The Ringer NBA Show - The NBA’s Late Leapers. Plus, Trae Young’s Exit Plan and the Big Three Hornets. | Group Chat

Episode Date: January 8, 2026

Justin, Rob, and J. Kyle Mann start by talking about the latest news on where Trae Young might be headed. Then they discuss the surging Hornets and their potential new Big Three. Finally, they chat ab...out three players who have recently taken a leap. (00:00) Intro (3:07) Trae Young (14:57) Charlotte Hornets (29:28) Fan Duel ad break (30:56) Anthony Black (42:45) Keyonte George (50:31) Donovan Clingan Hosts: Justin Verrier, Rob Mahoney, and J. Kyle Mann Audio Producer: Isaiah Blakely Video Producer: Victoria Valencia Production Supervision: Ben Cruz and Conor Nevins Additional Production Support: John Richter and Chris Wohlers Social: Isaiah Blakely and Keith Fujimoto The Ringer is committed to responsible gaming. Please visit⁠ www.rg-help.com⁠ to learn more about the resources and helplines available. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Hello and welcome to group chat. I am Justin Varyer and joining me in crystal clear 4K HD, whatever. Rob Mahoney, Jay Kyle, man. It's a new era, brothers. Welcome to the future. How does that make you feel, Justin? I feel like you are maybe the most resistant to the future of anyone I know. I don't know how to take that. Nor do I necessarily think that's true. I got all sorts of tech. I got iPhones. I got iPods. I got iPod. I got iPod. You sound like a grandpa, even as you're saying. JV. sounding like the Jeb Bush thing where he lists off all the Apple products that he has. But, yeah, Justin, I could watch just a breakout bit of content of you, A, adjusting your camera, dealing with all.
Starting point is 00:01:00 Just listening to you work through your tech balance in your life is pretty entertaining for me. I think people would dig it. Yeah, we had about what, like a 20-minute delay for this podcast, just trying to get a camera steady enough. We can't see, Justin. And we just see him going like this back and forth that I was like almost in tears. I had a great time. Yeah. But now here I am in this very dark, moody lighting.
Starting point is 00:01:21 So it's a new era because this is, I think the last pod that's going to go up on YouTube, we're transitioning officially on video to Netflix with Sunday's episode. You'd still get everything on Spotify as per usual audio and video. But if you just want the video product, go watch Stranger Things and then watch some strange guys talk about some things. Yeah. How many times do we have to mention Stranger Things? things on this pod to pop up as a recommended video after people are done watching it.
Starting point is 00:01:47 Because I think we should try to game it. A little like Hawkins breakdown. They had some basketball clips in there, right? Did they? Yeah, Dustin in season, I think, two or three. I forget, there's some basketball going on. Caleb, Caleb was putting it up. He was on the two guys.
Starting point is 00:02:04 You're still behind. I'm okay with that. And the guy who got killed at the mall, I'm trying to read. There were some basketball. A lot of great, but Billy, solid ball pressure. I thought. He was believable. Steve, I don't know. Steve seems like a wispy tuxedo score to me, but Rob doesn't even know what we're talking about, but the stranger, the stranger heads out there, they know, they know. I mean, Billy definitely had the haircut of a guy who would be really,
Starting point is 00:02:26 like a really annoying mid-major player who became a cult hero. So I guess that's worth something. Steel, steel percentage through the roof, though, I bet. He'd be a, he would definitely be a presty radar guy, I think, yeah. Yeah, less of a help defender, more of a point of attack guy. I could see it. Yeah, for sure. With for sure. All right, on today's docket, we're going to get to some guys who are taking some leaps. But these aren't just the normal leaps. These aren't just the bounds. These aren't just the jumps.
Starting point is 00:02:52 These are the late lepers. These are guys who have been popping. Over the past month or so, month plus of basketball, there's been some guys who have caught our eyes, which is that to the back end of the pod. We're also going to talk about the mighty Charlotte Hornets. Your goddamn right. But first and foremost, we have to talk about Trey Young, because he's the guy in the rumor mill right now. On the last pod, I believe we ended it basically saying,
Starting point is 00:03:15 I don't know who wants Trey Young. Is there actually a place for him to go? Turns out the market kind of agrees, Rob, because the only team that seems to have its hand up right now is the Washington Wizards. Yeah, team we kind of yada yada at our way past last time. And to be fair, it's not who wants Trey Young, it's who needs Trey Young. And I think even the Wizards are in the category of the team that doesn't exactly need Trey Young, but they're positioned because of C.J. McCollum's contract to just kind of throw up their hands and say,
Starting point is 00:03:40 why not? Why not take back Trey, keep this thing going, sub in a similar version of the same player if it can get a something in return? I get that from a certain perspective. I don't get it from the perspective of wanting to develop almost anyone else on that roster
Starting point is 00:03:56 outside of Alex Tsar. I think there could be a big small chemistry between Trey as we've seen with many bigs he's played with throughout his career. It's just tough if you're invested in the development of any of these other young wings or creators that Washington has to bring in someone like Trey who just kind of by definition in the way he plays is going to dominate the ball and control a lot.
Starting point is 00:04:16 I'm of two minds about it because I spent some time watching Trey Johnson because he's been surging lately and I don't know if we'll get to him or not, but I was just kind of watching the Wizards. And there is the side of it where you're like, okay, if you're wanting to get these guys into comfortable stasis, a guy like Trey Young is going to allow them, a Kishon George, a Trey Johnson, above Turington, to sort of like shift back into their natural,
Starting point is 00:04:38 comfortable roles. But comfortable stasis? Is that what we're striving for? No, we're not. I mean, I think if you're looking for the constraint thing that causes growth that's so popular, the constraint-led approach that's so popular in basketball right now, you want to kind of stress some of these guys to grow. And also, it serves the dual agenda of the thing that I'm kind of wondering about with the Wizards is, you know, they're not quite in the top three lottery odds in the 14 percent. They're in the 12 and a half percent where it takes a step down. That could be the difference between And the wizards, if anybody, have learned here where they've gotten leapfrog by some of these established teams in the lottery. It's like, maybe they've gone the other way where they're just like, this is chaos.
Starting point is 00:05:16 And they're just being like draft nihilist where they're like, nothing we do matters. What the pick we get is the pick we get. We're not going to aim for that 14% thing. But you would think that adding a Tray Young, is it going to help you be worse? Do you think that what do you think the wizards go? Do they get better or worse? That's kind of the question I'm asking in terms of what's going to cause them to get a high pick or what? pick big yet. Yeah, I think you guys are looking at it from the two perspectives I am,
Starting point is 00:05:39 whereas like there's the more cynical like nuts and bolts front office way of looking at this, where it's just like they might just be trying to roll over an expiring contract. Young has this year and the next year as a player option, presumably he's going to opt in unless one of these teams convince him to sign an extension perhaps that brings down his salary my year. So he just gets more years, fewer dollars. But you could also make the case that if he doesn't make them better, he also just is there to just be there, right? He's just a version of what Chris Milton is where he's just playing certain minutes.
Starting point is 00:06:11 You probably diminish him at a certain point in the season and then he move on from him as soon as you can. The other side of this is, does he actually help some of these young guys? Rob, you're making the case that he doesn't. I think, like, last year was probably the best example of what they could be shooting for, where if he's willing to play nice, at the very least, he has some experience activating
Starting point is 00:06:32 a deep bench of wing players. So the Hawks did okay in that mode last year. Do you think there's any belief there where at the very least if Trey is bought in, he could do that? I think he absolutely can do that. And I think this speaks to the kind of comfortable stasis that Kyle mentioned, where if your goal is to turn
Starting point is 00:06:51 Balakula Kula Bally into the best version of a role player he can be, putting him alongside Trey is good and will help streamline that stuff. And he'll organize the offense. And he'll maybe even someone like Bala, his percentages will tick up because the shots are easier because they're more comfortable because they're coming within the flow of like a really coherent offense which is something that tray can give you. But if you want Balakula Bali to be someone who's ever knocking on the door of stardom, I think playing with Trey is not the path you want. And that's kind of what
Starting point is 00:07:18 confuses me about the Wizards and where they are now is there are a lot of guys here who have potential to be something and we don't know what it is yet. I'm not going to put a ceiling on Bub Carrington. I'm not going to put a ceiling on Kishon or Ballal or anybody here right now. Not Bob. You sure you don't want to put a ceiling on Bob? He kind of puts his own ceiling on himself sometimes, but I want him to do that on his own terms, and I want the exploratory face. And I think that that's really my only objection to Tray Young, who I still really like, I think the way we talk about him can be kind of disrespectful at times, given the talent involved in the creation that he brings to the table. But he's just not a good fit for a developmental team. Like unless he was developing as he was with the young Hawks and they were all coming up together, but you put him on a team like this and he just eats up so much of the oxygen in the room. I think it's a little too severe to say that we're being like flat out disrespectful because I think you can ignore it's the tradeoffs with him. It's always been the tradeoffs because it's like he does such and it's amazing that
Starting point is 00:08:13 he can be literally one of the worst defensive players in the league in the last five years. And so incredible offensively. And then you have the role rigidity. But I was thinking about it. It's almost like the wizards probably it would be best suited based on what you're saying to handle this like like it's sort of the daycare. versus the Montessori thing, whereas I think we need the wizards to be more of a Montessori where we teach these guys to be self-sufficient a little bit, whereas what they're
Starting point is 00:08:40 doing right now is we're going to have Trey Young, maybe even literally chew all Kulabali's food for him in a way. Like I think we need to strain them and stress them. But a, you know, child care basketball comps. I could feel you guys really light up when I was saying that. It's kind of the parent brain that's taking over my life. I was a lot of Looking at this, though, that Washington's in an interesting situation and that they're a pretty decent catch and shoot team. They're 97th percentile in the league on uncontested looks, but they just don't get them. They're only like 37th percentile in the league on creating them. Bringing in a Tray Young is hypothetically going to increase those, but it doesn't quell, you know, dismiss any of those
Starting point is 00:09:20 concerns that we brought up. Yeah. Yeah, that's why I'm wondering if you bring in an organizer, at the very least, these guys are just being reared in with a little bit more of a guard in place. They have the bumpers on at the bowling alley pretty much. Because I look at the roster and like perhaps you don't want to artificially constrain some of these guys. You want them to play through mistakes. At the other hand, like, I could see where a lot of these guys ultimately end up in maybe not high level role players, but like whatever the in between is of star and role players. I guess it's just like rotation guys. Like Saar, Trey Johnson, uh, Kula Bali, like he's even Kishan George. Like these guys all feel like they will be very helpful starters on teams. But I'm not seeing like where the star
Starting point is 00:10:02 talent is going to be suppressed by Trey having the ball on his hands. And I also think we need to factor in just like the pure like Craven business side of this where anybody who has spent time in D.C. within the past decade, we'll tell you that nobody goes to that arena. It is a mausoleum and it is one of the worst home crowds in the league. I do have to wonder at a certain point, especially considering we forget, like, this is not just a tank. This is a double tank or a triple tank, considering the Bradley Beale's years ended up being that same kind of approach. I was doing the math here.
Starting point is 00:10:38 They've had top 15 picks the past eight years. So it's not just this recent stretch where they've decided to go Mike Winger and really tear it to the studs. Like there is a lot of history here. I wonder at a certain point, despite what they're saying, are people starting to get itchy fingers and wanting, at the very least, like, a semblance of competitive basketball out there?
Starting point is 00:10:59 They're always itchy fingers. There's always somebody who's like, but what if we pushed in? What if we accelerated? What if we consolidate what we have? I think that's a natural instinct, especially given the rare triple-tank scenario you laid out, J.B.,
Starting point is 00:11:12 like, this is a long time to be waiting for a team to coalesce. And the best version of the Wizards that we've seen anywhere near recently were just like, add Russell Westbrook and hope it works. You know, like that was the best case scenario for Washington basketball over the last decade, basically.
Starting point is 00:11:26 My concern is less almost like do you stifle star power and more do you stifle the sort of like overqualified contributions of winning players? For better or worse, I think a lot about Andrew Wiggins and I think a lot about who he was to the Golden State Warriors. And like, can you get to that point without the force feeding opportunity he got in Minnesota basically? So that when he did go to a winning situation, yeah, he had to learn new habits. he had to find his role.
Starting point is 00:11:52 But when it really came down to it and you needed a player to create something with six seconds left on the shot clock, he could be a star for six seconds. And like that's kind of what I want for a lot of these guys who, yeah, may not ever be multi-time all-stars in their own right. But can they be all-stars for six seconds? Can they have those stretches where they really find their groove as some of the most overqualified contributors in the sport? I think a lot of these guys have that potential in them.
Starting point is 00:12:17 And I do wonder how much trade could stifle it. it's the it's the pushing the muscle to failure thing that we've talked about with like that the spurs were doing that before the wimby you know when they those just those teams that were that were pretty rough when they were playing guys out of position and yeah i guess it kind of it kind poses the question like are you eating into that do you lose something if you if you you know you're not pumping yes to the to the to the full extent of the uh of the rep yeah just got to be a star for six seconds right rob that's it well look jd you're used to that Okay. JV is pushing past the limit.
Starting point is 00:12:52 We respect this about you. I just think, look, we're having this huge conversation about Trey and what he does to these young players. There was already a conversation about this stuff with C.J. McCollum and these young players. Just because C.J. is, oh, I missed that one. This is absolutely, like, I'm locked in all the Wizards. So we traded for a shorter version who also can't guard anybody. It is interesting on that front. And I would say CJ's, if anything, a slightly more flexible player in terms of his role.
Starting point is 00:13:19 And yet he was taking a lot of shots for this team. He was playing like a prominent on, had a lot of prominent on-ball responsibility for this team. That's only going to go up with Trey. And so if you're willing to make that bargain, yeah, the talent, of course, justifies it. If you're a little more skittish like I am, I guess whatever other players or picks you get back in a deal like that,
Starting point is 00:13:38 better be worth it. Yeah, I do wonder if there's also some house cleaning that could happen in this trade too. Like there's a bunch of, dare I say, riffraff on this roster that is kind of like either worked its way. out of the rotation came more first and foremost, but also just like guys on top of guys. So I almost wonder if you need to chisel out some of the more late first round picks and give time to like a Will Riley type. And can you pick up, for instance, Risha Shea in that whole thing? Like, what is the benefit in addition to Trey?
Starting point is 00:14:06 That's like the one piece of this that we really haven't sorted out here. So still a lot to figure out. I have to say I'm still like kind of baffled that this is Trey Young's trade value. I know we did it all out. And I guess like we shouldn't be surprised. You guys know how old Trey Young is? 28. 27?
Starting point is 00:14:23 27. Yeah. When someone asked me the other day at the arena, I was just off the top of my head, I guess 31. Just because there's just been so much. Jesus. I do. I mean, it's been dramatic from the jump.
Starting point is 00:14:36 He got traded for Luca. And then he goes to the Eastern Conference finals, like way earlier than that. And then all the tension starts from there. It's been like four to five years of that. And so plus a very dramatic Caroline situation. You know, it can be deceptive. Oh, boy. Oh, boy.
Starting point is 00:14:50 Why is it deceptive? Got to ask the right people about that one. All right. Now flipping to another bad southeastern team, but with perhaps some brighter future. Yeah, Rob was offended by that one. How dare you? Seriously. Let me just stop you right there.
Starting point is 00:15:10 Stop sign. Coming off the biggest win in five years in Charlotte Hornets basketball over the Oklahoma City Thunder. Maybe the biggest win in. Neo Hornets history. You know, since the full-on reboot, have they had a more important win than this? So what is that mark? Like post-Kemba Walker, basically?
Starting point is 00:15:28 Are we including the Gordon Hayward years where they were just like languishing with Nikola Batum? Oh, God. Yeah. You never languishing with Batum. Yeah. I mean, honestly, that might be kind of the standard set there, which is dark in its own way. But the Hornets, they get a win.
Starting point is 00:15:46 They have been pretty good. Rob sent us the tweet, I believe, from Trey Kirby that suggests when Lamello, Brandon Miller, and Connip will all play together. They're nine and six this season. So I guess the question is, how much should we read into this at this point? Because I think emotionally we want this to be something. But is it actually something? I think it's definitely something.
Starting point is 00:16:08 Kyle, are you on board with this? Well, why are you throwing to me so quickly? Are you worried about what I think? Go ahead. Say your piece, Rob. I'm looking to consensus built. You know, I'm trying to get this thing out of committee, all right? We're trying to make the hornets legit.
Starting point is 00:16:21 What do you think? I was, okay, Rob, you can speak. You're free to speak. I think it's real. Look, rocket science, having better players on the floor helps, especially when the depth on your team is like a little shaky or a little bit suspect. And I think within those nine wins, not only do you have the win against OKC, which is the worst thunder loss of the season, like by margin, they beat Toronto twice.
Starting point is 00:16:42 They beat a bunch of the East playing teams. Like, those are meaningful games for a team like the Hornets in terms. So like moving up the standings and where they're ultimately trying to go. I think this latest stretch with these guys healthy has sort of crystallized for me. I mean, one, they were already a good offensive team to begin with. This just makes them a better one. It doesn't change who they are. It just elevates what they already did so well.
Starting point is 00:17:03 And in particular, it makes it really hard for defenses to guard the entire floor. When in one corner you have con can't ripple driving a pick and roll. In the other corner, you have Brandon Miller, who defenses don't want to leave or vice versa. And the way that kind of stretches teams out, it forces them to make the same thing. tough decisions. It really puts kind of a strain on the rotation in a way that feels very real and very sustainable to me. That was the highest ball screen total for the Hornets of the season that that game. And there are points for possession on it was, I know we rattle off. Some people don't give a shit about points for possession. I know we could just throw that and be like,
Starting point is 00:17:36 hmm, yes, twiddle my mustache. But 1.127 is really high for a team to do 54 in a game. Like, that's a lot. But the thing that's interesting about it when you watched it, you elude, to it is that when you have the thing that Miller, Caniple and Lamello have in common is that they have live dribble skill sets. They can both, they can all three pass on the move. They're all very three, all three of them are very dynamic shooters who can shoot it and get it up in a lot of
Starting point is 00:18:03 different ways. And they're, they're good decision makers. And they're all tall. That's the interesting thing. So, and when they're screening for each other and you throw miles in there, too,
Starting point is 00:18:12 it really causes a lot of problems. Granted, OKC, you know, was missing eye heart and they were missing. Caruso in this game. But also, you can't praise OKC's depth and then turn around.
Starting point is 00:18:22 It's like they beat a team that had a lot of good pieces on it. And Cockburner didn't play for the Hornets. It was just interesting offensively to watch them. There were a lot of like befuddled faces from Dagnalt in this game that were like amusing me. I wrote down that OKC hit a buzz saw. Is that?
Starting point is 00:18:41 No. Are we accepting or rejecting that? I'll allow it. Okay. Not bad. Yeah. Offensively an interesting group of players,
Starting point is 00:18:48 perimeter players though. I think especially the reason that all this feels real and feels like an actual thing we should be monitoring is the reason that offense is good. I think you laid out like the multiple ball handlers,
Starting point is 00:18:59 Kyle, you're absolutely right. The formula is a lot like Boston's formula, which is all those guys handling the ball, shoot a fuck ton of threes, and clean up as many misses as you possibly can on the offensive class. And this NBA season has told us that works pretty well
Starting point is 00:19:12 with the way the game is played right now. Yes. Even without all those guys on the the Hornets take a lot of threes and they actually make a lot of threes this year. And those three guys in total are probably three of the better shot makers from three in the league just because they just have so much shooting. Now, at times they float and take too many of them. And I think developmental wise, I think it might be a little bit of a sticking point for some of them.
Starting point is 00:19:36 But I have liked what I've seen from Miller of late in particular because he's the guy that kind of gets lost in the shuffle. I mentioned this as we did our young core rankings, but it kind of feels like you forgot about Brandon Miller is the general consensus because of the injury, like just two, three years ago. This was a guy who in any normal year without Wembe would have been the rookie of the year and seemed destined for regular all-star appearances as soon as last season. He's come back from this most recent injury and seems to be playing with a little bit more of an edge. Partly, I think, because he's just coasting off the vibes of nearly ending Kyle Kuzma's life to the point
Starting point is 00:20:11 where, like, I was wondering, like, what Kyle Kuzma had to say to not only his teammates, but also So his loved ones after that where Bryn Miller basically just took his soul. But he just seems like he's kind of into like a badass state where he wants to prove something. And that chip on the shoulder is nice to see because of anyone, he's the one that's the big question mark. Because I kind of feel like we've settled into this weird state with Lamello where we accept the good and also accept the bad. Khan is kind of taking off. Miller is this curio where it's like he could be whatever the fuck he wants. It's great to see him embrace that.
Starting point is 00:20:45 Yes. I still have such high hopes for Brandon Miller. And seeing him kind of inch his way back after coming back from injury, slowly kind of find his form again, he still presents to me as like the best two-way prospect among the three of them. Like someone who can really be a difference maker with his length on defense, who can really like be this sort of creator on ball in those spotty moments that even you see Khan struggle with at times for as wonderful as he's been this season.
Starting point is 00:21:13 He feels like to get out of jail free card for this offense. and Khan feels like the flow initiation element and Lamello is just sort of like the chaotic elevator of the group. And so between the three of them and the different things that they're all bringing to the table, that is a cohesive offense in a way.
Starting point is 00:21:27 It's a little weird and a little unconventional and they play, I would say overall, like much slower than you would expect a team with that much young talent to play, but they just kind of make it work
Starting point is 00:21:37 when they're all out there together. Now you remove one of those legs of the stool and things can get pretty ugly, pretty quickly, but I like who they are offensively and I like the way those three present together. Are they like what? I think we could probably all agree that they're a legitimate big away from this like really flowing into something that's substantial.
Starting point is 00:21:55 I mean, would we say that that's right? Well, you say that they had the Mahler twins coming off the bench the other night where you had Tidjan Saloon, whatever we're calling him now. Tijon Salon. Tijon Salon. Who just looks like a fucking W.E. wrestler. And then you had fake Eduardo Nahara going in next day. to him.
Starting point is 00:22:16 Who is fake Eduardo Nahara? I think it's PJ Hall. Oh, sure. PJ Hall. You know what? That's actually not a bad comp. Let's go. We did it.
Starting point is 00:22:28 I think we're done in here. I don't expect the defense to really carry, but it was nuts watching them kind of like switch things or at least hold the died so their offense could take over on defense in that first half. Hall's a good athlete. He's people who haven't seen him. I mean, there's the curly-headed white guy thing. but he really is a pretty bouncy, strong, like, NBA.
Starting point is 00:22:49 He's an NBA, athleticism-wise, he's an NBA big, yeah. Yes. Every fiber of my being in terms of what I think I understand about basketball agrees with you, Kyle. They're like, if they get a certain kind of big in there and plug them in, this will be a more successful team. Certainly would be the case for their defense, where they need a lot of help.
Starting point is 00:23:08 But what those three guys are doing on the offensive glass, and I think where the NBA is overall in terms of this kind of trend setting, there are just different kinds of bigs who can be successful right now. And so there are times where Musa Diabate is just like a game-changing player, even though he is a little wild, even though his offense can be a little limited, even though he's not the big, like the biggest true big in the world, but he'll change games with his energy and his rebounding.
Starting point is 00:23:31 And maybe that is enough to a point, at least to get your offense to a certain point, where it leaves the balance of the Hornets, I think is where the debate lies. And do they need the sort of true rim protector beyond the like hyper-conservative Kochbrenner types who are going to just like hang back in place and guard the paint in a very traditional
Starting point is 00:23:50 but ultimately limited sense. I think my big question is how much is Lamello willing to just kind of back off because he's kind of fallen, I guess, ironically here, into a bit of a Trey Young situation where you just want him not to disrupt so much that it becomes a nuisance. Like he had some just bizarre turnovers.
Starting point is 00:24:10 Like any turnover he makes is just the weirdest turnover you've ever seen where it's like a contorting jump in the air, like throw it behind his back. And it's just like, why? Just fucking pass it to the guy next to you. Let's move this along. And I do wonder if he does that, he just kind of depresses that
Starting point is 00:24:27 and is being more of an organizer, as being someone who's just like playing within the system. Like, can he do that? Because then this team makes a little bit more sense. If he can't, I do think this might just be a little bit of flash in a pan. Everything you're saying, though, like everything you just laid out about LaMelle and what we would want him to be.
Starting point is 00:24:44 in his ideal role, also strikes me as the ultimate praise for Con Cniple and how quickly he has just become a steady hand for an offense. I'm in all, every time I watch the Hornets play about the reads he makes, about the calm in the pick and roll game, like he's not just like a great shooter. He's a great all-around offensive creator.
Starting point is 00:25:03 And someone who in the half court is honestly Charlotte's best option on a lot of these possessions, which is a crazy thing to think this early in his career. But it does give Lamello in a way a little more leash to be chaotic within a certain parameter, right? If he's off kind of doing this in a supplementary in a facilitating role, everyone can be cool with that because there's enough kind of stable organizing possessions
Starting point is 00:25:24 where those sort of wildcard elements make sense. If it's all Lemo all the time, we've kind of seen what that is for the Hornets, and it ultimately is like a little too volatile to hang anything on. I think that what you were saying when we were talking about Jha versus Trey versus Lamello the other day
Starting point is 00:25:39 and sort of like weighing out those three, you know, just at this point, distressed ideas of players at this point. I think the thing that, aside from size, I think the thing that is Trey or that Lamello has working for him is the fact that he is capable of not being that heliotype in a way that I don't think Jha or Trey necessarily are. A, because he's able to get his shot, he can shoot,
Starting point is 00:26:01 and he can get his shot off quickly and really, that's another thing about these three guys, is all three of them are like one motion shooters. It's fast in addition to being dynamic. But Lamello can get on and off the ball. if he's, granted, they haven't had structure in place. He's been asked to do so much more that we haven't seen as much of this from him, but he is capable of having the offense move through him as opposed to directly coming from him at all times,
Starting point is 00:26:24 which I think is a pretty big distinction for someone of his skill set to be able to do that. So that'll only serve the Hornets if they end up keeping him long term. So if we're looking ahead to the draft here, do you think like they need to start targeting Biggs? Like let's assume that Lamello is still here at the time that they're, drafting. Are you at the point where it's like you kind of can't cram too many of these ball handling wing types on top of each other? Do we need to target like a big or what do you think, Kyle? Is there like a guy that they should be thinking about? I don't think that they should be targeting. I'm just going to say some names that people can go Google if they want because I know
Starting point is 00:27:00 people just don't want, don't have the time for the draft until it's later. So I mean, if you start thinking about like the Kingston Fleming's who's been who's climbing right now, Braylin Mullins, the Yukon guy, like these these dynamic dribble past shoot guys. Bennett Sturts. I don't think he'll climb up that higher or Michael Brown for Louisville. I think that they, if they could end up with a big, powerful, athletic, defensive-minded, dunks a lot of stuff like a Caleb Wilson from North Carolina. That kind of guy could help them a whole lot. I've said over and over again, I mean, I'd like to see them get Camboozer from Duke,
Starting point is 00:27:30 who is more fulcrum-y, is positionally really smart, and is a fantastic passer. That's a couple of names there that would be interesting for them. But I don't know. like those are two. If they get the opportunity to add one of these top, top talents, I think you do it. But past that, I mean, there's another guy's co-oppede for Arizona. As another guy who's interesting that could work.
Starting point is 00:27:51 Or Yaxel Lindaborg. I know that sounds like a name I just made up from Michigan. Defensively, really, really solid can pass and shoot. They have a few options. But I do think that they should, I kind of think for now they're out of the like dribble past shoot skill guys unless they get an opportunity to get a superstar. But the hub big is kind of interesting to me. And I think one of the reasons it's interesting is that Khan is already such a good screener off ball.
Starting point is 00:28:17 Like he seems to have like a really implicit understanding of if I can shoot this well and I do literally anything in terms of setting a screen, it's going to freak some people out. If you have a really good playmaking big who's able to kind of like actually orchestrate the action a little bit and you have Brandon Miller and Khan screening for each other as they often do as they're like involved in the same actions, like that feels like something that could really work. and you could really build some action around. A big thing can attack single coverage. If you mixed it with what we've been talking about, them screening for each other, offensively, you have something very,
Starting point is 00:28:50 very interesting, I think. That's what they should be going after, just in my opinion. Going to need some lottery luck, because unfortunately, it's just too good. There are this next crew of teams
Starting point is 00:29:00 that's too good to be terrible with Utah and probably Brooklyn. Washington, unfortunately, after last night's win, might be creeping up toward that. But the bad teams are very bad. The Pacers have six wins right now. They have decided that all they need is a draft pick and nothing else matters for them. So, Tankray's getting
Starting point is 00:29:20 Nothing else matters. On that note, why don't we take a break? We'll come back, talk about some leapers. The Ringer NBA show is brought to you by Fandul. You know how wild it gets when an NBA player goes off for 50? Now that moment could literally make you money thanks to Fandul's brand new 50 piece jackpot. So if you think you know which player is going to have a big night, just visit Fandul.com slash Ringer NBA to take your shot at a share of the pot in bonus bets with the 50 piece jackpot. I like Luca Donchich to go for 50 points at some point in this season.
Starting point is 00:29:54 He's already gone for 40 a couple times, including one at 49. And did you hear LeBron recently? Basically, he's like, this is Luca's team. We're just kind of going around what he needs. How much does he believe that? I'm not sure. But at the very least, the fact that he's saying it is something. So give me Luca to score 15.
Starting point is 00:30:08 at some point this season. Fan duel, play your game. 21 plus and present in select states or 18 plus and present in D.C., Kentucky, or Wyoming, must place eligible pre-live wager on select markets, prize pool to be split equally among all eligible participants who made the correct pick. Bonus issued as non-law tarabo bonus bets,
Starting point is 00:30:26 which expires seven days after a seat. Gambling problem, call 1-800 gambler, or visit RG-HELP.com. Call 1-88-7-9-77 or visit ccpg.org slash chat in Connecticut. we're talking late leipas, all right? Not early leapers, not the guys that you know have taken the leap, the AJ Mitchell types, the other Ryan Rollins, all those others, Stefan Castles. We're talking about the late leapas.
Starting point is 00:30:55 And we have to start first and foremost with a guy that I think, Rob, you have been pining for this leap probably longer than anybody, and that is one Anthony Black. you put some money down last year and then kept doubling down and kept doubling down what do you, does it please you to finally see this guy like develop into something? You already know that it does. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:31:21 You know, look, he's been the talk of the group chat, group chat. We're catching him at a kind of an inconvenient time given that the magic had to bench all their starters and like a truly embarrassing loss to the Wizards, Anthony Black included. But we're just going to put that off to the same. side. I'm not going to let one bad night, you know, harsh my vibe. I'm writing the Anthony Black
Starting point is 00:31:40 Express. It turns out all he needed to do was make like a ridiculous percentage of his threes and also become a much more aggressive offensive player. And everything could be right as rain. Everything in his game is sort of falling into place. I think this is the sort of season from him where he's always been good playing out of flow, right? Like if you give him a downhill to attack, he can attack it. Now he's kind of making his own flow. And that's an important elevation for a lot of young players and you can see it from him turning kind of like what could be a normal walk-it-up possession into a run into the transition offense possession basically as often as possible. And I love that for him.
Starting point is 00:32:15 I certainly love it for the magic who need all those occasions they can get. It's been awesome to watch just how assertive he's been getting all the way to the basket. I was going to say you mentioned the shooting. I mean, he's just been, you hate to simplify. I hate when it's just shooting with a player like him because you want the other thing. to sort of balance it so that you're not, if you have a cold streak. It's, and it's not, luckily for him. He's been shooting the ball, like last 10 games, no bounce, catch and shoot shots,
Starting point is 00:32:42 47.1% from three. That's icing. I think when you're talking about the movement, when he gets into a flow, he's so sinewy and big and bendy. And he's also just plays hard as hell all the time. That's the thing about it. He just has a nastiness to him. And when he gets into the basket,
Starting point is 00:33:01 something that I've really noticed about him, this year is that he's just driving to score a lot more. You're just seeing him get to the rim and see that toughness. Whereas when it's that stagnant, like my life is just dependent on what I can do when the ball comes to me in this slow moving offense and whether or on that wastes a player that really, really is good with movement and momentum like him. And I think getting into early offense, because I was looking at it was like they're not turning people over more than they did in years past. And because you see the transition numbers and you're like, how is he? It's that he is, like you said, he's just, he's not waiting for a beat to be played for him.
Starting point is 00:33:37 He is just playing to beat himself and going and making it happen. What's interesting is that there feels like this little kind of crew of guys who are taking off here, the Amen Thompson types, the Saffan Castle types, who are point guards in name only. But they're like really just athletes. Like when in college football recruiting, when like a guy is too good of an athlete, but basically was like a running quarterback. They just don't know where to put him. He can go in.
Starting point is 00:34:02 anywhere, play cornerback, you can play all the skill positions. They just label him an athlete. I think of that with these guys because they're not really point guards, because a lot of times they're catching on the move and just getting downhill and making things happen just by sheer athleticism, force, and just doing things from there. And then we're seeing the nuance kind of being layered on top of there. But I'm curious if you guys agree, because like we've seen mega athletes here, but a lot of them are starting first and foremost as ball handlers. Is there something about the way guys are being reared now where we're seeing. these guys, like just athletes being
Starting point is 00:34:34 shoehorned into point car roles to begin with, and once they get to the NBA, they're just like in this kind of mixed zone? Or is there something maybe schematically that's allowing for these type of guys to pop in this sort of way? I think the last 10 to 15 years of basketball have really opened up the possibility of who plays where. And in
Starting point is 00:34:50 a different life, at a different time, Anthony Black might have been slotted in more directly as like, you are a wing player. This is what you do. But at different developmental levels, he's been given the ball. He's been given some opportunity to run with it. Even here with the magic. You know, they've played him at backup point a bunch and here with Jalen Suggs out has had plenty of opportunity to run point. And so there's just a little bit of more open-mindedness
Starting point is 00:35:11 with those guys and in terms of like what a point guard needs to do. You know, you don't need to be the walk-it-up floor general to be a point guard anymore. You can be Amman Thompson and be kind of a different sort of problem solver on every possession. I think that's really exciting for basketball and for the league. It's also certainly exciting for Anthony Black, who doesn't have those orchestrating instincts per se. And you can even see it. Like the lineups with him and Paolo Bancair and Desmond Bain, they don't all work, but when they work, they really, really click. And I also want to get your opinion on, they're calling that the killer bees. How do we feel about the, the Bancero Bain Black trio in Orlando? Too easy. Too many killer bees.
Starting point is 00:35:50 That's like a, that's a grade school pun. You want the high level version of that. You're saying get your numbers up. Step it up. Like the big ballers because we're BBB, you know? That would be a little bit better, but it's still not good. We'll work on it. We can work on it. And there will be time. I think the best versions of those lineups still have when Jalen Suggs is healthy him on the floor. That works really well.
Starting point is 00:36:10 And even failing that, Tias Jones playing with those guys has been pretty good. Like let Anthony Black be a weird hybrid guard who is mostly slashing and attacking. That seems to be unlocking the best parts of his offensive game. I think speaking to the, like, what is available to players like him, like I'm in like Stefan Castle. It's like at lower levels, you see this archetype of player who's sort of the big bully on campus, like getting to the rim and you kind of see them like, I think of, you know, Isaiah Collier, granted, you know, he hasn't had. Or Immanuel Moodye, players like that who are just big bullies who get to the, get to the basket. And I think what separates a black an Amin or a castle is that they have that sinewy, wiggly speed is a big thing that also,
Starting point is 00:36:58 they can balance it with their defensive impact on the other side. I think what happens is as they level up, those guys who are bullies, they get to the basket and then they maybe have more of a below the rim kind of thing that doesn't translate in the same way that the speed separates, like those guys that we're talking about that are able to break through and do well. I wanted to point out another thing about the shooting that's interesting that I've noticed because I was just kind of watching a lot of his shots to see what was different. I think I mentioned earlier in the year
Starting point is 00:37:29 there was a game that we were watching where he caught the ball and thought, very clearly thought for a second and didn't shoot it. That is like not present for him right now. And I think what's happening is when he's catching the ball, I think you're just removing that moment
Starting point is 00:37:43 of where there can be like mechanical disruption. He's just like, I caught it, I'm shooting it. He like flows right into it. Granted, it's not as fast as the Hornet boys that we were talking about, the actual killer bees, the killer hornets, whatever.
Starting point is 00:37:55 He is He's just removed some of that indecision, I think, and it's helping him streamline the way he shoots the ball. I mean, he made seven threes against the Nuggets a few weeks ago.
Starting point is 00:38:05 He barely even took seven threes in any game last season. Just that level of remove of getting into that faster and just committing to doing it. It's important for every shooter, but certainly someone like him. Yeah, it's been really crafty at the basket,
Starting point is 00:38:17 too, like using that speed to his advantage to get Connor moves going, where he has that, like, heavy step, and it gets the defense going and goes a different way. So he's, yeah, he's like kind of developing just on the fly. It's almost like something clicked and all of a sudden he's taken off. Unfortunately, the magic haven't taken off along with them.
Starting point is 00:38:33 They are six and seven since he entered the starting lineup. Obviously, they've had a ton of injury. Suggs is back out yet again. That's the first problem. The second problem is he is extension eligible this summer and the magic have a shit ton of money on their books. So just next year with their top four, they're committed to $155 million. And so we had talked about like, oh, this doesn't work. Like, can they keep Sugs?
Starting point is 00:38:58 Can they keep Frons? Will they break up the big four? That problem still very much exists. And now you added this fact that Black on his own right is probably due for a hefty pay raise. I guess it's a good problem ultimately to have. But I think this is good. Like, this is real rubber meets the road territory. I think even sooner than we expected.
Starting point is 00:39:18 Yeah. And it might feel different if Anthony Black were ascending in a way that made Jalen and Suggs, who has just been such like an injury wildcard to this point in his career. If you made Suggs feel more expendable in a trade, that's one thing. It doesn't feel that way. Like all these games where Suggs is out, you really see his absence in the lineup. You see the negative space of everything that he brings to the table. And so then there will be a hard decision between those two guards at some point.
Starting point is 00:39:44 It just won't be the kind that is facilitated by Black kind of nudging his way into things. He's just been so good that maybe it makes him a more appealing trade candidate. maybe it makes him an easier extension candidate. It is a good problem to have, JV. You're right about that, but it's not without its complications. Are we positive that the choice is going to be the guys at the same position, or is it going to be between him and, I mean, is that where the choice will be? That's the question.
Starting point is 00:40:08 Yeah, no, I think you have to start looking at probably the two bigger wings on a little bit harder. I mean, have we talked about Janus for Paulo as an idea? I feel like it's floating in the ether. It can't really happen this year. It's probably more of an off-season thing. only because of the contract. Apollo's extension doesn't kick in until this offseason. I don't know why you wouldn't do that for either side.
Starting point is 00:40:31 To me, that's like the cleanest fit on the board. Now, the money is actually worse because Janus is one of the few players that's going to make more than Paulo. Sure. You have to get someone out in addition to Paulo. But just for like a one-for-one swap,
Starting point is 00:40:42 like who says no? I kind of think both teams turn the key there. They might. I don't know that cleanest fit on the board. That's where, I mean, everything that the magic present in terms of a problem for spacing does not feel like a perfect solution to plug in Yanas or perfect for Janus
Starting point is 00:41:00 in terms of joining that kind of team. So if you keep Suggs, Black, Franz, and whoever's left. We are hoping that like 10 games of Anthony Black shooting is real. Like, I'm holding on tight, but it could crash really hard. It looks real. It looks real.
Starting point is 00:41:16 I hope it is. This is the most macro meta basketball like Galaxy. This situation is so funny. because the builds of these two teams have literal overlap and personnel and how they were built. It would be so hilarious if the team that was mimicking the team that won the title, if they ended up trading them for each other. And I think what the interesting problem, I think what you're talking about here is putting Janus, like, Janus granted, does the rim pressure thing better than anybody in the world at his position,
Starting point is 00:41:47 and he does it better than Palo, but it's kind of just a different version of, And maybe you hope that his betterness would sort of alleviate some of the things that Palo can't quite do. I think, I mean, you think Janus is a better passer than Palo in terms of like going downhill?
Starting point is 00:42:01 I think so. Yeah, but he's better finishing, I would say, right? And also the better teammates around him, I think just like kind of ease him into his waning prime a little bit easier. He could miss games.
Starting point is 00:42:16 And all of a sudden, this team could be fine. This is where I am with Janus. He's so fucking good. that almost any like, would you say no scenario to a Janus trade, I'm like, I kind of would probably do it because I get it and I love Janus. I just think that it would still require a lot more shoring up around the edges and kind of finessing what this lineup and what this magic team would look like, even if you bring him in. Yeah. I think they're going to have to do
Starting point is 00:42:40 something dramatic, though. I think that's probably where they're at this point. But we'll see. Another team kind of on our leapers list who is waiting patiently, very patiently to do something dramatic. It's Utah Jazz, who Kianti George, I feel like we've talked about in the past, but we've only probably done it in passing because he's kind of taken a double leap on top of the one that he started with since December 1st. So this is 15 games, basically 27, 7, and 5 on really good shooting percentages in almost eight free throws a game. So he's doing practically everything. I saw him here in Portland the other night. It was a pretty sad performance from the Jazz. Their defense is just dreadful. But,
Starting point is 00:43:20 George is definitely a player. Like, I think we talked about it more as a six man at times. Like, he seems like he's on to something special. Well, that's why he deserves more than a passing mention. Like, those are Tyrese Maxi numbers you just listed. And Keante George, he's quickly elevating within the ranks of the guards in the league. And he's doing it most impressively to me by, like, he's so good off the dribble. He has all of these other skills at his disposal.
Starting point is 00:43:46 It's like, I don't really know what the jazz are. I don't know where they're going. I don't know what the dramatic move will ultimately be. I certainly don't know what they are doing or have been doing with their defense basically for years now. Like they just have not been able to get any sort of momentum in terms of their team building at all. But I'm glad Keante George has been there. And I'm glad he's been playing in a Will Hardy offense because he is not just like a pick and roll machine. He plays dribble handoff.
Starting point is 00:44:09 He works off of cuts. Like he's used in so many creative capacities that he has become, if you also take into account how good of a catch and shoot player he is, the kind of really good guard who can play with other really great players. And that is exactly what the jazz need. It's certainly what a lot of teams need. It just puts them in a different kind of trajectory. Have you guys noticed this is just more of a mechanical observation about the way his arms wind up? Maybe this is the function of how long his arms are.
Starting point is 00:44:37 But he like straightens his arms at like chest level and like almost like a trebuech and then totally straightened gets them up above his head. And it's really strange. His elbows aren't bent. It's almost like the way KD shoots. It's an odd thing. But I was going to talk, the big thing, you mentioned the getting to the rim, the free throws, and the things like that. I went through and charted this that when he comes off of ball screens,
Starting point is 00:45:01 the percentage of the time that he doesn't settle for a jumper has really gone up. You know, last year it was 32.5% of the time. If he came off of a screen, he was going to take a pull-up jumper. And this year, it's up to 41.7. And part of that is there's an interesting, like, generation thing going on here where I've made fun of Nerkich a lot over the years defensively. But, well, more lately, I loved him when he was with the Blazers, but that's kind of what I'm getting to is there's a kind of a neo-dame thing going on with Nerkich where Nerkich knows how to play this way. Nerkich is second in the league and screen assists right now.
Starting point is 00:45:37 And I think Kianti is a big part of that. I'm glad you guys are mentioning some of these small guards, though, because this is kind of one of my pet, like, things that I'm always like looking for. because a lot of these guys have the athleticism, the dynamic shooting, all these different traits. And you're almost wondering why some guys get shuttled off into the sixth man score role versus the guys that really pop. There's obviously obvious things like success and just like some guys are just 1% shooters in the way that some guys aren't. But the one thing Will Hardy kind of pinpointed was that like he made a very conscious effort of like really changing like how he approached things. And you can kind of see it. Like he specifically said that some of his behaviors weren't good.
Starting point is 00:46:17 Was the specific quote from Hardy? I think he means more of his habits rather than like his interpersonal stuff. But if you look at what Kianti has said this season, apparently he went out and like made a concerted effort to work on his mental health. I think it meant like he contracted like a sports psychiatrist. But if you're looking at the change between last year to this year, it does feel like he's more dialed in than ever before. Like he had two straight seasons where he shot 39% from the field at like pretty. decent volume. And he was like just very erratic and chaotic in a way that was really hard to pin down. And what do we do with chaos? We kind of shuttle them into the sixth man rule. You say you
Starting point is 00:46:53 could do one thing, but you can't compound that with all the other good things we need in order to organize an offense. And I also liked how even when he hit kind of a wall early on, Hardy was saying that because their offense is a little bit more programmatic, like he was like, you can break free from the threes and layups thing that we're kind of going for here. you need the mid-range actually. Yeah. And it seems like that was not only a thing from the coaching staff, but something that, like, he's been studying on his own
Starting point is 00:47:21 in order to find counters to the defensive attention that he's getting. And so it just seems like he's locked in in a way. And I know that seems like a little trivial at times, but like he certainly is playing like someone who like relishes, like bringing the best out of every possession in the way that I think a lot of great players do. Yeah, I don't think that's trivial at all. And a lot of sports psychology, if you really want to boil it down and just like a blanket way is about focus, right? It's about like how do you zero out
Starting point is 00:47:48 distractions? How do you move on from one play to the next? How do you not get burdened by everything that's swirling around a professional athlete on the quarter off of it? And when we're talking about a young player making the leap by being more consistent, by settling less, by making more consistently good decisions, that's just telling me his focus has greatly improved, that he's more able to understand on this possession. I'm not going to let it affect, I'm not going to let what just happened affect me. I'm not going to let what's going to happen two quarters from now affect me. I'm going to get to my spot and I'm going to kill, kill, kill over and over and over. And expanding where those kill zones can be is really important. I think you're spot on, JV,
Starting point is 00:48:23 about the importance of the midrange for him. And in particular, he's been getting into that, like, high paint floater range and just really eating there. And that's where the craftiest guards in the league really thrive. That's the Jalen Brunson space. That's the Deeran Fox space, right? It's not just pure speed, although Cantayorzad's a great first step, but he's been so good at kind of like veering back and keeping guys on his back and understanding how to keep a defender at bay so that he can get to his spots. And like if he's doing that now at this stage, the sky is really the limit for him as far as who he can be as a creator.
Starting point is 00:48:55 It really opens a lot of doors. It's the development is discernment thing where, you know, knowing where and when and also developing those counters. Like it all kind of works together where Justin, I think what you said. And I think that this was the initial conversation that we had about him coming into the league was, are you going to be able to prove that you can develop those counters in the mid-range? Are you going to have to shoot the ball? Granted, he's answered the bell on every front, honestly, like shooting the shit out of the ball from three, getting into the pain.
Starting point is 00:49:24 And because if you're not able to do that, that's when you kind of become the guy of like, okay, we need to take your chaos and put it into a jar that we're going to pull out. We can't trust your consistency. see. If you're going to be this guy who is like leaning full offense all the time, that's not somebody that we can have, you know, powering our, powering whatever, our house for a whole game and rely on you because that's just ugly. If you want to be a distributor and somebody who can balance all of those things, you have to evolve and he has. And I think that it's changed a conversation around him. I think it was like around the potluck, wasn't it when I said, I think I picked him for favorite leap. I don't know, it was probably like a month or so ago. But that was a big thing for me is that he's, he's really shown that he's developed that. And I think it's, I mean, at this point then, I think it's kind of rescued him in a way where I was worried about him and he's gone all the way from being like saved himself to like this is a legitimate, legitimate piece that they have. Hardy said that has changed in approach is not a full 180 degrees, but probably like 168. Wow. That's a very hardy thing to say. Yeah. At the end of my article right there. Pretty good. My last one on the board here, one that Rob kind of griped about including, but I find myself believing in one Donovan Klingen. It doesn't seem like you guys do as well.
Starting point is 00:50:42 Don a Klingin. First of all, my griping is simply, you have to explain yourself. Like, you just have to justify. We're talking about a Kianti George level leap. And you're like, yeah, but what about a blazer? Well, we also needed to get three. It's true. The other options were great.
Starting point is 00:50:59 I just want to hear you make the case. I want to make you hear, I want to hear your impassioned plea for Donovan Klingen as one of the most compelling late break and leaps of the season. Yes, we should also note that like
Starting point is 00:51:10 those first two guys seem like on the verge of something pretty substantial. At the very least, Klingen seems like on the verge of being a regular, high level contributor, I would say. Leaps come in many shapes and sizes.
Starting point is 00:51:22 Sometimes an All-Star gets a little better and people dismiss that. It's like leaps, they're all important, man. That sounds like a hop to me though. It's all happening. It's all happening. Well, I think the biggest hop leap bound, whatever you want to call it, first and foremost, has been staying on the court for him. He's playing 30 minutes a game since over the past 12 games, which is like pretty significant. Now, they need him to play that many minutes because they don't really have a lot of depth there.
Starting point is 00:51:49 Never know when Rob Williams is playing. And then Yang is kind of what he is at this point. But I think the increased conditioning has really been a boon for him. He looks the part. And as a result, he gets to leverage all the good things that big old frame gives him, first and foremost on the boards. He is, if not the best offensive rebounder in the league. He's definitely in, like, the elite upper crust with, like, Mitchell Robinson, Rudy Gobert statistically. I think he's first.
Starting point is 00:52:16 I was going to say, that's okay. I mean, yeah. You better throw Musa Diabate in there if you're going to name those names. Stephen Adams. Yeah. Yeah. Well, it was funny because the Celtics in a racing game went super small against the Blazers down the stretch, partly because they have their own center issues, but Garza is what he is.
Starting point is 00:52:33 But I think in part to dare Klingan to really do something. Klingan's biggest battle is being a force offensively at the rim. And for a while, I was like, oh boy, they might win this one. But fortunately, Klingan got a big offensive rebound, swung that game and basically sealed it for them. And that's a big win if you look at what the Celtics have been doing. And so the offensive rebounding is there. He's just a big old turn at the rim. The rim protection stuff is kind of way, as like the personnel around him hasn't been there. Like they're making due with a couple two-way guys. I don't know how much of that is his fault.
Starting point is 00:53:05 The big thing is the three-pointer. Yeah. Which everyone is giving him as much fucking time to just like take the air, wind, like the wind speed, the temperature. He's checking the clock. He licked his finger and held it up. But he is hitting over the past 12, 53% on three a game, basically. That's indicative.
Starting point is 00:53:29 I think that's going to stick. I think it's indicative. Well, he's fucking canning these shots. Like, they are not like, oh, rim in. Oh, it looks kind of ugly. Like he's just drilling threes. I'm with you. No, I wrote down here.
Starting point is 00:53:42 He's a solid one Mississippi shooter. He's like, he looks around. He looks both ways. Like he's like, and then he shoots it. Make sure there's no cars coming across the court or anything like that. I wanted to, can we do measurements corner to support what you were saying just for can I just can I share? Yeah.
Starting point is 00:53:56 Break out the tape, baby. Yeah. Are we always doing measurements? What else do we do? This is important because I don't think that people appreciate how fucking big this dude is sometimes. Like it seems like an obvious thing to mention. He's pushing 7 foot 3 in shoes and he has a 7 foot 6 and 3 quarters wingspan. Gigantic human being.
Starting point is 00:54:15 In that Spurs game, Luke Cornett looked like he was struggling with his size. Kelly O'Donlinick was afraid of him. And I think if you just add to that just basic implied thing of like, okay, he's, he's, he's, He's just immovable around the basket to speak to what you're saying. And he's got pretty good hands. His craft isn't always the prettiest from A to B, but he gets it in the basket. And that's always been true about him. But the fact that if he's going to be able to make these one Mississippi threes, even if it drops to 35%.
Starting point is 00:54:43 Yeah. I don't know what your floor is. That's great. For a team like the Blazers, that's a big deal. I just want that diagram to scale. I want Donovan Klingan and like a stegosaurus next to each other, just so we can really appreciate exactly what we're dealing with here. I think the comp is Mark Eaton though
Starting point is 00:55:00 Like he's massive Daniel Gafford to Kyle's point was here the other day And like he was actually kind of given it to him Because he has the springs in order to do so But like he looked like a guard in comparison to Klingin It is pretty crazy I mean he's giant and he's enormous Especially as a screen setter too
Starting point is 00:55:16 And he's the kind of guy who will just like Screen and Rescreen and re-screen and re-screen Until he makes contact Which means he forces you to make a decision It's part of the reason he and Denny had like a nice little pick and roll game working this year but I love the way this gives him something to do other than offensive rebound dunker spot action, right? Like he's he is such a good high post passer and he's going to be a little lumbering up and down the court,
Starting point is 00:55:38 despite that new and improved conditioning you were talking about Justin. And so when he's trailing in transition, he can just kind of flow into this spot. And teams aren't guarding him right now. What's going to be interesting is like when that gap catches up, when the scouting report says this is a dude shooting 50% from three this month and teams are actually honoring that. I think we're right to sort of circle that as a positive. in terms of how that could affect his, like, what he's doing here. But ultimately, even if they guard him, that's a success, right? Like, we're just trying to figure out ways to keep Donovan
Starting point is 00:56:05 Klingin on the court, to make him a threat from further and further out to turn him into really, like, a model for what these bigger, slower centers can be. Like, if Donovan Klingin right now is a guy Yang Hansen can look at and say, okay, if I just, if I'm just a little more consistent from three, if I'm just making a little more contact on my screens, if I'm positioning myself better defensively in the way that Klingen does, those are things that are all achievable for him, that are achievable for a lot of bigs. They just have to reach out and grab them
Starting point is 00:56:34 and apparently hit more than half of their shots. What do you think about the fact that they, do you think that in terms of them reading their roster going into that draft, what do you think it says about the way that they viewed Klingan because them going after Yonge? I'm just kind of wondering, did they underestimate Klingin a little bit?
Starting point is 00:56:54 Because he's a better passer. think that people realize, I'm just kind of, or was it purely a front court depth thing that they needed regardless? Like, I'm kind of wondering if that, if that mindset that they had of going after that player type was appropriate now that we're getting to see Klingan be what we thought Klingin was and is. Well, it's at minimum a hedge, right? Yeah. Yeah, I think they probably just looked at his young, is special and they, they identified him as such. And they, I mean, they maneuvered around the draft in order to get him. They traded back, made sure they weren't back so far that they could still draft him. I think they really just wanted Young and we're just going with
Starting point is 00:57:30 that approach. But you're right. That was the obvious next question. You just drafted a big guy. I mean, we could also point to the 24 draft and say like, well, were they just drafting best player available? They had the spot open, but in that draft, I think you were just hoping for any sort of contributor there. Also, there is a world where they can coexist, but you're right, like it kind of diminishes. On the court? At the same time? No.
Starting point is 00:57:56 No. It's like a rotation. Okay, okay. In the same way that Gafford and Lively kind of did for the Mavs, different style of players. But like could Klingin basically be the backup. That would probably have to be that. Or you could just move him and you just say that you got both right and then you just have that good problem we were talking about with the magic. But you're right.
Starting point is 00:58:18 It's definitely, they're going to overlap at some point. That point might be as soon. his next season. Yeah, and I just, I have a little more faith in Klingen just in terms of how he positions himself on the court and how he anticipates action. That's one of the things that young players can come along quickly if they do catch that groove. And I'm not ruling young out from making that sort of development or that sort of relative leap. It just feels like Klingan is more comfortable anticipating what's coming at him when he's trying to, you know, blow up stuff as a defender, as a catch-all, as a rim protector. Like, he just has a better feel for it in a way
Starting point is 00:58:50 that basically allows you to stay on the floor or results in a ton of foul trouble in Yang's case. He should have more feel. Granted, I mean, I think he had better defensive feel at the same age. He's played a lot more serious basketball than Young at this point. But Justin, in particular, though, I think we need to bring up.
Starting point is 00:59:06 You said he was Rudy with a three. It was your hyperbolic assessment of Donovan Klingin. I was just, I was watching the way he moves a lot. And it kind of reminded me of the conversation that we've had about Cockburner where it's like Donovan is I think a pretty he's not like a fly around putting out fires like he doesn't rack up a ton of blocks but he does add you know he's not to the wimby level of like the amount of nopes that he adds up in a game like he has that sort of like gravity where people see him and they're like I'm not going to try it I think he's just a really smart wagerer with his with his size like he knows he can stay down I don't know I don't know if he's quite too I don't know if you were like wanting me to challenge the Rudy thing directly or if you were just for fun. But he doesn't quite move like Rudy, but he is effective.
Starting point is 00:59:55 He knows how to move for his size and his balance. I think Rudy, no, I was mostly embellishing. Mostly. I think Rudy is a defense unto himself. I think Klingin is like the end point of a defensive system that earlier in the year
Starting point is 01:00:13 when they had those pit bull like Trio, Drew, Denny, and Tumani kind of really pop in. I think clinging being on the back line is just the big old deterrent worked a lot to his strengths. And if you look at the rim protection numbers, like overall in the season, if it's like the defensive field goal percentage is like Evan Mowgli-esque. And I think a lot of that is just because overall it's just with tough to score on them when they had so many long big bodies there.
Starting point is 01:00:37 Now, if you look at it now more recently where it's like Caleb Love and some of these other guys who aren't defensive guys, they're pretty okay. Yeah. But as long as he's doing that, and I also think the good thing about the three-point shooting is, it's filtered down into the way he's playing overall. And then Kyle, you probably know this better than anyone. Like, this is a guy at Yukon that played with legitimate swagger. Like, he had, like, the terror squad, like, chain going. Like, that is who I thought Klingin would be. And last year, because he struggled, I think he was pretty muted as just the character.
Starting point is 01:01:06 And you've seen him play like a badass. And I think when you have that size, that's going to intimidate, like, NBA-sized humans, I think you want that guy to be, like, throwing your weight around, literally. And I think it's had an effect. He's out there like talking shit to people like after he scores on them and they're on the ground and like I think you need that edge if you're a big guy. I think sometimes it can be fun to sort of over time see the broader NBA audience sort of discover a player's personality.
Starting point is 01:01:33 I mean, I think we've seen that with Chet a little bit. You do the optics thing of you see at Donovan Klingin and he just kind of looks like a nice meek kind of awshucks guy. Well, he looks like an end if we're being honest. I was going to say he is enormous. He is. I'm just sure he is. I've never heard anything other than he is a nice guy, nice kid.
Starting point is 01:01:49 But I always resist the temptation to call people kids. But they are more and more to me, sadly. No, I mean, he definitely has that fire where he can bubble up. Like, I think when he made one of those threes, he was like pointing at the bench. He definitely has some of that MFer in him. And I think it's been more fun to see as he's been out there and been more comfortable. Because you did see it come out a lot at Yukon. Yeah.
Starting point is 01:02:12 I mean, you can tell the MFer in there because he's goosenecking on every single one of those He's holding that follow through as long as a human being possibly can. When does Kyle start to get the MFer out of him on this pod? When does he start calling out other podcasts being like, You talked about this the wrong way. I have the stats right here, bitch. I can't wait for it. What do we need to do to egg him along?
Starting point is 01:02:34 I don't know, man. It's fun. I have mellowed out a little bit, but I'm a pretty intense competitor. You wouldn't think so. I get that from people sometimes. But I actually kind of, I have to tone it down. I don't know. Are you guys on the same level? I can see Justin, you probably got fired up in games, right?
Starting point is 01:02:51 I mean, when I was in middle school, maybe when I got like the requisite five minutes, they had to play me. Right. I mean, I'm complaining about guys bringing the ball up in the court and pick up. So we've established how intense I am. So I don't think Rob's on that level either. Sometimes. You know, I think it all comes, it comes for all of us, for sure. I don't know that I'm on your level, though. I think I get the feeling, Kyle, that someone just like playing defense against you with any mild physicality would turn you into a rage monster. Now, come on a minute.
Starting point is 01:03:23 It's not a criticism. I'm just saying I see the evil within you. That's what I'm saying. Rob's more like a yokic. She just wants to go home and instead of play with his horses, he wants to watch his magnolia pictures. I mean, I would like to do that. Rob wants to stroke his corgi and watch Adrian Linker live concerts.
Starting point is 01:03:42 it's on YouTube. So, yeah. We contain multitudes. I want to do all that stuff. And I want to fucking win. And it drives me insane when other people don't care. Like, if it's a winner's stay on situation,
Starting point is 01:03:53 what are we doing here? I love it. What are we doing? You got three winners right here, baby. Absolutely. That's why this works. And maybe four with Donovan Klingin, you know,
Starting point is 01:04:02 at least here's the thing. If we're going to make, if we're going to shoe him into this category, he at least has to also win Big Boy of the Week. Right? Like, he is by default, the Big Boy of the Week. No. It's the big boy of the week most weeks, just by sure, girth.
Starting point is 01:04:14 It's true. I was going to, one last thing on him is, you know, we were talking about him as a force near the basket. Another thing that I was noticing is just him moving towards the rim whenever that, like, he has a lot of gravity at the rim whenever he doesn't even have the ball. And that serves guys like Shaden Sharp. He sometimes creates straight line drives for Shaden just because he takes a couple steps towards the rim. And I think that that speaks to just another way that he can help your offense. Why can't I be friends with him in the way that Shaden is friends with him is my question, you know?
Starting point is 01:04:48 Like I thought when I came here, we would just be like pow-wowan talking about the goat all days and at New Britain. Like, hey, remember when you used to drive by the SPN's campus? Doesn't happen, unfortunately. Well, what do you bring into the table? Nothing. I've made minimal effort. I said hi once. I told him I was from Connecticut.
Starting point is 01:05:05 I don't think he was moved. You did? Wow. I was going to say, I can't see Donovan like getting down on his knees in your garden and like, you know, tilling earth. I'm trying to imagine what you guys would have in common. But, yeah, that'd be a great social breakout. Justin tries to become friends with Klingin. I would love that.
Starting point is 01:05:24 I think that's going to put me in jail, not a morality. That'd be good content too. What's the state of the garden though right now, JV? What's going on? It's the winter. There ain't nothing going on with the garden. You can grow in the winter. Right now we're focusing on the bathroom.
Starting point is 01:05:38 We're in full reno mode. We're rehabbing a bathroom, baby. Are you sledge hammering walls down? What are you doing? Not yet. So I've been waiting since the summer to redo it myself. I've convinced myself purely by watching YouTube videos and inundating myself with like Instagram reels that I know how to like overhaul a bathroom.
Starting point is 01:05:59 See, you shake your head. Rob has no faith. Rob has it. Justin, this is going to happen. I believe in you more than almost anyone else in the world believes in you. And I don't think you. could do this. I think this is a mistake. I don't think you should renovate your own bathroom. Okay. Well, now that monster in me is coming out and I'm going to dominate. You're going to eat
Starting point is 01:06:17 those words. You need, but this is the thing. I'm just trying to encourage you. I'm just trying to stoke that fire. You know, you need the haters in your life to really be your best. That's true. I also need to find the water shut off valve in my house, which I spent literally two days over the winter break looking for. I cannot find it. We're off to a great start. Yep. All right, let's wrap it there. We'll be back on Sunday. Reminder, we'll be on Netflix. So the YouTubers, thanks for all the kind things you said to my mom.
Starting point is 01:06:48 I'm sure we'll have clips still going up there. But it's been great, I think. It's been fine. Honestly, it's been totally fine. But it's going to be great on Netflix, you know? Onward and upward. And I just want to reiterate, stranger things, stranger things, stranger things, stranger things. Et cetera, et cetera.
Starting point is 01:07:08 Yeah. So we're back on Sunday, Netflix, but still on Spotify, as per usual. Thank you to Isaiah Blakely. Thank you to Victoria Valencia. Thank you to Ben Cruz. We'll talk to you next time. Must be 21 plus and present in select states for Kansas in affiliation with Kansas Star Casino or 18 plus and present in D.C., Kentucky, or Wyoming. Gambling problem. Call 1-800-Gand-Hallor or visit RG-HALP.com. Call 1-88-78-7-7-7 or visit CCPG. or slash chat in Connecticut or visit MD gambling help.org in Maryland. Hope is here. Visit Gamblinghelp line, MA.m.m.m.m.m.org or call 800-327-0-50 for 24-7 support in Massachusetts. Or call 18778, Hope, NY, or text, Hope, NY in New York.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.