think that anybody should be celebrating Charlie Kirk's murder. There's really no positive that comes from it. But this is the cancel culture that Republicans decried for years when people got quote unquote canceled, more like held accountable for being racist, saying homophobic things, saying derogatory things about certain groups of people. Republicans were free speech warriors defending them. But when people online, like these random people who are not elected in the Democratic Party,

they're just average Americans, make a joke about Charlie Kirk's passing, which again, before the magas go to the comments, is wrong, I disagree with. Then they don't care about free speech. Free speech is speech for everybody, not just people you agree with. It's for people you disagree with who might say something that you find appalling. That's the nature of free speech. but J.D. Vance and the Republicans have never actually been pro-free speech. They're pro-speech that aligns with them, and that has been a consistent theme.

And this is one of the final clips I want to show you before we just look at some blatant hypocrisy from him in this clip, which is he said there's no unity with these people. One of the most divisive statements coming from a vice president I've ever seen. And just listen to what he had to say because the hypocrisy is astounding, and I'm going to break it down for you in a moment. Take a look. There is no unity with people who scream. at children over their parents' politics.

There is no unity with someone who lies about what Charlie Kirk said in order to excuse his murder. There is no unity with someone who harasses an innocent family the day after the father of that family lost a dear friend. There is no unity with the people who celebrate Charlie Kirk's assassination. And there is no unity with the people who fund these articles, who pay the salaries of these terrorist sympathizers, who argue that Charlie Kirk A loving husband and father deserved a shot to the neck because he spoke words with which they disagree.

Listen, all the people that J.D. Vance just described, people harassing Charlie Kirk's family or making fun of it or whatever, whatever he just said, I agree that those people are wrong. I agree. I think they're wrong. But number one, it's not the job of the vice president of the United States to say that there's no unity. Your mission is to lead everybody in the United States. Joe Biden, when he was in office, said no matter what you think of me, I'm here to make your life better. I'm here to represent you. But J.D. Vance is saying, you know, these people did something that I and him disagree with morally, so now there's no unity. And I just wish that J.D. Vance actually had principles and standards because he says there's no unity with people on the left who do these things. And again, I feel like I have to reiterate this all the time.

They are wrong to do it. But does J.D. Vance actually believe that? Because Alex Jones is somebody that he called a truth teller, praising him in a private speech all the way back in 2024. And even before, I believe. This actually happened, I believe, in 2021. But this is an article that was published in 2024. J.D. Vance praised him.

But Alex Jones is somebody who harassed Sandy Hook families for years. That tragic school shooting where Alex Jones said it was fake. those crisis actors, harassed their families for years, ruin their lives. And then Alex Jones lost in a lawsuit that they brought against him for those lives, $1.4 billion. Yet J.D. Vance is perfectly happy to call him a truth teller and praise him in private. Where's the consistency? It doesn't exist. The Democrats have been incredibly consistent about this. Elected leaders in the party have been consistent about this. If you mock political violence, engage in political violence, whatever, you're wrong to do it. And I fundamentally believe that because we're better than that.

As Americans, we're better than that as a country. But the Republicans do not. So it's so frustrating to see J.D. Vance get up there and preach that he's holier than thou. And the Republicans are so much better than the Democrats when members of their party are harassing school shooting victims. It makes no sense. Now, look, the final thing I want to show you is just J.D. Vance getting it wrong. At the beginning of his speech, She said that Charlie Kirk never said black women do not have brain processing power to be taken seriously. But let's play the clip side by side, shall we? Cuses Charlie of saying, and I quote, black women do not have brain processing power to be taken seriously. But if you go and watch the clip, the very clip she links to, you realize he never said anything like that.

He never uttered those words. If we would have said that Joy Reed and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson, Lee and Katangi Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would have been called the racist. But now they're coming out and they're saying it for us. They're coming out and they're saying, I'm only here because of affirmative action. Yeah, we know you do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously.

You had to go steal a white person slot to go be taken somewhat seriously. You know, just for the record, I mean, I think people, know this. All the women he just mentioned are black women. I don't think actually I need to commentate on that clip. I think the clip speaks for itself. So anyway, this was one of genuinely the most divisive speeches I've seen from this administration and this does far more harm than it does good. It doesn't do any good. It doesn't do any good. I'll leave the video there. Thank you so much for watching. It means the world. And as I always say, I greatly appreciate you and I hope you have an amazing rest of your day.