The President's Daily Brief - PDB Situation Report | April 5th, 2025: Trump's Economic Gambit & China Flexes On Taiwan

Episode Date: April 5, 2025

In this episode of The PDB Situation Report:   President Trump announces sweeping new tariffs on foreign imports, signaling a potential overhaul of U.S. trade policy. Kenneth Rapoza from the Coalition for a Prosperous America joins us to explain what these tariffs mean for American industries and consumers.   China completes two days of military drills surrounding Taiwan, sending a clear warning to the island's new president. Steve Yates from the Heritage Foundation breaks down the strategic messaging behind China's military maneuvers and what it means for the future of U.S.-China relations.   To listen to the show ad-free, become a premium member of The President’s Daily Brief by visiting PDBPremium.com. Please remember to subscribe if you enjoyed this episode of The President's Daily Brief. YouTube: youtube.com/@presidentsdailybrief Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Olivia Rodriguez, the unraveled tour, live across North America, with special guests. Get tickets Thursday, May 7th at Olivia Rodrigo.com. Lots of places can expose you to identity theft. Oh, no. That's why LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats to your identity, which is way more than anyone can do on their own. If we find anything suspicious, like new loans are changing.

just to your financial accounts, we alert you right away, all through text, phone, email, or the LifeLock app. Get the alerts that could make all the difference. Save up to 40% your first year at LifeLock.com slash special offer. Terms apply. Welcome to the PDB Situation Report. I'm Mike Baker. Your eyes and ears on the world stage. All right, let's get briefed. We'll start things off to date with a major shake-up in global trade as President Trump announced a sweeping new tariffs on imports. He did that on what's now called Liberation Day. Industry analysts at the Coalition for Prosperous America, Kenneth Raposso, stops by to give us his take. Later in the show, China just wrapped up two days of military drills around Taiwan and labeled the island's new president a, quote,

parasite. Well, that's not complimentary. It's the latest escalation in cross-straight tensions. Our old friend Steve Yates of the Heritage Foundation, he's going to join us to explain it. But first, today's situation report spotlight. In a Rose Garden address on Wednesday, President Trump unveiled a series of sweeping tariffs aimed at reshaping U.S. trade policy. Now, the plan includes a universal 10% tariff on all imports set to take effect on April 5th, with higher country-specific tariffs, such as 34% on Chinese goods and 20% on European Union products beginning on April 9th.

Are you keeping track of all this? The announcement sent shockwaves through global markets causing significant declines in stock futures and raising concerns, of course, about potential inflation and recession risks. Now, critics argue that these tariffs could increase consumer prices and disrupt international supply chains. But my next guest has quite a different outlook. Joining us now to give us perspective on the new tariff regime is Kenneth Raposa from the Coalition for a Prosperous America. Ken, thanks very much for joining us here on a Situation Report. Hey, thanks. Thanks, having me back.

Now, I'm going to ask you to take both sides of this argument, because frankly, I'm not smart enough to really understand the whole tariff situation. And I would play devil's advocate, but I don't think I'm clever enough to do that. So let's start with why, what's the positive side of this tariff regime? Well, the positive side is that you are going to entice companies to manufacture goods in the United States. And that might mean that they're investing in new Greenfield manufacturing plants, like we recognized, like we heard recently from Hyundai when they said they were invest in steelmaking in Louisiana. That's unheard of. They're only doing that because of the tariff threat.

Also, maybe a gesture of goodwill to hope that the Koreans weren't going to be tariff, but that's another story. So that's one reason why you do it. And if you and I, let's say, here's another reason, if you and I, other than the Greenfield project, right, this would be a brand new manufacturing plant to make whatever it may be, Starlink satellites. You and I have a factory. We spent millions of dollars to build this factory. We built it in 1980s. They got all the good equipment. It's ready to roll. We can make 100 widgets a day at this factory, whatever the widget may be. But we only make 60 widgets a day, maybe as low as 50.

And the reason why is because import penetration from all these countries that, you know, I wouldn't say abuse the United States, but think of the United States as their country, as their market. So you and I that spent millions of dollars on this factory floor and all this equipment, we're not firing on all eight cylinders. We're firing on maybe four. So what happens is all a sudden you and I are starting to get orders from Boeing and Ford to make that widget. And now we're hiring a third shift. And now we're putting those machines back and back to work. And so that's the good thing. That's the best case scenario, right? That's the best case scenario that that would happen with tariffs. You have to keep them permanent in order to make that happen.

Businesses and like markets, they need certainty. So you can't be, Trump can't be willy-nilly about this. He can't say there's going to be a tariff on Monday. And then on Friday says, oh, I changed my mind because so-and-so country said they're going to import more chicken. That's not how it works. So you have to be very, you have to be very serious and show these countries what's going to be permanent. Except, I mean, to your point, though, it seems like up to this stage, it has been a little bit, and I've never really, I don't think I've ever said this on the air before, but willy-nilly. I think I can say that. I think I'm not too old to say willy-nilly. I don't even know if I've ever said that before. Well, that's okay. Every now and that I channel my mom.

Like this, we're breaking new ground. We're breaking new ground. Breaking ground. We're breaking ground. Vision. Yeah. So, so let's let's, let's leave that to the side just for now, because I want to revisit that. But maybe for the, for the sake of everybody, uh, watching. Can you give us a layman's explanation as to how tariffs work? So let's pretend we're at Walmart. Everybody knows what Walmart is, and Walmart has to fill its warehouses with goods that you and I should buy. And it's springtime.

So, of course, since the end of the holidays, they've been buying patio furniture and things like that. So they are calling up their factories that they work with in South Asia, obviously, Southeast Asia and China. and they're saying, I need 100,000 orders of this Adirondon, plastic Adirondack chair. Okay? Well, that plastic Adirondack chair used to cost $10 for Walmart to import. And now with tariff, maybe it costs, let's say, let's say all things being equal.

It's 20%. So let's say now it costs 12, right? So 20% of 10, that's a $12 tariff. No. So Walmart might say, oh, that's too much money. Actually, Walmart will say that because Walmart just wants things cheap. And Walmart's going to say, I don't want to pay that.

And then the Chinese or the Asian company that makes that plastic adder on that chair is going to say, well, a deal is a deal. And then Walmart's going to say, well, instead of me importing 100,000, how about if I import 150,000 of them instead? Can you give me a deal? Oh, yeah, okay, I'll lower the price 10%. Right? So the tariff, in other words, what I'm fair to tell you is that a $100 chair tariffed at

10%, just to make it very simple math, does not mean the chair cost. cost $110. That's not what it means because of what I just explained to you, Walmart can set prices. Walmart can force its clients to lower prices. They can also tell their clients, I'm going to buy more, increase volume. Can you lower price for that reason? So there's many ways that the price change. So it's not a direct percent. It's not like $100 becomes $10 more out of your pocket. That's not how it works. but but not every company is Walmart not either company is Walmart so now let's look at the small

company let's go back to you and I mean you are not you and I haven't been our widget making factory we need to import a whole widget kings buddy we're that's right we're the widget we're the widget dynasty we're a widget dynasty man and but you know and we got to import some things from uh from let's not say Mexico because that free trade deal looks like it's bit untouched except for steel we're going to import some stuff from Vietnam.

And it used to be 3.5% duty. And now it's a 46% duty. And that was $100 good. So now for us it's going to be a problem because we're a smaller business. And we're not to be able to make that kind of deal with our supplier. So we're going to have to be very creative. We might have to say, oh, no, I don't have the money to do this at the moment. So I'm in trouble.

That is very possible. Or you might say, I'm going to work what's in my facts. factory for now until I can find new suppliers and maybe those guys are in Mexico. Maybe I can find guys in Mexico because again, the free trade deal of Mexico seems to be intact. Or maybe I say, which would be Trump's dream and hope, that you and I call our friend that we haven't spoke to since college and he says, Ken, you didn't know that I have made this widget too? Okay, it's going to cost you $10 more a pound, but hey, at least you know you can get it. Whatever you want, here's the price. Deal, sold. And now we're, now we're, that's what, that's what's happening.

So otherwise, again, you and I are going to have to pay that price. And, you know, however we talk to our suppliers about it, that's what we end up getting the final price tag up. But we're going to, there's going to be some suffering for sure, you know. But look, life is not easy, man. Life is not easy, man. It's, you know, the reason why you and I aren't generals in a war is because we're not, we're probably sitting there and we're thinking of all the worst case scenarios and we're,

we're, you know, pining over what could possibly go wrong and who's not going to like us anymore. and who's going to be mad, and we're not going to get anywhere, and then we're just going to go years and years into the future, and no change is going to be made. We're not going to take any risks, because we're too busy, worried about what might happen. Well, that's not what leadership is. You have to take action. If this is a complete disaster, which I don't think it will be, because the China tariffs were not a complete disaster, you can reverse it. This is not open-heart surgery. If all of a sudden the market goes down 80%, which it's not going to do, and people are being laid off left and rights and there's breadlines being formed. You can say, okay, we're all done

with that experiment. Let's go back to the way it was before I came up with this idea. I mean, that's the worst case. Yeah, I do think that one of the, and this is obviously one of the things that, you know, people who are pro-Trump administration are, you know, they always cite is the fact that, you know, he's a disruptor in part because to some degree he doesn't care, right? He's not a traditional politician. Right. So I think, you know, traditional. you get a pack of politicians in there and they'd look at this and go, well, the potential for recession, well, the potential for pain on the consumers part, and from a political perspective, it's tough to tell the consumers or the voters that life's tough, and you just

have to deal with it. And so I think, I do like the fact that, you know, there is this element of, let's just try it. It's like with cutting waste and fraud out of the government, right? I mean, people talked about it for decades, generations, and nobody ever tries it because of just the general dysfunctional nature of Washington, D.C. But getting back to the tariffs, it sounds like, from what you're saying, it sounds like there's a number of ways that that additional cost can be absorbed, possibly absorbed by the manufacturer, may be absorbed by the consumer. So it's not one size fits all and it's not as simple as saying, as you pointed out, you know, the prices are going to increase, therefore the consumer is going to pay more. Am I missing something there? It's not easy.

This is harder than rocket science. You know, a rocket might have, you know, 10,000 pieces at it, but we import tens of thousands of items and we have tariff codes for tens of thousands of items. So this is harder than rocket science, really. And it's not going to be easy, but we cannot be afraid. the United States since the days of Ross Perrault back in 1990s and I know you're a

Gen Xer, I'm pretty sure you are, and you know who Ross Perot is, the American electric... Watch yourself there, that's easy, easy. That was... I feel like I've just been insulted on my own program. No, come on, Ross Pro. The giant is something... Maybe I'm a millennial, Ken.

You don't know that. Okay, all right. Maybe you want. Okay, maybe I'm a baby boomer. Millennial, you know, news junkie, would know who Ross Broome is. So, since that time, though, right, Americans have, and the, America, the electorate has said, the free trade deals, NAFTA, for example,

eh, not so sure it's great for us, because blue-collar labor, which dominates the United States, right, without all software engineers and doctors and lawyers, or Wall Street brokers, those guys have been, okay, I don't know if I can say this on the air, so I have to, I have to pause, so I got to think. I bet you can. Give it a try. No, give it a try. I haven't been screwed.

Okay. And government reports that have said this, okay, by the International Trade Commission. Look it up. Free trade deals were great for Walmart. They were great for Microsoft. These are multinational corporations. They're not really interested in the homeland, like me and you and our widget factory. Our widget factory is interested in the whole land. Microsoft is not interested in the homeland. They're not. So the electorate has said, we want someone to pay attention to our interests. So a lot of times you hear people will say, oh, all these guys who import goods, they're going to be crushed.

All these guys have a whole business importing goods from Vermont, they're going to, from Vietnam and Cambodia. They're going to be absolutely crushed. It's absolutely devastating. Okay. I get it. Look, there are companies in the United States, large and small, who have invested tens of millions of dollars, maybe even just hundreds of thousands of dollars from companies that have four or five

people in it. And they are constantly being crushed by import penetration from around the world from countries that no one can compete with because their wages are lower, not because they're being paid slave labor, but because their currency is worth the price of a seashell at a gift shop at Cape Cod and source attraction in the summertime. So these are countries that you cannot compete with on labor, okay, alone. Not only that, when you look in a country like China, they heavily subsidized industries that they see as being industries of the future and industries that they want to be dominant players in. You are not going to win that fight with the Chinese period. So there is something you have to do. You can either say, forget it, we're going to throw

our hands up in the air and we're going to deindustrialize like the Europeans in the British, or you could use tariffs and other measures because tariffs are not the sole solution. to do something about it and take action. If you don't do anything about it, five, ten, 15 years from now, instead of 60% of the cars that are on the road in the United States being American made, it'll be 40%, 30%, until it's almost nothing. Because look at places like Korea, big car manufacturer in Korea. Everybody knows Hyundai and Kia. Those are the brands. I think it's 80% of cars on the road in Korea are made in Korea. Japan, 90%. Okay? Great for them.

Yep. So why? So the United States is just saying, you know something, I don't need to be 100% of our cars. How about if it's 75%? How about if it's 80? How about that? Can that possibly think the United States doesn't even have an auto industry anymore because of free trade. We have a North American auto industry now. It's over. And that's the reason why Trump can't even put tariffs on Mexico and Canada cars because it would totally destroy the auto industry because America doesn't have an auto industry anymore. It's the North American auto industry now. With Mexico and Canada, it's all. entwined, you cannot take that apart without massive pain. So we already lost the auto industry in this country. And the auto industry in this country is the center of the hub of automation. What's the industry that decides we're going to automate? How do you automate? Is the auto industry?

It's not the guys who make fabrics. It's not the guys who make airplanes. It's the auto industry that taught us how to automate. It's obviously not the guys that make widgets either. I clearly know that. And so listen, if you can stay right where you are, don't go anywhere. I've got a whole page full of questions here. But stay there if you can. And we'll be right back with Ken Raposa on the Situation Report. Kayak gets my flight, hotel, and rental car right. So I can tune out travel advice that's just plain wrong.

Bro, Skycoin, way better than points. Never fly during a Scorpio full mood. Just tell the manager you'll sue. Instant room upgrade. Stop taking bad travel advice. Start comparing hundreds of sites with kayak and get your trip right. Kayak, got that right. Now's the time to save on new carpet at the Home Depot.

Receive 10% off your total carpet project and 12 months special financing. Plus, we'll measure your space for free. Choose from a variety of stylish, on-trend options fit for everyday life with life-proof, life-proof with pet-proof technology, home decorators collection, and traffic. traffic master carcets. Save 10% and get 12 months special financing. Now at the Home Depot. Offer valid April 16th through May 3rd, 2006. Exclusions apply for licenses. See Home Depot.com slash license numbers. They say everything happens for a reason, but I suspect everything happens

for a Rees. Like this commercial break, did you need 15 seconds away from music or 15 seconds to eat arreases? Perhaps it's true. Everything happens for a Reeses. Welcome back to the BDP report. With us again is Ken Robosa from the Coalition for a Prosperous America. We're talking all things tariffs. Ken, let me ask you this. I think people are confused over how we got over a number of years, how we got to a situation where so many countries out there have high tariffs on the U.S. And it was clearly out of balance, but how did that happen over the years? Okay, well, again, a lot of the countries that we trade with, like let's look at the EU, for example, in the UK, their basic tariff was called the World Trade Organization, their baseline tariff, let's say ours is 3.4%. There's might be, I think the UK is 3.9 or 4, and maybe the EU is 5. So it's not a huge difference. But what Trump is complaining about, what Trump team is complaining about is that it's not the tariff. It's the non-tariff barriers. So let's say, for example, you and I, we have that widget factory.

We're trying to make some money, right? So we got our widget, and it's a beautiful widget. But our widget weighs 10 pounds. And the rule in Europe for this type of widget is it can only weigh 11. Then you and I spent a lot of money making an 11-pound widget, and then Europe says, it's got to be 12 pounds. So it's constant barrier for us so they can protect their local widget guys. also, which is something that all Americans have heard of, I'm sure in the news is, it's what Capitol Hill always complains about, is the phytocanitary measures. These are measures on food and animal care where the Europeans and the British will say, we don't want to import your beef, we don't want to import your chicken, because you give you

them a certain vaccine that we don't want, or you had a case of mad cow, is it, whatever it may be, right? And so that is the way that that blocks trade. So there's a lot of other issues that the Trump administration has looked at. And then, of course, the other issue would be balanced trade. So where are other countries that we have a huge trade deficit with? Of course, the EU is the second only to China, which is big, but declining because of the tariffs of 2017. In the UK, we have a surplus.

So I was actually kind of surprised with the tariff on there. But I believe that the reason for the tariff on the UK is because, they might become a transshipment point for the European Union in some way, right? With the European USA, you know, our multinationals in UK, we'll ship it through there or whatever. But the UK has a 10% tariff. Again, the reason why it's higher is because a lot of these countries, especially the emerging world, like India and China, they want to protect their own industry. They want their industries to grow, and they want to protect labor. I don't know if you ever been to India.

So why wasn't their pushback, why wasn't their pushback from previous administrations against this? It's very simple. It's very simple because the consumer is king. We have to be able to fill our garages, not with cars. We have to fill our garages with ski mobiles, canoes, children's play sets, toys no one uses, skis that have been no one's used, 50,000 pairs of shoes. That's why they want you to buy all these things. No one buys like the United States. No one's ever going to be a consumer like the United States. American consumer has a $6,000 revolving debt on their credit card. And the UK, I think, is 2000. In Japan, it's zero. So, I mean, you know, that's why they'd ever complain. They wanted the United States. The United States is the free market. There is no other free market, but the United

States. Yeah, Singapore has zero tariffs. Okay, Singapore. Okay. California is like, I mean, the Massachusetts economy is probably bigger than Singapore. You know, so I mean, you know, whatever. Good for them, right? So, you know, they never complained because, They thought that as long as Americans could buy cheap goods and their shop until they drop, then Wall Street was fine with that. And, of course, the Capitol Hill was fine with that. And so, you know, but look, a happy consumer is a happy voter, you know, so maybe there's a more happy voter, you know.

But we have not always seen that, though, have we? Because the consumers have been very happy for a long time. You know, consumers have been very happy for a long time. And there's been unrest in this country politically because of the, because, of global trade, because of how that is set up, and because politicians are not listening to what Americans are saying on that issue since the 1990s, where we are today is because of that, you know, you got Trump, and that has been his centerpiece argument for, you know, since 2016. He ran on trade. Right. And that's an interesting point, Ken, because, you know, certainly in the U.S.

here, a number of people are acting shocked at, you know, what the announcement was on on Liberation Day. By the way, I don't know if Liberation Day is going to be an official government holiday, what one can only hope. But I think, you know, there was this shock, right, from, at least inside the U.S. I think there was less surprise from the global players, because I think they've been anticipating this better, perhaps, than, and maybe it's just a media response and it's just a negative media response because that's what you're going to get with the Trump administration. I don't know. Look, oh, no, the Atlantic and the Democratic advocacy media was shocked by Trump.

I mean, I don't even know what to say to that. It's like, of course, he could literally come out and say, we found an alien race and they go to cure cancer and they're friendly, and here's their big spaceship, and they're going to teach us how to travel at warp speed. And it would be like, what? You know, it would be the end of the world. It's the apocalypse.

Yeah, how dare he? How dare he do that? We totally dispelled anything that they say. Now, as far as the rest of the, the world goes, no, the Europeans are absolutely beside themselves with grief. The economist today is talking about how this is the end of the world. Is a big image of orange man Trump carving out the United States from the rest of the planet. Like, you know, we're somehow the bad guys and we hate the rest of the world and we're giving the rest of the world the big middle

finger and tell them to go fend for themselves. The United States has been the consumer market for all of their goods forever. And all we're saying is, can't. Can we please, can we please be a consumer of our own goods? Not all, not 100%, but some. Can it be possible? We don't have antibiotics in this country that we make, at least not in big numbers. We have one company that makes amoxicillin, which is a petacillin, which would have saved you from COVID if you had it in 2011.

I can count one company on my hand. So Ireland is going to cry about all that because they're the big pharmaceutical guys, because they lowered taxes or whatever the tax rate is in order to attract all American pharmaceutical companies there. Look, what if you didn't have all of these medications? What if your country didn't have it? What would you think about it? If you want us just to be totally import dependent, this is a terrible idea. So the United States is saying, we're still going to trade with the world, we still want to buy your BMWs and Jaguars, okay? That's not going to end. But we want you to invest in our country. If you don't want to, and the American consumer decide,

he's not going to buy the BMW, okay? He's going to buy a Tesla instead or whatever. Then that's their prerogative and that's you. You failed. And I will say this, I believe BMW has a factory in Mexico so they could stop crying because they could just ship cars from Mexico to, you know, great. Yeah. You've given us the best case scenario earlier in the conversation. Give me the worst case scenario. Okay, well, I did give you a worst case too because I said, again, using our amazing widget factory, I said that if we require parts from Vietnam and Southeast Asian order to make our widget and we're just a small company with 10 guys running the show, that we are going to be in trouble because we can't tell those guys, hey, let's up the ante.

And instead of buying $1,000, we're going to buy $2,000 because maybe we don't have the money to do that. We got to go to our banker and we got to get out a loan to do those things for our Vietnamese suppliers to say, okay, I'll lower the price for you because you're increasing your volume. We might not be able to do that. And so when we order those goods from a customer and our custom broker has got to call us up and say, hey, Ken, you just ordered, you know, $100,000 worth of goods that's coming out a mare ship on June 1st, and you owe us, you got to deposit $100,000 with customs. You know, and that's going to be a problem.

That's going to be a headache for us. That's going to be a big headache for us. And that's for the, that's for the manufacturers. That's for the importers. That's for the people on the business. What about the consumers, right? because, again, there's this concept here that, you know, what's happening, this tariff regime could send the U.S. and, you know, parts of the world into a recession. So talk to me about that,

and doesn't that imply that, look, if the economy heads south in that, in that regard, you know, we did say, look, he's a, he's a disruptor. He doesn't really care about, he doesn't really care about politics in the traditional sense, but the party does, right? And look at this. Look at this. Go ahead. Yeah. Okay. You and I, not on a widget factory, I'll give myself an example because I don't, we're sick. We have, we're sick. We're diet. The doctor says you're diabetic. You've got to stop eating the chocolate cake every day or you're going to be on dialysis. I can't, I can't stop eating chocolate cake. I must keep eating it because I love it. Okay. That's the story. You're going to be on dialysis by the time you're 60 years old and you'll be living on it

until you're dead. Or I can say, okay, I'm going to stop eating chocolate cake as much as it sucks and the doctor says, you're in fine health. I'm not too happy about this fact that I'm not going to eat chocolate cake, but at least I'm happy in the long term that I'm going to be healthier. This is long term. We're thinking long term here. We're thinking what I'm going to do to rearrange global trade? Because the way global trade is now, it is set to manufacture. things in Asia. Yes, the United States innovates, but after we innovate, we don't mass produce. Asia mass is produced. Look, there's a company in my home state, Massachusetts, it's called Boston Dynamics. They make those stupid, ugly robotic dogs that you've probably seen and some cyborg robots.

You really don't like those dogs, do you? No, I don't like those dogs. I've seen those robotic dogs. They're amazingly cute, actually. Let me interrupt you just for a second, though. Let me interrupt you because you said something really interesting that I want to pick up on, which is this is long term. This is long term. But look, I think maybe we can agree that the average American doesn't think in the long term, right? We make very quick decisions.

Everyone's got ADHD. And so you see what I'm saying? I do. I do. Well, what country thinks long term that we're always worried about surpassing the United States? Hmm. What place in the world? Is it the Europeans? How are we worried about the Europeans? No, we're not worried about the Europeans? Is it the Brazilians? No. We're not worried about that. Who's the long-term planners that we're so worried about taking over us? It's the Chinese. They don't think about... But the part... Look, look, I guess my point, Ken, is it seems like we might be glossing over this idea that the American public is willing to take long. term pain, you know, for something like this, you can't, I mean, comparing it to the Chinese culture, I think is problematic because that's a, I agree with it. That's a all different world. Yeah, I agree with you. Okay. So it's not going to be long term pain, like we're going to be

suffering for years. You know what I mean? Going back to our widget factory, we might be suffering for a few months and hopefully we don't go out of business, honestly. I don't, I don't know. And I will say this, and maybe some companies will. Maybe some companies will go out of business. is absolutely true. Okay? But I will tell you this. There are many people who manufacture in the United States, like the United Oil Workers, who also went out of business. Tens of thousands, millions over the years, because of the policy that has been in place since the 1980s. You can keep doing that. You can keep doing that. And every passing year, you will have less and less opportunity for blue-collar workers.

They're not going to work for Bain, and not can work for the McKinsey Group, whatever it's called. They're not going to all become doctors and surgeons. They're not going to work for Wall Street. And you know what else? What's going to happen? They're not going to work for AI companies, developing software because they're not all geniuses.

And what's going to happen to that service sector on the tech side when China competes with Microsoft and Adobe and Intel? They might not compete with them. They might not compete with open AI in the United States market, but when the Vietnamese and the Brazilians want an AI platform and the Chinese say, we charge, only $10, the Americans say, we charge $200, well, now the service industry is going to start to cry. And they're going to understand what's like that manufacturers have been dealing with for a very long time. They're going to understand the pain. That's a really interesting element of this, I think. And look, I,

I think from my perspective, I think it's excellent. I think it's about time that the U.S. tries to rebalance the global trade situation. I think that's a very good thing to do. I think trying to onshore manufacturing. All of those things, I think it makes sense. And I also agree with your very initial point, which is consistency is going to be important here. And it does look like, you know, right off the bat that there may be some, you know,

negotiation going on for individual countries, perhaps. But I also kind of like the idea that, you know, this is, in a way, you could argue it's apolitical, right? Our allies have been hit with the tariffs just like our adversaries. And so I think that's also important. Yeah. So I like the idea. I guess what I'm concerned about when I look at this is the downside potential impact on on the ability for this to go for the long term. As you said, it has to be consistent and has to be long term.

And if the economy heads south for a period of time, you know what the voters are like. And that could create a real problem. Yeah. Possible. Anything in life is possible. Anything is possible, right?

I mean, yes. Wait a second, Ken. Wait a second. Did you just make up that saying, yeah. Right? Anything. Did you make up that saying anything in life is possible?

Well, let me give me another saying. And again, we were talking offline about us being at X-types. And I'm going to give you another saying from the great Jedi Mastery Yoda, who said, there is no... Oh, man, you geek it out on me now, buddy. Do or don't do. Do or don't do. There is no try.

You either do it or you don't do it. You can stay with the status quo. It's fine. We already know what the status quo is going to lead to. We already know. We already know. Europe knows. It's de-industrializing.

The European Central Bank Governor, former president, Mario Draghi, wrote a big report on this. UK knows it's deindustrializing. It's lucky to grow at half percent. Their market is in free fall right now because their market depends on us. Jaguar, which is owned by an Indian company called Tautomotus, it's not even a British company anymore. They are worried they can't sell jaguars.

That is ridiculous because if you and I want a jaguar and we can afford a jaguar, we are going to buy a jaguar. When I've been replaced it with a Subaru Forrester We're going to buy a Jaguar The Subaru Forrester does not compete with the Jaguar You know, I had a Subaru Forrester when I was younger And it's a great car, it's a hell of a car I mentioned the Subaru Forester

Because I have one in my driveway But I'm telling you it's not a Jaguar I would rather have a Jaguar but I can't afford a Jaguar And if you want a Geniquire you are going to buy a Jaguar That is the fact Look, there's going to be pain if it's that horrific, then Trump can reverse course. Hopefully it's not that horrific. I believe what we're going to see. So just to explain the audience, what we saw on Liberation Day,

there was, if you assume this, a baseline tariff of 10%, okay, all countries, this is supposed to be non-negotiable, and then the tariff rose higher. So other countries might have a 40% tariff, such as the case in Vietnam, 46%, I think it is. So, That might get negotiated lower because they might say, okay, you agree to, I don't know, lower your tariffs on motorcycles. I'm just now making it up as if the Vietnamese. It's not importing tons of Harley-Davidson. They could actually import a Holly Davidson from Thailand because Harley-Davidson,

Harley makes Harley-Davidson in Thailand. So it's irrelevant even if they were to say something like that. You'd be a fool if you fell for that. But they could say something like that, and Trump could probably fall for it. And then that tariff gets lowered. Okay, that's a possibility. But there will be a limit or there should be. Because if Trump is going to say that tariffs are X on Monday and now they're Y on the

following Monday, meaning, you know, they're non-existent, that is not good for a business and market sentiment because business and market sentiment means certainty. If the market understands that tariffs are 10% period or 15% period, that's it. End of the story. They can adjust to the new economic regime. If they think that it's going to be 10% and then two weeks later it's going to be nothing and we're going to go back.

It's too confusing and the market's going to be volatile. And again, back to our widget factory, we're not to know whether we should be buying more from Mexico or ending our relationship with our Vietnamese suppliers who we love and we love going to hang out with them in the summertime on the beaches of Vietnam or if we should call our friend from college and tell him, hey, we'll pay the American price,

which is a little bit more money for your widget. So, you know, I think the inconsistency, sorry to interrupt, Kim, but I'm mindful of time now, is also a problem not just from sort of the business mindset, but also from an operational perspective. Inconsistency in this is going to really play havoc with the logistics and global supply chain concerns for a variety of reasons. But look, this has been fantastic. I really appreciate you taking the time to sit with us and explain this. What I'd love to do is have you back on in the couple of months where we can analyze the current state of play.

what's happened over the past several weeks. And so that would be excellent. I also hope, and this is sincere, I hope the Liberation Day does become a regular holiday and has great traditions like picnicking and excess drinking. That's my hope. Oh, yeah. Yeah, yeah. And as I said in a compact magazine piece I did this week, is that, you know, you could break

out the grizzly cooler, which is made in the United States, or a Royal Master Grill, which is also made in the United States, some of them anyway. Look at you. Look at you. That's how it does with two very good plus. I said, I said, I was not members of the coalition for prosperous America. That's right. No, that's right.

All right, Ken, listen, Ken Raposa, the Coalition for a Prosperous America. This has been great. Thank you again for joining us and look forward to the next conversation, man. There's a lot to unpack there when we're talking tariffs. I guess that was, you know, part of that conversation was to try to say it's not just this or that. It's not as simple. And that's probably true for most things. All right, China just wrapped up two days of military.

drills around Taiwan. It's part show of force and it's part of warning. Beijing has also unleashed a fresh wave of threats, calling Taiwan's new president a quote parasite. So what message is Xi Jinping really sending? Well, I think he's sending the message that he doesn't like the Taiwanese president. Steve Yates from the Heritage Foundation joins us next to break it down. How many discounts does USA auto insurance offer? Too many to say here. Multi-vehicle discount. Safe driver discount. New vehicle discount. Storage discount. How many discounts will you stack up? Tap the banner or visit usa.com

slash auto discounts. Restrictions apply. This is Euphoria Calvin Klein, the new elixir collection, featuring three perfume intense scents, inspired by a unique orchid accord, paired with vanilla, each with its own distinct attitude,

each with its own universe, bold elixir, sensual, woody, addictive, magnetic elixir, sweet and romantic like a lingering touch, solar elixir, a radiant expression of joy, Ultra concentrated for amplified impact and lasting power.

Find your euphoria. Discover the Euphoria Elixir Collection by Calvin Klein. Hey, you, feeling hungry? Run the Denny's four. The new Etonia Everyday Value Slam! Part of Denny's slam and meal deals. And see the new Masters of the Universe movie, only in theaters June 5th. Welcome back to the PDB Situation Report.

China is once again turning up the pressure on Taiwan. This week, the Chinese military state. two days of war games around the island, deploying fighter jets, naval vessels, and long-range rocket units in what Beijing called a, quote, strong punishment for Taiwan's new president, Lai Qingda. In addition to the military hardware, Chinese officials also deployed some, well, let's call it interesting propaganda, releasing a short animated video calling President Lai a parasite and accusing him of pushing the island closer to war. Lai, for his part, has called for peace and but well, China clearly isn't buying it. So, you ask yourself, what's behind this latest round of

saber rattling and how serious is the threat? Those are all good questions. Joining us down to answer them is Steve Yates. He's a senior research fellow for China and national security policy at the Heritage Foundation. Steve, thanks very much for coming back on the Situation Report. Pleasure, of course. This latest round of aggressive boycott exercises is very provocative. It's, you know, it would probably be dominating a lot of the news cycle if we hadn't had a major announcement about tariffs everywhere in the world. Because I think this is the most provocative move to date by the People's Republic of China. Why do you say that? Because it really drew a line that you could literally read from space that cut Taiwan off from Japan, from the Philippines, from the Pacific, and blocked traffic. going north and south through the Taiwan Strait. And so whether they have the capabilities to sustain this, whether they have the intent

to hit and blow things up on the island of Taiwan, all those things are to be determined. But I think this is basically auditioning for what kind of reaction do we get from Washington, Tokyo, others, and from Taiwan. And are we just able to slow cook this frog to where we're just going to take it by these exercises and cut off transit. Well, what kind of reaction are they getting? So has there been any reaction from the White House, for example? Well, as far as I can discern, there hasn't been a clear reaction, partly because

all communications have been nuked by the conversation about tariffs, including Taiwan, being listed. On the one hand, they were listed as a country on the fact sheet, something that made them smile. And then the tariff number was up, something that did not make them smile. But here they were, having had a private sector rep from their TSM come to the White House and promise $100 billion of investment in the United States, something they hope would blunt getting tariffs levied their way to waking up to find that they're in the next round of

conversations of how are we going to recalibrate this strategic economic relationship. The State Department was pretty clear in saying that it is China that is destabilizing the status quo, that the U.S. policy is pretty clearly against any form of coercion or violence, redefining what Taiwan's relationship is with China. So I think in terms of the words they've been right, and Secretary Heggseth, just out in the region going to the Philippines and Japan, also going to Guam, these are geographies that are relevant and trying to enhance deterrence. Okay. Yeah. Now, it's interesting. You know that, you know, Taiwan was hit. with the tariffs. I mean, a variety of allies were, right? Israel was it with the tariffs,

even though they canceled their tariffs on the U.S., the European Union, of course. What other reaction has come out of Taiwan at this point? Had they talked about retaliatory measures? So the president of Taiwan has communicated through that new global medium known as X. It used to be we'd have press conferences and coverage on television. But on X, I thought he gave a pretty smart response, said that they had. already made efforts to lower barriers to trade, and they'd offered a lot of generous investment at the United States. They remained committed to that friendly relationship and essentially look forward to continuing the conversation. So I thought he did a wise job of not overdoing the

reaction, as people are kind of shocked to see what the announcement was. And I thought there was a degree of truth that they are looking at investing in a lot of parts of the United States. and it's up to them to kind of propose what next steps they want to put on the table and see whether the administration pulls down those numbers. But those numbers are calculated in ways that are very different than the U.S. trade representatives' methodologies in the past. And so it's not just looking at reciprocal tariff rates. They're looking at trade imbalances and putting that into the formulation. So I think there's a little bit of thought that needs to go into how to respond to that. and maybe a little thought on the U.S. side about how to take the responses from others that say,

Uncle, we want to deal with you. We are your friend. What can we do? Yeah. Looking at the, going back to the issue of the recent military drills, what do you make of what appears to be at the same time them ramping up propaganda, sort of a covert action campaign. Do you put any significance to that, or is it just kind of an aspect of what they typically would do anyway? No, I think we're seeing them testing all parts of their apparatus. And so with the Communist Party, really with any rational war power, you would want to have information war as part of what you were doing as your strategy towards success.

But the Communist Party is information warfare first and foremost. So we've seen them test physical capabilities. And we've seen them test from time to time trade and agriculture points of pressure to see if they can force points of pain and compromise. And this information war, I think, has been taken up a notch. And that information war has been aimed at the United States, too. And it's been pretty blunt and belligerent, if you ask me. And so we haven't really seen the Trump administration take the bait to get a no tit for tat on the information war yet. But I think we do need to take it seriously that they are practicing every piece of what they would have in mind to use if they took, look to take decisive action.

Cyber information, this boycotting, and then also having real classical military capabilities. Well, I mean, I think they have in a sense, maybe this is not the correct way to view it, but, you know, the fact that they've now got, what, 54% tariffs on all goods coming out of the, China, you could argue maybe that's their response. It's not just an economic move. It's not just about rebalancing trade. Maybe they're trying to send another message to the Chinese regime. I don't think you're wrong about that. I think that there is an intended signal to say, we have leverage, and you know, you don't have that many options to our vast consumer market. You can say, we're dependent on your goods, but your economy is actually at greater risk. than ours is, and you've been playing around in this Taiwan stuff, but now I'm going to raise

the stakes and you've got some domestic things you need to face. I think there's some logic to that. The only question I have is how it plays out in a completely controlled information environment in China. We'll see. We're not in an information war where the environments are equal or similar on both sides. That's it. You know, it's a bit of a side track here, but that's a really, interesting subject, right? In your experience and from, you know, your time working this region, what is the access like for the average Chinese citizen on the mainland to outside information? Well, it's changed a lot over time and some of it is by government direction and some of it's like, do I want to risk the hassle? So I'm just going to self-censor what I'm looking for and what I really

care about. And I think that in recent years, they're getting a lot of their news and information like they've gotten the rest of the world on short form video and texting apps, not necessarily consuming everything the Central Television Channel puts out. The older generation definitely still consumes that. But say the 18 to 38-year-old demographic is getting a lot of their information on WeChat and different kinds of social media platforms. And they have algorithmic control where they can literally eliminate certain words from being used and security can come ask you questions. And this was perfected during the COVID experience. And so a lot of Chinese people are choosing not to consume information that would maybe get a knock at the door or some kind of

asshole and they have facial recognition social credit score where it can affect your ability to enter the subway or high speed rail on family vacations if you'd all play right. So they've got much, much more control. That said, family members seem to find ways to get things in. VPNs can still work, but they're not perfect. And there's still kind of a question after a generation of cult-like control over information, even if I got the truth to you or you, are you? ready to receive it. There's a little bit of an allegory of cave situation where you come out of the dark, you're not ready for the full light. And so what kind of information can get to them? I think the most effective thing you can do is to try to raise doubts about the survivability

of their economic systems, raise doubts about what do these princelings of grandkids and kids that are the pride and joy of two generations of a family, whether they've got the opportunity they deserve and is Taiwan really worth it? That I think is an area where we could press more. It's interesting what you said about being inundated with information. It reminds me of this is apropole of absolutely nothing. I'm just warning our viewers, but we had a Russian defector years and years and years and years and years ago, dead now, who was moved to the states. and he just standing in a grocery store just spaced out. He was standing in front of a vast array of different types and brands of orange juice.

He just wanted orange juice, right? But then he went to get orange juice, and he was just overwhelmed by the volume, you know. It's not a perfect analogy to what you were talking about, but it's not bad. But I think there is an analogy. It's just not in the consumer goods, which definitely was a part of the Moscow and the Hudson kind of experience that you were describing. But in terms of thought, if you don't live in free speech, you don't even live in free avenues of information.

You have that similar experience just in your mind and your social media. So that's probably a bit of that we're going to have to wrestle with if the great firewall of China comes down some. Yeah, at some point. Steve, stay right there. All right, I've got a whole long list of questions still for you. But we have to take a quick break. And then we'll be right back with Steve Yates on the Situation Report.

Get the most out of your vehicle with GM genuine parts and AC Delco original equipment, the only parts designed, engineered, tested, and backed by General Motors. You can find your perfect fit for most makes and models and choose from three tiers of parts, including GMOE or gold and silver aftermarket parts. Visit gmparts.com for more information. Chronic migraine, 15 or more headache days of months. month, each lasting four hours or more, can make me feel like a spectator in my own life. Botox, Onabachalinum toxin A prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine. It's not for those

with 14 or fewer headache days a month. It's the number one prescribed branded chronic migraine preventive treatment. Prescription Botox is injected by your doctor. Effects of Botox may spread hours to weeks after injection causing serious symptoms. Alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems or muscle weakness can be signs of a life-threatening condition. Patients with these conditions before injection are at highest risk. Side effects may include allergic reactions, neck and injection site pain, fatigue, and headache. Allergic reactions can include rash, welts, asthma symptoms, and dizziness. Don't receive Botox if there's a skin infection. Tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or Nourke-Nus disease, Myasthenia Gravis or Lambert Eaton

syndrome, and medications, including botulinum toxins, as these may increase the risk of serious side effects. Why wait? Ask your doctor. Visit Botox Chronic Migraine.com or call 1-800-44-4-Botox more. Choice Hotels get you more of what you value. Here's a little tune to help you remember. Same drive, different day. Don't you wish you were getting away? Pack your bags and come on through. Texas, Ohio, Alaska, we're up there too. Comfort in. It's calling your name. Save on the stay. Oh, and free waffles are yours to claim. Well, I hope you like my little song, book direct at Welcome back to the PDB Situation Report. We're joined once again by Steve Yates, Senior Research Fellow for China and National Security Policy

at the Heritage Foundation. Steve, thanks very much for sticking around. We've been talking all things, China and Taiwan. Let me ask you this. It's going to seem like a disjointed question to throw at you, but there's a reason for it. What do we know about the health of Xi Jinping? and what do we know about his hold on power at this stage? Well, this is kind of a really interesting light of inquiry,

and it's one I've lived with my whole life, and I wish I could say that after 35 plus years of studying and watching this and dealing with people in the intelligence community and government and private sector, that we had a better read today than we did way back then, and I would argue we actually don't. I think that Xi Jinping is more isolated. We know less about what the actual state of his health is.

We're sort of left back to what we used to do in old Kremlinology and seeing pictures of leaders in public. Does he look puffy? Does he look frail? Who's standing next to them? Are they close? Are they far? Who's getting carted out of the meeting?

What does that mean? And so there's just a lot of old, very imprecise statecraft that is being used in this right now. there's a lot of theories about people in the military that are unhappy with Xi Jinping. They've moved very far in terms of getting money and being able to develop platforms with there's quality control questions. And nobody cares more about the people in the military than the people in the military. And if they're treated like potential cannon fodder going out on untested platforms, they might actually be less bold than some politico behind closed walls in the leadership compound in Beijing.

And so there's always tales about stresses and strains. And she has done a good job of disappearing, killing, and prosecuting people who wanted to challenge him. That creates deterrent at first, resentment over time. And we have to see how all that will play out. But we're flying blind. We have our military attaches. We have intelligence. We have diplomatic channels.

We have foreign friends who are trying to help us. But I would just argue in 2025, we have a less clear picture of that than we did at the time of the Tiena. and massacre and trying to figure out why they did what they did at that time. Yeah. Okay, that's really interesting. The reason for going down that path is that if you look at the timeline, everybody always wants to know, when's China going to move on Taiwan, right? And then they want to know, what's that going to look like?

Yeah. But the question of when, I would argue, again, maybe I'm wrong. It hasn't happened yet, but I could be, is. It could depend on Xi Jinping's health because he could view this as his most important legacy, right? So is he really going to step down, step aside before a move, whatever it looks like on Taiwan? So that's why I was asking you about his health. Yeah.

So I've heard that a lot and I think it could be true. We have to sort of factor it into our calculus as one of the dominant theories. But there's also the risk side of. that and parts of the Communist Party are going to be rational, and Xi Jinping may not be. But there's a lot of reason for them to doubt that this will be easy for them, that it will be a quick and easy, perfect victory. And that's what would work for a dying Xi Jinping if he wants to have a legacy. What would undermine that legacy is if he pushed the issue, there's some kind of kinetic

disruption. It smolders for a bit. coming out the other end is not a Taiwan that is successfully integrated with the broader people's republic. China's economy suffers greatly because of that risk being taken, and the CCP's in a worse position. That's also a rational scenario, and it just comes down to that old sting song applied, you know, do the Russians love their children too? Do the Chinese care about what comes after the initiation of this? And if they do, that legacy issue for Xi is not as clean a proposition of I'm dying, I'd like to go ahead and take this now.

There's a lot of downside for them. Look at you with your cultural pull of a Sting song. That's better. We'll see how many listeners even remember Sting. Yeah. Well, I mean, oh, hey, come on, the police, are you kidding me? Wow. Hey, I'm there.

I'm there. I just, yeah. My son, no, he doesn't have any. Fantastic, although I will say this, the song you cited from Sting, not my favorite. But still, it wasn't the police either of singing solo. Oh, I know. I know I was stinging. He got a little self-indulgent. I'm just saying. So, how well defended is Taiwan? It's very well defended in some ways. It's just old adage that it's a lot easier to hit and break something than it is to defend it against that kind of thing in terms of just the sheer volume of potential incoming. So if China chose to just shower the island of Taiwan with unrelenting missiles, there's a significant amount of capability. to thwart some of that, but it could be overwhelmed. But then you basically have a fried island. You don't get the

semiconductors. You don't get the people. I don't know what you got. And then I think Ukraine has awakened some people to the notion of the corollary to that. It's easier for them to hit that it is to control and hold. And so Taiwan has done things to make their society more resilient, to make their power supply more resilient. They got a long way to go on that. that, they do have meaningful military capabilities to try to hold out for a time. But what is that time? I think there's a lot of questions about at what point energy runs out for Taiwan. And at what point does energy run out for China? They don't have unlimited supplies to run a significant war machine. So there's just a lot of open-ended inquiry when we're looking at all of that. But I think, I

I still think that we're in a risk of a crisis all the time from now until there isn't a Communist Party in China anymore. And we've just got to, I think, balance that with more engagement from Japan, maybe a little from the Philippines and complicate stuff and buy time. What's your perspective on the PLA and the Chinese regime's military in terms of an invasion? Again, whatever that would look like. I agree with that. I can't imagine it's going to look like a series of missile barrages that just destroy the island. That seems counter to the Chinese regime's mindset, I think.

But as far as the military goes, is that even possible? Would they look and say, why would we attack other Chinese? I mean, do they? And here's, I guess, part of that question is, do they, view Taiwanese as Chinese in a sense. So they'd be shooting at each other. Yeah, they play games with this. And it's not so easy for the foreigners to follow along in the games they play with it. But they sort of console themselves with they can murder all the people they want because those were Taiwan independence activists. And those were splitists, as they call

them. And so they're no longer proper Chinese nationalistic people. And so they can be fodder. On the other hand, the whole reason they say that this belongs to them is that allegedly it's a society of Chinese people just like them. So contradiction is written right into the Communist Party DNA when it comes down to it. But they've worked in their own justification that because of politics, ideology, not ethnicity, that there are key elements of Taiwan that are worthy of getting smoked. This is, I just guess I hate to ask this question, right, because I know you're expecting it and it's always one of those that did, you know, we're just speculating here.

But from all those years of dealing with the region, what do you think this is going to look like? Well, I think that the aggression with blockades, the aggression against the Philippines, the sort of other areas of trouble, they've really galvanized that first island chain in a way that's never existed since World War II. Now, it's the beginning of, that reaction, not full readiness on their part. I think that actually is an asset to the United States and it complicates things for Beijing. I think that the military platforms, they have, they have a lot of big ticket items, a lot of fighter jets, a lot of sea vessels. Some of these things are really easy to see from far away. And so if US, Japan, others are interested

and willing, they can pretty much take a lot of that stuff out of commission quickly. So you could end up with a lot of Chinese material going in. Looks overwhelming in an initial phase, but there's a lack of training and experience on their warfighters. Those platforms might not have good quality control. We have to see. So I have a lot of suspicion of how that would play out. But I suspect that there'll be some effort at significant coercion in the next couple of years. I don't think it'll be an absolute invasion or outright military assault, but some effort at serious coercion. And we'll have to see whether the United States and its allies have the moxie to do to China, what was threatened to Russia and how that affects China's economy. I wouldn't want to test that today

under current plans and capabilities, but I do know that there are thoughts and plans to try to improve that option set, and I hope they're going at light speed. Well, I tell you what, you just uttered the secret word of the day, Moxie. So you win a prize, which is exciting. It's like the old Tonight Show when the duck would fly. I never mind. Now I'm dating myself. It's a clown.

See, Hotel Chang. Steve, listen, thank you very much. You're going to come back because, you know, we've really just kind of scratched the surface on this whole thing. And there's other parts of it that I really want to talk to you about. So I hope you'll come back when we call you. Steve Yates, Heritage Foundation. Listen, man, thank you again for joining us. Well, that is all the time that we have for this week's PDB situation report.

Don't look so sad. Come on. We'll be back next week. If you have any questions or comments or humorous anecdotes, or if you have any suggestions for how we should celebrate going forward Liberation Day, right? What traditions should we have every year? Well, just reach out to me. It's PDB at thefirsttv.com.

Send me your thoughts. And every month with your questions, our amazing team selects a bunch of them. they produce one of our critically acclaimed Ask Me Anything episodes. Finally, to listen to the podcast of this show ad-free. Yes, you can do that. Become a premium member of the president's daily brief by visiting PDB Premium.com. I'm Mike Baker, and until next time, stay informed. Stay safe.

Stay cool. Pay off your home, travel for life, drive a Ferrari. In celebration of the world premiere of the Monopoly Big Board Buckslot machine by Aristocrat Gaming, Yamava Resort and Casino at San Manuel is giving one person a 1.6 million dollar dream package. The biggest prize in Yamava's history. Club's Toronto members can earn daily instant prizes and secure a spot in the finale May 29th. Don't pass go and own it all. Only at Yamava, celebrating its 40th anniversary. You win? Details at yamava.com must be 21-20. Please gamble responsibly. Monopoly is a trademark of Hasbro. Hasbro is not a sponsor of this promotion.