The Knowledge Project with Shane Parrish - Carolyn Coughlin: Become A Better Listener
Episode Date: January 24, 2023Acclaimed executive coach and leadership development specialist Carolyn Coughlin calls on more than a decade of experience to help you become a better listener. She goes in-depth on why the language w...e use with each other and with ourselves is so important, the three different types of listening, the most common skill she teaches that makes an immediate impact, and how to help your kids become better listeners. Coughlin is a co-founder at Cultivating Leadership, a leadership development consultancy firm that helps leaders and organizations grow and lead in the face of complexity, ambiguity, and change. She also spent nine years with leadership consulting firm Kenning Associates and more than five years with McKinsey & Company. -- Want even more? Members get early access, hand-edited transcripts, member-only episodes, and so much more. Learn more here: https://fs.blog/membership/ Every Sunday our Brain Food newsletter shares timeless insights and ideas that you can use at work and home. Add it to your inbox: https://fs.blog/newsletter/ Follow Shane on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/ShaneAParrish Our Sponsors: MetaLab: Helping the world’s top companies design, build, and ship amazing products and services. https://www.metalab.com Aeropress: Press your perfect cup, every time. https://aeropress.com Athletic Greens: Comprehensive nutrition and gut health support in one simple scoop. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I guess the first thing I would say is that listening tends to be contagious.
So how each of us listens does tend to wear off on other people.
At that mind that when people feel really, really, truly seen and heard,
it's one of the most extraordinary experiences that a person can have.
Welcome to the Knowledge Project.
I'm your host, Shane Parrish.
This podcast is about mastering the best of what other people have already figured out
so you can apply their insights to your life.
If you're listening to this, you're missing out.
If you'd like access to the podcast before public release,
special episodes that don't appear anywhere
else, hand-edited transcripts, including my personal highlights from the conversation,
where you just want to support the show you love. You can join at fs.blog slash membership.
Check out the show notes for a link. My guest today is Carolyn Coughlin.
Carolyn has been an executive coach, facilitator, and leadership development specialist for over 15 years.
Her journey began in the corporate world where she was a management consultant first at
PWC and later at McKinsey and company. I wanted to talk to
Carolyn to deepen my understanding of adult development theory and become a better listener.
I've had multiple friends point out that she is one of the best listeners in the world.
And it might sound funny that I want to become a better listener given most of what I do on
this show is listen, but you'd be surprised at some of the insights I took away from this
particular conversation, including specific language to use coaching myself and my kids.
Carolyn and I discuss need tos versus want tos, listening to ourselves and others, including three different types of listening, listening to learn, listening to understand, and listening to fix.
We also discuss listening to our bodies, which offer a different type of intelligence, the most common skills she teaches her clients that are immediately useful, and so much more.
It's time to listen and learn.
Let's start with adult development theory.
What is it and why does it matter?
So adult development theory is a, I sort of think of it as a map.
There are several different adult development theories.
I won't go into detail about them.
But each of them is a theory that describes how once we get to be adults, so once we
look like adults, how does our sense making change?
And the big news of adult development theory, really when it first was introduced about 50, close to 60 years ago, was this idea that even when we look like adults, we are actually, like what's not so easily visible can, but doesn't always continue to change.
Just because someone looks, you know, that's 25 years old and looks like they ought to be a fully formed adult, there are still ways that the way they make sense of themselves in the world keeps,
changing. So it gives us a kind of a map to describe how that happens, and that's useful
in a variety of ways. Can you go deeper on that sense making? Yeah, yeah. So sense making is
when I look out at the world, how do I even know what I'm seeing means? So earlier in our
lives, when young people look out at the world, what they see makes sense to them in relationship
to their own kind of physical well-being, mostly.
Like, they look out and see things like I would look out and I would see my mother having a
stern face with me.
And what I would think was, what does this mean for me?
Am I in trouble?
Have I done something?
Do I need to change something so that I will be okay?
Later, we look out at an angry face and we think, oh, my goodness, I've done something
wrong.
I've hurt somebody.
How do they, they might think badly of me.
so I must be bad.
So therefore, what do I need to do to make the mirror that is this angry face looking back
at me be different so that I can feel okay about myself?
Later on, that changes, right?
I see an angry face and I might wonder, well, what's going on for that person?
What might be happening in their life?
And it doesn't get so conflated with me.
I'm kind of, I get to be more separate from that angry face.
but I wonder what does it mean and what, you know, it doesn't like influence me so much.
So that's what I mean. Does that help?
Yeah, it's like we're making meaning out of what we're seeing.
Yeah, exactly. But then there's another aspect to it. So we look out at the world and what is
what meaning do we make of it. But also there's a way. It's like how do we make sense of ourselves
and that changes over time too. Of course, that's like closely related to what we see outside of us.
But it's this interplay. It's really what we see. It's the meaning that we construct. It's often referred to. Adult development theories are often referred to as constructive developmental theories because it's a question of, it describes how do we construct reality? How do we construct meaning? And then how does that change over time?
And are there ways that we can change it? Or is it just a way that we understand how we develop?
Yeah. So I described it as a map that's really helpful because it gives us kind of a, I find that with my clients, certainly with myself and with my clients, it helps people understand. It gives people a language a way to see what might be happening. Like how I construct meaning of myself and the world has changed up till now and how it might change in the future. So it gives me like a reference point. And yes, of course, we there are many, and this is what developmental coaching is,
is all about. It's like how do we take the experiences that happen to us every day and use them
when we are not quite fit. We find ourselves not quite fit for our context, like up to what Bob
Keegan called it in over our heads. What moves can we make to try to develop our meaning
making to be more fit for the context. It happens better with company. Kind of a hard thing to do
alone. Yeah, I want to talk about that in a bit in terms of how we make sense of ourselves and
how other people, it prompted sort of something that you told me earlier, as you were saying
that, that a few years ago, a friend of yours noticed that you were saying things like, I need to
check in with the kids or I have to get home right after we finish up, which prompted a conversation
on the need tos versus want to use. Can you explore a bit of that to me and the language that you're
using? Yeah. So I have a couple of go-to interventions. I'll call them interventions. They're
basically kind of something that disrupts our normal patterns. And language, noticing and
disrupting language patterns, I find to be very, very helpful as a developmental move. That story
happened about, you know, 10 years ago when my children were younger. And I was really torn a lot
of the time because I was traveling around the world. I was really feeling like I was experiencing
the most exciting period up until then of my professional career and all parts of my life.
And I had these three children at home and a husband who was there with them most of the time
because he's a teacher so he didn't travel. He was around more. And I felt torn, you know,
between these two parts of my life. And a good friend of mine noticed that I often, when talking
about my kids and my family, just as you said, used the term, have to get home, I need to check
on them, I need to call. And so this, I already had this idea that our language is not just
an expression of our meaning making, but it also shapes our meaning making. So when this friend
of mine noticed that language pattern, I began to ask a question like, what could I, what words could
I use, that might actually change the way I make sense, help support me to be less torn
about this kind of kids and family and the rest of my life thing. And so that's what I mean.
And I did. So I started to really deliberately notice, and I could also feel it in my body,
you know, when I was about to talk about need to and have to. There's like this tightness and
constriction. And when I change the words to want to, it sounds like the tiniest intervention,
right? It seems almost so simple as to be silly, but it really, really changed the way I made
sense of my relationship to my responsibility, the role in the life of my family. It made it
possible for me to show up differently with them as well. Because effectively you're choosing it,
But if you feel like you have to, then it almost feels like not a choice.
I almost think of this in terms of three categories, which is like things I have to do.
Like I fundamentally just have to do them, things I want to do.
And then things other people want me to do.
And this helps me when I, especially when I feel busy, it helps me prioritize what I choose to take on.
And it's that little nuance in language that is really interesting.
And then often another nuance in language that you sort of prompted as you were talking is when I make a decision, I usually I try to say I choose to because fundamentally I'm making a choice.
TD Bank knows that running a small business is a journey from startup to growing and managing your business.
That's why they have a dedicated small business advice hub on their website to provide tips and insights on business banking to entrepreneurs.
No matter the stage of business you're in.
Visit td.com slash small business advice to find out more or to match with a TD small business banking account manager.
Yeah.
Just by using the language I choose to, it actually cultivates or constructs a new meaning around what you're doing.
Rather than the world or someone else doing it to you, you're stepping into it in a different way.
Right.
And it isn't just a pretend thing, you know, this whole idea of acting as if, it's talking as if, speaking as if I were choosing after a while, that translates into you're actually seeing it as a choice.
And often we just think of our language as throwaway, right? We don't see it as so important. It's almost invisible to us a lot of the time. It's habitual.
one of the words that you used in that response was torn and often a lot of us are feeling torn
between competing parts of our life and we sort of the words that we use to describe this
range from balance work life balance to harmony to integrated to a mosaic how do you think about
that and how do you help people who want to fulfill multiple parts of their
life and they seem to have competing demands. A lot of it really depends on where they are in
terms of how they make sense of these things. So work-life balance, like notice the difference
between work-life balance and mosaic. Those are really different. If someone that I'm working
with is talking about work-life balance, I may not immediately go to, what if you thought of it as a
mosaic. Because the work-life balance, it's almost, I get the visual of one of those old-fashioned
scales, you know, and you're trying to get it just right. I need just enough of work and just
enough of home just to get it just right. And it's as if there's a balance point that you can
reach that will be static and sustainable. So if someone sees it that way, I would probably ask a
question, you know, what's the most important thing to you about getting the balance just right
or what's the worst thing, you know, about not getting it just right? So I would probably want
to disrupt that the underlying assumptions about work-life balance is the thing first or
we get to offer it, offer a disruption and see where that goes. I also have to find metaphors
to be really helpful here with these sorts of things because often
I will listen to the metaphors that a client uses and try to tap into those.
When somebody is talking about balance, I will present to them like a scale, an old-fashioned
balancing scale.
And I'll just ask them, like, how does that feel to you?
Is that actually what you're going for here?
Sometimes it makes sense for me to introduce a metaphor that's slightly different and
ask them to consider that.
So when I think of work life, like work in life and integrating these components of life,
It's not just work in life, right?
And we tend to break it down into this, but there's also your health, there's your community.
There's all these other aspects that make for a meaningful life that once you start thinking about balance and you think about living a holistic life, it becomes impossible, I think, in my experience.
And so the mosaic term or sort of like integration of things is very different because the pieces at different points can take on different shapes and sizes, but they're always,
there, they're always present, and you're always giving some attention to it, but, you know,
it might be, I'm going to do less of this right now and more of this right now. And this needs
to be a bigger piece right now because that's more important. And on my better days, I see it
that way. And, you know, when I feel overwhelmed, I don't know how it is for you, I'd love to hear,
that it's harder to see it that way when things are really, really pressing on you for us to feel
satisfied with the mosaic on any given day, in some ways we have to be able to step back and look
at it and see how beautiful it is. But when you're stuck in the mosaic, because things are so
pressing, really can't see the beauty of it. All you can see is the mess. One of the things that
was interesting to me about that story, though, is how your friend took the words you were using
and described a meaning to them and like sort of it was a deeper sense of listening than just to the
words. Can you talk to me about that? This friend is a developmental coach, and she, so she's kind of in the
practice of wondering when she hears somebody use a word or a phrase. She notices the dissonance
between what she would mean by that and what she notices, I might be meaning by that, right? So this is
the listening below the surface. This is listening for meaning. So it's getting below underneath the
story or the words and wondering, how, what does that person actually mean by that? And it can be a
really hard practice to be in because we also have to do that while we have to be able to notice
what do I mean by that. What do I assume they mean by that? And wondering then, like, how is it
different, right? Always noticing what I think it means is probably wrong. And how could it be
wrong and therefore have to imply.
And then the words that we're using change how we think.
So the power of language is really important in that.
How does the language that we use limit our progress or our ability?
Our language tends to be habitual.
Like I said earlier, we often don't even notice the phrases we use.
So I had a client trying to let go of the achievement-oriented.
to nature of her life.
She always needing to do things in order to feel valuable.
And so she described to me what it feels like to her to be not adding value.
So she often used these terms that were sort of like, if I'm not doing something,
I'm just kind of shuffling around waiting for things to happen.
You know, what we did was we explored.
What does it mean to be like shuffling around waiting and who are.
are you when you're shuffling around waiting, what does that mean for you? But sometimes it's not
that overt. So language that is limiting for people is often as simple as what I described to you,
the have tos and the need tos. It often shows up as like, I am just this way. Or I am the sort of
person who has to respond when somebody emails me right away. I have to respond within five
minutes. Habits of language around identity. I am this way. I am that way. Other limiting language
you can hear in what I sometimes call monolithic narratives. So-and-so is always this way. At work,
I never seem to get my voice heard. There are so many of them. So what we want is to find enabling
patterns of language that help us in service of what it is we care about. Talk to me a little bit more
about language and our identity and how that affects our ability as leaders and people
and perhaps our performance or how small shifts in how we see ourselves or even how we
describe ourselves. Even if we don't fundamentally believe it, can the language that we use talking
about ourselves change who we are and what we're doing? So I'm going to start with a definition of
the definition I use of identity first. I think it might be helpful because that word gets used in a
variety of ways and all of them are right. But I just want to be clear about what I mean. I sometimes
call it identity with a small I rather than a capital I. I don't mean like my social identity
or my racial identity or my gender identity or anything, anything like that. What I mean is
how I see myself and how I want to be in the world, how I want you to see me in the world.
It's something we've been developing all of our lives, each of us, right? It's we adapt as
kids. We learn what works. We learn what doesn't work. We amplify the things. We keep doing the
things that work and we hopefully stop doing the things that don't work. So we get to a point in our
any point in our lives, we have this sense of who I am. And we spend a lot of time projecting that
identity, right? We've perfected it up until now. In what we do, what we wear, what we say,
what we don't say, what we don't do, who we hang out with. We're always projecting this identity.
right? Most of it's unconscious. And so what does language have to do with that? It's just one of many
ways that our identity is expressed. And every time I say, I would never do that. I'm in the
middle of a situation right now with a neighbor who's constructing something next to my house. And
I don't believe that this person has been particularly gracious or forthcoming or transparent
about what they're doing.
And I found myself saying yesterday,
I would never do that.
I'm not the sort of person who would do that.
That reinforces my sense of myself
as a person who's, whatever, considerate, transparent.
So that serves me really well.
Like, it's part of, I think it's part of what makes me successful
in life and in work.
And it also can get in my way
because I often don't stand up for myself.
If I see myself as the sort of person who would never do something that might, you know, upset another person, it really limits me, you know, that I can't do anything that would possibly hurt another person or seem like I'm putting myself first because it would disrupt my sense of my own sense of myself.
I think that's fascinating because one of the things I think about for biological creatures, which humans are, is that we have an innate sense of hierarchy in the world.
And hierarchy doesn't just mean status.
It can mean identity-based hierarchy.
And when you construct a world, and this can be completely wrong, so pushback, but when you construct
a world, which is like, I'm not the type of person who would do that, you immediately put
yourself higher than that person in this arbitrary hierarchy that you've created, which is like,
no matter what, I would never do that to somebody.
And you might be right and you might be wrong, but that sort of like is not the point
of this. It's just your placing yourself sort of in, and you're not doing it consciously. Like,
you're not trying to organize the world in this way where you're better than somebody else. And I
remember I first did this when it was like 16 at a grocery store. We had this guy come in. He, you
know, he illegally parks, runs in. He's rude to everybody. And, you know, I finally said
something back to him. It was my last shift at the grocery store. So I won't say what I said. But I was
walking home and it was like, well, you know, I might not be rich and it might not be blah, blah, blah,
but at least I'm not. And in that moment, I was creating this arbitrary hierarchy in which that I was
higher than that person. What I really heard in your story that really struck me was what we're doing
is we're creating a separation between us and other people. It's like, I'm not that. I'm this.
Creating the separation between us and other people is, on the one hand, for our own identity
formation, it's useful, I think. Like, how do we create, how do we construct our own sense
of self? Again, in an adult development way, how do we become self-authored, right? Like, standing
on our own, separate from other people. This is important. This is important developmentally.
And yet at the same time, the most complex problems that we need to work in our lives these days, they require us to see other perspectives.
They require that we build trust and connection with other people.
And so each time we kind of fortify our own identity as separate, we are severing connections that might actually be really, really important.
like on a team in an organization, right?
If you have separation among people, it is a detriment to trust.
And when you're dealing with really hard problems that can't be predicted and something
just happens, you have to be able to trust each other in order to respond well.
One of the things that I share about a lot these days is connection and how important
that is.
And leaders don't think of that necessarily as a core part of leadership.
or at least they haven't.
And it is.
I think it's probably the most important thing.
When you say connection, what do you mean?
I mean the relationship between people.
People actually thinking about impact on others, trust between people.
It's simply, it's connection between people.
It's love, it's trust.
You affect me.
I affect you.
And together, we are more than two people separately.
Talk to me a little bit more about this.
As you were saying that, I couldn't help think of sort of work from home as an example of having an impact on connection in terms of our impact on other people, trust, but our impact not only on the people we work with, but the people that we don't see.
If you worked in a downtown core and you're no longer going to a downtown core, well, there's all those little corner stores and Starbucks and grocery stores,
that are now impacted by the fact
that you're not going to work.
And when you do go into work,
you sort of get a more representative view of society.
You might sort of walk by somebody less fortunate than you.
You might interact with somebody else
who has a very different view than yours.
Everybody has that crazy person at the office,
but that crazy person at the office
sort of like actually exposes you
to what other people are thinking in a different way.
And now we're in our own bubble
in a lot of ways if you're working from home
and you're sort of less involved in society maybe.
And so you don't see the impact that you're having
on this broader community.
And then also want to talk about trust
and how trust is enabled or disabled
by sort of being in person and physically connected.
You're pointing to probably one of the most,
the things that is most on the minds
of the leaders that I am working with these days.
This whole work-from-home hybrid work question hadn't actually thought about it in the way that you just described, not quite so vividly as you just described, Shane.
Like, when we work from home, it's much easier to create our own echo chambers, either on purpose or inadvertently, and because we have so much more control over what we let in and what we don't let in.
You're surrounded by a world that looks like you, right?
So you hop on Zoom, you have this interaction with somebody, you get off of it, you hang it with
your friends, you get delivery of food, groceries, whatever, and the world just tends to look
like you.
And the socioeconomic world looks like you, the political world looks like you.
And my hunch, and I hope I'm wrong, is that this starts to lead to political extremes.
Yes.
I mean, you're hearing me hesitate here because it's such a dire hunt, the prediction, right?
If we were to play this out without any disruptions to that, then the world looks pretty siloed and polarized and isolated.
And we maybe, like, I hear people talk about it.
And this was true for me.
You know, when the shutdown happened, my three kids all came home from university and we got to spend a lot of time together that I thought we would never get again.
So that was beautiful, right?
people talk about the wonderful things about work from home. And those are your sort of dire
story that you laid out doesn't take away from that. And I think we really, really need to
watch for it. This is one of the things that we talk about a lot in organizations where I work
is that you mentioned this earlier, taking multiple perspectives. We have to often work to find
to the perspectives that are not only different from our own, but are maybe even threatening
to our own. And it's hard enough work when we're showing up at the office every day and
going out into a world where we see differences. Because let's face it, we can shut those
things out even when we're out in the world. It's just so much easier when we're not interacting
with people who are unlike us. Can you go deeper on, you said it was sort of top of mind to all
the leaders that you're talking to you today and this work from home. Can you go deeper on the
relationship between remote work, hybrid work, work from home, you know, whatever you want to
call it, going to the office and its relationship specifically to connection. And with connection,
I'm meaning sort of impact and trust. I mean, there is an assumption. You hear it in some
industries going to getting people in the office is the only way to cultivate whatever the kind of
office culture that people want. That's a pretty simple solution. And it was the obvious one
before the pandemic, because that's what most people did. Now you've got people who are working
from home. And one of the things that we see, I had a conversation with a leader several months
ago who's in an industry where they really, really wanted to get people back to the office.
He's the head of an office. And so he's really watching the dynamics. And he really, really
wanted people to come back. So at first he tried to get everybody to come back. And what he saw
was real pushback from particularly the administrative staff. Now, you could say that's a,
you could make up a story that says those people just don't see the value of coming into the
office. They just want their cushy little lives and to stay home. But when you look deeper,
what he discovered was that these people tend to live further from the office. So their commute time
is really long, like over an hour each way. And the professionals, what they
call the professional staff tend to live much closer to the office. When they're commuting, they're
like in an Uber or something going from one side of Manhattan to the other side of Manhattan
and they're working while they're in the Uber too. What the pandemic has revealed is that for
decades or longer people have been coming into the office because that's the thing to do,
but there have been differences that have been not really acknowledged, right? How coming to
the office is a really different experience for different people. You could say the same
thing about, you know, like women in a heavily male-dominated work environment, right? Being at
home, working at home for people who feel out of place in the office environment has probably
also been a great thing. And it's also true that for the most part, it's easier to connect casually
when you're in the office. It is not straightforward as everyone is finding out. What is you asked
particularly what's the connection between that and connection and trust.
Our firm has been remote since we founded in 2011, and I'd say we have a lot of trust,
a lot of trust, but we've developed mechanisms to be sure that we connect,
that like create the conditions for us to connect frequently and deeply,
both in the sorts of connections that we set up regularly as part of our systems,
and the way that we are together when we connect.
So trust really can happen remotely.
What are those strategies that you use to create trust and enable it?
There are several, but I would say the biggest one is that when we meet,
whether it's about a client situation or whether it's some internal thing that we're discussing
or whether it's just that we're getting together just to be together,
we start every meeting with the check-in.
We see it as a system-scanning exercise, right?
So the check-in, someone poses a question,
and every person in the room responds to the question,
and then we step back and get on the balcony
and look at the patterns,
the question being, what's in the room today?
What are the patterns we're seeing?
And particularly when you do a check-in,
it's important not only to see the commonalities, the themes, but also pay attention to the outliers
and also what wasn't said. So it could take a long time to check in in this way. And if you think
about it, when you bring a group of people together to do something, it's the people themselves
that matter the most, right? That's the raw material from which the work is getting done. We were doing
it, you know, since the beginning. And one of our clients caught onto it early on, and then it
sort of became a thing that a lot of our clients do as well. I want to come back to identity and
language just for a second before we go to the next topic. Is it something where we can create
our identity through language if we, for instance, want to go to the gym or be healthier?
And you say to yourself that I am, I go to the gym every day. I am the type of person.
who goes to the gym every day, even though you're not, you're creating this identity.
And then you almost have a commitment and consistency bias to live up to this identity that you've
fabricated in your head just with these words.
And so you're more likely to go to the gym because you see yourself as that type of person,
even though maybe perhaps that wasn't, you're using language to create a habit.
What's your reaction to that?
Absolutely.
I heard something about that recently.
It's speaking as if.
And yes, I totally believe that.
It's not a guarantee that if I talk about myself as a person who goes to the gym, that
I will become a person who goes to the gym.
And it's a nudge to the system.
It's a disruption.
It's one of the many things that can create the conditions for me to become a person
who goes to the gym.
What does it mean to create the conditions?
And what are the most useful ways that we can think about creating the conditions for
success or results or however you want to think or define that for you. Creating the conditions is an
idea that is one of the core ideas moves in complexity, right? So if you're wanting to make a change
in a complex system, which since each of us as human beings is a complex system, you know,
creating the change of becoming a person that goes to the gym, that's a complex, that's a change to a
complex system, right? If I want my team to behave differently, I'm also dealing with complexity there
because people are complex and human systems are complex. So the idea is that in a complex
system, you can't make change happen because the first thing that you need to do is understand
how the complex adaptive system currently self-organizes. So what are its current patterns? So if you
look at a family is one of the easiest ways to see this, right?
families have patterns. They have dynamics. People play roles. We've probably all heard stories or been
part of a story where one person in a family suddenly changes and the family tries to reject the
change, right? They want to continue acting the same, even when one person changes. So the idea
there is that in a complex system, you have to understand the patterns and then if you want to make a
change, you don't intervene directly because the system will push back.
Instead, you make little nudges, shape the path, like create and amplify conditions so that something can change.
So in that family example, the family might, a couple key members in the family, you might identify who, like, who are the strong attractors for particular unwelcome patterns and start with those people.
And maybe those people begin going to therapy, or maybe it's even much smaller, right?
They get a buddy who might have an influence on them in a particular way, for example, or conditions might be family dinners, or they might be, so family dinners are a condition, I think, that might create at least the conditions for family conversations, for example.
What role does environment play? Are there examples of sort of environmental nudges that you can think of that come to mind in creating the conditions for success?
We always have the opportunity to change our environment, right, as a way to help us, let's take losing weight.
One condition that we could create is to take all the stuff out of our refrigerator that we're super tempted by that doesn't contribute to our losing weight.
Another way to create conditions if you want to get more, if you want to get stronger, is you could buy some light hand weights and keep them next to your computer so that it's, you don't have to,
do much in order to lift weights and get your muscles stronger.
Buying a gym membership is an example of kind of a direct intervention that often fails.
I mean, it could be a condition-creating thing, but if we think that buying a gym member is going
to make us go to the gym, anyone who's ever bought a gym membership or most people will at least
have had one experience of doing that and finding that they just wasted their money.
That's why they sell 12-month memberships in November and December, right?
Exactly. Yeah. They're creating their own conditions for profitability because they know the
patterns of human beings, the people who own the gems. What about something that comes to mind
for me and this could be completely off, but sort of like hang around people whose default
behavior is your desired behavior. So if I'm a leader and I want to cultivate better listening
and I hang around somebody like you, do I naturally sort of acquire better listening? Or
if I am a runner and I join a running group, then I start to hang around with people who run
and then it makes it more likely that I become a runner or that I enjoy running. And then that
makes me run even more. And I often think about how environment, we think of our environment
most of the time when it comes to mind as physical. But our environment is also our identity, right?
We're creating an environment in our head, an artificial environment, if you will. Our
environment is also who we hang around, and they're sort of habits. And if we hang around people
who are sort of politically extreme, we will eventually become politically extreme. Or we hang
around people who are lazy. We become lazy. Talk to me a little bit about your reaction to that
and what your experience has been. Well, I'm chuckling because I'm the parent of three young
adults. And anyone who has ever had kids, you might notice that who your kids hang
around with feels really important. So I noticed that whenever one of, not as much now, but when they
were younger, when my, one of my children would be, have a friend that I thought would be a really
good influence on them, either because they were like a hard worker or ambitious or kind or not
the sort of person who got into trouble. I always thought that was great, you know, and I wanted
to amplify that. So I think the lesson there is there are, yes, of course, the people that we
hang out with, I think, can make a huge difference in shaping and creating the conditions
for us to grow in change in particular ways. And as I found out with my children, it's not a
guarantee, right? Trying to orchestrate things just right so that, you know, you're hanging out
with exactly the right people who will get you the exact right result is probably the wrong
mindset. A more helpful mindset is that people, communities, do create the conditions for
particular things. And we could be intentional about which people and communities we spend time
with in service of moving ourselves in a particular direction and it's no guarantee, which is the
way it is in complexity always. There's no guarantees ever. Listening is something a few people have
told me that you're extraordinarily good at. I suspect that's because you listen below the
surface and to the meaning and not just the words. How would you teach your kids to become better
listeners. How do you teach adults to become better listeners? I've never had anybody ask me exactly
that question before, Shane. I guess the first thing I would say is that listening tends to be
contagious. So how each of us listens does tend to wear off on other people. So I noticed,
again with my children, that when I listen, what we call, I have a call listening to
win, which is to just make them wrong, or like when I say, well, that's not true, you, you look
great. Or don't worry about that. You, you know, you'll be fine. It might feel good to me in the
moment, but it's not kind of, they don't feel heard. I thought, mind that when people feel
really, really, truly seen and heard, it's one of the most extraordinary experiences.
that a person can have. And so just being around that and having the experience of being on the
receiving end, that sort of deep listening where you feel truly seen and fully seen is itself
a condition for learning to listen. Well, on the other end of the spectrum, there are very
particular techniques that help people listen. Well, for me, the most important one has been really
the training and understanding of adult development theory, particularly the one that my colleagues
and I have most depth in, which is the subject object theory that it was developed by Bob Keegan and
others. And in the subject object theory, what you're listening for, the stage of development
is defined by what is subject and what is object. And when I say subject, what I mean,
as like what you're fused with. It's like the water you're swimming in, the lens through which you
see things, but you don't actually even know you have a lens. And what is object is what can be
held out and examined and talked about, like a value is object if you can see how it's shaping
what you do and don't do. A value is subject if it's invisibly shaping what you do and don't
to, for example. So in this subject, this growth edge coach training that several of my colleagues
and I run, what we're teaching coaches to do is to listen for what is subject and what is object.
In listening in that way, you have to be listening below the surface of the story. And every time you
hear a word or a phrase wondering, hmm, I wonder what that person means by that. And so it's
amping up curiosity, it's really, really foregrounding the fact that we, each of us never
really knows what another person means. And so we can only be curious to find out.
I like the word curiosity. When I think of listening, I think of seeing the world through
the other person's eyes. I don't have to agree with it. I want to see what they see and I want
to understand what they understand. One thing you said there that I want to, I want to
to come back to you in part because I have a child that does this is listening to win. How as a parent
do I coach, intervene, get this out of their system? How old is your child? 13. I ask that because
it really does make a difference at their developmental stage, how you might go about this.
And I'm struck by your phrase, I think you said, how do we coach? How do we coach?
this out of them. Yeah. Maybe that's the wrong phrase, but it like drives me currently. And he's super
smart, which is like it amplifies it even more because often he's right. So what is the hardest
thing for you about that? Just the social nature of it, right? And how alienating it can be
to always be the person who is listening to win. So from his perspective, it's, I listened
to what you said. I'm literal, right? And so it's, it's incorrect. And I'm going to do you,
he doesn't do it maliciously. He's like, I'm going to do you a favor and point out why you're
incorrect. And as a parent, I don't know what to do with this, because on one hand, on a literal
sense, he's right, on a social sense, he's wrong. And on a, is this going to get you what you want
in life perspective, it's learning when to use that and when to not use that.
And I'm struggling with him in terms of how I go about this.
So you're worried that he will alienate people, or is he alienating you?
Oh, he's not alienating me.
I think I'm worried that it makes it harder for him to fit in or be accepted by his period.
Yeah.
So I can hear that really, that sort of deep desire for him to not have, yeah, for life not to be harder for him because he is like, he's playing on hard mode.
Yeah, playing on hard mode.
Yeah, he's playing on hard mode and he's already exceptionally bright, which in another way puts it on hard mode again, right, in certain ways.
Yeah, I hear so deeply this, I mean, geez, the wanting to help somebody change something that is making, in your view, making their life unnecessarily hard and then worrying that maybe tell me if this is right, but worrying that if you don't help them change this, it might just become a more and more and more ingrained habit that continues to make their life hard.
Yeah. Well, I think that as he gets older, I mean, my role changes too, right? And it changes to
you're getting feedback. Are you seeing the feedback that you're getting? Are you, instead of a
direct intervention, like, don't do this, do this. You know, it changes to when you did this,
did it help you get what you wanted in that moment, right? Or is doing this going to get you what you
want. And that coaching after the fact is usually very helpful for him because he's like,
oh, I didn't mean it that way or I shouldn't have done that or I wasn't thinking when I said
something. And so it prompts at least a little bit of reflection around it, which we all have
as adults too, right? Like we all say stupid things on occasion or make a comment that we didn't
intend to make and it has an impact on another person. And then we reflect on it and we sort of
that reflection codifies the learning a little bit. So it takes that
experience and it translates that experience into a little bit of learning. And with enough
reflection and enough experience and enough iteration, enough feedback, we sort of self-correct as
adults most of the time. And I think you may have a part of your answer already. So it sounds like
what you're doing is you're creating the conditions for him to reflect on what the impact of the
way he's listening or not listening is having.
Well, trying to, when you said the phrase listening to win and you were talking with
your kids about not listening to win, I was like, well, is there a way that I can put a term
around it or a label around it when I can just say, you're listening to win?
And in that moment, that means this whole deeper conversation to him, which is like an
instant prompt to correct or not correct to nudge behavior towards a better that he's choosing,
right? Because I don't want to make his behavior choices for him. But can I say something like
that? And when you were saying it, that's what I thought you were doing. So this is where the
question, I didn't, I didn't intend for this to be like a longer question. Yeah. Yeah. So your question
is, is language giving language to something? Can that be a help in shifting the pattern?
Well, it's sort of a broader question. If we take it out of the context of me and my son,
it's sort of, can we learn to listen to ourselves better or does it take an outside person to
sort of intervene and point out our blind spots? And with my son, I'm trying to intervene
or sort of point out a blind spot. You're blind to this. It's happening. I'm pointing out
that it's happening. It sounded like that's what you were doing with your kids or maybe I'm
misinterpreting when you were said listening to win, which I love that phrase, by the way.
Yes.
It's so accurate.
Yeah.
I guess my point is there are many things that you can do to help somebody to notice
what they're doing in this case in terms of how they're listening.
One is reflecting back to them what you're seeing and the impact of that.
One is the invitation to invite them to reflect on it, the connection between what they're
doing and what they want.
is giving it language. I love hearing that listening to Wynn is such a powerful. It is because
you can just say that. It's like having some sort of a reminder every time you do something,
like a light goes off, something flashes, and it helps to create the connection between this
thing that you're a really instant connection, a reminder of what you're doing. So the idea of
listening to win, absolutely can be super helpful in shifting a pattern because it helps you
to notice the pattern instantly each time it's coming up. The other thing I noticed just about
feedback, the importance of feedback, right? We often cannot see what we're doing, and this is why we
need company. And we need company with whom we have trust who will tell us things that we can't see
in ourselves. This is one of the core conditions for being able to shift and change.
How did you use listening to win with your kids? I mean, honestly, I didn't use the phrase with them.
I wish I had now, you know, I really wish I had been more explicit about it. I took a more
kind of indirect approach in which, you know, for example, if my, I have twins. And when they were
younger, my daughter would often, well, they all listened to win all the time to each other,
but there were times when I can remember when my daughter would get so upset with my son
for making her life miserable in whatever way, right? Like, I have to do all your social life
for you. I have to remind you of, you know, what homework we have. It was this kind of stuff.
And when she was doing that to him or vice versa, what I would do, you know, what I would
do is I would come in and make what I would call a listening to learn or a listening to
see move where I would say to her, it looks like you're really upset because he is relying on
you for everything and you don't think he should have to be doing that and it's not your
responsibility. Is that right? And he could just literally see her whole body like breathe out. So I
generally took the approach of doing something different, of making a deeper listening move.
And my hope was that they would see that over time and notice the impact it had on them.
I probably could have been a lot more direct about it now that you say it, Shane.
I love these phrases, listening to win, listening to learn. I'm going to take this back and
incorporate it. And I'll report back to you on how it works. There is another one that you might find
helpful, which is called, we call it listening to fix. And this is probably the, by far the most
common one. So listening to WIC win is, let me make the problem go away by telling you, you don't
have a problem. Listening to learn or listening to see is, you know, getting underneath, literally,
really getting underneath the, what's being said and reflecting back to the person. And listening
to fix is, let me take your problem and solve it for you, or help you solve it.
it. So just so you have the whole repertoire. No, I mean, this sort of comes back to men are from
Mars, women are from Venus in a way, right, which is women typically listen to learn, men typically
listen to fix, problem solve, and this creates a divide between us. In your word earlier,
instead of a divide, it creates space between us. But we tend to think that listening just applies
to words, but we can also listen to our bodies. I mean, our emotions, our feelings, these all come
from the same systems that produce our words. And our bodies tend to respond to our environment
more than our words or quicker than our words. How can we learn to listen to our emotions,
our feelings, our body, and what it's telling us? This one, I'll start with how someone else
can help us do that. And this is what a lot of coaches do this, coaches who pay attention
to our people's somatic experience, is simply to ask. So if you were,
to say, Shane, I feel really, like, I have to get this thing done right now. I'm so busy, I can't be
distracted by anything else. I might say, so where do you feel that in your body? And if you're
unused to even noticing that you have a connection, that there's any, that there's a connection,
you might say, what do you even mean by that? I don't know. And then I might just like invite
you to turn your attention inward and to see if you can scan and notice if there's any connection
and what it might be between any kind of sensation in your body and this sense of being super
busy and don't have time for any distractions. So this is where another person can be so, so
helpful. It's about creating noticing connections between things that are happening in our head,
which is what most people are used to noticing
and what's happening in our bodies.
So it's just practice that way, really.
I like that question.
Where do you feel it in your body?
And that's something we can even ask ourselves.
Yes.
So you don't need another person.
It can become a habit, a habitual question that we ask ourselves.
I'm a case in point.
You know, I would, 15 years ago,
if you had asked me to notice,
where do I feel something in my body?
I would say, I don't know.
Like, I would say, okay, I can make something up.
You know, let me just make something up.
I'll just tell you.
It just takes practice.
We're only as good as the information we have.
There's a saying in psychology that if you could see the world the way that I see it,
you'd understand why I behave the way that I do.
So a large part of the way we see the world is through the information that we have.
A lot of times the information comes from the questions we ask.
How do we go about the process of asking,
different or better questions of ourselves and others in order to get better or different
information? The first thing is to notice the questions that you currently ask. So each of us
has habitual questions that we ask as well, of ourselves, of others, of the world. I was working
with a coach years ago who was extremely helpful, and he noticed that I habitually asked
the question, why do I do this? And there's this idea that our questions direct our attention.
So you are alluding to this a minute ago. So the question that I asked then becomes where
I look. So my attention, because of this question, I would get sort of intensely focused on
trying to figure out what was wrong with me or what was, you know, what what what led
me to do certain things. And that turns out to be helpful in some ways, but often, you know,
like most of us, we hit a dead end with that question. And so even if I got to the why I do this,
it didn't always result in me changing behavior. So that's just one example. So how do we
get different questions? I really do think we get them most from other people. Often in
at least just a start.
So we borrow them from other people, right?
Often when we're teaching about this idea of asking different questions, we ask
who in your life asks the questions that are either most different from yours or the best
questions.
And do you know what most people say?
Children.
Children ask great questions because they're not, they don't have the overlay of what
should I be asking.
They don't have the overlay of, I need to look smart.
They don't have any filter.
They're just asking the question that occurs to them.
And so these are questions that we often, as adults, don't ask anymore.
And so, like, why is the sky blue?
For example, we don't ask those questions anymore because, you know, we feel that's a question
we either should know the answer to or it's not relevant.
We often talk about borrowing questions from other people.
So listen to the questions, like I'm listening to the questions that you're asking, Shane.
And I'm noticing some of them.
I love their questions I never thought to ask.
And so, like, I'm making a note of them.
I love those questions.
So that's the best way I know how.
Notice the ones you habitually ask and borrow shamelessly from other people's questions.
I love the idea of borrowing.
I mean, the whole theme of our podcast is mastering the best of what other people have figured out.
So it's taking what you've figured out and then integrating it into our lives so that we can become better at what we're trying to accomplish or live a more meaningful life in the process.
I just want to say, Shane, that there's something that happens to us as adults that we think we have to have it all figured out ourselves, right?
I don't, if you don't have this idea, this is great.
For those of you out there who don't, who have never had that idea your way ahead
of the game in my book, but we don't.
Like the world is way too complex for that, that sometimes our greatest resource is right
there in front of us in the form of another person or someone else's idea.
Like, we don't have to do this alone.
So when you work with people, you like to teach skills that are immediately useful and developmental
in nature. What are the common skills that you find people struggling with that you teach them
that make a big difference? Well, I think the first one is probably listening. Listening better
is immediately useful because it enables you to get perspectives that you might actually need to solve a problem, right?
Super useful. When teams listen to each other really well, it makes room for all the perspectives
that might be needed to solve the problem. But listening is also developmental because it helps
it changes my relationship to me.
If I listen deeply, I begin to see that I, I might begin to question my own assumptions.
I might begin to see myself differently through your eyes.
So it's developmental in terms of the way I see myself.
It's developmental, it can be developmental in terms of the way I see the world.
The more perspectives I can make room for, the more comprehensive,
complexity, the more the world becomes a mosaic, right? And so I begin to see it in its fullness more
and more because, and that is a developmental move. So listening would be the first one, I would
say. Another one that I find really, really helpful is, well, actually the idea of complexity
itself, right? So helping people to see the world, as a friend of mine used to say, to see the world as
it is rather than as you want it to be. So there's a, you know, we, we teach about complexity
through a particular framework called the Kenevan framework that is pretty widely known these
days. And so it's a framework that can help immediately to sort out, if I'm facing some sort of
a challenge, like again, as a team, to sort out which bits of the challenge are obvious. So I can just
like automate them, don't have to worry about them, don't waste time on them, which parts are
complicated, we need to figure them out, in which parts are complex, and then so we deal with
those things differently, as we talked about earlier. But also seeing the world as this framework
helps us see the world as it is in its full complexity. That is also really developmental
because it changes the whole mindset, changes my sense of what I need to be as a little
leader as a person dealing with it. It changes my view of others from obstacles to necessary
parts of the system. So there's all kinds of ways. Do you want another one? Yeah. I mean,
two of the ones that you've said in past interviews that were the pyramid method and then
polarity management, I believe. Yeah, polarity management was the one that I was going to talk about
next. Yeah. Yeah. So in a nutshell, for those of you, listeners who are not familiar with what a
polarity is, this is based on the work of Barry Johnson, who developed the idea of a polarity
years and years ago, decades ago. And I don't know whether it's just me who now sees it
sees polarities and polarity work everywhere or whether it's becoming more commonplace.
I think it's a little bit of both. But a polarity,
is it's two things that are interconnected and that over time you need them both.
So it's like an example in organizations is centralized, decentralized, right?
If the question is, do we need to be decentralized or centralized, the answer is most likely both.
Yes.
Sometimes we need to be decentralized, sometimes we need to be centralized.
In some places, we need, and it's dynamic over time, right?
In a very personal sense, what I would call an intrapersonal polarity is, like, is a question
of do I focus on my needs or do I focus on others' needs?
Well, both, because if I focus on only my needs, pretty soon I'm going to be able to get
a lot of the negative aspects of that.
I'm going to be isolated.
I'm going to feel disconnected and I'm not going to be able to get my work done.
If I focus only on other people's needs, I'm going to get the negative aspects of that because I will lose myself.
I won't have a voice.
I'll probably get burnt out.
So a polarity, it's two things that are like an energy system in that they are inherently interconnected.
And to get the best outcomes over time, you need both.
This is in contrast to a choice.
Like, I have a choice every day when I drive to the office.
Do I go on the highway or do I go on the back road?
roads. Well, like, that's a choice. That's not a polarity, right? On any given day I can choose,
I'm fine. They're not super interconnected. The polarities are so useful in organizations to help,
not only to get different and more helpful perspectives on sticky problems, they also get people
talking to each other in ways that, that I find quite magical. But they're also, polarities are
seeing the world through polarities is also developmental because,
it literally changes the way you see the world because you look out at the world and suddenly
you begin to see so many things are interconnected. So many things are not either this or that.
That's true inside me as well. When we're younger, we tend to see ourselves as I am a this and
I'm not a that, right? I'm an athlete and I'm not a student, a person who likes big crowds and I'm
not a person who likes to be alone. But as we get older, I think many people naturally start
to see themselves in more nuanced ways.
Polarity management, seeing polarities, polarity thinking helps us to see things in more
nuanced ways, which not everything is nuanced.
A lot of things are not.
But when things really are nuanced, it's helpful to see them that way and not try to shove
them into a box of either or good and bad.
A lot of what we've talked about today is sort of recognizing that we're in a
and then trying to get a better aperture into the system that we're in and to your friend's
point about seeing the world as it is rather than have you as you'd have it be how do we do
that I'm going to just start for a second with why it's hard it's hard because sometimes very
often the world as it is can feel overwhelming it can feel too messy to solve it can feel
unpredictable, and in many ways, as human beings, we don't like unpredictability. Although,
interestingly, we do like unpredictability when it comes to things like athletic events. You know,
like who would watch a soccer match if you knew who was going to win and exactly what plays
were going to happen for second, third, and fourth, right? We wouldn't do that. That's what makes it
fun. Who would go to a movie if you knew exactly how it was going to turn out?
But somehow in our own lives, we don't like unpredictability because it leaves us feeling sort of out of control.
So seeing the world as it is does require a leap of faith in a way, right, that we will be okay,
that we don't need to be able to control everything in order for ourselves to be okay.
And so I think, you know, having that realization, really admitting that it is hard.
We want the world to be a certain way because it's mixed, it gives us comfort.
And then the second thing, I think, is practicing being in discomfort,
nudging ourselves just a little bit, a little bit, a little bit, in safe circumstances to,
feel discomfort and stay in it.
Our urge is like going back to the body.
Often there's this thing called what I call an action urge,
that when we feel uncomfortable,
there's something in our bodies that is saying,
get out of the discomfort.
So we act or react to remove the discomfort somehow.
Part of seeing the world as it is,
not just kind of conceptually,
but actually being in the world as it is,
requires us to practice being uncomfortable. And our bodies are so, and all parts of us are
really adaptable. If we put ourselves in uncomfortable situations where there's a safe and supportive
environment, it's like going to the gym. If you want to build your muscles, you just have to go
every day and you do it. So those are the two things I would say are helpful, at least as starters.
I think they're actually more than helpful.
They're required.
Let's talk about a little bit of a perspective taking
and how we can use that more effectively.
Most of us are aware that we have blind spots.
And taking somebody else's perspective
helps us remove our blind spots.
But when it comes to the moment,
how do we prompt ourselves?
How do we turn this knowledge?
into action. So we know we should do something. We know it's probably going to help us in
certain types of situations, but we have a problem taking this knowledge and transferring it into
action. How do we, are there prompts or habits that we can develop or cues that we can use
to remind ourselves to take other people's perspectives? Yes, that I do have a very specific
answer to that question, which is developing the habit of asking the question, how could I be
wrong? So just think about that for a minute, right? Most of the time we don't even think we're
wrong. So the question, it doesn't even occur to us, could I be wrong? And the question,
how could I be wrong, assumes that when it comes to the perspective of another person, we
probably are very wrong, right? Our perspective is our perspective, and it's going to be different
from other peoples. And so how could I be wrong increases our curiosity? And ideally, the purpose
of the question is to prompt us to get more curious, to go beyond our initial kind of
assumptions about, you know, what the truth is, and get curious and ask questions.
of other people. And so this is my favorite habit when it comes to perspective taking.
Two other questions before we wrap up here, one of which is what did you use to spend time on that you now see as unhelpful or not valuable?
Oh my goodness, that's such a good question. The first thing that comes to mind is trying to be on top of everything.
So I used to spend an inordinate amount of time trying to attend to everything from answering every email, you know, within a certain amount of time, to having, so having a clean inbox, you know, where I could actually see the bottom of the inbox on the first page, attending to making sure my house was clean.
Yeah.
This is one that I just had to give up when I had three young kids.
And so just, you know, knowing the latest, like, research on everything, you know,
making sure that I knew every last possible question that someone could ask me
before I walk into a situation so that I have an answer for everything.
these just don't seem they first became impossible so it was through realizing that I was in too much pain
trying to get it trying to get these things be on top of everything and now I see that
trying to be on top of everything actually takes away my attention from the present moment
from being fully present so I see the temptation
of it. I'm really, really grateful to be in this place in my life where I don't feel I need to do
that anymore. That's a really good one. It's almost like, I'm not mapping this to you, but when we
think of being on top of everything, it's not like we're consciously choosing to be on top of
everything. It's almost like we feel like if we're not on top of everything, what will other
people, what does that say about us? What do other people think about us? It's almost like somebody
else has a scoreboard and part of that scoreboard is like are you on top of everything and then
we're playing to that scoreboard and eventually as an adult you sort of like get to a point where
you're like, you know what? I don't want to play by that scoreboard anymore because it's not
serving me and it's just causing me to go crazy because it's almost impossible to be on top of
everything. Yeah. As you say that, I'm wondering, I'm asking myself, why was I doing that? And it would be
so many different reasons, but I think it shifted over time, but there's some element of
if I'm on top of everything, my life will feel calm and settled. Like there's some sort of a
destination in mind. It's like when you finish that last, when I was in university, you know,
I'd finished my last exam of the semester. There was this momentary feeling of, oh, I'm done.
So I think I was in search of that, oh, I'm done feeling.
But there are also a couple other things.
One is I think I was conflating respect for other people with being on top of everything.
So particularly with regard to answering all my emails, I thought, if I don't attend to things, I will be being disrespectful of other people.
I will not be, I mean, if you get down to the core of it, I will not go.
people do not ignore things that need to be done, especially when they affect other people. So
there's that whole element to it as well. And I'd say that was a much harder one for me to
loosen. And I still struggle with it sometimes. Because my impact on other people, I'm talking
about my identity now. So you all as listeners can think about what yours is. I have pretty strong
identity around being a person who other people can count on and who would never intentionally do
anything to hurt somebody else. And you might wonder, what does email have to do with hurting
somebody else? It's a pretty big stretch, but not in my mind sometimes. I think it's also interesting
where email is a medium where you want to be seen as reliable, right? We have this innate desire,
but anybody can just email you and usurp your time without your permission.
And then you, I'm mapping this to you, but like, I feel guilty if I don't respond to people.
And I'm like, but I never asked for this email.
I never wanted this email.
Like, why am I the one who's on the receiving end of this sort of like guilt?
And I'm putting it on myself, obviously, and not other people.
Is that what happens with you too?
I just think what we're both describing here is how incredibly complex we are as human beings.
and why it could be so hard to change?
Because we have these, back to identity, this sense of ourselves as a certain kind of person, and it has worked.
Otherwise, we wouldn't be here at this place where we have this identity in the first place.
And last question.
What does success mean to you?
Sounds so trite.
I just want to look back on my life and know that my presence mattered to somebody else.
Like that by me being in, whether it's in a room, you know, running a workshop or whether it's in a
friendship, whether it's with my children or my partner or anyone else, that my presence mattered.
And not because I had great ideas, not because I was so smart, but that in my presence,
another person could be more fully themselves.
That's one definition of success for me.
That's beautiful.
Thank you so much for taking the time today.
Thank you, Shane.
Thanks for listening and learning with us.
For a complete list of episodes, show notes, transcripts, and more,
go to fs.blog slash podcast or just Google the knowledge project until next time