The Ultimate Human with Gary Brecka - 82. Dr. Paul Saladino: The Big Lie and The Real Reason You Can't Lose Weight
Episode Date: July 25, 2024“Not all calories are created equally.” In this episode, Dr. Paul Saladino, MD, and Gary Brecka discuss the concept of “calories in, calories out” (CICO), caloric deficit, and metabolic syndro...me. Dr. Saladino also shares scientific studies on unprocessed versus ultra-processed foods and linoleic acid-rich foods, as well as the role of LDL in human bodies. Join Dr. Saladino & Gary Brecka as they reveal the hidden dangers of ultra-processed foods, and why the USDA needs to promote better food quality. Tune in to discover the truths that the food industry doesn’t want you to know. Connect with Dr. Paul Saladino, MD: “The Carnivore Code” book by Dr. Paul Saladino, MD available here: https://theultimatehuman.com/book-recs Listen to Dr. Paul Saladino, MD "Fundamental Health" podcast weekly on Spotify: https://spoti.fi/4f2XCDv For More Information on Dr. Paul Saladino, MD visit: https://bit.ly/3W6NPUh Follow Dr. Paul Saladino, MD on Instagram: https://bit.ly/4cM8OCG Follow Dr. Paul Saladino, MD on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3LtIilx Follow Dr. Paul Saladino, MD on TikTok: https://bit.ly/4cM2RG6 TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Introduction 01:21 Intro of Show and Guest 03:47 Dr. Paul Saladino’s Research on Calories 05:42 Dr. Kevin Hall Controlled Trial Results on Unprocessed and Ultra-Processed Foods 07:29 Calories Not Created Equally 11:49 Pilot Study on Linoleic Acid-Rich Meals 14:15 Debates on the Causes of Cholesterol 15:44 Oxidized LDL (oxLDL) and its Harmful Effects 19:52 Atherosclerosis Causes and Risk Factors 23:50 “Calories in, Calories out” (CICO) Concept 27:35 Markers of Metabolic Syndrome 30:38 Connect with Dr. Paul Saladino Get weekly tips from Gary Brecka on how to optimize your health and lifestyle routines: https://bit.ly/4eLDbdU Join our FREE 3-Day Ultimate Cold Plunge Challenge. Register now for exclusive access!: https://bit.ly/3zFjgxb PLUNGE - Use code “Ultimate” for $150 off your order of the best cold plunge & sauna in the US: https://bit.ly/3yYE3vl EIGHT SLEEP - Use code “GARY” to get $350 off Pod 4 Ultra: https://bit.ly/3WkLd6E ECHO GO PLUS HYDROGEN WATER BOTTLE: https://bit.ly/3xG0Pb8 BODY HEALTH - USE CODE ULTIMATE10 for 10% OFF YOUR ORDER: https://bit.ly/4cJdJE7 Discover top-rated products and exclusive deals. Shop now and elevate your everyday essentials with just a click!: https://theultimatehuman.com/amazon-recs Watch “The Ultimate Human Podcast with Gary Brecka” every Tuesday and Thursday at 9AM ET on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RPQYX8 Follow The Ultimate Human on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3VP9JuR Follow The Ultimate Human on TikTok: https://bit.ly/3XIusTX Follow The Ultimate Human on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3Y5pPDJ Follow Gary Brecka on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3RPpnFs Follow Gary Brecka on TikTok: https://bit.ly/4coJ8fo Follow Gary Brecka on Facebook: https://bit.ly/464VA1H SUBSCRIBE TO: https://www.youtube.com/@ultimatehumanpodcast https://www.youtube.com/@garybrecka Download “The Ultimate Human with Gary Brecka” podcast on all your favorite platforms: https://bit.ly/3RQftU0 The Ultimate Human with Gary Brecka Podcast is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute the practice of medicine, nursing or other professional health care services, including the giving of medical advice, and no doctor/patient relationship is formed. The use of information on this podcast or materials linked from this podcast is at the user’s own risk. The content of this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Users should not disregard or delay in obtaining medical advice for any medical condition they may have and should seek the assistance of their health care professionals for any such conditions. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I believe strongly that there is a ton of evidence that not all calories are created equally.
Look at the data in the United States. We eat the highest consumption of processed foods and
we're the most obese. So they came out recently and said that there is not enough evidence
to say that ultra processed foods contribute to obesity in humans. What calories in calories out
means for weight loss. And I thought, okay, this is really interesting. There are studies looking at markers of metabolic syndrome.
And the studies would suggest that 88 to 93% of the US population
have at least one marker of metabolic dysfunctions.
Calories are king.
You know, calories are what make you fat or make you lean.
Yes and no.
I want people to know it's not that complicated.
If we just understand that negative effects of ultra-processed foods are amplified
and the positive effects of unprocessed foods
are amplified in our physiology.
And if we just simply...
Hey guys, welcome back to the Ultimate Human Podcast.
I'm your host, human biologist, Gary Brekka,
where we go down the road of everything anti-aging,
biohacking, longevity, and everything in between.
And a very, very close friend of mine,
who's usually in Costa Rica,
hit me up last week and was like,
hey, I'm gonna be in Miami.
And I was like, well, you definitely gotta come by the house.
We'll do breakfast together. You know, we'll do some videos, you know, we'll
pick a couple of topics and we'll put them out on social media and we'll do some educational things.
And we, as always, just started eating each other's face. And we're doing a bunch of bio
hacking today. We did sauna and red light and cold plunging and a little bit of a light workout,
some breath work and had a big raw food breakfast this morning. And we were out on the balcony and we were talking about seed oils
and then we started having this really interesting conversation about calories.
Are all calories the same? Are all calories equal? Is a calorie a calorie a calorie,
whether it comes from fat or carbohydrate or proteins. Does calories in and calories out matter as the only measure of what's going to improve your metabolism or cause you to
lose weight? I mean, there's an oversimplification, in his opinion, that the data might indicate
otherwise. And so I said, look, this is something the world needs to know about. I've got a podcast
room in the other room. So let's just go in there and run a 20 minute,
you know,
short podcast.
And let's talk about calories in calories out.
Why a calorie is a calorie is a calorie may not actually be the case when it
comes to human physiology.
So I want you to welcome my good friend and well-known podcaster,
author,
speaker,
extraordinaire,
and biohacker to the extreme dr paul saladino thanks
for having me on again dude i'm i'm pumped that you're here like every time i see you we just eat
each other's face i know um so many good conversations and so many and so much information
to share you bring great gifts dude honey uh coconuts cherries yeah what was the name of the
honey that you brought me today it's mariola honey so it's mariola bee it's honey from stingless bees called mariola bees dude i am telling you guys um if
you're a honey fanatic even if you're not this was like liquid beautiful gold i mean it was so good
um i've had i've had three bowls of it so far just since since you got here it's good stuff but you
know um i challenge you to transform your life
in just three days.
Join my three-day cold plunge challenge
and experience the incredible benefits
of cold water therapy.
For three minutes each day,
immerse yourself in cold water
and feel the difference.
Cold plunging can boost your energy,
improve your mental clarity,
and enhance your mood.
It's easy to join.
So head over to theultimatehuman.com, download the Plunge app, track your progress, and connect with our community. It's easy to join. So head over to theultimatehuman.com,
download the Plunge app, track your progress, and connect with our community. Let's do this
together. Now let's get back to the Ultimate Human Podcast. So many things that we could
talk about. We were having a great debate about seed oils earlier out on the balcony.
And then we started this conversation about calories in, calories out, and how there's
an oversimplification, in my opinion, in the market about calories in general.
So talk to me a little bit about the research
that you've been digging into lately on calories.
So I was mentioning to you that on Twitter,
Kevin Hall, whose study we'll mention in a second,
posted something from the U.S.
Governmental Dietary Guidelines Committee.
Well, there's an entity I really trust.
I know, right?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
That's super trustful.
Already I'm suspect, but go ahead.
But the U.S. Dietary Guidelines Committee,
these are the people who made the 2020 to 2025
U.S. Dietary Guidelines.
They shape food lunches.
They shape food stamps.
They shape a lot of things in our country, you know?
Not everyone is accepting what they say is canon,
but it affects policy in the United States.
And then they're about to make the 2025 to 2030 guidelines for our country's health foods.
And these are the people who brought you the infamous super healthy food pyramid, et cetera, et cetera.
Right.
Lucky charms.
Exactly.
Well, yeah.
So they came out recently and said that there is not enough evidence to say that ultra-processed foods
contribute to obesity in humans. We need more research, guys. We don't know. And I thought,
okay, this is really interesting. And Elon Musk commented on this tweet. He said,
calories cause obesity, calories are king. And I thought, okay, this is an interesting
jumping off point. Two things I want to mention about this. The first is I hope that this isn't the U.S. Dietary Guidelines Committee sort of giving themselves license to include more ultra-processed foods in the dietary guidelines.
Because I think this is very confusing and this is insidious for us as Americans because I think it's really important that we understand what calories in, calories out means for weight loss.
And I believe strongly that there's a ton of evidence
that not all calories are created equally.
And what I mean by this is if you really look at the data,
and Kevin Hall, who retweeted this,
has actually done a great study on this
in a metabolic ward, a completely controlled study
looking at humans who are fed certain foods certain foods and they were, they were
completely controlled.
Everything they were fed was controlled.
They were in the hospital.
And what they did in Kevin Hall's study was they gave people the same amount of calories
for every meal.
They presented the same amount of calories and one group of people got ultra processed
foods and one group of people got unprocessed foods.
People got ultra processed foods and they presented the same calories. They matched for fat, carbohydrate, protein, salt. They matched for as many things as
they could, but one group of people got ultra processed calories and one group of people got
unprocessed calories. So one group of people is getting like salad and fish or chicken,
maybe some beef, maybe some grains that are unprocessed. And the other group is getting
more processed versions of all these things. A McChicken sandwich, a fish filet sandwich from McDonald's,
you know, chips. And what they found, and this was an ad-lib study. So they let people eat as
much as they want. So they gave them a certain amount of food and then they looked to see how
hungry people were. And the study was two weeks long, I believe. And over those two weeks,
not surprisingly, the people in the ultra-processed food diet ate an average of 500 calories more per day. I think I heard Dr. Hyman talking about this.
It was the lack of satiety and the hunger response was significantly more intense. And they not only
ate more food, more calories, and gained more weight, but they also reported being hungry or faster. Yes. I didn't read it to the depth that you did, but I did
gloss over it. And I think this is opening up a really interesting conversation because
I've long since held the position that some of the worst research we do on human beings is when
we study things in isolation, right? So we say, okay, let's deprive this person of calories,
put them in a caloric deficit and they lost weight.
So the way to lose weight is to go into a caloric deficit, which I which I agree with.
And then this myth, in my opinion, emerged that a calorie is a calorie is calorie.
So you could eat a thousand thousand calories of donuts or you could eat a thousand calories of grass fed meat or you can eat 1,000 calories of soda water or soda.
And it doesn't matter because those are just calories.
And see, here's the proof,
because we gave these people that drank nothing but soda
and ate donuts, but only ate 1,500 calories a day,
they lost weight.
Sure.
So see, they lost weight,
and they're eating ultra-processed,
high-carbohydrate, sugary foods.
But we're not looking then at downstream consequences.
What are the consequences on inflammation?
What are the consequences on hormones?
What are the consequences on hunger, satiety, all of these things?
So I'd love to hear your comments on that.
Yeah, this is exactly it.
And it's the idea that not all calories are created equally, right?
A thousand calories of donuts are not going to have the same physiologic responses in my body as a thousand calories of ribeye.
And we know this to be true.
There are plenty of studies that show us this.
A thousand calories of donuts, we know that's going to make me hungrier sooner, which in
real life, not in a study where they're limiting people and they're only giving them a certain
amount of food, in real life makes me hungry and it makes me crave food or it makes me
just, it can have other physiologic effects.
You mentioned hormones.
It can potentially affect endothelial function at the level of our blood vessels.
Mood.
Mood.
Emotion.
Yeah, emotion, whether we sleep, whether we're on a computer or doing things that are going
to affect us in terms of circadian rhythms.
And so what was interesting was that, you know, Elon Musk responds to this comment from Kevin Hall saying
the Dietary Guidelines Committee says ultra-processed foods,
we're not sure they really cause obesity,
kind of opening the door for Coca-Cola and these ultra-processed food companies,
which, by the way, spend millions of dollars a year lobbying Congress, right,
to have some sort of get-out-of-jail jail free card in the health space or from the government
to be included in like food stamps projects. You know, you can buy ultra processed food with food
stamps. That's insane. It's crazy, right? And so this is how it all kind of works that the dietary
guidelines committee can say, well, we're not completely sure that the calories from ultra
processed food are uniquely obesogenic. And then you have studies like Kevin Hall saying,
well, they're definitely making people hungrier
and they're definitely not full of the same nutrients
that a steak is.
And they're definitely full of more pesticides,
more oxidized oils, more gut disrupting compounds.
Preservatives and sexicides.
Preservatives, yeah.
So how can you not?
It's just, it's crazy to me that we don't understand this.
And I wanted to just,
I wanted to respond to like Elon's tweet and say,
because Elon said, calories are king. Calories are what make you fat or make you lean. Yes and no.
So we go round and round. We chase our tails about this calories in, calories out. And yes,
you're right. And this is what the proponents of calories in, calories out model say. You can lose
weight eating junk food. You can absolutely lose weight eating junk food. But will you keep that
weight off long-term? Will you be satiated? Will you be hungry? What will your mood be? What will your
hormones do? What will your blood vessels look like? How inflamed will you be overall long-term?
And those are not the same. And the reason I want to think it's so important to talk about is because
I want people to know it's not that complicated. It's really pretty simple. If we just understand
that ultra-processed foods are going to have a reverberating effect
in our physiology, they're going to be...
The negative effects of ultra-processed foods are amplified, and the positive effects of
unprocessed foods are amplified in our physiology.
And if we just simply kind of discard all the tribalism around which foods are best,
and we focus on unprocessed animal and plant foods at the exclusion of ultra-processed foods,
realizing I probably shouldn't eat 500 calories
of Doritos today
because that's going to have an amplified negative effect
bigger than those 500 calories in my physiology.
If I exclude as many ultra-processed foods as possible
and I just eat unprocessed meat and plant foods,
you're going to lose weight.
You're going to feel better.
You're going to get healthier. That's what the message should be. And the fact that the U S
dietary guidelines committee can't take that stand and that, that, that even Elon is a little
confused or doesn't understand this. And that there are a lot of people in the health space
who want to amplify the message that you can lose weight eating donuts. It just drives me crazy.
And I'll mention one more study also. So I talked about the study from Kevin Hall,
but there's another study and this is a pilot study. So it's a small study of eight people,
but they gave people an oleic acid-rich meal. Oleic acid is a monounsaturated fat prominent in
tallow or olive oil. And they gave people a linoleic acid-rich meal. That's an 18-carbon
polyunsaturated fat prominent in seed oils. So linoleic acid- This is another whole argument that people are like, seed oils aren't bad for you.
Processed, industrial processed seed oils are not bad for you. They're not causing inflammation.
There's no signs that these have negative consequences. I see that all over social media.
Yeah, it's frustrating. So they gave people these two meals, right? And what they found,
they actually looked at two hormones, ghrelin, which is kind of a hunger hormone. It's frustrating. So they gave people these two meals, right? And what they found, they actually looked at two hormones,
ghrelin, which is kind of a hunger hormone.
It's anti-satiety and resistant.
And we know that as levels of resistant rise in the human body,
we get more insulin resistance.
And so the levels of ghrelin and the levels of resistant were higher
when they gave people a linoleic acid-rich meal.
So this is a small study.
A CTO.
Yes, it's a small study, but yes,
it's a small study, but it is a study in humans. It is a controlled trial in humans. And we need bigger trials showing that linoleic acid rich meals may make us hungrier and more insulin
resistant. And this is just to emphasize this concept that not all calories are created equally.
These are equal caloric meals. One of them has 18-carbon monounsaturated fat, oleic acid.
One of them has 18-carbon polyunsaturated fat, linoleic acid.
They're supposed to both be 9 calories per gram.
But this linoleic acid-rich meal, again, linoleic acid-rich is usually found in seed oils,
things like corn, canola, sunflower, safflower, soybean, is making people hungrier.
It's changing the hormonal profile.
And it's also causing damage to the endothelial lining, which is the genesis of the cardiovascular
disease that we blame on cholesterol, right?
Cholesterol is at the scene of the crime, not pulling the trigger, but very often it's
there because it's trying to repair damage.
So I think with that, it's like, you know, we used to think that Alzheimer's disease was the presence of amyloid plaques and these neurofibrillary tangles.
And we're realizing now that the amyloid plaques are the byproduct of the inflammatory process.
So that the culprit is not the amyloid plaque.
Right.
The culprit is the inflammatory process.
Right. culprit is the inflammatory process right and so i think you're getting to the root of another
issue which is um are we really getting athalosclerosis arteriosclerosis because of
cholesterol or are we getting it because of damage to the endothelial lining of which there's strong
evidence to indicate that insulin resistance causes this inflammatory process and that cholesterol is
just being called there it's like somebody gave me the analogy the other day
that every time there's a fire, firemen show up.
Yeah.
And, you know, to put it out.
And so we're not blaming the firemen for the fire, are we?
Because they're actually there to try to put the fire out.
And it's kind of like what happens to, you know,
when there's damage to the endothelial wall,
to the lining of the artery, you know, the firemen show up, the
cholesterol shows up.
And we're like, we need to keep the cholesterol down, right?
Yeah.
And so like we need to suppress the firemen and fires will stop happening.
Yeah.
It's interesting.
And if people are confused about seed oils, because there's a lot of conflicting data.
Yes.
I would say look at the data regarding seed oil consumption and oxidized
LDL. So LDL is low-density lipoprotein. It's this quote-unquote bad cholesterol. Obviously,
that's an oversimplification, but it's pretty darn clear from multiple randomized controlled
trials in humans that when you feed humans seed oils versus olive oil versus butter, we get more oxidation of LDL. That is very,
very difficult to argue that point. So I do not know how individuals in the health space can argue.
And tell my listeners, what does oxidized LDL mean? Why is that so bad?
Yeah. LDL is low density lipoprotein it's like a balloon
or a bus that floats around our bodies and moves moves cholesterol and triglycerides so it's it's
a ball and it's a transporter it's a transporter it's a ball it's it has a membrane and the
membrane is full of phospholipids and the membrane is full of cholesterol and the membrane is full
of proteins and when ldl becomes oxidized it means that the phospholipids in the membrane
have become oxidized.
And oxidation is akin to rust, right?
Okay.
You can think about rust as oxidation.
Technically, oxidation is loss of electrons.
When a molecule loses an electron, it begins a free radical type cascade.
In the case of lipids, we call this lipid peroxidation.
And these are lipid peroxides that get formed in the membranes of our cells or in the membrane
of an LDL particle, a low-density lipoprotein particle. So now I've taken an LDL
particle, I've oxidized it, so I've damaged its phospholipid bilayer. Right. And now what is that
damage causing just because the phospholipid bilayer is rusted? Now what's the next consequence
of that? So when electrons are stolen from the phospholipids in the membrane, there's a chain reaction.
And eventually that free radical cascade, that lipid peroxidation reaction, damages the proteins on the surface of the LDL.
And when the proteins of the surface of the LDL are oxidized, they look differently.
And then we know pretty clearly from medical studies that that makes the LDL particles look like foreign invaders. And your macrophages,
the immune cells that live in your body, but also live in your arterial walls, are more likely to
take up that LDL molecule and form the beginning of an atherosclerotic plaque, which is called
a foam cell or a fatty streak. So macrophage is more likely to ingest LDL particles when the LDL is oxidized. That's how atherosclerosis begins.
So oxidized LDL is probably, you know,
potentially making this LDL more atherogenic.
Or I would say atherogenic de novo from the beginning,
because as you say, I also don't believe
that the case that LDL is atherogenic
in and of itself is shot yet.
I don't think it's very clear. I think that LDL, low densityogenic in and of itself is shot yet. I don't think it's very clear.
I think that LDL, low-density lipoprotein,
is moving cholesterol and triglycerides around the body,
and it is at the scene of an atherosclerotic plaque,
like you say, like firemen,
but that doesn't mean that it causes it.
Right.
And the ones that are at the scene
are these usually the oxidized versions of LDL?
Very often within the plaque, right?
Because what you're getting to
is that not all LDL is created equally.
Maybe it's all created equally,
but not all LDL is the same.
Not all LDL is the same.
And you can change your LDL based on what you eat.
You can change the size.
You can change the membrane composition.
You can make your LDL more likely to oxidize
when you eat seed oils.
And then once it oxidizes, it's more likely to be the culprit of plaquing.
Now, why is that?
Does it increase how sticky it is?
Is it more likely to clump and stick together and group and narrow the artery?
I don't think we fully know.
It could be that.
So this is all sort of not fully fleshed out within the lipid space.
It could be that there's a lot of changes
that can happen to LDL that damage LDL.
You can get desolated LDL, you can get oxidized LDL,
you can get all sorts of changes.
But basically, I would say high level,
it looks like LDL is this particle
that moves around your body, carrying substrate,
carrying building blocks.
And it probably moves in and out of your arterial wall on its own naturally because it has to deliver things but if your ldl is more
likely to oxidize then it's possible and again this is all sort of hypothesis we don't fully
have this worked out within lipidology that the ldl that's more likely to oxidize gets stuck
in your vessel wall and when it gets stuck in your vessel wall on a proteoglycan matrix inside
of your arterial wall then it's oxidized and then the macrophages come and clean it gets stuck in your vessel wall on a proteoglycan matrix inside of your arterial
wall then it's oxidized and then the macrophages come and clean it up because it's a it's a foreign
looking particle and that's how you get atherosclerotic plaque forming so native ldl ldl
that's not oxidized it's it's not an easy case to make that that is actually atherogenic or
injurious to the endothelium right but oxidize the LVL. Without endothelial damage,
I don't know that you have atherosclerosis.
I would say that you don't.
Yeah, because if we look at where atherosclerosis starts,
it starts in and around the heart usually.
And why would it concentrate there?
Well, it concentrates there because there's more turbulence
and more damage to the endothelium.
But we can get atherosclerosis other places.
Sometimes people get it in the bifurcations
of the femoral arteries.
But we do get atherosclerosis in places
where there tends to be more turbulent stress
denuding the endothelium.
And I think that individuals
who are insulin resistant, metabolically unhealthy,
they don't repair those wounds as well.
I think you and I, all of humans,
are getting
endothelial damage. That's just part of being a human. You have this delicate layer of endothelium
lining your arteries, and you have pressure in your arteries. It's very high. 120 millimeters
of mercury is a lot of pressure every time your heart pumps, right? And so you're going to strip
that endothelium even in a healthy individual. And I think that my theory, I think the hypothesis
here would be that in a healthy individual, you can repair that just like you scratch your knee, you know,
you repair it. But in a diabetic, somebody that's metabolically unwell, the repair of the endothelium
is delayed or it's impaired. We know that wound healing is impaired in diabetics. And so this is
why I believe diabetics have more of a predilection to atherosclerosis because they skin their knee
and sometimes you have to amputate the leg.
I mean, diabetics, when I was working in the hospital,
you would see diabetics come in
and you would do foot inspections on diabetics
because sometimes they don't even see
they have a little cut on their foot.
So a diabetic can like stub their toe
and they might lose their whole foot
because the infection becomes so rampant,
they don't know it's there.
And the wound healing is so impaired.
So when we become insulin resistant, also known as metabolic dysfunction, I think that we're probably just
not repairing the endothelium. We're all skinning our knees. We're all getting some denuding of the
endothelium, but we're not repairing it as well in diabetics. So we come back to square one.
How do you prevent atherosclerosis? Don't be diabetic. Don't be metabolically unhealthy. Let your body repair it.
And so I think that what's happening probably is that diabetics, people with metabolic dysfunction,
which is a spectrum of metabolic dysfunction, you're getting some damage to the endothelial
wall. And this could be from cigarette smoke, secondhand smoke, could be from diesel exhaust,
probably alcohol could do it. Lipopolysaccharide might be involved. Endotoxin. Processed food, seed oils.
Yes, lots of things can damage the endothelium.
And it's all about how well you repair it.
And if you're not repairing it well, then yes,
it's possible that LDL could get involved
and become connected to that proteoglycan layer
in the arterial wall.
It's more likely to get oxidized
if you're eating a bunch of seed oils.
Macrophages come, pick it up, make a foam cell,
make a fatty streak, and atherosclerosis, there it goes.
There you go.
So I'll give you this one thing, and then I'll pause.
I think about LDL like wood, and wood is valuable,
but wood doesn't make a fire on its own, right?
Wood is valuable because you can build a house out of it.
And we know that LDL has valuable roles in the human body.
It has immune roles. LDL participates in the immune response. It moves precursors for hormones around
our body. Yeah, it's a precursor for cholecalciferol. Exactly. And it actually can bind up LPS in the
human body and decrease it along with other lipoproteins. So it protects us from injury.
Wood is valuable. And if you live in a place where you don't have a lot of sparks coming out of your
oven and you're not like hammering metal and doing things with lots of fires, having a bunch
of wood in your woodshed is great.
It's valuable for you.
But if you're in a house, like if you're in a forge and you're making iron and you're
flying sparks everywhere, having a bunch of wood sitting around, it's going to give you
more atherosclerosis.
It's going to give you more fires, you know?
More LDL in the setting of sparks, which is, I'm drawing a metaphor with inflammation or
metabolic dysfunction, could look like it's causing more fires, but it's just a substrate.
It's involved. It's in the causal cascade, but it's not causing the issue. You need sparks to
make a fire. Wood doesn't spontaneously combust. Right. Yeah. No, very, very true. So just to round
this out and get back to our calories in, calories out. Where do you stand on the calories in,
calories out theory? So you can lose weight eating anything. It's been proven. You can lose weight
eating Twinkies. And I think that's the detriment. I think that's where the pundits get us and they
go, yeah, if you ate two donuts a day, you'd lose weight. You can lose weight. But we know from
studies, there's so many studies that show this, that caloric restriction more than 85, 90% of the time fails long-term because you get adaptive thermogenesis,
your thyroid turns down your metabolism. I mean, look at the biggest loser.
TSH drops, yeah.
Right. Look at the biggest loser. They all gain the weight back plus more.
So calories in, calories out works in the short-term and fails in the long-term.
And I think that really the only strategy that I've seen that's successful for people to lose weight long
term is to improve food quality because that's how you get satiety, right? You improve food quality.
You need less ultra-processed foods. And the Dietary Guidelines Committee needs to just check
themselves because they're absolutely crazy to say that, that we don't know that obesity
has caused by ultra-processed foods.
You can't leave that door open because then-
Look at the data in the United States.
We eat the highest consumption of processed foods
and we're the most obese.
And I know that you can't just say-
It's just correlation, Gary.
It's just correlation.
Yeah.
It's like we also do the highest number
of randomized clinical trials in healthcare.
We did 150,000 of them since 2008.
And so you see the byproduct
of taking randomized clinical trials
and just applying that narrow science
to an entire populace.
Yeah.
Right?
And it's crazy.
And so I think that, yes,
you can lose weight
if you want to restrict calories,
but I think that
if you want to get healthier,
that will be nearly impossible to achieve
unless you improve food quality.
So I think we should not be thinking
about calories in, calories out.
We should be thinking about how good,
how high quality can I make my food?
And if that sounds like a nebulous concept to people,
just think unprocessed meat, beef, chicken,
fish, lamb, pork, eggs, cheese, milk, preferably raw,
like unprocessed animal foods and unprocessed plant foods.
Shop around the outside of the grocery store.
Just don't do ultra processed foods.
And then that's the key to success.
Because I think that if you think calories,
then you're just gonna say,
I can eat this pizza today
and I'm gonna eat less calories tomorrow.
But I want people to understand like my,
the problem I have with that is it's very difficult for us to quantify or
qualify how the negative effects of that ultra processed food reverberate
throughout our physiology. And that's where calories in calories out fails.
The qualities of calories in can affect calories out.
It can affect your metabolism. It can affect your satiety.
The downstream consequences. We used to see this in the mortality space,
pushing LDL cholesterol down
because it was linked to cardiovascular disease,
but not realizing that it's also,
for lack of better words,
a construction material that's used to build cell walls,
cell membranes, hormones, vitamin D3.
So now if you remove construction material
from the job site,
it doesn't matter how good your contractor is.
They're not gonna assemble anything
without the construction material
and the body is no different.
You know, it has to make cell walls.
It has to make cell membranes.
It has to make hormones.
It makes vitamin D3 from sunlight and cholesterol.
And if you deprive it of those resources, you get other downstream consequences.
And if the study didn't look at those things, then, you know,
you would just draw the conclusion that, well, it's bad
because people with higher cholesterol have these higher rates of cardiovascular disease.
But maybe it's because people with higher cholesterol are having the endothelial damaging things
like the oxidation and what have you that actually leads to the damage that is
calling the cholesterol there.
I agree.
There are studies looking at markers of metabolic syndrome.
There's one from a few years ago and one more recently.
And the studies would suggest that 88% to 93% of the U.S. population have at least one
marker of metabolic dysfunction. So if we have a population in the United States
where 85% plus of people have at least,
they're on the spectrum of insulin resistance,
it's not surprising that LDL might look like it,
quote, causes atherosclerosis.
But there are so many studies now
that generally get ignored by people
in the ApoB causes atherosclerosis camp
that show a discordance between ApoB levels and atherosclerosis. So I think that it's, but,
and again, like it's causal until it's not. Exactly. It's causal. It's causal unless you're
healthy, you know, and maybe some of the behaviors you do that are healthy might actually raise your
ApoB like eating grass fed meat and eating less seed oils. That healthy might actually raise your ApoB, like eating grass-fed meat and eating less seed oils.
That's going to raise your ApoB.
And so this is where I really run into problems here with the ideologies.
I think that unless we really help people and we're very precise about the way we describe
cholesterol and cardiovascular disease risk in terms of a context, people are just going
to be confused.
I can't tell you how often I get DMs saying, I'm eating an animal-based diet.
I'm eating meat and I'm eating organs and I'm eating fruit
and I feel great and I've lost weight and my diabetes is better.
But I went to my doctor and they said my LDL is high and I need a statin.
And it's just like there's no context here.
And you don't have to look much further than the side effects of statins
to understand the benefits in terms you know, in terms of
the signal for potentially increased dementia, potentially increased diabetes. I mean, I can
tell you, cause I worked as a PA. So before I was a doctor, I was a physician assistant in cardiology
and I worked in cardiology. The idea that 3%, like Pfizer says, if people get side effects from
statins is bunk. It's more like 30% from what I've seen in my clinical practice.
And I saw hundreds of patients and a lot of them get side effects from statins. So it's the whole
eight, the cholesterol piece is probably one of the single greatest hurdles for people getting
healthy because we have not described it properly because I think the paradigm is wrong because most,
at least if people are listening to what I'm saying or listening to what you're saying, people are going to eat more
meat and they're going to eat less seed oils. And in 40 to 60% of people that might raise ApoB.
And so there's just, there's so many roadblocks people are putting up for people actually getting
healthier and becoming, you know, more vibrant individuals because we're not thinking about
calories properly. We're not thinking about calories properly.
We're not thinking about ApoB properly.
And these are nuanced, complicated discussions.
So hopefully that helps people understand the context of it.
Yeah, I think it does.
I think it does, man.
And I really appreciate you coming on.
We ran a little bit over the time, but I mean—
I just talk a lot.
No, no, no.
And I'm so interested.
I actually am—I've got 50 other questions that I want to ask, and the audience is probably
really interested.
So you will come back on, right?
Of course.
Okay.
So next time you're in Miami, we're definitely going to run another full podcast.
But for those folks that don't know you and would like to find out more about you or your books or your supplement line, how can they find you?
I'm at paulsaladinomd on every platform.
Okay.
Paul Saladino, MD on every platform. Okay. Paul Saladino, MD on every platform. He has an unbelievable line of products, organ meats and dissected dried organ meats that are in a capsule form if you don't like to eat raw liver.
That's Heart and Soil.
Heart and Soil.
And Lineage is our newest company, and we make grass-fed beef sticks with organs, and we just release an all-in-one protein powder.
He's got one out of testicle called the Whole Package. That's Heart and Soil. Yeah, we don'tfed beef sticks with organs and we just release an all-in-one protein powder out of testicle called the whole package that's a hardened soil yeah we don't make beef sticks
which actually really help you know it's interesting you would think testicle capsules
would be gross you can't taste it and the reviews on that one are amazing we can do a whole other
podcast on organs next time in my kitchen amazing yeah like the um the benefits of organs for humans
are incredible and that's a whole separate podcast,
probably related to like micro RNAs or something,
but they seem uniquely beneficial for humans.
And that's why we built Hardened Soil,
just to make them easy to get.
Yeah, and you've been sending me some great research,
which I've been digging into lately on,
I want the cat out of the bag,
but target specific or organ supplementation
for target specific organ results.
And it's very interesting.
I'm not ready to comment on it yet, but I've been, been reading a lot of what you sent me.
It's very, very eyeopening. So guys, um, I hope you enjoyed this podcast. Follow, um,
Paul Saladino, check him out. Um, look, look for his supplements, heart and soil. And as always,
that's just science.