150. Nicola Sturgeon: What Really Happened In The Scottish Referendum (Part 2)
00:00Thanks for listening to The Restis Politics. Sign up to the Restis Politics Plus.To enjoy ad-free listening, receive a weekly newsletter, join our members chat room and gain early access to live show tickets.Just go to therestispolities.com. That's therestispoletics.com.This episode is sponsored by HP. Now, Rory, I hear that Windows 10 is finally being put out to pasture this year.It is, and something pretty relevant for you, Alistair, given what I've seen as some of your technology.It's going on October the 14th, to be exact. And after that, Microsoft is going to be able to,stop supporting some of those old laptops of yours. No updates, no security patches. So if you were stillusing it or a business was still using Windows 10, it would be really exposed to cyber threats, for example.
00:40It would be like locking the door, but leaving the key in the lock. So it's time to move on,and HP are making that refreshingly straightforward. Yes, they are. HP's latest business PCscomes with Windows 11 Pro as standard. They're faster, more secure built for the AI tools,which are already reshaping the way we work. And you don't have to figure out all in your own.HP's business advisors help you pick the right kit, so no baffling jargon, just practical advice.And here's the bonus. Restis Politics listeners get 10% off business PCs at HP.com using the code Trip10Terms Apply.So unlock efficiency and innovation, upgrade to Windows 11 Pro PCs with HP and get 10% discount.
01:22Visit HP.com slash politics to find out more.Welcome back to Restless Politics Leading with me, Rory Stewart.me, Alastair Campbell, this is for part two of our interview with the former First Minister of Scotland,Nicola Sturgeon.Nicola, we left part one talking about Alex Salmon.And just before we go back into that, maybe just take us a step back to the independencereferendum.You were telling Rory about where you felt Salmon was good tactically.
01:56My big worry, as somebody who was on the other side of the argument to you, was actuallyI got the sense that Salmon ran rings around Cameron in terms of framing the whole thing, 16 and 17year old votes, the question, the timing of the question. That was an example to me of thesepretty effective tactical operations. And can I do a very, very quick explainer for internationallisteners? So we're now coming into 2014. The SMP has been pushing hard for independence,obviously from the creation of the party, but particularly since the creation of Scottishgovernment. And David Cameron takes what, for many of us, I was then in the Parliament in Westminster,that seemed like an enormous risk, which was to agree that there would be a referendum. And this time,
02:37referendum would have allowed Scotland to go independence if it got a majority in that vote, whereasthe votes in the 1970s had required a higher bar to cross for independence. And it felt like a very,very close thing. And it felt, as Alice says, as though Alex Hamer was very clever in setting theterms of this referendum, which felt as though it was continually disadvantaging the unionist side,right? That's my little explainer, which Nicol, you'll probably disagree with my explainer anyway.Over to you for an answer. I don't disagree with that. I don't think it's the whole story ofthe referendum. If we go back to David Cameron'sdecision to say yes to a referendum, which would take away
03:16any legal wrangling over whether the Scottish Parliament did or did not have powerto do it unilaterally, in that moment, and that was the momentDavid Cameron took us a little bit by surprise, we hadn't expected him to dothat when he did it. So we briefly were on the back foot and suddenlythought, because at that point we didn't knowwhether he was going to say you can have a referendum, but you haveto have it in three months' time.And so suddenly we thought, oh my
03:45goodness, we're not ready for this and yetwe might be about to berushed towards the pointof decision. But we quicklyregrouped andAlec was always really good in these momentsand through differentdevices we kind of rested
04:01the initiative back,got into a process of negotiationwhich from sort of late 2012I was in charge of with Michael Mooreon the other side of the debatethat led to the Edinburgh Agreement.And in the Edinburgh Agreement,we effectively, in terms of the process of the referendum,
04:17we kind of got everything we wanted.You know, we got to set the date,subject to electoral commission approval,we got to set the question,we were allowed,or we won the argument over votes for 16 and 17-year-old.So in terms of how that was then shaping upand processed terms,
04:34we were delighted with how,that was. I thinkto move on from process tosubstance, we were always ata disadvantage. Therewas a sort of institutionaland I guess it might always be this when you'vegot a battle between the status
04:51quo andan argument for bigchange, that the status quo has alwaysgot a bit of an advantage because it'sthe devil people know whether or notthey like it or not, they know itwhereas people who are arguingfor change as we were are always kind of
05:07having to get people to sort of accept the unknown and the unprovable in things.There was definitely a sense, and this was through UK government,I would say through the BBC and a lot of the British media,that anything David Cameron or the president of the European Commissionor the President of the United States said was taken as gospel,anything we said was assertion and couldn't be trusted.So there was an institutional imbalance there,in light of which the fact that we came as close is probably actually a bit of a triumph.
05:40You do admit, though, in the book, Nicola, that you feel that you were weak on the issues of currency,what would happen to the pound, weak on defence, weak on nuclear weapons.And it struck me as odd.Yes, I get it. Cameron threw down the gauntlet, took you by surprise.But I was genuinely surprised, both at the time and now reading your book,that you hadn't done more work on those questions.And are they not the questions that are going to haunt you again if another referendum comes?Can I just quickly come on the back of this?
06:11Because I don't know whether you remember, Nicola,but you very kindly came in front of my parliamentary committee in 2014,where I was grilling you on foreign affairs, defence, security.And I remember this quite long, I think it was in the Assembly rooms in Edinburgh,but a very, very long session where you were having to try to answer questionson exactly how many embassies Scotland was going to have abroad,how much funding you'd put into your intelligence services, etc.Let me try and as candidly as possible answer this.
06:38I think at the outset, when the referendum debate went from being kind of almost hypothetical,big picture into, well, there's definitely going to be a referendum.So the level of scrutiny and the granularity of scrutiny went up several gears.We were playing catch-up, I think, in the sort of preparation on some of these big questions.I think we got ourselves into a much stronger place.but that stronger place was always going to be a difficult place to arguewhat were essentially in advance unprovable things.Scotland will keep the pound.
07:11Now, I will argue to my dying day that had there been a yes vote in the referendum,there would have been an accommodation around a currency union.Now, what the price of that might have been for an independent Scotland is up for debate,but I believe there would have been.I also believe an independent Scotland would have been able to negotiate independent membershipof the European Union.But convincing people of that in advancewas always going to be really difficult.
07:37Add into that the sense of,you know, the referendum was effectively a choicebetween, you know, what will happen on take EU membership.It should have been a debate about what will happento EU membership if we stay in the UKversus what will happen if we vote for independence.Instead, it was all of, you know,what would happen if we stayed in the UK
07:58was treated as neutral and benjamin.and all the risk goes on the independence side.Now, in retrospect, you can see how unfair that wasbecause on EU membership, it was actually rejecting independencethat ended up with his out of the EU, not the opposite.So there was just a structural imbalance in the debate.Now, maybe inevitably, maybe it can't be any other way.And I think given that, although the outcome was devastating for people like me,
08:28in some ways, when you think about it in those terms, that we got so close to a different outcome is actually remarkable and a tribute to the strength, not just not of the political leadership necessarily, but of that grassroots democratic awakening in Scotland that blossomed over that summer into referendum day.I was passionately on the union side and remained very much on the union side, but I felt another challenge that you had is that,that nationalism was beginning to develop a bad name, because this is the beginning of the riseof populism, this is the beginning of the rise of right-wing nationalist parties and parts of Europe.And so an independence referendum, which was about dividing people, making a country smaller,saying, us and them, could always be characterized by people like me in terms of what peopledon't like about nationalism. And of course, you had a very different vision of nationalism,didn't you, had a vision of civic nationalism, which wasn't really like that. But were you
09:29conscious of that problem that nationalism was beginning to develop in a broader global context,a more difficult name, even if your type of nationalism wasn't like that? So I think that's somethingwe, and certainly I have always been conscious of. I don't think that became a bigger issuein the referendum campaign. I think had the referendum been a year later, that would have been different,but I think at that point it wasn't really. But that was something that had always,been a worry because the Scottish independence movement, the SNP, is not a nationalistparty in the sense that you have described and that we see in many parts of the worldtoday. And of course, in many of these countries, these nationalist parties are not, you know,
10:11they're not fighting independence campaigns. It's about a vision of the country that is.Evers is a civic movement. It's about self-government. You know, it's in the context of this debate,ironic that the SMP is probably the most pro-immigration party in the UK.I say that without fear of contradiction.We wanted Scotland to remain in the European Union.So the nationalist movement in Scotland is not just civic in the sense of it doesn't matterwhere you come from.If you live in Scotland, you have a stake in our country.
10:42But it is deeply internationalist in terms of independence is, yes, about making Scotlanda better place domestically, but it's also about Scotland playing a bigger role in theworld. So that's always been something that we fought to define and to avoid some of the morenegative connotations of nationalism globally. I've said before, and I'd say again, if I couldgo back to the founding of the SNP, I wouldn't call it the Scottish National Party, because I thinkthat name conjures up some of that stuff that is not justified, but can't do that, obviously.But I don't think that was a huge issue in the referendum campaign.I think what, and I'll just speak personally here, I think what I didn't take enough account of
11:29was the kind of emotional impact on the part of people who opposed independence of this sensethat it was part of their identity that they were at risk of losing.And I look back and feel a bit ashamed that I didn't pay enough attention to that,not in the sense of changing my mind, but being more sensitive to that.And it wasn't until Brexit, ironically, when I felt a part of my identity, European identity,was being taken away that I really understood that. And that was my deficiency, I think, looking back.That's really interesting you say that about the name. I can give you the exact date, March the 14th, 2014.The reason I know that's the date is the day that Tony Bend died. And I was in Aberdeen with Alex Salmon doing an interview for GQ,
12:18where if you remember, he said some silly things about Vladimir Putin.I remember this interview well.What did he say? Tell us what he said.He basically talked about how we admired Putinand whatever you said about Putin is a strong leader.And it was massive in Scottish politics for days and days and days and days.We had this very long interview and then we had dinner.And he said to me, if we get independence, by the way,
12:42I'd like to get some of you kind of Anglo-Scott's involved in the sort of process oftransition, blah, blah, blah.And I said, well, I think to get independence, you know,the first thing you should do should change the Labour of your party.I think you should get rid of national and make it about internationalism as well as independence.But anyway, that never happened.The other thing that came through in your account of the referendum campaign, you became what became known as the yes minister.Your job essentially became winning the argument for independence and also for doing the kind of the big draft white paper.
13:14And there's a very interesting account of Alex phoning you from Hong Kong.Sounds like he's a bit the worse for where.and you are reduced to tears by the fact that you seem to be carrying all the way of the work that you're doing.And you have what feels to me like a pretty bad panic attack.Is that right?Yeah.The first time in my life, I remember having what I would describe as a genuine panic attack.It was, you know, just a matter of weeks before the white paper had to go to print the white paper.
13:40And I think, and I would say this, I think we did a really good job in the white paper.Whatever people think about, you know, the content of it, I think we put out.out there, something that was a pretty weighty prospectus for how independence could be achievedand what it would deliver.It was bloody long, remember that.It was very long.But it was trying to do so many things in the same document.It was a really, really tough task to get it from conception through to publication.
14:06I had a big team working with me in the Civil Service, but I was personally, very personallyinvested in it.I was reading every draft myself, kind of rewriting bits of it myself.and by the end of this process,it took hours and hours and hours just to read it from start to finish.And I reached this point where I just,I had this sense of impossibility.I can't get it from where it is just now to where it needs to be
14:31and it goes to print in a few weeks.And I remember, you know, sort of ended up on the floor of the room I'm in right now,actually, crying and struggling to breathe.And it was just this way of responsibility of having to getthis document that I felt, and I think to some extent this proved to be the case, would be reallypivotal in how the rest of the campaign would unfold. And Alec at that point, he wasfirst minister, so maybe that this was justified, he was, you know, running the country,but he wasn't taking much to do with the white papery. Allick didn't really properly engage
15:10in the referendum campaign until probably after the Commonwealth Games that summer, so quite latesummer. I knew I had to get him tohe was the person who had to effectivelysign it off before it went to print. He hadn'tread it. I knew I had to get him to read itand just at the pointof knowing that I was going to haveto force this, he told me it was often a trade
15:29mission to China. And I'm like,how am I? How in eartham I meant to get him to read this thingwhen he's pissing off to China?And he said, I'll read it on the plane, Nicola.And I'm like, yeah, until you have the firstglass of in-flight champagne and thenabout, you know, we were faxing.
15:45copies of this to China. I'm like, you know, he's probably under covert surveillance.That was sensible.I know what, but we had no choice. So the Chinese, you before we did, what was going on?They probably did. But it was, you know, looking back, but anyway, the sort of the low pointof this was, because as well as having to do, I was having to stand in for a McPherson'squestions. On this particular day, the MOD had done a big announcement around shipbuilding,which was actually about reducing shipbuilding in Scotland, but it turned out to be.be more of a problem for the yes campaign than the no campaign. You know, my constituency
16:19interests meant, you know, I knew a lot about shipbuilding. There had been a shipyard in myconstituency for much of my time in Parliament. So I'm getting ready to go down to the chamberto do First Minister's questions for Alec and the phone rings and it's Alec. He'd spent theafternoon at horse racing in Hong Kong. He was not sober and he just phoned helpfully to give me a fewtips for First Minister's questions. I think I told him to F off and put the phone down. And yet, you see,the other thing that's interesting. You admitted that, you know, because I remember at the timeseeing you and some of your people and you said, oh, we've got this button down, we've gotthat button down. Oh, we did. I mean, we did. But it was, what was going on behind the scenes was
16:59much, much tougher. I'm glad you admitted in the book that, and I'm really pleased about this,because I was involved on the other side in this one, that Alistair Darling wiped the floor,that's your phrase, wiped the floor with him in the first debate. And you were then, and you describeyourself in the spin room saying how well Alex did while crying inside.Haven't you there by expose the utter pointlessness of these spin rooms?They're utterly pointless. I'm not an advocate of spin rooms. I've not because more of myexperience has been doing the debates rather than being in the spin room of the debates.But, you know, I've been in a spin room at debates probably less than a handful of times.
17:39This was the most miserable experience I had ever had in one.And it was that sense of, I thought in that moment we had blown the whole thing.Because at that point, it was still an uphill struggle, but there was a sense of, a growing sense of possibility that maybe, just maybe we could pull this off.And in that moment, it felt we'd blown the whole thing.It didn't turn out to be the case.The polls didn't, you know, show a hemorrhaging of yes support.But, you know, that was just a, it's a moment in the referendum campaign appeared.I will never, and I don't have the opportunity now to work out what was going on.
18:13but I wasn't allowed to take part in any of his debate preparation.I'd been doing most of the debates by this point.And I thought, well, you know, I've got a good sense of what's coming at is,what works best in our, but I was frozen out for reasons that I didn't understand at the timeand don't understand to this day.But there you go.That is all history.It's so refreshing to be able to talk honestly about these things now that everybody's left politics.
18:38But I just wondered sort of going behind the scenes, what it felt like to be on the other side.So if I think back to, as I say, you may not remember it very well, but we had you in Edinburgh in front of our committee.And I was asking grumpy questions about the intelligence service.And Frank Roy, who for listeners, was a longstanding member of parliament in Motherwell, who'd been a steel worker and a Scottish plant.And Ming Campbell, who was on the committee with me, who'd been a sort of Scottish national legend as an athlete.And then later you get much bigger guns like Gordon Brown making these kind of big speeches.What was your sort of sense of this?Did you feel that people were being unfair?
19:18Did you feel that these were biased unionists?Did you feel these were men patronising you?What was your emotional experience of these kinds of encounters?So we felt, I felt, you know, it was a David and Goliath situation.And we were the underdogs.We were, you know, the kind of upstarts against the whole weight of the British establishment.and of course there were other voices from outside Britain weighed in, President of the Commission, Obama, you know, Pines at some point.So we felt absolutely that we had this, you know, massive weight, establishment weight against us.
19:58There was also a sense that they were, you know, every fear and smears.It wasn't on the no side that debate, you know, the issues were being debated in a proper, realistic sense.It was a fear campaign.And, you know, the no campaign referred to itself as project fear.So, you know, and you talk about Gordon Brown's big speeches,and he made some very influential speeches in the course of that.I'm not knocking Gordon here.But he was one of the voices that decided to argue the case that people in Scotland
20:29would not be able to watch Doctor Who if we voted for independence.So there was a sense of just trying to scare people.I think it was EastEnders.Well, that makes it okay then, Alison.I take it all back.It was EastEnders instead of Doctor Who.I'm not sure that is the germane point at the heart of this debate.But anyway, so there was, and you know, you won't get to use the pound.
20:52You'll get chucked out of the European.And actually that started to play in our favour because people started to feel insultedthat intelligence and sense of self was being insulted.And there started to be a sense of, well, if in the UK we are so, we have no rights to shared assets,we have no right to determine our own future then actually,what good is this union doing us?So it played in our favour.And that's, we reached a point, I think,
21:18where once people decided to vote yes,there was no shifting them.So Alex, the first debate performance where in the moment,I thought this is going to be disastrous,people are going to, you know, hemorrhage away from yes.That didn't happen.People were solid once they made that decision.I think what we didn't do effectively enough,
21:39obviously because we lost and things like the debate performance just not being able to be convincingenough because we were trying to prove the unprovable on the big issues. We didn't get enoughor a fast enough momentum from the soft no to yeses. We got some of the way but we didn't getquite there and that was partly our own feeling but partly it was because of that weight ofyou know that the sky will fall in if Scotland votes to be independent. So the fighta week of the campaign, you know, the banks all, I think, probably under significant pressurefrom the Treasury were all pressed to come out and say, we'll leave Scotland if there's a yes vote.So that weight of everything being against us was definitely felt emotionally and practically.
22:26But in some way, you know, as an underdog often will, it allowed us to really rally and rallyour troops as well.Yeah, and also then Project Fear in the Brexit campaign, quite far badly.so they didn't really, Cameron and Osborne read the lessons of winningrather than the lessons of what went well and what didn't.In the hours after the result in 2014,Cameron's pronouncements on the doorstep of number 10about English boats for English laws,
22:52that was, I mean, from our perspective, brilliantand it helped fuel that post-referendum senseof Scotland's not being put back in its box,but from Cameron's point of view,the most tone-ref speech in a crowded field,the most tone deaf speech I've ever heard.It sounded as if he was punishing Scotlandfor daring to dream as opposed to saying,
23:14OK, we've heard that you might not thinkthe union is working great for you.How do we make it better?You said in the book that you had an inflated sense of optimismahead of polling day.And as the campaign he finished,you said, this is in the book.When I got home to Glasgow, I had a glass of wine and cried.
23:28It's quite a lot of tears in this book, Nicola.I'm one of life's criers,which is one of the things people probably don't think about.Right.Okay, Nicola, Alistair, quick break.and then back for more.Hey, this is Michael and Hannah from Gollhangers, The Rest is Science.This episode is brought to you by Cancer Research UK.
23:44We often think of beating cancer as treatment,but imagine stopping it before it begins.After years of work,Cancer Research UK scientists are launching a clinical trial of lung vacs,the first vaccine designed to prevent lung cancer.It builds on TracerX,the world's largest cancer evolution study,which tracked lung cancer cells over many years,
24:06years to uncover the disease's earliest warning signs. Lung Vax is designed to train the immune systemto spot these signs early on, destroying faulty cells before cancer develops. So it's not treatment,but preventative with the potential to stop lung cancer before it starts. The first stage of thetrial starts this year focusing on people at higher risk. It shows what long-term research makespossible. For more information about cancer research UK,Their research breakthroughs and how you can support them,visit Cancer Researchukuk.org forward slash the rest is science.Hi everybody, it's Dominic Samark here from The Rest is History.
24:52Now, some of you may have heard me on your show,The Rest is Politics when Rory was away and I was filling inand enjoying Alistair Campbell's tremendous banter.And I'm back to tell you about our new series on The Restis History,which is all about Britain in the 1970s,a period with a lot of uncanny.any resemblances to our own. So right now we're living through a moment when oil shocksgenerated by war in the Middle East are rippling through the world economy, when Britain
25:21feels like it's sunk in a bit of a malaise. People are arguing about Europe. The government hasgot a few issues with the trade unions. And we have a kind of, I suppose you'd say governingelite, a kind of political class that is really struggling to come to terms with all of theseissues and people are asking if Britain is governable at all. So there are a lot of parallels betweenthat Britain that I'm describing, which is our Britain, and the Britain of the mid-1970s.So in this series that's coming out on the rest is history, we'll be looking at these and otherissues. We'll be talking about the rise of Margaret Thatcher, obviously a colossal figure in ourpolitical life even now, whether you love her or loathe her. And we'll be talking about the very
26:01first Brexit referendum of 1975, a subject that I'm sure Rory and Alice.we'll have strong opinions about.We'll be talking about the fall of the Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilsonand we'll be talking about one of the grimmest moments in Britain's economic history,the moment in 1976 when we had to go cap in hand, as people said at the time,to the International Monetary Fund, the IMF, for a then record bailout.Now, if that sounds good to you, how could it not sound good to you?Of course it sounds good to you.
26:32We have a clip for you to listen to at the end ofthis episode. And if you want to hear more, just search for The Rest is History wherever you get yourpodcasts. Hello, I'm Gordon Carrera, National Security Journalist, and I'm David McCloskey,former CIA analyst or novelist. And together, we're the co-hosts of another Goalhanger show.The Rest is Classified, where we bring you the best stories from the world of spies and secrets.We have just released an absolutely cracking new series on the infamous Colombian drug lordPablo Escobar, how the U.S. spent decades fighting a war on drugs to bring his cocaine empire to justice.By 1989, Escobar was the seventh richest man in the world, wealthier than the entire state of
27:20Colombia. He was a husband, a father, and the most feared narco-terrorist in the world.But to the poor in his hometown of Medellin, he was kind of a hero. He built roads, houses,soccer fields. It became almost a Colombian robin hood to a nation weary with a veryunequal and violent political and legal system.Over the next few weeks, we'll take you deep inside the murky world of the hunt for Escobar.Using accounts from members of the secret military units deployed to find him,will reveal how Colombian and American forces work togetherto track down the man who controlled a global cocaine empire.
27:57If this sounds good, we'll have to clip for you at the end of this episode.Following on from first referendum,The time I was most scared, to be honest, is when Boris Johnson became prime minister.And we came into 2020.And I and many of my conservative colleagues in Scotland felt this is it.We're in real trouble because we've got a Tory government.We've got Boris Johnson as prime minister who was horrendously unpopular in Scotland.We'd had Brexit that Scotland had voted against.
28:28We had a massive, large, motivated SMP base.You as First Minister were riding higher than any.first minister in history. It seemed at that point that there was no way of avoiding a referendumand that you were very probably going to win. And then it didn't happen. Why didn't it happen?Why didn't you get it across the line the second time? If we had secured a referendum,we would have won that referendum. And that, you know, that can't be disproved because it didn'thappen. But I believe with every fibre of my being, that would have been the case. And therein liesthe answer to the question, why did we not secure a referendum? Because Westminster just
29:05decided it wasn't going to let it happen.Just to interrupt, because again, to bring people back to that, certainly the view of ScottishTories was that Westminster wouldn't be able to prevent it.And our advice to Boris Johnson, which turned out to be wrong from the unionist point ofview, was you're going to have to grant a referendum.You can't have a situation where Westminster refuses to grant.I think ultimately that will prove to be the case.I don't think in any democracy, people can be prevented forever from making a choice
29:32that enough people want to make.But in that moment, and this was a question that had never been definitively answered,you know, could the Scottish Parliament have done it unilaterally,or did it legally need, you know, Westminster to exercise the power or transfer the powerthat has now been, you know, answered through the Supreme Court,which actually in some ways is better for the independence movementbecause we've got a sense of reality rather than delusion about what is possible.And we know that we have to build the case and strengthen the pressure for a referendum.
30:05and for that to happen.But in that moment, I think it was easy for the Tories just to say no.What was the price of that?There wasn't much of a price to be paid.We were, they could play into the sense that they had created of, well, there's chaos around Brexit.So we don't want to, you know, we don't want to add to that at the moment.And then, of course, COVID comes along and there's a sense that, you know, for that reason,it's not the time to do this.
30:31So they found that politically, they were able just to say.say no. Now, I don't think that will sustain forever. The task for my party and those on my sideof the argument is to sooner rather than later get to a point where that position for any Westminstergovernment is politically unsustainable. And looking back, do you think there might have been acouple of things you could have done differently, that you could have gambled more, used thatincredible momentum and position you had in a slightly different way to get it across the line?In short, yes, there must have been things I could have done differently because II gambled more. The thing is I don't know what that means and I've searched my soul over what that means.
31:13Gambling more would have been to say, right, I don't care what you say Theresa May or Boris Johnson.I'm going to start the process of legislating for an independent referendum. I think I would have struggled to get that past my law officers at the time because of the legal position.But say I had managed to do it. It would have ended up in court because it would have been challenged.and we would have got to where we got towith the Supreme Court anyway.So gambling more, yeah,it might have made people feel better in the moment.Would it have actually delivered a different outcome?
31:47I think that is a much more open question.You know, we have a fundamental issuethat we have to reckon with,which is the Scotland Actreserves the constitution and with it,the determination of whether or notthere's going to be a referendum to Westminster governments.Now, my party had got into the point of believing is, well, actually, if I was just braver,
32:11if I was just, you know, more able to sort of give two fingers to Westminster, that would change.Well, we couldn't just magic that away.We can't just magic that away.What we've got to do is shift the political balance of advantage and disadvantage.We have to not just get to the point where a majority of people in Scotland clearly want independence,but they want it badly and urgently enoughthat there is a sense that Westminster can't stand in the way of that.And that sounds like, you know, long, hard work.
32:42And it is hard work and how long it is depends on how well we do it.But there's no magicing it away.And I wish there was.I wish there was some other way I could have found to get round the legal reality.But I'm not sure there is a way to get around.In fact, I'm pretty certain there's not.You were there almost a decade.You dealt with five British conservative prime ministers.
33:07You dispense with Liz Truss in about a third of a sentence.So we don't need to waste too much time on that.I get the feeling.Just tell me if this is right.You quite like Cameron.You had a lot of respect for Theresa May,but you couldn't really build a rapport.You thought Rishi Sunat was a little bit out of touch.
33:23And you thought Boris Johnson was a complete and total charlatan.Does that about sum it up?I think it's a reasonable summary.Cameron was the one I got on easiest withand I think that was partly the kind ofeating charms ofand yeah I quite liked himwe had our moments of
33:42we disagreed in a lot but we had somemoments of shouting at each other and such likebut I always got on well with himTeresa was undoubtedly of the five prime minutesas I interacted with the one that seemed to meto take the job most seriouslyyou know was always on top of our brief newwhat she was about
34:03and she would say the same about memaybe so it's not all one wayit was just impossible to build a reportand that frustrated me at timesbecause I instinctively thoughther and I should have been able to build a betterrapport and undoubtedly my failingas much as hers but it wasn't possible
34:18Rishi I didn't really have muchto do with Rishi because I stooddown not long after he becamePrime Minister Liss Trustwell we know what happened to Liss TrustBoris, you know, a message, something emerged during the COVID inquirywhere I had in a message to one of my advisors called him an effing clown.I mean, it wasn't the most polite way of describing somebody,
34:41but he's a clown, a charlatan, somebody who should never in a month of Sundaysbeen anywhere near Downing Street.And there was nothing about how Boris approached the jobthat said he took it remotely seriously.Everything for him was reduced.just to an opportunity for a gag.And that basically was my experience of them.And yeah, I don't know.
35:04Maybe some people have got different experiences, but that was mine.Given all that, and that's a pretty strong statement,how on earth did he manage to become Prime Minister?I mean, what does it tell us about British politics?I mean, because everything you've described would suggestthat British public, who basically,and we believe in democracy and have a certain amount of common sense,would never vote for someone like that.
35:24So what does it tell you about the world that someone like that can...become prime minister? In Scotland, of course, we didn't vote. I mean, obviously some people did,but in Scotland we didn't vote for them. I think, you know, why is Trump president? I think,and I think for progressives, people on the left of politics, I think there's some really bigquestions that we have to ask ourselves that there are, and arguably I was able to do thisfrom a very different political perspective than these guys of kind of just tune in to the kindof sense of a population and make them feel, and in my case I hope it was genuine, thatyou're kind of one of them and on their side and there's a sort of authentic connection. But people
36:08that Boris and Trump are doing that and how are they doing that? We have to ask ourselves thatbecause they are in many ways, you know, both Boris and Donald Trump are the polar opposite ofbeing, you know, of the people that are voting for them in many ways of the examples of. Theexamples of the problems of the financial and economic elites that have done so much damage.But I think there is a straight, and I always tried as a leader to speak straightforwardly.It's what I tried to do during COVID. People could agree or disagree with me, but I try to communicate clearly and directly.And I think they do that as well. And I think there is something, if you listen to the likes of, and I'm not, I don't want to single out here,Starmar and have a go at him gratuitously here, but you listen to people like Kier Starmor.
37:01And you get to the end of his sentence and think, what was he saying?What was he trying to say?Because it's all buzzwords and political jargon and it's all mangled up a bit.And so I think there is, and obviously the problems of the world right now are much more thancommunication.But I think politicians on the left, they're trying to ape the Trumps and the Johnsons ofthis world rather than offer an alternative.And then even when they're trying to offer an alternative,
37:26They're not able to communicate it in a way that people are able to relate to and connect with.Your publisher must have been delighted, though, that Trump had a little whack at you as he left Turnberrygolf club last, the last time he was there.Well, I was quite delighted.I suspect he'll be on the paperback cover.Back to your point about you, you love Alan Johnson.I'm with you on that one.I'm with you on that too, and I agree with you on Boris as well.
37:51Well, we both, most of our listeners.In fact, I'm very shocked that both of you've called him Boris.you must never call him Boris.Jim Murphy, you can't stand.You like Mark Dreyf and Carwin-Jones,very fond of Martin McGuinness.I think we've got to give you a little shout-outfor your analysis of Nigel Farage.
38:07While I found him every bit as odious in personas he appears on TV,it also seemed to me that underneath the bombastis a brittle, fragile ego.He seems very insecure, especially around women.And then you've got lots of interesting observationsabout sexism and misogyny throughout the book.And maybe this is a way back into Alex Salmon
38:26before we kind of get towards the end of this.I mean, it's so ingrained and embedded that women, or maybe everybody,but certainly speaking for myself, you don't always recognise it as sexism and misogyrybecause you kind of internalise it as just how the world is.And, you know, I'd tell a story in the book about a kind of episode of that I sufferedfrom an MSP of another party in the early days of the Scottish Parliament of effectivelysexual bullying.but it took me until 2017 in the wake of Me Too
39:00when the Scottish Parliament was doing a survey of staff and membersit took me till then to actually recognise what that had beenback at the time I just thought well that's what you have to put up with in politicsbecause that's rough and tumble that's how it isAre we allowed to tell the story or would you rather we didn't?I don't mind you can tell it thoughI still feel mortified by itSo basically this is a guy who spread the rumour
39:24that Nicola had injured a boyfriendwhilst performing oral sexand gave her the nickname Nasha.I don't know whether he started the rumouror gave me the nickname.Well, he certainly spread it.I don't know whether he was the source of it,but he took great delight in spreading it.
39:41Yeah.And then you also had this situationwith a very good friend of minewho I've known since way backwhen I was doing my job with Tonyand she was doing the same job with Shirak,and that's Catherine Collina,who then became ambassador.
39:54to the UK and this rumours spread.And you seem to indicate you think this may have been the Russiansthat you and she were involved in this lesbian relationship.I don't know.I just have often wondered,because it was an episode I won't go into just now in the 2015 electionof a story that came out of a discussion between meand a French ambassador, a different French ambassador.
40:12And I just often wondered,is this some kind of bot factorythat's taking all these little ingredientsand throwing up the story that had no basis, in fact, at all,that Catherine and I were having this relationshipinvolved at one pointthe suggestion we'd bought a housefrom Judy Murray and we were living in there
40:30and people, you know,if that had just been a social media rumour,I probably would never have heard it,but my family were being asked about it.My neighbours were, you know, asking about it.But going back to misogyny and sexism,I mean, that's undoubtedly an aspect of that.Women in politics
40:46are treated differently to menin almost every respect.You know, we, the focus on what we wear,how we look, the tone of our voice,things in men that are seen as attributes of leadershipand in women, their character flaws.And that different treatment was truewhen I was growing up in politics.
41:07It is still true today.And then you add in the factor of social mediaand the toxicity of social media.And I think while there are more women in politics today,I think the sense of public life being a bit ofhostile environment for women is actually greater today than it was in my earlier days in politics.I bring together your point about the age of Trump and your points about women and sexism.You were a real champion of some of the big progressive causes of the 2000s.
41:43You really defined yourself around issues like climate justice, immigration, and you were a bigcampaigner for trans rights.and these are things which now in the age of Trump feel a bit sort of abandoned.I mean, you'll get even Friends of Alistair on the left saying the Democratic Party could have won if it hadn't lent so hard into those issues.And that actually what they need to do is move away from those issues become more relevant to everyday voters, right?And that often means the progressive left basically not talking very much about climate, not talking about immigration, not talking about trans issues.It's a reflection on that. And do you sometimes fear that your form of...Progressivism, a bit like, I guess, my anxieties about my form of centristism, is being a bit
42:27kind of sidelined and left behind by bigger historical trends.I absolutely fear that.I think that's, you boil everything down.And my biggest worry about the state of democracy, the state of humanity right now,is that these issues that I think are so vital, you know, the planet is, is burning.I'm sitting here in Glasgow in early August, and we've got an Amber War 940.for wind and rain.You know, the planet, climate change is happening right now.
42:56There are parts of the world that are becoming uninhabitable because of climate change.And yet we seem to have slipped into this belief or large parts of the populations of the worldhave slipped into this belief that it's the action to tackle climate change that is impoverishingpeople, not climate change itself.And similarly on equality issues, you know, we've slipped into the sense that,you know, the problems that a working class man is facing economically are, you know,is all down to women's rights or gay rights or trans rights.And that is fine in terms of there are people in this world who want to argue these things
43:37because that's what they want to believe.My real despair, and at times right now it is despair,is that people on the progressive left or centre left of politics are just abandoning that territory.So for me, it's not that the government.Democrats in America or Labor or the S&P in a UK sense should be abandoning these issuesto focus on issues more relevant to people.The challenge is to show people why these issues are so relevant to their living standardsand to the health of the community that they happen to be living in.
44:09And instead, you take immigration.You know, I deplore the way in which Starmar is effectively abandoning this argument to Farage.I think it's electorally stupid because if you'd say to people,well, Farage is actually right,then I suspect they're going to vote for the real thingrather than the person that is seen to be playing catch-up.In Scotland right now, one of the biggest economic challenges we faceis a population that is not big enough for all the things we need to do.
44:41We need immigration.So I just want to see progressive politicians have the guts to stand upand argue the case on some of these things.It might be electorally uncomfortable for a periodbecause these things tend to go in historical cycles.But if you abandon the ground and cede the argument to your opponents,as I think is happening too much just now,then frankly, I think we're all in a pretty sticky wicket on some of this stuff.
45:06Yeah, you're right there about you,so you feel despair at the timidity of politicians on the leftin the face of charlatans stoking fear or destroying democracy.I think I've got a very strong sense of who you were pointing that one towards.Just my final, final point in Alex Salmond, and this relates to the discussion we just had on women in politics.When the scandal around the allegation, sexual misconduct allegations around him, was that the first time that you knew or sensed that he had, that there were real problems in this area concerning Salmon?Yeah, and I've searched.I've really searched my soul in this over the year since of, you know, should I have known?
45:46was I willfully blind to thisbut I didn't know that there was any senseof inappropriate sexual behaviourI've spoken openly aboutwhat would be described as sometimesbullying behaviourI'd heard rumours over the years aboutconsensual affairs
46:07and always took the viewrightly or wrongly that that was none of my businesswhat consenting adults get up to isis up to thembut nountil all of this came to light,I did not think or I certainly did not knowand I didn't think he was somebody
46:23that acted inappropriately around women.And again, going back to the whole issueof women being treated differently,there were times, and I don't want to put,I don't want to overstate this,but there were times around that whole periodwhere I thought I was getting more griefand being, you know,
46:41sort of scrutinised more for what I knew whenthan he was for,what he was actually alleged to have done.Yeah.And there's another observation I want to make about Sam which relates to your husband, Peter,because Rory made the point, I think we both made the point at different timesas that whole story was unfolding,that was it a bit odd that the chief executive was married to the leader?
47:06And you actually record that Salmon said to you at the time,you should maybe think about getting rid of Peter as chief executive.I mean, looking back, whatever his motivations, which may have been related to something completely different, looking back, do you not think that would have been a wise thing to do?I think I say in the book, and, you know, I'm being careful in what I say, and I'm going to be careful here for obvious reasons, because getting anywhere into the rights and wrong substantively on this issue would take all of us into legal waters that we're not able to get into.So if I even put a toe into the substance of this, then, you know, that's a problem.I can see why people think that is what I've said in the book.And I think that's probably as far as it's safe for me to go at the moment.Nicola, one thing that we see consistently through your career and through this interview
47:55is that you're passionate about women and the interests of women.Again, for internationalists, as one of the challenges that you faced was a challenge fromsome women over the transgender issue.There was this moment where you said that some of the people opposed.the SMP's gender reform bill, cloak themselves and women's rights to make it acceptable,but just as they're transphobic, you'll also find they're deeply misogynist,often homophobic, possibly some of them racist as well.What's going on there? I mean, that seems quite extreme.
48:28I find it astonishing that anybody would take issue with that statement.Now, what people, because literally everything I say on this issue is misrepresented andtwisted in some way, I am not saying, and I've never said that everybody who opposesthese trans rights or the gender recognition legislation that I took through Parliamentfalls into that category, not by any stretch of the imagination.But I'm sorry, I think whatever side of this debate you're on, it's a simple statement offact that there are many people who have attached themselves to this debate, you know,people who would support Trump or in America or Farage here.
49:06Being opposed to trans rights is at the moment the acceptable form of bigotry.and if you scratch the surface of that, you'll find that these people are also homophobic and sexist and misogynist and maybe racist as well.Even people who fundamentally disagree with me in this issue, I genuinely can't believe that they don't recognise that.And how is it? I mean, it's been one of the biggest bits of culture, we're almost more in Britain actually than in the US, strangely, because in the US, the progressive left doesn't have a group of feminists as opposed to trans rights.It's not really a political phenomenon.What do you think it says about Scotland in particular that almost uniquely in the developed world,people who traditionally would have been on the feminist progressive left have taken such a strong position on this?Well, some of them have.
49:52I've got many friends and colleagues on the feminist progressive left who are of that view.I'm not going to deny that, but I've got many, many who are not of that view.So I think they're in fair play to any campaign that manages to make people believe they are the overwhelmed,majority representation of an issue.I think with the help of media along the way,I think they've managed to do that.It's an interesting thing.When we first, or the issue of gender recognition reform
50:23was first mooted in Scotland.It was back in the 2016 Scottish election.And at that point, every party was committed to it.So it was myself for the SNP,Ruth Davidson for the Tories,Kess Dogdale for Labour,Willie Rennie for the Liberals.We were all at a hustings in that election campaign.
50:41The question was asked, we all committed to it.And all of us, in one form or another,had a commitment to reform in our manifestos at that election.And also, we were not doing something groundbreakingor not proposing something groundbreaking.Many other countries had already done this.The Republic of Ireland has had this on the statute book for a long time.And that sense of consensus,
51:01no great controversy around this,continued right up until, I don't know,2021, 2022, at which point it became mired in the culture war.Now, part of that was that many people had concerns that they genuinely hold,and I do not take away from that.But there was also a sense that it was being whipped up from certain quartersas part of that bigger culture war.I believe that trans people should be respected and protected.
51:34there have always been trans peoplethat always will be.We should try to take away the discriminationand the stigmatisation,afford greater dignity and respect.I'm a feminist to my coreand always have been and always will be.The risk to women comes from abusive men.
51:51In any group, and I'm talking to the trans group here,you'll find bad faith people, bad people.You know, there are some biologically born womenwho abuse children.In no other group do we say the bad peopleshould define the rights of the whole group,which seems to me what we started to do with trans people.So I believe the rights of trans people and the rights of women
52:12are not in conflict and shouldn't be in conflict.If I have an overarching regret about this,is not that I believe something I shouldn't have believedor should have changed my mind.I'll fight for the rights of minoritiesfor as long as I've got breath in my body.It's when this became so toxic.And I don't know that this would have made a difference, incidentally,
52:34but if I could have my time again,I think I would have pressed the pause button and said,okay, let's all take a breath, take a step back,and see if we can find a way of moving forward on this issuethat avoids or reduces that polarization and sense of division.It might not have worked, but I wish I had done that.My last question, Nicola, and thanks for all your time.You write a lot in the book about COVID
53:01and how heavily that weighed on you,and then you say that,that after you gave evidence to the COVID inquiry,you came close to a breakdown.You cried on and off for days.You couldn't get out of bed.You were blaming yourself for people dying.And I think is that the only time
53:14you've actually gone and sought professional help?Yeah.You know, without ending on too much of a down,just tell us about that.I can see it now as almost the strawthat came close to breaking the camels back in that period.I think if all the other stuffthat I had faced since standing down as First Minister
53:32hadn't happened,then that COVID inquiry experience might not have had that impact on me.It was accumulation of things and it brought me to that point.And it was a friend who said to me,you should talk to somebody.And I've always, maybe Western Scotland kind of mentality about these things that,and wrongly, I should say, I'm utterly wrong about this.But I suppose I've always had that sense of going to seek professional help is a sign of weakness.
53:59But the friend taught me into it.I went to see a counsellor.and it helped me hugely.And it didn't take long a few sessions of actually talking to somebodywith a bit of distance and obviously training for me to bring myself back out of the kind of hole I'd fallen into.And I suppose that that's maybe the sort of, I don't know, sharpest illustration of what I've kind of learned over the past couple of years.Because the past couple of years for me have been the most testing.of my life
54:34and a lot of it's played out across the mediaso I don't need to go into it alland I'm often struck by a sensethat if you hadyou know a few years agoput in front of methis scenario that would unfoldI would have said I won't survive that
54:49I just won't be able to get through thatand yet I haveand it's been I've had really lowdark moments along the waybut through inner resiliencethroughrecognizing a needy professional help at one stagethrough friends who have been much better friends to me
55:09than I've ever been to anybody else in the past,something I hope to put right in the future.I've come through a really difficult timeand can say hand on heart that I'm probably happierthan I've ever been before.And so there's something in, I'm not a different person,I'm the same person, but I've got a different perspectiveand outlook on life today.
55:28And while I wish that certain things hadn't happened,that's probably a healthy place to be.The final one from me, looking forward, you've had this extraordinary role as FirstMinister.I mean, it's something very, very few people get, a chance to play a central role in thegovernment of a whole nation.And now you're young.Thank you.
55:47I am.Your mid-50s, I mean, you've been in politics almost all your life.I mean, you've known almost nothing else.You've got another at least 20 years of working life ahead of you.And I guess maybe this is therapy for me and Alistair as well.but how do you think about what you do next,which will genuinely give you that level of fulfillment and depth.It's remotely comparable to what you did in the first half of your life.
56:12Please do say podcasting.I'm coming for you.I'm going to basically launch a rival podcast.I'm not.So I think because the last couple of years have been so tumultuous and, you know,unexpected and unusual,I kind of need a bit of time to rebalance myself and just,I guess just enjoy being out of some of that.
56:36I think so a couple of random thoughts on this and I think a fair bit about it.I think being First Minister or being Prime Minister of a country, it's so unique.You can't replicate that in anything else you do.And looking, I think, at some leaders name and no names,I think the ones who possibly struggle most are the ones who try to replicate that.And so I'm not sure that's the right thing to do.For me, it's about finding or discovering or rediscovering what else in life gives mefulfillment and happiness.
57:06And I use that second word very deliberately.I don't regret anything about the career path I took.It's been a huge privilege.And, you know, I don't regret a second of it.And this has been my choice.You know, I sacrifice certain things along the way.I didn't do a lot of the things people of my age and stage in life would have done.and I sometimes think I'm going to have a period of maybe living life a bit back to front
57:31and just taking the luxury of enjoying certain things of finding fulfillment and happiness in other waysand just enjoying the kind of luxury of being able to pick and choose of where I happen to be in the world at any given time,what I want to do and find, not by trying to force it, but through a process, just finding where I can make a differencewhat I want to use the voice I've got such as it isto try to influence and what things make me a happy person.Very good. Well, listen, you two have been getting on far too well,but we'll have to come back another time to discuss your observations.I don't know if you spotted this one, Rory,
58:11having had the opportunity to preserve the royal family up close,I have little doubt that history, however long the sweep of it may be in this respect,will look back on the Queen's death as the beginning of its end.Rory will not agree with you, that one, Nicola,but we're going to have to leave it there.That's an episode in and of itself.I think it is, yeah.Thank you so much for your time.
58:32Have a great day.And I'm in Scotland too facing some very extreme weather,so I hope you have a safe afternoon.And you.So, Rory, your former leader.Yeah.Listen, I mean, just to come back to my complete obsessionwith the idea that when people become ex-politicians,
58:51they become much more interesting.I mean, that was a Nicholas Sturgeon.I barely recognise.Really?Yeah, I was talking yesterday to Ruth Davidson, who I admire Mensity, and she was complainingthat, and she really knew her well, 10 years against her in Scottish Parliament, thatNicholas Surchin used to have this stock in trade where she'd say, of course, I've made a fewmistakes, but she'd never give you a single example.
59:14It was total sort of stainless steel.And suddenly today, having gone in thinking, my goodness, we're going to have to work hardto get her to open up, she was natural, open, self-revelling.reflective, self-critical. I mean, people, real nerds can watch some of my previous encounterswith her. You know, I was on question time with her. I was taking testimony from the thing.At the select media, as I say, very, very stiff, brittle, defensive. And suddenly there wasthis incredibly attractive human person that I warmed to immensely. I mean, I said right atthe start that she says in the book that she felt it was a form of therapy. And I think it has been,
59:55If you think about, you know, what the last couple of years have been like for a fairly obvious reasons to do with an ongoing criminal case, you didn't want to get into it.And just sorry, just to interrupt, because we didn't quite explain this to people.I mean, you mentioned briefly at the beginning, but for people to understand, her husband was arrested, charged with embezzlement, re-arrested.The police were photographed going into her house, going through her drawers, digging up the gun.She was arrested.She was arrested and now being clear.I mean, and this was somebody who when she stepped down was at the absolute pinnacle.I mean, it's like a Shakespearean tragedy and then was crashed down in an instant to being portrayed as a criminal, a villain, corrupt, etc.
01:00:38So, I mean, unbelievable.I've said you before that I, look, I'm not a nationalist.I'm very proud to be British.I'm very proud to be Scottish.In fact, one of the things that I liked in the book very early on, she talked about one of theof her grandparents who was quotes English by birth but Scottish by choice, which is exactly what I ambecause of my family background and so forth. But I've always found in her, I think I've alwaysspotted this very strange mix of the shy and the quite sort of inward looking and somebody who nonetheless
01:01:18has a sense of how you operate in the limelight. I mean, we were joking about it afterwards.finished her recording when the very, very first time I met her. And she was a real rising star atthe time. She'd been made Health Minister. Everybody was saying she's the one who's going to takeover as First Minister. And I was doing this charity bite ride up in Scotland for leukemia research,as it was then known, now called Blood Cancer UK. And she and I were the kind of the star attractionsat this thing. So I thought really looking forward to having a good chat with Nicola. We couldtoddler along on the bike for a few hours. Anyway, needless to say, it was pelting with rain.And she was very, very cold. I mean, really quite cold. And I remember saying to friends,
01:02:05I was, God, she had Nicholas Surgeon. She was really, really cold. Then I got to know a bit bettersubsequently. And I went to her, why were you so cold first time I ever met you?Well, frankly, because it was partly because it was a horrible day, but also because I wasabsolutely terrified of you. Because at the time, you had this image of the sort of, you know,the big fat controller who was in charge of everything.There's also something in this anecdote which you're not quite getting across,which we've got from Nicola,which is you describe yourself as going on happy toddling bike ride.
01:02:34Her memory of it is the maladaptively overly competitive,Alistair speeding into the thing.There's no chance for conversation at all.No, no, Roy, that's because my intention was to have a nice little leisurely bike rideand then win.But because she'd been so sort of chilly,I thought, so did it, I'll just, you know, I'll just win the race.But then, and then, of course, I think the only reference to me in the book,
01:02:58which she was joking about after we finished the interview,is where she says that I was relentless in persuading herto come out for the people's vote campaign and the second referendum on Brexit.We didn't really get into Brexit, but that was when I kind of, I guess,had most to do with her.And I agree with you, by the way, I felt at that point,I felt that with Johnson in power in the UK,Britain out of Europe and labour struggling in Scotland,
01:03:25I thought if they don't get it over the line now,I'm not sure they ever will.And of course, there are people in the SMP,I think, who have a sort of feeling,which she would say is unfair,that maybe if Alex Salman had been leading them,he would have been able to bring off that magic,that he would have taken that risk,
01:03:40that he would have found a way of forcing the Westminster government.Certainly, I mean, certainly that's what we as Scottish Tories felt.I mean, very much the advice we were sending to Westminster, and we were wrong, was, no, no, no, Boris can'toppose the signal will of the Scottish Parliament if they really wanted to. I mean, we were desperatelysaying, listen, this was a once-and-a-lifetime decision. That's what the SMP said. It's got to be 20years for the next referendum. But we were really, really worried. We didn't have enough timebecause it's amazing. I mean, it's a brilliant two hours. And I really loved the way that we wentnaturally from conversation to conversation. But the question I had up my sleeve that I would have
01:04:17like to ask is about education. And it is actually about what she actually achieved as FirstMinister. So she said 10 years ago that closing Scotland's education attainment gap was her politicalpriority. She said, let me be clear. I want to be judged on this. She didn't succeed there. And infact, Education Scotland's getting even worse under her successes. The figures from Februaryshow the number of kids leaving schools with no qualifications in Scotland is at its highest for 15years. And that I guess is something that Anna Sawa and others, and indeed my former colleaguesin the Conservative Party in Scott, will keep pointing out, which is, despite all therasmatars, despite all the popularity, the performance on things like education, some people
01:05:00might even say health, was not what it should have been. And that's maybe something if wehave a third go at her. When we talk about the end of the monarchy? Well, presumably if I'd asked that,I would have got quite a defensive response. I was in two minds about that as well, because when I putto her, that quote from where she talked about her own school, not really meeting kids' aspirations.I mean, I do hear from quite a lot of parents in Scotland say, well, you know, it hasn't much,you know, it's still the same.Well, actually, the figures suggest it's, figures suggest it's worse, unfortunately.Yeah.
01:05:27I mean, Scotland's gone from being one of the best educational records in Europe.Yeah, I think one of the reasons why you enjoyed it much more as an interview is neitherwe nor she allowed it to become a kind of, you know, we were better than you,Labor's better than the SMP or whatever.So, no, I'm glad you enjoyed it, because I know you've, I've heard your many, many doubts.I will get so much grief from my friends.I'll tell them now, Adas, yes, yes, yes, you can say what you like.And I saw what, Douglas Alexander, he always gives me a hard time for being nice than Nicola.
01:06:01Catherine McLeod always tells me, you know, tells me off.But you cannot deny.And the other thing I've got to say, I was, as I often do, I was imagining,my family listening to the podcast.And I, you know, that stuff she was saying at the end about, you know, stuff that youbelieve in, you have to, you have to fight for it.You don't lean into the people who completely disagree with you.Yeah.
01:06:25So, you know, on issues like climate and trans and economic inequality and all the rest of it.And immigration indeed.Yeah.Well, thank you.And of course, my own apology to Ruth Davidson, who would have felt that I wasn't as toughas I should have been.But no, I really was taken with it.And I do think actually she revealed in that interview why in the end she is a little bit different from Theresa May.
01:06:46She was right to say that they both in some ways are quite introverted figures.But she's got a capacity now for informality, humor, self-criticism, which I think is really charming.I really was taking a minute.Good.See you soon.Thank you.Bye-bye, Alistair.Hi again.
01:07:10It's David from The Rest is Classified.Here's that clip we mentioned earlier.Victory over drugs is our cause.a just cause.And with your help,we are going to win.Pablo Escobar,the head of the Medelline drug cartel.
01:07:26The world's 14th,richest man.He was, in many ways,a terrorist.This is an economic powerconcentrated in a few handsand in criminal minds.What they cannot obtain by blackmail,
01:07:38they get by murder.And I don't think heexpressed any regret at all.He tries to portray himselfas a man of the people,this kind of like leftist revolutionary outlaw.Nearly everyone in Medellin supports the traffickers.Those who don't are either dead or targets.
01:07:55If you declare war, you've got to expect the state to respond.This is the moment where he goes too far.13 bombs have gone off to Medellin since the weekend.By the end of 87, Bogota is essentially a war zone.US spending for international anti-drug effortsis going to grow from less than $300 million in 1980.to more than 700 million by 1991.It is the certain knowledge that no one is really safe in Colombia from drug cartel assassins.
01:08:25It's a conflict where the goal wasn't even to stop, the flow of cocaine.It was to bring down this narco-terrorist.Everything has turned against him after this point.The whole thing he was building is collapsing.To hear the full episode, listen to the rest is classified wherever you get your podcasts.
There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click any sentence in the transcript to leave one.