The Ringer NBA Show - Did the Nets Solve the Regular Season? | The Answer
Episode Date: April 9, 2021Chris is joined by The Ringer’s Rob Mahoney to discuss the Nets' experimental approach to the regular season (02:00), the success of buyout additions Blake Griffin and LaMarcus Aldridge (35:00), and... more. Host: Chris Ryan Guest: Rob Mahoney Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
From in-depth analysis of basketball and football to life advice, Ryan Rusillo has got you covered on the Ryan Rusillo podcast.
Join him as he talks to some of the best names in sports while providing sharp analysis and wit you won't find elsewhere.
Check out the Ryan Rusillo podcast on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hello and welcome to The Ringer NBA show.
It is The Answer.
I'm your host Chris Ryan and this week we are asking, did the Nets show us a new way to watch the NBA regular season this year?
So an amazing performance by the Brooklyn Nets
against the New Orleans Pelicans on Wednesday
and it got me thinking
you know, we haven't talked about the Nets in a while
probably since the Hardin Trade and it seemed like we were due
and Rob Mahoney from the Ringer wrote a really great piece this week
about how the Nets have been treating this season as a laboratory
as a place to experiment both tactically
but obviously with their personnel
constantly shifting from Durant's injury, Hardin's arrival,
Kyrie's absences and the emergence of these incredible role players
that they seem to have happened upon, you know,
may have heard of, like, those guys like Blake Griffin and Lamarcus Aldridge,
what feel-good stories those are to see those role players?
The Nets have just been trying stuff.
And I don't know that a lot of teams really do that.
You know, as a Sixers fan, it's been an awesome season.
But I don't really think that we have been experimenting very much.
Whereas when you look at Brooklyn and you look at all that they've had to deal with,
but also all that they've chosen to take on,
it's a fascinating way to go through the regular season.
I think a lot of coaches, coach scared.
I think a lot of teams play scared,
or a lot of teams just get sort of settled with what they are and who they want to be.
And the Nets haven't really done that.
So I wanted to talk to Rob about whether or not that was something that specifically only Brooklyn could do because of their talent
or whether it was something that other teams should maybe think about.
And we also just wanted to have a general sort of like stand in slackjawed awe of this Brooklyn juggernaut conversation.
So let's get into my chat with Rob Mahoney.
Joining me back on the show, I think third or fourth time.
It's Rob Mahoney.
What's up, Rob?
I'm just a regular here now.
I enjoy it.
I do too.
I hope you know my order by now.
I hope we have that kind of patter.
Yeah, that's right.
Rob is here to talk about the Brooklyn Nets,
but on a more broad way,
broad spectrum,
I want to talk a little bit about
how the Nets are treating the regular season
and whether or not it's a way
for other teams to maybe treat it in the future
or if you have to have Kevin Durant,
Kyrie Irving, and James Harden
to exactly do what the Nets are doing.
So Rob wrote a piece this week. It's on the ringer. It's called Brooklyn has turned the regular season into its laboratory. And Rob, I was curious just whether or not this was sort of like an idea that met a team or a team that met an idea when it comes to the piece. Because on one hand, I think we're always looking for ways into a regular season that can often feel like a little bit of a drag at times, you know, where you sort of get our bearings and then head towards the postseason. But it has a lot of valleys. Was this something where you were like,
there was something about the way Brooklyn played that jumped out at you, or had you been thinking
about this and Brooklyn kind of answered it? Yeah, I mean, I think it's probably an idea that met a team,
just because for me, this is a much longer, larger process of watching basketball and evaluating
teams. And Brooklyn came in, even from the start of the season, and look like a team that was
going to do exactly this. And, you know, teams are, their appetite for adventurousness in the regular
season varies. And, you know, coaches have jobs on the line. Players are up for contracts. Like,
there's a lot of variables that go into this stuff and dictate what teams are willing to do or how
conservative they're going to be. But as you mentioned, when you have Kevin Durant, when you have
this kind of talent, and I think most importantly, too, when you're, there's a lot of clarity in what
the nets are playing for, right? Like, they're playing for a championship. They are playing for a
deep playoff run. The regular season, it matters in some ways, but only as a vehicle to get you there.
And so if it can be a vehicle for trying out every possibility of how you can play and what
kind of lineups you can put together, that's probably the best way to get to that endpoint.
Yeah, I've been fascinated with them for a lot of different reasons. Obviously,
you know, whenever you see the construction of a super team, usually that first year,
no matter what the end result is, there's going to be some chemistry issues, there's off-court
stuff. There's also a lot of like scrutiny. Like I obviously remember the first iteration of that
heat team. And essentially it was like a nightly appointment viewing to see if they lost. And that was
like the most exciting thing in sports
was seeing each team
the heat played, give them their best
shot. It was almost like a weird, it was like a
tournament game on a nightly basis
when they first started. I didn't really get that
feeling with the Nets. And I don't know whether or not
that's because
the league has changed so much in the 10
years or whatever since the Heat
formed that first time. But
I get the feeling like the Nets
have been able to basically
conduct their basketball
away from the noise, even though they have
been a part of their fair share of off-court stuff,
whether it's Kyrie missing games,
the hardened trade,
and everything that went into that with him,
basically talking his way out of Houston.
And then Durant, coming back from the Achilles,
going down with his hamstring,
and in the meantime, getting into like, Rappaport zone,
all this stuff, other teams you would call that huge distractions,
can they focus and win the championship?
I don't, when I watch the Nets play basketball,
that stuff never seems to matter.
No, I think you're right that the heat in a lot of,
always normalized a lot of this stuff. Just the experience of watching super teams. And to your point,
other teams playing against them just feels substantively different now. And the closest thing I think
we've seen since the heat to that experience, the every night is a chance to beat this team,
is maybe like the Warriors when they were going for the record. Yeah. And especially when they were
going on long win streaks. And then it's like, okay, can you crack this code? Even more so than when
they got Durant. Like that was the time where it was, we need to beat this team in this random regular
season game, which it just puts a very different kind of spotlight on a random Thursday night
T&T game, even, you know, a marquee by NBA standards, when the regular season and the purpose
of it is usually something that's a lot bigger than that.
Yeah, you know, that Warriors team, you're talking about the 73 win team, it's almost
the flip side of the heat where it was like, I think people generally were like, I want them
to do this. Like, this is really cool that they're making this run at this record.
I remember being in like a bar in Texas and watching that Memphis game.
towards the end of that season.
I think that might have been either the record tying win or the record setting win.
And just being like, there was like 17 people standing around at a bar in Austin
cheering for the Warriors, which was not like, you know, that was like a like sort of organic, you know,
sports fandom moment that I think that you don't really get that often.
But with the Nets, it's like, I'm more watching them to kind of see what they might become.
And that's scary when you think about some of the results.
that they've already put up this season.
Yeah, the fact that they are so far
from their finished product
and really don't even know
what that finished product is going to look like,
I think is what's so interesting.
And it's one of those things where,
you know, if you had to bet your life
on who Steve Nash is going to start
in an Eastern Conference Finals game,
I would advise you to have your affairs in order.
You know, like I just have no idea
if it's going to be Bruce Brown.
Like DeAndre Jordan is getting D&Ps right now.
Is he going to be the starter
against Joelle and Bede in the Sixers?
I don't know.
Maybe Lamarcus Aldridge is.
There's just so much.
optionality with this team and so much of a willingness to explore it that lends itself to that
kind of like I just want to turn on this net schemes and I just see what they're up to.
Yeah. So I mean like I want to get into their role players as well because I think that that's like
an under remarked. That's not been remarked upon enough. But I want to kind of go through your piece
a little bit here because there's a few lines in here that I thought were really good ideas for
jumping off points for this conversation. The first one is the only real value in the regular season
is what a team makes of it. So.
I imagine that, regardless of whether they had done the hardened trade,
I think Steve Nash's approach to this season probably would have been similar.
And they've got Mike Dantonie in there,
and those guys are obviously on a very similar wavelength
in terms of what kind of offense they want to run.
But what do you think the Nets are making of this regular season
for our listeners who maybe are kind of trying to get a clearer idea of what we're talking about here?
Yeah, I mean, especially when you contrast them with teams that either have to go
all out all the time to make the playoffs
or they want to go all out in the regular
season to prove something to themselves
or to the league. The Nets are just
kind of going about their business, kicking
every single tire that they have, turning
over every rock, looking at every possible
lineup combination. And they have
a general style of play.
But within that, there are
so many different versions of the Nets. You know,
this is one of the fastest-paced offenses
in the NBA, but you put James Hardin
on the floor and he pulls it back,
he slows it down. He's a game manager.
right now in a very different way than even Kyrie is.
And so the fact that you're getting different looks
at all of these shades of the Nets,
depending on which stars are on the floor,
who's in the lineup, who's not,
it just gives you such a different lens
to look at a 72-game sample size.
Yeah, you know, so we're recording this on Thursday,
the Nets tattooed the Pelicans last night.
And one of the scariest things, I think,
if you're planning,
if you're cheering for a team
that's going to see the Nets in the playoffs,
like I am,
who might see the Nets in the playoffs,
is the fact that they,
Pelicans were oftentimes doubling
Marcus Aldridge.
That should honestly scare the shit out of you.
If their fourth best player,
if that's who he is,
if he's not their fifth best behind Harris
an offensive player,
is getting doubled on the lower left block
by Stephen Adams,
and Stephen Adams needs help doing that.
There's no math for that.
There's no solve for that.
There's no defense for that.
You can't clone Tibbs
and bring them onto your team.
There's nothing you can do
about five guys who need
double teams. And they're not the first team to do that either. Like Lamarcus has been passing out
a doubles basically since he got there. And yeah, in theory, he's the guy you should worry about
the least. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, we were under the, I was under the impression and we can get into the
morality of the buyout market later on. But I was under the impression that he was going to be like a nice
additive backup for Claxton and Jordan and Brown. And like he was going to come in and play 12 to 20
minutes game. And I guess that is what he's doing. But last night was like, I think his most efficient
offensive game, I think, both by
eye test, and the numbers are really good for him, too.
You know, you're talking about
what teams make
of the regular season, and I think that we could actually
break down a couple of
these different approaches teams have, you know,
and some of these are like philosophical, but some of
these are, you know,
they're basically
what happens once you sort of start to
figure out what you are. And there's like, we've talked
about these pedal to the floor teams, like
the 15, 16 Warriors. I think
the bucks from the last couple of seasons,
clearly were playing for
as like a 60-win season at least,
if not locking up home-court advantage.
And I think the Jazz this season
are playing their asses off every night
and I think they want to have home-court advantage.
They want teams coming into Utah
in close-out games.
That's the pedal to the floor way of doing it.
Then there's the switch,
the flipping the switch way,
which I think really only works
if you have a very specific kind of talent.
So that specific kind of talent would be LeBron.
I think LeBron can not coast, but his teams can be third or fourth and putting it together
and guys are taking targeted rests and maybe they're bringing in different buyouts and
veterans.
And then all of a sudden it just hits you like a wave, right?
Yeah, I mean, Tristan Thompson straight up said that this week.
Like when he was with the Cavs, like this is what we did.
We didn't really care if we were the fourth seed because we knew what kind of team we were,
what kind of team we could be when we wanted to become that.
this season is interesting because
I don't know that there are that many
teams ready at the switch to flip it
they're kind of still looking for it like the clippers
are still figuring out where the switch is for them
the Lakers like again if they're healthy is one question
but what condition they're going to be in by the start
of the playoffs is something we'll have to figure out as we go
and I think they'll have to figure out
when they need to flip that switch and what it even looks like now that they're
incorporating Andre Drummond and there's just a lot more
questions around that team than a usual LeBron team
yeah and the funny thing
about the Lakers this year was that I thought LeBron was kind of going all out. It was
A.D., who was more of a switch guy. Like, AD, I wouldn't say he was dog in it or anything
like that, but I think he was definitely playing himself into shape. He was coming off a long
season. I think he was banged up in the bubble. And they were obviously taking a very
conservative route with the Achilles now with his injury. So, yeah, the Lakers and, you know,
Brooklyn has risen as this title favor.
because I think partially because the Lakers seem banged up and like we're not really sure whether or not like does LeBron and AD make KCP all of a sudden a competent shooter again or what's going on there.
So you've got these LeBron teams.
I think you could also go back to some of the Big Three-era Boston teams that tried this.
Then there's the staying afloat teams, you know, and I think this is, I think this sounds pejorative and I don't mean it that way.
But this is the team that basically knows what they are, knows what they do well, kind of sticks to their rotation.
maybe there are some surprises,
but for the most part,
are going through the NBA season
to be as healthy as possible
going to the playoffs
and apply what they have already
know about themselves to the postseason.
I would never say that the Sixers
are staying afloat because they're
among the best two to three teams in the east.
But I do think that the dock way of doing things
is let's find out who we are.
Let's be the best version of that.
We're not going to surprise anybody.
What we're going to do is present you
with these overwhelming talent options
in Joel, Ben, Tobias, good shooters around them.
That's like kind of where I think the Sixers are right now
and there's a couple of other teams probably like that.
Yeah, I think the Sixers, I mean,
their situation is so much dictated by Joel's injury
where if he had been healthy the whole time,
maybe they would have been closer to a pedal to the floor team.
But as it stands, they're more of a stay afloat.
And yeah, Doc's philosophy,
definitely among the more conservative coaches
in terms of style, in terms of rotation,
stuff like that, sometimes to his detriment.
I think that's a team that could probably afford to get a little weirder,
but the presence of a player like Embed does make you more rigid
in terms of what you can and want to run.
Yeah, I mean, it's interesting too,
because with Embed and the Sixers and LeBron and the Lakers,
I can't tell how much of a bubble that we're in
because I feel like we start talking about MVP earlier and earlier in the media.
Yeah.
But I do think that some of what happened with Embedon and LeBron is not their injuries,
but the way in which they were being deployed
was tied to the MVP award.
You know what I mean?
Like there was,
I don't think LeBron would have taken
his two weeks of like rest and relaxation
this season had he not twisted that ankle
and had he not gotten the high angle sprain
and was in contention for an MVP
and especially if Embed was still playing.
You know, like I don't think he would have ceded
the award necessarily to Embed.
I mean, LeBron has his finger on the pulse of that conversation
and really he has his thumb on the scale of it.
You know, like he is.
extremely conscious of what the MVP race looks like
and usually the fact that he should be at the top of it,
which when you're LeBron,
that's a pretty defensible stance to take.
It's so weird.
This season,
I mean,
I think that there's a lot of really viable candidates for the award,
but it seems like it might be a participation award this year
or an endurance award.
Like,
it's basically like,
because as soon as M.B.
went out,
as soon as LeBron went out,
I feel like their odds or their favorability dropped a lot.
But it's like,
are we then just going to give it to the guy who played 75 games?
Is that, like, should we just say you have to play X number of games to even qualify for the MVP award?
Well, luckily, we have this very nebulous criteria from the league where everyone gets to just make their shit up and decide, oh, he played 30 games, he played 50 games, that's good enough for me.
So, I mean, I was really looking forward personally to the philosophical imbid and yogh conversation.
Like, which of these skill sets do you value within the context of their team?
Like, that's interesting to talk about.
And instead, as you're saying, both here and I think in the rookie of the year race, too, with Lamello out, it's going to be.
a lot more, oh, he played 70%
of his games, therefore, which is just
not as fun. Yeah, Simmons and
Rissillo, like, losing their
minds about Anthony Edwards possibly
winning,
Rookie of the Year was pretty high comedy to be.
Not that I disagree with them, but it's just like, you can
tell, it's like, this is just going to be one of those
seasons where, like, a guy who's, like,
had a pretty good year.
But, like, you watch Anthony Edwards. It's just, like,
Anthony Edwards has, like, total green light.
Like, he's got these shooting
25 times a game.
Yeah, I mean, they're playing a different sport there.
Like, you know, especially for a, you know,
Charlotte is a team like we were mentioning that's not even in a,
they're kind of staying afloat now because of their injury situation,
but they were going all out.
Like, that's a franchise that really wants to make the playoffs versus the wolves.
I mean, it's performance art a lot of the time.
Now they're a little more structured with Chris Finch,
but they're just trying to find who they are, period.
Yeah.
So that leads us to other categories of approaches to the regular season.
I think you have staying afloat.
The flip side of that,
I think we could call falling apart.
I wouldn't necessarily say that that is,
that's kind of like the teams that are stuck in the high lottery.
The teams that are struggling to stay at 500 or below
and haven't quite tanked out,
haven't quite bottomed out,
but are still like just sort of try to figure out
who they are late into this season.
And then the final teams are teams that either should be tanking or are tanking.
Teams that maybe don't know that they're tanking.
And that is like a handful of squads,
whether it's Houston and Minnesota, as we've talked about before,
or I think the Wizards, you know, obviously.
So there's a few teams there that are kind of bottomy out.
Did you have any other approaches to the regular season here, though?
I mean, I think the only kind of gray area within that is where Brooklyn is.
And I think to some extent where Milwaukee is, too,
I think, you know, they haven't been quite as bold as the Nets,
but that's a team that was in the pedal to the floor slash,
we know who we are camp.
And they've had to do a lot of soul searching this year.
And some of that was Drew Holiday being out,
which required Chris Middleton to play a lot of point,
which changed their rotation a little bit.
But they're also, you know, they're switching a lot more.
They're putting Janus more off the ball in crunch time situations,
whether that's with Chris or with Drew handling it.
They're doing a lot of the things that, frankly,
people have been asking Mike Boodenholzer to do for most of his time there,
and they're getting to it, they're getting more comfortable with it,
in the hopes that when they run into that wall in the playoffs,
again, they'll have something to say about it.
There's another idea in your piece that I wanted to chat with you a little bit about,
which is that the NFL is more episodic.
This is Rob Mahoney writing here.
The NFL is more episodic
with enough heft behind
a random Monday night game
to make it an event.
The stakes of the NBA season
are more introspective,
brought to light
in the slow burn
of a team figuring itself out.
And if you want to see the value
in that marathon,
look at what the Nets
have worked through
and what they've become.
I think that what you're getting at
here also is something that,
you know,
the Nets being the best team
in the East right now,
as we record this, they have the best offense in the league as we record this.
There's an argument to be made, given what they've done this season, that this is the most super
of super teams because they can actually lose a link in the chain and still be this.
I think a lot of that comes to the Hardin trade.
Because if this was just a Durant Irving team, that conversation is very different.
But when you have an MVP who can lead the league as Hardin is right now in minutes per game,
that is just an incredible,
it gives your team
incredible staying power
through all these experiments.
So, you know,
there's kind of two prongs
to this conversation,
right, where it's like,
there's what should teams
be using the regular season for
and there's what should those of us
watching the regular season
be looking for?
Yeah.
And I think this idea
of the NBA
as a less episodic thing
in the regular season
and more of a season long arc,
that's where those two ideas
kind of converge for me.
Yeah, I mean,
it's especially going to,
it's hard for the NBA.
Look, there's plenty of
NFL games. A lot of them get flexed out towards the end of the season, but there's plenty of NFL
games where you might be looking forward to this Monday night or that Sunday night game.
And it turns out that this wide receiver, that quarterback, or this quarterback, or this left
tackle are hurt. And all of a sudden, like, it's not much of an event. But in the NBA, I think,
especially this year with a lot of the COVID absences and the stop start nature of everything,
you know, we have a game coming Saturday, which is, I think should be the marquee event of the NBA
season, which would be Lakers' nets on Saturday.
day, I think it's on ABC, if not ESPN.
And, you know, we're not going to have LeBron.
We're not going to have A.D.
We're not going to have Hardin.
That's not the NBA's fault.
But I think when you have a reality like that, you're forced to kind of look at like something
on a much longer continuum than any given one data point, which is hard because I think
a lot of people relate to the NBA on a minute to minute night to night basis where
they get on Twitter and they do all this analysis and they make, they get their jokes off.
but in fact it's like way closer to baseball than it is to football.
Well, we have kind of multi-track experiences in that way
where you're getting the jokes off on Twitter or whatever.
But even if you just follow a team,
and especially I think if you followed a team pre,
you know, we've kind of hit on 2010 as kind of a landmark moment in the league,
especially if you were following a team before then,
you're already kind of trained to look for this stuff,
to like look at the NBA this way.
Like if you're a Wolves fan, you know, we're talking about Anthony Edwards.
If you're a Wolves fan, I mean, first song,
But second, you know, you're noticing, you know, you're noticing that Anthony Edwards isn't just scoring more, but like the directionality of his game has changed from month to month.
Like, he's evolved as a player within this year.
You're looking at, you know, what does Chris Finch do differently than what Ryan Saunders?
Like, these are just things you're monitoring as a fan of that team.
So I think we already do this and we make the jokes.
You know, it's a multi-track experience in that way because, you know, we can focus on the minutiae.
We can, you know, get to the punchlines, get to the soap opera.
but the great advantage of the regular season is time.
It's just this elongated thing.
And when you have that, you get to develop ideas
and you get to develop characters.
You know, it is like a season of television in that way
where that's where you get the meat
of who these teams are and who these people are.
Yeah, I mean, I think that in my personal experience,
you know, before I thought about doing,
we thought about doing this specific podcast,
I had been kind of at peace with the idea
of maybe just watching like 80-Sixers games.
and that being the way through which I view the league.
Like obviously I would watch other stuff,
but I think that your personal
and sometimes regional fandom of stuff
can be a very interesting lens through which to view the league,
although you're much more concerned with
how is Mike Scott looking
than how is Aaron Gordon fitting in in Denver
one night every 10 days that I see the nuggets or something like that.
I mean, I want to hear that pot.
I want to hear the Chris Ryan's descent into madness podcasts.
I think people could just listen to Wrights to Riky Sanchez.
It's like they got it covered.
I want to ask you about a couple other lines in this piece
and that I want to talk a little bit more broadly about the Nets.
But you said,
teams with this much stark power tend not to try anything too interesting.
Is there a paradox here where somehow they have landed on three talents
that have allowed them to the Brooklyn,
has landed on these three specific talents,
which I think maybe in the beginning,
people were like, these guys are just friends or like, you know, like this was like a
backroom, all-star cigar smoke room like set up. But in fact, like the very specific
skill sets of these guys allow the nets to be the shape-shifting monster that they are.
Has the cigar smoked room changed? Like is that a dated, is it like everybody with their
veins in the back now or something? Like let's like, I'm going to give my cousin the contract
to the new like water system or something like that.
I'm just, I'm wondering if there's still, if deals are still being cut back there.
I mean, I mean, Durant seems more like a hookabar kind of guy anyway.
Yeah, I think it's more of like a 22nd century vape situation.
Yeah, it's not, it's a startup.
I mean, it's, I think we need to give all three of those guys credit for being more flexible
than it seemed like they might be.
You and I talked after the Hardin trade about like, how much is he going to change his game?
How much is he willing to do that?
because everything was catered to him in Houston.
I think he's been the player he could be.
He's been more of a playmaker,
more of a team-oriented,
more of a flow guy than he was in Houston.
He's still playing a version of his game,
but one that fits with everything.
And, you know, Kyrie in particular,
like this is a great example of what the Nets might do
that other teams wouldn't.
Is Kevin Durant comes back
against the Pelicans last night.
And Kyrie basically just, like,
lets him run point for a quarter.
Just, you know,
Durant inbounds the ball to Kyrie.
it right back. He says, I don't want it. I'm going to go stand in the corner. You run this thing for a while.
Get your feet under you. That's just something that, you know, he doesn't have to do, something some
stars don't do. Maybe for him, maybe for other stars, it might be like, oh, I need to get Kevin Durant
into the flow. I need to put him in easy spots. But they're going to say, no, our seven-footer is
going to run point for us for this quarter, and you're just going to have to deal with that.
And look, lo and behold, they score 36 to 40 points in that quarter because Kevin Durant is
unbelievable. And so there are all kinds of versions of that thing that are happening every night.
for the Nets. If you had to describe that that style of offense specifically, I know that they're,
they're just constantly switching as much as possible on defense, but on offense. How would you
describe their style of basketball? Is it, is it an evolutionary step of the MDA style that we saw
in Houston? It's an interesting point because I think for Dantone, if anything, the criticism of him
would be that he has his style, he has his base structure, and he doesn't necessarily want to veer
too much from that.
Versus the Nets, I think they take that basic spacing.
Like, they still run, you know, you could superimpose some of the drag screens they run
in transition over the seven seconds or less suns, and it would look exactly the same.
Like, there are some concepts there that are very Dantony.
And yet they will also just like feed Lamarcus Aldridge on the left block for the first
five possessions of the game because they can.
And it's a team that never posted up before they got Aldrich.
And all of a sudden, they're going to do that now.
So I think it's constantly evolving right.
now, which is what makes it so hard to peg down.
And it's so hard to...
Ultimately, I think,
going to be very hard to scout.
I don't know which version of the nets you prepare for
if you're going to play them in the first or second round of the playoffs.
We always talk about how, like, it's a different sport in the postseason.
I would like to see if this is the exception to that rule.
Because, you know, I would describe them as honestly as, like, an All-Star team if they were
trying.
You know, when you watch the NBA All-Star game and you see those flashes of, like,
telepathic passing and just kind of like a sense of like everybody on the floor trusts that the
other guy can make the play that they're about to set them up for and that feeling of,
you know, no open shot is going to be missed. No cut is going to be missed. Like guys just have like
this understanding. And also I want to get to their chemistry in a minute. Like when you have that
kind of like it kind of goes beyond X's and O's tactics, I'm not really sure that closing out
threes a little bit more aggressively is going to be the solution here.
the solution for whom?
For a defending, teams defending against the nets.
Like where it's like, well, you got to understand it.
The playoffs, man, it gets a little tight out there.
You're not going to get your corner threes off without somebody running at you.
And I'm like, maybe not, but like, I don't know if it matters.
No, I mean, especially when the guy who's then attacking that closeout is Kevin Durant.
Or as we saw against the Nets or against the Pelicans, Kyrie Irving, like driving in for a dunk over two guys.
Or making fadeaway 17 footers over Stephen Adams.
Yeah.
I think, you know, the one thing, and again, to give the role players a lot of credit on this team,
there aren't a lot of guys who feel like deer in the headlights, who feel like they won't be up for the moment.
You know, with the LeBron Cavs, for example, when they got Jordan Clarkson, it was so obvious Jordan Clarkson was not ready for that.
At that point in his career, just like was not prepared to be the guy catching the ball from LeBron and having to make a three or else you lose that game.
Maybe he's that player now. He's looking a lot better, a lot more confident in Utah.
but all the guys in Brooklyn
like Joe Harris
seems undaunted to me
if you want to close out at him
he's driving all the way to the basket
sometimes drawing two or three defenders along the way
like Nick Claxton is going to do some wild
things sometimes but sometimes you want guys
who are willing to step outside
a finite role like that
and do a dribble drive toward the basket
as a big man you need all that stuff
to work Bruce Brown does not seem intimidated
by anybody like all these guys fit
really well within this very
constantly shifting style
that the Nets are playing right now.
But they also seem like
they might just be game
for the scrutiny
of a playoff series.
I don't know what it is.
And maybe it's just
the way basketball itself has changed,
but this doesn't feel like
a bunch of like
minimum contract pegs
that they have found
to fill out the roster.
Like somehow,
and I guess this leads
to the buyout conversation,
somehow Gioza seems like a very,
very,
like he seems like a kind of
old school spurs find where I'm like,
I know this guy went to Florida,
but like how did you find him
and why is he giving you like 11 really solid minutes here,
you know,
to back up Kyrie?
I mean,
he's the kind of guy who for them,
it seems like he should be a luxury,
but their whole roster is just luxuries.
You know,
like you plug in TLC,
Timothy Luawa Cabo into the rotation
and he just like gives you good minutes
for a stretch while Kevin Durant is out.
Like the whole lineup is,
are those guys.
and, you know, I think we, there are a lot of questions about the depth at the beginning of this season.
A lot of questions about do we really trust Jeff Green to be the fifth guy.
Jeff Green has been unbelievable.
Yeah, he's been awesome this year.
And I don't know what that says about the model of what the Nets were building because, you know, some of these guys are holdovers, I think at this point, very few of them from the previous iteration of the Nets.
Most of them are just guys.
The last Atkinson team, basically.
Right.
Most of these guys are just guys they cobbled together who were castoffs from other teams.
Like, people were not, you know, champing at the bit to get Bruce Brown.
He was not a hot commodity.
I've had the TLC experience.
It's like, it's like cool, but it's also like you would not want him shooting in any kind of consequential moment.
But what they're getting out of him is exactly what they need.
Yeah.
And I think it's that up and down the roster, everybody.
So then in some ways, their personnel style or like the way they assembled this team kind of mirrors the way they play ball on the court.
I mean, because there's not a lot that you could say, though, they must have known that they were going to play Bruce Brown at center.
You know what I mean?
When they went into the season, maybe they had some hints that Hardin would like to come play there.
But I'm sure that they were probably pretty fine with Jared Allen and D. Andre Jordan at the five, and they were going to figure it out with Irving, Durant, Harris, or whatever.
And now they've got, you know, the PJ Tucker style, like, micro big in Brown.
And it seems to be really working for them.
they're still starting him there.
I don't know.
I kind of wish more teams messed around like this.
I think maybe I'm speaking specifically
from the perspective of a Sixers fan
who's like even in the Embed absence,
I feel like Doc was pretty dogmatic about like,
here's how we play and like Dwight is the Embed here.
And like I know that they're like Sixers cultists
can be very excited about like B-Ball Paul and stuff like that.
But like that kind of messing around where you find out,
hey, man, maybe this guy could give us like 10 minutes
in a playoff.
game is the kind of thing I wish Doc had done a little bit more that Nash definitely has done.
Yeah, and I think for the Sixers, there's, you know, the criticism and I think where it has
some truth to it there is, in the games and beat is played, the second unit has not been good
enough. You know, they haven't had what they need from that second unit in the games and beat
is played. Now, the whole tenor of the team shifts when he's been out, of course. But so, like,
could you have done more there to jazz things up to try different combinations? I think, of course,
you could have.
And that's where, you know, the Nets,
every team and every fan base has their B-Ball Paul, right?
Like the guy that they wish played more.
The Nets don't really have that guy.
I think Nick Clackston is the closest thing to it
just because they're probably Nets fans
who want him to play 30 minutes a game.
But everyone gets a shot.
Like everyone in Brooklyn has gotten a shot.
Terrence Mann is a really good example
of a guy that you find over the course of a season.
And then now it looks like realize
that you don't need Lou Williams
if you've got Terrence Man.
and Rondo. You know what I mean? That's like something that the Clippers did a really good job
for the course of the year. They clearly thought sometime around the deadline, or if not before,
this team cannot beat Utah, Phoenix, L.A., all like in some combination. So they needed to do something
and just watching Man on the Clippers the last couple of games has been really impressive to see
him kind of grow into that role. I think more teams should probably accept maybe like five to seven more
losses to find out five to seven more truisms about their roster.
Yeah.
You know, there are some teams that can't afford it.
There's some, you know, and maybe some of them are protecting against, say, like,
maybe we would have said that about the Lakers at the start of the season, all of a sudden
LeBron and ADR out of the lineup and you're talking about, are the Lakers going to fall into
the play-in game?
Like, that's the cost of doing this business.
But as long as you can get away with it, as long as your roster is relatively healthy, I'm,
I'm in favor of it.
I think that's the way you should navigate the season if you have aspirations of being a
high-level playoff team in particular.
Yeah, I mean, the nets have the luxury of never really putting together too many losses in a row.
You know, even when they were probably short-handed after the hardened trade, I think they were like
four and five at the beginning of the season or something like that. But, man, they rip off wins
and chunks unlike any team other than basically Utah this season. And they've never lost
so many in a row that anyone starts to like look under the hood. And that's a big thing, you know?
Well, that's the thing we don't know about them yet is what happens if they go down,
owe to in a playoff series, and they have everybody. There's no excuses. There's no like hardens out,
Durant's out. Everybody's on the floor. These are three guys who haven't had to problem solve in
that particular way yet. So that's the big unknown for them. And I think some of the tradeoff of
the situation they've been in and the style they play is you just don't have a lot of foundational
experience of having your best players on the floor in moments of adversity. I get very into
the backseat driving on coaches in the playoffs, but there's part of me that feels like that will be
a moot point when it comes to the playoffs of the nets.
It's like, what's the last play that Steve Nash runs?
Sure, we can second guess it and be like, Hardin should have taken it or Kyrie should
have taken it.
It's like, are you really going to get mad at him for getting Durand jumper from somewhere
on the floor?
That sounds like a pretty high percentage shot, you know what I mean?
So it's more just that it's a moot point than you're in the Kyrie school of,
oh, we actually have six head coaches, including our star players.
Let's talk about the buyout guys.
I think they've done a great job bringing those guys in.
And, you know, I sent out a couple of text messages.
I sound like Winhorse, but I did do a little, like, just poke it around.
But I was like, so how, like, what's the deal with this version of Blake?
What's this version of Lamarcus?
Because I think that there was a sentiment that these two dudes are just absolutely gassed.
And like, they might give you one heroic or two heroic performances, but this is not what people are making it out to be, where it's just somehow plundering the rest of the league.
I appreciate the fact that Blake has now dunked it as many times since he's joined the
nets as he has in like two years or whatever that stat was I saw the other night.
Yeah.
I will say that I do think that it looks like these guys have a little bit more gas in the tank than I thought they did.
And that the idea that Aldridge was like completely washed.
And that's why San Antonio was getting rid of him.
I think San Antonio knows what they are.
And they like arrived at this conclusion to Aldridge's time in.
in Texas.
But man,
like,
do you feel like
after watching them
for half a dozen,
10 games,
you're feeling differently
about the buyout boys
than you were before?
I think Blake in particular.
Like,
he looks really good
and looks like he can fit
what they need,
even defensively.
Like,
we've just seen him move
and rotate and be vertical
and do all the things
you would want a big to do.
Aldridge is still
going to be a little bit
of a wait and see
and I think is more
matchup dependent.
But if he's taking
not Blake's minutes
or class
Laxton's minutes, but basically D'Andre Jordan's minutes, that's a net gain to me.
Yeah, I mean, what Lamarcus gives you, and they're going to ask this question about Lamarcus,
they're going to ask it about Brown, they're going to ask it about Claxton.
What do they give you against Inde?
Right.
So when it gets down to that time and maybe even Janus in that way, depending on how Bud is deploying Janus against the nets,
the nets, the nets will not be forming a fucking wall.
So what are we talking about here?
Like if the Sixers slow it down and grind it out, can anyone hang with Embed? Or are we talking about Embedd's going to put 42 on the nets and then it's just a shootout kind of thing?
I think it's going to be a lot of swarming. It's going to be, you know, this is a team that is comfortable putting smaller defenders in disadvantageous positions and then just flocking to the ball, getting a lot of length around it. I mean, Bruce Brown guards guys who are like seven feet tall on a nightly basis. That's just what they do. So he's not going to guard Embededdeed.
could you apply the same principles to
Jeff Green guarding Embed for
stretches, to Durant guarding Joel
Embed for stretches? Those are things you can
experiment with. I still think we're going to see a lot
of one big body on Embed
and then a double with length coming to him
and really testing all that passing
and the passing out of doubles that he's been trying to
work on this season. I think that's what
it's going to come down to. I don't think it's going to be
an Embed scores 40
points a night kind of series. I think it's
does he have eight turnovers
or does he have eight assists?
So to conclude this, and I agree with you about Blake, by the way. I just think that I really, I don't think especially this season it's going to matter to him at all. And I think he's probably just happy to be in playing meaningful basketball for the first time in a couple years. He actually seems like somebody who still has something about him that is like a bounceability, an energy and like a kind of like an elastic.
to him that I think is like really suited for these sort of spurts and this this role player
role rather than hey Blake needs to get a lot of touches Blake needs to dribble at the top of
the key for a while and see what's going on. Blake might want to take a couple 17 footers,
whatever. Like seeing him in the corner, seeing him cutting to the basket, it should be pretty
nerve-wracking for the rest of the league. Well, and that's where, you know, a lot has been made of his
dunks so far as you mentioned. And certainly you watch the Brooklyn bench every time he dunks and
they're freaking out. I'm sure it's like a, you know, F the haters kind of situation with all
that. But there's a reason he's being left open, right? Like, it's because he's the fifth guy on
the floor. It's because the defense doesn't think he's going to cut. They're still reacting to him
like he's Detroit Blake. And I think the pistons are better served by having him out of there. Like,
it was doing them no good to have him there. But in Brooklyn, in spurts, I think you're
his game does lend itself to that.
And most importantly, for a guy with bad knees,
you bottle up what he does in 12 to 15 minutes,
that's a good player.
And it's a good player who can sustain
for longer stretches of time.
So this is the other thing,
and we can sort of wrap it up here.
But in terms of chemistry,
I too noticed the bench bob celebrations.
I too noticed that Lamarca's Aldridge
taking turnaround fadeaway jumpers
and Harden,
calling the shot in as it left,
his hand. And that actually was like, man, I think that these guys are pretty into each other.
And I think that they have a much higher estimation of where Aldridge and Griffin are in their
careers than maybe like what the larger basketball discourse has given those guys credit
for. I don't really remember seeing a super team with this kind of, I guess the first Durant
warriors, but these guys seem to fucking love playing with one another from the 13th guy, the
12th guy on the bench to Harden, Kyrie and Durant.
Well, everyone's gotten to eat a little bit.
That always helps.
And I think having, even the guys who are out or who were injured, like Durant was out for a while,
but he was with the team.
Like, it always hurts when a guy's injured and has to stay home and rehab versus when
you can travel, you can be around it.
And when you can have James Harden celebrating Lamarcus Aldridge fadeaway jumpers.
Like, that is a meaningful thing.
And I think, you know, every super team does have moments of chemistry.
You know, like, the heat, what was, I'm trying to remember what the viral video.
sensation that the heat made
where it was like a music cue
where everyone freaks out.
The Harlem Shake?
The Harlem Shake, thank you.
Yeah, yeah.
So, like, every, you know,
I'm sure there are lots of versions
of that kind of thing.
For a second, I thought you were referring
to when those guys made fun of Dirk
for having a cold.
And that was your viral moment.
Very different kind of viral moment.
That might have been more of a low point of their chemistry.
But there, yeah, there's a like,
the cameras are on us,
therefore let's act happy kind of viral,
like kind of a chemistry.
And then there's this sort of thing,
which I do think,
is a little bit different.
I want to ask you this last question.
Are we underrating what Nash has done this season?
Well, we did just say that coaching doesn't matter, right?
Yeah, I guess so.
I guess so.
But, like, I mean, I guess in some ways, you know,
like Kerr had the signature move, the first title year.
You know, he had the lineup of death idea.
And, you know, it wasn't his idea.
It was an assistance.
But he had like a signature coaching move.
And I now, to some extent,
when you read like, I know you guys talk to the light years dudes on group chat.
I feel like there is a real anti-Kir, animus brewing among certain factions of the Warriors
fandom because they're like, he's trying to run the triangle with guys you should be running
really simple P&R.
But with Nash this year, it's pretty much like guided the ship through two Kyrie absences,
not the same kind of absence necessarily, but like two sort of like Kyrie's not going to
be with the team for a couple of days situations.
The Durant hamstring.
the hardened trade,
essentially navigating the Hardin thing
to the point where now,
dudes are just like,
Hardin's great.
Love this guy.
You know what I mean?
Like,
we've just completely moved past
them getting out of Houston.
I guess maybe the presence of Dan Tony
makes everybody think this is like
Dan Tony's running the offense
and Nash is just wearing cool shoes
and clapping.
But he's doing a pretty nice job
keeping everybody on the same page.
I think he's doing an excellent job.
And like sometimes coaching
is knowing when to get out of the way.
Sometimes it's knowing,
when to empower certain guys.
Like, he's acing all of that stuff.
And so if you want to go through and look at the Nets DHOs,
like there's some good, clean stuff in there.
There's lots to celebrate.
But it's really more about all this kind of adaptability we've been talking about.
There are coaches who do not do this.
And there are a lot of coaches who are coaching for their jobs on a nightly basis
and are just so hyper-focused on we need to win every game,
who live and die with that kind of mentality.
And I think there's something admirable about that.
but that's not what the Nets needed.
And so credit to that organization
for recognizing the kind of coach they needed
and that Steve could be that guy,
because who knew?
I mean, he doesn't have a body of work to judge,
but just temperamentally,
I think he's been perfect for that team.
Yeah, I mean, he's probably,
I'm trying to think, like,
is he the best player that is a coach now
since, like, Bird?
I mean, who, like,
is he the, like, the best NBA player
to be a coach,
to be this good at coaching?
I guess that's a lot of like qualifiers since since bird.
Yeah, I mean, it's the best player part because there are guys like Kerr and Rick Carlisle.
There's lots of good, good former players who are coaches, Nate McMillan,
but like, you know, in terms of a former MVP who is a coach and is showing to be really capable for this team,
he's off to a great start.
But I think the Kerr, the Kerr met comparison is telling in that not all coaches are great for every situation.
Sometimes there's skill sets lean more toward one team or the other.
we don't know what Nash would look like
with a different kind of team. But for this one,
what he does well aligns really well
with what they need. Yeah, Steve Nashman, go coach
the Knicks. What's wrong with you? Challenge yourself.
Rob, thank you so much for joining me
today on The Answer. Thanks, Chris.
Thanks so much to Rob Mahoney
and thanks to listen to The Answer. We've got
such a great slate of NBA stuff
as we round into the postseason and it's a
draft season to keep your eye on Ringar MBA
University. That goes every two weeks
on the Ringer NBA fee with KOC
and Kyle and
sharks. We've got real ones on
Mondays, got group chat on Tuesdays.
You've got Ringer MBA University every other
Wednesday. The answer on Fridays and of course
mismatch is on Tuesdays and
Fridays so keep listening to all that night.
Of course, Bill and Ryan on Sunday nights
and throughout the week. So tons of
NBA stuff as the postseason and draft
season comes along, stay tuned to the
Ringer NBA show.
