The Ringer NBA Show - “The Pacemakers” Take Game 3. Plus, Predicting Offseason Headlines. | Group Chat

Episode Date: June 12, 2025

Justin, Rob, and Wos return to react to the Pacers taking a 2-1 lead in the NBA Finals. They discuss another great Tyrese Haliburton performance, Bennedict Mathurin and TJ McConnell's vital contributi...ons off the bench, and more. Then, they take a look at some hypothetical offseason headlines about the Knicks' coaching search, Kevin Durant trade destinations, and Giannis potentially staying put in Milwaukee. Hosts: Justin Verrier, Rob Mahoney, and Wosny Lambre Producers: Isaiah Blakely and Ben Cruz Social: Keith Fujimoto This episode is presented by State Farm®️. Dishing the assists you need off the court. State Farm®️ with the Assist. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:11 welcome to group chat. I am Justin Verrier and joining me back for another triumphant Indiana Pacers win. Rob Mahoney Bigwaz. Rob, what are we calling these guys? The pacemakers? The cardiac pacers, I feel like we need to name now. We got
Starting point is 00:00:27 a lot to go through on that front, Justin. We asked the group chat listeners for their recommendations for Pacer's sick names. Let me tell you, they delivered. My phone has never blown up so much as registering with every email notification. So we're going to get into it. I think we have plenty of time to sing the Pacers praises on this pod.
Starting point is 00:00:43 But I just got to say for us, for the three of us and all that we've been through as Corn Boys together, we still didn't give the Pacers enough credit. We still haven't lavished them with enough praise. The Indiana Pacers are two wins away from the NBA title. How about that? Yeah. Well, I don't know if you felt this, but after that game two, when the Thunder won, there seemed to be a resetting where everyone's like, oh, Thunder and Five,
Starting point is 00:01:07 we're going to see what we all expected. but clearly not. I did not feel that. I didn't feel that at all. The Thunder in game two, they looked like a team with their actual backs against the wall and they played hard, they killed it,
Starting point is 00:01:23 all of that in front of their home crowd. But the Pacers have been an incredible home team the entire playoffs. Like the idea that game three was going to happen and the Thunder were going to just come in and roll them. I don't, like we got to just, we got to get over it. This is a very
Starting point is 00:01:39 good to great team. They're not going to get rolled by anybody. They're too good for that. And so, no, I mean, I can understand why people, they come in with their priors, heavy favorite on the thunder side. And so they come back with game two and have a authoritative win. I understand why people, you know, just revert back to their priors. But like, for me, this team has been incredible in Indy, the entire playoffs. And, you know, basically, I'm, outside of game one, they've been a game three, an indie sort of team. Like they're even used to the rhythms now of a series swinging back to Indianapolis. And so, yeah, I thought they would be tough, tough to kill again.
Starting point is 00:02:23 This episode is brought to you by State Farm. On the basketball court, the best players know when to pass. And off the court, you still need teammates who are there when it counts. That's where State Farm comes in. With agents and online tools to help you find the coverage you need, you could focus on what really needs. matters, whether that's hitting game winners or just getting through the day. State Farm, with the assist, coverage options are selected by the customer, availability, and eligibility
Starting point is 00:02:51 vary by state. I think part of it was just like the regular season. We spent so much time coming to terms with the fact that OKC was so much better than practically everyone and that the Pacers, certainly in the mix. Obviously, we talked a lot about their second half, but yeah, I think a lot of us were just kind of like reverting back to what we previously had as our bias is going into these series. But I also think like the Pacers Rob also showed why they keep doing this when at the end of this game in particular, it seemed
Starting point is 00:03:21 like for the last, I don't know, eight, seven, six minutes, whatever it was, they made practically every play, every hustle play, every sharp, precise play, while the Thunder just ran out of gas and just didn't seem like they had that extra hump they needed. I think that last part of it is the key part. Like, it felt like the Pacers won
Starting point is 00:03:39 the War of Attrition in a lot of ways where not only all of those critical, like, must have 50-50 ball plays, the Thunder looked exhausted, they looked flat-footed, they looked like they lost track of all the little things. Like, how many times did we see a pacer run in for an offensive rebound, basically untouched, an OB-top and two-handed dunk put back? Like, that's unacceptable in an NBA finals game. And yet an incredible possession, an incredible sequence of events for Indiana, and they had those kinds of plays across the board. And I think that stuff starts with Indiana picking up Shea over the course of this entire game,
Starting point is 00:04:12 wearing him down gradually over the course of it, targeting him defensively in a way that I thought was more concerted than we've seen in these finals to this point. And you can see the downstream effects of all of that. Now J-Dub has to do more. Now Chet has to do more. Now Alex Crusoe is handling the ball more. Now we're stretching out guys' minutes
Starting point is 00:04:27 and consolidating the rotation. And everyone's having to do a little bit more. And it seemed like by the end nobody really had enough to do, like to manage that kind of energy level was. that's that's the impression that I got one shee possession stands out to me it's the one where he comes out he gets the high screen and they basically
Starting point is 00:04:48 hedge on him and as the the one pacer defender is recovering back to I think it's Caruso he's recovering back to Shay sort of pirouettes turns around doesn't know what to do he's right at the free throw line extended which is his spot and he just walks He just turns around and walks, looks confused, and in the fourth quarter, their offense bogged down.
Starting point is 00:05:12 That's what I remember boast from that fourth quarter. It was just, it wasn't even a lot of isolation, by the way. They were setting screens up top and trying to get some movement going. It's just that indie just covered it beautifully. And I think some of the stuff where you're setting a screen with Caruso, who although he's made a nice amount of shots, he's not a threat to dribble drive. He's not a threat to set his own to run his own pick and roll.
Starting point is 00:05:40 He's just not a threat. So to get his defender in the mix on Shay or on J-dub in these fourth quarter possessions where now these guys have to operate where they're already, you know, attracting extra help because the screener just brought his man over. I thought that stuff was tough. And I think playing the Pacers does wear on teams both mentally. and physically. I think there's something, too,
Starting point is 00:06:05 having to remind yourself every single time to get all the way back every single time, having to remind yourself about the constant actions and movements and is this guy going to drive it?
Starting point is 00:06:14 Is he going to shoot it? Like, not the unpredictability of it. You don't get to rest your mind when you're playing against the Pacers. And I think by the time the fourth quarter came around, I think OKZ was just over it. They're like, Jesus Christ,
Starting point is 00:06:27 I'm sick of this. Yeah. Well, it did seem like, Rob, that the Pacers made more of a concerted effort. And even Halliburton kind of like nodded to the fact that they were going to take Shea out of this pretty much. Or the very that's going to add added additional attention to him. It's six turnovers in this game. Turnovers were a big deal overall. I think six was the most for him in a postseason game. Do you think a lot of it was that? I guess three things are happening here.
Starting point is 00:06:50 One, the added addition to Shea and the trickle down effect from that. It seemed like the thunder also tightened the rotation, which I was trying to remember the last time they went eight even in a half, which is what they went to, and it did feel like they didn't have the extra oomph, or is this more pacer's, like when you get into a game in the fourth quarter that's close, this is where they break out the daggers and like you better fucking just run for cover.
Starting point is 00:07:12 Yeah, I think probably the first and the third primarily. Like I think any time you can put that much wear and tear on Shea over the course of a game, just force him to do so much heavy lifting just to get the ball up court to disrupt the flow of their offense. We've seen time and again throughout these playoffs. If you can just disrupt them at the point of attack with Shea, You forced the thunder to get into some really deep possessions really quickly.
Starting point is 00:07:33 And I say that in a game that was honestly one of J-dub's best games throughout this postseason. I thought he was sensational for the bulk of this game. And just down the stretch, their whole offense fell apart. It wasn't just him. It wasn't just a. It was kind of everything. Sensational for J-dub? Because I noticed him pop after halftime where he was concertedly, like, being aggressive about it.
Starting point is 00:07:54 He had those two big buckets. He guarded Seaccom up in the perimeter. So clearly something got to him that he needed to lock in. But I think with J-dub, he does come in fits and starts. And my criticism has always been like, where's the complete effort where if Shea is going to get all that additional attention, he just takes the game by his throat and has like a 30-point performance. Right.
Starting point is 00:08:14 I think that's where the close to this game was a little disappointing. Because if I had to pinpoint what I was most impressed from J-dub in this game, like the games where he hits a bunch of spot-up jumpers, good. That's always a good shot. Like, everyone needs that on their offense. But the games where he's hitting tough, contested shots, especially mid-rangers, runners, the star-level shots, those are the games that impressed me most.
Starting point is 00:08:35 And I thought we saw flashes of that throughout this game, right? Little moments where maybe the offense was on the skids a little bit, and all of a sudden, J-Dub's coming up with a huge bucket. He's saving possessions. He's bailing the thunder out of some stuff that's going sideways. And then by the end of this game, they just had no one bailing them out, right? Shea is having the kinds of possessions that was outlined. J-Dub is a little bit invisible.
Starting point is 00:08:55 Chet had a nice opening stretch, especially in transition, but sort of faded offensively over the course of this game. All of a sudden there's just like no flotation devices left for the thunder, which is such a weird place to see a team. Like we're just used to them being able to weather any kind of storm, any kind of huge run. And the Pacers, like they've been sort of basically every opponent to this point, have just been overwhelming in games like this.
Starting point is 00:09:17 I thought J-dub, I thought this was a really good J-dub game. It wasn't perfect, obviously, but I thought some of the stuff he did is going to, like this is the stuff that needs to have. happen if they're going to win the series. In the second quarter, Indiana kind of stretched it to seven. And it looked like, okay, some momentum was happening. And J. Dub, I think, got to the line, like, six times that quarter. And it was just getting to the rack, drawing contact, like, the stuff that you expect from big time players, like, all right, this is how I calm the team down.
Starting point is 00:09:48 I'm not like, okay, making some dribble, dribble, dribble, step back. It's like, no, I'm getting the rock in and around the basket, or I'm going towards the basket on the dribble. I'm going. I'm getting to the line. I thought that did calm and settle them. And that's a thing that nobody else on that team can do outside of Shay, right? Like, have possessions where it's not the most crisp, perfect ball movement.
Starting point is 00:10:10 It's just, all right, I'm just better than the guy in front of me or on my hip right now. And I'm creating. I thought this wasn't like a really good J-dub game. I just thought the thunder, like you guys said, the offense in the fourth was just stuck in the mud, man. And I think you got to give credit to the paces, because they were executing defense at an insanely high level.
Starting point is 00:10:34 Again, we know what Neesmith and Nemhard do on a day-to-day. Miles Turner? In the fourth quarter, he was goddamn Bill Russell. Halliburton, yo, I'm sorry. Halliburton's defense, man, deserves some level of respect. And I know we're probably going to get into it, too, because that was the chatter that I was most paying attention to coming out of game two.
Starting point is 00:10:58 It's like, ah, see, three points. See, he barely took any shots. Oh, you got a suicide. Blah, blah, blah. I'm like, guys, relax. Bro, like, he's been doing this entire playoffs. Like, guys, chill. And I thought his aggression,
Starting point is 00:11:13 the way he was just like hunting for his shots, and then in the fourth where I think things really got broken wide open for Indies offense, the Thunder did not know what to do on that Miles Turner pick and roll. It was just all bad. options. Like, Hallie had to floater whenever he wanted to. If they went under, he had to pull up three. Like, that pocket pass was there working for miles to catch at the foul line. That's
Starting point is 00:11:37 when I was like, okay, season troubled this quarter because they can't do anything with that pick and rolling. Yeah, Halley deserved his flowers for that. Yeah, I think the issue was not only were there, what, two to three days in between finals games? And so we had a whole lot of time in order to parse through whatever happened. And then the natural inclination is just like Star Player had X many points. He was either great or he didn't play well enough. If you watch the Pacers thus far, this is just kind of how he plays.
Starting point is 00:12:04 And the Pacer's success largely derives from him. But I guess this was the bounce back game that everyone could probably agree was pretty awesome. 22, 11, and 9 overall, just like a complete performance on both ends, as well as mentioned. Rob, I guess we could say that Tari's Halliburton is not having a down year officially at this point.
Starting point is 00:12:22 Oh, wow. It's very big of you to finally come to those terms, Justin. And I appreciate it, though. I'm saying it's big of Trenton Wofford. We need to tell our boy on the net he's not having it down here. This is true. This is true. Look, I hate for Trindon Wofford to take Ellis on this podcast, but this one he's got to take
Starting point is 00:12:38 all the way. Like 100%. Look, the overrated chatter has been out there. Waser rate, like the, is he aggressive enough chatter has been out there the last couple of days in particular? I think this game from Halliburton is a great case study in what we're talking about when we talk about stars being aggressive. Because, yes, some of it is Tyrese Hallibur.
Starting point is 00:12:56 a pass first player needs to turn down the part of his brain that wants to pass a little bit. Like he needs to turn that part down. He needs to be willing to settle for some shots that are not the best shot, but in these circumstances against this defense are a good enough shot, or a great enough shot in some instances. I also thought his teammates did him a great service, and Rick Carlisle did him a great service by starting a bunch of possessions in other places. How many possessions start with Andrew Nemhart,
Starting point is 00:13:21 start with Pascal Seaccombe with the intent of rerouting to Tyrault. Haliburton with momentum, with an advantage, with a switch he can attack. Like the whole point of attacking a team like the Thunders, if they're going to switch this much, guess what? Shea, if you switch on to Pascal Seacom, you're going to get posted. Isaiah Hardenstein, if you switch onto Tyreys Halliburton, we're going to then run you through a bunch of action in ways that you're not used to doing. And I thought Halliburton took incredible advantage of those situations as much as anything. And like, that's tactical, right? Like, that's a team-level decision on how to help him be a more aggressive player.
Starting point is 00:13:53 and it really paid off not just for him, but then in him getting to the lane and spraying out to everyone else and playing Indiana Pacer's basketball. Yeah, I pilot did this take on Rob the other day was, so he's going to have to pretend
Starting point is 00:14:06 like he hasn't heard me go through this at all. But I want to get your thoughts, first and foremost. It seems like part of why we can't accept Halliburton for being like a true blue superstar, and large part is because the two things he does well are the two things over the past decade or so, we've kind of been pushing
Starting point is 00:14:23 against, like he's a pass for his point guard who gets guys involved, first and foremost, isn't really much of a score. Well, like, over the past decade, our scores are our point guards. The point that we don't even call them point guards anymore, they're ball hands, right? They're offensive engines. It's Luca,
Starting point is 00:14:39 it's hard, and it's also like the clutch stuff. It's Shea. Yeah. It's Shea. Yeah. Perfect example. It's also, like, the clutch stuff, though, which, like, we know is, like, wonky, and we have all of our nerdy friends and even us being like, oh, you clutch, you know, it's a small sample but it does feel like
Starting point is 00:14:55 he has if there's a clutch gene a clutch gene because it's not just him it's his team and so it's almost like we it's like he is a throwback in a certain sense that a lot of things that we used to talk about and used to value in stars Steve Nash or even Kobe with the clutch but we almost worked against it
Starting point is 00:15:11 for a decade that we're just we're taking a while to catch up to it again so Hallie to me is in the Steve Nash and Chris Paul before the knee completely gave out on him um people don't remember this version of Chris Paul because it was so long ago
Starting point is 00:15:27 but like he would be the you know the consummate point god so to speak for three quarters and then when the clutch would come this dude would just start scoring every single possession that was like his entire MO same with Nash like he just wouldn't be aggressive
Starting point is 00:15:43 hunting his shot for the entire game and then when it was the fourth quarter he would just be like yo soon as I come off the Samari screen I'm firing you know Chris Paul I think Halliburton has a lot of that in him where he just feels like until it's like this last, last minute, he's not going to spend the game just aggressively looking for his own shot.
Starting point is 00:16:05 And even when he's not looking for his own shot, just staying on the ball. Yeah. And I think, again, like, what people just got to respect is that the unpredictability of the way the bassers play is an asset. The fact that it's not the same. same action for four freaking quarters, like the Luca Donchich Mavs, for instance, right? Or Tray Young back in the days.
Starting point is 00:16:33 Like the same exact offense for four quarters, you don't let the defense look at it for four quarters. And so, again, it puts them in a bad position in a clutch where they're like, who exactly is about to take over? Like, when this guy catches it on the wing, when NMR catches it on the wing, he, He's a legitimate threat to put his head down and go all the way to the basket on his own. Or to pull up, who know?
Starting point is 00:16:59 Like, you don't know. That is so stressful for a defense, man. Whereas, like, you know, again, Caruso touches the ball in the fourth quarter. I know he's not putting his head down and taking it to the rack. He's just not. You know, same with Lou Dorr.
Starting point is 00:17:13 Lou Dorr is not going to dribble into a crowd in the fourth quarter. Yes. You know, like, they're just way more predictable than the paces are. And I think Halliburton is why. Like the nature of his game allows for these guys to step up in big moments because they're doing it all game long. It's so true.
Starting point is 00:17:32 I think the finishing piece of that is some of what you're outlining was in terms of that Steve Nash, Chris Paul level. Halliborne absolutely has the elements of those guys' games. I don't think he has the full Steve Nash against Dallas in the playoffs go for 48 game. Like we're going to let anyone else, like we're going to dare you to beat us in lockdown every other option. I don't know that he has that gear in him yet. And frankly, Thunder aren't challenging him in that particular way. But if you're going to keep a defense like OKC's off balance, being aggressive on offense is a huge part of that.
Starting point is 00:18:01 And you could see it over the course of this game in terms of unlocking, I would say, the pocket pass in particular. Halberton's timing on the pocket pass is so precise and so great, especially if you buy even for a second that he's going to pull up for the floater. And you could see the Thunder getting kind of pulled into that possibility that, okay, like he's coming out looking for this drive in a way that we're not used to. We're going to stay with him for a half beat longer. And then now of a sudden that Miles Turner passes right there for the taking every time because you put that seat
Starting point is 00:18:29 of doubt in the Thunder's mind in the first and second. Really, I would say in the second quarter. That's when everything for Indy snapped into place. We haven't even talked about the bench yet. My brain is screaming Ben Matherin at the top of its brain lungs. And T.J. McConnell. Whether whether this was the T.J. McConnell game or the Ben Matherin game, it was like an all-out brawl to see which one would survive. Yeah, so it's good to have a point guard. It's good to also have a backup point guard, especially one who gets five steals in an NBA game.
Starting point is 00:18:58 There was like an 11 and 4 run they had where I think virtually all of that came via TJ, whether it was with the past or the few scoring opportunities he had in this game. I mean, was as someone who won the inaugural white NBA players American draft, you have to be proud of this one. I'm telling you, I found religion on T.J. McConnell last playoffs
Starting point is 00:19:20 where I was like, come on, he's not going to do this against playoff defenses. And he just did it against every single playoff defense he came up against. And now it's the Thunder who are the best playoff defenses. Playoff defenses were invented. And he's doing it against them again. And a lot of it is just he's constantly getting into the teeth of the defense with the dribble. And like you shouldn't feel like T.J. McConnell is going to be some major threat while he's in the the lane with a live dribble. But like, it's natural to be like, hold on, this guy's three feet
Starting point is 00:19:54 from the basket right now with a live, like, this is a problem. And the, and the defenses is reacting. Like, at one point, I forget, he drove to the lane and the defense lost somebody on a backdoor cut and he just dumped it off to him. I'm just like, T.J. McConnell is creating wide open dunks off of his dribble penetration. That's insane. It was nuts. And you're right. We're all finding faith together. You know, I think that, look, there's a lot of reasons to doubt T.J. McConnell over the years for exactly the reasons you described. He is a classic, like, run around a lot, sometimes accomplish a little. Or some matchups would be very tough for him, frankly, in a way that the first two games of the series were.
Starting point is 00:20:36 But here we are. You know, United in our faith, father, son, and T.J. McConnell. Has there been a more coach's son game in NBA history than three inbound passes? You were listening to the freaking ESPN? Broadcast, bro. God bless Doris Burke, but she literally did that he's six two and white. Like, it's a miracle that he's in the NBA. She said he's only six two.
Starting point is 00:21:00 I'm like, yo, bro, she's really doing it. Like, the coach's son and the moxie and the craft and he's pesky. And I'm just like, yo, calling an NBA player pesky is hilarious, bro. Well, and we wonder why Tyrese Halliburton's dad had the gumption to go up to Janus after a game one time. It's because whenever these parents are in the crowd, they show them 90 fucking times and they become pseudo-celebrities all of a sudden, and they're probably feeling their self
Starting point is 00:21:26 enough to the way they think. If they have enough liquid courage, they can go up to Yannis and be like, what the fuck is up now? Don't do that, Mr. McConnell, okay? We don't need that. Yeah, TJ McConnell's dad is, he got a lot of run,
Starting point is 00:21:40 but listen, TJ was killing. He deserved it. In the first half and the second half, he had two great, amazing stints in this game. and obviously Ben Matherin, you know, the Haitian sensation, he was just magnificent. He was, it was crazy what he was doing out there. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:21:57 So I think the big picture brain in me wants to be like, oh, well, all of this depth, it just works in concert. And so that a team like the Pacers that likes to push the pace is going to have the healthy bodies, the live bodies in order to just keep hitting you with waves, right? The strategy of it all. Like I am guilty of looking to those sorts of things as much as possible.
Starting point is 00:22:16 But then it's just good. when guys just play out of their fucking gourds coming off the bench. TJ was one of them. Ben was another one of them. Rob, did you think that when Ben Matherin came into the league and he was saying how much LeBron needed to prove that he could play at Ben Matherin's level that this was in store for him?
Starting point is 00:22:36 You know, I didn't think it's going to quite be this. But I'm glad to be proven wrong on this and many other things. 27 points on 12 shots for Ben Matherin. Like, are you fucking kidding me? It's unreal. To have, in 22 minutes. And here's where I am with Ben Matherin,
Starting point is 00:22:52 because his journey through the Pacer's system has been fascinating. Obviously, he was injured during last year's playoff run, so he didn't have quite the same experience as some of these other guys did. Stylistically has been a bit like on a slightly different beat, I would say, than many of the Pacers' regulars and mainstays. And for that reason, I just don't think Rick Carlisle trusts him in the way that he trusts Andrew Nemhart or Aaron Neesmith, or even sometimes Ben Shepard, for that matter.
Starting point is 00:23:15 which makes me feel like Ben Matherin to me, this version of Ben Matherin is the more evolved Jonathan Cuminga. This is the contrast of styles. This is like, and I say that not, like, it's not that Jonathan Cominga is a wildly more talented player or Ben Matherin is a wildly more talented player,
Starting point is 00:23:31 but you can tell that one of these two guys is a little bit more in tune with what his team is doing, not fully in tune, because if he were fully in tune, he would be another plug and replace Indiana Pacer. But the reason Ben Matherin is valuable to Indiana is because he is not exactly, like everyone else.
Starting point is 00:23:46 Because he's going to come into this game, because he's going to come into other games and get to the line a ton on one night, be a commanding on-ball force on another night, be a little bit out of the loop sometimes, but can take over a game in a way that a Ben Shepard never will be able to. And that is worth its weight in gold
Starting point is 00:24:02 in the NBA finals, clearly. Like this, you cannot replicate that kind of value coming off the bench. Yeah, what Rob is talking about is Indies frenetic, crazy, hyper-movement, hyper-fat, pace of play, style of play, doesn't fit with how Ben Mathriman
Starting point is 00:24:21 has traditionally been, which is just a traditional shooting guard, methodical. Like he's a classic six-man bench score. Yes. Yes. Break you off the dribble. Call some pick and rolls every now and again,
Starting point is 00:24:34 but I'm looking to score every time. Like, I think today or tonight, he was like, you know what? I want to catch the ball going downhill, but I don't have to do with. starting from 30 feet. I can do that on a dribble handoff. I can keep the defender in jail
Starting point is 00:24:52 coming off of a pin down as the defender is behind my back. It's like all of these positions you fight to get into off of the dribble. He's getting into it off of the ball. And that's obviously more in tune with what Indiana wants to do. And the guy is very skilled, very athletic.
Starting point is 00:25:12 Like he's a good, talented player. And it just shown tonight, man. Like some of these and ones, then he's getting to the lane and finishing with the left and make his spot up three.
Starting point is 00:25:24 I'm like, this is, this is insane what this guy is doing. I think the point we're kind of circling here is that, yes, the Pacers are unpredictable because of their playing style. A lot of the freelancing they're able to do
Starting point is 00:25:35 is because of the pace and Hallibur and all this other stuff. But they also slot into more traditional roles than what the Thunder have, which is kind of like the prime example of a modern team where, Yes, Shea does a lot of it. But then you have a lot of two-way guys around it,
Starting point is 00:25:48 a lot of guys who are a little bit more programmatic and how it will go about their offense. To the point, Rob, where I credit Isaiah Blakely, our producer, who talked about this before we got on here, it's like, at a certain point, if Shea is getting mold, like who's around to dribble? Like, how many actually guys do they have, like Matherin? Isaiah Joe is a guy that I brought up as a potential replacement for that.
Starting point is 00:26:08 He only played four business in this game, hit both of his shots, but, like, he gives away so much that they tend to shorten the rotation with guys that are centers, like Hartnstein, or Caruso and, like, their wing defenders. And so it's like, where is that coming from if it's not J-Dub and Winchette is really in the flow of things? But can I ask y'all, is Isaiah Joe getting killed on defense that badly? No.
Starting point is 00:26:30 It doesn't feel like it. I thought he was fine. Like, his ability to, like, keep the defense pretty stretched, man, and worried. Talk about that mental attrition. He's one of those guys. Like, look, Lou Dort made some threes today. Caruso made one in the corner. The Pacers, like, it sucks when that happens as a defense,
Starting point is 00:26:49 when it's like, this is kind of what we wanted and it went against us. Like, that's a bad feeling. But that's not the same as Isaiah Joe making two straight three-pointers in terms of the panic. So I'm just asking you all like, is he that bad on defense? I actually think he's been okay on defense for most of the season. Like, not every night, but by and large has been fine. And in this game, I didn't really have a problem with how he was playing. I didn't understand why he got yanked out of the rotation for the second half.
Starting point is 00:27:15 Other than clearly the Thunder were trying to buckle down and we're trying to find minutes for their best guys. It's one thing if you're trading off Isaiah Joe minutes for Lou Doord minutes. It's another thing if you're doing it so you can stretch out Shea a little bit further. And I can understand the logic of that in a game like this. I just, I don't know that it paid off in the way that the Thunder needed it to. Yeah, the Shea thing is the big part of it because he did get 42 minutes in this game. They had the extra rest. And so maybe that was just baked into their plan.
Starting point is 00:27:40 And as we've seen with the Thunder, like when they have a plan, they tend to stick with it, even though they have optionality within the roster to turn to certain guys more than the others. So we'll see. The other thing I wanted to bring up to you guys just briefly is that the Thunder definitely racked up some turnover. They ended up with 19. Indy had 14, but I feel like the disparity was bigger during the course of the game before I got a hand toward the end there. So I forgot who had this stat, but I saw a kick around Twitter. Apologies, I usually try to write down who comes up with it. but 72% of the playoff games this postseason
Starting point is 00:28:11 have been dictated by turnovers, which might be the case historically, like the team that's executing better tends to win. On the other hand, it does feel more important in this series in particular. We talked about it coming into it. Obviously, both teams take care of the ball, the thunder get so much out of creating turnovers themselves.
Starting point is 00:28:29 Do you think there's anything more to it, Rob? Do you think that, like, the fact that, like, is offense just getting to a point where it's so crisp that the mistakes are just popping a little bit more? Honestly, I would guess this is something that kind of comes out in the noise a little bit. I think it's probably a little bit more randomness. I would guess it's probably, as you said,
Starting point is 00:28:49 in line with historical data. I also think it's weighted heavily by the fact that we are now in the NBA finals and the two teams here are the thunder and the Pacers. I was just going to say that. Like these are two teams, like their styles are predicated on dominating the turnover margin. And therefore, like overall for the playoffs
Starting point is 00:29:06 is going to look that way. But I think if the Nuggets had gone on a deep playoff run, maybe it would look a little bit differently. If the Knicks had gone on a longer run, maybe it would look a little bit differently. I think some of that's just like, that's how these two teams play. They are incredibly successful with it for their personnel.
Starting point is 00:29:21 I don't know that it means that anyone would be or it has to be the dominant style in the league right now. So in the second quarter, I had it down. I was like, oh, the Pacers are finally getting their run game going, which feels like the first time all series that that had happened. talking about two quarters into the third game of the series. It's almost like, you know, if you're like watching the Chiefs and they finally hit a 40-yard pass, it's like, oh, okay, they're getting big plays now. And so, yeah, I think the turnovers helped unlock that.
Starting point is 00:29:53 But again, the Pacers were doing it off of makes. And, like, man, this one, it was this one play where Topping just got behind the freaking defense somehow. He caught it maybe five feet into half court, got behind the defense. Everybody reacted. I think he ended up dumping it off for a basket or whatever. But I'm just like, man, this is the things that I've been watching these guys do all playoffs long, that it's finally happening against the thunder, who, you know, God bless him. For the first two games, did a good job of keeping these guys in the half court.
Starting point is 00:30:27 Today was the first time it felt like the pace was like, all right, we're getting into our type of game again. I mean, one big part of that, too, as far as like, what makes the page? are so successful in crunch time. What makes like the turnover margins such a dominant stat in this year's playoffs? Like when you get into the ends of these games in particular, Indy just does not turn the ball over. And so then it's not a mystery
Starting point is 00:30:48 why they're able to go on these game-changing runs. They're getting shots on goal every single time. And they may be successful. They're a great shot-making team. Maybe sometimes they'll miss. But like they're going to turn you over enough times to get out and run and make something of it. They're going to turn you over often enough, even if you are
Starting point is 00:31:03 the Oklahoma City Thunder, that they're going to stay in games. They're going to come back in games. They're going to turn a series. They're going to make it to one. This is just who these guys are at this point. Yeah, it's crazy because as miraculous as it is and as magical as this run has been, it's kind of all repeatable. And the way that they've come back has looked like the other games that we've seen. And so at this point, it's a miraculous formula that they just have down that they could just turn to. This one, I guess they didn't even need the miraculous part because they kind of had this game in hand for most of it. the very least had their hand on the throttle for a lot of this.
Starting point is 00:31:38 And so, because of them, man, they definitely punched the thunder in the mouth and the game that they needed to. Dude, it's not even, the point of,
Starting point is 00:31:46 like, miraculous is, is hilarious at this point again. Because at one point, I thought one of the shots that kind of blew this thing open was knee-smith in the corner where he does the catch where he barely puts his arm freaking down.
Starting point is 00:32:02 He immediately gets up and launches it and just, splashes. I'm just like, bro, this is what? Like, is this happening again? And yeah, like, it's not a miracle. Yeah, the cross court to Halliburton to
Starting point is 00:32:17 Kneesmith in the shooting pocket gets it up within like a split second. I was like, game over. They're so in rhythm. Like, there's no coming back from that. Well, let's take this opportunity, as you alluded to, Justin, to christen these pacers properly. We've consulted the authorities, which are the group chat listeners.
Starting point is 00:32:34 I got to say, the variety of names, some of which were truly unhinged, some of which required paragraphs of explanation. I'm here to tell you that's a little bit too intricate for the exercise of what we're trying to accomplish here, which is we need something snappy. We need a we believe warriors. We need maybe at most in terms of difficulty, a seven seconds or less sons. I would like to throw out to you first, just for fun, the variety of pop culture oriented names that people threw at us to describe the Indiana Pacers, because we do work here at the ringer.com. com.
Starting point is 00:33:07 The Survivers. How do we feel about the survivors? Apostrophe C. Creative, but you really have to emphasize the sur in order to get there. Good thinking. You really do.
Starting point is 00:33:19 Again, I think it's maybe a step too far. There were some that are like people trying to riff on goonies and the never say die thing of goonies. I think that's too much. Many, many people suggested nicknames oriented to the Leonardo DiCaprio movie The Revenant in light of our
Starting point is 00:33:35 conversation about being post death. I think that might be too much. And I say that as someone who enjoys that movie in Leo's career very much. Corniceps? What do you think, Justin? How do you feel about cornyceps? I fucking love it, but that's even too weird for me.
Starting point is 00:33:54 It's too weird. We got several the P-1000s after Terminator 2. I see the vision, but again, I think it's a little too much. The payback pacer's. Now we're getting somewhere. Now we're getting into the right range. But ultimately, I think we've got to step outside of that realm. Or if we're going to do pop culture, I think Children of the Corn is still the one to beat as far as that goes.
Starting point is 00:34:15 Otherwise... I think Children of the Corn is my favorite. I think... Children of the Corn has got some legs. Many recommendations for the possum pacers, which I do think has some legs. But they're like a possum. But possum is such a disgusting animal. There's a negative competition to the possums.
Starting point is 00:34:36 This is beautiful basketball. Too beautiful for a possum laying on the road. Posses are too ugly. I just find myself coming back to pacemakers, though. I think pacemakers might be not ideal, but perfectly evocative for what we need from this pacer's team. Can we do any better than pacemakers? Pacemakers and children of the corn are my two favorites, to be honest. Survivors is shining to the survivors.
Starting point is 00:35:01 Yeah, maybe we'll throw up a poll. We'll throw a poll on social or something. That's a New York Post back page for sure. But like, yeah, too good. So pacemakers. I kind of like it. I think so. Pacers.
Starting point is 00:35:14 Okay. That's the one I would go for. But yeah, maybe we could put a poll. You've got a lot of heart, Justin. You're goddamn right they do. In the heartland, they've got some heart. All right. Anything else from this game or should we turn the page here to?
Starting point is 00:35:27 I think we got it all. Chet Holmgren was really good in the first half. He was. Nice third quarter. It was just like, I was like, man, when Chet becomes this guy on a regular basis, yeah, watch out, bro. That was exciting to watch. One little throwaway thing that I think could have changed the game maybe a little bit.
Starting point is 00:35:47 How was that not a flagrant foul on Aaron Neesmith down the stretch? The dick punch? I don't know. I think. No, the two-handed shoulder, like the horse collar almost. This is my thing. He didn't know which side the ball was going to be on, so he went for both sides. Sure.
Starting point is 00:36:03 I guess that's a play. I guess that's a justification. That's a regular foul, man. Like Caruso landed on his two feet just fine. Like it didn't cause him to have some bad, horrible landing. Like, bro, play on, man. I'm soft. I get it.
Starting point is 00:36:20 Is it too soon to have the conversation of whether or not this is the most surprising title of our lifetime? Do we need to save that? We need to save content. So, like, don't burn through all of our good. content now. I've got like two days between games. I'm living out of a hotel.
Starting point is 00:36:37 Man, I've got so much fucking time. I have 20 segments if you really want them. If you ask me to outline my dream scenario, it's lock Justin Verrier in a room and make him dream of segments about the Indiana Pacers. So we're really living my best life. So, but what do you, you guys, have you guys changed your minds about the series?
Starting point is 00:36:57 Oh, about who would win? Oh, um. Sounds like y'all are preparing for, A title. I don't know. A title parade in Nactown. I like how Waz has flipped this around where he's now Mr. Pacer. I'm not.
Starting point is 00:37:11 I'm the only one that thought this could go six or seven. I'm not Mr. Pacer. Yeah, like, I'm not. I just literally didn't think the Thunder would roll them. That's it. Like, I just, I've been beaten into submission by the Pacers. I got too much respect for these guys. That's true.
Starting point is 00:37:27 I could definitely see it going seven now. Regardless of who wins. I would still lean toward the thunder. They still have a ton of moves that I think that they couldn't really turn to here. It's like it's not like they're getting dominated. It's a couple dialed turns and just like keeping the game out of reach long enough
Starting point is 00:37:44 so the Pacers can't do this, right? Like game two is repeatable. I think they got it. I think they got to stop being cute. How many shots did Shea take tonight? Like 19? Again, I repeat. That should be close to the 30.
Starting point is 00:37:57 In my opinion. See, this is my opinion. I like, don't give me. wrong. Shake, if you can get Shane more shots, you should do that. He's an amazing player. I thought he was working for it and trying to get to those shots, and Andrew Nemhard and Ben Shepard and some spots Aaron Eastman
Starting point is 00:38:11 they're really the first two guys, were just all over him. And I thought they played phenomenal one-on-one defense in a way that made it hard for She to take 30. Yeah. I think you guys saw, and to Waz's point earlier, like when Chet clicks into place, this team hits another gear. And so
Starting point is 00:38:26 one of the ways that we can really open things up for him. we saw some too big going down the stretch. I almost wondered if they had to go even smaller at the end of the game. It's just being able to optimize Chet seems like it's going to be the decisive thing of this entire series because he had like six free throws in that first quarter.
Starting point is 00:38:44 I was like, is he the new foul merchant? Do we really need to reroute the narrative in order to get to him because he was getting the line on some kind of shoddish shot? But it's just he changes everything for them at this point. So he almost is the canary and the coal mine for this series. There is a fascinating thing at play with the stars in this series.
Starting point is 00:39:00 You know, we haven't talked about Pascal Seacom much. He, I thought, had a tremendous game too. He's the one that balanced them in the first half, though. They came out shaky as hell. Shaky as hell. They call that first time out, and it's Yacom and them just, they just finally, like, settled in. Yes. And I think, look, who sets the floor for both of these teams?
Starting point is 00:39:20 For OKC, I think Shea's excellence one-on-one and the defense make it, like, they never have bad, like, terrible games. I think they're always going to be at a certain level of competence because of those two things. For the Pacers, I think Siakum sets the floor. He is the steady piece. And Halliburton clicking and his style and the momentum of the greater offense is what breaks the ceiling and lets them blow the top off the thing. For the thunder, their floor is incredibly high. It lets them dominate in the regular season.
Starting point is 00:39:49 It lets them beat a ton of playoff opponents. But you're right, Justin, like Chet is the kind of guy who raises their ceiling. A great J-dub game is the thing that raises their ceiling. They need those sorts of elements to be their best possible selves. And we're just not seeing them quite consistently enough to beat opponent as good as these Indiana Pacers. After that first quarter, I was Pockeying take about how Chet is like the prime representation of the evolution of basketball. But we'll get to that next time when they actually have a good game. He plays an entire good game.
Starting point is 00:40:18 So we'll turn now to the offseason because as we've been going through these finals, it feels like something's happening every day to the point where it's today. I feel like I got 30 news alerts about various coaches that just turned down the New York tickerbockers, unfortunately. So I came, I put together three headlines based off of the TikTok pieces, the feature stories that Ramona Shelburne could be writing when these events happen. I want you guys to tell me, one, like, how likely is the scenario and two, how likely is the piece that falls? I do think we need to start first and foremost with those next. Wait, wait, wait, hold on.
Starting point is 00:40:57 Let's stop right there. What is the distinction between the two things we are rating? You're just going to tell me if you like it or you don't. Like, we're going to talk about the movie itself. And then you're going to tell me if you think the headline is funny. Yeah. Don't ask questions about my bits because they fall apart incredibly incredibly.
Starting point is 00:41:15 I just think they're funny. I have no one to put them against. And then all of a sudden, yeah. So, Knicks were turned down. So they asked and but, for permission, but were ultimately declined permission to interview. I have five head coaches in the NBA. Just, I think all of these reports came today or over the past few days.
Starting point is 00:41:35 Chris Finch, Imi Adoka, Jason Kidd, Quinn, Quinn Snyder, Billy Donovan. It reminded me of like the athletic when they first popped up and like they were just hiring everybody from every newspaper. They said this is the opposite. Yeah, except they got turned down because unfortunately, uh, yeah, the, um, yeah, the, New York Post is not the one the place they want to go to. So the headline I have down here is accepting the scowland, why Brian Scalibrini's streetball bullying proved he's built for New York.
Starting point is 00:42:12 So they are turned down by so many people. They turned to Brian Scalabrini. And the lead to this piece was all about how he took it to George, the Messiah, and streetball. the Scallenge is what he used to call it. And that showed his tough mentality in order to take the job with the Knicks, turn them around,
Starting point is 00:42:31 almost like Eddie will be Goldberg style. I need you to walk me through your process. He's saying that the coaching search is going to get so desperate. They have to do something like get a Bryant Scalabrini. I think the desperation is just going to be an assistant who you don't have to ask permission to talk to. Like they're just going to have to hire some assistant that people respect and like and move on.
Starting point is 00:42:57 And again, this is why I thought they should use, like, the New York might to go actually get somebody. Not be, like, permission to talk to your coach. What you, you, I'm Eme Adoka. I'm freaking, you know, Chris Finch. I'm whoever. You're going to interview me if I'm good enough to take your Nick job? Like, no.
Starting point is 00:43:21 Like, it doesn't, like, bro, you were supposed to go there and be like, Yo, I want you really badly. And here's how we're going to get you out of freaking Minnesota or Houston. This isn't some, oh, let's just let the Knicks talk to our guy for the, like, what? And if you're the guy, if you're the coach, like, why am I doing some, why am I begging you to work at your fucking company when I got a good at ass job right now? You sound crazy. Interview with me, like, what are you talking about? Why is you're 100% right?
Starting point is 00:43:54 Like you don't ask Denzel to audition on tape. Exactly. That's not what this process is supposed to be. For your little off-Broadway crappy-ass production. Are you shitting me? That said, was it, correct me if I'm wrong. I feel like a pot or two ago.
Starting point is 00:44:06 You did go on an extended rant about how what Mark Dagnall's doing is cute, but you got to level up and go do it with the Knicks for it to mean anything. Am I misremembering your take? No, yeah, for sure. But you know what I mean, though. It's just a monkey operation. Like a few O KC people got mad about like, oh, the Knicks aren't the big time or whatever.
Starting point is 00:44:25 Like, it was a freaking joke. Get over it, Prairie people. Anyway. But you're right. They're doing it in public. The point is not that the Knicks aren't big time. The point is like, you just fired a coach. Okay?
Starting point is 00:44:38 I didn't get fired by my job. My job likes me. It's like you just fired a coach. You're the one that's in need a help right now. I have a job. you know, I just got to the conference finals if I'm Finch. I just took, you know,
Starting point is 00:44:55 Houston to the playoffs and a nice seating and all of that young team, mad trade assets. You show up to your night pods. Every time. Yeah, you have a job, and we like your job. Like, the approach makes no sense.
Starting point is 00:45:12 It's not a job interview. It's a getting touch with these people's agents telling them like, yo, You see what Houston's paying you? We're going to pay the hell out of you and you're going to get to be rich as hell in New York. You down with that number that we got for you? All right, cool.
Starting point is 00:45:29 Now we go deal with your owner and how we pry you from the owner and grease the skids that way. Like, this is crazy what they're doing right now. It reminds me a lot of when a reporter asked a question in the press conference, which nobody, like a trained coach or athlete, isn't going to respond with honesty.
Starting point is 00:45:49 Right? To get the actual thing that's happening, it has to be behind closed doors because no one's going to admit that publicly. But for whatever reason, the Knicks went on this very public campaign of asking every coach. And obviously, every team is going to take that as an opportunity to go run to Shams or whomever and be like, oh, we turn them down. Fuck them. We got our coaches back. And so if anything, it's so crazy. I thought that this was like a way to go get somebody else that they actually wanted, that this was a smoke screen to like to, like to. distract people from their actual You're saying this is like a Bobby Hurley speaking of Woj. Right. Yes. Danny Early. Excuse me. Sorry. But you're right. I thought there was another move coming and maybe it will but it might just be the Knicks kind of just doing this off the seat of their pants. Yeah, what do you know? Jim Dolan's not playing four-dimensional chess.
Starting point is 00:46:41 I think you're right. You're on to something though, Justin, with the reporting like daisy chaining that's happening here. This is a too many guys problem. We don't, usually think about coaching searches in those terms, but like you can do this with maybe one to two employed head coaches. You can't do it with six. You just, you just can't keep going around the circle trying to poach head coaches because teams will leak it
Starting point is 00:47:04 because they don't have any vested interest in protecting you. So like, I just don't understand this other than through the lens of this is Nick's entitlement, which is very different from Lakers exceptionalism, which is at least on an institutional level kind of earned. this isn't even earned. This is just thinking that you deserve those coaches more than other teams do.
Starting point is 00:47:23 So here's an example of how this stuff happens generally. Freaking Tim Connolly. Okay? He's in Denver with his cheap-ass ownership. A-Rod and them want to make a splengette. Like, bro, we're about to pay you like a motherfucker. Okay?
Starting point is 00:47:42 He had just signed his deal with Denver knowing he was underpaid. And he was like, yo, guys, like, you give me the raise. Like, A. Rod and them want me really bad. But y'all give me the raise is cool. And the ownership was like, nah, bitch, you just signed this. Kick rocks. We had a handshake.
Starting point is 00:48:00 Like, we just shook on this. I don't care what A. Rod and them said. So that's how you do it. You go find, you identify the guy. You offer him a shit ton of money. And then you, like, wait for their freaking employee to be like, no, no, no, I'm not. You know what? I'll pay you more.
Starting point is 00:48:17 Or you know what? Yo, you disloyal as fuck. Go, go be a whore and take the money. Okay? Like, that's how this game works. They don't go over and say, permissionist make the Tim Connolly, please? No.
Starting point is 00:48:32 Tell Tim Connolly you about to pay him and let his representatives do the rest. I got to be honest, if you're a coach that hasn't been asked yet, do you start to feel bad? Like, if you're Chauncey Billups and you have not been asked for, like, permission to interview.
Starting point is 00:48:48 Like you're like, what, what is wrong with me? What did I do? Maybe that's the real move. Give every other coach an existential crisis in the process. Crazy. This is crazy. And, you know, I've been seeing the stuff where people like, oh, this feels like a Dolan move.
Starting point is 00:49:05 This feels like Dolan, like, you know, he was off doing whatever the hell he was doing. Now the team is having the most success in 25 years. He's like, oh, I can taste it. Let me get back involved. And, like, I'm like, I don't know. Like, Tibbs did have his shortcomings, blah, blah, blah. But, like, it's now this process how it's playing out is feeling like a Dolan situation. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:49:26 So we'll see. I mean, ultimately the Lakers won a title after, in air quote, settling for Frank Vogel. If there's talent there, someone is going to be able to go in there and probably have an opportunity. It's just not going to win the headlines. Yes. So I assume this will, they will turn to an assistant at some point that they know and love and he will take the job. job. So nuts.
Starting point is 00:49:48 Maybe he'll do just as good or better job of tips. We'll see. Next one I have up here is Kevin Durant. The chase is officially on because Shams had a report today suggesting that KD and Rich Kleinman and specifically boardroom CEO, Rich Kleinman, have met multiple times over the past week and are sifting through trade scenarios as if they haven't been doing that for weeks for months. but at a certain point,
Starting point is 00:50:16 they have obviously been weighing certain teams. The teams that, in their quotes, have expressed interest in Durant mainly feature Houston, San Antonio, Miami, Minnesota, New York. Obviously, other teams have probably inquired, but he names those teams probably for a reason.
Starting point is 00:50:33 I have, as the headline, the power of pop, Sheila Kili's with the side of salsa, an unfinished business, colon, inside Kevin Durant's. blockbuster trade to San Antonio. We're getting to Mission Impossible levels of punctuation in these headlines. And it should have been a wine reference and not like...
Starting point is 00:50:54 Yeah, that's true. It's true. Well, in Texas, though, I wanted to throw in that... Well, Pop is a wine guy. You know these NBA players love wine. That's true. That's true. I just wanted him to go, like, they actually met at a clandestine, like,
Starting point is 00:51:06 Tex-Mex place that Katie used to go to back in his awesome days. He's at some hard shell tacos. And he's like, we're shredded cheese on it. Katie ordered the chili kila, but he told them to hold the salsa. And it reminded him of his youth when he also held off on doing it the easy way because he was going to do it the hard way. And that's how he became an all-MBA player.
Starting point is 00:51:28 Well, let me just say this. As someone who was once a 19-year-old as a freshman at the University of Texas, maybe not the same taste in Tex-Mexis pop. You know, I don't think those circles quite overlap. Okay. But I think the question is, do we think San Antonio is the most, the move here because it seems like a lot of things are heading in that direction. I'm still waiting for the sell on this.
Starting point is 00:51:50 Like if you are the Spurs, Kevin Durant's a wonderful player, incredibly talented. I don't think there's a doubt that he would make them better. I just don't know if I'm San Antonio if I'm making any moves that are on a two-year runway right now. Like I am looking forward, perpetually, onward and upward. Like, I don't know why I would be on a Kevin Durant style path when my best player is Victor Webbenyama. now we have a high pick in the draft. And, like, there's so many ways you could move forward here other than banking on a 36,
Starting point is 00:52:20 or is he 37 year old veteran? Going to be. See, like, Spurs doing the Yannis thing makes sense because, like, you said, Rob. It's like that you could talk yourself being in a four-year thing, right? The KD thing is so short term. And to be that short term, and now, like, when being young, like, you're going to turn into a KD offense, you know? and like Deerra Fox and when Benyama need to be developing their chemistry as teammates. And look, I think they would be obviously a much better team for it.
Starting point is 00:52:57 I just don't know like that developmentally this is the best thing for the team. I think the sales pitch would be thus. And I can go either way on it. We're going to draft Dylan Harper number two. And we're going to say we're looking at this more as the long view. Yonis might not come on the market. we're going to talk about that next. Even if he does, like, you know, that's a four to five year window as opposed to a 10 to 12,
Starting point is 00:53:21 which is like, Wembe might be that good for that long. We're thinking Duncan years with this guy. So we draft Harper, but we still want to like push the button a little bit. We want to push forward. We want to compete now because we think Fox, Wemby, plus everything that we have, we could do something this year. Durant might be the middle tier move where if he accepts a role where he's more superstar emeritus, he actually let the young guys
Starting point is 00:53:46 trudge you through the regular season. I show up 50 games, and then in the playoffs, I'm going to pop and I'm going to take us to as far as we can get. And then he has more of a three to four year last couple years as opposed to doing everything like he did with Phoenix, where he was not only had to be the best player offensively, but the best player defensively. So it's twofold, if I could TLDR us.
Starting point is 00:54:08 It's the Spurs having their cake and eating at two. And for Durant, it's like, I'm just going to let the young guys, carry me through the back end of my career, kind of the way Chris Paul did with the Sons. Like he was the guy that started the drink. Well, I think that's also part of it. If they can get him for something a little bit more moderate,
Starting point is 00:54:25 and if you have Dylan Harper, if you have Fox, presumably you can deal a guard. Is that Fasel? Is that Stefan Castle? Are you more willing to give up that plus some picks? And you keep the guns of a competitor. The cell is like untouchable in this deal.
Starting point is 00:54:42 Like, that seems insane to me. I think it's more that Phoenix's incentives, yeah, Phoenix's incentives are not really anchored towards draft picks particularly. They want to be competitive. And so you would need a third team if it's going to be a draft and or young player heavy. I think so. That's a bad idea. Right. Because they don't have their own draft picks.
Starting point is 00:55:04 Would they rather be mediocre around Booker, which is where it seems like they're signaling their heads are at? Or would they want to just steadily build with somebody else's future? I'll be honest, like spurs picks of the future don't do much for me. Maybe they think it's the Hawks picks that the Spuror is still on. But again, Hawks look like they can be in the fourth seat next year if things go right just because of the way the East is looking. And so maybe they just don't have the package laws. I don't know what the money is that you put together. And I mean, yeah, I can't why can't the sons be like, all right, Devin Booker, you're Mr. Sun, right?
Starting point is 00:55:38 Well, you're going to bring up the fourth pick in the draft and Castle or Vassell. you know, and this is, we're rocking and rolling now. Like, I could be talked into that if I'm Phoenix. I got two franchise cornerstones, allegedly. And so just keep it pushing from there. Yeah. I think from San Antonio's perspective, I'm bumping on two things, Justin. Because I see the vision of what you're talking about as far as like the sort of midpath
Starting point is 00:56:03 that could make sense, especially if you can sell KD on the plan you described, of like kind of saving himself during the regular season, let the young legs take over. I just don't think in the West the young legs taking over is a guarantee of anything right now. Like the West is pretty competitive all the way through. They had some serious injury and health concerns this year, granted that held them down a little bit, but it's not like the spurs were just like sailing through this thing,
Starting point is 00:56:26 even with Victor as good as he was, even after bringing Fox in and then having his own injury issues along the way. So it's like, can you just bank on this team to be a middle playoff seat? I don't think you can. And I would also feel a lot better about it if the player you were acquiring, whatever star you want to bring in, we're a downhill player.
Starting point is 00:56:44 I want someone who goes to the basket to play opposite Victor. And Kevin Dren doesn't do that anymore. And that's kind of an issue if you want to start pairing those guys together. It's like all of a sudden, you have a lot of guys who like taking mid to long range jumpers.
Starting point is 00:56:57 And that might not be what you want to stage your entire offense around at this stage. So the other options here. So if San Antonio is number one for you, do you guys like any of the other, the other teams mentioned Houston, Miami, Minnesota. New York, there's been some kind of reporting to suggest they're not really in it. But was, do any of those appeal to you more than San Antonio?
Starting point is 00:57:19 Minnesota for sure. If I'm replacing Julius Randall with KD, sign me up. That's an exciting prospect for sure. I just don't know what's in that for Phoenix. What are we doing? Like, you're going to have to pay the hell out of Julius Randall. And I don't think the next three years of Julius Randall are going to have more output than KD. Do you guys?
Starting point is 00:57:44 They have a shiny Rob Dillingham sitting right there. Oh, Rob Dillian. There's no big part of the package. Didn't you see Terran Shannon's playoff minutes? Come on. Yeah, Minnesota is the one that I'm most intrigued by, but I just don't see how they make, like, why Phoenix is thirsty to do that. I guess there would be enough mix of young players, like, could you get Dylan? him. Could you get Shannon? Is there a way to work in like a Nasreed or an Akila Alexander Walker?
Starting point is 00:58:14 Jaden McDaniels? Right? I think that's where I would draw the line. You'd want Jaden in order to make that happen. See, I don't think you do that if you're Minnesota. I'm not sure you do it if you're Minnesota. I'm not sure Phoenix is on the line if Jade McDaniels is involved. Just like, again, just like as you're putting the pieces together,
Starting point is 00:58:31 it's like what is the tipping point from the Phoenix Sun's perspective? Jade McDaniels is surely a tipping point. Anyone else who's going to be involved who could realistically be involved in a trade like that? I just don't really see the argument. Jaden and Julius Randall That's a lot Your team is not going to be better He's just not going to be a better team
Starting point is 00:58:52 To me I don't think you can get rid of Edwards McDaniels or probably even Rudy Because you need to keep the guts of what makes your team good now And just add Katie to that If you can get it done like that But usually when we're saying Like you don't want to get rid of these guys Those are the guys that teams want
Starting point is 00:59:09 The only reason I might think a little that the reality might go a little differently from how we feel about it is it sure seemed like Minnesota was very interested in the Kevin Durant market at the trade deadline. Even at a time where it was logistically almost impossible for them to get him, they wanted to
Starting point is 00:59:25 demonstrate to Kevin Durant. Look how eager we are to trade for you. We love you. You know? Kee, we love you. That's how you do it. You don't go trying to sign everybody's coach in order to make these overtures you. You make little trade rumors behind the scenes.
Starting point is 00:59:41 Yeah. Well, one thing that's kind of complicating the market, probably for Katie and everybody else, is it seems like Janice is going to stay put in Milwaukee, or at least that's where we are on June 11th as we're recording this. We'll see in a couple days, a couple weeks, because I don't know what he's returning to. We can get into that. But Janus, not only the reports are out there that he's not on the market, the buck's unwilling to deal them. Obviously, that makes sense for them. Why would they deal him if they didn't have to? He's also just tweeting up a storm now to the point we tweeted out today. Does anybody else miss for him? And I have an answer for that. Fuck no. And so my headline here is philosophy according to Janus, colon, and this is a quote, I'm going to finish what I started. What do you think? Would you read it? Would you click?
Starting point is 01:00:29 I mean, I would click all of these for the record. Definitely I would click the Scalinch. Like, that's no time flat seeing that on my feet, I would click it. You know what? I go back and. forth on whether I can actually see Janus as a lifetime buck. Clearly, he's demonstrated an incredible loyalty to that franchise. He's also kind of done what he's had to do as a star to force their hand in this situation or that, as any star should do in that situation.
Starting point is 01:00:57 I think ultimately he will play for another team at some point, whether that's now. Clearly, he's pumping the brakes on that. But I think he is destined for that at some point in his career. But clearly that may be another year down the line or three years down the line. I honestly have no idea with that guy. Yeah, I think he'll eventually go ring chase somewhere. But, again, I think the KD timeline, career timeline is an instructive one. Just like, all right, force a trade, force a move. And what's so great about what happened in Brooklyn and Phoenix?
Starting point is 01:01:36 You know, like, what's so awesome about that? And so, yeah, I think it's something that's super duper, attractive presents itself. Like, I would imagine if there was like a golden state opportunity that like actually made some kind of sense. I could see him being like, yeah, me and stuff, absolutely. But, you know, what's out there right now, maybe he just doesn't feel that attractive in terms of place and players that he would be with.
Starting point is 01:02:07 Yeah. I think he should do whatever he wants. my question is after he's decided to show up for training camp and he looks around at the team assembled if he's going to have a little bit of up there's in remorse here because if you thought last year's bucks
Starting point is 01:02:23 look bad, it's potentially going to be worse than that. So free agents, I have them down as potentially losing 191 starts if they don't return a lot of the guys that they have on the market available, which is Brooke Lopez, Tori and Prince, Gary Trent Jr., Ryan Rollins.
Starting point is 01:02:41 All of a sudden, Ryan Rollins being an unrestricted free agent looks like a potentially big loss if they lose them. And then Jaredo Sims. And then in player options, they have Bobby Portis. Pat Conantin,
Starting point is 01:02:51 he assumed he's going to pick that one up at $9.4 million, Kevin Porter Jr. But it's likely, I would say, not just possible that they lose a lot of those guys and have to find a way
Starting point is 01:03:03 to replace the team that we were already saying was barely good enough to be even on the floor of the guy of this caliber. or Dame, of course, we didn't even mention when is he coming back? And if he comes back, mid-30s small guard
Starting point is 01:03:16 with a devastating injury, he's not coming back next season. I wouldn't expect. Is he just going to go to Cancun midway through and get to the LeBron and chill like program here? Because if not, like, it's going to get pretty frustrating for him next season.
Starting point is 01:03:32 See, I think he is going to show up to camp and do his part with whatever the bucks look like. And he's going to get through about six weeks at the season and be like, like what, what is this? What did I sign up for? Like once, especially super high level professional athletes
Starting point is 01:03:47 are confronted with the fact that their best is maybe not enough to elevate any kind of circumstance around them. And like, let's be honest about what this is. Even if they do bring some of those guys back, Justin, Brooke Lopez is 37 years old and was just kind of like played out of halves of playoffs of playoffs games.
Starting point is 01:04:04 Like, he is not the answer. The team as constructed is not the answer. So then you have to create a new one, whole cloth, with Janice's salary on the books, obviously,
Starting point is 01:04:13 with Dame's salary on the books, obviously, or move on from him in a way that's not going to actually benefit the team because trading Damian Lillard at this stage is not an
Starting point is 01:04:21 additive trade for another team. So what are you getting back in return for it? I don't know what the easy solutions are. In order to even get the bucks back to, what do they went? Forty-eight games a season? Like, I don't know how you get them back to that point.
Starting point is 01:04:35 It's not looking good. I found myself today being like, would they rather have, Chris Middleton's expiring contract rather than Kyle Kuzman's last two years on the deal, even though Kuzman's salary is lower, the fact that they have to convince someone to take an extra year as opposed to an expiring at a higher amount
Starting point is 01:04:56 where they could just match the contract, give them their 20, 31 first round pick because, oh, by the way, that's literally the only pick that they could trade unless they want to trade swaps and swaps. I don't know if those swaps or swaps, they swap it as much as they want to swap them. So I just... Like, we're the moves here.
Starting point is 01:05:14 You know? I don't think there's a move in addition to the contract. Yeah. It's just mediocrity. Dionys is just going to have to suffer through mediocrity and be like, I'm Mr. Buck. I'm hearing good times and in bad. I think that's what he's going for.
Starting point is 01:05:27 Like, I'm here through thick and thin. I think we're going to turn this around. And next year's just going to have to be the sacrificial lamb of a season. And for what it's worth, totally fine. Like, if that's what he wants to do. This is his call. This is his career. want to treat your superstardom is up to you.
Starting point is 01:05:44 And if it's worth more to him to reward what Milwaukee has put into him, what the bucks have put into him over the course of his career, like power to him for doing that. Have you guys gamed out something that would make sense for Milwaukee while also like, you know, bringing back,
Starting point is 01:06:02 putting Janus in a position to win? I think Houston can come the closest. Would you trade Evan Mobley for Janus? I think, I wouldn't trade it. I wouldn't do that as the bucks because if I just have Mobley and nothing else and not my own future, what am I surrounding with Mobley? So it's almost like a slightly worse version of what I have now except like you just don't
Starting point is 01:06:30 have anything to feed the main star that you have. Sure, but like in let's say two years when your books make way more sense, you'll be in a position to do so. with Janice in two years, like, he's going to be old. You know what I mean? Evan Mobley will still be squarely on the upswing of his career in two years.
Starting point is 01:06:54 Was, if 32-year-old Janus is old, what are we? Oh, we're cooked. Oh, okay. Washed and laundered. Stick of fork in us. I think with Mobley, you will get to like two years from now
Starting point is 01:07:09 where you have open cap space to do something with it. Realize you're in Milwaukee. You can't bring anybody there because it's not like Mowbys out there partying in like in Calabasas right now just like recruiting guys for four years down the road. And so you'll have to trade him in three years from that
Starting point is 01:07:26 because he will be looking to hit free agency down the road. So like to me that only... So what should the bucks want in return for Janus in a trade? If not a really all-star player who's cost-controlled, like what should they want? I would look at more of the Houston, San Antonio teams that could offer me a lot of different things with the idea that I expect one of them to pop in a certain way. And so, like, if I have Reed Shepherd, I have a couple other, like this upcoming number nine pick.
Starting point is 01:07:55 I have like one or two other guys, Tarisian, whomever might be, Jabari Smith. Then like, oh, maybe I see something in them and I could turn them into something. And at the very least, I have multiple bites of the apple. So you're basically saying, I didn't have the past four drafts, but I have this team's past four drafts. And so I could hopefully bring a team out of that because, again, like, what are the things that are going to be additive to the team outside of this trade? It's like they're not getting picks back in because they don't have players to trade. They don't have their own picks so they can't draft their way to other players.
Starting point is 01:08:26 So it's just like you're stuck in this situation for two years until you can get rid of Dame. So I think Houston makes sense. I think Houston does make sense as a Yannis destination and as a Kevin Durant destination for that matter, like if we wanted to get down to it. but also apparently there's no destination to be had for Yadda. So he's going to be hanging out in Milwaukee until he decides otherwise. I'll say this. Janice Jabari Smith, Amman Thompson is fucking sick.
Starting point is 01:08:51 And so I know Yonis wants to say and toil and just be the guy in Milwaukee, but like all of us are rooting for you to go to Houston because I want to watch that. So we'll see. All right. Wrap it there. I think we'll be back Friday. Houston was in the playoffs this year. That seems like years ago that I was watching that team play basketball.
Starting point is 01:09:14 Doesn't that seem like such a long time ago? I just like the segment, Waz remembers the Houston Rockets. Just remembers that they exist, that they're out there. She was to our own one shining moment at the end of the finals where we just list off things that happened over the past two months of our lives that we just completely forgot.
Starting point is 01:09:33 Yeah. We should 100% do that. Had a pretty good game once. He also had several pretty bad games too. All right. We'll be back, I believe, Friday. No was. We'll miss you, buddy.
Starting point is 01:09:45 Yes, I'm going to be in Guatemala. One of my best friends is getting married on Saturday. So, yeah, I'm going to be in Guatemala, and Antigua wedding. Yep. Do you want to shout out your friend now or later? Sydney, Sydney Snow, one of the greats ever. So, yeah, shout to her.
Starting point is 01:10:04 We need to stop asking you where you're going, because I want us to guess, Because there's no way any of his Because when we say like, oh, going to Lume, you're like, no, I'm actually, I'm going to Washington, D.C. You know, I'm going to Delaware. Believe me. Believe me. When I got this wedding invitation from two black Americans from Florida and D.C. respectively, I'm like, yeah, probably going to be in Florida and the Keys and some shit.
Starting point is 01:10:33 Probably, you know, like, these people are pretty successful. It's probably going to be some sexy locale or whatever. When I seen that shit say Antigua Guatemala, I was like, what the hell? We are the things we do. Well, we'll miss you. But we'll have a fill in for you on Friday for game four, another exciting edition of group chat and another NBA finals game.
Starting point is 01:11:00 So we will talk to you then. Thank you to Isaiah Blakely. Thank you to Ben Cruz. Talk to you next time.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.