The Harry Sisson Show - Trump's Epstein SECRET Just Got CONFIRMED

Episode Date: March 7, 2026

Harry Sisson breaks down a major development in the Epstein story surrounding Donald Trump.

All right, folks, we have a major update on the ongoing story surrounding Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. Yesterday on the show, we talked about how the DOJ finally released those three missing interviews with a woman who accused Donald Trump of assaulting her with Epstein when she was between the ages of 13 and 15 years old. These interviews were not in the original Epstein files. It took journalists really digging into the story to even find the fact that these interviews existed. And eventually there was enough pressure on the DOJ to release. them because they were violating the law by not doing so. And finally, these interviews are out, and they are incredibly damning. But we just got another piece of information about these

interviews that is crucial. The FBI deemed the accuser to be credible. So Donald Trump and all the people around him have gone around saying, well, you know what? The accusations against him are baseless. There's no fact to any of them. Well, the FBI under Donald Trump in 2019 found it to be credible. They found her accusation credible. So they There's so much more to this Epstein story that we're going to talk about, specifically surrounding Pam Bondi, possibly getting impeached, an investigation into her as well, which we'll talk about in just a moment. But without further ado, let's get into it.

So this is from the Miami Herald, and it's from Julie K. Brown, who you may know as one of the main journalists who really took down Epstein with her reporting. And they put out this article today. DOJ releases Epstein files with accusations against Trump, referencing these three missing interviews. And this is something that caught a lot of people's eye in the article. And it reads, a DOJ source told the Miami Herald that agents found her to be credible and that they would not have interviewed her four times if they thought that she was lying. Remember, only one of the interviews was released. It was heavily redacted, made no mention of Donald Trump, even though she

had accused him of his salt. And the later three that were just released, very much included Donald Trump's name. We'll talk about that in just a moment as well. In the end, she declined to cooperate with their investigation and they lost touch with her, the source says, which actually is pretty in line with the documents that were released, these interviews that were conducted with her. This is part of one of the three interviews, one of the three interview notes, I should say, the agents taking notes about what they were asking her and whatnot. And they asked her whether she felt comfortable detailing her contacts with Trump.

she again asked what the point would be of providing the information at this point in her life when there was a strong possibility that nothing could be done about it. And that kind of backs up what we're reading here from the Miami Herald that she declined to cooperate further. She didn't want to be involved and eventually they lost touch with each other. They lost touch with her and they haven't spoken since. And so that kind of backs each other up. And consistently in this interview, she's like, you know, I don't really want to talk about Donald Trump out of, in my view, fear of retaliation. She doesn't want to be in Donald Trump.

cites. It's important to note that these interviews took place in 2019. So Donald Trump was president. She knew he was president. She didn't want to be targeted by Trump. We've seen what happens when the Maga cult goes after somebody. And also, the important thing to also note about this time is that Donald Trump was president. This was the FBI that he controlled. And that FBI deemed her to be credible. Now, MAGA will not talk about this accusation. They will just discredit it despite the facts, despite the accusation being in depth, despite the FBI deeming, her credible and interviewing her four times, but we cannot let this story die. And so I want to briefly remind you, before we talk about the trouble that Pam Bondi is in, I want to remind you

what these accusations say, because they are truly heartbreaking. In one of the interviews, she, this was in August of 2019. She recalled at least one incident in which Epstein took her off the island when she was between the ages of 13 to 15 years old. He drove her and or flew her to either New York or New Jersey. She was introduced to someone with, quote, money, money, money. and she identified him as Donald Trump. She and Epstein were with others to include Trump in a very tall building with huge rooms. I wonder what building that might be. Trump did not like her, the victim, from the get-go, and she said he didn't like that I was a boy girl, referencing a tomboy.

She could not recall the identities of the other individuals present. However, they all exited when Trump asked everyone to leave the room. Trump mentioned something to the effect of, quote, let me teach you how little girls are supposed to be, which is a disgusting quote that will make your skin crawl undeniably. And she uns, or Donald Trump, I should say, unzipped his pants and put her head down in his area. You kind of get what I'm saying. And she bit him. According to her accusation, Trump struck her and said words to the effect of get this little blank the hell out of here.

And she said that she bit Trump because he disgusted her and he had money and it reeked. off of him, according to her interview with the FBI here. She also said in this interview that she got the feeling that the relationship between Trump and Epstein included a certain amount of jealousy. She thought Trump appeared jealous of Epstein, but at some point they ended up on level playing fields. Trump and Epstein sometimes used the terms, quote, fresh meat, untainted, and not jaded, while referring to girls.

Again, a cringeworthy quote that will really make your skin crawl. Finally, one of the last things she said in this interview was that Epstein, talked about blackmailing people in front of her, and she was confident that Trump knew Epstein was blackmailing people because she heard Epstein and Trump talk about it, which completely contradicts the narrative from this administration, which is, number one, Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong. Number two, there are no accusations against him. But number three, they've also said that there's no list, that Epstein didn't blackmail anybody,

and I think we all know that that is a complete lie. There's a complete fabrication. We've read some of the files where that is very obviously taking place. But this is the interview with this victim that the FBI deemed credible, credible. Interviewed her four times, met with her in person, kind of credible. That is some serious stuff. And Pam Bondi has to answer for it. The Trump administration has to answer for this accusation, but also the cover-up of the Epstein files.

And the problem for Bondi is that not only are Democrats furious with her because we all are, but also Republicans are furious with her. This is from Politico. Pam Bondi's in trouble with Republicans on Capitol Hill. Attorney General Pam Bondi was already in trouble with congressional Republicans. Now she could be facing an even more existential threat to her political future after Donald Trump ousted Christine Nome, showing his willingness to ax cabinet members who lose trust within the Republican Party. Because let's be clear, Donald Trump didn't fire Christine Nome because Democrats don't like her.

He fired her because he was losing support among Republicans because of her. And Pam Bondi is having that similar pull-down effect. Bondi is under intense scrutiny for her handling of the Epstein files. As many as 20 Republicans might be prepared to back an effort to render punishment against the nation's top prosecutor for slow walking the materials release, according to the Democrat helping lead the charge. And five Republicans joined with Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Wednesday to subpoena her testimony in their investigation into Epstein. So they're going to find out more about this cover. cover up. We already saw, you know, Pam Bondi testify recently in front of Congress about the Epstein thing. It was a debacle. I mean, you know, she said the Dow is over 50,000 points. No longer,

might I add, no longer. But even Republicans are pushing back on Pam Bondi. And the final thing I want to point out is that House Democrats are now moving to impeach her. So Democrats are going after. Republicans are going after her. And the representative Sri Tanedar has filed these articles of impeachment, these three different articles of impeachment against Bondi. It's a long shot, but it's something that absolutely should happen. She should obviously no longer be in this role, not only for the Epstein file cover up, but for downplaying everything, for not talking to victims when they've wanted to talk to her and the Department of Justice.

It is despicable what Bondi and Trump have done with this story. But the main takeaway here is that everything we just read in that document from that victim, the FBI deemed credible. an FBI that was controlled by Donald Trump. So do with that information what you will. Let me know what you think about everything in the comments. Make sure to subscribe. I'm not going to let this story die.

I'm not going to let it go away. Despite what Donald Trump wants, drop a like on the video. If you're on Apple or Spotify, please make sure to rate the show five stars. It goes an incredibly long way. Have an amazing rest of your day. And we will talk soon.