The New Yorker Radio Hour - From Critics at Large: The Year of the Doll
Episode Date: December 26, 2023This bonus episode comes from The New Yorker’s Critics at Large podcast.In the highest-grossing movie of 2023, Barbie, a literal doll, leaves the comforts of Barbieland and ventures into real-world ...Los Angeles, where she discovers the myriad difficulties of modern womanhood. This arc from cosseted naïveté to feminist awakening is a narrative through line that connects some of the biggest cultural products of the year. In this episode, the staff writers Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz discuss how 2023 became “the year of the doll,” tracing the trope from “Barbie” to Yorgos Lanthimos’s film “Poor Things,” whose protagonist finds self-determination through sexual agency, and beyond. In Sofia Coppola’s “Priscilla,” a teen-age Priscilla Beaulieu lives under the thumb of Elvis at Graceland before finally breaking free, while in Emma Cline’s novel “The Guest,” the doll figure must fend for herself after the trappings of luxury fall away, revealing the precarity of her circumstances. The hosts explore how ideas about whiteness, beauty, and women’s bodily autonomy inform these works, and how the shock of political backsliding might explain why these stories struck a chord with audiences. “Most of us believed that the work of Roe v. Wade was done,” Cunningham says. “If that is a message that we could all grasp—that a step forward is not a permanent thing—I think that would be a positive thing.” New Yorker Radio Hour listeners, we want to hear from you. We have a few questions about the show and how you listen to it. The survey takes about twenty minutes, and your feedback will help us make our podcast better. Take the survey here.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I'm Vincent Cunningham.
I'm Alex Schwartz.
And I'm Nomi Fry.
This is a special edition of the New Yorker Radio Hour podcast.
It's an episode we're sharing from the New Yorker's critics at large,
a show where the three of us gather every week to make sense of what's happening
and the culture right now and how we got here.
We hope you enjoy it.
So, you guys, there comes a time in every critic's life, a very special time,
when that critic is obliged to consider
what this year has been about.
And my friends, that time is now for us, the critics at large.
Yes.
Let us join hands and decide what the year has been about.
Let us pray.
Alex, would you like to do the honors?
Oh, I would indeed.
Well, as we three were sitting around discussing.
Shooting the shit.
Shooting the shit as we do on a regular basis, both on and off the air.
crossing it back and forth.
Yeah, yeah.
And trying to come up with, you know, as Nomi says, this great critic's responsibility to take a chaotic mess of a year as every year inevitably is and come up with one dominant, cultural, throughline, one narrative that will make sense of everything we've just experienced over these past 12 months.
We came up with the year of the doll.
That's right.
The year of the doll.
We have seen any number of cultural objects in which a cloistered world.
woman often used as a play thing by another person, breaks free of her circumstances, and goes
off into the wide world to learn something about it and about herself.
Hey, Barbie.
Can I come to your house tonight?
Sure.
I don't have anything they planned, just a giant blowout party with all the Barbies and plant
choreography and a bespoke song.
You should stop by.
The big example of this, of course, is Barbie, which I finally watched yesterday.
Yesterday I was finally inducted into the cult of Barbie.
I'm all about it.
Do you wear hot pink?
If I knew that exact pantone, it would be my entire wardrobe, of course.
But if we suddenly wore like full hot pink, like 7,000 months after the movie premiered?
I think that would make you chicer than chic.
I think it would be really cool.
Once we started to sort of toss this idea around, as you said, Alex, I saw it everywhere.
There are all kinds of examples of it.
One of my favorite movies, kind of can't believe this year, was Megan, the, like, the animant sort of, like, female Chucky.
Hi, Megan.
I'm Katie.
It's nice to meet you, Katie.
Do you want to hang out?
Okay.
Yeah, it is everywhere.
I mean, there's so many examples where we have this figure of the doll, either, like, an actual doll, right?
But then also, if we think about it a little bit more broadly and metaphorically, you know, we've had Yorgoes.
Slantamos, new movie, Poor Things, which just came out starring Emma Stone as a sort of like
Frankenstein-like invention.
She's an experiment.
Good evening.
Her rain and her body are not quite synchronized.
We've had Priscilla, the Sophia Coppola biopic.
This what is the antennae here, Mr. Presley?
You got women throwing themselves at you.
Why my daughter?
Well, Sarah, I happen to be very fond of your daughter.
Of the Elvis Presley bride, who is cloistered in Graceland.
We've had, you know, to go to the fashion end of things,
kind of doll-like fashions taking over the TikTok sphere,
Bose, velvet, you know, sequins.
We've had Taylor Swift.
We're about to go on a little adventure together,
and that adventure is going to span 17 years of music.
Times Person of the Year and her heirs tour
with all of its glittery, girly glory,
which is kind of doll-like in a lot of ways.
You know, I mean, the list just goes on and on, okay?
So today, we're going to be tracing this idea of the doll across the culture of this past year.
And we'll talk about how this trend maps onto the political reality of today as well,
where women's agency over their own bodies has become a newly radical idea in the time since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v.
Wade.
You're hearing critics at large on the New Yorker Radio Hour.
Our show is 2023, the year of the doll.
Okay, so let's start with the obvious Barbie, a movie about a literal doll, which grossed $1.44 billion.
Really?
The highest grossing film of the year and the 14th highest grossing film of all time.
Is that true?
That's real?
It's real.
Oh, my God.
Directed by Greta Gerwig.
Yeah.
And I want to start off by asking you guys, especially Vincent, because since you just, you kind of sidestep this.
The whole moment.
The whole moment.
What do you guys make of this movie's popularity?
Yeah.
What do you think?
Yeah, I thought I was pretty enthusiastic about it.
I liked it a lot.
You liked it, right?
You texted us after and you were like, I'm into it.
It's great.
Yeah.
To your point, that's exactly what happened.
I sidestepped the sort of initial critical discipline.
which had a lot to do with, you know, whether the politics of this movie were somehow revolutionary, which, of course, they are not.
Yeah.
They are, there are things we've heard.
But what's, it's funny, which I didn't really get from the initial raft of speech about this movie.
It's funny.
It sort of takes place on two levels.
You can always feel the sort of critical intelligence of Greta Gerwig as transmitted through the narration of Helen Mirren, who is talking a lot at the beginning and telling us about, like,
About Barbieland.
Thanks to Barbie, all problems of feminism and equal rights have been solved.
At least that's what the Barbies think.
After all, they're living in Barbieland.
And about the sort of the beautiful lives that all the Barbies live,
especially what they call stereotypical Barbie,
which is Margot Robbie, right?
Because we should know that, of course, there's Barbies of all stripes,
You know, there's like Dr. Barbie.
Like, there's Scientist Barbie.
There's Dr. Barbie.
There's President Barbie.
There's President Barbie.
Supreme Court Justice Barbie.
Every role that can be performed is performed by Barbie.
It's a liberal utopia.
That's right.
And it's a world in which the patriarchy has been banished.
Obviously, right, like this all gets complicated when Margot Robbie Barbie is suddenly has
what she first says, you know, sort of thoughts of death.
Maybe some thoughts of death?
Thoughts of death.
Is that a problem?
Oh.
What?
I've heard of this.
Of course, I didn't think it was possible.
And so she has to make a journey into the real world.
Oh, you've done it.
You've opened a portal.
I didn't open a portal.
Someone did.
And now there is a rip in the continuum that is the membrane between Barbie land and the real world.
And if you want to be stereotypical Barbie Perfect again, the baby girl, you've got to
fix it. You're going to keep going funny.
Alex, how do you think the movie helps build up our archetype of what this figure of the doll is through Barbie?
In one sense, it helps that she's literal doll.
And we all know her.
There's that.
And we've always known her as long as any of us has been alive and for many generations prior.
But I think in our archetype of the doll, we're talking about a beautiful woman, played by Margarabi, as we've said,
who fits into not just the stereotypical Barbie ideal,
but kind of the stereotypical ideal of white female beauty,
thin, blonde, big blue eyes.
And life is easy for her.
Life is good for her.
But that's in part because it is so cosseted.
Yeah.
The doll figure has to both learn about the real workings of the universe,
her own position in it,
and has to grapple with the ways in which certain of her advantages
don't actually confer significant political power on her
that in order to achieve that political power
in the case of the Barbie movie,
she has to work together with the other Barbies
to retake what has been taken from them.
With the other Barbies
and also crucially with a real-life woman,
Mattel, administrative assistant,
played by America Ferreira,
who clarifies to her
what it is like to be a real woman in the world.
And as, you know, I'm sure,
One of the most quoted passages in this movie is this speech, the soliloquy that the America for error's character gives about how impossible it is to be a modern woman.
You're supposed to stay pretty for men, but not so pretty that you tempt them too much or that you threaten other women because you're supposed to be a part of the sisterhood.
But always stand out and always be grateful.
But never forget that the system is rigged.
So find a way to acknowledge that, but also always be grateful.
You have to never get old.
Never be rude.
Never show off.
Never be selfish.
Never fall down.
Never fail.
Never show fear.
Never get out of line.
It's too hard.
It's too contradictory.
And nobody gives you a medal or says,
thank you.
And it turns out, in fact,
that not only are you doing everything wrong,
but also everything is your fault.
It's about the fallacy of having it all, right?
She's like our representative in that world.
non-Barby woman viewer gets to be like, yeah.
Right, exactly.
At that moment.
Exactly.
And, you know, in Barbie's role in that instance is to discover as the doll that real women have, that there are difficulties that they face.
That if she accepts the challenge of becoming, you know, a real girl to Pinocchio's real boy, this is just, you know, just thrown out references here, Pinocchio.
It's true.
It's true.
that, you know, it comes with a bunch of not-so-great stuff that she's going to have to navigate as well.
And, of course, one of the points of the movie is that the warts in all life is actually worth it.
Right. Rather than living in a kind of fools paradise of a supposed utopia, being in the real world with all its difficulties is kind of a worthy endeavor.
Right.
Right.
So this brings us to another film I really wanted to talk about with you guys.
And it's a new movie.
It's out in theaters now called Poor Things.
It's directed by Yorgas Lanthamos and written by Tony McNamara, which also, I think, shares with Barbie this thrust of a doll-like figure who goes out into the world and discovers that things are maybe a little bit more complicated than she might have guessed.
Does anyone want to give me like a brief synopsis of how she came to be this sort of doll-like figure who didn't go out and then suddenly like breaks into the world and so on?
That's right.
Well, we learned sort of a little bit into the movie that Bella Baxter, who is the sort of the Frankensteinian creation of Godwin.
Dr. Godwin Baxter, a sort of mad scientist figure played by the amazing Willem DeFoe.
I must betray my sympathy's toward this act.
I love Bolema Foe.
He's the man.
We learned that she was in a former life a young woman who, a young woman, pregnant woman,
who decides to end her own life.
She jumps off of a bridge.
And Dr. Baxter finds her, performs an insane surgery whereby he excises the child from her,
performs the most nefarious C-section ever depicted in film.
takes out the child's brain and implants it into the child's fetal, developmental brain,
and places it into the body of Bella Baxter, played by Emma Stone,
therefore creating a kind of woman child who he will watch, develop from a child in this accelerated way,
kind of, into a young woman in the body of an already adult woman.
Hello.
Bella, this is Mr. McCandals.
Hello, Bella.
Oh.
Oh.
Blood.
Blood. Blood. Blood.
Yes. I'm fine. I'm fine.
She's like a baby, right?
She's sort of like, you see her toddling, or a toddler, I guess, you could say.
She sort of like physically toddles around, like barely keeping her body up, right?
This is occasion to much hilarity.
You know, she's like Emma Stone is a fantastic actress and a fantastic, like, comic actress as well.
So there's a lot of laughs to be had with her sort of playing this, like, full-grown, beautiful woman who's kind of like lax.
You know, she pees on the floor.
There's all of that.
She speaks in this highly idiosyncratic half-baby, half raised by a scientist way.
Yes.
I have made discovery.
Yeah, yeah.
Bella has made discovery.
She talks about herself in the third person.
You know, Bella Baxter's made discovery.
And like, and what's similar to me about this with Barbie is that the entity, in this case, Bella, is a sort of, I kept on thinking about the figure of the Gallum, G-O-L-E-M, the sort of creation of dust and air in Jewish mysticism, right?
And mud.
And mud, which is like, is a projection of the hopes and wishes and desires and needs and fantasies of the maker and is like sent forward into the world purely as that, right?
But of course, the idea is free will, agency itself must out that somebody even a creation of somebody else's pure will will will.
embark on their own journey, and this is what Bella does.
You know, for me, like you mentioned the Golem, Vincent, and that's a great comparison,
but it's also kind of, to me, this is coupled with a kind of my fair lady-ish plot or narrative
where, like, Godwin, Baxter, and this young assistant he hires.
Max McCandals.
Max McCandals, played by Rami Yusuf, who's great as well.
Really good in this.
I'm really good at this. Surprisingly good. Yeah, I was like, wow, he's great.
They tried a teacher to be a lady, you know, to be a woman. And, you know, one of the main ways the movie suggests that free will will out, as you know, Vincent, is the sexual component of this woman who's fully a woman, you know, even though she's like much behind intellectually and emotionally, certainly.
And so there are all of these very funny scenes, and it kind of like gains steam as a narrative, as a narrative kind of point over the course of the movie where Bella discovers that she's horny.
And it starts by her like masturbating with like a piece of fruit.
With an apple, yeah.
And an apple, yes.
Just think of Eden, my friends.
Yeah.
That's right.
Yeah, it's not even.
I mean, later is it a banana?
I feel like she tries a lot of different.
She tempts a banana, but an apple is the fruit of her enlightenment.
That's the fruit of her enlightenment.
That's right.
It's the fruit of her enlightenment. Very true. Very true. And then, of course, the men are horrified, and yet aroused.
You know, there's that whole thing. And the kind of like male fantasy component of this doll figure who's like, she's a little baby, but she wants to fuck.
You know, like this sort of like all she wants to do is like, you know, so it's like this thing that definitely.
as like, which it's also we should talk about Barbie in relation to that, because it's quite
different.
Sure.
Well, when I first saw this movie in September, my thought was, holy shit, this is Barbie
with a twist.
It's in both cases, it's about a beautiful woman who doesn't really understand the currency
that that holds out in the broader world, entering the broader world with a silly
male companion.
In the case of Bella Baxter and Poor Things, her silly male companion, the Ken to her Barbie,
is the character of Duncan Wedderburn, played by Mark Rufflow.
Also so good.
I know you're upset with me.
Forgive my kidnapping of you, but it was for love, a romantic jabe.
Don't be such a cunt about it.
I want to drink.
Of course, my darling.
The ship is fun, the whole world to explore.
Do you love me?
I love you.
Describe the elements I should be looking for within myself, to be sure.
You just feel.
that or not. So it is no evidence base, as God would say. So how judge it empirically?
What the fuck are you talking about? Who are you? You don't know what bananas are. You'd never heard of
chess and yet you know it imperiously. Coming back to the idea of the doll in both of these movies,
I think the real question, especially around sex in poor things, is who is the doll for?
You know, what is discussed in the beginning when Bella begins to gain more control over her
body at least is basically like, you know, Max McCandals, the Ramey Yousif character asks her creator,
Godwin Baxter, did you create her to have sex with? Like, did you basically make a living sex doll?
Yeah. And the answer is, no, no, but that's because I'm a eunuch. Why don't you do it? Why don't we marry her to you?
Yeah. And so when she enters the world, it's through sexual agency because she gets really, you know,
excited by the idea of running off and having a lot of sex with Duncan Wedderburn, which they
proceed to do. And then, of course, it turns out. She calls it Furious jumping. But he can't control
her. And this unleashed passion, you know, and sexual agency, of course, the stuff that men
have tried to control for as long as there have been men and women, can't be controlled by Duncan,
can't be controlled by anyone and becomes like this sort of seat of her liberation. Like,
if we want to get into brass tacks, I think that plot.
line goes totally off the rails. Okay, so she becomes a sex worker in Paris. And her, even though she is
literally the plaything of men, she is under the sort of economic control of a female madam.
And then she finds a female lover inside the brothel. Is it a brothel? Inside the brothel. It's definitely
100% of brothel. Right. And this is like, I think this is meant to sort of gradually sort of the sort of disappearance of men from
the direct sexual control over her is supposed to, I think, be sort of an arc in a kind of
completion of that initial sex dollish nature of Bella.
Is that?
Yeah, I think you're totally right that it's supposed to.
I also find it like incredibly facile as just an escape from the problem.
Like the conditions that exist for this brothel are not, you know, there's a joke in the
movie where she says, wouldn't it be better if we chose are the men?
Because wouldn't everyone feel better if we liked having sex with these men instead of being chosen by them?
That's right.
That's explained to her, no, silly, silly.
Of course not.
So she's put in a position in which she has no choice.
And there is one really ghastly moment where she realizes, oh, this is not about me at all.
After all this fun, consensual sex, I'm about to basically be raped by a John.
But he turns out not to be very good in bed.
And so it becomes fun again.
And she realizes she can kind of twist it to her own making.
And that I find just like a big lie of the movie and the lie of this idea of sexual agency.
Yeah. No, I totally agree. I mean, I love this movie. I loved it like a hundred times more than Barbie. Sorry, Barbie. I mean, I think Barbie was, you know, the- Barbie's fun. This is, to me, this is amazing. This is an amazing movie. I totally agree with you, however, Alex. Like, there's this huge blind spot there, you know, of this sort of like male fantasy of not just the idea of this beautiful woman who's just like up for anything and will always be like, yeah, I want to have sex. But also just in the sense of her,
emotional landscape being consistently detached.
It's kind of like that in itself is, of course, a complete fantasy that this doll figure is able to maintain.
Right. In one way, I see what you're saying, No, and I think it's really interesting.
Like, in one way, the doll of Bella Baxter comes off as totally liberated because she escapes the constraints of the desires of,
of both the men who have created her and the man who thinks that he can possess her.
But at the same time, she mimics a different kind of total male desire, which is like the woman who has no feelings and basically can't become needy.
Exactly. She can't be needy. She needs nothing from you.
She needs nothing from you. And that might be what drives you mad, but also makes her totally alluring and endlessly irresistible.
Yeah. I agree with you that I think it's a really great movie. And I also think that it is just attached to its own.
It's just attached to itself.
To me, it goes on too long.
Attached to its own conceit.
Yeah, it's attached to its own conceit.
It goes on a bit too long, and it doesn't really allow the real person to form out of the doll-like figure.
So I think in some ways, you stay stuck in a trap.
Yeah, stuck in doll land.
My friend did mention something yesterday that was really interesting.
It was like how perfectly, like, laser-s shaved Bella Baxter is through that whole movie.
Who's doing all that shade?
100%.
Here's some questions I have about that movie.
Yeah, who's shaving her armpits?
Okay?
Is it Prim?
Is it Nurse Prim?
I noticed the armpits thing.
I was glad however she had pubic here.
Oh, my God.
So much about this movie is it's a fantasy.
It's a fantasy.
Okay, guys, glitter, bows, women trapped in a vortex of desire and capitalism.
Join us as we continue our exploration of the Year of the Doll.
Hells yes.
Okay, you guys, Barbie, poor things, you know, two central texts of the last few months that talk about dolls.
But there's always more, right?
And I want to hear from you, what else have we got in terms of our doll-like year?
Yeah, one of my favorite films of this year, visually, I'll say.
Maybe it wouldn't make my top 10 just like my favorite films, but I love the way it looks, is Sophia Coppola's.
Priscilla.
Yeah.
What do we have here?
Elvis, this is Priscilla Buryl.
What are you saying?
Maybe we got someone quiet.
Just what is the antennae here, Mr. Presley?
What you got?
Right, it came out in theaters
about a month or so ago, and it's starring,
and this matters, I think.
The teeny weeny,
Kaylee, as Priscilla Presley,
and the human giant,
Jacob Allerty as Elvis.
I think they make a lot out of the difference
in these two heights.
Incredible casting.
The doll of Kelly Spaney is...
Elardi is really good in this movie.
And she's good, too.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I thought she was excellent.
And she is, as you say, Vinson,
and she is doll-like in every particular.
She's tiny.
She's a young girl living on...
14 years old.
14 years old.
Yeah.
9th grade.
Her family, she's sitting in a diner and some guy,
some emissary of Elvis comes over to her and says,
hey, Elvis Presley's throwing a party and I think he would really like you.
I think he, you know.
This, like, truly like,
I'm sorry, like Epstein Island level of like recruitment and horror.
It's like one of...
It's a horror movie.
It's a horror movie.
You guys, please, it was a different time.
Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
No, and so and that's very scary.
And she goes to live with him while she is in, still in high school.
And he like he and his father, Vernon Presley, become her wardens.
Well, yeah, it is grisly.
But what it does is show through, really, like, through interior design, what it is to belong to someone, to be, you know, Barbie uses the metaphor, I think, very well, of the dollhouse, right?
Yeah.
As a place that can be like a gilded cage, right?
A beautiful, something that seems beautiful can be also the agent of your imprisonment.
In this case, it's like literally Elvis's bedroom.
It's this over-decorated, overly plush space that's very beautiful.
So it's like her and him in this room, two, three days at a time.
And she belongs to him.
You know, she basically becomes completely isolated.
It's like, you know, R. Kelly level shit.
And it's interior design and it's also fashion design because there are scenes of Alice being like, you don't look good like that.
Oh, yeah.
You should dye your hair like that.
This is what I want you to wear.
So she becomes literally...
She's his doll.
Yeah, he's shaping her for his current and future use.
You know, there always is the question that we have to ask, which is who is the doll for?
In this case, obviously, the doll is for Elvis.
I mean, it does remind me of a doll's house.
The classic play, which was also on Broadway this year with Jessica Chastain, which is, you know...
The Ipsen play.
Yeah, the Ipsen play.
I would absolutely say that the Ipsen play's revival is another year of the doll artifact.
And, of course, the point of a doll's house is that a woman's life is made for the man who she serves.
That is the 19th century point that Ibsen is making.
And then famously in a doll's house, Nora breaks out of the hold that Torvald, her husband has placed on her and decides to leave and to leave her life.
You know, in the case—
At the very end—
At the very, very end—
Which is similar to Priscilla as well.
Which is similar to Priscilla.
I watched this movie yesterday, probably while Vincent was watching Barber.
be absolutely loved it.
Priscilla, you loved it.
It's a great movie, right?
I know that no, I liked it.
What I, okay, I'll tell you what I liked.
And then I'll tell you what I loved.
Okay, I liked it.
What I liked about this movie, I went to see it with my husband who was like practically
snoozing throughout and he was like, it was like absolutely boring.
I liked that it was boring.
Like I liked the sort of, I respect the deadness of this movie.
That's a really way to say that, yeah.
You know, it's like a monitor with a heartbeat where it's like barely, you know, it's like flatline, almost flatlining.
And I respect that rhythm and cadence.
And I think it really shows what it's like to be a doll under someone else's control, you know.
I couldn't say I felt passionate about it as you seem to feel, Alex.
I just love the horror elements and how horror can be a trapping of, or how rather the trappings of, or how rather the trappings of,
very elevated bourgeois lifestyle, which is what she's living at Graceland, are themselves, you know, the elements of horror.
One thing occurs to me that also occurs to me in relation to poor things into Barbie, which is the role and status of motherhood.
You know, in the world of Barbie, one reason when I saw the movie, when I first saw the movie, I thought, huh, you know, how have all these, how have the Barbies managed to have it all?
to have these great figures of positions of power
and to run the world that they live in.
And one answer is they have no obligations
to anyone but themselves.
They have no mothering obligations,
which have been used historically
to deprive women of rights and broader society
by chaining them to the home.
So, you know, there's one mother Barbie character,
Midge, who is isolated and kind of pushed to the side.
She's actually pregnant.
She's not yet a mother.
And, of course, in the real world,
the America Ferrer character is a mother
and has obligations to her daughter and has tension with her daughter over what it means to mother and be mothered.
Then in poor things, you have someone who is her, as Godwin-Baxer explains, her own mother and her own daughter simultaneously,
also has had all bodily agency removed from her when it comes to that question.
And then in Priscilla, she becomes mother.
And one thing that happens is that she has to make actual decisions for her daughter,
and she has some kind of real responsibility to another living creature.
And that is really, I would think, one thing that pushes her to have to leave this total trap that she actually has to have responsibility and have some kind of, you know, action.
Which, you know, in another doll text I'd like to discuss today is Emma Klein's the guest, right, where we have this protagonist, her name is Alex.
Alex, who is portrayed kind of in abstract strokes, right?
We know she is very attractive, though maybe not model beautiful.
She's white, you know, as we should note all of the protagonists we've been discussing so far have been, and this is a point we'll return to.
And she is a sex worker.
The book opens in the Hamptons.
It's summer.
She has become the sort of consort of this wealthy older man.
he doesn't know she's a sex worker, but it's clear also that he is aware that the relationship is kind of transactional.
She gives him value as a man and he gives her money, right, and a place to stay.
And this book takes place over the course of six days where Alex, you know, fucks up the bag, you know, is like, makes a mess as she's wanted.
do, the guy she lives with is like, you out, go back to the city. I'm buying you a ticket back to the city. I don't want to see you anymore. And she decides that instead of going back to the city, she's going to remain in the Hamptons kind of like tough it out somehow. And so it's kind of an odyssey where she is once again thrust out, you know, as in these other narratives, thrust out of kind of like a relatively cloistered space where she was comfortable and, you know, kind of knew her role.
into survival mode.
And we as readers get to see her journey
and how she is affected by it or not
and how much agency she can exert over the world.
Yeah, this is not a journey of female empowerment
from lack of knowledge to knowledge.
I think this makes a great pairing with Priscilla.
Let's go.
There's very little difference between the figure of Alex
and the figure of Priscilla.
I think one huge difference is just
precarity that Alex is really scraping by. She has made herself into a doll of her own creation
based on what she thinks the desires of, you know, how she can fulfill the desires of men.
I think, like, Naomi, what you were saying before about both she and her boyfriend
understanding the deal, the arrangement they're in. She, of course, meanwhile, has no money
of her own to speak of, and her very existence depends on her continuing to find favor with
people in his world. You know, a book that
the guest, and I do just want to say
that I am friends with its author.
I am a huge fan
of the book and also friends with Emma Klein, it's author.
But, you know, the guest
to me is really in conversation
with the House of MIRTH. We've talked about
Edith on our
costume drama episode.
But the degree to which
a young woman without her
own means finds
herself really trapped
and dependent
by making herself beautiful, by playing the game.
You know, it's, it's, the, the guest is a really chilling book because you see how little
that currency buys her in the end.
And also you see why she can't quit it, why being a doll seems to her like the solution.
And while she ends up getting trapped, you know, basically out of the doll's house.
The doll's house closes to her and she has no other environment she can live in.
So if 2023 is the year of the doll, I guess the ultimate.
obvious question is why? That's in a minute on critics at large from the New Yorker.
Okay, so guys, the question I have is why is this happening right now? Obviously,
dolls have been with us from the dawn of time, but now they're back in a big way. And what do we
also make of the quote-unquote political awakening aspect of these stories? Well, there's one really
clear place to start for me at least, which is the undoing of Roe v. Wade last year. And it's
just a hellstorm of effects that have been unleashed into our world. You know, we can't say
that's the reason that something like Barbie exists or the reason, certainly, that something like
poor things exist. No, and also, of course, these movies have been a development for a long time.
But they are a huge reason, and to me perhaps the reason, why they hit so hard right now and why this theme is a theme that's worth addressing.
You know, obviously American women right now are at a low point of control over our bodies.
We're recording while Kate Cox in Texas has become a focal point for the nation, mother of two trying to get an abortion because of abnormalities.
with her pregnancy and being denied it by the male attorney general of Texas.
I mean, talk about a horror story.
We're watching a horror story unfold, and there are many other examples, both publicly known and not.
So this question of control and autonomy over women's lives and women's bodies is simply huge.
I mean, there are other aspects of dull culture, like the fashion aspects.
Like, they're kind of fun.
and honestly, like, enjoyable and great aspects of doll culture coming out.
And some of that may be like a bit of a girl power from the 90s thing, having a resurgence.
Perhaps even in the face of some of these political threats, a sense of like, yeah, we want to embrace a very obvious and fun aspect of femininity.
And I think a lot of these more kind of like design elements, right, or kind of like community building through.
fashion elements, whether it's like on the Taylor Swift tour or kind of doll-like fashions taking
over the TikTok sphere, bows, velvet, you know, sequins, positioned themselves as empowering,
right? And certainly the Barbie trend of wearing pink, hot pink to the movie theater, you know,
and kind of being like, I am Barbie woman, Barbicore, right? They call it Barbie core. I am Barbie woman.
Hear me roar. You know, we're forced to be reckoned with, you know,
recalling in some ways the kind of pussy hat of, of, you know, 2016 and 2017.
Right, a kind of de-politicized pussy hat maybe.
A depoliticized, but, you know, arguably somewhat politicized kind of version of female empowerment, right?
And another thing to say about this are dolls always white women, right?
Is this about like an awakening of white women to condition.
that say women of color have experienced for, you know, way harsher ways and way longer, right?
It's like Barbie suddenly being like, oh, wait, you know, the real world sucks.
What do you mean I can't get an abortion in Texas?
Yeah, absolutely.
I mean, to have that realization, you have to be idealized by the culture to begin with.
You have to be held up.
You have to have something to gain.
Yes, and you have to be held up as an example of, you know, ideal femininity, which in our culture,
is almost always rendered as a white phenomenon.
So, yeah, you know, I think it makes a lot of sense that we're talking about.
We're doing our white studies episode, as we've joked.
You know, we're talking about a bunch of white women who think life is pretty good,
discover actually that it's a ploy and then have to go out into the world
and reckon with reality as opposed to having been forced to do that reckoning in a much earlier point.
You know, Nomi, what you're saying puts me in mind of this essay by,
Susan Faludi that I was reading.
I think she published it last year.
Of those times.
Susan Faludi argued that we've become so obsessed with pop culture feminism over the past, you know.
Yeah.
Katie Perry saying, I'm actually a feminist.
Yeah, the past 10 years, I would say, basically, this, you know, putting feminism on T-shirts, basically.
And write all kinds of pop figures saying, like, I am feminism.
I represent it.
That, of course, the eye has been taken off the ball.
And meanwhile, women's rights have been so rolled back.
You know, once again, of course, we're sitting around here discussing culture, but is the culture now ready to grapple with that?
That's kind of what I'm wondering.
Yeah, well, I think this is where we sort of reach the crossroads of where culture is not always totally equipped to take on the nuances of a political moment, right?
Because art is always stuck between representation on the one hand and rhetoric on the other, right?
So it's like, if you want to talk about what Barbie has been, it has to be Margot Robbie.
And so that is a representational reality that might not always fulfill the rhetorical needs of a more nuanced thing of the sentence of the movie's problem.
Yeah, which is why like, by the way, a non-white woman, like America Ferrara has to be the one to come in and give the speeches.
Yes.
You know what I mean?
Like she comes in and does the rhetorical part that the representation of Barbie can't do.
Yes.
Very true.
And in Lantamos's, there's a nihilist character played by the comedian Gerard Carmichael who's like brings
Bella and watches this awful scene of poverty, dead children, all these beggars.
And she just has a days-long freak out about it.
Right.
It's like a very like quote-a-quote white woman way.
Right, right.
Liberal tears.
But there, in any case, right, this problem of, I think it's, I think food is totally right
to point out that cultureize and especially like sort of during the Greta Gerwig move of like,
I'm going to try to sneak my messages into this movie that is, at the end of the day,
an ad for Mattel, how could it not be, right?
That there are tradeoffs.
But I think that's only a metaphor for the larger problem of what art can do about politics at all.
I think one of the points is that there's this oscillating between empowerment and disempowerment, right?
Like, where are we with this figure?
Is it giving us more as women, right?
Is it giving us more power, more agency, more strength?
Or is it just like another clever way to be kept within the realm of, you know, not the realm of politics?
Well, it's funny.
I think at its best these representations, almost like what they teach us is contained within your question.
Because it seems to me that one of the big sort of even more generalizable lessons of this trope, let's say, is that what we think is,
is a step forward, what we think is positive, is often a kind of feedback loop that takes us back, right?
The premise of Barbie is that she is an invention that thinks that she has helped.
Bella is, after all, an agent of a kind of science.
I mean, if we want to zoom all the way back out, most of us believe that the work of Roe v. Wade was done.
I think if that is a message that we could all grasp for many reasons across our culture that like a step forward is not a permanent thing.
The rug can be pulled out at any moment.
If we could all learn that, I think that would be a positive thing.
That would help us.
Oh, okay.
That's great.
Yeah, that's very interesting, Vincent.
I mean, when I'm thinking about the doll and the figure of the doll, it also has to do with this big American idea of agency and selfhood and rugged individualism.
Yeah.
You know, one thing that these doll movies all have to do with is the idea of what is free will and what is willed by those who pulled the strings, you know?
And to a degree, these are questions that all of us have to reckon with.
Like, there is, if we're all dolls, then as Barbie shows, there is power in banding together and actually changing the circumstances that we operate under and, you know, determining that we have to be in control of, you know, we have to be the ones doing the controlling.
But, you know, on her own, a single doll may believe that she is doing things that she wants to do.
She wants to go to the mall because this is the purest expression of her true selfhood.
Well, no.
No.
Yeah, quote unquote, I'm doing it for myself feminism.
Right.
I'm doing it for myself feminism.
Me time feminism, you know, whatever, all things that are good may be in small doses, but a greater political will needs to be activated.
And we are actually seeing it being activated across the country as, you know, abortion does become this huge issue for the 2024 election.
So in a lot of ways, you know, I don't know about the good versus bad question.
I like to dodge those kinds of questions sometimes.
And simply say that.
That dodge is called criticism.
Yeah, that dodge is called criticism.
Well, simply, I would like to simply say that I think that these huge, frankly, utterly existential questions are showing up in the guise.
of some really clever entertainment
and are giving us new ways
to think about things that actually matter a lot to our lives.
