Under the Influence with Terry O'Reilly - Ask Terry 2023
Episode Date: June 24, 2023It’s our final episode of the season already.And as always, we throw the show open to our listeners.And answer your questions.We’ll explore why jingles have disappeared, how old jingles are being ...used to help Alzheimer’s patients, we’ll talk about Eddie Shack and his Pop Shoppe commercials, why the biggest companies have the dullest ads and we’ll answer that burning question: What ever happened to the “follow the bouncing ball” sing-along commercials. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hi, it's Terry O'Reilly.
As you may know, we've been producing a lot of bonus episodes while under the influences on hiatus.
They're called the Beatleology Interviews, where I talk to people who knew the Beatles, work with them, love them, and the authors who write about them.
Well, the Beatleology Interviews have become a hit, so we are spinning it out to be a standalone podcast series. You've already
heard conversations with people like actors Mark Hamill, Malcolm McDowell, and Beatles confidant
Astrid Kershaw. But coming up, I talk to May Pang, who dated John Lennon in the mid-70s.
I talk to double fantasy guitarist Earl Slick, Apple Records creative director John Kosh.
I'll be talking to Jan Hayworth,
who designed the Sgt. Pepper album cover. Very cool. And I'll talk to singer Dion,
who is one of only five people still alive who were on the Sgt. Pepper cover. And two of those
people were Beatles. The stories they tell are amazing. So thank you for making this series such
a success. And please, do me a favor,
follow the Beatleology
interviews on your podcast app.
You don't even have to be a huge Beatles fan,
you just have to love storytelling.
Subscribe now, and don't
miss a single beat.
This is an apostrophe podcast production.
You're so king in it.
You're so king in it.
You're so king in it.
Your teeth look whiter than no nose You're not you when you're hungry
You're a good hand with all the teeth
You're under the influence with Terry O'Reilly.
Well, it's our last episode of the season already.
And as we do every year, we open the final show up to questions from our amazing listeners.
We received the most questions ever this year.
As a matter of fact, I was handed 15 pages of questions to pour through.
We've tried to squeeze as many as possible into this episode.
And if you don't hear your question, know that we simply ran out of time.
But we've done our best.
We'll explore why jingles have disappeared,
how old jingles are being used to help Alzheimer's patients.
We'll talk about Eddie Shack and his pop shop commercials,
why the biggest companies have the dullest ads,
and we'll answer that burning question,
whatever happened to the Follow the Bouncing Balls sing-along commercials?
You're under the influence.
On Twitter, at OnOneRail asks,
I've always been curious about the arrangers and session musicians involved in commercial soundtracks.
I've noticed some amazing arrangements, very professional.
Are the musicians well-known, a consistent community,
and are they wealthy as a result?
Well, the musicians hired to play the music in
commercials are some of the best in the country. We often had players from symphony orchestras in
our studios, we hired the best jazz players, and we always had the best session players in our
recording sessions. These musicians were the most in-demand players in town. And yes, they get paid
royalties, or what's called residuals, for their work.
The busiest ones can make a lot of money.
And yes, union actors get residuals too.
Non-union actors don't, as a rule.
The Actors' Union, ACTRA,
and the Association of Canadian Advertisers
have been locked in a bitter year-long battle
over residuals recently.
On a similar note, at JD Novel asks this on Twitter.
Why do you think companies have moved away from the jingle? I rarely hear them anymore, but love them or hate them, they really stick in your head. So I'd have thought they'd be a valuable tool. Yep, jingles were a huge part of the advertising landscape going all the way back to the 1930s and 40s.
The purpose of a jingle wasn't so much to persuade someone to choose a product, but instead to remind them to
use a product. There was very little persuasive language in a jingle, but they were created to be
earworms, catchy and sticky. So if you were standing in front of a grocery shelf full of
toothpaste back in the day, for example, this jingle might pop into your mind.
You'll wonder where the yellow went when you brush your teeth with
Pepsodent, Pepsodent,
Pepsodent. And that
little reminder just might make you reach
for Pepsodent. By the
way, you might recognize the first line
of this old jingle. Your teeth look
whiter than new, new, new. Ha ha.
Now you know where that comes from.
There have been many great
jingles over the decades.
But jingles fell completely out of favor in the 1980s.
The emergence of MTV and much music saw to that,
along with the huge sales from the soundtrack to movies like The Big Chill.
Suddenly, songs old and new became very hip in commercials,
and artists started licensing their music catalogs to advertisers for the first time.
Like Marvin Gaye's classic song for California Raisins.
I heard it through the grapevine
Raised in the California sunshine
California Raisins from the California vineyards
Don't you know I heard it through the grapevine?
Sounds great, doesn't it?
A few years before that, you could not have got
I Heard It Through the Grapevine for a commercial.
But the zeitgeist changed,
and artists saw big paychecks being waved in front of their noses.
I remember doing work for Chevrolet when Bob Seger's song
Like a Rock was being used in truck commercials.
I asked the Detroit creative director on Chevrolet
how much they were paying Seger for that song.
He said,
Let me put it this way.
They back a Brinks truck up to his door every year.
But once advertisers started licensing hit songs,
jingles fell out of favor and were considered cheesy and old school.
But you can't argue with their effectiveness.
On the subject of jingles, I read a fascinating article last week.
In Puerto Rico, old advertising jingles are being used to treat Alzheimer patients.
As we all know, music has a remarkable ability to transport us back to a particular time and place in our histories.
They are time stamps in our collective memory.
Music from the past is also known to bring back memories and ease symptoms in middle-stage Alzheimer patients.
The Puerto Rico Alzheimer Association partnered with radio stations there
to search through an 80-year-old jingle archive.
From the archive, they pulled out the most famous jingles,
then compiled personal playlists.
Caregivers could access JingleTherapy.org to generate personalized playlists
just by entering their patient's birth date,
identifying the ones that help them remember, rest, and ease their daily symptoms.
In this case study video, you can see patients listening to old jingles with headphones,
smiling and singing along.
The jingles help patients recall fond memories from their youth.
They stimulated
emotional sensations, and the more the jingle therapy progressed, the greater the results.
In over 600 patients, the effect on cognitive measures was considerable, with significant
improvement in memory, orientation, depression, and anxiety. To date, 12 different health centers in Puerto Rico
have incorporated jingle therapy as part of their daily routine.
On Twitter, Eric Campbell asks,
Why are there way more truck ads during hockey broadcasts than during baseball broadcasts?
To answer this, I reached out to Lauren Richards, one of the top media people in the ad business.
According to research, hockey attracts more potential truck buyers than baseball by a wide margin. The average hockey-viewing adult is 23% more likely than the average Canadian
to be in the market to purchase or lease a truck,
compared to the average baseball viewer,
who is 15% less likely than the average Canadian
to be in the market to lease or purchase a truck.
So, Eric, there you are.
Here's another fun question from Twitter.
At bchafe10 asks,
Would Windex be smart to extend their product line to include windshield washer fluid?
If the new product is sufficiently similar to the main product benefit and won't weaken the main brand's meaning, it could work.
But while being similar, the new product must have a functionally different use than the
main brand.
So, if a coffee maker who manufactures regular coffee extends its line to include flavored
coffees, it could work. And if you use that logic, Windex cleans household windows
so a new variation sold as windshield washer fluid makes complete sense.
Similar, but different enough not to confuse shoppers.
I like the idea. At Terry Pichet asks,
How much did Eddie Shack increase Pop Shop's bottom line with his commercials?
Ah, Eddie Shack, who hailed from my hometown of Sudbury, Ontario, by the way.
Eddie was a character.
He played in the NHL
from 1957 to 1975.
I remember when he got the puck,
he would scream
all the way down the ice.
Too funny.
He was such a colorful personality,
Brian McFarlane,
the Hockey Night in Canada
broadcaster,
even wrote a song about Eddie.
Clear the track, here comes Shaq. He knocks him down and he gives him a whack. and Canada broadcaster, even wrote a song about Eddie.
It hit the charts in February of 1966,
went straight to number one,
and stayed there for two weeks.
Eddie Shack was known as the entertainer,
and Pop Shop wanted to leverage
his big personality.
Pop Shop was started in London, Ontario in 1969.
It pioneered the concept of cash-and-carry pop.
It was number one in selling pop by the case.
In the mid-70s, it hired Eddie to be their spokesman.
Maybe I didn't go far in school,
but there's one thing I've learned from my mom and dad.
Look after the nickels and dimes, and the dollars will look after themselves. Right? Right on! They've
got big bottles, too. Each commercial ended with Eddie making fun of his magnificent proboscis.
And I've got a nose for value. Eventually, Eddie Schack became vice president of marketing
for Pop Shop, and his commercials helped the company grow in leaps and bounds.
According to Pop Shop, the company grew to eventually have
over 500 stores in Canada, the U.S., and Australia,
and offered 26 flavors in refillable bottles.
Then came the cola wars between Pepsi and Coke
in the 1980s,
followed by the emergence
of private label soft drinks
in grocery stores.
It would signal the end
of Pop Shop in 1983.
But Pop Shop Pop
started showing up again
in 2004,
and you can still find it
in quite a few grocery stores.
And someone wants to know why politicians can air such negative commercials about their opponents.
On Facebook, Colin Boehner asks,
How do U.S. politicians get away with being so critical of their opponents in their television ads,
as well as other campaign advertisements?
Seems bluntly brutal in some circumstances.
Well, Colin, there is a simple reason for this.
In political advertising, there are really no rules and no regulations.
Unlike other categories like food, alcohol, or pharmaceutical advertising, there are no parameters.
Other than that, the one stipulation for U.S. candidates running for federal office
is that they must claim responsibility
for ads they have paid for.
I'm Ted Budd, and I approve this message.
I approve this message
is a Federal Election Commission provision
that requires candidates to
stand by your ad.
It must come at the end of the commercial,
it must be on screen for four seconds,
and it must be readable.
The hope was that by claiming responsibility for a message,
it would tone down the negativity in political ads.
But, as we all know, that didn't work.
Kent Onofrechuk has an interesting question.
How has the line of what is acceptable and not acceptable in marketing shifted over generations?
Is that line a good dance partner for an advertiser to play with?
Well, Kent, so much has shifted over the generations in the ad biz.
In some ways, it's gotten looser,
and in other ways, it's become much more conservative.
Back in the day, before the year 2000, let's say,
advertisers had to watch their P's and Q's.
While you could be somewhat suggestive,
the language had to be absolutely clean.
However, when it came to beer advertising,
scantily clad women populated most commercials.
I never wanted to do that kind of advertising
and always presented humor with no bikinis.
But beer clients back in the 80s would just point to research.
When beer drinkers were asked if they'd like to see
more bikini-free humor in commercials,
or more bikinis, they always voted for bikinis.
So, I was shown the door.
While I did manage to do some funny commercials for some beer brands, bikini-free,
I realized I wasn't the right guy for that category.
Now, today, a commercial filled with bikinis would be highly inappropriate.
Yet, what is deemed acceptable language
has gotten looser.
Take this ad for Kmart.
You hear that? I can ship my pants for free.
Wow, I just may ship my pants.
Yeah, ship your pants.
Billy, you can ship your pants, too.
I can't wait to ship my pants, Dad.
I just shipped my pants, and it's very my pants, Dad. I just shipped my pants and it's very convenient.
Very convenient.
I just shipped my drawers.
I just shipped my nightie.
I just shipped my bed.
If you can't find what you're looking for in store,
we'll find it at Kmart.com right now and ship it to you for free.
I don't think I could have gotten away with that commercial in the 1980s.
Another thing that has changed is in the automobile category.
When I was working on car commercials back in the day,
you could not show a car speeding, squealing, or skidding.
It was strictly forbidden.
If we tried that, the commercials would never have cleared the regulators,
and TV stations would have refused to run them.
But today, I see
that kind of aggressive driving in commercials
all the time. So,
somewhere along the line, that rule
has been loosened.
Is playing close
to the bleeding edge a good dance partner
for brands? Well,
it can be. If the commercials
are smart and daring and bold, but know how to
touch the line without blasting through it, I think that can definitely work. When you see
commercials that are boring and annoying, that is an advertiser who is afraid of being bold.
But when I see a bold ad that is smart, or even a bold ad that almost works but doesn't quite get there, I applaud that advertiser.
At least they're trying to do something different.
Speaking of beer, Neil McPherson remembered a beer campaign I once worked on.
Neil says,
Years ago you devoted an episode to a New England beer for which you did a campaign.
The signature whistle from the ad became popular and bar patrons would order it just by whistling the three notes.
What was the name of the beer and is it still around?
Good memory, Neil.
We were approached by a small micro
brewery in the state of Maine.
They wanted an unusual advertising
idea to launch a new beer called
Sparhawk Golden Ale.
Here was the key
feature. The beer was made for
the residents of Maine, not
the tourists.
So our task was to advertise to Mainers without the tourists hearing the campaign.
On radio.
Just a bit tricky.
But we figured out a solution.
Before the tourists arrived, we ran commercials telling the people of Maine that Sparhawk
was a new, refreshing beer that was made for them, not the tourists.
Then we said, from this point on, you will never hear a commercial for Sparhawk.
Instead, you will hear this code sound.
When you hear that whistle, it means we've brewed a new batch of Sparhawk.
Come and get it.
Well, the client was understandably nervous,
as the bulk of his campaign didn't even mention his beer by name.
But we had a hunch the people of Maine would get it and play along.
And boy, did they ever.
People began ordering the beer at bars by just whistling those three notes.
It was so successful,
a May newspaper dedicated an entire full-page article to Sparhawk,
just before the tourist season began, thankfully.
The beer became so popular,
it was eventually bought out by a bigger brewery.
But when I googled Sparhawk for this show,
it sadly appears the beer is no longer available.
What a shame. But what a great client we had.
On Facebook, Sarah R.
Davis Lim says,
Some of the biggest companies
have the dullest ads.
Is it just being complacent?
Death by committee?
Fear of alienating some segment of the customers by having a strong personality?
Well, excellent question, Sarah.
While there are probably many answers to that question,
the overriding one, in my opinion,
is that the bigger the company, the thicker the
bureaucracy. It is death by committee. A lot of middle managers in marketing departments run
scared. They have the power to say no, but no power to say yes. And everybody wants to put
their fingerprints on an idea. So a good idea can die from a thousand paper cuts.
A long time ago, a CEO complained he wasn't getting enough good thinking from his advertising
agency. The creative director had a great response. He said, even though we have a four-inch flow at
our end, only a two-inch stream gets pumped to you. In other words, the marketing manager between
the CEO and the advertising agency was not good. The marketing department at many companies is a
catch-all place. When people want a promotion and companies don't know where to put them,
they often drop them into marketing.
And they often have zero advertising instincts.
I can't tell you how many times I saw that happen.
That is a huge reason why there is so much bad advertising.
Sorry, I calls them like I sees them.
Douglas McTaggart has this to say.
My question is,
what is the origin of the bouncing ball sing-along commercial?
The bouncing ball seems to have fallen flat since the 70s,
kicked to the marketing curb, and in a fadeaway lost to time.
Its demise is a mystery for inquiring minds.
Douglas also sent along this old Libby's Beans commercial
that has a song and a bouncing ball so people could sing along at home.
Sing along with Libby.
What makes you taste what's tingle all the way?
Libby's Beans, the deep brown flavored way.
The sauce is perfect to each and every beat.
Just eat them and you'll see what we mean.
Getting people to sing along with a jingle
was a great way of embedding it in their minds.
Follow the Bouncing Ball has a very interesting history.
It was first used in short films.
The Bouncing Ball was created by the Fleischer Brothers way back in the 1920s.
They founded a pioneering animation studio,
probably most famous for their Betty Boop character.
The brothers released a series of sing-along films. During the 1920s, before sound, films
were often accompanied by an organist or an orchestra and the music was performed live.
When the projectionist was changing reels, or before and after the main feature, lyrics were shown
on the screens and audiences sang along.
The Fleischer brothers pioneered a way to film sing-alongs in those early days of motion
pictures.
They printed white song lyrics on a black drum that was slowly turned by hand, and one
Fleischer brother would don a black
glove and hold a black stick with a white ball on the end. He would physically bounce the ball
over the appropriate lyrics, solving the previous problem of imperfect synchronization.
Those sing-alongs were the first audience participation films. They were very popular during the war, as community singing helped bolster morale.
In those early days, animated characters were filmed singing, and a bouncing ball would
invite the audience to sing along.
Keep your eye on the little bouncing balls. Each little string will make you
sing if you follow
the tune
of the silvery
moon.
Later, famous singers
like Ethel Merman would invite the public
to sing along with her.
Come sing along with me
to the melody.
It's so easy to recall.
And while your voices ring,
won't you keep following the little bouncing ball?
Come on, everybody, and join me.
I'm on my path.
It didn't take long for Madison Avenue to spot a good thing when they saw it.
So the bouncing ball was added to theatrical commercials,
like this one for the 1931 Oldsmobile.
Many people thought the automobile would never replace the horse,
but it certainly took the place of the parlor sofa on a Sunday afternoon.
Those old cars looked funny, but they struggled along in spite of the horse laughs.
Let's all sing about the old Olds that's still rolling right along.
Now follow the ball.
Young Johnny Steel has an Oldsmobile.
He loves a dear little girl. years later in the mid 1950s
the bouncing ball sing-alongs were sold to the new medium of television
now people could sit in the comfort of their homes and sing along
over time more and more commercials were created
using the Fleischer Brothers bouncing ball
just like the Libby's Beans commercial
Douglas referenced in his question.
But like the jingle,
the bouncing ball eventually fell out of favor
sometime in the late 70s
when musical tastes started to change.
But in its day,
it was a very effective technique
to embed a catchy song in someone's mind
and attach that sticky song to a
brand. Thanks for all the great questions and thank you to our listeners for all the wonderful
support you give our show. We truly appreciate it.
Some of the questions
you send in
are actually great episode ideas,
so keep your ears peeled
next season.
This is the end
of our 12th season
of Under the Influence
and our 18th on CBC.
I'd like to take a moment now
to thank our amazing
Under the Influence team
who work their hearts out
for you every week.
Our incredible producer who manages everything that happens
in the Terrastream mobile recording studio
is the wonderful Debbie O'Reilly.
The man who makes us sound good every week
is our chief sound engineer, Jeff Devine.
Those two wandering minstrels of our theme song
are composers Ari Posner
and Ian Lefevre.
It would be impossible
to do this show
without our incredibly
resourceful researchers.
They are
Allison Pinches,
Abby Forsyth,
Patrick James Aslan,
and Terry O'Sullivan.
Our groovy graphic designer
is Callie Rae O'Reilly.
The lady who tells you that you're under the influence every
week is Angela Bottas.
The lady who suggests you take a dive
into our archives every week is
Sydney O'Reilly.
At Sturdy Hugh asked,
who is the voice actor who does our fun fact
segment at the end of our shows?
Hugh says his voice sounds so
familiar. Well, Sturdy Hugh, our wonderful fun Hugh says his voice sounds so familiar. Well, sturdy
Hugh. Our wonderful fun
fact man is Frank LaPrey.
Frank is one of the top voiceover
actors in the ad biz.
That's why he's so familiar.
Thanks also to our
podcast partner, Acast,
for all their support.
And last but not least,
thank you to the good folks at CBC for all their support over the years but not least, thank you to the good folks at CBC
for all their support over the years.
We will be airing some archived
Age of Persuasion episodes over the summer,
so stay tuned.
Be safe.
We'll see you in January.
I'm Terry O'Reilly.
Fun fact.
Terry O'Reilly and I grew up together
in Sudbury, Ontario.
It was fun.
And that's a fact.