The Harry Sisson Show - Trump Response To LEAKED Epstein Letter BACKFIRES

Episode Date: December 23, 2025

Harry Sisson breaks down the DOJ's response to the bombshell Epstein letter that implicates Trump.

All right, folks, look, I am calling BS. I'm calling BS on Donald Trump's Department of Justice spending all day today trying to discredit documents from the Epstein files, saying that any allegation against Donald Trump is false and unproven, and they're focusing on one document in particular. It is this letter that we got last night, which I talked about on the show, where Jeffrey Epstein is allegedly writing to Larry Nassar, that creepy physician who did awful things to little girls and women, similar to Epstein, they're now going after this letter in particular. And their explanation for it, to me, is total BS. So we're going to go through this video. I'm going to go through all the different things the DOJ has said about it today. Before I do

any of that, make sure to subscribe down below, drop a like on the video, comment, let me know what you think about the story. And without further ado, let's start here this morning at 730. You can see that it's already been fact-checked by people on Twitter. But at 7.30 in the morning, the Department of Justice said, quote, the Department of Justice has officially released nearly 30,000 more pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against Donald Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear, the claims are unfounded in false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against Trump already. So you can already see the partisan

language in a statement that is supposed to be coming from a department, a government agency, that is not meant to be political, but we live in Donald Trump's America. Nevertheless, out of our commitment to the law and transparency, the DOJ is releasing these documents with the legally required protections for Epstein's victims. They've already failed on this front. A number of victims have been unintentionally exposed in these documents, and they're also not following the law. They were meant to release all of the documents, but that brings us to this letter

that was released late last night and then obviously caused a lot of controversy because of how explosive it is. The letter reads, and I quote, Dear L.N. from Epstein, as you know by now, I have taken the short route home. Good luck, as in Epstein taking his life. We shared one thing, our love and caring for young ladies at the hope they'd reach their full potential. Our president shares our love of young Nabil girls. When a young beauty walked by, he loved to grab snatch, whereas we ended up snatching grub in the messholes of the system. Life is unfair. Yours.

Jay Epstein. That letter is explosive. I mean, it is explosive. It says Jay Epstein at the top, Manhattan Correctional to Larry Nassar who was in prison in Arizona, but at this time I don't believe he was. And the letter never reached Nassar. It was returned to send her. And I mean, Epstein is basically, you know, one predator writing to another predator saying, hey, the Donald Trump, the president of the United States, agrees with us on our love for young girls. And in my view, when he writes that life is unfair,

allegedly writes that life is unfair, it seems to me that Epstein is saying, well, you know, Donald Trump didn't get caught, but we did, and that's unfair. And that brings us to this DOJ statement, where after this letter had been circulating for hours on end, millions of people had seen it. They wrote, quote, the Department of Justice is currently looking into the validity of this alleged letter from Epstein to Larry Nassar, and we will follow up as soon as possible.

In the meantime, three facts stand out. Number one, the postmark on the envelope is Virginia, not New York, where Epstein was jailed at the time, and they are referencing on the letter, let me show you. It's kind of hard to see, but right there it says Nova, Northern Virginia, is what their claim is, on the 13th of August. The return address listed the wrong jail where Epstein was held and did not include his inmate number, which is required for outgoing mail. The envelope was processed three days after Epstein's death.

Now, this is suspicious to me because none of these facts actually debunk the authenticity of the letter. We'll go one by one. The postmark on the envelope being from Virginia, inmate mail goes through these specialized processing centers because they have to scan them for anything illegal, narcotics, whatever it might be. They go through these centers, and these centers are often outside of states where people are sending them from. Normally, their third-party centers. It's a private company doing it, so they're not going to be in every prison in America. So it's entirely possible that Epstein wrote a letter in New York, sent the letter out, and it was processed in Virginia, meaning it was postmarked there. Then the return address listed the wrong jail where Epstein was held and did not include his inmate number.

That could entirely be the fault of Epstein, who just did it incorrectly. It doesn't mean that it wasn't written by him. And then it says the envelope was processed three days after Epstein's death, which connects to this one. Mail in jail, male in jail, it kind of sounds weird. But mail in prison is processed far slower than if you just go to the UPS office, you hand in your letter, and then it's gone. It takes far longer. There's a processing system, and it often takes many business days. So these facts do not dispute it whatsoever.

But then the Department of Justice within two hours, just look at when this statement, 130 on East Coast time. in two hours, they posted 327, less than two hours. Apparently, they concluded their investigation, saying the FBI has confirmed this alleged letter from Epstein to Larry Nassar is fake. The fake letter was received by the jail and flagged for the FBI at the time. The FBI made this conclusion based on the following facts. Number one, the writing does not appear to match Jeffrey Epstein's.

I disagree. The letter was postmarked, as we just talked about. The return address did not include the jail where Epstein was held and did not include his inmate number. This fake letter serves as a reminder that just because a document is released by the DOJ does not make the allegations or claims within the document factual. Now, just to be clear, they concluded this investigation within two hours. This is a letter that was discovered in 2019 that just now they're evaluating the validity of the letter.

It took them, what, six years, maybe even seven by the time, or I should say six, six years at the time to discover whether this letter is valid or not, this bombshell letter in the Epstein investigation, which might implicate somebody else, took them six years? I mean, give me a break. And their facts are just not facts. They do not dispute the letter's authenticity. And again, we don't know if it's 100% authentic or not. We don't know if Epstein wrote it, but what they just said right here does not dispute the facts. And here's the thing. There is a chain of custody logs of this letter, which confirms that it was found in 2019. This is about the letter that Epstein wrote. you can see, Epstein Jeffrey, one return to send her card to inmate Epstein. It was found in the

mailroom of September 25th, 2019 at 6 a.m. And I believe the NYM under ECN and item stands for New York Manhattan, but obviously not 100% sure, which is where Epstein was held. So according to this document that was released as part of the Epstein files, the letter was discovered in the mailroom of this prison in New York City. And they're trying to say, well, it had no connection to Epstein. It just happened to also be found in the mail room where Epstein was held, according to this document, at least, if we're reading into it. And additionally, on the claim of the handwriting, I don't know about you, but the handwriting looks similar to me. This is the letter that Epstein left in his cell before he died, almost like the last thing he wrote. And just look at this and look at some of this.

Now, this appears to be much more cursive than Epstein is using in this letter. But if you just look at some of the specific letters he's writing, it looks similar. I mean, look at the S's, right? the S here on this boys or bogs, whatever this word is, that S looks very similar to the S he's using here. You can just find any S you want. The mess halls right here, for example, mess, right there. That S looks similar to that S to me. And of course, there are different Ss in here, but I'm just looking at this handwriting,

and to me, it looks similar. I'm not a handwriting expert. I cannot conclude this. I do not have a degree in this. But if I'm just using my eyeball, then to me, it seems like, the writing looks similar. But you can let me know in the comments. And you can let me know if you think the letter is fake.

I think it's hard to say we don't know for certain. But if I'm leaning one way or another, I'm leaning toward the letter being real. Given the facts that we know, given that this letter was reported on back in 2023, its existence was reported on the fact that the DOJ is now spending so much time on it and spending, and their investigation was under two hours. And they're so focused on this letter because they know it's a bombshell letter. To me, it all seems weird.

But please, Humble me. Correct me in the comments if you think I'm wrong. I will absolutely hear from you. And I want to hear arguments on this. But I don't know. You let me know in the comments. Make sure to subscribe down below. I'm going to continue to call out the DOJ and their cover up for all of this crap. Make sure to like the video as well. You know, it goes an incredibly long way. But man, what a crazy day.