The Harry Sisson Show - Trump PANICS As Epstein Files Get UNREDACTED

Episode Date: February 10, 2026

Harry Sisson breaks down new Epstein files being unredacted by the DOJ after members of Congress exposed them.

All right, folks, I have some significant updates for you in the Epstein story that you absolutely need to know about. Late last night, the Department of Justice unredacted some of the documents that they were covering up. They were keeping secret. And that's for two main reasons. Number one, members of Congress were able to view the unredacted versions at the Department of Justice starting yesterday. But also, members like Thomas Massey, Rokane, and more were pressuring them to release these documents and they actually folded. Now we can view them publicly. we're going to talk about them in this video.

I'm going to talk about how this all went down and show you the documents on top of that. But the walls are really crumbling for the Trump regime. Now that members of Congress can see these documents, there's really no hiding anymore. And they're calling it out right now. So before we get into any of that, please make sure to subscribe down below, drop a like on the video, comment. Let me know what you think about these documents. And without further ado, let's get into it. So first and foremost, I want to start with what Representative Thomas Massey said on CNN yesterday.

because while some of these documents have been redacted, and we're going to look at them in just a moment, there are still some major issues with the Department of Justice's conduct, and they're still covering up some files and actively breaking the law. Watch Thomas Massey break it down on Caitlin Collins show last night on CNN. Here's another problem, big problem that I discovered. There's big black screens of complete redactions, and you go in there and look on the computer,

sometimes you lift off the black ink, and there's white ink redacting files. And so when we asked the people in the room who weren't responsible for the redactions, they said, oh, we think those are how the files were given to us. Now, those are 302 forms that come from the FBI. And the FBI... Which are witness interview forms, basically. Right. Witness interview forms, which would have the names of people who are implicated in crimes

by the witnesses and the victims. We can't see those. Now, the DOJ can say, well, this is how the FBI gave those to us. Here's the problem with it. The legislation that Rokana and I wrote makes the DOJ responsible for producing the documents, but it compels the FBI and U.S. Attorney Journals to turn over those documents. So they don't have the authority to just make random redactions. Here's another problem with the redactions. You know, the DOJ put up files, and then they pulled them back down. And in December they pulled them back down, redacted a little more and put them back up in some cases. Well, in this latest tranche, they've pulled files down.

They haven't put them back up. And when I go over to the computers, I can't see the files they've pulled down. I have hard copies from where they were up on the internet. But they're not even available internally to you from what you can see. As far as I can tell. And you don't know why that is? I have no idea why that is. And I would hope that when I go back to the DOJ tomorrow, they'll make those files available.

Wow. So even after these members of Congress are going to the DOJ, to look at these documents without redactions, there are still redactions. They are still breaking the law. The FBI can't just claim, oh, that's the way the documents are, the DOJ can't claim that either. They actually have to remove these redactions. They have the original documents. They didn't produce them.

They are still covering up these files, and some of the documents they took down are still not available yet. So we're going to look at some unredacted documents here, but to be clear, there is still an active cover up happening, and they still haven't released all of the Epstein files. And let's actually hear from a Republican. Representative Lauren Bobert was asked about these documents what she thought when seeing them. And this is what she said outside of the Capitol last night. Congresswoman, are you among the members who got to see the unredacted files today?

Yes, I saw some of them, not all of them, obviously. And I'll be going back tomorrow to see more. Any reaction on what you've seen so far? I think that there's folks who are definitely implicated in co-conspirators. And, you know, I don't think everyone there that was talking about underage girls being trafficked are victims. Got it. And do you support any clemency for Galane Maxwell? She was saying that she was... I do not. I think... I think Galane Maxwell should get more time and she should definitely be in a harsher prison than what she's in. It's absolutely disgusting. Got it. Thank you, Congresswoman.

Wow. Lauren Bobert seemingly breaking with Donald Trump, you know, he moved her to that lower level security prison, which is much more comfortable. And even she is saying that some of the redactions seem over the top that, you know, the Department of Justice. And she's seen these documents, actually. The Department of Justice is claiming that they're protecting victims. she's saying she's seen them and not so fast. Now, that's just the reaction from Thomas Massey and Lauren Boebert, but now let's get into these documents that have been unredacted as a result of Massey and other members of Congress. So he put this out last night at 10, 11 p.m. So later in the night, saying in response to my posts on X slash Twitter today, the Department of Justice, one, unredacted an FBI file that labels two individuals as co-conspirators. Number two, unredacted a file that

list several men who might be implicated. And number three, tacitly admitted that Sultan Ahmed bin Solum was the sender of the torture video, which is a really gruesome email that we saw where there's a redaction. It says, you know, I think it says something along the lines of Love the Torture Video, and they retracted the person who sent that email, which is crazy. But let's get into it. So he put out a thread referencing his back and forth with Todd Blanche, the number two at the Department of Justice. And it started here. He said, this is a well-known retired CEO. He knows this because he looked at the document. DoJ should unredact this.

Why did they redact it? Todd Blanche responded, The document you cite has numerous victim names. We have just unredacted Les Wexner's name from this document, but his name already appears in the files thousands of times. DOJ is hiding nothing. Bold claim from Todd Blanche, they obviously are hiding something.

But look, this is a document, which has now been partially unredacted, including co-conspirators, alleged co-conspirators. And they're still protecting some of these people. I bet you. that we could probably find out who some of these photos are. It doesn't look like, it looks like they're publicly available photos, not secret photos.

I bet we could find them out. But they are unredacted of Leslie Groff as an alleged co-conspirator. This has all been unredacted as a part of Thomas Massey's pressure campaign. You have Galane Maxwell. Of course, you have other people. This image, for some reason, that background looked kind of familiar to me. Transparently, it almost kind of looked like the White House, but I don't think it is. This is another co-conspirator.

You have John Luke Brunel co-conspirator, another person's identity was redacted, but then you have Les Wexner, a co-conspirator, and Karina Shuliac, former girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein. So a lot of this page was fully redacted before. Now it's open because of Thomas Massey, and he continued, actually, in this thread, this is the second thing he was talking about, saying Ro Khanna and I just spent two hours at the DOJ viewing the mostly unredacted Epstein files. Four of the 18 redacted names on this document referenced right here are men. then born before 1970. DoJ needs to explain why they are redacted unless they were just randoms

in a lineup. So could be people who are implicated in Epstein scheme. Todd Blanche responded, the document you cite has numerous victim names. We have just unredacted all non-victum names from this document. The DOJ is committed to transparency. You're watching in real time. Thomas Massey, again, a Republican member of Congress, pressuring the Department of Justice to unredact these documents. and they're actually folding to the pressure. They actually are. They actually are. And here's that list, unredacted.

You can see it now. If there's any names that you recognize, aside from the obvious of like Jeffrey Epstein and Galane Maxwell, let me know. None of these names I recognize transparently. I've looked into some of them, but none of them I recognize without looking into them. So let me know. And then all the rest of the pages are just redactions, black photos. And then there's a photo of Epstein. There's a photo of Maxwell in here, I believe, somewhere.

But you get the idea. There's a bunch of redacted photos. That's pretty much what the document is. So they're still covering some things up. Unsure why these are redacted unless they're photos of victims or whatever it might be. But I don't know. Who knows at this point with this DOJ? Here's another one where Thomas Massey says, a Sultan seems to have sent this.

DOJ should make this public. Todd Blanche said, you looked at that document. You know it's an email address that was redacted. The law requires redactions for personally identifiable information, including if an email address. And you know that the Sultan's name is available unredacted in the file. see this one, be honest, and stop the grandstanding, which he's not, he's not grandstanding. He is being honest. This is a document that is for some reason redacted, but Kyle Cheney, a legal reporter at Politico,

pointed out that in response to this Todd Blanche tweet, this suggests that DOJ can tell us in some cases who is behind the redacted email addresses, since they weren't redacted to protect the sender slash recipients identity, but just their contact info. Also, doesn't the law just require redactions of the victims personally identifiable information? Yes. So, we have a bunch of different emails out there, which we've talked about on the show, where it seems like the rich, powerful men are admitting to crimes to Epstein. For example, one of the most viral emails we've seen, said something along the lines of, had fun last night. Your littlest girl was a little naughty.

They have protected that person's identity for no good reason. And so this is suggesting what Todd Blanche is saying right here that, you know, you have to redact. contact information and whatnot, that that email should be unredacted today. I hope Thomas Massey pressures the DOJ on that document in particular because there are a bunch of emails like that that I think we need to know more about as the American people and for them to follow the law. They can't just continue to break the Epstein Files Transparency Act. It's crap.

It's bullshit. So anyway, man, oh man, some of these documents being redacted like the co-conspirator list or this list or this email where essentially it's been confirmed. that it was a Sultan is interesting. I will leave the video there. Thank you so much for watching. Make sure to subscribe down below, drop a like on the video, comment. Let me know what you think about the story. If you noticed anything here that I might have missed, I'm always fascinated by what you have to say. If you're on Apple or Spotify, please make sure to rate the show five stars and follow along. Have an amazing rest of your day, and we will talk soon.