The Ultimate Human with Gary Brecka - 270. Dr. Stephanie Haridopolos: On Screen Harms in Kids, the 2010 Drop & the Surgeon General's New Advisory
Episode Date: May 14, 2026Since 2010, math scores in 13-year-olds have dropped 14%, reading has dropped 7%, and by 2050, 40% of kids are projected to have myopia and the Surgeon General's office just connected that curve to th...e screen in your child's hand. Today, I sat down with Dr. Stephanie Haridopolos, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Health at HHS, to walk through the new advisory on screen harms, the 5-D framework parents can use today, and what bell-to-bell phone policies are actually doing in 37 states. CLICK HERE TO BECOME GARY’S VIP!: https://bit.ly/4ai0Xwg Connect with Stephanie Haridopolos through the Office of the Surgeon General Website: https://bit.ly/4tSfkQp Instagram: https://bit.ly/4eLK81e YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RCtyqO Facebook: https://bit.ly/3R6RLWk X: https://bit.ly/3P1RYtf LinkedIn: https://bit.ly/4dikiPW Thank you to our partners A-GAME: “ULTIMATE15” FOR 15% OFF: http://bit.ly/4kek1ij AION: “ULTIMATE10” FOR 10% OFF: https://bit.ly/4h6KHAD AIRES: "ULTIMATE20 " FOR 20% OFF: https://bit.ly/4a3Duze BAJA GOLD: "ULTIMATE10" FOR 10% OFF: https://bit.ly/3WSBqUa BODYHEALTH: “ULTIMATE20” FOR 20% OFF: http://bit.ly/4e5IjsV COLD LIFE: THE ULTIMATE HUMAN PLUNGE: https://bit.ly/4eULUKp CYMBIOTIKA: "ULTIMATE10" FOR 10% OFF: https://bit.ly/4tjyluP GENETIC METHYLATION TEST (UK ONLY): https://bit.ly/48QJJrk GENETIC TEST (USA ONLY): https://bit.ly/3Yg1Uk9 GOPUFF: GET YOUR FAVORITE SNACK!: https://bit.ly/4obIFDC H2TAB: “ULTIMATE10” FOR 10% OFF: https://bit.ly/4hMNdgg HEALF: 10% OFF YOUR ORDER: https://bit.ly/41HJg6S PEPTUAL: “TUH10” FOR 10% OFF: https://bit.ly/4mKxgcn SNOOZE: LET’S GET TO SLEEP!: https://bit.ly/4pt1T6V WHOOP: JOIN & GET 1 FREE MONTH!: https://bit.ly/3VQ0nzW Watch the “Ultimate Human Podcast” every Tuesday & Thursday at 9AM EST: YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RPQYX8 Podcasts: https://bit.ly/3RQftU0 Connect with Gary Brecka Instagram: https://bit.ly/3RPpnFs TikTok: https://bit.ly/4coJ8fo X: https://bit.ly/3Opc8tf Facebook: https://bit.ly/464VA1H LinkedIn: https://bit.ly/4hH7Ri2 Website: https://bit.ly/4eLDbdU Merch: https://bit.ly/4aBpOM1 Newsletter: https://bit.ly/47ejrws Ask Gary: https://bit.ly/3PEAJuG Timestamps 00:00 - Introduction: Screen harms and the Surgeon General 01:15 - The MAHA partnership and HHS direction 02:51 - From family physician to HHS leadership 04:18 - Demystifying the office of the Surgeon General 06:45 - 25 years of patient care meets public policy 07:56 - A congenital heart defect at age four 10:48 - The new advisory on screen use in youth 12:37 - What the science actually shows 15:40 - Metabolic health and the military recruitment crisis 16:36 - Myopia: 40% of kids by 2050 18:16 - The 2010 collapse in math and reading 19:11 - An entire generation as an experiment 20:05 - Bell-to-bell phone policies and what's working 21:40 - Mental health, body dysmorphia, and deepfakes 23:47 - The five-D framework for parents 27:07 - Why more states haven't adopted bell-to-bell 28:35 - Gut dysbiosis and the body's engine 33:37 - The newborn screening updates saving lives 35:01 - Chronic Lyme disease and federal recognition 38:13 - Lyme awareness month and treatment gaps 39:08 - Bringing 25 years of practice into policy 40:45 - What does it mean to you to be an Ultimate Human? Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and does not provide medical advice. It is not intended for diagnosing or treating any health condition. Always consult a licensed healthcare professional before making health or wellness decisions. Gary Brecka is the owner of Ultimate Human, LLC which operates The Ultimate Human podcast and promotes certain third-party products used by Gary Brecka in his personal health and wellness protocols and daily life and for which Ultimate Human LLC and / or Gary Brecka directly or indirectly holds an economic interest or receives compensation. Accordingly, statements made by Gary Brecka and others (including on The Ultimate Human podcast) may be considered. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
If you are exposed to screen time at a very young age before 18 months,
it could affect the full development of the brain.
And so it's not just about how much screen time quantity, it's also the quality of it.
Hardly apparent in America today would say,
I have no concerns at all about what my child is consuming on social media
or the amount of time that they're spending on their phones.
In the Office of the Surgeon General,
you have such a huge megaphone to discuss very pertinent.
health emerging threats to the public and how then do we amplify that message to increase health
and wellness?
In a perfect world, pulling all of your experience, what would be the utopia of success
for you if what was accomplished?
Believe or not, this is probably the most surprising.
Hey guys, welcome back to the Ultimate Human podcast.
I'm your host, human biologist Gary Brecker, where we go down the road of everything, anti-aging
biohacking, longevity, and everything in between. And as you know, lately I have been very involved
in the MAHA action, which is essentially this public-private partnership between health and human
services and the general sector, talking about and influencing and having interaction with
health and human services on the direction of health care in America. And most of all, looking at
initiatives to keep people out of the system. Not everything that they're doing in HHS and the USFDA is
is designed to fix the health care system. A lot of it is designed to keep people out of chronic
care. And today's guest is one of those thought leaders. She is a practicing physician. She's a
mother, ballroom dancer. She is an absolutely wonderful human being. Dr. Stephanie Herodopoulos
is now the acting chief of staff and senior advisor to the U.S. Surgeon General's Office. Her role
is updated, so I'll allow her to update us on that tune. But thank you so much for coming on the
Human Podcast. This is truly an honor. I appreciate the invite. Thank you.
I'm so happy to have you here. You know, you know, one of the things I've noticed about
this administration, at least as it relates to health care and health care policy,
is they're asking hard questions. They're challenging some of the status quo. They're shaking
things up all to have a positive impact on American's health care. They are not accepting
the fact that we are spending nearly $5 trillion a year on health care,
and the outcome has been some of the sickest, fatest, most disease-ridden human beings on the planet.
And I think, you know, I would love, first of all, for you to correct your title
because I know I left some of those out.
Recently, I was promoted a principal, deputy assistant secretary held at HHS,
and I've been there for 15 months.
I had a calling to make a bigger impact than I could just seeing the direct patient care.
I miss it.
I'm missing my patients.
And for over two decades, being able to see generations of families of all life, the whole lifespan from womb to tomb.
But with that...
Boom to tomb.
I love that.
I've never heard that saying.
I like that.
Cradle the group.
But, you know, we can...
We're in a big shift in health care right now,
and I wanted to be a part of that movement.
You know, with Kuhn's Law, we talk about, you know,
sometimes you have crises and then a drift,
but then now we're in a paradigm shift.
And with that paradigm shift,
we can, with a broad brush,
change the trajectory of so many lives in America.
And so I said, I want to serve.
And it was just such a true honor for President Trump to entrust this huge responsibility in me as one of his political appointees during this time.
You know, I wonder if we might just for, you know, most of people that are watching this podcast, everybody has heard of the Office of the Surgeon General, the Surgeon General for sure.
But, and states have Surgeon General's as well.
But can we just kind of demystify the office for a minute?
And, like, what is the role of this?
the government and what are some of the initiatives that are going on in the Surgeon General?
Why should my audience draw their attention or care about what's going on at the Office of the
Surgeon General?
My goodness, such long history of the Office of the Surgeon General.
You've heard from previous Surgeon General's in the 60s that brought attention to the harms of
combustible tobacco to Everett Coop in the 80s with HIV and AIDS.
In the Office of the Surgeon General, you have such a huge megaphone and you have a platform to discuss very pertinent health emerging threats and harms to the public and how then do we amplify that message to increase health and wellness.
So there are many different ways in which the Office of the Surgeon General can communicate.
It could be a call to action.
It could be an advisory and it could be a commissioned Surgeon General report, which takes years and longer period of time.
In the Office of the Surgeon General, we also oversee public health reports, which is a peer-reviewed journal that's been in existence for 148 years.
Wow.
And it's the longest peer-review journal in the nation's history.
And we also oversee the operations of the public health service.
Commission Corps that has been in existence for over 200 years. So right now we have
5,500 Commission Corps officers. They're military uniformed, unarmed, unarmed health
care warriors that are all over the United States and some international posts that are
there to help with natural disasters, outbreaks. If there,
is a problem with illnesses coming into our country, ports of entry.
They work in every department of the U.S. government, and it's so it's a true honor to serve
alongside them in the office.
Wow.
I mean, because I think, you know, very often we don't humanize these departments.
And one of the things I've loved about getting to know you is you had 25-year history
as a physician, raised a family, you're a wife, you're a mother, you're a practicing physician,
and family, family medicine, you've had hands-on patients for decades.
And you're just bringing that day-to-day, decades of knowledge of having been a practitioner
into the office of Surgeon General.
So I feel like you have a really good handle on real-world problems, right?
I mean, what is everyday mom and dad in America?
What are they suffering from?
What ailments do they have?
where the issues, where the government can possibly intervene and give support, guidance, help,
create awareness.
And so I'm very fond of a lot of the folks in the administration because they do seem to be very,
at least, you know, related to Maha, because they seem to be very purpose-driven and passionate.
And we talked earlier about your drive to become a physician.
And I wonder if you might just share that story with my audience, because I find it really compelling.
Thank you.
I was born with a congeneral heart defect called the atrial septal defect,
and I was lucky to have access to care and lucky to have astute physicians that heard the murmur
and got a plan of action and care and eventually having open heart surgery.
At what age?
At age four.
I know at Columbia Presbyterian Hospital, and it closed a hole,
and I have been able to live a healthy normal life since.
where I won't eventually have a right heart failure, which could happen if the shunt was not closed.
I had a four-to-one shunt, which was a big hole.
And so, you know, I'm very passionate about making sure that people have access to care and to health,
but also preventative medicine in the sense that when what drove me at that age,
I set my North Star that I wanted to be a doctor.
At four years old, that's just so awesome.
I think at four years old, I wanted to be a police officer, a cowboy.
I also wanted to be an Indian.
I think I wanted to be a fireman and an astronaut.
And I'm none of those.
So for you to set your North Star and be sitting here now in the office of the Surgeon General, that's pretty, I mean, that's commitment.
Well, thank you.
By the way, you're making such a big impact with your work, so I commend you for that.
you really have a huge reach.
Thank you.
I am just so blessed to be here, and I am grateful every day, and I feel compelled to live a purpose-driven
life with God-given talents.
Yeah, when we were having lunch earlier today, you know, we talked about just some of the basics,
right, that go missed in modern medicine.
And, you know, one of the things I really enjoyed about our conversation was we started
to talk about community connection, how children are becoming isolated. You know, they're missing
that real human connection because, you know, we've developed a dependency in the sense that we're
connected through our screens and our phones and our laptops and our iPads. And that's actually
not true. And I think a big concern of parents today is, you know, my children are spending so
much time on screens, what is coming through those screens? And what, you know, what are they learning?
What are the threats? You know, how is this helping or hurting the developmental cycle of their brains?
And I know this is a big passion project of yours. And I wonder if you might just talk about what is the
Office of the Surgeon General doing, you know, with respect to screen times.
Well, I'm going to back up a little bit. And last August, the White House released the
Maha Strategic Plan. And it had many different action items and deliverables. And one of them was
delineated for the Office of the Surgeon General to bring awareness to the harms of screen use
and youth. And the actual conversation had started with the previous Surgeon General talking about
social media and mental health. But I decided to pull it a little broader than that. Let's talk about
harms of screen use, and also what it could do to not only mental health, but
neurocognitive development, your physical and metabolic health, and social interaction and
health and health and health. So this is so exciting that this was one of the prerogatives of the
Maha Strategic Plan, and we developed a wonderful advisory from the Surgeon General. So I'm so excited
to talk about that with you today. Yeah, I'm really excited to talk about it because I think that,
you know, hardly a parent in America today would say, I have no concerns at all about what my
child is consuming on social media or the amount of time that they're spending on their phones
or, you know, what they're communicating, what's being communicated to them. And, you know,
there's so many stories about the scary issues around predators,
but even without the direct dangerous risks of social media,
you're talking about the amount of time they're spending on screens
and neurodevelopmental issues.
Yep.
So we decided to release an advisory on the use of screen harms
in both adolescents and children.
And so with that,
advisories will not only give you the best scientific evidence that's available, all in a wonderful
nugget, 25 pages, well-sighted with up-to-date research that were obtained from NIH, CDC,
ASP, all within these divisions within HHS. So we came together and we gave the best available
information, but not only that,
toolkits. What could
be done about it? What
can advice can be given
to parents, educators,
policymakers,
and the youth
themselves as well as
what could tech companies do to make
it better at this point?
So I highly... I seem to be a big
willing participant in that company
but...
Well, you know,
we just put what's out there
and what's scientifically available for everyone to read.
So what I could tell you is from our findings that this has affected brain development.
So it can actually affect your executive functioning skills.
If you are exposed to screen time at a very young age before 18 months,
it could affect the full development of the brain.
And so it's not just about how much screen time quantity, it's also the quality of it.
So we need to think about what actually they are watching.
You'll see states around the country, and I think there's like 37 of them that have some bell-to-bell policy.
What that means is during schools, they're actually eliminating some districts and some statewide that you cannot use self-to-bel policy.
phones in school. I love that. I mean, you and I grew up in an era with no cell phones and we did
just fine. And when there are emergencies, parents can get a hold of the school. School can get a hold of
a parent. You don't need to constantly be in communication. I mean, maybe there's some rare
exceptions. Someone has a halter monitor or something where they actually need to be connected to a phone.
But I can't imagine what my high school collegiate years would have been like if I had this
screen constantly pulling my attention away because, you know, when you're learning and you're
trying to take in information, you're constantly being distracted by whatever you're doom scrolling
about. But what surprised you in your findings? Was there anything that surprised you in the
evidence or your findings? Well, I can go into some of that. Yes, actually. Well, I'm glad you asked.
Oh, I'm glad you asked. All right. Well, let's talk about the physical
findings. That's different from the last
general report. So
we're finding, we know
the risk, we know obesity
rates and children are so high.
We understand so many children are not
qualified to serve the military if they wanted to.
We're talking like almost
70% because of some health
poor metabolic health. Poor metabolic health.
So the more sedentary
we are, the more we are going down
a rabbit hole of doom scrolling
and we are looking
at a screen, the less active we are.
What we want to be is get moving.
So just if we're looking at doom scrolling late at night, we're not sleeping, that's affecting
our overall health.
We're less active.
We're less socially engaged.
So that's not surprising, but it's worth saying that there, can we say causation versus
correlation?
We think that the more screen time that you're on, the less active you are.
it is a multifactoral cause.
Certainly a correlation there, right?
I mean, if you're sitting and you're on a screen, you're not moving.
That's right.
And not to mention, if you're on a screen inside, you're not outside.
So the more you're on a screen, what could that do to something called near-sightedness?
Myopia is also a name.
That means that you can't see far.
And it is estimated by 2050 that 40% of kids will have.
have myopia.
Mm.
So we really need to bring that up.
That is a, that's a harm.
That's a hazard from being on screens too much and not going outside.
The distance that you can focus and sort of observe your outside environment because you're
bringing your, your outside environment 15 inches from your nose.
That's right.
Right?
And I don't think evolutionarily we were designed to, to live within 15 inches of our face.
I don't think so.
think that, you know, we're the Gen Xers, right?
I am a mother of three Gen Zers.
What do we do after Gen Z?
Do you go back to A?
Oh, we're back to the beginning.
It's like naming hurricanes.
We're kind of going to go through the whole half of them and start over again.
It's like a demographic cohort, right?
When you talk about from baby boomers to Gen X, Millennials, Gen Z, and then Alpha.
And so you're following a population from their, when they were born.
born and that's what they have. That's a common denominator. So believe it or not, this is probably
the most surprising. NAEP national academic evaluation progress is something that's been used
since the 1970s that evaluates math and reading. Since 2010, so over a decade, we have seen
precipitous decreases in both of those metrics.
Math and meeting scores.
Yep.
So competency level.
Yep.
So in 13-year-olds, you'll see a 7% decrease or 7 point decrease in the reading and a 14% decrease in math.
What started in 2010 ubiquitously?
screens yeah yeah it's a screen revolution factor so this generation doesn't know life without it
so really we were blessed to be able to grow up without it and be able to be young enough to
navigate with it yeah but this is an experiment with this generation both the zers and alphas
that what what is going to what harms are they going to have because
because of it. And I think that history will judge us not only about the actions we take and the
steps we take, but the inactions that we let happen. So I feel like we have a moral and ethical
duty right now to bring this to the surface. Yes, there's more research that needs to be done,
but our children don't have time for us to tease all of that out. Is there any data coming from
these, some of these states where they're actually doing this bell-to-bell policy,
are you seeing positive data emerging from?
Yep.
And what does that look like?
Well, first of all, can you imagine being a teacher in a school where you're trying to teach
and someone is just looking at their screen on their cell phone and ignoring you?
So my hat's off to teachers in the United States that work so hard to do the right thing.
And this is, and none of this is a diss on parents.
We want to elevate parents' ability to,
have the tools they need.
But the thing specifically,
you'll see kids actually talking at lunch to each other.
You see academic scores improving.
You see less disciplinary actions in the schools.
You see that kids are more involved in sports and other activities.
So overwhelmingly, and in other countries that have adopted some sort of bell-to-bell policy,
you're seeing the positive trends going in the right direction.
I love that.
Yeah.
I think that there's something to that, and I commend the states and individual districts that have adopted those type of policies.
But kids are not being exposed outside of that.
I think that we have the responsibility as physicians when we see them at a physical with the parents ask about it in anticipatory guidance.
How much screen time?
Know your number.
how many hours a day are you on a screen and bring it to the attention?
Yeah.
So there are evidence that kids are now on their cell phones more often than they sleep or in school.
Wow. Yeah. So then where are they getting their education from?
If they're absorbing data from their cell phone more than they're absorbing data while they're in school, then where are they really getting their education, right?
Where are they getting? What's shaping them, right?
And what are they being exposed to?
when they are on.
And there are definitely some major harms that we probably should discuss at some point.
Yeah, let's discuss it.
Yeah.
I mean, we know that there has been some mental health issues, increased depression, increased anxiety.
Since 2010 with this, have been the screens.
Okay.
Body dysmorphia, you know, wanting to be perfect, wanting, you know, almost like a fear of missing out.
I think that that has driven a lot of mental health issues, especially in girls.
But what are they being exposed to as far as exploitation?
Right.
So I think that children and youth should have also some, they'll call it, digital citizenship.
Being aware of what they...
Digital citizenship, what they should put out there.
You know, because it follows you.
follow you in a positive way, but it also can follow you in a negative way.
But there's also sometimes even a sports picture of an athlete out there on the internet could be a deep fake that's put into a dude and then people are being exploited financially.
And unfortunately, there has been suicides coming from that cyber bullying or exploitation.
So that is a real harm that we need to talk more about.
and what maybe a chat bot could do in saying, massaging a conversation that unfortunately has led to suicide instead of the other direction.
These are real things we need to be talking about.
So in a broad sense, what does this initiative on screens coming out of the Surgeon General's office in a perfect world?
What would it accomplish?
Would more states adopt these bell-to-bell policies?
I think so.
I think policymakers could be empowered with some making, you know,
data, some data, but also more money and research possibly going forward.
They could ask tech companies possibly to make sure that they protect the well-being of youth.
I can see parents coming up with a wonderful plan, a digital plan for the kids,
maybe delaying technology, modeling behavior with a do, do, like, show them how they should be.
Like, so that's a delay, a do, divert if a kid is looking like that's all they want to do,
divert them to a positive activity.
You know, maybe a digital disconnect.
It doesn't, we call it a detox, but having an environment where you, um,
Have like at meals, we are not going to have that cell phone, have digital free zones in the house.
And five, discuss, discuss the plan.
So the kids understand and buy in.
Like, I don't want adolescents to feel we're talking down to them.
I want to empower them.
Right.
I want them to be the CEO of their life.
Yeah, it should be, it should sound empowering.
So is this some of the guidance that is coming out?
Yes.
Okay.
Yep.
And so you'll have guidance for parents.
guidance for educators, are you going to publicize some of what your research has shown
to linked to some of the harms?
Absolutely.
So within the advisory encompasses the harms that we have delineated.
But then the toolkits are for the different stakeholders, parents, educators, policymakers,
and the youth and tech companies.
So it's all nicely packaged for it to be hopefully cited in the future when people are trying to pass laws or change their behaviors, but use it for health care providers also to educate and in a way where it's public facing and it's easily digestible.
Why don't you think more states have adopted these policies?
Well, 37 have in some.
capacity and I think about 20 have full state to state. It's a shift. It's a paradigm shift that is
moving in that direction. You're going to see more and more. There's always a delay in what we know
and action that follows. Right? So I think that it could be in progress. You have to wait for
state legislatures to convene and then you pass it and then the governor signs it and then it's
an implementation phase. And is there a fiscal attached and are, you know, is there the ability
to do it in a way that is streamlined.
So, I mean, there's many factors, but, I mean, overwhelmingly, it's going in the right direction.
That's so good to hear.
Is it, I don't purport to really understand who has the legislative authority over public school systems,
but is, so the federal government can't legislate this in and pass something in a federal
level that says, hey, we need these bell-to-bell policies.
That's really left up to the states.
It is.
I do believe in the Tenth Amendment and giving the states the, you know, autonomy to do that.
But we can present.
You can give the guidance.
The guidance.
And then they can see that as an adoption.
They could adopt the recommendations.
It's just like the recommended uniform screening panel for newborn diseases.
When the baby's born at the second day of life, they get the little hill stick with the blood.
And they could check for all these rare diseases so they know ahead of time.
And so we can pass it at HHS through HRSA.
And then the states are either aligned and can adopt or they don't.
So there's 14 states that automatically will adopt in some fashion with rare diseases.
Very proud about what HHS did in December in creating two new recommendations to add to the recommended uniform screening panel.
That's metachromatic leukodistrophy, MLD.
MLD and Duchenne leukodistrophy that was both added.
So now the states are in the implementation phase that want to adopt it.
That's great.
You know, we also talked about gut health at lunch day.
And I was, I was, I was, it's so inspired to hear you talking about that.
I'm like, well, the office of the surgeon general is really thinking about gut health.
We're in a new era.
This is really good because, you know,
clearly in my work and my community, we know the detriments of having gut dysbiosis and all of the
downstream consequences from behavioral disorders to what we call mood and mental illnesses to
tension deficit and all kinds of consequences just from having a really disrupted gut microbiome
or really, you know, poor gut function, gut dyspiosis. So are there initiatives,
surrounding gut health that you're working on?
Well, I wanted to let you know. Last May, with the public health reports that we have,
we had did a call for papers to researchers on a lot of Maha-related topics.
One of them was gut dysbiosis, which is great.
So I'm asking researchers to submit their manuscripts for publication on that subject
because we want to know more.
There are at the NIH, one of the institutes at NIH, there's a division that is working specifically on that.
On gut health?
Yep.
Wow.
And at ARPAH as well.
So, look, we know that it's the engine of our overall body.
We make neurotransmitters there.
I mean, we absorb all of our nutrients.
Got brain access.
we know that we have inflammation and gut dysbiosis.
It will lead to something called leaky gut syndrome,
which then can pour toxins into our bloodstream
that should have stayed in our colon.
And then what does that do to our immune dysregulation
and festering for chronic diseases?
So we need to have a healthy gut.
And we need to put that in the forefront
Because if we have a healthy gut, a lot of times whatever we are being exposed to in life, our body should be able to handle it, but not if we don't have a healthy gut.
I would totally agree with you.
Are there initiatives or guidance coming out of the certain general's office around this?
Are you working on?
Well, I'm working in collaboration with others.
It might not be in a report coming out exactly from our office like an advisory, but we're definitely going to bring attention to that.
But within HHS, this is embedded within one of the main priorities of this secretary.
So in a perfect world, you know, sort of pulling all of your experience as a mother,
25 years as a physician, especially in family medicine, what would be when you exit this role,
what would be like the utopia of success for you if what was accomplished?
Well, yeah.
What would be your vision for what's...
My vision.
I will tell you that if it all ended today, I'm so proud of the work that we've already accomplished
with aiding and adding two of those rare diseases to the recommended uniform screening panel.
That means, and I just want to highlight this again,
that for generations, parents and children will never know the hurt of having to die by age five
because they were not screened for something that could be treated with a one-time gene therapy.
Wow.
And then they live a normal life.
Wow.
And if these children are not screened at birth and they develop the symptoms of the neurodegeneration
that this leukidistrophy does, they're not eligible.
for the one-time gene therapy. That's FDA approved. Wow. So you have to catch it.
I was unaware of that. Yeah. Wow. And so just and think about the first child's never caught.
The second child, you fight for their life because you find out what happened to the first one.
Mm-hmm. And so we parents won't ever have to know that hurt for generations. I didn't realize it was a single gene therapeutic intervention.
For MLD. Wow, for MLD.
For Dishan, it's different.
How rare is that?
It's quite rare.
Well, look, one is too many, but...
That's true.
Yeah.
I'd say about 1 in 40,000 live births, but in the Native American population, actually, the incidence
is much higher.
I believe 1 in 3,000.
Wow.
In a certain tribal, there's like a genetic bottleneck there.
And you know how Secretary Kennedy is just...
so passionate about helping our tribal nations and Indian health services. So especially when he heard
that statistic, he was all in. But when you diagnose Deschenz at birth, and you, there are so many
treatments now that will diminish the progress of the muscular dystrophy so they can live a longer
lifespan and a more quality lifespan. So really, it met criteria.
to add that on. And I hope that this podcast helps states adopt it more readily.
I hope so too. I mean, so right now this was guidance from the office. And it's up to the states to say,
we're going to implement this in our public school system. Yes. Or not public school system.
Sorry, we're going to implement this in our health care system. Our state labs. State labs.
And just adding to the newborn screen is done with the heel stick with just a drop of blood,
at birth and then sent to the state lab.
And so it's already being done.
The newborn screen also includes hearing and a pulse axiominer,
which can check for oxygen sats.
Right.
So if the oxygen sats are low,
it would be indicative of possible heart congenital defect,
which brings me around to why it's so important for me
to highlight the recommended uniform screen panel in newborn screens
because when you screen early, then you can help either fix or prevent the progression of disease.
Yeah.
So that is where my passion is.
But as far as other initiatives go, I'm super excited about our roundtable that we had in December on Lyme disease.
Yeah, that was a big one for me too.
I was so happy to see it.
Because, you know, I've had physicians tell me that that's just completely made up.
Well, I think they need to get with the time.
So do.
There's infection associated chronic illnesses, IACI's, and COVID, long COVID, actually helped with that thought process.
We know long COVID exists.
And so it's being recognized.
And really that helped with the medical community realizing that the same version of an infection associated chronic illness with chronic Lyme exists too.
not all will persist to a chronic Lyme, maybe about a 20%,
but a majority of the ones that do go to the chronic Lyme are women
because of autoimmune issues.
So there's something, again, maybe with the X chromosome that increases,
their likelihood to have autoimmune deficient problems,
as well as problems with their gut.
So if, and, you know, the crazy part is we,
for treating Lyme disease, we might have to do antibiotics for a long period,
yet there's no standardized recommendation on how to put pre-improbiotics in the gut to mitigate
the effects of the antibiotics.
Wow.
So, you know, coming up with new standards there, you know, even with...
These are huge, huge issues because I, you know, we...
By the way, Lyme disease month is in May.
Is it?
Yeah.
I didn't know that either.
Okay.
So it's coming up as Lyme disease month.
I'll have to do something online because, you know,
I've had a number of, I'm very familiar with Lyme and its chronology and its etiology
and the co-infections, you know, the bacterial and the parasitic co-infections, which very often go missed.
And some of these people suffer these low-grade infections for a decade.
You know, it's not the kind of symptoms that drive them to the ER.
So they just suffer with it.
That's right.
It misdiagnosed.
It mimics arthritis.
It mimics, you know, migraines.
You know.
So CDC.
is updating their guidelines and they'll will be doing some social media blast on on that
prevention of course and you'll you'll see secretary Kennedy talking a lot about this he's very
passionate about it you know he's suffered as well as his family uh from i didn't know he had
well his children oh children his sons um yeah and he just um this is just near and dear to his heart so
we, when he said that to me, I said, you got it, sir.
And we're going to get all policymakers and physicians and patient advocates and researchers
all in one room.
The fact that we're bringing awareness so they can test for it.
You know, I talk a lot on my platform about mold, mycotoxins, parasites, viruses,
heavy metals, like the things that don't show up on a standard lab, you know, because
some Lyme patients maybe, except for some liver enzymes, or, or, you know,
or those things, you know, they're not on standard panels and they just go missed.
And so if there's no awareness around it, then.
The biomarkers specifically are poor for the test and we're researchers being done for
increasing the very, hopefully a point of care biomarker.
But, you know, the Lyme disease, the Spirochite really likes to get out of the blood and
into the tissues and create a biofilm, and that's why it's so hard to detect.
That's part of the problem.
So just sort of wrapping things up, how much did your practice as a family practitioner,
how much has that impacted your role in the certain general's office?
Having a front row seat to humanity every day and seeing generations of families,
I worked in the same community for two decades
and seeing how education,
empowering them with knowledge to give them the tools they need
to take care of themselves
because they only see me a few times a year.
I needed to take the time and sit with them
and talk to them about what they're eating,
how they're exercising,
and thinking upstream.
So I always had a provisive,
preventative medicine thought process with them because I knew that if I empowered them with the
knowledge to live healthier, then they would come back with better blood work, lower blood pressure,
lower weight, more energy, and feel better.
And we were going to just improve their lives.
So for me to be able to take that experience on the real world side and then bring it up to,
with a little public health perspective, at H.H.
and in making mass changes in a very above conjecture,
above criticism way, then I was compelled to do it.
And it's an honor every single day to serve with Secretary Kennedy and for this administration.
That's great.
So Dr. Herodopoulos, first of all, thank you for coming on the Ultimate Human Podcast.
It's amazing.
Where can my audience find out more about what the Office of the Surgeon General is doing?
Well, right now, we do have a lot of social media on X, Instagram, and Facebook, Office of the Surgeon General.
You can also on our website on HHS every time we put out an advisory.
You can find it on the Office of the Certain General website within HHS.
Okay.
And those are the best vehicles to be able to view what we're doing.
I saw that there is current priorities of the U.S. Surgeon General, so I'm going to put a link to that.
Reports and publications. I'm going to put a link to that. And leadership changes that impact public health.
So I'm going to give links to those on your site. You know, I always wind down on my podcast by asking my guests the same question.
And there's no right or wrong answer to this question. But what does it mean to you to be an ultimate human?
you're on the Old Been Human podcast.
My goodness.
I think being a humanitarian in loving other human beings,
I think that lifting others up, being positive,
how do we make the world better?
And how do we leave the world a better place than we found it?
I think would be really a life well-lived.
Yeah, that's being an ultimate human. Well, Dr. Herodopoulos, thank you so much. We're going to follow your path and your work. I wish you all the success in the world. I think you've got a great team around you. I think you've got a great much of health warriors and some of these agencies like yourself that are really fighting for the American people. And I applaud that. I know it hasn't been easy because anytime that you want to create change and make progress, you create enemies.
and it seems like your heart, like a lot of the folks in this administration is in the right place.
And I appreciate your work.
Thank you so much for having me on your show.
You're welcome.
Until next time, guys, that's just science.
