The Harry Sisson Show - Trump PANICS As SECRET Epstein Letter LEAKS

Episode Date: September 9, 2025

Trump PANICS As DARK Epstein Past Gets EXPOSEDTrump's SECRET Letter To Epstein Just LEAKED

Folks, we have some major breaking news. Donald Trump's Epstein cover-up is unraveling right before his very eyes because the Wall Street Journal and the House Oversight Democrats just published the birthday card that Donald Trump sent to Jeffrey Epstein in the early 2000s. Now, reminder, Donald Trump claimed that this card was fake. He's suing the Wall Street Journal and editors at the Wall Street Journal for publishing. the article about the birthday card, and now it seems like his lie, his baseless claim, has been thoroughly debunked. We all knew that this birthday card was real, but now even more so. So I want to dive into this article and actually show you the birthday card and run through it,

but earlier today, this is kind of how we got to this point. Congressman Robert Garcia published a tweet saying that oversight Democrats just received the Epstein birthday book and additional documents from the Epstein estate. So this letter, this birthday card, actually came directly from attorneys at Epstein's estate. It didn't just come from out of thin air, as Maga likes to claim. It came from the Epstein estate. And then Congressman Robert Garcia said that we got the Epstein note that Trump says doesn't exist.

Time to end this White House cover up. They published it on Twitter. But I do want to dive into the Wall Street Journal article with you and show you the card. Let me just zoom out just for a second here so you can see it in its entirety. And it's exactly as the Wall Street Journal described it. It is the outline of a woman. There are breasts, as they said in their original article. And as you can see down here, Donald Trump's signature.

It's written Donald J. Trump in print. Then it's incursive, a signature from Donald Trump as he signs everything with a black marker. And you see his signature down there saying, Donald. I mean, that is his signature. That's how he signs executive orders. That's how he signs documents. And of course, the voiceover, the fictional conversation between Trump and Epstein that Donald Trump wrote in the card is exactly as the Wall Street Journal described it. It says a voiceover, there must be more to life than having everything.

Donald, yes, there is, but I won't tell you what it is. Jeffrey, nor will I, since I also know what it is. Donald, we have certain things in common, Jeffrey, said Trump, which I'm still wondering from all the MAGA Republicans out there, what do Donald Trump and Epstein have in common? We never got an answer on that one. Jeffrey said, yes, we do. Come to think of it. Donald, enigma's never aged. Have you noticed that? Jeffrey, as a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you, Donald, a pal is a wonderful thing. Happy birthday, and may every day be another wonderful secret, signed Donald Trump. And I just want to give you the most clear view of it. That is the birthday card that Donald.

Donald Trump sent to Jeffrey Epstein. And here is it in its entirety from the House Oversight Democrats. An official document that again came from the Epstein estate. There is no faking that. These attorneys are not handing in a fake birthday card to Congress. That would be a whole host of crimes that they'd be charged with, among many other things. And the Wall Street Journal just kind of breaks down the story a little bit in this article. And then I want to show you the reaction from some of these Republicans. It's not good. They said lawyers for Epstein's estate have given Congress a copy of the birthday book put together for his 50th birthday, which includes a letter with Trump's signature that he said doesn't exist. On Monday, House Oversight Committee members confirmed they received the book.

Donald Trump called the EPSC investigation a hoax and claimed that his birthday note doesn't exist. Now we know that Donald Trump was lying and is doing everything he can to cover up the truth, said Robert Garcia, who is the committee's ranking member. Enough of the games and the lies. Release the files now. that's kind of the statement that you're seeing from the House Oversight Democrats in the post that we looked at earlier. And I do want to remind everybody the lengths that Donald Trump went to to silence this story. I mean, not only did he call the letter a hoax, not only did he call the entire Epstein letter or the Epstein story, I should say, a hoax, but he also said he's suing

the Wall Street Journal over this article that they published originally referencing the birthday card. Remember, this is the truth social post he put out at the time saying the Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch personally were warned directly by Trump that the supposed letter they printed by Trump to Epstein was a fake. And if they print it, they will be sued. Mr. Murdoch stated that he would take care of it, but obviously did not have the power to do so. The editor of the Wall Street Journal Emma Tucker was told directly by Karen Lenn-Levitt and Trump. The letter was fake, but Emma Tucker didn't want to hear that. Instead, they're going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway. Trump will be suing the Wall Street Journal,

Corps and Mr. Murdoch shortly. The press has learned, has to learn to be truthful and not rely on sources that probably don't even exist. It has truly turned out to be a disgusting and filthy rag and writing defamatory lies like this shows their desperation to remain relevant. So he was going off. He was furious at the Wall Street Journal. But of course, the Wall Street Journal is sticking by the reporting and they should. I mean, of course, now they should because the letter has been released and we've seen it. And this lawsuit, that Donald Trump filed against the Wall Street Journal and Murdoch and anybody else that he included in the lawsuit, I imagine is going to be thrown out very quickly. We already knew that, but now especially

so. And I just want to quickly check in with J.D. Vance because, you know, he put out this post in relation to the original article that was published saying, forgive my language, but the story is complete another BS. The Wall Street Journal should be ashamed for publishing it. Where is the letter? Would you be shocked to learn they never showed it to us before publishing it? Does anyone honestly believe this sounds like Donald Trump? The letter is now in the hands of Congress and the public. I would not be shocked to learn that they never showed it to you. Or excuse me, I would be shocked it to learn that they never showed it to you because they did.

We know that now. And they reference it directly to Donald Trump in the White House. And yes, of course it sounds like Donald Trump. This is exactly something that Donald Trump would do. He was best buds with Jeffrey Epstein. I can't believe that J.D. Vance was shocked by this revelation. But I just want to check in with him now because he claimed that the story was BS, complete and utter BS. That's what J.D. Vance said.

Now the birthday letter is in the hands of the public. And I just want J.D. Vance to go on the record again and claim that this is fake. I would just love to hear that. And as I mentioned, the Republicans are having a really hard time with this story. They're not happy about it. They're reacting very poorly. This guy, who's a huge MAGA account on social media, unfortunately. said, you are pathetic. This is fake and you are losers. I mean, you know, the, the lengths that you

have to go to to believe that this is a conspiracy is crazy. Number one, you have to believe that the Wall Street Journal is lying. Number two, you have to believe that Congress is lying. And also, number three, you have to believe that Jeffrey Epstein's estate is lying and they're willing to commit crimes in order to hurt Donald Trump. Is that really the conspiracy that all these different people are going to these lengths just to hurt Donald Trump, or maybe the card with his signature on it is real. Maybe it's that. They, you know, they can't fathom that. Here's another one I saw. LMFAO. OMG, this is the big bombshell. Democrats are pathetic and desperate. This guy, and then he followed up by saying, do you, does this actually look like Donald Trump's signature? Yes.

If you just look at a Donald Trump signature across the board. Matter of fact, one, I pull that up really quickly. So this is the signature on the card, and this is Donald Trump's signature. On the card, it's just signed Donald. Here is Donald Trump, the full name. But if you just look at the first half, the Donald part of the signature, it looks identical. It looks identical. The D at the beginning, the D at the end matches it exactly on the birthday card. So do I think this is Trump's signature? Yes, absolutely. Is there a conspiracy here? No. These MAGA freaks are just coping really hard by it right now because they know that Donald Trump got exposed. But anyway, I just had to show you, this bombshell article from the Wall Street Journal

with this letter now being published. So please share the story everywhere. Every American deserves to see Donald Trump's lies being called out, but I'll leave it there. I don't want to waste any more of your time. Donald Trump and the MAGA movement are in full-blown panic mode right now

over the Wall Street Journal releasing the birthday card that Trump sent to Jeffrey Epstein in the early 2000s. Now, remember, when this story originally came out when the Wall Street Journal first reported on it, Donald Trump and everybody around him claimed that the story was false. They said that the Wall Street Journal just made it up that there was no birthday card and now Trump's cover-up of the Epstein story has been exposed even

further. And that has caused not only White House staff to go insane, but also his fans, maggot influencers, people who support him and they're coming up with these absurd excuses to justify Trump's relationship with Epstein. So I want to show you just some of the reactions from Maga World, including Caroline Levitt, which just reeks of panic. And then later, I want to show you this follow-up article that the Wall Street Journal published, where they go and do a line-by-line analysis

of Donald Trump's birthday card to Epstein to prove its authenticity. They had this ready for when Donald Trump and the people around him inevitably were going to claim it's false. This is certainly worth a read. This article is worth a breakdown, so make sure you stay until the end to watch it. But regardless, let's start here with Caroline Levin, where she put out this really just absurd statement on the story saying the latest piece published by the Wall Street Journal proves this entire birthday card story is false.

What a start to her statement. I would love for her to expand on how publishing the birthday card proves that the birthday card does not exist. That kind of seems like some backward reasoning to me. But regardless, as I've said all along, it's clear Trump did not draw this picture and he did not sign it. Trump's team will continue to aggressively pursue litigation. I think this entire statement is a joke. But this part in particular is just maybe the most absurd of all these different small paragraphs. Because Donald Trump's case, whenever it gets to a judge, is going to be thrown out quicker than you can say Donald Trump loves Jeffrey Epstein.

I mean, it's going to be laughed out of court because the Wall Street Journal has incredibly high editorial standards, and they verify things before they publish it. Furthermore, the reporter who wrote this hatchet job reached out for comment at the exact same minute. He published his story giving us no time to respond. I bet that's not true, but even if he did, we know what the White House's response to the story already is. They've commented on it a number of times. This is fake news to perpetuate the Democrat Epstein hoax. They're still calling it an Epstein hoax where this awful man did awful things to society's most vulnerable children.

And they're calling it a hoax. They're saying that the story doesn't exist. It's just so disgusting. So this is what Caroline Levitt is running with. And of course, people in the comments, including myself, are giving her a lot of crap for it. Might as touch JoJo from jurors, House Majority Pack, Patriot. I mean, all these different folks are really getting in on this because it is just such an absurd excuse. Here's another one that has been quote tweeted, uplifted, and amplified by really prominent figures in the MAGA movement like Benny Johnson, who we're going to talk about in a second.

And it says Trump's authenticated signature in 1993 versus the signature from the fake letter purported to be from the same year. And they're saying that this signature, as you can see right down here, does not look like this signature. Now, if you're asking me, just remember the signature for just a second. If you're asking me, this signature looks identical to this one. Obviously, this is a Donald Trump signature. It has his full name. But this, just zooming in on the Donald part, looks identical to the Epstein letter signature. Actually, we can zoom in on here and hopefully do a little bit of a quick side by side.

You tell me in the comments. I want to hear from you if you think they look similar. They do to me. This is the signature they're saying that doesn't look similar. This is the one they're saying is fake. You know, it's just so absurd the excuses they're coming up with. To me, it looks very identical. And along with, I'm going to show you some other signatures from the same time in that Wall Street Journal article.

They went in on Donald Trump. But here's another one I want to show you from Benny Johnson, a very prominent MAGA figure, who, remember, got paid hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Russians to spread lies online. But regardless, he said, the Wall Street Journal just released the letter. In quotations, they claim that Donald Trump sent to Epstein, is this really the best they could do? Trump has the most famous signature in the world. time to sue them into oblivion is his claim, is what he is what he wrote here. Again, you know, he's citing this signature from Donald Trump's, that's a more recent signature from Donald Trump. He's saying

that this one that was, I guess, signed in the year, when he was 45th president, so maybe between 2017 and 2021 when he was president, whatever it might be, he's saying this signature is completely opposite, doesn't look anything like that. And while this newer signature from Trump is, slightly different. I still think it looks similar, but regardless, somebody's signature is likely to change over like a 30, 20 year period, but even when you get in to putting side-by-side images of these signatures, they look identical. So let's just go into this Wall Street Journal article, and Benny Johnson's claim right here is going to be thoroughly debunked. They released this follow-up saying, a visual breakdown of the Trump birthday letter to Epstein. Here's an analysis of the

letter bearing Trump's name that was included in a 50th birthday book for Jeffrey Epstein. The Wall Street Journal, of course, reported this in July, and Caroline Levitt, Trump, have all called it fake. So here's a look at some key features of the document, signature and typeface. In the Epstein letter, Trump's signature is a squiggly Donald mimicking hair. Trump often signs with his full name, but there are other examples of personal letters he sent with a similar signature and bold lettering. So, for example, we have the letter to Epstein. This is the one that we all saw, this signature and font used in the 2003 Epstein letter, resemble one that he sent to George Conway in 2006, just three years later after that letter, a thank you letter Trump sent in April 2006

to attorney George Conway, or a letter he sent in November 2000 to Hillary Clinton, congratulating her on her election to the U.S. Senate. I mean, when you, especially right here, this is a really good image that proves the point, when you're looking at the letter, the excuse me, the signature on the Epstein letter, the first one, compare that to the George Conway signature, compare that to the Hillary Clinton signature. These are identical signatures. They are identical. If you're a reasonable person who's not in the MAG occult, you're looking at these and

you're saying, yes, these are the same. These are the same signatures who came from the same person. It's insane that Mag is even doing this. But it continues. Line drawings. This is where they get really in depth here. The Epstein letter has a line drawing that appears to be hand drawn with heavy marker, including a pair of small arcs, denoting a woman's breasts.

Over the years, doodles and drawings of city escapes and other objects with similar strokes have been attributed to Trump and auction for charity. So, for example, take a look at this. This is an image that Donald Trump drew. Take a look at this. Right? And then look at the lines on the drawing. Trump and his team say there's no way that I could have drawn this, these long, squiggly

lines, there's no way. And then you look at something like this where there are long squiggly lines and he's drawing. And of course, his signature is there too, which does look similar as well. But how about the third person? Donald Trump in this letter, you can see they're having a third person conversation. That's the way it's written. And it's interesting because Donald Trump does this a lot.

The Epstein letter has a typewritten note styled as an imaginary conversation between Trump and Epstein written in the third person. In speeches and social media posts, Trump has often referred to himself in the third person. Here's one. In 2015, nobody would be tougher on ISIS than Donald Trump. Nobody. Here's one in 2017. Some of the signs you'll see are not put up by the people that love or like Donald Trump.

They're put up by the other side. How about 2018? But because his name is Donald Trump, you have haters and they can. to hate. This is another clip from Trump. How about 2020? Nobody's done more for the historically black colleges and universities than Donald Trump. Consistently, this guy refers to himself in the third person. And if you remember the statement that Donald Trump put out on truth social announcing his lawsuit of the Wall Street Journal, he also referred to himself in the third person. He is still doing that in 2025. How about word choices? The Epstein letter says,

Enigma's never aged. Have you noticed that? And ends with a pal is a wonderful thing. Happy birthday. And may every day be another wonderful secret. Trump used the word enigma to describe Don King and Mike Tyson in his 1990 book and to describe Dan Rather in his 2004 book in social media posts and in speeches. Trump has often used the phrase a wonderful thing. Here are some examples.

This is the book. This is any, and the quote is, any discussion of Mike's affairs eventually lead to the subject of Don King. Don like Mike is something of an enigma. This was in 1990. Here's another one from 2004. This is one of those gray areas that remain an enigma, even to those who have finally honed business instincts. So this is a word that Donald Trump was using around the time. How about another one? Another example. Dan Rather is an enigma to me. He's got absolutely no talent or charisma. 2004, right? Around the same time. And here's a clip of Trump in 2017. I think Brexit's going to be a wonderful thing. Trump in 2024, see in the old days, you say it's a wonderful thing. Donald Trump

in 2024 on Joe Rogan, and we sold it to the Waldorf Astoria. It was a wonderful thing. Trump in 2025, it's going to be a wonderful thing. This article is comprehensive. And when you're looking at all the evidence that the Wall Street Journal just provided, it is so abundantly clear that this letter was written, signed, and drawn on by Donald Trump. And so the fact that Caroline Levitt and members of the Trump administration and community in the movement are denying it so aggressively just makes them even more guilty in my eyes. Right? Like, it's so crazy how they're denying objective truth.

You're looking at these signatures side by side. I just want to pull it up one more time before I wrap up here. These are the same. Like, it's, I feel like I'm watching somebody say that two plus two equals five. All of us are saying, well, no, two plus two equals four. Donald Trump and his team are trying to say, no, no, no, you're wrong. actually, it's five. That makes no sense. And claiming that this signature is not similar to the other two that you see on your screen to Conway and Clinton is absurd. So anyway, Mag is having a meltdown.

They're not happy with this story, but of course they were never going to be. I'll leave the video there. Thank you so much for watching. I hope you enjoyed. And as I always say, I greatly appreciate you. And I hope you have an amazing rest of your day.