The Harry Sisson Show - Trump Stooge LOSES IT When CONFRONTED On Epstein

Episode Date: February 11, 2026

Harry Sisson breaks down Pam Bondi's disastrous hearing in front of Congress today where she refused to answer any questions about Epstein and his ties to Trump.

All right, folks, we have to talk about the complete disaster we all collectively witnessed, which was Attorney General Pam Bondi testifying in front of Congress today over Epstein and a variety of issues. But specifically on the topic of Epstein, it went so poorly for Donald Trump, Pam Bondi, the entire Trump regime. Any time she was asked a question about Epstein, she would deflect or just straight up not answer it or attack the person who is asking the question. There are some really humiliating moments in this. testimony, not only for Pam Bondi, but for the United States that I think you should see. We're going to talk about all of them.

They're very powerful and really expose the cover up. We've all been witnessing with Trump and Pam Bondi surrounding the Epstein files. Before we do any of that, though, please make sure to subscribe down below, drop a like on the video, comment. Let me know what you think about this story. If you're on Apple or Spotify, please make sure to rate the show five stars and follow along. I'm currently away.

Again, I'm away from my setup, but I'm still going to talk about the news, still keep you folks updated. So I want to start here. with a clip of Representative Dan Goldman, referencing the Epstein survivors who are in that room watching the hearing take place and getting their feedback

on if the Department of Justice has talked to them, reached out to them for evidence, and it's just a really powerful moment, a really powerful split screen, and Pam Bondi doesn't even look at these Epstein survivors. So just watch, you'll see what I mean.

It's fantastic. There are 32 names. One is redacted. 31 are not. So someone looked at it and decided to redact something. And I will tell you that that is clearly intentional to intimidate these survivors and victims.

Now, in a interview last week... How will you tell me that's intentional? In an interview last week, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche... You can't go off script. ...said that any victim that wants to speak with the department has done so, hopefully. Well, thanks to the incredibly brave people

sitting here behind you, we can actually ask them if that's true. Now, would the survivors and victims who are here, please stand up one more time. Just by show of hands, how many of you or your loved ones actually have met with the Department of Justice and provided testimony and evidence? None. And of those of you who have not met, which is everyone, how many of you have reached out either individually or through a lawyer or representative to offer to provide testimony and evidence. All of them. And of those of you, all of you who have reached out, how many of you were denied or ignored by the Department of Justice? All of them. And despite the shameful and despicable efforts by Ms. Bondi and her department to intimidate you. How many of you are still

willing to speak to the Department of Justice? All of them. Well, Ms. Bondi, it looks like you have some more witnesses to talk to talk to. And I yield back. We will go to the good gentleman from North Carolina. Wow. I mean, shout out to Representative Dan Goldman for holding fire to her feet. That was fantastic, exactly what the country needs to see right now. I mean, these are Epstein victims watching this hearing take place, watching Pam Bondi lie about their cases. They have not been reached out to you by the Department of Justice. They've tried.

They've been ignored. The Department of Justice has not gathered any evidence from these survivors. And what really pisses me off about this clip especially is not just that Pam Bondi is sitting there, not saying, you know what, give me your information, let's reach out, let's talk. These Epstein survivors are standing up. They're putting their hands up saying,

we want to talk to you, you won't talk to us. What really pisses me off is that Pam Bondi won't even look at them. She won't even acknowledge that they exist. There was a previous question in this hearing as well, where Pam Bondi was asked to apologize to these victims for not hearing them out, for ignoring them, for not hearing their stories, for sometimes releasing their names

when they've asked to remain anonymous. She wouldn't look at them either. The Trump regime wants to protect. as if these Epstein victims do not exist. They want this Epstein story to go away. That is why it's so vital that we're here talking about this now because their dream scenarios that were silent. We forget.

It's just a, it's in the wind. It's gone. Absolutely not. Pam Bondi is squirming right there because she knows if she looks at these survivors, if she even acknowledges their existence, her overlord Donald Trump will come down and smack her down. It's disgraceful what this administration is doing.

Here's another example of this, where Representative Jerry, Nadler, a Democrat from New York, asked Pam Bondi a very simple question. Are there any other people that you're investigating, looking to look into prosecuting connection to Epstein, and just look at the meltdown she has over this question. It, again, is disgraceful. How many of Epstein's co-conspirators have you indicted? How many perpetrators are you even investigating? First, you showed it. I find it. How many have you indicted? Excuse me. I'm going to answer the question. I answer my question. I answer my question.

No, I'm going to answer the question the way I want to answer the question. Your theatrics are ridiculous. Chairman Jordan, I'm not going to get in the gutter with these people, but I'm going to answer the question. How many of you invited? Again, the time belongs. Beclaiming my time. The time belongs. I think it's very interesting.

I think it's very interesting that he talks about they indicted. The president said they indicted him twice. They sure did. And he indicted. Oh, okay. Here we go with these theatrics. The time belongs to the gentleman from New York. We will give you a few more seconds.

We will do that. But when you ask a question, the witness gets to answer. You may not like the answer, but she gets too answer. The question was, how many of EFSI? They don't like the answer, Chairman, because it's honest. So he asked a four-minute question. Restore 45 seconds, Mr. Nathor, please, Mr. Chairman.

You can let her filibuster all day long, but not on our watch. Not on our time. No way. And I told you about that, Attorney General, before you started. You don't tell me. Yeah, I did tell you because we saw what you did in the Senate. Not even a lawyer. Committee will be in order.

I should get back at least 45 seconds. We will give you a few more seconds. I said that already. 45 seconds. Okay, I'm timing right now, Mr. Natalie. All right. I mean, what a disaster. You would think that in the United States of America,

regardless of who's in power, you wouldn't have theatrics like this. You wouldn't have shows like this. I mean, remember what we're talking about here. We're talking about Epstein committing, heinous, disgusting crimes against little girls. And when Pam Bondi has asked a very simple question in a calm demeanor, are you investigating anybody?

Are you looking to prosecute anybody else? She freaks out. She has no composure. She has no idea what she's doing. Her only task, her only objective is protect Donald Trump, remove his name from the conversation, and attack anybody that suggests that they haven't done a good job on this. It is disgusting what this Department of Justice. is doing. It results, I mean, look, her answer was personal attacks, personal attacks against

somebody asking a question that I think most Americans would want to know about. And that's the thing. I don't care if you're a Democrat, Republican, independent. I think everybody, anybody that's reasonable, can look at this and say, this is absurd. This is not the way it should be in the United States of America, especially when we're talking about crimes as sensitive, as heinous as these. The final clip I want to show you is a Democratic representative asking attorney general Pam Bondi, you know, we have some Trump administration officials who have been named in the Epstein files. They have ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Has the Department of Justice asked those people about those ties? And what, and you probably already know what's about to happen. Pam Bondi doesn't

answer the question. Watch. Yes or no. Has the Justice Department asked Secretary Lutnik about his ties to Epstein? Excuse me. Secretary Lutnik has addressed those ties himself. I'm asking you, has the Department specifically asked Secretary Lutnik about his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. He has addressed those ties himself. Has the DOJ asked Secretary Phelan about his ties to Jeffrey Epstein? I don't know whether he has addressed those or not. Has the Deputy Secretary Feinberg talked to the Department of Justice about his ties to Jeffrey Epstein? Yes or no?

Has the Department of Justice talked to Secretary, Deputy Secretary Weinberg about his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, which are clearly spelled out in the files. It's a very simple question. It's not a trick question. I'm just asking you. Yeah, I'm stunned that you want to continue talking about. Oh, my gosh. Okay. I'm reclining my time. I'm asking you not a trick question, a simple question. It's not a trick question. It's a simple question. Has the Department of Justice talked to these Trump administration officials about their ties to Epstein. It's so simple, and she can't answer it, because you know why she can't answer it. The question is, the answer is no. No, they have not.

No, they have not talked to these officials about their ties to Epstein. They haven't looked into their ties to Epstein. They just pretend it doesn't exist. You know, the cover-up just gets deeper and deeper every single day. Every single day gets worse. And when you're just asking the chief law enforcement officer in the United States, simple question. about a powerful man who committed heinous crimes against little girls who had this trafficking ring to target little girls which involved powerful men. When you're asking them simple questions about this, they can't answer. That's a real problem. That's a problem that should be called out by every single person.

I don't care who you are. So anyway, this hearing, I believe, is still going on at the time of me filming this is probably wrapping up soon. But a disgraceful display from Attorney General Pam Bondi, I expected nothing less from her. I will leave the video there. There are many other clips we could talk about. but we'll leave it there. Make sure to subscribe down below, drop a like on the video, comment. Let me know what you think about this story.

Let me know what you think about these clips. If you're on Apple or Spotify, please make sure to rate the show five stars and follow along. It goes an incredibly long way. Have an amazing rest of your day, despite everything we just watched, and we will talk soon.